sale of goods act

Contract of Sale of Goods

Chapter 10


• The Sale of Goods Act, 1930 codifies the law relating to the sale of goods in a separate enactment.

• Prior to the passing of this Act, provisions of Indian Contract, 1872 (Chapter VII, Sections 76-123) were made applicable to the sale of goods. The Ac? came into force on 1st July, 1930.

• It contains 66 sections and extends to the whole of India except the State of Jammu and Kashmir.


• Section 4 (1) of the Sale of Goods Act, 1930 defines – "A contract of sale of goods is contract

whereby the seller transfers or agrees to transfer the property in goods to the buyer for a price".


Essential Characteristics of a Contract of Sale of Goods

– There must be two parties to a contract of sale viz., a buyer and a seller.

– The object of the contract of sale must be transfer of property in the goods by one person to another. 'Property' here means 'ownership'.

– The Subject matter of the contract of sale must be 'Goods'. The term and includes Goods mean every kind of movable property other than actionable claims and money, and includes stock and share, growing crops, grass and things attached to or forming part of the land which are agreed to be severed before sale or under the contract of sale.

Contract of Sale of GoodsEssential Characteristics of a Contract of Sale of Goods

Consideration for a sale of goods must be money consideration, called the 'Price'; when goods are exchanged for other goods, the transaction is not 'sale, but an 'exchange' or 'barter'.

However, there is nothing to prevent the consideration being partly in money and partly in goods.

– A contract of sale may be writing or by words of month, or partly in writing and partly by words of month, or may be implied from the conduct of the parties.

– A contract of sale includes both an actual sale and agreement to sell.


• Delivery and

Payment : • The contract of sale

may provide for any of the following combination.

Option Delivery Payment

1. Immediate Immediate

2. Immediate By instalments

3. Immediate At some future date

4. By instalments By instalments

5. By instalments Immediate

6. By instalments At some future date

7. At some future date

At some future date


Immediate


By instalments

Agreement to Sell (Section 4(3)):

• Where under a contract of sale, the transfer of property in goods is to take place at a future date or subject to some conditions thereafter to be fulfilled, the contract is called an ' Agreement to Sell'.

• Thus, whereby a contract of sale, a seller purports to effect a present sale of future goods, the agreement operates as an executory contract.

Distinction between Sale and Agreement to Sell

• (i) Transfer of property: – In a sale, the property in the goods passes from the seller to his

buyer immediately so that the seller is no more the owner of his goods sold.

– In an agreement to sell, the transfer of property in the goods is to take place at a future date or subject to certain conditions being fulfilled so that the seller continues to be owner until the agreement to sell becomes an actual sale.

• (ii) Risk of loss: – In a sale, in the event of the goods being destroyed, the loss

falls on the buyer even though the possession of the goods was with the seller.

– In an agreement to sell, if the goods are destroyed, the loss falls on the seller even though the goods were in the possession of his buyer.


• Nature of contract: – A sale is an executed contract whereas an agreement

to sell is an executory contract.

• Consequences of breach:– In a sale, if there is a breach of contract by the buyer,

the seller can sue for his price, even though the goods are still in his possession.

– In an agreement to sell, the seller can sue only for damages and not for his payment of the price.


• Right to resell: – In a sale, the seller cannot resell the goods and if he

does so, the subsequent buyer does not acquire a good title to his goods. In an agreement to sell, in case of resale, the bona fide buyer for value, without notice of the prior agreement to sell, the seller is not bound to part with the goods until he is paid for.

• Insolvency of buyer: – In a sale, if the buyer becomes insolvent before he

pays for the goods, the seller must return them to the Official Receiver or Assignee,

• he will be entitled to a rateable dividend only for the price of the goods.

– In an agreement to sell, the seller is not bound to part with the goods until he is paid for.


• Insolvency of seller: – In sale, upon insolvency of the seller, since the

ownership has passed to the buyer, he (buyer) can recover identical goods from the Official Receiver or Assignee of the seller.

– In an 'agreement to sell', if the buyer has paid for the goods, he can only claim a rateable dividend from the seller's estate.

• Nature of rights :– The buyer acquires a jus in rem i.e., right against the

whole world.On the other hand, an agreement to sell is a mere contract which secures to the buyer, only jus in personam i.e., right against a particular individual.

Sale and Contract for Work and Labour

• The difference between a contract of sale and a contract for work and labour is difficult to make.

• This is particularly so when the contract is a composite one involving both a contract of work and labour and a contract of sale.

• Nevertheless, the distinction between the two rests on a clear principle.

• A contract of sale is one whose main object is the transfer of property in, and the delivery of the possession of, a chattel (a movable item) as a chattel to the buyer.

• Where the principal object of the work undertaken by the payee of the price is not the transfer of chattel as a chattel, the contract is one for work and labour.

Sale and Contract for Work and Labour

• Example :

• (1) A promises to print and deliver to B 500 copies of manuscript, which B entrusted to A. For that job, paper and ink is supplied by A. Is this a contract of sale?

• The present contract is not a contract for sale because though A uses his own paper and ink for printing books and delivers them to B, the substance of the contract is skill and experience of the printer and supply of materials is only subsidiary to work and labour of A.

Difference between Sale and Bailment

Sale Bailment and Pledge

1 Ownership in goods is transferred from the seller to the buyer.

There is transfer of possession and not of ownership from the baifor to the bailee

2 The buyer may use the goods in any way he likes.

A bailee can use the goods only according to the directions of the bailor.

3 There is no return of goods from the buyer to the seller, unless there is breach.

The goods are necessarily returned after the specified time or accomplishment of the purpose.

4 The consideration is the price in terms of money.

The consideration is an undertaking to return the goods after the accomplishment of purpose.

5 The question of any charges to be paid by the seller to buyer or vice versa does not arise

The bailor has to repay the charges which the bailee has incurred in keeping the goods safe.

Sale and Hire Purchase Agreement• A hire purchase agreement differs from a contract of sale.

• An ordinary hire purchase agreement is a contract of bailment.

• It differs from a contract of an outright sale since in hire purchase the ownership or property in the goods will pass on to the buyer when he pays off all the stipulated installments

• A hire purchase agreement, therefore, is an irrevocable offer for sale, which will become a contract of sale on the fulfillment of the condition by the intending buyer, i.e., payment of all the hire installment

• Unlike a seller, a hirer cannot exercise any ownership rights on the goods, i.e., right to resell or pledge the goods till he has paid all the installments of hire.

Difference between Sale and Hire Purchase Agreement

• Transfer of property in the goods :

– In a sale, the property in the goods is transferred from the seller to the buyer immediately on the date of contract of sale.

– But in a hire purchase agreement, the property in the goods passes from the seller to the hire purchaser only when he (i.e., the hire purchaser) pays the last instalment.

• Position of the buyer :

– In a sale, the buyer becomes the owner of the goods bought, whereas in a hire purchase, the hire purchaser becomes just a bailee till the last instalment is paid by him.


• Insolvency of the buyer : – In a sale, if the price of the goods sold is not paid by the buyer and the

buyer becomes insolvent, the seller cannot recover the goods from the official assignee or official receiver.

– He can only claim rateable dividend out of the property of the insolvent buyer.

– But in a hire purchase, if the price of the goods is not paid and if the buyer becomes insolvent, the seller can take back the goods.

• Passing of title by the buyer :

– In a sale, as the ownership of the goods sold is with the buyer, the buyer can pass a good title to a bonafide purchaser from him.

– On the other hand, in a hire purchase, since the ownership will not be passed on to the hire purchaser until the last installment is paid, the hire purchaser cannot pass any title even to a bona fide purchaser.


• Sales Tax : – In a sale, tax is levied at the time of the contract of sale,

whereas in a hire purchase, sales tax is not levied till the hire purchase ripens into a sale.

• Nature of the contract: – A sale is an executed contract (i.e., completed contract)

in which the ownership of the goods is transferred from the seller to the buyer as soon as the contract is entered into.

– But a hire purchase agreement is only an executory contract in which the ownership of the goods will be transferred from the seller to the hire purchaser only when the last installment is paid.


• Termination of contract : – In a sale, the buyer cannot terminate the contract of sale and

return the goods at any time he likes. – But, in a hire purchase, the hire purchaser has an option to

terminate the contract and return the goods at any time he likes.

• Installments paid : – In a sale, where the payment is made by the buyer in

installments, the installments paid by the buyer are regarded as part payments made by the buyer towards the price of the goods.

– But, in a hire purchase, the installments paid by the hire purchaser are not regarded as payments made by the hire purchaser towards the price of the goods till the option to purchase is exercised by him.

– If the hire purchase is terminated, the installments already paid are just regarded as hire charges.


• Governing Act : – A sale is governed by the Sale of Goods Act, 1930, whereas

a hire purchase is governed by the Hire Purchase Act, 1972.

• Taking lack possession of the goods :

– In a sale, as the ownership of the goods is passed from the seller to the buyer immediately on the date of sale itself, the seller cannot take back the possession of the goods, if the purchaser fails to pay the price of the goods.

– On the other hand, in a hire purchase, as the ownership of the goods is not transferred from the seller to the hire purchaser until the last installment is paid, the hire seller can take back the possession of the goods, if the hire purchaser fails to pay any of the installments.

GOODS - the Subject-matter of Contract of Sale

• The term 'goods' means every kind of movable property and includes – (a) stocks and shares, – (b) growing crops, grass – (c) the things attached to or– (d) forming part of the land which can be

severed (i.e., separated) from the land.

• Goods does not include money and actionable claims

• The goods forming subject-matter of the contract of sale may be classified as under: – (i) existing goods, – (ii) future goods,– (iii) contingent goods.

• Existing goods may be – (a) specific goods – (b) ascertained goods and– (c) unascertained goods.

GOODS - the Subject-matter of Contract of Sale

Difference between Future Goods and Contingent Goods

• Possession or Acquisition :

– Future goods are goods which are not possessed by the seller at the time of making the contract of sale, but which will be manufactured, produced or acquired by the seller after the contract of sale is made.

– On the other hand, contingent goods are goods the acquisition of which by the seller depends upon an uncertain contingency which may or may not happen.

Difference between Future Goods and Contingent Goods

• Certainty : – Future goods are more certain about their coming

into existence, whereas contingent goods are less certain about their coming into existence.

• Control over factors of Production: – In the case of future goods, the factors of production

are within human control. – But in the case of contingent goods, the factors of

production are not within the control of human beings.

PRICE

• Section 2 (10) of the Act defines 'price' as the money consideration for a sale of goods.

• The price may be 'money' actually paid or promised to be paid depending on whether the agreement is for a cash or credit sale

Modes of fixing price

• Accordingly, there are five methods of fixing price, which are given below: – 1. Price expressly stated in the contract; – 2. Price to be fixed in manner provided by the

contract; – 3. Price to be determined by the course of dealings

between the parties; – 4. Reasonable price;

– 5. Price fixation by third party e.g. valuer • A valuer is a person who is appointed to value a thing

because of his special skill, aptitude or knowledge.

Earnest money or deposit

• Sometimes, it happens that the buyer pays part of the price in advance as a token of good faith or as a security for the due performance of the contract.

• If such amount is not given as a part payment of the purchase money, it is called earnest money or deposit.

• If the contract is duly performed, the earnest money is adjusted against the purchase price and only the balance of the price is required to be paid.

• But if the contract is not performed or cannot be performed through the fault of the buyer, the earnest money is forfeited by the seller.

• If the contract is not performed or cannot be performed through the fault of the seller, the seller must return the earnest money.

• Thus, earnest money is security for the prompt performance fulfillment of the agreement.

Stipulation as Time

• Section 11 of the Act states that where a different intention appears from the terms of the contract, stipulation as to time of payment is not deemed to be of the essence of a contract of sale.

• Whether any stipulation as to time is of the essence of the contract or not depends on the terms of the contract.

• However, stipulation as to time, except as regards the time of payment, are usually of the essence of the contract.

DOCUMENT OF TITLE OF GOODS

• Any document which is used in the ordinary course of business as – proof of the possession or – control of goods, or – authorising or purporting to authorise, – either by endorsement or by delivery, – the possessor of the document to transfer or

receive goods thereby represented is document of title to goods (Sec.2(4)).

Popular examples of the documents of title to goods

• Bill of lading :

– A bill of lading is a receipt given by the ship owner acknowledging the receipt of goods for carriage.

– It has been defined as a "receipt for goods shipped on board a ship, signed by the person who contracts to carry them, or his agent, and stating the terms on which the goods were delivered to and received by the ship".


• Dock warrant:

– A dock warrant is document which is issued by a-dock owner.

– It contains the details of the goods; certifying that the goods are held on behalf of the person whose name is appeared in it or his assignee by endorsement.

– It authorizes the person holding it to receive the possession of the goods.


• Warehouse keeper's certificate :

– Warehouse is a building in which goods are stored. Warehouse keeper's certificate is a document issued by the warehouse keeper stating that the goods specified in the document are in the warehouse or wharf.

– Warehousing (Development & Regulation ) Bill 2007 gives legal validity to warehouse Receipt and makes a fully negotiable instrument.


• Railway receipt :

– A railway receipt is a document which issued by the railway as the acknowledgement of the receipt of goods.

– It provides that on surrender of the receipt at the destination of the goods by the consignee the goods mentioned therein will be delivered to him.

• Delivery Order : – A delivery order is an order which is given by the

owner of goods directing a person who holds the goods on his behalf to deliver them to a person named therein.

CONDITIONS AND WARRANTIES

• There may be certain terms which are not so vital to the contract that their breach may seem to be a breach of the contract as such.

• Such terms are known as Warranties of the contract of sale

CONDITIONS AND WARRANTIES

• Section 12(2) of the Sale of Goods Act, 1930 has defined a condition thus :

• "A condition is a stipulation essential to the main purpose of the contract, the breach of which gives rise to a right to treat the contract as repudiated".

• A warranty is defined by Section 12(3) of the.Sale of Goods Act, 1930 thus :

• "A warranty is a stipulation collateral to the main purpose of the contract, the breach of which gives rise to only claim for damages but not to a right to reject the goods and treat the contract as repudiated".

Characteristic features of a Condition• A condition is a stipulation or term regarding goods forming part of

the contract of sale, and it is not a rqere expression of opinion or commendatory statement (i.e., statement of praise).

• A condition is a stipulation in a contract of sale essential to the main purpose of the contract. – It goes to the very root of the contract and forms the very foundation of

it.

• The breach of a condition gives the aggrieved party the right to treat the contract as repudiated, and also entitles him to claim damages.

• If a condition in a contract of sale is broken, no doubt, the aggrieved party can treat the contract as repudiated and reject the goods.– But he has also an alternative option.

• That is, he can treat the breach of condition a breach of warranty and can claim only damages without rejecting the goods.

Characteristic features of a Warranty

• A warranty is a stipulation or term regarding goods forming part of the contract of sale, and is not a mere expression of opinion or statement of commendation or praise.

• A warranty is a stipulation or term which is not essential to the main purpose of the contract and is only collateral (i.e., incidental, subsidiary or minor) to the main purpose of the contract. In short, it is only of secondary importance.

• The breach of a warranty gives the aggrieved party only the right to sue for damages, and not the right to repudiate the contract.

– It may be noted that the measure of damages for breach of warranty is the estimated loss directly or naturally resulting in the ordinary course of events from the breach.

Examples of Conditions and Warranties

• A says to B, a horse dealer, "I want a horse which runs at a speed of 60 kilometers per hour".

• B points out a particular horse and says that it runs at 60 kilometers per hour. A buys the horse.

• Later, A finds that the horse runs only at a speed of 45 kilometers per hour.

• Here, there is a breach of condition, because the stipulation made by the seller regarding the horse is a condition forming the very basis of the contract.,

Cases of treating the breach of condition as breach of warranty:

– A buyer can treat the breach of a conditions as a breach of warranty.

– This option has been given to him under Section 13(1) of the Act.

– According to it, in the following cases, a breach of condition would be treated as a breach of warranty only.

Voluntary waiver

• Where the buyer elects to treat the breach of condition as a breach of warranty. – For example, where he claims damages

instead of repudiating the contract, • Where the buyer waives the 'condition'. Waiver

may be express or implied. • Once the buyer has waived a condition, he is

stopped from insisting on its fulfillment.

Acceptance of Goods

• "Where, a contract of sale is not severable and the buyer has accepted the goods or part thereof, the buyer breach of any condition to be fulfilled by the seller can only be treated as a breach of warranty".

• In such case, the buyer would be deprived of his right of rejecting the goods and treating the contract as repudiated, unless there is a term in the contract, express or implied, to that effect.

Difference Between Condition And Warranty

Condition Warranty

1.Relation to main purposeIt is an essential to the main purpose of the contract.

It is subsidiary to the main purpose of the contract.

2.Rights of aggrieved partyBreach of condition gives the aggrieved party a right

to repudiate the contract and to get damages.

Breach of warranty entiles the aggrieved party to claim damages only.

3.Treating condition as warranty.Under certain circumstances a breach of condition

may be treated as a breach of warranty.

A warranty cannot become a condition.

4.Legal effect of breachBreach of condition will affect the legality of the

contract.

Breach of warranty will not affect the legality of the contract.

5.Discharge on breachIn case of breach of condition the aggrieved party is

free to discharge his promise.

In case of breach of warranty the aggrie ved party is not free to discharge his promise.

Express and Implied Conditions and Warranties

• Conditions and Warranties may be either express or implied.

• They are express, when they are expressly provided by the parties.

• On the other hand, there are certain conditions and warranties which are implied by law

Implied Conditions and WarrantiesImplied Conditions Implied 'Warranties

(a) Conditions as to title [Section 14(a)] (a) Warranty as to quiet possession/ enjoyment (Section 14(c)]

(b) Condition in case of sale by description (Section 15)

(b) Warranty of freedom from encumbrances [Section 14(c)]

(c) Condition in case of sale by sample (Section 17) (c) Warranty as to quality or fitness for a particular purpose annexed by the usage

of trade [Sectionl6 (3)(d) Condition in case of sale by description and

sample (Section 15)(d) Disclosure of dangerous nature of goods

(e) Condition as to quality or fitness [Section 16(2)]

(0 Condition as to merchantable quality [Section 16(2)]

(g) Condition as to wholesomeness

(h) Condition implied by custom [Section 16(3)]

Implied Conditions• Conditions as the title {Section 14 (a)}:

– In a contract of sale, there is an implied condition on the part of the seller that:

– (a) in the case of a sale, he has a right to sell the goods; – (b) in the case of an agreement to sell, he will have a

right to sell the goods at the time when the property is to pass.

• Sale by description (Section 15):

– Where there is a contract for the sale of goods by description, there is an implied condition that the goods shall correspond with the description.

Implied Conditions

• Sale by sample (Section 17):

– In the case of a contact for sale by sample, there is an implied condition:

– that the bulk shall correspond with the sample in quality;– that the buyer shall have a reasonable opportunity of

comparing the bulk with the sample;– that the goods shall be free from any defect, rendering

them unmerchantable, which would not be apparent on reasonable examination of the sample.

– This applies only to latent defect i.e., those which are not discoverable on reasonable examination.

– But if the defect is patent i.e., apparent and visible, the seller is not responsible.

Implied Conditions

• Sale by Sample as well as by description (Section 15):

• If the sale is by sample as well as description, there is an implied condition that the bulk of the goods shall correspond both with the sample and with the description

Implied Conditions

Condition as to fitness or quality (Section 15)

• Priest Vs. Last (1903): • P, a draper, purchased a hot water bottle from a retail

chemist. • P asked the chemist whether it will withstand boiling

water. • Chemist told him that the bottle was meant to hold hot

water. • The bottle burst when water poured into it and injured his

wife. • It was held that the chemist shall be liable to pay

damages to P, as he knew that the bottle was purchased for the purpose of being used as a hot water bottle

Implied Conditions

• Sale under patent or trade name : – In the case of a contract for the sale implied

condition as to its fitness for any particular purpose.

– It is so because in such a case, the buyer is not relying on the skill and judgement of the seller but relies on the good reputation of the trade name.

Implied Conditions

• Condition as to merchantability - (Section 16(2)) :

• This condition is implied only where the sale is by description.

• Where goods are bought by description from a seller, be of a merchantable quality i.e., the goods are of merchantable quality if:

– (i) they are reasonably saleable under the description by which they are known in the market;

– (ii) they are purchased for personal use, they must be reasonably fit for the purpose for which they are generally used.

Implied Conditions

• Condition as to wholesomes : – In the case of eatables and provisions, in

addition to the condition of the merchantable quality, there is an added obligation on the part of the seller that the goods shall be wholesome.

– Chaproniere Vs. Mason (1905) :• C bought a bread from a store. • It contained a stone which broke one of C's teeth.• Held, C could recover damages

Implied Conditions

• Condition implied by custom or usage of trade - Section 16 (3): – An implied warranty or condition as to quality

or fitness a particular purpose may be annexed by custom or usage of trade.

– It is clear that a usage would override the law provided it is reasonable and just.

– If usage is given effects, it necessarily changes the rule of law applicable to the case.

Implied Warranties• Quiet possession - {Section 14( b)}: • In a contract of sale, unless the circumstances of the contract are

such as to show different intention, there is implied warranty that the buyer shall have and enjoy quiet possession of the goods.

• Freedom from encumbrance - {Section 14(c)} :

• In contract of sale, there is implied warranty that the goods shall be free from any charge or encumbrance, in favour of any third party not declared or not known on the part of the buyer before or at the time when the contract was made or he has been given notice of them.

• Disclosure of dangerous nature of goods : • There is another implied warranty on the part of the seller, that in

case the goods sold are inherently dangerous or they are likely to be dangerous to the buyer, the seller must warn the buyer about the probable danger. If there is a breach of his warranty, the seller will be liable in damages.

Exclusion of implied conditions and warranties (Section 62)

• Implied conditions and warranties in a contract of sale may be negatived or varied by – (i) express agreement between the parties; – (ii) the course of dealings between the parties; – (iii) the custom or usage of trade, if usage is

such as to bind both the parties to the contract.

DOCTRINE OF CAVEAT EMPTOR

• 'caveat emptor' is Latin word which means 'let the buyer beware'

• It is the buyer's duty to select goods of his requirement. – The seller is not bound to supply the goods

which shall be fit for any particular quality. – This rule is known as the 'doctrine of caveat

emptor'.

DOCTRINE OF CAVEAT EMPTOR

• Sale of Goods Act– Subject to the provisions of this Act and any

other law for the time being in force, – there is no implied warranty or conditions as

the quality or fitness for any particular purpose of goods supplied under a contract of sale

Exceptions to the Doctrine of Caveat Emptor (Section 16)

(a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (0) (g)In case of

misrepresentation

by seller

In case of concealment of latent defects

by seller

In case of sale by description

(Section 15)

In case of sale by sample

(Section

17)

In case of sale by description and sample

(Section 15)

Fitnessfor a

particularpurpose

Section16(1)

MerchantableQuality

Section (16)2

Exceptions to the Doctrine of Caveat Emptor

• Conditions as to quality of fitness for buyer's purpose:

– Ordinarily, there is no implied condition that the goods shall be fit for the particular purpose of the buyer.

– But in certain circumstances, if the buyer makes his purpose clear to seller and buys the goods relying upon his skill and judgment, then there is an implied condition that the goods shall be fit for the buyer's specific purpose.

– In such cases, the doctrine of caveat emptor does not apply.


• Condition as to merchantability:

– Sometimes, the goods are sold by description. In such cases, there is an implied condition that the goods shall be of merchantable quantity.

– Thus, in case of sale by description the seller is bound to deliver the goods of merchantable quantity and in such cases, the doctrine of caveat emptor does not apply.

• Conditions as to wholesomeness :

– It is a part of the condition as to merchantability.

– This condition is applicable in cases of eatables i.e., foodstuffs and other goods which are used for human consumption.

– In such cases, in addition to the principal condition as to merchantability, another implied condition is that the goods must be wholesome i.e., sound, pure and fit for consumption at the time of sale.


• Conditions implied by customs:

• The implied conditions as to 'fitness' and 'merchantability' are applicable only if certain requirements are fulfilled.

• However, the implied condition as quality or fitness for a particular purpose may be attached by the custom or usage of trade {section 16 (3)}.

• This is so because the parties enter into an agreement with reference to those known usages.


• Sale under a patent or trade name :

– In the case of a contract for the sale of a specified article under its patent or other trade name, there is no implied condition that the goods shall be reasonably fit for any particular purpose {(provision to Sec. 16(1)}.

• Consent obtained by fraud:

– Where the consent of the buyer, in a contract of sale, is obtained by the seller by fraud or where the seller knowingly conceals a defect which could not be discovered on a reasonable examination i.e., where there is latent defect in the goods, the doctrine of caveat emptor does not hold good.

PRACTICAL PROBLEMS

• Attempt the problem, giving reasons for your answer:• A dealer in radios gives a 'Philips' radio to a customer on the terms

that Rs. 1000 should be paid by him immediately and Rs. 200 more in two monthly equal installments.

• It was further agreed that if the radio is found defective the customer may return it within a week but not later. The customer makes default in paying the last installment. Can the radio dealer take back the radio on his default?

• [Hint. No,the radio dealer cannot take back the radio on default by the customer because it is a contract of sale and not of hire purchase.}

End of Chapter 10

sale of goods act

Documents

contract of sale

sale of goods act

present sale of future

actual sale

goods consideration

goods section

identical goods

goods delivery