E-Mails S-150 through S-199__S-150. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding UNITEL's proposed laser plasmaS-151. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding more plasma-related articlesS-152. from Jack Sarfatti regarding actual working hardware and UFO theoriesS-153. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding Magnetized PlasmasS-154. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding skeptics and lack-of-fundingS-155. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding my tactics of alerting CongressS-156. from Bryan Willoughby regarding building a demo prototypeS-157. from Bryan Willoughby regarding his "Master Plan" for UNITELS-158. from Bryan Willoughby regarding promoting these new technologies on a Global scaleS-159. from Bryan Willoughby regarding strategies on forging successful venturesS-160. from Larry Maurer forwarding an e-mail he sentS-161. from Dr. Jadczyk regarding ORMEsS-162. from Bryan Willoughby regarding superstrings, Taylor Kramer, TeslaS-163. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding others who may be exploring similar technologiesS-164. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding search for a protégé student of UCLA's Dr. John

DawsonS-165. from Ken Myers regarding comments of others concerning ORMEsS-166. from Bryan Willoughby regarding another Unification theory posted on KeelyNetS-167. from Bryan Willoughby regarding an Australian inventor who's being sued by investorsS-168. from Bob King regarding other Montauk whistle-blowers besides the 4 most commonly knownS-169. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL forwarding an e-mail sent to an associate of Dr. Greer'sS-170. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding last-minute touches to UNITEL's newslettersS-171. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding another abrupt shift of support from another campS-172. from Dr. Jack Sarfatti regarding Dr. Steven GreerS-173. from Dr. Jack Sarfatti regarding Dr. Eugene MalloveS-174. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding Sarfatti's comments (e-mail # 173)S-175. from Bob King regarding email # 174 that included references to "Reichian" technologyS-176. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding new ideas to generate incomeS-177. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding Foreward to the UNITEL book "Flying Colors"S-178. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding UCLA wave collapse research in laser plasmasS-179. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding response from NASA's Breakthrough Propulsion

ProjectS-180. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL forwarding e-mail to Tom Bearden explaining 'quantum

tunneling' for space travelS-181. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding technical details of UNITEL's back-engineeringS-182. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding response to Bob Drake (associate of Michio Kaku's)S-183. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding the Irish inventor claims of tapping the ZPES-184. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding contacting Ann Drunyan (Mrs. Carl Sagan)S-185. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding past corporate pitfalls and human nature in generalS-186. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding article on FTL and "tunneling"S-187. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding more technical discussion on FTL, ZPE, anti-gravS-188. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding latest e-mail correspondencesS-189. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding misc. Scientific American articlesS-190. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL comments on Michio Kaku's reponses to questionsS-191. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL reflecting on attitudes and motivations of othersS-192. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL responding to Bob Drake's memoS-193. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding MQT and Josephson's Junction mechanismsS-194. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding a past letter sent to Carl SaganS-195. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding future discussions with Dr. Michio Kaku

232

S-196. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding postings of breakthroughs at the Los Alamos websiteS-197. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding writing UNITEL's bookS-198. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding writing specifics on UNITEL's bookS-199. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding another corporation interested in UNITEL

S-150. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL forwarding consulting inquiry with Dr. Fred Alan Wolf

From : Larry Maurer <lmaurer@unitelnw.com>To : stealthskater@hotmail.comSubject : Fwd: RE: UNITEL Aerospace & ElectronicsDate : Thu, 03 Jan 2002 13:28:43 -0800

>At 01:20 PM 1/3/02 -0800, you wrote: >>>> Hi Larry,

>> Certainly I am open to hearing about your work in a non-disclosing professional consulting arrangement. I wasn't soliciting from you in any way if my email gave you that impression. It's just that I seem to have enough to do these days since writing, designing PowerPoint Multimedia, and public-speaking fully occupies me. However, I would certainly be available to listen. But you may find me a bit annoying since I ask a lot of questions when I don't understand something. My consultation fees would run around $250/hour.

>> Best Wishes,

>> Fred Alan Wolf, Ph.D. >> Have Brains / Will Travel >> 435 15th Avenue Apt. 3 >> San Francisco, CA 94118-2828 >> email fawolf@ix.netcom.com >> telephone/fax/modem (415) 387-3100>> http://home.ix.netcom.com/~fawolf

>Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2002 13:28:21 -0800 >To: fawolf@ix.netcom.com >From: Larry Maurer <lmaurer@unitelnw.com> >Subject: RE: UNITEL Aerospace & Electronics

>Sounds great, Fred!

>BTW, check out http://www.physics.ucla.edu/class/01F/250_Rosenzweig/notes/pondero.pdf . Very similar to our proposed plasma.

> This is the same advanced wave mechanics that I want to describe in presenting our proposed laser plasma that produces the adiabatic pressure and stress energy tensor field through trapped biexcitonic gasses within the projected potential (true RGB) EM wells. The dielectric force and ZPE will split the whole ship/field into N and S monopole fields on a Macro level.

> Mike and I look forward to coming down there fairly soon (within the next 6 weeks). Let's stay in touch.

233

>Best, >Larry

S-151. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding more plasma related articles

From : Larry Maurer <lmaurer@unitelnw.com>To : <stealthskater@hotmail.com>Subject : Re: TAP-TEN yGroupDate : Thu, 03 Jan 2002 13:51:08 -0800

At 01:06 PM 1/3/02 -0500, you wrote:

> Your friend Bryan's T.A.P.-T.E.N. has a Yahoo! yGroups at => http://groups.yahoo.com/group/tapten . It has some interesting messages covering everything from time-travel to UFOs to pyramids to ZPE. I haven't come across Sarfatti yet. But I did see someone quoting your ol' buddy Dr. Greer .

Mark:

Also check out "Nonlinear Wave Interactions in a 2-Electron Temperature Plasma", "Weakly Nonlinear High-Frequency Waves in Magnetized Plasmas", and especially "Electron Acceleration by Weakly Nonlinear High-Frequency Waves in Magnetized Plasmas".

But above and beyond this, from our good old American research friends from UCLA check out Prof. John Dawson's "Plasma Beat Oscillator". More BANG for the buck!

Larry

S-152. from Jack Sarfatti forwarding actual working hardware and UFO theories

From : Jack Sarfatti <sarfatti@well.com>To : sarfatti@well.comSubject : Re: Your query on propellantless propulsion - warp driveDate : Thu, 03 Jan 2002 14:23:40 -0800

John Schnurer wrote:

>Howdy Jack,>>As a small question:>>Who in your opinion is close to -- or has and can show with hardware -- any modification of Inertia or Gravity and who can show Propulsion without using reaction mass.>>Thanks,

234

>John Herman Schnurer

"Hardware"? No one. I was talking strictly theory.

We at ISSO had one "hardware" project in this area that was a "maybe", but not really. I never saw the math details and the chap was a John Nash type for sure (ref: film "A Beautiful Mind"). I mean with a high IQ. He has something that worked on a very small scale although not by any stretch of the imagination would it be a "warp drive" (more like a "tractor beam"). It is all classical microwave electrical engineering and I doubt it will work as advertised (i.e., scalable to large devices). The physics does not go deep enough. All Classical EM no gravity as far as I could tell. I did not see detailed math. But that is my educated guess.

>> Jack Sarfatti wrote:

>> Me -- and only me -- to my present knowledge. Read my book and my recent papers.>>>> http://stardrive.org/Jack/Book.pdf>> http://stardrive.org/Jack/Physics101.pdf>> http://stardrive.org/Jack/Cosmo1.pdf>>>> It should be quite obvious to anyone with even a modest understanding of General Relativity. I could be wrong, however. I have seen no other model that even comes close while remaining integrated seamlessly with the rest of mainstream Physics. Certainly not anything by Hal Puthoff, Bernie Haisch & Co. They have thrown the baby out with the bathwater.>>>> I know exactly where they went wrong. They neglect the coherence mechanism of spontaneous broken internal symmetry of the vacuum required for Classical space-time to come into being in a quantum phase transition. There is no incoherent classical limit to quantum gravity. There is, however, a coherent Macroscopic quantum limit that gives our Classical universe with us stuck in it like Edmund Abbott's "Flatlanders". Hal P and Bernie H et-al fail to grok this delicate balance on which our existence hangs precariously -- i.e. the "Ice 9" problem (Kurt Vonnegut).>>>> My second "technical" book Super Cosmos will have a lot of details not in my first book Destiny Matrix (which is essentially autobiography and biography by others for the historical record). My criteria are strict.>>>> 1. Propellantless propulsion must not contradict any of the known energy-momentum conservation laws in standard mainstream Physics.>>>> 2. It cannot violate Einstein's principle of Equivalence and throw away tensor calculus like Hal Puthoff proposes. In particular, one cannot use a local Classical vacuum gravitational field stress-energy density tensor as in the Yillmaz theory that Hal P is so fond of.>>>> 3. The unconventional flying object "UFO" (in the sense of Paul Hill's nice little flying saucer engineering book) must self-generate it's own locally controllable timelike geodesic with small local tidal forces. That is, the machine and all its contents are on a self-propelled "LIF" (local inertial frame). See John Archibald Wheeler's "A Journey into Gravity and Spacetime" for background. Alcubierre's "warp drive solution" has this property, BTW. The ISSO "hardware" project(s) did not.>>

235

>> 4. The new theory must be a clear covering theory of Einstein's 1915 geometrodynamics and its Kaluza-Klein and supersymmetry generalizations to the "Super Cosmos" of many "brane worlds" as explained in "The Universe's Unseen Dimensions" Aug 2000, Scientific American, Hyperspace by M. Kaku, The Universe in a Nutshell by Stephen Hawking, e.g "O Brane New World">>>> 5. The relationship to Quantum Physics must be worked out in detail. In particular the role of the Zero-Point Energy fluctuations of all of the dynamical force and source fields. For example, gravitating positive Zero-Point Energy fluctuations are opposed by repulsive anti-gravity quantum pressure three times larger! (p. 25, Cosmological Physics by John Peacock). Puthoff completely neglects this and does not seem to be aware of it. Neither does Paul Wesson mention it in his CIPA review paper on the very subject! This is a very serious omission from mainstream Physics.>>>> 6. The space-time stiffness barrier must be broken.>>>> i.e. 1 fermi bend per 4 billion metric tons equivalent of applied stress-energy density (i.e., "Feynman's number" in his Cal Tech Lectures on Quantum Gravity).>>>> 7. Relation of the new covering theory to both "dark matter" and "quintessence" (repulsive vacuum energy speeding up the expansion rate of the Universe) must be patently obvious.>>>> Only my theory addresses all of these points. Eric Davis (on NIDS website) in his MUFON 2001 paper on UFOs and StarGate physics completely skirts these all-important issues and gives a false impression that Hal Puthoff's PV model is a viable explanation. It is not at all, IMO!

S-153. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding Magnetized Plasmas

From : Larry Maurer <lmaurer@unitelnw.com>To : stealthskater@hotmail.comSubject : Magnetized PlasmasDate : Thu, 03 Jan 2002 15:09:20 -0800

> Major Research Interest

> I. Physics of Dusty Plasmas: New collective effects in weakly and strongly coupled dusty plasmas have been found. For example, we have discovered the dust acoustic wave (Planet. Space Sci. 38, 543, 1990), the dust ion acoustic shock (PRL 83, 1602, 1999), dispersion properties of a dusty plasma containing non-spherical rotating dust grains (PRL 84, 2626, 2000), the parametric instability of dust lattice waves in a turbulent plasma sheath (PRL 84, 5328, 2000), and the wakefield (PLA 203, 40, 1995; PoP 3, 1770, 1996) for charged dust grain attraction, while the parametric instability theory contributes to the understanding of the observed "sublimation" transition of the plasma crystal from a solid to a gaslike state. Furthermore, the DAW, the DIA shock and the wakefield have been observed in experiments. Our dusty plasma work has relevance to cosmic physics as well to low-temperature laboratory dusty discharges and to molecular clouds.> > II. Neutrino Plasma Physics: A new whole subject has been opened by investigating the nonlinear interaction (PRL 83, 2703, 1999; Phys. Plasmas 7, 2166, 2000) of neutrinos with plasmas. Thus, we have solved many astrophysical problems (viz. the generation of magnetic fields in the Early

236

Universe and on the surface of a neutron star, the generation of inhomogeneities in the Early Universe (Phys. Plasmas 5, 2815, 1998), supernova explosions, the origin of gamma ray bursts, etc) in terms of the nonlinear neutrino plasma coupling involving collective interactions (Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 41, A699, 1999). The collective neutrino plasma interaction work has been carried out in collaboration with Professor Hans Bethe and John Dawson of the USA. >> III. Nonlinear Waves in Geophysical Flows: Various types of new nonlinear effects associated with gravity, internal and Rossby waves have been identified. New nonlinear structures in geophysical flows have been predicted. >> IV. Nonlinear Wave Phenomena in Astrophysical and Pair Plasmas: Wave-wave and wave-particle interactions have been studied in order to understand microstructures in pulsar magnetospheres, and the propagation of cosmic rays in the interstellar medium. The focus was on stimulated scattering instabilities of radiation and the formation of envelope solitons. >> V. Theories of Parametric Instabilities: We have developed theories for numerous parametric processes in uniform and nonuniform plasmas with and without an external magnetic field. Applications to ionospheric modification and laboratory experiments involving high-frequency heater and microwaves have been considered. The results also have applications in Astrophysics. >> VI. Theories for Finite Amplitude Envelope Solitons: We have presented theories for the envelope solitons (PRL 36, 968, 1976), non-envelope solitons, and double layers. The results have been applied to the understanding of nonlinear wave phenomena in space and laboratory plasmas. Recently we have presented theories (PoP 6, 1677, 1999; ibid. 6, 4120, 1999) for nonlinearly modulated dispersive Alfven waves which are observed in the Earth's ionosphere/magnetosphere as well as in the Solar corona. Our most recent works (PRL 84, 4373, 2000 and GRL 27, 89, 2000) provide nonlinear models for coherent electric field structures in the magnetosphere as well as auroral density cavities that are observed by POLAR, FREJA, and FAST spacecrafts. >> VII. Large Amplitude Waves and Fields in Plasmas are investigated. Here, various kinds of new relativistic nonlinear effects are shown to exist. This work has applications to the acceleration of charged particles in space and astrophysical plasmas.>> VIII. Nonlinear Convective Motion in Plasmas: Linear and nonlinear convective cells and magnetostatic modes have been investigated. The calculation of thermal and non-thermal test particle cross-field transport has been carried out. Our results are applied to the understanding of anomalous transport in space and laboratory plasmas.>> IX. Plasma Turbulence and Plasma Vortices: A calculation of cross-field diffusion and the a.c. conductivity of a turbulent plasma has been done. Model nonlinear equations for the study of low-frequency (drift-Alfv'en, kink, tearing, etc.) turbulence in magnetized plasmas have been derived. New instabilities in nonuniform magnetoplasmas were found. In the nonlinear analyses, we have established cascading rules, self-organization, and chaos. Specifically, we have reported (e.g. PRL 41, 1656, 1978: Phys. Plasmas 5, 616, 1998) the existence of various types of vortices, which appear frequently in in the Earth's ionosphere, magnetosphere, and extraterrestrial environment.

S-154. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding skeptics and lack-of-funding

From : Larry Maurer <lmaurer@unitelnw.com>237

To : stealthskater@hotmail.comSubject : Re: Sarfatti's caustic commentsDate : Thu, 03 Jan 2002 21:01:38 -0800

At 06:31 PM 1/3/02 -0500, you wrote: > I don't understand this guy. I mean, who died and elected him "God"? I acknowledge that he has above-average smarts. But as I remarked to Dr. "Ark" (who never did respond to me on this), where is this guy's Nobel Prize if he's so smart? He dissed Witten and Hawking. But where is HIS Fields Medal? Where is HIS MacArthur Fellowship (the so-called "genius award")? More importantly (as Jerry Decker of KeelyNet says), the name of the game is actual prototypes or inventions -- not mounds-and-mounds of theories that are always conveniently untestable.>> At first I thought it was a long-standing feud between you and him and I and anyone else who came out on the side of UNITEL immediately drew his wrath (as if we were "clones" of Larry Maurer). But now I'm seeing that he has absolute rage for anyone who doesn't agree with him 100%. He's even picking on Murray Gell-Mann who won the Nobel Prize. I've never seen anything like it. And I've been mentored by some pretty gifted people who have plenty of patents themselves but never did rub anyone's nose in-the-ground. The bad thing about him is he's attracted a cult following and some people -- who may have money like Firmage -- probably are influenced by him too much.>> By-the-way, concerning the articles I've been sending you over these months, if you ever find any of them that appears to back up your case in some manner (application, theory, engineering, whatever), print it out and keep it in a notebook for ready reference. Then if any investor says "that's a crazy idea", you can point to the same (or similar) things other people are already doing. For example, the Tdimension company that's using a dye-based laser for levitation …>> -- Mark

I agree with your feeling out the situation at hand. I just don't understand this guy [Jack Sarfatti] along with several others that totally ignore the fact we have a patent. Especially a Japanese patent where they are much more thorough in their technical review process.

The damage that is going on here is sickening. This new and wonderful technology in its delicate and new condition is totally being forced to be developed by -- most likely -- foreign entities because of this constant bickering, self-serving BS. It is obvious that the ill bidding going on is out of jealousy and maintaining the same old NASA WWII technology rocket/oil power structure so their world domination is not interrupted in our lifetimes. They want everyone to believe that our designs belong in the next century and that our technology will disrupt Society etc.

I know Col. Tom Beardon and associates are giving it a go in the UK for whatever reason. I just do not think that our fellow countrymen will further allow the draining of our valuable technology to foreign countries if they knew what was going on. Do you? I know that you can see the value in our efforts and support our efforts to build and test prototypes. I really believe this technical death grip the Powers-that-Be have on control of TV and the news media that they are going to take us all down to being a third world country. Reduced to playing cop with our forever-supported military.

With this technology, however, all of the Western hemisphere will be providing service to Asians and/or European powers. As the jobs are disappearing one-by-one (especially here in Portland where

238

unemployment is the highest in the Nation), we Americans desperately need this technology to survive. I want to throw up when somebody like Jack does everything in his power to cause foment and disruption at a time when we need to unify together (like T.A.P.-T.E.N. is trying to do) to bring new technology to fruition for the advancement of mankind to progress instead of regress.

We will try to stay positive in our endeavors here, Mark. We must depend on the power of truth through presentation of facts, strength in the masses, and nurture technical progress to its rightful fruition. That's about all we can do as I refuse to even acknowledge these negative entities anymore.

Regards, Larry

S-155. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding my tactics of alerting Congress

From : Larry Maurer <lmaurer@unitelnw.com>To : stealthskater@hotmail.comSubject : Re: things seem tough all overDate : Thu, 03 Jan 2002 21:40:06 -0800

At 06:47 PM 1/3/02 -0500, you wrote: > I was leafing through a National Geographic at the doctor's office. One article was about current Russia. A large photograph showed a collection of some of that country's brightest physicists in a makeshift informal Yahoo! type meeting, lamenting the lack of state- or business-sponsored R&D funds. They all seemed to possess impressive credentials. We need another war or space race. Maybe the ETs should invade us and jump-start our economy!>> My "angle" with the Congress was to say (1) they can't stop you from selling a patent you invented without signing any National Security oath, and (2) as an American I'd hate to buy these inventions from a third-rate country when we could have developed them here all along (hinting how would the voters like to learn about all who dropped that ball). >> I may have to come up with other "scare" tactics to use on non-governmental entities ... >> -- Mark

Yahoo, Mark! Nail 'em to the cross, buddy! Right now I am watching "Testing the UFOs" on the History Channel. I was told today that Fred Alan Wolf was on one of the UFO History channel shows.

S-156. from Bryan Willoughby regarding building a demo prototype

From : Affirm Technologies" <pathfinder@mindspring.com>To : <stealthskater@hotmail.com>CC : "BluEyes" <pathfinder@mindspring.com>Subject : Re: a little demo goes a long wayDate : Fri, 4 Jan 2002 22:41:34 -0800

239

----- Original Message -----

> From: stealthskater@hotmail.com > To: pathfinder@mindspring.com > Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 10:47 PM> Subject: a little demo goes a long way>> Bryan --

> ... and before I forget, one thing I get constantly bombarded with is questions like "if it's so good, why hasn't it been developed in all those years? Must be something wrong somewhere." And these are coming from the most skeptical conservatives who unfortunately have all the money.>> I asked Larry recently about his design. I know the interstellar thing requires some huge lens. It's probably like trying to manufacture a large telescope mirror. But you don't need a 2-ft diameter lens to fit inside a PC-sized quantum computer. That's probably on the order of LED if not smaller. He said that it would take $5-10 million to make a prototype 2-ft diameter lens. How much would it cost to make the QC lens? $50-100K? That's something more readily-financed and would prove the viability of the concept which has so many detractors in even the "new" physics fields (like Saratti, "Ark"). But I never got a reply from him on that.>> Like the old saying "it's easier to catch flies with sugar", something in hand -- ANYTHING! -- goes so much farther than a ton of papers/documents/theories in attracting investors. If money isn't available at the University of Chicago MBE lab, how hard would it be to "grow" some crude crystals in a high school chemistry lab? Again, anything 'concrete' is better than nothing!>> -- Mark

SERIES...I will report and reply in PARTS Mark,

First, it varies upon the SPECS that make this LENS with dependence on APPLICATION.

ONE: I want them to use the method I have kept on applying in my communications. It's the fact the IF you use the Synthetic CRYSTALLITE, then you are cutting your GROWTH time for MBE Process about 85%. THEN SIMULTANEOUSLY, WE CAN BUILD the 1.4-year CRYSTAL from the COMPOUND .....that will work the best in my thoughts ~ EVEN a QUANTUM MODULATOR for OPTIC Communications CAN be built Simultaneously for little money~Bryan

THEN if you allow for the SIZE Variations, you will be Looking at the Point of perhaps 7 Microns and 2 Feet.

It's a matter of Importance to the FIRST PROTOTYPE

240

Being that NO one has ACTUALLY BUILT SUCCESSFULLY a PROTOTYPE for ROOM-TEMP QC, then my thought would be DO that FIRST. Show the Quantum Effect while you create/show APPLICATION of the Technology of the QC. Eventually everything CAN and WOULD be Created/BUILT upon PROCESSES.

S-157. from Bryan Willoughby regarding his "Master Plan" for UNITEL

From : "Affirm Technologies" <pathfinder@mindspring.com> To : <stealthskater@hotmail.com> CC : "BluEyes" <pathfinder@mindspring.com>Subject : Re: evolution of prototypesDate : Sat, 5 Jan 2002 16:26:01 -0800

----- Original Message -----

> From: stealthskater@hotmail.com > To: pathfinder@mindspring.com > Sent: Saturday, January 05, 2002 1:28 PM> Subject: evolution of prototypes>> Hi Bryan -->> You must have done something, because the site is back up again!>> I first saw this posted at 'The Black Vault'. Another company called Transdimension is proposing using their dye-based laser Asymmetric Gravitational Wave Propulsion System . Their site is at => http://www.tdimension.com/projects.html . Apparently they already have some existing products they are selling. I brought this to Larry's attention, and he said he sent them a letter to see if they wanted to do business with UNITEL (although Larry was certain his laser was far superior to their's). But the true significance of this is that a company with an established product line (and appears to have defense customers) has come out and said that anti-grav by laser is NOT science-fiction. I thought this would be a piece of "evidence" that Larry could use on some of his critics. (A secondary piece of theoretical evidence examining a link between plasma and gravity is at => http://www.goodfelloweb.com/nature/cgbi/index.html .)>> I've had some experience in the chemical industry watching projects grow into production. Sometimes the designs are on paper with established and proven chemical and thermodynamic models (e.g., how to design a heat exchanger, distillation column, fluidized-bed reactor, etc. -- much experimentation went into developing "canned" design procedures that can be computerized). But other times a discovery is made in the laboratory. Say for example a new catalyst is found by whatever means (theory, accident, ???). While initial observations look promising, nevertheless a rigorous set of steps must be followed before vast sums are spent to implement this discovery into a production unit. The catalyst is produced in small quantities and tested in "batch" runs. Appropriate scale-up calculations are made and it is next tested in a small steady-state "pilot plant" unit. If everything still looks okay, then more simulations are done to scale it up to a commercial production unit.>

241

> Although Szilard is credited with the idea of a nuclear chain reaction (supposedly by watching traffic lights crossing streets in Hungary), many nations including the U.S. knew of the concept. Everyone wanted to build an atomic bomb. But many skeptics abounded, some saying that such a blast would ignite the earth's atmosphere while other saying a chain reaction (the necessary "first step") couldn't be achieved. Enrico Fermi and his team undertook the building of the first crude atomic reactor under the University of Chicago stadium. For a while it looked like the skeptics were right. Fermi couldn't get a sustained reaction. Other countries discovered the same thing and gave up. Fermi persisted. He found the success was an ultra-pure form of graphite (that was used as a "moderator" to slow the neutrons down to increase the nuclei "cross-sections"). After he arranged to have this stuff made specially for him, he was able to achieve the first controlled chain reaction. Then it was full steam ahead for Oppenheimer & company and the Manhattan Project. von Neumann suggested a chemical IMplosion to generate a critical mass. Fermi already proved that it was feasible to artificially produce a chain reaction.>> In UNITEL's case -- from the limited knowledge I have -- everything is based on Larry's engineering experience and a close-up observation/examination (of some sort) of a UFO. No lab work even on a small rudimentary scale has been done at all. And the first prototype seems to be some very expensive unique semiconductor lens that will take over a year to make. And to boot even he admits that he & Mike are guessing at some of the physics while his detractors (like Sarfatti) are saying their knowledge of physics says it can't work. Even with Rolls-Royce, they were going to fund the manufactur of only a very small surface of UNITEL's smart-skin. But Larry seems to be taking a route (going from CA drawings with no proven physics to a production-sized unit with no intermediate steps in between). I can understand why this might scare off conservative investors ... that's not normally how things are done. That's why I was suggesting producing something much smaller (that would say take a month to "grow") that could substantiate the viability of his convictions and thus prove the concept to the doubters.>> But there might be parts of the complete story that I'm not privvy to. I learn more each time I receive an e-mail from you or him. And that's fine. I'm just pointing out the 'obvious' to me and anyone on the street. By-the-way, I nearly crapped when I read Fred Wolf would aid UNITEL in its battles with Sarfatti and others for $250/hour. For that rate, he should be able to walk-on-water and kill with Zeus-like thunderbolts! It'd be cheaper to buy Mike a laptop, get him an AOL account, and let him respond to Sarfatti's caustic e-mails and give Larry a much-needed break. Bring in Dr. Wolf only when UNITEL is having problems generating the B-E effects on a test unit.>> That's all for now. Hope your trip is off to a good start. At the TAP-TEN yGroups site, I noticed where an upcoming conference was set for November of this year in Las Vegas. SO far UNITEL and the Russian inventor are scheduled to appear. Are you working on getting others? You might arrange with Glenn Campbell (http://www.ufomind.com ) to conduct some Area-51 tours.

Hi Mark, BIG PICTURE & DETAILS :

THE BOTTOM LINE for BUSINESS is that we have to be WELL ORGANIZED with a Productive Plan of Action that will Catalyst the Documented Test Results in a Fortress of VIABLE PRODUCTS. In the event that things don't go so positive for our results, we need to be certain that we're not out a

242

fortune before we begin any production for Mass Manufacturing exotic (today) application products. These Strategic Operations will NEED to be COHERENT even if we ARE working in QUANTUM!

Enjoyed your email contents. See, Mark, it's what I have remembered to mention and reinforce all

along to 'Team Unitel' for the last three years. (I knew there was no way they could go anywhere anytime soon if there's no GUIDANCE TRACK of Elemental Testing Series and Backing of Result DOCUMENTATION.) You have got to gain some respect in the Physics community and stop battling over things that don't matter any way. Sarfatti (and perhaps others like him) is NOT the way to go into Physics communities to gain position. You need to SHOW Your Proof!

The only way I know how to do that is to gain some very Preliminary Funding ( we have that in my work being done today) selling of Initial Shares...( some of the shares have been sold, but that's not enough to come through with what we need for Lab work as that was just 'absorbed in paying for their living and corporate and Intellectual Property protection). We must conduct HO-Scale experiments (as you mentioned) such as a Scalable miniature lens (whatever will prove the theories and ideas) for conducting their initial ''LAB"" Experiments. Make some Test, Create Observable Findings, Document them in an intense series of Test/Results (including Publishing Whitepaper) Improve through the batteries of test on the miniature scale.

Then once they are assured of their Capabilities from there through Intense TESTING/Documented Results, exercise the right for a line on Secondary funding and then -- and only then -- conduct the UIC build-out of the To-Scale Lens, Flat First, and the process is Repeated from the First Initial Test Batteries.

Then once that is complete, continue to DOCUMENT and WHITEPAPER the Whole Project while , at the same time reach out Strategically through the Physics World and get together more (SUPPORT) alliance to their findings. Bring this position forward through Conferences and, again, continue to gain support while still allowing the Lab (UIC or Designated) to continue the Growth of the Crystal at Larger Scale. Still probably not the Parabolic one -- that is for the FULL-SCALE one for Aerospace.

I believe we would good to produce for the HOLO-1 initially through all this effort yet show the results by Applying Series of PROOF SETS of much Smaller Prototypes. Several prototypes are definitely common to INVENTION.

SECURE A TOP-NOTCH MANAGEMENT TEAM. PRODUCTION can only begin when we KNOW that what we have and can be MASS PRODUCED.

I personally would like to see UNITEL Team position themselves with some very "out of the box"

Investment Team. That's the people that I know in this domain that want to see Invention like this come out to be Marketable on a Global Scale with Distribution Channel/Network Centers. We're speaking more in the lines of the QC and other Application Products that can be created such as Communication Products such as a Quantum Modulator.

Also, in the whole while of all this effort, I believe we better keep our gauged eye on the Competition and others coming through with Invention of this Magnitude. Personally, I know several groups that are in the same area. I have spoken to a couple very private entities that would like to partner in a Project together once we get ORGANIZED and know which way we're heading.

Mark, there's no way ANY investor is just coming in here and lay down some CASH for this to come about. It's going to have to stand on its MERITS.

243

And you are not at all out of line about the FACT that LARRY and MIKE are no CORPORATE TEAM today. This is going to have to be! PLAY YOUR PARTS and let OTHERS come in and RUN THE SHOW. THEY are Engineers and Physic- minded. Which is PERFECT! YOU can't BE everything. That's why there's TEAM CONCEPT initiatives that must be actuated.

Much more later. You already know that there's not way you and I have to ''preach'' this around the

circle. Believe me, they KNOW there's no way to do this without a PROPER ORGANIZED EFFORT! They are just talking right now. That's good. But that is NOT enough.

We're GOING TO HAVE TO BE METHODICAL about EVERYTHING.

NOW just between you and I, I already know a way that you don't have to GROW a CRYSTAL to MANIPULATE these Quantum Fields. I have mentioned this several times to LARRY (not Mike at first ) and Larry just goes right through that with his SAME STORIES) and I am just fed his knowledge over and over. So I know not to try convincing them. I don't want to try that.

When it is the right moment, I will then actuate my Integration Method and we'll be bypassing the Growth aspect once it is aligned properly and naturally with their methods. It's simple. I don't even get over-involved with their Stories. I listen politely. If in case that they decide not to even go it my way for a Test, then I am naturally at knowledge in hand to bring it to Fruition away from this UNITEL Project.

Remember, there's a place for everything. Like you have been there testing to the gills and reassuring in every measurement. We know this is necessary or you are not with Valid Proof. However, I will state here that there's no sense in trying to CONVINCE everyone. You just perhaps have to SHOW the Majority and that will take care of the Masses.

Hey, I really don't discount neither MIKE and LARRY. It's their position to do things their way.

We just have to FIND A FIT! WE CAN DO ALL OF THIS WITH GOOD ORGANIZATION PLANNING and PATTERNS.

Mark, I have several theories and also more inventions/methods ... one, two, three ... Tey will all see

Daylight from my Autism work to my Compounds in Physics methodologies. It's nothing like just "keeping it stored all your life". TESLA (and other similar inventors) at least -- even with all the Interference (he didn't know business world methods) -- he STILL made for a UNIQUE difference in this Earth's inhabitants' present and future inventions.

Regards in kind,~bryan

S-158. from Bryan Willoughby regarding more thoughts on organizing a true "team" for UNITEL

From : "Affirm Technologies" <pathfinder@mindspring.com> To : <stealthskater@hotmail.com>Subject : Re: you're the man with the PLAN !Date : Sat, 5 Jan 2002 18:44:59 -0800

244

----- Original Message ----- > From: stealthskater@hotmail.com > To: pathfinder@mindspring.com > Sent: Saturday, January 05, 2002 5:05 PM>Subject: you're the man with the PLAN !>>Bryan -->>Finally! I've finally heard from someone who knows the cold hard facts of the business world. As much as I like Larry -- and my heart is convinced he's not making any of this up -- still it would be difficult for others to come to his aid when a logical mind says "extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof". >> Actually I more agree than disagree with Sarfatti, Kaku, Witten and the rest. It's just Sarfatti's personal demeanor that really turns me off. The only thing more worse than asking a dumb (in his mind) question is NOT asking it all. Which is his way of brow-beating people. I do think at times these mainstreamers don't "push the envelope" so-to-speak for fear of damaging their reputations and cushy teaching positions.>> It's only natural for us to seek out peers to discuss our ambitions. I can see why Larry likes to go into physics groups and post to get comments. I used to be a semi-pro roller-skater and I would hang out with that crowd all-the-time. If I were into NASCAR, I'd probably spend most of my free time in garages or shops that sell customized car equipment. Tom Mahood (whom I like but criticize for not having more of an 'open mind') said he looked into Larry's claims a couple of years ago and couldn't decide "if he was a sincere crackpot or a smart con artist". When you talk-the-talk but can't walk-the-walk, you're really leaving yourself wide open for attack.> > Personally I would have thought it would be a more mature approach -- and certainly one that I would expect from the giften people I've worked with over the years at Carbide and DuPont and even in college -- if Sarfatti, Mahood, and the rest would have said something like "your guesses at how the physics work are severely lacking in our estimate, but we don't necessarily say your device cannot work like you claim". I did finally get that admission from Dr. "Ark" when he admitted that Mike does seem to "know all about physics" and "I wish them luck. No kidding!" I relayed that admission to Larry but never heard anything more about it. He and "Ark" apparently had previous battles on an old eGroups anti-grav site.> > Anyway, Bryan, your last batch of e-mails was the first hint of anything I've seen so far that could be perceived as a PROFESSIONAL plan. And by this I'm not taking anything away from Larry or Mike. It's like you said -- assigning individual strengths and talents to form a team. That's why my entreprenurial photo/music business failed because I had to do everything including things I'm just not cut out for.> > I live in south-central West Virginia (Charleston) which borders Virginia, Ohio, and Kentucky. Let me know when you're going to be near in the future ...>> -- Mark

Mark,

245

Excellent take on things, Mark. There's a fine line between Debating, Relating, and Exacerbating. Point is: Exactly, that there's a need to ASSIST PEOPLE that come around like MIKE (PHYSICIST TOUCH) and LARRY.

Here's my take on this. IF Sarfatti (I totally agree about him. I don't waste time on his efforts, and in my perception he WASTES the PRECIOUS Life Energy that he breathes on 75% Bad Attitude) When he and OTHERS could be ASSISTING someone like MIKE AND LARRY or at least offer him a PATH to Follow that proves the greatest chance of success.. OK, I certainly don't want to continue giving to one another back-and-forth, <stealthskater>, as you already realize the situations that you SEE on the Web Forums .. and when we both realize the SHORT FALLS that are all around this UNITEL Challenge/Vision.

NOW, here's what OUR PLAN OF ACTION CAN BE … GET Larry and Mike together in a Conference, Person-to-Person. (Yes -- I have had my visits. But

they were NOT what I call GREAT PLANNING as I didn't try to take charg e. And they didn't even come CLOSE to engaging on something with STRATEGICS. So I decided to NOT allow that Wasted time. I worked on some other projects while they were dancing in the stories...)

ALLOW them to UNLOAD their Armor at the door. Let go of the "going to beat someone else at the crap table" and UPLOAD a WELL-ORGANIZED BUSINESS AND OPERATIONS STRATEGIC PLAN. KEY. FOLLOW THROUGH WITH THIS PLAN -- as IMPLEMENTED -- with ONLY necessary changes according to Well Documented Facts and Figures.

FIRST - PLAN. SECOND - ACTION.

It's that easy. All the other DETAILS are just that. LARRY and MIKE have from what I have heard ... come through with some good meeting planned ... and come OUT with a non-performing representation. They can and have to GET ON TRACK. That's the BIGGEST problem so it HAS TO BE DONE WITH METHODICAL PLANNING AND "DISCIPLINE". I know you would have to agree, Mark.

Oh, and I have some business to take care of in KY. So when I get my itinerary, I could advise you

of such and perhaps you could see to meet me perhaps on the way between your place and mine location. That would perhaps work to save some time. Up to us, though, to make it work.

Mark, I am an Engineer and a Entrepreneur. Also, I have led several companies to successful

ventures from ground-up. Been there and still doing 'that'. Thanks for the EFFECTIVE COMMUNICATION, Mark. We got a LOT to do. But there's NO limit to what we are Capable of with PROPER Planning. I LIKE YOUR THINKIN ! Hey, by the way Mark… you can probably tell that I have a post-

Military background. And for me, it does indeed help me devise plans of actions and filter through the wasted elements. It came from some of my Special Forces operations. I don't rely on all the tactics as I INTEGRATE those with my Engineering,Marketing, Financial Background, and Physics know-how and ideas, invention s. My main theme in life is to do EVERYTHING I can to make a difference. PAY IT FORWARD with my Full support, intestinal fortitude, and Visionary gifts.

246

It certainly seems that you have a passion to see that things that we might not can explain (or at the least, explained) so that we may rise above the possibilities into the FULL USE of Our Collective Minds through the UNIVERSE. Best regards,~bryan

S-159. from Bryan Willoughby regarding strategies on forging successful ventures

From : "Affirm Technologies" <pathfinder@mindspring.com> To : <stealthskater@hotmail.com> Subject : Re: what makes an "expert" ?Date : Sat, 5 Jan 2002 19:12:20 -0800

----- Original Message -----

> From: stealthskater@hotmail.com> To: pathfinder@mindspring.com > Sent: Saturday, January 05, 2002 6:23 PM> Subject: what makes an "expert" ?>> Hey Bryan --> > It's funny how people can get defensive about their own convictions and complain that their detractors are too biased. But when it comes their turn, they can have just as much of a "closed mind". I picked up on one of Larry's sore points -- the mental aspect of the possible relationship between the consciousness and the quantum universe. Actually I admire Sarfatti's and Herbet's work here for attempting to formulate equations with numbers to describe such an abstract concept. I tried to tell Larry there must be something 'here' because of all the research and money that has been spent on U.S. and Soviet remote-viewing programs. Dan Sherman was involved in a NSA "Intuitive Communications" program that combined psi with a computer somehow. And I've seen Navy contracts that have been copies and posted on the Montauk boards for investigating the effects of hyperspatial geometry on consciousness as well as manipulating geometry to achieve interstellar travel. Larry believes in the latter but pushes you away when you start talking about the former. Like you I attribute it to "nobody's perfect" and engage in discussions he's most comfortable with.>> The Inflationary Model of the Big-Bang theory has successfully beat back any other contender for the past 2 decades (contrary to what my brother-in-law, a civil engineer but a very conservative fundamentalist lay preacher would profess). But there is a new alternative theory (just proposed last year and discussed in http://www.stealthskater.com/Documents/Strings_1.doc ) . Using an entirely different physics (the collison between parallel 5-dimensional universal membranes instead of expansion of a infinitesmally-small point of infinite density), it produces the EXACT same predictions of the Inflationary Model. It goes even further in saying that 2 drawbacks of the former model -- the prediction of magnetic monopoles and gravitational waves, neither of which has been observed -- is NOT necessary. The new model was made possible by superstring theory and Witten's recent M-brane theory.>

247

> The point of this example is that models and theories are just that. When they can be tested and confirmed, they become a Law of Nature. Until then it's the best that our best can come up with to "fit" what can be seen and observed and measured. Superstrings may well be proven not to be entirely 'correct'. But no other single theory fits as much of the data while adhering to all the necessary physical and quantum constraints and restrictions. I found it exciting because it shows others are getting over their inhibitions about accepting the notions of alternate dimensions (which may well be how UFOs travel through MQT). I'm not sure I would go as far as that book "The Holographic Universe" and say everything is an aritifical reality or whatever.>> I attached a document that contains some past e-mails I received. Talking about people's prejudices and my-way-only, you'll find it an interesting insight into how some "experts" think.

Mark,

This email will just be a follow-up and very brief to express my thoughts about everyone's IDEA is Right.

IF...WHEN...(better!) everyone COMES together, not just the greatest people in SCHOLAR

LEAGUES) but that the OPEN-MINDED and PROVEN PEOPLE that have that ABILITY to SEND NEW TECHNIQUES through MATCHED-UP TECHNOLOGY, MERGED with MEDICAL and PHYSICAL and indeed SPIRITUAL POSSIBILITY, THEN and ONLY THEN will be FULL KNOW the WONDERFUL IMPACT of CAPABILITIES of what it means to know TOTAL INTEGRATION on EARTH-PLANE and Beyond. Perhaps even through tapping into the EXTRA-INTERSTELLAR OUTSOURCES which might indeed SHOW their Abilities with Us when we're FULLY RESOURCING Our TOTAL EFFECTIVE COMMUNICATIONS and ACTUATIONS to PROGRESS Beyond QUANTUM LEAPS.

Mark, I am prepared in several ways, from training through RV, BM, Hypnogogics, and other external sources of measured device and influences of Future Probable events and Past occurences (which is relative). Much is capable on these regions of universal connectivity. It strengthens existentially when allowed to 'band' naturally in group methodologies. That is not the only heightened way (as you know as even as I speak here). I have some (surely others do) really far-reaching ideas in this area alone after so many years of applications and extraordinary research and uncovering. The natural and future ''events'' (in my perception) are ALWAYS in RECORDING POSITION! : )

You know, the topic of STRING theory... That's one that I won't attempt to try to open too far on

this communications. You will understand, that I have so much passion in this area -- as well as several many others -- that I would much prefer the challenge of communications in person. Something about being IN TUNE with the Moment. But I enjoy reaching out to some of the Ppublished material at times as I get yet another angle of perception through all of these events.

YOU, my friend, have a VERY diverse LIFE of EXPERIENCE TOO! ~cool to know we can relate

on many levels... Best regards,~bryan

248

S-160. from Larry Maurer forwarding a theoretical explanation of UNITEL's laser plasma

From : Larry Maurer <lmaurer@unitelnw.com>To : stealthskater@hotmail.comSubject : Fwd: Re: UNITEL AerospaceDate : Sat, 05 Jan 2002 20:43:57 -0800

> At 02:09 AM 1/5/02 -0500, you wrote:

>> Dear Larry: >>>> It's good to hear from you. Happy New Year to you also! Thank you very much for inviting me to visit Japan with you. To be honest, I have not made a final decision. But it's unlikely that I will go.>>>> On one hand, I want to help you sell your proposal to Toyota so you will be able to demonstrate your concept. I know you and Michael have put so much effort on this project for such a long time. Your trip sounds a lot of fun also. I have no problem in translating technical, legal and business discussions. I can be very useful a translator for you.>>>> On the other hand as I might have told you before, I do not fully understand your ideas. Therefore I cannot explain it to anyone either in English or Japanese very well. I am not sure if I can explain the physics experiment which I did with Raymond long time ago either. I do not fully understand the relevance (and significance) of that work to what you are trying to do.>>>> Larry, I really wish I could understand your concept better so that I can be of your help in selling your proposal to Toyota. Last several years, I myself have developed a skill to sell new technology to future customers and investors and get their upfront commitment to develop specific products. So I fully understand what you are trying to do here.>>>> I had a lot of admiration for your perseverance. So I really hope you will succeed. >>>> Thanks again and best regards, >> Aki

> Date: Sat, 05 Jan 2002 19:23:44 -0800 > To: A2tomita@aol.com > From: Larry Maurer <lmaurer@unitelnw.com> > Subject: Re: UNITEL Aerospace

> Aki: >> Now that I have a bit of a breather, I thought I would give you a better idea of what we are attempting to describe and the relationship of our proposed laser plasma and its monopole effects as compared to the same monopole effects on a Macroscopic scale as you and Dr. Chiao produced with optical fibers and RF waveguides. I realize that your work that you performed in this research project with Dr. Chiao was to measure the monopole effect and that you may not totally understand how we will produce monopole effect with our laser beam. Anyway, to satisfy your curiosity, here are some useful pointers for you to look at:>

249

> Wave Collapse >> Wave collapse is a most exciting phenomenon of plasma physics -- first predicted in a seminal paper by the Russian scientist V.E. Zakharov in 1972. Using a fluid description of a thermal plasma and distinguishing sharply between slow and fast dynamics, Zakharov derived 2 coupled differential equations which describe the nonlinear evolution of so-called Langmuir waves.>> The Zakharov model shows how Langmuir wave packets can collapse so that the electric field reaches extreme values within a small region.>> Before the collapse is ultimately arrested (in our plasma) where the field might reach very large values, and charged particles which pass through the field during the collapse can be accelerated. In a real plasma, infinite fields are of course impossible. And it has been shown that the collapse is sooner-or-later halted by wave-particle interactions. The electric field is thus prevented from growing indefinitely to high energies. Before the collapse is ultimately arrested, however, the field might reach very large values.>> Also, charged particles which pass through the field during the collapse can be accelerated. In laboratory experiments, one has observed a "burst" or "flash" of fast electrons associated with collapsing waves - producing a tail in the particle distribution. The phenomenon of wave collapse is strongly associated with the so-called ponderomotive force. Before pursuing the concept of collapse, let us digress with a brief look at this peculiar force.>> A charged particle bouncing in the field of a constant-amplitude wave will oscillate in a perfectly periodic manner. If the wave is modulated, however, so that its amplitude varies with position, the particle will experience a net force working on a time scale long compared to the wave period. This is the ponderomotive force which can be derived by taking the time-average of the force on the particle caused by the wave field. In the 1-dimensional case, the ponderomotive force is given by >

> F = - q*q/(4*omega*omega)*d(|E0|*|E0)/dx >> where "q", "omega", and "E0" are respectively the particle charge, the wave frequency, and the electric field amplitude. The asterisks denote multiplication. Note that the force increases with the gradient of the electric field energy density but decreases with the frequency.>> Our proposed super-dense projected laser plasma will produce the same ponderomotive force through oscillation of the projected buckets in the laser plasma. Please review the following url: http://www.physics.ucla.edu/class/01F/250_Rosenzweig/notes/pondero.pdf .>> This is the same advanced wave mechanics as described in our proposed laser plasma that produces the adiabatic pressure and stress energy tensor field through trapped biexcitonic gasses within the projected potential (true RGB) EM wells. The oscillation of the projected EM wells (buckets) from the projected end-point of the laser plasma back-and-forth with the phase conjugate reflected buckets at the paraboloidically-curved free-standing red, green, & blue RF-activated (II-VI compound RF transparent high-temperature) glass crystallite laser superlattice lens. The dielectric force and ZPE will split the whole ship/field into N and S monopole fields on a Macroscopic level.>> Beyond producing an extremely strong magnetic attraction for our propulsion system, an enormous amount of energy can also be produced (Boot Strap Effect). This directly relates to the production of energy that T.A.P.-T.E.N. is interested in.

250

>> Also check out: "Nonlinear Wave Interactions in a 2-Electron Temperature Plasma", "Weakly Nonlinear High-Frequency Waves in Magnetized Plasmas", and especially "Electron Acceleration by Weakly Nonlinear High-Frequency Waves in Magnetized Plasmas." Also from American research at UCLA, check out the Prof. John Dawson's "Plasma Beat Oscillator".>> The first wavelet packets were constructed in summer 1989 by Meyer and Ronald Coifman in Gstaad Switzerland, and Victor Wickerhauser and Stephen Quake at Yale. Loosely speaking a wavelet packet is the product of a wavelet and a wiggle, an oscillating function. The wavelet itself reacts to abrupt changes while the wiggle inside reacts to regular oscillations. In this case, the project oscillating buckets are the wave packets. The trapped biexcitonic particles are the wiggle inside. A true EM wave packet is produced via the RGB (255 lumens per) sections of the lens that recombine as true "white", coherent monochromatic light.>> A basic criterion and constant factor for the design employed in our computer generated laser plasma in N-dimensional vector space is a tuned equilaterally triangular lattice array. The equilaterally triangular lattice is the ideal superconducting lattice for all acoustic-charge-photon (hierarchy of beam constituents) interactions to take place. The RF field tailors all interactions on both microscopic and Macroscopic levels.>> The polarized diamagnetic biexcitonic gas becomes very dense when confined in the projected oscillating buckets. The confined oscillating excitonic gas particles (bosons) will form a Bose-Einstein condensate with their particle spins aligned, generating a fiber bundle packet with parallel transport within the projected buckets (for mass carrying purposes). The point-like projected oscillating buckets begin to take on monopolar or particulate general vector potential -- both in harmonics and dynamics -- with the faster moving excitonic particles confined in the relatively slower moving projected, oscillating buckets. >> The projected oscillating buckets lie along the z-axis like beads on a string and are reflected back with an increase in energy (see NASA Projects Ruby Falls and Epcot) from the point of collapse in the projected laser plasma. This (longitudinal) collapse is due to Laurentz-Fitzgerald contraction. As the projected oscillating buckets -- with an increase in energy-- reflect back towards the laser lens, they are in turn reflected back precisely to the point of contraction by a phase conjugate mirror (PCM) signal at the surface of the lens where another bucket is kicked-in the projected plasma, in a precisely timed fashion.>> This oscillation of the projected buckets between the projected end-point and laser lens with PCM reflection causes an "energy swing" witch creates an intense amount of energy that is built up in a relatively short period of time. Due to the dielectric effect, the projected plasma renormalizes North and South poles with positive and negative charges at either end of the projected plasma.>> The pulsing of the projected laser plasma (similar to "q-switching") produces an increase in amplitude, affecting the overall probability of the projected field to produce a high gain in field strength. The parameters of the projected sinusoidal, interiorly resonating compressed field are set up by the distribution of RF field components in precisely clocked phase relationships accomplished by computer modulation which also controls the overall field amplitude. >> When the bucket density is increased through PCM reflection/oscillation to produce left-handed Larmor precession of the buckets, mimicking the rotation of frustrated overlapping wave sections of closed Wilson loop plaquettes as found in a microscopic hadron string. High-frequency harmonics create electrooptical effects such as the magnetooptical Faraday polarized states of photons.

251

Clocking controls the Larmor precession in odd-numbered precessing frustrations or half-twists. These half-twists connect electric (three-parts) and magnetic (three-parts) through the six-tensor projected coherent plasma.>> An intense amount of electric energy in a small amount of space:>> The feedback mechanism of collapse

>Consider a monofrequent wave which is spatially modulated so that its amplitude changes with position. The ponderomotive force will then push electrons away from the regions of large amplitude, and into regions of smaller amplitude. When the electrons are perturbed, an ambipolar field is set up which causes the ions to move along with the electrons, so that the plasma remains quasi-neutral. Thus the plasma density drops in regions where the wave amplitude is large, and decreases in regions where the amplitude is small.>> If the wave is (e.g., a Langmuir wave) a lower hybrid or an upper hybrid wave, a drop in the background plasma density implies an increase in the refraction index. From optics, it is known that wave energy tends to focus into regions of large refraction index. The result of all this is a strong feedback mechanism. Some-or-other mechanism initially modulates the wave field so that the ponderomotive force pushes plasma away from large-amplitude regions. The refraction index becomes large in the resulting cavities. Wave energy is focused into the regions of large amplitude. The ponderomotive force is further intensified. More plasma particles are forced out of the cavities, the refraction index of the cavities increases still further. And so on and so on until the collapse is finally aborted by transit-time interactions.>> Research on wave collapse>> The Plasma-Astrophysics Group of the University of Oslo conducts research on various aspects of wave collapse. We have looked at the dynamics of individual cavitons (collapsing wave packets) for the case of Langmuir waves, upper hybrid waves, and other electrostatic waves in weakly magnetized plasmas as well as for Langmuir-type waves in multi-temperature unmagnetized plasmas. The wave dynamics has been modelled by partial differential equations which have been integrated by so-called spectral methods.>> For wave collapse applications, spectral methods are among the fastest known and orders of magnitude faster than self-consistent particle simulations. Many interesting results have been derived, such as recurrent wave collapse where the caviton first tends to collapse, then expands for a certain period, once more starts to collapse, etc. We have also performed extensive calculations on the details of transit-time interactions inside wave packets. If you are interested in further reading on our projects on wave collapse, take a look at some relevant publications, in particular the papers entitled "Nonlinear Wave Interactions in a 2-Electron Temperature Plasma", "Weakly Nonlinear High-Frequency Waves in Magnetized Plasmas", and "Electron Acceleration by Weakly Nonlinear High-Frequency Waves in Magnetized Plasmas." >> Sorry the information is kind of rough. But this is the jixt of what we want to describe so that we can (finally) construct and test our prototypes. I haven't got a reply from Kimio at Toyota. But we will be able to converse just fine with Yoshinari and Kimio's assistance. Once we construct our prototype and we are successful, perhaps you and Dr. Chiao may be interested in studying the effects (along with the rest of the world physics community) of our patented laser and projected plasma. Michael has proven his self time-and-time again with Ph.D-level physicists. And we are very

252

confident that our design works. Let me know if you have any comments on the material herein, etc. and Mike and/or I will be very happy to respond.>> We will be coming to the Bay area sometime in the next 6-to-8 weeks to meet with Dr. Fred A. Wolf, Ph.D physicist. Perhaps you may want to join us for a casual dinner meeting and we will enlighten you to our progress as we will spend a couple of days on our visit. Good luck, Aki, and again have a happy and prosperous New Year!>> Regards, >> Larry D. Maurer, Principal > & Director, Engineering > Unitel, Inc. > www.unitelnw.com > (503) 232-2740

S-161. from Dr. Jadczyk regarding ORMEs

From : "Laura Knight-Jadczyk" <lark2@ozline.net>To : <stealthskater@hotmail.com>Subject : Re: attached sample document from the ORMEs searchDate : Sun, 6 Jan 2002 15:36:14 -0500

On 28 Dec 2001, at 14:05, <stealthskater> wrote:

> The attached is a MS-Word conversion of one of the ORMEs' sites (to save you some time in <link>ing to that site). It mentions Josephson tunneling and "laser-like" performance. I have no idea of what they're talking about.

Plain nonsense and featured disinfo.

-- ark

S-162. from Bryan Willoughby regarding superstrings, Taylor Kramer, Tesla

From : "Affirm Technologies" <pathfinder@mindspring.com>To : <stealthskater@hotmail.com>CC : "BluEyes" <pathfinder@mindspring.com> Subject : Re: Taylor Kramer versus superstringsDate : Sun, 6 Jan 2002 13:18:04 -0800

----- Original Message ----- > From: stealthskater@hotmail.com > To: pathfinder@mindspring.com > Sent: Sunday, January 06, 2002 10:53 AM> Subject: Taylor Kramer versus superstrings

253

>> Bryan -->> I had almost forgotten about this until we started talking about superstrings.>> Again -- for some unknown reason -- I just happened to catch an episode of "America's Most Wanted" on tv. It comes on locally at 9pm Saturday, a time that I'm normally at a skating rink. I don't know why I was home and just happened to watch broadcast tv that night.>> It was a 'Missing Persons' segment featuring Philip Taylor Kramer, His story is at => http://www.mrkabc.com/news/kramer01.html . His father didn't come across like any "crackpot" to me and reminded me of the type of professors I had in college. Apparently the elder Kramer had developed a "theory of everything" based on the discoveries of Einstein, Planck, Fermi and others. It proved so mathematically challenging that it was unsolvable for decades. Reportedly the son had a revelation that solved more of "the Equation".>> I had tried to contact Ray Kramer through the author of the above article. He was somewhat rude and offered no help. I did a web "White Pages" search for Ray (or Raymond) Kramer in California and produced 4 numbers/addresses. But none of them had an e-mail address. I didn't want to contact Professor Kramer if this would bring back painful memories of his son's death. But I was very interested to see if he incorporated any superstring theories in his equations or if they were of some new type altogether. In the AMW interview -- which I copied onto videotape -- he mentioned using unstable gravitational waves for instantaneous communication anywhere within the universe. In the above-referenced article another revelation was made that hinted at actual physical teleportation. I don't know if this had to do with "Star Chamber" type stuff or not.>> An addendum of sorts was added by conspiracist author Sherman Skolnick at => http://www.stealthskater.com/Documents/Kramer_1.doc . It is his theory that Kramer did not die because of his discovery but perhaps due to his involvement with the O.J. case. Based on the "body language" of his wife Jennifer in the AMW interview, it seemed that she knew more than what she was telling and I sort of got some strange feeling that perhaps Kramer had a mistress on-the-side and a jealous husband did him in. But I have absolutely NO basis for that and that could be 180 degrees from the real truth. When they found Kramer's bones in the Malibu canyon, no explanation was given for how they were drug out of his suspended mini-van and strewn over the grounds. In fact, it was very strange that no more details or confirmations ever came out in public after the mini-van was discovered. No suicide notes, no nothing ... very tidy and "convenient" .>> Just for your information ...> -- Mark

Mark,

First -- I knew about Tesla's 'situation'. I'll explain that one in person with you when we meet.

You dig-up some interesting articles and connections when you put your mind to it, don't you?

Ah, you know what else? We have something much in common. Not that I am Pro or close to it. But I have ALWAYS liked Skating. Roller, that is. Cool way to stay in shape too!

254

Will speak to you more about 'Kramer' etc when the opportunity arrives. My idea is that string theory is not what the Universe's behavior is really about. However, any one

can draw their own conclusions and form a ''deeper perception'' -- dependent sometimes more on what they read 'vs' what the observer 'first-hand'. ""Perhaps, everything we ever learn about life may or may NOT be true. I always remember to keep that close in heart."' I am not much of a person with a CLOSED mind. I love to be open-minded when it comes to Universal Knowledge OR "otherwise'.

Thanks for the sharing. You and I need (I feel strongly about this) to get together. Once this

business with my work is complete, I will come there. I just need to be 'done' with this little detail of the '60K' I mentioned. I will somehow do this rapidly; I want to move onward. This is just a moment's course of actions...that will lead into greater events happening...perhaps you will notice SYNCHRONICITY in what I am expressing.

Here's ONE WISH. TESLA was SO aware! I wished that he would NOT have been so strapped,

''taken'' and alone in his quests for the Universe's Keys. He was NOT a Business operating individual. And the PERSONS that he DID get involved with were almost every bit out to 'take' him right from the beginning.

HIS STORY will be a Mystery till ONE day, it will be TOLD as it TRULY HAPPENED. ~FEEL THE MAGIC..

All the best, ~bryan

S-163. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding others who may be exploring similar technologies

From : Larry Maurer <lmaurer@unitelnw.com>To : stealthskater@hotmail.comSubject : Re: your e-mail to AkiDate : Sun, 06 Jan 2002 17:25:36 -0800

At 06:41 PM 1/6/02 -0500, you wrote: > Mr. Maurer -- >> What a weekend, huh? I had about the same type here.>> Judging from your letter to Aki, it certainly seems that your theses are well-founded in theory. (I'm glad to know I'm not the only one who doesn't understand all the physics!) But this stuff-- for as much as seems to have been written about it -- can't be a closely-guarded secret. Do you think other agencies/companies are pursuing similar lines of research trying to generate these room-temperature B-E effects either by using lasers or other means? Maybe that's why the Air Force has taken a sit-back-and-see if you can move forward with your ideas of how to achieve these events predicted-by-theory where their best efforts continue to fail. Just a thought ... could be wrong, though. >

255

> Regarding the interstellar vehicle, say for argument's sake you can make it hover and do MQT. Since these other dimensions have never been "mapped", per se, how do you know where to go? I'm thinking about the movie "Lost In Space" where they could "zap" themselves out of harm's way but had no control over where they would re-emerge. Would more of the superstring theory have to be developed to derive some functions which relate these other dimensions to our 4-D coordinates? Would unmanned craft have to be sent via MQT to "chart" these realms so some sort of navigational map could be formulated? >> -- Mark

Hi Mark:

Yeah, what a weekend! Last night I found the infamous "Plasma Beat Oscillator" creator Prof. John M. Dawson of UCLA. Our buddy Paul Kirsch of UCLA Med School wrote me today announcing the fact that Dr. Dawson died just this last November. Just my kind of luck exactly! I wrote Paul back asking if he could find a grad student of Prof. Dawson's for us to correspond and perhaps work with.

Yes, we will be mapping our way to where we think the probability is good for habitable planets to be at etc. with unmanned and manned vehicles. Just like StarTrek's "Enterprise", we "will go where no man has been before". I know that UCLA & the U. of Oslo (wave collapse experiments) are very close to our proposed plasma with similar effects etc. As you can see, we have a lot of "fence sitters" ready to approve or deny the possibilities of our design. When we are successful (notice I didn't say "if" we are successful) with our prototype testing, just watch those SOBs jump to want to get involved! 'Till then, it's carefully said: "I am not sure I understand. But good luck...." blah, blah, blah and so forth.

This wishy-washy fickle crap is what we have been putting up with since day one! At least Charlie Johnson (former Pres. of Boeing Aerospace) had the gonies to make a decision and take immediate and positive action to meet with us because he found out that Boeing could instill a magnetized charge on a laser beam. This is why if the investors balk this coming week, we are going gung-ho to complete and publish our book ASAP. That will get the word out on all the facts and history behind us so that somebody or organization will take the risk and go for it (i.e., build our prototype).

Apparently you have made your decision to commit to helping us out of careful thought and consideration of weighing the facts presented. The same can be said from several associates and supporters that are professionals and did the same scrutiny of our design. Why then can't these damnable investors and the Feds make up their fickle minds? At least Sarfatti has made his mind up and taken action on a negative note hoping we will fail (poor bastard!).

I shall keep you posted on what is going to happen or not happen this next week or so with investors.

best, Larry

S-164. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding search for a student of UCLA's Dr. John Dawson

256

From : Larry Maurer <lmaurer@unitelnw.com>To : stealthskater@hotmail.comSubject : Fwd: UNITEL AerospaceDate : Sun, 06 Jan 2002 17:26:11 -0800

> Date: Sun, 06 Jan 2002 14:44:37 -0800 > To: pkirsh@pop.bol.ucla.edu > From: Larry Maurer <lmaurer@unitelnw.com> > Subject: Fwd: UNITEL Aerospace

> Paul: > Here is the email I just sent to the deceased Dr. John M. Dawson. Perhaps you could find out who one of his students is for us.>> Larry

>>>> Date: Sun, 06 Jan 2002 01:29:24 -0800 >> To: dawson@physics.ucla.edu >> From: Larry Maurer <lmaurer@unitelnw.com> >> Subject: UNITEL Aerospace

>> Dear Dr. Dawson:

>> We would sincerely like to work with you concerning our patented proposed laser plasma that is very similar to your work. Please respond as I firmly believe that you will be very interested in our proposed project at UIC. I hope you will respond to this message as we hope to hire your services in a consultation manner to assist in developing and testing our proposed project. Thank you in advance, John. I can almost guarantee that you will thoroughly enjoy taking part in our project. I hope to hear from you soon,

>> Sincerely,

>> Larry D. Maurer, Principal >> & Director, Engineering >> Unitel, Inc. >> www.unitelnw.com >> (503) 232-2740

S-165. from Ken Myers regarding comments of others concerning ORMEs

From : Ken <sprite_mkii@yahoo.com>To : <stealthskater@hotmail.com> Subject : Re: received a response from Dr. Jadczyk concerning ORMES Date : Sun, 6 Jan 2002 23:28:52 -0800 (PST)

Hi --

"Mainstream" folk tend to be rather narrow, eh. Look what they did to Velikovsky and Sitchin. The movie "Contact" sums it up. And Sagan was one of the big detractors of Velikovsky.

257

My field is no less impacted (pun here). So we go on without their knowledge or support.

I have found that a version of the famous Einstein quote "Great minds have always encountered violent opposition from mediocre minds" to be quite true. I would only change the last word in the quote to spirits. Or may be being beneficent to personalities. HO HO HO!

Take care and follow your own path. I know that is the only way that brings peace and satisfaction. -- Ken

S-166. from Bryan Willoughby regarding another Unification theory posted on KeelyNet

From : "Affirm Technologies" <pathfinder@mindspring.com> To : <stealthskater@hotmail.com> Subject : Re: another guy with yet another theory Date : Mon, 7 Jan 2002 04:24:16 -0800

----- Original Message ----- > From: stealthskater@hotmail.com > To: pathfinder@mindspring.com > Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 4:17 AM> Subject: another guy with yet another theory>> I saw this posted on KeelyNet on Sunday => http://maddsci.tripod.com/MIGATRAC/index.html . Another guy claiming that prominent physicists and cosmologists are missing the boat on forces of nature. In the end he gives no real revelations but a teaser to buy his book and stock for some anti-grav project. >> -- Mark

Hi Mark,

I'm up and at it this almost afternoon! ; ) Yes, I think sometimes there's too much data marketing.

My theory: simply allow to document and prove what I know and learn continuously. And then only when I have something ''ready'' to show will I publish those openly. Otherwise, only very tight circles of communications. ~ ~bry

S-167. from Bryan Willoughby regarding an Australian inventor who's being sued by investors

From : "Affirm Technologies" <pathfinder@mindspring.com> To : <stealthskater@hotmail.com> Subject : Re: another bad publicity case for future technology investors Date : Mon, 7 Jan 2002 08:32:48 -0800

----- Original Message -----

258

> From: stealthskater@hotmail.com > To: pathfinder@mindspring.com > Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 6:35 AM> Subject: another bad publicity case for future technology investors>> an example of what you DON'T want to happen => http://www.escribe.com/science/keelynet/m11837.html

True true true ... Yes, I have heard of Brian. He's going to live on through everyone that touches this Earth. Somehow we know that happens.

Well, that's my opinion. Some touch it more closer. But it all matters ...~bryan

S-168. from Bob King regarding other Montauk whistle-blowers besides the 4 most commonly known

From : bob king <bobking@xtra.co.nz>To : <stealthskater@hotmail.com>Subject : Re: any reliable Montauk sources ? Date : Thu, 10 Jan 2002 09:14:27 +1300

Hi ya Mark,

Thursday, January 10, 2002, 5:23:03 AM, you wrote:

> I'm debating a relative and another guy on the web about Montauk. Unlike Roswell and the P-X, there aren't any investigators or whistle-blowers other than Nichols, Moon, Bielek, and Cameron. All of them have been publicly discredited along with their reports. [in fact, the latest damage down to Nichols was at => http://www.tricountyi.net/~randerse/montauk1.htm ] I wouldn't call John Quinn a reliable source either because he seems to be too much of a conspiracy writer.

Most of them are so.

> …I can hold my own on Roswell and the P-X. There's been a wide variety of researchers and personal testimonies …

Sure have. And I have my doubts if any of them have actually been there!

> … but I'm forced by lack of credible reports to admit defeat with Montauk unless I can find some others to replace the above 4 principles.

I am sure you know more about it than I do. The only 2 things I really know about the place are that (A) it was/is being used to work on developments of Tesla's work and that (B) it's in the middle of a 'national park' (humph) with signs up around it saying trespassers will be shot! Sorry I can't be of more help.--Regards,

259

bob

S-169. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL forwarding an e-mail sent to an associate of Dr. Greer's

> Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2002 13:16:50 -0800 > To: jonathankolber@earthlink.net > From: Larry Maurer <lmaurer@unitelnw.com> > Subject: Re: Your aerospace applications

> Hello Jonathan:

> Thanks for your prompt reply. It is very interesting here because I met with Dr. Greer last July. He invited me to a luncheon meeting here in Portland which I attended. Dr. Greer didn't have much time to talk to me much about our business (UNITEL) because there were several individuals demanding his attention along with us. Dr. Greer did express much interest in helping us get funded. He asked for a business plan. Which I gave him. He told me that he wanted to develop a much more professional business plan and was quite certain that he could fund us with "millions". I did not hear from Dr. Greer since then and feared that he lost interest in us for whatever reason.>> I can say this, however. That Dr. Greer should be very pleased with our progress since we last talked. We hope to construct our prototypes at UIC along with getting KHD started on our magnetooptical software, Applied Sciences, and Flight Unlimited (including Dave Froning, Bob Roach, Hal Puthoff and Dr. T.W .Barrett) started on our aerospace projects.>> We are also attempting to contact fellow associates and researchers at UCLA Physics laser research Dept. of the late Dr. John M. Dawson who recently passed away (last November '01). They have been performing research with very similar laser plasma beam devices similar to our patented laser beam plasma. You may have heard of Prof. Dawson's "Plasma Beat Oscillator", a laser device that produces a vast amount of energy. We also have been in touch with Akira Tomita who along with Dr. Raymond Chiao (Cal Berkeley Physics Dept.) are world famous for producing monopole effects with an optical fiber and/or an RF waveguide. We want to produce the same monopole effects with our laser plasma as they did with optical fiber and RF waveguide.>> The old adage "build it and they will come" applies here as we firmly believe that once we construct our prototypes, we will draw much attention to our project and acquiring further funds to construct larger prototypes shouldn't be any problem. Aki has a very simple description of the monopole effect by analogy to a "culvert pipe and bowling ball".>> We have been discussing formal contracts with Rolls Royce Deutschland in Berlin, Germany and Toyota Motor Co.'s Aero-Business Dept. Business Development Division in Tokyo, Japan. We have patents in these countries and are very familiar with the individuals managing the departments there. We hope to be funded and continue with these International large, deep-pocket manufacturers for business associates. We were awarded Number 59 out of the top 100 International Aerospace companies for 2001-2002 and we hope to climb to the Number One spot in the next 3 to 5 years.>> This may be a great opportunity for your firm to get involved with our exciting projects with the several universities we have under contract. I look forward to hearing from you and what you have in mind from here on out. Tell Dr. Greer that he can call us anytime he wants. Or you can take over as I know he is extremely busy. We also recently got Art Bell excited about UNITEL. He wants us

260

on his show because a friend of ours recently installed a radio tower at Art's residence in Las Vegas where he had an entire afternoon to discuss UNITEL's exciting history and futuristic projects.

> Good luck, Jonathan. I hope to hear from you soon. Thank you,>> Sincerely, >> Larry D. Maurer, Principal > & Director, Engineering > Unitel, Inc. > www.unitelnw.com > (503) 232-2740

> At 01:02 PM 1/10/02 -0700, you wrote: > >> Thanks, Larry. I have today responded to a letter from your associate Doug Starfield.>>>> We seek a testable over-unity or electrogravitic device that we can license if it passes triple-vetted university testing.>>>> We are an early-stage startup. However, our founder and CEO Dr. Steven Greer has one of the best rolodexes on the planet. He can literally pick up the phone and reach virtually anyone of importance, either directly or through a contact's introduction. Several "household names" in business and politics have given him assurances of whatever funding we require once we have identified such a device. You may be familiar with Dr. Greer through the Disclosure Project and its May 9, 2001 event at the National Press Club. Visit http://www.disclosureproject.org for details. >>>> We already have seed capital in the six figures. If this kind of collaboration is of interest, please advise. >>>> Jonathan Kolber >>>> PS--I have attached several documents that introduce us, our mission and our capabilities. >>

>>----- Original Message ----- >>> From: "Larry Maurer" <lmaurer@unitelnw.com> >>> To: <jonathankolber@earthlink.net> >>> Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 12:57 PM >>> Subject: Re: Your aerospace applications >>> >>> Dear Mr. Kolber: >>> >>> Thank you for contacting us. It seems like what your firm has to offer is a > good business fit for us as we hope to construct our prototypes that will > interact with the ZPE. I will send you some materials. Please send us more info on Space Energy Access Systems. Please review the attached business plan. Thanks. >>> >>> Sincerely, >>>

261

>>> Larry D. Maurer, Principal >>> & Director, Engineering >>> Unitel, Inc. >>> www.unitelnw.com >>> (503) 232-2740 >>>

>>> At 11:59 AM 1/9/02 -0700, you wrote: >>>>>>> We have been referred to your aerospace applications web pages, but find them blank. It is our understanding that you have technology for developing electrogravitic (or ZPE-powered) craft. We are in a position to bring to bear some very significant resources for the development and marketing of such craft. Please advise if you have interest in exploring this further. >>>>>>>> Jonathan Kolber >>>> Vice President, Planning and Product Development >>>> Space Energy Access Systems, Inc. >>>> 7501 Batesville Road >>>> Afton, VA 22920

S-170. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding last minute touches to UNITEL's newsletters

From : Larry Maurer <lmaurer@unitelnw.com> To : stealthskater@hotmail.comSubject : Newsletter Date : Thu, 10 Jan 2002 18:39:12 -0800 Attachment : NL-1.DOC (359k)

> Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2002 18:39:11> To: pkirsh@ucla.edu> From: Larry Maurer <lmaurer@unitelnw.com>> Subject: Newsletter> X-Attachments: C:\MYDOCU~1\NL-1.DOC;> > Paul:> > Here is a meaty one fer ya! Perhaps you can change and/or add to the short-/long-term goals on each category to make them more different. Also I am wondering how to squeeze the small iset picture that I have for "other" category add on the front page. Possibly leaving it blank may be the way to go.>> Anyway it is set, ready for final edit. It looks great so far. Perhaps your final touch, Paul, would do it. Check out the ode to Prof. Dawson. Need the birthdate the day he died (i.e. 1932 -2001) if you can find it. Let me know any additions etc. you might have. Go ahead and just make the changes, Paul. Also stick your credits in there.>> Larry

262

S-171. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding another abrupt shift of support from another camp

From : Larry Maurer <lmaurer@unitelnw.com>To : stealthskater@hotmail.comSubject : Re: trivia highlightsDate : Sat, 12 Jan 2002 01:55:41 -0800

Mark:

Check out attached final newsletter copy and inserted comments below:

Larry

At 07:11 AM 1/11/02 -0500, you wrote:

> One of the things I was not aware of was just how long it was going to take to manufacture yours lens of 7-or-so molecules thick and 2 feet in diameter. I learned that from Bryan -- over a year! Once they get that built, you better have the Air Force or U.S. Marshals guard it en route from Chicago to California to have it permanently mounted in the titanium frame. Then place armed guards around it 24 hours-a-day wherever its final resting place is. > > Unless it compromises a proprietary concern, little facts like that go a long way to helping people understand why it's taking so long (in addition to the government scandal stuff). Maybe you could insert little "Did You Know That ..." comments throughout the Newsletter to add a sort of trivia flavor to it? Andrews did that in his Testors model kit of Lazar's UFO, adding little text boxes of Lazar's comments throughout the step-by-step building instructions.

Well, they say "sex sells". I, however, don't believe we have to do that. Our stuff is for real. We had former U.S. Senator (Senior) & Head of the Appropriations Committee Mark O. Hatfield really going to bat for us. And now you are sparking some interest once again in these circles. I shall not dirty America's future. It's Greer's chance to take part in a real space program. Not some ESP phantom ship deal.

BTW, Desmond Gary Dean (author of Bridge Across the Universe) called me today and said he wants to help us. He wants to assist in the creation of movies and knows Mrs. Gene Roddenberry personally. He is talking to her tomorrow. I am getting a copy of his book, too. Lots to do! We are really getting some devotees now.

> Sorry ... I went right to your newsletter attachment last night without reading your cover letter. You had already addressed the "Other" icon problem. I work from 6am-3pm and it was going on 11:30pm last night when I responded to your e-mail. I was trying to figure out why Boylan's site went down. I don't know if you know much about him. He passes on some real whoppers. He accuses Bearden of inadvertently passing on disinformation, and yet he has come under the same attacks. Neither of them are branded as deliberate, more as nice guys led astray. Anyway, in Boylan's case, he lost his license to practice therapy as a psychologist because of (1) leading some clients to believe they were being subjected to

263

"external powers" which were out of their control and (2) actually using therapy sessions (like in a hot tub) to induce an atmosphere conducive to sex. That's what I read in news reports about him on the Web. He always seemed up-front with me, though.>> Did you ever notice how many of these "whistle-blowers" like Boylan, Greer, Lazar always have some failing personality trait or past deed which resurrects itself to "bite" them at the most inopportune times? I used to wonder if the government recruits smart guys with "ghosts" in their past that can be brought back to "life" if these guys ever get out-of-line.

Yeah, Mark. Check out the applecart BS I got from our man Greer & his crony Jonathan:

>> From: "Jonathan Kolber" <jonathankolber@earthlink.net> >> To: "Larry Maurer" <lmaurer@unitelnw.com> >> Subject: Re: Your aerospace applications >> Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2002 11:52:29 -0700 >> X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 >> X-RCPT-TO: <lmaurer@unitelnw.com> >> Larry, >> Thanks for the newsletter. It is good to know you have met Dr. Greer. To me, he is that rare individual with the leadership skills necessary to pull off the "impossible". >> >> While I admire your enthusiasm and confidence, I must express a concern. Dr. Greer's experience (and some of my own) strongly suggestd that you will be opposed in your efforts to "upset the applecart". The opposition can turn quite ugly. That's why the major part of our strategic plan is focused on dissuading, or otherwise stopping, such opposition. Right now, we are totally focused on identifying and licensing a device that displays testable over-unity or electrogravitic properties. Do you know of such? Once funded for our Phase II, we plan to begin exploring and researching more widely. >> Best, >> Jonathan

S-172. from Dr. Jack Sarfatti regarding Dr. Steven Greer

From : Jack Sarfatti <sarfatti@well.com>To : bruce maccabee <brumac@compuserve.com>CC : Art Bell <artbell@mindspring.com>, dipshit moroni <DPUpdates@disclosureproject.org>, Doctor Jibar Rish <quanta@mail.cruzio.com>, "Eugene F. Mallove" <editor@infinite-energy.com>, "Jeff Altman (E-mail)" <Jeff@disclosureproject.org>, tony moroni <antonio@disclosureproject.org>, UFO Files <WeeklyFiles@filersfiles.com>, "vecker@ufomag.com" <vecker@ufomag.com>, "visions@ntlworld.com" <visions@ntlworld.com>, Wes Thomas <west@sonic.net>, Yokatta <yokatta@oxy.edu> Subject : Re: UFO Disclosure Virus AttackDate : Sat, 12 Jan 2002 11:49:10 -0800Attachment : C__DOCUME~1_User1_LOCALS~1_Temp_nsmailJ3.jpeg (71k)

> bruce maccabee wrote: >

264

> IF Greer has his way all current energy systems will be replaced. > HAHAHAHAHA! In case you didn't see this:>> These marching morons are also sending around e-mail viruses.>>>

>> .................... >> Disclosure Project Email Update >> 1-11-2002 >>--------------------------------- >> Dear Supporters of the Disclosure Project, >> The past year has been an extraordinary time for The Disclosure Project and the world. We had the most successful and best attended press conference in 20 years on May 9, 2001 at the National Press Club. The truth about UFOs, illegal covert projects, and the promise of a new civilization made possible by the release of new energy and propulsion systems … …

hogwash!

>> … was heard by over a billion people in the past 7 months. Thousands of people have attended Campaign for Disclosure events and a grass roots movement is growing to push for Disclosure. … … …

Lies! All lies from Danny Sheehan and his motley crew.

>> Thousands of letters were sent to dozens of members of Congress - and some have begun to take the matter seriously and are even asking for affidavits from select witnesses. Of course, the tragedy of 9/11 has dominated the media and Congress. But at the same time it has underscored the folly of an unnecessary dependence on imported oil as the main source of energy for America and the world. Increasingly, people are beginning to understand the true high price of oil. We are in the process of implementing a grass roots extension of the Campaign for Disclosure … …

AKA "fifth column"

>> … … by creating the official Disclosure Project Representatives program. Under this program, people will be able to sponsor and conduct Disclosure Project town hall meetings in their local area, showing either the May 9, 2001 National Press Club video or the Disclosure Video. Through this effort, an unlimited number of people can be empowered to spread the truth and organize locally for full Disclosure. Please check the web site for updates on this which should be posted shortly.>>>> In other website news, we have a new guestbook up on the site which we would encourage all of you to sign (if you haven't done so already) and get your friends to sign. Some of our recent efforts have been focused on an outgrowth of Dr. Greer's 11 years of intense research into this subject. We have identified a number of prospective civilian scientists and inventors who appear to have uncovered important new electromagnetic energy and propulsion technologies. We have concluded that the time has come to form an entity to definitively identify, test, disclose and mass-produce such

265

a device to replace the internal combustion engine and the need for fossil fuels. I have no doubt that we now possess the strategic capability to do this once a bona fide technology is identified and tested by independent facilities. To this end, Dr. Greer has formed a corporation: Space Energy Access Systems, Inc. (or SEAS). This entity will identify, test, secure, disclose, finance and produce systems to replace all current energy sources currently in use. It will have a significant associated Foundation to fund and support Disclosure, world peace, outer space relations, environmental protection and the alleviation of human poverty and suffering.>>>> I would like to thank you for everything you have done to support The Disclosure Project in the past year. It would have been impossible to accomplish the historic events of the past year-or-two without your dedication, support and love. Now it is on to 2002 -- yhe year the technologies behind UFO energy and propulsion systems will begin to be released to a long-suffering world. God bless you and thank you for everything! Sincerely, The Disclosure Project

The "UFO Disclosure Project" is a disinformation and misinformation project making fraudulent claims about secret U.S. Black technologies that do not yet exist. The project needs to be investigated by the Feds!

S-173. from Dr. Jack Sarfatti regarding Dr. Eugene Mallove

From : Jack Sarfatti <sarfatti@well.com>To : sarfatti@well.comSubject : Mallove's claims on "aetherometrodynamics" LOL ;-)Date : Sun, 13 Jan 2002 09:06:25 -0800Attachment : C__DOCUME~1_User1_LOCALS~1_Temp_nsmailOA.jpeg (4k)

S-P & M-M Sirag wrote:

> Jack, > I have looked at the context of the Correa equations (i.e., section AS2-10). The experiment involved is in electrostatics using a gold-leaf electroscope (thus the term "gold-graviton" is coined). The experiment is not actually described but some conclusions are drawn. As you know, electrostatics is a very tricky area experimentally. I remember working with electroscopes in my high-school physics class in Alberta. These worked pretty well because the air in Alberta is usually very dry (especially in the winter).

> Without any details of their experimental set-up and methods, I can only wonder how they controlled for moisture content in the atmosphere to prevent leakage of charge.

> I agree with you that their equations make no dimensional sense. We have better ideas to work on than this.

Exactly. That Eugene Mallove could not see that instantly see that causes me to write him off as credible source. I was quite surprised, actually. I had previously thought better of his technical competence.

266

> I have looked at many of their pieces of writing on the AKRONOS website. They seem to be at loggerheads with a host of people--especially the Reichians, although they base many of their experimental ideas on Reich's experiments. Of course, they eschew the standard ideas of physics, and claim to be creating a new physics, while using some terminology from standard physics, such as "energy" and "graviton". So it's very confusing to read their very verbose (but uninformative) writings. They have some patents. But I believe that patents don't require working models. There are many things patented that don't really work. >> We have other fish to fry. I recommend that we leave the Correa people alone. Assuming that they are wrong, they will fail--like many others we know about. It's definitely not worth our time to argue with them :-) >> All for now.

Agreed. ;-)

I think that all the claims of the UFO Disclosure Project that the U.S. Government is "illegally" hiding secret free energy machines and anti-gravity engines is complete Cargo Cult pseudoscientific nonsense.

>> Saul-Paul (January 12, 2002) >>>> From: Jack Sarfatti <sarfatti@well.com> >> To: "creon@isso.org" <creon@isso.org> >> Date: Sat, Jan 12, 2002, 12:21 PM >>>> to the above smaller list >> Creon, >>>> Eugene Mallove has proven himself to be a crackpot with this

>> stuff. The LHS of this equation is claimed to be an "energy". I was quite surprised actually at his low level of competence in >>elementary physics. >>>> I would like you guys to pipe in with your opinions on this specific issue. Do any of you see anything sound in the above equation? Perhaps I am missing something? ;-)

S-174. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding Sarfatti's comments (e-mail # 172)

From : Larry Maurer <lmaurer@unitelnw.com>To : stealthskater@hotmail.comSubject : Re: Sarfatti on GreerDate : Mon, 14 Jan 2002 12:49:28 -0800

Mark:

Thanks for the info. I think it's hilarious about these guys and their disinformation service. It's sad, though, that they have sincere followers that actually believe in them. I can't wait to get a technical film with moving graphics along with interviews with researchers so the public can see with their own eyes

267

what we have and decide for themselves which one is the real entity: Us -or- Jack-ass "bait & switch" policy he accuses others of performing.

Best, Larry

S-175. from Bob King regarding email # 174 that included references to "Reichian" technology

From : bob king <bobking@xtra.co.nz>To : <stealthskater@hotmail.com> Subject : ref: forwarded e-mail from SarfattiDate : Tue, 15 Jan 2002 11:52:15 +1300

Hi ya Mark,

> It's rare that I come across the name of Reich outside of the Montauk stuff. Yet I had someone respond to me recently on that ORMEs stuff who said he remembers studying Reich in graduate school while getting his Ph.D. in psychology. And then I saw Reich mentioned again in the following e-mail from Sarfatti. Maybe the guy existed after all !!

Well, it does help if they are real ;-)

>> Subject: Mallove's claims on "aetherometrodynamics" LOL ;-)>> >> I have looked at the context of the Correa equations (i.e., section AS2-10). The experiment involved is in electrostatics using a gold-leaf electroscope (thus the term "gold-graviton" is coined). The experiment is not actually described, … …

Typical. Probably just theory

>> but some conclusions are drawn. … …

Again typical. Have a guess and get everyone discussing something that never happened.

>> As you know, electrostatics is a very tricky area experimentally. … …

Correct.

>> Without any details of their experimental set-up and methods, I can only wonder how they controlled for moisture content in the atmosphere to prevent leakage of charge. … …

Quite!

>> I agree with you that their equations make no dimensional sense. We have better ideas to work on than this. … …

Agreed.268

>> Exactly. That Eugene Mallove could not see that instantly see that causes me to write him off as credible source. … …

Agreed.

>> I think that all the claims of the UFO Disclosure Project that the U.S. Government is "illegally" hiding secret free energy machines and anti-gravity engines is complete Cargo Cult pseudoscientific nonsense.

Debatable.

>> "What I cannot create, I do not understand." -- Richard Feynman

Bloody nutcase!--Regards, bob

S-176. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding new ideas to generate income

From : Larry Maurer <lmaurer@unitelnw.com> To : stealthskater@hotmail.com Subject : Fwd: New IdeasDate : Tue, 15 Jan 2002 11:12:25 -0800

> Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2002 11:04:57 -0800> To: pkirsh@ucla.edu > From: Larry Maurer <lmaurer@unitelnw.com> > Subject: Fwd: New Ideas >

>> To: "Larry Maurer" <unitel@unitelnw.com> >> Cc: "Larry Maurer" <unitel@unitelnw.com> >> Subject: New Ideas >> Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2002 00:35:52 -0500 >>>> Message from Esmond Gary Dean.>>>> After I have review the past contract, we can work details for any contract with me. There has a number of new Leggo toys based on people traveling to Mars. Meanwhile the Moller International who created a toy based on their own real-life flying car. They show it on their web site- www.moller.com Price $10. May be might be possible to sell toys based on the aerospace vehicles and medical equipment prototypes. This might create another profitable product lines just in time for Thanksgiving and Christmas.>>>> I have seen a serious article about faster-than-light drives hit the cover pages of Popular Science and the Scientific American. The front cover of Popular Science says "Warp Speed Gets

269

Real*.We Thought It Was Science Fiction. Then We Visited NASA .*Sort of. If you wish I could help articles for both magazines. You check them out on their Internet websites.

S-177. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding Foreward to his book "Flying Colors"

From : Larry Maurer <lmaurer@unitelnw.com>To : stealthskater@hotmail.comSubject : Fwd: Foreword to our forthcoming bookDate : Tue, 15 Jan 2002 14:54:08 -0800

attachment : Foreword.doc (43k) [ Appendix: UNITEL_attachment_ S-177 ]

> Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2002 14:52:56 -0800 > To: deanandpaul@earthlink.net > From: Larry Maurer <lmaurer@unitelnw.com> > Subject: Foreword to our forthcoming book

> Hello Gary:

> I just wrote a foreword to our forthcoming book entitled Flying Colors which is an autobiography of myself and my co-inventor Michael E. Miller. I mentioned your name, book, and some short statements into it that I changed to fit what I had to say. I need permission from you to put it in there of course, so please review the "Foreword" and let me know if it is okay.>> In a sense, the "Foreword" advertises your book and kind of ties our 2 books together. Especially since we do have a common drive that is expressed in the "Foreword". Let me know your thoughts, Gary. I just got a brainstorm to write it last night. Our book is nearly finished in the rough draft and I am sending it to our editor Paul Kirsch for editing. Perhaps you may like a peek at it yourself. It is very large, however, and I will have to send it in chunks by email. I hope to hear from you soon (all comments and additions are welcome too, Gary!).>> Best, >> Larry Maurer >Unitel, Inc.

FOREWORD

When we first took on the humungous undertaking of designing, perfecting and eventually marketing our proposed space ship design along with our medical, quantum computer, and other industrial applications for our newly-discovered technology, we never expected to gain so much progress,so quickly. We took on a mountain and we not only climbed it but we are also dancing on top of it!

For whatever reason, we are driven to see these projects to come to fruition at whatever the cost. We aren’t involved in this business for the money and maybe that’s why we have accomplished everything except the major funding our corporation Unitel Inc. needs to begin designing prototypes.

270

After 20 years of carrying the ball, UNITEL has never looked so good. Our proposed prototypes and projects are based entirely on sound scientific principles. This book tells the story of our progress from inception to now. When we first started out in 1982, we were told that we “would never get a patent on our ideas”. In spite of these discouraging words, we were awarded a patent in record time by the United States Patent Office on March 1989. We were in turn awarded patents in several international countries including Japan which is far more thorough in their scrutiny of technology before giving out patents.

We were also told that the scientific community would never accept our “wild ideas”. This attitude was exemplified with a disenchanting statement after a technical meeting at Edwards Air Force Base in 1984 by one of the USAF representatives that “we will not see the fruition of this type of advanced technology in our lifetime”. This was after a technical review committee was disbanded before it even got started.

A physicist on hand from Hughes Aircraft Co who led the technical review of our project by the USAF quickly shot down our project because “we had not physically observed a monopole”. In 1986, a couple of fellows by the name of Tomita and Chiao proved him wrong with their world-famous application of monopole effects to optical fibers and RF waveguides. We only intend to create the same “monopole effects” with our laser system as Tomita and Chiao did with optical fibers and RF wave-guides.

We were told that we would never mathematically prove “Conservation of Energy and Momentum” by physicists poo-pooing our attempts to progress with our proposed projects. A meeting in 1997 with a Honda R&D technical review committee, our friend and associate Yoshinari Minami (Manager, Patent Services, NEC Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) successfully proved conservation of momentum and energy of our proposed aerospace propulsion system by provided mathematical equations.

When we say we are ready to build our prototypes, we really mean it! The only thing we are lacking is the necessary funding to do so. We understand out technology thoroughly. We have world-class universities and manufacturer/subcontractors ready to go to work on a 2-year contract and the support and blessings of many esteemed organizations such as the IAA-IAF.

We are pioneers of Macroscopic Quantum Tunneling (MQT) applied to a feasible aerospace propulsion system,which would allow travel to the distant regions of deep space and our Universe. When we first described this scientific method of travel in outer space, we were greeted with blank stares and disbelief. We were all but labeled as quacks or crazy for our ideas. Now “tunneling” is a well-accepted “buzz word” in most of the World’s top aerospace organizations.

We intend to continue to raise eyebrows by continuing our great progression towards constructing real prototypes with real effects such as the ponderomotive force applied to our proposed laser plasma. We need this important and valuable technology for the advancement of Mankind. Through continued support by our valued devotees, we shall succeed in these endeavors. Several letters have been sent out to various U.S. Senators. We have a history of strong support from former U.S. Senator of Oregon Mark O. Hatfield. We expect to draw a lot of attention and support from our government to assist UNITEL in its endeavors. Perhaps you may want to contact your Senator and Congressman to enlighten them to our important project proposals.

As Esmond Gary Dean (author of Bridge Across the Universe) lists on his web ite: There are many reasons why we need to develop our proposed space propulsion system. According to the famous author of “War of the Worlds”, H. G. Wells; "It's All or Nothing. It's The Universe Or Nothing At All!", Arthur C Clarke said: "I trust that more than a few decades before we can have safe and economical

271

space propulsion systems depending on a new principles of physics that are now being discussed by far sighted engineers and scientists. When we know how to do it efficiently the main expenses of space travel will be cantering and in flight movies".

Russian President Putin said: "Space is the locomotive which will pull forward all other industry spheres. It is not possible to create new materials. Examine the Earth, prospect natural resources, forecast weather or communications without a space program".

Chinese Space Scientist Liang said: "For Mankind in the 21st Century, space applications will be as essential as electricity and oil in the 19th Century." Jim Benson, Space Dev President: "In space; water is white gold. Any country, any company, any person who can afford a private jet or mega-yacht can now afford their own deep space mission to the Moon, asteroid, or Mars".

(see: http://icedragon540ny_1.tripod.com/thebridgeacrosstheuniverse )

Our MQT spaceship design is becoming increasingly popular. An article about faster than light drives hit the cover pages of Popular Science and Scientific American. The front cover of Popular Science says "Warp Speed Gets Real. We Thought It Was Science Fiction." Then We Visited NASA where the idea of applying MQT to a spaceship is all but accepted.

In any case, no matter who you are, there is a good reason to accept this technology. The seriousness of the possible event of a general holocaust that would destroy Mankind presents a clear and present danger. The real possibility of an asteroid colliding with our planet is inevitable. The last time we had a close call was only very recently (January 7, 2002) when an asteroid came within 375,000 miles from Earth. We had only 2 weeks notice of that incident.

The next time we have 2 weeks notice may be the last time. Imagine suddenly getting a 2-week eviction notice from your landlord or your doctor telling you that you have 2 weeks to live. This is not enough time to build our spaceships to transport any number of our fellow humans to a safe place away from our planet (if there is such a place). It doesn’t matter how rich you are, how religious or what religion you may be a part of. No matter what place you hold in Society whether it is government, corporation, or church, you are not safe. Nor are your loved ones or family members.

The only insurance that you have is to develop a feasible space transportation system for exploration and development of habitable domains on near and/or distant planets or perhaps the Moon and/or manmade biospheres to orbit our planet. There are many of us that have viable designs and research that seriously need funding and have been ignored for far to long. (see: CNN.com - Earth escapes brush with killer asteroid - January 7, 2002 )

We hope that such a terrible event will not happen. But in all reality it most likely will. We watched from afar the devastating collision of the Shoemaker-Levy Comet with planet Jupiter in 1999. The resent close call of 375,000 miles we had with the asteroid is more than likely a preclude to the one (perhaps much larger asteroid) that is heading our way, this time, in a direct collision course with Earth. The oil that we enjoy for powering our vehicles may be made out of Mankind this time for future creatures that may evolve in the next millennia. This is a great reason to develop our space transportation system. It may be the only insurance we have for the continuation of Mankind.

S-178. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding UCLA wave collapse research in laser plasmas

From : Larry Maurer <lmaurer@unitelnw.com>272

To : stealthskater@hotmail.comSubject : Fwd: Ponderomotive ForceDate : Wed, 16 Jan 2002 23:51:31 -0800

> Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 23:45:55 -0800 > To: cmaccone@to.alespazio.it > From: Larry Maurer <lmaurer@unitelnw.com> > Subject: Fwd: Ponderomotive Force > > Dear Claudio:>> I hope things are going well for you. It has been a while since we last met in Pasadena, California. We have been progressing slowly and we are happy to receive so many supporters of our projects. I have attached our new newsletter for your review. As you know, we can always use any help we can in mathematically expressing the description of our proposed laser plasma system.>> The oscillation of the projected potential EM wells that oscillate back-and-forth (energy swing) should produce the same ponderomotive force as described below in the wave collapse research performed at Oslo and UCLA. We hope to provide enough information -- especially math information -- so that we can acquire much-needed funds to construct and test prototypes of our patented laser plasma system.>> Please let me know if you can help us, Claudio. We firmly believe we are on the right track here concerning the application of the ponderomotive force to a laser plasma. I hope to hear from you soon.

>>>> Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 23:28:14 -0800 >> To: y-minami@nepas.nec.co.jp >> From: Larry Maurer <lmaurer@unitelnw.com> >> Subject: Ponderomotive Force >>>> Hello Yoshinari:>>>> I am curious if it is possible to illustrate mathematically the direct similarity between the ponderomotive force F = - q*q/(4*omega*omega)*d(|E0|*|E0)/dx and our proposed laser plasma. Is it possible for you to do this? The potential EM wells that oscillate from the phase conjugate mirror reflection at the face (similar to of our lens to the end-point that is moving projected end-point of the projected laser plasma which can collapse only to 10-44 via Lawrence-Fitzgerald contraction (remember at least one end-point of a quantum string must move at the speed-of-light). This oscillation can be directly related to the ponderomotive force that arises due to this oscillation. Since the plasma is pulsed, not only will the projected field have a higher gain but the "collapse" occurring when the "off" or "pinch-off" point in the projected pulsed laser plasma. Please let me know your thoughts here, Yoshinari.>>>> This is very similar to the late Prof. John M. Dawson, Physics Dept., UCLA for his "Plasma Beat Oscillator" laser system. This could be the key we need to express where the energy comes from in describing our proposed laser plasma beam and its effects. At any rate, the ponderomotive force will play a significant role in how our proposed laser plasma will work. Please let me know if you can help. Thank you in advance. Michael can explain the physics. But he is a little weak in math as you may know. Perhaps Dr. Maccone may be

273

able to write the math. Anyway, Yoshinari, I appreciate your help and it could lead to recognition for your brilliant work. >>>> Sincerely, >> >> Larry Maurer

>>>>>> Wave Collapse>>>>>> Wave collapse is a most exciting phenomenon of plasma physics, first predicted in a seminal paper by the Russian scientist V.E. Zakharov in 1972. Using a fluid description of a thermal plasma and distinguishing sharply between slow and fast dynamics, Zakharov managed to derive 2 coupled differential equations which describe the nonlinear evolution of so-called Langmuir waves.>>>>>> The Zakharov model shows how Langmuir wave packets can collapse so that the electric field reaches extreme values in a very small region. In the limit where wave-particle interactions are ignored, the Zakharov equations predicts that the electric field will become infinitely strong in a short time, called the collapse time. In a real plasma, infinite fields are of course impossible and it has been shown that the collapse is sooner-or-later halted by wave-particle interactions and the electric field is prevented from growing indefinitely. >>>>>> Why does wave collapse happen?>>>>>> The phenomenon of wave collapse is strongly associated with the so-called ponderomotive force. Before pursuing, let us have a brief look at this peculiar force. A charged particle bouncing in the field of a constant-amplitude wave will oscillate in a perfectly periodic manner. If the wave is modulated, however, so that its amplitude varies slightly with position, the particle will experience a net force working on a time scale long compared to the wave period. This is the ponderomotive force which can be derived by taking the time-average of the force on the particle caused by the wave field. In the 1-dimensional case, the ponderomotive force is given by >>>>>> F = - q*q/(4*omega*omega)*d(|E0|*|E0)/dx. >>>

>>> where "q", "omega", and "E0" are respectively the particle charge, the wave frequency, and the electric field amplitude, and the asterisks denote multiplication. Note that the force increases with the gradient of the electric field amplitude E0 but decreases with the frequency. This is plausible since a large frequency implies that the direction of the field changes before the particle has had time to move far along the modulated wave.>>>>>> A large spatial gradient leads to a strong ponderomotive force since then the particle only needs to move a slight distance for the field to change. Since the force depends only on the charge of the particles, it mainly affects the electrons of a plasma.>>>>>> Finally, we note that the expression for the ponderomotive force involves no expression for the phase of the field. This is due to the fact that we have derived the force by averaging over all phases (i.e., over one wave period.)

274

>>>>>> Assume a monofrequent wave which is spatially modulated so that its amplitude changes with position. The ponderomotive force will then push electrons away from the regions of large amplitude, and into regions of smaller amplitude. When the electrons are perturbed, an ambipolar field is set up which causes the ions to move along with the electrons so that the plasma remains quasi-neutral. Thus the plasma density drops in regions where the wave amplitude is large and decreases in regions where the amplitude is small.>>>>>> If the wave is (for example, a Langmuir wave) a lower hybrid or an upper hybrid wave, a drop in the background plasma density implies an increase in the refraction index. From optics, it is known that wave energy tends to focus into regions of large refraction index. The result of all this is a strong feedback mechanism.>>>>>> Some-or-other mechanism initially modulates the wave field so that the ponderomotive force pushes plasma away from large-amplitude regions; the refraction index becomes large in the resulting cavities; wave energy is focused into the regions of large amplitude; the ponderomotive force intensifies further; more plasma particles are forced out of the cavities; the refraction index of the cavities increases still further; and so on and so on.>>>>>> Research on wave collapse>>>>>> The Plasma-Astrophysics Group of the University of Oslo conducts research on various aspects of wave collapse. We have looked at the dynamics of individual cavitons (collapsing wave packets) for the case of Langmuir waves, upper hybrid waves and other electrostatic waves in weakly magnetized plasmas as well as for Langmuir-type waves in multi-temperature un-magnetized plasmas.>>>>>> The wave dynamics has been modeled by partial differential equations which have been integrated by so-called "spectral methods". For wave collapse applications, spectral methods are among the fastest known and orders of magnitude faster than self-consistent particle simulations. Many interesting results have been derived, such a recurrent wave collapse (where the caviton first tends to collapse, then expands for a certain period, once more starts to collapse, and so on). >>>>>> If you are interested in further reading on our projects on wave collapse, take a look at our relevant publications. In particular the papers entitled "Nonlinear Wave Interactions in a 2-Electron Temperature Plasma", "Weakly Nonlinear High-Frequency Waves in Magnetized Plasmas", and "Electron Acceleration by Weakly Nonlinear High-Frequency Waves in Magnetized Plasmas."

S-179. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL forwarding response from NASA's Breakthrough Propulsion Project

From : Larry Maurer <lmaurer@unitelnw.com>To : stealthskater@hotmail.comSubject : Fwd: BPP Project - GrantsDate : Sat, 19 Jan 2002 01:59:50 -080

275

> Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2002 01:58:21 -0800 > To: Dave Froning (Boeing Aerospace)> From: Larry Maurer <lmaurer@unitelnw.com> > Subject: Fwd: BPP Project - Grants >> Dave: >> Sounds mighty familiar, doesn't it? If the graft, payoffs, and corruption wasn't bad enough, looks like they finally cut off whatever future they (I should say that you and I) have. Oh boy! WWII rockets to Mars. The Public needs to be aware of what we have to offer as a viable alternative to the same old "spend your tax dollars on rockets to Mars" crap. Never mind a real spaceship!>> I guess we have to focus on getting the Public awareness to the alternatives to wasting money in outer-space transportation methods. Please excuse my "French" here, Dave, but everyone's destiny is up to us. What a chore to wake up to! Surrounded by scammers, whackos, ill-purveying competitors, and on and on. It's surely been a long road to hoe. But I truly believe in the fact that you can't stop progress and we will make it to where we want to be.

> That is constructing prototypes and enlightening the Public to the new technology that we advance. We represent a lot of hard-working researchers that we have built our project on at the various universities performing research that we have based our designs on. >> Oh well, enough venting already. I just get emotional over this stuff with our government and their priorities. Wish us luck. >> Larry

>>>> X-Info: IDE / NASA Lewis Research Center >> X-Sender: jschuer@popserve.grc.nasa.gov >> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 >> Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2002 10:09:21 -0500 >> To: Larry Maurer <lmaurer@unitelnw.com> >> From: Jean Schuerger <Jean.Schuerger@grc.nasa.gov> >> Subject: BPP Project - Grants >>>> Dear Larry, >>>> The best source of a grant would be the formal BPP "Call for Proposals" which has now been delayed. Funding for the solicitation might be cut (see further details on the BPP Project website: http://www.grc.nasa.gov/WWW/bpp/ ), and budget assessments are underway. You may also want to check back to the Project web site in a couple of months for updated information. >>>> However, if you are interested in applying for grants in other areas, please see the following NASA websites:>>>> NASA Grants Office: http://www.grc.nasa.gov/WWW/Procure/grants/main.html >>>> NASA Research Opportunities On-Line: http://research.hq.nasa.gov/research.cfm >>

276

>> Regards, >>>> Jean Schuerger >> QSS Group, Inc. >> Document Control Specialist for the >> Breakthrough Propulsion Physics (BPP) Project

>>>>>> At 10:32 PM 01/16/2002 -0800, you (Larry Maurer) wrote: >>> Hello Jean: >>>>>> Please review attached newsletter and following email FYI. Please send me any grants if we have any chance at applying for them if you have any that pertains to our technology. Thank you in advance, >>>>>> Sincerely, >>>>>> Larry D. Maurer, Principal&Director, Engineering >>> Unitel, Inc. >>> (503) 232-2740 >>> www.unitelnw.com

S-180. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL forwarding e-mail to Tom Bearden explaining 'quantum tunneling' for space travel

Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2002 01:35:15 -0800 To: stealthskaters@yahoo.com From: "Larry Maurer" <lmaurer@unitelnw.com>Subject: Fwd: Re: Another Question

> To: murdic1@bellsouth.net> From: Larry Maurer <lmaurer@unitelnw.com>> Subject: Re: Another Question>

> At 08:38 AM 1/27/02 -0600, you wrote:>>> Larry,>> Thanks for the timely response to my e-mail of 01/23/02. As I understand quantum tunneling, the application on a Macroscopic level as it relates to anything let alone a space propulsion system is mind-boggling. Can you explain for me in simple layman's terms how the propulsion system is to function and the obvious advantages of a MQT propulsion system? I guess I just need you to confirm what I'm thinking.>>>> Thanks,>> Tom

> Dear Tom:>

277

> You know, Tom, that there are millions of our fellow individuals out there in the public that have the same questions. This is our main goal: to create informative films to be aired on public TV that will enlighten everyone to the facts concerning MQT and how it is applied to a space transportation system. This topic is ripe and it's high time that it's being discussed on public TV or even revealed. It would be of peak viewer interest!>> If properly done (as we intend to do), the info film would be a terrific hit. Our proposed film would, of course, have moving graphic illustrations that would be a qualified representation of the facts surrounding MQT -- combined with filmed interviews with top aerospace representatives and researchers -- be a definitely jaw-dropping, mind-boggling event!>> Tom, you are one-in-a-million asking the right questions about our advanced aerospace propulsion system design that we want to present to the viewing audience. There are some important facts -- such as quantum tunneling and BECs that the Public may be only somewhat familiar with -- that we want to present in our proposed films.>> I can tell, Tom, that your appetite or thirst (if you will) for information on this topic must be quenched! That is exactly what we want to do. Especially since we have International patents on the design of our device and want to explain to the public the significance of our design and how it relates to our quantum applications which include aerospace propulsion.>> Anyway, Tom, you know the juxt of our current business endeavors. All I can say is (quoting my sister from the mid-1980s newspaper article on us) that "there is power in the masses" and that "you can't stop progress!" I suppose that I should also throw in the quote that "there is nothing stranger or stronger than the Truth".>> Let me know if you can comment or add to my comments and answers to your question here, Tom. I know I already answered your question with an email I sent previous to this one. However, this is how I really feel about the current situation and what we are doing at this point in time. I have included the "Foreword" to our forthcoming book Flying Colors attached herein for your review. Comments?>> Regards,>> Larry D. Maurer, Principal&Director, Engineering> Unitel, Inc.> (503) 232-2740> www.unitelnw.com>

S-181. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding technical details of UNITEL's back-engineering

From : Larry Maurer <lmaurer@unitelnw.com>To : stealthskater@hotmail.comSubject : Fwd: Re: Quantum Computer Break-Through Date : on, 28 Jan 2002 20:00:39 -0800

> Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2002 19:59:40 -0800 > To: snoball2@earthlink.net

278

> From: Larry Maurer <lmaurer@unitelnw.com> > Subject: Re: Quantum Computer Break-Through >> Bob: >> Another addition. Are you aware of the world record (Gauss) being broken at Cal Berkley (300,000 times stronger than the Earth's magnetic field) as mentioned in our newsletter? The electromagnet is composed of the same metals (Niobium-Titanium) as our smartskin exterior charged hull. Except we have our synthetic diamond p-doped layer at the outermost layer for the computer modulated fractional 1/3 charge at the surface.>> Fooling Mother Nature is our ultimate endeavor here, Bob, (as you may know) and we will have a MOSS system that will be computer modulated (hopefully by our QC "HOLO-1" on-board to manage our quantum system) system to maintain it to keep the system from decohering. This is where we had our good friend and associate in Tokyo -- Yoshinari Minami -- supply the math to support our argument with Kaku that the WKB Approx. does not apply to our design. I can send you a copy of our paper with this math if you like (our paper that was meant for the IAA-IAF & STAIF is going into our forthcoming book entitled Flying Colors). I have attached the "Foreword" to the book herein for your review, Bob.>> It's good to hear from you, Bob. I had the term "ponderomotive" stuck in my head. I started investigating it on the Net and it led me right to the late Prof. Dawson's Plasma Beat Oscillator at UCLA. In fact, it prompted me to email Prof. Dawson where I discovered (much to my chagrin) that he died just a couple of weeks before.>> We are currently trying to locate Prof. Dawson's associate researchers at UCLA through our associate editor Paul Kirsch at UCLA medical school. Let me know if you have any comments on the similarity between Dawson's Plasma Beat Oscillator and our proposed laser plasma with the oscillating potential EM wells that oscillate between the projected end-point and the Phase conjugate Mirror (PCM) reflection at the lens surface.>> In our case, the wave collapse happens when our (very dense, color mixed) pulsed beam is cuty at the trailing edge, which adds a pinch on the plasma. Remember, the RGB EM wells are true EM wavepackets that renormalize to white (just like RGB quarks) amazing coincidence between the labeled RGB quarks and the real EM spectrum of real color RGB!>> Believe me, Bob, we would have never in a thousand years discovered this connection without being shown a working ship. Who was the mysterious wizard behind the curtain, we may never know. But reverse-engineering is the truth here. Perhaps you can help us figure the final parts to the puzzle. We have had 20 years to figure it out (what we were shown) and there isn't much we don't understand. However, the ponderomotive force (along with the color, dielectric, and adiabatic forces) is perhaps the key to where we will obtain the necessary energy to perform MQT. It will be a glorious day for all of us when we can finally build our prototypes!>> Regards,

> Larry >

> At 01:59 PM 1/27/02 -0800, you wrote: >> Larry, >>

279

>> Thanks for the update and the file.>>>> The "smart skin" is part of the puzzle. If its touch feels like it is "alive", you just might have something.>>>> Kaku has a newsgroup if you are interested in it. I have included the URL: >> http://clubs.yahoo.com/clubs/michiokakusscienceforum

>> There are also a number of other Yahoo physics clubs that might be of interest. >>>> Best regards, >>>>Bob

>>>> Larry Maurer wrote: >>> Hello Bob! >>>>>> I am fine. How have you been doing? We have been focusing on writing our autobiography book Flying Colors and talking to movie producers. Yes, Bob, it's down to that. But we have more faith in John Q. Public than in any so-called major investors right now. Thanks for letting me know about your posting. I have attached a copy of our latest newsletter for your review. >>>>>> Regards, >>>>>> Larry Maurer >>> Unitel, Inc.

>>>>>>At 11:56 PM 1/25/02 -0800, you wrote: >>> >>>> Larry, >>>>>>>> How have you been? I am posting on the following site: http://www.uhnd.com/openforum/forum.cgi/page=0 >>>>>>>> -- Bob >>>>>>>> My new email address is: >>>> <mailto:snoball2@earthlink.net>snoball2@earthlink.net

S-182. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding response Bob Drake (associate of Michio Kaku's)

From : Larry Maurer <lmaurer@unitelnw.com> To : stealthskater@hotmail.comSubject : Fwd: Re: Quantum Computer Break-Through Date : Mon, 28 Jan 2002 20:06:42 -0800

280

Mark:

Bob Drake is an associate of Michio Kaku's and ended up on our side after the much heated debate with Kaku over the WKB Approx being zero for the Macro level. Both Miller and Minami proved Kaku wrong and Bob knows it!

Anyway, Kaku "ran for cover" and stopped communicating with us as soon as I mentioned the word "sighting". What am I supposed to do about the situation? The Eugene Police and the FBI know of the incidences that alerted the whole town! Are we all supposed to be crazy and sniffing glue (including the cops!)?

My God! Say the word 'UFO' and it all gets flushed! I firmly believe that the Public is going to see the truth and then -- and maybe only then -- will somebody make a fucking move to build our stuff!

Larry

S-183. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding the Irish inventor claims of tapping the ZPE

From : Larry Maurer <lmaurer@unitelnw.com>To : stealthskater@hotmail.comSubject : Fwd: ZPE e- GeneratorDate : Tue, 29 Jan 2002 17:36:54 -0800

> Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2002 17:34:53 -0800 > To: pkirsh@ucla.edu > From: Larry Maurer <lmaurer@unitelnw.com> > Subject: ZPE e- Generator >

>> Tuesday January 22 10:50 AM ET >>I rish Inventor Says Cracks World's Energy Needs >> Photos >> Reuters Photo >> By Kevin Smith >> DUBLIN (Reuters) - It has been a pipe-dream of inventors since Leonardo da Vinci. But has the secret of free energy now been found in Ireland? A cold stone house on a wind-swept Irish hillside may seem an unlikely setting for the birthplace of such an epoch-making discovery. But it is here that an Irish inventor says he has developed a machine that will do no less than change the world. >>>> The 58-year-old electrical engineer who lives in the Irish republic and intends -- for "security and publicity-avoidance reasons'' to keep his identity a secret has spent 23 years perfecting the Jasker Power System. It is an electromechanical device he says is capable of nothing less than replenishing its own energy source.>>>> The Irishman is not alone in making such assertions. The Internet is awash with speculation about Free or "Zero Point'"energy with many claiming to have cracked the problem using magnets, coils, and even crystals. "These claims come along every 10 years or so and nothing ever comes of them. They're all cases of 'voodoo science','' said Robert Park, professor of physics at the University of Maryland.

281

>>>> The makers of the "Jasker" (a name derived from family abbreviations) say it can be built to scale using off-the-shelf components and can power anything that requires a motor. "The Jasker produces emission-free energy at no cost apart from the installation. It is quite possibly the most significant invention since the wheel,'' Tom Hedrick, the only person involved with the machine willing to give his name, told Reuters.>>>> Hedrick -- the chief executive of a company set up with a view to licensing the device in the United States -- said the technology shattered preconceived laws of Science. "It's a giant leap forward. The uses of this are almost beyond imagination.''>>>> RED HOT WITH CONTROVERSY>>>> Not surprisingly, this topic is red hot with controversy, sharply dividing a world scientific community still on its guard after the "Cold Fusion'' fiasco of 1989 when a group of Utah researchers scandalized the scientific world with claims -- quickly found to be unsupported -- that the long-sought answer to the problem of Cold Fusion had been discovered.>>>> Experts contacted by Reuters were wary, citing the First Law of Thermodynamics which in layman's terms states that you can't get more energy out than you put in. "I don't believe this. It goes against fundamentals which have not yet been disproved,'' said William Beattie, senior lecturer in electrical engineering at Queen's University in Belfast, Northern Ireland. "These people (Jasker) are either Nobel prize-winners or they don't know what they're dealing with. The energy has to come from somewhere.''>>>> Undaunted, the inventor says that once powered-up, his device can run indefinitely. Or at least until the parts wear out, adding that he has supplied all his own domestic power needs free for 17 months. But he is keen to head off the notion that he has tapped into the age-old myth of perpetual motion. "Perpetual motion is impossible. This is a self-sustaining unit which at the same time provides surplus electrical energy,'' he said.>>>> THE SIZE OF A DISHWASHER>>>> In a demonstration for Reuters, a prototype roughly the size of a dishwasher was run for around 10 minutes using four 12-volt car batteries as an initial power source. Emitting a steady motorized hum, the machine powered three 100-watt light bulbs for the duration. A multimeter reading of the batteries' voltage before the device started up showed a total of 48.9 volts. When it was switched off, a second reading showed 51.2 volts indicating that, somehow, they had been reimbursed.>>>> The machine went on to run for around two hours while photographs were taken, with no diminution in the brightness of the light bulbs which remained lit during a short power cut. "The draw on the batteries was estimated at more than 4.5 kilowatts. With any existing technology the batteries would have been drained flat in 1½- minutes,'' the inventor said.>>>> Modern theories of Zero-Point Energy have their roots in Quantum Physics and encompass the fraught areas of ''anti-gravity machines'' and `"advanced propulsion'' research. Contributors to the debate range from serious exponents of quantum science to those who insist free energy secrets have been imparted to them by aliens.>>

282

>> Still others seem convinced the U.S. Government is conspiring to suppress such discoveries. Nick Cook, aerospace consultant to Janes Defense Weekly and author of The Hunt for Zero Point' is not as quick as some to dismiss the possibilities. "Zero-Point Energy has been proven to exist,'' he told Reuters. "The question is whether it can be tapped to provide usable energy. And to that end, I think it's possible, yes. There are a lot of eminent scientists now involved in this field and they wouldn't be if there wasn't anything to it.''>>>> "In my experience, opinion in this field is extremely polarized. People either go with this area of investigation in their minds or they don't. And if they don't, they tend to pooh-pooh it vehemently. It's very difficult to get an objective assessment,'' he said. "Basically, no one wants to be the first to stick his head above the parapet.''>>>> Impervious to skepticism, Jasker's makers see the first practical application of their technology as a stand-alone generator for home use although the automotive industry could also be a near-term target given the huge investment in developing substitutes for gasoline-fueled engines. With world oil reserves running down, there is mounting urgency in the quest for alternatives. If the Jasker men really are on to something, it could be the most important Irish invention since Guinness.

S-184. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding contacting Ann Drunyan

From : Larry Maurer <lmaurer@unitelnw.com>To : stealthskater@hotmail.comSubject : Fwd: Greetings from my UNITEL Email Account! Date : Tue, 29 Jan 2002 17:52:27 -0800

> From: "Doug Starfield" <starman@unitelnw.com> > Reply-To: "Doug Starfield" <starman@unitelnw.com> > Date: Tue, 29 Jan 102 13:39:49 +0000 > To: andrew@unitelnw.com > CC: lmaurer@unitelnw.com > > Hello All, > > Just wanted to let you know that my UNITEL email account is working. It's one more sign of being a real company. I hope that we get funded soon. Larry, please let me know that you emailed the pdf version of Dr. Sagan's letter (that I emailed you) to Ann Druyan. It is important that we start out right with she and her organization. They are probably feeling sad still about the Solar Sail failure. Maybe we can work off of that to get funding from them. >> So in the future, email me to this email account. I'll try and find another virtual office on the Net for us. The other one went out of business.>> If Bryan contacts you, just keep the conversation positive but don't give out anymore game plan to him. Let him do his own thing. As the boy who cried "I have an investor!" once too often, he needs to prove himself to us now, I believe.>> Larry, could you ask Paul Kirsch to see about doing a UNITEL article for Discovery Magazine? Take a look at the current issue when you go online (www.discovery.com ) or into a grocery store.

283

Lots of "news" on the very same physics that we are trying to harness with the optical QC and the Propulsion System.>> Regards, >> Doug Starfield > VP, Director of Marketing > Unitel, Inc.

S-185. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding past corporate pitfalls and human nature in general

From : Larry Maurer <lmaurer@unitelnw.com>To : stealthskater@hotmail.com Subject : Re: human nature Date : Tue, 29 Jan 2002 20:29:14 -0800

At 07:55 AM 1/28/02 -0500, you wrote: > Larry -- >> This is an afterthought on that DuPont story I told you about.>> That was my first job after grad school, working as a chemical engineer assigned to a technical R&D engineering group within a production plant that had dozens of individual units (all producing different chemicals). Our group simulated changes to existing processes as best we could in a small lab. If the tests were convincing enough, the changes were immediately incorporated into the production units. If more "convincing" was needed -- or if the changes involved lots of money -- they were next tested in a small 'pilot plant' that could be rapidly configured. [e.g., sometimes our tests in the lab were "batch" scale as compared to the steady-state continuous production units; ergo move the next series of tests into a small-but-continuous-running pilot plant] >> I always felt the people that actually "ran" the plant were the individual production unit managers and not the official plant administrators. Their units were responsibly for generating "green" dollars (not "funny money") for the plant. They were crusty old-timers from the old school, not believing in any new-fangled theories until they were 110% sure. [They didn't want to fix something if it wasn't broken.] Lots of them never had college degrees. But they "ate" M.S. engineers and Ph.D. chemists for breakfast! Within a week I was introduced to one of the production managers who was a former All-American lineman at Syracuse. I offered him my resume and some papers I had published. He was disinterested but took them anyway. Then he asked me to sit down and he rested his elbow on his desk and raised his arm. He then said something like "in case you have any doubts on who has the last word around here ...".>> We were required to wear shirts and ties in spite of the fact that we were in the dirty, smelly, and greasy units a lot of the time. Unlike most recent college new-hires, the old-timers liked me because I would do things like slide down emergency escape fire-poles, getting my shirt and pants stained. Rather than waiting for a plant vehicle, I would carry samples of dirty chemicals and catalysts 3/4-mile to the analytical lab, getting more sweaty

284

and dirty on those hot humid days. (Actually I preferred the outdoors to a desk job anyway.) I really wasn't doing these things to win their "approval", but they liked me more than other recent hires and accepted me into their "clique". I found out that when I did offer a suggestion, they would listen to me in earnest (even if they disagreed) because they saw me as one of "them". >> I did get into trouble one time. One of the products the plant made was Sodium Styrene Sulfonate. It was a "dye acceptor" added to synthetic fibers like Orlon which made them retain colors. It was difficult to make. We had to use the standard reaction sequence you would find in an organic chemistry textbook. Two of the most virulent and nastiest chemicals I've ever worked with were liquid bromine and SO3 acid and were key players in this synthesis. I reconfigured the packing in a reaction column in the lab and it seemed to give a purer intermediate product. But we were using reagent-grade lab-quality ingredients. I needed an actual sample from the "live" production unit to see if the results could be duplicated. So a pipe-fitter was called-in to free a corroded sample valve in a feedback line. Somehow his wrench slipped under all the effort and hit him in his jaw and broke his false teeth. I ended up on the "shit list" of all the production unit managers because I was the one who requested the work order and -- in their way of thinking -- I was indirectly responsible for the lost-time accident that stopped an on-going safety plant safety record.>> All of the above serve as an example of the mind-set of some of these people who wield considerable authority and influence. From a purist's point-of-view, they are wrong. But if you adopt that attitude, your ideas will never get very far. I think Bearden has made the mistake of taking these people head-on for all these years. Let's face it, everybody has been hearing about free-energy, over-unity, weather-control, orgone, cold fusion etc. for 50+ years. Not only Bearden's site but also Jerry Keely (KeelyNet), John Greenwald (The Black Vault), Boylan and others. Nothing ever comes out of it. Nothing! Not the slightest bit of experimental evidence that can be duplicated. The latest major fiasco was the Utah cold fusion flap where lots of money had been spent to replicate the results. The misinterpretation of the tests just made it that much more difficult for everyone else and their ideas. Now all the investors are gun-shy.>> A lot of them are conservatives like Tom Mahood who adopt an "extraordinary claims require extraordinary [up-front] proofs" position. See some of Tom's past e-mails to me in the attachment. People like Tom are similar to the ones I've met in industry. One thing I've learned you is you can't "reason" with them -- you have to "work" with them. If you try to "change" them -- I'm right and you're wrong -- you'll just piss them off and you'll nail the coffin shut for all time. That's why I was suggesting you use Dr. Wolf in a physics "P-R" role that would solicit help from other physicists rather than force something down their throats in endless debates. (Of course if he has accumulated his share of detractors, then he's not the right man for this "intermediary" job. For $250/hr he should be able to change gold-into-lead

>For what it's worth ... > -- Mark

Mark:

I can really relate to your description of your working conditions. You will probably gather when you read the book I am writing concerning my career in the engineering industry, that there is a lot of similarities. When I was at Bonney, Bennett & Peters Consulting Engineers in Eugene, OR, it was the

285

second largest engineering firm on the West Coast (including L.A. etc.). Talk about a corporate pecking order and the continual bantering of the social & corporate ladder climbers! You can only imagine.

I kept my head down (avoiding social gatherings at the upper-echelon engineers and their clique parties) and strived for speed and perfection in producing mechanical and structural drawings. I actually had bets with a checker (Bob Andreason) in the Checking Dept. on getting an ace (perfect drawing with no mistakes) and Bob would reply: "I've never had a perfect drawing with no mistakes!" Plus Bob made sure that the "degree of difficulty" was there.

Well, I got my ace and I was quickly rushed to advanced tech positions. I have always been proud to make my way by technical means and not the devious butt-kissing method.

BB&P was brought to its knees (like Enron) because of a very bad ($100K) mistake by an under-talented social sot who'm we affectionately called "Sluggo". He wormed his way to a management position by misrepresentations of his supposed technical ability and credibility. He was a large-bellied, sloppily-dressed, and ill-mannered, almost vulgar in his drafting room small talk atmosphere. He would act like the office of 110 engineers and technicians in one large office was like it was a popularity contest just for him.

Sluggo had a very aggressive in his demeanor and would stroll around the office from desk-to-desk with every word just bellowing out of his pie-hole. We had various sawmill construction projects at BB&P and we split the departments up into small groups, each group a different client project.

I was in the Mechanical Dept. under the notorious Ray Nyls, Manager of the Mechanical Dept. and his engineering assistant Manager (second head-Nazi) Clyde McDonald. I shouldn't get down too much on Clyde. He was a little more mellow. Kind of like the Second Mate part that Harvey Keitel played in the WWII submarine movie "U-571". Remember after the captain would lay out some atrocious orders, Keitel would yell at the crew: "Now you boys heard what the captain said now hop to it!" That's what Clyde would do. He would come around to each tech and make sure they knew what they were doing etc.

At one point to show the efficiency of our little tightly knit groups that sort of watched over each other for social defenses etc. Well, a very beautiful blonde office lady named Mychel (i.e., sounds like "Michael") who (as the gossip was spreading about) was purported to be one of the owner's (Ralph Bennett) who was married with children (two very spoiled little teenage girls who came into the office frequently) girl friend. I witnessed the flirtation when Mychel would pass in an out of Ralph's office (which was classical big-wig office complete with gold fish & bowl).

Well, Old Ray Nyls decided he was going to hire this veteran who had been shot in the head in the Korean War. Veterans had a powerful effect on our office. Ray was an ex-major in the USAF and a fighter pilot (I found out in 1984 that he was also a Base Commander at Selfridge AFB with Carl Sagan and J. Alan Hyneck -Project Bluebook) and had a similar demeanor to J Edgar Hoover's bulldog attitude.

Anyway, we knew the vet guy that Ray had hired had been shot in the head and that he had had seizures similar an epileptic attack. Well, they put the guy's desk and drafting station up in the front part of the office building near Mychel's little station.

About 1/2 hour from lunch, the entire office of 110 employees were suddenly intensely shocked by a blood-curdling scream from Mychel! At first, there was some initial shuffling and a sudden BLAM!

286

when the guy hit the floor flopping around like a filleted Flounder! (Mychel's shrill Hollywood-like scream was probably the capper that would have given anyone with a weak heart a heart attack!!)

Everyone stopped what they were doing as the closest engineers ran over and immediately took the correct action of aiding an epileptic. They stuck a wallet in the guy's mouth and tried to clear desks and chairs out of the way so the guy could freely flop and twist around on the floor. There was a sort-of split second whereby everyone was frozen in awe at the spectacle that was going on. That split-second seemed to last forever (so did the screa!).

Anyway, the guy stopped flopping after a while as others were soothing and petting poor sobbing Mychal with Owner Ralph Bennett standing in front of his office door with his hands on his hips. It didn't take long. We had an emergency Technical meeting where Clyde called us into Ralph's office as Ralph had taken Mychel home and so forth. Clyde kind of made head and mouth movements about the reasons why. But we were told to take the next day off as we wanted to make the poor vet flopper think we were all being laid off because of a "big emergency sawmill contract that was suddenly dropped. Clyde told us that we had the day paid for and that he appreciated it.

How do you like that! I get a paid day off just to get rid of their flopper so Mychel wouldn't stess! Ray was furious! He hired the flopper and got a butt-chewing from the owners for hiring what they believed that Ray knew the guy had seizures! That was the beginning of a long slide down for Ray. But that wouldn't come until later. Enter Sluggo.

Bill Brackman (Head of the Structural Engineering Dept.) brought Sluggo around and introduced him to each one of us. This was sort of rubbing it into Ray because Brackman was kind of strutting with this new guy around the Mechanical Dept. and all the interdepartmental strife and competition as if to say "Looks like I have to do the hiring around here". Sluggo was, I have to admit, somewhat quiet and shy the first day or so. However, it didn't take our burping, drawling, so-and-so long to brag and "stroke" his way to the top.

Bill Brackman and Ralph Bennett hired Sluggo as a tech 1 because he supposedly had plywood mill design experience. WRONG!! As it was way too late before everyone found out what was up. After a while and several social dinner parties later, our man Sluggo suddenly received the position of Project Manager of the plywood section of a several hundred $million sawmill-plywood mill facilities in Springhill, LA. I was instructed to be Sluggo's assistant. I was pulled out of our little group of 5-or-6 technicians in the Mechanical Dept. working on conveyor and materials handling equipment drawings. We were all working together as a team and had our job Captain. We were an efficient happy group of drafters. We all thought Sluggo was weird and I cursed the day I was told to work with Sluggo as his assistant (more like his bitch!).

I had trouble right away with the guy who decided he would try to find fault with me on just about anything from shoelaces to size of lead. This was as we found out later that it was a daft way of covering up his lies about the knowledge he supposedly had about plywood mill design. Well, it wasn't long until Sluggo complained to a couple of higher-ups (just to strike first). I became increasingly more and more angry at the situation of working with such a fat slob of a work-bully such as Sluggo!

Well, Sluggo told me in one of his ridiculous designs to draw or design the equipment (which was used to much lighter in weight steel design which I was used to in sawmill materials handling equipment design). I knew he was wrong and confronted him about the fault in his design (I can't remember what the flaw was. Possibly a leg running through a support or something idiotic like that).

287

Sluggo reared back in his chair and yelled as loud as he could yell. "I told you how to draw it now draw it or I will find somebody that can! Now I am very busy right now so get the Hell outa' here!"

This was absolutely insane! Sluggo was turning into a maniac over a simple discussion over what I thought was "wrong" in my orders that he gave me to do concerning the plywood mill design (concept) drawings. Sluggo wanted it to appear that I was a troublemaker. This really drew much attention and I was starting to get those weird "corporate" looks like I had a sign on my back or something I couldn't see that labeled me as weird.

I decided to take my evidence (which was a copy of what design Sluggo wanted me to do) to the group of technicians I worked with. We had a little mini tech meeting and it was unanimous that Sluggo's design wouldn't work.

Nevertheless, I was shipped over to the Structural Dept. the next day. Sluggo moved to a higher position and the work was allotted to another team. I had been moved to a complete other building from Sluggo across the street, away from the corporate offices and the dept. heads. I felt like I was trapped and reprimanded for going against the grain. Ray caught me in the rec room and asked me about the whole affair and I told him.

A month-or-so late, I was given the task of coordinating mechanical and structural projects at Springhill. The Structural Dept. had to have all the positions for the support legs in the sawmill before the conveyors, materials handling equipment drawings were finished. International Paper (IP) -- the owner of the new mill facilities in Springhill -- were not yet settled on their decision so the last part of the mill was being held back so concrete could begin to be poured, etc. with conveyor leg pads being poured in place. If a few conveyor legs had to be changed and it was too late, they would simply use "Red-heads" (expansion bolts) or drill concrete for leg supports.

Well, there was this log sweep that IP wanted moved that we kept calling Sluggo to finish with IP on. This went on for almost 3 weeks of telling Sluggo or leaving a message on his machine that IP wanted to move the log sweeps.

Sluggo dropped the ball. The original log sweeps were "fabbed" up in the shop. Of course, the entire piece of equipment costing $100K was too short and useless. It was to long for the new position or they could have chopped or cut it down to fit the size and salvaged part of the money. Sluggo and Ralph Bennett pleaded with IP to keep the log sweeps and use the fabbed up log sweep. IP wouldn't budge. BB&P had to eat the $100K loss.

That was the beginning of the end for BB&P. They are out of business today because of that damn Sluggo and the lying and cheating ways these rats clamber to make it to the top. BB&P went into a downward spiral of the $100K loss and other cost overruns. They didn't find out about Sluggo's lies about his knowledge. Remind you of Enron? Sickening, isn't it!

Seems like the Sluggos of the World are getting ferreted out in the bad economic times we have around now!

S-186. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding article on FTL and "tunneling"

From : Larry Maurer <lmaurer@unitelnw.com>To : stealthskater@hotmail.com

288

Subject : Fwd: FTL Article Date : Wed, 30 Jan 2002 10:33:31 -0800

> Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2002 21:09:44 -0800 > From: Robert Drake <snoball2@earthlink.net> > User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:0.9.2) Gecko/20010726 Netscape6/6.1 > X-Accept-Language: en-us > To: Larry Maurer <lmaurer@unitelnw.com> > Subject: FTL Article > 0@mail.unitelnw.com> > Content-Type: multipart/alternative; > boundary="------------070807060101080903070709" > X-RCPT-TO: <lmaurer@unitelnw.com> > X-UIDL: 304358888 > Status: U >> "Faster-than-light speeds in tunneling experiments" -- an annotated bibliography

> Revision and enlargement of this page are currently in progress. I've given up setting concrete dates. A more thorough text is in the process of being written and, say, 70% done (January 2001). And until a more complete overhaul, I'll add some more references in a piecemeal fashion <http://www.aei-potsdam.mpg.de/%7Empoessel/Physik/FTL/tunnelingftl.html#Supp>below . > > One central tenet of Special Relativity theory is that light speed is the greatest speed at which energy, information, signals etc. can be transmitted. In many physics-related Internet newsgroups, claims have appeared that recent tunneling experiments show this assumption to be wrong and that information can indeed be transmitted by speeds faster than that of light (the most prominent example of "information" being a Mozart symphony, having been transmitted with 4.7 times the speed-of-light).>> In this document, I've tried to collect the major references on these faster-than-light (FTL) experiments. If I find the time, I will develop this into a written introduction on the topic of FTL speeds and tunneling. So far, it is merely a (possibly incomplete) collection of references. If anyone has relevant additions/comments, I'd appreciate a <mailto:mpoessel@x4u2.desy.de>mail. >> Most of the references are to the technical literature (i.e., presuming that the reader has at least a basic grasp of Physics). However, as usual, those articles have abstracts and conclusions, which give an overview of what the article is about. Some references that are in German are omitted here, but can be found in the <http://www.aei-potsdam.mpg.de/%7Empoessel/Physik/FTL/nimtz.html>german version of this page . >> What's this all about anyway? >> In recent years, some physicists have conducted experiments in which faster-than-light (FTL) speeds were measured. On the other hand, Einstein's theory of Special Relativity gives light speed as the absolute speed limit for matter and information! If information is transmitted faster, then a host of strange effects can be produced (e.g. for some observers, it looks like the information was received even before it was sent. How this comes about should be described in elementary literature on Special Relativity). This violation of causality is very worrisome. And thus Special Relativity's demand that neither matter nor information should move faster-than-light is a pretty fundamental

289

one and not at all comparable to the objections some physicists had about faster-than-sound travel in the first half of this Century.<< So, has Special Relativity been disproved now that FTL speeds have been measured? The first problem with this naive conclusion is that while in Special Relativity neither information nor energy are allowed to be transmitted faster-than-light but that certain velocities in connection with the phenomena of wave transmission may well exceed light speed.>> For instance, the phase velocity of a wave or the group velocity of a wave packet are not in principle restricted below light speed. The speed connected with wave phenomena that (according to Special Relativity must never exceed light speed) is the front velocity of the wave or wave packet. Which roughly can be seen as the speed of the first little stirring that tells an observer "Hey, there's a wave coming". Detailled examinations of the differences between the velocities useful to describe waves can be found in the classic book * Brillouin, L. 1960 Wave Propagation and Group Velocity. NY: Academic Press.>> Basic information on quantum tunneling can be found in the introductory Quantum Theory literature. >> Characteristic of the discussion of the FTL/tunneling experiments is that the experimental results are relatively uncontroversial. It is their interpretation that the debate is about. As far as I can see, right now there is a consensus that in neither of the experiments, FTL-front velocities have been measured and that thus there is no contradiction to Einstein causality or to Special Relativity's claim that no front speed can exceed light speed.>> The discussion of how much time a particle needs to tunnel through a barrier has been going on since the 1930s and still goes on today as far as I can tell. This discussion is about "real" tunneling experiments (like the ones a Berkeley group around Raymond Chiao has done) as well as experiments with microwaves in waveguides (that do not involve Quantum Mechanics) like those of G&uumlnter Nimtz et al. An overview of the discussion (including lots of further references) can be found in * Hauge, E.H. & St&oslashvneng 1989, Review of Modern Physics 61, S. 917--936. >> The Berkeley group gives a general overview of their research at http://www.physics.berkeley.edu/research/chiao/research.html >> An experiment of theirs where a single photon tunneled through a barrier and its tunneling speed (not a signal speed!) was 1.7 times light speed is described in * Steinberg, A.M., Kwiat, P.G. & R.Y. Chiao 1993: "Measurement of the Single-Photon Tunneling Time" in Physical Review Letter 71, S. 708--711 > > Articles concerned with the propagation of wave packets that happens FTL and is somewhat complicated by the fact that the waves "borrow" some energy from the medium -- but does not violate causality -- are >> * Chiao, R.Y. 1993: "Superluminal (but causal) propagation of wavepackets in transparent media with inverted atomic populations" in Phys. Rev. A 48, B34.>> * Chiao, R.Y. 1996: "Tachyon-like excitations in inverted two-level media" in Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 1254.>

290

> Aephraim Steinberg ( who is a former graduate student of Chiao's) has written 2 papers especially on the problem of tunneling time which are available online at * Aephraim M. Steinberg 1995: "<http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/quant-ph/9502003> Conditional probabilities in quantum theory and the tunneling time controversy " in Phys. Rev A52, 32-42 (was preprint quant-ph/9502003).>> * Aephraim M. Steinberg 1995: "<http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/quant-ph/9501015> How much time does a tunneling particle spend in the barrier region? " in Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 2405-9 (was preprint quant-ph/9501015). >> Some other papers of Chiao's Berkeley group are also online -- e.g. > * Aephraim M. Steinberg, Raymond Y. Chiao 1995: "<http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/quant-ph/9501013> Sub-femtosecond determination of transmission delay times for a dielectric mirror (photonic band gap) as a function of angle of incidence " in Phys. Rev. A51, 3525/8 (was Preprint quant-ph/9501013). >> * Raymond Y. Chiao, Paul G. Kwiat, Aephraim M. Steinberg: "<http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/quant-ph/9501016> Quantum non-locality in Two-Photon Experiments at Berkeley " (International Workshop on Laser and Quantum Optics, Nathiagali, Pakistan, 9-14 July 1994) in Quantum and Semiclassical Optics7 , 259-78 (was preprint quant-ph/950101).>> Earlier experiments by G&uumlnter Nimtz of Cologne University (Universit&aumlt K&oumln), with whose experiments most of the later newspaper articles are concerned, have been published as >> * Enders, A. und G. Nimtz 1993, "Evanescent-mode propagation and quantum tunneling" in Phys. Rev.E 48, S. 632-634. >> * Enders, A. und G. Nimtz 1993, J. Phys. I (France) 3, S. 1089 >> * Nimtz, G. et al. 1994: "Photonic Tunneling Times"in J. Phys. I (France) 4, 565. >> * A description of the equivalence between these microwave-experiments and quantum mechanical tunneling is described in Martin, Th. und Landauer, R. 1991: "Time delay of evanescent electromagnetic waves and the analogy to particle tunneling" in Phys. Rev. A 45 , S. 2611-2617.>> In reaction to Nimtz' publications, a number of articles appeared which deal with (a) why causality is not violated in these experiments and (b) how the results of the experiments come about. These are >> * Deutch, J.M. und F.E. Low 1993: "Barrier Penetration and Superluminal Velocity" in Ann. Phys. (NY)228, S. 184-202. >> * Hass, K. und P. Busch 1994: "Causality of superluminal barrier traversal" in Phys. Lett. A 185, S. 9-13. >> * Landauer, R. und Th. Martin 1994: "Barrier interaction time in tunneling" in Rev. Mod. Phys. 66, S. 217-228. >> * Azbel, M. Y. 1994: "Superluminal Velocity, Tunneling Traversal Time and Causality" in Solid State Comm. 91, S. 439-441.>> Nimtz's reply and general observations on causality and his experiments can be found in

291

> * Heitmann, W. und G. Nimtz 1994: "On causality proofs of superluminal barrier traversal of frequency band limited wave packets" in Phys. Lett. A 196, S. 154-158.>> As far as the more recent experiments of Nimtz are concerned (especially the popular tunneling of parts of Mozart's 40th symphony with 4.7 fold light-speed), I have not been able to find references to a technical article yet. Heitman/Nimtz 1994 (see above) refer to it as "H. Aichmann and G. Nimtz, to be published". I haven't found it in Physics Abstracts (up to July 1996). I think I should look again soon), though.>> The problem of tunneling times is also the topic of some articles I've found in the quantum physics (quant-ph) archive, namely >> * Toralf Gruner, Dirk-Gunnar Welsch: <http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/quant-ph/9606008> Photon tunneling through absorbing dielectric barriers, Preprint quant-ph/9606008 >> * Andrea Begliuomini, Luciano Bracci: <http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/quant-ph/9605045> The tunneling time for a wave packet as measured with a physical clock Preprint quant-ph/9605045 >> * M. S. Marinov, Bilha Segev <http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/quant-ph/9603018> On the concept of the tunneling time Preprint quant-ph/9603018 >>---------- > * Aichmann, H., G. Nimtz and H. Spieker: "Photonische Tunnelzeiten: sunb-- und superluminales Tunneln" in Verhandlungen der Deutschen Physikalischen Gesellschaft7, 1995, S. 1258. >> * I'm listing this brief publication (a conference abstract) despite its being in German as it is the only publication directly referring to the tunneling of the Mozart symphony that I know of. The following article has much more content: >> * Nimtz, G. and W. Heitmann: "Superluminal Photonic Tunneling and Quantum Electronics" in Progress in Quantum Electronics21(2) (1997), S. 81-108. >> * Contains an expose of Nimtz' interpretation of his and other tunneling experiments. >> * Chiao, R.Y. Chiao and A.M. Steinberg: "Tunneling Times and Superluminality" in Progress in OpticsXXXVII (1997), S. 345-405. >> * Good summary of the "conventional" view why there is no faster-than-light information transfer in these tunneling experiments. >> * Mitchell, M.W. and R.Y. Chiao: "Causality and negative group delays in a simple bandpass amplifier" in American Journal of Physics 66(1) (1998), S. 14-19. >> * Describes a very simple setup with the help of which one can understand how faster-than-light (or even negative) group and "signal"-velocities can occur without any violation of causality and without any faster-than-light information transfer. >> * Diener, G.: "Superluminal group velocities and information transfer" in Physics LettersA223 (1996), S. 327-331. >

292

> * General article about the pulse reshaping which, in the conventional interpretation, explains the faster-than-light (or negative) group velocities.>> The following references are from the proceedings of the workshop "Superluminal(?) Velocities: Tunneling time, barrier penetration, non-trivial vacua, philosophy of physics", organized by F. W. Hehl, P. Mittelstaedt and G. Nimtz, which took place in Cologne, June 6-10, 1998. >> I. Evanescent mode propagation and simulations >> * A.M. Steinberg et al.: "An atom optics experiment to investigate faster-than-light tunneling" in Annalen der Physik (Leipzig), 7 (1998), S. 593-601. >> * M. Büttiker and H. Thomas: "Front propagation in evanescent media" in Annalen der Physik (Leipzig), 7 (1998), S. 602-617. >> * G. Nimtz: "Superluminal signal velocity" in Annalen der Physik (Leipzig), 7 (1998), S. 618-624. >> * A. A. Stahlhofen and H. Druxes: "Observable tachyons in the tunneling regime?" in Annalen der Physik (Leipzig), 7 (1998), S. 625-630. >> * X. Chen and C. Xiong: "Electromagnetic simulation of the evanescent mode" in Annalen der Physik (Leipzig), 7 (1998), S. 631-638. >> * G. Diener: "Energy balance and energy transport velocity in dispersive media" in Annalen der Physik (Leipzig), 7 (1998), S. 639-644. >> * H. D. Dahmen et al.: "Quantile motion of electromagnetic waves in wave guides of varying cross section and dispersive media" in Annalen der Physik (Leipzig), 7 (1998), S. 645-653. >> * E. Capelas de Oliveira and W. A. Rodrigues Jr.:"Superluminal electromagnetic waves in free space" in Annalen der Physik (Leipzig), 7 (1998), S. 654-659. >> II. Superluminal quantum phenomena >> * F. E. Low: "Comments on apparent superluminal propagation" in Annalen der Physik (Leipzig), 7 (1998), S. 660-661. >> * C. R. Leavens and R. Sala Mayato: "Are predicted superluminal tunneling times an artifact of using the nonrelativistic Schrödinger equation?" in Annalen der Physik (Leipzig), 7 (1998), S. 662-670. >> * J. G. Muga and J. P. Palao: "Negative time delays in one dimensional absorptive collisions" in Annalen der Physik (Leipzig), 7 (1998), S. 671-678. >> * S. Brouard and J. G. Muga: "Transient increase of high momenta in quantum wave-packet collisions" in Annalen der Physik (Leipzig), 7 (1998), S. 679-686. >> * C. Bracher and M. Kleber: "Minimum tunneling time in quantum motion" in Annalen der Physik (Leipzig), 7 (1998), S. 687-694. >

293

> * D. Kreimer: "Locality, QED and classical electrodynamics" in Annalen der Physik (Leipzig), 7 (1998), S. 695-699. >> * K. Scharnhorst: "The velocities of light in modified QED vacua" in Annalen der Physik (Leipzig), 7 (1998), S. 700-709. >> * P. Mittelstaedt: "Can EPR-correlations be used for the transmission of superluminal signals?" in Annalen der Physik (Leipzig), 7 (1998), S. 710-715. >> * G. C. Hegerfeldt: "Instantaneous spreading and Einstein causality in quantum theory" in Annalen der Physik (Leipzig), 7 (1998), S. 716-725. >> * G. F. Melloy and A. J. Bracken: "The velocity of probability transport in quantum mechanics" in Annalen der Physik (Leipzig), 7 (1998), S. 726-731. >> * H. M. Krenzlin et al.: "Wave packet tunneling" in Annalen der Physik (Leipzig), 7 (1998), S. 732-736. >> III. Causality, Superluminality, and Relativity >> * P. Weingartner: "Causality in the natural sciences" in Annalen der Physik (Leipzig), 7 (1998), S. 737-747. >> * U. Schelb: "On the role of a limiting velocity in constructive spacetime axiomatics" in Annalen der Physik (Leipzig), 7 (1998), S. 748-755. >> * V. Gasparian et al.: "On the application of the Kramers-Kronig relations to the interaction time problem" in Annalen der Physik (Leipzig) , 7 (1998), S. 756-763. >> * E. Recami et al.: "Superluminal microwave propagation and special relativity" in Annalen der Physik (Leipzig), 7 (1998), S. 764-773. >> * H. Goenner: "Einstein causality and the superluminal velocities of the Cologne microwave experiment" in Annalen der Physik (Leipzig), 7 (1998), S. 774-782 >> * Aichmann, H., G. Nimtz and H. Spieker: "Photonische Tunnelzeiten: sunb-- und superluminales Tunneln" in Verhandlungen der Deutschen Physikalischen Gesellschaft7, 1995, S. 1258. >> * I'm listing this brief publication (a conference abstract) despite its being in German as it is the only publication directly referring to the tunneling of the Mozart symphony that I know of. The following article has much more content: >> * Nimtz, G. and W. Heitmann: "Superluminal Photonic Tunneling and Quantum Electronics" in Progress in Quantum Electronics21(2) (1997), S. 81-108. >> * Contains an expose of Nimtz' interpretation of his and other tunneling experiments. >> * Chiao, R.Y. Chiao and A.M. Steinberg: "Tunneling Times and Superluminality" in Progress in OpticsXXXVII (1997), S. 345-405. >

294

> * Good summary of the "conventional" view why there is no faster-than-light information transfer in these tunneling experiments. >> * Mitchell, M.W. and R.Y. Chiao: "Causality and negative group delays in a simple bandpass amplifier" in American Journal of Physics 66(1) (1998), S. 14-19. >> * Describes a very simple setup with the help of which one can understand how faster-than-light (or even negative) group and "signal"-velocities can occur without any violation of causality and without any faster-than-light information transfer. >> * Diener, G.: "Superluminal group velocities and information transfer" in Physics LettersA223 (1996), S. 327-331. >> * General article about the pulse reshaping which, in the conventional interpretation, explains the faster-than-light (or negative) group velocities. >> The following references are from the proceedings of the workshop "Superluminal(?) Velocities: Tunneling time, barrier penetration, non-trivial vacua, philosophy of physics", organized by F. W. Hehl, P. Mittelstaedt and G. Nimtz, which took place in Cologne, June 6-10, 1998. >> I. Evanescent mode propagation and simulations >> * A.M. Steinberg et al.: "An atom optics experiment to investigate faster-than-light tunneling" in Annalen der Physik (Leipzig), 7 (1998), S. 593-601. >> * M. Büttiker and H. Thomas: "Front propagation in evanescent media" in Annalen der Physik (Leipzig), 7 (1998), S. 602-617. >> * G. Nimtz: "Superluminal signal velocity" in Annalen der Physik (Leipzig), 7 (1998), S. 618-624. >> * A. A. Stahlhofen and H. Druxes: "Observable tachyons in the tunneling regime?" in Annalen der Physik (Leipzig), 7 (1998), S. 625-630. >> * X. Chen and C. Xiong: "Electromagnetic simulation of the evanescent mode" in Annalen der Physik (Leipzig), 7 (1998), S. 631-638. >> * G. Diener: "Energy balance and energy transport velocity in dispersive media" in Annalen der Physik (Leipzig), 7 (1998), S. 639-644. >> * H. D. Dahmen et al.: "Quantile motion of electromagnetic waves in wave guides of varying cross section and dispersive media" in Annalen der Physik (Leipzig), 7 (1998), S. 645-653. >> * E. Capelas de Oliveira and W. A. Rodrigues Jr.:"Superluminal electromagnetic waves in free space" in Annalen der Physik (Leipzig), 7 (1998), S. 654-659. >> II. Superluminal quantum phenomena >> * F. E. Low: "Comments on apparent superluminal propagation" in Annalen der Physik (Leipzig), 7 (1998), S. 660-661. >

295

> * C. R. Leavens and R. Sala Mayato: "Are predicted superluminal tunneling times an artifact of using the nonrelativistic Schrödinger equation?" in Annalen der Physik (Leipzig), 7 (1998), S. 662-670. >> * J. G. Muga and J. P. Palao: "Negative time delays in one dimensional absorptive collisions" in Annalen der Physik (Leipzig), 7 (1998), S. 671-678. >> * S. Brouard and J. G. Muga: "Transient increase of high momenta in quantum wave-packet collisions" in Annalen der Physik (Leipzig), 7 (1998), S. 679-686. >> * C. Bracher and M. Kleber: "Minimum tunneling time in quantum motion" in Annalen der Physik (Leipzig), 7 (1998), S. 687-694. >> * D. Kreimer: "Locality, QED and classical electrodynamics" in Annalen der Physik (Leipzig), 7 (1998), S. 695-699. >> * K. Scharnhorst: "The velocities of light in modified QED vacua" in Annalen der Physik (Leipzig), 7 (1998), S. 700-709. >> * P. Mittelstaedt: "Can EPR-correlations be used for the transmission of superluminal signals?" in Annalen der Physik (Leipzig), 7 (1998), S. 710-715. >> * G. C. Hegerfeldt: "Instantaneous spreading and Einstein causality in quantum theory" in Annalen der Physik (Leipzig), 7 (1998), S. 716-725. >> * G. F. Melloy and A. J. Bracken: "The velocity of probability transport in quantum mechanics" in Annalen der Physik (Leipzig), 7 (1998), S. 726-731. >> * H. M. Krenzlin et al.: "Wave packet tunneling" in Annalen der Physik (Leipzig), 7 (1998), S. 732-736. >> III. Causality, superluminality and relativity >> * P. Weingartner: "Causality in the natural sciences" in Annalen der Physik (Leipzig), 7 (1998), S. 737-747. >> * U. Schelb: "On the role of a limiting velocity in constructive spacetime axiomatics" in Annalen der Physik (Leipzig), 7 (1998), S. 748-755. >> * V. Gasparian et al.: "On the application of the Kramers-Kronig relations to the interaction time problem" in Annalen der Physik (Leipzig) , 7 (1998), S. 756-763. >> * E. Recami et al.: "Superluminal microwave propagation and special relativity" in Annalen der Physik (Leipzig), 7 (1998), S. 764-773. >> * H. Goenner: "Einstein causality and the superluminal velocities of the Cologne microwave experiment" in Annalen der Physik (Leipzig), 7 (1998), S. 774-782.

296

S-187. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding more technical discussion on FTL, ZPE, anti- grav

From : Larry Maurer <lmaurer@unitelnw.com> To : stealthskater@hotmail.com Subject : Fwd: More FTL Date : Wed, 30 Jan 2002 20:18:37 -0800

> Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 19:40:04 -0800 > From: Robert Drake <snoball2@earthlink.net> > User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:0.9.2) Gecko/20010726 Netscape6/6.1 > X-Accept-Language: en-us > To: Larry Maurer <lmaurer@unitelnw.com> > Subject: More FTL >0@mail.unitelnw.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > X-RCPT-TO: <lmaurer@unitelnw.com> > X-UIDL: 304358923 > Status: U >> QUANTUM MECHANICS has been with us for over 60 years and has been thoroughly put through its paces both experimentally and theoretically. Yet physicists continue to be haunted by its strange implications (e.g., virtual particles, anti-matter, negative energy, energy, dinger's cat).>> Now it appears there is something else to add to the list: light that travels faster-than-light. Recent and past experiments that show that C can not only be slowed but also speeded up have been in the science news forefront for the past 2 years. Einstein's Special Theory of Relativity says that anything that traveled faster-than-light would also have to travel backwards in time. So if light can travel faster-than-light, shouldn't it be possible to send signals backwards in time causing all sorts of mayhem with effects taking place before anything ought to have caused them?>> Well, not exactly. It turns out that the Quantum World is so strange that it is -- after all -- possible to break Einstein's speed limit. Until very recently, the consensus was that this would not violate Einstein's theories. But some tantalizing new results reported at a meeting last month are not so easy to explain away. If they prove true, Relativity theory could be in trouble.>> The heart of all such experiments actually goes back to something that has been around for generations. One is the concept of "tunnel" effects. The other has to do with the structure of the medium photons (the carrier of light) is traveling in.>> Ever since white light was split apart into its separate components or frequencies, we have been changing the speed-of-light just slightly. But that effect is due to a slowing of C in a diffraction medium. Now along comes experiments that show the group velocity of a propagated wave of light in a waveguide can be made to far exceed C.>> Notice that I mentioned group velocity here. This concept of a "group velocity" traveling greater than C has been around in the electronics communication field as long as we have had microwaves and waveguides. Several decades back, it was noticed that a magnetic image of a signal traveling in a wave guide moves ahead of the actual signal. That image actually does travel faster than C and experiments have proved this many times over as does the waveguide math.>

297

> The problem has always been that it is an image that cannot be used to transmit data of any type (except perhaps if a proper detector could be fashioned so that an on/off data stream was used). To date, I know of no one who has directly tried this.>> Now we have something new on the horizon. In particular, there is the work of Raymond Chiao and colleagues at the University of California at Berkeley. Chiao has been pioneering a range of experiments that probe the twilight zone of Quantum Mechanics -- an alien world where ghostly particles can spontaneously appear and disappear; where objects can pass through solid walls; and where everything seems to dance to a different tune depending on whether or not you happen to be watching.>> Quantum Tunneling is, in itself, a remarkable phenomenon because it involves particles traveling through barriers that ought to be impenetrable. If you throw a ball at a wall, you expect the ball to bounce back and not to pass straight through it. Yet subatomic particles pull off the quantum equivalent of this feat with consummate ease. According to Quantum Theory, there is a distinct (albeit small) probability that a particle can tunnel its way through a barrier even if it does not have enough energy to jump over. The probability declines exponentially with barrier thickness. So for all practical purposes, Quantum Tunneling is usually observed only when barriers are no thicker than a few atomic layers.>> Nevertheless, Quantum Tunneling has many practical applications including playing a major role in nuclear fusion, in electronic devices such as the tunnel diode, and in tunneling electron microscopes (the highest resolution microscopes in existence). What Chiao and others have done is measure how long it takes particles of light (photons) to tunnel through a barrier. Their rationale was a pile of theoretical calculations (some weer formed as long ago as the 1930s) which suggested a strange idea.>> In 1932, L. MacColl of Bell Labs wrote: "When a particle tunnels through a barrier, it does so without any appreciable delay." The implications of this, though, did not become apparent until 1955 when Eugene Wigner and his student L. Eisenbud at Princeton analyzed the problem and concluded that under some circumstances tunnelling particles could actually travel faster-than-light.>> This bizarre conclusion has been re-examined and argued about by theoreticians over the decades. The problem is that many ways of looking at it seem to leave common sense behind. What actually happens in the tunnel effect is that the wave nature of a particle comes into play. As that particle hits that barrier, its wave function starts to collapse. From the perspective of one who works with String theory, the outer membrane extension collapses. If the barrier is small enough, that waveform will not totally collapse before the opposite side of the barrier is reached. In that case, the wave re-expands again on the other side and the particle pops back into its existance as a particle-wave again. To an outside observer, the particle vanishes at one point and reappears again at another point.>> This barrier jumping goes on all the time in semi-conductors in equipment like this computer. But there is an aspect that even Dirac noticed to this function that does seem to exceed C. Certain aspects of a particle's state can be communicated across distances faster than light is able to travel. Dirac chose to ignore these aspects even though he once worked the math out and showed it followed a modified Lorentz formula. I mentioned that aspect on my own site in the proof from other theories section.>> To date, I believe that M-theory has been the only field of study that has confronted these contradictions and found an answer that obeys relativity to the letter. What most have always ignored is that just like Dirac's formulas for the electron predicted an opposite counterpart, so does

298

Relativity. Einstein himself noted the possible existence of what is now called "tachyons" (i.e., particles that travel faster-than-light). But like so many after him, he choice to ignore those states. What M-theory does is find an answer to why we cannot observe those states. They exist in a higher dimensional framework that is compacted smaller than the Planck scale.>> As I mentioned to GeometroDynamics in an email and to others, my own modified M-theory is the same as regular M-Theory in that it is actually an 11-D framework. I just choice to ignore Time in my discussion of 6-D space-time because it simplifies things. Time and velocity there do exist. But at a higher rate from ours.>> What we experience as time passage in relation to motion is actually a combination of 2 time frames that add to make a different value. Just as the energies in both sub-spaces add together or blend together to make the values we can measure in particles and fields. Does this imply that Time runs backwards in 6-D space? No, not within its own time frame. Only in relation to our perspective. Cause and effect within each time frame still follow a set path. But each of those paths is opposite in the other frame. It's like a mirror image. Left and right are reversed in a mirror. But the image is still the same image. Only the symmetry is changed by reversal.>> On Kant and Einstein's First Principles>> One of the major problems (as good as Relativity) is that the philosophical implications of the likelihood that observation will continue to reveal an infinite universe have never been actually decently considered. It is very true that Einstein well answered Kant's Antinomy of Space. But his method does so without answering the Antinomy of Time.>> Part of this is the finite and unbounded principle that almost all of us in physics use. Indeed, it is almost counter-logic to state such. A finite Universe by its very nature has to have a boundary or event horizon. Otherwise the Universe one is describing would be infinite. That boundary is formed by the most extreme point in all directions (given uniform expansion which evidence points to) of both matter and energy.>> Consider such a uniform expanding sphere of photons and thus discount any non-uniform changes in expansion rate . Such a system must by nature have a boundary. Else what it is expanding into would have to be considered part of the system in question. Since that which it is expanding into cannot be considered the same vacuum state as our present universe. One cannot consider it to be part of our Universe except as possible another sub-space. Secondly, since nothing can be determined by experiment or observation about this unique sub-space owing to the fact it would be an absolute zero. I do not feel a zero can be considered a true sub-space.>> I have made reference to Kant herein. Some have tried to claim that Kant implied in his ideas though he predates such that non-Euclidean geometry is logically impossible. I personally do not believe that is a correct interpretation of Kant. I personally follow some like Leonard Nelson ("Philosophy and Axiomatic," Socratic Method and Critical Philosophy, Dover, 1965; p.164. Kant to us simply though the axioms of geometry are synthetic. Thus it is not truly analytic. We base our geometry on observation and to a certain extent on visualization. This applies to both normal Euclidean geometry and non-Euclidean geometry. Non-Euclidean geometry did not change our spatial imagination. It only proved what Kant had already implicitly claimed -- the synthetic and axiomatically independent character of the first principles of geometry. >> If Kant is right, then we will never be able to imagine the appearance of Lobachevskian or multi-dimensional non-Euclidean spaces or to model them without extrinsic curvature, however well we

299

understand the analytic equations. But I do not feel this prevents us from coming to grips with a real answer to Kant on both space and time. This has been the crux of our problem not only here in our discussions. But it is a fundamental problem across the board in both Physics and Cosmology. We all tend to use different terms when it comes to time. Most of our definitions of space all remain the same. Whether one choices to follow the Newtonian approach, that of Einstein, that of M-theory, or any other approach. It's when we start describing our fundamentals of time that we all diverge.>> Put this on the record. I am not saying my own definition of Time is any better than anyone else's. But I do feel it goes a long way to defining time and removing the original problem of the boundary problem. As such, it does attempt to at least go a bit beyond Einstein and give an answer to Kant on both space and time. >> The Special Theory of Relativity is nothing less than an adaptation of physical principles to Maxwell-Lorentz Electrodynamics. It takes the assumption of Euclidean Geometry that is valid for ridged bodies, the inertial frame, and inertia. It combines them with the invariance of the velocity of light from electrodynamics. To get these two to agree, it had to abandon the concept of "absolute time". That much is shown in Einstein's own lecture to the Nordic Assembly of Naturalist on July 11, 1923.>> However, what most forget is that GR does not follow Euclidean Geometry. As such, GR itself modifies SR. GR is built upon a higher dimensional form of geometry. It is non-Euclidean and as such it abandons those original assumptions and takes them as strictly a separate case. The biggest thing that GR does do is it keeps those assumptions from ElectroDynamics. As such, it agrees with the invariance of the speed-of-light in the vacuum. But it even more stipulates that the geometry of that vacuum controls that invariance.>> Since early times, we have known that if you change that vacuum state you alter the speed-of-light. Light in water, for instance travels at 75% of its velocity in a vacuum. In fact, in water certain things can and do travel faster than light. So thus, we do have proof that the invariance of C only pertains to the normal vacuum state. It also only would pertain to the present state of that vacuum.>> When one tries to abstract backwards in time towards T=0, one encounters a state where the vacuum density overall changes. One cannot by principle then assume that invariance as seen in our present state holds true then. Nor can we by principle hold that it would hold true under all changed states of that vacuum. Thus, Relativity does have its limits like it or not. Those limits are defined by the terms that C remains constant in the vacuum as we now observe it and know it to be. Beyond that, one simply cannot state otherwise unless one desires to go against the very fundamental underpinnings of relativity itself and against the one who wrote that theory.>> Natural FTL States Explained>> Consider the interval given by ds2 = A(z,r)dct2 - A-1(z,r)dz2 - dr2 - r2dq2. 'A' will go to '1' as r goes to ¥ . A will be -1 at r = 0 for a finite length along z of (a,b) and again 'A' will go to '1' as z goes to ± ¥ . A coordinate transformation that reduces this interval to the form of special relativity at the location of an observer between (a,b) at r = 0 is given by ct = z', z = ct'. Time ct and space z are folded over in this region. This results in a velocity transformation u = c2/u'.>> Thus an object still with respect to this local frame moves from point 'a' to point 'b' instantaneously. Now a boost can be done from the local inertial S' frame to another local inertial frame S" and the transformation will be Lorentz. This leads to the general transformation from a local frame to the remote frame given by ct = gz' + gbetact' and x = gct' + gbetax'. But these are

300

inverted compared to the Lorentz transformation equations. b is the velocity of S" with respect to S'. This leads to the velocity transformation u =c2(1 + vu'/c2)/(u' + v).>> Now the fastest that S" can move with respect to S' is v = c and this results in u = c. Thus we see that for this case of space-time folding c is the speed minimum instead of the speed maximum. This same effect happens in matter cross the event horizon of a black hole. Thus under the event horizon, the coordinate speed-of-light falling radialy into a Schwartzschild hole is a speed minimum for in falling objects rather than a speed maximum. It is also the same effect arrived at in crossing the membrane into 6D space-time.>> In http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/gr-qc/pdf/9907/9907019.pdf , it has been referenced that in 2-dimensional space-time modeling of the effects of Alcubierre's Warp Drive Theory there has been discovered that the vacuum stress energy of a quantified massless field would diverge on the Horizon as it formed. This extended to a 4-D model shows that an infinite amount of energy would be formed from the divergence and by semi-Classical back reaction such would prevent a ship from achieving any usable warp field beyond that of C. However, this does not rule out attaining C itself or any fraction of C via a similar method. Even the attainment of C by any spaceship would be a fundamental increase in our ability to travel in space.>> So the field of both negative energy and warp field generation does deserve further research. It certainly hints that there exists at least on mathematically and modeling grounds ability to extend our current velocities of space travel to that horizon boarder. There has also been research done by those originally involved in this and other institutions that have shown those divergences can be at least at the model level worked around into something that allows carrying the field on up in velocity gain. Some of those have even shown far less energy requirements of negative energy to achieve that effect. >> It is the effect that interests me the most in their model. The Alcubeirre solution allows a craft or any object to have an apparent speed relative to an observer elsewhere which is greater than the speed-of-light. This is achieved by an effect caused by space-time expanding behind the craft and being compressed in front of the craft.>> There does remain a possible means of achieving the same effect without the usage of negative energy. The structure of 6-D space-time with the effects of 4-D space-time canceled out would be one of rapid expansion back towards its normal state of a perfect vacuum state. If the 4-D portion could be canceled out behind a ship, this same effect could be generated. This could be possibly done by using an effective opposite going phase wave type field in that area that cancels the normal positive going phase wave within a given region of space.>> The biggest problems concern creation of that transtating wave (as I have chosen to call it). And focusing such a field projection so a craft or object can remain in its own bubble of normal space-time within. Such a field generation (while by no means impossible in the future) is beyond our present capability of generating at this time. But it does open an interesting field of research that should be pursued.>> One method that is also disserving of mention is that uncontrolled energy violations are an intrinsic part of any brane based low energy approximation to String theory. (They also occur in M-theory.) The possible results of these energy violations are transverable wormholes; ability to avoid a singularity condition; and production of negative energy. Some of this has been referenced before in http://www.physics.wustl.edu/~visser/npb584-2000-415.pdf by Carlos Barcelo & Mat Visser with

301

the Physics Department at Washington University. In fact, his own work has shown others have noted the time reversed mirror universe effect in other String theories.>> Just usually most have considered it a nulled out condition with our Universe being a sort of baby universe attached to it via the membrane as a horizon point. One thing I have noted in his work is that the only known stable conditions for such do invoke a negative cosmological constant. This in light of the discovered speeded up expansion and my own modeling (which includes such shows) that at least we may be on the right track.>> It is also interesting that some models do allow a dual membrane or boundary condition to exist. This would make in our discussion C states a similar condition. But they do not forbid a slip over effect by any means. The real problem would be control of such which I still believe is beyond our knowledge at this time. But the door does remain open to such.>> I find it remarkable considering the categorical acceptance of Relativity as an absolute condition that the scientific community has gotten this far in an open discussion of at least the possibility that relativity may be only a portion of a larger picture. It seems that Science is poised to literally take such a step to go beyond the classical in its understanding. We live in unique times which may allow a lot of the dreams and desires of man to be fulfilled. Only time and research and new definitions stand in our way at present.>> STABLE CTC SOLUTION FROM A MODIFIED M-THEORY >> To remove those condition from a static formulated transversible wormhole solution that generate violation to classical energy conditions to Einstein's equations, one must do the following: using generalization from a Misner space which has been modified if one analytically continues the maximal extended Misner Metric so that ds2= -du2+dw2+(dx2)2+(dx3)2 to the Euclidean section so that u=iota zeta we obtain a Misner instanton on the section where w and zeta are both real. The Euclidean time t and the closed space-like coordinate are both periodic (the later having a period of 2πT2.>> Going back to the Lorentzian sector, we find that the period of the closed coordinate becomes linerally dependent on the physical time. Using automorphic fields in the Hadamard function, one can obtain a quantized condition for time. This gives us a figure on the order of the Planck time. This confines such a stable wormhole condition to the general area of the Planck scale. Which my own theory has stipulated in its modified form is that area defined by the Membrane itself.>> Thus for the mention in my work of the tube within a tube structure. These Planck scale wormholes are the true source of the true virtual aspects of the vacuum. It's an overlap zone of 2 distinct space-times which has boundary conditions on both sides. As an object accelerates towards C, it is this same boundary or horizon that object encounters when the time-defined horizon solution for the Universe is imposed in our modeling. The question becomes since energy itself intermixes in this region, how can one jump or slip across that barrier?>> Some Proposed Material on FTL Warp Theory>> Special Relativity is only a special case of physics within a more general theory known as General Relativity. In General Relativity, the vacuum speed-of-light is locally invariant but not globally invariant. The vacuum speed-of-light remote from a given observer need not be c. It can be greater than c and can vary with direction depending on the gravitational field involved. Because this is

302

allowed, starships that travel between the stars faster than c are not ruled out a-priori within the physics of General Relativity.>> In 1994, physicist Miguel Alcubierre of the University of Wales published how to use General Relativity to consider a space-time geometry -- actual "warp drives"! -- that would undo the Special Relativistic time dilation effects and allow for faster than c travel in the May issue of Classical and Quantum Gravity (see http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/gr-qc/0009013). His space-time geometry would also allow for acceleration of the ship without any internal forces crushing the crew. They would feel weightless as the ship accelerated.>> Unfortunately, in the arbitrary manner that the metric was developed it was shown by Pfenning & Ford to require a lot of negative energy that would violate a few quantum mechanics energy conditions and a greater magnitude of it than all the mass of the known Iniverse (see http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/gr-qc/9702026).>> A case of the space-time geometry that he had derived can be represented in the following equation ds2 = dct2 - (dx - betafdct)2 - dy2 - dz2 f can be any function of the coordinates that is one at the location of the starship and zero far from it. Transforming coordinates to a particular choice of the starship coordinate frame and allowing it to travel faster than c (b > 1), coordinate singularities crop up in the equation corresponding to event horizons in front of and behind the ship enclosing it in a mathematical bubble. This is called the "warp bubble". Even though the event horizons remain for any choice of ship frame, there is a choice for star ship coordinates for which the singular nature is transformed away. >> Chris Van Den Broeck of the Institute for Theoretical Physics at the Catholic University of Leuven, Belgium came up with an alteration for this space-time geometry that would retain all of the desired warp drive qualities but reduced the negative energy requirements down to the order of a transversable wormhole. (see http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/gr-qc/9905084/)>> The space-time geometry can be represented by this equation ds2 = dct2 - B2[(dx - beta fdct)2 + dy2 + dz2 B can be any function that is large near the starship and one far from it although he used a specific Top Hat function for his example calculations. That not only brought the negative energy requirements down to a hopefully one day reachable goal but also solved one of the quantum mechanics energy condition violations.>> To consider these transformation as extended to 4-dimensional space-time with arbitrarily time dependent acceleration, wWe also present the ship frame energy density T00 from a 4-dimensional calculation and note that the 4-D classical calculation is everywhere finite. >> Consider an Alcubierre interval given according to a remote frame's cylindrical coordinates by ds2 = (1 - beta2f2)dct2 + 2bfdctdz - dz2 - dr2 - r2df?2 whre f is a function that is 1 at the location of the ship and zero far from it. We start out with the first transformation z' = z - òctbetadct where b is first expressed here as a function of time ct. With some algebra for simplification, this results in ds2 = [1 - beta2(1 - f)2]dct2 - 2b(1 - f)dctdz' - dz2 - dr2 - r2df?2 .>> Let g = 1 - f and this becomes ds2 = (1 - beta2g2)dct2 - 2bgdctdz' - dz'2 - dr2 - r2df?2 >> Notice that this returned the original intervals form with a reversal on the sign of b and a reversal of the boundary conditions for g. Now we notice that at r = 0, this interval becomes the interval for Special Relativity transformed to cylindrical coordinates. Thus,we have found a transformation to a frame based local to the ship. One can also verify that in these coordinates the relevant affine

303

connections vanish at r = 0. Basically there are several models to work with when it comes to the subject of warp drives. The problem in all cases is generating the negative energy.>> First Principles of FTL Travel>> The first principle of warp technology will be that the main reason we will ever exceed the light-speed limit is inertia. As a body approaches the light speed limit C, its mass due to kinetic energy gain will increase exponentially up to infinity at C.>> Our second problem is Time which means that Time must stand still to a body moving at C or the principle of Relativity will be violated.>> Field acceleration refers to the acceleration of the body by applying the momentum to the components which make up the body rather than to the body itself. The difference may seem small. However, it is profound. In older forms of propulsion, force is applied from the power plants and is subject to inertia as it propagates through the body to change its inertial state. With a field accelerator, the body is immersed in the field and biased to a certain inertial state. There is no inertial effect since the force does not have to propagate across the body. >> Any quantum force of sufficient capacity can produce a warp field. Gravitation is the most often expressed force. However, electromagnetism is the most used force since it is the most controllable and understood. It is also important to note that electroweak force (of which electromagnetic force is a subset) is kinetic whereas the strong force is static.>> Static forces are difficult to bias and often require an actual imbalance in the field to achieve the warp effect. Kinetic forces have a polarity and can easily be biased in their natural flows without applying undue stress to the structure of the body involved. This was why I have referenced a group of frequencies EM field in my own work with the phase shifted ahead of individual phase waves of the particles that make up the craft. Match the phase wave frequency; and even though a phase wave differs from an EM wave, the two will interact with each other. >> Field acceleration handles the time question as well. The body within the field experiences no inertia and is therefore in a state of stable inertia all the time. Such bodies are moving at sub light velocities sufficiently small as not to experience major time dilation. It is the surrounding space which is warped by the allererator field. Quantum acceleration of the entire field frame compresses space in an isolinear fashion. I mentioned a few times in my own proposal besides the lessening of dilation effects. It is also a velocity that we could achieve in the future.>> Other proposed methods of FTL travel work along similar lines to achieve the same effect.>> There are 5 basic proposed methods of achieving faster-than-light motion as far as solid matter states. They are (1) Alcunierre's method and those based upon his original idea; (2) the Phase Shift Method; (3) the Phase Canceling Method; (4) the Jump Gate Approach; and (5) QESAT or Quantum Entangled Spin Altered Transport as I have chosen to call it.>> All of these methods work by either altering the vacuum structure of space-time or by utilizing the odd behaviour shown in Quantum Mechanics. None of these methods in any fashion violate anything generally established under Relativity. They simply alter the conditions and thus change the perimeters. While the last method is interesting in some forms I have heard proposed, it does have the problem of establishing a near rest carbon copy of the original craft or object one wishes to accelerate. The Jump Gate proposal -- while possible -- is way beyond our capability at this time

304

and most likely any time in the near future. I believe only the first 3 methods are a worthy area of focus at this time. They are more related than unrelated and cross research benefit exists. They all could benefit from research in the Quantum Entanglement field.>> NEGATIVE ENERGY FIELD GENERATION FROM THE ZPF AND AMPLIFICATION METHODS>> Scientists through the 19th Century believed in the existence of an "ether" which was modeled as a material substance that could support the wave propagation of light. >> The famous Michelson-Morley experiment failed to detect the expected ether wind produced by the Earth's motion through it. At the turn of the century, Einstein used this result to support the theory of Special Relativity. When this became accepted, the scientific community rejected the existence of the "ether". Thus Classical physicists came to consider the vacuum of space to be truly empty. The Classical model was only to last until the 1930s when Quantum Mechanics became accepted. From QM arose a mathematical term in the description of the ground state of any oscillating system called the "Zero-Point Energy".>> The term "Zero-Point" refers to zero degrees Kelvin. Which means this energy exists even in the absence of all heat. The energy was interpreted as being INHERENT TO THE FABRIC OF SPACE ITSELF. Dirac showed how electron-positron pair production could arise from the vacuum fluctuations and Quantum ElectroDynamics was born.>> The Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle allowed quantum mechanical systems to "borrow" this energy for short periods of time. The Vacuum filled up with something new and came back into science not modeled as a material substance but rather as a randomly fluctuating energy field. In some recent versions of M-theory (mine included), this Field is itself a combination of 2 separate space-time fields itself. (More on this later, however.)>> The question has been raised: does this fit with Relativity? If, so, does it modify Relativity to any extent?>> Now before I continue to answer this question, I first want to state what Relativity actually states. Simply put, the speed-of-light remains constant at 186,300 miles-per-second in the vacuum.>> But Relativity also says more. It says that for a stationary observer ('stationary' here meaning relatively so as compared to an object being observed), an object moving or accelerating will not only appear to shrink in length but also any clock reference from the stationary point to that of the moving object will show a time shrinking effect the faster that object moves. This is all according to Lorentz formula that predates Relativity from the time Newton's "aether" or "ether "was still believed in. This effect has been tested to the limits of our capability of velocity at present and found to match the experiments exactly within error range.>> Boyer showed that by invoking the postulate of Lorentz invariance, the spectral energy density p of the Zero-Point fluctuations must have the particular form as a function of frequency w : p(w) = kw3 where the constant k is related to Planck's constant as commonly called Planck's Constant Crossed. This result gives a quantitative basis to the theory of random electrodynamics which strives to show that quantum mechanical effects arise FROM MATTER'S INTERACTION WITH THE ZERO-POINT ENERGY.>

305

> However, when you work out the math, the ZPF should generate an infinite amount of energy. Yet in Relativity, it doesn't. Something is modifying the vacuum. A similar problem plagues quantum electrodynamics where infinities are renormalized away. Some type of frequency cutoff is required to create a finite quantitative theory. >> Wheeler applied the theory of General Relativity to the ZPE to create a natural cutoff in his theory of GeometroDynamics. In General Relativity, the fabric of space curves as a function of energy density.>> When the density becomes sufficiently great, space pinches like it is forming a black hole. This gives rise to the formation of hyperspace structures that Wheeler called "wormholes". These wormholes those of us who work with String theory are familiar with. To us they are the event horizon (so to speak) between 6-D Higg's space-time and our 4-D graviton space-time. We call them the "Membrane" or "String" depending upon which version you happen to follow.>> Wheeler's calculation yielded microscopic channels on the order of 10-33 cm having a (mass equivalent) energy density of 10+94 grams/cm3 (cubed). Notice how these correspond to the String scale. The resulting view is that the fabric of space consists of constantly forming and annihilating pairs of microscopic "mini" blackholes and whiteholes which channel electric flux into and out of our 3-dimensional space.>> These mini-holes manifest dynamics which could be modeled as a turbulent virtual plasma that Wheeler calls the "quantum foam". In this view, the elementary particles are like bubbles or vortices arising from the dynamics of the vacuum energy. In my own modification to M-theory, I showed they can actually be pictured as shell-like extensions of the membrane itself which does restore the particle concept to the theory and maintains aspects of older models like the dual standing wave model, the Waveicle from ether theory, the wave-particle model from Einstein's time, and the Compton Vortex model derived from QM. But like regular M-theory, I do so without the need of unnatural renormalization. >> Recent experiments that utilize the Casimir effect have shown this Zero-Point Field not only does exist. They have also shown that at least on small scales, we can modify that energy level. We can actually remove energy from it and produce an area of negative energy density within a localized region.>> But there does remain possible ways to increase this negative energy field. Many have been proposed. One basic method is to use a factor about the field that is already known to our advantage. That being that if you add energy into it (such as via heat from a local plasma field), you get a resulting larger negative energy field. The question isn't a matter of can it be done. It has been experimented with and shown to work. The question is how to amplify such an effect.>> In 1977 the Nobel Prize in Chemistry was given for defining the conditions under which a system could evolve from randomness toward coherence. The conditions are that the system must be

> (1) far from equilibrium, > (2) nonlinear in its dynamics > (3) have an energy flux through it.

>> These conditions are expressed in general system theory terms. It turns out that the already published theories of the ZPE can -- under certain circumstances -- fulfill these conditions. Adding energy into the ZPF via heat is one tested method to force the system or field towards coherence. What hasn't been tested is how much energy is needed to reach coherence and how this modification

306

to the vacuum affects the speed-of-light as a constant. In theory -- based upon sound math but untested currently by experiments since we've never achieved a true coherent state yet -- the velocity of light in such a region should be vastly higher than in our current vacuum state. Indeed, in theory it could be raised many orders higher.>> The odd thing is even any negative energy in a given region should alter C. Why no one to date as tested this with a Casimir plate setup is beyond me. An actual test could be setup and performed in even a home situation. Create a semi-circular waveguide just large enough to allow a laser beam to travel down its lengths. Have the open end of the waveguide open to 2 mm-separated plates of a length of choice. Have a second laser diode set to fire across through this gap just matching ½ wavelength of the main lasers pulse. Have a detector for the diode laser beam at the other side of the plates utilized with timing measurement for the passage of the beam across the gap. Have this inside of a vacuum chamber. Then run your experiment.>> The amount of negative energy present can be calculated by force= (π2*h-cross*C/240*a4)A with a = distance of gap and A = area of plates. This was why I said the size of plates is your choice. The more area covered, the larger the effect you generate. The separation I chose was connected with ½ wavelength of Hydrogen to remove any natural effects from space around you. >> Now the field setup under regular proposed warp programs utilizes a sweeping effect where in front of the ship a region of compression is formed while behind the ship a region of expanding space is created. This by what ever field proposal one choices to follow produces a moving frame situation for the ship whereby it actually moves forward at any given velocity because space itself is moving. Similar to how our Universe itself expands moving the galaxies along with it.>> I have already gone into some of the math behind this. But what I am proposing is a modification to this approach. That modification is based upon finding an exact field coil configuration that produces a linear amplification of each coils effect so that the craft while existing in its own space-normal ZPF condition exists in a sort of cone shaped external field of negative energy region that expands space behind the craft.>> That expansion behind the craft would produce a similar effect to a surfboard riding upon a wave and take advantage of the craft being surrounded by a region where C no longer equals its current value. The trick then becomes alignment of the twin field generators so that a narrow point is formed in front of the ship since any blunt region would produce a shear effect and tend of build up an energy shock wave that would slow the ship down.>> One may have to literally bring the space normal horizon of the inward field up right next to the back of the craft by pointing the field coils front in towards the craft with their aft section pointed out unless some means of projecting the whole field can be found. Shape of the craft will determine how much this must be done.>> For right now, I will ignore the issue of producing a linear chain amplification effect. I will instead go back to one normal proposed field generation method and see how this looks modified into a single aligned field situation and then combine the results as if we had two field generators then work on shaping it to the desired outcome.>> For sake of not back-tracking in my work, I will utilize one that allows for the generation of such a field without an undue huge amount of negative energy. Exact energy will have to await experiments to not only determine each coherence zone but also the possible range of C within such zones. Then we can better figure out the range of the field across space from each field coil setup.

307

>> So this method will not be exact. It will simply give us a basic geometric model to work from. In Hiscock's 2-D calculation, a scalar field could easily be found because of the form the metric took: ds2 = (1 +2phi/c2)dct2 - dz2/(1 + 2phi/c2). However, I do agree that more than one scalar field configuration can be derived.>> For one, it has already been mentioned in arXiv.org@gr-qc/0009013 5 Sep 2000 "The Warp Drive : Hyper-Fast Travel within General Relativity" . Miguel Alcubierre University of Wales in Cardiff UK that metrics can be generated under which less negative energy is required to achieve the proposed Top Hat field shape.>> For two, these metrics have not been shifted in shape to generate the type of field we are seeking here.>> For three, I agree with ZcPhysics in his online comment that we should be able to globally transform the space-time to that form in 4 dimension which can't be done. The scalar field is a "linearized" and weak field approximation for this particular form of a space-time metric. The energy density can classically by arrived at by t^00 = -(7c2/8πiG)(phi,j*phi,j) using Einstein summation.>> Fourthly, I also agree that the 16 other tensor components have never been properly treated from GR over to this field approach. Nor has this field been honestly looked at from an 11-D perspective available under M-theory or my own dual time modification to it. Agreeing that those tensors from GR define the normal composite geometry of space-time that results from the admixture of 6-D Higg's space-time into 4-D Graviton space-time, let's for sake of argument here only concentrate upon the 4-D solution then.>> In doing a linearized weak field approximation, 4 more restrictions can be placed on the potentials in linearizing the result that reduces the number of independent potentials to 6. The restriction that has to be done to linearize the result allows for 4 more restrictions because there remains some choices of frame. In the end, this still leaves 2 independent scalar potentials.>> Fortunately, the Classical result as calculated by the ship frame is that the energy density is given only by one element of the contravariant Einstein tensor G^00. We know what that is and so we know what GR says the energy density is. Coordinate frame energy density = T^00 = (c4/8πG)G^00. Thus we can actually ignore the Scalar component if we so choice because we can already obtain it from that which we already have.>> Now in following a further proposed modification to this field, we will reintroduce a time dilation term into the ship frame's interval. Only we will use different boundary conditions for it. We will keep A=1 both at the location of the ship and far from it but allow it to become large in the warped region. This is achieved by the simplest means possible in my proposed field generation method since each warp field generator would produce an equal negative energy region.>> With the effect focused outward away from the ship slightly by the field coil setup, the actual inward going portion of such fields would overlap and cancel their effect out in the region of the ship. This yields a space normal time region which is again restored at the fringes of the outward going field. From the standpoint of a geometric picture of space-time around the ship and extending outwards, one has actually created a dual event horizon situation as far as time goes. The inner one is the shell of the canceled out field inside of which normal time flow is restored. The outer one is

308

formed at the boundary where normal time resumes and within which we have a negative energy field that allows motion faster than C to exist.>> Now if these field generators are placed alongside of the ship in extended position in parallel to the ship, they would form 2 main elongated spheres of negative energy region with a heart-shaped blunted front end and a spanning out rear field effect. That blunt front region would create a disturbance wake in its path through space-time that would literally pile up particles in the ship's path. That would defeat our purpose and create undue stress on our ship.>> But if we place them at a proper angle to the ship, we can narrow that blunt end effect to a finer point region similar to how the hulls of supersonic aircraft were narrowed to reduce the shockwave effect of supersonic flight through the atmosphere. Internal-wise, this would produce a wider zone of space normal time flow in front of the ship than behind.>> I also believe that elevating them slight above the plane of the ship would also nearly eliminate any shock front transfer against the craft's direct line of motion. Sort of like cocking that shock motion up and away from the craft. This would, however, generate a shock wake behind the craft that spreads out and disperses as the field reduces in strength towards the outer event horizon. Its effects on the stability of the coherent modified ZPF would have to be studied further to discover any ill effects it might produce.>> My hunch (without any actual figures) is that quantum effects would cancel such out or dissipate it through the medium itself by further heating the ZPF through particle pair production. The position of the craft in relation to its cone shaped field would best be chosen to approximate a craft riding on the leading edge of a wave crest so as to harness the most forward motion from the field's effects. At this point, we reduce our discussion to those of main drive system and how to achieve that linear amplification effect with our field coils.>> One thing that must be counted into overall discussion of velocity here is that unlike the original proposed warp fields, ours would utilize expanding space behind the ship to propel our craft forward instead of a combination like the "Top Hat" version does. Thus velocity would depend upon the thrust output of the main drive combined with how fast space behind the craft is spreading out. The moving frames concept here is unified with its own speed component and that of the initial drive system. So the faster the main drive can propel our ship, the higher velocity one can gain within each stable domain. Also the faster one can have the space behind the craft expand the higher a velocity one can achieve. So now, we have 2 design perimeters to figure into our craft design. That and the craft's shape.>> Theoretical physics depends on the idea of symmetry. Symmetry means certain things do not change when other things do change. The changes can be passive (i.e. changes in a frame of reference or point of view POV) or perspective. The changes can also be active as in the displacement or rotation of an object in space. Symmetries and Conservation Laws are 2 sides of the same coin.>> Translate an object along the straightest path possible in space. If there is a symmetry there, the linear momentum of the object is conserved. This is force-free motion. Therefore Newton's idea of "force" really arises as a broken transitional symmetry. Symmetry under displacement in time conserves the total energy of the displaced object. Symmetry of rotation of an object about an axis in space conserves the component of total angular momentum along that axis. Torque is a property of a broken rotational symmetry.>

309

>In addition to these external symmetries associated with movement in space and time, there are the "internal" or "gauge" symmetries that cause the electromagnetic force field, the weak force field of beta radioactive decay of nuclei, and the strong force field that binds quarks into nucleons and mesons.>> The residue of the strong force is the nuclear force that binds nucleons (protons and neutrons) into the nuclei of atoms. The binding of atoms into molecules, liquids, neutral plasmas of ionized gases and solid state crystals is purely from the electromagnetic force field together with the Bohm quantum bit pilot waves of "active information" and a new kind of nonclassical symmetry called permutation symmetry among identical quantum objects.>> Note: under conditions of Dicke "super-radiance" with a lot of fermion photon emitters concentrated within a single wavelength of the real photon radiation, the fermions "cooperate" -- analogous to the Mossbauer effect used in the 1960 Pound-Rebka experiment showing the gravity redshift -- to mimic a Bose-Einstein "condensate" (Nature, August 16, 2001, p.689, J. Javanainen).>> Now when we refer to the idea of coherent states to the ZPF, we are actually speaking of points were that ZPF as it undergoes a phase transition reaches a symmetry conservation point. Simple Casimir Plate experiments force the vacuum to reach a lower energy state by the fact that the placement of those plates prevents some of the normal virtual particles from forming. The idea of heating that vacuum point is simply a means to increase the excitation of the vacuum itself and thus to produce a stronger energy negative state within that region.>> As the negative energy rises, the field strength of this negative energy increases and thus its reach across space-time increases. But the fact remains that there should be naturally occurring coherent regions forming stair steps or domains on the way down towards a literal zero field. I take this from the Quantum nature of the vacuum as we presently observe it.>> Part of the answer to why we have matter in the first place is stability under conditions of spontaneous broken continuous symmetry whereby those particles reach a coherent state with the ZPF locally. But that only gives us the baseline for the vacuum in its assumed lowest energy state. It's assumed to be lowest because it is stable.>> However, picturing a deep shelf with a ball sitting on it could be considered stable. Yet with the right push, that ball could drop off towards an even more stable coherent condition. When we set up an experiment with those plates we are actually taking a small portion of the ZPF field lower. Doing the same and heating, the local vacuum region is taking it lower still. Our question is where is the next coherent range between our present state and the bottom. Normally this would be a function of temperature too. Our present vacuum is sometimes called a "frozen" vacuum. The closest to the bottom we can reach would then be Absolute Zero.>> For example, the locally ordered (or non-random) field of a laser or a superfluid or a superconductor has long range phase coherence forming an "interferogram" in space-time that can be roughly thought of as implicit or "implicate" (Bohm) holographic information storage. This kind of coherent signal is in stark opposition the random Zero-Point quantum noise fluctuations of the vacuum and also Classical noise.>> Such a coherent long-range phased state is a superposition of different numbers of bosons (either real or virtual). If virtual, it can be a "superfluid" coherent derandomizing of the Zero-Point fluctuations of the "normal" component of the quantum vacuum. Indeed, the Higgs mechanism in which lepto-quarks get their inertial rest mass in the Standard Model is a good example. Though in

310

my own modification to M-theory, this is replaced with a field hidden in 6-D space-time instead of a regular particle as the Standard Model would propose. But the example shows directly what we are after here. Finding those states in which the random fluctuations of the ZPF become de-randomized into a set coherent state.>> There is a reason why I seek this out. Those coherent regions should have a definite set velocity range within each of them while I could generate a field of a set given strength to achieve my derived effect. Velocity then would simply be dependent upon its negative energy addition to that of our craft's primary thrust system and the expansion rate of the energy field behind the ship. The other would literally multiply these by a certain given internal factor.>> To give an example, for argument sake lets say in the first case our craft could achieve 0.5C. Let's say that with the field on our craft could achieve 1C. In this lower coherent range, it might achieve 2C because that region actually multiples or doubles any given velocity to maintain its coherent condition. Step down to the next coherent zone and we get 4C or 6C depending upon how it multiples velocity. Now you begin to see what I am after. Letting Nature do some of the extra work for us.>> To locate one such possible point, I need to backtrack into a separate (but related) field of work. Newton recognized that the fall of an apple, the tides, and the orbits of the planets as aspects of a single phenomenon -- gravity. Maxwell unified electricity, magnetism, and light. Each synthesis extends our understanding and leads eventually to new applications. Einstein unified space and time into one format of space-time. Then he spent the last years of his life seeking to unify Gravity and the EM field (but to no major avail).>> In 1979 Weinberg, Salam and Glashow were awarded the Nobel Prize for their unification of the EM force with the Weak Force responsible for atomic decay based upon an adaptation of 't Hooft's renormalization from an earlier developed theory for the Strong Force called Quantum ChromoDynamics (or QCD for short).>> In modern times, we now have String theory and M-theory as the primary avenue towards unifying the last holdout force Gravity with all the rest. This is based upon supersymmetry which arose after the success of the other two commonly referenced as the Standard Model.>> My focal point for this discussion will be the predicted Quark/Hadron transition range. Let's for sake of argument here assume its range projected below the normal ZPF field range would equal such a Coherence zone. Now both energy and temperature can and are expressed using the same basic unit. The common measure of energy is the electron volt. 1 eV equals 1.6x10 -5 joules which we find used in Physics to describe temperature. This transition range lies at 2-to-3 GeV according to the standard model.>> So let's say the coherence band in the ZPF we are after lies 2-to-3 GeV less than our current Normal ZPF state. To reach such a state, we need to induce 150-to -00 MeV temperature differences into the local ZPF. Very reachable by even being heated via a high-power laser.>> Now let's perform a renormalization method and say that the normal ZPF state equals a state where current velocity ranges extend from zero to C. Take the M from MeV and exchange it for 1 million. Now plug in our current range and shift it 150 to 200 million. Let's say we choose the low side and put it at 150 million. This gives a velocity increase of 1.5 million times whatever value we plug in from a space normal condition.>

311

> This example is not a real one. But it does show how one could find the increase factor. Now let's try and find a more usable one. >> Let's use the same one but focus on a stable state. For the normal, non-transitionaing state of the proton, the density is 1 GeV per fm3. We know in the normal vacuum this is a stable state. Let's then see what we find for the electron. We have 500 KeV per fm3. Let's say that at 500 KeV down the scale from our current ZPF, we have a stable range. If we follow the other example, we'd have an increase of say C to a velocity of 9.315^10 miles per second with a minimum velocity of 500,000 miles per second. That base then sets slightly higher than 2.683 times our current Max for the ZPF.>> Now back to my original example for our proposed ship. If its space normal velocity is .5C, then its new velocity in this higher domain would be 4.6575^10 miles per second. Here again, you have to remember no one has found or tested even one of these coherent zones. So none of these figures are actual. But they do provide a good exercise by which you can get a picture of how velocity/energy density/temperature could be related. >> Basically my own assumption is that if you half the energy density of our current vacuum state, you double the effective velocity. Under that assumption, those before-mentioned ranges would be many powers of domains lower than even that. But following the assumption that ½ ZPF would equal a velocity range from 0.5C to 2C for an equal space normal range of 0 to C, what then remains to determine is simply how fast the energy density decreases for a given temperature input.>> Now in engineering terms, the velocity-of-light in free space c is given by the expression of the relationship between the magnetic permeability and dielectric permittivity of the vacuum. However, both of these are controled by the energy density of the ZPF. Thus, altering the ZPF does alter those two factors.>> Now since the dilectric permittivity = 8.854x10-12 F/m and the magnetic permeability = 4x10-7 H/m with C= 1/(µ00)1/2 in the normal ZPF, we do know that the dilectric permittivity changes under a localized area with the Casmir Effect. In short (as emphasized by Wesson), the speed-of-light c is context-dependent and not as fundamental as widely believed.>> This is the area of most needed research. What we need is a system to generate the Casimir Effect into a wider localized area of space-time. Usuable velocity increases could be achieved for any Coherent state where the dilectric permittivity is cut by ½ of greater. But given our present slow velocity of reaction rocketry, what we need is actually a cut of many magnitudes with the whole potential velocity scale shifted from its present 0 to C range to one of C to C2.>> This then would open up space travel to wider scale potential and allow us to utilize our present drive systems and still get out of our local neighborhood. At say such a shifted scale, we could achieve 0.1C. Our upper velocity range would then become 3,470,769,000 MPS or 18,630 times C. This puts everything under 20,000 LY from Earth with a 2-year or less round-trip mission. Well within the time scale of some long range planned future missions within our local system.>> Remember, this is all simply brain-storming. The only thing we do know to date is that if you alter ZPF like in Casmir Experiments, you alter the velocity of light. We do not know if we can increase such a field to cover a wide area. Nor whether we can mold such a field into a usable shape either along my projected lines of those mentioned in conventional warp theory models that resemble a Top Hat type field. We do know by the math that one can be made to be stable. But no one to date has made one of those stable field solutions. Nor have they tried considering we haven't developed the means to amplify such a field yet. This remains then one huge wide open field of research for

312

those future scientists. But the fundamental ground work is being laid by current scientists through their work being published on the Los Alamos Archives System.>> ZPF History.>> The ZPF was first introduced by Max Planck in 1911 as a renewed investigation of the relationship between matter and radiation or energy as related to a blackbody. The formula is well known that 1/2hv +B(v,t). From this, a quantum oscilator should have a finite ZPF energy even at Absolute Zero. Einstein-Hopf required a ZPF function in their work only with hv instead of Planck's version.>> Nerst in 1916 first proposed a universal ZPF. However, it was Mulliken in 1925 that first conducted and experimentally proved not only the existance of the ZPF but also provided the first experimental proof of Heisenburg-Schrodinger Quantum Mechanics. To date, the most dramatic example of the ZPF being used is its role in maintaining Helium in a liquid under its own vapor pressure at near Absolute Zero.>> The first person to demonstrate by math that C varies under different boundary conditions was Scharnhorst in 1998 with his work that shows a Casimir effect altered ZPF works as an accelerating medium. It's this kind of medium that in the last year-or-so was in the news showing light speeded up and slowed down under certain conditions. Hawking had some on this with his modification added to Galphabeta so that it equals 8πTalphabeta+U where U is a small term that perturbs the system from its Classical solution. But it remains Scharnhorst's work that has given us the best indication that C can be varied.>> 1.) The metric g is a sole dynamic field and the theory contains no arbitrary functions or parameters (apart from the value of the Newtonian coupling constant G) which is measurable in laboratory experiments. Throughout this, I will ignore the cosmological constant. Although it has significance for quantum field theory, quantum gravity, and cosmology, on the scale of the solar-system or of stellar systems its effects are negligible for values ofcorresponding to a cosmological closure density.>> The field equations of GR are derivable from an invariant action principle. Generally it takes the form Guv=Ruv1/2guvR=8πGTuv. Now some propose Guv(x)+Delta(x)guv(x) = -(8πC4)Tuv(x). But the normal would actually be for a negative region such that Guv=-(8πGTuv) which yields a result the same as a normal 4-D model of GR. Only a reversed region or manifold in which gravity here has been reversed.

>> My reason for this is that the variance of G with the introduction of U (simular to Hawking's method) is actually a product of the cosmological factor which for finite local areas is for all intense zero. To accomplish this, most introduce exotic matter. However, the same general effect arises within a lowered ZPF condition such that the negative then is accomplished via a subtraction of normal energy within a given localized region. The negative then becomes simply a matter of difference.>> An example of such a region is that produced by the Casimir Effect since this doesn't create any major violation of CWC. I believe we can ignore such. I base this upon the fact that even this negative field (though displaying a fall off effect of 1/r7) does extend beyond the small local region. Since according to Scharnhorst (and latter verified by other accelerating medium experiments), this does yield a velocity increase to C without a violation of SR because one is dealing with a special

313

frame of reference, I see no major reason to modify GR to achieve a FTL condition when the normal method will achieve the same.>> All one needs is to treat the reference frame of the ship as a Nulled Region in which the normal ZPF condition is restored due to two Negative ZPF zones overlapping (i.e., -1*-1=1), then have the external field non-stationary with respect to the craft and non-symmetriic. If the effect sweeps backwards in concentric larger areas, the net effect is the same as Alcubierre's method and those based upon it without the requirement of huge energy factors, nor a violation of any WEC effects.>> Basically, you achieve this by changing the space locally into an accelerating medium and have the ship exist within a region where the reference frames are moving outside of it. Far simpler effect and requiring far less energy to produce. Especially if a method of enhancing the Casimir effect can be found.>> Gravity vs Anti-Gravity>> The speed of gravitational radiation (Cgw) depends upon the specific model of Gravitation that you use. There are quite a few competing models (all consistent with all experiments to date) including of course Einstein's but also Brans-Dicke and several families of others. All metric models can support gravity waves. But not all predict radiation propogation at Cgw = Cem.>> There is a class of theories with "prior geometry" in which there is an additional metric which does not depend only on the local matter density. In such theories, Cgw != Cem in general.>> However, there is good evidence that Cgw is in fact at least almost Cem. We observe high-energy cosmic rays in the 1020-to-1021 eV region. Such particles are travelling at up to (1-10-18)*Cem. If Cgw < Cem, then particles with Cgw < v < Cem will radiate Cherenkov gravitational radiation into the vacuum and decelerate from the back reaction. So evidence of these very fast cosmic rays is good evidence that Cgw >= (1-10-18)*Cem, very close indeed to Cem. Bottom line: in a purely Einsteinian universe, Cgw = Cem.>> In my own model based upon a dual time M-theory of 11-D format, our 4-D manifold is a product of the overlap of 2 sub-space-time manifolds. In it, Cgw is a product of 2 components. One componet is negative and the other is positive. In one, the propogation velocity is slightly less than C. In the other, it is faster than C.>> Now in the absence of the first component, space-time would expand at a 7-D level. This is exactly opposite of the effect that gravity has upon space-time. But it is a condition that only happens naturally in a mechanism tied to the cosmological constant and dependent upon local matter density. This does not preclude the usage of artificial means to achieve a simular local effect. One possible area is altering the local density by altering the ZPF. Another would be canceling the local effect of the less-than-C component. This could be done possible through a transtation method. However in either case, this isn't "anti-gravity" in its strict sence. True anti-gravity would require negative mass.>> Now when it concerns EM and GR, the stress-energy tensor is a generalization of the 3-dimensional stress tensor developed late in the last century and used by all materials science engineers to compute stresses in solid materials. It turns out that the force per unit area in the direction v across a plane with normal n depends linearly on both n and v (i.e., it is measured by a tensor.>

314

> Let V be an n-dimensional real vector space with basis {e_1, ... e_n}. A "tensor" is just a multilinear map such as T: V x V x V* -- R This particular tensor takes arguments u,v,xi where u,v are vectors and xi is a covector on V. Covectors are linear mappings xi: V -- R. You can think of u,v as column vectors and xi as a row vector where xi(v) is [ v^(1) ] [ v^(2) ] xi(v) = [x1_(1), xi_(2), ... xi_(n)] [ ... ] [ v^(n) ] (In this context, subscripts in parentheses are often used for the components of row vectors and superscripts in parentheses for the components of column vectors. Thus v_1 is a column vector and v_1^(2) is the second component of that vector; xi^2 is a row vector and xi^2_(1) is the first component of that row vector.)>> V* is the space of covectors on V and it too has a basis -- the dual basis o^j defined by { 1 if k=j o^j(e_k) = { 0 else There are n such basis vectors so V* is n-dimensional just like V. Saying that, T is "multilinear" means that T( a_1 u_1 + a_2 u_2, v, xi) = a_1 T(u_1,v,xi) + a_2 T(u_2,v,xi) and similarly for the other 2 arguments. This means that we can completely define the values of T on any triple u,v,xi by defining its values on triples of basis vectors T^{(i)(j)}_(k) = T(e_i, e_j, o^k) >> For given u,v,xi, we can write them as linear combinations of the basis vectors {e_j}: u = u^(i) e_i = u^(1) e_1 + u^(2) e_2 + ... u^(n) e_n v = v^(j) e_j xi = xi_(k) o^k (where we sum over repeated indices one up, one down, as suggested in the first line above) and then by the multilinearity T(u,v,xi) = T(u^(i) e_i, v,xi) = u^(i) T(e_i,v,xi) = u^(i) T(e_i, v^(j) e_j, xi) = u^(i) v^(j) T(e_i, e_j, xi) = u^(i) v^(j) T(e_i, e_j, xi_(k) o^k) = u^(i) v^(j) xi_(k) T(e_i, e_j, o^k) = T^{(i)(j)}_(k) u^(i) v^(j) xi_(k)>> Notice this is a triple sum over the n3 numbers T^{(i)(j)}_(k). These numbers are the components of the tensor and are analogous to the n components of a vector or covector. But just as with vectors, representations of tensors with respect to the basis {e_i & e_j & o^k} of V & V & V* comes with a price. The components change if we change to a new basis, in a manner completely analogous to the way the components of a vector change if we adopt a new basis for V.>> Suffice it to say that (o^j & o^k)(u,v) = o^j(u) o^k(v) where we have multiplication of real numbers on the right. The point of introducing tensor products is that it is often convenient to think about a tensor as a linear map on a new vector space V & V & V* rather than a multilinear map on V x V x V*.)>> If A is an invertible matrix, it provides a coordinate change to a new basis of the vector space V given by e'_j = A e_j = a_(j)^(k) e_k where a_(j)^(k) are the components of the matrix A. If u = u^(j) e_j then the new components are given by u = u^(j) A^(-1) e'_j = u^(j) B e'_j = u^(j) b^(k)_(j) e'_k or (replacing the dummy index k by j') u^(j') = u^(j) b^(j')_(j)>> Here, B is just A^(-1) and b^(j')_(j) are the n^2 components of B. This induces a corresponding change of dual basis o'^j = o^j A^{-1} Note that this gives { 1 k=j o'^j (e'_k) = o^j A^(-1) A e_k = o^j e_k = { 0 else as required for {o'^j} to give the dual basis to {e'_k}. We must transform the components T^{(i)(j)}_(k) in order to compute values of T as triple sums over components expressed in the new basis and its dual.>> In analogy with the expression u^(j') = u^(j) b^(j')_(j) for vectors, we have the change of basis expression xi_(j') = xi_(j) a^(j')_(j) For tensors, this law looks like T^{(i')(j')}_(k') = T^{(i)(j)}_(k) b^(i')_(i) b^(j')_(j) a^(k')_(k)>> I stress once more that for each of the n3 components of T, this is a triple sum over n3 terms. To make sense of it, get a large sheet of paper and write out all the sums for say the case n=2. The stress tensor S: V x V -- R thus is associated with n2 components in a particular basis which we can

315

write as a matrix [ s^{(1)(1)} s^{(1)(2)} s^{(1)(3)} ] [ s^{(2)(1)} s^{(2)(2)} s^{(2)(3)} ] [ s^{(3)(1)} s^{(3)(2)} s^{(3)(3)} ] Here, s^{(1)(3)} (for example) measures the stress across the plane orthogonal to e_1 in the direction e_3.>> These numbers represent all the pressures and stresses in some material at a single point in space. It is very important that S is a symmetric matrix: the force per unit area across the plane normal to e_j in the direction e_k equals the force per unit area across the plane normal to e_k in the direction e_j. This means we can always diagonalize the matrix by a proper choice of basis.>> The eigenvalues are called "pressures" and the eigenvectors are the "principal directions" of S. The stress-energy tensor (or matter tensor) of GR incorporates this stress tensor, fluxes, and energy density at a single event in space-time into a single multilinear object which is also a tensor T: V x V -- R, except that now V is E^(1,3). Once again ,we can write it as a matrix:>> Density | three flux components -----------|--------------------------- flux | stress tensor>> A vector -field- is a smooth map assigning a vector to each point in space (or space-time) and similarly for tensor fields. Thus the matter tensor field assigns a tensor (a multilinear map) to each point in space-time. A change of coordinates on space-time induces a change in basis in the tangent space at each point in space-time and thus induces changes in the components of the multilinear map at each event.>> If the density also vanishes, the result is considered a vacuum to the extent that it vanishes dictates the bottom line for that vacuum state. It also determines the propagation velocity of C. For each particle, there is a local coherent solution to that vacuum. Indeed, our 4-D manifold contains multiple solutions locally. Some add to that state and others subtract from the ground state. Globally, these add to a ZPF condition that is at least 120 places smaller than what Classical theory would predict. That canceling mechanism I have already discussed in my own model and theory.>> Now in QM, vacuum fluctuations give rise to a matter tensor of the form [rho 0 0 0 ] [ 0 -rho 0 0 ] [ 0 0 -rho 0 ] [ 0 0 0 -rho ] I have been at pains to emphasize that strictly speaking, a solution in gtr must not only satisfy Einstein's field equation G^{(a)(b)} = 8 π T^{(a)(b)} but also the dominant energy condition which says that when we have chosen coordinates diagonalizing the matter tensor, the density of mass-energy T^{(0)(0)} must be positive. And moreover must be strictly larger than the absolute value of the other three eigenvalues (the principal pressures).>> In the field equation, note that the Einstein tensor G is computed entirely in terms of the geometry (by taking a sort of "trace" of the Riemann curvature tensor to get the Ricci tensor R and then subtracting off a term rather like writing A - t I when defining the characteristic polynomial of A as det(A - tI).>> But lowering the local ZPF does not violate this premise. In all cases, the density issue remains positive and larger than the principle pressure. So this doesn't call into effect any violation of WEC. Nor does it require negative mass or anti-gravity.>> So the solution to Alcubierre's warp formula that utilize an altered ZPF condition have no reason to actually have to satisfy any problems raised on the WEC violation. This is also the reason that the Casimir effect and other accelerating medium effects can exist in the first place without major structure problems in space-time. They simply do not generate such.>

316

> SIDE NOTE >> I do not know how many here know the formula for capacity. But I have noticed an odd relationship between this and a Casimir effected ZPF. Basically, if you treat those seperated plates as plates of a capacitor as the distance of separation, decrease the force due to the Casimir Effect increases while the capacitance decreases. Thus capacitance follows the energy range of the ZPF and inversely follows the External force being generated.>> All of these are variables controlled by the area of the plates and the separation of the plates. For a vacuum K in the capacitance formula effectively equals 1 with the formula being C=2.25-7(KA/S) with A being area and S being separation distance when using inches as our scale.>> As an example, with A=0.5 sq. inches and S=0.01 inches, the capacitance =11.3 mf. Plugging those values into the formula for the force externally generated in a Casimir setup, we get 2.535639415-25 gram per inches squared. I haven't yet tried this with a charge present across the gap. But I suspect there is a relationship between modifying the ZPF(As such local inertia) and an EM field.>> This might tie in with some who have proposed theories that strong EM Fields counter gravity. This would be because while gravity curves space-time the EM field would tend to straighten or stiffen space-time in a local region thus working against gravity. However, my guess is that they are incorrect and the EM field actually helps curve space-time. An externally-applied EM field present between those plates would at first glance raise the ZPF -- not lower it.>> So perhaps we have here proof that Gravity and EM perform a similar task when it comes to curving space-time. Which makes sense when one considers that a given amount energy confined within an area is equal to a given amount of mass in an area.>> When the poles of a freely suspended charged capacitor (even in vacuum) were placed on a horizontal axis, a forward thrust would be produced which would move the capacitor in the direction of the positive pole. The direction of thrust would reverse in conjunction with a polarity change. This is the phenomenon known as the Biefield-Brown Effect.

> Now when you examine this effect, it is actually proof of what I was trying to show and not anti-gravity at all. Those who call it anti-gravity neglect the fact that EM forces far outpower gravity. Secondly, while a strong charge causes local curvature, the direction of force to that charge will produce motion on freely seperated plates. If you look at the setup of the Biefield-Brown Effect and a Casimir Effect and that I mentioned before they are simply copies of each other.>> Now when a charge is induced across those plates by direct current, that charge will seek to move from its negative plate to the positive. And even though it can't move unless that charge is greater than the local dielectric breakdown voltage, it still produces a force in the direction of that positive plate. This accounts for that so called anti-gravity result. In other words, it's not anti-gravity at all. It's simply a matter of force being applied in a certain direction producing thrust. That thrust ballances at a certain point when its force equals gravities force in that local region. Put in the simplest terms: when the electron force towards the positive plate equals gravities force downward in the other direction, the two ballance out and you have levitation - yes; anti-gravity - no. Basically, I could perform the same task with a small fan thruster whose output exactly matched gravity's push downward at a given altitude.>

317

> Thus, I would tend to discount EM fields being able to create anti-gravity effects.>> Below is a list of some recognized research links in the first.>

> http://www.geocities.com/alcwarp - The Alcubierre Warp http://www.geocities.com/einswarp

> - Alcubierre Warp http://members.tripod.com/da_theoretical1

> - Page of Edward Halerewicz http://force-of-nature.iwarp.com/warpshel.htm

> - Page of WarpDriveGuy(Simon Jenks) http://www.aei-potsdam.mpg.de/office/alcubierre.htm ...

> - Miguel Alcubierre's Bio http://force-of-nature.iwarp.com/warpzero.htm

> - Pfenning and Ford's ideas http://force-of-nature.iwarp.com/warpone.htm - Chris Van Den Broeck's Warp-Bubble http://popularmechanics.com/popmech/sci/9712STSPM....

> - NASA's Anti-Gravity Machine http://popularmechanics.com/popmech/sci/0010STRSCM...

> - Ning Li Electro-Gravity Research article http://www.warp-drive.org

> http://arXiv.org - arXiv.org - Scientific Research

> http://force-of-nature.iwarp.com/links.htm - Warp-Drive.org - Useful Links Page

> http://force-of-nature.iwarp.com/gravitypaper.html - A Mechanism for Quantum Gravity

> http://arXiv.org/find/gr-qc/1/abs:+AND+warp+drive/... - Warp Drive Query at arXiv.org

> http://www.physics.wustl.edu/~visser - Matt Visser Homepage

> http://pancake.uchicago.edu/~carroll - Sean M Carroll Homepage

> http://www.imo.physik.uni-muenchen.de/~mbaum/poste... - German Explanation for Warp Bubbles

> http://www.cogs.susx.ac.uk/lab/nlp/gazdar/teach/at... - British (Sussex University) explanation

> http://www.physics.uoguelph.ca/poisson/mitch/ - Michael John Pfenning Home Page

> http://web.ukonline.co.uk/Members/ad.johnson/astrn...

S-188. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding latest e-mail sorrespondences

From : Larry Maurer <lmaurer@unitelnw.com> To : stealthskater@hotmail.com Subject : Re: so you're into "time-travel" now, huh ??? Date : Wed, 30 Jan 2002 23:55:14 -0800

At 11:35 PM 1/30/02 -0500, you wrote:

> This sounds like some of the ways people misinterpreted the "Montauk Project" and alternate words / time-lines. The fact that the Montauk principals did nothing to discourage this didn't help matters any, and the true facts behind the on-going studies are conveniently shielded from scrutiny by these whacky claims of "time travel". Tell that guy to go see a remote-viewer -- they are supposed to be able to traverse space and time. (Or route him to T.A.P.-T.E.N. or that TIME-TEC (Argentina). Puthoff himself formalized the training

318

programs. The trouble is that it's still more of an art than a science and results are often unreliable. But the world peer-review magazine "Nature" gave its stamp-of-approval in a long article on it. >> As much as you believe in what you saw demonstrated before your very eyes, I truly am convinced that there is something to this "consciousness" aspect of post-quantum theory and how it relates to hyperspace and MQT. That's why the UFOs "blink" on-and-off, sometimes up close resulting in scaring even seasoned observers out of their wits. That's why the UFOs seemingly intercept radio transmissions and "blink off" radar screens. I don't think it has anything to do with RF ... I think -- crazy as it sounds -- that they are almost "reading minds". That's why the DoD and Navy have awarded contracts to study the effects of the new hyperspatial geometry on human consciousness. It's an entirely new physics which has completely stymied even the most radical scientific minds. The only links to the physical world that I have seen are (1) Lyn Bucanon's famed feat of "influencing" a quantum event in a laptop computer that ended up "frying" it and (2) the Russians have some sort of "alarm" that can detect remote-viewing. Over recent years I have come to appreciate and admire Russian science and engineering. They don't waste money and time on pie-in-the-sky stuff.>> I'm like you, though. If I can't measure it, weigh it, see it, then I have trouble admitting its existence. But I don't have any trouble in believing in God so I am guilty of a double standard. I think that is the true "magic" of UFO behavior that Corso, Lazar, Dean, Stevens, Swartz, and others talk about. It's NOT the fantastic maneuvers or the silent propellent-less hovering. It's these other things that appear as "black magic". Those are what seem to be many hundreds-of-years ahead of our science. But that doesn't mean we can't reap immediate benefits from back-engineering what we do understand. If we believe Corso, then we got fiber optics, lasers, composite materials, integrated circuits and more from crashed discs. There are reportedly more things recovered that can't be reverse-engineered or explained, however [see Swartz' article "Technology of the Gods"].>> The technology that UNITEL is trying to develop is a quantum leap ahead what has been back-engineered to-date and is truly revolutionary. I'm very excited to be witnessing its development. I think there is even more beyond that but -- like you -- I'm too much of a nuts-and-bolts engineer to know how to tackle that. I think this is what Nichols was referring to as "artificial reality generation"; why Lazar was prohibited from going into the uppermost levels of these craft; why members of Bill Uhouse's team said they "would rather ride a rocketship into Hell than go back in those [crashed] craft"; why Corso said the craft seemed to be a "physical extension" of the crew inside; and why Sarfatti seems to know what Corso was talking about and addresses it in his post-Quantum stuff. Did you ever worry that once you "turned on" the superlattice laser, it would generate a MQT "hole" and just suck itself into it and disappear into some part of the universe (like in the sci-fi movie "Lost in Space")?>> I think there's enough work in your patents to challenge top-notch engineers for years to get it working. Mankind will certainly be better off because of it. This other "stuff" is best left to a newer generation of scientists-engineers. I believe in its viability, but I avoid it because I can't begin to understand it. I think in the final analysis there will be proven a scientific link between UFO technology, the Philadelphia Experiment, the Montauk "time-travel" stuff, and remote-viewing. I am sufficiently distant from specific endeavors that I can see the overall "forest" without being consumed by individual "trees". I can really see an overall "umbrella" of sorts linking all these diverse phenomena together but I can't nail it down. I doubt that anyone in my lifetime will be able to. But we have more-than-enough on our hands with next generation technology like UNITEL's!

319

>> I assume that you haven't heard from anybody I wrote to on your behalf or you would have told me by now. Off-the-subject a little, I heard a story where an architectural company was designing a building and sending the specs off to an engineering house in India who would create the drawings and e-mail them back. They are saving money because of the lower cost of living in India. Could you use the UNITEL site to advertise your CAD/CAM services in addition to Andrew's web-designing? Andrew would have to put "META tags" in the html code so search engines could pick up on it. Just a thought ...

Hi Mark!

I thought you would get a kick out of that weirdo request for time travelers. Indeed it's sad though, isn't it? In accordance with the last paper I sent you that I forwarded from Bob's paper where I made comments. In developing and testing our quantum spaceship, we had better (in fact, we MUST!) pay attention to time dilation and interaction via MQT methods. Then and only then will we find out if we have a time machine on our hands.

I sent you Dr. J.A. Wheeler's paper talking about him considering an electron being a particle traveling backward in time (ergo, if we mimic the electron on a Macro level.) And why did the space vehicles jump Michael and I on two separate occasions? Why us?

Well, we will worry about those problems when we get to the point of building our prototypes. One would think, however, that our goddamn Government would be concerned about such matters of who will have a controllable time machine and what will they do with it! What is scary is someone told me the Japanese and Germans will never forget WWII and would change the outcome if they could!

Good idea about the website and advertising drafting services. We shall see what happens to get the job done.

Larry

S-189. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding Scientific American articles

From : Larry Maurer <lmaurer@unitelnw.com> To : stealthskater@hotmail.com Subject : Red, Green & Blue Date : Thu, 31 Jan 2002 13:23:04 -0800

Mark:

Since we are in the business of fooling Mother Nature by making her think that our ship & projected field system is one gigantic electron-positron or electron-hole (exciton) pair, we are at a near stalemate with many physicists concerning our use of red, green & blue sections that are supposed to mimic the red, green, & blue quarks contained in an electron. The following is a description by Prof. Gerard t'Hooft of the QCD system in an article in Scientific American:

>>

320

>> "To explain how three quarks can form a bound state, one must assume that like charges attract. The theory that has evolved to explain the strong force prescribes exactly these interactions. The analogue of electric charge is a property called color (although it has nothing to do with the colors of the visible spectrum). The term color was chosen because the rule for forming hadrons can be expressed succinctly by requiring all allowed combinations of quarks to be "white," or colorless. The quarks are assigned the primary colors red, green, and blue; the anti-quarks have the complementary "anti-colors" cyan, magenta and yellow. Each of the quark flavors comes in all three colors, so that the introduction of color charge triples the number of distinct quarks." >>>> "From the available quark pigments there are two ways to create white: by mixing all three primary colors or by mixing one primary color with its complementary anti-color. The baryons are made according to the first scheme: the three quarks in a baryon are required to have different colors, so that the three primary hues are necessarily represented. In a meson a color is always accompanied by its complementary anti-color. The theory devised to account for these baffling interactions is modeled directly on quantum electrodynamics and is called quantum chromodynamics. It is a non-Abelian gauge theory. The gauge symmetry is an invariance with respect to local transformations of quark color." >>>>"It is easy to imagine a global color symmetry. The quark colors, like the isotopic-spin states of hadrons, might be indicated by the orientation of an arrow in some imaginary internal space. Successive rotations of a third of a turn would change a quark from red to green to blue and back to red again. In a baryon, then, there would be three arrows, with one arrow set to each of the three colors. A global symmetry transformation, by definition, must affect all three arrows in the same way and at the same time. For example, all three arrows might rotate clockwise a third of a turn. As a result of such a transformation all three quarks would change color, but all observable properties of the hadron would remain as before. In particular there would still be one quark of each color, and so the baryon would remain colorless." >>>>"Quantum ChromoDynamics requires that this invariance be retained even when the symmetry transformation is a local one. In the absence of forces or interactions, the invariance is obviously lost. Then local transformation can change the color of one quark but leave the other quarks unaltered, which would give the hadron a net color. As in other gauge theories, the way to restore the invariance with respect to local symmetry operations is to introduce new fields. In Quantum ChromoDynamics, the fields needed are analogous to the electromagnetic field but are much more complicated. They have 8 times as many components as the electromagnetic field has. It is these fields that give rise to the strong force."

We first started out investigating what we were shown when the space vehicle landed directly in front of the four of us that fateful Sunday evening on October 18th, 1981 from 10 feet away. It was obvious that the "juxt" of what they were trying to show us was the red, green, & blue lens as the ship landed; turned off its light (revealing that the lens was composed of the 3 equal-part red, green, & blue tinted lens sections); and then turned on an interior light revealing the inside of the craft which had nothing in it but a box-like structure. Then after a couple of seconds, the craft flew up and out of sight, away from us with a shower of sparks trailing from the stern.

Well, we started noticing the significance of the red, green, & blue to t'Hooft's QCD quark design. Notice the attached illustration which is a modified illustration of a hadron string by Prof. t'Hooft.

321

Michael sent a letter to Prof. t'Hooft and he wished us luck in our project. We immediately thought (and still do) that there was a connection between the labeling of the quarks with the primary colors and the primary colors themselves.

Prof. t'Hooft (who received the Nobel Prize for physics last year) thought our design was very interesting and understands our dilemma of proving that the primary color labeling of quarks may be more than just "labeling". It may be just as we say -- and what we were shown -- that the colors will create the strong force (i.e., QCD) effects we want.

Dr. Raymond Chiao later added the fact in a separate Scientific American article about how to produce a true EM wavepacket; one must have the wavepacket be composed of a minimum of 3 separate primary colors: red, green, & blue or red, yellow, & blue etc. This added to our growing arsenal of information. However, we will still get lots of flack about red, green, & blue trying to mimic quarks. Oh well! If we could just construct our lens prototype, we can prove all of this is true.

Regards, Larry

>>And why did the space vehicles jump Michael and I on two separate occasions? Why us?

you wrote:>> I think the current fervered interest in hyperspace and "extra" dimensions means the powers-that-be are convinced of their existence and are subtly encouraging development of the theories. These dimensions would make MQT possible and -- as Lazar said -- linear speed has no meaning anymore and Einstein's SOL limit does not apply. I think all is not fine-and-dandy, though, that they've experienced problems with volunteers going crazy when "entering" these holes. Maybe there is something to these alternate time-lines and "deja vu" existences. Maybe time is not an absolute either. I never bought it, but I think that's what that popular book "The Holographic Universe" was trying to say. I wonder if Dr. Wheeler ever updated his Many Worlds theory with these new theories about time, consciousness, and reality. I myself try to avoid it because I'm too biased against things I can't feel or measure. >

>>> >>Well, we will worry about those problems when we get to the point of building our prototypes. One would think however, that our goddamn government would be concerned about such matters of, who will have a controllable time machine and what will they do with it? What is scary is, someone told me the Japanese and Germans will never forget WWII and would change the outcome if they could!

> I don't mean to make this sound dramatic. But I can't help but wonder if -- for reasons unknown to us -- you guys were "chosen" by the ETs, much the same way as certain ordinary individuals (at least 'ordinary' to the world-at-large) were given a mental image of where the giant mothership was going to land in "Close Encounters". Much of the script was allegedly based on stories that had been passed around for decades. I think a lot of scriptwriters get their ideas from paranormal or ET related folklore, like the movies "Contact", "Scanners", "the Matrix", "Dreamscape", and of course "ET". Regarding you two, it looks like the ETs made a good choice because even after all these years and adversity, you have given up the

322

ship yet! Had I myself not accidentally picked up that Astronomy magazine with Kaku's article, or just happened to see the DATELINE interviews with Corso and Morehouse, I wouldn't be writing this e-mail now. I wonder about my un-planned "role" in all of this sometimes.>>That is one of the popular side stories about the Montauk Project. That in addition to viewing past and future events, some of the researchers tried to engineer realities where we won the War with less casualties and so on. They made some mistakes and created realities (I don't know how stable or long-lasting they were) where the other side won and where both sides annihilated each other. Nichols said we're living in a "time loop" between 1943 and 2003 that would appear to be irreversible. Who knows? Maybe the Montauk Project and the Everett/Wheeler "Many Worlds" theory inspired the tv series "Sliders".

>>>>I read an article about how companies were using the Internet to do business. Since competition is tight, this one company was able to underbid others by having the e-mailing the specs to a company in India who -- because of cheaper lager wages -- produced the engineering blueprints at minimal cost. (Of course that would go down-the-tubes if they started imposing tariffs on such web traffic.) The problem with search engines is you have to pay a hefty price for the better ones to carry you. My brother-in-law operates his own civil engineering consulting company and complains that they always put his company at the bottom of a long search list that is headed up by the more prosperous firms. Google's policy is the ones who get the most "hits" are awarded the highest positions on the list. So unless you can come up with some unique "key phrases" (CADD, CAM are not "unique" ... there's probably a million companies with those words) …>> -- Mark

Good idea about the website and advertising drafting services! We shall see what happens to get the job done.

S-190. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL comments on Michio Kaku's reponses to questions

From : Larry Maurer <lmaurer@unitelnw.com> To : stealthskater@hotmail.com Subject : Re: Kaku's stand on UFOs Date : Thu, 31 Jan 2002 16:40:49 -0800

At 02:57 PM 1/31/02 -0500, you wrote: >> I returned to that new link that Dave Kauble put up on Deb's "NEWS" page ( http://www.debshome.com ) for the real-time interviews with Kaku and Pope concerning UFOs. Once I got the ABC Science index, I searched for "Kaku". It returned a bunch of archived chats and interviews. You might see evidence of his "double-standard" concerning UFOs at http://search.abcnews.go.com/query.html?qm=0&ct=0&rq=0&qt=kaku&Submit3.x=15&Submit3.y=1 1 .

323

Mark:

I suppose our little story and our patented design for a spaceship blows Kaku's story all to Hell, doesn't it? I have some inserts on his statements below:

>>>> "Science or Sci-Fi?" Chat with physicist Michio Kaku Nov.,'02>>> UFOs -- science fact or science fiction? What are the plausible scientific theories that support the existence of UFOs? Are there real-life physics behind the concept of a flying saucer? How do they fly? How could they travel through time and space?>> Chris Wallace looks at these questions in the latest edition of his Internet Exposé: “UFO 2000: The Search Continues.” In this Webcast, Wallace interviews Michio Kaku, an internationally-recognized authority in theoretical physics and the environment. >> >> Kaku is the author of 9 books, the last two of which (Hyperspace and Visions) are international best sellers. Michio Kaku joined us in an online chat today. The chat transcript is below:>>>> Moderator at 1:56pm ET >> "Welcome Dr. Michio Kaku. David Wohlfarth from tnt21.atl2.da.uu.net at 1:56pm ET : "Hello Dr. Kaku. My question is what the difference is between folding space and wormholes?">>>> Michio Kaku at 1:57pm ET: "Folding space and wormholes are the same thing. In science-fiction, a great distinction is made between the two. But from a mathematical point of view, they are the same. If I take a sheet of paper, fold it in half, and then punch a hole through this folded sheet of paper, this is sometimes called 'folded space'. However, a mathematician would call this a simply-connected manifold. So mathematically speaking, they are the same." Moderator at 1:58pm ET

To study this concept and how it relates to the UNITEL spaceship, see "How to Visualize Surfaces in three-Dimensional Manifolds" by Jeffery R. Weeks and "Fiber bundles and Quantum Theory" by Bernstein & Phillips, Scientific American, July, 1981, pg.122 which introduces the reader to Riemannian geometry on surfaces and then applies the ideas to Physics.

>> RJ asks: "Do you think that most people are thinking the wrong way when it comes to "traveling" great distances in space? Isn't it feasible that overlapping or intersecting dimensions can be purposely breached thus allowing movement between them for those who have realized that the "physical" world goes beyond our ideas about the limits of Physics?">>>> Michio Kaku at 2:00pm ET: "This could be true. Most scientists giggle when they hear about UFOs, because the distance between stars is so great. It would take centuries to millennia for a civilization to navigate even to nearby stars. However, if we have what is called a type-III civilization, their energy consumption is so great that they might be able to open up higher dimensions. At present, most -- but not all -- physicists believe there is a good possibility that we live in 10- or 11- dimensional space. If we can access the Planck energy, space and time becomes unstable and wormholes begin to open up, giving us the possibility that we might use these wormholes for transportation to the stars."

324

AKA Monsieur Kip Thorne! What master grandstanders they be! A politician's answer, that's for sure. Kaku knows who supplies the butter for his bread. Gain popularity by leaning to the Left but staunchly stand on the Rright, of course.

Of course, they would run and hide from hardcore math proving their stance on the WKB Approx. and the latest very important papers from world-class physicists and aerospace researchers presenting proof that MQT is indeed possible. These kind of people that make an effort to appear avante-guard in their demeanor to gain attention only in reality to take a conservative "no contest" stance as they spew all but Classical, conservative physics views on something that can not be proven until funding is spent to construct and test prototypes.

Like Sarfatti, Kaku is basking in the fact that these advanced propulsion concepts are not proven and may never be proven. I wonder what his reply will be when UNITEL constructs it's prototypes and they work. Of courser much to his dismay, he will probably not have much to say. You know he won't say that he was counting on UNITEL's failure and was playing the odds that are not in our favor. These odds are growing more-and-more in our favor as time goes by. The aerospace propulsion concepts that UNITEL advances is getting more support from the world scientific community with more-and-more technical feasibility is discovered everyday.

>> Moderator at 2:02pm ET: "You say in your interview on this Web Show that ours is likely not a very advanced civilization, that we are a Stage zero civilization. What characteristics would be classified as Class III or of the highest? What would these beings be able to do? What would they look like? Would they be composed entirely of brain-matter?">>>> Michio Kaku at 2:04pm ET: "A Type I civilization controls all forms of planetary power. They control the weather, earthquakes, volcanoes, and the ocean. A Type II civilization controls the power of a star. They can manipulate and play with stars. A Type III civilization is galactic. They have colonized most of the stars in the galaxy. On this scale, we are type zero. We get our energy from dead plants (i.e., oil). We physicists believe that in 100-to-200 years, we will attain Type I status. However, to have warp drive, you must be an advanced Type I, II, or III civilization."

>> Bryan P. at 2:05pm ET : "Mr. Kaku, if high-speed interstellar travel was possible, what method do you think looks most promising? Is propulsion the only way? Are we possibly looking at this problem the wrong way?">>>> Michio Kaku at 2:08pm ET: For sub-light speed velocities, our best hope lies in laser sails and ramjet fusion engines or perhaps anti-matter engines. All these technologies will take at least a century to develop. And even then, we will only attain perhaps half the speed-of-light. I believe that the first star ship may be a nanoprobe (perhaps the size of your fist) which will use nanotechnology to miniaturize its propulsion systems. To exceed the speed-of-light, you must necessarily drill a hole in space or compress space. Either way, you have to be at least Type II or III civilization to exceed the speed-of-light."

Boy! is this guy Kaku behind on technology or what! The Solar Sail project is all but defunct along with the (very ancient) ramjet design. The anti-matter idea is by far more ridiculous than MQT because it costs a $trillion a gram to create and store anti-matter. It was calculated that it will require 100 lbs. to travel to the nearest star that would not be reached for at least 110 years!

325

I think that since Kaku is so sure that MQT will not work because of the WKB Approx., he has taken such a solid stance that he has killed his goat over (being against MQT). He is now the leader of the scientific community that is against the hypothesis of MQT and he can't go back to being an open, purely scientific researcher anymore. It would make him and his polished reputation a liar, fraudulent, untrustworthy or worse.

Again, I find our 80s' science heroes like Kaku and Kip Thorne basically selling out to the old hat science. They gained a little popularity and then moved to maintain a conservative stance. They might have just as well not even discussed the possibilities of wormholes, etc.

>> Dan B. from eas.asu.edu at 2:08pm ET: "Dr. Kaku, in Hyperspace you assert that the laws of Classical physics and Quantum physics are unified when taken in 10 dimensions. Has this (untestable) theory been accepted by the physics community?">>>> Michio Kaku at 2:11pm ET: "At present, there is only one candidate for a theory which can unify all of Physics. This is the 10-dimensional superstring theory. It has no rivals. No other theory can make the claim of unifying all the forces of the Universe. At present, the theory cannot be tested. However, in the next decade, new machines may be powerful enough to detect super particles which are low vibrations of the superstring. In Geneva, we have the LHC (the Large Hadron Collider). We hope it may be possible to create lower vibrations of the super-string with this machine in this decade, and, hence, partially verify this theory. If verified, it will be the ultimate theory -- the Theory of Everything."

Right. At least he has some complacency for his fellow researchers and their proposed research that will prove these important concepts. Feeling a little guilty so he shows a little openness towards these possibilities. Most likely a tease to maintain his charisma for his popularity poll.

>> Red at 2:11pm ET : "What is your estimate on how many other civilizations are out there like ours, living on planets like ours.">>>> Michio Kaku at 2:14pm ET: "Professor Frank Drake estimated 40 years ago that there might be about ten thousand planets in our galaxy with intelligent life. Carl Sagan re-did Drake's calculation and estimated perhaps millions of planets may have intelligent lifeforms. Since then, new data indicate that the conditions for Life are much rarer in our Galaxy than previously thought. Life in the Galaxy must meet a stringent set of conditions so stringent that perhaps only a few hundred planets in the Galaxy have intelligent life. However, there are trillions of other galaxies. So, therefore, I believe that the probability of other intelligent lifeforms in the Universe is nearly 100%."

So, ergo, let's not put any faith in UFOs and the possibility of REAL space travel? Typical contradiction. But it is obvious that he wants to appear to lean to the Left for his popularity poll.

>> Moderator at 2:14pm ET: Prel Freg asks: "You say that these beings might consider us so primitive that they regard us as "ants" that are not even worthy of sharing technology with. But isn't it likely that they would at least consider us worthy of study? Can you comment on how they might be actually observing us. Perhaps from a station on the dark side of the Moon?">>>> Michio Kaku at 2:16pm ET: "Some physicists believe that we already have been visited by a Type III civilization. The most efficient way to explore the Galaxy is to send self-

326

replicating robot probes to land on distant moons. Moons have no erosion or rust and the probes can last for millions of years. These probes -- like a virus -- create millions of copies of themselves to land on other moons. Therefore within 100,000 years, you can probe an entire galaxy. On our own Moon, there could be a probe left over from a passing Type III civilization waiting to be discovered. This was the basis of the movie '2001'."

Squarebutt info. He's safe with that comment!

>> Moderator at 2:17pm ET: Dan asks: "With the recent exponential advancements in science and technology, do you foresee a day when man will travel faster-than-light? And if so, what do you think the time frame would be?">>>> Michio Kaku at 2:19pm ET: "I think within a century, we will have miniature probes which can attain perhaps half the speed-of-light. However, to exceed the speed-of-light may take thousands of years until we become a Type II civilization. We are, perhaps, 100 years away from attaining Type I status. We are perhaps several thousand years away from attaining Type II status. And perhaps a hundred thousand years away from attaining Type III status. In outer space, that is a twinkling of an eye."

Sorry, Dr. Kaku. Let us talk about our sightings in 1981 and our design. Care to call us liars? Or frauds perhaps? Well now, we have patents, Police and FBI sighting reports over the skies of Eugene, OR, universities, International aerospace organizations, worldclass scientists, on and on....

He is saying several thousand years and we were shown with working crafts that this was happening in 1981. Does he have a crystal ball? Or perhaps Madame so-and-so on TV has read his and our future? I wonder if someone would have to hold him down to force him to check out all the facts concerned with our spaceship design. I just don't think he will want to look and will probably want it all to just go away!

>> Alfredo Argueta at 2:19pm ET: "Of all the fascinating forecasts you made in Visions, which one do you believe will have the deepest and most lasting impact on human life?">>>> Michio Kaku at 2:21pm ET: "Perhaps the most profound prediction in my book is when we humans control our own genetic heritage. This means, for example, controlling the aging process and being able perhaps to double or triple the human lifespan. Within 20 years, we may have the first technologies proven in the laboratory which can begin to extend our lifespan. Within a century, this could become commonplace. If so, this will create a profound demographic and social shift in the nature of the human race."

That's right, best stick with medical aspirations. Even if it is more crystal ball stuff.

>> Moderator at 2:21pm ET. Jim Long asks: "What is the quantum vacuum? And how does it relate to FTL travel?">>>> Michio Kaku at 2:24pm ET: "Some physicists (a minority) believe that the vacuum possesses vast quantities of energy called "Zero-Point" Energy. The first person to call attention to the vacuum energy was Nikola Tesla. However, he could not prove that the vacuum had energy.>>

327

>> "Zero-Point Energy has been observed in the laboratory. This is called the 'Casimir Effect'. It is extremely small. So small that it is useless for space travel. However, a Type II or III civilization might be able to harness the vacuum energy to compress space and attain warp drive. In Scientific American magazine a few months ago, there was a detailed article about how the Casimir effect might give us warp drive. But the authors were careful to say that it would take an extremely advanced technology to harness the Casimir effect for warp drive (i.e., a Type II or III civilization)."

Unless UNITEL builds its spaceship which announces the premises that 'micro' is 'Macro'. Mother Nature doen't care whether the particle system is microscopic or as big as an aircraft carrier. The manmade cigar-shaped, hard deformed nucleii found in U-237 & U-238 are proof of that as they are hundreds of times larger than normal nucleii. There is a vast amount of energy available in the ZPE. Our ship system will just be another particle system floating in the ZPE sea and will be able to borrow energy to perform MQT. We intend to prove this as soon as we can. Hal Puthoff has put much effort into recognizing this (that 'micro' is 'Macro') (sort of as we must maintain decoherence like quantum computer design).

>> Columbia.edu guy at 2:25pm ET: "What do you think of UC Berkeley's SETI program? And do you feel the constant listening to signals will turn up anything of use?">>>> Michio Kaku at 2:27pm ET: "The SETI at Home project from Berkeley has harnessed almost a million pc's to search for intelligent life in the universe. Go to their web page and your PC can also be used to look for intelligent life in the universe. However, the signals they are looking for are simply too primitive to explore all the stars in the Galaxy. Plus, aliens may not broadcast on the frequency detected by SETI at Home. Therefore, I am pessimistic that they will discover intelligent life because their equipment is too primitive. I do not believe that we should send signals in space to communicate with aliens. This could be very dangerous unless we understand their intentions."

Now I have to agree with Kaku on this one. The aliens won't pay any attention to any 2-dimensional noise. But just wait until we fire up a gigantic quantum particle system that would interact with higher dimensions!

>> Russell at 2:27pm ET : "You state that it will take thousands of years to attain type 2 status. Do you think that the resources on Earth will sustain humanity for that long?">>>> Michio Kaku at 2:29pm ET: "We physicists -- when calculating when we will attain Type II or III status -- only assume that our energy consumption grows at around 3 percent per year. Even though this growth rate seems very small, over thousands of years you can calculate that we will have the power of a star or even a galaxy. The Earth as a single planet may not be able to sustain this growth over thousands of years. Therefore we may have to terraform nearby planets in order to maintain this growth rate. Personally, I don't believe we should have a crash program to put men on Mars. Robots are cheaper and better. However, over thousands of years, it may become feasible to terraform Mars."

Right!!! Wait until de' big asteroid come! Den' poor old Michio should deserve his rightful place to escape de' holocaust and go to Mars!

328

>> Moderator at 2:30pm ET: Pituka Heilbron asks: "In simple terms please, what happens with the time once we leave the Earth's atmosphere? Is there time in space?">>>> Michio Kaku at 2:32pm ET: "Yes, there is time in space. Some people have written that time does not exist. They are probably quacks. They are not working scientists; they are mainly philosophers and amateurs. We scientists believe that any theory should be measurable and testable. Time can be measured. Einstein's theory has been verified millions of times. Any new theory must, therefore, build on top of Einstein's theory and not tear it down. That's where superstring theory comes in. Superstring theory is the first major theory to improve on Einstein's theory in this century."

Yeah, Michio. But let's not apply string theory to space travel like UNITEL has. Dat's wrong, boss!

>> Douglas Thompson at 2:32pm E : "What major steps technologically does Mankind have to take to attain a Type I civilization?">>>> Michio Kaku at 2:34pm ET: "We will naturally attain Type I status unless we pollute ourselves to death. The Internet, for example, is a "Type I" telephone system of the future. English will be the language of this type one civilization. The European Union is one piece of a type one economy. The culture of this Type I civilization unfortunately will be MTV, rap music, blue jeans, and news culture."

What? Blue jeans? Kind o' like his book Hyperspace! Never mind a FEASIBLE space transportation system based on the same sound scientific principles! Any other cool predictions?

>> MikeM at 2:34pm ET: "If Mankind were to discover, perhaps by "listening" to signals from space that other intelligent life definitely did exist, what do you think would be Mankind's reaction? >>>> Michio Kaku at 2:36pm ET: "I think our immediate reaction would be to have a heart attack. As Arthur C. Clarke once said 'If aliens exist or if aliens don't exist, either way it is a frightening thought. If aliens don't exist, then we are alone. And that's very scary. If we are not alone, that's even scarier because look at the history of what happens when different civilizations collided in the last 400 years.' I think most people will be shocked out of their minds if we pick up a signal from an intelligent life form in space."

Well, let's get "shocked out of our minds" then, Michio, because de' big ship has done landed in Eugene, Oregon in 1981-82. Frankly, I got over my shock and near heart attack and decided to start designing a space ship of our own! Den we can say "Hey, gee thanks Mr. Spaceman! Thanks for showing us a real spaceship up close". Obviously, Kaku has labeled everyone that has seen a UFO as crazy, liar … you know the routine. We shall see what happens after we build!

>> Moderator at 2:36pm ET: "Dr. Kaku, thank you for joining us today. Do you have any final thoughts?">>>> Michio Kaku at 2:36pm ET: "I would just say that for further reading, see my web page at www.mkaku.org and also my books Hyperspace and Visons.">>

329

>> Moderator at 2:38pmET : "Please take a moment to check out the latest installment of Chris Wallace's Internet Exposé: 'UFO2000: The Search Continues.' Thank you, Michio Kaku, for joining us."

S-191. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL reflecting on attitudes and motivations of others

From : Larry Maurer <lmaurer@unitelnw.com>To : stealthskater@hotmail.com Subject : Re: your review on Kaku Date : Fri, 01 Feb 2002 12:55:03 -0800

Hey Mark:

I am not sure about the disk stuff. I had a brief experience where I "thought" I saw some disks. But I am not sure enough to make any positive statements about the incident. On the other hand, I am very positive about our design we are ready to build. It wasn't me by myself. I was with other individuals along with the whole town of Eugene (including the police) saw the craft from very close up. Michael is quite positive that we can produce a working model of his disk design. But I think it would only water down our hard work and design for our cigar- teardrop shaped craft.

I do, however, unlike Kaku respect others in their explanations and sightings and so forth of the various UFOs. I try to keep an open mind about what they are saying and do remain somewhat agnostic about the situation. I give them the benefit of the doubt and respect them as they may be telling the truth.

Concerning my situation, I have never ever seen something that wasn't there. And being trained in the engineering field, I above anyone else should know the difference between a ball of gas or Kytes with candles etc. and the real machine. Especially when others are screaming from the sight of the craft ten feet from us (closest I ever came to a heart attack!).

So I am not taking 'no' for an answer from Kaku and/or Captain Ellidge at Edwards AFB saying that "we will never see a craft of this type in our lifetimes". I wonder what would they think if we were shown this craft because a big asteroid is coming to destroy the Earth soon. For the first time, we may sway the public to think like we do. Like the actor Struther Martin in the movie "Cool Hand Luke" when he said "They have to get their mind's right" (hee hee :-) and understand that we aren't farting out the stern anymore and there will be no wings needed in space!

The strength of attraction of our ship to field is 39 orders in magnitude stronger than one G. That's 1039 stronger! Try and match that with fuel- even anti-matter! The strong force between a particle and its anti-particle (electron-positron) pair was described by Harold Fritsch as like trying to take a child from its favorite toy!

See inserted comments below …

At 07:45 AM 2/1/02 -0500, you wrote:

> Larry -- >

330

> It may be advantageous that I am not expert in these complex areas of physics. It has enabled me to sit back and view the "forest" unfolding rather than get involved with the evolution of specific "trees" contained within that forest. I can see loose threads binding all these different phenomena together. It's like a giant jigsaw puzzle with some of the original pieces lost forever with other "bogus" pieces thrown into the mix. I think enough clues are there for someone with a lot more deductive reasoning powers than me to solve it. >> The most basic thing that can't be swept under-the-carpet is all those past UFO sightings that occurred before the age of digital trickery. If you take that as a starting point, you work backwards and see what theories fit. They blink 'on' and 'off' out of apparent existence. Are we talking about opticial "cloaking" here or MQT? Probably both. As you told me in your very first e-mail (when your site was down for "reconstruction"), MQT is the only viable method for achieving interstellar travel. If Kaku accepts that for his fist-sized nanoengineering starship, then why not scale it up to a practical size? If the legends are true, that has already been done (with disastrous mental side-effects to the crew) in the P-X, either using the traditional tale of radar-invisibility (von Newmann & Tesla) or Chica's and King's reports of actual "teleportation"/backward time-travel (Tesla & Teller). The Montauk thing is a separate issue which is probably continuing at what was rumored to be taking place at "S-4" as "Project Looking Glass".>>The only things they used to discredit Lazar with were his lying about his academic credentials, his bankruptcy, and his helping a brothel madam to computerize her records. Therefore -- according to Campbell and Mahood -- EVERYTHING Lazar said was false. That's just plain ridiculous. Lazar was a competent nuclear physics lab technician who got fired from his contractor job at Los Alamos because he was spending too much of his work time and the facilities equipment on his personal projects (like the famous "jet car" he invented and was widely-publicized). The government is pissed-off at him for tipping the public off about Area-51 and all its nuances. I think Lazar is a lot like your associate Mike Miller in that they show you don't necessarily need a formal education to understand new concepts in physics. (You probably will suffer in the applied math, though. Mahood takes delight in pointing out that Lazar can't solve even a basic differential equation..) >>Whether he actually worked on this stuff personally -- or whether he is just reporting what had been passed on to him (granted, that could be disinformation) -- I believe that he is telling what-he-knows without fabrication. Mahood indirectly corroborated Lazar's story by saying one his remote-viewer friends "saw" 9 empty hangers built into the side of the Papoose mountains just where Lazar said they were. They've already confirmed the existence of Elements 118 and 116. Lazar said 116 was produced when 115 was bombarded with protons and transmutated into 116 which subsequently decayed and released an anti-proton in the process. Because that particle interacted immediately with a target gas in an annihilation reaction, there was no need for any type of magnetic confinement bottle. What is more "magical" to me about 115 is the strong force that allegedly was "tapped" to produce a repulsive force or generate a (MQT) distortion. Lazar said you could back-calculate the frequency of this "gravity wave" from the dimensions of the waveguide, but he wanted to keep that to himself for the time-being.>>But you're right ... all of this is pie-in-the-sky because it's impractical to produce anti-matter. UNLESS you can find stuff like 115 already made. Then you have a ready source of anti-matter on-demand. Did Yoshari ever speculate on how he was going to generate the anti-protons for his small on-board reactor?

331

I think he was suggesting an off the shelf item that is a small-enough, powerful-enough powerplant. It was his advice that the proton exchanger was the right choice back in '97. But we may have a better, more powerful, more concise powerplant available today to choose from.

>I might also try some "black" companies like EG&G and Bechtel. Can't hurt ... I've tried everywhere else. I may also e-mail George Lucas's Special F-X company. Sooner-or-later this stuff has to be elevated to where someone of importance takes notice. In the meantime I'll go back to your e-mails and select some to put in a document which will further establish your case. You have some excellent material in those and they were a real eye-opener to me. You certainly have left no stone unturned as you've contacted the leading experts in these fields. That in itself has to say something about your convictions. I don't understand why others can't see this ...

I can't understand it either. Now we are forced to publish our book to try to bring in funding for us as I am certain the Public will love our material. Especially if it's done right. So we are in the business of making films and selling books. So be it! Things will accelerate after the Public is familiar with us and our design.

S-192. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL forwarding response to Bob Drake's memo

From : Larry Maurer <lmaurer@unitelnw.com> To : stealthskater@hotmail.com Subject : Fwd: Re: Note - the universe is about 15 billion years old & earth is only b million years old Date : Fri, 01 Feb 2002 12:56:27 -0800

> Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2002 11:43:56 -0800 > To: snoball2@earthlink.net > From: Larry Maurer <lmaurer@unitelnw.com> > Subject: Re: Note - the Universe is about 15 billion years old & Earth is only b million years old >> Bob: >> Yes, hopefully someday soon we will be ready to send an MQT ship. One each to the areas that are high probability of a habitable planet to further mankind to populate and expand in the new frontier. I think we have to be positive about this and keep an open mind concerning everyone's efforts to develop a feasible MQT spaceship. I get a little upset at the negative views and opinions such as the one I sent with Dr. Kaku and I added some rude comments of my own in response. The following work is very valuable in the hope that we truly will someday send ships to contact and explore such possibilities. >> Regards, > Larry

> At 06:21 PM 1/31/02 -0800, you wrote:>> Larry, >>

332

>> The purpose of this email is to provide perspective relating to how the earth's sun and nearby planets relate to the known universe. Within this known universe, what do you think the odds would be of finding intelligent life? >>>> There are about 200 billion stars in our (Milky Way) galaxy, and I have heard there are about 100 billion galaxies in the known universe. If each of the galaxies averages about 100 billion stars, this would mean there are about 100 billion times times 100 billion stars in our universe. If I figured it correctly, that number would be a 10 to the 21st power (or 10 with 21 zeroes behind it).

> Yes, Bob. And the strength of attraction of our projected field to our proposed spaceship (QCD- Strong force) is 1039 the strength of one G (39 zeros after it!). Try and match that with conventional action-reaction rocket or jet power!

>> The National Geographic Magazine printed a fold out called "Journey Into The Universe Through Space And Time" in 1983 and is used as the reference material for the information shown below: >>> What is the magnitude of our known galaxy? (Note: A light-year equals 5,878,500,000,000 miles or 5.9 trillion miles).>>>> 1. Sun and near planets (Sun, Mercury, Venus, Earth) has as a circumference of 0.000016 light-years,>>>> 2. Sun's neighbors which form a Globular Cluster (about 20 stars including Alpha Centuri, Sirius, Lalande, etc.) has a circumference of 20 light-years.>>>> 3. Milky Way Galaxy which is made up of Globular Clusters (including the Sun's neighbors) has a circumference of 50 thousand light-years.>>>> 4 . Local Group (includes the Milky Way Galaxy as well as some 19 other galaxies including Draco, Andromeda ) (also referred to as "this sector of space") has a circumference of 2 million light-years.>>>> 5. Local Supercluster (includes clusters of galaxies including our Local Group) ("like fleets of ships--congregate in superclusters) has a circumference of 75 million light-years.>>>> 6. The Known Universe (includes our Local Supercluster) ("In whatever direction we look into deep space, we can detect clusters of galaxies and superclusters, all moving away from us. Toward the observable horizon, we see quasars-quasi-stellar objects-and the uniform glow of the Big Bang. There is no center; any observer anywhere would see the same effect. The Universe is isotropic. That is, it looks the same in every direction. Quasars (the most distant objects yet observed) are among the most curious and the most energetic. Each of the brightest quasars emits the energy of hundreds of galaxies from a volume far smaller than the Milky Way. Each is probably a violent nucleus of a distant galaxy. The furthest quasars are rushing away from us at more than 90 percent the speed-of-light."): Has a circumference of 20 billion light years.

333

S-193. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding MQT and Josephson's Junction mechanisms

From : Larry Maurer <lmaurer@unitelnw.com> To : stealthskater@hotmail.com Subject : Fwd: Re: Fwd: Re: Kaku's stand on UFOs Date : Fri, 01 Feb 2002 18:02:40 -0800

> Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2002 18:01:34 -0800 > To: snoball2@earthlink.net > From: Larry Maurer <lmaurer@unitelnw.com> > Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: Kaku's stand on UFOs >> Hi Bob: >> I thought you may enjoy the following article from Alan Chuang/IBM. If it is indeed possible to fool Mother Nature with our proposed spaceship as a gigantic fake electron-hole pair, then perhaps we can transfer the boson pair to where ever we wish to travel to via MQT Josephson's Junction mechanism. Remember it was Stephen Weinberg (Univ. Texas at Austin) that proved that our universe is one gigantic potential barrier. i.e., Space-time is in its own essence a potential barrier whether it is a billion light-years across it or one milli-micron across. It doesn't make any difference.>> John Wheeler told us we would have to have such a tremendous amount of energy (1/3 fractional charge) at the surface that it may tear the craft apart in order to attempt at mimicking an electron as an electron. We will put a hot enough spark on the surface all right with our Niobium-Titanium exterior charged hull. The capped-cone shape provides a stability zone that makes our ship act and appear to Mother Nature as a gigantic particle. The integrity patterns with the reaction-diffusion mechanism (Turing) interacting with the ZPE, the ship could interact just as an electron and borrow extra-energy from the ZPE to tunnel. These integrity patterns provide the quantum information to match the pair phase to the other side of the tunneling junction to go where you would want to go.>> Make sense? I am going to add some stuff from Minami, Jerry Bales, Dave Froning, and others to show how their additional tunneling information has been applied to a feasible space propulsion system. > > Regards, > Larry

>> Josephson Junctions >>>> "In 1976, Brian Josephson discovered that when 2 superconductors are placed in a close proximity together or separated by a thin insulating barrier, a current is still able to pass from one superconductor to another. The apparatus is called a Josephson junction. And the phenomenon of current passing through the barrier is called 'tunneling' or the 'DC Josephson effect'.">>>> "To understand why tunneling occurs, we need to first understand electrons. Just like light, electrons have a dual nature and can exist as both particles and waves (that can be described by wave functions). In fact as Louis deBroglie discovered, all mass exhibits wave properties. Another property of electrons is that there is fundamental limitation on how exactly one can know both the position and the momentum of the electron at a given time. This means that the more precisely one knows the momentum of an electron, the less one

334

knows about the position of that at a certain point in time and vice versa. This is known as the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle. This principle applies to all matter but it only has a significant effect on particles as small as electrons." >>>> "According to the Heisenberg uncertainty Principle, an electron on one side of the Josephson Junction has a finite probability of existing on the other side of the barrier. Another way to think about it is that the wavefunction of the electron can not stop immediately at the insulating barrier; it must die out over some distance. If the wavefunction is not completely dead by the time it reaches the other side of the insulating barrier, it can keep going on its merry way."

>> http://www.uni.uiuc.edu/~hchiang/chem/jj.html

>> At 09:36 PM 1/31/02 -0800, you wrote: >>>>> Larry, >>>>>> Thanks. It is worthwhile to understand the system. >>>>>> Bob

S-194. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding a past letter sent to Carl Sagan

From : Larry Maurer <lmaurer@unitelnw.com> To : stealthskater@hotmail.com Subject : Fwd: UNITEL Aerospace & Electronics Date : Sat, 02 Feb 2002 12:44:26 -0800

> Date: Sat, 02 Feb 2002 12:43:27 -0800 > To: ltaplin@carlsagan.com > From: Larry Maurer <lmaurer@unitelnw.com> > Subject: UNITEL Aerospace & Electronics >> Lesley: >> One last letter to explain why I originally contacted Ann aside from encouragement from my business associates. I want to explain why I wrote Carl Sagan in the first place which is somewhat of a personal nature.>> It has to do with Carl being on site at Selfridge AFB in 1966-67. As it turns out, my former supervisor Ray Nyls was the Base Commander (Major Raymond Nyls) when J. Allan Hyneck and Carl Sagan were stationed there to work on "Project Bluebook". Ray was the "Second in Command" -- directly under Hyneck working on Project Bluebook.>> I had worked for several years with Ray and even commuted to work with him and he never, ever mentioned his work on Project Bluebook. Ray was also a friend and confidante. That was a main decision for me to join the U.S. Navy Flight School in late 1981. It wasn't until I was confronted by the flying space vehicles on 2 occasions (Oct. 18, 1981 and Dec. 22, 1981 -- at one point from 10

335

feet away!). The entire town of Eugene was also buzzed by these same craft including members of the Eugene police force. The Eugene Police encouraged me to make a report on their behalf with the FBI, which I did. Since then, we formed UNITEL, Inc. and have been developing our version of what we saw back then.>> However, in 1984 a lady friend gave me a UFO paperback book that listed my former boss and retired fighter pilot Ray Nyls as being an active part in 'Project Bluebook' along with Carl Sagan and J. Hyneck. I was shocked at this and immediately took the book to Ray's home to confront him about the situation. Ray's wife Marge became hysterical, saying to me she didn't want her husband Ray to get involved in that stuff again.>> Ray confirmed that it was true and I gave him the paperback novel. I asked him what he thought of Project Bluebook (which was disbanded shortly after his stay at Selfridge AFB). He answered that the witnesses "were just a bunch of people waving their hands to get on camera". I then began asking him if there was something he wanted to say concerning my sightings (while I was with several other witnesses) that had something definitely to do with me. I know Ray very well after working with him for so many years on complicated engineering projects. He knew better than to lie because I could tell if he was going to lie to me. So he basically said "I'm not talking, Larry" and I dropped it.>> I know that I could not have pried any info concerning the events as it was obvious it was a State Secret or USAF secret that he was obligated not to talk about. These guys don't even talk to their wives about it. So I didn't even try. I haven't talked to Ray much since. I feel used like the USAF knows something that I don't. To this day, we have much support from the USAF. But they never seem to have the funds to fund the construction of our prototypes. >> Anyway, the letter that I received from Carl (that I sent in my last email for Ann to read) was an answer to my letter that I sent him asking if he had anything he wanted to comment on concerning his stay at Selfridge AFB and my sightings and/or our patented proposed space propulsion system. I at first thought that I was getting the tight lip service again when I read Carl's letter. But I didn't realize that he was ill and died shortly after writing the letter. I did wonder about why Carl didn't simply ignore my letter. But he did respond.>> I know that our work is what Carl had spent his whole life on in hope that someone like us would create a real spaceship someday. It is sad that he can't be alive to see our progress. I wonder if Ann remembers what went on back in those days? They say that 'Project Bluebook' was disbanded to keep secret the real stuff going on that has much to do with me.>> A new edition to the book was put out within one month after I told him about the book with Ray's name removed. We are publishing an autobiography of our project that includes the sightings, FBI and police reports entitled Flying Colors. I am not going to mention Ray (or Carl's) name concerning the whole UFO book and my event out of respect for Ray. We are also negotiating for funding to produce a film on MQT and aerospace propulsion entitled "Tunnel Time". I am sure if Carl were alive today, he would be intrigued and impressed with the content and esteemed researchers on the film. >>Anyway, that is why I contacted Carl and why he wrote back. I thought Ann would like to know that. Thanks, >> Larry Maurer > Unitel, Inc.

336

>> Larry, >> Will do. >> Lesley >> ----------

>>> From: Larry Maurer <lmaurer@unitelnw.com> >>> Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2002 19:01:10 -0700 >>> To: ltaplin@carlsagan.com >>> Subject: Re: UNITEL Aerospace & Electronics >>> >>> Dear Lesley: >>> >>> Could you please also forward the attached jpg of a letter I received from Carl Sagan to Ann. I think she would appreciate seeing it. Thanks, >>> >>> Larry Maurer >>> Unitel, Inc. >>> >>> At 02:18 PM 1/29/02 -0800, you wrote: >>>

>>>> Larry, >>>> I'm sorry I didn't respond directly to your previous email. I did forward >it on to Ann Druyan's office in New York, and hopefully they will get back >to you from there. >>>> >>>> Very best, >>>> Lesley Taplin >>>> Cosmos Studios >>>> >>>> on 1/29/02 1:45 PM, Larry Maurer (by way of Cosmos) at lmaurer@unitelnw.com wrote:>>>>

>>>>> Attention: Please forward to Ann Druyan >>>>> >>>>> Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2002 17:21:59 -0800 >>>>> To: quick@carlsagan.com >>>>> From: Larry Maurer <lmaurer@unitelnw.com> >>>>>Subject: UNITEL Aerospace & Electronics >>>>> >>>>>Dear Ann: >>>>> >>>>>I thought you may be interested in our exciting projects here at UNITEL so I took the liberty of attaching our latest newsletter. I had communicated with Carl shortly before he passed away and I have a letter from him. I am sure that he would be really enthused with the success and progress we have made. We are ready to start construction and testing of our prototypes at UIC in Chicago. Our VP -- Doug Starfield -- told me that you may be interested in our project after the failure of the space sail project, etc. We are finishing our autobiography book entitled Flying Colors and we are discussing production of several films to be aired for public viewing (TV and films). One individual we are contacting is Mrs. Gene Roddenberry. Please let me know if you are interested in our projects and I will be happy to send you information on our plans, projects, etc. Thank you,

337

>>>>>>>>>> Sincerely, >>>>> >>>>> Larry D. Maurer, Principal&Director, Engineering >>>>> Unitel, Inc. >>>>> (503) 232-2740 >>>>> www.unitelnw.com

S-195. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding future discussions with Dr. Michio Kaku

From : Larry Maurer <lmaurer@unitelnw.com> To : stealthskater@hotmail.com Subject : Fwd: future discussions with Dr. Kaku Date : Sat, 02 Feb 2002 14:03:32 -0800

> Date: Sat, 02 Feb 2002 14:01:33 -0800 > To: snoball2@earthlink.net > From: Larry Maurer <lmaurer@unitelnw.com> > Subject: Re: Note - the universe is about 15 billion years old … >> Bob: >> I would like to. But since Kaku has ignored any of the last 4 attempts to communicate with him, I seriously doubt he would. I think it is too late. He has pretty much taken a firm stance and now has to stand by it (meaning he does not believe in ANY of the UFO stories and FTL or MQT applications). I think we can do better with Ed Witten, Dr. Ray Chiao, and so on. They have a chance to defend their views in a positive mode.>> I can almost bet you, Bob, that Kaku will strive to either ignore or run away from any further confrontations on WKB or MQT debate. There are too many big guns in the IAA-IAF along with NASA BPP (Dr. Chiao) researchers pointing the way that MQT is truly feasible and the way to go. This is a sad situation. But I know these types like Kaku and Thorne who are glory hogs and have killed their goats. Now it's time for them to just fade away like old soldiers of an ancient outdated science.> > I can't wait for our movie and book for the Public to decide what we should do. It isn't going to take a whole lot of money to construct and test our prototypes. The Oil boys will seriously be confronted with their death grip of mis-information will be extinguished in the name of progress by the viewing public. This will hopefully lead the way.>> I would seriously like Kaku to talk to the Eugene Police officers on duty those nights. I will tell you that they DO NOT like some government investigator telling them they were seeing something other than what they saw. I will never remember that mutual look of "I know how you feel" from the police. Believe me, they are serious and that is why they asked me to report the incidences to the FBI. We know what we saw and -- more precisely -- what we were shown. That is the QCD Strong Force connection that we are about to prove (among other things).

>> I know this is hard for you to choke down, Bob. But think how I feel. I have a career in the engineering field and I certainly don't run around telling everyone that I saw a UFO. The fact is,

338

however, when it boils down to the truth, no matter how hard it is to take we have to deal with it. I want to show all sighting incidences exactly as they happened. Police reports and everything.>> There is no mistaking the evidence when we saw the craft from 10 feet away. Further more, we have had 20 years to perfect our understanding of what we were shown and we are truly ready to build! Michael has proven his knowledge of Physics many times and it will be interesting for us to just tell the whole World the physics behind what we saw and what we intend to build. Perhaps we can get to Kaku through a third party. But like I say, I seriously think he will conveniently duck the issue and decline any discussion.>> Regards, >> Larry >>At 12:50 PM 2/2/02 -0800, you wrote: >

>> Larry, >>>> I have not emailed Dr. Kaku after interchanging several emails about the WKB Approx. about two to three years ago. >> >>I understand what you are stating further below. >>>> One possible way to initialize a debate is to bring up the topic on Kaku's message board. He has some fairly knowledgeable people who run the board for him. >>>> Best regards, >>>> Bob >>>> Larry Maurer wrote: >>

>>>>>> Hello Bob: >>>>>> I sincerely hope Dr. Kaku can sit down and listen to what we have to say. I just can't sit there and listen to him say "we will never have the ability to travel with MQT techniques, not in a thousand years" after what I have been through in my life. I was an agnostic to until I personally was confronted by a working craft along with half the town of Eugene. I have the entire Eugene Police force and the FBI supporting these sightings. We can prove why they weren't picked up on radar as we can reflect RF waves from our ships. They showed us something (red, green, & blue lens) that is the key to MQT and using QCD (Color or Strong Force) for space travel and quantum computers. My co-inventor and business partner along with our associates. We want to debate WKB Approx and other points openly on TV if necessary for the benefit of Mankind. Strange but it is the TRUTH! and we aim to prove ourselves once and for all! >>>>>>Larry >>>>>>At 09:49 PM 2/1/02 -0800, you wrote: >>>

339

>>>> Larry, >>>>>>> Kaku is an OK guy who outwardly defends the "norms". >>>>>>>> It is important to listen very closely. I want your plan to work. >>>>>>>> Best regards, >>>> Bob

S-196. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding postings of breakthroughs at the Los Alamos website

From : Larry Maurer <lmaurer@unitelnw.com>To : stealthskater@hotmail.comSubject : Fwd: UNITEL Aerospace & ElectronicsDate : Fri, 08 Feb 2002 15:06:15 -0800

> Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2002 14:49:47 -0800 > To: halgravity@yahoo.com > From: Larry Maurer <lmaurer@unitelnw.com> > Subject: UNITEL Aerospace & Electronics > > Dears Sirs: , I am making contact with your group. We have the targeted manufacturers of the various components of our proposed patented all-electric propulsion system. The vehicle will hopefully perform as we expect -- much like a helicopter in that it will hover or move about in any direction from slow to very high rates of velocity in a completely computer-controlled system.> > The craft, however, in its variable size from a sportscar size to the Zeppelin size, cigar-shaped vehicles cannot rest on solid surfaces as they will have to be suspended by a Mag-Lev type of suspension. This is because of the exterior charge at the hull surface. The close-adhering EM charge on the exterior Titanium-Niobium smartskin hull can be modulated to produce extremely fine interactions such as becoming radar-invisible stealth capability by absorbing or bending around the craft any RF wave including RADAR. The exterior charge is a 1/3 fractional charge in a modulated Raleigh wave integrity that will provide the force of sufficient electrical potential. A plasma (cloud of ionized gases) will be formed.> > As described by early researchers: "In the Searle case, it was believed that 'free electrons' were centrifugally thrown towards the outside rim to accumulate the necessary potential for the lift. The mention of the Klystron in previous similar designs is again interesting in that it provides a clue to a superior means of creating the plasma levitation field locally. Klystrons and magnetrons are used in microwave ovens to generate the intense, focused local microwave field for cooking. This indicates that application to an appropriate surface at a specific frequency might excite the surrounding air sufficiently to generate the plasma."> > I hope to hear from your group if you are interested in our proposed projects. Thank you,> > Larry D. Maurer> Principal & Director, Engineering > Unitel, Inc.

340

> (503) 232-2740 > www.unitelnw.com

>> >> From: "frank chille" <frankchille@hotmail.com> >> To: lmaurer@unitelnw.com >> Cc: skywatcher22@hotmail.com >> Subject: A Possible Helpful Link >> Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2002 20:14:13 >> X-OriginalArrivalTime: 08 Feb 2002 20:14:17.0950 (UTC) >> FILETIME=[2FCFE7E0:01C1B0DD] >> X-RCPT-TO: <lmaurer@unitelnw.com> >> >> Hi Larry & Bill >> >> Larry, thanks much for your earlier email. I pass this note onto both of you. Bill knows Art; but for your info, Larry - Art Wagner is a Theoretical Physicist who keeps his hand in breaking technology - he has spend much time at the Princeton Physics Library keeping abreast many diverse elements which are coming to Light in anti-gravity, propulsion, string theory, quantum, etc. He felt both you and Bill should be aware of this link - please give our best to Mike. Until sooner, >> Frank Chille >> >> PS Art has found some most amazing physics breakthroughs listed on the Los Alamos website - would you like him to share them with you and Mike? >>

>>> From: "art wagner" <wagnerart@hotmail.com> >>> To: frankchille@hotmail.com >>> Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2002 11:37:20 -0500 >>> >>>.Hi Frank - "A Causally Connected Superluminal Warp drive Spacetime" by F. Loup, R. Held, D. Waite, E. Halerewicz, Jr., M. Stabno, M. Kuntzman and R. Sims (January 28, 2002) posted to (xxx.lanl.gov) at arXiv:gr-qc/0202021 6Feb2002. Relay to Bill and Larry...advise that they make contact with Advanced Theoretical propulsion Group (ATPG) headed by the above-mentioned people at http://www.geocities.com/halgravity/atpg.html ). Art

S-197. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding writing UNITEL's book

From : Larry Maurer <lmaurer@unitelnw.com>To : stealthskater@hotmail.comSubject : Fwd: Re: chapter 5Date : Sun, 10 Feb 2002 21:14:57 -0800

> Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2002 20:49:32 -0800 > To: pkirsh@ucla.edu > From: Larry Maurer <lmaurer@unitelnw.com> > Subject: Re: chapter 5 > > Thanks, Paul!

341

> I got it okay. I'll answer the questions in red and fire the changed version right back to you. Concerning the "Type III" question, remember I have scanned and burned the drawings of each Type (I thru VI) so the Drawing of III & IV is inserted there for the reader. I will make a brief comment on the differences between each type as they are mentioned. > > We are contacting Morris Publishing: >

>> Morris Publishing 1-800-650-7888 >> 3212 East Higway 30 >> POBox 2110 >> Kearney,NE 68847 >> http://publish@morrispublishing.com/ >> >> Gary Dean said they are doing his book "Bridge Across the Universe" and that they will do 1000 hardback high quality books for $3000 with 20 color photos. Gary also said they do some marketing and will do the first 1000 after enough advanced orders come in. We could sell them for $49.95 to $59.95 and give you part of the sales profit and use the rest for Unitel's projects. What do you think? >> >> Anyway, I want to get the other chapters and pertinent materials including the final edited version of the Interdimensional Journal on the CD ROM and mail it to you so you will have everything. If we could coordinate with Morris and/or another publisher, we could get the ship under way as they say! Comments? >> >> Larry >> >> At 12:04 AM 2/10/02 -0800, you wrote: >>

>>> Hi, >>> I went through chapter 5. It took about 3 hours. There are a couple of things that will need further elaboration and I have marked these in red text. >>> >>> I have sometimes added things which evolved out of conversations you and I have had in earlier e-mails. However, I hope you are checking my edit to make sure I have things right. In general, I have been trying to let your voice shine through in the edit, and have just removed redundant statements or changed things that read awkwardly. >>> >>> For this to be book length, it will have to be around 110 pages at least. It seems with this chapter you may be at around 20-to-25 pages. So I hope you are working on the latter chapters so that we can pull this together. I have no doubt that you have much more to say and that expanding this to 110 pages will not be a problem. If however you want suggestions let me know. For instance, you could start discussing some of the problems you've had with venture capitalists who want to see it done before they invest. You could also explain the physics more.

>>> best, Paul

S-198. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding writing specifics on UNITEL's book

342

From : Larry Maurer <lmaurer@unitelnw.com>To : stealthskater@hotmail.comSubject : Fwd: Re: slight adjustments and ideasDate : Sun, 10 Feb 2002 21:15:30 -0800

> At 08:53 PM 2/10/02 -0800, you wrote: >>> Hi, >> I have been thinking that I want to do the highest good. So in regards to Chapter 5 that I just sent, I am sending a politically correct revision.>> >> Basically, you mention the Cadmium in the school and the Cadmium in the design of the skin and how the simultaneity of the event seemed a positive sign. The fact is that Cadmium is toxic and so I have added a word about how you will have to work with it carefully. >> >> Also you mention how you lost Dr. Hwa when you went told him you went to the DoD. This gives us the opportunity to mention that inventors don't get much support from the Government and that the reader can contact their representative to lobby for money for inventors. >> >> Also, I think how this effects me in the present is that it will be important to ask for NSF funding rather than defense dept. money. And as I have mentioned before, I think the way to go there is to get a STTR grant for industry-academia partnership. What I visualize is that a local community college could build the tear-drop shell. Perhaps I am incredibly naive here but I am wondering if indeed the basic frame of the ship could actually be built by students. I can bet that those students would come to that class on time and it would be good publicity both for the school and your company. You could get newspaper headings like: "corporation in Oregon participates in cutting edge science with minority community college." The local college has airplanes in their back yard that the students learn to repair. With funding, could they do something more ambitious? I would suppose you get experts to check for QC.>>>> Anyway for the complicated stuff like the skin, a place like UCLA could lay the coating and insert the switch that turns on the plasma stuff and the laser projection pinwheel with the taught nippy at the end (however that is done). So here your plans could be brought into reality by coordinating with 2 academic institutions. And then you have the angle that big fat UCLA is working with poor West LA College. Now you have mentioned that there are other commercial companies that could help with the production and they could be pulled in to the industry-academic grant as well. If this resonates with you, perhaps we could do a sketch of the proposal. >> >> best, Paul

> Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2002 21:12:42 -0800 > To: pkirsh@ucla.edu > From: Larry Maurer <lmaurer@unitelnw.com> > Subject: Re: slight adjustments and ideas > > Sounds good, Paul!> > I think that we need to drop our bombshell on the Public with marketing our book while we are deciding which path is best. If we could be the captains of our own ship with UNITEL. At any rate, I like getting the universities directly involved. The CdS is in the lens -- not the hull skin (Nb-Ti). We already have several universities involved. So why not bring in the feds with matching funds?

343

The USAF is still hanging in there with us. They actually have some groovy people that are trying everything they can to help us. They are just strapped by limited funds by the Fed. A public reaction as a response to our book may instigate all of this!> > As far as the attached chapter are you saying, you want it to over ride the last version you sent?> > Regards, > > Larry >

S-199. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding writing specifics on UNITEL's book

From : Larry Maurer <lmaurer@unitelnw.com>To : stealthskater@hotmail.comSubject : UNITEL Aerospace & ElectronicsDate : Mon, 11 Feb 2002 19:06:24 -0800

Attachment : CWINDOWSTEMPnsmail621.jpe (114k)

Mark : FYI

> Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 14:12:25 -0800 >.From: P2 Systems <p2systems@earthlink.net> > Organization: P2 Systems > X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (Win98; U) > X-Accept-Language: en,x-ns1BB83msitNh5,x-ns2U100btwUq5f > To: Larry Maurer <lmaurer@unitelnw.com> > Subject: Re: Fwd: RE: UNITEL Aerospace & Electronics > X-RCPT-TO: <lmaurer@unitelnw.com> > > Larry, > > Here is Siamak's new business. I stand corrected regarding what I said previously. He appears to have an interest in the Holo Propulsion System. > > DugOut

344

<= previous E-mails 100-149 next E-mails 200-249 =>

if on the Internet, press <BACK> on your browser to return to the previous page (or go to www.stealthskater.com)

else if accessing these files from the CD in a MS-Word session, simply <CLOSE> this file's window-session; the previous window-session should still remain 'active'

345