samsung advanced institute of technology dfss & triz hyo june kim...
TRANSCRIPT
SAMSUNG Advanced Institute of TechnologyDFSS & TRIZ
Hyo June [email protected]
Theory of Inventive Problem Solving
Ideal Final ResultContradiction
Resource
Introduction of TRIZ1. History of TRIZ2. Contradiction3. Su-Field Analysis4. ARIZ5. Technology Evolution6. Trimming 7. Case Study8. Knowledgist ver. 2.5
SAMSUNG Advanced Institute of TechnologyDFSS & TRIZ
Hyo June [email protected]
Theory of Inventive Problem Solving
Ideal Final ResultContradiction
Resource
History of TRIZ
SAMSUNG Advanced Institute of TechnologyDFSS & TRIZ
Hyo June [email protected]
Theory of Inventive Problem Solving
Ideal Final ResultContradiction
Resource
History of TRIZ
• 1926 15 October • 1940 First Invention (13-year-old) • 1946 Military serves in Patent department• 1946 Start of TRIZ development (20yr)• 1949 Two Grand Prix in inventors competition (23yr), Letter to Stalin, Arrest
• 1956 Freedom, first publication in journal• 1958 Journalist and Science Fiction• 1961 First book about TRIZ• 1971 Lecture at University in Baku• 1974 Publication Abroad (Japan) • 1981 More than 300 school in USSR• TRIZCON held & AI established in USA
SAMSUNG Advanced Institute of TechnologyDFSS & TRIZ
Hyo June [email protected]
Theory of Inventive Problem Solving
Ideal Final ResultContradiction
Resource
Contradiction
• 1946 ~ 1960, Altshuller researched “Contradiction”
Problem Solutionscalled “Inventive” (Level 3 and 4)
OvercomingContradiction
Breakthrough
The typical engineering approach is to compromise, but that approach does not lead to an invention. An Invention overcomes the contradiction.
SAMSUNG Advanced Institute of TechnologyDFSS & TRIZ
Hyo June [email protected]
Theory of Inventive Problem Solving
Ideal Final ResultContradiction
Resource
Contradiction
• 1946 ~ 1960 : “Contradiction”
Problem Solutionscalled “Inventive” (Level 3 and 4)
Removal ofContradiction
Breakthrough
SAMSUNG Advanced Institute of TechnologyDFSS & TRIZ
Hyo June [email protected]
Theory of Inventive Problem Solving
Ideal Final ResultContradiction
Resource
Contradiction
• 1946 ~ 1960 : “Contradiction”
Problem Solutions called “Inventive” (Level 3 and 4)
Removal ofContradiction
Breakthrough
Analysis and Classification about the Principles used at overcoming Contradiction
Analysis and Classification about the Principles used at overcoming Contradiction
Two Kinds ofContradiction
TechnicalContradiction
PhysicalContradiction
40 Principles
Separation Principles
SAMSUNG Advanced Institute of TechnologyDFSS & TRIZ
Hyo June [email protected]
Theory of Inventive Problem Solving
Ideal Final ResultContradiction
Resource
Contradiction
• 1946 ~ 1960 : “Contradiction”
Two Kinds ofContradiction
TechnicalContradiction
PhysicalContradiction
Airplane : Speed , Weight .
Airplane : Landing Wheels must Exist, must not Exist.
(by the powerful engine) (by the larger weight of engine)
(for landing on earth) (for an air resistance at flying)
Chemical : Speed , Quality . (by temperature increase) (undesired reaction also starts)reaction
(Generally, as soon as an engineer solve one problem, another unexpected harmful results happen)
(Generally, by one reason, an engineer must choose an action. But simultaneously an engineer must choose count-action by another reason )
Bicycle : Chain must be Rigid and Flexible.
(to transfer big force) (for circular movement)
SAMSUNG Advanced Institute of TechnologyDFSS & TRIZ
Hyo June [email protected]
Theory of Inventive Problem Solving
Ideal Final ResultContradiction
Resource
Contradiction
• 1946 ~ 1960 : “Contradiction”
Analysis and Classification about the Principles used at overcoming Contradiction
Analysis and Classification about the Principles used at overcoming Contradiction
PhysicalContradiction
Separation Principles
1. Separation in TIME2. Separation in SPACE3. Separation in SCALE....
SAMSUNG Advanced Institute of TechnologyDFSS & TRIZ
Hyo June [email protected]
Theory of Inventive Problem Solving
Ideal Final ResultContradiction
Resource
Contradiction
• 1946 ~ 1960 : “Contradiction”
PhysicalContradiction
Separation Principles
1. Separation in TIME2. Separation in SPACE3. Separation in SCALE....
SAMSUNG Advanced Institute of TechnologyDFSS & TRIZ
Hyo June [email protected]
Theory of Inventive Problem Solving
Ideal Final ResultContradiction
Resource
Contradiction
• 1946 ~ 1960, “Contradiction”
Analysis and Classification about the Principles used at overcoming Contradiction
Analysis and Classification about the Principles used at overcoming Contradiction
TechnicalContradiction 40 Principles
1 Segmentation2 Separation…
35 Parameter change36 Phase transitions…
40 Composite materials
divide an object into independent partsmake an object easy to disassembleincrease the degree of fragmentation (or segmentation) of an object
separate an 'interfering' part (or property) from an object, or single out the only necessary part (or property) of an object
change an object`s physical state (e.g. to a gas, liquid, or solid),change the concentration or consistency,change the degree of flexibility,change the temperature.
use phenomena occurring during phase transitions (e.g. volume changes, loss or absorption of heat, etc.).
change from uniform to composite (multiple) materials
SAMSUNG Advanced Institute of TechnologyDFSS & TRIZ
Hyo June [email protected]
Theory of Inventive Problem Solving
Ideal Final ResultContradiction
Resource
Contradiction
Is there any method to use 40 principles with easy ?
Altshuller made standard vocabulary at engineering field as39 Engineering Parameters.
SAMSUNG Advanced Institute of TechnologyDFSS & TRIZ
Hyo June [email protected]
Theory of Inventive Problem Solving
Ideal Final ResultContradiction
Resource
Contradiction
Recommended principles by Altshuller ; usually 3 or 4 principles among 40 principles
SAMSUNG Advanced Institute of TechnologyDFSS & TRIZ
Hyo June [email protected]
Theory of Inventive Problem Solving
Ideal Final ResultContradiction
Resource
In every technological system, one can discern two objects or substances, S1 and S2.
[ex : two parts of system the system itself and its product the system and its environment]
These substances interact or communicate through a field, F.
[ex : Mechanical Acoustic Thermal Chemical Electric Magnetic etc]
The relationship between the field and the two substances can be expressed in a Su-Field triangle.
This triangle diagram may be thought of the technological system.It is of course a very simple, abstract model.More detailed models can be made by adding more nodes, linking triangles together, etc.
Su-Field Analysis
• 1956 ~ 1970, Altshuller researched “Resource”
SAMSUNG Advanced Institute of TechnologyDFSS & TRIZ
Hyo June [email protected]
Theory of Inventive Problem Solving
Ideal Final ResultContradiction
Resource
These diagram can be made more informative by introducing different line symbols for the connections between nodes.
Su-Field Analysis
• 1956 ~ 1970 : Resource
If a Su-Field diagram contains dashed or wavy lines, then the system it represents needs improvement ie, an inventive problem.
The solution to this inventive problem may also be presented by a Su-Field diagram, which would be a modification of the original diagram.
SAMSUNG Advanced Institute of TechnologyDFSS & TRIZ
Hyo June [email protected]
Theory of Inventive Problem Solving
Ideal Final ResultContradiction
Resource
Su-Field Analysis
• 1956 ~ 1970 : Resource
76 Standard SolutionsInitial Problem Situation is
described as graphic method
The recommended solution by Altshuller for each specific situation is also described as graphic method
Analysis and Classification about the Principles used at more than one million patents
Analysis and Classification about the Principles used at more than one million patents
described as graphic method called Su-Field Diagram
SAMSUNG Advanced Institute of TechnologyDFSS & TRIZ
Hyo June [email protected]
Theory of Inventive Problem Solving
Ideal Final ResultContradiction
Resource
ARIZ
• 1970 ~ 1985, he researched Problem Solving ProcessAttention!ARIZ is a complicated tool. Do not apply it to solve new practical problems without at least for 80 academic hours of preliminary study.
ARIZ Education at SAMSUNG by TRIZ Master Nikolai Khomenko
SAMSUNG Advanced Institute of TechnologyDFSS & TRIZ
Hyo June [email protected]
Theory of Inventive Problem Solving
Ideal Final ResultContradiction
Resource
ARIZ
• 1970 ~ 1985 : Problem Solving Process
Step 1. Analyzing the Problem
1.1. formulate the mini-problem1.2. define the conflicting elements1.3. describe graphic models for technical contradiction1.4. select a graphic model for further analysis1.5. intensify the conflict1.6. describe the problem model1.7. apply the inventive standards
Step 2. Analyzing the Problem Model2.1. define the operational zone (oz)2.2. define the operational time (ot)2.3. define the substance-field resources (sfr)
Attention!ARIZ is a complicated tool. Do not apply it to solve new practical problems without at least for 80 academic hours of preliminary study.
SAMSUNG Advanced Institute of TechnologyDFSS & TRIZ
Hyo June [email protected]
Theory of Inventive Problem Solving
Ideal Final ResultContradiction
Resource
ARIZ
• 1970 ~ 1985 : Problem Solving Process
Step 3. Defining Ideal Final Result (IFR) and Physical Contradiction (PhC)3.1. formulate IFR-13.2. intensify definition of IFR-13.3. Identify the physical contradiction for the macro-level3.4. Identify the physical contradiction for the micro-level3.5. formulate IFR-23.6. apply the inventive standards to resolved physical contradiction
Step 4. Mobilizing and Utilizing of Substance-Field Resources (SFR)4.1. simulation with little creatures4.2. to take a"step back" from IFR4.3. using combination of substance resources4.4. using "void"4.5. using derived resources4.6. using an electrical field4.7. using a field and field-sensitive substance
Attention!ARIZ is a complicated tool. Do not apply it to solve new practical problems without at least for 80 academic hours of preliminary study.
SAMSUNG Advanced Institute of TechnologyDFSS & TRIZ
Hyo June [email protected]
Theory of Inventive Problem Solving
Ideal Final ResultContradiction
Resource
ARIZ
• 1970 ~ 1985 : Problem Solving Process
Step 5. Apply the Knowledge Base5.1. applying the system of standard solutions for inventive problems5.2. applying the problem-analogous5.3. applying the principles for resolving the physical contradictions5.4. applying the pointer to physical effects and phenomena
Step 6. Changing or Substituting the Problem6.1. transition to the technical solution6.2. checking the problem formulation for combination of several problems6.3. changing the problem6.4. reformulation of mini-problem
Attention!ARIZ is a complicated tool. Do not apply it to solve new practical problems without at least for 80 academic hours of preliminary study.
SAMSUNG Advanced Institute of TechnologyDFSS & TRIZ
Hyo June [email protected]
Theory of Inventive Problem Solving
Ideal Final ResultContradiction
Resource
ARIZ
• 1970 ~ 1985 : Problem Solving Process
Step 7. Analyzing the Method of Resolving the Physical Contradiction7.1 checking the concept of solution7.2. preliminary estimation of the solution concept7.3. checking the priority of the solution through patent funds7.4. estimation of sub-problems to implement obtained solution concept
Step 8. Applying The Obtained Solution8.1. estimate of changes for super-system8.2. find new application for obtained solution8.3. apply solution concept for other problems
Step 9. Analyzing the Problem Solving Process9.1. compare proposed process and real9.2. compare obtained solution concept and knowledge from TRIZ
Attention!ARIZ is a complicated tool. Do not apply it to solve new practical problems without at least for 80 academic hours of preliminary study.
SAMSUNG Advanced Institute of TechnologyDFSS & TRIZ
Hyo June [email protected]
Theory of Inventive Problem Solving
Ideal Final ResultContradiction
Resource
TechnologyEvolution
SAMSUNG Advanced Institute of TechnologyDFSS & TRIZ
Hyo June [email protected]
Theory of Inventive Problem Solving
Ideal Final ResultContradiction
Resource
1. History of TRIZ2. Contradiction3. Su-Field Analysis4. ARIZ5. Technology Evolution6. Trimming 7. Case Study8. Knowledgist ver. 2.5
These three part is done separated material.