safety leading indicators - nwccc · presented by billy gibbons, jmj associates ... 1.owner review...
TRANSCRIPT
® Incident and Injury-Free and IIF are registered trademarks of JMJ Associates© 2006-2008 JMJ Associates, LLP. All rights reserved. v041508
Safety Leading Indicators:Overview of the
Construction Industry Institute RT284 Research Team Findings
July 2012
Presented By Billy Gibbons, JMJ Associates for the NWCCC Conference
November 15, 2012
® Incident and Injury-Free and IIF are registered trademarks of JMJ Associates© 2006-2008 JMJ Associates, LLP. All rights reserved. v041508
Agenda• What is RT 284?• Definition of leading indicators• Passive leading indicators
– Methods – Results
• Active leading indicators– Methods– Results
• Making leading indicators work in your company
® Incident and Injury-Free and IIF are registered trademarks of JMJ Associates© 2006-2008 JMJ Associates, LLP. All rights reserved. v041508
Steve Trickel –Lead
Zachry
Dave Wulf –Co-Lead
ConocoPhillips
Dr. Jimmie Hinze – ResearchU.of Florida
Dr. Matt Hallowell – Research
U. of Colorado
David BurrisShaw Power
Group
Ted CarewAZCO Inc.
Tim ChestnutIrving Oil
Debbie Cunningham
ConocoPhillips
James DuncanJacobs
Billy GibbonsJMJ Associates
John GrabowskiCITGO
Larry GreenDuPont
Bob HorvatCargill
Paul LeeLilly
Michael MendozaAbbott
Roger SmithZurich
Ron SpearAMEC
Mark ThompsonTeck Resources
Limited
Sam ThurmanFluor
Elbe WatkinsBIS Industrial
Services
Research Team 284 Members
® Incident and Injury-Free and IIF are registered trademarks of JMJ Associates© 2006-2008 JMJ Associates, LLP. All rights reserved. v041508
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
325 413 477 497 527 613 644 770 518 765 995 936 1,117 1,073 1,129 1,195 1,333 1,297 1,766 2,085 2,403
Tota
l Rec
orda
ble
Inju
ry R
ate
Year and Work Hours (MM)
CII TRIR Trends
What can we do to accelerate improvement?
4
® Incident and Injury-Free and IIF are registered trademarks of JMJ Associates© 2006-2008 JMJ Associates, LLP. All rights reserved. v041508
What are leading indicators?
Leading indicators pertain to measures of attitudes, behaviors, practices, or conditions
that influence construction safety performance.
There are two types…
® Incident and Injury-Free and IIF are registered trademarks of JMJ Associates© 2006-2008 JMJ Associates, LLP. All rights reserved. v041508
Passive Safety Leading Indicators
Safety strategies that are generally implemented before the construction phase begins, to set the
project up for success
6
® Incident and Injury-Free and IIF are registered trademarks of JMJ Associates© 2006-2008 JMJ Associates, LLP. All rights reserved. v041508
Active Safety Leading Indicators
Measures of safety strategies made during the construction phase that can indicate the “health” of
safety on the project and trigger adjustments
® Incident and Injury-Free and IIF are registered trademarks of JMJ Associates© 2006-2008 JMJ Associates, LLP. All rights reserved. v041508
Studying passive safety leading indicators
What are the passive leading indicators?– Past CII literature (best practices) – Research Teamà Led to over 100 potential passive leading indicators!
How often are they implemented and which best predict strong safety performance?– Team conducted interviews with representatives of 58
projects in the US
® Incident and Injury-Free and IIF are registered trademarks of JMJ Associates© 2006-2008 JMJ Associates, LLP. All rights reserved. v041508
Passive safety leading indicator results
– 22 of the strategies were used on every project studied (the foundation elements)
9
® Incident and Injury-Free and IIF are registered trademarks of JMJ Associates© 2006-2008 JMJ Associates, LLP. All rights reserved. v04150810
1. Health & safety (H&S) manual2. Specific safety prequalification3. Subs participation in GC’s orientation and training4. Subs safety standards compared to GC5. Safety leadership training for foremen6. Management review of craft worker training7. Safety during constructability reviews8. Safety in scheduling9. Heavy eqpt inspection and approval program10. Written site-safety plan11. Lock-out tag-out policy
Passive Leading Indicators on All Projects
MRH1
Slide 10
MRH1 Jimmie, is there a reason that each of these is in its own text box? Are you planning to use an animation? I am concerned that this slide will be difficult to discuss because of the volume and time that we are shooting for.Matthew Ryan Hallowell, 6/19/2012
® Incident and Injury-Free and IIF are registered trademarks of JMJ Associates© 2006-2008 JMJ Associates, LLP. All rights reserved. v04150811
12. 100% hard hat policy13. Stop work policy14. Emergency response plan for the project15. Job hazard analyses16. Workers involvement in hazard assessment17. Safety goals development and communication18. Safe behavior reward and recognition 19. Near-misses investigation20. Foremen involvement in accident investigation21. Foremen involvement in hazard assessment22. Regular scheduled meetings for safety personnel
Passive Leading Indicators on All ProjectsMRH2
Slide 11
MRH2 Same comment as previous. I dont think this slide looks very nice and the LIs are not lined up.Matthew Ryan Hallowell, 6/19/2012
® Incident and Injury-Free and IIF are registered trademarks of JMJ Associates© 2006-2008 JMJ Associates, LLP. All rights reserved. v04150812
10 were identified that predicted particularly strong safety performance with high statistical significance1. Owner review and approval of CM and GC’s project
safety plan2. Participation of all contractors and subcontractors in
safety meetings3. Site-specific safety orientation for all managers4. 100% steel-toed boots policy5. Medical facilities on-site6. First aid log7. Minimum ratio of safety professionals to workers8. Worker-to-worker observation program9. Workers involvement in perception surveys10.Foremen involvement in policy creation and
implementation
® Incident and Injury-Free and IIF are registered trademarks of JMJ Associates© 2006-2008 JMJ Associates, LLP. All rights reserved. v041508
The research team identified 100 possible safety policies and practices
that could be implemented.
How did the implementation of these policies and practices impact safety
performance?
13
® Incident and Injury-Free and IIF are registered trademarks of JMJ Associates© 2006-2008 JMJ Associates, LLP. All rights reserved. v04150814
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
70 to 79% 80 to 89 % over 90%
2.77
1.66
0.55
Tota
l Rec
orda
ble
Inju
ry R
ate
Percent of Safety Policies/Practices Implemented
Based on top 10 Safety Policies and Practices
® Incident and Injury-Free and IIF are registered trademarks of JMJ Associates© 2006-2008 JMJ Associates, LLP. All rights reserved. v041508
That’s what we know about setting a project up for success
but what do we do once the project starts?
The critical question: If you go onto a project and don’t know the injury rate, how do you know whether it is safe or not?
15
® Incident and Injury-Free and IIF are registered trademarks of JMJ Associates© 2006-2008 JMJ Associates, LLP. All rights reserved. v041508
Studying active safety leading indicators
19 case study projects
16
® Incident and Injury-Free and IIF are registered trademarks of JMJ Associates© 2006-2008 JMJ Associates, LLP. All rights reserved. v041508
Studying active safety leading indicators
14 award-winningproject descriptions
17
® Incident and Injury-Free and IIF are registered trademarks of JMJ Associates© 2006-2008 JMJ Associates, LLP. All rights reserved. v041508
Studying active safety leading indicators
Research team brainstorming
18
® Incident and Injury-Free and IIF are registered trademarks of JMJ Associates© 2006-2008 JMJ Associates, LLP. All rights reserved. v041508
The concept– Active safety leading indicators can be measured
and can alert management about the need for a positive response before an injury occurs.
– Some are strategies most companies are already doing!
• Site safety audits• Toolbox meetings
– A shift toward:• Measurement• Setting thresholds• Implementing an action plan if the values are not
desirable19
® Incident and Injury-Free and IIF are registered trademarks of JMJ Associates© 2006-2008 JMJ Associates, LLP. All rights reserved. v041508
Active Leading IndicatorsExamples:
– Housekeeping– Vendor orientations– Owner safety walkthroughs– Stop work– Safety audits– Positive reinforcements
20
® Incident and Injury-Free and IIF are registered trademarks of JMJ Associates© 2006-2008 JMJ Associates, LLP. All rights reserved. v041508
Example: Safety Audits– Almost all firms conduct safety
audits BUT few measure, track, and respond in an organized fashion
– This may be a great place to start
• Evaluate your auditing process (who, what, how often)
• What might you measure that would predict safety?
• What is your target?• What if your measurements
showed unacceptable results?
Research Summary
Implementation Resource
21
® Incident and Injury-Free and IIF are registered trademarks of JMJ Associates© 2006-2008 JMJ Associates, LLP. All rights reserved. v041508
What we learned about active safety leading indicators…
– Very few leading indicators are fully implemented by general industry
– Projects where leading indicators were measured and fully implemented had an average TRIR of 0.19!
– Every firm can benefit from active safety leading indicators.
– A strong foundation of safety is a prerequisite.– A champion must be committed to success.– The next step is to carefully select a few active
safety leading indicators and implement them on your project
22
® Incident and Injury-Free and IIF are registered trademarks of JMJ Associates© 2006-2008 JMJ Associates, LLP. All rights reserved. v04150823
Start with 2 or 3Whose performance is to be monitored?Are there some you already use?Have the resourcesReview your existing safety practicesChoose those that you can intervene
Process relatedNumeric “Score”Easily understoodCredible-objective not subjectiveSignal need for actionValidate those for with existing metricsConsistency in the measuresKnowledgeable of processTrained personnel to collect informationMethodology clearly definedSchedule for data collectionProperly formatted collection toolsRepository for information
Management commitmentPassionate “Champion”Full participation and understandingIncorporated into new hire orientationFirst line supervisor buy-inCritical examination of data
Broad communication“Work the Plan”Ensure consistency across the boardDescription of Leading IndicatorData collection processStrong program integrity, no deviations
Individual or Ad Hoc CommitteeCompilation of dataPrompt processingGraphical representationResults interpreted, Thresholds/TriggersRecommendation derived from resultsCorrelation with other indicators
Disseminated broadly to all stakeholdersMonthly project report distributionInclude subcontractorsReviewed weekly by Project Safety CommitteePublic display, add to existing dashboardsComparison of current to historical dataDemonstrated interest of management
Evaluation of effectivenessIntervention or adjustment with deviationsLevel of attention to processPerception survey resultsData consistencyProcess easy to implementInformation meaningfulNew indicator sign?
Recognize committed participationPrompt feedbackKey individuals regularly informed of resultsPublic recognition for key contributorsSpot awards where appropriateProject celebrations for milestone achievements
® Incident and Injury-Free and IIF are registered trademarks of JMJ Associates© 2006-2008 JMJ Associates, LLP. All rights reserved. v041508
® Incident and Injury-Free and IIF are registered trademarks of JMJ Associates© 2006-2008 JMJ Associates, LLP. All rights reserved. v041508
In Summary– Passive safety leading indicators: Tell you the extent
to which you have set your project up for success.
– Active safety leading indicators: Tell you the safety potential of your project and provide signals when adjustments need to happen to keep the project on course for an incident and injury-free project.
25