safe and sustainable development of the ......module n: safe navigation and environment protection...
TRANSCRIPT
MODULE N: SAFE NAVIGATION AND
ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION (2017-2022)Halifax, 3 October 2017
SAFE AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT OF THE OCEAN FRONTIER
OUTLINE1. GOAL & SCOPE
2. MODULE CONTENT
3. INTEGRATIVE ACTIVITIES
4. EXPECTED LINKS WITH
OTHER MODULES
5. MODULE GOVERNANCE
6. MODULE MOBILIZATION
1. GOAL &
SCOPE
Using interdisciplinary perspectives,
Module N investigates how ocean
change in the NWA and CEAG
shapes our understanding of the risks
posed by increased shipping and the
search for solutions.
Module N will generate enhanced
understanding and applications:
Maritime risks
Ship emissions controls
Ship noise
Strategizing for oil spill response and SAR
capacities in remote areas
MSP for conflict management
Regulatory tools
Marine Scientific Research Strategy (MSR)
Northwest
Atlantic &
Canadian
Eastern Arctic
Gateway
(CEAG)
DRIVERS
Continued loss of sea ice and calving in the
CEAG
Shipping activity is poised to increase in the
Canadian Arctic and NWA (e.g., CETA,
Corridors)
Increased shipping will stretch SAR and spill
response capacity (e.g., Oceans Action Plan)
Shipping implications for coastal populations
deserve assessment (e.g., public health)
Ship noise impact in the marine environment
is not fully understood and regulated
Growing interface between shipping and Inuit rights (e.g., Lancaster Sound)
CHANGE
Ocean change
Users
* Shipping (spatial, icebreaking,
emissions, noise)
* Indigenous (traditional,
contemporary)
Governance
* Policy
* Law
* Institutional
* Management (inclIndigenous)
SHIPPING
ENVIRONMENT
Risks to ships• Ocean-atmosphere
interactions (weather)• Surface conditions• Reduced visibility• Sea ice• Icebergs• Other uses• Etc.
Risks from ships• Air emissions• Climate change impacts• Underwater noise• Discharges and spills• Collisions• Ships/persons in distress• Public health impacts• Disrupting ice routes• Coastal economies• Etc.
SAFETYOCEAN USERS
INDIGENOUS
PEOPLES
CHANGING OCEAN
MULTI-DISCIPLINARY RESEARCH
Law &
policy
Risk
aspects
Data /
informationNatural
Science
Social
Science
2. MODULE CONTENT
Subproject 1 – Emissions from shipsLead: Martin
Team: Chang, Chircop, Pelot, Perrie, Ritchie, Wallace,
• Activities:
• Assess the current effects of marine aerosols on
coastal populations
• Predict future changes
• Run simulations and predictions using the GEOS-
Chem model, an open-source global 3-D model
of atmospheric composition
• Applications:
• Inform the development of marine
transportation policy and risk reduction strategy
• Implications of scientific findings for Canadian
and international maritime regulation
• Options for proposing evidence-based MARPOL
Annex VI protection for Arctic waters.
Subproject 2 – Ship NoiseLead: Barclay & Pelot
Team:
• Work:
• Attempt to improve current modelling
techniques to assess potential impact of shipping
in NWA/CEAG
• Review of current state of ambient (natural)
noise in northern latitudes based on historical
data (previous decade)
• Data-validated noise modelling based on recent
arctic measurements and anticipated shipping
increases to predict changes in the sound field
• Applications:
• Results can be used by fisheries, coastal
communities, management of marine protected
areas (MPAs) and underwater surveillance
Subproject 3 – Spill ResponseLead: Pelot & Chircop
Team: Aporta, Dawson, Fanning, Perrie, Ritchie
• Work:• Combine risk-based demand estimation of spill
occurrences with current and anticipated
response resources to assess equity and
efficiency of coverage across our area of interest
• Special focus on complexities of the northern
environment (remoteness, community reliance
on country food, and relative lack of resilience of
the ecosystem to pollution stresses)
• Applications:
• Cost-benefit and risk effectiveness models will be
developed to help inform spill response
capability planning and/or regulatory reform
Subproject 4 – Search and RescueLead: Pelot
Team: Dawson, Neis, Perrie, Ritchie, Schroeder
• Work:
• Develop an integrated multi-criteria framework to
model Arctic conditions that affect Search and
Rescue resource planning: lack of infrastructure,
poor weather, low visibility, ice impediments, poor
communications, and frigid waters.
• Estimate future shipping traffic growth scenarios in
the Arctic to determine the amount of exposure
• Applications:
• Develop risk-based planning methods and tools
that include concepts of remoteness, suitability of
various response assets to diverse incident types,
and cost-benefit analyses to help inform strategic
and tactical SAR planning.
Subproject 5 – Risk AssessmentLead: Pelot
Team: Dawson, Neis, Chircop, Aporta, Beveridge• Work:
• Use the IRGC risk governance framework to develop a
comprehensive, evidence-based approach for the two
fundamental aims of assessing and managing risks
associated with shipping in the NWA and CEAG.
• Address the changing circumstances of navigation in
these regions, and representing the values of multiple
stakeholders in the risk modelling.
• Applications:
• Prioritize shipping risks in terms of various measures of
impacts, in order to appreciate the key problem areas
from a variety of perspectives.
• Devise key risk mitigation strategies to bolster existing
approaches, with emphasis on remoteness, changing
conditions, and discrimination between extreme event
planning versus operational risk reduction
Subproject 6 – MSP AssessmentLeads: Aporta & Fanning
Team: Beveridge, Chircop, Cudennec, Dawson, Martin, Matz-
Lück, Pelot, Neis, Schroeder
• Work:• Study how MSP packaged with ship routeing and
reporting measures may provide added value to
ocean management in the NWA and CAG
• Focus on areas where shipping produces conflicting
interactions with other ocean uses, Inuit interests and
conservation measures
• Ascertain how Indigenous peoples might be
affected by growth of shipping in Arctic waters and
to lessons learned from MSP in the Northeast Atlantic
and other European waters
• Applications:
• Inclusive and integrated planning and management
scenarios to mitigate potential conflicts while
achieving ecosystem-based management goals.
Subproject 7 – Regulatory AssessmentLead: Chircop
Team: Aporta, Beveridge, Cudennec, Fanning, Martin, Matz-Lück,
Neis, Pelot, Schroeder
• Work:
• Policy and regulatory analyses of safety and
environmental (incl. emissions, noise) regulation
• Assessment of tools for interface of shipping with
other ocean uses, Indigenous uses, conservation
measures
• Assessment of the Canadian and international polar
shipping regulatory landscape
• Applications:
• Proposals for evidence-based policy and regulatory
options to enable Canada meet its international
obligations while protecting its vital interests in the
NWA/CEAG.
Subproject 8 – MSR AssessmentLeads: Chircop & Leslie
Team: Pelot, Wallace
• Work:
• Assessment of policy and regulatory
framework for MSR in Canada
• Assessment of how Canadian benefits from
foreign MSR in Canadian waters can be
optimised
• Applications:
• Proposal/strategy for ships of opportunity in
support of MSR
• Policy paper on integrating marine scientific
research policy/permitting in Canada
3. INTEGRATIVE
ACTIVITIES
Composite teams for
subgroups
Annual video-
conferenced/skyped
plenary meetings (Y1, Y2,
Y3, Y4, Y5)
Major international and
comparative research
workshops (Y2, Y4)
Interdisciplinary outputs
DISSEMINATION OF INTEGRATED OUTPUTS/RESULTS
Enhanced
understanding
(scholarly outputs)
1. Five doctoral theses
(Dalhousie PhDs)
2. Two workshop
proceedings (major
publisher)
3. 16 articles/chapters
(refereed
journals/books)
4. Blogs
Applications (stakeholder-specific outputs)
1. Marine aerosols predictive model(TC, ECCC, DFO, shipping industry and affected communities)
2. Ship noise forecasting model (DFO, DRDC, TC)
3. Integrated SAR & spill response model (CCG, TC, DFO, ECCC and shipping industry)
4. Interactive web-based atlas (Inuit communities, TC, DFO, CCG, other stakeholders)
5. Eight policy papers (DFO, TC, CCG, etc.)
4. EXPECTED LINKS WITH OTHER MODULES
Subprojects Connection to other Modules
1. Emissions from ships A, C2. Ship noise E, G, P, Q3. Spill response G, I, M, Q
4. Search & rescue A, M, Q5. Risk assessment A, E, G, I, P, Q
6. MSP assessment A, G, M, P
7. Regulatory assessment A, E, G, I, M
8. MSR assessment O, P, Q
A. Marine Atmospheric Composition and VisibilityC. Microbial Community StructureE. Indicators of Ecosystem ChangeG. Future-Proofing Marine Protected Area NetworksI. Informing Governance Responses in a Changing OceanM. Social License and Planning in Coastal CommunitiesO. Transforming Ocean ObservationsP. Research Data ManagementQ. Integrative Ocean Data Tools and Analytics
5. MODULE GOVERNANCE
Ocean Frontier Institute
Co-principal investigators
(Chircop, Pelot, Martin, Aporta)
Module Management
Committee (PIs + Barclay, Neis)
SP1 SP2
Research Advisory Council
(Government, industry, Indigenous)
SP3 SP4 SP5 SP6 SP7 SP8
PARTNERS & PARTICIPANTS (TBC)
University
• Dalhousie
• MUN
• Other Canadian
• UBO
• Kiel
• WMU
Government
• TC
• DFO
• CCG
• DRDC
• ECCC
Indigenous
• ICC
• Inuit Elders
Industry
• Shipping Federation of Canada
• Fednav
6. MODULE MOBILIZATION
Administrative:
Investigator checklist completed
Project account opened
Ethics
Management:
First MMC meeting held in August (next in October)
RAC members in the process of being contacted or confirmed
Detailed plans for each subgroup will be developed in October in preparation of launching of research
Plenary:
First project plenary meeting projected for December
THANK YOU!
QUESTIONS? / COMMENTS !
Prepared by
Aldo Chircop, Ronald Pelot, Randall Martin, Claudio Aporta