s_300_349.doc · web views-300. from larry maurer of unitel forwarding misc. correspondences from...
TRANSCRIPT
S_300_349.doc
Table of Contents - "S_300_349.doc"__
S-300. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL forwarding misc. correspondences from supporters & detractors
S-301. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding crystal growth in space
S-302. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding UIC-MPL research prior to UNITEL
S-303. from Andrew Potter upon receiving the promotional edition of the Aero book
S-304. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL forwarding an essay on UFOs by Gary Voss of TAP-TEN
S-305. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL reporting he received the books
S-306. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL forwarding an e-mail to Yosharini Minami regarding the Aero book
S-307. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding afterthoughts on the promotional Aero edition
S-308. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding the "Holo-1" Quantum Computer book
S-309: from Lori Cordini regarding Carol Rutz' unfortunate experiences with "Black Ops" programs
S-310: from Andrew Potter regarding a virus that appeared to target UNITEL
S-311: from Andrew Potter forwarding an e-mail from Larry Maurer that "the rest of the world has caught up to UNITEL"
S-312: from Andrew Potter regarding complex quantum computer simulations
S-313: from Andrew Potter regarding proposed change in UNITEL marketing strategies
S-314: from Jack Sarfatti regarding the physical Hyperspace and the quantum-Mental Multiverse
S-315: from "Adam" regarding 'psychoactive' materials in UFOs
S-316: from Bruce Maccabee regarding UFO science and origins
S-317: from John Schnurer (JNL Labs) regarding quantum-based "theories"
S-318: from Jack Sarfatti regarding his archive of previously-lost UFO-physics documents
S-319: from T. Akin rgarding Quantum Theories of Gravity
S-320: from John Schnurer (of JNL Labs) regarding the Aspen Effect
S-321: from Bob King regarding "Timeline of Secret Government Projects" essay at Cassiopaea site
S-322: from Jack Sarfatti regarding Zero-Point Fluctuation Geodesic Motion
S-323. from Wayne Mitchell regarding "Project Ghost"
S-324. from John Schnurer regarding the Apsen Effect
S-325. from Mark Solis regarding "speeds" of light
S-326. from Andrew Potter forwarding physics discussion between Larry Maurer & Edward Halerewicz
S-327. from Andrew Potter forwarding correspondence from Larry Maurer on writing UNITEL's HOLO-1 and "Flying Colors" books
S-328. from Dr. Jack Sarfatti regarding dark energy and gravity waves
S-329. from Dr. Max Tegmark regarding his Scientific American "Parallel Universes" article
S-330. from Andrew Potter regarding new photonic crystals bend light to ANY frequency
S-331. from Andrew Potter forwarding correspondence from Larry Maurer (UNITEL) regarding room-temperature superconductors
S-332. from Tom Bearden regarding the Aharnov-Anandan and Berry phases
S-333. from Dr. Velimir Abamovic regarding 'Time' in physical and biological systems
S-334. from Andrew Potter forwarding Edward Halerewicz, Jr.'s comments about UNITEL's book
S-335. from Andrew Potter forwarding Q&A between Ed Halerewitcz, Jr. and Larry Maurer
S-336. from Dr. Velimir Abramovic regarding his "snail" & web addresses
S-337. from Andrew Potter regarding Internet rumors on UNITEL
S-338. from Tom Skeggs regarding the "basics" of the Montauk Project
S-339. from NIDS regarding UNITEL's proposals
S-340. from Dr. Reginald Jaynes regarding adding from his website
S-341. from Thomas Skeggs regarding remote-viewing Montauk
S-342. from Edward Halerewicz, Jr. regarding UNITEL, Bob Lazar, Edward Teller, Andrei Sakharov
S-343. from Thomas Skeggs just "touching bases"
S-344. from Thomas Skeggs regarding writing a book about his Montauk-related research
S-345. from Thoams Skeggs regarding the Montauk Project and MK-ULTRA
S-346. from Thomas Skeggs regarding time-travel experiments in former missile silos
S-347. from Thomas Skeggs regarding remote-viewing Plattsburgh AFB
S-348. from Thomas Skeggs regarding "shielding" remote-viewing
S-300. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL forwarding misc. correspondences from supporters & detractors
From : Larry Maurer
To : [email protected]
Subject : Fwd: Is this guy for real?
Date : Mon, 15 Jul 2002 16:33:52 -0700
> To: [email protected]
> From: Larry Maurer
> Subject: Is this guy for real?
>
> Gary:
>
> This guy Sarfatti is really bordering on a Libel suit. Where does he get off dedicating himself to bad mouth us? Sounds like the pot calling the kettle black! I just do not understand him. How can we that bad, being called morons, crackpots, etc., when we have patents (especially our Japanese patent that took 8 years because they are much more thorough in their patent scrutiny), along with our esteemed associates, subcontractors/manufacturers (certainly UIC is one of the most respected world-class organizations) and on and on? Is he working for the Taliban or our large established corporate competition? Throughout this whole ordeal of Sarfatti's rantings the past few years, Sarfatti has not come up with one iota of proof of what part of our proposed aerospace propulsion design that he finds fault with. I really do not think he is bright enough to understand our design. He only wants to be one of the naysayers in hopes that we will be wrong which will make him appear to be the guy to go to for getting approval for any new designs. How sick is this fellow?!
>
> I know he has contacted Dr. Terence Barrett, Dr. Sivananthanon, and several others to put them on the spot and bad mouth us. I've threatened to sue him before and he agreed to cease his meandering dark comments against us so I did not pursue the law suit. Now, I am going to be so upset if he convinces our publishers to not publish our book. Oh brother!
>
> Anyway, thought I would bring this matter to your attention. Please let me know what you think as I want to send you one of the promotion books. This is so depressing Gary. Too many people have put in so much work for us over the last 20 years or so and they do not deserve such ill-mannered treatment. I sure hope there are enough individuals that support our theory and design to email or write Sarfatti to let him know a piece of their mind!
>
> Regards,
>Larry Maurer
>>
>> Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2002 16:48:24 -0700
>> From: Jack Sarfatti
>> Subject: RE: American Antigravity Photon Confirmation {New Cover Photo from Wired Magazine?}
>> To: Alan Parker , Brother Blue , "DarkEditor@aol. com" , Ron Pandolfi , [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], Gary Voss Cc: "Amara@Kurzweilai. Net" , "Alw@Peaceinspace. Com" , "Awret@Erols. Com" , APOLLINAIR , Brumac , Congressman Dana , Daniel Sheehan , David Crockett Williams , David Gladstone , "Decker@Ufomag. Com" , Edgarmitchell , Eldon A Byrd , Eric Davis , Fernando Loup , "Gary G. Ford" , Foggy Writer , Frank Lauria , GeorgeWeis , Glen Lindenstadt , Henryward , Henry Monteith , Ibison , JagdishM , Jeffrey Mishlove , Jfwoodward , John Dering , Kim Burrafato , Klaskey , Koen J Van Vlaenderen , Mata Hari Von Brownie , Michael Sarfatti , Michael Nisgore , Mike Coyle , MindForms , Mike Rossman , Nicole Tedesco , Paul Zielinski , Robbins , Russell Targ , Saul Paul Sirag , "Skrippner@Saybrook. Edu" , Stan Tenen , Steve New Wolff , Steven Greer , Tim Ventura , Timdeeg2002 , UFO Files , "Vecker@Ufomag. Com" , "Visions@Ntlworld. Com" , Wcri , Wes Thomas , Yokatta
>> Reply-to: [email protected]
>> X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0)
>> Importance: Normal
>> X-RCPT-TO:
>>
>> This is all Crackpot Cargo Cult Pseudo-Science Flim-Flam Flap-Doodle for technical morons by morons. The blind leading the gullible down the primrose path to disaster.
>>
>>> Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2002 08:45:21 -0700
>>>
>>> To: Gary Voss
>>> T.A.P.-T.E.N. Research
>>>
>>> Email Replies To:
>>> From: "Xtreme Xpeditions Team"
>>> Subject: Xpeditions Magazine - Travel Edition
>>>
>>> ******** "Have you written a book and need a publisher?" *************
>>>E-mail Carol Adler at Dandelion Publishing: [email protected]
>>>
>>>Best Wishes
>>>
>>> ---Jerry & Kathy Wills
>>> Editors, Xpeditions Magazine
>>> (Somewhere in America...)
>>> Thanks :)
>>> [Xtreme List Administrator]
>>>
>>> "If you or someone you know has information about any ancient site and would like us to investigate it, please contact us (e-mail) with the details or call 602 243 9092. All correspondence is strictly confidential." http://www.xpeditionsmagazine.com
>>>
>>> ************You may find the following of "Newsworthy" Great Interest!
>>> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/tapten/message/1791
>>>
>>> Check out the new "Lifter" Photo at our online "Photos" section!
>>> Doug Starfield & Friend Clive, (Reporter for Wired Magazine] posing in front of "The Lifter" (Special Thanks To "Tim Ventura" and "Larry Maurer" for submitting this jpg!)
>>> Posted: 14-Jul-2002 by vosstech - Resolution: 480 x 360
>>> Thumbnail: 2 KB | Screen Size: 56 KB | Full Size: 124 KB
>>>
>>> Note: You will need to select the feature "Show All" on the top of the photo album's front page in order to view all thumbnail photos on a single page. http://photos.groups.yahoo.com/group/tapten/lst
>>>>
>>>> Latest News Flash on the "Lifter" ---
>>>> This has yet to be released to the General Public!!
>>>>
>>>> To: [email protected]
>>>> Subject: Future Mission Objectives & New Developments...
>>>> Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2002 02:40:30 -0500
>>>>
>>>> "Hello Again Larry!
>>>>
>>>> Just plugging in to get updated on what's ahead for UNITEL and what your latest interests are focused on pertaining to future developments & mission objectives.
>>>>
>>>> Lots of exciting things happening within TAP-TEN, you should take a look at this website, Larry! [UNITEL is mentioned there.] I think you will have many questions after you had a moment to absorb the videos & data files."
>>>>
>>>>*American Antigravity Website: http://www.americanantigravity.com
>>>>
>>>>> From: Larry Maurer
>>>>> To: [email protected]
>>>>> Subject: Fwd: Wired Magazine Interview
>>>>> Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2002 13:48:45 -0700
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Gary:
>>>>>
>>>>> I am forwarding you an email from Tim Ventura of a photo of our VP Doug Starfield and the Wired magazine writer Mac, who they are writing a story that includes UNITEL.
>>>>>
>>>>> I am getting 20 promo copies of our Aerospace Propulsion book we are talking to McGraw-Hill, Barnes & Noble. I will send you a copy if you like. Stay tuned, my friend! Harold McGee, Austin, TX is trying to buy a machine shop to construct and test our various prototypes that fits right in with what you mention herein. Talk to you soon!"
>>>>>
>>>>> ---Larry
>>>>> *UNITEL Inc.
>>>>>
>>>>> UNITEL Inc. is a technology development company that owns a generic patent with ten (10) claims both in the U.S. (No. 4,817,102, March 28, 1989) and in Japan (No.1,864,717, August 8, 1994), with patents approved but not yet received in Austria, Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, Korea, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Sweden and the United Kingdom (No. 89906639.3, September 11, 1990) on a system with multiple applications. This generic quantum electronics system design applications include computing and aerospace propulsion. UNITEL is prepared to build a prototype quantum computer system entitled HOLO-1. HOLO-1 uses a specially-designed crystal laser lens to store, retrieve, and process data using light instead of electricity. http://www.unitelnw.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>> **********From: Larry Maurer
>>>>>> To: [email protected]
>>>>>> Subject: Fwd: "Wired Magazine Interview"
>>>>>> Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2002 13:48:45 -0700
>>>>>>
>>>>>> From: "Tim Ventura"
>>>>>> To: "Larry Maurer"
>>>>>> Subject: Wired Magazine Interview
>>>>>> Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2002 22:09:29 -0700
>>>>>> X-RCPT-TO:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Dear Larry:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I can't give you a guarantee that it will make the article, but Doug Starfield was here today with myself and the reporter from Wired Magazine he did a really good overview of the UNITEL idea, so the reporter should be definitely briefed on your project & goals.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I've attached a photo of Doug & Clive posing in front of the Lifter if this makes the magazine, then you are completely set."
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks;
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --Tim Ventura
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --- In tapten@y..., "Tom" wrote:
>>>>>>> Research into Lifters has been carried out in France for some time at the JPN by Jean-Louis Naudin. http://jnaudin.free.fr/html/lifters.htm and dozens of locations around the world. http://jnaudin.free.fr/html/lfreplog.htm
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>>>> From: vosstech
>>>>>>> To: tapten@y...
>>>>>>> Sent: Saturday, July 13, 2002 5:05 PM
>>>>>>> Subject: [tapten] Re: ....... American Antigravity Photon Confirmation ........
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This is indeed truly amazing work, and I implore you all to take a look at the video's and data on Tim Ventura's American Antigravity website! WoW! I can't wait to get the funding resources to start building these here in San Diego! of course we will invite those who are involved to join us & assist us with our joint projects when we are ready.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks for sharing with us Bill, let's be sure to email Tim an invite to join our group and share more with us here at our message boards to discuss his ideas with us.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ---T12 of TAP-TEN
>>>>>>> American Antigravity Website:
>>>>>>> http://www.americanantigravity.com
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --- In tapten@y..., Bill Butler wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Great Work Tim...!!!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks Man, Bill@WST
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> To: space-elevator@y...
>>>>>>>>> From: "tventura6"
>>>>>>>>> Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2002 02:20:57 -0000
>>>>>>>>> Subject: [space-elevator] American Antigravity -
>>>>>>>>> http://www.americanantigravity.com
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ###################################################
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Dear Group -
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I'm a new member involved with Biefeld-Brown and other electromagnetic propulsion research, and I manage the website http://www.americanantigravity.com
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The website covers in detail Lifter technology and several other areas of EM Propulsion, including:
>>>>>>>>>> - Lifter technology (video, photos, explanations)
>>>>>>>>>> - Lifter tech complete plans and parts guides
>>>>>>>>>> - The Hutchinson Effect
>>>>>>>>>> - Mark Tomion's StarDrive
>>>>>>>>>> - Hovertech's Ion-Containment Device
>>>>>>>>>> - UNITEL NW's MQT StarDrive Device
>>>>>>>>>> - Deseversky's 1950's Ionocraft Tests
>>>>>>>>>> - Applied Electrogravitics Beamship Tests
>>>>>>>>>> - Prof. Fran De Aquino's System-G Gravity-Shield
>>>>>>>>>> - Betavoltaic Isotopic Power-Cell Devices
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Thanks;
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Tim Ventura
>>>>>>>>>> http://www.americanantigravity.com
S-301. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding crystal growth in space
From : Larry Maurer
To : [email protected]
Subject : Re: CNN.com - Space crew grows crystals, could be real gas - July 9, 2002
Date : Tue, 16 Jul 2002 11:19:06 -0700
Attachment : 53d7b4.jpg (1k), 53d83c.jpg (1k), 53d845.jpg (16k), 53d85b.jpg (7k), 53d86a.jpg (5k), 53d878.jpg (1k), 53d883.jpg (1k), 53d88e.jpg (2k), 53d89a.jpg (5k), 53d8a7.jpg (6k), 53d8b5.jpg (7k), 53d8c5.jpg (78k), 53d8f3.jpg (1k)
Mark:
Thanks. We have been aware of the crystal growth in space where conditions are extremely optimal to MBE grow our patented lens. Especially before we found UIC MP Labs that were the only labs capable of MBE growth of the II-VI compound lens as all other labs are set up for III-V compound crystals. We had considered the NASA space labs but was very expensive and exotic if we were lucky enough to get them to grow the crystals. Fortunately, with the assistance from Mike DeBruzzi at EPI MBE Equipment Mfrs., we found Siva and UIC MP Labs. Siva is an expert on II-VI compounds and their applications to various devices (which was done for USN and US Army Labs as well for heat-seeking, night-vision equipment).
It would be cool to get NASA and/or Russians to grow the very large doped RF transparent glass crystallite II-VI compound lens of our design which was also suggested by Mike DeBruzzi for the last layer to be MBE grown to ensure chromaticity (lasing). Lets find out!
Best,
Larry
At 06:27 AM 7/16/02 -0700, you wrote:
CNN.com - Space crew grows crystals, could be real gas - July 9, 2002
>
> >http://cnn.space.savethis.clickability.com/st/saveThisPopupApp?clickMap=saveFromET&partnerID=2018&etMailToID=2104441964>53d89a.jpg
> >http://cnn.space.emailthis.clickability.com/et/emailThis?clickMap=forward&etMailToID=2104441964&partnerID=2018>53d8a7.jpg
S-302. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding UIC-MPL research prior to UNITEL
From : Larry Maurer
To : "Stealth Skater"
Subject : Re: HgCdTe => CdTe:Te
Date : Tue, 16 Jul 2002 22:42:32 -0700
At 08:55 PM 7/15/02 -0400, you wrote:
>
> Then we need to update/modify that figure before I put out the next batch. If you get any questions regarding that, tell them whatever.
>
> I liked it because it emphasized the challenging interrelationships between R&D in this new materials science field. I'm hoping it will answer some of the questions as to "why are they taking so long"?
>
> E-mail me what I should substitute in those boxes (i.e., change 'Army Labs' to 'UIC MPL', etc.)
>
> I haven't gotten anything from Sarfatti for a long time now. I guess he is still on the warpath, though. I don't know how much influence someone like him can wield, but I think your book can stand on its own. But then I know nothing about the publisher business. It would seem to me that Jack has made more than his share of enemies, though, so it shouldn't be too hard to find somebody who's equally tired of his tirades and antics.
>
>> From: Larry Maurer
>> To: "Stealth Skater"
>> Subject: Re: HgCdTe -or- CdTe:Te ???
>> Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2002 10:09:48 -0700
>>
>> Mark:
>>
>> No, we are working with UIC Physics Labs. No, we do not use mercury.
>>
>> At 06:49 PM 7/12/02 -0400, you wrote:
>>
>>> Larry --
>>>
>>> Check that old document/drawing (looks like a Powerpoint >>slide) on >>Research & Development. That's the one I just re-did and sent it to you as a 48K MS-Word document.
>>>
>>> All through the documents you consistently mention CdTe:Te. But in that drawing, at the top it says "High Operation Temperature / IF FPA's / based on HgCdTe". Was the mercury compound a predecessor? If it's no longer used and has been superceded by the cadmium stuff, let me know so I can update that drawing.
>>>
>>> Also on the same one, in the middle it says the "University of Illionois at Chicago Army Research Lab / Northrop-Grumman". Is this something different or has it been replaced by the UIC Microphysics Lab?
>>>
>>>-- Mark
Mark:
It's UIC that sent me the material or actually the documents was given to me along with other related material at UIC when I visited them a couple of years ago. Screw that Safarti guy anyway. Full steam ahead, aye Mark? Lots going on with films, new interested investors wanting to back Harold McGee's machine shop in Austin Texas, Tap-Ten machine shop in San Diego, Tim Ventura's Lifter, and so forth.
Can't wait to push the books! I will be sending you the HOLO-1 document soon.
Best,
L.
S-303. from Andrew Potter upon receiving the promotional edition of the Aero book
From : Andrew Potter
To : [email protected]
Subject : Holy Shit! Talk about a bombshell document!
Date : Thu, 18 Jul 2002 15:42:26 -0400
Stealth,
I haven't had time to read the entire book yet, but just from glancing through it (especially the intro/conclusion, etc) this fucking blows me away. I noticed you put in memos from Boeing and Rolls Royce. Publishers should be lining up at UNITEL's door after they see this.
Anyhow, a magnificent work. I'll keep you posted if I find any errors while I'm reading the book.
Amazing! Keep up the good work, man!
-Andrew
S-304. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL forwarding an essay on UFOs by Gary Voss of TAP-TEN
From : Larry Maurer
To : [email protected]
Subject : Fwd: Speculative Engineering [More Power for the course.]
Date : Thu, 18 Jul 2002 11:47:47 -0700
>
> X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.41 (Entity 5.404)
> From: "Gary Voss"
> To:
> Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2002 12:15:19 -0500
> Subject: Speculative Engineering, [More Power for the course.]
> X-Originating-Ip: 172.171.5.87
> X-Originating-Server: ws1-3.us4.outblaze.com
> X-RCPT-TO:
>
> I have added some highlights here taken from:
> "How to Build a Flying Saucer After So Many Amateurs Have Failed: An essay in Speculative Engineering by T. B. P. "
>
> I trust you will find many familiar descriptions that correlate to our ideas.
>
> ---T12
>
>> At the end of the nineteenth century, the most distinguished scientists and engineers declared that no known combination of materials and locomotion could be assembled into a practical flying machine. Fifty years later another generation of distinguished scientists and engineers declared that it was technologically infeasible for a rocket ship to reach the moon. Nevertheless, men were getting off the ground and out into space even while these words were uttered.
>>
>>In the last half of the twentieth century, when technology is advancing faster than reports can reach the public, it is fashionable to hold the pronouncements of yesterday's experts to ridicule. But there is something anomalous about the consistency with which eminent authorities fail to recognize technological advances even while they are being made. You must bear in mind that these men are not given to making public pronouncements in haste; their conclusions are reached after exhaustive calculations and proofs, and they are better informed about their subject than anyone else alive. But by and large, revolutionary advances in technology do not contribute to the advantage of established experts, so they tend to believe that the challenge cannot possibly be realized.
>>
>> The UFO phenomenon is a perversity in the annals of revolutionary engineering. On the one hand, public authorities deny the existence of flying saucers and prove their existence to be impossible. This is just as we should expect from established experts. But on the other hand, people who believe that flying saucers exist have produced findings that only tend to prove that UFOs are technologically infeasible by any known combination of materials and locomotion.
>>
>> The next problem facing us is that the momentum imparted to the centrifugal spoke is carries it all around the cycle with little loss of velocity. The amount of concentrated centrifugal force carrying the engine in the desired direction is too low to be practical. Momentum is half the product of mass multiplied by velocity squared. Therefore, what we need is a spoke that has a tremendous velocity with minimal mass. They don't make spokes like that for bicycle wheels. A search through the engineers' catalog however, turns up just the kind of centrifuge we need. An electron has no mass at rest (you cannot find a smaller minimum mass than that); all it's mass is inherent in its velocity. So we build an electron raceway in the shape of a doughnut in which we can accelerate an electron to a speed close to that of light. As the speed of light is approached, the energy of acceleration is converted to a momentum approaching infinity. As it happens, an electron accelerator answering our need was developed by the Unive …
>>
>> We can visualize the operation of the Mark I from what is known about particle accelerators. To begin with, high energy electrons ionize the air surrounding them. This causes the betatrons to glow like an annular neon tube.
>>
>> The peculiar property of microwaves heating all material containing the water molecule means that any animal luckless enough to be nearby may be cooked from the inside out; vegetation will be scorched where a saucer lands; and any rocks containing water of crystallization will be blasted. Every housewife with a microwave knows all this; only hard-headed scientists and soft-headed true believers are completely dumbfounded.
>>
>> UFOnauts would be cooked by their own engines, too, if they left the flight deck without shielding. This probably explains why a pair of UFOnauts, in a widely published photograph, wear reflective plastic jumpsuits. Mounting the betatrons outboard on a disc is an efficient way to get them away from the crew's compartment, and the plating of the hull shields the interior. At high accelerations, increasing amounts of power are transformed into radiation, making the centrifugal drive inefficient in strong gravitational fields. The most practical employment of this engineering is for large spacecraft, never intended to land. The flying saucers we see are very likely scouting craft sent from mother ships moored in orbit. For brief periods of operation, the heavy fuel consumption of the Mark I can be tolerated, along with radiation leakage - especially when the planet being scouted is not your own.
>>
>> Examples:
>>
>> Mark I - Electronic centrifuges mounted around a fixed disc, outboard. Mark II - Electronic centrifuges mounted outboard around a rotating disc. Mark III - Electronic centrifuges mounted outboard around a rotating disc, period of cycles tuned to harmonize with ley lines, for jet assist. Mark IV - Particle centrifuge tuned to modify time coordinates by faster than light travel. Mark V - No centrifuge. Solid state coils and crystal harmonics transforms ambient field directly for dematerialization and rematerialization at destinations in time and space.
>>
>> Essentially, a large rotating disk has a smaller rotating disc on one side of the main driving axle. The two wheels are geared together so that a weight mounted on the rim of the smaller wheel is always at the outside of the larger wheel during the same length of arc of each revolution, and always next to the main axle during the opposite arc. What happens is that the velocity of the weight is amplified by harmonic coincidence with the large rotor during one half of its period of revolution, and diminished during the other half cycle. This concentrates momentum in the same quarter continually, to rectify the centrifuge. The result is identical to my Hyperspace Drive, but has the beauty of continuously rotating motion. Now, if the D. drive is made with a huge main rotor, - like about thirty feet in diameter - there is enough room to mount a series of smaller wheels around the rim, set in gimbals >> for attitude control, and Mr. D. himself has himself a model T Flying Saucer requiring no license from the AEC.
>>
>> In 1975, Professor E. L., Head of the Department of Electrical Engineering at the Imperial College of Science and Technology in London, England, invented another approach to harnessing the centrifugal force of a gyroscope to power an antigravity engine - well, he almost invented it, but he did not have the sense to hold onto success when he grasped it. Professor L. is world-renowned for his most creative solutions to the problems of magnetic-levitation-propulsion systems, and the fruit of his brain is operating today in Germany and Japan, his railway trains float in the air while traveling at over three hundred miles per hour. If anyone can present the world with a proven anti gravity engine, it must be the professor.
>>
>> L. satisfied himself that the precessional force causing a gyroscope to wobble had no reaction. This is a clear violation of N.'s Third Law of Motion as 'generally conceived'. L. figured that if he could engage the precessional acceleration while the gyroscope wobbled in one direction and release the precession while it wobble in other directions, he would be able to demonstrate to a forum of colleagues and critics at the college a rectified centrifuge that worked as a proper antigravity engine. His insight was sound but he did not work it out right. All he succeeded in demonstrating was a 'separation between action and reaction,' and his engine did nothing but oscillate violently. Unfortunately, neither L. or his critics were looking for a temporal separation between action and reaction, so the loophole he proved in N.'s Third Law was not noticed. Everyone was looking for action without reaction, so no one saw anything at all. Innumerable other inventors have constructed engines essentially identical to L.'s …
>>
>> Another invention described is U.S. Patent disclosure number 3,653,269, granted to R. F., a retired chemical engineer in Louisiana. F. mounted his gyroscopes around the rim of a large rotor disc, like a two cylinder flying saucer. Every time the rotor turns a half cycle, the precessional twist of the gyros in reaction generates a powerful force. During the half cycle when F.'s gyros were twisting in the other direction, his clutch grabbed and transmitted the power to the driving wheels. During the other half cycle, the gyros twisted freely. F. claims his machine traveled four miles per hour until it flew to pieces from centrifugal forces. After examining the patents, I agreed that it looked like it would work, and it certainly would fly to pieces because the bearing mounts were not nearly strong enough to contain the powerful twisting forces his machine generated. F.'s design, however, cannot be included among antigravity engines because it would not operate off the ground. He never claimed it would, and F. a …
>>
>> What L. needed was another rotary component, like the D. drive, geared to his engine's oscillations so that they would always be turned to drive in the same direction. As it happens, an Italian by the name of Todeschini recently secured a patent on this idea, and his working model is said to be attracting the interest of European engineers.
>>
>> When the final rectifying device is added to the essential L. design, all the moving parts generate the vectors of a vortex, and the velocity generated is the axial thrust of the vortex. Therefore I call inventions based on this design the Vortex Drive.
>>
>> By replacing the Hyperspace modules of the Mark I Flying Saucer with Vortex modules, still retaining the essential betatron as the centrifuge, performance is improved for the Mark II. To begin with, drive is generated only when the main rotor is revolving, so the saucer can be parked with the motor running. This eliminates the agonizing doubt we all suffered when the Lunar Landers were about to blast off to rejoin the command capsule: Will the engine start? This would explain why the ring of lights around the rim of a saucer is said to begin to revolve immediately prior to lift off. A precessional drive affords a wider range of control, and the responses are more stable than a direct centrifuge. But the most interesting improvement is the result of the 'structure' of the electromagnetic field generated by the Vortex drive. By amplifying and diminishing certain vectors harmonically, the Mark III flying saucer can ride the electromagnetic current of the Earth's electromagnetic field like the jet stream. And thi …
>>
>> The flying saucer consumes fuel at a rate that cannot be supplied by all the wells in Arabia. Therefore we have to assume that UFO engineers must have developed a practical atomic fusion reactor. But once the Mark III is perfected, another fuel supply becomes attainable, and no other is so practical for flying saucer. The Moray Valve converts the Mark III into a Mark IV Flying Saucer by extending its operational capabilities through 'time' as well as space. The Moray Valve, you see, functions by changing the direction of flow of energy in the Sun's gravitational field. It is the velocity of energy that determines motion, and motion determines the flow of time.
>>
>> Dr. M. R., President of the University for Social Research, published a paper describing the discoveries of Dr. P. A. Biefeld, astronomer and physicist at the California Institute for Advanced Studies, and his assistant, T. B.. In 1923 Biefeld discovered that a heavily charged electrical condensor moved toward its positive pole when suspended in a gravitational field. He assigned B. to study the effect as a research project. A series of experiments showed B. that the most efficient shape for a field propelled condensor was a disc with a central dome. In 1926 T. published his paper describing all the construction features and flight characteristics of a flying saucer, conforming to the testimony of the first flight witnessed over Mount Rainer twenty-one years later and corroborated by thousands of witnesses since. (The Biefeld-Brown Effect explains why a Mark III rides the electromagnetic jet stream.)
>>
>> We may speculate that flying saucers spotted from time to time may not only include visitors from other planets and travelers through time, but also fledglings from an unknown number of cuckoo's nests in secret experimental plants all over the world. The space program at Cape Canaveral may be nothing more than a supercolossal theatre orchestrated by Cecil B. Demille to reassure Americans that they are still 'numero uno' after Russia beat our atomic ace by putting Sputnik into orbit. We need not doubt that the Apollo spaceships got to the Moon, but we may wonder if Neil Armstrong was the first man to land there. The real space program may have been conducted in secret as a spin-off from the Manhattan Project since the end of World War II, and Apollo 13 may have been picked up by a sag wagon to make sure our team scored a home run every time they went to bat. The exploration of space is the most dangerous enterprise ever taken on by a living species. Don't you ever wonder why the Russians are losing men in spac …
>>
>> The following article was published as a two part series in the February and March issues of "The UFO Enigma". This is the newsletter of the UFO Study Group of Greater St. Louis, Inc.
>>
>> http://www.theorderoftime.com/science/sciences/articles/saucer.html
S-305. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL reporting he received the books
From : Larry Maurer
To : "Stealth Skater"
Subject : Re: Australian lasers violate second law of thermodynamics ...
Date : Mon, 22 Jul 2002 19:03:01 -0700
GOT 'EM!! LOOKS GREAT!
Did you send a copy to Barnes & Noble? Just checking. Don't want to send two! I noticed you have "Star Shots Studio" listed for promo books. Sure we couldn't buy the publishing equipment to mass produce books for sale? Of course we need a marketing group. I am receiving orders for books already! we are contacting University of Washington and Oregon State U. Have any schools, universities and/or colleges around your location?
S-306. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL forwarding an e-mail to Yosharini Minami regarding the Aero book
From : Larry Maurer
To : [email protected]
Subject : Fwd: Re: UNITEL Aerospace & Electronics Aero Promotion Book
Date : Tue, 23 Jul 2002 15:05:53 -0700
>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "Larry Maurer"
>>> To:
>>> Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 2:59 PM
>>> Subject: UNITEL Aerospace & Electronics Aero Promotion Book
>>>
>>> Yoshinari:
>>>
>>> Please email me your current mailing address to send you a copy of our book that I mentioned to you about earlier. I think you will be impressed. We have contacted Barnes & Noble, Morris and other publishers to publish our book. We have 45 promo copies of our aero book and we will hopefully sell enough copies to build our prototype from the profits. All looks great! as soon as you give me the current address I will send you a book. It has some of your brilliant material from one of your JBIS publications that I asked you for permission about adding to our book earlier. We want to have the book published in Japanese also.
>>>
>>> We are very proud of the book and it will also give you credit for your valuable and important input on MQT. It is only for promotion purposes only and we are sending the book to you for your review and following input. We think you will enjoy the book very much!
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Larry
>At 05:13 PM 7/23/02 +0900, you wrote:
>> Dear Larry,
>>
>> I am very glad to hear that you published the book. I look forward to receiving the book soon. My summer vacation is from Aug.3 to Aug.12.
>>
>> mailing address:
>>
>> Yoshinari Minami
>> NEC Patent Service, Ltd.
>> 5-11, Shibaura 4-Chome, Minato-Ku, Tokyo 108-0023, JAPAN
> To: [email protected]
> From: Larry Maurer
> Subject: Re: UNITEL Aerospace & Electronics Aero Promotion Book
>
> Yoshinari:
>
> Thank you. I too am very ecstatic and overjoyed with the way the book is put together by Mark McWilliams with the few resources and equipment he had at his disposal. Of course there are a few minor changes that need to be made, but that can easily be taken care of in the final publication by the professional book publisher. The book has several color illustrations and pictures in it so that it is eye-appealing; especially the cover which is very exciting and colorful to catch the eye of a book browser.
>
> We are willing to offer you copies of the book at a reduced rate so that perhaps you could assist us in marketing the book in Japan. Perhaps it might be easier if you could oversee the translation of the book into Japanese so that the scientific wording is correct in the translation process. We think that many people, scientific institutions, schools, colleges and universities in Japan and America will want to order our books for students and researchers. This is an excellent way for us to acquire money to build and test our prototypes, Yoshinari. At any rate, you can make some extra money for yourself by marketing the book in Japan. Perhaps you could also promote our book on Japanese TV shows if you like. So far, virtually everyone I have shown the book to has really expressed their opinion that they like the book and everyone wants a book to have for themselves. The main thing I want to express is that all the profits made from selling our books are to go directly into constructing and testing prototypes. Because of the situation of the economy, this is the only way we have to be able to build our prototypes.
>
> I will be sending you a book tomorrow via airmail. You should receive it about the time you return from your vacation. I hope you have an enjoyable vacation, Yoshinari. Please let me know by e-mail when you receive the book.
>
> Regards,
> Larry
S-307. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding afterthoughts on the promotional Aero edition
From : Larry Maurer
To : [email protected]
Subject : Re: hints and tidbits
Date : Tue, 23 Jul 2002 15:30:31 -0700
At 06:57 AM 7/23/02 -0400, you wrote:
>
> I forgot ... I did send out one other copy to Andrew Potter in Cincinnati.
>
> Take this with a grain of salt because I'm no salesman or marketing expert. I'm inclined to think you'd sell more to the average person on-the-street through a mall bookstore than at a college campus where the kids are inundated with technical books anyway and look to party -- not ready more. But here you'd have to rely on the advice of those in-the-know.
>
> My limited role -- similar to what I did in the photo/recording studio -- was to take an amateur with great talent to the next (semi-pro) level. In your case it was taking your great manuscript and transforming it into a pseudo-book. It would be better received by your peers as well as people in the publishing industry (which isn't fair as they should judge by content and not appearances). I'm hoping Paul is impressed enough to redouble his efforts to promote your concepts with those down his way. I don't know if those researchers working in private think tanks could use this to convince their supervisors to looking at your stuff more seriously. In the end it wouldn't surprise me if you didn't get stuck with having to get an "agent" to promote this to publishers and distributors.
>
> Feel free to change anything in the book. Afterall, it's your book. I just put stuff in -- "publisher", "copyright statements", etc. -- to make it look like a real book. I didn't know the exact titles of your other books and films so I just "winged it" (your expression). I sent you the complete set of MS-Word files on CD that were used to make the different sections. They were split up because I noticed that with "background saving" turned 'ON', MS-Word takes forever to allow changes to a certain large .doc file. Your's are large because of all the images. (If it were one large document, you'd need a supercomputer to edit it.)
>
> Usually the page numbers are set automatically within each file starting with whatever number I gave it. In certain sections I used "section breaks" rather than "page breaks" to let me hardcode page numbers. (For example, this was done in the beginning to let me use page number "iii", "iv", "v", etc.) Note that some of the Figures use text boxes (sometimes invisible) to conceal stray lines, hard-to-read captions, etc. I tried to print these off and scan them back in so I could eliminate any embedded text boxes. But frequently the details on the original figures were so minute and fine that re-scanning them was in effect making a "copy of a copy" and I suffered a generation loss in quality. So I left the things in there. I doubt they would convert properly if someone blindly transformed the MS-Word file into Adobe .pdf format. You would have to print-off/scan-in at that point.
>
> Notice the special 90-lb paper that I used. Actually that ream is a few years old. They make the same weight paper with a shinier glossier surface now, maybe for the new laser photocopiers. What I noticed is that it increases smudges and smears if the copying isn't perfect. On the top or bottom of the package is a label with a little red arrow. You should always put the paper the supply tray with that side pointed up. When you print "duplex" -- i.e., front and back -- I found that regardless of what the copier promises about automatic duplexing, it's more apt to jam. The heat causes this paper to curl longitudinally. I have found it better to print one side at-a-time, then take those copies and fold them counter to the furl, then turn them upside down in the supply tray to use for printing on the backside. Of course this is done at the expense of a lot more manual effort and consumes a great deal of time. And the copiers still jam and occasionally … …
>
> For some reason these copiers at times will grab two sheets but only print on one. So instead of having 25 copies of one page, you really only have 24. I have to collate all the pages by hand, all 160 pages/book x 25 books! That takes an entire evening, but it will catch pages that weren't printed. And my spiral comb binder can only punch 5 pages max. at-a-time. So I have to hand separate small bunches of pages from any given stack to punch and place in a pile for later comb inserting. I'm not going to discuss lamination of front and back covers here.
>
> It will take the greater part of a weekend to make 25 copies. A professional establishment can probably make 1,000 copies in 3 hours. Plus their ink doesn't smear (as compared to a laser toner cartidge). The downside is the initial cost as they have to make master plates for each page. The actual paper cost is negligible. I mention this as I don't want to get into the mass publishing business (unless someone buys me some of this professional equipment). That's why I was advocating using these limited copies to stir interest and hopefully attract backers to promote them on a grandeur scale (as well as to cause financiers like "Felix" to take a second look at your patents and proposals). Used in this role, these limited copies will be a "force multiplier" (like an AWACS is in air combat, allowing a small fighter force to do the job of a much larger one).
>
> You are the final judge of course, but I think you might want to add some more stuff to some of the skimpier chapters. But it's your call ... they could be okay as it now stands. I sent what I feel is the corrected equations for pages 95 and 96 yesterday along with an updated CD containing the MS-Word code. Before you print these off en masse, you probably want to get someone like Yoshi or Hal to go over the equations. Plus that one paragraph at the end of page 96 referencing "T2-star" just hangs there. Where is the equation for T2-star? Why even mention it? It serves no purpose. Little things like that which others might pick up on.
>
> Maybe you can add things to this book which will cross-reference all of the books. For instance, if the reader wants to learn more about the history of the CdTe crystallites and different attempts to grow them, that is contained in the HOLO-1 book.
>
> Hopefully I can do the same pseudo-publication thing with "Flying Colors". The readers shouldn't need to be as well-versed in quantum physics to appreciate that story. Between the two of them -- one high-tech and the other a real-life X-files -- I think you're off to a great start to interim surviving on your feet without a day job and while waiting for funding.
>
> -- :Later,
> -- Mark
Mark:
Thanks for your hard work and sending a book to Andy. Now I am wondering what price is fair to sell the book at and about what price we should figure in for the publisher for each book. At first I thought $20 per book to publish and sell them for $59.95. Now I am wondering if that figure is too high? Perhaps $49.95? $39.95? Is the $20 per book to publish to high? Too low? What do you think?
I was told by David Carter yesterday when I gave him his book as he is an investor into UNITEL and works for Intel here in Portland area at the management level and wants a copy of HOLO-1 to show upper management at R&D to hopefully get their attention to invest. I told him that we are putting together an equally good copy of HOLO-1 as our aerospace book.
Dave went on to say that we should get Michael to do a book review on Art Bell and that we should instantly sell as many as 60,000 books overnight. Tim Ventura has been on the Art Bell radio show twice and he says the last time he got 30,000 hits within one hour after he was on the Art Bell show. Now, even Tim wants to promote UNITEL with his lifter (which works from the Biefield-Brown-Townsend effect that Mike Miller simply describes the effect of how it is related to our design in that electrons "chase" holes or positrons) which he has an article in Wired magazine and has several TV and radio shows he is invited to. We could be there with him to promote our book. We will do the same as in all adds; "allow 6 to 8 weeks for delivery". That would give us plenty of time to get the books published, etc. We will have an add-up on our web site soon to sell the books. We need to get a Visa and/or American Express card accounts so that we can take on orders for our books. Any input on that?
I am going to get together with Mike soon to finalize "Flying Colors". Mike just had an interview and an article done on him and UNITEL on Mike's local neighborhood newsletter "Blachly-Lane Journal". I will send you a copy when I get some copies for myself. In it he talks about our sightings. The time is ripe for our book! I smell "No.1 Best Seller" if done right! Lets take a crack at it aye? We can mix in a lot from our current aero prop book and the forthcoming HOLO-1 book as well. We 3 should have done this years ago!!!
Best,
Larry
S-308. from Larry Maurer of UNITEL regarding the HOLO-1 Quantum Computer book
From : Larry Maurer
To : "Stealth Skater"
Subject : Re: miscellaneous thoughts
Date : Fri, 26 Jul 2002 15:47:48 -0700
Hi Mark:
I have been sending the books off to key people and book publishers to get orders up and running. The main thing is our book is on its way to Tokyo as we write. I hope we make it big in Japan as Scientific American magazine won't even know what hit them! That way, we will have much money to create our own illustrations, build prototypes, etc.
Have a request from Dave Carter, a UNITEL investor that works for Intel who wants a copy of HOLO-1 to show management at Intel R&D Corp. Div. I am thinking of a HOLO-1 book that can have much illustrations and other related materials contained within the book so that it will be large enough to be considered worthy enough for people to buy the book HOLO-1. I mean I have tons of quantum, NMR, photon and all other related versions such as "Spin" storage & retrieval of information.
Should we give it a go Cholo?! :-) I know you are probably tired and need a break but at least we have food for thought here, Mark! I have also been thinking of finishing up Flying Colors and the medical book too! All of these of course can also be translated into Japanese and published in Japan. The more irons we have in the fire, the more of a chance we have to make money so that we can build our prototypes; the ultimate "Showstopper"!!
All of these fickle investors can continue to sit on their butts and watch us dump our profits into building our prototypes; and upon successful working prototypes, they can all just "read 'em and weep"!!. Lord O'Lightning, Mark! I can't wait for that glorious day!! Can you imagine? Think of how we shall accelerate transportation, medicine, computers, etc. into the "Starfleet" mode of operandi!! Of course you know how many sudden friends and fellow workers will pop up and say "I always believed in you that you would make it someday". SCREW THAT!! You will have a place "on the bus" (sort of speaking) because of your hard and dedication. It's people like you, Andy Moore, and others that have helped us get to where we are today. Everybody else can take a flying leap!
See inserts below for my response:
> Larry :
>
> (1) Pertaining to the "notes_x" attachments I sent you yesterday, the "notes_2" applies to the next batch of books you'll receive Monday or Tuesday. I saw some Figures which needed "cleaned-up" in the first batch and did so in the second batch. Those touch-ups weren't made to the batch you just received. (But the "notes_1" text-boxes were made to both the first and second batches.)
>
> (2) At some pint in time you have to get the book copyrighted. Legally, whenever you create something it is automatically copyrighted. However, to pursue copyright infringement damages in a court of law, it is nearly impossible without a certificate-of-copyright registration with the U.S. Copyright Office. The forms are in .pdf format and downloadable. You have to send in $30 with the forms and a copy of the book. They don't want a CD or tape or other electronic media. But the forms are so damn complicated! And it takes 5 to 9 months before you're hear from them, and even then that answer might be they need more information. It's almost less of a headache to find an attorney who has done copyright registrations. He'll charge you through-the-nose but knows the ropes. Of course, a publisher has their own in-house attorneys that can do this.
>
> (3) One drawback to making a retail version of a MQT simulation computer game is that you have to do a lot of research and programming up-front before selling the disc. What if new technologies or discoveries are made 3 months after you sell the first edition?
No comprendo, Senor!! We are just going to go for it with Andy at the helm of the game design, implementation, marketing, etc. (if you know what I mean Captain!!).
> If you had this available as an on-line simulation, then changes could be made daily if needed. Users would log onto to your server with a credit-card and be billed for each Meg of bandwidth. That might be the way to go, although I'm not an expert in on-line computer gaming.
>
True, but I am leaving that up to Mr. A to deal with as it is his "little pork chop" and he can deal with it as I am dealing with book sales and marketing.
>
>
> Also you could add a second option. Instead of just MQTing around the universe, how about simulating RIFE and orgone effects on the human physiology. Sort of like a "Sim City" game except this is on the effects of biomagnetics on the human body. There are several Yahoo! groups devoted to this. You could attract devotees from the medical community where the MQT stuff would attract from the aerospace and physics crowd. And being on-line, you could update daily. Perhaps have a section where you "plug" user-submitted models into the overall simulation. I could see where a mix of game-players and pseudo-researchers would be using the on-line version.
Sounds good. However, I will leave that up to Mr. A: i.e,."He grew it, He'll chew it!" Better yet; "He baked it; He can sell it!"
> (4) I'm sure you've given thought to sending investing companies a copy, such as Rolls-Royce, Honda, NEC, etc. I don't know if the Nigerians are an option or not. I'd hate for you to send out the few copies you have to those who find it interesting but whose hands are tied and nothing will ever come of it in the way of grants.
No way, Jose!! Not in a million-zillion years!!! Those pesky Nigerians are probably more trustworthy than RR, Boeing, IBM, Honda, etc. at this point in the game. Somebodies running scared at the SEC State of Oregon, Boeing, IBM, Intel and so forth! One successful prototype and its all over baby blue!!! Vini-Vidi-Vicci, Mark!! Their days are numbered my friend! Just like the 8-track, slide-rule, black & white TV, we are coming for them! Whom does the bell toll for"? It tolls for thee (powers that be- oil/rocket boys) McGee!!
Best,
Larry
S-309. from Lori Cordini regarding Carol Rutz' unfortunate experiences with "Black Ops" programs
Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2002 12:34:49 -0700 (PDT)
From: "Lori Cordini" | This is Spam | Add to Address Book
Subject: Re: [SO] Operation Paperclip update & expose
To: "stealthskaters"
A very good read: "A Nation Betrayed". A true story by someone who for a lifetime was used and abused by the "black ops programs" of the 1950s. Written by Carol Rutz. An honest and strong woman who is recovering from the torture and the pain. My story is peanuts compared to what this lady went through. Her courage is admirable!
-lori
S-310. from Andrew Potter regarding a virus that seemed to target UNITEL
From : Andrew Potter
To : "Stealth Skater"
Subject : The Full Story
Date : Mon, 07 Oct 2002 02:16:40 -0400
--- stealthskaters wrote:
> Janes Defence reporter Nick Cook's expose on 'Operation Paperclip' and the capture of Nazi "Wonder Weapon" scientists to work for the U.S. in exchange for protection from War Crimes trials. It shows how some of the SS politics "tagged along" with the new science and found its way into today's Black Budget and anti-gravity flight research. => http://www.theatlantic.com/unbound/interviews/int2002-09-05.htm
>
> Also an excellent history of and current progress in understanding the Casimir force and its theoretical promises of allowing the ZPE/QVF field to be tapped into for over-unity energy => http://physicsweb.org/article/world/15/9/6 .
>
> For future reference, I added both of these links to my site at http://www.stealthskater.com/Science.htm . (I also have them in MS-Word format and can make those available as downloadable .doc files if anyone needs that.)
Mark,
Thankyou for giving me Larry's number. This isn't over yet but I think it will be soon. Here was the message I first received:
> Return-Path: <"B.G."@email.lviv.ua>
> Received: from cliff.msbb.uc.edu (cliff.edw2.uc.edu [10.23.1.159])
> by email.msbb.uc.edu (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id XAA21016
> for ; Thu, 3 Oct 2002 23:04:21 -0400 (EDT)
> Received: from innovations.dsinw.com (IDENT:[email protected] [207.149.40.194])
> by cliff.msbb.uc.edu (8.9.2/8.9.2) with SMTP id UAA16213
> for ; Thu, 3 Oct 2002 20:10:12 -0400 (EDT)
> Received: from mauser (14-105.021.popsite.net [66.217.132.105])
> by innovations.dsinw.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id g942XIZ19325;
> Thu, 3 Oct 2002 19:33:18 -0700
> Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2002 19:33:18 -0700
> Message-Id: <[email protected]>
> From: "B.G."@email.lviv.ua>
> Subject: AW: Splitting Electrons
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------9D3NM9IJ9V4ZP4"
> X-UIDL: 1c6e8ba1fbd91667ae23c4b6e355cb04
>
> Dear Larry,
>
> I have very good news. Yesterday, the head of our department (Dr. R.) forwarded me a call for proposals from the Strategic Research Center. He asked me to make proposals. I will do.
>
> The following infos are confidential so please do not forward to anyone this mail. We will have a meeting with Sir Roger Penrose discussing the results of the coming AIAA/NASA BPP meeting. You may remember that my Fibonacci Flying Wing has the exact geometry of the non-periodic Penrose Tiling Pattern. It is linked to quasi-crystals.
>
> Now imagine the wing enclosed in a plasma. Then produce some plasma crystals in a non-neutral plasma (e.g. with your device). One can imagine a Macroscopic state of coherence where all particles act as being one. This would lead to a Macroscopic cold neutrino scattering accompanied with some dramatic effects. There is a paper by Prof. Aharonov and Prof. Casher on anomalous neutrino scattering from crystals. You (UNITEL) and me have very similar ideas.
>
> Now we have funds to make things real. So I kindly ask you to send a proposal. You should state one copy to me when sending the proposal to Dr. H. R. This is important.
>
> Best regards,
> "B.G."
I first searched for information on the virus, and found this page:
"
http://securityresponse.symantec.com/avcenter/venc/data/[email protected]
This is the most important paragraph in that page:
"It then uses its own SMTP engine to send itself to all email addresses that it finds. The worm also can construct addresses for the "From:" field using information that it harvests from the infected computer. For example, the worm may find the addresses [email protected], [email protected], and [email protected]. The worm could create an email message addressed to [email protected] and spoof the "From:" address, so that it appears to come from [email protected]. The spoofed address can also be a valid email address that the worm finds on the system."
But I wouldn't know this until later. Then my friend Will Lambeth and I searched for information on "B.G.". This is some of the info we found:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/forcefieldpropulsionphysics/messages/394
"
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/forcefieldpropulsionphysics/messages/1130
HYPERLINK "http://jnaudin.free.fr/html/lfreplog2.htm"
http://jnaudin.free.fr/html/lfreplog2.htm
"B.G." graduated from the University of Berlin with a degree in Physics.
Next I e-mailed Larry. Here was his response:
>
> Andrew; FYI
>
> If "B.G." is playing some kind of vindictive shithead games (he is Turkish Islamic in Germany) because I kind of went over his head by contacting Dr. E. W., Director, research, RR, London, UK, I am going to have his head on a platter! Why did he send out this bad virus to all these people? Why would he jeopardize his position at RR in doing so by involving Dr. R. I mean if I find out from Dr. Williams that Dr. R. is one of "B.G."'s cronies or the man retired or is dead.... "B.G."'s ass is mine!!! I will make certain he is fired or worse.
>
> I sincerely hope that the virus is just a circumstance but why did "B.G." send the email to you and several others connected with UNITEL and ask not to forward it (maybe he knew that the email was infected and felt bad about forwarding it).... I had a hard time sleeping last night thinking about this virus thing because before I heard from you I was thinking that Paul Kirsch and Doug Starfield are of the Jewish persuasion. Doesn't make sense unless he meant ill will to UNITEL and its people. I am emailing Dr. W. to get his opinion. I shall be in touch with you to let you know what I can find out as I am going to get to the bottom of this. Let me know your thoughts, Andrew. I am baffled until I hear more from "B.G." and others.
>
> Regards,
> Larry
>>
>> To: "B.G."@email.lviv.ua
>> From: Larry Maurer
>> Subject: UNITEL, Inc.
>>
>> "B.G.":
>>
>> What is going on? Why did you send this very bad virus to all of these people concerning UNITEL? Please explain as this is a very serious situation. Is Dr. R. aware of this email message you sent out? I am not sure of which way you want us to contact Dr. R. with our proposal; his email or regular mail address? Please let me know which way to send it to him. I would appreciate it. Does your Dept. have our original project proposal that was shelved on file? Could we reactivate that since it was voted on and passed by RR's technical team (when we received 7 out of 8 rating)?
>>
>> Regards,
>> Larry Maurer
Shortly afterward the UNITEL website went down.
Then I started analyzing "B.G."'s supposed e-mail address. I visited the http://email.lviv.ua e-mail domain. It's a Ukranian domain. But the login only has 10 characters and "B.G."'s address has 15. So the account cannot exist. After this I tried to send a reply to the account ("B.G.") and got a "User Unknown" message.
After that I started looking at the header of the message. The first strange thing I noticed was the Message-Id. (The originating machine) You can see this is http://innovations.dsinw.com. That's "Direct Source Internet North West" -- a company based out of Portland.
Next, I compared the e-mail header above to other e-mails sent to me from Larry. Take this one for instance:
> Return-Path:
> Received: from cliff.msbb.uc.edu (cliff.edw2.uc.edu [10.23.1.159])
> by email.msbb.uc.edu (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id MAA29566
> for ; Tue, 17 Sep 2002 12:02:22 -0400 (EDT)
> Received: from innovations.dsinw.com (IDENT:[email protected] [207.149.40.194])
> by cliff.msbb.uc.edu (8.9.2/8.9.2) with SMTP id JAA29330
> for ; Tue, 17 Sep 2002 09:09:20 -0400 (EDT)
> Received: from mauser.unitelnw.com (09-042.021.popsite.net [66.217.131.42])
> by innovations.dsinw.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g8HFnPU14621
> for ; Tue, 17 Sep 2002 08:49:25 -0700
> Message-Id: <[email protected]>
> X-Sender: [email protected]@mail.unitelnw.com
> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1
> Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2002 08:58:56 -0700
> To: [email protected]
> From: Larry Maurer
> Subject: Fwd: RGB laser & charge related paper
> Mime-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
> X-IMAPbase: 1032293201 1
> X-UIDL: 0a49a561fc96a9a15c97cc3fbb35bbc4
> Status: RO
> X-Status:
> X-Keywords:
> X-UID: 1
The machine mauser is the same, and the IP address is also identical. This means it came from the same machine/Internet connection.
Next I did a full trace on the e-mail, requesting logs from StarNet -- the ISP used to send the message. (The logs haven't been sent yet.)
Finally, after re-reading the virus description Saturday, I knew this must have been an accident done by the virus itself. S I asked you for his number and called him Sunday.
Larry said that he has anti-virus and firewall installed and that he doesn't think his machine could have done it. But I think the anti-virus must have been out-of-date or not in use because of what happened.
Anyhow, so that's what I've been doing the last few days -
-Andrew
At 12:36 AM 10/6/2002 -0400, you wrote:
>>From: Andrew Potter
>>To: [email protected]
>>Subject: Virus Pt. 2
>>Date: Sun, 06 Oct 2002 00:06:12 -0400
>>
>>I need Larry's number. This virus came from his machine. It was smart enough to fool us. And it sent out confidential information and infected just about every UNITEL person. Would you happen to have his number? Thx-
> telephone: (503) 232-2740
S-311. from Andrew Potter forwarding an e-mail that "the rest of the world is catching up to UNITEL"
From : Andrew Potter
To : [email protected]
Subject : Fwd: Great Website on Quantum Chromodynamics
Date : Fri, 25 Oct 2002 05:36:35 -0400
> Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 05:34:26 -0400
> To: Larry Maurer
> From: Andrew Potter
> Subject: Great Website on Quantum Chromodynamics
>
> Larry,
> found this series of realplayer lectures on quantum chromodynamics: http://wlap.physics.lsa.umich.edu/cern/lectures/academ/2000/webber/ . They have good quality video/audio, like taking a college course for free.
> -Andrew
> At 08:58 AM 9/17/2002 -0700, you wrote:
>>
>> Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2002 08:52:04 -0700
>> To: Mike Miller
>> From: Larry Maurer
>> Subject: Fwd: RGB laser & charge related paper
>>
>> Please be advised that the rest of the world has caught up to us. Let's hope they don't pass us... Hopefully, we will have the necessary funding soon to construct our prototype and literally produce the Yang-Mills potent EM wells described herein (with QCD interactions).
>>
>>> Cohen M. "Clifford Residues and Charge Quantization."
http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/gr-qc/0207107
>>> X-Originating-IP: [65.168.107.205]
>>> From: "Edward Halerewicz, Jr."
>>> To: "Larry Maurer"
>>> Subject: RGB laser & charge related paper
>>> Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2002 15:03:56 -0500
>>> X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
>>> X-OriginalArrivalTime: 16 Sep 2002 20:06:21.0254 (UTC) FILETIME=[868EDE60:01C25DBC]
>>> X-RCPT-TO:
>>>
>>> Larry,
>>>
>>> I recently came upon a quantization paper that I thought you might find very interesting:
>>>
>>> Cohen M. "Clifford Residues and Charge Quantization."
http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/gr-qc/0207107
>>>
>>> After briefly scanning the link that you provided of your patent, the references therein help me to get a better grasp of how the laser works. The 1/3 charge appears to be related to the work of Yang and Mills, I suspect now the 1/3 charge is "color" charge of quantum chromodynamics, and hence is carried by the Yang-Mills field. As I read the above paper I came across several terms you use for your design, such as fiber bundles for example. Its a technical paper however *if* you are all ready familiar with these concepts it shouldn't be to difficult to grasp.
>>>
>>> Relevant Points:
>>>
>>> *The Yang-Mills field cycles by a period similar to the one for the coherent white light.
>>> *The propagation of the field rotates (as your laser).
>>> *Increasing the energy of the field creates a contraction in spacetime (similar to rotating naked singularity concept)
>>> *He finds a relation between this period and electrical charge quantization, this leads to the Fine Structure Constant and may help how you simulate an electron. Although the massive over charge of the hull may still be a problem.
>>> *And lastly increasing the amount of energy in the vacuum would increase the magnetic strength of the field.
>>>
>>> I originally looked at the paper because I thought it may be quantum gravity related. However as I read it you can see I found several concepts which I thought you may find interesting.
>>>
>>> -Edward Halerewicz, Jr.
>>> Warp Drive Today
>>> http://da_theoretical1.tripod.com
>>> Web Master: ATPG
>>> http://galileo.spaceports.com/~atpg2
S-312. from Andrew Potter regarding complex quantum computer calculations
From : Andrew Potter
To : [email protected]
Subject : Proof of concept with $0.00
Date : Sun, 27 Oct 2002 23:42:33 -0500
Mark,
It looks like that link you sent me on "Virtual Proteins" may be a hit. I'd looked at this stuff before, even used SETI@Home, etc., but I've never thought of applying it to UNITEL. It seems as though one can create quantum models with computers that accurately reflect nature no matter what your pre-conceptions may be. Thus we may be able to create a model of HOLO-1 or the spaceship that proves the design with enough accuracy to woo investors. I'm not going to do much or any programming with it though. I've suggested making it open source. Or perhaps they'll make enough money with their book to commercially fund the development.
"Flying Colors" interests me as well. I've read through the first bit of it (the first chapter, the foreward, etc.) and it didn't seem like the best writing. But it was effective anyways. Nano-engineering is interesting. I suppose that may work if you could engineer it atom-by-atom. But - it'd probably be faster just to make sure you used a process whereby the atoms were aligned.
It seems like if we could MQT to a distant world we should be able to withstand their environment. Don't know though - maybe that's why the Greys haven't taken us over yet eh? ;) Hell, we can withstand outerspace itself without a spacesuit for a couple minutes. Seems like landing (on an Earth-Like world) shouldn't be much different from exploring a new continent.
-Andrew
> Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2002 19:25:42 -0500
> To: [email protected],[email protected]
> From: Andrew Potter
> Subject: Re: UNITEL
>
> Larry,
>
> Here's an article I found on Google on quantum simulations: http://www.tcm.phy.cam.ac.uk/~pdh1001/thesis/node9.html
>
> "Quantum-mechanical calculations stand out because they are by design ab initio i.e. from first-principles, calculations. They do not depend upon any external parameters except the atomic numbers of the constituent atoms to be modeled and cannot therefore be biased by preconceptions about the final result. Such calculations are reliable and can be used with confidence to predict the behaviour of nature."
>
> "The computational demands of exact calculations grow exponentially with the size of the system being studied..."
>
> You may want to get in contact with some of these people (who worked on Folding@Home): http://folding.stanford.edu/about.html
>
>or perhaps someone from SETI@Home: http://setiathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/
>
> also if you decide to make it an open-source software, this may be a good site: http://sourceforge.net/
>
> Personally I don't have any experience with this kind of thing, but good luck-
>
> -Andrew
>
>At 06:18 PM 10/27/2002 -0500, you wrote:
>
>> Good idea. How do we go about it?
>>
>> At 09:58 PM 10/21/02 -0400, you wrote:
>>>
>>> Perhaps you could use distributed computing to save money with your prototype experiment. Or you could create one mean simulation of the spaceship or HOLO-1.
S-313. from Andrew Potter regarding proposed change in UNITEL's marketing strategies
From : Andrew Potter
To : [email protected]
Subject : Fwd: Strategies
Date : Mon, 28 Oct 2002 20:58:23 -0500
> Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 20:57:52 -0500
> To: [email protected]
> From: Andrew Potter
> Subject: Strategies
>
> Larry,
> Mark and I both think UNITEL may benefit from a radical new strategy. We think that creating a computer simulation of either HOLO-1, the spaceship or processes involved could sway investors and those "sitting on the fence". This strategy (in theory) doesn't have to cost anything (if done with volunteers and distributed computing technology), and while you're doing this you can begin constructing the prototype. We think that this way UNITEL will transition from a design company to an experimental company, and eventually to a company with products for the consumer. According to Mithral Cosm:
>
> "The kit should allow a first-year programmer to take an application and make it into a client-server application in a weekend."
>
> We can use RadVC to do the front-end of the application. It emulates VB in Visual C++. Once we have the design, we can put in the math for the quantum mechanical, etc, simulations (the hard part). Then finally we'd put in the networking code, and test it. I could help some.
>
> Mark sent this:
>> X-Originating-IP: [129.71.200.88]
>> From: "Stealth Skater"
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: soliciting prospective publishers
>> Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 11:54:24 -0500
>> X-OriginalArrivalTime: 28 Oct 2002 16:54:25.0207 (UTC) FILETIME=[ABCF0C70:01C27EA2]
>> X-IMAPbase: 1035842351 1
>>X-Status:
>> X-Keywords:
>>
>> This guy wants to publish a book but is in the same situation that Larry is in. He chose to solicit prospective publishers at http://www.stargate-chronicles.com/book.html . Don't know if this approach would work at UNITEL's site.
S-314. from Jack Sarfatti regarding physical Hyperspace vs. the quantum-mental Multiverse
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 08:37:30 -0800
From: "Jack Sarfatti" | This is Spam | Add to Address Book
Subject: RE: [UFO_HOTLINE_BULLETI] just what is this new "magic" science ?
To: "stealthskaters" , [email protected]
From my new book (sequel to "A Beautiful Mind" :-)) see http://www.1stbooks.com search author "Jack Sarfatti"
Herbert Gold “It’s Jack Sarfatti against the World and he’s indomitable. One of his soaring theories is that things which have not happened yet can cause events in the present … Already in his possession are the theorems, formula, algebra and poetry for it …. And citations from Faust.” Bohemia, Where Art, Angt, Love and Strong Coffee Meet, p. 15 (Simon & Schuster, 1993)
Frederick “You are talking about the nonsensical ravings of a lunatic mind.” (Mell Brooks, "Young Frankenstein")
"A Lunatic Mind? Diary of a Mad Physicist" Episode 3 in Space-Time and Beyond - The Series
Bell’s locality inequality is that micro-quantum reality must either be nonlocal or non-objective or both in order to preserve statistical signal locality consistent with the retarded causality postulate of no effects after causes and no faster than light influences. Bohm’s hidden variable theory is objective nonlocal. Many worlds “multiverse” theory can be made local but non-objective in the sense of not being counter-factual definite. That is, anything that can happen does happen in a parallel quantum wave universe.
This is Murray Gell-Mann’s position in “The Quark and the Jaguar”. You can think of the many quantum wave worlds of the qubit multiverse as valleys separated by mountains on a thought-like mindscape or landscape. The many quantum wave “qubit” worlds of David Deutsch’s “multiverse” should not be confounded with the parallel brane worlds of hyperspace described by Stephen Hawking in “The Universe in a Nutshell”. The rock-like geometrodynamic brane worlds of hyperspace get their marching orders from the qubit mental worlds of the multiverse. The multiverse “pilot wave” and the hyperspace brane worlds (or super hidden variable) together form the post-Bohmian “Super Cosmos”
Most of the big shot mainstream theoretical physics pundits are confused here by Niels Bohr’s Copenhagen Fairy Tale of The Smoky Dragon and, therefore, do not make the illuminating distinction because they are unfamiliar with Bohm’s deep ideas. A good example of this is in the Tuesday, October 29, 2002 Science New York Times “A New View Of Our Universe: A Self-Reproducing Cosmos” by Dennis Overby. The pictures in that article are for the material geometrodynamic brane inflated bubbles not the quantum computing giant pilot wave “wave function of the universe” that David Deutsch is really talking about in his book “The Fabric of Reality.”
Our visible universe is only a relatively tiny patch ~ 30 billion light years across on a brane bubble trillions of light years across. However, because of the locally variable zero point cosmological field in my new theory, we can expect Star Gate Time Travel Machines that connect different parts of our bubble that are outside each other’s speed of light horizons. These Star Gates can even connect different bubbles in this Super Cosmos (cosmic mind-wave included) allowing trade between different advanced civilizations anywhere-when. This is the best of all possible scenarios that I call the “Pangloss Alternative” (Voltaire’s “Candide”). Direct back-action of the rock-like brane worlds on their mental Multiverse pilot wave landscape awakens consciousness in the Multiverse and this is the “Mind of God” in Hawking’s sense at the end of “A Brief History of Time”.
S-315. from "Adam" regarding possible psychoactive materials in UFOs
From: [email protected]
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 23:46:51 EST
Subject: Re: [SO] just what is this "magic" Science ?!
I like your work there. Very interesting. I like the idea of these crafts (whatever we may call them) being "psycho-active" as you put it. That's always been one of my personal favorite explanations, in a way. Perhaps you'd like to discuss some of your ideas.
What do you think about the possibility that crafts are just that -- psychic materializations from a higher plane of existence? Maybe not even a higher plane -- just a different one or even this one. This might sound loony to you, but I've done research on various topics and what struck me most was research into astral projection. Now this IS leading somewhere, so bear with me . . .
According to most astral projectors, they claim that when "traveling" into the astral realm, that one appears as a point of light to the permanent "residents" of the astral realm. There are various levels of the astral realm, some being completely random and subject to our manipulation while others are more permanent in nature and more closely related to our physical world.
I guess it can be thought of this way, my idea. If part of our consciousness or sub-conscious travels into this astral realm (which is theoretically a different dimension or level of existence), it appears as a point of light or whatever we might decide it to appear as. Not only that but in that dream realm, it's exactly that. A dream world. For us, if an astral traveler is skilled, they can weave intricate environments and do other such things that are otherwise impossible in our physical realm. What if our physical world is kind of like an astral realm for other beings from other realms of existence?
What I mean is that there are tons of sightings of strange lights and shapes moving around with impossible maneuvers and mind-boggling speed (in terms of our physical realm), But if these are just visitors from another realm, who says they are subject to our physical laws (just like an astral traveler is not subject to physical laws in the astral realm)? These beings might be able to do things in our reality that seem impossible to us. But that is only because we cannot do such things ourselves.
Imagine what a resident in the astral realm (assuming that there are beings that occupy that realm) thinks seeing a point of light flying around in their world, speaking to them, doing different tasks, or materializing into different forms. They would be baffled I assume. It's just sort of my analogy for what might be the case with some of these mysterious lights and craft. It seems in many cases that UFOs, aliens, etc. all exhibit out of the ordinary capabilities. So who's to say that our physical laws apply to them?
And maybe the Government knows this and that's why they don't even bother trying to explain it scientifically or mechanically. Because perhaps it DOES exceed our physical laws and comprehension. Perhaps the only way to investigate it thoroughly is to travel to these different levels of existence. Maybe we just aren't on a plane of existence that would allow us to understand what-the-hell is going on!
I'd be interested in hearing some more of your ideas. Nothing is better than sharing ideas. I don't need facts; conjecture is good enough for me -- haha. It's rather fun to take various approaches to things. For me, wondering is more fun that knowing.
-Adam
S-316. from Bruce Maccabee regarding UFO science and origins
Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2002 09:42:08 -0500
From: "bruce maccabee" | This is Spam | Add to Address Book
Subject: [SO] just what is this "magic" science ?!
To: "stealthskaters"
>
> The Bentwaters and Puerto Rico reports of UFOs "exploding" or "combining" into entirely different objects continue to haunt me. More than mere "morphing", as multiple objects were created from just one. I used to think they tunneled into some "extra" dimension and others came out to take their place. But I'm not so sure anymore if they are somehow "organic" or consciously-manipulated "thought-into-matter". Just because our science doesn't understand how such a thing could be possible doesn't mean some advanced substance could not be "psycho-active" (for lack of a better term). The only "proof" I offer to this postulation is the same statement repea