sales+and+goods+act

Upload: hardik-naik

Post on 02-Jun-2018

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/10/2019 Sales+and+Goods+Act

    1/6

    CHAPTER 4

    SALE OF GOODS ACT 1930

    Originally, the law relating to sale of goods was contained in Chapter VII of the Indian Contract Act, 1872. Thesame was repealed and re-enacted by the Sale of Goods Act, III of 1930.

    4.1 FORMATION OF THE CONTRACT OF SALE

    Definition

    (Section 4)A contract of sale of goods is a contract whereby the seller transfers or agrees to transfer the property in goods tothe buyer for price".

    ESSENTIALS OF CONTRACT OF SALEFrom the above definition, the following essentials of a contract of sale may by noted:1. There must be at least two parties2. Transfer or Agreement to transfer the ownership of goods .3. The subject matter of the contract must necessarily be 'goods'.4. The consideration is Price.5. A Contract of sale may be absolute or conditional6. All other essentials of a valid contract must be present.

    `SALE` AND 'AGREEMENT TO SELL' DISTINGUISHEDSale:

    It is a contract where the ownership in the goods is transferred by seller to the buyer immediately at theconclusion contract. Thus, strictly speaking, sale takes place when there is a transfer of property in goods fromthe seller to the buyer. A sale is an executed contract.

    It must be noted here that the payment of price is immaterial to the transfer of property in goods.Ex -A sells his Yamaha Motor Bicycle to B for Rs. 10,000. It is a sale since the ownership of the motorcycle hasbeen transferred from A to B.

    Agreement to sell:

    It is a contract of sale where the transfer of property in goods is to take place at a future date or subject to somecondition thereafter to be fulfilled.Ex-(i) A agreed to buy from B a certain quantity of nitrate of soda. The ship carrying the nitrate of soda was yet to

    arrive. This is `an agreement to sale`. In this case, the ownership of nitrate of soda is to be to transferred

    to A on the arrival of the ship containing the specified goods (i.e. nitrate of soda) [Johnson V Mcdonald(1842) 9 M & W 600, 60 RR 838]

    (ii) On 1stMarch 1998, A agreed to sell his car to B for Rs. 80,000. It was agreed between themselves that the

    ownership of the car will transfer to B on 31stMarch 1998 when the car is got registered in B`s name. It is

    an agreement to sell and it will become sale on 31stMarch when the car is registered in the name of B.

    Other points of distinction between a sale and an agreement to sell are:

    Sale Agreement to sell1. A sale is an executed contract.2. In a sale, since the property has passed to the buyer,

    the seller can sue the buyer for the price of thegoods.

    3. A sale creates a right in rem.4. In case of loss of goods, the loss will fall on the

    buyer, even though the goods are in the possessionof the seller. It is because 'Risk' is associated withownership.

    4. In case buyer pays the price and the seller thereafterbecomes an insolvent, the buyer can claim the goodsfrom the Official Receiver or Assignee.

    6. If the buyer becomes an insolvent without paying theprice, the ownership having passed to the buyer, theseller shall have to deliver the goods to the OfficialAssignee or Receiver except where he has a lienover the goods.

    1. An Agreement to sell is an executory contract.2. In an agreement to sell, in case of breach, the seller

    can only sue for damages, unless the price waspayable at a stated date.

    3. An agreement to sell creates a right inpersonam.4. The loss in this case shall be borne by the seller,

    even though the goods are in the possession of thebuyer.

    5. In these circumstances, the buyer cannot claim thegoods but only a rateable dividend for the moneypaid.

    6. In these circumstances, the seller can refuse todeliver the goods to the Official Assignee or Re-ceiver.

  • 8/10/2019 Sales+and+Goods+Act

    2/6

    25

    Sale and Hire Purchase Agreement

    Hire Purchase Agreement It is an agreement for hire, with an option to purchase.

    The hirer, under this agreement, is required to pay every month a particular sum of money, and if he paysin that way for a fixed number of months, the hirer will become the owner of the goods on the payment ofthe last instalment.

    But, if the hirer fails to pay any particular instalment, the owner can terminate the contract and take awaythe goods, because the ownership continues to remain in the owner. A "Hire-purchase agreement" is

    distinct from "Sale" in which price is payable by instalments A 'Hire-purchase agreement,' does not result in passing of the property unless the option to purchase is

    exercised, usually by payment of all the instalments. Till such time, it constitutes bailment.

    Sale ln case of sale, the property passes as soon as sale is made though price has not been fully paid.

    In determining as to whether a particular contract belongs to one type or the other, regard shall have to be paidto the fact whether the hirer has merely an option to purchase, or whether he has bought or agreed to buy thegoods.

    4.2 GOODS

    Definition of `GOODS` under the Act 'Goods' means every kind of moveable property and includes stock and shares, growing crops, grass, and

    things attached to or forming part of the land, which are agreed to be severed before sale or under the contractof sale.

    Actionable claims and money are not included in the definition of goods.

    Thus, goods include every kind of moveable property other than actionable claim or money. Example -goodwill, copyright, trademark, patents, water, gas, and electricity are all goods and may be the subject matterof a contract of sale.

    The test is if the property on shifting its situation, does not lose its character, the said property shall be movableand fall within the definition of `Goods`.

    Which documents are considered as `DOCUMENTS OF TITLE TO GOODS` A document of title to goods may be described as any document used as proof of the possession or control of

    goods, authorising or purporting to authorise, either by endorsement or by delivery, the possessor of thedocument to transfer or receive goods thereby represented.

    The following are documents of title to goods:

    Bill of Lading; Dock Warrant; Warehousekeeper's Certificate; Wharfinger's Certificate; Railway Receipt; Warrant or order forthe delivery of goods; and any other document used in the ordinary course of business as a document of title .

    CLASSIFICATION OF GOODSGoods may be classified into:1. Existing Goods - Existing goods are those, which are owned or possessed by the seller at the time of the

    contract. Instances of sale of goods possessed but not owned by the sellers fire sales by agents and pledgees.Existing goods may be either:(a) Specific and Ascertained - goods identified and agreed upon at the time a contract of sale is made; or(b) Generic and Unascertained - goods arc goods indicated by description and not specifically identified.

    2. Future Goods - Future goods" means goods to be manufactured or produced or acquired by the seller aftermaking the contract of sale.

    3. Contingent Goods -Contingent goods are the goods the acquisition of which by the seller depends upon acontingency which mayor may not happen. Contingent goods are a part of future goods.

    4.3 PRICE

    'Price' means the money considerationfor sale ofthe goods. 'Price' is an integral part of a contract of sale. If itis not fixed or is not capable of being fixed, the whole contract is void ab-initio.

    The Act provides that the price may be fixed(I) either by the contract or(II) may be agreed to be fixed in a manner provided by the contract, e.g., by a valuer, or

  • 8/10/2019 Sales+and+Goods+Act

    3/6

    26

    (III) it may be determined by the course of dealings between the parties.(IV) in case, price is not capable of being fixed in any of the above ways, the buyer is bound to pay

    reasonable price. What is reasonable price will vary from case to case.

    4.4 CONDITIONS AND WARRANTIES

    [Sections 11-17]

    In a contract of sale, parties make certain stipulations, i.e., agree to certain terms. Some of them may beintended by the parties to be of a fundamental nature, e.g., quality of the goods to be supplied. The stipulationessential to the main purpose of the contract, the breach of which gives rise to a right to treat the contract as

    repudiated. Such stipulations are known as Conditions`. In contrast, some may be intended by the parties to be binding, but of a subsidiary or inferior character, e.g.,

    time of payment. Thus, stipulation collateral to the main purpose of the contract, the breach of which gives riseto a claim for damages but not to a right to reject the goods. Here the stipulations are known as warranties'.

    DISTINCTION BETWEEN 'CONDITION' AND 'WARRANTY'

    Condition Warranty1. A condition is a stipulation (in a contract), which is

    essential to the main purpose of the contract.2. A breach of condition gives the aggrieved party a

    right to sue for damages as well as the right torepudiate the contract.

    3. A breach of condition may be treated as a breach ofwarranty in certain circumstances.

    1. A warranty is a stipulation, which is only collateral orsubsidiary to the main purpose of the contract.

    2. A breach of warranty gives only the right to sue fordamages. The contract cannot be repudiated.

    3. A breach of warranty cannot be treated as a breach

    of condition.

    Ex-A man buys a particular horse, which is warranted quiet to ride and drive. If the horse turns out to be vicious, thebuyer's only remedy is to claim damages.But if instead of buying a particular horse, a man asks a dealer to supply him with a quiet horse and the horseturns out to be vicious, the stipulation is a condition and the buyer can reject the horse, or keep the horse and claimdamages.

    WHEN CONDITION TO BE TREATED AS WARRANTY[SECTION 13]

    Under the following circumstances a breach of condition is to be treated as a breach of warranty, i.e., the rightto repudiate the contract is deemed to have been lost:1. Waiver of Condition2. Compulsory treatment of breach of condition as breach of Warranty.

    EXPRESS AND IMPLIED CONDITIONS AND WARRANTIES Conditions and Warranties may be either express or implied.

    They are said to be "express" when the terms of the contract expressly provide for them. They are said to be'implied'when the law deems their existence in the contract even without their actually having been put in thecontract.

    (A) IMPLIED CONDITIONS The following are the implied conditions

    (1)Condition as to Title(2) Sale by Description(3) Condition as to Quality or Fitness(4) Merchantable Quality

    Sale by sample-A contract of sale is a contract for sale by sample where there is a term in the contract, express orimplied, to that effect.

    In a sale by sample, the following are the implied conditions:1. The bulk shall correspond with the sample in quality;2. That the buyer shall have a reasonable opportunity of comparing the bulk with the sample; and3. That the goods shall be free from any defects rendering them unmerchantable, which would not be

    apparent on reasonable examination of the sample.Ex-(i) Certain shoes were sold by sample for the French Army. The shoes were found to contain paper not

    discoverable by ordinary inspection. Held, the buyer was entitled to the refund of price plus damages.(ii) In a contract for the sale of brandy by sample, the brandy that was supplied had been coloured with a dye.

    Held, the buyer was not bound by the contract, though the bulk corresponded with sample, since the defectcould not have been located on reasonable examination of the sample [Mody v. Gregson(1868) L.R.4Ex. 49.].

  • 8/10/2019 Sales+and+Goods+Act

    4/6

    27

    (B) IMPLIED WARRANTIES There are two implied warranties. These are:

    1. Warranty of Quiet Possession2. Warranty of Freedom from Encumbrances

    Ex A purchased a second hand typewriter from B. A used it for sometime and also spend some money on itsrepairs. The typewriter turned out to be stolen one and as such A had to return it to the true owner. It was heldthat A could recover damages from B amounting to the price paid and the cost of repair [Mason v.

    Burmingham (1949) 2 KB 545]4.5 DOCTRINE OF caveat emptor

    Caveat Emptor is a fundamental principle of the law of sale of goods. It means "Caution Buyer", i.e. "Let thebuyer beware".

    In other words, it is not the duty of the seller's duty to point out defects of his own goods. The buyer mustinspect the goods to find out if they will suit his purpose.

    Ex-Pigs were sold "subject to all faults", and these pigs, being infected, caused typhoid to other healthy pigs of thebuyer, it was held that the seller was not bound to disclose that the pigs were unhealthy. The rule of the law being'Caveat Emptor'. [Goddard v. Hobbs 1878, 4 App. Cas. 13].Exceptions

    1. Where the seller makes a false representation and buyer relies on that representation. The rule of "CaveatEmptor" will not apply and the buyer will be entitled to the goods according to that representation;

    2. Where the seller actively conceals a defect in the goods , so that on a reasonable examination the samecould not be discovered;

    3. Where the buyer makes known to the seller the purpose for which he is buying the goods , and the sellerhappens to be a person whose business is to sell goods of that description, then there is an implied conditionthat the goods shall be reasonably fit for such purpose. The rule of Caveat Emptor will not apply;

    4. In case of sale by description, there is implied condition as to their being of merchantable quality. However, ifthe buyer has examined the goods, this condition of "merchantability" extends only to hidden or latent defects.The defects, which such examination ought to have revealed, are not covered, i.e., the rule of Caveat Emptorwill be applicable.

    Ex -In Donoghue v. Stevenson(the `snail in the ginger-beer`case) it was held that manufacturers owed a duty tothe ultimate consumer to take care in making their goods where there is no likelihood of their being examinedbefore they reach the ultimate consumer.

    When does property pass from the seller to the buyer(a) Specific or Ascertained goods - the property in the good is transferred to the buyer at such times the parties

    to the contract intend to be transferred or when something has to be done by the seller to put them in adeliverable state, property passes only when such thing is done, and the buyer has notice thereof.Ex-The whole of the contents of a cistern of oil were sold, and the seller had to put the oil in casks to be thendelivered to the buyer. Held, the property did not pass until the oil was actually put into casks ready for deliveryand the buyer was notified accordingly. [Rugg v. Minett, 1809,11 East 2.101].

    (b) Unascertained or Future Goods - property in the goods is not transferred to the buyer unless and until thegoods are ascertained.Ex-X agrees to sell Y 200 quintals of wheat out or a larger quantity lying in X's store. The agreed price is to be paidon the day appointed under the contract. Unless and until the required quantity of 200 quintals is separated

    from the larger quantity and the goods have thus been ascertained, -property cannot pass from the seller to thebuyer.

    4.6 TRANSFER OF TITLE BY NON-OWNERS

    [Sections 27-30]

    The general rule is that only the owner of goods can transfer a good title. No one can give a better title than hehimself has. This rule is expressed by the maxim "Nemo dat quod non habet" which means "that no one cangive what he himself has not"

    If the seller, therefore, has no title, or a defective title, the buyer's title will be equally wanting or defective as thecase may be, though he may be a purchaser - bonafide and for value.

    Ex-A f inds a ring of B and sells it to a third person who purchases it for value and in good faith. The true owner,

  • 8/10/2019 Sales+and+Goods+Act

    5/6

    28

    i.e., B can recover from that person, for A having no title could pass none the better. [Faruquaharson v. King(1902) A.C. 324.).

    Exceptions to the Rule

    1. Sale by Mercantile Agent2. Sale by a Joint-owner3. Sale by a Person in Possession under a Voidable Contract4. Sale by the Seller in Possession of Goods after Sale - Where a seller having sold goods, continues in possession

    thereof or of documents or title to the goods, such seller will pass a good title to the (second) buyer, if that buyer

    has acted in good faith and without notice of the previous sale. 5. Sale by an unpaid seller - a seller who has exercised his right of lien or stoppage in transit can, resell the goods

    and convey a valid title to another buyer, though no notice of re-sale has been given to the original buyer.

    DUTIES OF THE SELLER AND BUYERDuty of the seller

    a) To deliver the goods, in accordance with the terms of the contract of sale.b) Delivery and payment of price are concurrent conditions.c) The seller of goods has the duty of giving delivery according to the terms of the contract.Duty of the buyer

    a) Pay for the goods;b) Accept delivery; andc) Pay compensation to the seller in case he wrongfully refuses to accept delivery.

    DELIVERY It has been defined as a voluntary transfer of possession from one person to another.. Delivery of the goods may, be:I. Physical or Actual Delivery2. Symbolic Delivery - e.g., delivery of a railway receipt properly endorsed, or delivery of the key of a warehouse;3. Constructive Delivery or Attornment - only an acknowledgement by the person in possession that he holds

    them on behalf of another.

    Rules regarding delivery1. Theseller is not bound to deliver goods till the buyer appliesfordelivery in terms of the contract.

    2. Place of Delivery- goods sold are to be delivered at the place agreed for delivery in the contract.3. Time of Deliveryas per contract otherwise within reasonable time.

    4. The expensesof and incidental to putting the goods into a deliverable state shall be borne by the seller, as perthe terms of the contact.

    5. Demand and tender must be at a reasonable hour- What is a reasonable hour is a question of fact.6. Delivery of Wrong Quantity- Where the seller delivers to the buyer a quantity of goods less than he contracted

    to sell, the buyer may reject them. But, if the buyer accepts the goods so delivered he shall be required to payfor them at the contracted rate.

    7. Instalment Deliveries- The buyer is not bound to accept delivery by instalment, unless otherwise agreed.

    8. Delivery to the Carrier or Wharfinger- Delivery of goods by the seller to a carrier for transmission to buyer orto wharfinger for safe custody isprima facie deemed to be a delivery of the goods to the buyer.As regards insurance, the sellers duty is only to give sufficient notice to the buyer to enable him to insure thegoods. Alternatively it may be agreed to send the goods c.i.f. or ex-ship.

    9. Buyer not bound to return rejected goods- when the goods are delivered to a buyer on sale or return basis andthe buyer refuses to accept them, he is not bound to return them to the seller, but it is his duty to inform theseller that he has refused them; otherwise after lapse of a reasonable time, he will be deemed to have acceptedthem.

    10.Liability of the Buyer- When the seller is ready and willing to deliver the goods and requests the buyer to takedelivery and the buyer does not within a reasonable time takes delivery of the goods, he is liable to the seller forany loss occasioned by his neglect or refusal to take delivery, and also for a reasonable charge for the care andcustody of the goods.

    4.7 UNPAID SELLER AND HIS RIGHTS

    A contract is comprised of reciprocal promises, in a contract of sale, if seller is under an obligation to delivergoods; buyer has to pay for it. In case buyer fails or refuses to pay, the seller, as an unpaid seller, shall havecertain rights.

    Who is an unpaid seller An unpaid seller of goods is a person who has not been paid the whole of the price or to whom the whole of the

    price has not been tendered. The term "seller" includes an agent of the seller.

  • 8/10/2019 Sales+and+Goods+Act

    6/6

    29

    The seller of goods is deemed to be an "unpaid seller" if:(a) the whole of the price, has not been paid or tendered;(b) when a bill of exchange or other negotiable instrument has been received as conditional payment, and the

    condition on which it was received has not been fulfilled by reason of the dishonour of the instrument orotherwise. .

    Rights of an unpaid seller Rights of an unpaid seller may broadly be classified under two heads namely:

    1. Rights against goods

    An unpaid seller has the following rights against the goods:(a) Lien on the goods(b) A right of stoppage in transit(c) A right of re-sale

    2. Rights Against the Buyer Personally

    An unpaid seller, besides his rights against goods, has the following rights against the buyer personally:(i) Right to sue for the price; and(ii) the right to sue the buyer for damages for non-acceptance.

    4.8 SALE BY AUCTION

    (Section 64)

    In the case of sale by auction the following rules apply:1. When the goods are put up for sale in lots, each lot is deemed, prima facie, to be the subject matter of a

    separate contract of sale;2. At an auction, the sale is complete when the auctioneer announces its completion by the fall of the hammer orin other customary manner; until such completion any bidder may withdraw his bid.

    3. A right to bid may be reserved expressly by or on behalf of the seller and where such right is expressly soreserved, but not otherwise, the seller or any person on his behalf may bid at the auction;

    4. Where the sale is not notified to be subject to a right to bid on behalf of the seller, it shall not be lawful for theseller to bid for himself or to employ any person to bid at such sale, or for the auctioneer knowingly to take anybid from the seller or any such person, Any sale contravening this rule shall be treated as fraudulent;

    5. The sale may be notified to be subject to a reserved or upset price;6. If the seller makes use of pretended bidding to raise the price, sale is voidable at the option of the buyer.

    [Thornett v. Haines. 1846, 15 M. & W. 367].