sample of organizations participating in consolidated appeals · 2017-09-14 · sample of...
TRANSCRIPT
SAMPLE OF ORGANIZATIONS PARTICIPATING IN CONSOLIDATED APPEALS
ACF
ACTED
ADRA
Afghanaid
AVSI
CARE
CARITAS
CONCERN
COOPI
CRS
CWS
DRC
FAO
GOAL
GTZ
Handicap International
HELP
HelpAge International
Humedica
IMC
INTERSOS
IOM
IRC
IRIN
Islamic Relief Worldwide
LWF
MACCA
Malteser
Medair
Mercy Corps
MERLIN
NPA
NRC
OCHA
OHCHR
OXFAM
Première Urgence
Save the Children
Solidarités
TEARFUND
Terre des Hommes
UNAIDS
UNDP
UNDSS
UNESCO
UNFPA
UN-HABITAT
UNHCR
UNICEF
WFP
WHO
World Vision Int’l
iii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY........................................................................................................................... 1 Table I: Requirements and funding to date per cluster ........................................................... 5 Table II: Requirements and funding to date per priority level................................................... 5 Table III: Requirements and funding to date per organization .................................................. 6
2. CHANGES IN THE CONTEXT, HUMANITARIAN NEEDS, AND RESPONSE.................................... 8 2.1 CONTEXT .................................................................................................................................... 8 2.2 SUMMARY OF RESPONSE TO DATE.............................................................................................. 11 2.3 UPDATED NEEDS ANALYSIS AND INFORMATION GAPS ................................................................... 13 2.4 ANALYSIS OF FUNDING TO DATE ................................................................................................. 16
3. PROGRESS TOWARDS ACHIEVING STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES AND SECTORAL TARGETS . 18 3.1 STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES ............................................................................................................ 18 3.2 SECTOR RESPONSE PLANS ......................................................................................................... 19
3.2.1 Agriculture and Livestock................................................................................................. 19 3.2.2 Coordination..................................................................................................................... 23 3.2.3 Early Recovery................................................................................................................. 25 3.2.4 Education ......................................................................................................................... 29 3.2.5 Food Aid........................................................................................................................... 32 3.2.6 Health............................................................................................................................... 35 3.2.7 Multi-Sector/Refugees ..................................................................................................... 40 3.2.8 Nutrition............................................................................................................................ 45 3.2.9 Protection......................................................................................................................... 49 3.2.10 WASH .............................................................................................................................. 57
4. FORWARD VIEW.................................................................................................................................... 64 NEEDS ASSESSMENT PLANS FOR THE 2012 CAP ................................................................................... 64
ANNEX I: LIST OF PROJECTS AND FUNDING TABLES.................................................................... 68 Table IV: List of appeal projects (grouped by cluster), with funding status of each ................ 68 Table V: Total funding to date per donor to projects listed in the appeal ............................... 77 Table VI: Total humanitarian funding to date per donor (appeal plus other) ........................... 78 Table VII: Humanitarian funding to date per donor to projects not listed in the appeal............ 79 Table VIII: Requirements and funding to date per gender marker score................................... 80 Table IX: Requirements and funding to date per geographical area ....................................... 81
ANNEX II: ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS.................................................................................... 82
Please note that appeals are revised regularly. The latest version of this document is available
on http://www.humanitarianappeal.net.
Full project details can be viewed, downloaded and printed from http://fts.unocha.org/.
iv
K E N Y A
1
1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The review of the Kenya 2011+ Emergency Humanitarian Response Plan coincides with the Government of Kenya’s 30 May declaration on drought being a national disaster. The grave combination of drought-induced crop failure due to climate variability, livestock deaths, rising food and non-food prices, eroding coping capacities, and shortfalls in food and non-food assistance levels are expected to weaken food security to emergency levels among pastoralists in the northern, eastern and north-eastern provinces and to crisis levels for some marginal agricultural farm households after June, following the failed 2011 long rains. According to the May FewsNet food security outlook1, the food security of 2.4 million people is classified as Stressed or Crisis levels, requiring immediate food and non-food assistance to mitigate further declines in food security. Children under five are increasingly exposed to malnutrition associated with the current drought conditions. Malnutrition rates are now above emergency thresholds with districts such as Marsabit facing 4.1% severe acute malnutrition and 22% global acute malnutrition. In addition, about 1.1 million boys and girls plus 8,000 teachers are affected by drought annually with varying severity (Kenya Food Security Steering Group 2010). Associated with declining food security is the surging inflation and soaring food and fuel price shocks that have sparked protests in the country. Food prices have risen by at least 25% between January and April this year.2 The urban population is highly market-dependent and therefore extremely vulnerable to price shocks. (According to the World Bank estimates, 44 million more people in developing countries have fallen into poverty since June 2010 due to increasing food prices.) Maize prices in Kenya rose by 73% between June 2010 and January 2011. Refugee numbers continue to rise as persistent conflict in Somalia triggers cross-border influxes. By the end of May 2011, 53,641 new refugees and asylum seekers had been registered country-wide compared to 27,651 during the same period in 2010. As of 31 May, there were 479,919 refugees in the country. Most of the refugee arrivals are in poor health: the global acute malnutrition (GAM) rate among arrivals is 15%, two times higher than the 7.8% rate among the existing refugee population in camps. The increasing refugee population adds to the already congested camps while at the same time outstripping the already dwindling resources shared with the host communities. As the suspension of the establishment of required infrastructure in the new extension of Ifo II refugee camp continues, refugees are still languishing in the currently over-crowded camps. Access constraints in cross-border regions due to resource-based conflicts as well as spill-over conflict from neighbouring countries such as Somalia have combined to hamper effective delivery of humanitarian aid to displaced populations. Insecurity incidents have been reported in the north-east and north-west of the country leading to substantial temporary displacements of up to 2,000 people coupled with increased humanitarian needs. The political environment remains fragile with the potential for inter-communal violence and population displacement triggered by (1) political reform processes; (2) the International Criminal Court investigation linked to the 2007-2008 post-election violence; (3) hearings of past historical injustices through the Truth, Justice and Reconciliation Commission (TJRC); and (4) preparatory stages leading to the general elections scheduled for August 2012. Reform processes particularly on the implementation of the new constitution and passing of associated relevant electoral laws to assist in the implementation remain in progress. The Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission (IEBC) bill, passed by Parliament on 31 May, is critical to the election process as the Constitution provides for an additional 80 constituencies which the IEBC is expected to delineate. In line with the 2011-2013 humanitarian strategy, the focus remains on assisting households to recover fully from recurrent shocks and hazards through, for example, offering immediate and
1 Famine Early Warning Systems Update (FEWSNET), Kenya Food Security Outlook Update, May 2011, http://www.fews.net/docs/publications/kenya_fsou_2011_05_final.pdf. 2 Consumers Federation of Kenya, April 2011.
K E N Y A
2
medium-term food and non-food interventions that seek to mitigate urgent needs while concurrently restoring livelihoods and building their resilience. The rapid deterioration of the food security situation and associated humanitarian consequences underlines the gravity of the situation that requires immediate funding support to respond to the crisis. In this regard, the revised requirements for the projects in the Mid-Year Review of the 2011+ Emergency Humanitarian Response Plan (EHRP) are $604,845,876.3 Basic humanitarian and development facts about Kenya
Most recent data Previous data or pre-crisis baseline
Population 38,610,097 (Source: Kenya National Bureau of Statistics [KNBS], 2010)
28,696,607 (KNBS - 1999)
IDPs
30,000 Mau forest IDPs, 6,004 households in self-help sites (Ministry of State for Special Programmes [MoSSP] 31July 2010)
20,000 people in transit sites (3,714 households), 35,000 people in self-help sites (6,802 households) (MoSSP, March 2010)4
In-country Total: 479,919 395,708 UNHCR - June 2010
Popu
latio
n M
ovem
ents
Refugees Abroad Total: 9,620 (UNHCR online database as at
January 2010)
Gross national income per capita
$1,560 (2008, World Development Indicators Database, April 2010) (PPP method)
Econ
omic
St
atus
%of population living below income poverty line (PPP $1.25 a day, 2000-2008)
19.7% (United Nations Development Programme [UNDP] HDR 2010)
19.7% (2005)
Crude mortality rate 11.7 per 1,000 ( as at 1999 - Kenya Demographic Health Survey [KDHS] 2009)
Maternal mortality 488/100,000 live births (KDHS 2008 – 2009) Under-five mortality 74/1,000 (UNICEF: (KDHS 2008 - 2009)
Life expectancy Years from birth: male: 53; female: 55 (WHO: Global Health Observatory [GHO], 2008)
n/a
Number of health work force (MD + nurse + midwife) per 10,000 population
11.8 /10,000 (WHO: GHO) Nursing and midwifery personnel: (2002)
Measles vaccination rate (6 mo -15 years)
74 (WHO: GHO, 2009) 90 (2008)
Adult HIV prevalence (15-49 years old)
6.3% (KDHS 2008-2009) / 1.4 million (Kenya AIDS Indicator Survey 2007)
Hea
lth
Number of cases for selected diseases relevant to the crisis
Cholera - 3,354 cases, case fatality rate (CFR) of 2.1% – (MoPHS, September 2010)
8,383 cases CFR 2.3%, (WHO, 2009)
WA
SH % of population
without sustainable access to an improved drinking water source
41% (UNDP HDR 2010) 43% (UNICEF Childinfo, 2006); 3-5 litres per person per day in the Northern Pastoral Livelihood Cluster/in some ASAL districts
ECHO)Vulnerability and Crisis Index score
ECHO Global Needs Assessment results 2010 Score: 3
UNDP HDI score 0.470, rank 128 out of 169 countries (UNDP HDR 2010)
0.541 (ranked 147 out of 182 countries- HDR 2009/country sheets)
Oth
er
vuln
erab
ility
in
dice
s
IASC Early Warning - Early Action rating Red
3 All dollar signs in this document denote United States dollars. Funding for this appeal should be reported to the Financial Tracking Service (FTS, [email protected]), which will display its requirements and funding on the current appeals page.) 4 According to NGOs, the number of IDPs residing in transit sites and self-help groups is estimated to be higher.
K E N Y A
3
Most recent data Previous data or pre-crisis baseline
Food
Sec
urity
Food Security Indicator: Integrated Food Security Phase Classification (current phase)
Overall situation and food security prognosis: Areas reporting the largest deficits include the northern and eastern pastoral districts including Wajir, Marsabit, Isiolo, northern Garissa, northern Tana River and Mandera; and the southeastern marginal districts of Kitui, Makueni, Mwingi and Tharaka. Food insecurity for the poor and very poor households in northern and eastern pastoral areas is likely to deteriorate to Crisis and Emergency levels (IPC Phases 3 and 4) from July onward unless urgent cross-sectoral interventions are instituted. For poor and very poor farm households in the south-eastern marginal agricultural areas, food security is likely to deteriorate to Crisis levels (IPC Phase 3) from the current Stressed level (IPC Phase 2) after July. Food insecurity is similarly deteriorating in the pastoral districts of Turkana and Samburu districts and is likely to fall into Crisis levels (IPC Phase 3) after July. While little harvests are anticipated in the coastal lowland districts of Malindi, Kwale, Kilifi and Taita Taveta, favorable rains in late April and May have mitigated rapid deterioration in food security. The Coastal areas are anticipated to remain in the Stressed (IPC Phase 2) through the onset of the short rains.
The north-eastern pastoral cluster: The food insecurity situation in north-eastern pastoral cluster has reached Crisis levels, with the exception of Tana River district where the situation is at the Stressed level.
The north-western pastoralCool cluster: In January 2011, the food security situation in most parts of the cluster was at the Stressed level, with the exception of north-eastern Marsabit and southern Moyale which were already in the Crisis level. By June 2011, the situation has deteriorated to Crisis level in Marsabit and Moyale districts. Although food security situation in Turkana has remained at the Stressed level, food security is rapidly deteriorating due to an upsurge of conflicts over resources and exceptionally high food prices. From July to September 2011, food security situation is likely to deteriorate further, to emergency level in Marsabit and Moyale and to Crisis level in Turkana.
K E N Y A
4
Most recent data Previous data or pre-crisis baseline
Food
Sec
urity
Food Security Indicator: Integrated Food Security Phase Classification (current phase)
The south-eastern and coastal marginal agricultural cluster: While the long-rains season is a minor season, household food insecurity is precariously fragile after two other poor or failed seasons, in succession. Farm households in the marginal agricultural districts of the south-eastern lowlands in particular and coastal farm households, to some extent, are faced with severe food insecurity through February 2012, at least. The food security situation for households in the south-eastern lowlands is likely to decline precariously after July, through February 2012, when the next harvest is anticipated. The food security of farm households in the coastal lowlands has improved as compared to mid-April and is likely to sustain households to the next season.
(Source: KFSSG 2011 Long Rains Mid-Season Assessment Report)
% of children under five suffering from wasting
6.7% (KDHS, 2008-09) 5.6% (KDHS 2003)
% of children under five suffering from underweight
16.1% (KDHS, 2008-09) 19.9% (KDHS 2003)
% of children under five suffering from stunting
35.3% (KDHS, 2008-09) 30.3% (KDHS 2003)
Global acute malnutrition (GAM) rate among children under five (<2 z-scores, WHO 2006 - 2011 Nutrition survey results)
Above 20% in Mandera West, Mandera Central, Mandera East, Marsabit, Wajir West-North and Turkana. Between 15% and <20% in Garissa and Isiolo. Between 10% and <15% in Mwingi Below 10% in Kaijado, Kitui, Makueni (2011 nutrition survey results)
Nutrition survey reports
Nut
ritio
n
Children under five and pregnant and lactating women affected by acute malnutrition
385,000 acutely malnourished children <five years old 90,000 acutely malnourished pregnant and lactating women (Nutrition survey reports)
Nutrition survey reports
K E N Y A
5
Table I: Requirements and funding to date per cluster
2011+ Kenya Emergency Humanitarian Response Plan as of 30 June 2011
http://fts.unocha.org
Compiled by OCHA on the basis of information provided by donors and appealing organizations.
Cluster Original requirements
Revised requirements
Funding
Unmet requirements
% Covered
Uncommittedpledges
($) A
($) B
($) C
($) D=B-C
E=C/B
($) F
AGRICULTURE AND LIVESTOCK 16,864,992 33,153,036 4,034,847 29,118,189 12% -
COORDINATION 2,094,100 2,085,530 784,652 1,300,878 38% -
EARLY RECOVERY 6,970,950 8,333,512 2,300,000 6,033,512 28% -
EDUCATION 1,036,460 1,036,460 518,939 517,521 50% -
FOOD AID 106,316,713 129,949,729 136,969,113 (7,019,384) 105% -
HEALTH 11,731,432 12,190,453 1,115,904 11,074,549 9% -
MULTI-SECTOR ASSISTANCE TO REFUGEES
339,160,588 340,614,191 125,186,862 215,427,329 37% -
NUTRITION 21,548,988 55,694,269 6,895,956 48,798,313 12% -
PROTECTION 7,626,871 7,762,016 632,193 7,129,823 8% -
WATER, SANITATION AND HYGIENE
12,476,700 14,026,680 3,932,415 10,094,265 28% -
CLUSTER NOT YET SPECIFIED - - 822,644 n/a n/a 778,574
Grand Total 525,827,794 604,845,876 283,193,525 321,652,351 47% 778,574 Table II: Requirements and funding to date per priority level
Priority Original requirements
Revised requirements
Funding
Unmet requirements
% Covered
Uncommittedpledges
($) A
($) B
($) C
($) D=B-C
E=C/B
($) F
HIGH 501,418,237 583,386,844 278,862,251 304,524,593 48% -
MEDIUM 24,409,557 21,459,032 3,508,630 17,950,402 16% -
NOT SPECIFIED - - 822,644 n/a n/a 778,574
Grand Total 525,827,794 604,845,876 283,193,525 321,652,351 47% 778,574 NOTE: "Funding" means Contributions + Commitments + Carry-over Contribution: the actual payment of funds or transfer of in-kind goods from the donor to the recipient entity. Commitment: creation of a legal, contractual obligation between the donor and recipient entity, specifying the amount to be
contributed. Pledge: a non-binding announcement of an intended contribution or allocation by the donor. ("Uncommitted pledge" on these
tables indicates the balance of original pledges not yet committed.) The list of projects and the figures for their funding requirements in this document are a snapshot as of 30 June 2011. For continuously updated information on projects, funding requirements, and contributions to date, visit the Financial Tracking Service (fts.unocha.org).
K E N Y A
6
Table III: Requirements and funding to date per organization
2011+ Kenya Emergency Humanitarian Response Plan as of 30 June 2011
http://fts.unocha.org
Compiled by OCHA on the basis of information provided by donors and appealing organizations.
Appealing organization
Original requirements
Revised requirements
Funding
Unmet requirements
% Covered
Uncommittedpledges
($) A
($) B
($) C
($) D=B-C
E=C/B
($) F
ACF 2,305,364 3,013,471 150,000 2,863,471 5% -
ACTED 1,275,713 1,885,403 416,732 1,468,671 22% -
ADEO 956,125 956,125 - 956,125 0% -
ADRA - Kenya 251,063 251,063 - 251,063 0% -
CCDA 208,650 208,650 - 208,650 0% -
Chr. Aid 1,434,600 1,434,600 - 1,434,600 0% -
CHRiG - 622,800 - 622,800 0% -
COOPI 5,460,859 5,460,859 150,000 5,310,859 3% -
CW 2,293,144 2,293,144 510,000 1,783,144 22% -
CWSK 2,387,825 2,387,825 - 2,387,825 0% -
Diakonie Emergency Aid 231,142 231,142 - 231,142 0% -
DRC 1,414,047 1,549,192 - 1,549,192 0% -
ERF (OCHA) - - 822,644 (822,644) 0% 778,574
FAO 7,226,400 23,318,514 2,738,114 20,580,400 12% -
FH 948,680 1,331,200 - 1,331,200 0% -
GOAL 564,000 564,000 - 564,000 0% -
HCF - 739,762 - 739,762 0% -
HelpAge International 608,958 608,958 - 608,958 0% -
IMC UK - 996,466 - 996,466 0% -
IOM 8,635,970 8,635,970 2,480,001 6,155,969 29% -
IRC 8,630,000 8,630,000 2,300,000 6,330,000 27% -
IRW 2,110,000 2,274,360 150,000 2,124,360 7% -
KCS 132,000 132,000 - 132,000 0% -
LWF 9,400,000 3,043,000 3,042,500 500 100% -
MERCY - USA 631,207 631,207 631,207 - 100% -
MERLIN 1,346,185 1,646,185 307,044 1,339,141 19% -
NCCK 150,000 150,000 - 150,000 0% -
OCHA 2,094,100 2,085,530 784,652 1,300,878 38% -
OXFAM GB 8,188,790 8,188,790 1,425,298 6,763,492 17% -
PU 742,293 742,293 - 742,293 0% -
SC 5,734,415 5,734,415 1,150,227 4,584,188 20% -
UNDP 657,700 657,700 - 657,700 0% -
UNHCR 213,206,239 230,342,207 42,253,952 188,088,255 18% -
UNICEF 15,266,900 18,874,905 10,608,057 8,266,848 56% -
VSF (Germany) 1,000,000 1,000,000 400,000 600,000 40% -
VSF (Switzerland) 1,220,000 1,220,000 - 1,220,000 0% -
WFP 209,108,627 252,659,251 212,729,353 39,929,898 84% -
WHO 7,004,049 7,463,070 143,744 7,319,326 2% -
K E N Y A
7
Appealing organization
Original requirements
Revised requirements
Funding
Unmet requirements
% Covered
Uncommittedpledges
($) A
($) B
($) C
($) D=B-C
E=C/B
($) F
WVI 2,599,649 2,599,649 - 2,599,649 0% -
ZAF 403,100 282,170 - 282,170 0% -
Grand Total 525,827,794 604,845,876 283,193,525 321,652,351 47% 778,574 NOTE: "Funding" means Contributions + Commitments + Carry-over Contribution: the actual payment of funds or transfer of in-kind goods from the donor to the recipient entity. Commitment: creation of a legal, contractual obligation between the donor and recipient entity, specifying the amount to be
contributed. Pledge: a non-binding announcement of an intended contribution or allocation by the donor. ("Uncommitted pledge" on these
tables indicates the balance of original pledges not yet committed.) The list of projects and the figures for their funding requirements in this document are a snapshot as of 30 June 2011. For continuously updated information on projects, funding requirements, and contributions to date, visit the Financial Tracking Service (fts.unocha.org).
K E N Y A
8
2. CHANGES IN THE CONTEXT, HUMANITARIAN NEEDS, AND RESPONSE
2.1 CONTEXT Changes in Context Multiple shocks contributing to current food crisis – the unfolding La Nina conditions underpinned by the poor performance of the short rains (October-December 2010) and long rains (March-May 2011) have triggered the increase of food-insecure population from 1.2 million in December 2010 to 2.4 million in February 2011. Of this, 1.35 million people reside in the pastoral areas in the north and east of the country while the rest (1.05 million people) are from the short-rains-dependent south-east and coastal marginal agricultural areas. The planned Long Rains Assessment (LRA) in July is expected to provide an updated picture of the current emergency. In the meantime, preliminary results from the May mid-season assessments indicate that pastoralists in parts of Wajir, Moyale, and Marsabit districts are losing livestock and their food security could deteriorate sharply after June, as current improvements in pasture, browse, and water availability (brought about by rainfall in late April through early May) are unlikely to sustain livestock through October, except in Mandera and northern Moyale. Water and browse are likely to be exhausted within two months, and significant crop failure is anticipated in the coastal and south-eastern marginal agricultural areas due to the late onset and erratic distribution of the rains. The majority of agricultural production is rain-fed. Hence the next rains anticipated at the end of October 2011 will be critical in providing respite to the current drought conditions and to cushion the current food insecurity. The main harvests in the western, Nyanza and Rift Valley highlands are expected to only reach the deficit-producing pastoral and marginal agricultural areas after October.
Figure 1: Estimated current food security outcomes, May-June 2011
Figure 2: Estimated current food security outcomes, July-September 2011
K E N Y A
9
Farmers have eroded most of their coping strategies due to extended periods of poor or failed seasons. In addition, livestock productivity is on the decline with increasing livestock mortalities. Distances to watering points have doubled since January from 20 to 50 km. In addition, maize prices are soaring to 60-80% higher than the five-year average in most markets and are close or higher than record prices reported in 2008-095. The mid-season assessment indicates that the food-insecure population will likely increase from the current 2.4 million to between 3-3.5 million from July to September.
The Ministry of Agriculture indicates that maize stocks held by farmers, traders, millers and the National Cereals and Produce Board stood at 16.9 million bags at the beginning of May and is expected to last up to July. Cross-border inflows from Uganda and Tanzania have also dropped since February this year, as similar drought in those countries reduced their in-country maize stocks. Maize is Kenya’s staple food with a national consumption rate of 3.5 million bags per month.
The urban slum population has been severely hit by the price increases given their dependence on the market and its susceptibility to price volatility. The consumer price index rose 8.1% between December 2010 and April 2011; of this, the largest increases were in the food and transport indices. Petrol was 27.59% more expensive in April 2011 than one year before. Most poor families use kerosene for cooking and lighting. The increased fuel prices have therefore directly affected household food security. This has translated into decrease in dietary diversity and food security among urban households; increased use of negative coping mechanisms; loss of human, social and physical capital; and potential civil unrest. There is a mounting call for humanitarian partners to monitor the urban food security situation and plan for response. Resource-based conflict - The resultant competition for scarce resources triggered by the current drought is escalating conflict which is characterized by cattle raids, inter-communal fighting and killings as already witnessed in north-western areas (Turkana, Baringo, Marsabit and Wajir counties) and north-eastern areas (Greater Mandera and Wajir districts) in Kenya. The inter-communal conflict is linked to competition for the already scarce and dwindling resources following the migration of pastoralists from northern Turkana to south-western Ethiopia in search of food. In addition, the migration of pastoralists from Ethiopia into Moyale (Kenya) is also compounding the food insecurity situation.
5 Kenya Food Security Outlook Update- May 2011
Women trekking to collect water after the earth pan in Duse failed to recharge
Credit: ACF
The deterioration of livestock conditions has negatively impacted pastoralists’ terms of trade.
Credit FAO
K E N Y A
10
A total of 113 people lost their lives during conflict from January to 10 May 2011. In 2010, 68 people were reported killed during the same reporting period. The 2011 figure surpassed that of 2010 following the killing of at least 40 people during one incident, when Merille militia from Ethiopia attacked people from the Turkana community. Turkana district accounted for close to half of those killed – 55, followed by Garissa with 20. More than 6,300 people were displaced in pastoral areas. Of those displaced, 5,500 were in Mandera and 1,800 in Garissa. Owing to the porous nature of the border between Kenya and Somalia, insurgencies in Somalia have had spill-over effects in Kenya. In February, heavy fighting between the Transitional Federal Government (TFG) forces, associated militias, and reportedly the Ethiopian National Defence Forces (ENDF) against Al Shabaab positions along the Mandera-Bulahawa border began on 23 February resulting in at least 2,000 people displaced and seeking assistance in Mandera, Kenya. Mandera town is at the confluence of Kenya, Ethiopia and Somalia border point and its hospital serves the three countries. With the increased number of injured people the Mandera medical hospital was reportedly overwhelmed and lacked the capacity to effectively treat the wounded. Health and Nutrition - The northern regions of the country continue to face health and disease challenges compounded by under-staffing and lack of qualified health personnel, limited medical supplies and weak health infrastructure facilities. A measles outbreak was reported along the refugee corridor stretching from Dadaab (north-east) to Kakuma (north-west) and Nairobi causing 11 deaths and 462 confirmed laboratory tests. At least 1.9 million children under five years old are at risk of measles. In addition, the Ministry of Public Health and Sanitation (MoPHS) has issued health alerts for possible fellow fever, Ebola haemorrhagic fever and poliomyelitis reported in the neighbouring countries of Uganda, South Sudan and Somalia associated with the deteriorating food security situation and high malnutrition levels. The Nutrition sector is estimating that about 385,000 children and 90,000 women are suffering from acute malnutrition. HIV in Emergencies - A national consultation to strengthen coordination between HIV and humanitarian actors was organized in March 2011 by the National AIDS Control Council (NACC), supported by the UN Joint Team on AIDS, followed by a training of trainers to support further capacity-building of decentralized actors on the integration of HIV concerns within humanitarian action. A draft national plan of action for the year, encompassing a range of activities from review and domestication of guidelines to the provision of technical support on HIV mainstreaming for emergency sectors, is envisaged to strengthen HIV programming within humanitarian planning and to respond adequately to the HIV-related needs of populations of humanitarian concern. Refugees - Kenya continues to host the largest refugee population in the world with no signs of the refugee influx slowing down. The monthly refugee influx has more than doubled from the 4,000 per month projected in September 2010 to 11,000 refugees registered monthly in overcrowded Dadaab camps since January 2011. Increased insecurity and drought in Somalia continue to force Somalis to flee into neighbouring states. Overall, there are 479,919 refugees in Kenya of whom 350,629 are in Dadaab, 80,986 in Kakuma and 48,304 in Nairobi. (Source: UNHCR, May 2011)
K E N Y A
11
Internally Displaced Populations - Despite the high number of internally displaced people (IDPs) (300,000 according to Internal Displacement Monitoring Centre [IDMC]), Kenya continues to lack a specific national legal framework related to the protection and assistance for IDPs. So far, an IDP policy has been drafted and a cabinet memo on the same has been prepared and shared with the cabinet on 16 May. Adoption of the national IDP Policy and ratification of the Kampala Convention would reinforce Kenya’s obligations in the context of prevention of internal displacement, management of internal displacement situations when they occur and identification of durable solutions, and will align the country’s response to the standards and principle contained in the existing regional and international human rights documents. Key protection concerns noted among the IDP population are: a) security challenges in displacement and return areas and unaddressed grievances among IDP and host/neighbour/receiving communities (closely associated with the viability, effectiveness and impact of the peace-building processes and initiatives); b) access to and appropriateness of the available durable solutions and IDPs’ participation in its identification and pursuit; c) slow and varied provision of financial compensation and other assistance by the Government; d) limited or no access to housing and land; and e) prevalence of sexual- and gender-based violence (SGBV) and child protection cases. Unavailability of accurate data on post-election violence (PEV), IDPs and other categories of displacements (e.g. forest evictions and displacements related to the scarce resources in some parts of the country) remains a challenge. However, the Government has in April 2011 embarked on an initiative to raise funds for a project which aims to verify the IDPs from the 2007/08 PEV to enable accurate assessment of the number of IDPs requiring compensation or Government assistance. As of December 2010, more than 6,000 people have been resettled and the general pace of the resettlement assistance has increased significantly. In January 2011, the Government announced an allocation of Kenyan schilling (KSH) 7,977 billion ($99,043,953) towards resettlement of IDPs. 2.2 SUMMARY OF RESPONSE TO DATE
The Food Sector response has to date included assistance to 1.4 million through food-for-assets (FFA) and general food distributions (GFD). Cash-for-assets (CFA) has also been piloted successfully in Mwingi and is being rolled out to other districts in the marginal agricultural districts. In the urban sector, two ongoing cash-based projects are targeting informal settlements. Admitted beneficiaries are discharged from the programme after their nutritional status has improved and remains stable for at least three months.
Under the Agriculture and Livestock Sector, the introduction of community-based disaster risk reduction (CMDRR) has cushioned communities against the full impact of the current La Niña conditions. Communities have identified their main hazards and initiated community action plans to mitigate the hazards. The current drought has enabled implementation of CMDRR through the activation of mitigation measures, such as negotiation for access to pasture and browse in areas that have received rainfall. This systematic utilization of grazing resources through the use of grazing councils has enabled mitigation of conflicts and the regulation of water source utilization to enable shorter waiting periods and adequate recharge of water sources.
Maize crops wilting back in March 2011, Kathonzweni division Makueni district.
K E N Y A
12
The continuing drought in north-eastern Kenya is having a major impact on education with populations moving in search of water and children dropping out of school. This is resulting in large numbers of out-of-school children without access to continuing schooling which will set them back and have a long-term impact on their education. The Education Sector is addressing this through the creation of more mobile schools that can follow the communities. Worth noting as well is the increased focus on education for refugee children, an area that had not received as much attention in the appeal process. This is due to an influx in numbers of refugee children arriving at the camps and the inadequate number of schools to cope with the increased number of pupils. Important achievements in the Education Sector during 2011 include a rapid response to the drought in north-eastern Kenya through the provision of school feeding and educational materials to affected schools. The Ministry of Education’s commitment to this intervention was clearly demonstrated by the reprogramming of funds to address the developing need of school meals. In relation to the objective of protection of rights of IDPs and advancement of durable solutions, the Protection Sector has facilitated the launch of peace-building and shelter programmers in Eldoret targeting host and IDP communities. 16 peace barazas (public meetings) are targeting 550 men, women and youth representatives. There are 49 functional peace committees in conflict-prone areas. In addition, the recruitment of Volunteer Children’s Officers in all locations has enhanced capacity of the Department of Children’s Services to respond to children’s needs. On the health front, the Health Sector has contributed to the containment of a cholera outbreak which intensified in 2010. However, risk factors that can trigger another outbreak remain, thereby requiring continued maintenance of response structures for the next two years. In addition, re-orientation of 20 district health teams in the affected areas was conducted. In 2010, Kenya adopted a package of 11 high-impact nutrition interventions focusing on infant feeding, micronutrient supplementation and management of acute malnutrition. These essential nutrition services which are proven to be efficient in preventing and addressing malnutrition and mortality in children (26% deaths prevented if implemented fully and at scale) are integrated and currently implemented in the Arid and Semi-arid Lands (ASALs). In the beginning of 2011, Ministry of Health (MOH) support and this full package of interventions have been scaled up at health facility and community level to contribute to the reduction of morbidity and mortality of Kenya most affected and vulnerable population – children under five and pregnant and lactating women Water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) Sector partners have provided access to safe water to 742,000 people representing 55% of the original target. 400,000 people have been reached with emergency water trucking in drought-affected districts. The Government of Kenya’s (GoK) drought response through the Ministry of Water and Irrigation (MoWI) includes the repair of 227 water points. Government Response: The Government has called for urgent importation of maize to boost current stocks held at the National Strategic Grain Reserves. Of the 2.4 million people affected, the World Food Programme (WFP) is targeting 1.75 million through general food distributions and food-for-assets while the Government is assisting the rest numbering 800,000. Drought relief work was also conducted by the Government of Kenya through the Ministry of Water and Irrigation. This included the repair of 227 water points, fuel subsidies to 101 community water supply schemes and water delivery to 373 water trucking points. According to the WASH Sector, the total cost of the GoK’s interventions was KSH 323 million (approx. $4 million) and the number of beneficiaries reached is estimated at 2.8 million based on reaching an estimated 80% of the GoK target of 3.6 million people. The Kenya Red Cross Society launched a drought response appeal in January 2011 after which the agency strengthened its water trucking activities in Turkana, Moyale, Marsabit, and Mandera. A
K E N Y A
13
massive livestock destocking initiative was also launched in Marsabit as a measure to counter severe losses in livestock capital. Gender Marker Review The Gender Marker was introduced for the first time in the history of humanitarian financing in Kenya during the EHRP 2011+. Humanitarian actors recognized that conflict and natural disaster affect women, girls, boys and men in different ways and that gender issues continued to ‘fall through the cracks.’ In addition, actors recognized that humanitarian evaluations reported weak gender results. Kenya appealed for the support of 107 projects. Ten of the projects were coded zero as they had no gender considerations. Twenty seven projects were coded ‘1’ indicating that they had limited gender considerations. The majority of the projects (68) were coded ‘2’, indicating that they included significant gender considerations in the project requests.
Summary of Gender Marker Codes for Kenya 2011
Cluster Code 0 % Code
1 % Code 2a % Code
2b % Not specified % Total
Kenya 10 9.5% 27 25% 59 55% 9 8.5% 2 2% 107 During the Mid-Year Review (MYR), partners highlighted the following as the benefits of the Gender Marker. The Marker: • provided a platform for addressing the needs of both male and female beneficiaries. • helped to reduce discrimination. • contributed to the establishment of minimum standards for response. • helped to engage donors from a gender/beneficiary perspective. Partners also highlighted the following challenges: • Lack of adequate knowledge on the implementation of the Gender Marker. • Implementing agencies have limited resource materials. • Monitoring the implementation process was not always followed. • There has been a high turn-over of staff and those left did not have adequate knowledge of the
Marker. • There has been a limited platform for sharing experiences. Partners provided the following recommendations to address the challenges: • Training on the Gender Marker should be extended to implementing agencies and be
conducted twice per year. • Sector leads should provide marker updates in the MYR. • Sectors should be supported with the coding of new projects after the MYR. • OCHA should support implementing agencies and sectors with the acquisition and distribution
of resource materials. • Donors should continuously be engaged with the implementation of the Gender Maker being
highlighted as a benefit. 2.3 UPDATED NEEDS ANALYSIS AND INFORMATION GAPS • Food Insecurity - Food assistance continues to be guided by the twice-yearly assessments
which follow the long and short rains. The next major inter-agency Long Rains Assessment is planned for July 2011.
• For urban areas, the results of the urban baseline study have not been released resulting in no additional funds. In this regard, three of the five planned cash-based projects targeting the informal settlements of Nairobi have not materialized.
• Education - Whereas the national education cluster meets monthly to appraise impacts of emergencies in education, there is lack of such structures at the districts/local levels. Thus information transmission is one way i.e. from districts to the national working groups. There is
K E N Y A
14
thus the need to build local capacities of the coordination mechanism through supporting and strengthening systems and capacity development both at national and sub-national levels. This may involve training education support structures such as the District Education Board (DEB) at the district levels to advocate for education in emergencies.
• The continuing influx of the refugees has strained the existing educational facilities. According to the Kenya Food Security Steering Group (KFSSG), about 1.1 million boys and girls plus 8,000 teachers are affected by drought annually with varying severity (KFSSG, 2010). Therefore, enhancing school retention/continuity of access to education for over 1.25 million boys and girls through the provision of food, water, hygiene, learning materials and gender-sensitive sanitation facilities is required for continued education.
• An interagency assessment of the Education sector in Dadaab revealed that the pupil-classroom ratio stands at 113:1, while teacher-pupil ratio stands at 1:85. Moreover, over 48,000 refugee school-age boys and girls are currently out of schools. There is the urgent need to support the refugee schools and host community schools around Kakuma and Dadaab refugee camps with requisite educational teaching and learning materials. There is a further need to train the refugee teachers on multi-grade teaching to handle large classes.
• Protection - There is a need to update data for PEV IDPs although no assessments have taken place so far. A baseline study on IDPs Street Children profiling for Rift Valley is planned.
• A priority need for the Protection sector also includes coordinating with other sectors to ensure protection for inherently vulnerable groups, such as older people, people with disabilities, women (i.e. widows and single mothers), and children (i.e. orphans, unaccompanied and separated children, child-headed households and other vulnerable children, such as those with vulnerable caregivers).
• The peace-building component in conflict-prone areas is expected to target 3,000 beneficiaries by the end of August 2011.
• Given the prognosis of little or no rainfall in the next three months until August, the WASH Sector has increased their target beneficiary numbers from 960,000 to 1,920,000 which represents 80% of the 2.4 million people identified as in need of food assistance.
• Since January 2011, disaster risk reduction (DRR) mainstreaming is ongoing in Kakuma and Dadaab refugee camps and plans are underway to upscale the same to host communities in 2012 also in line with the Country Strategic Plan. In an effort to contribute towards recovery of livelihoods, 500 households have been reached through their participation in the village savings and loans associations and business skills training.
• Nutrition: The effects of the drought are manifesting in several ways. The nutrition status of children under five and pregnant and lactating women is likely to worsen during the July-September 2011 dry season. Results of nutrition surveys carried out in the ASALs in the first five months of 2011 show this deterioration. Global acute malnutrition (GAM) rates are above 20% for children under five in Marsabit, Turkana, Wajir West-North (significantly higher compared to 2010) and Mandera. In Isiolo, and Garissa GAM rates (<-2 z-scores, WHO 2006) are between 15% and 20%.
Most Likely Scenario In reviewing the scenarios developed in September 2010, it was noted that the number of food-insecure people has increased from 1.2 million reported in September 2010 to 1.6 million in December 2010. With the poor performance of the short rains in October-December 2010, the drought-induced food insecurity worsened further. The number of food-insecure people further increased from 1.6 million to the current 2.4 million. The food security situation is expected to deteriorate further after a dismal long rains performance particularly in the north, north-eastern pastoral and south-east marginal agricultural areas. The mid-season assessment conducted in May 2011 projects that 3 million to 3.5 million people will require direct food assistance in the period beyond July 2011. The planned Long Rains Assessment in July will however give a clear figure of the caseload of food-insecure population. The impact of high food commodity prices and fuel prices will further complicate the food security situation in the country and deepen poverty levels and households’ access to food, especially in the already-affected areas and urban vulnerable populations. This has prompted the Government to
K E N Y A
15
declare the drought a national disaster and directed the Treasury to prepare the necessary instruments of approval to facilitate urgent importation of maize to boost the current stocks in the nation’s Strategic Grain Reserves. The nutrition status of children under five and pregnant and lactating women is likely to worsen during the July-September 2011 dry season. Current GAM rates are above 20% for children under five in Marsabit (significantly higher compared to 2010), Wajir and Mandera. 31 nutrition surveys are expected to be undertaken in 2011. The security situation in Somalia remained volatile in the last six months leading to estimated 10,000 new arrivals per month against the projected 4,000 in 2010. The refugee influx from Somalia is expected to be sustained at 11,000 new arrivals per month for the next six months. This will continue to worsen the humanitarian situation in the already over-stretched camps with a refugee population of 473,000. For example, an estimated 42,000 refugees are already living outside the Dadaab refugee camp for lack of space after the infrastructure implementation on Ifo II camp decongestion project failed to materialize. The number of new arrivals from southern Sudan remained low following a relatively peaceful referendum in January 2011. Most of the insecurity incidents in southern Sudan did not lead to external migrations but rather internal displacements only. Only an estimated 1,500 new arrivals in Kakuma refugee camp were reported from southern Sudan since January 2011. This situation is expected to hold for the next six months with a specific watch over the July 2011 date when southern Sudan becomes an independent state. The rate of urbanization continues to increase with main challenges related to urban poverty. The caseloads of food-insecure households, malnutrition rates and health indicators are likely to remain of concern due to constant rural-urban migration, cumulative vulnerabilities and high food prices in urban areas. Increase in resource-based conflict has been reported in the past six months. This is attributed to continued decline in pasture and water resources due to the effects of the La Niña phenomena. 113 people have been killed from January to 10 May 2011. 3,800 people were displaced in Turkana and Garissa districts. Poor performance of the long rains and forecasted dry conditions in most parts of the country will lead to further deterioration of the pasture and water in the next six months. As a result, competition and conflict over already scarce resources is expected to continue. This will be accompanied by temporary displacements in the pastoral areas. The internal displacement situation in the country is yet to be resolved with the Government facing challenges in finding land for resettling the IDPs and resistance from host communities in some instances. The humanitarian situation in the temporary relocation sites continues to worsen as efforts to resettle them elsewhere appear to getting more complicated day by day. Though the number of displaced population has relatively remained constant, tensions in the hot spots are expected to increase as the date approaches for the confirmation of charges against the six suspects stemming from the PEV. This may trigger some displacements in such hotspots in the Rift Valley. Around 10,000 people may be displaced either voluntarily or forcefully as ethnic tensions soar. As the drought situation continues to bite, an upsurge of cholera outbreaks is expected in the cholera-prone districts. Whereas the cholera outbreak has been contained, the underlying risk factors for future outbreaks remain. Within the last six months, there were also measles outbreaks in the northern regions of the country among the districts along the refugee corridor, stretching from Dadaab to Kakuma including Nairobi. Continued outbreaks are expected in the next six months as the drought continues and refugees’ influx increases. Over the last six months the political situation in the country has remained largely stable but characterised by continued contestation of national issues within the coalition government. This
K E N Y A
16
situation is expected to hold for the next six months. Government leadership was maintained in drought response and other emergencies in the country. However the operationalization of the National Drought Contingency Fund and the Contingency Fund within the national budget which would assist the Government in rapidly responding to drought emergencies still remains to be achieved. It is less likely that the operationalization will be achieved in the next six months as the politics around the implementation of the new constitution and early campaigns is expected to be the main preoccupation. The commencement of early campaigns ahead of the 2012 elections is expected to increase tensions from the second half of 2011 while devolution of power to the new counties may present challenges in terms of management of devolved resources and governance. The progress by the International Criminal Court (ICC) on the six suspects believed to have played a major role in the PEV is expected to add to the tensions especially around the first September 2011 which is the date set for the hearings on confirmation of PEV charges against the six suspects. The humanitarian system in the country will need to step up the level of preparedness and response to on-going humanitarian emergencies and the expected deterioration of the situation in the country linked to refugee influx from Somalia, food insecurity, malnutrition, disease outbreaks and internal displacements. In order to address the chronic vulnerabilities in the country, the humanitarian partners will need to work together with development partners and mainstream DRR and early recovery initiatives. 2.4 ANALYSIS OF FUNDING TO DATE
Limited funding in parallel to continued growing needs, high food prices and low stocks locally and regionally, affected the quantity of food distributed in the first half of the year.
Funding for projects in the 2011+EHRP, including grants from the Central Emergency Response Fund (CERF), has enabled the Health sector to respond to critical issues such as the cholera outbreak. However, other health needs emerged at the same time such as measles and wild poliomyelitis that required additional resources and funding support. This resulted in diversion of such resources such as staff capacity to respond to the new needs.
Continued funding support is required in order to sustain the gains made so far in addition to full implementation of original response plans.
Since April 2011, earmarked funding from the Emergency Response Fund amounting to over $1 million has elevated drought response interventions which continue to be implemented in the worst-affected areas of northern and north-east provinces. $6 million of CERF funds received earlier in the year have also been instrumental in responding to drought.
As at 30 June, the 2011+EHRP has received funding amounting to 47% of requirements. In reviewing funding to sectors, the funding level of 50% for education is a large increase from previous years. According to the Education sector, this increase in funding reflects a better understanding of the importance of education as a key mechanism for DRR and funding is largely aimed at setting up systems to decrease drop-out of students in areas prone to
ERF-funded projects on rapid response to protect the livelihoods and productive assets of vulnerable households affected by drought conditions: veterinary officer inspecting a carcass, Garbatulla District, Eastern Province. Credit: ACF
K E N Y A
17
disasters. Sectors such as Agriculture and Livestock, Health and Protection have received less than 20% funding so far. Funding for the EHRP has been primarily channelled towards projects with high priority which represents 98% of the total funding. In parallel with the EHRP, the total cost of the Government’s interventions for drought response for the WASH sector is estimated at $4 million.
K E N Y A
18
3. PROGRESS TOWARDS ACHIEVING STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES AND SECTORAL TARGETS
3.1 STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES The three-year strategic objectives will be comprehensively reviewed in May 2012. Strategic Objective 1: Highly vulnerable populations affected by natural and man-made disasters receive timely and coordinated life-saving humanitarian assistance and protection based on assessed needs and employing a human rights-based approach.
Indicator End of year target Proportion of disaster-affected men, boys, women and girls receiving timely and holistic humanitarian response.
90% of targeted vulnerable population
Strategic Objective 2: Ensure the early recovery of populations affected by natural and man-made disasters and support the further integration of recovery approaches with longer-term interventions to reduce high levels of chronic vulnerability.
Indicator Target Percentage of humanitarian response projects that incorporate early recovery components. 60%
Strategic Objective 3: Enhance community resilience using targeted disaster risk reduction approaches to reduce the impacts of disasters and ensure linkages with longer-term initiatives to reduce vulnerability.
Indicator Target Percentage of humanitarian response projects that incorporate disaster risk reduction components linking with longer-term initiatives.
50%
Strategic Objective 4: Targeted and sustained advocacy with the Government of Kenya and development actors to further their engagement in addressing issues of chronic vulnerability (specifically with regards to populations of the ASALs) and provide durable solutions.
Indicator Target Increased number of partnerships with Government and development actors in addressing chronic vulnerability
50%
K E N Y A
19
3.2 SECTOR RESPONSE PLANS 3.2.1 AGRICULTURE AND LIVESTOCK
Sector lead agency FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION (FAO) Co-lead Ministry of Agriculture and Ministry of Livestock Development Cluster members ACTED, CARE in Kenya, Catholic Diocese PACIDA, Ministry of Agriculture
Vetworks East Africa and VSF Belgium. Number of projects 20 Sector objectives Support to pastoral and agro-pastoral communities affected by drought
phenomenon Beneficiaries 2,700,000 people Funds requested Original: $16,864,992
Revised at mid-year: $33,153,036 Funds requested per priority level
$32,203,036 (High priority) $950,000 (Medium Priority)
Funding to date $4,034,847 (12% of revised requirements) Contact Robert Allport - [email protected]
Table: Disaggregated number of affected population and beneficiaries
Affected population Target beneficiaries Category Female Male Total Female Male Total Food and livelihood in marginal agriculture and pastoral areas
2,000,000 1,500,000 3.500,000 1,100,000 800,000 1,900,000
Urban vulnerabilities 2,000,000 1,500,000 3,500,000 200,000 150,000 350,000 Vulnerable in medium and high rainfall areas 1,000,000 800,000 1,800,000 300,000 150,000 450,000
Totals 5,000,000 3,600,000 8,800,000 1,600,000 1,100,000 2,700,000 Changes in needs a) In the pastoral areas, the low and poorly distributed rainfall has resulted in low pasture and
browse condition. The livestock conditions are deteriorating and mortality rates are increasing. Thus instead of restocking as suggested in the 2011+EHRP, in the Mid-Year Review both commercial and slaughter destocking is proposed in order to save the pastoralists from losing the livestock. Disease surveillance and treatment should be scaled up and negotiations with district authorities emphasized to avoid conflicts.
b) In the marginal agricultural areas, the three consecutive season of complete crop failures coupled with the soaring food prices has resulted in more food-insecure households. In order to save the livelihoods, voucher-for-work activities will be encouraged. In this approach, the communities’ members will work in groups to construct soil and water conservation structures, water harvesting structures and to rehabilitate small scale irrigation infrastructures. They will be issued with vouchers to be redeemed to traders to meet immediate household needs while the work done will improve resilience to future drought disasters.
c) In the urban areas, high food prices have resulted in more food-insecure households. To improve the food insecurity situation, the urban dwellers will be encouraged to establish small scale kitchen gardening to increase vegetable production for household use and income generation.
The prioritized needs are therefore the up-scaling of destocking for food and commercial livestock off-take, water trucking for livestock, livestock feed, disease surveillance and control, voucher-for-work activities to meet immediate need and improve resilience of community (water and soil conservation , rehabilitation irrigation and water collection), farm input distribution (improved drought tolerant crop seeds) and urban agriculture. The achievements to date include: a) the Short and Long Rains Assessment b) four disease surveillance mission and vaccination of over three million livestock c) restocking of 2,000 animals d) training of livestock keepers
K E N Y A
20
e) distribution of 100 MT of seeds of various drought tolerant crops to over 15,000 households f) conservation of 5,000 acres of farms through the construction of soil and water conservation
structures and construction of 20 water harvesting structures g) rehabilitating and bringing back 1,000 acres to irrigation. The major implementation challenge was drought and lack of improved seeds for drought tolerant crops. More beneficiaries need to be reached due to increasing food prices and the effects of drought.
KE
NY
A
21
Mid
-yea
r mon
itorin
g vs
. obj
ectiv
es
Clu
ster
Obj
ectiv
es
Out
com
es
Targ
et o
utpu
ts
Indi
cato
r with
co
rres
pond
ing
targ
et
Ach
ieve
d as
of m
id-y
ear
1.
Stre
ngth
en th
e de
velo
pmen
t of
early
war
ning
mec
hani
sms,
fo
od s
ecur
ity in
form
atio
n sy
stem
s an
d vu
lner
abilit
y an
alys
is to
info
rm
prep
ared
ness
and
resp
onse
at
both
nat
iona
l and
cou
nty
leve
ls
to re
duce
neg
ativ
e ef
fect
s on
w
omen
, girl
s, b
oys
and
men
of
all a
ges
in p
asto
ral,
agro
-pa
stor
al a
nd m
argi
nal
agric
ultu
ral d
isas
ter-p
rone
ar
eas.
1.1
Prep
ared
ness
and
re
spon
se im
prov
ed
thro
ugh
early
war
ning
and
fo
od s
ecur
ity in
form
atio
n.
1.1.
1 R
egul
ar u
pdat
es o
n hu
man
itaria
n si
tuat
ion.
1.
1.2
Impr
oved
ava
ilabi
lity,
and
an
alys
is o
f ear
ly w
arni
ng
and
food
sec
urity
in
form
atio
n to
faci
litat
e de
cisi
on m
akin
g.
1.1.
3 E
arly
war
ning
sys
tem
and
fo
od s
ecur
ity in
form
atio
n in
pla
ce a
nd fu
nctio
nal.
• Tw
o ea
rly w
arni
ng a
nd fo
od
secu
rity
info
rmat
ion
repo
rts
(Lon
g an
d Sh
ort R
ains
as
sess
men
t rep
orts
). •
Tim
ely
resp
onse
to d
isas
ter.
• R
educ
ed im
pact
on
disa
ster
.
• Tw
o ea
rly w
arni
ng a
nd fo
od
secu
rity
info
rmat
ion
repo
rts (L
ong
and
Sho
rt R
ains
ass
essm
ent
repo
rts c
ompi
led
in O
ctob
er 2
010
and
Febr
uary
201
1 re
spec
tivel
y).
• Fo
od a
nd n
on-fo
od in
terv
entio
ns
impl
emen
ted.
•
Inte
rven
tions
redu
ced
adve
rsity
of
mal
nutri
tion
rate
s, tr
ekki
ng
dist
ance
s, fo
od a
cces
s an
d av
aila
bilit
y.
2.
Sup
port
the
vuln
erab
le m
en
and
wom
en e
qual
ly in
sel
ecte
d dr
ough
t-affe
cted
par
ts o
f A
SA
Ls to
pro
tect
and
rebu
ild
thei
r liv
esto
ck a
sset
s th
roug
h liv
esto
ck d
isea
se s
urve
illan
ce
and
cont
rol,
rest
ocki
ng a
nd
dest
ocki
ng, f
odde
r pro
duct
ion,
ra
ngel
and
reha
bilit
atio
n an
d tra
inin
g on
issu
es re
late
d to
re
silie
nce.
2.1
Kno
wle
dge
and
skills
of
past
oral
ists
(men
and
w
omen
) on
lives
tock
pr
oduc
tion
incl
udin
g di
seas
e co
ntro
l, fe
ed
reso
urce
s an
d w
ater
m
anag
emen
t st
reng
then
ed.
2.2
Live
lihoo
d as
sets
/ opt
ions
se
cure
d.
2.1.
1 R
egul
ar a
nd p
artic
ipat
ory
lives
tock
dis
ease
su
rvei
llanc
e.
2.1.
2 Fu
nctio
nal c
omm
unity
-ba
sed
anim
al h
ealth
w
orke
rs (C
AH
Ws)
in
volv
ing
both
men
and
w
omen
in p
lace
. 2.
1.3
Impr
oved
ava
ilabi
lity
of
fodd
er a
nd p
astu
res.
2.
2.1
Sel
ectiv
e re
stoc
king
with
ca
ttle,
cam
els
and
rum
inan
ts to
vul
nera
ble
hous
ehol
ds.
• Fo
ur d
isea
se s
urve
illan
ces
cond
ucte
d an
d re
ports
on
dise
ase
outb
reak
. •
50 C
AHW
s di
sagg
rega
ted
by g
ende
r tra
ined
and
thre
e m
illion
ani
mal
s va
ccin
ated
an
d tre
ated
. •
500
acre
s un
der f
odde
r.
• 2,
000
anim
als
rest
ocke
d.
• Fo
ur d
isea
se s
urve
illan
ces
cond
ucte
d us
ing
the
Dis
trict
D
isea
se S
urve
illan
ce
Com
mitt
ees
(DD
SC
).
• 50
CAH
Ws
train
ed a
nd 6
2 liv
esto
ck tr
ader
s tra
ined
. •
A to
tal o
f 1,6
07,2
02 s
mal
l she
ep
and
goat
s w
ere
vacc
inat
ed
agai
nst P
PR
, 337
,097
goa
ts w
ere
vacc
inat
ed a
gain
st C
CP
P, a
nd
1,59
9 ca
ttle
rece
ived
vac
cina
tion
agai
nst L
SD
and
CB
PP
. •
A to
tal o
f 361
,247
sm
all s
tock
s,
and
628
larg
e st
ocks
wer
e de
-w
orm
ed a
nd 1
32,7
20 s
mal
l st
ocks
and
708
larg
e st
ocks
wer
e tre
ated
. •
500
acre
s of
fodd
er p
lant
ed in
D
aua
Riv
er, G
aris
sa, a
nd
Turk
ana.
•
Thro
ugh
the
rest
ocki
ng
unde
rtake
n by
V
SF-
B,
OX
FAM
an
d VS
F-Su
isse
,a
tota
l of
188
ca
mel
s an
d 3,
731
shoa
ts w
ere
dist
ribut
ed t
o co
mm
uniti
es.
Als
o 53
6 be
e hi
ves
wer
e di
strib
uted
to
com
mun
ities
.
KE
NY
A
22
C
lust
er O
bjec
tives
O
utco
mes
Ta
rget
out
puts
In
dica
tor w
ith
corr
espo
ndin
g ta
rget
A
chie
ved
as o
f mid
-yea
r
3.
Faci
litat
e vu
lner
able
sm
all-
scal
e w
omen
and
men
farm
ers
in m
argi
nal a
gric
ultu
re a
reas
to
sust
aina
bly
impr
ove
thei
r ag
ricul
tura
l pro
duct
ion
by
prov
idin
g qu
ality
and
sui
tabl
e fa
rm in
puts
and
bui
ldin
g th
eir
capa
citie
s to
use
impr
oved
pr
oduc
tion
tech
nolo
gies
.
3.1
Pro
duct
ion
capa
citie
s of
th
e vu
lner
able
wom
en a
nd
men
in m
argi
nal
agric
ultu
ral a
reas
st
reng
then
ed a
nd
enha
nced
.
3.1.
1 Vu
lner
able
hou
seho
lds
prov
ided
with
sui
tabl
e an
d ad
apte
d dr
ough
t tol
eran
t cr
op s
eeds
. 3.
1.2
Trai
ning
on
impr
oved
dry
-la
nd c
rops
pro
duct
ion
tech
nolo
gies
, cro
p di
vers
ifica
tion.
3.
1.3
Cap
acity
-bui
ldin
g on
pos
t- ha
rves
t han
dlin
g in
clud
ing
time
of h
arve
stin
g, d
ryin
g an
d st
orag
e, li
nkag
es to
m
arke
ts.
3.
1.4
Pro
mot
ion
of c
omm
unity
-ba
sed
seed
bul
king
to
ensu
re s
eed
resi
lienc
e.
• 10
0 m
etric
tonn
es o
f var
ious
se
eds
and
200
MTs
of
ferti
lizer
s di
strib
uted
to m
en,
wom
en a
nd o
ther
vu
lner
able
gro
ups.
•
Am
ount
and
val
ue o
f cro
ps
prod
uced
. •
2,00
0 w
omen
and
men
tra
ined
and
usi
ng im
prov
ed
stor
age
faci
litie
s.
• 10
0 M
Ts o
f see
ds o
f var
ious
dr
ough
t-tol
eran
t cro
ps
prod
uced
thro
ugh
com
mun
ity-b
ased
see
d bu
lkin
g sy
stem
s.
• 10
0 M
Ts o
f var
ious
see
ds a
nd
dist
ribut
ed to
men
, wom
en a
nd
othe
r vul
nera
ble
grou
ps.
• O
ver 9
0% c
rop
failu
re a
s a
resu
lt of
La
Nin
a
• 20
0 w
omen
and
men
trai
ned
and
usin
g im
prov
ed s
tora
ge fa
cilit
ies.
•
100
MTs
of s
eeds
of v
ario
us
drou
ght-t
oler
ant c
rops
pro
duce
d th
roug
h co
mm
unity
-bas
ed s
eed
bulk
ing
syst
ems.
4.
Incr
ease
resi
lienc
e of
the
vuln
erab
le w
omen
, girl
s, b
oys
and
men
in p
asto
ral,
agro
-pa
stor
al a
nd m
argi
nal
agric
ultu
ral a
reas
thro
ugh
clim
ate
chan
ge a
dapt
atio
n an
d m
itiga
tion.
4.1
Wom
en, g
irls,
boy
s an
d m
en re
aliz
e re
duce
d ne
gativ
e ef
fect
s of
di
sast
ers.
4.1.
1 S
oil a
nd w
ater
co
nser
vatio
n an
d w
ater
ha
rves
ting
stru
ctur
es
esta
blis
hed.
4.
1.2
Pro
mot
ion
of c
onse
rvat
ion
agric
ultu
re.
4.1.
3 P
rom
otio
n of
sm
all-s
cale
irr
igat
ion.
4.
1.4
Reh
abili
tatio
n of
den
uded
ra
ngel
ands
and
pro
mot
ion
of fo
dder
pro
duct
ion.
4.
1.5
Enh
ance
d na
tura
l re
sour
ce a
nd
envi
ronm
enta
l m
anag
emen
t.
• 5,
000
acre
s un
der s
oil a
nd
wat
er c
onse
rvat
ion.
•
20 w
ater
har
vest
ing
stru
ctur
es c
onst
ruct
ed.
• 50
0 pe
ople
pra
ctis
ing
smal
l-sc
ale
irrig
atio
n an
d 1,
000
acre
s pu
t und
er s
mal
l-sca
le
irrig
atio
n.
• 2,
000
acre
s of
rang
e la
nd
area
reha
bilit
ated
.
• 10
00 a
cres
und
er s
oil a
nd w
ater
co
nser
vatio
n.
• Th
ree
wat
er h
arve
stin
g st
ruct
ures
co
nstru
cted
. •
200
HH
pra
ctis
ing
smal
l-sca
le
irrig
atio
n an
d 30
0 ac
res
put
unde
r sm
all-s
cale
irrig
atio
n.
• N
one
of ra
nge
land
are
a re
habi
litat
ed.
K E N Y A
23
3.2.2 COORDINATION
Sector lead agencies OFFICE FOR THE COORDINATION OF HUMANITARIAN AFFAIRS (OCHA) IN SUPPORT OF THE HUMANITARIAN COORDINATOR (HC)
Sector members UN agencies,(I)NGOs, Government of Kenya Number of projects 1 Sector objectives • Strengthen coordination on DRR at the national and local levels and its
linkages with humanitarian coordination mechanisms. • Support sustainable solutions to vulnerability through enhanced advocacy
and strengthened linkages with development partners. • Ensure rapid, timely, effective and principled coordination of humanitarian
action. • Enhance integrated information management.
Beneficiaries 4, 990,000 vulnerable and affected populations in Kenya (food insecurity 2.4 million, IDPs 60,000, 30,000 floods, urban – 2.5 million)
Funds requested Original: $2,094,100 Revised at mid-year: $2,085,530
Funds requested per priority level
$2,085,530 (High)
Funding to date $784,652 (38% of revised requirements) Contact information Jeanine Cooper - [email protected]
Patrick Lavand’homme - [email protected] Needs Analysis An estimated 4.99 million people will require humanitarian aid due to increased effects of various emergencies in the next six months. With the country facing heightened food insecurity and other multiple hazards, increased coordinated preparedness, response and recovery will be required at the national and local levels. With the significantly poor performance of the 2010 short rains and the 2011 long rains, droughts continue to shape the humanitarian needs in the country. The number of food-insecure people increased from 1.2 million in 2010 to 1.6 million in December 2010 as the drought situation worsened, and again increased to 2.4 million following the Short Rains Assessment in February 2011. With the poor long rains performance in 2011, the humanitarian situation will worsen further. The mid-season assessment conducted in May 2011 projects that 3 to 3.5 million people will require direct food assistance in the period beyond July 2011. The planned Long Rains Assessment in July will however give a clear figure of the food-insecure caseload. The drought situation is expected to manifest itself in humanitarian needs related to increased food insecurity and malnutrition, poor access to water and sanitation and disease outbreaks particularly in the north-eastern, northern, south-eastern and coastal areas where the long rains performed poorly. The continued instability in Somalia continues to contribute to refugee influx into the already-overstretched camps. An estimated 10,000 new arrivals have been registered monthly since January, bringing the number of refugees to 473,000 in both Kakuma and Dadaab camps. The refugee influx is expected to be sustained at 10,000 new arrivals from Somalia further worsening the humanitarian situation. The humanitarian needs for the residual post-election IDPs is yet to be sorted out and will continue to raise concerns as the Government resettlement process is slowed down by difficulties in accessing appropriate land to resettle the remaining IDPs. With tensions starting to be experienced in the Rift Valley due to political campaigns and ICC progress on the post-election suspects, further displacements are likely in the next six months. Though the Mau evictions have been temporarily halted, the 2009 evictees are still living in a deplorable situation. The increasing humanitarian needs and chronic vulnerabilities in the country call for a continued harmonised coordination system, and the strengthening of disaster risk reduction mainstreaming in response and development planning both at national and local levels in the next six months.
K E N Y A
24
Mid-year monitoring vs. objectives Cluster
objectives Outcomes Outputs Indicators Achieved as of mid-year
1. Strengthen coordination on DRR at the national and local levels.
1.1 Increased community resilience.
1.2 DRR platforms integrated in new administrative structures.
1.1.1 Multi-hazard early warning systems.
1.2.1 Contingency plans.
Early warning systems. Hazard contingency plans. DRR platform.
La Niña contingency plan, Sudan referendum, and Somali refugee influx contingency plans supported, DRR platform supported on mapping and fire safety campaigns.
2. Support sustainable solutions to vulnerability through enhanced advocacy and strengthened linkages with development partners.
2.1 Sustainable emergency response and recovery.
2.1.1 Increased participation of development partners in humanitarian action.
Increase in partnerships in humanitarian actions.
Partnerships for urban vulnerabilities, Cross-border emergencies, and DRR and recovery mainstreaming established.
3. Ensure rapid, timely, effective and principled coordination of humanitarian action.
3.1 Effective humanitarian actions.
3.2 Clear disaster response coordination system.
3.1.1 Timely multi-spectral response to disasters.
3.2.1 Disaster response coordination structure.
Reduced disaster response time.
Timely needs assessments and response to the La Nina drought undertaken.
4. Enhance integrated information management.
4.1 Integrated information on disasters
4.2 Enhanced inter-agency and inter-governmental sharing of information.
4.1.1 Enhanced decision support systems.
4.2.1 Informed disaster response interventions.
Available data on emergencies. Information platforms. Information portals.
Spatial data on drought and floods, Training on Desinventar done and roll-out planned, 3Ws and OCHA online updated.
K E N Y A
25
3.2.3 EARLY RECOVERY
Sector lead agency UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME (UNDP) Sector members ADEO, ADRA, Diakonie Emergency Aid, GOAL (an Irish NGO), HELPAGE, IOM,
IRC, OXFAM GB, UNDP and WVI. Number of projects 12 Sector objectives • To minimize the impact of crises on affected populations by facilitating the
return to their homes at the earliest time possible (for displaced populations), promote the involvement of host communities in their own recovery at the earliest time possible, and reinforce the role of local authorities (with respect to conflict sensitivity).
• To review and strengthen conflict mitigation structure to reduce on the ethnic- and resource-based tension that affects the peaceful co-existence of communities.
• To contribute towards recovery of livelihoods of women and men including the urban poor and elderly women and men affected by conflicts and natural disasters.
• To strengthen governance structures at community level to address disaster preparedness and response ensuring the equal participation of women and men and building on the existing knowledge and skills, coping mechanisms of women, girls, men and boys.
• To facilitate equal provision of shelters to women men and the aged affected by natural disasters and conflicts
• To mainstream early recovery initiatives into sector programming. Beneficiaries 229,594 women, 123,604 men, 359,951 children (Total: 713,149) Funds requested Original $6,970,950
Revised: $8,333,512 Funds requested per priority level
$7,769,512 (High) $564,000 (Medium)
Funding to date $2,300,000 (28% of revised requirements) Contact information Beatrice Teya - [email protected]
Martin Madara - [email protected] Needs Analysis The impacts of droughts, floods, climate change, influx of refugees from neighbouring countries internal and cross-border conflicts have eroded communities’ coping mechanisms and require recovery interventions. 1. To review and strengthen conflict mitigation structures in view of the new constitution
dispensation and promote peace and reconciliation at local and national levels. The new constitutional dispensation has radically reviewed the governance structure, which calls for reorganization of the previous District Peace Committees (DPCs) to effectively address the underlying tension within the communities especially in the PEV affected areas. In ASAL areas, the conflicts have continued due to scarce resources as well as harsh climatic conditions, which have been exacerbated by climate variability and have affected the lives and livelihoods of women, girls, men and boys differently. The women and girls often engage in the household’s chore to ensure household access to food thus affecting even girl’s child education, while men are more often entangled in the conflict, and boys may be moving with animals in search of pasture. This often results in frequent migration of such communities in search of not only peace, but new livelihoods as well. The conflicts have also led to livestock rustling across the borders, thus leading to further population displacements and destitution. There is a need to support community structures in addressing peace and conflict management. 2. Rehabilitation of livelihoods for communities affected by natural disaster and conflicts. The cumulative effects of successive drought, floods and low productivity have resulted into severe asset stripping, severely diminished coping capacities and livelihoods strategies/sources and increased household vulnerability of the affected populations. In the ASAL and marginal agricultural parts of Kenya, the impacts of the frequent natural disasters especially drought and floods have resulted in heavy livestock losses and crop failures resulting in increased need for support to rebuild
K E N Y A
26
the livelihood systems of both the pastoralists and agro-pastoralists. The overall global increases in food prices, disruption in food production and distribution have also increased the nutritional stress among the urban poor, the displaced and those communities living in ASAL. The long rains of 2010 caused floods in most parts of the pastoral districts and even in the parts of the grain basket areas, which led to crop losses. Hopes of good harvests were dashed by aflatoxin contamination when some 2.3 million bags of maize were reportedly contaminated. The recurrent increase of fuel prices will exacerbate the souring food prices. Recovery initiatives are required in the short and medium-term to help households resume their normal and/or better livelihoods activities. 3. To enhance development of disaster risk reduction planning and implementation of
strategies at the community level. Although the Government has institutions and structures in place to address natural disasters, the level of preparedness and response at community level is insufficient, owing to the lack of a disaster risk management policy which has been in draft form for long. Women and men have continued to be affected differently by natural disasters such as floods, drought, fires and landslides. The governance structure needs to be strengthened especially at community level to support the building of community resilience with full and equal participation of women and men of all ages. 4. Ensure equal provision of durable shelter for women and men in communities affected
by natural disasters and conflicts. Most women, girls, men and boys affected by floods, resource-based conflicts and even the PEV lose their shelter. The Government has put efforts into resettling the PEV-affected IDPs. Unfortunately, some IDPs have not yet been fully resettled and are staying in transit camps. There is need to continue providing shelter to protect vulnerable women, girls, boys and men from the harsh weather conditions and to provide dignity and security to all, including the elderly. There will be adequate and equal participation of women and men on the kind of shelter appropriate for different areas affected to promote ownership and acceptance.
KE
NY
A
27
Clu
ster
Obj
ectiv
es, O
utco
mes
, Out
puts
and
Indi
cato
rs
C
lust
er
Obj
ectiv
es
Out
com
es
Out
puts
In
dica
tor w
ith c
orre
spon
ding
Ta
rget
A
chie
ved
as o
f mid
-yea
r
1 To
revi
ew a
nd
stre
ngth
en c
onfli
ct
miti
gatio
n st
ruct
ures
to
redu
ce o
n th
e et
hnic
and
re
sour
ce b
ased
te
nsio
n th
at a
ffect
s th
e pe
acef
ul c
o-ex
iste
nce
of
com
mun
ities
.
Ope
ratio
naliz
atio
n of
pea
ce-
build
ing
and
conf
lict
man
agem
ent
polic
y.
Enha
nced
na
tiona
l in
frast
ruct
ure
of
peac
e.
Enha
nced
pa
rtner
ship
and
co
hesi
on a
mon
g co
mm
uniti
es.
Cap
acity
-bui
ldin
g in
itiat
ives
for
soci
al s
truct
ures
su
ppor
ted
at a
ll le
vels
. Pe
ace
com
mitt
ees
incr
ease
d an
d st
reng
then
ed a
t al
l lev
els.
Ps
ycho
-soc
ial
coun
sellin
g se
ssio
ns
cond
ucte
d.
Shar
ing
of
reso
urce
s am
ong
conf
lictin
g co
mm
uniti
es.
Faci
litat
ing
inte
r-et
hnic
soc
ial a
nd
cultu
ral a
ctiv
ities
(s
ports
and
cu
ltura
l fes
tival
s).
20 tr
aini
ngs
on p
eace
-bu
ildin
g/le
ader
ship
. 47
pea
ce c
omm
ittee
s es
tabl
ishe
d an
d st
reng
then
ed.
300
IDP
s co
unse
lled.
A
t lea
st 2
0 gr
oups
cou
nsel
led
(you
th s
port
grou
ps) b
y th
e en
d of
20
11.
Pol
itica
l lea
ders
from
diff
eren
t et
hnic
bac
kgro
unds
join
tly
parti
cipa
te in
pub
lic p
eace
eve
nts
prom
otin
g pe
ace
with
thei
r ad
vers
arie
s.
Four
spo
rt to
urna
men
ts a
nd tw
o cu
ltura
l fes
tival
s he
ld b
y en
d of
20
11.
1.
Trai
n lo
cal a
utho
ritie
s an
d pa
rtner
s on
goo
d go
vern
ance
, co
nflic
t pre
vent
ion
and
peac
e en
hanc
emen
t pro
cess
es.
• H
eld
a cr
oss
bord
er c
onsu
ltativ
e fo
rum
for T
urka
na a
nd
Topo
sa c
omm
uniti
es fr
om K
enya
and
Sou
ther
n S
udan
re
spec
tivel
y. 9
7 le
ader
s in
clud
ing
the
Min
iste
r for
Lan
ds,
mem
bers
of p
arlia
men
t, di
stric
t com
mis
sion
ers
and
com
mun
ity le
ader
s at
tend
ed.
• A
n in
ter-c
omm
unity
cro
ss-b
orde
r pea
ce c
omm
ittee
no
min
ated
for T
urka
na -
Topo
sa c
omm
uniti
es.
• Th
e no
min
ated
com
mitt
ee c
ondu
cted
a p
eace
cer
emon
y at
th
e Kr
aals
alo
ng th
e Ke
nya-
Sud
an b
orde
r. •
Dis
tribu
ted
over
200
pea
ce s
ticke
rs.
2.
Iden
tifie
d yo
uth
orga
niza
tions
, com
mun
ity s
take
hold
ers
and
esta
blis
hed
com
mun
ity n
etw
ork
3.
R
estru
ctur
ed a
nd s
treng
then
ed 1
2 cl
uste
r pea
ce c
omm
ittee
s.
Trai
ned
DP
Cs
and
Clu
ster
Pea
ce C
omm
ittee
s on
con
flict
m
itiga
tion
and
peac
e-bu
ildin
g.
4.
Stre
ngth
ened
cro
ss-b
orde
r lin
kage
s w
ith c
omm
uniti
es, C
SO
s,
and
gove
rnm
ent a
ctor
s fo
r effe
ctiv
e pe
ace-
build
ing.
2 To
con
tribu
te
tow
ards
reco
very
of
live
lihoo
ds o
f w
omen
and
men
in
clud
ing
the
urba
n po
or a
nd
elde
rly a
ffect
ed b
y co
nflic
ts, h
uman
-in
duce
d an
d na
tura
l dis
aste
rs.
Live
lihoo
ds o
f co
mm
uniti
es
secu
red,
rest
ored
an
d di
vers
ified
.
Cap
acity
-bui
ldin
g of
com
mun
ities
on
live
lihoo
ds.
Intro
duct
ion
and/
or
dive
rsifi
catio
n of
liv
elih
oods
so
urce
s.
Link
ages
with
M
ED
/IGA
sup
port
serv
ice
prov
ider
s.
5,30
0 co
mm
unity
mem
bers
– w
ith
equa
l par
ticip
atio
n of
wom
en a
nd
men
, inc
ludi
ng th
e ur
ban
poor
and
th
e el
derly
- em
pow
ered
on
dive
rse
livel
ihoo
ds s
ourc
es a
nd
oppo
rtuni
ties.
• 15
wom
en g
iven
upg
rade
d tra
inin
g on
bas
ketry
and
raw
m
ater
ials
pro
vide
d.
• 15
you
th id
entif
ied
for f
ilm p
rodu
ctio
n tra
inin
g in
par
tner
ship
w
ith F
ilm A
id.
• 18
sta
ff an
d st
akeh
olde
rs tr
aine
d on
GIS
and
rem
ote
sens
ing.
•
Five
you
th s
uppo
rted
with
she
d, to
ols,
raw
mat
eria
ls fo
r ca
rpen
try w
orks
hop.
•
120
sets
of t
ools
for p
lum
bing
, car
pent
ry, m
ason
ry, s
ewin
g w
ere
dona
ted
to D
onbo
sco
VT
scho
ol
• C
otto
n fa
rmin
g of
20
acre
s fo
r 200
hou
seho
lds
com
men
ced
with
the
seed
s pr
ovid
ed b
y th
e D
epar
tmen
t of A
gric
ultu
re.
• 23
00 N
eem
tree
s ar
e be
ing
plan
ted
on a
2 a
cre
plot
. •
IRC
has
reac
hed
out t
o 50
0 ho
useh
olds
thro
ugh
thei
r pa
rtici
patio
n in
the
Villa
ge S
avin
gs a
nd L
oans
Ass
ocia
tions
and
bu
sine
ss s
kills
trai
ning
.
KE
NY
A
28
C
lust
er
Obj
ectiv
es
Out
com
es
Out
puts
In
dica
tor w
ith c
orre
spon
ding
Ta
rget
A
chie
ved
as o
f mid
-yea
r
3 To
stre
ngth
en
gove
rnan
ce
stru
ctur
es a
t co
mm
unity
leve
l to
addr
ess
disa
ster
pr
epar
edne
ss a
nd
resp
onse
, en
surin
g th
e eq
ual
parti
cipa
tion
of
wom
en a
nd m
en
and
build
ing
on
thei
r exi
stin
g kn
owle
dge,
ski
lls
and
copi
ng
mec
hani
sms.
DR
R p
olic
y op
erat
iona
lized
. G
over
nmen
t in
crea
sed
fund
ing
for D
RR
ac
tiviti
es.
Gov
ernm
ent
inco
rpor
ates
D
RR
in n
atio
nal
deve
lopm
ent
plan
s at
all
leve
ls.
Wom
en a
nd m
en
in c
omm
uniti
es
are
equa
lly
conv
ersa
nt w
ith
and
wel
l pr
epar
ed fo
r co
mm
on
disa
ster
s in
thei
r en
viro
nmen
t.
Gov
erna
nce
stru
ctur
es
stre
ngth
ened
at
all l
evel
s.
DR
M p
olic
y fo
rmul
ated
and
op
erat
iona
lized
. Em
erge
ncy
Res
pons
e an
d D
isas
ter
Man
agem
ent
Com
mitt
ees
stre
ngth
ened
/c
onst
itute
d.
Com
mun
ity
Dis
aste
r Pr
epar
edne
ss
and
Res
pons
e P
lans
dev
elop
ed,
diss
emin
ated
and
im
plem
ente
d.
Nat
iona
l, co
unty
and
loca
l lev
el
gove
rnan
ce s
truct
ures
sup
porte
d.
DR
M p
olic
y op
erat
iona
lized
by
2013
. O
ne n
atio
nal p
latfo
rm a
nd 4
7 co
unty
com
mitt
ees
(with
gen
der-
bala
nce)
on
disa
ster
pr
epar
edne
ss tr
aine
d.
At l
east
47
Dis
aste
r Pre
pare
dnes
s an
d R
espo
nse
plan
s de
velo
ped
by
2012
.
• G
aris
sa C
ount
y C
ontin
genc
y Pl
anni
ng p
roce
ss h
as b
een
deve
lope
d.
4 To
faci
litat
e eq
ual
(equ
itabl
e)
prov
isio
n of
sh
elte
rs to
wom
en,
men
and
the
elde
rly a
ffect
ed b
y di
sast
ers
and
conf
licts
, ens
urin
g eq
ual (
equi
tabl
e)
parti
cipa
tion
of
both
wom
en a
nd
men
.
Life
of d
ecen
cy:
free
of p
hysi
cal,
soci
al a
nd
psyc
holo
gica
l ha
rm.
Con
stru
ctio
n of
sh
elte
r and
re
settl
ing
of
disa
ster
vic
tims.
R
ainw
ater
ha
rves
ting
kits
in
stal
led
on
prev
ious
ly
cons
truct
ed
shel
ters
.
100
shel
ters
con
stru
cted
. 50
0 w
omen
, girl
s, b
oys
and
men
liv
ing
in d
ecen
t she
lters
. 3,
500
rain
wat
er h
arve
stin
g ki
ts
inst
alle
d.
• 3,
559
shel
ters
con
stru
cted
for I
DP
s in
the
Nor
th R
ift V
alle
y (W
aren
g an
d E
ldor
et E
ast D
istri
cts)
. •
Det
aile
d G
BV
ass
essm
ent p
rodu
ced
to in
form
prio
ritie
s ac
ross
IR
C p
rogr
amm
ing
and
also
at t
he in
tera
genc
y le
vel t
o en
sure
G
BV
con
cern
s ar
e m
ains
tream
ed a
cros
s al
l sec
tors
.
5 To
mai
nstre
am
early
reco
very
in
itiat
ives
into
se
ctor
pr
ogra
mm
ing.
Saf
e an
d re
silie
nt
com
mun
ity.
Sec
tors
in
corp
orat
ing
early
reco
very
an
d D
RR
in
itiat
ives
in th
eir
plan
s.
At l
east
six
sec
tors
inco
rpor
atin
g ea
rly re
cove
ry in
thei
r res
pons
e pl
ans.
• D
RR
and
CC
A m
ains
tream
ing
ongo
ing
in K
akum
a an
d D
aada
b re
fuge
e ca
mps
sin
ce J
anua
ry to
be
scal
ed u
p to
hos
t co
mm
uniti
es in
201
2 in
line
with
Cou
ntry
Stra
tegi
c P
lan.
K E N Y A
29
3.2.4 EDUCATION Sector lead agencies UNITED NATIONS CHILDREN'S FUND (UNICEF)/Save the Children
(SC) in support of the Ministry of Education Sector members MOE and Partners Number of projects 2 Sector objectives • All school-aged children affected by emergencies access to education
during emergencies. • Capacity development of the education system is strengthened both at
national and sub national levels to effectively respond to education in emergencies.
• Education sector is coordinated among key development partners both local and international with clear linkages to multi-sectoral interventions.
• DRR integrated within the Education sector interventions. Beneficiaries 1,251,430 school children
Girls 600,684 Boys 650,746
Funds requested $1,036,460 Funds requested per priority level
$676,100 (High) $360,360 (Medium)
Funding to date $518,939 (50% of revised requirements) Contact information Kerstin Karlstrom - [email protected]
Table: Disaggregated number of affected population and beneficiaries
Beneficiaries Affected population Category
Female male Total Female Male Total
Children benefitting from school feeding program 1,776,000 1,924,000 3,700,000 528,000 572,000 1,100,000
Floods affected 159,840 173,160 333,000 48,000 52,000 100,000
Children in urban informal settlements 32,160 34,840 67,000 9,600 10,400 20,000
Potential displacements from Mau 32,160 34,840 67,000 9,600 10,400 20,000
School Children in the new fourth camp in Dadaab of Ifo II 19,200 20,800 40,000 5,486 5,944 11,430
Total 2,019,360 2,187,640 4,207,000 600,686 650,744 1,251,430
Important achievements during 2011 include a rapid response to the drought in north-eastern Kenya through the provision of school feeding and educational materials to affected schools. The Ministry of Education’s commitment to this intervention was clearly demonstrated through the reprogramming of funds to address the developing need of school meals. Strategic shifts for the remainder of 2011 involve an increased focus on capacity development following a loss of key staff members managing the cluster due to transfers of responsibilities within the Ministry. A stronger focus on district based preparedness is suggested. The continuing influx of refugees due to the deteriorating situation in Somalia has led to a discussion on how to increase the educational focus in Dadaab. This is challenging as it sits outside the Ministry of Education’s view of what is their core responsibility. It is suggested that a rapid response in the form of educational spaces to cater for the increased number of pupils is provided as well as a quality education improvement package to mitigate the risk of drop out and reduce vulnerability that comes from being out of school.
K E N Y A
30
Targets have been slightly modified to more accurately reflect the level of intervention. For example, the focus in disaster risk reduction in the Kenyan context is not just on curriculum reform but also on providing alternative ways of schooling in emergency prone areas. Therefore the targets have been revised to reflect these alternative service providers. Similarly the support to the MoE has been redefined through more specific targets. The national education cluster is re-organizing itself to include new partners due to staff rotation. Capitalizing on this process the coordination mechanism will be re-looked at and the terms of reference for the group updated hopefully leading to an even more coordinated approach in the future.
KE
NY
A
31
Mid
-yea
r mon
itorin
g vs
. obj
ectiv
es
Clu
ster
Obj
ectiv
es
Out
com
es
Targ
et o
utpu
ts
Indi
cato
r with
cor
resp
ondi
ng
targ
et
Ach
ieve
d as
of m
id-y
ear
1. I
ncre
ase
acce
ss to
ed
ucat
ion
in
emer
genc
y pr
one
area
s.
Pro
vide
alte
rnat
ive
form
s of
edu
catio
n in
are
as
pron
e to
dis
aste
r. In
crea
se c
apac
ity o
f te
ache
rs to
con
tinue
pr
ovid
ing
qual
ity e
duca
tion
durin
g hu
man
itaria
n em
erge
ncie
s
Set u
p su
stai
nabl
e m
obile
sch
ools
in
drou
ght p
rone
are
as.
Trai
ning
of t
each
ers
on p
edag
ogy
and
child
cen
tred
teac
hing
met
hodo
logi
es.
Tem
pora
ry le
arni
ng s
pace
s pr
ovid
ed in
em
erge
ncy
affe
cted
are
as.
Scho
ol s
uppl
ies
prov
ided
in a
ffect
ed
area
s.
Expa
nd e
mer
genc
y sc
hool
feed
ing
in
emer
genc
y af
fect
ed a
reas
.
No.
of b
oys
and
girls
acc
essi
ng
scho
ols
in a
saf
e en
viro
nmen
t du
ring
emer
genc
ies.
N
o of
sch
ools
ben
efitt
ing
from
te
achi
ng a
nd le
arni
ng s
uppl
ies.
N
umbe
r of t
each
ing
pers
onne
l in
em
erge
ncy
pron
e ar
eas
train
ed in
ped
agog
y.
13,7
00 p
upils
reac
hed
with
edu
catio
nal
mat
eria
ls.
2. C
apac
ity
deve
lopm
ent o
f the
ed
ucat
ion
syst
em is
st
reng
then
ed b
oth
at
natio
nal a
nd s
ub
natio
nal l
evel
s to
ef
fect
ivel
y re
spon
d to
edu
catio
n in
em
erge
ncie
s.
Nat
iona
l and
sub
nat
iona
l ca
paci
ties
of e
duca
tion
man
ager
s en
hanc
ed to
ad
dres
s ed
ucat
ion
in
emer
genc
ies.
Impr
oved
pla
nnin
g an
d m
onito
ring
capa
city
of n
atio
nal a
nd d
istri
ct
educ
atio
n au
thor
ities
D
istri
ct E
duca
tion
Boa
rd m
embe
rs in
em
erge
ncy
pron
e di
stric
ts d
evel
op
dist
rict s
peci
fic E
PR
P p
lans
Num
ber o
f nat
iona
l and
dis
trict
le
vel e
duca
tion
auth
oriti
es
train
ed o
n sc
hool
man
agem
ent
durin
g em
erge
ncie
s N
o of
Dis
trict
s ed
ucat
ion
EP
RP
’s
Num
ber o
f act
iviti
es in
the
natio
nal E
PR
P im
plem
ente
d
Nat
iona
l EP
RP
com
plet
ed
56 D
EB
trai
ned
in 1
8 di
stric
ts.
3. E
duca
tion
sect
or is
co
ordi
nate
d am
ong
key
deve
lopm
ent
partn
ers
both
loca
l an
d in
tern
atio
nal
with
cle
ar li
nkag
es
to m
ulti
sect
oral
in
terv
entio
ns.
Educ
atio
n em
erge
ncy
is
prio
ritis
ed b
y ke
y m
inis
tries
an
d de
velo
pmen
t par
tner
s.
Mon
thly
clu
ster
mee
tings
org
aniz
ed.
Dat
a on
impa
ct o
f em
erge
ncy
on
educ
atio
n co
llect
ed a
nd a
naly
zed.
Jo
int f
undi
ng o
f MoE
EP
RP
prio
ritie
s.
Edu
catio
n cl
uste
r mee
tings
hel
d m
onth
ly.
Avai
labi
lity
of ti
mel
y an
d up
date
d in
form
atio
n th
at in
form
s em
erge
ncy
resp
onse
. E
vide
nce
of o
ther
sec
tor s
uppo
rt
to e
duca
tion
EP
RP
.
One
mee
ting
sinc
e Ja
nuar
y, M
oE is
re
orga
nizi
ng.
4. D
RR
inte
grat
ed
with
in th
e E
duca
tion
sect
or in
terv
entio
ns.
DR
R is
mai
nstre
amed
in
educ
atio
n pr
ogra
mm
es.
Mob
ile a
nd lo
w c
ost b
oard
ing
scho
ols
defin
ed a
s D
RR
resp
onse
. S
choo
l saf
ety
prom
oted
as
a ke
y pa
rt of
Chi
ld F
riend
ly S
choo
ls.
% in
crea
se in
enr
olm
ent i
n m
obile
an
d lo
w c
ost b
oard
ing
scho
ols.
N
o of
teac
hers
trai
ned
on s
choo
l sa
fety
.
90 m
obile
sch
ools
ope
ratio
nal.
Low
cos
t boa
rdin
g sc
hool
s re
ceiv
ed
supp
lies.
Sc
hool
feed
ing
prog
ram
me
prov
ided
–
Gov
ernm
ent o
f Ken
ya p
rovi
ded
KE
S
111,
189,
000
to “t
op u
p” s
choo
l fee
ding
in
scho
ols
that
wer
e re
ceiv
ing
an in
flux
of
stud
ents
due
to m
igra
tion.
K E N Y A
32
3.2.5 FOOD AID
Sector lead agency WORLD FOOD PROGRAMME (WFP) Sector members
Action Aid, ALDEF, Catholic Diocese-Kitui/Meru, Child Fund, COCOP,COOPI, Concern Worldwide, ELBERTA, FHI, Help Heal, KRC, Oxfam GB, Ramati, Turkana Rehabilitation Project and WV.
Number of projects 5 (1 food sector + 4 urban cash) Sector objectives Prevent acute hunger and malnutrition among food-insecure populations and
build or restore livelihoods. Invest in disaster preparedness and mitigation measures.
Beneficiaries 1,837,480 Funds requested Original: 106,316,713
Revised at mid-year: $129,949,729 Funds requested per priority level
$128,359,989 (High) $1,589,740 (Medium)
Funding to date $136,969,113 (105% of revised requirements) Contact information Romina Woldemariam - [email protected]
Table: Disaggregated number of affected population and beneficiaries
Target beneficiaries Category
Affected population
Female Male Total
GFD 536,433 456,961 993,394 FFA 457,552 305,034 762,586 Total 2,400,000 993,984 761,996 1,755,980 Supplementary feeding programme
138,000
Maternal-child health
40,000
Urban 41,500 Totals 1,837,480
Food assistance continues to be guided by the twice-yearly assessments which follow the long and short rains. With predictions of La Niña materializing, the food security is deteriorating rapidly. Thus while planning figures at the time of preparing the 2011 EHRP are slightly less than one million people, this has changed since. The Short Rains Assessment conducted in January 2011 found 2.4 million people were food-insecure. Of this, 1.35 million people (women, men, girls and boys) reside in the pastoral areas in the north and east of the country while the rest (1.05 million people) are from the short rains dependent south-east and coastal marginal agricultural area. In addition, the March-June long rains season has also performed dismally. The food security is therefore expected to further worsen from July. Already, livestock productivity is on the decline, water and grazing resources scarce and livestock mortalities reported especially in Wajir, Mandera and Garissa. In the marginal agricultural areas, the total failure of the short rains season caused extensive crop losses in the worst affected districts of Mwingi, Kitui, Tharaka, Mwea, Kwale, Kilifi and Malindi. Depleted household food stocks, above normal food prices, and reduced on farm labour opportunities have caused declines in household food security for the poor and very poor. Of the 2.4 million people affected, WFP is targeting 1.75 million through general food distributions and food-for-assets while the Government is assisting the rest. Nutrition-oriented interventions - supplementary feeding and mother-and-child health and nutrition for children below five years and women – will also be implemented. Focus will be on both relief and recovery activities depending on vulnerabilities. There will be a gradual shift from relief towards recovery oriented activities by developing longer-term community or households’ assets. The recovery component aims to enhance
K E N Y A
33
resilience to shocks through the creation of household and community assets through food for asset (FFA) activities. Disaster risk reduction is well integrated into recovery activities. Achievements to date include assistance to 1.4 million through FFA and GFD allowing them to meet their food needs. However, insufficient cereals (poor funding at first, then high prices, and low stocks locally and in the region) affected quantity of food distributed during the first half of 2011. Cash for assets (CFA) has also been piloted successfully in Mwingi and is being rolled out to other districts in the marginal agricultural districts. Under CFA, households are provided with cash entitlements allowing them to make purchases in the market to meet their basic food needs. Supplementary feeding activities in the arid and semi arid lands have been ongoing and have met the target. Moderately malnourished women and children under-five at risk of becoming severely malnourished are admitted into health clinics and receive food assistance until they recover. In the urban sector, the results of the urban baseline study have not been released. With no additional funds received, three of the five planned cash-based projects targeting the informal settlements of Nairobi have not materialized, while two are ongoing. Admitted beneficiaries are discharged from the programme after their nutritional status has improved and remains stable and above the thresholds for at least three consecutive months.
KE
NY
A
34
Mid
-yea
r mon
itorin
g vs
. obj
ectiv
es
Clu
ster
Obj
ectiv
es
Out
com
es
Targ
et o
utpu
ts
Indi
cato
r A
chie
ved
as o
f mid
-yea
r 1.
Mee
t im
med
iate
food
gap
s in
A
SA
L.
1.1
Adeq
uate
Foo
d C
onsu
mpt
ion
scor
e.
1.1.
1 Fo
od d
istri
bute
d in
su
ffici
ent q
uant
ities
in
timel
y m
anne
r.
Food
Con
sum
ptio
n sc
ore
> 35
(p
erce
nt o
f hou
seho
ld).
P
asto
ral:
FCS
=44
Mar
gina
l Agr
icul
tura
l: FC
S=4
9
2. E
nhan
ce re
cove
ry a
nd
resi
lienc
e to
sho
cks.
2.
1 Th
roug
h re
cove
ry a
nd D
RR
as
set c
reat
ions
, hou
seho
lds’
ab
ility
to re
spon
d to
sho
cks
impr
oved
.
2.1.
1 C
reat
ion
of c
omm
unity
as
sets
thro
ugh
optim
um
use
of n
atur
al re
sour
ces
and
test
ed te
chno
logi
es.
Hou
seho
lds
and
com
mun
ity a
sset
sc
ore
for 8
0% o
f hou
seho
lds
incr
ease
d.
Dat
a co
llect
ed tw
ice
year
ly, t
o be
co
llect
ed in
Jun
e.
3. I
mpr
ove
exis
ting
mar
ket
info
rmat
ion
syst
ems.
3.
1 Ti
mel
y de
cisi
on m
akin
g ba
sed
on e
arly
mar
ket
info
rmat
ion.
3.1.
1 M
acro
and
mic
ro fo
od a
nd
mar
ket r
elat
ed in
form
atio
n co
llect
ed a
nd s
hare
d.
Qua
rterly
repo
rts p
rodu
ced
and
diss
emin
ated
.
In p
rogr
ess
4. I
mpr
ove
food
/inco
me
secu
rity
for m
ost v
ulne
rabl
e ur
ban
hous
ehol
ds u
nabl
e to
mee
t the
ir fo
od n
eeds
.
4.2.
1 A
dequ
ate
food
co
nsum
ptio
n.
4.2.
1 C
ash/
vouc
hers
dis
tribu
ted
in c
orre
ct a
mou
nts
in ti
mel
y m
anne
r. 4.
2.2
Rat
io o
f foo
d to
non
-food
ex
pend
iture
dec
reas
es.
Food
con
sum
ptio
n sc
ore
> 35
.
Urb
an F
CS
= 53
(Mat
hare
)
K E N Y A
35
3.2.6 HEALTH
Sector lead agency WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION (WHO) Co-lead Ministry Of Public Health and Sanitation Sector members ADEO CDC, IOM, IRC, Merlin, MOPHS, MOMS, six Provincial Health Teams and
40 District Health Teams, SC and WVK. Number of projects 7 Sector objectives Rapidly predict, detect and respond to disasters, and disease outbreaks due to
the drought disaster to reduce excess morbidity, mortality, and disability in Kenya:
Beneficiaries A total of 3,572,000, beneficiaries, 2,180,000 women and girls, 1,392,000 men and boys from six provinces; including over 300,000 refugees in the two refugee camps and urban centres in Nairobi and special vulnerable groups in the arid and semi-arid regions in the six provinces.
Funds requested Original: $11,731,432 Revised at mid-year: $12,190,453
Funds requested per priority level
$11,890,453 (HIGH) $300,000 (MEDIUM)
Funding to date $1,115,904 (9% of revised requirements) Contact information [email protected]
Affected population Target beneficiaries Category Female Male Total Female Male Total
Drought affected 2,600,000 1,200,000 3,800,000 1,800,000 1,000,000 2,800,000 IDPs and returnees 102,000 86,000 188,000 102,000 102,000 204,000 Refugees east 148,000 117,000 265,000 140,000 148,000 288,000 Refugees south 40,000 25,000 65000 30,000 40,000 70,000 Host communities 308,000 102,000 500,000 108,000 102,000 210,000 Totals 3,198,000 1,530,000 4,818,000 2,180,000 1,392,000 3,572,000
Changes in needs: The health and disease dynamics in Kenya had not improved over the last six months especially in the northern arid and semi-arid regions of the country. Within the last six months also there were increases in acute malnutrition among children (290,000) and women (90,000) contributing to reduced capacity to fight infectious diseases. Thus there were measles outbreaks among the districts along the refugee highway, stretching from Dadaab to Kakuma including Nairobi. In all 23 districts 1,908,873 children less than five years were at risk and there were 462 laboratory confirmed cases with 11 deaths. In addition, health alerts have also been issued by the Ministry of Public Health and Sanitation for possible yellow fever and Ebola haemorrhagic fevers and poliomyelitis outbreaks were reported from the neighbouring countries of Uganda, South Sudan and Somalia. The security classification of the same region remained UN phase ‘3’ with lot of insecurity threats within and also for the neighbouring countries. The Government declared a national disaster for drought in the arid and semi-arid regions of the country in June 2011, a situation contributing to further deterioration of the health status, with over 2.4 million people at risk especially women and children. The poor food, water, sanitation and health situation is expected to deteriorate; poor hygiene and sanitation practices coupled with poor cultural practices will lead to communicable diseases outbreaks. The effect of the drought is leading to internal migration of people from one area to the other, distorting the demographic and coverage variables and also often shifting the burden of service provision disproportionately, which has an important impact on resources for the health care system. In addition, the onset of the short rains later in the year will complicate the emergency response in the traditional areas of Nyanza, north-eastern, North Rift valley and Coast provinces which are likely to experience floods, landslides, displacement of people and influx of pastoralists and refugees from neighbouring countries. The flood situation would expose population to water and vector born diseases.
K E N Y A
36
There are 473,000 refugees located in two large camps in both north-eastern and north-western parts of the country in Dadaab and Kakuma. The number is likely to increase if the current insecurity situation continues in Southern Sudan. These areas also have the lowest basic social services indicators in the country. The availability of public health facilities varies widely across the country ranging from 3.8/100,000 in the targeted areas to 10.5/100,000. The percentage of safe drinking water and excreta disposal is 46% as against national average of 60.4% and excreta disposal coverage is 32.7% as against the national average of 87.7%. Fully immunised coverage for children is 55% as against national average of 85%. These areas are geographically expansive, with poor road networks and widely dispersed health facilities. The nomadic lifestyle, susceptible cultural practices and poor literacy rates have compounded the problem. Shortage of qualified health personnel, medical supplies and drugs for disease outbreaks and illnesses are also complex health challenges.
The Health sector’s main thrust for the emergency response will be to upscale the early warning systems for potential disease outbreaks, promptly detect and respond to communicable diseases outbreaks and other disasters, ensuring availability of essential drugs, laboratory reagents, vaccines and rapid diagnostic kits and establishing capacity to manage disease outbreaks for MoH and partners. Achievements to date in 2011 The cholera outbreak had been declared by the Government for the first time in 2010. It had however been contained in 2010 due to the availability of funds to the Health sector. However, the risk factors remain amidst the weak health system in these areas and thus the current structures need to be sustained at least for two more years. In addition, re-orientation had been conducted for at least 20 district health teams in the affected areas. The Kenya Weekly Epidemiological bulletin continues to be published regularly. Reasons for any significant deviation between targets and actual achievements as of mid-year The needs increased during the implementation of the projects. For example, in addition to the cholera outbreak, there were other disease outbreaks such as measles and wild poliomyelitis requiring diversion of resources, especially staff, to address them. The expected extra funding could not be
K E N Y A
37
mobilized. More funding is also required to sustain the gains made so far in addition to full implementation of the original plans. Important implementation challenges The increasing effects of the drought contributed to the internal migration of people from one area to the other and have changed the usual demography and planning for resources and technical support. Orientation for the other remaining 30 district health teams in integrated early warning systems, outbreak investigation and response using whole sector approach remains a challenge. How the cluster re-validated the projects In developing the key strategies for intervention, the Health sector, the WASH sector, national disaster response agencies, line ministries including Ministries of Public health and Sanitation, Medical Services, Water, Livestock, security services and local Government authorities were all engaged and sectoral response plans were developed into a comprehensive disaster response plan. Various assessments were conducted by the Ministries of Health, WHO, Kenya Red Cross and Partners. In-depth analysis of the reports findings considered geographical locations, hazards and risk factors, the emergency health response system, impact on women, women headed households, and children especially, and the risk factors perpetuating the occurrence of disasters in these vulnerable areas. In addition, desk reviews of the Kenya Food Security Short Rains Assessment, Kenya Weekly Epidemiological reports and the 2010 Kenya Demographic Health survey were conducted to identify regions most at risk of public health disasters.
KE
NY
A
38
Mid
-yea
r mon
itorin
g vs
. obj
ectiv
es
Clu
ster
Obj
ectiv
es
Out
com
es
Targ
et o
utpu
ts
Indi
cato
r with
co
rres
pond
ing
targ
et
Ach
ieve
d as
of m
id-y
ear
1.1.
1 Jo
int a
sses
smen
ts
cond
ucte
d.
At l
east
80%
of a
sses
smen
t re
ports
ava
ilabl
e.
50%
of t
he a
ffect
ed
dist
ricts
wer
e re
-orie
nted
. 1.
1 Im
prov
ed c
oord
inat
ion
in
the
Hea
lth s
ecto
r. 1.
1.2
Em
erge
ncy
stak
ehol
der
mee
tings
at a
ll le
vels
. 80
% o
f sta
keho
lder
mee
ting
repo
rts a
vaila
ble.
50
% o
f Dis
trict
Hea
lth
Man
agem
ent T
eam
s (D
HM
Ts) t
rain
ed h
eld
coor
dina
tion
mee
tings
du
ring
epid
emic
. 1.
2 Im
prov
ed c
omm
unic
atio
n an
d in
form
atio
n sh
arin
g am
ong
stak
ehol
ders
.
1.2.
1 N
umbe
r of
impl
emen
tatio
n re
ports
su
bmitt
ed b
y pa
rtner
s.
At l
east
80%
of m
onth
ly h
ealth
em
erge
ncy
bulle
tins
publ
ishe
d.80
% O
f Wee
kly
Epi
dem
iolo
gica
l Bul
letin
s pu
blis
hed.
1.
Stre
ngth
en th
e ex
istin
g H
ealth
Sec
tor
coor
dina
tion
mec
hani
sms
amon
g st
akeh
olde
rs fo
cusi
ng o
n co
ncer
ns o
f fem
ales
and
ch
ildre
n fo
r im
prov
ed
capa
city
, res
ourc
e m
obiliz
atio
n an
d ad
voca
cy fo
r DR
R.
1.3
Coo
rdin
ated
em
erge
ncy
resp
onse
pla
nnin
g,
impl
emen
tatio
n an
d m
onito
ring.
1.3.
1 In
tegr
ated
mul
ti-se
ctor
an
d pa
rtner
dis
aste
r re
spon
se a
nd ri
sk
redu
ctio
n.
1.3.
2 Jo
int m
onito
ring
repo
rts.
80%
of d
istri
ct p
lans
ava
ilabl
e.
100%
of j
oint
mon
itorin
g re
ports
ava
ilabl
e.
55%
of c
hole
ra re
spon
se
plan
s a
vaila
ble.
2.1
Mor
talit
y m
aint
aine
d be
low
1%
. 2.
1.1
Mor
talit
y re
duce
d in
di
stric
ts.
2.1.
2 N
umbe
r of h
ealth
w
orke
rs tr
aine
d.
Cas
e fa
talit
y ra
te re
duce
d fro
m
2.1%
to b
elow
1%
.for c
hole
ra
outb
reak
80
% o
f key
DH
MT
mem
bers
tra
ined
.
0.2%
(cas
e fa
talit
y re
duce
d to
bel
ow s
et ta
rget
). 50
%
2.2
DH
MTs
re-o
rient
ed o
n di
seas
e ou
tbre
ak
inve
stig
atio
n an
d ca
ses
man
agem
ent.
2.2.
1 Tr
aini
ng fo
r DH
MTs
in
mos
t affe
cted
and
at r
isk
area
s.
Rep
orts
of t
rain
ings
con
duct
ed
for D
HM
Ts.
80%
of t
rain
ings
con
duct
ed
2.
Ens
ure
cont
inui
ty o
f rap
id
life-
savi
ng e
mer
genc
y re
spon
se s
ervi
ces
and
capa
citie
s ar
e av
aila
ble
for t
he ta
rget
vul
nera
ble
popu
latio
ns.
2.3
Dis
trict
s an
d pr
ovin
ces
have
em
erge
ncy
stoc
ks
for s
urge
cap
acity
.
2.1.
2 N
o. o
f dis
trict
s in
affe
cted
ar
eas
with
out e
ssen
tial
drug
s st
ock-
outs
.
No.
of d
istri
cts
with
out s
tock
-ou
ts d
urin
g em
erge
ncie
s an
d di
seas
e ou
tbre
aks.
80%
(pre
posi
tione
d ca
rrie
d ou
t in
8 ta
rget
ed lo
catio
ns.
3.1.
2 In
crea
sed
repo
rting
of
case
s by
spe
cial
vu
lner
able
gro
ups
to
heal
th fa
cilit
ies.
Cov
erag
e of
stig
mat
ized
pa
tient
s re
porti
ng to
hea
lth
faci
litie
s.
3.
Impr
ove
the
com
mun
ity
and
heal
th c
are
emer
genc
y re
silie
nt
stru
ctur
es a
nd c
apac
ities
to
con
tain
dis
ease
ou
tbre
aks
and
redu
ce
com
mun
ity v
ulne
rabi
lity.
3.1
No.
of r
epor
ted
dise
ases
ou
tbre
aks
redu
ced
by
50%
.
3.2.
1 In
crea
sed
no o
f ho
useh
olds
usi
ng
chlo
rinat
ion
met
hods
.
Pro
porti
on o
f hou
seho
lds
usin
g sa
fe w
ater
met
hods
(at l
east
60
%).
60%
esp
ecia
lly in
the
north
-w
est r
egio
ns.
30%
cov
erag
e (A
ttitu
des
and
avai
labi
lity
of ta
blet
s).
KE
NY
A
39
Clu
ster
Obj
ectiv
es
Out
com
es
Targ
et o
utpu
ts
Indi
cato
r with
co
rres
pond
ing
targ
et
Ach
ieve
d as
of m
id-y
ear
3.
3 N
o. o
f mon
thly
hea
lth
educ
atio
n ca
mpa
igns
co
nduc
ted
in th
e m
ost
affe
cted
dis
trict
s.
3.3.
1 M
onth
ly h
ealth
edu
catio
n ca
mpa
igns
in p
asto
ral
com
mun
ities
.
No.
of h
ealth
edu
catio
n ca
mpa
igns
con
duct
ed p
er
dist
rict p
er m
onth
.
30%
3.
3 C
omm
uniti
es e
mba
rk o
n lo
cal h
ealth
pro
mot
ion
proj
ects
3.3.
2 N
o of
ver
ifiab
le
com
mun
ity p
roje
cts
initi
ated
by
com
mun
ities
pe
r mon
th.
No
of c
omm
unity
pro
ject
s in
crea
se b
y 30
%.
50%
(han
d w
ashi
ng, t
oile
t di
spos
al e
tc.)
4.1
Enh
ance
d co
mm
unic
atio
n fro
m c
omm
unity
to h
ealth
fa
cilit
y le
vel.
4.1.
1 C
omm
unity
hea
lth
wor
kers
in p
lace
. N
o. o
f rum
ours
or d
isea
se
outb
reak
s re
porte
d w
ithin
a
mon
th /
com
mun
ity.
100%
4.1
Com
mun
ity m
embe
rs
orie
nted
to re
port
infe
ctio
us d
isea
ses
to
heal
th fa
cilit
ies
on ti
me.
4.1.
1 H
ealth
edu
catio
n ca
mpa
igns
. N
o. o
f cho
lera
cas
es in
crea
se
by 2
0% in
affe
cted
co
mm
uniti
es.
50%
incr
ease
in n
umbe
r of
repo
rted
case
s
4.2
Dis
trict
mul
ti-ha
zard
and
in
tegr
ated
dis
ease
su
rvei
llanc
e an
d re
spon
se
syst
em in
pla
ce.
4.2.
1 Tr
aini
ng c
ondu
cted
for
DH
MTs
and
par
tner
s.
4.2.
2 O
utbr
eaks
and
rum
ours
in
vest
igat
ed w
ithin
48
hour
s.
80%
of D
HM
Ts tr
aine
d.
50%
4.
Sca
le u
p th
e co
mm
unity
an
d he
alth
sys
tem
pr
edic
tabi
lity
thro
ugh
inte
grat
ed e
arly
war
ning
sy
stem
s in
clud
ing
dise
ase
surv
eilla
nce
for
epid
emic
-pro
ne
dise
ases
.
4.3
Dis
trict
hea
lth fa
cilit
ies
diag
nose
pro
mpt
ly
infe
ctio
us d
isea
ses.
4.3
Dis
trict
hos
pita
ls s
uppl
ied
with
bas
ic la
bora
tory
re
agen
ts a
nd ra
pid
diag
nost
ic k
its.
% o
f Hea
lth fa
cilit
ies
with
out
stoc
k ou
ts d
urin
g th
e ch
oler
a ou
tbre
ak.
85%
of h
ealth
faci
litie
s
4.
4 D
istri
ct h
ealth
team
s an
d fa
cilit
ies
supp
orte
d to
ra
pidl
y re
spon
d to
ru
mou
rs a
nd c
hole
ra
outb
reak
s.
4.4
Fund
s an
d te
chni
cal
guid
elin
es a
vaila
ble
for
quic
k di
agno
sis
of
dise
ase
outb
reak
s.
DH
MTs
in c
hole
ra o
utbr
eak
area
s s
uppo
rted
cont
inuo
usly
fo
r six
mon
ths.
100%
of D
HM
Ts
K E N Y A
40
3.2.7 MULTI-SECTOR/REFUGEES
Sector lead agency UNITED NATIONS HIGH COMMISSIONER FOR REFUGEES (UNHCR) Sector members COOPI, DRC, IOM, IRC, OXFAM GB, SC, UNICEF, UNHCR, WFP and WHO. Number of projects 14 Sector objectives Food Assistance and Nutrition
1. All refugees are provided with adequate and appropriate food to meet the minimum nutritional requirements. 2. All refugees are provided with nutrition services including micronutrient supplementation and integrated management of acute malnutrition (IMAM) to address and reduce morbidity and mortality rates. WASH 3. All refugees have access to safe, adequate, portable, and clean water. 4. All refugees have access to adequate and secure sanitation facilities. 5. All refugees implement best hygiene practice. Health 6. All refugees have access to basic health care. 7. Refugees mental well being strengthened through psycho-social assistance and counselling. Protection 8. All refugees are legally protected in accordance with Kenyan and international standards, laws and jurisprudence. 9. New arrivals are received according to established protection procedures and standards. 10. Refugee children, women and other vulnerable people are protected from SGBV. 11. All refugees vulnerable to human trafficking are protected. Education 12. There is access to education for all refugees of school-going age. Shelter and NFI 13. All refugees have adequate appropriate and secure shelter. 14. All refugee households are provided with a shelter kit. Camp management 15. Refugee camps are organized in a systematic well structured and well coordinated manner for increased access, safety and efficiency. Durable Solutions 16. At least 10,000 refugees are resettled in designated resettlement countries.
Beneficiaries As Per Submitted Project Sheet: Total: 550,500 Refugees in Kenya (Dadaab, Kakuma and Nairobi) Children: 303,000 Women: 120,000 Other group: 127,000 Total (30 May 2011 statistics): 479,919 refugees in Kenya (Dadaab, Kakuma and Nairobi) Children: 264,396 Women: 104,807 Other group: 110,716
Funds requested Original: $339,160,588 Revised at mid-year: $340,614,191
Funds requested per priority level
$334,787,987 (HIGH) $5,826,204 (MEDIUM)
Funding to date $125,186,862 (37% of revised requirements) Contact information [email protected]
+254-729-110461 Disaggregated number of affected population and beneficiaries
Affected population Target beneficiaries Category Female Male Total Female Male Total IDPs and returnees Refugees east (NEP) 174,672 175,757 350,629 174,672 175,757 350,629 Refugees west (RVP) 38,209 42,777 80,986 38,209 42,777 80,986 Refugees south (Nairobi) 23,669 24,635 48,304 23,669 24,635 48,304 Host communities 199,151 203,174 402,325 24,750 25,250 50,000 Totals 435,701 446,343 882,244 261,300 268,419 529,919
K E N Y A
41
Changes in needs a) 53,641 new refugees and asylum seekers registered country wide (5,004 in Nairobi, 44,704 in
north-eastern province and 4,452 in Rift Valley Province) compared to 27,651 at the same stage in 2010.
b) The new arrivals are in poor nutritional shape, as there are no clear food security mechanisms in place due to drought in both Somalia and the north-eastern province. Up to 80% of them are women and children.
c) Malnutrition rates among new arrivals are two to three times higher than camp rates. Indeed GAM rates are around 15% among new arrivals (with Dagahaley camp posting the highest rates), compared to 7.8% among the existing population (December 2010 statistics for existing population).
d) Among new arrivals, admission rates into feeding centres for malnourished children are as high as 55%, up from 10% in December 2010 (a five-fold increase).
e) Mortality rates for under-five’s are triple to quadruple camp rates. f) This emergency is characterised both by the influx described above and high malnutrition
rates amongst new arrivals. To combat these problems effectively, all humanitarian actors jointly implemented an emergency response strategy as of 30 May:
i. Access and assist all new arrivals within 24-hours of arrival. Special attention will be paid to extremely vulnerable people/people with special needs (EVPs/PSNs: pregnant women, unaccompanied minors, separated children, the elderly, disabled people, etc);
ii. Boost primary care (medical screening, healthcare and feeding) targeting all new arrivals. Specific attention will be given to EVPs/PSNs, particularly pregnant/lactating women and children;
iii. Open, capacitate and operate round-the-clock vulnerability and feeding centers in all three camps where above services (including provision of food and non-food items) will be available to all new arrivals.
Important achievements to date in 2011 • Registration of 53,641 New Arrivals. • Handover of registration and reception to the Government of Kenya (Department of Refugee Affairs [DRA]). Reasons for any significant deviation between targets and actual achievements as of mid-year • The lack of capacity among humanitarian agencies to manage emergent needs. • The high numbers of new arrivals vis-à-vis the lack of space for settlement. Important implementation challenges • The lack of land to settle new arrivals remains a major challenge. • The food pipeline is at risk due to funding limitations.
KE
NY
A
42
Mid
-yea
r mon
itorin
g vs
. obj
ectiv
es
Clu
ster
Obj
ectiv
es
Out
com
es
Targ
et o
utpu
ts
Indi
cato
r with
cor
resp
ondi
ng
targ
et
Ach
ieve
d as
of m
id-y
ear
1.
Favo
urab
le
Pro
tect
ion
Env
ironm
ent
Prot
ectio
n •
All
asyl
um
seek
ers
have
ac
cess
to te
rrito
ry.
• Th
e N
atio
nal l
egal
fram
ewor
k is
co
nsis
tent
w
ith
inte
rnat
iona
l pr
otec
tion
stan
dard
s.
• Th
e re
latio
nshi
p be
twee
n hu
man
itaria
n ac
tors
an
d th
e ho
st c
omm
uniti
es is
impr
oved
.
• B
orde
r m
onito
ring
and
patro
ls
cond
ucte
d •
The
Ref
ugee
s A
ct,
2006
is
am
ende
d m
akin
g it
cons
iste
nt
with
inte
rnat
iona
l ref
ugee
law
. •
Gui
delin
es t
o th
e A
ct a
nd t
he
Polic
y ar
e in
pla
ce
• M
eetin
gs
held
w
ith
host
co
mm
uniti
es to
exc
hang
e id
eas
and
appr
ise
them
of
w
orki
ng
bein
g do
ne
in
the
refu
gee
affe
cted
are
as,
as w
ell
as t
o co
nsul
t on
othe
r mat
ters
.
• Al
l re
fuge
es a
nd a
sylu
m-s
eeke
rs
have
acc
ess
to th
e te
rrito
ry.
• A
ll ne
w a
rriva
ls h
ave
acce
ss to
the
terri
tory
. D
adaa
b ha
s be
en
expe
rienc
ing
an in
crea
se o
f new
ar
rival
s at
an
aver
age
10,0
00 p
er
mon
th a
s co
mpa
red
to th
e la
st
quar
ter o
f 201
0 (6
,000
).
• U
NH
CR
has
bee
n in
volv
ed in
all
Dis
trict
Ste
erin
g G
roup
mee
tings
in
Dad
aab
and
Fafi
resp
ectiv
ely.
2.
Fair
Pro
tect
ion
Pro
cess
es a
nd
Doc
umen
tatio
n
• Al
l re
fuge
es
and
asyl
um
seek
ers
are
regi
ster
ed o
n an
in
divi
dual
ba
sis
acco
rdin
g to
in
tern
atio
nal s
tand
ards
.
• R
efug
ees
and
asyl
um s
eeke
rs
are
regi
ster
ed w
ithin
24
hour
s of
arri
val.
• U
NH
CR
and
par
tner
s at
tend
ed
at l
east
one
cou
rt se
ssio
n pe
r w
eek
to li
tigat
e on
beh
alf o
f the
re
fuge
es a
nd a
sylu
m s
eeke
rs
deta
ined
for
pure
ly im
mig
ratio
n pu
rpos
es.
• Al
l re
fuge
es a
nd a
sylu
m s
eeke
rs
are
regi
ster
ed a
nd h
ave
rele
vant
an
d re
quis
ite d
ocum
enta
tion.
• A
tota
l of 4
6,83
2 ha
ve b
een
regi
ster
ed s
ince
the
star
t of t
his
year
w
ith 4
5,97
0 in
divi
dual
s ar
rivin
g fro
m
Som
alia
, 819
from
Eth
iopi
a, 2
2 fro
m
Suda
n, 1
0 fro
m th
e D
emoc
ratic
R
epub
lic o
f Con
go, f
our f
rom
B
urun
di, 5
from
Uga
nda,
one
from
Er
itrea
and
one
from
Côt
e d'
Ivoi
re.
3.
Sec
urity
from
Vi
olen
ce a
nd
Exp
loita
tion
• R
efug
ee c
hild
ren,
wom
en a
nd
othe
r vu
lner
able
pe
ople
ar
e pr
otec
ted
from
SG
BV
. •
All
refu
gees
vu
lner
able
to
hu
man
traf
ficki
ng a
re p
rote
cted
.•
Stre
ngth
enin
g of
co
mm
unity
po
licin
g w
ithin
the
cam
ps.
• Ad
equa
te
com
mun
ity
polic
e re
crui
ted,
trai
ned
and
depl
oyed
. •
No
refu
gee
is
deta
ined
fo
r un
just
ified
reas
ons.
4.
Com
mun
ity
Parti
cipa
tion
and
Sel
f-Man
agem
ent
Cam
p m
anag
emen
t •
Ref
ugee
cam
ps a
re o
rgan
ized
in
a s
yste
mat
ic w
ell
stru
ctur
ed
and
wel
l co
ordi
nate
d m
anne
r fo
r in
crea
sed
acce
ss,
safe
ty
and
effic
ienc
y.
• R
egul
ar,
free
and
fair
elec
tions
/cha
nge
of le
ader
ship
•
Reg
ular
mee
tings
with
refu
gees
an
d re
fuge
e le
ader
s to
des
ign,
im
plem
ent,
coor
dina
te
revi
ew
proj
ects
.
• E
lect
ions
hel
d at
lea
st o
nce
in
two
year
s fo
r offi
ce b
eare
rs.
• Th
e el
ectio
ns a
re c
ondu
cted
in a
fre
e an
d fa
ir m
anne
r. •
Two
mee
tings
with
ref
ugee
s an
d re
fuge
e le
ader
s ev
ery
mon
th.
• D
ue to
sec
urity
con
cern
s th
e el
ectio
n sc
hedu
led
for M
ay 2
011
have
bee
n po
stpo
ned
to A
ugus
t 20
11 b
y th
e D
RA
• Tw
o m
eetin
gs w
ith re
fuge
es a
nd
refu
gee
lead
ers
have
bee
n he
ld
ever
y m
onth
. 5.
D
urab
le S
olut
ions
D
urab
le S
olut
ions
•
All
cand
idat
es f
or r
eset
tlem
ent
are
timel
y pr
oces
sed
for
thei
r re
loca
tion
in a
third
cou
ntry
.
• A
t le
ast
10,0
00
refu
gees
ar
e re
settl
ed
in
desi
gnat
ed
rese
ttlem
ent c
ount
ries.
• Th
e na
mes
of
13
,000
re
fuge
es
subm
itted
for r
eset
tlem
ent.
• O
ut o
f 13
,000
sub
mitt
ed,
only
500
ha
ve
relo
cate
d to
re
settl
emen
t co
untri
es.
KE
NY
A
43
Clu
ster
Obj
ectiv
es
Out
com
es
Targ
et o
utpu
ts
Indi
cato
r with
cor
resp
ondi
ng
targ
et
Ach
ieve
d as
of m
id-y
ear
Food
Ass
ista
nce
and
Nut
ritio
n •
Red
uced
or s
tabi
lized
mor
talit
y in
chi
ldre
n un
der f
ive
and
adul
ts in
targ
eted
pop
ulat
ions
af
fect
ed b
y em
erge
ncy.
•
Adeq
uate
food
con
sum
ptio
n ov
er a
ssis
tanc
e pe
riod
for
targ
eted
hou
seho
lds
at ri
sk o
f fa
lling
into
acu
te h
unge
r.
• D
istri
butio
n of
food
in s
uffic
ient
qu
antit
y an
d qu
ality
to ta
rget
ed
popu
latio
n in
the
refu
gee
cam
ps.
•
Dis
aste
r miti
gatio
n as
sets
bui
lt or
rest
ored
by
targ
eted
co
mm
uniti
es.
• 42
0,00
0 re
fuge
es re
ceiv
e fo
od
• 42
,700
MT
of fo
od is
dis
tribu
ted
• 18
pro
ject
s to
be
com
plet
ed (n
ine
wat
er p
ans
and
nine
con
tour
bu
nds)
.
• 42
1,00
0 re
fuge
es re
ceiv
ed fo
od
• 26
,000
MT
of fo
od d
istri
bute
d •
Wat
er p
ans:
ten
com
plet
ed
• C
onto
ur b
unds
: 12
com
plet
ed
6.
Pro
visi
on o
f es
sent
ial s
ervi
ces
and
basi
c ne
eds.
• Al
l ref
ugee
s ar
e pr
ovid
ed w
ith
nutri
tion
serv
ices
incl
udin
g m
icro
nutri
ent s
uppl
emen
tatio
n an
d IM
AM
to a
ddre
ss a
nd
redu
ce m
orbi
dity
and
mor
talit
y ra
tes.
• C
hild
ren
(boy
s an
d gi
rls) a
nd
wom
en a
ffect
ed b
y ac
ute
mal
nutri
tion
have
incr
ease
d ac
cess
to tr
eatm
ent.
• In
crea
sed
perfo
rman
ce o
f m
anag
emen
t of a
cute
m
alnu
tritio
n fo
r chi
ldre
n (b
oys
and
girls
) and
wom
en.
• In
crea
sed
cove
rage
of V
itam
in
A s
uppl
emen
tatio
n fo
r chi
ldre
n un
der f
ive.
•
Incr
ease
d co
vera
ge o
f iro
n/fo
lic
supp
lem
enta
tion
for p
regn
ant
wom
en.
• In
crea
se c
over
age
of z
inc
supp
lem
enta
tion
in c
hild
ren
(boy
s an
d gi
rls) p
rese
ntin
g w
ith
diar
rhoe
a.
• In
crea
sed
cove
rage
of
dew
orm
ing
of c
hild
ren
from
12
mon
ths
to fi
ve y
ears
. •
50 g
ram
s of
com
plem
enta
ry
food
pro
vide
d pe
r per
son
per
day.
•
Sup
plem
enta
ry th
erap
eutic
fe
edin
g do
ne
• 90
% o
f mod
erat
ely
and
seve
rely
m
alno
uris
hed
child
ren
and
preg
nant
and
lact
atin
g w
omen
ac
cess
ing
treat
men
t. •
75%
of m
oder
atel
y an
d se
vere
ly
mal
nour
ishe
d ch
ildre
n an
d pr
egna
nt a
nd la
ctat
ing
mot
hers
ac
cess
ing
treat
men
t who
re
cove
red.
•
90%
of c
hild
ren
< fiv
e ye
ars
old
supp
lem
ente
d by
vita
min
A (t
wic
e ye
arly
). •
90%
of p
regn
ant w
omen
su
pple
men
ted
with
iron
-fola
te
• 90
% z
inc
supp
lem
enta
tion
durin
g ep
isod
es o
f dia
rrhoe
a am
ong
child
ren.
•
>80%
of c
hild
ren
from
12
mon
ths
to fi
ve y
ears
dew
orm
ed (t
wic
e ye
arly
). •
Prov
ide
com
plim
enta
ry fo
ods
to
child
ren
and
preg
nant
and
la
ctat
ing
mot
hers
redu
cing
GA
M
and
to b
elow
SA
M.
• 50
gra
ms/
pers
on/d
ay o
f co
mpl
emen
tary
food
pro
vide
d.
KE
NY
A
44
Clu
ster
Obj
ectiv
es
Out
com
es
Targ
et o
utpu
ts
Indi
cato
r with
cor
resp
ondi
ng
targ
et
Ach
ieve
d as
of m
id-y
ear
WA
SH
• A
ll re
fuge
es h
ave
acce
ss to
sa
fe, a
dequ
ate,
por
tabl
e, a
nd
clea
n w
ater
. •
All
refu
gees
hav
e ac
cess
to
adeq
uate
and
sec
ure
sani
tatio
n fa
cilit
ies.
•
All
refu
gees
pra
ctic
e be
st
hygi
ene
prac
tice.
• A
t lea
st 2
0 lit
res
of p
otab
le
wat
er s
uppl
ied
per p
erso
n pe
r da
y.
• A
t lea
st 2
0 re
fuge
es p
er fa
mily
la
trine
. •
Ref
ugee
s w
ash
thei
r han
ds
befo
re a
nd a
fter t
oile
t use
and
be
fore
and
afte
r mea
ls.
• E
xten
d w
ater
sup
ply
to th
ree
new
si
tes,
impr
ove
effic
ienc
y an
d bu
ild
refu
gee
wat
er m
anag
emen
t ca
paci
ty e
nsur
ing
refu
gees
re
ceiv
e at
leas
t 20
l/p/d
.
• In
crea
se a
cces
s to
wat
er re
duci
ng
time
spen
t in
the
colle
ctio
n of
w
ater
par
ticul
arly
for w
omen
and
ch
ildre
n an
d re
duci
ng th
e ris
ks
rela
ted
to S
GB
V.
• In
Kak
uma,
an
aver
age
of 2
0.1
l/p/d
of
wat
er w
as s
uppl
ied
and
the
dist
ance
to th
e ne
ares
t wat
er p
oint
w
as m
aint
aine
d at
less
than
200
m.
Wom
en s
pent
less
tim
e in
col
lect
ing
wat
er a
nd w
ere
less
exp
ose
to ri
sks
of S
GB
V a
s a
resu
lt.
Hea
lth
• A
ll re
fuge
es h
ave
acce
ss to
ba
sic
heal
th c
are.
•
Ref
ugee
s m
enta
l wel
l bei
ng
stre
ngth
ened
thro
ugh
psyc
ho-
soci
al a
ssis
tanc
e an
d co
unse
lling
.
• A
dditi
onal
hea
lth c
entre
s co
nstru
cted
and
equ
ippe
d to
in
crea
se a
cces
s of
refu
gees
to
heal
th fa
cilit
ies.
• Th
ree
new
hea
lth c
entre
s co
nstru
cted
.
• Th
ree
heal
th c
entre
s ha
ve b
een
cons
truct
ed in
clud
ing
one
on th
e ou
tski
rts o
f the
refu
gee
cam
ps to
ca
ter t
o re
fuge
es w
ho h
ave
self
settl
ed o
n th
e ou
tski
rts o
f the
ca
mps
.
Educ
atio
n •
Ther
e is
acc
ess
to e
duca
tion
for a
ll re
fuge
es o
f sch
ool-g
oing
ag
e.
• C
onst
ruct
ion
of tw
o pr
imar
y sc
hool
s, te
n cl
assr
oom
s, 3
0 te
ache
r hou
ses,
ten
wat
er
pans
, 2 x
18
– be
d m
ater
nity
w
ards
, one
dis
pens
arie
s an
d 2
x 12
0 –
bed
dorm
itorie
s.
• C
onst
ruct
100
new
cla
ssro
oms,
th
ree
new
sec
onda
ry s
choo
ls a
nd
enha
nce
enro
lmen
t to
100%
.
• In
Kak
uma,
no
new
cla
ssro
om h
as
been
con
stru
cted
; one
prim
ary
scho
ol w
ith e
ight
cla
ssro
oms
was
co
nver
ted
into
a s
econ
dary
sch
ool.
Th
e nu
mbe
r of l
earn
ers
who
be
nefit
ed fr
om e
duca
tion
and
child
pr
otec
tion
was
15,
536
(8,9
52 b
oys,
6,
584
girls
) in
prim
ary
scho
ol a
nd
1,08
3 (8
94 b
oys,
189
girl
s) fo
r se
cond
ary
scho
ol.
This
repr
esen
ts
65%
of t
he s
choo
l goi
ng a
ged
child
ren,
whi
ch is
a 2
4.5%
and
26
.5%
incr
ease
from
last
yea
r in
prim
ary
and
seco
ndar
y sc
hool
re
spec
tivel
y.
Shel
ter a
nd N
FI
• Al
l ref
ugee
s ha
ve a
dequ
ate
appr
opria
te a
nd s
ecur
e sh
elte
r.•
All r
efug
ee h
ouse
hold
s ar
e pr
ovid
ed w
ith a
she
lter k
it.
• C
onst
ruct
ion
of 4
0,00
0 ne
w
shel
ters
for 4
0,00
0 fa
mili
es a
nd
prov
ide
NFI
s to
40,
000
fam
ilies
• A
ll ne
w a
rriva
ls a
re p
rovi
ded
with
a N
FI K
it co
ntai
ning
pla
stic
sh
eets
, ten
ts, m
ats,
jerr
y ca
ns
and
soap
.
• A
t lea
st 5
0% o
f the
refu
gees
hav
e sa
fe, s
ecur
e an
d ad
equa
te s
helte
r (A
t lea
st 5
,000
add
ition
al s
helte
rs
cons
truct
ed a
nd 5
00 d
ilapi
date
d sh
elte
rs re
paire
d).
• 21
1 ne
w s
helte
rs h
ave
been
co
nstru
cted
for 4
2 fa
mili
es.
48,7
07
indi
vidu
als
have
so
far b
enef
ited
from
NFI
s (p
last
ic s
heet
s, te
nts,
m
ats,
jerr
y ca
ns a
nd s
oap)
.
K E N Y A
45
3.2.8 NUTRITION
Sector lead agency UNITED NATIONS CHILDREN’S FUND (UNICEF) Sector members ACF, CONCERN W, FHI, IMC, IR, IRC, MERLIN, MERCY USA, MOPHS, SC,
UNICEF, WFP and WV. Number of projects 17 Sector objectives 1. To contribute to the reduction of morbidity and mortality in children (boys and
girls) through preventive and curative actions to affected populations, including drought affected urban poor and displaced populations.
2. To improve decision making and effective nutrition response through strengthened coordination and information systems.
3. To increase the recognition and investment of nutrition related interventions by the Government of Kenya and development partners through communication and advocacy.
Beneficiaries Children (boys and girls): 568,000 (including 269,500 affected by acute malnutrition) Women: 216,800 (including 63,000 affected by acute malnutrition)
Funds requested Original: $21,548,988 Revised at mid-year: $55,694,269
Funds requested per priority level
$55,694,269 (High)
Funding to date $6,895,956 (12% of revised requirements) Contact information Dolores Rio – [email protected]
NoreenPrendiville – [email protected] Table: Disaggregated number of affected population and beneficiaries
Affected population Target beneficiaries Category Female Male Total Female Male Total Children <5 yrs, for other nutrition services 701,480 718,520 1,420,000 280,592 287,408 568,000
Women, for other nutrition services 542,000 542,000 216,800 216,800
Children <5 yrs affected by malnutrition 190,190 194,810 385,000 133,133 136,367 269,500
Women affected by malnutrition 90,000 63,000 63,000
Changes in needs and strategy The Kenya Meteorological Department report for the March-May 2011 Long Rains indicates substantially depressed rainfall in the north-eastern and eastern provinces. Given the poor rainfall performance, the increase of staple food and fuel prices, the April-September 2011 Kenya Food Security outlook indicates deteriorating household food security in the arid and semi-arid districts. In Kenya, levels of stunting and wasting among children as well as maternal and neo-natal mortality remain unacceptably high. Nutrition status of children under five years and pregnant and lactating women is likely to worsen during the July-September 2011 dry season. Results of nutrition surveys carried out in the ASALs in the first five months of 2011 show this deterioration. GAM rates are above 20% for children less than five years in Marsabit, Turkana, Wajir West-North (significantly higher compared to 2010) and Mandera. In Isiolo, and Garissa GAM rates (<-2 z-scores, WHO 2006) are between 15% and 20%. 31 nutrition surveys will be done in 2011. In 2010, Kenya adopted a package of 11 high-impact nutrition interventions focusing on infant feeding, micronutrient supplementation and management of acute malnutrition. These essential nutrition services which are proven to be efficient in preventing and addressing malnutrition and mortality in children (26% deaths prevented if implemented fully and at scale) are integrated and currently implemented in ASALs.
K E N Y A
46
The Nutrition sector is estimating that about 385,000 children and 90,000 women are suffering from acute malnutrition. Due to this deterioration, the Nutrition sector is presenting 17 projects in the Kenya+ EHRP MYR. The aim of those projects is to scale up this full package of nutrition interventions at health facility and community level and to implement Blanket Supplementary Feeding programme in ASALs districts to contribute to the reduction of morbidity and mortality of Kenya most affected and vulnerable population: children less than five years and pregnant and lactating women. Indicators of the Nutrition sector’s outputs have been reviewed for infant and young child feeding practices and micronutrient supplementation to make sure they reflect achievements and progress. Regarding funding requirement, originally the Nutrition sector has requested $21,548,988 for 13 projects and 32% has been funded to date. However most of the funding will expire before the end of 2011. Furthermore, due to increasing number of affected population caused by the nutrition and food security deterioration, the Nutrition sector’s revised funding gap at mid-year is $48,798,313.
KE
NY
A
47
Mid
-yea
r mon
itorin
g vs
. obj
ectiv
es
Clu
ster
Obj
ectiv
es
Out
com
es
Targ
et o
utpu
ts
Indi
cato
r with
cor
resp
ondi
ng ta
rget
A
chie
ved
as o
f mid
-yea
r In
crea
se c
over
age
of h
ealth
fa
cilit
y of
ferin
g th
e fu
ll pa
ckag
e of
hig
h im
pact
nu
tritio
n in
terv
entio
ns.
% o
f hea
lth fa
cilit
ies
impl
emen
ting
the
full
pack
age
of h
igh
impa
ct
nutri
tion
inte
rven
tions
.
70%
88
.7%
of h
ealth
faci
litie
s ar
e im
plem
entin
g th
e fu
ll pa
ckag
e of
hig
h im
pact
nut
ritio
n in
terv
entio
ns.
Chi
ldre
n (b
oys
and
girls
) an
d w
omen
affe
cted
by
acut
e m
alnu
tritio
n ha
ve
incr
ease
d ac
cess
to
treat
men
t at h
ealth
faci
lity
and
com
mun
ity le
vel.
% o
f mod
erat
ely
and
seve
rely
m
alno
uris
hed
child
ren
and
preg
nant
and
lact
atin
g m
othe
rs
acce
ssin
g tre
atm
ent.
70%
73
% o
f sev
erel
y m
alno
uris
hed
child
ren
are
acce
ssin
g tre
atm
ent.
58%
of m
oder
atel
y m
alno
uris
hed
child
ren
are
acce
ssin
g tre
atm
ent.
32.9
% o
f pre
gnan
t and
lact
atin
g w
omen
ar
e ac
cess
ing
treat
men
t. In
crea
sed
perfo
rman
ce o
f m
anag
emen
t of a
cute
m
alnu
tritio
n fo
r chi
ldre
n (b
oys
and
girls
) and
wom
en.
% o
f mod
erat
ely
and
seve
rely
m
alno
uris
hed
child
ren
and
preg
nant
and
lact
atin
g m
othe
rs
acce
ssin
g tre
atm
ent w
ho re
cove
r.
75%
79
% o
f sev
erel
y m
alno
uris
hed
child
ren
acce
ssin
g tre
atm
ent r
ecov
ered
. 82
% o
f mod
erat
ely
mal
nour
ishe
d ch
ildre
n ac
cess
ing
treat
men
t rec
over
ed.
77%
of p
regn
ant a
nd la
ctat
ing
wom
en
acce
ssin
g tre
atm
ent r
ecov
ered
. %
of h
ealth
faci
lity
offe
ring
a fu
nctio
ning
(as
per s
tand
ards
sc
ore
card
s) m
othe
rs’ s
uppo
rt gr
oups
on
mon
thly
bas
is.
50%
O
ur e
xper
ienc
e ha
s sh
own
that
this
in
dica
tor i
s no
t ref
lect
ing
impr
ovem
ent o
f IY
CF
prac
tices
. Th
is in
dica
tor i
s de
lete
d in
th
e M
YR
.
% o
f chi
ldre
n ag
ed 6
-59
mon
ths
rece
ivin
g op
timal
com
plem
enta
ry
feed
ing.
>80%
N
ew in
dica
tor i
n th
e M
YR
201
1
Pro
porti
on o
f inf
ants
less
than
six
m
onth
s of
age
exc
lusi
vely
br
east
fed.
>50%
N
ew in
dica
tor i
n th
e M
YR
201
1
To c
ontri
bute
to th
e re
duct
ion
of m
orbi
dity
and
m
orta
lity
in c
hild
ren
(boy
s an
d gi
rls) t
hrou
gh
prev
entiv
e an
d cu
rativ
e ac
tions
to a
ffect
ed
popu
latio
ns, i
nclu
ding
dr
ough
t affe
cted
, urb
an
poor
and
dis
plac
ed
popu
latio
ns.
Incr
ease
d co
vera
ge
of h
igh
impa
ct
nutri
tion
inte
rven
tions
at
hea
lth fa
cilit
y an
d co
mm
unity
leve
l, in
clud
ing
treat
men
t of
acu
te m
alnu
tritio
n.
Impr
oved
infa
nt a
nd y
oung
ch
ild fe
edin
g pr
actic
es.
Per
cent
age
of A
NC
/PM
TCT
clie
nts
coun
selle
d on
infa
nt
feed
ing
optio
ns.
80%
N
ew in
dica
tor i
n th
e M
YR
201
1
KE
NY
A
48
Clu
ster
Obj
ectiv
es
Out
com
es
Targ
et o
utpu
ts
Indi
cato
r with
cor
resp
ondi
ng ta
rget
A
chie
ved
as o
f mid
-yea
r In
crea
sed
cove
rage
of
Vita
min
A s
uppl
emen
tatio
n fo
r chi
ldre
n un
der f
ive.
% V
itam
in A
sup
plem
ent (
twic
e ye
arly
). 80
%
Nat
iona
l: en
d of
201
1 20
11 N
utrit
ion
Sur
vey
resu
lts:
Mar
sabi
t: 9.
7%
Mak
ueni
: 40%
Is
iolo
: 21.
7%
Sam
buru
: 37.
4%
Incr
ease
d co
vera
ge o
f iro
n/fo
lic s
uppl
emen
tatio
n fo
r pre
gnan
t wom
en.
% o
f pre
gnan
t wom
en
supp
lem
ente
d w
ith ir
on-fo
late
. 80
%
Ave
rage
of 2
6.7%
in A
SA
Ls
Incr
ease
cov
erag
e of
zin
c su
pple
men
tatio
n in
chi
ldre
n (b
oys
and
girls
) pre
sent
ing
with
dia
rrhoe
a.
% z
inc
supp
lem
enta
tion
durin
g ep
isod
es o
f dia
rrhoe
a.
80%
A
vera
ge o
f 42%
in A
SA
Ls
Incr
ease
d co
vera
ge o
f de
wor
min
g.
% o
f chi
ldre
n 1-
5 ye
ars
pres
entin
g at
hea
lth fa
cilit
y de
wor
med
. >8
0%
New
indi
cato
r in
the
MY
R 2
011
Impr
oved
repo
rting
(tim
ely
and
qual
ity).
% o
f dis
trict
s se
ndin
g co
mpl
ete
mon
thly
nut
ritio
n re
port.
80
%
IMA
M: 9
1%
Vita
min
A: 5
6%
Impr
ove
qual
ity a
nd
timel
ines
s of
repo
rting
, in
clud
ing
data
ana
lysi
s,
from
hea
lth fa
cilit
y an
d di
stric
t lev
els.
Impr
oved
info
rmat
ion
shar
ing
amon
g pa
rtner
s an
d ac
ross
sec
tors
.
# of
Nut
ritio
n B
ulle
tin s
harin
g ke
y nu
tritio
n is
sues
dis
sem
inat
ed a
t na
tiona
l and
sub
-nat
iona
l lev
el.
4 1
% o
f dis
trict
s ha
ving
mon
thly
co
ordi
natio
n m
eetin
g w
ith k
ey
acto
rs.
80%
80
% o
f AS
AL
Dis
trict
s
To im
prov
e de
cisi
on
mak
ing
and
effe
ctiv
e nu
tritio
n re
spon
se
thro
ugh
stre
ngth
ened
co
ordi
natio
n an
d in
form
atio
n sy
stem
s.
Stre
ngth
ened
sec
tora
l lin
kage
s an
d co
ordi
natio
n m
echa
nism
s at
sub
-na
tiona
l.
Impr
oved
coo
rdin
atio
n sy
stem
at s
ub-n
atio
nal l
evel
.
% o
f act
ion
poin
ts fr
om
coor
dina
tion
mee
tings
im
plem
ente
d.
60%
En
d of
201
1
Nut
ritio
n st
rate
gy d
evel
oped
in
cons
ulta
tion
with
sta
keho
lder
s
1 1
To in
crea
se th
e re
cogn
ition
and
in
vest
men
t of n
utrit
ion
rela
ted
inte
rven
tions
by
the
GoK
and
de
velo
pmen
t par
tner
s th
roug
h co
mm
unic
atio
n an
d ad
voca
cy.
Stre
ngth
en a
dvoc
acy
and
com
mun
icat
ion
stra
tegy
for n
utrit
ion.
Join
t Nut
ritio
n S
trate
gy a
nd
Ope
ratio
nal P
lan
deve
lope
d an
d di
ssem
inat
ed.
Nut
ritio
n O
pera
tiona
l Pla
n de
velo
ped
in c
onsu
ltatio
n w
ith
stak
ehol
ders
.
1 1
K E N Y A
49
3.2.9 PROTECTION
Sector lead agency UNITED NATIONS HIGH COMMISSIONER FOR REFUGEES (UNHCR) Sector members CWSK, DRC, HELPAGE INTERNATIONAL, IOM, IRC, KITUO CHA SHERIA,
KNCHR, NCCK, OXFAM-GB, SC and UNICEF. Number of projects 12 Sector objectives 1. The rights of IDPs before, during, and after displacement (including durable
solutions), and the rights of affected communities, are protected through various measures including, the adoption and subsequent implementation of policies and international and regional obligations. 2. Protection working group members at the national and field level, including national institutional leadership, have enhanced capacity to carry out advocacy initiatives, coordinate activities, monitor, and share information. 3. Affected populations have access to justice and a holistic range of PSS services. 4. Children are protected from violence, abuse, exploitation and family separation through specific emergency interventions and through further development of Kenya’s child protection system. 5. National institutions, civil society national and field-based PWG members capacities are strengthened to provide protection to groups vulnerable to human trafficking and SGBV (IDPs, pastoral communities, and peri-urban migrants) and to disseminate GBV/post-rape care (PRC) protocols, including enhancing capacity of one-stop centres and GBV NGOs to respond to sexual violence, including provision of post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP).
Total number of beneficiaries
1,777,501
Funds requested Original: $7,626,871 Revised: $7,762,016
Funds requested per priority level
All projects are classified as medium priority.
Funding to date $632,193 (8% of revised requirements) Contact information Igor Ivancic - [email protected]
Johanne Hjort - [email protected] Salaton Leteipan - [email protected] Stephanie Shanler - [email protected]
Table: Disaggregated number of affected population and beneficiaries
Affected population6 Beneficiaries7 Category Female Male Total Female Male Total IDP 152,340 147,660 300,000 570,765 36,635 607,400 Non-IDP 30,000Children 68,627 69,373 138,000 1,008,705Youth 71,260Community workers/NGOs 60,136
Needs Analysis Although Kenya’s Constitutional Referendum was a peaceful event, the political environment remains fragile with the potential for inter-communal violence and population displacement triggered by political reform processes; investigations into the post-elections violence by the ICC and, finally, in the preparatory stages leading up to the presidential elections scheduled for August 2012. These processes have added to the already existing climate of tension and distrust between different groups and, naturally, have an impact on the general sense of security among the IDPs. The controversy that initially surrounded the Truth, Justice and Reconciliation Commission also contributed to the sense that grievances caused by the PEV events have not been addressed in an appropriate manner. The lack of trust between IDPs and their former neighbours prevails. In IDP hosting and return areas, IDPs that reside in transit sites continue to seek confidence and rely on permanent Kenya Police presence which was established as part of the support to the 2008 Operation Rudi Nyumbani. 6 Figure comprises 50,000 IDPs from PEV. 7 Cumulative figure of beneficiaries calculated from all the Protection projects
K E N Y A
50
As indicated last year, there is need for further humanitarian assistance for evictees in Mau forest, Huruma village in Kieni, Embobut and Teldet forest areas. Some of the observed challenges related to the forest evictions are lack of basic services and livelihoods and tensions between IDPs and host population. An in-depth profiling and assessment of needs for this category has been lacking but with the change in perspective in the MoSSP this may need to be undertaken. In May 2011, there have been reports of cross-border conflict on the Kenya/Ethiopian border that have left more than 40 people dead and approximately 2000 others displaced. This conflict has been linked to scarce resources in the region around Lake Turkana. Lack of comprehensive registration and profiling data persists among the PEV IDPs, in particular with regards to the so called ‘integrated IDPs’. General lack of disaggregated data by age and sex hampers assessment of the magnitude of the problem affecting different population groups. The needs of specific groups like the elderly and children are not adequately catered for. However, the GoK has in April 2011 tried to raise funds to a project which aims at verifying the PEV IDP data they have in their database and thereby identify who have benefited from GoK assistance. The process of land resettlement continues to be slow due to the problems associated with the land acquisition and limited funding availability. However, by December 2010 more than 6,000 individuals have been resettled and the general pace of the resettlement assistance has increased significantly8. Some of the land offered to IDPs by GoK has been found rocky and unsuitable for farming by the IDPs with the result that some IDPs in for example Molo have opposed their relocation as land is found unproductive and susceptible to frequent conflicts9. There is a gap in ensuring availability of basic services at the relocation sites in particular when it comes to access to water (especially potable water), healthcare, education and livelihood or food production opportunities. The Kenya National Commission on Human Rights (KNHCR) is in 2011 undertaking protection monitoring in the relocation sites to document the extent to which the IDPs are able to achieve durable solutions. Participatory assessments that are scheduled in the latter part of the year by KNCHR will also be able to assess the quality of the durable solutions. Despite some resistance from part of the GoK to recognise the Mau evictees as IDPs, Mau evictees have now been included in the GoK IDP program under MoSSP and the Mau IDP resettlement plan should therefore be identical to the one provided to the PEV IDPs10. Children affected by PEV continue to suffer psychosocial distress from grief and witnessing violence. They struggle to find alternatives to harmful coping mechanisms, such as sex work, adopted during displacement. While many children affected may have returned home to their families under the umbrella of the Department of Children Services’ Reunification of Separated Children Program over the course of 2008 – 2009, there is speculation that the proliferation of street children in urban areas of the Rift Valley may be a result of internal displacement emanating from PEV or perhaps be underpinned by food insecurity in other areas, natural disaster, or forest evictions. This is supported by NGOs working in areas such as Eldoret and Nakuru who report that the number of school drop-outs and children who are sent to beg or work on the street due to lack of livelihood options among IDP families have increased significantly. A planned baseline study on street (IDP) children carried out by Save the Children, organized under the auspices of the National Protection Working Group on Internal Displacement (PWGID) in collaboration with field-based groups and local government in five urban locations in the Rift Valley will profile the street children, look at services available for them and identify IDP affected children with a view towards identifying durable solutions. The Child Protection system in Kenya is still in the nascent stages of development. National priority areas for intervention during times of emergency continue to fall under the auspices of the themes, such as reunification of separated children, provision of psychosocial support in the form of child
8 The Kenyan Deputy Prime Minister and the Minister for Finance indicated in January 2011 that the Government of Kenya has allocated KSH 7.977 billion ($99,043,953) towards resettlement of IDPs (Statement on Government’s Support for IDPs in Daily National, 7 Jan. 2011) 9 KHRC/IDP Network: Gains and Pitfalls: A Status Report on the Support to IDPs in Kenya 2008-2010. 10 For each household: 2.25 acres of land and a house built on the same land.
K E N Y A
51
friendly spaces, and prevention and response to sexual violence. Also, supporting enhanced access to education, awareness of trafficking and measures preventing boys from joining criminal gangs need to be prioritized. Legislative development has been slow indicating the need for coordinated advocacy. However, the draft National Policy on the Prevention of Internal Displacement and the Protection and Assistance to Internally Displaced People in Kenya (Draft IDP Policy) has been submitted by the Ministry of State for Special Programmes to the Cabinet on 16 May 2011. Government of Kenya played an instrumental role during the process of drafting and adoption of the Kampala Convention – October 2009 - whose entry into force will follow after the ratification by 15 member states of the African Union. Kenya has not at this stage signed or ratified the Kampala Convention. There is still a need for further advocacy and sensitization work to support the process of the Kampala Convention ratification in Kenya and the draft IDP policy. One example of advocacy work is a workshop for members of the Parliamentary Select Committee on Internal Displacement, which was held in May 201111. It is hoped that with the adoption of both documents, Kenya will be in a position to establish the appropriate legal framework responding to the protection and assistance needs of IDPs. Coordination remains a priority and warrants enhancement. At the national level, a continued priority will be to support the endeavours of the National Protection Working Group on Internal Displacement (PWGID) with a view of gradual and full ownership of the forum by the GoK. Similarly support will be rendered to two field-based Protection Working Groups (PWGs) (Nakuru and Eldoret). These coordination mechanisms have mainstreamed child protection and GBV issues in their work. They have proven to be a useful coordination forum for government actors, community-based organizations (CBOs), international NGOs and members of the UN family and there is consensus on the need for the continued capacity building in the areas of monitoring, programming and service/assistance delivery through adoption of the rights-based approach. Identification of priority needs Effective protection must “encompass all activities at achieving the full rights of the individual in accordance with the letter and spirit of the relevant bodies of law (human rights, humanitarian and refugee law)”. (IASC definition). In view of the needs of the current IDPs and the potential threats of new displacement, a set of priority needs must be considered. These priorities have been set in accordance with the vivid reality presented by national capacity to prevent and respond in accordance with qualitative and quantitative data collection on protection violations that occurred during and after the PEV, as well as new data on other risks faced by populations at risk for displacement or affected by conflict/natural disaster. The priority needs include, but are not necessarily limited to: • Protecting the rights of IDPs before, during, and after displacement and supporting the adoption of
Kenya’s draft National Policy on IDPs, ratification of the Kampala Convention, and the outreach at both the field and national level of the protection working groups.
• Establishing protection monitoring in areas of potential displacement and crisis with a view to taking effective protective action. Within the existing displaced population the priority is to monitor and facilitate attainment of durable solutions.
• Coordinating with other sectors to ensure protection of inherently vulnerable groups, such as older people, people with disabilities, women (i.e. widows and single mothers), and children (i.e. orphans, unaccompanied and separated children, child-headed households and other vulnerable children, such as those with vulnerable caregivers).
• Ensuring that children are protected from violence, abuse, and exploitation (including trafficking), and that family reunification is facilitated in the event of separation.
• Providing a prompt response to the medical, psycho-social, legal, and security needs of survivors of sexual violence (both adults and children).
11 The Committee shall review the laws and polices governing IDPs and assess how the government has addressed the plight of IDPs displaced by PEV.
KE
NY
A
52
Mid
-yea
r mon
itorin
g vs
. obj
ectiv
es
Clu
ster
Obj
ectiv
es
Out
com
es
Out
puts
In
dica
tors
A
chie
ved
as o
f mid
-yea
r 1.
The
righ
ts o
f ID
Ps
befo
re,
durin
g, a
nd a
fter
disp
lace
men
t (in
clud
ing
dura
ble
solu
tions
), an
d th
e rig
hts
of a
ffect
ed
com
mun
ities
, are
pro
tect
ed
thro
ugh
vario
us m
easu
res
incl
udin
g, th
e ad
optio
n an
d su
bseq
uent
impl
emen
tatio
n of
pol
icie
s an
d in
tern
atio
nal
and
regi
onal
obl
igat
ions
.
• ID
Ps
are
awar
e of
thei
r rig
hts
and
able
to m
ove
volu
ntar
ily a
s w
ell a
s ac
cess
co
mpl
aint
s m
echa
nism
s.
• ID
Ps
and
affe
cted
co
mm
uniti
es a
re a
ble
to c
o-ex
ist p
eace
fully
.
• A
dopt
ion
of a
Nat
iona
l ID
P P
olic
y.
• R
atifi
catio
n of
the
Kam
pala
Con
vent
ion.
•
Func
tiona
l pea
ce
com
mitt
ees
draw
ing
mem
bers
hip
from
wom
en,
men
, boy
s an
d gi
rls a
t di
stric
t, di
visi
on a
nd
loca
tion
leve
ls in
con
flict
-pr
one
area
s.
• D
ispl
aced
IDP
s re
turn
to
thei
r far
ms
and
revi
ve
livel
ihoo
d ac
tiviti
es.
• R
ival
gro
ups
in c
onfli
ct-
pron
e ar
eas
parti
cipa
te
in d
ialo
gue
and
cros
s le
anin
g in
itiat
ive.
•
Nat
iona
l dat
a fo
r PE
V
IDP
s up
date
d an
d av
aile
d.
• N
umbe
r of f
unct
iona
l pe
ace
com
mitt
ees
in th
e co
nflic
t-pro
ne a
reas
. •
Num
ber o
f dis
plac
ed
peop
le/fa
mili
es re
turn
ing
back
to th
eir f
arm
s.
• N
umbe
r liv
elih
ood
syst
ems
esta
blis
hed
by
IDP
s/re
turn
ees.
•
Num
ber o
f com
mun
ity
dial
ogue
ses
sion
s or
gani
zed
by th
e pe
ace
com
mitt
ees.
•
Num
ber o
f ID
P
Ass
essm
ents
con
duct
ed
and
docu
men
ted.
• R
CK
has
in p
artn
ersh
ip w
ith
DR
C la
unch
ed a
pea
ce-
build
ing
and
shel
ter
prog
ram
me
in E
ldor
et ta
rget
ing
both
the
host
and
IDP
co
mm
uniti
es.
As
of e
nd o
f May
20
11, R
CK
hav
e he
ld 1
6 pe
ace
bara
zas,
targ
etin
g ab
out
550
men
, wom
en a
nd y
outh
re
pres
enta
tives
. Th
e pe
ace-
build
ing
com
pone
nt w
ill ta
rget
30
00 b
enef
icia
ries
by e
nd
Aug
ust.
•
No
IDP
ass
essm
ents
hav
e be
en c
ondu
cted
so
far.
• Th
ere
are
49 fu
nctio
nal p
eace
co
mm
ittee
s in
the
conf
lict-
pron
e ar
eas.
•
Appr
oxim
atel
y 71
2 of
dis
plac
ed
peop
le/fa
mili
es re
turn
ed b
ack
to th
eir f
arm
s.
• IO
M h
as w
orke
d cl
osel
y w
ith
DP
Cs
from
the
sub-
loca
tion
to
dist
rict l
evel
whe
re th
ey h
eld
two
train
ing
sess
ions
and
had
th
ree
mee
tings
led
by th
e P
rovi
ncia
l Adm
inis
tratio
n of
W
aren
g an
d E
ldor
et E
ast
Dis
trict
s.
• O
ffice
r situ
ated
in G
reat
er
Uas
in G
ishu
Cou
nty.
•
IOM
has
con
duct
ed m
any
Com
mun
ity D
ialo
gue
mee
tings
in
var
ious
loca
tions
nam
ely
Che
pngo
ror,
Ola
re, C
haga
iya
and
Ole
ngui
se.
KE
NY
A
53
Clu
ster
Obj
ectiv
es
Out
com
es
Out
puts
In
dica
tors
A
chie
ved
as o
f mid
-yea
r 2.
Pro
tect
ion
wor
king
gro
up
mem
bers
at t
he n
atio
nal a
nd
field
leve
l, in
clud
ing
natio
nal
inst
itutio
nal l
eade
rshi
p, h
ave
enha
nced
cap
acity
to c
arry
ou
t adv
ocac
y in
itiat
ives
, co
ordi
nate
act
iviti
es, m
onito
r, an
d sh
are
info
rmat
ion.
• P
WG
IDs
on ID
Ps
are
oper
atio
nal a
nd fi
eld-
bas
ed
PW
G d
evel
op T
oRs,
m
onito
ring
and
refe
rral
m
echa
nism
s.
• S
ub-g
roup
s on
chi
ldre
n,
GB
V a
nd p
sych
o-so
cial
su
ppor
t are
effe
ctiv
ely
esta
blis
hed/
inte
grat
ed.
• Im
prov
ed c
omm
unic
atio
n an
d co
ordi
natio
n be
twee
n na
tiona
l and
fiel
d le
vel
grou
ps.
• C
oope
rativ
e pr
otec
tion
partn
ersh
ips
to im
prov
e th
e pr
otec
tion
envi
ronm
ent e
stab
lishe
d w
ith re
leva
nt a
ctor
s.
• S
uppo
rt an
d ca
paci
tatin
g of
NG
Os
and
civi
l soc
iety
is
pro
vide
d.
• M
eetin
gs/w
orks
hops
/sem
ina
rs a
re o
rgan
ized
.
• N
umbe
r of f
ield
-bas
ed a
nd
natio
nal P
WG
mee
tings
he
ld.
•
Num
ber o
f mon
itors
de
ploy
ed.
• N
umbe
rof I
DP
s/re
turn
ees’
si
tuat
ion
mon
itore
d.
• P
WG
ID a
nd fi
eld-
base
d P
WG
s ar
e le
d by
the
GoK
an
d na
tiona
l act
ors.
•
Fiel
d ba
sed
PWG
IDs
have
dev
elop
ed T
OR
s an
d ha
ve fu
nctio
ning
re
ferra
l mec
hani
sms.
•
Num
ber o
f GoK
and
non
-go
vern
men
t sta
keho
lder
s tra
ined
on
IDP
sta
ndar
ds,
SG
BV
, chi
ld p
rote
ctio
n is
sues
and
traf
ficki
ng.
• N
umbe
r of t
raffi
ckin
g ca
ses
repo
rted/
docu
men
ted
and
effe
ctiv
ely
assi
sted
.
• 12
nat
iona
l and
fiel
d-ba
sed
PW
G m
eetin
gs h
eld.
•
RC
K h
ave
chai
red
four
ad
voca
cy s
ub g
roup
mee
tings
un
der P
WG
and
ToR
and
ad
voca
cy a
ctiv
ities
hav
e be
en
iden
tifie
d an
d co
ordi
nate
d be
twee
n th
e m
embe
rs o
f the
su
b-gr
oup.
•
25 m
onito
rs d
eplo
yed.
•
As
of e
nd o
f May
, the
situ
atio
n of
150
0 ID
P h
ouse
hold
s ID
Ps/
retu
rnee
s ha
ve b
een
mon
itore
d.
• P
WG
ID a
nd fi
eld-
base
d PW
Gs
are
led
by th
e G
oK a
nd
natio
nal a
ctor
s w
ith s
ecre
taria
t su
ppor
t fro
m U
NH
CR
. •
ToR
s de
velo
ped
for f
ield
bas
ed
PWG
IDs
whi
le a
lso
crea
ting
refe
rral m
echa
nism
s.
• B
asel
ine
stud
y on
(ID
P) S
treet
C
hild
ren
Pro
filin
g fo
r Rift
Val
ley
plan
ned.
•
Ret
urne
es ID
Ps
wer
e m
onito
red
by IO
M s
taff
espe
cial
ly in
Nya
kiny
wa,
C
haga
iya
and
Che
mar
e fa
rms
• K
NC
HR
org
anis
ed o
ne tr
aini
ng
with
28
of G
oK a
nd n
on-
gove
rnm
ent s
take
hold
ers
train
ed o
n ID
P s
tand
ards
, S
GB
V, c
hild
pro
tect
ion
issu
es
and
traffi
ckin
g.
KE
NY
A
54
Clu
ster
Obj
ectiv
es
Out
com
es
Out
puts
In
dica
tors
A
chie
ved
as o
f mid
-yea
r 3.
Affe
cted
pop
ulat
ions
hav
e ac
cess
to ju
stic
e an
d a
holis
tic ra
nge
of P
SS
serv
ices
.
• A
ffect
ed p
opul
atio
ns a
nd
com
mun
ities
pro
vide
d w
ith
coun
selli
ng a
nd c
hild
fri
endl
y sp
aces
/recr
eatio
nal
activ
ities
that
will
enha
nce
heal
ing
and
miti
gate
long
- te
rm P
SS.
•
Affe
cted
pop
ulat
ions
and
co
mm
uniti
es h
ave
acce
ss to
co
mpl
aint
s m
echa
nism
s an
d re
ferra
ls.
• H
igh
leve
l tra
uma
coun
sellin
g pr
ovid
ed, a
s ne
eded
, by
iden
tifie
d pr
ofes
sion
als
• C
omm
unity
and
oth
er
rele
vant
act
ors
train
ed in
P
SS
and
ass
ista
nce.
•
CFS
, suc
h as
tent
s or
ex
istin
g st
ruct
ures
, in
plac
e to
pro
vide
PS
S.
• N
umbe
r of P
SS
ce
ntre
s/C
FS e
stab
lishe
d an
d op
erat
iona
l. •
Num
ber o
f com
mun
ity
mem
bers
reac
hed
thro
ugh
indi
vidu
al a
nd g
roup
co
unse
lling.
•
Num
ber o
f com
mun
ity
mem
bers
trai
ned.
• Th
ree
wor
king
CFS
hav
e be
en
esta
blis
hed.
•
Stru
ctur
ed a
nd u
n-st
ruct
ured
co
unse
lling
ses
sion
s ha
ve
been
goi
ng o
n in
Rur
igi w
here
a
larg
e nu
mbe
r of I
DP
s re
turn
ed.
• 36
6 st
uden
ts o
f Rur
igi
seco
ndar
y sc
hool
wer
e re
ache
d th
roug
h in
divi
dual
an
d gr
oup
ther
apie
s.
• C
hem
are
and
Cha
gaiy
a co
mm
unity
mem
bers
es
peci
ally
the
old
ones
had
co
unse
lling
sess
ions
as
they
re
turn
ed to
thei
r far
ms
•
421
of c
omm
unity
mem
bers
re
ache
d th
roug
h in
divi
dual
an
d gr
oup
coun
selli
ng.
KE
NY
A
55
Clu
ster
Obj
ectiv
es
Out
com
es
Out
puts
In
dica
tors
A
chie
ved
as o
f mid
-yea
r 4.
Chi
ldre
n ar
e pr
otec
ted
from
vio
lenc
e, a
buse
, ex
ploi
tatio
n an
d fa
mily
se
para
tion
thro
ugh
spec
ific
emer
genc
y in
terv
entio
ns a
nd
thro
ugh
furth
er d
evel
opm
ent
of K
enya
’s c
hild
pro
tect
ion
syst
em.
• E
mer
genc
y ch
ild p
rote
ctio
n se
rvic
es a
nd c
hild
pro
tect
ion
syst
em’s
bas
ed re
ferr
al
mec
hani
sms
in p
lace
to
prev
ent a
nd re
spon
d to
vi
olen
ce, a
buse
and
ex
ploi
tatio
n in
em
erge
ncie
s.•
Chi
ld p
rote
ctio
n ac
tors
are
ab
le to
initi
ate
the
proc
ess
of id
entif
ying
; doc
umen
ting,
tra
cing
and
reun
ifyin
g (ID
TR) s
epar
ated
chi
ldre
n w
ith c
harit
able
chi
ldre
n’s
inst
itutio
ns re
mai
ning
a la
st
reso
rt as
per
Dep
artm
ent o
f C
hild
ren’
s S
ervi
ces
(DC
S)
rule
s an
d re
gula
tions
.
• P
reve
ntiv
e m
easu
res
incl
udin
g aw
aren
ess
rais
ing
cam
paig
ns o
n ch
ild p
rote
ctio
n im
plem
ente
d.
• D
ata
and
stat
istic
s on
ch
ild ri
ghts
vio
latio
ns a
re
colle
cted
thro
ugh
field
ba
sed
PW
Gs
and
serv
ice
prov
ider
s.
• D
CS
and
NG
O p
erso
nnel
ar
e tra
ined
in ID
TR a
nd
supp
ort p
rovi
ded
to
mai
nten
ance
of n
atio
nal
data
base
.
• N
umbe
r of s
epar
ated
ch
ildre
n id
entif
ied.
•
Num
ber o
f sep
arat
ed
child
ren
reun
ified
. •
Num
ber o
f cal
ls re
ceiv
ed
on 1
16 h
otlin
es.
• N
umbe
r of r
efer
rals
mad
e by
pro
tect
ion
acto
rs.
• N
umbe
r of r
efer
rals
mad
e by
pro
tect
ion
acto
rs
resu
lting
in re
solu
tion.
• O
ngoi
ng in
terv
entio
n fo
r ch
ildre
n af
fect
ed b
y ab
use,
ne
glec
t, ex
ploi
tatio
n an
d vi
olen
ce th
roug
h th
e D
istri
ct
Chi
ldre
n’s
offic
es.
• E
nhan
ced
capa
city
of t
he
Dep
artm
ent o
f Chi
ldre
n’s
Ser
vice
s to
resp
ond
to
child
ren’
s ne
eds
thro
ugh
the
recr
uitm
ent o
f Vol
unte
er
Chi
ldre
n’s
Offi
cers
in a
ll lo
catio
ns.
• O
ngoi
ng m
appi
ng o
f st
akeh
olde
rs w
ithin
the
CP
Sys
tem
to fa
cilit
ate
timel
y re
ferra
l. •
Sav
e th
e C
hild
ren
curr
ently
w
orki
ng w
ith lo
cal C
BO
to
esta
blis
h an
d bu
ild th
e ca
paci
ty o
f Chi
ld P
rote
ctio
n C
omm
ittee
mem
bers
in
seve
ral l
ocat
ions
(pre
vent
ive
mea
sure
s).
• O
ngoi
ng C
hild
Rig
hts
Situ
atio
n A
naly
sis
on s
treet
ch
ildre
n in
Uas
in G
ishu
to
info
rm a
Stra
tegy
doc
umen
t fo
r int
erve
ntio
ns (i
nclu
ding
Fa
mily
Reu
nific
atio
n an
d C
omm
unity
-bas
ed
reha
bilit
atio
n an
d re
inte
grat
ion)
.
KE
NY
A
56
Clu
ster
Obj
ectiv
es
Out
com
es
Out
puts
In
dica
tors
A
chie
ved
as o
f mid
-yea
r 5.
Nat
iona
l ins
titut
ions
, civ
il so
ciet
y na
tiona
l and
fiel
d-ba
sed
PW
G m
embe
rs
capa
citie
s ar
e st
reng
then
ed
to p
rovi
de p
rote
ctio
n to
gr
oups
vul
nera
ble
to h
uman
tra
ffick
ing
and
SG
BV
(ID
Ps,
pa
stor
al c
omm
uniti
es, a
nd
peri-
urba
n m
igra
nts)
and
to
diss
emin
ate
GB
V/p
ost-r
ape
care
(PR
C) p
roto
cols
, in
clud
ing
enha
ncin
g ca
paci
ty
of o
ne-s
top
cent
res
and
GB
V
NG
Os
to re
spon
d to
sex
ual
viol
ence
, inc
ludi
ng p
rovi
sion
of
pos
t-exp
osur
e pr
ophy
laxi
s (P
EP
).
• N
atio
nal a
nd fi
eld-
base
d PW
G m
embe
rs s
ensi
tized
on
hum
an tr
affic
king
. •
Hum
an tr
affic
king
m
ains
tream
ed in
to th
e na
tiona
l and
fiel
d-ba
sed
PWG
s, in
clud
ing
GBV
re
ferr
al s
yste
m a
nd
repo
rting
she
et.
• In
crea
sed
acce
ss to
dire
ct
assi
stan
ce, i
nclu
ding
GB
V
supp
ort s
ervi
ces
for w
omen
an
d gi
rls w
ho h
ave
been
vi
ctim
s of
traf
ficki
ng,
incl
udin
g sa
fe s
helte
r and
re
inte
grat
ion.
• S
ensi
tizat
ion
fora
/wor
ksho
ps fo
r na
tiona
l and
fiel
d ba
sed
PW
G m
embe
rs.
• S
OP
dev
elop
ed, a
dopt
ed
and
impl
emen
ted
by th
e in
ter-
min
iste
rial s
teer
ing
com
mitt
ee.
• Tr
affic
king
vic
tims
prov
ided
with
dire
ct
assi
stan
ce.
• Tr
aini
ng m
ater
ials
and
tra
inin
g re
port.
•
SOP
docu
men
t. •
50 tr
affic
king
vic
tims
(40
wom
en a
nd g
irls,
10
boys
an
d m
en) a
ssis
ted.
• Th
e N
atio
nal P
lan
of A
ctio
n to
A
id th
e Im
plem
enta
tion
of th
e N
atio
nal F
ram
ewor
k to
war
ds
Pre
vent
ion
and
Res
pons
e of
S
GB
V d
evel
oped
and
di
strib
uted
to s
take
hold
ers.
•
Com
plet
ed m
appi
ng o
f GB
V
serv
ice
prov
isio
n in
Ken
ya in
or
der t
o ad
voca
te fo
r up
scal
ing
of m
ulti-
sect
oral
pr
even
tion
and
resp
onse
to
SG
BV
at t
he c
omm
unity
leve
l, th
roug
h su
stai
ned
supp
ort t
o ke
y se
ctor
s in
clud
ing
heal
th,
lega
l/jus
tice,
sec
urity
, and
ps
ycho
soci
al.
K E N Y A
57
3.2.10 WASH
Sector lead agency UNITED NATIONS CHILDREN’S FUND (UNICEF) in support of MOWI Sector members Agencies participating: WESCOORD members (NGOs, ALRMP, Line
Ministries, MoE, MoPHS, MoWI and UNICEF) Number of projects 15 Sector objectives 1. To ensure timely provision of WASH supplies to emergency affected
women, girls, boys and men. 2. To improve access to safe and adequate water for affected beneficiaries (women, girls, boys and men) at community level. 3. To improve sanitation and hygiene practices for affected beneficiaries (women, girls, boys and men) at community level. 4. Enhance access to safe and adequate water and improved access to gender sensitive sanitation and hygiene facilities separate for boys and girls, addressing special needs of disabled children and girls in emergency affected schools and health facilities. 5. Promote water quality surveillance and household water treatment and safe storage at community level to control and eliminate cholera outbreaks in affected areas. 6. Strengthen capacity of national, provincial and district level WESCOORD to enable coordinated preparedness and response.
Beneficiaries 1,920,000 people including 770,000 children in emergency affected areas.
Funds requested Original:$12,476,700 Revised at mid-year:$14,026,680
Funds requested per priority level
$9,919,968(High) $4,106,712(Medium)
Funding to date $3,932,415 (28% of revised requirements) Revised disaggregated number of affected population and beneficiaries
Affected population Beneficiaries Category Female Male Total Female Male Total Vulnerable school children of drought-, flood- and cholera-affected areas
490,000 470,000 960,000 390,000 380,000 770,000
Vulnerable population of drought-, flood- and cholera-affected areas.
730,000 710,000 1,440,000 580,000 570,000 1,150,000
Changes in needs The 2010 Short Rains Season Assessment estimated that the amount of people requiring humanitarian assistance increased to 2.4 million from the 1.2 million in August 2010. The rainfall data for the Long Rains Season of March, April, May as presented by the Kenya Meteorological Department during the EHRP MYR in May stated that the majority of districts had received below average rainfall and that in most case this rainfall showed poor temporal distribution i.e. was tending to one or two heavy downpours as opposed to regular rainfall throughout the three month season. Districts in the Northern and Eastern Pastoralist Livelihood Clusters were particularly affected with only Turkana receiving something approaching expected amounts of rainfall. The weather outlook for the next three months i.e. June, July, August predicted little or no rainfall across the country. Ahead of the Long Rains Season Assessment Report the drought situation update from the Kenya Food Security Steering Group presented at the EHRP MYR suggested that all livelihood indicators were continuing to worsen and that the poor long rains season would do nothing to improve these.
K E N Y A
58
Therefore the WASH sector will raise their target beneficiary number to 1,920,000 which represents 80% of the 2.4 million people identified in the 2010 Short Rains Assessment Report. This is reflected in the revised beneficiary table (Table 1) above. Following the MYR of the sector and subsequent consultation with sector partners the objectives, outcomes, outputs and indicators were revised as follows:- Objective 2 – Access To Safe and Adequate Water. The WASH sector partners provided access to safe water to 335,000 people, representing 24% of the target through the construction or rehabilitation of 56 water points. The majority of these, amounting to 242,000 people, were covered by the rehabilitation of seven piped water supply schemes in cholera affected districts including the rehabilitation of the Lodwar Town water supply scheme. 367,000,000 people were reached by emergency water trucking in drought affected districts bringing the total number of people reported as benefitting from improved access to safe and adequate water to 702,000 or 52% of the target. Whilst the WASH sector priority is to move away from unsustainable water supplies it is true that water trucking remains a common intervention in emergency affected areas especially where populations have been displaced. Therefore there is a need to revise the sector indicators to ensure that water trucking activities are included and that the true number of beneficiaries receiving safe water in emergency affected areas is adequately reported. Therefore a new output has been added in table 3 under 2.1.3 “People have improved access to safe and adequate water” with the Indicator “Percentage of target population with improved access to safe and adequate water”. Objective 3 – Household Sanitation Only 1,400 people in 280 households were reported as benefitting from construction of latrines at household level. Whilst household level sanitation is a critical area to address the cycle of disease in Kenya it fits more easily as a regular development programme activity than an emergency intervention. For example the GoK’s newly launched “Rural Kenya Open Defecation Free by 2013” campaign which is using CLTS (Community Led Total Sanitation) methodologies aimed at enabling communities to devise their own sanitation action plans and move up the sanitation ladder. The focus of the emergency sanitation component should be on institutional latrines i.e. schools and health centres, as covered under objective 4, and displaced populations as captured under objective 1. The sector should capture the number of people receiving hygiene promotion messages, information and training as a way to improve the poor hygiene practices and reducing the incidence of water related diseases Output 3.1.1 is therefore revised to read “Improved knowledge of sanitation and hygiene for affected women, girls, boys and men” with the indicator “Percentage of target population receiving hygiene promotion messages or training”. Objective 4 Latrines and hand washing facilities were reported as being constructed in 40 schools and four clinics. This reached an estimated 25,000 school children (6% of target) however the number of school children reached is not clearly stated in the indicators. The number of children reported as having received hygiene promotion training in schools was only 6,575. The indicator (4.1.2) to address the WASH needs of girls and disabled people was poorly reported. Output 4.1.2 “Provision for special needs of girls and disabled children made” should be clarified since it is assumed that the needs of these groups are taken into account in all WASH programme
K E N Y A
59
interventions in schools and would therefore be the same as indicator 4.1.1. The indicator for output 4.1.2 is currently not easily measurable. In order to record the number of school children served there also needs to be a clear differentiation between WASH services in schools and health centres. Also there is a need to specify the target number of health centres for construction of WASH facilities – this is set at ten. Output 4.1.1 has been revised to read “Gender sensitive and disabled access latrines and hand washing facilities constructed or rehabilitated in schools” with the indicator “Number of latrines and hand washing facilities constructed in schools”. Output 4.1.2 has been revised to read “Gender sensitive and disabled access latrines and hand washing facilities constructed or rehabilitated in health facilities” with the indicator “Latrines and hand washing facilities constructed in 10 health facilities”. Output 4.1.3 has been revised to read “Children in their places of learning have access to appropriate sanitation facilities, hygiene messages and information” with the indicator “Number of school children with improved access to sanitation facilities and who received hygiene promotion messages”. Objective 5 – Water Quality. No water quality testing kits were reported as having been distributed under emergency programmes (indicator 5.1.1). Just over 308,000 people (22% of target) were reached with hygiene, sanitation and household water treatment techniques. At household level the priority of the sector is on the treatment of water rather than the testing of the water quality therefore it is suggested to focus on output 5.1.2. In addition, work is on-going in the sector to improve the quality of water provided to communities through piped water supply schemes especially in cholera affected peri-urban areas. This has primarily been conducted by UNICEF through the Water Service Boards, Water User Associations and Water Service Providers. It is estimated that so far in 2011 less than 650,000 people have benefited from improved water supply services in terms of both quantity and quality through the rehabilitation of water supply schemes and water safety planning approaches. Therefore in order to ensure that these beneficiaries of improved water quality are adequately captured in the sector reports it is recommended to amend the output and indicator accordingly. Output 5.1.1 has been revised to read “Affected populations have improved access to water of appropriate quality at household level” with two indicators “Percentage of target population reached with household water treatment and safe storage technologies and training” and “Percentage of target population with access to improved quality water through community water supply schemes”. Objective 6 Training of district WESCOORDs was conducted in late 2010 and there are plans to conduct more during 2011. The output (6.1.1) needs to be amended to reflect that the trainings are at district level rather than provincial or national level. The target is set at reaching the district officers (Public Health and Water) in 50 emergency prone districts. Capacity is being built within the national level WESCOORD Secretariat within the MoWI and in addition a review of WESCOORD was conducted in late 2010. The review makes recommendations as to the linkages and information sharing between district and national levels. The strengthening of the district level WESCOORDs through training, and improvement in linkages with the national level in line with the WESCOORD review recommendations will be covered by the continuing work of the national level WESCOORD. It is therefore recommended to amend output 6.1.2 to reflect only the national level WESCOORD meetings with qualitative assessments of WESCOORD i.e. effectiveness of district level WESCOORD reporting and coordination in future reviews and reports. Output 6.1.1 has been revised to read “District level WESCOORDs trained on disaster preparedness and response” with the indicator “District WESCOORDs in 50 districts receive training”.
K E N Y A
60
Output 6.1.2 has been revised to read “National WESCOORD monthly coordination meetings” with the indicator “12 national level WESCOORD meetings held”. The revised objectives, outcomes, outputs and indicators are shown below in table 4. GoK’s Drought Response The achievements table as shown below does not reflect the drought relief work conducted by the Government of Kenya through the Ministry of Water and Irrigation. This included the repair of 227 water points, fuel subsidies to 101 community water supply schemes and water delivery to 373 water trucking points. The total cost of the GoK’s interventions was KSH 323 million (approx. $4 million) and the number of beneficiaries reached is estimated at 2.8 million based on reaching an estimated 80% of the GoK target of 3.6 million people. The beneficiary figures stated were estimated and these will be confirmed and broken down in line with the WASH sector indicators to ensure that they are captured in the 2011 annual achievement report for the WASH sector. Reasons for any significant deviation between targets and actual achievements as of mid-year See GoK response in ‘2’ above. Of the sector funding requirements of $14.03 million as contained in the 15 EHRP projects, only $3.9 million, or 28%, has been reported as received to the Financial Tracking Service (FTS). In addition the GoK allocated approximately $4 million for emergency drought response activities and some partners had reported activities but not the associated funding. The sector indicators did not adequately reflect the sector’s emergency work – for example people reached through emergency water trucking were not included in the access to water indicator. As suggested above, the sector indicators should be revised to adequately reflect sector activities and ensure these are well coordinated and reported. In general there is a need to continue to improve activity and funding reporting within the sector to ensure the WASH situation is correctly reflected and to improve analysis and planning. Important implementation challenges Security remains a challenge in many districts of north-eastern province, especially the Greater Mandera and Wajir Districts. The division of districts and creation of new districts has, in many areas; weakened GoK capacity as the new district administrations establishes themselves. How the cluster re-validated the projects During the MYR, the sector reviewed the indicators and amended these to ensure full coverage – for example the inclusion of people reached by emergency water trucking in drought affected areas rather than only those reached by water point rehabilitation. The sector works with UNOCHA through the Sector Technical Working Group, WESCOORD to ensure partner presence and projects are mapped and reported. The sector has identified priority areas in line with KFSSG assessment reports and updates and places priority on projects addressing the needs in these areas. Finally, it is worthwhile noting that the capacity of the WASH Sector Technical Working Group, WESCOORD, has been strengthened by the recruitment of an Information Manager and Assistant Information Manager to join the Secretariat from the Ministry of Water and Irrigation (MoWI). Additional MoWI staff have been assigned to the WESCOORD Secretariat and dedicated office space including ITC equipment has been set up to house the WESCOORD Secretariat within MoWI headquarters. The increased capacity of the WESCOORD Secretariat will improve the sector’s ability to gather and analyse sector information, especially district level activity reports, and coordinate emergency activities more effectively enabling more efficient orchestration of projects to ensure full coverage without gaps or duplication.
KE
NY
A
61
Mid
-yea
r mon
itorin
g vs
. obj
ectiv
es
Clu
ster
Obj
ectiv
es
Out
com
es
Out
puts
In
dica
tors
Ach
ieve
d as
of m
id-y
ear
1. T
o en
sure
tim
ely
prov
isio
n of
W
AS
H s
uppl
ies
to e
mer
genc
y af
fect
ed w
omen
, girl
s, b
oys
and
men
.
1.1
Affe
cted
wom
en, g
irls,
bo
ys a
nd m
en a
re a
dequ
atel
y ca
tere
d fo
r in
term
s of
WAS
H
supp
lies.
1.1.
1 Im
prov
ed ti
mel
y ac
cess
to e
mer
genc
y W
AS
H s
uppl
ies.
Per
cent
age
of a
ffect
ed
wom
en, g
irls,
boy
s an
d m
en
acce
ssin
g W
ASH
sup
plie
s on
tim
e.
322,
571
(23%
)
2.1.
1 N
on-fu
nctio
ning
WS
sc
hem
es re
habi
litat
ed.
51 w
ater
poi
nts
reha
bilit
ated
2.
To
impr
ove
acce
ss to
saf
e an
d ad
equa
te w
ater
for a
ffect
ed
bene
ficia
ries
(wom
en, g
irls,
boy
s an
d m
en) a
t com
mun
ity le
vel.
2.1
Red
uced
inci
denc
e of
w
ater
-rel
ated
dis
ease
s am
ongs
t affe
cted
be
nefic
iarie
s.
2.1.
2 N
ew w
ater
sup
ply
sche
me
deve
lope
d.
Num
ber o
f ope
ratio
nal
spec
ial n
eeds
frie
ndly
wat
er
syst
ems/
poin
ts c
onst
ruct
ed
and/
or re
habi
litat
ed.
Five
wat
er p
oint
s co
nstru
cted
3.
To
impr
ove
sani
tatio
n an
d hy
gien
e pr
actic
es fo
r affe
cted
be
nefic
iarie
s (w
omen
, girl
s, b
oys
and
men
) at c
omm
unity
leve
l.
3.1
Red
uced
inci
denc
e of
di
seas
es re
late
d to
poo
r hy
gien
e an
d sa
nita
tion
prac
tices
at h
ouse
hold
leve
l.
3.1.
1 Im
prov
ed a
cces
s to
pr
oper
san
itatio
n an
d hy
gien
e fo
r affe
cted
wom
en,
girls
, boy
s an
d m
en.
Per
cent
age
of a
ffect
ed
peop
le (d
isag
greg
ated
by
sex
and
age)
usi
ng
appr
opria
te s
anita
tion
faci
litie
s.
1,40
0 pe
ople
4.1.
1 G
ende
r-se
nsiti
ve
latri
nes
/han
d w
ashi
ng
faci
lity
cons
truct
ed in
sc
hool
s an
d he
alth
faci
litie
s.
Num
ber o
f lat
rines
and
han
d w
ashi
ng fa
cilit
ies
cons
truct
ed/re
habi
litat
ed a
t th
e sc
hool
s an
d he
alth
fa
cilit
ies.
230
latri
nes
in 4
0 sc
hool
s an
d fo
ur c
linic
s
4.1.
2 P
rovi
sion
for s
peci
al
need
s of
girl
s an
d di
sabl
ed
child
ren
mad
e.
Pro
visi
on m
ade
with
in
scho
ols
to a
ddre
ss s
peci
al
WA
SH
nee
ds o
f girl
s an
d di
sabl
ed.
Des
ign
of la
trine
blo
cks
cons
ider
ed w
ith d
isab
led
acce
ss a
nd b
athr
oom
s fo
r gi
rls.
4. E
nhan
ce a
cces
s to
saf
e an
d ad
equa
te w
ater
and
impr
oved
ac
cess
to g
ende
r sen
sitiv
e sa
nita
tion
and
hygi
ene
faci
litie
s se
para
te fo
r boy
s an
d gi
rls,
addr
essi
ng s
peci
al n
eeds
of
disa
bled
chi
ldre
n an
d gi
rls in
em
erge
ncy
affe
cted
sch
ools
and
he
alth
faci
litie
s.
4.1
Red
uced
inci
denc
e of
di
seas
es re
late
d to
poo
r hy
gien
e an
d sa
nita
tion
prac
tices
at s
choo
l and
hea
lth
faci
lity
leve
l.
4.1.
3 S
choo
l hyg
iene
and
sa
nita
tion
prom
otio
n tra
inin
g ca
rried
out
.
Num
ber o
f pup
ils tr
aine
d on
hy
gien
e an
d sa
nita
tion
prom
otio
n.
6,57
5 sc
hool
chi
ldre
n
5.1.
1 V
ulne
rabl
e ho
useh
olds
ab
le to
test
bac
terio
logi
cal
cont
amin
atio
n at
hou
seho
ld
leve
l.
Per
cent
age
of h
ouse
hold
s re
ceiv
ing
wat
er te
stin
g ki
ts.
0 5.
Pro
mot
e w
ater
qua
lity
surv
eilla
nce
and
hous
ehol
d w
ater
trea
tmen
t and
saf
e st
orag
e at
com
mun
ity le
vel t
o co
ntro
l and
el
imin
ate
chol
era
outb
reak
s in
af
fect
ed a
reas
.
5.1
Red
uced
inci
denc
e of
di
seas
es re
late
d to
poo
r hy
gien
e an
d sa
nita
tion
prac
tices
at h
ouse
hold
leve
l.
5.1.
2 A
ppro
pria
te s
anita
tion
and
hygi
ene
prac
tices
at
hous
ehol
d le
vel p
rom
oted
.
Num
ber o
f peo
ple
(dis
aggr
egat
ed b
y se
x an
d ag
e) re
ache
d w
ith h
ygie
ne,
sani
tatio
n an
d ho
useh
old
wat
er tr
eatm
ent t
echn
ique
s.
308,
562
KE
NY
A
62
Clu
ster
Obj
ectiv
es
Out
com
es
Out
puts
In
dica
tors
Ach
ieve
d as
of m
id-y
ear
6.1.
1 N
atio
nal,
prov
inci
al
and
dist
rict l
evel
W
ES
CO
OR
Ds
train
ed o
n di
sast
er p
repa
redn
ess
and
resp
onse
.
Num
ber o
f tra
inin
gs c
arrie
d ou
t at a
ll le
vels
. N
umbe
r of p
eopl
e tra
ined
at
all l
evel
s.
0 6.
Stre
ngth
en c
apac
ity o
f N
atio
nal,
prov
inci
al a
nd d
istri
ct
leve
l WE
SC
OO
RD
to e
nabl
e co
ordi
nate
d pr
epar
edne
ss a
nd
resp
onse
.
6.1
Impr
oved
coo
rdin
atio
n du
ring
disa
ster
pre
pare
dnes
s an
d re
spon
se.
6.1.
2 W
ES
CO
OR
D m
onth
ly
mee
tings
at d
istri
ct,
prov
inci
al a
nd n
atio
nal
leve
ls.
Num
ber o
f mon
thly
mee
tings
at
all
leve
ls.
Five
mon
thly
mee
tings
of
Nat
iona
l WES
CO
OR
D
Rev
ised
Obj
ectiv
es, O
utco
mes
, Out
puts
& In
dica
tors
C
lust
er O
bjec
tives
O
utco
mes
O
utpu
ts
Indi
cato
r with
co
rres
pond
ing
targ
et
Ach
ieve
d
1. T
o en
sure
tim
ely
prov
isio
n of
W
AS
H s
uppl
ies
to e
mer
genc
y af
fect
ed w
omen
, girl
s, b
oys
and
men
.
1.1
Affe
cted
wom
en, g
irls,
bo
ys a
nd m
en a
re a
dequ
atel
y ca
tere
d fo
r in
term
s of
WAS
H
supp
lies.
1.1.
1 Im
prov
ed ti
mel
y ac
cess
to e
mer
genc
y W
AS
H s
uppl
ies.
Per
cent
age
of a
ffect
ed
wom
en, g
irls,
boy
s an
d m
en
acce
ssin
g W
ASH
sup
plie
s on
tim
e.
2.
1.1
Non
-func
tioni
ng W
S
sche
mes
reha
bilit
ated
.
2.1.
2 N
ew W
S s
chem
es
deve
lope
d.
Num
ber o
f ope
ratio
nal
spec
ial n
eeds
frie
ndly
wat
er
syst
ems/
poin
ts c
onst
ruct
ed
and/
or re
habi
litat
ed.
2. T
o im
prov
e ac
cess
to s
afe
and
adeq
uate
wat
er fo
r affe
cted
be
nefic
iarie
s (w
omen
, girl
s, b
oys
and
men
) at c
omm
unity
leve
l.
2.1
Red
uced
inci
denc
e of
w
ater
-rel
ated
dis
ease
s am
ongs
t affe
cted
be
nefic
iarie
s.
2.
1.3
Peo
ple
have
impr
oved
ac
cess
to s
afe
& a
dequ
ate
wat
er.
Per
cent
age
of ta
rget
po
pula
tion
with
acc
ess
to
safe
& a
dequ
ate
wat
er.
3. T
o im
prov
e sa
nita
tion
and
hygi
ene
prac
tices
for a
ffect
ed
bene
ficia
ries
(wom
en, g
irls,
boy
s an
d m
en) a
t com
mun
ity le
vel.
3.1
Red
uced
inci
denc
e of
di
seas
es re
late
d to
poo
r hy
gien
e an
d sa
nita
tion
prac
tices
at h
ouse
hold
leve
l.
3.1.
1 Im
prov
ed k
now
ledg
e of
san
itatio
n an
d hy
gien
e fo
r af
fect
ed w
omen
, girl
s bo
ys
and
men
.
Per
cent
age
of a
ffect
ed
peop
le re
ceiv
ing
hygi
ene
prom
otio
n m
essa
ges
or
train
ing.
4.1.
1 G
ende
r-sen
sitiv
e &
di
sabl
ed a
cces
s la
trine
s &
ha
nd w
ashi
ng fa
cilit
ies
cons
truct
ed o
r reh
abilit
ated
in
sch
ools
Num
ber o
f lat
rines
and
han
d w
ashi
ng fa
cilit
ies
cons
truct
ed o
r reh
abilit
ated
in
sch
ools
4.
Enh
ance
acc
ess
to s
afe
and
adeq
uate
wat
er a
nd im
prov
ed
acce
ss to
gen
der s
ensi
tive
sani
tatio
n an
d hy
gien
e fa
cilit
ies
sepa
rate
for b
oys
and
girls
, ad
dres
sing
spe
cial
nee
ds o
f di
sabl
ed c
hild
ren
and
girls
in
4.1
Red
uced
inci
denc
e of
di
seas
es re
late
d to
poo
r hy
gien
e an
d sa
nita
tion
prac
tices
at s
choo
l and
hea
lth
faci
lity
leve
l. 4.
1.2
Gen
der-s
ensi
tive
&
disa
bled
acc
ess
latri
nes
&
Num
ber o
f lat
rines
and
han
d w
ashi
ng fa
cilit
ies
KE
NY
A
63
Clu
ster
Obj
ectiv
es
Out
com
es
Out
puts
In
dica
tor w
ith
corr
espo
ndin
g ta
rget
A
chie
ved
hand
was
hing
faci
litie
s co
nstru
cted
or r
ehab
ilitat
ed
in h
ealth
faci
litie
s.
cons
truct
ed o
r reh
abilit
ated
in
10
heal
th fa
cilit
ies.
em
erge
ncy
affe
cted
sch
ools
and
he
alth
faci
litie
s.
4.1.
3 C
hild
ren
in th
eir p
lace
of
lear
ning
hav
e ac
cess
to
appr
opria
te s
anita
tion
faci
litie
s an
d hy
gien
e m
essa
ges
and
info
rmat
ion.
Num
ber o
f sch
ool c
hild
ren
with
impr
oved
acc
ess
to
sani
tatio
n fa
cilit
ies
and
train
ed o
n hy
gien
e an
d sa
nita
tion
prom
otio
n.
Per
cent
age
of ta
rget
po
pula
tion
reac
hed
with
ho
useh
old
wat
er tr
eatm
ent &
sa
fe s
tora
ge te
chno
logi
es &
tra
inin
g.
5.
Pro
mot
e w
ater
qua
lity
surv
eilla
nce
and
hous
ehol
d w
ater
trea
tmen
t and
saf
e st
orag
e at
com
mun
ity le
vel t
o co
ntro
l and
el
imin
ate
chol
era
outb
reak
s in
af
fect
ed a
reas
.
5.1
Red
uced
inci
denc
e of
di
seas
es re
late
d to
poo
r hy
gien
e an
d sa
nita
tion
prac
tices
at h
ouse
hold
leve
l.
5.1.
1 A
ffect
ed p
opul
atio
ns
have
impr
oved
acc
ess
to
wat
er o
f app
ropr
iate
qua
lity.
Per
cent
age
of ta
rget
po
pula
tion
with
acc
ess
to
impr
oved
qua
lity
wat
er
thro
ugh
com
mun
ity w
ater
su
pply
sch
emes
6.1.
1 D
istri
ct le
vel
WE
SC
OO
RD
s tra
ined
on
disa
ster
pre
pare
dnes
s an
d re
spon
se.
Dis
trict
WES
CO
OR
Ds
in 5
0 di
stric
ts re
ceiv
e tra
inin
g
6. S
treng
then
cap
acity
of
Nat
iona
l, pr
ovin
cial
and
dis
trict
le
vel W
ES
CO
OR
D to
ena
ble
coor
dina
ted
prep
ared
ness
and
re
spon
se.
6.1
Impr
oved
coo
rdin
atio
n du
ring
disa
ster
pre
pare
dnes
s an
d re
spon
se.
6.1.
2 N
atio
nal W
ESC
OO
RD
m
onth
ly c
oord
inat
ion
mee
tings
.
12 n
atio
nal l
evel
W
ES
CO
OR
D m
eetin
gs h
eld.
K E N Y A
64
4. FORWARD VIEW
The three-year (2011-2013) humanitarian strategy with systematic incorporation of disaster risk reduction approaches outlines short- and long-term response strategies to address acute and chronic humanitarian needs outlined in the EHRP document. Timely funding is critical for responding to the current acute needs while at the same time laying the foundation for enhancing early recovery initiatives such as community resilience and reducing the impacts of disasters frequently experienced in the country. This is reflected in the understanding that, for instance, the inability of food-insecure households to recover fully from recurrent shocks and hazards requires a mix of immediate and medium-term food and non-food interventions that seek to mitigate urgent needs while concurrently restoring livelihoods and building resilience. Similar methods and approaches will continue to be employed across all sector response plans. Humanitarian partners are committed to carrying out targeted and sustained advocacy with the Government of Kenya and development actors to further their engagement in addressing chronic vulnerabilities and attainment of sustainable solutions. NEEDS ASSESSMENT PLANS FOR THE 2012 CAP
1. Will there be a CAP in 2012? YES 2. CAP 2012 Workshop dates: End of September 2011 3. Needs Assessment Plan for the 2012 CAP: existing assessments, identification of gaps in assessment information, and planned assessments to fill gaps (see overleaf)
KE
NY
A
65
CO
MPL
ETED
NEE
DS
ASS
ESSM
ENT
Clu
ster
G
eogr
aphi
c ar
eas
and
popu
latio
n gr
oups
ta
rget
ed
Lead
Age
ncy
and
Part
ners
D
ate
Title
or S
ubje
ct
Edu
catio
n D
istri
cts
of K
ipke
lion
and
Kur
esoi
U
NIC
EF
and
MoE
2-
5 Fe
b 20
10
Mau
Ass
essm
ent t
arge
ting
Kip
kelio
nn a
nd K
ures
oi d
istri
cts
Edu
catio
n D
adaa
b U
NIC
EF,
UN
HC
R a
nd
partn
ers
21-2
5 Ju
ne 2
010
Ass
essm
ent o
f the
Edu
catio
n S
ecto
r in
Dad
aab
Edu
catio
n N
atio
nally
U
NIC
EF,
MoE
and
pa
rtner
s A
ugus
t to
Oct
ober
20
10
Edu
catio
n S
ecto
r Em
erge
ncy
Pre
pare
dnes
s an
d R
espo
nse
plan
W
AS
H
AS
AL
Dis
trict
s m
ainl
y in
the
north
, eas
t and
sou
th e
ast
parts
of K
enya
UN
ICE
F an
d va
rious
pa
rtner
s S
ep 2
009
A re
view
of t
he s
tatu
s of
em
erge
ncy
wat
er tr
ucki
ng in
the
AS
AL
dist
ricts
of K
enya
WA
SH
no
rther
n, e
aste
rn, s
outh
-ea
ster
n an
d co
ast
KFS
SG
/WE
SC
OO
RD
Fe
brua
ry/A
ugus
t 20
10
Sho
rt an
d Lo
ng R
ain
Ass
essm
ent
WA
SH
A
SA
L di
stric
ts m
ainl
y in
the
north
, eas
t and
sou
th-e
ast
parts
of K
enya
UN
ICE
F an
d va
rious
pa
rtner
s S
ep 2
009
A re
view
of t
he s
tatu
s of
em
erge
ncy
wat
er tr
ucki
ng in
the
AS
AL
dist
ricts
of K
enya
Hea
lth
Nat
ionw
ide
MoH
and
par
tner
s 20
09- 2
012
Rev
ised
Ken
ya H
ealth
Pol
icy
Fram
ewor
k 19
94 -
2010
H
ealth
N
atio
nal
WH
O, M
oPH
S, M
oMS
20
09
Fact
s an
d fig
ures
Min
istry
of M
edic
al S
ervi
ces
Hea
lth
Nat
iona
l N
atio
nal S
tatis
tical
S
ervi
ce
K
enya
Dem
ogra
phic
and
Hea
lth S
urve
y 20
08 -
2009
Hea
lth
Cou
ntry
wid
e W
HO
and
Min
istri
es o
f H
ealth
20
09 -2
013
Cou
ntry
Coo
pera
tion
Stra
tegy
Hea
lth
Cou
ntry
wid
e W
HO
and
par
tner
s 20
09 -2
013
UN
DA
F H
ealth
C
ount
ryw
ide
WH
O a
nd p
artn
ers
2007
- 201
2 N
atio
nal H
ealth
Sec
tor S
trate
gic
plan
H
ealth
C
ount
ry w
ide
WH
O a
nd p
artn
ers
2010
K
enya
Wee
kly
Epi
dem
iolo
gica
l Rep
orts
- M
oPH
S
Hea
lth
Coa
st P
rovi
nce
WH
O a
nd p
rovi
ncia
l he
alth
team
O
5- 2
010
Rap
id h
ealth
ass
essm
ent o
f the
cho
lera
situ
atio
n in
M
sam
bwen
i, K
ilind
i and
Mom
bass
a di
stric
ts
Hea
lth
Turk
ana
and
Pok
ot D
istri
cts
WV
K a
nd D
HM
Ts
03 –
10,
201
0 C
hole
ra ri
sk fa
ctor
ana
lysi
s in
the
Turk
ana
and
Pok
ot
dist
ricts
H
ealth
S
outh
-eas
tern
pro
vinc
e A
DE
O a
nd D
HM
Ts
03 –
10,
201
0 C
hole
ra ri
sk fa
ctor
ana
lysi
s in
the
Turk
ana
and
Pok
ot
dist
ricts
H
ealth
W
ajir
and
man
dera
regi
on
WH
O a
nd M
ERLI
N
01 a
nd 0
5 20
10
Ear
ly w
arni
ng s
yste
ms
in W
ajir
and
Man
dera
dis
trict
s
KE
NY
A
66
CU
RR
ENT
GA
PS IN
INFO
RM
ATI
ON
C
lust
er
Geo
grap
hica
l are
as a
nd p
opul
atio
n gr
oups
on
whi
ch in
form
atio
n is
lack
ing
E
duca
tion
Edu
catio
n st
atus
in th
e ur
ban
info
rmal
set
tlem
ents
of N
airo
bi, E
ldor
et a
nd K
isum
u W
AS
H
Info
rmat
ion
on w
ater
sup
ply
acce
ss, h
ygie
ne a
nd s
anita
tion
prac
tices
of p
eri-u
rban
are
as re
curr
ently
affe
cted
by
chol
era
Hea
lth
Lack
of a
dequ
ate
Hea
lth s
ecto
r, an
d st
aff c
apac
ity in
the
arid
and
sem
i-arid
are
as d
ue to
hig
h st
aff a
ttriti
on
Hea
lth
Poo
r dat
a on
acc
essi
bilit
y to
hea
lth b
y th
e ur
ban
slum
dw
elle
rs in
Nai
robi
and
oth
er la
rger
tow
ns
Food
C
ompr
ehen
sive
Foo
d S
ecur
ity a
nd N
utrit
ion
Bas
elin
e A
sses
smen
t in
all m
ajor
citi
es/to
wns
in K
enya
(car
ried
out i
n 20
10, f
indi
ngs
still
pen
ding
)
Clu
ster
G
eogr
aphi
c ar
eas
and
popu
latio
n gr
oups
ta
rget
ed
Lead
Age
ncy
and
Part
ners
D
ate
Title
or S
ubje
ct
Pro
tect
ion
Nor
th a
nd S
outh
Rift
Val
ley,
no
rth-e
aste
rn a
nd e
aste
rn
prov
ince
s
Lead
: UN
HC
R, P
artn
ers:
N
CC
K, U
NIC
EF, I
OM
, O
XFA
M-G
B, H
elpa
ge
Inte
rnat
iona
l, IR
C, D
RC
, S
C, K
ituo
Cha
She
ria,
CW
SK
, KN
CH
R
In
ter-a
genc
y ra
pid
asse
ssm
ent o
f GB
V d
urin
g P
EV
in
Ken
ya, 2
008;
IOM
’s c
ount
er tr
affic
king
cam
paig
n ev
alua
tion
repo
rt (J
une
2010
); IO
M’s
rapi
d as
sess
men
ts a
mon
g pa
stor
alis
t dro
pout
s an
d ID
Ps
in K
akum
a an
d G
aris
sa
(200
9); M
oSS
P ID
P S
tatu
s br
ief J
uly
30th
201
0; H
elpa
ge
Inte
rnat
iona
l, “A
frica
Reg
iona
l Dev
elop
men
t Cen
tre,
“Tur
kana
Dis
trict
Rap
id A
sses
smen
t on
Issu
es o
f Old
er
Peo
ple”
, Nai
robi
, 200
9; A
mne
sty
Inte
rnat
iona
l, “In
secu
rity
and
Dig
nity
: Wom
en’s
exp
erie
nces
in th
e sl
ums
of N
airo
bi,
Ken
ya”,
UK
, 201
0; K
ituo
Cha
She
ria, “
Nai
robi
Fac
t Fin
ding
by
the
Pea
ce, J
ustic
e an
d R
econ
cilia
tion
Pro
ject
- 9-1
9 M
arch
, 201
0”, N
airo
bi, 2
010;
Myr
um, W
ard
and
Mar
sh,
2008
. A
Rap
id A
sses
smen
t of G
ende
r-ba
sed
Vio
lenc
e du
ring
the
PE
V in
Ken
ya, c
ondu
cted
Jan
uary
– F
ebru
ary
2008
; DR
C m
onth
ly m
onito
ring
repo
rts in
Mol
o an
d K
ures
oi
2010
; NC
CK
: N
CC
K p
rogr
ess
repo
rt (J
anua
ry to
Jun
e
NC
CK
Gen
eral
Ass
embl
y re
port,
Aug
ust 2
010;
NC
CK
Sou
th ri
ft pr
otec
tion
mon
itorin
g re
port
(Jun
e-D
ecem
ber
2009
); N
CC
K ch
ild p
rote
ctio
n re
port
title
d “o
ur c
hild
ren
our
hope
" (M
ay 2
008-
Dec
embe
r 200
8); N
CC
K S
outh
rift
reco
ncilia
tion
proj
ect p
ropo
sal (
2009
); K
NC
HR
mon
thly
fiel
d m
onito
ring
mis
sion
s in
201
0; U
NH
CR
mon
thly
pro
tect
ion
wor
king
gro
up re
ports
Fo
od A
id
Arid
and
Sem
i-Arid
Lan
ds o
f K
enya
(AS
AL)
K
FSS
G
Feb
2011
S
hort
Rai
ns A
sses
smen
t (to
be
upda
ted
whe
n Lo
ng R
ains
A
sses
smen
t is
com
plet
ed in
end
Jul
y/A
ugus
t 201
1)
KE
NY
A
67
PLA
NN
ED N
EED
S A
SSES
SMEN
TS
Clu
ster
G
eogr
aphi
cal A
reas
and
Po
pula
tion
Gro
ups
Targ
eted
Le
ad A
genc
y an
d Pa
rtne
rs
Subj
ect a
nd P
lann
ed D
ate
Fund
ing
Nee
ded
(Am
ount
) an
d to
be
Fund
ed b
y (if
Id
entif
ied)
($
) E
duca
tion
Urb
an in
form
al s
ettle
men
ts o
f N
airo
bi, E
ldor
et a
nd K
isum
u.
UN
ICE
F an
d pa
rtner
s B
y en
d of
201
1 15
,000
fund
ed b
y U
NIC
EF
WA
SH
Per
i-urb
an c
hole
ra-a
ffect
ed a
reas
of
nor
th-e
aste
rn p
rovi
nces
, N
yanz
a, w
este
rn, a
nd c
oast
pr
ovin
ces.
UN
ICE
F, M
oWI a
nd
othe
r par
tner
s
Asse
ssm
ent o
n W
ater
sup
ply
acce
ss,
sani
tatio
n an
d hy
gien
e pr
actic
es.
To b
e do
ne
by e
nd o
f 201
1.
120,
000
WA
SH
Dis
trict
s w
ith re
curr
ent c
hole
ra in
no
rth-e
aste
rn p
rovi
nces
, Nya
nza,
co
ast,
wes
tern
, and
Rift
Val
ley
prov
ince
s.
UN
ICE
F, M
oPH
, MoW
I an
d ot
her p
artn
ers
Ass
essm
ent o
n ef
fect
iven
ess
of c
hole
ra
com
mun
icat
ion
stra
tegy
and
hou
seho
ld w
ater
tre
atm
ent i
nter
vent
ions
. To
be
done
by
end
of
2011
.
110,
000
WA
SH
N
orth
-eas
tern
pro
vinc
es, N
yanz
a,
wes
tern
, coa
st, a
nd R
ift V
alle
y pr
ovin
ces.
UN
ICE
F, M
oWI a
nd
othe
r par
tner
s
Rap
id a
sses
smen
t on
syst
em fu
nctio
nalit
y an
d ef
fect
iven
ess
of w
ater
sup
ply
man
agem
ent o
f W
S s
yste
ms
com
plet
ed 2
009/
2010
. To
be
done
by
end
of 2
011.
120,
000
Hea
lth
Arid
and
sem
i-arid
are
as a
nd
urba
n sl
ums.
W
HO
, MoP
H, p
artn
ers
Vul
nera
bilit
y an
d R
isk
Ana
lysi
s an
d M
appi
ng
160,
000
FOO
D
Arid
and
sem
i-arid
land
s of
K
enya
(AS
AL)
. K
FSS
G
Long
Rai
ns A
sses
smen
t – J
uly/
Aug
201
1 S
hort
Rai
ns A
sses
smen
t – F
eb 2
012.
15
0,00
0 (S
RA
) +
(150
,000
LR
A)
KE
NY
A
68
AN
NEX
I:
LIST
OF
PRO
JEC
TS A
ND
FU
ND
ING
TA
BLE
S
Tabl
e IV
: Li
st o
f app
eal p
roje
cts
(gro
uped
by
clus
ter)
, with
fund
ing
stat
us o
f eac
h
2011
+ Ke
nya
Em
erge
ncy
Hum
anita
rian
Res
pons
e P
lan
as o
f 30
June
201
1 ht
tp://
fts.u
noch
a.or
g
Com
pile
d by
OC
HA
on th
e ba
sis
of in
form
atio
n pr
ovid
ed b
y do
nors
and
app
ealin
g or
gani
zatio
ns.
Proj
ect c
ode
Title
A
ppea
ling
agen
cy
Orig
inal
re
quire
men
ts($
)
Rev
ised
re
quire
men
ts($
)
Fund
ing
($)
Unm
et
requ
irem
ent
s
($)
%
Cov
ered
Pr
iorit
y
AG
RIC
ULT
UR
E A
ND
LIV
ESTO
CK
KEN
-11/
A/3
6911
/558
7 S
uppo
rt liv
elih
oods
to b
uild
resi
lienc
e th
roug
h liv
esto
ck in
terv
entio
n an
d ca
sh in
ject
ion
VS
F (G
erm
any)
50
0,00
050
0,00
025
0,00
025
0,00
050
%
HIG
H
KEN
-11/
A/3
6986
/505
9 P
asto
ralis
ts a
nd a
gro-
past
oral
ists
food
sec
urity
and
liv
elih
oods
enh
ance
men
t C
hr. A
id
600,
000
600,
000
-60
0,00
00%
H
IGH
KEN
-11/
A/3
7001
/R/5
167
Stre
ngth
enin
g C
omm
unity
Man
aged
Dro
ught
Ris
k R
educ
tion
in N
orth
ern
Ken
ya
CO
OP
I 60
0,00
060
0,00
015
0,00
045
0,00
025
%
HIG
H
KEN
-11/
A/3
7003
/R/5
167
Sup
port
to a
gric
ultu
ral p
rodu
ctio
n an
d po
st h
arve
st
man
agem
ent f
or im
prov
ed fo
od s
ecur
ity in
Sou
th-
east
ern
mar
gina
l D
istri
cts
of K
enya
(Eas
tern
P
rovi
nce)
CO
OP
I 1,
868,
760
1,86
8,76
0-
1,86
8,76
00%
H
IGH
KEN
-11/
A/3
7016
/645
8 Li
veho
ods
supp
ort p
rogr
am to
the
past
oral
ist
com
mun
ities
of E
ast P
okot
, Sam
buru
and
Sou
th
Turk
ana
Dis
trict
s A
CTE
D
416,
732
416,
732
416,
732
-10
0%
HIG
H
KEN
-11/
A/3
7018
/511
0 E
nhan
cing
fodd
er p
rodu
ctio
n, a
vaila
bilit
y an
d ac
cess
ibilit
y in
Nor
th E
aste
rn P
rovi
nce
VS
F (S
witz
erla
nd)
520,
000
520,
000
-52
0,00
00%
H
IGH
KEN
-11/
A/3
7019
/511
0 E
nhan
cing
food
sec
urity
of h
ouse
hold
s w
ith m
al-
nour
ishe
d ch
ildre
n th
roug
h in
crea
sed
avai
labi
lity
of
anim
al p
rodu
cts
VS
F (S
witz
erla
nd)
700,
000
700,
000
-70
0,00
00%
H
IGH
KEN
-11/
A/3
7060
/R/1
4455
P
rom
otio
n of
sus
tain
able
food
sec
urity
in M
beer
e D
istri
ct;
Evu
rore
Div
isio
n th
roug
h us
e of
inno
vativ
e an
d lo
caliz
ed te
chno
logi
es
ZAF
403,
100
282,
170
-28
2,17
00%
H
IGH
KEN
-11/
A/3
7066
/R/1
23
Coo
rdin
atio
n of
Agr
icul
ture
and
Liv
esto
ck s
ecto
r hu
man
itaria
n fo
od s
ecur
ity a
nd li
velih
ood
inte
rven
tions
FA
O
6,30
0,00
02,
738,
114
2,73
8,11
4-
100%
H
IGH
KEN
-11/
A/3
7075
/512
0 E
mer
genc
y A
nim
al D
esto
ckin
g in
Tur
kana
Nor
th
and
Wes
t O
XFA
M G
B
200,
000
200,
000
-20
0,00
00%
H
IGH
KEN
-11/
A/3
7101
/R/1
23
Enh
ance
d fo
od s
ecur
ity th
roug
h im
prov
ed p
ost
harv
est h
andl
ing
and
stor
age
by v
ulne
rabl
e ho
useh
olds
in th
e m
argi
nal a
gric
ultu
ral a
reas
of
Ken
ya
FAO
92
6,40
01,
126,
400
-1,
126,
400
0%
HIG
H
KE
NY
A
69
Proj
ect c
ode
Title
A
ppea
ling
agen
cy
Orig
inal
re
quire
men
ts($
)
Rev
ised
re
quire
men
ts($
)
Fund
ing
($)
Unm
et
requ
irem
ent
s
($)
%
Cov
ered
Pr
iorit
y
KEN
-11/
A/3
7438
/298
Li
velih
oods
Rec
over
y to
Miti
gate
Env
ironm
enta
l D
egra
datio
n an
d C
limat
e C
hang
e Im
pact
s in
N
orth
ern
Ken
ya
IOM
2,
380,
000
2,38
0,00
018
0,00
12,
199,
999
8%
HIG
H
KEN
-11/
A/3
7772
/518
6 Li
velih
oods
sup
port
and
prot
ectio
n to
incr
ease
the
resi
lienc
e of
vul
nera
ble
hous
ehol
ds a
nd
com
mun
ities
A
CF
950,
000
950,
000
150,
000
800,
000
16%
M
ED
IUM
KEN
-11/
A/3
8078
/558
7 Fo
od s
ecur
ity, d
isas
ter r
espo
nse
and
prep
ared
ness
ac
tion
for p
asto
ralis
t com
mun
ities
V
SF
(Ger
man
y)
500,
000
500,
000
150,
000
350,
000
30%
H
IGH
KEN
-11/
A/4
1980
/R/6
458
Live
lihoo
d su
ppor
t to
(agr
o) p
asto
ral c
omm
uniti
es o
f W
est P
okot
A
CTE
D
-31
6,86
0-
316,
860
0%
HIG
H
KEN
-11/
A/4
2465
/R/1
23
Sup
port
to p
rote
ctin
g an
d re
build
ing
of li
vest
ock
asse
ts (d
isea
se c
ontro
l, fe
ed p
rovi
sion
and
wat
er
prov
isio
n, d
esto
ckin
g)
FAO
-
6,50
0,00
0-
6,50
0,00
00%
H
IGH
KEN
-11/
A/4
2466
/R/1
23
Sup
port
to c
rop
prod
uctio
n ac
tiviti
es in
clud
ing
seed
pr
ovis
ion
of d
roug
ht to
lera
nt c
rops
and
bul
king
, pr
omot
ion
of im
prov
ed te
chno
logi
es, c
omm
unity
se
ed p
rodu
ctio
n, c
rop
dive
rsifi
catio
n, p
ost h
arve
st
hand
ling
and
stor
age
and
mar
ket l
inka
ges
FAO
-
3,62
4,00
0-
3,62
4,00
00%
H
IGH
KEN
-11/
A/4
2467
/R/1
23
Sup
port
to a
ctiv
ities
that
enh
ance
com
mun
ity
resi
lienc
e th
roug
h w
ater
har
vest
ing,
soi
l and
wat
er
cons
erva
tion,
and
pro
mot
ion
of s
mal
l sca
le ir
rigat
ion
FAO
-
4,60
0,00
0-
4,60
0,00
00%
H
IGH
KEN
-11/
A/4
2469
/R/1
23
Sup
port
early
war
ning
, foo
d se
curit
y in
form
atio
n an
d co
ordi
natio
n FA
O
-2,
610,
000
-2,
610,
000
0%
HIG
H
KEN
-11/
A/4
2471
/R/1
23
Pro
mot
e ur
ban
and
peri-
urba
n ag
ricul
ture
FA
O
-2,
120,
000
-2,
120,
000
0%
HIG
H
Sub
tota
l for
AG
RIC
ULT
UR
E A
ND
LIV
ESTO
CK
16
,864
,992
33,1
53,0
364,
034,
847
29,1
18,1
8912
%
CO
OR
DIN
ATI
ON
KEN
-11/
CSS
/380
15/R
/119
H
uman
itaria
n C
oord
inat
ion
and
Adv
ocac
y in
Ken
ya
OC
HA
2,
094,
100
2,08
5,53
078
4,65
21,
300,
878
38%
H
IGH
Sub
tota
l for
CO
OR
DIN
ATI
ON
2,
094,
100
2,08
5,53
078
4,65
21,
300,
878
38%
EAR
LY R
ECO
VER
Y
KEN
-11/
A/3
7151
/R/5
536
Impr
ovin
g ac
cess
to f
ood
secu
rity
of v
ulne
rabl
e ho
useh
olds
hea
ded
by o
lder
men
and
wom
en in
Tu
rkan
a di
stric
t
Hel
pAge
In
tern
atio
nal
335,
514
335,
514
-33
5,51
40%
H
IGH
KEN
-11/
ER/3
6976
/R/7
76
Stre
ngth
enin
g G
over
nanc
e S
truct
ure
for D
isas
ter
Pre
pare
dnes
s an
d R
espo
nse
UN
DP
65
7,70
065
7,70
0-
657,
700
0%
HIG
H
KEN
-11/
ER/3
7070
/512
0 E
mer
genc
y C
ash
for W
ork
in T
urka
na N
orth
and
W
est
OX
FAM
GB
1,
250,
000
1,25
0,00
0-
1,25
0,00
00%
H
IGH
KE
NY
A
70
Proj
ect c
ode
Title
A
ppea
ling
agen
cy
Orig
inal
re
quire
men
ts($
)
Rev
ised
re
quire
men
ts($
)
Fund
ing
($)
Unm
et
requ
irem
ent
s
($)
%
Cov
ered
Pr
iorit
y
KEN
-11/
ER/3
7115
/578
9 R
econ
cilia
tion
and
Vio
lenc
e P
reve
ntio
n in
the
Cen
tral R
ift-V
alle
y
Dia
koni
e E
mer
genc
y A
id
231,
142
231,
142
-23
1,14
20%
H
IGH
KEN
-11/
ER/3
7130
/857
1 In
crea
se fo
od s
ecur
ity fo
r 20,
000
hous
ehol
ds
(120
,000
per
sons
) in
the
mar
gina
l far
min
g la
nds
of
Mw
ingi
dis
trict
, Eas
tern
pro
vinc
e
AD
RA
- K
enya
14
6,96
914
6,96
9-
146,
969
0%
HIG
H
KEN
-11/
ER/3
7134
/298
M
itiga
ting
reso
urce
bas
ed c
onfli
cts
amon
g pa
stor
alis
t, ho
st a
nd lo
cal c
omm
uniti
es in
nor
ther
n K
enya
thro
ugh
stre
ngth
enin
g yo
uth
capa
citie
s to
ad
apt t
o cl
imat
e ch
ange
IOM
2,
400,
000
2,40
0,00
02,
300,
000
100,
000
96%
H
IGH
KEN
-11/
ER/3
7158
/517
9 S
treng
then
ing
capa
city
of a
ctor
s fo
r inc
lusi
on o
f D
RR
app
roac
hes
in h
uman
itaria
n in
terv
entio
ns in
Tu
rkan
a an
d G
aris
sa c
ount
ies,
Ken
ya
IRC
26
0,00
026
0,00
0-
260,
000
0%
HIG
H
KEN
-11/
ER/3
7159
/779
0 R
educ
ing
wat
er g
athe
ring-
rela
ted
prot
ectio
n is
sues
an
d co
ntrib
utin
g to
pea
ce b
uild
ing
amon
g po
st-
conf
lict c
omm
uniti
es in
the
Sout
hern
Rift
Val
ley
GO
AL
564,
000
564,
000
-56
4,00
00%
M
ED
IUM
KEN
-11/
ER/3
7164
/843
2 E
arly
reco
very
resp
onse
act
ions
for c
omm
uniti
es in
N
arok
Dis
trict
, A
DE
O
349,
625
349,
625
-34
9,62
50%
H
IGH
KEN
-11/
ER/3
7686
/850
2 E
nhan
cing
Res
ilienc
e of
Pas
tora
lists
and
Agr
o-pa
stor
alis
ts in
Dro
ught
/ Fl
oods
Pro
ne C
omm
uniti
es
of B
arin
go, T
ana,
Tav
eta-
Voi
and
Nya
tike
WV
I 77
6,00
077
6,00
0-
776,
000
0%
HIG
H
KEN
-11/
ER/4
1852
/R/1
4414
Im
prov
ing
Food
Pro
duct
ion
and
livel
ihoo
ds In
Ker
io
Val
ley
Mar
akw
et D
istri
ct
CH
RiG
-
622,
800
-62
2,80
00%
H
IGH
KEN
-11/
ER/4
2575
/R/1
4792
E
mpo
wer
men
t of t
he m
ost v
ulne
rabl
e m
embe
rs o
f th
e co
mm
unity
. H
CF
-73
9,76
2-
739,
762
0%
HIG
H
Sub
tota
l for
EA
RLY
REC
OVE
RY
6,
970,
950
8,33
3,51
22,
300,
000
6,03
3,51
228
%
EDU
CA
TIO
N
KEN
-11/
E/37
074/
R/1
24
Sup
port
the
Min
istry
of E
duca
tion
in th
e Im
plem
enta
tion
of E
mer
genc
y E
duca
tion
Pre
pare
dene
ss a
nd R
espo
nse
Pla
n U
NIC
EF
676,
100
676,
100
518,
939
157,
161
77%
H
IGH
KEN
-11/
E/37
985/
6079
E
duca
tion
in E
mer
genc
ies
Cap
acity
Dev
elop
men
t fo
r Dis
trict
Sta
keho
lder
s an
d C
hild
ren
in K
enya
S
C
360,
360
360,
360
-36
0,36
00%
M
ED
IUM
Sub
tota
l for
ED
UC
ATI
ON
1,
036,
460
1,03
6,46
051
8,93
951
7,52
150
%
FOO
D A
ID
KEN
-11/
F/37
094/
5120
Fo
od S
ecur
ity C
risis
Inte
rven
tion,
Rec
over
y an
d D
evel
opm
ent i
n U
rban
Info
rmal
Set
tlem
ents
of
Nai
robi
O
XFA
M G
B
711,
740
711,
740
711,
740
-10
0%
ME
DIU
M
KEN
-11/
F/37
111/
5167
Fo
od S
ecur
ity fo
r Vul
nera
ble
Slu
m D
wel
lers
in
Mat
hare
Val
ley,
Nai
robi
C
OO
PI
428,
000
428,
000
-42
8,00
00%
M
ED
IUM
KE
NY
A
71
Proj
ect c
ode
Title
A
ppea
ling
agen
cy
Orig
inal
re
quire
men
ts($
)
Rev
ised
re
quire
men
ts($
)
Fund
ing
($)
Unm
et
requ
irem
ent
s
($)
%
Cov
ered
Pr
iorit
y
KEN
-11/
F/37
136/
R/5
61
Pro
tect
ing
and
Reb
uild
ing
Live
lihoo
ds in
the
Arid
an
d S
emi A
rid A
reas
of K
enya
W
FP
104,
726,
973
128,
359,
989
136,
257,
373
(7,8
97,3
84)
106%
H
IGH
KEN
-11/
F/38
281/
5179
M
itiga
ting
Hun
ger f
or th
e U
rban
Poo
r in
Nai
robi
IR
C
450,
000
450,
000
-45
0,00
00%
M
ED
IUM
Sub
tota
l for
FO
OD
AID
10
6,31
6,71
312
9,94
9,72
913
6,96
9,11
3(7
,019
,384
)10
5%
HEA
LTH
KEN
-11/
H/3
7120
/R/2
98
Pro
visi
on o
f em
erge
ncy
and
mid
-term
ass
ista
nce
to
stre
ngth
en p
repa
redn
ess
and
resp
onse
to c
hole
ra
affe
cted
are
as o
f Tur
kana
Cou
nty,
Pok
ot W
est
Cou
nty
and
Mar
sabi
t Cou
nty
thro
ugh
com
preh
ensi
ve H
ealth
and
WAS
H a
ppro
ach
IOM
1,
343,
103
1,34
3,10
3-
1,34
3,10
30%
H
IGH
KEN
-11/
H/3
7160
/517
9 M
ater
nal a
nd c
hild
mor
talit
y in
Tur
kana
and
Wes
t P
okot
Dis
trict
s IR
C
300,
000
300,
000
-30
0,00
00%
M
ED
IUM
KEN
-11/
H/3
7384
/843
2 A
cces
s to
hea
lth s
ervi
ces
in D
isas
ter a
ffect
ed
com
mun
ities
in K
ajia
do a
nd N
arok
Cou
ntie
s A
DE
O
162,
750
162,
750
-16
2,75
00%
H
IGH
KEN
-11/
H/3
7703
/R/1
24
Em
erge
ncy
Res
pons
e to
vul
nera
ble
child
ren
and
wom
en in
Nor
th E
aste
rn, N
orth
Rift
Val
ley,
Upp
er
Eas
tern
, Nya
nza,
Wes
tern
, Coa
st P
rovi
nces
and
in
form
al s
ettle
men
ts o
f Nai
robi
UN
ICEF
2,
000,
900
2,00
0,90
01,
115,
904
884,
996
56%
H
IGH
KEN
-11/
H/3
7779
/519
5 E
mer
genc
y H
ealth
Car
e fo
r dro
ught
affe
cted
co
mm
uniti
es in
Tur
kana
, Rift
Val
ley
Pro
vinc
e, N
orth
W
este
rn K
enya
M
ER
LIN
60
5,62
060
5,62
0-
605,
620
0%
HIG
H
KEN
-11/
H/3
7821
/R/1
22
Em
erge
ncy
resp
onse
to d
isas
ters
, cho
lera
and
ot
her d
isea
ses
outb
reak
s
WH
O
6,30
7,50
46,
766,
525
-6,
766,
525
0%
HIG
H
KEN
-11/
H/3
7871
/607
9 E
mer
genc
y he
alth
resp
onse
for v
ulne
rabl
e po
pula
tion
in d
isas
ter p
rone
Waj
ir an
d M
ande
ra
dist
ricts
, with
a s
peci
al fo
cus
on c
hild
ren,
pre
gnan
t an
d la
ctat
ing
wom
en.
SC
1,
011,
555
1,01
1,55
5-
1,01
1,55
50%
H
IGH
Sub
tota
l for
HEA
LTH
11
,731
,432
12,1
90,4
531,
115,
904
11,0
74,5
499%
MU
LTI-S
ECTO
R A
SSIS
TAN
CE
TO R
EFU
GEE
S
KEN
-11/
E/37
648/
R/1
24
Sup
porti
ng E
duca
tion
in D
adaa
b R
efug
ee C
amp
and
Hos
t Com
mun
ities
U
NIC
EF
626,
300
627,
155
481,
489
145,
666
77%
H
IGH
KEN
-11/
ER/3
7705
/607
9 Fr
esh
Food
Vou
cher
Pro
ject
, Dad
aab
Ref
ugee
C
amps
S
C
769,
125
769,
125
493,
197
275,
928
64%
M
ED
IUM
KEN
-11/
F/37
173/
R/5
61
Food
Ass
ista
nce
to S
omal
i and
Sud
anes
e R
efug
ees
in K
enya
W
FP
100,
527,
286
91,2
01,0
6676
,471
,980
14,7
29,0
8684
%
HIG
H
KEN
-11/
H/3
7157
/517
9 P
rovi
sion
of B
asic
Ess
entia
l Hea
lth S
ervi
ces
for
Kak
uma
and
Hag
ader
a R
efug
ees
IRC
4,
920,
000
4,92
0,00
02,
300,
000
2,62
0,00
047
%
HIG
H
KE
NY
A
72
Proj
ect c
ode
Title
A
ppea
ling
agen
cy
Orig
inal
re
quire
men
ts($
)
Rev
ised
re
quire
men
ts($
)
Fund
ing
($)
Unm
et
requ
irem
ent
s
($)
%
Cov
ered
Pr
iorit
y
KEN
-11/
H/3
8103
/R/1
22
Em
erge
ncy
resp
onse
sup
port
to H
ealth
Sec
tor
Par
tner
s in
the
two
refu
gee
cam
ps a
nd h
ost
com
mun
ities
W
HO
69
6,54
569
6,54
514
3,74
455
2,80
121
%
HIG
H
KEN
-11/
MS/
3711
2/29
8 P
rom
otin
g pr
otec
tion
and
assi
stan
ce fo
r ref
ugee
an
d ho
st c
omm
uniti
es in
Nor
ther
n K
enya
and
urb
an
setti
ngs
thro
ugh
coun
ter t
raffi
ckin
g ef
forts
and
ps
ycho
soci
al a
ssis
tanc
e.
IOM
1,
429,
126
1,42
9,12
6-
1,42
9,12
60%
M
ED
IUM
KEN
-11/
MS/
3712
1/R
/516
7 E
mer
genc
y W
AS
H in
terv
entio
ns a
nd L
ivel
ihoo
d A
ssis
tanc
e to
Ref
ugee
s an
d H
ost c
omm
uniti
es.
CO
OP
I 1,
207,
981
1,20
7,98
1-
1,20
7,98
10%
M
ED
IUM
KEN
-11/
MS/
3747
7/60
79
Com
preh
ensi
ve C
hild
Pro
tect
ion
Pre
vent
ion
and
Res
pons
e S
ervi
ces
to b
oys
and
girls
in th
e D
adaa
b R
efug
ee C
amps
and
Hos
t Com
mun
ity
SC
27
6,00
027
6,00
0-
276,
000
0%
HIG
H
KEN
-11/
MS/
3819
0/R
/120
P
rote
ctio
n an
d A
ssis
tanc
e to
refu
gees
, asy
lum
se
eker
s an
d st
atel
ess
peop
le in
Ken
ya
UN
HC
R
212,
735,
653
229,
871,
621
42,2
53,9
5218
7,61
7,66
918
%
HIG
H
KEN
-11/
MS/
3822
1/R
/550
2 K
akum
a R
efug
ee C
amp
Car
e an
d M
aint
enan
ce
Ass
ista
nce
Pro
ject
LW
F 4,
900,
000
1,52
1,50
01,
521,
500
-10
0%
ME
DIU
M
KEN
-11/
MS/
3822
5/R
/550
2 S
omal
i Ref
ugee
s A
ssis
tanc
e in
Dad
aab
Ref
ugee
C
amps
LW
F 4,
500,
000
1,52
1,50
01,
521,
000
500
100%
H
IGH
KEN
-11/
P-H
R-R
L/37
048/
124
Chi
ld P
rote
ctio
n in
Dad
aab
Ref
ugee
Cam
p an
d H
ost C
omm
unity
U
NIC
EF
674,
100
674,
100
-67
4,10
00%
H
IGH
KEN
-11/
WS/
3710
9/51
20
Upg
rade
and
exp
ansi
on o
f wat
er a
nd s
anita
tion
infra
stru
ctur
e, D
adaa
b re
fuge
e ca
mp
OX
FAM
GB
5,
000,
000
5,00
0,00
0-
5,00
0,00
00%
H
IGH
KEN
-11/
WS/
3716
7/51
81
Impr
ovin
g hy
gien
e an
d en
viro
nmen
tal s
anita
tion
stan
dard
s in
Ifo
II re
fuge
e ca
mp
in D
adaa
b.
DR
C
898,
472
898,
472
-89
8,47
20%
M
ED
IUM
Sub
tota
l for
MU
LTI-S
ECTO
R A
SSIS
TAN
CE
TO R
EFU
GEE
S
339,
160,
588
340,
614,
191
125,
186,
862
215,
427,
329
37%
NU
TRIT
ION
KEN
-11/
H/3
7107
/R/8
058
Enh
ance
d E
ssen
tial N
utrit
ion
Serv
ices
at h
ealth
fa
cilit
y an
d co
mm
unity
leve
l in
Nor
th E
aste
rn-
Ken
ya ,
Man
dera
Eas
t and
Nor
th,W
ajir
Nor
th a
nd
Wes
t
IRW
1,
640,
000
1,80
4,36
0-
1,80
4,36
00%
H
IGH
KEN
-11/
H/3
7140
/R/5
61
Bla
nket
Sup
plem
enta
ry F
eedi
ng P
rogr
amm
e fo
r bo
ys a
nd g
irls
less
than
five
yea
rs, a
nd w
omen
(p
regn
ant a
nd la
ctat
ing)
W
FP
3,85
4,36
824
,934
,749
-24
,934
,749
0%
HIG
H
KEN
-11/
H/3
7430
/R/8
497
Sup
port
the
Min
istry
of P
ublic
Hea
lth a
nd S
anita
tion
(MO
PH
S) a
nd M
inis
try o
f Med
ical
Ser
vice
s (M
OM
S)
in D
eliv
ery
of h
igh
impa
ct n
utrit
ion
inte
rven
tion
at
the
heal
th fa
cilit
ies
and
com
mun
ity le
vel o
f the
la
rger
Mar
sabi
t Dis
trict
FH
348,
680
431,
200
-43
1,20
00%
H
IGH
KEN
-11/
H/3
7604
/517
9 R
educ
ing
child
hood
mal
nutri
tion
in a
rid a
nd s
emi
arid
dis
trict
s in
Ken
ya: T
urka
na N
orth
, Loi
ma
and
Fafi
Dis
trict
. IR
C
850,
000
850,
000
-85
0,00
00%
H
IGH
KE
NY
A
73
Proj
ect c
ode
Title
A
ppea
ling
agen
cy
Orig
inal
re
quire
men
ts($
)
Rev
ised
re
quire
men
ts($
)
Fund
ing
($)
Unm
et
requ
irem
ent
s
($)
%
Cov
ered
Pr
iorit
y
KEN
-11/
H/3
7685
/R/5
195
Nut
ritio
n su
ppor
t for
dro
ught
affe
cted
pas
tora
l co
mm
uniti
es in
Tur
kana
, Rift
Val
ley
Pro
vinc
e of
K
enya
M
ER
LIN
74
0,56
51,
040,
565
307,
044
733,
521
30%
H
IGH
KEN
-11/
H/3
7702
/607
9 S
calin
g up
ess
entia
l nut
ritio
n ac
tions
in W
ajir
and
Man
dera
Dis
trict
s S
C
2,81
7,37
52,
817,
375
657,
030
2,16
0,34
523
%
HIG
H
KEN
-11/
H/3
7749
/849
8 S
cale
–up
of H
igh
Impa
ct N
utrit
ion
Inte
rven
tions
for
Impr
oved
Nut
ritio
n in
Urb
an S
lum
s of
Nai
robi
and
K
isum
u C
W
1,18
0,83
41,
180,
834
510,
000
670,
834
43%
H
IGH
KEN
-11/
H/3
7765
/849
8 S
cale
-up
of H
igh
Impa
ct In
terv
entio
ns fo
r Chi
ldre
n an
d W
omen
in M
oyal
e an
d S
olol
o D
istri
cts
CW
55
0,31
055
0,31
0-
550,
310
0%
HIG
H
KEN
-11/
H/3
7768
/518
6 S
calin
g up
of h
igh
impa
ct n
utrit
ion
inte
rven
tions
in
Gar
batu
lla d
istri
ct
AC
F 45
0,00
045
0,00
0-
450,
000
0%
HIG
H
KEN
-11/
H/3
7770
/850
2 S
uppo
rt sc
ale
up h
igh
impa
ct n
utrit
ion
inte
rven
tions
fo
r chi
ldre
n un
der f
ive
and
preg
nant
and
lact
atin
g w
omen
in
Turk
ana,
Bar
ingo
and
Sam
buru
Dis
trict
s in
Ken
ya
WV
I 1,
823,
649
1,82
3,64
9-
1,82
3,64
90%
H
IGH
KEN
-11/
H/3
7771
/849
8 Im
prov
ing
Ava
ilabi
lity
and
Effe
ctiv
e D
eliv
ery
of
Nut
ritio
n S
ervi
ces
in K
ajia
do C
entra
l and
Loi
toki
tok
Dis
trict
s C
W
562,
000
562,
000
-56
2,00
00%
H
IGH
KEN
-11/
H/3
7777
/128
01
Inte
grat
ed E
mer
genc
y an
d P
repa
redn
ess
Nut
ritio
n S
uppo
rt P
rogr
am in
Kaj
iado
Cou
nty
ME
RC
Y-U
SA63
1,20
763
1,20
763
1,20
7-
100%
H
IGH
KEN
-11/
H/3
7873
/R/1
24
Res
pond
ing
to N
utrit
ion
in E
mer
genc
ies
in K
enya
U
NIC
EF
6,10
0,00
08,
750,
000
4,79
0,67
53,
959,
325
55%
H
IGH
KEN
-11/
H/4
2011
/R/5
186
Sca
ling
up o
f hig
h im
pact
nut
ritio
n in
terv
entio
ns in
th
e vu
lner
able
are
as o
f Wes
t Pok
ot c
ount
y of
Ken
y A
CF
-70
8,10
7-
708,
107
0%
HIG
H
KEN
-11/
H/4
2047
/R/5
61
Mat
erna
l and
Chi
ld H
ealth
and
Nut
ritio
n W
FP
-96
,165
-96
,165
0%
HIG
H
KEN
-11/
H/4
2051
/R/1
3107
E
nhan
ced
Hig
h Im
pact
Nut
ritio
n S
ervi
ces
at h
ealth
fa
cilit
y an
d co
mm
unity
leve
l S
ambu
ru, L
aiki
pia,
Ta
na R
iver
Isi
olo
and
Mer
u N
orth
dis
trict
s of
Ken
yaIM
C U
K
-99
6,46
6-
996,
466
0%
HIG
H
KEN
-11/
H/4
2099
/R/5
61
Sca
ling
up S
uppl
emen
tary
Fee
ding
Pro
gram
mes
for
boys
and
girl
s le
ss th
an fi
ve y
ears
, and
wom
en
(pre
gnan
t and
lact
atin
g)
WFP
-
8,06
7,28
2-
8,06
7,28
20%
H
IGH
Sub
tota
l for
NU
TRIT
ION
21
,548
,988
55,6
94,2
696,
895,
956
48,7
98,3
1312
%
PRO
TEC
TIO
N
KEN
-11/
P-H
R-R
L/37
047/
124
Chi
ld P
rote
ctio
n in
Em
erge
ncy
- Pre
vent
ion,
R
espo
nse,
and
Sys
tem
's D
evel
opm
ent
UN
ICEF
63
6,65
063
6,65
063
2,19
34,
457
99%
M
ED
IUM
KEN
-11/
P-H
R-
RL/
3709
6/13
095
Pro
tect
ion
mon
itorin
g, re
porti
ng a
nd re
spon
se fo
r in
tern
ally
dis
plac
ed p
eopl
e in
Rift
Val
ley
NC
CK
15
0,00
015
0,00
0-
150,
000
0%
ME
DIU
M
KE
NY
A
74
Proj
ect c
ode
Title
A
ppea
ling
agen
cy
Orig
inal
re
quire
men
ts($
)
Rev
ised
re
quire
men
ts($
)
Fund
ing
($)
Unm
et
requ
irem
ent
s
($)
%
Cov
ered
Pr
iorit
y
KEN
-11/
P-H
R-
RL/
3710
0/51
20
Act
Fas
t – A
ct L
ocal
ly:
Com
mun
ity D
riven
Con
flict
E
arly
War
ning
and
Res
pons
e P
roje
ct to
Pro
tect
C
omm
uniti
es a
gain
st E
scal
atin
g V
iole
nce
in
Con
flict
-pro
ne H
ot S
pots
OX
FAM
GB
52
7,05
052
7,05
0-
527,
050
0%
ME
DIU
M
KEN
-11/
P-H
R-R
L/37
114/
298
Enh
anci
ng p
rote
ctio
n an
d as
sist
ance
for w
omen
, gi
rls a
nd b
oys
vuln
erab
le to
traf
ficki
ng a
mon
g ID
P,
past
oral
ist a
nd p
eri-u
rban
mig
rant
com
mun
ities
th
roug
h ca
paci
ty b
uild
ing
and
psyc
hoso
cial
as
sist
ance
IOM
1,
083,
741
1,08
3,74
1-
1,08
3,74
10%
M
ED
IUM
KEN
-11/
P-H
R-R
L/37
128/
120
Stre
ngth
en th
e P
WG
ID w
ork
thro
ugh
enha
nced
pr
otec
tion
mon
itorin
g, c
oord
inat
ion,
adv
ocac
y an
d ca
paci
ty b
uild
ing
with
a v
iew
of a
chie
ving
dur
able
so
lutio
ns to
dis
plac
emen
t pro
blem
s in
Ken
ya
UN
HC
R
470,
586
470,
586
-47
0,58
60%
M
ED
IUM
KEN
-11/
P-H
R-
RL/
3715
0/R
/553
6 P
rote
ctin
g ol
der m
en a
nd w
omen
affe
cted
by
chro
nic
drou
ght a
nd p
ost e
lect
ion
viol
ence
in
Turk
ana
dist
rict t
hrou
gh a
ge fr
iend
ly s
ervi
ces
Hel
pAge
In
tern
atio
nal
273,
444
273,
444
-27
3,44
40%
M
ED
IUM
KEN
-11/
P-H
R-
RL/
3715
5/51
79
Stre
ngth
enin
g G
BV
resp
onse
in N
airo
bi
IRC
70
0,00
070
0,00
0-
700,
000
0%
ME
DIU
M
KEN
-11/
P-H
R-
RL/
3716
1/R
/518
1
Pro
mot
ing
dura
ble
solu
tions
for r
etur
ning
dis
plac
ed
wom
en, g
irls,
boy
s m
en a
nd c
ount
erpa
rt re
side
nt
com
mun
ities
thro
ugh
advo
cacy
and
pro
tect
ion
activ
ities
.
DR
C
515,
575
650,
720
-65
0,72
00%
M
ED
IUM
KEN
-11/
P-H
R-
RL/
3716
3/13
116
Bui
ld a
nd s
treng
then
sys
tem
s fo
r em
erge
ncy
prep
ared
ness
and
resp
onse
for c
hild
pro
tect
ion
in
Ken
ya
CW
SK
2,
387,
825
2,38
7,82
5-
2,38
7,82
50%
M
ED
IUM
KEN
-11/
P-H
R-
RL/
3734
8/14
468
Pro
tect
ion
of u
rban
IDP
s th
roug
h le
gal a
ssis
tanc
e an
d le
gal e
duca
tion
KC
S
132,
000
132,
000
-13
2,00
00%
M
ED
IUM
KEN
-11/
P-H
R-
RL/
3737
9/51
79
Impr
ovin
g em
erge
ncy
prep
ared
ness
for c
hild
pr
otec
tion
syst
ems
in K
enya
IR
C
250,
000
250,
000
-25
0,00
00%
M
ED
IUM
KEN
-11/
P-H
R-
RL/
3813
0/60
79
Stre
ngth
enin
g of
the
form
al a
nd lo
caliz
ed c
hild
pr
otec
tion
syst
em to
impr
ove
the
prot
ectio
n of
the
mos
t vul
nera
ble
child
ren
in E
ldor
et
SC
50
0,00
050
0,00
0-
500,
000
0%
ME
DIU
M
Sub
tota
l for
PR
OTE
CTI
ON
7,
626,
871
7,76
2,01
663
2,19
37,
129,
823
8%
WA
TER
, SA
NIT
ATI
ON
AN
D H
YGIE
NE
KEN
-11/
WS/
3697
0/50
59
Sup
port
emer
genc
y w
ater
sup
ply,
san
itatio
n an
d dr
ough
t res
ilienc
e in
Moy
ale
and
Man
dera
dis
trcits
of
Not
hern
Ken
ya
Chr
. Aid
83
4,60
083
4,60
0-
834,
600
0%
HIG
H
KEN
-11/
WS/
3700
2/R
/516
7
Pro
visi
on o
f wat
er, s
anita
tion
and
hygi
ene
faci
litie
s to
redu
ce v
ulne
rabi
lity
and
risk
expo
sure
of N
airo
bi
info
rmal
set
tlem
ents
com
mun
ities
(Hur
uma
and
Mat
hare
info
rmal
set
tlem
ents
, Sta
rehe
C
onst
ituen
cy, N
airo
bi)
CO
OP
I 32
5,28
032
5,28
0-
325,
280
0%
ME
DIU
M
KE
NY
A
75
Proj
ect c
ode
Title
A
ppea
ling
agen
cy
Orig
inal
re
quire
men
ts($
)
Rev
ised
re
quire
men
ts($
)
Fund
ing
($)
Unm
et
requ
irem
ent
s
($)
%
Cov
ered
Pr
iorit
y
KEN
-11/
WS/
3701
5/64
58
Pro
vidi
ng a
cces
s to
Wat
er, S
anita
tion
and
Hyg
iene
to
con
tribu
te to
the
achi
evem
ent o
f the
Mille
nniu
m
Dev
elop
men
t Goa
ls in
the
Eas
t Pok
ot re
gion
, Ken
yaA
CTE
D
858,
981
858,
981
-85
8,98
10%
H
IGH
KEN
-11/
WS/
3703
8/R
/132
72
Rap
id E
mer
genc
y R
espo
nse
to a
nd M
itiga
tion
of
chol
era
outb
reak
in th
e af
fect
ed p
opul
atio
n th
roug
h w
ater
trea
tmen
t and
hyg
iene
edu
catio
n us
ing
E-
WA
T te
chno
logi
es in
Kis
umu
Eas
t
CC
DA
20
8,65
020
8,65
0-
208,
650
0%
ME
DIU
M
KEN
-11/
WS/
3707
2/51
20
Nor
ther
n K
enya
Em
erge
ncy
WA
SH
Pro
gram
me
OX
FAM
GB
50
0,00
050
0,00
071
3,55
8(2
13,5
58)
143%
H
IGH
KEN
-11/
WS/
3710
8/R
/516
7 Im
prov
emen
t of A
cces
s to
WAS
H s
ervi
ces
for m
ost
vuln
erab
le w
omen
, girl
s, b
oys
and
men
in K
wal
e an
d K
ilifi
Dis
trict
s, C
oast
Pro
vinc
e, K
enya
. C
OO
PI
1,03
0,83
81,
030,
838
-1,
030,
838
0%
ME
DIU
M
KEN
-11/
WS/
3711
3/60
27
Enh
ance
men
t of t
he d
roug
ht re
silie
nce
capa
citie
s of
th
e he
rder
s’ c
omm
uniti
es o
f Gar
issa
and
Tan
a R
iver
dis
trict
s, b
ased
on
a sp
ecifi
c W
ASH
resp
onse
an
d th
e in
trodu
ctio
n of
spe
cific
DR
R m
etho
dolo
gies
PU
74
2,29
374
2,29
3-
742,
293
0%
HIG
H
KEN
-11/
WS/
3711
7/R
/805
8 E
mer
genc
y S
choo
l Wat
er a
nd S
anita
tion
Faci
lity
Reh
abili
tatio
n in
Nor
ther
n K
enya
IR
W
470,
000
470,
000
150,
000
320,
000
32%
H
IGH
KEN
-11/
WS/
3713
8/85
71
Pro
visi
on o
f WAS
H s
truct
ures
and
pro
mot
ion
of
hygi
ene
in K
yuso
to im
prov
e ac
cess
to s
afe
and
clea
n w
ater
for t
he c
omm
unity
AD
RA
- K
enya
10
4,09
410
4,09
4-
104,
094
0%
HIG
H
KEN
-11/
WS/
3715
3/R
/517
9 C
omm
unity
Wat
er a
nd S
anita
tion
(CO
WAS
A)
Pro
ject
IR
C
900,
000
900,
000
-90
0,00
00%
M
ED
IUM
KEN
-11/
WS/
3716
5/84
32
WA
SH R
espo
nse
to F
lood
s an
d D
roug
ht fo
r C
omm
uniti
es in
Nar
ok
AD
EO
44
3,75
044
3,75
0-
443,
750
0%
ME
DIU
M
KEN
-11/
WS/
3722
7/R
/124
W
ASH
Em
erge
ncy
Res
pons
e P
roje
ct
UN
ICE
F 4,
552,
850
5,51
0,00
03,
068,
857
2,44
1,14
356
%
HIG
H
KEN
-11/
WS/
3776
7/R
/849
7 R
espo
ndin
g to
Pas
tora
lists
' Hum
anita
rian
WAS
H
Nee
ds in
Upp
er E
aste
rn
FH
600,
000
900,
000
-90
0,00
00%
H
IGH
KEN
-11/
WS/
3811
1/51
86
Em
erge
ncy
and
Dro
ught
Miti
gatio
n W
ater
, S
anita
tion
and
Hyg
iene
Inte
rven
tion
AC
F 90
5,36
490
5,36
4-
905,
364
0%
ME
DIU
M
KEN
-11/
WS/
4198
3/R
/645
8 Im
prov
ing
acce
ss to
saf
e an
d cl
ean
wat
er fo
r (ag
ro)
past
oral
com
mun
ities
of C
entra
l Pok
ot a
nd P
okot
N
orth
Dis
trict
s (W
est P
okot
Cou
nty)
A
CTE
D
-29
2,83
0-
292,
830
0%
ME
DIU
M
Sub
tota
l for
WA
TER
, SA
NIT
ATI
ON
AN
D H
YGIE
NE
12
,476
,700
14,0
26,6
803,
932,
415
10,0
94,2
6528
%
CLU
STER
NO
T YE
T SP
ECIF
IED
KEN
-11/
SNYS
/401
55/8
487
Ken
ya E
mer
genc
y R
espo
nse
Fund
- E
RF
(targ
et
need
s $2
milli
on)
ER
F (O
CH
A)
--
822,
644
n/a
n/a
NO
T S
PEC
IFIE
D
Sub
tota
l for
CLU
STER
NO
T YE
T SP
ECIF
IED
-
-82
2,64
4n/
an/
a
KE
NY
A
76
Proj
ect c
ode
Title
A
ppea
ling
agen
cy
Orig
inal
re
quire
men
ts($
)
Rev
ised
re
quire
men
ts($
)
Fund
ing
($)
Unm
et
requ
irem
ent
s
($)
%
Cov
ered
Pr
iorit
y
Gra
nd T
otal
52
5,82
7,79
460
4,84
5,87
628
3,19
3,52
532
1,65
2,35
147
%
N
OTE
: "F
undi
ng" m
eans
Con
tribu
tions
+ C
omm
itmen
ts +
Car
ry-o
ver
Con
tribu
tion:
th
e ac
tual
pay
men
t of f
unds
or t
rans
fer o
f in-
kind
goo
ds fr
om th
e do
nor t
o th
e re
cipi
ent e
ntity
. C
omm
itmen
t:
crea
tion
of a
lega
l, co
ntra
ctua
l obl
igat
ion
betw
een
the
dono
r and
reci
pien
t ent
ity, s
peci
fyin
g th
e am
ount
to b
e co
ntrib
uted
. Pl
edge
: a
non-
bind
ing
anno
unce
men
t of a
n in
tend
ed c
ontri
butio
n or
allo
catio
n by
the
dono
r. ("
Unc
omm
itted
ple
dge"
on
thes
e ta
bles
indi
cate
s th
e ba
lanc
e of
orig
inal
ple
dges
not
yet
com
mitt
ed.)
The
list o
f pro
ject
s an
d th
e fig
ures
for t
heir
fund
ing
requ
irem
ents
in th
is d
ocum
ent a
re a
sna
psho
t as
of 3
0 Ju
ne 2
011.
For
con
tinuo
usly
upd
ated
info
rmat
ion
on p
roje
cts,
fund
ing
requ
irem
ents
, and
con
tribu
tions
to
date
, vis
it th
e Fi
nanc
ial T
rack
ing
Serv
ice
(fts.
unoc
ha.o
rg).
K E N Y A
77
Table V: Total funding to date per donor to projects listed in the appeal
2011+ Kenya Emergency Humanitarian Response Plan as of 30 June 2011
http://fts.unocha.org
Compiled by OCHA on the basis of information provided by donors and appealing organizations.
Donor Funding % of Grand Total
Uncommitted pledges
($) ($)
United States 112,581,477 40% -
Carry-over (donors not specified) 63,251,138 22% -
Japan 24,308,800 9% -
European Commission 20,191,881 7% -
Canada 15,078,957 5% -
Allocation of unearmarked funds by UN agencies 14,472,092 5% -
Central Emergency Response Fund (CERF) 5,993,848 2% -
Sweden 5,358,448 2% 778,574
Germany 5,077,705 2% -
United Kingdom 4,370,350 2% -
Australia 4,357,298 2% -
Various (details not yet provided) 3,042,500 1% -
Switzerland 1,505,375 1% -
Russian Federation 1,000,000 0% -
Finland 953,678 0% -
Saudi Arabia 738,487 0% -
France 657,030 0% -
Norway 254,461 0% -
Grand Total 283,193,525 100% 778,574 NOTE: "Funding" means Contributions + Commitments + Carry-over Contribution: the actual payment of funds or transfer of in-kind goods from the donor to the recipient entity. Commitment: creation of a legal, contractual obligation between the donor and recipient entity, specifying the amount to be
contributed. Pledge: a non-binding announcement of an intended contribution or allocation by the donor. ("Uncommitted pledge" on these
tables indicates the balance of original pledges not yet committed.) The list of projects and the figures for their funding requirements in this document are a snapshot as of 30 June 2011. For continuously updated information on projects, funding requirements, and contributions to date, visit the Financial Tracking Service (fts.unocha.org).
K E N Y A
78
Table VI: Total humanitarian funding to date per donor (appeal plus other)
Kenya 2011 as of 30 June 2011
http://fts.unocha.org
Compiled by OCHA on the basis of information provided by donors and appealing organizations.
Donor Funding** % of Grand Total
Uncommitted pledges
($) ($)
United States 116,810,423 37% -
Carry-over (donors not specified) 63,251,138 20% -
European Commission 41,601,579 13% -
Japan 24,708,800 8% -
Canada 15,078,957 5% -
Allocation of unearmarked funds by UN agencies 14,957,912 5% -
Central Emergency Response Fund 5,993,848 2% -
Sweden 5,814,844 2% 778,574
Germany 5,764,518 2% -
United Kingdom 4,370,350 1% -
Australia 4,357,298 1% -
Various (details not yet provided) 3,042,500 1% -
Switzerland 2,479,441 1% -
Finland 1,634,877 1% -
Russian Federation 1,000,000 0% -
Saudi Arabia (Kingdom of) 738,487 0% -
Private (individuals & organisations) 681,315 0% -
France 657,030 0% -
Norway 254,461 0% -
Denmark 90,462 0% -
Ireland 61,813 0% -
Grand Total 313,350,053 100% 778,574 NOTE: "Funding" means Contributions + Commitments + Carry-over Contribution: the actual payment of funds or transfer of in-kind goods from the donor to the recipient entity. Commitment: creation of a legal, contractual obligation between the donor and recipient entity, specifying the amount to be
contributed. Pledge: a non-binding announcement of an intended contribution or allocation by the donor. ("Uncommitted pledge" on these
tables indicates the balance of original pledges not yet committed.) * Includes contributions to the Consolidated Appeal and additional contributions outside of the Consolidated Appeal Process
(bilateral, Red Cross, etc.)
Zeros in both the funding and uncommitted pledges columns indicate that no value has been reported for in-kind contributions. The list of projects and the figures for their funding requirements in this document are a snapshot as of 30 June 2011. For continuously updated information on projects, funding requirements, and contributions to date, visit the Financial Tracking Service (fts.unocha.org).
K E N Y A
79
Table VII: Humanitarian funding to date per donor to projects not listed in the appeal
Other Humanitarian Funding to Kenya 2011 as of 30 June 2011
http://fts.unocha.org
Compiled by OCHA on the basis of information provided by donors and appealing organizations.
Donor Funding % of Grand Total
Uncommitted pledges
($) ($)
European Commission 21,409,698 71% -
United States 4,228,946 14% -
Allocation of unearmarked funds by UN agencies 1,167,135 4% -
Switzerland 974,066 3% -
Germany 686,813 2% -
Finland 681,199 2% -
Sweden 456,396 2% -
Japan 400,000 1% -
Denmark 90,462 0% -
Ireland 61,813 0% -
Grand Total 30,156,528 100% - NOTE: "Funding" means Contributions + Commitments + Carry-over
This table also includes funding to Appeal projects but in surplus to these projects' requirements as stated in the Appeal. Contribution: the actual payment of funds or transfer of in-kind goods from the donor to the recipient entity. Commitment: creation of a legal, contractual obligation between the donor and recipient entity, specifying the amount to be
contributed. Pledge: a non-binding announcement of an intended contribution or allocation by the donor. ("Uncommitted pledge" on these
tables indicates the balance of original pledges not yet committed.) The list of projects and the figures for their funding requirements in this document are a snapshot as of 30 June 2011. For continuously updated information on projects, funding requirements, and contributions to date, visit the Financial Tracking Service (fts.unocha.org).
K E N Y A
80
Table VIII: Requirements and funding to date per gender marker score
2011+ Kenya Emergency Humanitarian Response Plan as of 30 June 2011
http://fts.unocha.org
Compiled by OCHA on the basis of information provided by donors and appealing organizations.
Gender marker Original requirements
Revised requirements
Funding
Unmet requirements
% Covered
Uncommittedpledges
($) A
($) B
($) C
($) D=B-C
E=C/B
($) F
0-No signs that gender issues were considered in project design
5,593,244 5,593,244 - 5,593,244 0% -
1-The project is designed to contribute in some limited way to gender equality
22,770,817 23,796,639 4,274,689 19,521,950 18% -
2a-The project is designed to contribute significantly to gender equality
386,556,623 471,672,583 198,634,211 273,038,372 42% -
2b-The principal purpose of the project is to advance gender equality
110,907,110 103,783,410 79,461,981 24,321,429 77% -
Not specified - - 822,644 n/a n/a 778,574
Grand Total 525,827,794 604,845,876 283,193,525 321,652,351 47% 778,574
NOTE: "Funding" means Contributions + Commitments + Carry-over Contribution: the actual payment of funds or transfer of in-kind goods from the donor to the recipient entity. Commitment: creation of a legal, contractual obligation between the donor and recipient entity, specifying the amount to be
contributed. Pledge: a non-binding announcement of an intended contribution or allocation by the donor. ("Uncommitted pledge" on these
tables indicates the balance of original pledges not yet committed.) The list of projects and the figures for their funding requirements in this document are a snapshot as of 30 June 2011. For continuously updated information on projects, funding requirements, and contributions to date, visit the Financial Tracking Service (fts.unocha.org).
K E N Y A
81
Table IX: Requirements and funding to date per geographical area
2011+ Kenya Emergency Humanitarian Response Plan as of 30 June 2011
http://fts.unocha.org
Compiled by OCHA on the basis of information provided by donors and appealing organizations.
Location Original requirements
Revised requirements
Funding
Unmet requirements
% Covered
Uncommittedpledges
($) A
($) B
($) C
($) D=B-C
E=C/B
($) F
Multiple locations 471,823,154 538,644,332 274,254,376 264,389,956 51% 778,574
North Eastern 24,338,111 28,024,826 3,702,716 24,322,110 13% -
Eastern 6,253,367 15,035,122 150,000 14,885,122 1% -
Rift Valley 17,214,554 16,951,558 3,590,041 13,361,517 21% -
Coast 3,124,938 3,116,368 784,652 2,331,716 25% -
Nairobi 2,865,020 2,865,020 711,740 2,153,280 25% -
Nyanza 208,650 208,650 - 208,650 0% -
Grand Total 525,827,794 604,845,876 283,193,525 321,652,351 47% 778,574
NOTE: "Funding" means Contributions + Commitments + Carry-over Contribution: the actual payment of funds or transfer of in-kind goods from the donor to the recipient entity. Commitment: creation of a legal, contractual obligation between the donor and recipient entity, specifying the amount to be
contributed. Pledge: a non-binding announcement of an intended contribution or allocation by the donor. ("Uncommitted pledge" on these
tables indicates the balance of original pledges not yet committed.) The list of projects and the figures for their funding requirements in this document are a snapshot as of 30 June 2011. For continuously updated information on projects, funding requirements, and contributions to date, visit the Financial Tracking Service (fts.unocha.org).
K E N Y A
82
ANNEX II: ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS
3W Who, What, Where ACF Action Contre la Faim (Action against Hunger) ACTED Agence d’Aide à la Coopération Technique et au Développement (Agency for Technical
Cooperation and Development) ADEO African Development and Emergency Organization ADRA adventist development and relief agency AFLC Acute Food and Livelihood Crisis AIDS acquired immuno-deficiency syndrome ALDEF Arid Lands Development Focus ALRMP Arid Lands Resource Management Project ANC/PMTCT ante-natal care/prevention of mother-to-child transmission ASAL Arid and Semi-Arid Lands CAHW community-based animal health workers CBO community-based organization CBPP contagious bovine pleural pneumonia CCA climate change adaptation CCPP contagious caprine pleural pneumonia CDC US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention CERF Central Emergency Response Fund CFA cash for assets CFR case fatality rate CFS child-friendly spaces CLTS community-led total sanitation CMDRR community-based disaster risk reduction COCOP Consortium of Cooperating Partners COOPI Cooperazione Internazionale (International Cooperation) CP child protection CSO civil society organization CWSK Child Welfare Society of Kenya DCS Department of Children's Services DDSC District Disease Surveillance Committees DEB District Education Board DHMT District Health Management Teams DPC District Peace Committees DRA Department of Refugee Affairs DRC Danish Refugee Council DRM disaster risk management DRR disaster risk reduction ECHO European Commission Directorate-General for Humanitarian Aid and Civil Protection EHRP Emergency Humanitarian Response Plan ENDF Ethiopian National Defence Force EPRP Emergency Preparedness and Response Plan EVIs/PSNs extremely vulnerable people/ people with special needs FCS food consumption score FFA food for assets FHI Food for the Hungry International FTS Financial Tracking Service GAM global acute malnutrition GBV gender-based violence GFD general food distribution GHO Global Health Observatory GIS geographic information system GoK Government of Kenya HDI Human Development Index
K E N Y A
83
HDR Human Development Report HIV human immuno-deficiency virus IASC Inter-Agency Standing Committee ICC International Criminal Court ICVA International Council of Voluntary Agencies IDMC Internal Displacement Monitoring Centre IDP(s) internally displaced person (people) IDTR identifying, documenting, tracing and reunifying IEBC Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission IMAM Integrated management of acute malnutrition IMC International Medical Corps IOM International Organization for Migration IGA income-generating activities IR Islamic Relief IRC International Rescue Committee KDHS Kenya Demographic Health Survey KFSSG Kenya Food Security Steering Group KNBS Kenya National Bureau of Statistics KNCHR Kenya National Commission on Human Rights KRC Kenyan Red Cross KSH Kenyan shilling l/p/d litres per person per day LRA long rains assessment LSD lumpy skin disease MD medical doctor MERLIN Medical Emergency Relief International MoE Ministry of Education MoH Ministry of Health MoMS Ministry of Medical Services MoPHS Ministry of Public Health and Sanitation MoSSP Ministry of State for Special Programme MoWI Ministry of Water & Irrigation MT metric tons MYR mid-year review NACC National AIDS Control Council NCCK National Council of Churches of Kenya NGO non-governmental organization OCHA Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs PACIDA Pastoralist Community Initiative and Development Assistance PEV post-election violence PEP post-exposure prophylaxis PPP purchasing power parity PRC post-rape care PSS psycho-social support PWG Protection Working Group PWGID National Protection Working Group on Internal Displacement RCK Refugee Consortium of Kenya RVP Rift Valley Province SAM severe acute malnutrition SC Save the Children SCHR Steering Committee for Humanitarian Response SGBV sexual and gender-based violence SOP standard operating procedure SFP+MCH supplementary feeding programme and mother-and child health SRA short rains assessment
K E N Y A
84
TFG Transitional Federal Government TJRC Truth Justice and Reconciliation Commission ToRs terms of reference UK United Kingdom UN United Nations UNDAF United Nations Development Assistance Framework UNDP United Nations Development Programme UNHCR United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees UNICEF United Nations Children’s Fund VSF-B Vétérinaires sans frontières - Belgium VSF-Suisse Vétérinaires sans frontières - Switzerland WASH water, sanitation, and hygiene WESCOORD Water and Environmental Sanitation Coordination Committee WFP World Food Programme WHO World Health Organization WV World Vision WVI World Vision International WVK World Vision-Kenya
Consolidated Appeal Process (CAP)
The CAP is a tool for aid organizations to jointly plan, coordinate, implement and monitor their response to disasters and emergencies, and to appeal for funds together instead of competitively. It is the forum for developing a strategic approach to humanitarian action, focusing on close cooperation between host governments, donors, and non-governmental organizations (NGOs), the International Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement, International Organization for Migration (IOM) and, United Nations agencies. As such, it presents a snapshot of the situation and response plans, and is an inclusive and coordinated programme cycle of: • strategic planning leading to a Common Humanitarian Action Plan (CHAP); • resource mobilization leading to a Consolidated Appeal or a Flash Appeal; • coordinated programme implementation; • joint monitoring and evaluation; • revision, if necessary; • reporting on results. The CHAP is the core of the CAP – a strategic plan for humanitarian response in a given country or region, including the following elements: • A common analysis of the context in which humanitarian action takes place; • An assessment of needs; • Best, worst, and most likely scenarios; • A clear statement of longer-term objectives and goals; • Prioritised response plans, including a detailed mapping of projects to cover all needs; • A framework for monitoring the strategy and revising it if necessary. The CHAP is the core of a Consolidated Appeal or, when crises break out or natural disasters strike, a Flash Appeal. Under the leadership of the Humanitarian Coordinator, and in consultation with host Governments and donors, the CHAP is developed at the field level by the Humanitarian Country Team. This team includes IASC members and standing invitees (UN agencies, the International Organization for Migration, the International Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement, and NGOs that belong to International Council of Voluntary Agencies, Interaction, or Steering Committee for Humanitarian Response [SCHR]), but non-IASC members, such as national NGOs, can also be included. The Humanitarian Coordinator is responsible for the annual preparation of the consolidated appeal document. The document is launched globally near the end of each year to enhance advocacy and resource mobilization. An update, known as the Mid-Year Review, is presented to donors the following July. Donors generally fund appealing agencies directly in response to project proposals listed in appeals. The Financial Tracking Service (FTS), managed by the United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA), is a database of appeal funding needs and worldwide donor contributions, and can be found on http://fts.unocha.org. In sum, the CAP is how aid agencies join forces to provide people in need the best available protection and assistance, on time.
OFFICE FOR THE COORDINATION OF HUMANITARIAN AFFAIRS (OCHA)
UNITED NATIONS PALAIS DES NATIONS
NEW YORK, NY 10017 1211 GENEVA 10 USA SWITZERLAND