s kumar intermetallic phase formation in wrought al-mg-si alloy 2012.pdf

Upload: sachith-praminda-rupasinghe

Post on 02-Apr-2018

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/27/2019 S Kumar Intermetallic Phase Formation in Wrought Al-Mg-Si Alloy 2012.pdf

    1/5

    T E C H N I C A L P A PE R TP 2589

    Fe Bearing Intermetallic Phase Formation in a WroughtAlMgSi Alloy

    S. Kumar P. S. Grant K. A. Q. OReilly

    Received: 6 July 2012/ Accepted: 16 September 2012 / Published online: 10 October 2012

    Indian Institute of Metals 2012

    Abstract This paper investigates the two dimensional

    (2D) and three dimensional (3D) morphologies of the Febearing intermetallics that forms during the direct chill

    casting of an AA6063 Al alloy. An intermetallic phase

    extraction technique was used to facilitate 3D intercon-

    nectivity, morphology and fraction of intermetallics.

    Metallographic 2D analyses suggest the presence of Chi-

    nese-script-type and needle-type morphology Fe bearing

    intermetallics typically at the primary Al grain boundaries,

    whereas 3D analyse of the extracted intermetallics suggests

    those particles have dendrite-type and platelet-type mor-

    phologies. In-addition, globular shaped intermetallics

    which were observed in 2D within the primary Al grains

    where observed to have sphere shaped rosette-type mor-

    phology in 3D. ac-AlFeSi and b-AlFeSi were the two

    dominant intermetallic phases observed in the as-cast bil-

    let. Clusters of Ti rich particles were observed at the point

    from which growth appears to have started suggesting a

    possible nucleating site for the Fe intermetallics to form

    during solidification.

    Keywords AA6063 Al alloy DC casting

    Intermetallics Extraction

    1 Introduction

    Due to superior strength, good formability and heat-treat-

    ability, AlMgSi (6xxx series) alloys have found potential

    applications as structural materials in the automotive and

    building industries. Most commercial wrought Al alloysare cast using the direct chill (DC) casting process [1].

    During solidification, the solid solubility of the minor

    alloying elements (Fe, Si, Mn and Mg) in the primary Al

    decreases, as a result they tend to segregate to the liquid

    that is the lost to solidify. Hence, this results in the for-

    mation of complex intermetallics at the cell and grain

    boundaries. Since the solidification conditions in DC

    casting are non-equilibrium, the type of intermetallic that

    forms may vary [2]. In-order to modify the as-cast Fe

    bearing intermetallics into more favourable forms for

    downstream processing, the cast billet is usually subjected

    to heat treatment. The necessity to increase the use of

    recycled aluminium pushes casting technologies to toler-

    ate higher impurity content, particularly Fe [3]. Therefore,

    in-order to develop advanced casting technologies and

    heat treatment processing routes for recycled alloys it is

    essential to understand the nature of the intermetallics that

    form during DC casting. There is considerable literature

    available to understand the type of Fe bearing interme-

    tallic in DC cast 6xxx series Al alloys billet specifically

    focused on two dimensional (2D) metallographic analysis

    [4, 5], but very few investigations are available concern-

    ing 3D morphological analysis [6]. Therefore in this

    study, the 3D morphological nature of the Fe bearing

    intermetallic particles that form during DC casting is

    investigated. A phase extraction technique is used to

    facilitate observation of the 3D nature of the intermetallic

    particles by dissolving the Al matrix [7]. In-addition

    inclusions in liquid metals are inevitable. They either

    enter through inoculant additions or form in situ during

    liquid metal handling. This paper also highlights the

    possible role of inclusions on the intermetallic phase

    formation during solidification.

    S. Kumar (&) P. S. Grant K. A. Q. OReilly

    Department of Materials, The EPSRC Centre for Innovative

    Manufacturing in Liquid Metal Engineering,

    University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3PH, UK

    e-mail: [email protected]

    123

    Trans Indian Inst Met (December 2012) 65(6):553557

    DOI 10.1007/s12666-012-0221-y

  • 7/27/2019 S Kumar Intermetallic Phase Formation in Wrought Al-Mg-Si Alloy 2012.pdf

    2/5

    2 Experimental Details

    The elemental composition of the AA6063 Al alloy used in

    this study is 0.45Mg, 0.41Si, 0.19Fe, 0.07Mn, 0.01Cu,

    0.01Ti and balance Al (all in wt%). The alloy was DC cast

    into a 190 mm billet. The billet was analysed across its

    cross-section. The mounted samples were grounded and

    mechanically polished with a colloidal silica suspensionhaving a grain size of 0.04 lm for 2D microstructural

    analysis. For grain size analysis the samples were anodised

    using Barkers reagent (7 ml HBF4 [48 %], 93 ml H2O) at

    20 V for 60 s. Grain size and dendrite arm spacing (DAS)

    were measured using the mean liner intercept method on

    the polarised images taken using a Zeiss Axiophot2 optical

    microscope. Intermetallic particles were extracted by dis-

    solving the Al matrix using anhydrous boiling butan-1-ol

    (butanol) while keeping the intermetallics intact. The

    intermetallics were then collected on a polytetrafluoroeth-

    ylene filter paper with pore size of 2 lm. A Philips 1700

    X-ray diffractometer (XRD) was used for the phase iden-tification. A JEOL 840A scanning electron microscope

    (SEM) equipped with secondary electron and back-scat-

    tered electron (BSE) detectors and an energy-dispersive

    X-ray spectrometer (EDS) was used to analyse the inter-

    metallic phases. A JEOL 840F field emission gun (FEG)

    SEM was used for high resolution images.

    3 Results

    3.1 2D Analysis

    Anodised microstructures of the sample from the centre

    (Fig. 1) of the cast billet suggest fine equiaxed primary Al

    grains. The average grain size and DAS of the primary Al

    at the centre of the cast billet is 102 13 and 30 7 lm,

    respectively. It is interesting to note that the large aspect

    ratio containing discrete particles are decorated along the

    primary Al grain boundaries (Fig. 1). In-addition to these

    grain boundary particles, fine spherical shaped particles

    were observed within the primary Al grains. SEM 2D

    metallographic analysis reveals that those large aspect ratiointermetallic particles were either in the form of Chinese-

    script-type (Fig. 2a) or needle-type (Fig. 2b) morphologies.

    Further, the spherical shaped particles were observed to

    have rosette-type (Fig. 2c) morphology. The EDS analysis

    of the metallographic samples revealed a narrow range of

    Fe:Si ratio within these intermetallics. Among these

    intermetallics, the Chinese-script-type particles have higher

    (4.3) Fe:Si ratios than the needle-type (2.4) ones.

    3.2 3D Analysis

    In-order to understand the 3D nature of these intermetallics

    it is essential to remove the Al matrix and analyses the

    extracted particles. It is very interesting to note that these

    extracted intermetallics were well interconnected (Fig. 3)

    and they are typically more than two hundred of microns in

    length, which could not be ascertained from the 2D

    observations made of the metallographic samples. There-

    fore it may not be appropriate to characterise the Fe

    bearing intermetallic using only 2D metallographic sam-

    ples. Such lengthy and well interconnected intermetallics

    have been observed to usually form along the grain

    boundaries. It is also interesting to note that the interme-tallics which were observed with the Chinese-script-type

    and needle-type morphologies seen in 2D were observed to

    have dendrite-type (Fig. 4a) and platelet-type (Fig. 4b)

    morphologies in 3D analysis, respectively. In-addition, the

    intermetallics which were observed within the primary Al

    grains have a very different rosette-type 3D morphology

    (Fig. 4c). XRD analysis of the extracted particles revealed

    that ac-AlFeSi and b-AlFeSi are the two dominant as-cast

    Fe bearing intermetallic phases observed in this alloy

    (Fig. 5).

    4 Discussion

    4.1 Solidification and Phase Selection

    Due to non-equilibrium solidification conditions in DC

    casting and the low solid solubility of solute elements (Fe,

    Si) in Al, excess solute tends to segregate into the liquid at

    solidliquid interface. This solute rich liquid will be the

    last to solidify and results in the formation of various

    Fig. 1 Optical micrograph shows the primary Al grains, where the

    label A denotes the location of large aspect ratio particles and label

    S denotes the location of fine spherical particles

    554 Trans Indian Inst Met (December 2012) 65(6):553557

    123

  • 7/27/2019 S Kumar Intermetallic Phase Formation in Wrought Al-Mg-Si Alloy 2012.pdf

    3/5

    intermetallic phases. The anodised microstructure clearly

    reveals that these intermetallic phases mostly form at the

    grain and cell boundaries. Thermodynamic calculation

    using PandaT simulation [8] suggest that the primary Al is

    the first phase to form during solidification and followed by

    Al13Fe4, ac-AlFeSi, b-AlFeSi and Mg2Si as temperature

    lowers. These intermetallic phases form as the result of

    various eutectic and peritecitc solidification reactions. The

    absence of Al13Fe4 in the present billet suggests that the

    corresponding reaction might be suppressed or allowed to

    transform to different phase. The absence of Mg2Si in the

    XRD pattern is not unusual for as-cast alloy and is likely to

    be due to Mg2Si being present below the detection limit of

    the XRD.

    Fora given local composition, intermetallic phase selection

    is determined by two criteria: competitive nucleation and

    competitive growth [2]. Competitive nucleation favours the

    intermetallics which havehigh nucleation temperaturesor low

    under-cooling for nucleation, whereas competitive growth

    favours the phase having the higher growth temperature orhigher growth rate. The nucleation of Fe bearing intermetallic

    phases may be enhanced by the presence of potent nucleating

    substrates such as preformed primary Al or pre-solidified

    reaction products or inclusions. Interestingly in the present

    study, Ti rich particle and oxide particle clusters were fre-

    quently observed to be associated with ac-AlFeSi and

    b-AlFeSi. Figure 6a shows a cluster of TiB particles asso-

    ciated with a b-AlFeSi platelet, suggesting TiB acted as a

    nucleating substrate. The higher magnification of this cluster

    shows (Fig. 6b) typical hexagonal morphology of TiB2 par-

    ticles. TEM analysis [9] showed the existence of good lattice

    matching between TiB2 and b-AlFeSi. Such Fe bearingintermetallics nucleated in this way have been observed to

    have distinct points of origin. Figure 4a shows a petal-like

    dendrite-type ac-AlFeSi particle growing from a central point.

    EDS analysis revealed the presence of Ti rich particles at this

    location and suggests it as the point of origin for the petals.

    Inclusions such as TiB2 and oxides may nucleate the Fe

    bearing intermetallics either directly or through forming an

    intermediate compound. Thus inclusions can trigger inter-

    metallic phase selection.

    Fig. 2 BSE-SEM images showing 2D morphology of the different Fe

    bearing intermetallics observed in the metallographic sample. Where

    a Chinese-script-type, b needle-type and c rosette-type particles,

    respectively

    Fig. 3 FEG-SEM image of an extracted intermetallic showing a well

    interconnected intermetallic network

    Trans Indian Inst Met (December 2012) 65(6):553557 555

    123

  • 7/27/2019 S Kumar Intermetallic Phase Formation in Wrought Al-Mg-Si Alloy 2012.pdf

    4/5

  • 7/27/2019 S Kumar Intermetallic Phase Formation in Wrought Al-Mg-Si Alloy 2012.pdf

    5/5

    split and engulf small pockets of solute rich liquid or such

    pockets also can form between secondary dendrite arms.

    These pockets of entrapped solute rich liquid may not

    contain active nuclei and therefore may under cool well

    below the ac-AlFeSi and Al eutectic reaction temperature.

    Thus there may be copious nucleation in this super cooled

    liquid resulting in rapid freezing and the formation of

    clusters of fine nano-sized ac-AlFeSi particles, as observed.

    It is important to note that most of these spherical type

    particles were found separate without interconnectivity,

    this further supports that these intermetallics form from

    isolated liquid.

    Intermetallics morphology influences the physical

    properties of the final product. It has been reported that

    needle/platelet-type morphology containing intermetallic is

    detrimental to mechanical properties [12].

    5 Conclusions

    In this AA6063 alloy DC cast billet, ac-AlFeSi and

    b-AlFeSi were the two dominant Fe bearing intermetallic

    phases. Grain boundary ac-AlFeSi has a dendrite-type

    morphology whereas b-AlFeSi has a platelet-type mor-

    phology. ac-AlFeSi which was observed within the Al

    grains can have a sphere like rosette-type morphology.

    Other than this spherical type particle, most of the Fe

    bearing intermetallic that were observed at the grainboundaries and cell boundaries of the primary Al where

    well interconnected. Interconnectivity plays a crucial role

    in the downstream, secondary deformation processing of

    wrought Al alloys. Therefore it is essential to develop

    processing routes which can reduce this intermetallic

    interconnectivity.

    Acknowledgments The authors would like to acknowledge the

    financial support of SAPA and EPSRC Centre for Innovative Man-

    ufacturing in Liquid Metal Engineering and Feng Yan, of the Brunel

    University, UK, for providing the PandaT data.

    References

    1. Eskin D G, Physical Metallurgy of Direct Chill Casting of Alu-

    minum Alloys, Taylor and Francis Group, Oxford (2008), p 8.

    2. Allen C M, OReilly K A Q, Cantor B, and Evans P V, Prog

    Mater Sci 43 (1998) 89.

    3. Kumar S, Hari Babu N, Scamans G M, Eskin D G, and Fan Z, Int

    J Mater Res. http://www.ijmr.de/MK110760

    4. Onurlu S, and Tekin A, J Mater Sci 29 (1994) 1652.

    5. Tanihata H, Sugawara T, Matsuda K, and Ikeno S, J Mater Sci 34

    (1999) 1205.

    6. Sweet L, Zhi S M, Gao S X, Taiylor J A, and Easton M A, Metall

    Mater Trans A 42 (2011) 1737.

    7. Verma A, Kumar S, Grant P S, and OReilly K A Q, in Pro-

    ceedings of the International Conference of Aluminium Alloys,

    (eds) Weiland H, Rollett A D, and Cassada W A, Pittsburgh

    (2012), p 1413.

    8. http://www.computherm.com/pandat.html. Accessed 5 July 2012

    9. Sha G, Intermetallic Phase Selection in 6xxx Series Al Alloys,

    D. Phil. Thesis, University of Oxford (2001).

    10. Langsrud Y, Key Eng Mater 44&45 (1990) 95.

    11. Hsu C, OReilly K A Q, Cantor B, and Hamerton B, Mater Sci

    Eng A 304306 (2001) 119.

    12. Zajac S, Hutchinson B, Johansson A, and Gullman L O, Mater

    Sci Technol 10 (1994) 323.

    Fig. 6 FEG-SEM images

    showing Ti rich particles

    associated with platelet-type

    b-AlFeSi. Where b is the higher

    magnification image of the

    arrow make in a indicates the

    location of Ti rich particles

    cluster

    Trans Indian Inst Met (December 2012) 65(6):553557 557

    123

    http://www.ijmr.de/MK110760http://www.computherm.com/pandat.htmlhttp://www.computherm.com/pandat.htmlhttp://www.ijmr.de/MK110760