s. n. “ cavities for super b-factory” 1 of 38 sasha novokhatski slac, stanford university...
TRANSCRIPT
1 of 38
S.
N.
“ C
avit
ies
for
Su
per
B-
Fact
ory
”
Sasha NovokhatskiSLAC, Stanford
University
Accelerator Session April 20, 2005
Low R/Q Cavitiesfor Super B-
factory
2 of 38
S.
N.
“ C
avit
ies
for
Su
per
B-
Fact
ory
”Why Low R/Q Cavities for
Super B?
Because we need high currents to achieve super high luminosity
3 of 38
S.
N.
“ C
avit
ies
for
Su
per
B-
Fact
ory
”Low R/Q cavities are:
• To damp multi-bunch instability• To avoid single-bunch instability• To decrease HOM power
4 of 38
S.
N.
“ C
avit
ies
for
Su
per
B-
Fact
ory
”How we can make low
R/Q?• By decreasing cavity gap
– in this case HOM power goes down – but surface fields go up and bring limit
very soon
• By increasing beam pipe radius– smaller R/Q -
- closer to cut-off frequency
5 of 38
S.
N.
“ C
avit
ies
for
Su
per
B-
Fact
ory
”Varying cavity gap length
cavity gap cavity gap
35.5 Ohm R/Q 24.3 Ohm
0.39 V/pC HOM loss factor 0.24 V/pC
12.77 MV/m Max surface electric field* 31.12 MV/m
30.16 A/m Max surface magnetic field* 58.78 A/m
*for 1 MeV energy gain, f=952 MHz, bore radius 70 mm
6 of 38
S.
N.
“ C
avit
ies
for
Su
per
B-
Fact
ory
”Varying beam pipe radius
“Wakefield” calculations
7 of 38
S.
N.
“ C
avit
ies
for
Su
per
B-
Fact
ory
”Wakefield spectrum
“Wakefield” calculations
8 of 38
S.
N.
“ C
avit
ies
for
Su
per
B-
Fact
ory
”Electric Field Distribution
Rb=110mm
Rb=90mm
Rb=70mm
“SUPERFISH” calculations
9 of 38
S.
N.
“ C
avit
ies
for
Su
per
B-
Fact
ory
”Surface fields distribution**1 MeV energy gain. Electric field – Green. Magnetic field - pink
“SUPERFISH” calculations
10 of 38
S.
N.
“ C
avit
ies
for
Su
per
B-
Fact
ory
”Cavity parameters
11 of 38
S.
N.
“ C
avit
ies
for
Su
per
B-
Fact
ory
”R/Q and HOM Power
12 of 38
S.
N.
“ C
avit
ies
for
Su
per
B-
Fact
ory
”Transient time factor and stored
Energy
13 of 38
S.
N.
“ C
avit
ies
for
Su
per
B-
Fact
ory
”Maximum surface fields
magnetic
electric
14 of 38
S.
N.
“ C
avit
ies
for
Su
per
B-
Fact
ory
”
Periodic Structure. Main mode coupling
Distance between cavities 787.5 mm (5)
Zero mode
mode
Coupling: 0.55/952=5.8E-04
TM01
Cut-off
1.04276 GHz
Rb=110mm
15 of 38
S.
N.
“ C
avit
ies
for
Su
per
B-
Fact
ory
”Trapped TM11 modes
Zero mode
mode
TM11
Cut-off
1.6621 GHz
“MAFIA” calculations
16 of 38
S.
N.
“ C
avit
ies
for
Su
per
B-
Fact
ory
”Trapped TE11 modes
Zero mode
mode
TE11
Cut-off
798.55 MHz
“MAFIA” calculations
17 of 38
S.
N.
“ C
avit
ies
for
Su
per
B-
Fact
ory
”Checking single–bunch
stabilityWe need to know:
• Wake potentials
• Number of cavities
• Total voltage
• Momentum compaction
18 of 38
S.
N.
“ C
avit
ies
for
Su
per
B-
Fact
ory
”Cavity wake Potential
Bunch shortening ?
19 of 38
S.
N.
“ C
avit
ies
for
Su
per
B-
Fact
ory
”Yes, cavity wake produces shorter
bunches
Bunch Current 3.300 mA Bunch Charge 24.21 nC Zero bunchlength 1.80 mm Moment. compact. 9.400E-04 Ring Energy 3500.0 MeV Energy Spread 2.400 MeV SR Energy loss 0.970 MeV per turn RF Voltage: 52.50 MV Number of cavities 42 Phase Angle 1.059 degree (0.926 mm) Harmonic Number 6984 Rev. frequency 136.2707 kHz Synchrotron freq. 17.045 kHz (7.995 Turns) Damping turns 4100.000
1.8 mm 1.75 mm
1.25MV/cav
20 of 38
S.
N.
“ C
avit
ies
for
Su
per
B-
Fact
ory
”Resistive-Wall Wake (bunch lengthening)
PowerSS: 39.44 MW Al: 7.88 MWCu: 6.06 MW
SR: 22.3 MW
21 of 38
S.
N.
“ C
avit
ies
for
Su
per
B-
Fact
ory
”IP wake (large additional
part)PowerIP HOMs: 4.0 MW
22 of 38
S.
N.
“ C
avit
ies
for
Su
per
B-
Fact
ory
”All wakes included
Bunch Current 3.300 mA Bunch Charge 24.21 nC Zero bunchlength 1.80 mm Moment. compact. 9.400E-04 Ring Energy 3500.0 MeV Energy Spread 2.400 MeV SR Energy loss 0.970 MeV per turn RF Voltage: 52.50 MV Number of cavities 42 Phase Angle 1.059 degree (0.926 mm) Harmonic Number 6984 Rev. frequency 136.2707 kHz Synchrotron freq. 17.045 kHz (7.995 Turns) Damping turns 4100.000
1.83 mm
23 of 38
S.
N.
“ C
avit
ies
for
Su
per
B-
Fact
ory
”Bunch length in the ring
IP
cavities
1
3 2
24 of 38
S.
N.
“ C
avit
ies
for
Su
per
B-
Fact
ory
”
IP
1.83 mm
25 of 38
S.
N.
“ C
avit
ies
for
Su
per
B-
Fact
ory
”
2.00 mm
Before cavities
26 of 38
S.
N.
“ C
avit
ies
for
Su
per
B-
Fact
ory
”
2.00 mm
after cavities
27 of 38
S.
N.
“ C
avit
ies
for
Su
per
B-
Fact
ory
”
IP
1.83 mm
IP
Cavities
28 of 38
S.
N.
“ C
avit
ies
for
Su
per
B-
Fact
ory
”More Voltage
• 1.5 MV/cavity * 42 = 63 MV
• Momentum compaction goes to 1.128E-03 to have the same bunchlength
29 of 38
S.
N.
“ C
avit
ies
for
Su
per
B-
Fact
ory
”
IP
1.77 mm
30 of 38
S.
N.
“ C
avit
ies
for
Su
per
B-
Fact
ory
”
2.02 mm
Before cavities
31 of 38
S.
N.
“ C
avit
ies
for
Su
per
B-
Fact
ory
”
2.02 mm
after cavities
32 of 38
S.
N.
“ C
avit
ies
for
Su
per
B-
Fact
ory
”
IP
1.77 mm
IP
Cavities
33 of 38
S.
N.
“ C
avit
ies
for
Su
per
B-
Fact
ory
”More focusing
• We can increase momentum compaction more to bring bunch length to 1.8mm at IP
34 of 38
S.
N.
“ C
avit
ies
for
Su
per
B-
Fact
ory
”
IP
1.816 mm
35 of 38
S.
N.
“ C
avit
ies
for
Su
per
B-
Fact
ory
”
2.085 mm
Before cavities
36 of 38
S.
N.
“ C
avit
ies
for
Su
per
B-
Fact
ory
”
2.085 mm
after cavities
37 of 38
S.
N.
“ C
avit
ies
for
Su
per
B-
Fact
ory
”
IP
1.816 mm
IP
Cavities
38 of 38
S.
N.
“ C
avit
ies
for
Su
per
B-
Fact
ory
”Conclusions
• Low R/Q cavities are needed for super high luminosity factories. These cavities are superconducting cavities.
• Low R/Q is achieved by using large beam pipe. Cut-off frequency is very closer to the working frequency.
• Trapped transverse modes must be damped using external loads.
• High voltage and correspondent momentum compaction give additional bunch shortening at interaction point.