sample report - drainage company london

J Snow Drainage Solutions (T/A JSD Solutions 24/7 Ltd)International House, 24 Holborn Viaduct, London EC1A 2BN

[email protected]

Sample Report (Project Name Here) // Cover

Project

Project Name Sample Report (Project Name Here)

Project Description CCTV DRAINAGE SURVEY REPORT

Start Date 03/05/2017

Project Status

Inspection Standard


[email protected]

Table of ContentsDate:

03/05/2017Project Name Project Number:

Sample Report (Project Name Here)

Sample Report (Project Name Here) // Page: I

Scoring Summary .......................................................................................................................................................................................P-1

Project Information .......................................................................................................................................................................................P-2

Project Pictures .......................................................................................................................................................................................P-4

Defect Grade Description (Section) .......................................................................................................................................................................................P-5

Section Profile .......................................................................................................................................................................................P-6

Section: 1; US HOR - MH01 .......................................................................................................................................................................................1

Section: 2; MH01 - SEWER .......................................................................................................................................................................................3

.......................................................................................................................................................................................11


[email protected]

Scoring SummaryDate :

03/05/2017Project Name : Project Number :

Sample Report (Project Name Here)

Sample Report (Project Name Here) // Page: P-1

Structural Defects

Section Pipe Ref Grade Description

2 MH01X 3 Fracture, circumferential, from 02 to 09 o'clock

Grade 3: Best practice suggests consideration should be given to repairs in the medium term.

Grade 4: Best practice suggests consideration should be given to repairs to avoid a potential collapse.

Grade 5: Best practice suggests that this pipe is at risk of collapse at any time. Urgent consideration shouldbe given to repairs to avoid total failure

Service / Operational Defects

Section Pipe Ref Grade Description

2 MH01X 5 Multiple defects

Grade 3: Best practice suggests consideration should be given to maintenance activities in the medium term.

Grade 4: Best practice suggests consideration should be given to maintenance activity to avoid potentialblockages.

Grade 5: Best practice suggests that this pipe is at a high risk of backing up or causing flooding.

Abandoned Surveys

Section Pipe Ref Description

2 MH01X Survey abandoned

Information

These summaries are based on the SRM grading from the WRC.


[email protected]

Project InformationProject Date:

03/05/2017

Client

Company or Site Name: Site/Company Name

Contact: Your Name

Department:

Street: Street Address

Town or City: Town/City & Post Code

Phone: Your Contact Number

Fax:

Mobile:

Email:

CCTV DRAINAGE SURVEY REPORTProject Description:

Project Name: Client's Ref:Sample Report (Project Name Here)


01

Contractor

Company or Site Name: J Snow Drainage Solutions (T/A JSD Solutions 24/7 Ltd)

Contact: 0207 125 0295 - 07946 480 288

Department:

Street: International House, 24 Holborn Viaduct

Town or City: London EC1A 2BN

Phone:

Fax:

Mobile:

Email: [email protected]


[email protected]

Project InformationProject Date:

03/05/2017

CCTV DRAINAGE SURVEY REPORTProject Description:

Project Name: Client's Ref:Sample Report (Project Name Here)


01

Project Notes

This page will have a full description of defects found along with recommendations.


[email protected]


Project PicturesProject Date:03/05/2017

Project Name: Project Number:Sample Report (Project Name Here)

FRONT-HOME-IMAGE

IMG_0891

IMG_0889

IMG_0893


[email protected]

Defect Grade Description (Section)Project Date:03/05/2017



1: Brick: No structural defects.

Pipe: No structural defects.

Acceptable structural condition.

2: Brick: Circumferential cracking; single longitudinal crack; surface mortar loss (depth missing < 15mm);surface damage - slight spalling (breaking away of small fragments from the surface); surface damage -slight wear (increased roughness).

Pipe: Circumferential crack; moderate joint defects (i.e. medium open joint or medium displaced joint);surface damage - slight spalling (breaking away of small fragments from the surface) or slight wear(increased roughness).

Minimal collapse likelihood in the short term but potential for further deterioration.

3: Brick: Medium mortar loss (depth missing 15-50mm) without other defects; more than one longitudinalcrack (at a single location); multiple cracking; single bricks displaced; deformation < 5%; no fracture andonly moderate mortar loss; surface damage - medium spalling (large areas of chipped brick); surfacedamage - medium wear (large area of brick surface is missing).

Pipe: Fracture with no deformation or deformation < 5%; longitudinal cracking or multiple cracking; minorloss of level; severe joint defects (i.e. large open joint or large displaced joint); surface damage - partialarea of pipe surface is missing or worn.

! Collapse unlikely in the near future but further deterioration likely !

4: Brick: Total mortar loss (depth missing > 50mm) with deformation > 10%; deformation up to 10% andfractured; displaced or hanging brickwork; small number of missing bricks; dropped invert (drop > 20mm);moderate loss of level; surface damage - large spalling (entire surface of brick is missing); surface damage- large wear (entire surface of brick is missing).

Pipe: Broken; deformation up to 10% and broken; fracture with deformation 5-10%; multiple fractures;serious loss of level; serious joint defects with voids or soil visible (open joint with > 50mm soil or voidvisible or joint displacement > 25% of diameter); surface damage - entire area of pipe surface is missing orseverly worn.

!! Collapse likely in the foreseeable future !!

5: Brick: Already collapsed; missing Invert; deformation > 10% and fractured; displaced or hanging brickworkand deformation < 10%; extensive areas of missing brickwork.

Pipe: Already collapsed; deformation > 10% and broken; extensive areas of pipe fabric missing; fractureswith deformation > 10%

!!! Collapsed or collapse imminent !!!


[email protected]

Section Profile


Project Date:03/05/2017


SectionNo.

Upstream Node Downstream Node Date Road Pipe Material ExpectedLength

[m]

Inspected Length[m]

1 US HOR MH01 03/05/2017 GREEN COURT, ORLEYFARM ROAD

Vitrified claypipe (i.e. allclayware)

9.23 9.23

2 MH01 SEWER 03/05/2017 GREEN COURT, ORLEYFARM ROAD

Vitrified claypipe (i.e. allclayware)

14.20 12.16

2 x Circular 100 = 23.43 Expected Length [m] ( 21.39 Inspected Length [m] )

Total: 2 = 23.43 Expected Length [m] ( 21.39 Inspected Length [m] )


[email protected]

Section Inspection - 03/05/2017 - US HORXDate: Client's Ref : PLR:Weather:

Operator:

Section:

Criticality Grade:Vehicle: Camera: Preset Length [m]:

Pre Cleaned:

Type of Pipe:

Sample Report (Project Name Here) // Page: 1

Town or Village: Middlesex Insp Dir: MH01 <~ US HOR US MH: US HOR

Road: Green Court, Orley Farm Road Inspected Length: 9.23 m US Depth: 450.00 m

Location: Under a permanent buildingTotal Length: 9.23 m DS MH: MH01

Surface Cover: Pipe Length: 0.00 m DS Depth: 600.00 m

Use: Foul Pipe Shape: Circular

Lining Type: Height / Width: 100 / 0 mm

Inspection Purpose: Sample survey to determine asset condition Pipe Material: Vitrified clay pipe (i.e. all clayware)

Year Constructed: Flow Control: No flow control

Comment: AFTER DRAIN CLEARANCE

Recommendation:

1:80 Position m Code Observation Grade

03/05/17 01 No rain or snow

Jamie Snow

1 US HORXYes

Gravity drain/sewer

STR no def STR peak STR mean STR total STR grade SER no def SER peak SER mean SER total SER grade0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0

Inspection:

1 8:48Time:

Note: In line with the WRc SRM, plastic pipes are not scored against structural defects.

MH01

Depth: 600.00

US HOR

Depth: 450.00

0.04m // 00:00:01 //

0.04m // 00:00:03 //

6.38m // 00:00:49 //

7.41m // 00:00:55 //

8.25m // 00:01:02 //

0.04 MH Start node type, manhole, reference number: MH01

0.04 WL Water level, 0 % of the vertical dimension

6.38 GP General photograph taken at this point



9.23 MHF Finish node type, manhole, reference number: USHOR


[email protected]

Section Pictures - 03/05/2017 - US HORX


1 US HORX 01Section Number: Inspection Direction: PLR: Client's Ref:

MH01 US HOR

Contractor's Ref:

20170503-084859-snap0000.jpg, 00:00:01, 0.04mStart node type, manhole, reference number: MH01

20170503-084859-snap0002.jpg, 00:00:49, 6.38mGeneral photograph taken at this point


20170503-084859-snap0001.jpg, 00:00:03, 0.04mWater level, 0 % of the vertical dimension


20170503-084859-snap0005.jpg, 00:01:12, 9.23mFinish node type, manhole, reference number: US HOR


[email protected]

Section Inspection - 03/05/2017 - MH01XDate: Client's Ref : PLR:Weather:

Operator:

Section:


Pre Cleaned:

Type of Pipe:


Town or Village: Middlesex Insp Dir: MH01 ~> SEWER US MH: MH01

Road: Green Court, Orley Farm Road Inspected Length: 12.16 m US Depth: 600.00 m

Location: Under a permanent buildingTotal Length: 14.20 m DS MH: SEWER

Surface Cover: Pipe Length: 0.00 m DS Depth: 0.00 m

Use: Foul Pipe Shape: Circular

Lining Type: Height / Width: 100 / 0 mm

Inspection Purpose: Sample survey to determine asset condition Pipe Material: Vitrified clay pipe (i.e. all clayware)

Year Constructed: Flow Control: No flow control

Comment: AFTER DRAIN CLEARANCE

Recommendation:



Jamie Snow

2 MH01XYes

Gravity drain/sewer

Inspection:

2 8:50Time:

MH01

Depth: 600.00

-0.15m // 00:00:01 //

-0.15m // 00:00:03 //

0.08m // 00:00:25 //

0.42m // 00:00:45 //

0.53m // 00:00:57 //

-0.15 MH Start node type, manhole, reference number: MH01

-0.15 WL Water level, 0 % of the vertical dimension

0.08 RMJ Roots, mass at joint, 60 % cross-sectional area loss 5



1.29 RMJ Roots, mass at joint, 10 % cross-sectional area loss 3

1.48 CC Crack, circumferential, from 04 to 08 o'clock 2

1.56 CL Crack, longitudinal, at 07 o'clock 2

1.98 JDM Joint displaced, medium 1

2.70 JDL Joint displaced, large 1


3.31 RFJ Roots, fine at joint 2

3.65 LL Line deviates left

3.88 RTJ Roots, tap at joint 4



[email protected]


Operator:

Section:


Pre Cleaned:

Type of Pipe:


Recommendation:



Jamie Snow

2 MH01XYes

Gravity drain/sewer

STR no def STR peak STR mean STR total STR grade SER no def SER peak SER mean SER total SER grade8 40.0 7.6 7.6 3.0 8 15.0 3.9 47.0 5.0

Inspection:

2 8:50Time:

Note: In line with the WRc SRM, plastic pipes are not scored against structural defects.

SEWER

Depth: 0.00





8.51 FC Fracture, circumferential, from 02 to 09 o'clock 3



9.88 RTJ Roots, tap at joint 4

11.17 RM Roots, mass, 70 % cross-sectional area loss 5

12.16 SA Survey abandoned

14.20 End of pipe


[email protected]


Operator:

Section:


Pre Cleaned:

Type of Pipe:



Jamie Snow

2 MH01XYes

Gravity drain/sewer

Inspection:

2 8:50Time:


[email protected]

Section Pictures - 03/05/2017 - MH01X


2 MH01X 01Section Number: Inspection Direction: PLR: Client's Ref:

MH01 SEWER

Contractor's Ref:

20170503-085059-snap0000.jpg, 00:00:01, -0.15mStart node type, manhole, reference number: MH01

20170503-085059-snap0002.jpg, 00:00:25, 0.08mRoots, mass at joint, 60 % cross-sectional area loss


20170503-085059-snap0001.jpg, 00:00:03, -0.15mWater level, 0 % of the vertical dimension


20170503-085059-snap0005.jpg, 00:01:19, 1.29mRoots, mass at joint, 10 % cross-sectional area loss


[email protected]




MH01 SEWER

Contractor's Ref:

20170503-085059-snap0006.jpg, 00:01:31, 1.48mCrack, circumferential, from 04 to 08 o'clock

20170503-085059-snap0008.jpg, 00:02:13, 1.98mJoint displaced, medium


20170503-085059-snap0007.jpg, 00:01:50, 1.56mCrack, longitudinal, at 07 o'clock

20170503-085059-snap0009.jpg, 00:02:36, 2.70mJoint displaced, large

20170503-085059-snap0011.jpg, 00:03:04, 3.31mRoots, fine at joint


[email protected]




MH01 SEWER

Contractor's Ref:

20170503-085059-snap0012.jpg, 00:03:21, 3.65mLine deviates left



20170503-085059-snap0013.jpg, 00:03:38, 3.88mRoots, tap at joint




[email protected]




MH01 SEWER

Contractor's Ref:



20170503-085059-snap0022.jpg, 00:06:14, 9.88mRoots, tap at joint

20170503-085059-snap0019.jpg, 00:05:29, 8.51mFracture, circumferential, from 02 to 09 o'clock


20170503-085059-snap0023.jpg, 00:06:59, 11.17mRoots, mass, 70 % cross-sectional area loss


[email protected]




MH01 SEWER

Contractor's Ref:

20170503-085059-snap0024.jpg, 00:07:38, 12.16mSurvey abandoned


[email protected]

11

sample report - drainage company london

Documents