s3.amazonaws.com · web viewemployee suggestions is the main portal through which promotion and...
TRANSCRIPT
1TANGLEWOOD
Tanglewood Case Analysis
Heather L Horvath
Bryant and Stratton
HURS217 – Williams
4/22/2017
2TANGLEWOOD
Case 1: Staffing Strategy
Acquire or Develop Talent:
Emmerson and Woods mission is to provide maximum value to their customers, shareholders
and employees. They plan to accomplish this goal through adhering to core values of responsible
financial management, clear and honest communication and keeping performance and customer
service at the forefront. The position of “buy or make” your talent (Heneman, Judge, &
Kammeyer-Mueller, 2012, p. 27), Tanglewood would benefit highly from a pure development
strategy. Meaning, Tanglewood should adopt a strategy to “make” their talent. Training its own
employees will create the atmosphere Tanglewood envisions within their mission statement. This
strategy is more defined in which can be utilized for talent development within the organization
to help develop future talent by investing in the Human Capital of the organization.
Hire Yourself or Outsource:
Outsourcing would mean, allowing someone who does not have their “finger on the pulse” of the
organizational culture making decisions on whom is qualified to be hired. Outsourcing is also
quite costly and could interfere with Tanglewoods mission of financial responsibility.
Outsourcing is also very common when Human Resources (HR) functions do not exist within an
organization or to relieve themselves of legal compliance such as, with equal opportunity laws
(Heneman, Judge, & Kammeyer-Mueller, 2012, p. 27). With Tanglewood having quite a robust
HR department that manages the many HR functions, specifically staffing services of the
organization, outsourcing is quite un-necessary. Plus, with Tanglewoods current staffing strategy
internal management is involved in the final decisions allowing for identification of quality
employees that fit the organizational culture.
3TANGLEWOOD
External or Internal Hiring:
Organizational staffing strategies use a combination of internal and external hiring may be
necessary. However, to cultivate a stable committed workforce and to market launching long-
term careers an emphasis on internal hiring is needed (Heneman, Judge, & Kammeyer-Mueller,
2012, p. 277). This will help develop a workforce of committed and qualified individuals to help
carry on the Tanglewood philosophy to the future. Tanglewood currently has many layers to the
organizational structures, especially management, in which the company needs to consolidate.
Tangelwood emphasizes a culture of transparency through “straight talk” and employees at all
levels of the corporation are encouraged to make suggestions regarding operations. Employee
suggestions is the main portal through which promotion and advancement are achieved providing
an internal talent pool. Building on the organizations human capital. External hiring is typically
needed for hiring entry level positions or when there are no qualified internal candidates
(Heneman, Judge, & Kammeyer-Mueller, 2012, p. 27). In recent, financial reports it shows that
Tanglewood is a moderately sized organization with strong growth potential. Meaning,
Tanglewood could potentially be in a situation where rapid growth is needed and external hiring
would be beneficial in filling those needs.
Core or Flexible Workforce:
A core workforce is made up of regular full and part time employees while a flexible workforce
is made up of temporary workers and used on a as needed basis. Each store is made up of
approximately 215 employees, all of which are regular full or part time employees. Emmerson
and Wood emphasize an environment based on employee participation and teams, which is
described within their vision of an employee relations environment. Each shift is run based on a
team concept and employee evaluations reflect teamwork. Flexible workforces lack strong
4TANGLEWOOD
cultural knowledge and behavior as well as teamwork. Core employees view a flexible
workforce as having no loyalty and commitment to the organization due to turnover rates in
flexible staffing. In order to, maintain Tanglewood’s philosophy on employee relations and
quality a core workforce is essential for success.
Hire or Retain:
A healthy balance of hiring and retention is key. Hiring strategies are necessary when hiring new
employees due to employee turnover. Whether the employee left due to retirement, termination,
promotion, etc. Regardless, replacing employees can be expensive, so always hire to retain. Take
your time and do it right. Hiring strategies should include clear, specific job descriptions so that
candidates are aware of how they fit in and what learning opportunities they’ll have for future
development. Once the employee is hired, retention becomes of high importance. Retention has a
lot to do with employee value. Therefore, a company’s ability to retain employees is likely due to
perks, benefits and incentives offered (Heneman, Judge, & Kammeyer-Mueller, 2012, p. 28).
Tanglewood uses retention strategies through offering financial incentive to associates for their
suggestion that has been implemented and financial incentives to department managers for
developing and implementing the new policy or procedure. Other ways in which Tanglewood
adds to the retention strategy is through open communication, engaging in employee
development opportunities and promoting from within.
National or Global:
Outsourcing and offshoring are related but also very distinct from the another. While outsourcing
is moving a business process to another vendor, whether inside or outside of the country,
offshoring is setting up the organizations operations in another country (Heneman, Judge, &
5TANGLEWOOD
Kammeyer-Mueller, 2012, p. 28). Tanglewood has 243 stores located regionally. When they are
ready to further expand, Tanglewood should look at expanding more nationally. This allow
Tanglewood the ability to expand online ordering store pick up locations, lowering shipping
costs. Tanglewood may also find other distribution centers in closer range in which they can
manufacture or obtain services at lower costs.
Attract or Relocate:
Attracting staff is a cost save for an organization. It is cheaper to bring the labor to the
organization versus the organization to the labor (Heneman, Judge, & Kammeyer-Mueller, 2012,
p. 29). Part of Tanglewoods expansion strategy was purchasing existing stores rather than
building new stores. Benefits of this strategy is that there is already an established customer base
and an existing labor market.
Overstaff or Understaff:
Within the retail industry it is expected that there will be fluxuations in the demand for products
and services. For example, seasonal and off season periods. Therefore, there are fluxuations in
overstaffing and understaffing. If Tanglewood is working towards a retention strategy their focus
should be on overstaffing. Overstaffing can act as a step-in succession planning strategies by
stockpiling talent for internal advancement. Overstaffing is also part of expansion planning to
prepare for growth.
Short or Long Term Focus:
Currently, Tanglewoods current staffing strategy function have not been strong due to variations
between regional managers and how they run their HR practices. Therefore, it is inevitable that
Tanglewood needs to focus on their immediate short term goals to create central staffing
6TANGLEWOOD
operation efficiencies within the organization to prepare for upcoming expansions. Tanglewood
can then work on long term staffing strategies by implementing a talent management program
that will collaborate with succession planning for internal promotion and advancement.
Staffing Quality
Person/Job or Person/Organization Match
Person/job match is when an individual is matched to a job based on specific knowledge, skills,
abilities and other characteristics (KSAO’s). The person/organization match is when both have
compatible beliefs and values in relation to the culture and behavior of the organization and its
human capital. Tanglewood has a high expectation relating to commitment, value, honesty,
responsibility, performance and customer service not only to their customers but to their
employees as well. With the many levels of staff there are specific tasks and responsibilities in
which person/job match is a priority. However, because of the high commitment to team
orientation and employee advancement making tasks a bit more flexible Tanglewood would
benefit with a person/organization match to meet current and future customer and employee
needs.
Specific or General KSOA’s
Staying in line with the person/job and person/organization match, due to a variety of job levels
at Tanglewood a blend of both specific and general KSAO’s would be beneficial. Some positions
will require more specific KSAO’s such as human resources and department managers. While
other positions may require more general KSAO’s such as store associates and operations
managers where a variety of KSAO’s can be utilized.
Exceptional or Acceptable Workforce Quality
7TANGLEWOOD
Tanglewood sets a high bar as described in their mission statement. Although, an acceptable
workforce will cost much less to hire it could ultimately cost more in overhead costs such as
productivity, quality and turnover. Focusing on an exceptional workforce will allow for better
quality of product and service provided, diversity and innovation. Thus, bringing in more of a
profit for Tanglewood.
Active or Passive Diversity
If Tanglewood continues to plan expansions they would benefit by adopting an active diversity
plan. Advocates of an active diversity strategy argues that it is legally and morally appropriate
and that a diverse workforce allows the organization to be more attuned to the diverse needs of
the customers it serves (Heneman, Judge, & Kammeyer-Mueller, 2012, p. 32). Diversity is also
the foundation of innovation and future operations.
Case 2: Planning
Forecasting Labor Availability
The Washington market is very stable and Tanglewood uses internal promotions to fill many
openings for several of their supervisory and management positions. The Markov Analysis is
used to determine the staff that is available and the staff that will be needed.
Forecast of Availabilities
Next Year (Projected)
Current Workforce (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) Exit
(1) Store Associate 85004505 510 0 0 0 3485
(2) Shift Leader 1200 0 600 192 0 0 408
8TANGLEWOOD
(3) Department Manager 850 0 0 493 102 0 255
(4) Assistant Store Manager 150 0 0 9 69 12 60
(5) Store Manager 50 0 0 0 0 33 17
Environmental Scans
Environmental scans incorporate both internal and external influences. The two most important
internal influences are the organizations strategy and culture (Heneman, Judge, & Kammeyer-
Mueller, 2012, p. 92). Tanglewood relies on its experienced employees as a major source of
talent. Because the company promotes from within its internal strategy increases employee
retention. Plus, the internal strategy adds to the company’s strong culture. External influences
include the current labor market when trying to fill positions. Filling positions externally can
become a challenge in markets that have a consistent supply of qualified individuals as retail is
undesirable due to long hours and low pay. An advantage that Tanglewood would seem to have
in the labor market is in the Pacific Northwest where unemployment rates are high. However, as
the labor market expands in professional and managerial sectors it will reduce the number of
available candidates for Tanglewood.
Gap Analysis
Next Year (Projected)
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5)
Year End Total 4505 1110 694 171 45
External Hires Needed 3995 90 156 21 5
9TANGLEWOOD
Action Plan
The GAP Analysis shows that Tanglewood needs to fill approximately 4,000 sales associates, 90
shift leaders, 156 department managers, 21 assistant managers and 5 store manager positions.
Considering, Tanglewoods internal hiring strategy shift leader and management roles will most
likely be filled internally. External hiring needs will be focused mainly on store associates.
Employee Representation
Based on the Incumbency levels shown on Table 1.3 (p. 19) of the Tanglewood Case Book,
women are under-represented in store associate and department manager positions while, other
minorities are under-represented in store associate and shift leader positions (Kammeyer-
Mueller, 2012, p. 19). Therefore, although woman and minorities have some prevalence in
certain positions Tanglewood needs to ensure a more prevalent balance of woman in higher
management positions and other minorities in store associate and shift leader positions to avoid
future issues in these areas.
Case Three: Recruiting
Organizational methods to determine best methods of recruiting
Tanglewood has a constant need to keep up with recruitment strategies to satisfy turnover rates.
With continuing the organizational recruitment method, recruitment targets are more likely to be
consistent and met. To promote and encourage an organized method a recruitment guide has
been provided.
Recruitment Guide for Sales Associate
10TANGLEWOOD
Position: Sales Associate
Reports to: Department Manager
Relevant Labor Market: Eastern/Western Washington and Northern/Southern Oregon
Timeline: Continues
Activities to Undertake, to source well qualified candidates:
Employee Referrals
Media (websites)
Kiosk
State job services
Staffing agency
Staff members involved:
VP of HR
Staffing services director
Staffing services team
Regional managers
Budget: $4,000 - $5,000
Open versus targeted recruitment methods
Tanglewood uses a variety of recruitment methods to attract candidates. Current methods used
include; media advertisement, job referrals, in store kiosk, state job services, and staffing
agencies. The methods primarily used vary by region.
Open recruitment is a passive recruitment method. Meaning, anyone is open to apply
regardless of qualifications. This method would typically attract a more diverse population. Open
recruitment can be a primary method when in need of hiring many candidates. Open recruitment
methods are achieved through a variety of media resources, as it has the potential to reach a
much larger audience. An open recruitment method would be beneficial in filling a sales
11TANGLEWOOD
associate position as there is not a huge degree of KSAO’s, educational and qualification
requirements.
Targeted recruitment methods are just the opposite of open recruitment. Meaning, specific labor
markets are identified, focus on KSAO’s. Targeted recruitment would be best when hiring for
management positions or diversity groups. Previously, we noted that Tanglewood should focus
recruitment methods on hiring woman and minorities into specific positions. Tanglewood can
utilize employee referral, kiosk, job services and staffing agency methods to target specific
applicants.
Western Washington
Utilizes the following recruitment methods to recruit candidates; media, referrals, kiosk, and
state job services. Employee referrals and job services yield the highest volume of applicants and
candidates. However, employee referral and kiosk methods yield the highest percent of
candidates hired and retained after six months. With Tanglewood focused on minimizing
turnover, looking at a one year retention rate employee referrals yield 69% and job services
yields 75% retention. (Kammeyer-Mueller, 2012, pg. 61). This percentage is obtained by
dividing the number of candidates hired by the number of individuals that stay. These two
methods are also the most cost effective based on cost per hire; $3,305.73 employee referral and
$4,531.01 for job services.
Eastern Washington
The region where it all started. Although, western and eastern Washington embrace similar
management philosophy’s their recruitment methods are very different. Eastern Washington
relies primarily on media advertising resulting in a high number of applicants (4629). However,
12TANGLEWOOD
employee referrals (3996) is another main source which yields a higher number of candidates
hired, 1016 US 676 from media recruitment methods. Employee referrals also have a much
higher one year retention rate of 72%, while media yields 45%. The kiosk method also yields a
higher retention rate of 65% over primary recruitment methods. Employee referrals in the eastern
region is more cost effective at $3,339.21 per hire US. $3,369.13 upon hire. The kiosk method
yields the highest cost ($5,566.59 cost per hire) however, it has the second-best success rate over
primary media methods.
Northern Oregon
There are these major recruitment categories used in this region. Primarily media and kiosks.
Secondary recruitment methods used are the utilization of staffing agencies. Due to a different
operational philosophy in this region. They believe individuals and hiring methods are based
primarily on making decisions that are financially sound. There recruitment methods yield the
highest applicant pool of 3986 applicants almost 1400 more employees than the media method.
The agency method yields the lowest applicant pool of 1290. The kiosk and agency method hire
more employees than their applicant pool plus have the highest one year retention rates, 96% for
agency and 66% for kiosk. It appears media may be the most cost effective at $3,895 cost per
hire, but the least effective method. This is an example where lowest cost does not always appear
to be the most effective.
Southern Oregon
Is the smallest region yet the most innovative region? Many of the recruitment methods used in
other regions were adopted from Southern Oregon. This region uses a combination of methods
VS primary and secondary methods. The combo used includes; employee referrals, kiosk, and
13TANGLEWOOD
staffing agencies. While the kiosk method yields, the highest applicant pool it also yields the
lowest one year retention rate of 62%. The kiosk is also the most expensive method, $5,961 cost
per hire. Employee referral and agency methods are comparable regarding their applicant pool
having a difference of 120 applicants. These methods also yield the highest percentage of
individuals hired; 34% agency and 32% employee referral. While kiosk hire rate is only 13%.
The referral and agency method are also more cost effective with cost per hire; $4,686 agency
and $4,169 referral. Southern Oregon can save on overhead costs for recruitment by eliminating
the kiosk method.
Northern Oregon is very conservative about their recruitment methods and operational
philosophy. Northern Oregon has suggested that the other regions follow their example and
utilize a more “hands off” approach within their recruitment effects, using kiosks and staffing
agencies. While, staffing agencies yields the most favorable results for the lowest across all
regions. Plus, kiosks are one of the most expensive methods in comparison to other methods.
While, other regions would most definitely benefit by utilizing the agency method as
demonstrated by Norther Oregon, Northern Oregon would benefit by adopting an employee
referral program as demonstrated by the other regions.
Tanglewood management is committed to improving customer service quality. Their
major concerns are influenced by turnover lag time, administrative process, lack of KSAO’s
relating to positive customer service and targeted messages to attract appropriate candidates. The
following recruitment methods should be utilized in each region to optimize recruiting methods.
Sufficient quantity, quality, cost and impact on HR outcomes should be considered based on
regional labor markets. It’s not always a “one size, fits all” method. Metrics should be designed,
minimizing the number of unqualified candidates. Utilizing KSAO’s and personality assessments
14TANGLEWOOD
in the application process would filter out potential unqualified individuals, saving time and cost.
These assessments can translate to internal talent management systems, leading to succession
planning.
Realistic message
A realistic message portrays the organization and the job as it really is rather than what they
think applicants want to hear (Heneman, & Kammeyer-Mueller, 2012, pg. 223). Many argue that
this does not send a positive message to attract candidates. However, it sends the message of
what to expect in realistic terms. Tanglewood should include working long hours and holidays,
hourly rate and specific tasks. Tanglewood should also mention their importance on human
capital investment with internal promotion policies, benefits and referral programs.
Employment board message
An employment board message portrays an appealing message to attract a “employer of choice”
(Heneman, & Kammeyer-Mueller, 2012, pg.225). Tanglewood should adopt a catchy phrase or
tag to correlate with its culture and values.
Targeted message
Targeted messages are used to attract specific audiences and their needs or wants (Heneman, &
Kammeyer-Mueller, 2012, pg.226). Tanglewood should target labor markets to close the
diversity gap and/or those looking for entry level work.
15TANGLEWOOD
Case Four: Measurement and Validation
Staffing Services
MemoTo: Marilyn Gonzalez, Human Resources VP
From: Heather L Horvath, Staffing Services
cc: Daryl Perrone, Staffing Services Director
Date: 4/22/2017
Re: Recruitment Measurement and Validation
Statistical data was collected from a chosen test area that included 10 Seattle stores. Statistical data was also collected from the remaining Tanglewood stores to compare results.
The data analysis demonstrates the traditional methods (Reference Table 3.1) of selection by estimating correlations between achieved measures of education, work experience, managerial interviews and the measures of citizenship, absence, performance and promotion potential. This information was collected from application blanks and interviews.
A second data analysis (Reference Table 3.2) was also completed to gather correlations between traditional selection methods but also the proposed selection method that includes personality tests, biodata, and retail market experience.
There is a positive correlation between selection methods that were utilized for both samples. Positive correlations are shown as p< value that is less than 0.5. Anything higher is not a positive correlation.
Referencing the traditional data analysis education, work experience and interview score have a strong correlation with promotion potential. While the proposed data analysis shows a strong correlation between traditional and proposed predictors to an employee’s promotion potential.
The traditional method also shows a strong correlation of all 3 predictors to performance. However, table 3.2 demonstrates the proposed predictors have a more significant value of correlation to performance. Meaning, there is a higher potential of a person/job or
16TANGLEWOOD
person/organization match. Therefore, the proposed method should be used to correlate with employee performance and promotion potential.
Table 3.1 Data from Stores Employing the Traditional Selection Method
Citizenship Absence Performance Promotion potential
Education Correlation 0.03 -0.02 0.15 0.17
p-value < 0.01 0.03 < 0.01 < 0.01
Work experience Correlation 0.17 0.07 0.22 0.25
p-value < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01
Interview score Correlation 0.13 0.01 0.04 0.32
p-value < 0.01 0.26 < 0.01 < 0.01
Table 3.2 Data from stores employing the proposed method
Citizenship Absence Performance Promotion potential
Education Correlation 0.01 -0.01 0.08 0.14
p-value 0.77 0.77 0.02 < 0.01
Work experience Correlation 0.04 -0.04 0.16 0.18
p-value 0.25 0.25 < 0.01 < 0.01
Interview score Correlation -0.02 0.03 0.01 0.16
p-value 0.57 0.39 0.77 < 0.01
Retail knowledge Correlation 0.02 -0.07 0.12 0.33
p-value 0.57 0.04 < 0.01 < 0.01
Biodata Correlation 0.17 -0.17 0.22 0.34
p-value < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 <0.01
Applicant exam Correlation 0.03 -0.02 0.26 0.34
p-value 0.39 0.57 < 0.01 < 0.01
Conscientiousness Correlation 0.14 -0.33 0.17 0.29
p-value < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01
Extraversion Correlation 0.09 0.09 0.22 0.06
17TANGLEWOOD
p-value 0.01 0.01 < 0.01 0.09
The validity of a measure is defined as the degree to which it measures the attitude it is intended
to measure (Heneman, & Kammeyer-Mueller, 2012, pg. 335). In this case, the measure is the
correlation between recruitment selection predictors and the annual employee performance
evaluation attributes. For example, work experience, retail knowledge, biodata, applicant exam,
and personality test correlate to performance and promotion potential. Education, work
experience and interview score and retail knowledge hold very little to no correlation to
performance attributes. With Tanglewoods internal promotion commitment and their
commitment to superior customer service excellence and team work the predictors that relate
closely to store associate include the use of the proposed method.
Based on the data collected the predictors that highlight good candidates include work
experience, biodata, and conscientiousness. In which, they correlate with performance metrics
that are important to Tanglewoods current and future employment. Due to positive correlations
between the traditional and proposed methods the observed validity can be translated to the other
stores. However, due to the significant difference in sample size the other stores could yield
different results.
The proposed method demonstrates the most favorable results. Although, traditional
methods reveal a significant amount of detail regarding an applicant, the proposed method “dives
deeper” to discover how predictors correlate to performance attributes that correlate with the
company’s core values and culture.
Case Five: Disparate Impact Analysis
18TANGLEWOOD
To, determine disparate impact within the hiring practices at Tanglewood we’ll take a close look
at historical flow and concentration statistics.
The flow statistics chart below will look at the 4/5 rule which looks at differences in selection
rates among diverse groups for specific jobs.
Historical Hiring and Promotion Data: Applicant Flows
Occupational category
Total White* Total Non-White
African-American*
4/5 Ratio Non-White
4/5 Ration African
AmericanStore Associates External
hiresApplicants 18226 15436 2790 594
Hires 3832 3221 611 135Selection ratio 21.02% 20.87 21.90 22.73 1.05 1.09
Shift leader External hires
Applicants 392 320 72 17
Hires 61 54 7 2 Selection ratio 15.56% 16.88 9.72 11.76 .58 .70 Internal
hiresApplicants 864 712 152 30
Hires 280 241 39 6 Selection ratio 32.41% 33.85 25.66 20 .76 .59
Department manager
External hires
Applicants 1242 1074 168 44
Hires 94 82 12 3Selection ratio 7.57% 7.64 7.14 6.82 .93 .89
Internal hires
Applicants 589 509
80 21
Hires 124 108
16 3
Selection ratio 21.05% 21.22 20 14.29 .94 .67
Asst. store manager
External hires
Applicants 146 123 23 7
Hires 17 15 2 0 Selection ratio 11.64% 12.20 8.70 0 .71 0 Internal
hiresApplicants 108 90 18 4
Hires 27 2 1
19TANGLEWOOD
25 Selection ratio 25.00% 27.80 11.11 25 .40 .90
Store Manager External hires
Applicants 50 42 8 2
Hires 5 4 1 0Selection ratio 10.00% 9.52 12.50 0 1.31 0
Internal hires
Applicants 81 66 15 4
Hires 13 9 4 0Selection ratio 16.05% 13.64 26.70 0 1.96 0
*Non-Hispanic
For this case, the focus is on internal hires. The selection ratio points to the evidence of disparate
treatment among African American and non-white minorities amongst shift leaders, African
American department managers, non-white assistant managers and African American store
managers.
If we take a second look by utilizing concentration data, it is evident that there is higher
concentration of white employees in all store positions. African American have the lowest
concentration among the three groups.
Historical Concentration Data
Occupational category Total White* Total Non-White
African-American*
Store Associates Employees 2760 2307 453 95Concentration 83.59% 16.41% 3.44%
Shift leader Employees 552 464 88 10Concentration 84.06% 15.94% 1.81%
Department manager Employees 391 341 50 9Concentration 87.21% 12.79% 2.30%
Asst. store manager Employees 69 64 5 2Concentration 92.75% 7.24% 2.90%
Store Manager Employees 23 16 7 0Concentration 69.57% 30.43% 0%
Total Employees 3795 3192 603 116*Non-Hispanic
20TANGLEWOOD
Tanglewood should be prepared to respond to Eaglette and Schubert promptly by expressing the
success of their organization as well as their inclusion of diversity in the workplace.
Tanglewood judge’s individual performance based on their performance and
character
Tanglewood incorporates a philosophy of openness, inclusiveness and diversity
Tanglewood has built a culture of human capital development and retention that
focuses on internal promotion
Tanglewood should also present documentation of current diversity programs to show diversity
measures and performance. To defend disparate treatment, Tanglewood should also respond by
providing supporting evidence that there is a bona fide occupational qualification that may exist
that supports reasons for disqualification. Tanglewood should also respond with adequate
documentation that supports decision of decline.
To improve internal recruitment efforts, Tanglewood should review all internal recruitment
policies and practices to ensure that there is no room for discrimination. Tanglewood is also
encouraged to:
Encourage minority groups to apply
Actively recruit from a variety of sources
Advertise to target a variety of demographic groups
Recruit in areas that have large populations of minorities
Base decisions primarily on performance and qualifications versus personality and
word of mouth
Implement management training relating to diversity recruitment practices
21TANGLEWOOD
Tanglewood would also benefit for promotion and career development policies and practices:
Develop an Affirmative Action Program
Provide additional training and mentoring to encourage advancement
Case 6: Interview
Tanglewood is seeking a structured interview selection process that can be utilized consistently
across all stores. The idea of this approach is to ensure that each interview is presented with the
same questions and scoring systems to remove any biases from the decision-making process.
In this scenario, our focus is on a department manager position. A detailed selection plan for
department manager is shown below to include KSAO’s from the job description to reflect
important Tanglewood cultural attributes. Each KSAO was identified for necessity and
importance in the selection process.
Detailed Selection Plan for Department Manager
Major KSAO Category Necessary for Selection?(Y/N)
Experience Check
Education Check
Marshfield Applicant Exam
Retail Knowledge Test
Knowledge of organizational policies and practices
yX X
Skill in judgement and decision making
Y X X
Ability to think, develop original solutions within prescribed parameters
Y X X
Knowledge of retail management policies and practices
Y X X X
Knowledge of legal precepts underlying personal management
Y X X
Skill in the analysis of financial and
Y X X X
22TANGLEWOOD
operational dataAbility to reason inductively
Y X X X
Knowledge of customer service principles
Y X X
Skill in managing personnel resources
Y X
Communication and speaking skills
Y X X
In a structured interview process, there should be a good mix of behavioral and situational
interview questions that will capture and measure job related competencies regarding past
experiences and hypothetical situations. All candidates are asked the same questions, in the same
order. All responses are then evaluated using the same scoring key as shown below, “Interview
Assessment Scoring Key”.
Interview Questions and Measurement of KSAO’s
Behavioral Interview Questions
1. Skill in judgement and decision making: How do you handle implementing decisions that
are not always popular?
2. Ability to think and develop original solutions within prescribed parameters: Give an
example of how you worked on a team?
3. Skill in managing personnel resources: Share an example of how you were able to motivate
employees or co-workers.
4. Knowledge of legal precepts underlying personnel management: Have you ever handled a
difficult situation? How did you handle it and what was the outcome?
23TANGLEWOOD
5. Knowledge of retail management policies and practices: Tell me about how you worked
effectively under pressure?
Situational Interview Questions
1. Knowledge of organizational policies and procedures: Give me a time in which you had to
conform to a policy in which you did not agree?
2. Ability to reason inductively: Describe a time you disagreed with someone at work?
3. Skill in the analysis of financial and operational data: Tell me about a time in which you
made a mistake? How did you handle it?
4. Knowledge of customer service principles: Describe a situation you had to work with a
difficult customer.
5. Communication and speaking skills: Describe a time when you had to provide criticism.
Interview Assessment Scoring Key
Question 1: How do you handle implementing decisions that are not always popular? Comments:
0 1 2 3No answer Provided General explanation
provided. No details given.
Provided an example. No explanation of decisions made.
Detailed explanation, decision and outcome.
Question 2: Give an example of how you worked on a team? Comments:
0 1 2 3No answer Provided General explanation
provided. No details given.
Provided an example. No explanation of decisions made.
Detailed explanation, decision and outcome.
Question 3: Share an example of how you were able to motivate employees or co-workers. Comments:
0 1 2 3
24TANGLEWOOD
No answer Provided General explanation provided. No details given.
Provided an example. No explanation of decisions made.
Detailed explanation, decision and outcome.
Question 4: Have you ever handled a difficult situation? How did you handle it and what was the outcome?Comments:
0 1 2 3No answer Provided General explanation
provided. No details given.
Provided an example. No explanation of decisions made.
Detailed explanation, decision and outcome.
Question 5: Tell me about how you worked effectively under pressure?Comments:
0 1 2 3No answer Provided General explanation
provided. No details given.
Provided an example. No explanation of decisions made.
Detailed explanation, decision and outcome.
Question 6: Give me a time in which you had to conform to a policy in which you did not agree? Comments:
0 1 2 3No answer Provided General explanation
provided. No details given.
Provided an example. No explanation of decisions made.
Detailed explanation, decision and outcome.
Question 7: Describe a time you disagreed with someone at work?Comments:
0 1 2 3No answer Provided General explanation
provided. No details given.
Provided an example. No explanation of decisions made.
Detailed explanation, decision and outcome.
Question 8: Tell me about a time in which you made a mistake? How did you handle it?Comments:
0 1 2 3No answer Provided General explanation
provided. No details given.
Provided an example. No explanation of decisions made.
Detailed explanation, decision and outcome.
Question 9: Describe a situation you had to work with a difficult customer.Comments:
0 1 2 3No answer Provided General explanation
provided. No details given.
Provided an example. No explanation of decisions made.
Detailed explanation, decision and outcome.
Question 10: Describe a time when you had to provide criticism.Comments:
0 1 2 3No answer Provided General explanation Provided an example. Detailed explanation,
25TANGLEWOOD
provided. No details given.
No explanation of decisions made.
decision and outcome.
Case 7: Selection Decision Making
Tanglewood is looking for a new manager for its Flagship store location located in Spokane. The
hiring of the most qualified manager is of high importance for the following reasons, Flagship is
the largest and most elaborate of Tanglewood stores, it has very strong revenues, it is used as a
training site for all new managers, it is used as a testing ground for new products and it services
one of the largest diverse customer bases due to its location.
A detailed selection plan for store manager is shown below to include KSAO’s from the job
description to reflect important Tanglewood cultural attributes. Also, included in this selection
plan are the resources utilized to capture and measure the KSAO’s for each applicant.
Detailed Selection Plan for Store Manager
Major KSAO Category
Necessary for Selection(Y/N)
Biodata Marshfield Applicant Exam
Retail Knowledge
Conscientiousness Extraversion
Knowledge of organizational policies and practices
Y X
Skill in judgment and decision making
Y X X X
Ability to think creatively and develop original solutions
Y X X X
Knowledge of retail management policies and practices
Y X
Knowledge of legal precepts underlying personnel management
Y X X
26TANGLEWOOD
Skill in the analysis of financial and operational data
Y X X X
Ability to reason inductively
Y X X X
Knowledge of the customer base served by the store
Y X
Skill in managing personnel resources
Y X X
Communication and speaking skills
Y X X
A closed recruiting process was conducted and only twenty potential candidates were chosen to
compete in this process. Amongst these candidates were internal and external candidates that
were nominated and carefully selected by trusted resources. Only ten expressed a strong interest
in the store manager position. Below is the candidates Individual Applicant information data
(Kammeyer-Mueller, 2012, p. 71).
Individual Applicant Information
Biodata Applicant exam Retail Knowledge Conscientiousness
Extraversion
Andrews, David 70 45 65 75 70
Greer, Shauna 60 65 70 50 90
Renoir, Maxine 80 60 40 90 80
Binghome, Bruce
60 55 80 65 55
Yorn, John 40 80 45 60 60
Thomas, Mindy 75 40 30 80 75
Vacarri, Brenda 55 35 45 60 75
Reznor, Thomas 65 90 60 70 80
Durvall, Adam 60 60 55 50 65
27TANGLEWOOD
Heckman, Jane 85 55 60 90 90
Corporate Average
50 50 50 50 50
Managerial average
60 60 65 55 70
Assessment scores for each candidate will be based on three separate multiple predictor methods:
clinical prediction, unit weighting and rational weighting.
Store Manager Applicant Rankings
Clinical Prediction Unit Weighting Rational WeightingAndrews, David 65 325 63.3Greer, Shauna 67 335 65.6Renoir, Maxine 70 350 60.6Binghome, Bruce 63 315 67.1Yorn, John 57 285 52Thomas, Mindy 60 300 50.3Vacarri, Brenda 69 270 48.1Reznor, Thomas 67 365 68.9Durvall, Adam 58 290 57.6Heckman, Jane 76 380 69.5
Clinical prediction is based on management expert judgement and subjective matter including
the resume and the interview versus mechanical decisions (Heneman III, Judge, & Kammeyer-
Mueller, 2012, p. 550 – 552). The top three candidates predicted through clinical prediction are
as follows: Jane Heckman, Maxine Renoir and Brenda Vacarri.
Utilizing unit weighting each predictor is weighted equally, however, this means that each
predictor holds the same value as the others (Heneman III, Judge, & Kammeyer-Mueller, 2012,
p. 552). The top three candidates include: Jane Heckman, Thomas Reznor and Maxine Renoir.
28TANGLEWOOD
Rational weighting combines a differential with each predictor based on what subject matter
experts believe to be of importance to job success (Heneman III, Judge, & Kammeyer-Mueller,
2012, p. 552). Rational weighting predicts that Jane Heckman, Thomas Reznor and Bruce
Binghome are the top three candidates.
If we incorporate a multiple hurdles approach where an applicant must earn a passing score for
each predictor without compensating high scores for low scores (Heneman III, Judge, &
Kammeyer-Mueller, 2012, p. 554). The five finalists would include: Jane Heckman, Maxine
Renoir, Thomas Reznor, Shauna Greer and David Andrews.
Not one method is the perfect method in the selection process. However, choosing a combination
of methods that hold the highest value to the person/job or person/organization match is ideal.
Therefore, a combination of rational weighting and multiple hurdles are the most appropriate
methods.
Decision makers hold a critical role to the selection process and those who hold this role should
have extensive knowledge in the following areas: hiring and selection process, job skills needed
for the position as well as employment law and any other legal aspects that can affect hiring
decisions. Therefore, Tanglewood should hold a panel of decision makers to include: The
Eastern Washington regional manager, the staffing services director, selection manager, the EEO
coordinator and possibly one or two experienced store managers.
Official Guide for Selection
Develop a Selection Plan Analyze KSAO’s from appropriate job
description along with cultural attributes
necessary to the position
29TANGLEWOOD
Choose Appropriate Selection Methods Use a process of measurement and validation
to correlate appropriate selection methods and
predictors based on the position
Utilize Multiple Predictors Use a combination of predictors to remove
biases and potential adverse impact results
Define Decision Makers Decision makers should have extensive
knowledge in the following areas: hiring and
selection process, job skills needed for the
position as well as employment law and any
other legal aspects that can affect hiring
decisions
Case 8: Retention Management
Drivers of Turnover
The top three reported reasons that managers leave Tanglewood include: departure because of
superior reasons such as pay and benefits, dissatisfaction with the organizations direction and
major life event reasons. Based on the information collected from the regional turnover data and
exit interview there is correlation in the drivers or reasons that are creating turnover. The highest
turnover regions include Northern California and Colorado, both reaching almost 50% turnover.
These regions also have the highest competition index and reason for leaving is pay being the
highest valued reason for retention. Where the competition index is high is typically where you
see the highest turnover, supporting that performance is observable from the outside and
successful managers will receive competitive offers from Tanglewoods competition even though
30TANGLEWOOD
Tanglewood is a market leader in compensation. However, across all regions pay satisfaction
only comes in third for overall value and satisfaction. The highest rated component that
employees value most is supervisor satisfaction, rated overall at 3.6. This demonstrates a
correlation with departure reasons given due to dissatisfaction with the organizations direction.
Employees are looking for consistency of behaviors demonstrated of Tanglewood management
based on Tanglewoods mission and philosophy.
Functional or Dysfunctional Turnover
Based on the data collected Tanglewood is experiencing dysfunctional turnover due to avoidable
reasons of voluntary turnover. Dysfunctional turnover is “defined as the level that produces a
divergence between the organizations optimal balance and costs associated with retaining
employees (Abelson, 1984, p. 1).” Dysfunctional turnover negatively impacts Tanglewood
financially and non-financially. No matter the type of turnover there are increased costs to the
organization due to time and efforts exhausted from management and human resource staff,
production and quality costs, customer service, replacement costs and training costs and much
more. Tanglewood spends two months training management regardless of whether they were
internal or external candidates to instill Tanglewoods, vision, mission and philosophy. Therefore,
the burden is not only financially due to costs associated with training but also the non-financial
emphasis on lost KSOA’s, customer service and quality measures.
Exit Interview Process
Tanglewoods current exit interview process is informal and provides no real structure to gather
quality data on reasons for departure. It can be difficult to formulate or identify true reasons that
may be problematic when exit interviews are based on informal, friendly conversations.
31TANGLEWOOD
Therefore, the following recommendations are being made to improve the quality of data being
collected.
The interviewer should be a neutral individual such as Human Resources or an
anonymous third party vendor
Those conducting exit interviews will go through a robust training program that
emphasizes on an appropriate and structured format to gather quality data and
focus on employee comfort and positive reinforcement
A list of structured interview questions will be provided for consistency across all
regions to ensure quality data is collected that can be correlated to other factors
and components in the labor market
The interviewer will be expected to study and prepare for each candidate to
validate functional or dysfunctional turnover data
The interview will be conducted privately and confidentially for collecting data
for retention management
Job Satisfaction Survey
Most turnover types are voluntary, Tanglewood has taken the first step to potentially asses the
root cause of employee dissatisfaction and potential causes of turnover by conducting job
satisfaction surveys. This data will help Tanglewood to determine both intrinsic and extrinsic
rewards that are most important to an employee’s job satisfaction to prevent dysfunctional
turnover. Due to Tanglewoods current survey process they receive low participation. It is
recommended that Tanglewood work with an outside vendor that specializes in job satisfaction
surveys. Anonymous surveys tend to engage more employee response. Plus, due to
32TANGLEWOOD
approximately only a 50% response rate, it may be beneficial to send the survey to randomly
selected employees.
Staffing Services
MemoTo: Marilyn Gonzalez and Daryl Perrone, Tanglewood Corporate Offices
From: Heather Horvath, Staffing Services
cc: Emerson and Wood
Date: 4/22/2017
Re: Retention Management
It is best that organizations have a retention management plan in place before a problem arises so that they can identify and take the necessary steps to tackle turnover issues immediately versus allowing repeat turnover instances to occur.
The top three reasons that managers leave Tanglewood include: departure because of superior reasons such as pay and benefits, dissatisfaction with the organizations direction and major life event reasons. Both intrinsic and extrinsic rewards should be included in the retention management plan to correlate with all job satisfaction values. Therefore, the following recommendations are being made to improve retention at Tanglewood:
Provide above market salary Provide a comprehensive menu of health benefits above industry norms Increase communication to include organizational strategic directions, objectives and
goals Provide training and development opportunities for career growth to enhance promoting
from within Offer flexible work schedules to promote work/life balance Ensure management provides a positive environment by conducting surveys Increase frequency of performance management to build on the employer-employee
relationship Link rewards to performance and tenure to promote motivation and loyalty Conduct “Stay” interviews to stay abreast of job satisfaction factors
33TANGLEWOOD
References
Abelson, M. A., & Baysinger, B. D. (1984). Optimal and Dysfunctional Turnover: Toward an
34TANGLEWOOD
Organizational Level Model. Academy Of Management Review, 9(2), 331-341.
doi:10.5465/AMR.1984.4277675
Heneman III, H., Judge, T., & Kammeyer-Mueller, J. (2012). Staffing Organizations (7th ed.).
New York: McGraw-Hill/ Irwin.
Kammeyer-Mueller, J. (2012). Tanglewood casebook for use with staffing organizations
(7thed.). Florida: Mendota House Inc.