s4quality tools
DESCRIPTION
quality managementTRANSCRIPT
-
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 5 1
Quality tools for lean Quality tools for lean systemsystem
Dr. R K SinghDr. R K Singh
-
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 5 2
ExampleExample--Imagine that pump manufacturing Co has started to implement
TPM. After the passage of a week, the maintenance engineerdecides to compute overall equipment effectiveness (OEE) ofa lathe in which shafts are machined. In this regard, themaintenance engineer gathers the following data.
LoadingLoading time/shift=time/shift=480480 mtsmts,,SetSet upup time/shift=time/shift=7575 mtsmtsDownDown time/shift=time/shift=4545 mtsmts,,NumberNumber ofof shaftsshafts machined/shift=machined/shift=2020,,AverageAverage cyclecycle timetime ofof machiningmachining shaft=shaft= 1212 mtsmtsOperatingOperating time/shift=time/shift=480480 mtsmtsNumberNumber ofof shaftsshafts rejected/shift=rejected/shift=55DetermineDetermine thethe OEEOEE ofof thethe lathelathe inin whichwhich thethe shaftsshafts areare
machinedmachined.. AlsoAlso commentcomment byby referringreferring thethe OEEOEE valuevalue ofofmachinemachine..
-
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 5 3
SolutionSolutionAvailabilityAvailability= (Loading time= (Loading time--set up timeset up time--down time) X100 down time) X100
/loading time/loading time=(480=(480--7575--45)X100/480=75%45)X100/480=75%
Performance Efficiency=Average cycle time cycle time xNumberxNumber of good of good units made during the specific period x100/operating timeunits made during the specific period x100/operating time
=12 x (20=12 x (20--5) x100/480 =37.5%5) x100/480 =37.5%
Rate of quality= (Total units of good products/total units = (Total units of good products/total units produced) x100 =15/20 x100=75produced) x100 =15/20 x100=75
OEE= 0.75x0.375x0.75=0.2109=21.09%OEE= 0.75x0.375x0.75=0.2109=21.09%
-
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 5 4
What is Quality?What is Quality?
TheThe qualityquality ofof aa productproduct oror serviceservice isisaa customerscustomers perceptionperception ofof thethedegreedegree toto whichwhich thethe productproduct ororserviceservice meetsmeets hishis oror herherexpectationsexpectations..
-
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 5 5
Key Dimensions of QualityKey Dimensions of Quality
PerformancePerformance FeaturesFeatures ReliabilityReliability ConformanceConformance
DurabilityDurability ServiceabilityServiceability AestheticsAesthetics Perceived qualityPerceived quality ValueValue
-
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 5 6
MalcomMalcom BaldrigeBaldrige National Quality National Quality Award Award
Applicants are evaluated on:Applicants are evaluated on:Categories PointsLeadership 120Strategic Planning 85Customer & Market Focus 85Measurement, Analysis, and Knowledge Management 90Workforce Focus 85Process Management 85Results 450
-
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 5 7
CIICII--EXIM Business EXIM Business Excellence Award: Excellence Award: ModelModel
Leadership100
Processes140
PeopleResults
90Customer
Results200
SocietyResults
60
KeyPerformance
Results150
People90
Policy & Strategy
80Partnership &
Resources90
Enablers Results
Innovation & LearningAdopted from: http://www.ciionline.org/Common/201/default.asp?Page=The%20Business%20Excellence%20Model.htm
-
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 5 8
Quality CostingQuality CostingCategories of Quality CostsCategories of Quality Costs
Control CostsControl Costs Failure CostsFailure Costs
PreventionPrevention AppraisalAppraisal InternalInternal ExternalExternal
Quality CostsQuality Costs
-
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 5 9
Total Quality ManagementTotal Quality Management
A philosophy that involves everyone A philosophy that involves everyone in an organization in a continual effort in an organization in a continual effort to improve quality and achieve to improve quality and achieve customer satisfaction.customer satisfaction.
TT QQ MM
-
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 5 10
1.1.Find out what the Find out what the customer wantscustomer wants2.2.Design a product Design a product or service that or service that
meets or exceeds customer wantsmeets or exceeds customer wants3.3.Design processes Design processes that facilitates that facilitates
doing the job right the first timedoing the job right the first time4.4.Keep track of Keep track of resultsresults5.5.Extend these concepts to Extend these concepts to supplierssuppliers
The TQM ApproachThe TQM Approach
-
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 5 11
Seven Concepts of TQMSeven Concepts of TQM
Continuous improvementContinuous improvement Six SigmaSix Sigma Employee empowermentEmployee empowerment BenchmarkingBenchmarking JustJust--inin--time (JIT)time (JIT) Taguchi conceptsTaguchi concepts Knowledge of TQM toolsKnowledge of TQM tools
-
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 5 12
2. DoTest the
plan
3. CheckIs the plan working?
4. ActImplement
the plan
1.PlanIdentify the
improvement and make
a plan
Shewharts PDCA ModelShewharts PDCA Model
-
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 5 13
Six SigmaSix Sigma Originally developed by Motorola, Originally developed by Motorola,
adopted and enhanced by Honeywell and adopted and enhanced by Honeywell and GEGE
Two meaningsTwo meanings Statistical definition of a process that Statistical definition of a process that
is 99.9997% capable, 3.4 defects per is 99.9997% capable, 3.4 defects per million opportunities (DPMO)million opportunities (DPMO)
66
-
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 5 14
Two meaningsTwo meanings Statistical definition of a process that Statistical definition of a process that
is 99.9997% capable, 3.4 defects per is 99.9997% capable, 3.4 defects per million opportunities (DPMO)million opportunities (DPMO)
A program designed to reduce A program designed to reduce defects, lower costs, and improve defects, lower costs, and improve customer satisfactioncustomer satisfaction
Six SigmaSix Sigma
Mean
Lower limits Upper limits
3.4 defects/million
6
2,700 defects/million
3
-
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 5 15
Six Sigma ProcessSix Sigma Process DefineDefine MeasureMeasure AnalyzeAnalyze ImproveImprove ControlControl
DMAICDMAIC
-
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 5 16
Six Sigma Quality (Continued)Six Sigma Quality (Continued)
Six Sigma allows managers to readily describe Six Sigma allows managers to readily describe process performance using a common metric: process performance using a common metric: Defects Per Million Opportunities (DPMO)Defects Per Million Opportunities (DPMO)
1,000,000 x
units of No. x unit
per error for iesopportunit ofNumber
defects ofNumber
DPMO
-
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 5 17
Six Sigma Quality (Continued)Six Sigma Quality (Continued)Example of Defects Per Million Example of Defects Per Million
Opportunities (DPMO) calculation. Opportunities (DPMO) calculation. Suppose we observe 200 letters Suppose we observe 200 letters delivered incorrectly to the wrong delivered incorrectly to the wrong addresses in a small city during a addresses in a small city during a single day when a total of 200,000 single day when a total of 200,000 letters were delivered. What is the letters were delivered. What is the DPMO in this situation?DPMO in this situation?
000,1 1,000,000 x
200,000 x 1
200DPMO
So, for every one million letters delivered this citys postal managers can expect to have 1,000 letters incorrectly sent to the wrong address.
Cost of Quality: What might that DPMO mean in terms of over-time employment to correct the errors?
-
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 5 18
JustJust--inin--Time (JIT)Time (JIT)
Pull system of production scheduling Pull system of production scheduling including supply managementincluding supply management Production only when signaledProduction only when signaled
Allows reduced inventory levelsAllows reduced inventory levels Inventory costs money and hides process Inventory costs money and hides process
and material problemsand material problems
Encourages improved process and Encourages improved process and product qualityproduct quality
-
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 5 19
JustJust--InIn--Time (JIT) ExampleTime (JIT) Example
ScrapUnreliable VendorsCapacity
Imbalances
Work in process inventory level
(hides problems)
-
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 5 20
JustJust--InIn--Time (JIT) ExampleTime (JIT) Example
Reducing inventory revealsReducing inventory revealsproblems so they can be solvedproblems so they can be solved
ScrapUnreliable VendorsCapacity
Imbalances
-
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 5 21
Taguchi ConceptsTaguchi Concepts Engineering and experimental Engineering and experimental
design methods to improve product design methods to improve product and process designand process design Identify key component and process Identify key component and process
variables affecting product variationvariables affecting product variation
Taguchi ConceptsTaguchi ConceptsQuality robustnessQuality robustnessQuality loss functionQuality loss functionTargetTarget--oriented qualityoriented quality
-
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 5 22
Quality RobustnessQuality Robustness
Ability to produce products Ability to produce products uniformly in adverse manufacturing uniformly in adverse manufacturing and environmental conditionsand environmental conditionsRemove the effects of adverse Remove the effects of adverse
conditionsconditionsSmall variations in materials and Small variations in materials and
process do not destroy product process do not destroy product qualityquality
-
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 5 23
Unacceptable
Poor
GoodBest
Fair
Quality Loss FunctionQuality Loss FunctionHigh lossHigh loss
Loss (to Loss (to producing producing organization, organization, customer, customer, and society)and society)
Low lossLow loss
FrequencyFrequency
LowerLower TargetTarget UpperUpperSpecificationSpecification
TargetTarget--oriented quality oriented quality yields more product in yields more product in the best categorythe best category
TargetTarget--oriented quality oriented quality brings product toward brings product toward the target valuethe target valueConformanceConformance--oriented oriented quality keeps products quality keeps products within 3 standard within 3 standard deviationsdeviations
L = DL = D22CCwherewhere
L =L = loss to societyloss to societyD =D = distance from distance from
target valuetarget valueC =C = cost of deviationcost of deviation
-
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 5 24
Service QualityService Quality
ConvenienceConvenience ReliabilityReliability ResponsivenessResponsiveness TimeTime AssuranceAssurance CourtesyCourtesy TangiblesTangibles
-
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 5 25
Examples of Service QualityExamples of Service Quality
Dimension Examples1. Convenience Was the service center conveniently located?
2. Reliability Was the problem fixed?
3. Responsiveness Were customer service personnel willing and able to answer questions?
4. Time How long did the customer wait?
5. Assurance Did the customer service personnel seem knowledgeable about the repair?
6. Courtesy Were customer service personnel and the cashier friendly and courteous?
7. Tangibles Were the facilities clean, personnel neat?
-
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 5 26
Tools of TQMTools of TQMCheck sheetsCheck sheetsScatter diagramsScatter diagramsCauseCause--andand--effect diagramseffect diagramsPareto chartsPareto chartsFlowchartsFlowchartsHistogramHistogramStatistical process control chartStatistical process control chart
-
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 5 27
//
/ / /// /// ///// ////
//////
HourDefect 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
ABC
////
/
Seven Tools of TQMSeven Tools of TQM(a)(a) Check Sheet: Check Sheet: An organized method of An organized method of
recording datarecording data
-
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 5 28
Seven Tools of TQMSeven Tools of TQM(b)(b) Scatter Diagram: Scatter Diagram: A graph of the value A graph of the value
of one variable vs. another variableof one variable vs. another variable
AbsenteeismAbsenteeism
Prod
uctiv
ityPr
oduc
tivity
-
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 5 29
Seven Tools of TQMSeven Tools of TQM(c)(c) CauseCause--andand--Effect Diagram: Effect Diagram: A tool that A tool that
identifies process elements (causes) that identifies process elements (causes) that might effect an outcomemight effect an outcome
CauseCauseMaterialsMaterials MethodsMethods
ManpowerManpower MachineryMachinery
EffectEffect
-
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 5 30
Seven Tools of TQMSeven Tools of TQM(d)(d) Pareto Chart: Pareto Chart: A graph to identify and plot A graph to identify and plot
problems or defects in descending order of problems or defects in descending order of frequencyfrequencyFr
eque
ncy
Freq
uenc
y
Perc
ent
Perc
ent
AA BB CC DD EE
-
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 5 31
Seven Tools of TQMSeven Tools of TQM(e)(e) Flowchart (Process Diagram): Flowchart (Process Diagram): A chart that A chart that
describes the steps in a processdescribes the steps in a process
-
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 5 32
Flow ChartsFlow ChartsMRI FlowchartMRI Flowchart1.1. Physician schedules MRIPhysician schedules MRI2.2. Patient taken to MRIPatient taken to MRI3.3. Patient signs inPatient signs in4.4. Patient is preparedPatient is prepared5.5. Technician carries out MRITechnician carries out MRI6.6. Technician inspects filmTechnician inspects film
7.7. If unsatisfactory, repeatIf unsatisfactory, repeat8.8. Patient taken back to roomPatient taken back to room9.9. MRI read by radiologistMRI read by radiologist10.10. MRI report transferred to MRI report transferred to
physicianphysician11.11. Patient and physician discussPatient and physician discuss
1111
1010
20%20%
99
8880%80%
11 22 33 44 55 66 77
-
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 5 33
Seven Tools of TQMSeven Tools of TQM(f)(f) Histogram: Histogram: A distribution showing the A distribution showing the
frequency of occurrences of a variablefrequency of occurrences of a variableDistributionDistribution
Repair time (minutes)Repair time (minutes)
Freq
uenc
yFr
eque
ncy
-
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 5 34
Seven Tools of TQMSeven Tools of TQM(g)(g) Statistical Process Control Chart: Statistical Process Control Chart: A chart with A chart with
time on the horizontal axis to plot values of a time on the horizontal axis to plot values of a statisticstatistic
Upper control limitUpper control limit
Target valueTarget value
Lower control limitLower control limit
TimeTime
-
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 5 35
Quality Assurance using SPCQuality Assurance using SPC
Designed StandardDesigned Standard
Centre of specification Centre of specification limits (Target)limits (Target)
Upper Specification Limit Upper Specification Limit (USL)(USL)
Lower Specification Limit Lower Specification Limit (LSL)(LSL)
(USL (USL LSL): Desired LSL): Desired tolerancetoleranceThis represents the voice This represents the voice of the customerof the customer
Status of processStatus of process
Centre of the process Centre of the process (Process Average)(Process Average)
Upper Control Limit (UCL)Upper Control Limit (UCL) Lower Control Limit (LCL)Lower Control Limit (LCL) (UCL (UCL LCL): Spread of the LCL): Spread of the
processprocess
This represents the voice This represents the voice of the processof the process
-
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 5 36
VariabilityVariability
RandomRandom common causescommon causes inherent in a inherent in a
processprocess can be eliminated can be eliminated
only through only through improvements in improvements in the systemthe system
NonNon--RandomRandom special causesspecial causes due to identifiable due to identifiable
factorsfactors can be modified can be modified
through operator or through operator or management actionmanagement action
-
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 5 37
Quality MeasuresQuality Measures
AttributeAttribute a product characteristic that can be a product characteristic that can be
evaluated with a evaluated with a discrete responsediscrete response good good bad; yes bad; yes -- nono
VariableVariable a product characteristic that is a product characteristic that is
continuouscontinuous and can be measuredand can be measured weight weight -- lengthlength
-
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 5 38
Applying SPC to Service (cont.)Applying SPC to Service (cont.) HospitalsHospitals
timeliness and quickness of care, staff responses to timeliness and quickness of care, staff responses to requests, accuracy of lab tests, cleanliness, courtesy, requests, accuracy of lab tests, cleanliness, courtesy, accuracy of paperwork, speed of admittance and accuracy of paperwork, speed of admittance and checkoutscheckouts
Grocery StoresGrocery Stores waiting time to check out, frequency of outwaiting time to check out, frequency of out--ofof--stock stock
items, quality of food items, cleanliness, customer items, quality of food items, cleanliness, customer complaints, checkout register errorscomplaints, checkout register errors
AirlinesAirlines flight delays, lost luggage and luggage handling, waiting flight delays, lost luggage and luggage handling, waiting
time at ticket counters and checktime at ticket counters and check--in, agent and flight in, agent and flight attendant courtesy, accurate flight information, attendant courtesy, accurate flight information, passenger cabin cleanliness and maintenancepassenger cabin cleanliness and maintenance
-
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 5 39
Applying SPC to Service (cont.)Applying SPC to Service (cont.) FastFast--Food RestaurantsFood Restaurants
waiting time for service, customer complaints, waiting time for service, customer complaints, cleanliness, food quality, order accuracy, cleanliness, food quality, order accuracy, employee courtesyemployee courtesy
Insurance CompaniesInsurance Companies billing accuracy, timeliness of claims processing, billing accuracy, timeliness of claims processing,
agent availability and response timeagent availability and response time
-
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 5 40
Control ChartsControl Charts
A graph that A graph that establishes control establishes control limits of a processlimits of a process
Control limitsControl limits upper and lower bands upper and lower bands
of a control chartof a control chart
Types of chartsTypes of charts Attributes
pp--chartchart cc--chartchart
Variables range (Rrange (R--chart)chart) mean (x bar mean (x bar
chart)chart)
-
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 5 41
Characteristics for process controlCharacteristics for process controlSome examplesSome examples
Sl. No. Type of Applications Characteristic for Measurement
1 Component Manufacturing Conformance of physical measurements of components and sub-assemblies to specifications
Conformance to operating characteristics of machines and other resources involved in the process
2 Final Assembly Number of defects in the product Conformance to test specifications Number of missing elements
3 Process Industries Temperature, Pressure and Heat specifications Conformance to product specifications Conformance to equipment specifications Vibrations and other variations in equipments
and sub-systems Conformance to specifications of the
automation & control system
4 Service Systems Number of defects in various business processes
Errors in processing documents Conformance to waiting time/lead time related
specifications
-
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 5 42
Population and Sampling Population and Sampling DistributionsDistributions
Distribution of Distribution of sample meanssample means
Standard Standard deviation of deviation of the sample the sample meansmeans
= = xx ==
nn
Mean of sample means = xMean of sample means = x
| | | | | | |
--33xx --22xx --11xx xx ++11xx ++22xx ++33xx
99.73%99.73% of all xof all xfall within fall within 33xx
95.45%95.45% fall within fall within 22xx
-
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 5 43
Control Charts for VariablesControl Charts for Variables
For variables that have For variables that have continuous dimensionscontinuous dimensions Weight, speed, length, Weight, speed, length,
strength, etc.strength, etc.
xx--charts are to control charts are to control the central tendency of the processthe central tendency of the process
RR--charts are to control the dispersion of charts are to control the dispersion of the processthe process
These two charts must be used togetherThese two charts must be used together
-
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 5 44
Setting Chart LimitsSetting Chart LimitsFor xFor x--Charts when we know Charts when we know
Upper control limit Upper control limit (UCL)(UCL) = x + z= x + zxxLower control limit Lower control limit (LCL)(LCL) = x = x -- zzxx
wherewhere xx == mean of the sample means or a target mean of the sample means or a target value set for the processvalue set for the process
zz == number of normal standard deviationsnumber of normal standard deviationsxx == standard deviation of the sample meansstandard deviation of the sample means
== / n/ n == population standard deviationpopulation standard deviationnn == sample sizesample size
-
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 5 45
Setting Control LimitsSetting Control LimitsHour 1Hour 1
SampleSample Weight ofWeight ofNumberNumber Oat FlakesOat Flakes
11 171722 131333 161644 181855 171766 161677 151588 171799 1616
MeanMean 16.116.1 == 11
HourHour MeanMean HourHour MeanMean11 16.116.1 77 15.215.222 16.816.8 88 16.416.433 15.515.5 99 16.316.344 16.516.5 1010 14.814.855 16.516.5 1111 14.214.266 16.416.4 1212 17.317.3
n = 9n = 9
LCLLCLxx = x = x -- zzxx = = 16 16 -- 3(1/3) = 15 3(1/3) = 15
For For 99.73%99.73% control limits, z control limits, z = 3= 3
UCLUCLxx = x + z= x + zxx = 16 + 3(1/3) = 17 = 16 + 3(1/3) = 17
-
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 5 46
17 = UCL17 = UCL
15 = LCL15 = LCL
16 = Mean16 = Mean
Setting Control LimitsSetting Control LimitsControl Chart Control Chart for sample of for sample of 9 boxes9 boxes
Sample numberSample number
|| || || || || || || || || || || ||11 22 33 44 55 66 77 88 99 1010 1111 1212
Variation due Variation due to assignable to assignable
causescauses
Variation due Variation due to assignable to assignable
causescauses
Variation due to Variation due to natural causesnatural causes
Out of Out of controlcontrol
Out of Out of controlcontrol
-
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 5 47
Setting Chart LimitsSetting Chart Limits
For xFor x--Charts when we dont know Charts when we dont know
Lower control limit Lower control limit (LCL)(LCL) = x = x -- AA22RR
Upper control limit Upper control limit (UCL)(UCL) = x + A= x + A22RR
wherewhere RR == average range of the samplesaverage range of the samplesAA22 == control chart factor found in Table.1 control chart factor found in Table.1 xx == mean of the sample meansmean of the sample means
-
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 5 48
Control Chart FactorsControl Chart Factors
Table 1Table 1
Sample Size Sample Size Mean Factor Mean Factor Upper Range Upper Range Lower RangeLower Rangen n AA22 DD44 DD3322 1.8801.880 3.2683.268 0033 1.0231.023 2.5742.574 0044 .729.729 2.2822.282 0055 .577.577 2.1152.115 0066 .483.483 2.0042.004 0077 .419.419 1.9241.924 0.0760.07688 .373.373 1.8641.864 0.1360.13699 .337.337 1.8161.816 0.1840.184
1010 .308.308 1.7771.777 0.2230.2231212 .266.266 1.7161.716 0.2840.284
-
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 5 49
Setting Control LimitsSetting Control LimitsProcess average x Process average x = 12= 12 ouncesouncesAverage range R Average range R = .25= .25Sample size n Sample size n = 5= 5
-
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 5 50
Setting Control LimitsSetting Control Limits
UCLUCLxx = x + A= x + A22RR= 12 + (.577)(.25)= 12 + (.577)(.25)= 12 + .144= 12 + .144= 12.144 = 12.144 ouncesounces
Process average x Process average x = 12= 12 ouncesouncesAverage range R Average range R = .25= .25Sample size n Sample size n = 5= 5
From From Table.1Table.1
-
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 5 51
Setting Control LimitsSetting Control Limits
UCLUCLxx = x + A= x + A22RR= 12 + (.577)(.25)= 12 + (.577)(.25)= 12 + .144= 12 + .144= 12.144 = 12.144 ouncesounces
LCLLCLxx = x = x -- AA22RR= 12 = 12 -- .144.144= 11.857 = 11.857 ouncesounces
Process average x Process average x = 12= 12 ouncesouncesAverage range R Average range R = .25= .25Sample size n Sample size n = 5= 5
UCL = 12.144UCL = 12.144
Mean = 12Mean = 12
LCL = 11.857LCL = 11.857
-
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 5 52
R R ChartChart
Type of variables control chartType of variables control chart Shows sample ranges over timeShows sample ranges over time
Difference between smallest and Difference between smallest and largest values in samplelargest values in sample
Monitors process variabilityMonitors process variability Independent from process meanIndependent from process mean
-
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 5 53
R R Chart Chart
For RFor R--ChartsCharts
Lower control limit Lower control limit (LCL(LCLRR)) = D= D33RR
Upper control limit Upper control limit (UCL(UCLRR)) = D= D44RR
wherewhereRR == average range of the samplesaverage range of the samples
DD33 and Dand D44 == control chart factors from Table.1 control chart factors from Table.1
-
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 5 54
Setting Control LimitsSetting Control Limits
UCLUCLRR = D= D44RR= (2.115)(5.3)= (2.115)(5.3)= 11.2 = 11.2 poundspounds
LCLLCLRR = D= D33RR= (0)(5.3)= (0)(5.3)= 0 = 0 poundspounds
Average range R Average range R = 5.3 = 5.3 poundspoundsSample size n Sample size n = 5= 5From From Table 1Table 1 DD44 = 2.115, = 2.115, DD33 = 0= 0
UCL = 11.2UCL = 11.2
Mean = 5.3Mean = 5.3
LCL = 0LCL = 0
-
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 5 55
Mean and Range ChartsMean and Range Charts(a)(a)These These sampling sampling distributions distributions result in the result in the charts belowcharts below
(Sampling mean is (Sampling mean is shifting upward but shifting upward but range is consistent)range is consistent)
RR--chartchart(R(R--chart does not chart does not detect change in detect change in mean)mean)
UCLUCL
LCLLCL
xx--chartchart(x(x--chart detects chart detects shift in central shift in central tendency)tendency)
UCLUCL
LCLLCL
-
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 5 56
Mean and Range ChartsMean and Range Charts
RR--chartchart(R(R--chart detects chart detects increase in increase in dispersion)dispersion)
UCLUCL
LCLLCL
(b)(b)These These sampling sampling distributions distributions result in the result in the charts belowcharts below
(Sampling mean (Sampling mean is constant but is constant but dispersion is dispersion is increasing)increasing)
xx--chartchart(x(x--chart does not chart does not detect the increase detect the increase in dispersion)in dispersion)
UCLUCL
LCLLCL
-
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 5 57
Control Charts for AttributesControl Charts for Attributes
For variables that are categoricalFor variables that are categoricalGood/bad, yes/no, Good/bad, yes/no,
acceptable/unacceptableacceptable/unacceptable
Measurement is typically counting Measurement is typically counting defectivesdefectives
Charts may measureCharts may measurePercent defective (pPercent defective (p--chart)chart)Number of defects (cNumber of defects (c--chart)chart)
-
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 5 58
Control Limits for pControl Limits for p--ChartsCharts
Population will be a binomial distribution, Population will be a binomial distribution, but applying the Central Limit Theorem but applying the Central Limit Theorem
allows us to assume a normal distribution allows us to assume a normal distribution for the sample statisticsfor the sample statistics
UCLUCLpp = p + z= p + zpp^^
LCLLCLpp = p = p -- zzpp^^wherewhere pp == mean fraction defective in the samplemean fraction defective in the sample
zz == number of standard deviationsnumber of standard deviationspp == standard deviation of the sampling distributionstandard deviation of the sampling distributionnn == sample sizesample size^^
pp(1 (1 -- pp))nnpp ==^^
-
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 5 59
pp--Chart for Data EntryChart for Data Entry(Sample size=100)(Sample size=100)
SampleSample NumberNumber FractionFraction SampleSample NumberNumber FractionFractionNumberNumber of Errorsof Errors DefectiveDefective NumberNumber of Errorsof Errors DefectiveDefective
11 66 .06.06 1111 66 .06.0622 55 .05.05 1212 11 .01.0133 00 .00.00 1313 88 .08.0844 11 .01.01 1414 77 .07.0755 44 .04.04 1515 55 .05.0566 22 .02.02 1616 44 .04.0477 55 .05.05 1717 1111 .11.1188 33 .03.03 1818 33 .03.0399 33 .03.03 1919 00 .00.00
1010 22 .02.02 2020 44 .04.04Total Total = 80= 80
(.04)(1 (.04)(1 -- .04).04)100100pp = = = .02= .02^^
p p = = .04= = .048080
(100)(20)(100)(20)
-
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 5 60
.11 .11
.10 .10
.09 .09
.08 .08
.07 .07
.06 .06
.05 .05
.04 .04
.03 .03
.02 .02
.01 .01
.00 .00
Sample numberSample number
Frac
tion
defe
ctiv
eFr
actio
n de
fect
ive
| | | | | | | | | |22 44 66 88 1010 1212 1414 1616 1818 2020
pp--Chart for Data EntryChart for Data EntryUCLUCLpp = p + z= p + zpp = .04 + 3(.02) = .10= .04 + 3(.02) = .10^^
LCLLCLpp = p = p -- zzpp = .04 = .04 -- 3(.02) = 03(.02) = 0^^
UCLUCLpp = 0.10= 0.10
LCLLCLpp = 0.00= 0.00
p p = 0.04= 0.04
-
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 5 61
.11 .11
.10 .10
.09 .09
.08 .08
.07 .07
.06 .06
.05 .05
.04 .04
.03 .03
.02 .02
.01 .01
.00 .00
Sample numberSample number
Frac
tion
defe
ctiv
eFr
actio
n de
fect
ive
| | | | | | | | | |22 44 66 88 1010 1212 1414 1616 1818 2020
UCLUCLpp = p + z= p + zpp = .04 + 3(.02) = .10= .04 + 3(.02) = .10^^
LCLLCLpp = p = p -- zzpp = .04 = .04 -- 3(.02) = 03(.02) = 0^^
UCLUCLpp = 0.10= 0.10
LCLLCLpp = 0.00= 0.00
p p = 0.04= 0.04
pp--Chart for Data EntryChart for Data Entry
Possible assignable
causes present
-
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 5 62
Control Limits for cControl Limits for c--ChartsCharts
Population will be a Poisson distribution, Population will be a Poisson distribution, but applying the Central Limit Theorem but applying the Central Limit Theorem
allows us to assume a normal distribution allows us to assume a normal distribution for the sample statisticsfor the sample statistics
wherewhere cc == mean number defective in the samplemean number defective in the sample
UCLUCLcc = c + = c + 33 cc LCLLCLcc = c = c -- 33 cc
-
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 5 63
cc--Chart for Cab CompanyChart for Cab Companyc c = 54= 54 complaintscomplaints/9/9 days days = 6 = 6 complaintscomplaints//dayday
|1
|2
|3
|4
|5
|6
|7
|8
|9
DayDay
Num
ber d
efec
tive
Num
ber d
efec
tive14 14
12 12 10 10 8 8 6 6 4 2 0 0
UCLUCLcc = c + = c + 33 cc= 6 + 3 6= 6 + 3 6= 13.35= 13.35
LCLLCLcc = c = c -- 33 cc= 6 = 6 -- 3 63 6= 0= 0
UCLUCLcc = 13.35= 13.35
LCLLCLcc = 0= 0
c c = 6= 6
-
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 5 64
Which Control Chart to UseWhich Control Chart to Use
Using an xUsing an x--chart and Rchart and R--chart:chart:Observations are variablesObservations are variablesCollect Collect 20 20 -- 2525 samples of n samples of n = 4= 4, or n , or n = =
55, or more, each from a stable process , or more, each from a stable process and compute the mean for the xand compute the mean for the x--chart chart and range for the Rand range for the R--chartchart
Track samples of n observations eachTrack samples of n observations each
Variables DataVariables Data
-
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 5 65
Which Control Chart to UseWhich Control Chart to Use
Using the pUsing the p--chart:chart:Observations are attributes that can Observations are attributes that can
be categorized in two states be categorized in two states We deal with fraction, proportion, or We deal with fraction, proportion, or
percent defectivespercent defectivesHave several samples, each with Have several samples, each with
many observationsmany observations
Attribute DataAttribute Data
-
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 5 66
Which Control Chart to UseWhich Control Chart to Use
Using a cUsing a c--Chart:Chart:Observations are attributes whose Observations are attributes whose
defects per unit of output can be defects per unit of output can be countedcounted
The number counted is a small part of The number counted is a small part of the possible occurrencesthe possible occurrences
Defects such as number of blemishes Defects such as number of blemishes on a desk, number of typos in a page on a desk, number of typos in a page of text, flaws in a bolt of clothof text, flaws in a bolt of cloth
Attribute DataAttribute Data
-
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 5 67
Process CapabilityProcess Capability
The natural variation of a process The natural variation of a process should be small enough to produce should be small enough to produce products that meet the standards products that meet the standards requiredrequired
A process in statistical control does not A process in statistical control does not necessarily meet the design necessarily meet the design specificationsspecifications
Process capability is a measure of the Process capability is a measure of the relationship between the natural relationship between the natural variation of the process and the design variation of the process and the design specificationsspecifications
-
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 5 68
Process Capability RatioProcess Capability Ratio
CCpp = = Upper Specification Upper Specification -- Lower SpecificationLower Specification
66
A capable process must have a A capable process must have a CCpp of at of at least least 1.01.0
Does not look at how well the process Does not look at how well the process is centered in the specification range is centered in the specification range
Often a target value of Often a target value of CCpp = 1.33 = 1.33 is used is used to allow for offto allow for off--center processescenter processes
Six Sigma quality requires aSix Sigma quality requires a CCpp = 2.0= 2.0
-
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 5 69
Process Capability RatioProcess Capability Ratio
CCpp = = Upper Specification Upper Specification -- Lower SpecificationLower Specification
66
Insurance claims processInsurance claims process
Process mean x Process mean x = 210.0= 210.0 minutesminutesProcess standard deviation Process standard deviation = .516= .516 minutesminutesDesign specification Design specification = 210 = 210 33 minutesminutes
-
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 5 70
Process Capability RatioProcess Capability Ratio
CCpp = = Upper Specification Upper Specification -- Lower SpecificationLower Specification
66
Insurance claims processInsurance claims process
Process mean x Process mean x = 210.0= 210.0 minutesminutesProcess standard deviation Process standard deviation = .516= .516 minutesminutesDesign specification Design specification = 210 = 210 33 minutesminutes
= = 1.938= = 1.938213 213 -- 2072076(.516)6(.516)
-
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 5 71
Process Capability RatioProcess Capability Ratio
CCpp = = Upper Specification Upper Specification -- Lower SpecificationLower Specification
66
Insurance claims processInsurance claims process
Process mean x Process mean x = 210.0= 210.0 minutesminutesProcess standard deviation Process standard deviation = .516= .516 minutesminutesDesign specification Design specification = 210 = 210 33 minutesminutes
= = 1.938= = 1.938213 213 -- 2072076(.516)6(.516) Process is capable
-
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 5 72
Process Capability IndexProcess Capability Index
A capable process must have a A capable process must have a CCpkpk of at of at least least 1.01.0
A capable process is not necessarily in the A capable process is not necessarily in the center of the specification, but it falls within center of the specification, but it falls within the specification limit at both extremesthe specification limit at both extremes
CCpkpk = minimum of ,= minimum of ,UpperUpperSpecification Specification -- xxLimitLimit
33
LowerLowerx x -- SpecificationSpecification
LimitLimit33
-
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 5 73
Process Capability IndexProcess Capability IndexNew Cutting MachineNew Cutting Machine
New process mean x New process mean x = .250 inches= .250 inchesProcess standard deviation Process standard deviation = .0005 inches= .0005 inchesUpper Specification Limit Upper Specification Limit = .251 inches= .251 inchesLower Specification LimitLower Specification Limit = .249 inches= .249 inches
-
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 5 74
Process Capability IndexProcess Capability IndexNew Cutting MachineNew Cutting Machine
New process mean x New process mean x = .250 inches= .250 inchesProcess standard deviation Process standard deviation = .0005 inches= .0005 inchesUpper Specification Limit Upper Specification Limit = .251 inches= .251 inchesLower Specification LimitLower Specification Limit = .249 inches= .249 inches
CCpkpk = minimum of ,= minimum of ,(.251) (.251) -- .250.250
(3).0005(3).0005
-
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 5 75
Process Capability IndexProcess Capability IndexNew Cutting MachineNew Cutting Machine
New process mean x New process mean x = .250 inches= .250 inchesProcess standard deviation Process standard deviation = .0005 inches= .0005 inchesUpper Specification Limit Upper Specification Limit = .251 inches= .251 inchesLower Specification LimitLower Specification Limit = .249 inches= .249 inches
CCpkpk = = 0.67= = 0.67.001.001.0015.0015
New machine is NOT capable
CCpkpk = minimum of ,= minimum of ,(.251) (.251) -- .250.250
(3).0005(3).0005.250 .250 -- (.249)(.249)
(3).0005(3).0005
Both calculations result inBoth calculations result in
-
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 5 76
Interpreting Interpreting CCpkpk
Cpk = negative number
Cpk = zero
Cpk = between 0 and 1
Cpk = 1
Cpk > 1
-
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 5 77
Acceptance SamplingAcceptance Sampling Form of quality testing used for Form of quality testing used for
incoming materials or finished goodsincoming materials or finished goodsTake samples at random from a lot Take samples at random from a lot
(shipment) of items(shipment) of items Inspect each of the items in the sampleInspect each of the items in the sampleDecide whether to reject the whole lot Decide whether to reject the whole lot
based on the inspection resultsbased on the inspection results
Only screens lots; does not drive Only screens lots; does not drive quality improvement effortsquality improvement efforts
-
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 5 78
Acceptance SamplingAcceptance Sampling Form of quality testing used for Form of quality testing used for
incoming materials or finished goodsincoming materials or finished goodsTake samples at random from a lot Take samples at random from a lot
(shipment) of items(shipment) of items Inspect each of the items in the sampleInspect each of the items in the sampleDecide whether to reject the whole lot Decide whether to reject the whole lot
based on the inspection resultsbased on the inspection results
Only screens lots; does not drive Only screens lots; does not drive quality improvement effortsquality improvement efforts
Rejected lots can be: Returned to the
supplier Culled for
defectives (100% inspection)
-
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 5 79
Operating Characteristic Operating Characteristic CurveCurve
Shows how well a sampling plan Shows how well a sampling plan discriminates between good and discriminates between good and bad lots (shipments)bad lots (shipments)
Shows the relationship between Shows the relationship between the probability of accepting a lot the probability of accepting a lot and its quality leveland its quality level
-
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 5 80
Return whole shipment
The Perfect OC CurveThe Perfect OC Curve
% Defective in Lot% Defective in Lot
P(A
ccep
t Who
le S
hipm
ent)
P(A
ccep
t Who
le S
hipm
ent)
100 100
75 75
50 50
25 25
0 0 | | | | | | | | | | |00 1010 2020 3030 4040 5050 6060 7070 8080 9090 100100
Cut-Off
Keep whole Keep whole shipmentshipment
-
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 5 81
An OC CurveAn OC Curve
Probability Probability of of
AcceptanceAcceptance
Percent Percent defectivedefective
| | | | | | | | |00 11 22 33 44 55 66 77 88
100 100 95 95
75 75
50 50
25 25
10 10
0 0
= 0.05= 0.05 producers risk for AQLproducers risk for AQL
= 0.10= 0.10
Consumers Consumers risk for LTPDrisk for LTPD
LTPDLTPDAQLAQLBad lotsBad lotsIndifference Indifference zonezone
Good Good lotslots
Figure S6.9Figure S6.9
-
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 5 82
AQL and LTPDAQL and LTPD
Acceptable Quality Level (AQL)Acceptable Quality Level (AQL)Poorest level of quality we are Poorest level of quality we are
willing to acceptwilling to accept
Lot Tolerance Percent Defective Lot Tolerance Percent Defective (LTPD)(LTPD)Quality level we consider badQuality level we consider badConsumer (buyer) does not want to Consumer (buyer) does not want to
accept lots with more defects than accept lots with more defects than LTPDLTPD
-
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 5 83
Producers and Consumers Producers and Consumers RisksRisks
Producer's risk Producer's risk (())Probability of rejecting a good lot Probability of rejecting a good lot Probability of rejecting a lot when the Probability of rejecting a lot when the
fraction defective is at or above the fraction defective is at or above the AQLAQL
Consumer's risk Consumer's risk (())Probability of accepting a bad lot Probability of accepting a bad lot Probability of accepting a lot when Probability of accepting a lot when
fraction defective is below the LTPDfraction defective is below the LTPD
-
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 5 84
SPC and Process VariabilitySPC and Process Variability
(a)(a) Acceptance Acceptance sampling (Some sampling (Some bad units accepted)bad units accepted)
(b)(b) Statistical process Statistical process control (Keep the control (Keep the process in control)process in control)
(c)(c) CCpkpk >1>1 (Design (Design a process that a process that is in control)is in control)
Lower Lower specification specification
limitlimit
Upper Upper specification specification
limitlimit
Process mean, Process mean, mm