Quantum Kibble-Zurek mechanism and critical dynamics on a programmableRydberg simulator

Alexander Keesling,1 Ahmed Omran,1 Harry Levine,1 Hannes Bernien,1 Hannes Pichler,1, 2

Soonwon Choi,1 Rhine Samajdar,1 Sylvain Schwartz,3 Pietro Silvi,4 Subir Sachdev,1

Peter Zoller,4 Manuel Endres,5 Markus Greiner,1 Vladan Vuletic,6 and Mikhail D. Lukin1

1Department of Physics, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA2ITAMP, Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA

3Laboratoire Kastler Brossel, ENS, CNRS, Sorbonne Universite, College de France, Paris, France4Institute for Quantum Optics and Quantum Information, Austrian Academy of Sciences

& Center for Quantum Physics, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck A-6020, Austria5Division of Physics, Mathematics and Astronomy, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA

6Department of Physics and Research Laboratory of Electronics,Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA

Quantum phase transitions (QPTs) involvetransformations between different states of mat-ter that are driven by quantum fluctuations [1].These fluctuations play a dominant role in thequantum critical region surrounding the tran-sition point, where the dynamics are governedby the universal properties associated with theQPT. While time-dependent phenomena associ-ated with classical, thermally driven phase tran-sitions have been extensively studied in systemsranging from the early universe to Bose Ein-stein Condensates [2–5], understanding criticalreal-time dynamics in isolated, non-equilibriumquantum systems is an outstanding challenge [6].Here, we use a Rydberg atom quantum simu-lator with programmable interactions to studythe quantum critical dynamics associated withseveral distinct QPTs. By studying the growthof spatial correlations while crossing the QPT,we experimentally verify the quantum Kibble-Zurek mechanism (QKZM) [7–9] for an Ising-typeQPT, explore scaling universality, and observecorrections beyond QKZM predictions. This ap-proach is subsequently used to measure the crit-ical exponents associated with chiral clock mod-els [10, 11], providing new insights into exotic sys-tems that have not been understood previously,and opening the door for precision studies of crit-ical phenomena, simulations of lattice gauge the-ories [12, 13] and applications to quantum opti-mization [14, 15].

The celebrated Kibble-Zurek mechanism [2, 3] de-scribes nonequilibrium dynamics and the formation oftopological defects in a second-order phase transitiondriven by thermal fluctuations, and has been experimen-tally verified in a wide variety of physical systems [4, 5].Recently, the concepts underlying the Kibble-Zurek de-scription have been extended to the quantum regime [7–9]. Here, the typical size of the correlated regions, ξ, aftera dynamical sweep across the QPT scales as a power-law

Critical point gcControl parameter g

Cor

rela

tion

leng

th »

Phase 1 Phase 2

»» jg¡ gcj¡º

Tim

e

¿ » jg¡ gcj¡zºFast rampSlow ramp

0 1 2 3 4 5Detuning ¢=

1

2

3

4

Inte

ract

ion

rang

e R

B=a

²±²±²±²±²±²±²

²±±²±±²±±²±±²

²±±±²±±±²±±±²

ℤ2

ℤ3

ℤ4

t

¢

-0.05

0

0.05

-0.1

0

0.1

Den

sity

-den

sity

cor

rela

tor G

(r)

0 4 8 12 16 20Distance r (sites)

-0.2-0.1

00.1

a

b

c d

Ω

Ω

FIG. 1: Quantum Kibble-Zurek mechanism (QKZM)and phase diagram. a, Illustration of the QKZM. Asthe control parameter approaches its critical value, the re-sponse time, τ , given by the inverse energy gap of the sys-tem, diverges. When the temporal distance to the criticalpoint becomes equal to the response time, as marked by redcrosses, the correlation length, b, stops growing due to nona-diabatic excitations. c, Numerically calculated ground-statephase diagram. Circles (diamonds) denote numerically ob-tained points along the phase boundaries calculated using(infinite-size) Density-Matrix Renormalization Group tech-niques (Methods). The shaded regions are a guide to the eye.Dashed lines show the experimental trajectories across thephase transitions determined by the pulse diagram shown asan inset. d, Measured (circles) density-density Rydberg cor-relations with fits to the expected ordered pattern (solid lines)consistent with Z4- (orange), Z3- (purple) and Z2-ordered(green) states. Error bars denote the standard error of themean (s.e.m.) and are smaller than the marker size.

of the sweep rate, s, with an exponent, µ, determinedentirely by the QPT’s universality class. Specifically,QKZM postulates that when the time scale over whichthe Hamiltonian changes becomes faster than the char-acteristic response time, τ , determined by the inverse ofthe energy gap between the ground and excited states,nonadiabatic excitations prevent the continued growth ofcorrelated regions (Figs. 1a,b). The resulting scaling ex-ponent, µ = ν/(1 + νz), is determined by a combinationof the critical exponent ν, that characterizes the diver-gent correlation length, and the dynamical critical ex-ponent z, that characterizes the relative scaling of space

arX

iv:1

809.

0554

0v2

[qu

ant-

ph]

1 A

pr 2

019

2

0 5Final detuning ¢f (MHz)

0

1

2

3

4

5

Cor

r. le

ngth

» (s

ites) 2.5 MHz/¹s

5 MHz/¹s10 MHz/¹s20 MHz/¹s40 MHz/¹s

0.10.07 0.2 0.3Inverse detuning sweep rate s¡1 (¹s/MHz)

2

3

4

» f (s

ites)

MPSExperiment¹= 0.50(3)

a

b c

FIG. 2: Quantum Kibble-Zurek mechanism for a quantum phase transition (QPT) into the Z2-ordered phase.a, Single-shot images of the atom array before and after a fast (orange arrow) and a slow (blue arrow) sweep across the phasetransition, showing larger average sizes of correlated domains for the slower sweep. Green spots (open circles) represent atomsin |g〉 (|r〉). Blue rectangles mark the position of domain walls, and the red and gray colored regions above highlight the extentof the correlated domains. b, Correlation length growth and saturation as the system crosses the QPT at different rates. Thegray dashed line indicates the critical detuning. c, Dependence of correlation length on inverse sweep rate across the phasetransition with experimentally measured (green) and matrix product state-simulated results (red). The length is extractedfrom fitting the modulus of the correlation data to an exponential decay. Error bars denote fit uncertainty. The dashed lineindicates a power-law fit with a scaling exponent µ = 0.50(3) for the experiment.

and time close to the critical point [1]. While QKZM hasmany important implications, e.g. in quantum informa-tion science [14], its experimental verification is challeng-ing due to the coupling of many-body systems to the en-vironment [15]. Recently, experimental control over iso-lated quantum systems enabled the observation of scalingbehavior across quantum phase transitions described bymean-field theories [16, 17]. While important aspects ofQPTs have already been explored in strongly correlatedsystems [18], experimental observation of quantum criti-cal phenomena beyond mean-field in real-time dynamicsremains an outstanding challenge [15, 19, 20].

We probe quantum criticality using a reconfigurable1D array of 87Rb atoms with programmable interac-tions [21]. In our system, 51 atoms in the electronicground state |g〉, evenly separated by a controllable dis-tance, are homogeneously coupled to the excited Rydbergstate |r〉, in which they experience van der Waals interac-tions with a strength that decays as V (r) ∝ 1/r6, wherer is the interatomic distance. This system is describedby the many-body Hamiltonian,

H~

=Ω

2

∑i

(|gi〉 〈ri|+ |ri〉 〈gi|)−∆∑i

ni +∑i<j

Vijninj ,

(1)where ni = |ri〉 〈ri| is the projector onto the Rydbergstate at site i, ∆ and Ω are the detuning and Rabi fre-quency of the coherent laser coupling between |g〉 and|r〉, and Vij is the interaction strength between atoms inthe Rydberg state at sites i and j. For negative values of∆, the many-body ground state corresponds to a state inwhich all atoms are in the electronic ground state |g〉, up

to quantum fluctuations, and belongs to a so-called “dis-ordered” phase with no broken spatial symmetry. For∆ > 0, several spatially ordered phases arise from thecompetition between the detuning term, which favors alarge Rydberg fraction, and the Rydberg blockade, whichprohibits simultaneous excitation of atoms separated bya distance smaller than the blockade radius, RB , definedvia V (RB) ≡ Ω. As illustrated in Fig. 1c,d, we probedifferent QPTs into states breaking various symmetriesby choosing the interatomic spacing, and sweeping thecontrol parameter, ∆, across the phase boundary.

We first focus on the QPT into the antiferromagneticphase with broken Z2 symmetry, which is known to be-long to the Ising universality class [1]. Using an inter-atomic spacing, a, such that RB/a ∼ 1.69, we createan array of 51 atoms in the electronic ground state, andslowly turn on Ω at ∆ < 0, adiabatically preparing thesystem in the ground state of the disordered phase. Thedetuning is then increased at a constant rate, s, up toa final value ∆f , at which point Ω is slowly turned off(see inset of Fig. 1c), and the state of every atom is mea-sured. We examine the dynamical development of corre-lations between the atoms, characterized by the Rydbergdensity-density correlation function:

G(r) =∑i

(〈nini+r〉 − 〈ni〉〈ni+r〉)/Nr, (2)

where the normalization Nr is the number of pairs ofsites separated by distance r. By fitting an exponen-tial decay to the modulus of the correlation function, weextract the correlation length. The experimental results

3

0.4 0.85 1.3 1.75Ramp speed s (MHz/¹s)

2 6 10 14 18

-0.3

0

0.3

0.6

Nor

mal

ized

cor

rela

tor G

(r)

5 9 13

0

0.1

0.2

0.3(¡1)rG((s=s0)

¹r)

2 6 10 14 18Rescaled distance (s=s0)

¹r

-0.3

0

0.3

0.6

5 9 13

0

0.1

0.2

0.3(¡1)rG((s=s0)

¹r)

2 8 14 20

a b

c d

FIG. 3: Universality of spatial correlations. Collapse of the measured (a) and numerically calculated (c) correlations inthe Z2-ordered phase with distances rescaled according to the extracted scaling exponents. The blue line connects the pointsof the correlation function corresponding to the slowest sweep rate. The insets show the staggered rescaled correlations. Thenegative values of the correlation function indicate nontrivial correlations between domain walls. Collapse of the measured (b)and numerically calculated (d) correlations in the Z3-ordered phase highlighting the energetic difference of the different typesof defects, as shown by the distinguishability of the two negative branches, i.e., a deviation from a period-3 density wave. Allerror bars indicate the s.e.m.

show growth of the correlation length as the detuning ap-proaches the critical point, followed by saturation oncethe detuning is swept past the critical point into theordered phase (Fig. 2b). From the individual images,it is apparent that, while for fast sweeps the ordereddomains are frequently interrupted by defects (domainwalls), for slow ramps, significantly longer domains areobserved (Fig. 2a). A systematic analysis of the finalcorrelation lengths after crossing into the ordered phaseshows that a power-law scaling model ξ(s) = ξ0(s0/s)

µ

with µ = 0.50(3) accurately describes our measurements(Fig. 2c). These results are consistent with numericalsimulations (red points) of the coherent evolution of thesystem using Matrix Product States (MPS).

The QPT into the Z2-ordered phase is in the Ising uni-versality class [1], with critical exponents in 1D of z = 1,ν = 1, and consequently, µIsing = 0.5. Our observationsare consistent with these quantitative predictions, andare quite distinct from those associated with a mean-fieldIsing transition, described by z = 1, ν = 1/2, and yieldingµmf = 1/3 [1, 16]. These results offer the first experimen-tal verification of the quantum Kibble-Zurek mechanismin an isolated quantum system that defies a mean-fielddescription.

A key concept associated with critical phenomena isthat of universality, which is manifested by the collapse

of correlations to a universal form when rescaled accord-ing to the corresponding critical exponents [1]. Such asignature is a strong test of an underlying universal scal-ing law, and in connection with the QKZM, should ap-pear upon rescaling lengths by (s/s0)µ [25]. Fig. 3a showsthat the rescaled correlations for RB/a ∼ 1.81 indeed col-lapse onto two smooth branches, which in turn collapseon top of each other when the correlations are rectifiedas (−1)rG(r) (inset in Fig. 3a), according to the Z2 orderparameter.

While the quantum Kibble-Zurek mechanism is acoarse-grained description predicting the mean densityof defects, the shape of the correlation function gives fur-ther access to microscopic details of the system. Detailedinspection of the rescaled correlation functions revealsnontrivial deviations from a simple exponential decay.In particular, the correlations in Fig. 3a become negativefor a range of distances, which implies complex dynam-ics in the formation and spreading of defects. The ob-served corrections to simple QKZM predictions are con-sistent with recent theoretical analyses [25, 26] and are ingood agreement with numerical simulations using MPS(Fig. 3c). Finally, applying the universal rescaling to thecorrelation growth shown in Fig. 2b allows us to inde-pendently estimate the values of critical exponents (Ex-tended Data Fig. 7), showing that our results are consis-

4

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

Dom

ain

pro

bab

ility ℤ2 ℤ3 ℤ4

ℤ2

ℤ3

ℤ4

1.5 2 2.5 3Interaction range RB=a

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

¹=º=(1+zº)

1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5

a

b

c

FIG. 4: Power-law scaling for different interactions. a, Experimental realization of the chiral clock model [22]. Thetop row shows a single fluorescence image of a state in the Z3-symmetry broken phase (RB/a ∼ 2.16), with four Z2-typedefects displacing the Rydberg atoms in one direction (counter-clockwise chirality). The bottom rows display a system withstronger interactions (RB/a ∼ 2.43), where Z4-type defects are favored, and the Rydberg atoms are displaced in the oppositedirection (clockwise chirality). The colored regions highlight the extent of the correlated domains, labeled by clock orientationsin connection to the chiral clock model. b, Fraction of the final state consistent with the different ZN -ordered states observed inthe experiment (left, circles) and in numerical simulations (right, diamonds). Within the Z3-ordered region, the most dominanttype of defect changes from Z2- to Z4-type as the interaction range increases. The higher contrast in the calculated domainprobabilities in Fig. 4b is due to finite detection fidelity, which does not affect the extracted value of µ. c, Scaling exponent, µ,as a function of RB/a obtained from experimental data (left, circles), and matrix product state simulations (right, diamonds).Pale blue points indicate instances where the measured correlation lengths do not grow beyond the size of RB/a. Shaded areasindicate the regions consistent with Z2- (green), Z3- (purple), and Z4-ordered (orange) phases. The solid green line correspondsto µIsing, the purple dashed lines represent the upper [22], and lower [23] bounds of µCCM, while the purple dotted line is thevalue of µCCM obtained from the best numerical estimates of z [22] and ν [24]. Error bars represent the 68% confidence interval(b), and uncertainty of the power-law fit (c), which is dominated by systematic effects in the extraction of individual correlationlengths.

tent with z = ν = 1 associated with the Ising QPT.

Having established the validity of the QKZM, as wellas its limitations, for a QPT in the Ising universalityclass, we now explore transitions into more complex ZN -ordered phases, where Rydberg excitations are evenlyseparated by N > 2 sites (see Fig. 1c). The correla-tion functions at smaller interatomic spacings after slowdetuning sweeps reflect the spatial ordering of the Z3-and Z4-ordered phases (Fig. 1d). In addition, we de-termine the probability of finding two Rydberg excita-tions separated by N -sites, for each value of N and RB(Fig. 4b). Combining these measurements with the nu-merically obtained critical points (see Fig. 1c), we experi-mentally identify approximate boundaries for the regionsconsistent with the Z2-, Z3-, and Z4-ordered phases inFig. 4b. Within these regions, the dominant type of or-der is the one associated with the corresponding phase,while the second most prevalent type of order arises from

the lowest-energy (most probable) defects. In particular,we observe that in the Z3-ordered phase, the most-likelydefect changes from Z2-like for smaller values of RB/a,to Z4-like as RB/a increases.

We test for a power-law scaling behavior of the correla-tion length growth as a function of ramp speed at differ-ent interaction strengths in Fig. 4c. To consistently com-pare the results for all interaction strengths, we fit thecorrelation function to an exponentially decaying densitywave with a period set by the underlying order (as op-posed to the modulus of the correlation function usedin Fig. 2c). The scaling is extracted through a power-law fit to the resulting correlation lengths. In parameterregimes far away from regions of competing order, weobserve three stable plateaus for the regions consistentwith Z2, Z3, and Z4 order, respectively. For interactionstrengths where there is a strong competition betweendifferent types of order, we do not observe the formation

5

of long-range correlations (pale points in Fig. 4c). Inthese cases, the detuning sweeps either do not fully crossthe phase boundary into the ordered phases (Methods) orpotentially enter theoretically predicted incommensuratephases [11, 27].

To understand these observations, we compare them tofinite-size scaling analyses of ground-state properties [22–24], as well as MPS-based numerical simulations of ourexperimental protocol for the full Hamiltonian (1). Forthe transitions into the Z2-ordered phase, some of the ex-tracted values of µ are slightly larger than the expectedexponent from the Ising model µIsing = 0.5. We attributethese deviations, to a combination of the long-ranged in-teractions, finite-size and/or time effects, and systematiceffects related to the inversion of the alternating pattern(Fig. 3a,c, see also Methods).

Quantum phase transitions associated with the break-ing of a Z3 symmetry are more complex due to compe-tition between the different types of defects that can beformed. In our system, the defects correspond to two dif-ferent types of domain walls, where the distance betweenneighboring Rydberg excitations is 2 sites and 4 sites (seeFig. 4a). For the experimentally accessible parameterregimes, the different associated excitation energies lead,in general, to an asymmetry between these defects (seealso Fig. 4b). Correspondingly, the Z3-symmetry break-ing is believed to be in the universality class of the 3-statechiral clock model (CCM) (Fig. 4a, Methods, and [22]).

The exact nature of such phase transitions has been asubject of intense theoretical research for the past threedecades [10, 11, 22–24, 28]. Only very recently, numericalstudies of equilibrium scaling properties [22–24] providedevidence for a direct transition [24] along some pathsacross the phase boundary, where the expected rangeof values of the scaling exponent is µ < 0.45 [22], andµ > 0.25 [23]. Our experimental results are consistentwith a direct CCM phase transition over a range of in-teraction strengths with µ ∼ 0.38, in agreement withthe theoretical value obtained by combining the resultsof the most extensive numerical finite-size scaling studies[22, 24] (dashed line in Fig. 4c). Further evidence fora direct chiral QPT is provided by the universal scalingbehavior into the Z3-ordered phase (see Fig. 3b,d).

The transition into the Z4-ordered phase is even moreinvolved. At present, complete understanding of thistransition is lacking, in particular due to the poten-tial presence of an intermediate gapless incommensu-rate phase [11, 28]. Our experimental results in thisregion are reasonably consistent with power-law scal-ing with µ ∼ 0.25. While recent theoretical workshows that QKZM scaling may still hold on quenchingthrough a gapless phase, albeit with a modified (system-specific) power-law exponent [29], detailed theoretical un-derstanding of our experimentally observed exponents inthe Z4 regime requires further studies.

Detailed comparison of our experimental results across

all phases to the numerical simulation of the Hamilto-nian dynamics using MPS are presented in Figure 4.While qualitatively similar, they display clear discrep-ancies. Most significant is a systematic offset in the ex-tracted values of µ between experiment, finite-size scalinganalysis and time-dependent MPS simulations. Whileit can be potentially attributed to experimental imper-fections and subtle differences between the experimen-tal system and the model used for the numerical sim-ulations (see Methods), the disagre.ement of MPS withboth experimental results and finite-size scaling analysesof equilibrium properties highlights the difficulty in ap-proximately modeling complex nonequilibrium dynamicsof many-body systems.

Our observations demonstrate a novel approach forprobing quantum critical phenomena and provide newinsights into the physics of exotic QPTs that do not lendthemselves to simple theoretical analyses. Increasing thesystem size, improving atomic coherence properties, andexploring wider parameter regimes may allow for moreprecise probing of exotic QPTs into both ordered andincommensurate phases [11, 22, 24, 27] in various mod-els. In particular, the present approach is well suited forsimulations of lattice gauge theories [13]. Whereas thesystem studied here is formally equivalent to a quantumlink model on a ladder [30], two- and three-dimensionalsystems, realized using novel trapping techniques [31, 32],can be used to simulate a wide variety of non-triviallattice gauge models [12]. Finally, the methods demon-strated in this work can be used to effectively encode andexplore solutions to computationally difficult combinato-rial optimization problems such as finding the MaximumIndependent Set [33]. Detailed understanding of quan-tum dynamics in such systems might have direct appli-cations for exploring quantum speedup in both adiabaticand dynamical quantum optimization algorithms [14].

[1] Sachdev, S. Quantum Phase Transitions (CambridgeUniversity Press, 2009), 2nd edn.

[2] Kibble, T. W. B. Topology of cosmic domains andstrings. J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 9, 1387 (1976).

[3] Zurek, W. H. Cosmological experiments in superfluid he-lium? Nature 317, 505 (1985).

[4] del Campo, A. & Zurek, W. H. Universality of phasetransition dynamics: Topological defects from symmetrybreaking. International Journal of Modern Physics A 29,1430018 (2014).

[5] Navon, N., Gaunt, A. L., Smith, R. P. & Hadzibabic, Z.Critical dynamics of spontaneous symmetry breaking ina homogenous Bose gas. Science 347, 167 (2015).

[6] Polkovnikov, A., Sengupta, K., Silva, A. & Vengalattore,M. Colloquium: Nonequilibrium dynamics of closed in-teracting quantum systems. Reviews of Modern Physics83, 863 (2011).

[7] Polkovnikov, A. Universal adiabatic dynamics in the

6

vicinity of a quantum critical point. Phys. Rev. B 72,161201 (2005).

[8] Zurek, W. H., Dorner, U. & Zoller, P. Dynamics of aquantum phase transition. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 105701(2005).

[9] Dziarmaga, J. Dynamics of a quantum phase transition:Exact solution of the quantum ising model. Physical Re-view Letters 95, 245701 (2005).

[10] Huse, D. A. & Fisher, M. E. Domain Walls and the Melt-ing of Commensurate Surface Phases. Phys Rev Lett 49,793 (1982).

[11] Ostlund, S. Incommensurate and commensurate phasesin asymmetric clock models. Phys. Rev. B 24, 398 (1981).

[12] Tagliacozzo, L., Celi, A., Orland, P., Mitchel, M. W. &Lewenstein, M. Simulation of non-abelian gauge theorieswith optical lattices. Nat. Commun. 4 (2013).

[13] Weimer, H., Muller, M., Lesanovsky, I., Zoller, P. &Buchler, H. P. A Rydberg quantum simulator. Nat. Phys.6, 382–388 (2010).

[14] Farhi, E., Goldstone, J., Gutmann, S. & Spiser, M. Quan-tum computation by adiabatic evolution. arXiv:quant-ph/0001106.

[15] Gardas, B., Dziarmaga, J., Zurek, W. H. & Zwolak, M.Defects in quantum computers. Sci. Rep. 8 (2018).

[16] Anquez, M. et al. Quantum Kibble-Zurek mechanism ina spin-1 Bose-Einstein condensate. Phys. Rev. Lett. 116,155301 (2016).

[17] Clark, L. W., Feng, L. & Chin, C. Universal space-timescaling symmetry in the dynamics of bosons across aquantum phase transition. Science 354, 606 (2016).

[18] Endres, M. et al. The ‘Higgs’ amplitude mode at the two-dimensional superfluid/Mott insulator transition. Nature487, 454 (2012).

[19] Chen, D., White, M., Borries, C. & deMarco, B. Quan-tum quench of an atomic Mott insulator. Phys. Rev. Lett.106, 235304 (2011).

[20] Braun, S. et al. Emergence of coherence and the dynamicsof quantum phase transitions. PNAS 112, 3641 (2015).

[21] Bernien, H. et al. Probing many-body dynamics on a 51-atom quantum simulator. Nature 551, 579 (2017).

[22] Samajdar, R., Choi, S., Pichler, H., Lukin, M. D. &Sachdev, S. Numerical study of the chiral Z3 quantumphase transition in one spatial dimension. Phys. Rev. A98, 023614 (2018).

[23] Whitsitt, S., Samajdar, R. & Sachdev, S. Quantum fieldtheory for the chiral clock transition in one spatial di-mension. Phys. Rev. B 98, 205118 (2018).

[24] Chepiga, N. & Mila, F. Floating phase versus chiral tran-sition in a 1D hard-boson model. Phys. Rev. Lett. 122(2018).

[25] Kolodrubetz, M., Clark, B. K. & Huse, D. A. Nonequi-librium dynamical critical scaling of the quantum Isingchain. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109 (2012).

[26] Cherng, R. W. & Levitov, L. S. Entropy and correlationfunctions of a driven quantum spin chain. Phys. Rev. A73, 043614 (2006).

[27] Fendley, P., Sengupta, K. & Sachdev, S. Competingdensity-wave orders in a one-dimensional hard-bosonmodel. Phys. Rev. B 69, 075106 (2004).

[28] Haldane, F. D. M., Bak, P. & Bohr, T. Phase diagramsof surface structures from Bethe-ansatz solutions of thequantum sine-Gordon model. Phys. Rev. B 28, 2743(1983).

[29] Dutta, A. et al. Quantum phase transitions in transverse

field spin models : From Statistical Physics to QuantumInformation (Cambridge University Press, 2015).

[30] Moessner, R., Sondhi, S. L. & Fradkin, E. Short-rangedresonating valence bond physics, quantum dimer models,and ising gauge theories. Phys. Rev. B 65, 024504 (2001).

[31] Barredo, D., Lienhard, V., de Leseleuc, S., Lahaye, T. &Browaeys, A. Synthetic three-dimensional atomic struc-tures assembled atom by atom. Nature 561, 79 (2018).

[32] Kumar, A., Wu, T.-Y., Giraldo Mejia, F. & Weiss, D. S.Sorting ultracold atoms in a three-dimensional opticallattice in a realization of maxwell’s demon. Nature 561,83 (2018).

[33] Pichler, H., Wang, S.-T., Zhou, L., Choi, S. & Lukin,M. D. Quantum Optimization for Maximum IndependentSet Using Rydberg Atom Arrays. arXiv:1808.10816.

Acknowlegements We thank Anushya Chandran, Eu-gene Demler, Anatoli Polkovnikov, and Ashvin Vish-wanath for insightful discussions. This work was sup-ported by NSF, CUA, ARO, AFOSR MURI, DOE,and Vannevar Bush Faculty Fellowship. A.O. acknowl-edges support by a research fellowship from the Ger-man Research Foundation (DFG). H.L. acknowledgessupport from the National Defense Science and Engi-neering Graduate (NDSEG) fellowship. S. Schwartzacknowledges funding from the European Union underthe Marie Sk lodowska Curie Individual Fellowship Pro-gramme H2020-MSCA-IF-2014 (project number 658253).H.P. acknowledges support by the National Science Foun-dation (NSF) through a grant at the Institute of Theoret-ical Atomic Molecular and Optical Physics (ITAMP) atHarvard University and the Smithsonian AstrophysicalObservatory. ME acknowledges funding provided by theInstitute for Quantum Information and Matter, an NSFPhysics Frontiers Center (NSF Grant PHY-1733907). S.Sachdev acknowledges support from the US Departmentof Energy (grant number de-sc0019030).

Author Contributions The experimental measure-ments and data analysis were carried out by A.K.,A.O.,H.L., and H.B.. Theoretical analysis was performedby H.P., S.C., and R.S.. S.Schwartz, P.S., S.Sachdev,P.Z., and M.E. contributed to the development of mea-surement protocols and theoretical models, and the in-terpretation of results. All work was supervised by M.G.,V.V. and M.D.L.. All authors discussed the results andcontributed to the manuscript.

Correspondance and requests for materials shouldbe addressed to M.D.L.

7

METHODS

Rydberg array preparation. The experiment uti-lizes an acousto-optic deflector to generate multiple op-tical tweezers, which are loaded probabilistically from acold gas of 87Rb atoms in a magneto-optical trap. Eachtweezer can be loaded with up to a single atom. Oncethe cloud is dispersed, a fluorescence image, similar tothe ones shown in Fig. 2a of the main text, is taken toidentify loaded traps. The traps are then rearranged togenerate a defect-free regular array of 51 atoms, evenlyseparated by a distance a [34].

We define our spin Hamiltonian according to twopseudospin-1/2 states. The first is a ground-statehyperfine sublevel, |g〉 =

∣∣5S1/2, F = 2,mF = −2⟩.

The second is the interacting Rydberg state|r〉 = |70S, J = 1/2,mJ = −1/2〉. These two statesare coupled by a two-photon process via the intermedi-ate state |e〉 =

∣∣6P3/2, F = 3,mF = −3⟩. The two lasers

operate at wavelengths 420 nm for the lower transitionand 1013 nm for the upper transition.

The 420 nm laser is a frequency-doubled Titanium-Sapphire laser (SolsTiS 4000 PSX F by M Squared),locked to an optical reference cavity (ATF- 6010-4 fromStable Laser Systems). The 1013 nm laser is an exter-nal cavity diode laser (CEL002 by MOGLabs) that islocked to the same reference cavity. The transmittedlight through the cavity is used to injection lock another1013 nm laser diode, which is then amplified by a taperedamplifier [35].

Both beams are focused along the array axis (alignedwith the quantization axis) to drive σ− and σ+ transi-tions for the 420 nm and 1013 nm beams, respectively.

Pulse generation. We modulate the 420 nm Rydberglaser with an AOM driven by an arbitrary waveform gen-erator (AWG, M4i.6631-x8 by Spectrum Instrumenta-tion). For each experiment, we program a waveform withvarying amplitudes, frequencies and phases in the timedomain into the AWG, which is then transmitted to theAOM through a high-power RF amplifier (ZHL-1-2W+by Mini-Circuits).

The nonlinear AOM response to changes in amplitudeand frequency poses a technical challenge. The deflectionefficiency is not proportional to the waveform amplitude,and large changes in the waveform frequency lead to vari-ations in the deflection efficiency. These effects lead todistortions in the pulse shape. We apply feed-forwardcorrections to the amplitude to both match the outputintensity to the desired waveform amplitude, as well asto compensate for the variations with frequency.

Pulse Parameters. All pulses begin by turning on thevalue of Ω linearly over 1µs at a fixed initial detuning∆0. We select our initial detuning to be as close to the

critical point as possible subject to the constraint thatthe initial turn-on is still fully adiabatic. We identifythis detuning experimentally by ramping Ω on and thenoff for various fixed detunings. In the adiabatic case, allthe atoms should return to |g〉. We therefore select thedetuning closest to resonance that still shows no excessexcitation at the end of the pulse. For a typical mea-surement in the Z2 regime, we select ∆0 = −2.5 MHz(Extended Data Fig. 1).

The final detunings of the sweeps are chosen in mostcases to cross the tip of the corresponding phase bound-ary. In some cases in which the interaction strength ison the border between two phases, we do not fully crossover the boundary (Extended Data Fig. 2a).

The power-law scaling behavior of the correlationlength can be limited owing to strong nonadiabaticityfar away from the critical point, where the behavior ofthe system is susceptible to the microscopic details andshould deviate from universal theories, limiting how fasta sweep across the phase transition can be. At the sametime, slow sweeps are more susceptible to decoherence,both because of the longer pulse time window, and be-cause the system remains closer to the ground state nearthe critical point and the growing quantum correlationsare increasingly sensitive to environmental noise. To de-termine the range of rates for which QKZM scaling canbe observed, we perform a sweep into each of the orderedphases at a wide range of sweep speeds s. We fit thecorrelation lengths for each parameter, discarding all theinstances where the correlation length is smaller than thesize of the blockade radius, to a model that accounts forincoherent processes as a saturation in the final size ofthe correlation length, namely:

ξ(s) =

ξ0(s0/s)

µ : s ≤ sc,ξ0(s0/sc)

µ : s > sc.(3)

From this fit, we set smin > sc and find smax suchthat ξ(smax) > RB . An example of this can be seen inExtended Data Fig. 3. In this way, we determine thesweep parameters for the different values of the interac-tion strength (see Extended Data Table 1).

Numerical computation of the phase diagram.The quantum critical points along the phase boundaryon the phase diagram presented in the main text wereobtained using both finite- and infinite-system density-matrix renormalization group (DMRG) algorithms [36–41]. The filled colored regions are not the result of nu-merical simulations, and only show approximately the ex-pected shape of the phases. In this section, we describethe details of the DMRG calculations.

For the infinite-system DMRG (iDMRG), we generallyfollow the method summarized in Ref. [42], where trans-lationally invariant matrix product states (iMPS) areused as variational ansatze for ground-state wavefunc-

8

tions. Our Hamiltonian with long-range interactions isencoded using matrix product operator representations,where 1/r6 decaying interactions are approximated by alinear combination of four exponentials

1

r6≈

4∑i=1

cixri , (4)

with (c1, c2, c3, c4) = (170.55, 1.29, 0.0252, 0.000279) and(x1, x2, x3, x4) = (0.00519, 0.0835, 0.279, 0.565) [43]. Theresultant function provides an excellent approximationwith relative error less than 10−5 (Extended Data Fig.4). This accuracy implies that even with the strongest in-teraction strength probed in our experiments (Rb ≈ 3.5),

the maximum correction, V0

∣∣∣1/r6 −∑4i=1 cix

ri

∣∣∣ . (2π)×36 kHz, is much weaker than the smallest energy scalethat can be probed within our experimental timescales.

Our phase diagram involves quantum phases thatspontaneously break spatial translation symmetry.Hence, it is important that the number of spins in a trans-lationally invariant unit cell of our iMPS ansatz mustbe compatible with the broken spatial symmetry. Weuse 2 or 6 spins as a unit cell in order to probe phasetransitions from disordered to Z2-ordered or Z3-orderedphases, respectively. Incommensurate phases or onset ofspatial symmetry breaking that is not compatible withthe number of spins per unit cell can be identified byoscillatory behavior of wavefunction overlaps or energydensities over iterations.

In order to obtain the ground-state wavefunction, weiteratively optimize iMPS tensors until the (local) overlapbetween wavefunctions from two consecutive optimiza-tion steps approaches unity up to a small error ε. Asconvergence criteria, we require that either ε ≤ 10−8 or εis limited by truncation errors arising from finite bond di-mension D [42]. We use a wide range of bond dimensionsup to D = 200, depending on the quantity of interest tobe computed and on the convergence of wavefunctions.For example, computing the ground state energy den-sity is relatively insensitive to bond dimensions, whileextracting correlation lengths near the critical point re-quires a substantially larger D.

We thus extract the phase boundaries from the en-ergy density. Specifically, we use iDMRG to extract theground-state energy density E along a line in the param-eter space, (Rb/a,∆/Ω), and compute its second deriva-tive along the line. When crossing a quantum phase tran-sition, the second-order derivative of the energy densityexhibits a sharp feature. For example, Extended DataFig. 2b shows the numerically computed energy densitiesper unit cell (6 spins) as a function of Rb/a ∈ [1.75, 2.25]for a fixed ∆/Ω = 2 with D = 10. We find clear cuspsat Rb/a ≈ 1.86 and 2.18, corresponding to critical pointsfrom Z2-ordered to disordered and to Z3-ordered phases.Similar procedures along different lines lead to the phase

diagram in Extended Data Fig. 2a and in Fig. 1c of themain text.

These phase boundaries are also reproduced usingfinite-system DMRG [44, 45] with a bond dimension up toD = 60 for a chain of L = 51 atoms and open boundaryconditions. The first three energy levels are individuallytargeted, which, in turn, gives us access to the energygap. The closing of the gap outlines well-defined lobes inthe phase diagram, the boundaries of which overlap wellwith the points extracted previously with iDMRG (seeExtended Data Fig. 5).

A few remarks are in order. First, it has been previ-ously discussed that the Z3-ordered phase may be inter-facing incommensurate phases [27]. However, we do notfind any evidence of incommensurate phases between Z2

and Z3 phases up to ∆/Ω = 12 within our numericalprecision. The nature of the direct transition from disor-dered to Z3-ordered phases is discussed in Refs. [22–24].Second, we have not explicitly identified the phase tran-sition between disordered to Z4-ordered phases. This isbecause our choices of a unit cell (two or six spins) arenot compatible with Z4-ordered wavefunctions. Instead,the boundary of the disordered phase for Rb/a > 3 (yel-low diamonds in Extended Data Fig. 2a) has been ex-tracted from the convergence of the iDMRG algorithm;as ∆/Ω increases with a fixed Rb/a, the yellow diamondsin Extended Data Fig. 2a indicate the points at whichthe iDMRG algorithm ceases to converge, and insteadexhibits oscillatory behaviors. Our method does not dis-tinguish whether this is due to the onset of the Z4-orderedphase or a gapless incommensurate phase.

Correlation length extraction and scaling. Fromthe fluorescence pictures obtained at the end of an ex-perimental sequence, we calculate the two-dimensionalRydberg density-density correlation map:

G(i, j) = 〈ninj〉 − 〈ni〉〈nj〉. (5)

To minimize boundary effects, we disregard 8 sitesfrom each edge. From the remaining bulk correlations,we average out this map over diagonal lines of constant|i− j| to obtain the Rydberg density-density correlationdescribed in Eq. (2) in the main text (Extended DataFig. 6). The uncertainties for the values of G(r) arefound via a jackknife analysis.

Two different approaches are used to extract a charac-teristic length from such correlations. For transitions intoZN -ordered states (Fig. 4), we perform a least squaresfit to the data with the model function:

G(r) = Ae−r/ξGN (r)gs, (6)

where A is the amplitude at r = 0, ξ is the correla-tion length, and GN (r)gs is the ideal correlation functionat integer values of r for the corresponding ZN -ordered

9

state, with a peak every N sites:

G2(r)gs = cos(2πr/2)

G3(r)gs = cos(2πr/3) (7)

G4(r)gs = cos(2πr/4) + 1/2 cos(2πr/2).

The range of distances used for all fits is 0 < r ≤ 20,where the cutoff at 20 sites is used to avoid any potentialfinite-size effects of the system.

In addition to the procedure described above, for Z2-ordered states it is possible to extract a correlation lengthby fitting an exponential decay to the modulus of thecorrelation function, as is done in Fig. 2 of the maintext. This method allows for the determination of thecorrelation length in a way that is less susceptible to sys-tematic effects arising from inversions of the alternatingpattern, as observed in Fig. 3a of the main text. How-ever, this method cannot be applied to ZN -ordered statesfor N > 2, necessitating the use of a more general ap-proach, such as the function G(r) defined above. Whilethe scaling exponents extracted using both of these meth-ods for the Z2-ordered state data are consistent withinerror bars, G(r) is used to obtain all exponents in Fig.4c of the main text.

To extract the most likely scaling exponent µ at a giveninteraction, we fit a power law

ξ = ξ0 (s/s0)−µ, (8)

where s is the detuning sweep rate.

ZN domain density. In the fluorescence images ob-tained at the end of each experimental sequence, we iden-tify the loss of an atom to a Rydberg excitation. In thisway, we can directly count the number of instances oftwo lost atoms separated by N sites, where every sitein between contains an atom. To extract the data forFig. 4b in the main text, we disregard the first 8 sitesfrom the edges and count the instances in which bothends of the N atom chain are within the bulk, fN . Therelative probability for two lost atoms separated by Nsites is given by:

pN =N × fN∑i>0(i× fi)

. (9)

Unlike G(r), pN is susceptible to detection infidelity [21,35].

Length rescaling of correlation functions. InFig. 3 of the main text, we use the normalized mea-sured density-density correlation functions, 1

AiG(r)i, and

rescale the length r by the QKZM length scaling expo-nent found via the scaling analysis of correlation length,r → (s/s0)µr.

Finite-time scaling. The length scaling exponent,

µ, found experimentally sets constraints to the possiblecombinations of the critical exponents z and ν at a giveninteraction strength. In order to estimate, or qualita-tively test, the possible values of z and ν, given the con-straints set by µ, we make use of the fact that in thecritical region, all system properties scale in a univer-sal way. The QKZM predicts a universal scaling of timewith a scaling exponent of zν/(1+zν), in addition to thescaling of length with µ = ν/(1 + zν) [46] . In the exper-iment, the control parameter used to cross the quantumphase transition is δ = ∆−∆c, where ∆c is the value ofthe detuning at the critical point and can be estimatedthrough numerical simulations (see section on numericalcomputation of the phase diagram). Near the criticalpoint, the control parameter varies in time as δ(t) = st,leading to a universal scaling of δ(s) = δ0(s0/s)

κ, whereκ = −1/(1 + zν). Using the data shown in the main textfor the correlation length growth across the transitioninto the Z2-ordered phase, we can apply the transforma-tion ξ → ξ(s/s0)µ and δ → δ(s/s0)κ, to observe how wellthe data collapse to a universal shape. Extended DataFig. 7 shows that these data are consistent with havingcritical exponents z = 1 ' ν, as is expected for the Isinguniversality class.

Numerical simulation of Kibble-Zurek dynamics.We numerically model the dynamics of the system usingmatrix product states and employ a variant of a timeevolving block decimation (TEBD) algorithm to propa-gate the state. We use a state update that allows us toexactly include the effect of interaction between atomsthat are separated by less than ` = 7 sites. Interactionsbeyond this range are neglected. To this end, we use aTrotterization for the unitary that propagates the systemfrom a time tk to a time tk+1 = tk + ∆t as

U(tk → tk+1) ≈N−`∏p=1

exp (−ihp(tk)∆t) , (10)

where

hp(tk) =1

`

`−1∑j=0

(Ω(tk)

2σxp+j −∆(tk)np+j

)

+

`−2∑i=0

`−1∑j=i+1

1

`− (j − i)Vi,jnp+inp+j

(11)

for 1 < p < N−`, and h1 and hN−` are similar, but withappropriately adjusted coefficients.

We simulate the evolution according to the same pulseshape as applied in the experiment, with a time step of∆t = 0.15 ns and a bond dimension of 128. A compari-son between the numerically simulated dynamics and theexperimental results for different interaction strengths isshown in Fig. 4 of the main text. As described in thesection on “Correlation length extraction and scaling”,

10

deviations of the individual correlation functions froman exponentially decaying period-N density wave leadto systematic effects that dominate the uncertainty inthe determination of the values presented in Fig. 4 b ofthe main text. The comparison between experimentaland numerical results is susceptible to multiple effects,including finite-size effects [47], accuracy of the approx-imate numerical methods used, experimental imperfec-tions, and data fitting, which contribute to the observeddiscrepancy.

Chiral clock models. QPTs in the Rydberg Hamil-tonian, Eq. (1) of the main text, involving Zn (n ≥ 3)translational symmetry breaking along one spatial direc-tion are expected to be in the universality class of theextensively-studied Zn chiral clock models [10, 11, 28, 48–51]. To elucidate this connection, let us focus on n = 3and consider the case when V1 |Ω|, |∆|, that is,nearest-neighbor interactions are strong enough to ef-fectively preclude two neighboring atoms from simulta-neously being in the Rydberg state. Since the van derWaals interactions decay rapidly as Vx = C6/x

6, we ne-glect couplings beyond the third-nearest neighbor by ap-proximating Vx ≈ 0 for x ≥ 3, leading to a truncatedmodel of the form:

HRyd =

N∑i=1

Ω

2(|gi〉〈ri|+ |ri〉〈gi|)−∆ni + V2nini+2,

(12)

supplemented with the constraint ni ni+1 = 0.The Hamiltonian (12) can be mapped to a system of

hard-core bosons, where no more than one boson canoccupy a single site. This follows upon identifying thestate where the atom at site i is in the internal state |r〉(|g〉) with the presence (absence) of a boson. Definingthe bosonic annihilation and number operators, bi andni = b†i bi, respectively, we obtain

Hb =

N∑i=1

Ω

2(b†i + bi)−∆ni + V2 nini+2, (13)

together with ni ni+1 = 0. This model (often referred toas the U−V model) was shown by Refs. [27, 52] to exhibita phase transition in the universality class of the three-state chiral clock model (CCM), over a set of parameters.

The Zn CCM is a simple extension of the transverse-field Ising model in which each spin is promoted to haven > 2 states. However, instead of extending the sym-metry from Z2 to Sn, which would result in the n-statePotts model [53], the interactions are constructed to beinvariant under Zn transformations. With n = 3, thethree-state CCM is defined by the Hamiltonian [50, 51]

Hccm = −fN∑j=1

τ †j e−iφ − JN−1∑j=1

σ†j σj+1 e−i θ + h.c. (14)

acting on a one-dimensional chain of N spins. The three-state spin operators τi and σi, which can be representedas

τ =

1 0 00 ω 00 0 ω2

, σ =

0 1 00 0 11 0 0

, (15)

act locally on the site i, and each satisfy

τ3 = σ3 = 1 , σ τ = ω τ σ ; ω ≡ exp (2π i/3) . (16)

Here, φ and θ define two chiral interaction phases: for de-scribing spatially ordered phases, we need φ = 0, where-upon time-reversal and spatial-parity are both symme-tries of the Hamiltonian but a purely spatial chiralityis still present. Note that HRyd does not break time-reversal symmetry, necessitating the choice of φ = 0 inthe quantum clock model (14). However, with both φand θ nonzero, time-reversal and spatial-parity (inver-sion) symmetries are individually broken, but their prod-uct is preserved.

As depicted in Fig. 4a, a generic state in the Hilbertspace of the Z3 CCM can be mapped to one of threestates of a clock according to the eigenvalue 1, ω, or ω2

of the operator σ at each site. Consequently, there can betwo domain walls in the system that differ in their ener-gies, depending upon whether the clock rotates clockwiseor counterclockwise upon crossing the wall. With φ = 0and θ 6= 0, these have different energies, 2J sin(π/6 − θ)and 2J sin(π/6 + θ), and are thus inequivalent, leadingto a chirality in the system that is absent for φ = θ = 0.

On setting both φ = θ = 0, Hccm reduces to theHamiltonian for the three-state Potts model which pos-sesses a larger symmetry, S3; the concomitant order–disorder phase transition has critical exponents z = 1,ν = 5/6 [53–55], and accordingly µ ≈ 0.45. Note thatthese exponents are fundamentally distinct from thoseof the Z3 CCM, namely, z ≈ 1.33, ν ≈ 0.71, yieldingµ ≈ 0.37. The Rydberg Hamiltonian described in themain text contains a point along the phase boundary forwhich the condition of φ = θ = 0 is fulfilled, and withfine tuned pulses it may be possible to explore the criticalproperties of the three-state Potts model.

For n = 4, the transitions of both the Potts and theachiral clock model are in the Ashkin-Teller universalityclass [56, 57]. The critical exponents of the four-statePotts model are z = 1, ν = 2/3 (implying µ = 0.40),whereas the four-state achiral clock model is equivalentto two uncoupled Ising systems with z = 1, ν = 1. Witha nonzero chirality, however, it is believed that there isno direct transition from the ordered to the disorderedphase in the four-state CCM as an intermediate gaplessincommensurate phase always intervenes [11, 28, 58].

11

[34] Endres, M. et al. Atom-by-atom assembly of defect-freeone-dimensional cold atom arrays. Science 354, 1024(2016).

[35] Levine, H. et al. High-fidelity control and entanglementof Rydberg-atom qubits. Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 123603(2018).

[36] White, S. R. Density matrix formulation for quantumrenormalization groups. Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 2863 (1992).

[37] White, S. R. Density-matrix algorithms for quantumrenormalization groups. Phys. Rev. B 48, 10345 (1993).

[38] Ostlund, S. & Rommer, S. Thermodynamic limit of den-sity matrix renormalization. Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 3537(1995).

[39] Rommer, S. & Ostlund, S. Class of ansatz wave functionsfor one-dimensional spin systems and their relation to thedensity matrix renormalization group. Phys. Rev. B 55,2164 (1997).

[40] Dukelsky, J., Martin-Delgado, M. A., Nishino, T. &Sierra, G. Equivalence of the variational matrix productmethod and the density matrix renormalization groupapplied to spin chains. EPL 43, 457 (1998).

[41] Peschel, I., Wang, X., Kaulke, M. & Hallberg, K.(eds.)Density-matrix Renormalization: A New Numer-ical Method in Physics. Lecture Notes in Physics(Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, 1999).

[42] McCulloch, I. P. Infinite size density matrix renormaliza-tion group, revisited. arXiv:0804.2509v1 (2008).

[43] Pirvu, B., Murg, V., Cirac, J. I. & Verstraete, F. Ma-trix product operator representations. New Journal ofPhysics 12 (2010).

[44] Schollwock, U. The density-matrix renormalizationgroup. Rev. Mod. Phys. 77, 259 (2005).

[45] Schollwock, U. The density-matrix renormalizationgroup: a short introduction. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 369,2643 (2011).

[46] Gerster, M., Haggenmiller, B., Tschirsich, F., Silvi, P.& Montangero, S. Dynamical Ginzburg criterion for thequantum-classical crossover of the Kibble-Zurek mecha-nism. arXiv:1807.10611 (2018).

[47] Jaschke, D., Maeda, K., Whalen, J. D., Wall, M. L. &Carr, L. D. Critical phenomena and Kibble-Zurek scalingin the long-range quantum Ising chain. New. J. Phys. 19(2017).

[48] Huse, D. A. Simple three-state model with infinitelymany phases. Phys. Rev. B 24, 5180 (1981).

[49] Huse, D. A., Szpilka, A. M. & Fisher, M. E. Melting andwetting transitions in the three-state chiral clock model.Physica A 121, 363 (1983).

[50] Fendley, P. Parafermionic edge zero modes in Zn-invariant spin chains. J. Stat. Mech 11, 11020 (2012).

[51] Zhuang, Y., Changlani, H. J., Tubman, N. M. & Hughes,T. L. Phase diagram of the Z3 parafermionic chain withchiral interactions. Phys. Rev. B 92, 035154 (2015).

[52] Sachdev, S., Sengupta, K. & Girvin, S. M. Mott insu-lators in strong electric fields. Phys. Rev. B 66, 075128(2002).

[53] Wu, F.-Y. The Potts model. Rev. Mod. Phys. 54, 235(1982).

[54] Alexander, S. Lattice gas transition of He on Grafoil. Acontinous transition with cubic terms. Phys. Lett. A 54,353 (1975).

[55] Baxter, R. J. Hard hexagons: exact solution. J. Phys. A:Math. Gen 13, L61 (1980).

[56] Jose, J. V., Kadanoff, L. P., Kirkpatrick, S. & Nel-son, D. R. Renormalization vortices, and symmetry-breaking perturbations in the two-dimensional planarmodel. Phys. Rev. B 16, 1217 (1977).

[57] Kadanoff, L. P. Connections between the critical behav-ior of the planar model and that of the eight-vertexmodel. Phys. Rev. Lett. 39, 903 (1977).

[58] Yeomans, J. ANNNI and clock models. Physica B+C127, 187 (1984).

12

Extended Data Figure 1: Determination of initial detuning ∆0. At a fixed laser detuning, we linearly ramp Ω on andthen off over 1 µs each. We identify the negative detuning closest to resonance for which we are fully adiabatic, such that theexcitation probability at the end of the pulse returns to the minimum. From this typical measurement, taken at RB/a = 1.59,we set ∆0 = −2.5 MHz. Error bars denote 68% confidence intervals.

Extended Data Figure 2: Numerically extracted phase diagram with trajectories for QKZM measurements. a,Green (purple) markers indicate the phase boundary points between disordered and Z2-(Z3-)ordered phases. Yellow diamondsindicate the boundaries of the disordered phase (as approached from increasing ∆ with fixed Ω and Rb/a). We have not verifiedif these transitions are directly from disordered to Z4-ordered phases, or involve incommensurate phases. Each gray dashed linecorresponds to the trajectory across phase space used to probe for scaling behavior of correlation length growth. The horizontalsection of each trace corresponds to the detuning sweep at a constant Rabi frequency, while the curved sections correspondto pulse turn-off at a fixed value of the detuning. The total duration of the detuning sweep is varied to control the rate oftransition across the phase boundaries, but the time to turn the field off is not. b, Numerically obtained energy densities Ealong the red solid line indicated in (a). The second order derivatives of E shows clear cusps at two critical points.

13

Extended Data Figure 3: Scaling window. Determination of the window of rates where scaling is valid for the transitioninto the Z3-ordered phase. The black solid lines represent the result of the fitted model which grows as a power law until itsaturates. The dashed horizontal line marks the size of the blockade radius. The values of all the rates used in the experimentare larger than the value at which the dashed and solid lines intersect, and smaller than the point where the model saturates.The error bars denote the uncertainty of the power-law fit.

Extended Data Figure 4: Interaction potential approximation. Comparison between the exact power-law decay 1/r6

and its approximation using a linear combination of four exponentials. The two functions agree with each other until theirrelative strength decreases to 10−6.

14

s s

Extended Data Table 1: Pulse parameters for QKZM sweeps. For different blockade radii RB/a, we list the initialand final detunings ∆0 and ∆f of the sweeps, and the minimum and maximum sweep speeds, smin and smax, applied.

15

Extended Data Figure 5: Energy gap. Calculated gap between ground and first excited state using density-matrixrenormalization group (DMRG) calculations. Green (purple) circles indicate the extracted quantum critical points separatingthe disordered from the Z2(Z3)-ordered phase.

Extended Data Figure 6: Rydberg density-density correlations. Full density-density correlation map for sites i and jafter a slow sweep into the Z2-ordered phase. The orange square outline marks the bulk region used for analysis.

16

-5 -2.5 0 2.5 5Control parameter ± (MHz)

0

2

4

Cor

r. le

ngth

» (s

ites)

5 MHz/¹s10 MHz/¹s20 MHz/¹s

-4 -2 0 2±(s=s0)

∙

0

2

4

6

»(s=

s 0)¹

º= 1.08z= 1.00

Extended Data Figure 7: Finite-size scaling across QPT into Z2-ordered phase. a, Experimentally measured growthof the correlation length across the phase transition for different sweep speeds. The error bars denote the uncertainty of thepower-law fit. b, Verification of critical exponents across the QPT into Z2-ordered phase by rescaling the control parameterand spatial correlations. Using the experimentally extracted value of the QKZM length scaling exponent, µ = 0.52, and settingthe dynamical critical exponent to the Ising prediction, z = 1, it is observed that the data in a falls along a smooth function.