russo bielefed dec11
DESCRIPTION
TRANSCRIPT
Causes and probabilitiesfor health
Federica Russo
Center Leo Apostel, Free University BrusselsCenter for Reasoning, University of Kent
2
Overview
Medical humanities and philosophy of science
Causes for health
Probabilities for health
For whom? For what?
3
PHIL SCI PERSPECTIVEON MEDICINE
Medical Humanities
4
The ‘human’ study of medicine
Medicine, experimental medicine, and the biological understanding of wellness and disease
Medical humanities bring ‘Man’ into medicineAnthropological, psychological, sociological,
philosophical understanding of wellness and disease
5
Phil med moves beyond ethics
Traditional phil med is about ethics
Fresh philosophical look at medicine:How do we know: epistemology and methodology
of medical researchWhat it is: metaphysics of the ‘objects’ of medicine
6
TYPICAL QUESTIONS IN PHIL MEDMedical Humanities
7
Ethics questions, e.g.:
Is it ethical to conduct research on stem cells?
Should we accept euthanasia?
Is it ethical to deliver web-based diagnoses online to patients?
…
8
Phil Sci questions, e.g.:
What notion of cause is applicable to biomedical contexts?
How to interpret probability in biomedical contexts?
What procedures grant extrapolation from animal models to humans?
…
9
EXAMPLESMedical Humanities
10
Do electromagnetic fields cause brain tumour?
John lived 40 years close to an antenna tower. Did this cause him cancer?
How much is the risk of developing CHD lowered if I quit smoking?
Did the campaign in schools lower smoking rates?
11
GENERIC AND SINGLE CASECauses for Health
12
Medical knowledge and Personalised medicine
Medical knowledge: Generic causal relations
Are in principle repeatable
Are supposed to hold of the majority of the population
Epidemiological studies plus lab results
Personalised medicine: Single Case causal relations
Are tailored to the individual patient
Make use of specific, unique information about the patient
13
LEVELS OF CAUSATIONCauses for Health
14
A chicken-egg question?
No primacy of either level
Mutual need of both levels
An iterative process
15
GENERIC AND SINGLE CASEProbabilities for Health
16
Different levels of causation, different interpretations of probability
GenericHeavy smokers have 10 times more chances
to develop lung cancer
Frequency of occurrence of disease in a given population
Single CaseJohn’s chances of recovery after operation are 80%
Degree of belief in occurrence of a specific event
17
CAUSES AS DIFFERENCE-MAKERSCauses for Health
18
What causes are, what causes do
A virus causes infection
Penicillin cures infection
Socio-economic status influences access to healthcare
Smoking restricts blood vessels
Different ‘things’ can be causes
What they all do is to make a difference
to a condition of health or of disease
19
VARIATIONAL EPISTEMOLOGY AND METHODOLOGY
Causes for Health
20
Look at variations in order to …
Find out causes of disease
Find out causes of recovery
Find out regulatory mechanisms
Comparisons between groups
Exposed / unexposed; healthy / ill
What makes conditions vary across groups / individuals
21
ODDS AND RISKSProbabilities for Health
Risks, Odds and Probabilities:Easy to compute
Risks and odds compare proportions in groups
Factor Disease
Yes No
Exposed n11
p11
n12
p12
Unexposed n21
p21
n22
p22
exp
exp
/
/
/
/
;
un
n n n pRR
n n n p
Odds n nOR
Odds n n
Odds PP Odds
Odds P
11 11 12 11
21 21 22 21
11 12
21 22
1 1
Risks, Odds, and Probabilities ‘explained’
… a RR equal to 2.0 means that an unexposed person is twice as likely to have and adverse outcome as one who is not exposed …
(Sistrom & Garvan 2004)
… odds and probabilities are different ways of expressing the chance that an outcome may occur…
(Sistrom & Garvan 2004)
… the probability that a child with eczema will also have fever is estimated by the proportion 141/561 (25.1%) …
(Bland & Altman 2000)
24
Risks, Odds, and Probabilities explained
‘unexposed person’, ‘child’ are statistical individualsindividuals randomly sampled from the population
Odds and risks compare proportions in groupsThey have a generic interpretation
The corresponding probabilities are generic too
They are not directly applicable to the single-caseTo be applicable they need to be constrained by further single
case knowledge
25
FOR WHOM? LAYMEN
What do laymen understand:
Out of doctor’s explanation?
In self, web-based diagnoses?
In 123&me genetic mapping?
In Wiki Medicare?
26
FOR WHOM? MEDICAL PRACTITIONERS
How can a better
understanding
of phil med issues
improve medical practitioners’
explanations?
27
FIGHT STATISTICAL HEGEMONYFor What?
28
Evidence-based people claim they can get ‘medical causes’ out of statisticsNot so sure, though
A point about philosophy of science
What information is conveyed by statisticsA point about communication of science
29
RECONCILE WESTERN ANDNON-WESTERN HEALINGS
For What?
30
Compare, set up a dialogue
What can Western medicine learn from other ways of healing? And vice-versa.
Salvage expert knowledge in the era of evidence.After ethno-biology, ethno-medicine?
31
To sum up
A gentle introduction to phil med for non-philosophers (Hopefully!) Medical humanities, phil sci in medicine
Causes and probabilities for healthFor populations, for individualsMedical knowledge, diagnosis
Whom is this philosophy good for? (Hopefully!)Laymen, medical practitioners