san francisco international...
TRANSCRIPT
2 0 1 3 A n n u A l R e p o R t
F i s c a l Y e a r 2 0 1 2 - 2 0 1 3
San Francisco International Airport
3 Connecting the World
5 United States of America
9 Asia/Oceania
11 Europe/Middle East
13 Canada
15 Latin America
17 Facts & Figures
Ta ble of Contents
I am extremely proud of the ongoing accomplishments at SFO, the international gateway to San Francisco
and the innovation capital of the world.
Mayor Edwin M. Lee
19 Cargo
21 Awards & Recognition
23 Building for the Future
25 Letter from the Airport Director
27 Letter from the Commission President
29 Financial Summary
37 Airport Commission &Airport Management
Malaspina Glacier, Alaska
For more than 85 years, San Francisco International Airport (SFO) has been connecting people with places. With
40 airlines and 112 direct destinations, SFO continues to be one of the world’s major airports, ranking 7th in North
America and 22nd in the world in 2012. In Fiscal Year (FY) 2012/13 (July through June), total passenger volume
reached 44.7 million, a 3.9% increase from the prior year. Both measures established a new peak for SFO.
United Airlines (UA) and Virgin America (VX) accounted for a majority of the domestic growth with over 600,000
additional domestic enplanements1, or 86% of the total domestic growth in the FY. UA introduced year-round
non-stop service to Raleigh-Durham, NC and Ft. Lauderdale, FL. VX introduced year-round non-stop service to
Washington D.C. Reagan National Airport; Newark, NJ and Austin, TX; and seasonal service to Palm Springs, CA
and Anchorage, AK.
International traffic continued to grow as well, primarily to Asia, Europe and Latin America, with nearly 130,000
more enplanements1, accounting for 89% of international growth. New service included SAS Scandinavian Airlines
(SK) to Copenhagen, DK; China Eastern (MU) to Shanghai, CN and United Airlines (UA) to Paris, FR.
1 Passengers boarding an aircraft at SFO.
The spectacular images are courtesy of the U.S. Geological Survey’s “Earth as Art” Collection. These aerial views
represent some of the countries served by the airlines at SFO.
3
Connecting the Wor ld
Lake Eyre, Australia
AirTran Airways
Alaska Airlines
American Airlines
Delta Air Lines
Frontier Airlines
Hawaiian Airlines
Horizon Air
JetBlue Airways
Southwest Airlines
Sun Country Airlines
United Airlines
United Express
US Airways
Virgin America
ABQ Albuquerque, NM
ACV Eureka, CA
ANC Anchorage, AK
ATL Atlanta, GA
AUS Austin, TX
BFL Bakersfield, CA
BOI Boise, ID
BOS Boston, MA
BUR Burbank, CA
BWI Baltimore, MD
BZN Bozeman, MT
CEC Crescent City, CA
CIC Chico, CA
CLE Cleveland, OH
CLT Charlotte, NC
COS Colorado Springs, CO
CVG Cincinnati, OH
DCA Washington-Reagan, VA
DEN Denver, CO
DFW Dallas/Fort Worth, TX
DTW Detroit, MI
EUG Eugene, OR
EWR Newark, NJ
FAT Fresno, CA
FLL Fort Lauderdale, FL
GEG Spokane, WA
D E S T I N A T I O N S
SFO ha s an average of 500 da i ly non-stop depa r ture s to
de st inat ions in the United States of A mer ica .
C A R R I E R S
5Arizona, United States of America
HNL Honolulu/Oahu, HI
IAD Washington-Dulles, VA
IAH Houston, TX
IDA Idaho Falls, ID
ITO Hilo, HI
JAC Jackson Hole, WY
JFK New York, NY
KOA Kona, HI
LAS Las Vegas, NV
LAX Los Angeles, CA
LGB Long Beach, CA
LIH Lihue/Kauai, HI
LMT Klamath Falls, OR
MCI Kansas City, MO
MCO Orlando, FL
MDW Chicago-Midway, IL
MEM Memphis, TN
MFR Medford, OR
MIA Miami, FL
MKE Milwaukee, WI
MOD Modesto, CA
MRY Monterey, CA
MSO Missoula, MT
MSP Minneapolis/St. Paul, MN
MSY New Orleans, LA
OGG Kahului/Maui, HI
OKC Oklahoma City, OK
ONT Ontario, CA
ORD Chicago-O’Hare, IL
OTH North Bend, OR
PDX Portland, OR
PHL Philadelphia, PA
PHX Phoenix, AZ
PIT Pittsburgh, PA
PSC Pasco/Tri-Cities, WA
PSP Palm Springs, CA
RDD Redding, CA
RDM Redmond, OR
RDU Raleigh-Durham, NC
RNO Reno, NV
SAN San Diego, CA
SAT San Antonio, TX
SBA Santa Barbara, CA
SBP San Luis Obispo, CA
SEA Seattle/Tacoma, WA
SLC Salt Lake City, UT
SMF Sacramento, CA
SNA Orange County, CA
STL St. Louis, MO
TUS Tucson, AZ
D E S T I N A T I O N S ( c o n t i n u e d )
Domest ic pa s senger t ra f f ic to de st inat ions in the
United States of A mer ica increa sed by 4.2%.
7Meandering Mississippi, United States of America
Transpaci f ic or ig in and dest inat ion t ra f f ic to
Asi a /Oce a ni a grew by 6 .9% in 2012 .
Air China
Air New Zealand
All Nippon Airways
Asiana Airlines
Cathay Pacific Airways
China Airlines
China Eastern
Delta Air Lines
EVA Airways
Japan Airlines
Korean Airlines
Philippine Airlines
Singapore Airlines
United Airlines
AKL Auckland, NZ
HND Tokyo-Haneda, JP
HKG Hong Kong, HK
ICN Seoul-Incheon, KR
KIX Osaka-Kansai, JP
MNL Manila, PH
NRT Tokyo-Narita, JP
PEK Beijing, CN
PVG Shanghai, CN
SIN Singapore via Hong Kong, HK or Seoul, KR
SYD Sydney, AU
TPE Taipei, TW
WUH Wuhan, CN via Shanghai, CN
D E S T I N A T I O N S
C A R R I E R S
9Alluvial Fan, China
11
A irl ine s at SFO of fer an average of 5,000 da i ly non-stop seat s to
de st inat ions in Europe and the Middle E ast.
Air Berlin
Air France
British Airways
Emirates
KLM Royal Dutch Airlines
Lufthansa German Airlines
SAS Scandinavian Airlines
Swiss International Air Lines
United Airlines
Virgin Atlantic Airways
XL Airways France
AMS Amsterdam, NL
CDG Paris-De Gaulle, FR
CPH Copenhagen, DK
DUS Düsseldorf, DE
DXB Dubai, AE
FRA Frankfurt, DE
LHR London-Heathrow, UK
MUC Munich, DE
ZRH Zurich, CH
D E S T I N A T I O N S
C A R R I E R S
Lake District, England
13
More than 1.2 mi l l ion pa s sengers f lew to/f rom Ca na da .
Air Canada
United Airlines
WestJet
YEG Edmonton, CA
YUL Montreal, CA
YVR Vancouver, CA
YYC Calgary, CA
YYJ Victoria, CA
YYZ Toronto, CA
D E S T I N A T I O N S
C A R R I E R S
Ice Stars, Canada
15
Pa ssenger t ra f f ic to de st inat ions in
L atin A mer ica grew by 8.2%.
AeroMexico
Alaska Airlines
LAN Peru
Taca International Airlines
United Airlines
Virgin America
CUN Cancun, MX
GDL Guadalajara, MX
GRU Sao Paulo, BR via Lima, PE
LIM Lima, PE
MEX Mexico City, MX
PVR Puerto Vallarta, MX
SAL San Salvador, SV
SJD San Jose del Cabo, MX
D E S T I N A T I O N S
C A R R I E R S
Pinacate Volcano Field, Mexico
17
Facts & Figur es
PassengersTotal Passengers 44,741,921
Total Bay Area Market Share (7th in North America, 22nd in the world in 20121)
71%
Domestic Enplaned and Deplaned Passengers (78%) 35,024,595
Domestic Bay Area Market Share 66%
International Enplaned and Deplaned Passengers (22%) 9,594,782
International Bay Area Market Share 96%
Through (In-transit) 122,544
Top 5 A irl ines by Market Sha reUnited Airlines 46%
Virgin America 9%
Delta Air Lines 8%
Southwest/AirTran Airlines 8%American Airlines 7%
Top 5 Domest ic Dest inat ions2
Greater Los Angeles Area, CA (BUR , LAX, LGB, ONT & SNA)
Greater New York Area, NY (EWR & JFK)
Greater Chicago Area, IL (MDW & ORD)
Las Vegas, NV (LAS)
San Diego, CA (SAN)
Top 5 Internat iona l Dest inat ions3
London/Heathrow, UK (LHR)
Tokyo/Haneda & Narita, JP (HND & NRT)
Hong Kong, HK (HKG)
Seoul/Incheon, KR (ICN)
Vancouver, BC, CA (YVR)
1 Source: Airports Council International2 By average flights per week3 By average seat capacity per week
North America
19
Ca rgo
Total Cargo (metric tons) 329,571
Domestic 117,514
International 212,057
ABX Air
Air Cargo Carriers
Ameriflight
Asiana Airlines
Atlas Air
Cathay Pacific Airways
China Airlines
EVA Airways
Evergreen International Airlines
FedEx
Kalitta Air
Korean Airlines
Nippon Cargo Airlines
Singapore Airlines Cargo
Southern Air
World Airways
C A R R I E R S 2
C A R G O 1
1 Excludes mail2 Includes freighters
Akpatok Island, Canada
21
Awa r ds & R ecognit ion
Best A irpor t in t he A mer ica s Frequent Business Traveler
Gold Magel la n Award Travel Weekly Sustainability Leader in the Overall - Eco-Friendly 'Green' Airport Category
Si lver Magel la n Award Travel Weekly Overall Social Media Program
A irpor t s Going Green Award Chicago Department of Aviation Employee Wellness Program
Concession Program Airports Council International - North America Outstanding Concession Program - First Place Best Food & Beverage Program in the Large Airport Category - First Place Best New Food & Beverage (Self-Service Concept) for Napa Farms Market in Terminal 2 Best Innovative Consumer Experience Concept or Practice - Third Place Best Green Concessions Practice or Concept - Third Place
Concession Program Airport Revenue News Airport with the Best Concessions Management Team Airport with the Best Overall Concession Program - Tied In the Single Terminal Division: Airport with the Most Unique Services (Terminal 2) Airport with the Best Overall Concession Program
Best Sing le Socia l Media Promot ion by a U.S. A irpor t Travel + Leisure #SFOHolidays Postagram Campaign
E xcel lence in Market ing Airports Council International - North America Annual Report - Third Place
Great Sandy Desert, Australia
SFO is redefining what tomorrow's air travel will be with a $4.1 billion, 10-year Capital Improvement Plan which includes:
• Terminal 3 East• Terminal 1 Boarding Area B Redevelopment• On-Airport Hotel• Terminal 3 West and Boarding Area F Redevelopment
Projects currently underway:
• Runway Safety Area (RSA) Program• Air Traffic Control Tower• Terminal 3 Boarding Area E Renovation• Terminal 3 East Connector• West Field Cargo
Projects completed in FY 2012/2013:
• Marine Emergency Rescue Facility (MERF)
23
Building for the Futur e
Lake Amadeus, Australia
I am pleased to report that San Francisco International Airport (SFO) had another successful year. During this period,
nearly 45 million passengers traveled through SFO, eclipsing the prior year’s passenger traffic and establishing a new
record.
As a result of continued traffic growth, we are investing in the airport’s future, with a 10-Year Capital Improvement
Plan (CIP). This $4.1 billion investment will allow us to elevate the quality of all passenger facilities to meet or exceed
the high standard established in Terminal 2. Scheduled to open in January 2014, Terminal 3, Boarding Area E will
provide a vastly improved passenger experience. The dramatic renovation of Terminal 1, Boarding Area B is in its early
planning stage and will feature 24 gates at the conclusion of this multi-phase project. We are even developing a plan to
further improve the services and amenities in the International Terminal, which opened in 2000.
Creating an exceptional airport also requires making travel seamless. Towards that end, the CIP will include the
development of a luxury 400-room four-star on-airport hotel accessible by SFO’s light rail AirTrain system. While a
hotel operator will manage the facility, SFO will assume the construction cost and retain oversight to ensure that
quality and service levels remain consistent with its terminal facilities.
These projects will also demonstrate our commitment to environmental leadership by meeting or exceeding
sustainability guidelines. A new Airfield Operations facility will incorporate a net-zero energy design that will utilize
solar panels to produce 100% of its energy requirements. This facility is expected to achieve the Airport’s first LEED®
Platinum certification.
SFO also completed and received FAA certification for the construction of new Runway Safety Areas on our two major
runways. Work is on-schedule for the project to be completed in 2014, one year ahead of federal requirements. We will
continue our unwavering commitment to safety.
I am grateful to San Francisco Mayor Edwin M. Lee and the members of the Airport Commission for their continued
guidance and support which is integral to SFO achieving its vision as a world-class airport. I am also extremely proud
of our dedicated airport staff for the way in which they responded to the Asiana Flight 214 incident on July 6, 2013.
Hundreds of employees rushed to the airport immediately without being asked. I’ve never seen so many people pull
together so quickly and so unselfishly. They truly exemplified the airport’s core value: “we are one team.”
John L. Martin Airport Director
Letter from the A ir port Dir ector
25Bogda Mountains, China
27
San Francisco International Airport (SFO) continues to serve as an economic engine for the region, fueling local
economies through the jobs it creates and the revenue it generates. In 2012, SFO accounted for $5.4 billion in
business activity and supported 33,580 direct airport jobs. When off-site business activities directly dependent on
airport services are included, SFO contributed $31.2 billion in business sales with 153,000 jobs in the area. The
approval of the Capital Improvement Plan will continue this trend by creating more than 36,000 jobs over the next
ten years.
SFO also continues to be on the forefront with its outreach program to small and disadvantaged businesses, having
first created a Small Business Affairs Office in 1982. For the past three years, SFO has awarded over 30% of contract
dollars to Local Business Enterprises (LBEs) and Disadvantaged Business Enterprises (DBEs) and airport DBEs now
account for over 50% of concession leases, generating over $73 million in revenues annually.
The airport clearly recognizes the value of quality concessions and local business involvement and revenue reflects the
customer demand for such options. Terminal 2, with its locally-sourced concessions, reflects the diversity of the Bay
Area and boasts the highest spend rate per passenger of any terminal in the United States. As a result, SFO was
honored by both Airports Council America-North America and Airport Revenue News with multiple awards for its
concession program.
SFO will continue to provide such opportunities, as evidenced by the innovative “pop-up” concession concept which
will launch in the renovated Terminal 3 Boarding Area E. This program provides move-in ready concession space to
small businesses unable to incur the traditional startup costs of an airport environment. In return, customers at SFO
will gain even greater access to unique shopping and dining offerings to ensure their exceptional airport experience.
On behalf of the Airport Commission, I extend my sincere congratulations to SFO on the accolades it has earned over
the past year. These awards and recognition showcase the high standards of operation set by Airport Director John L.
Martin and serve as a testament to commitment and capability of the employees at SFO.
Larry Mazzola President, Airport Commission
Letter from the Commission Pr esident
Campeche, Mexico
Fina nci a l Summ a ry
High l ight s of A irl ine Operat ions at the A irpor t
Fiscal Year 2013 passenger traffic at SFO concluded with 22.3 million enplanements, an increase of 4.0% compared to
the prior fiscal year that established a new peak for the Airport. Service additions from SFO’s largest carrier, United
Airlines, and second largest and hometown airline, Virgin America, led to most of the increase. Two new international
carriers, Scandinavian Airlines and China Eastern, introduced service in April 2013. Total cargo and U.S. mail
tonnage declined by 3.9% with reduced domestic and Asia shipments.
The 4.0% fiscal year-over-year enplanement increase at SFO compares to an increase of 3.1%1 at Oakland International
Airport and an increase of 2.7%2 at Mineta San Jose International Airport, resulting in a Bay Area passenger market
share increase of 0.3 percentage point for SFO to 70.8%. As compared to Department of Transportation (DOT) data
through June 2013, SFO’s enplanement increase of 4.0% fared better than a national average increase of 0.2%.3
1 Source: Oakland International Airport Traffic Report.2 Source: Mineta San Jose International Airport Traffic Report.3 Source: U.S. Department of Transportation, Bureau of Transportation Statistics.
29Alaska, United States of America
Net Posit ion Summar y (in thousands)
FY 2013 FY2012
FY 2013 Increase
(Decrease)
Assets:
Unrestricted current assets $ 399,085 387,781 11,304
Restricted assets available for current outlay 159,004 114,727 44,277
Restricted assets 424,055 390,371 33,684
Capital assets, net 3,720,791 3,734,426 (13,635)
Unamortized bond issuance costs 25,269 28,753 (3,484)
Total assets 4,728,204 4,656,058 72,146
Deferred outflows on derivative instruments 64,743 98,979 (34,236)
Total assets and deferred outflows 4,792,947 4,755,037 37,910
Liabilities:
Current liabilities payable from unrestricted assets 500,511 424,916 75,595
Current liabilities payable from restricted assets 295,698 91,139 204,559
Noncurrent liabilities 3,620,981 3,831,511 (210,530)
Derivative instruments 81,338 116,859 (35,521)
Total liabilities 4,498,528 4,464,425 34,103
Net position:
Net investment in capital assets (52,581) 4,190 (56,771)
Restricted for debt service 19,757 25,711 (5,954)
Restricted for capital projects 139,981 71,109 68,872
Unrestricted 187,262 189,602 (2,340)
Total net position $ 294,419 290,612 3,807
30
High l ight s of Cha nges in Net Posit ion (in thousands)
FY 2013 FY 2012
FY 2013 Increase
(Decrease)
Operating revenues $ 726,358 668,672 57,686
Operating expenses 561,458 543,063 18,395
Operating income 164,900 125,609 39,291
Other non-operating expenses, net (190,587) (106,512) (84,075)
Income (loss) before capital contributions and transfers (25,687) 19,097 (44,784)
Capital contributions 65,958 14,538 51,420
Transfers to City and County of San Francisco (36,464) (33,993) (2,471)
Changes in net position 3,807 (358) 4,165
Total net position at beginning of year 290,612 290,970 (358)
Total net position at end of year $ 294,419 290,612 3,807
31
Operat ing Revenues (in millions)
Aviation $ 413.9 57%Concession 129.5 18%Parking & Transportation 113.6 16%Net Sales & Services 69.3 9%
Total $ 726.3 100%
Operat ing E xpenses (in millions)
Personnel $ 239.2 43%Depreciation 176.5 31%Contractual Services 62.9 11%Repairs & Maintenance 27.6 5%Light, Heat & Power 19.3 3%Services Provided by Other City Departments 14.6 3%Materials & Supplies 14.0 3%Amortization of Bond Issuance Costs 4.4 <1%General & Administrative 2.8 <1%Environmental Remediation 0.1 <1%
Total $ 561.4 100%
Independent Auditor’s Repor t
The Honorable Mayor and Board of Supervisors
City and County of San Francisco:
Report on Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying financial statements of the Airport Commission, City and County of San
Francisco, San Francisco International Airport (the Airport), an enterprise fund of the City and County of San
Francisco, California (the City), which comprise the statements of net position as of June 30, 2013 and 2012, and the
related statements of changes in net position and statements of cash flows for the years then ended, and the related
notes to the financial statements.
Management’s Responsibility for the Financial Statements
Management is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of these financial statements in accordance with
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles; this includes the design, implementation, and maintenance of internal
control relevant to the preparation and fair presentation of financial statements that are free from material
misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.
Auditors’ Responsibility
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits
in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America; the standards applicable to
financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards issued by the Comptroller General of the United States.
Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free from material misstatement.
An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditors’ judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material
misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor
considers internal control relevant to the Airport’s preparation and fair presentation of the financial statements in
order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an
opinion on the effectiveness of the Airport’s internal control. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also
includes evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of significant accounting
estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements.
32 33
We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit
opinion.
Opinion
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position
of the Airport Commission, City and County of San Francisco, San Francisco International Airport as of June 30,
2013 and 2012, and changes in its net position and its cash flows for the years then ended in accordance with U.S.
generally accepted accounting principles.
Emphasis of Matter
As discussed in note 1, the financial statements of the Airport are intended to present the net position and the changes
in net position and cash flows of only that portion of the City that is attributable to the transactions of the Airport.
They do not purport to, and do not, present fairly the net position of the City as of June 30, 2013 and 2012, the
changes in its net position, or, where applicable, the cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with U.S.
generally accepted accounting principles.
Other Matters
Required Supplementary Information
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles require that the information in the Management’s Discussion and
Analysis on pages 4 through 31 be presented to supplement the basic financial statements. Such information, although
not a part of the basic financial statements, is required by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board, which
considers it to be an essential part of financial reporting for placing the basic financial statements in an appropriate
operational, economic, or historical context. We have applied certain limited procedures to the required
supplementary information in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of
America, which consisted of inquiries of management about the methods of preparing the information and comparing
the information for consistency with management’s responses to our inquiries, the basic financial statements, and other
knowledge we obtained during our audits of the basic financial statements. We do not express an opinion or provide
any assurance on the information because the limited procedures do not provide us with sufficient evidence to express
an opinion or provide any assurance.
Supplementary and Other Information
Our audits were conducted for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic financial statements of the Airport
Commission, City and County of San Francisco, San Francisco International Airport. The accompanying Schedule of
Passenger Facility Charge Revenues and Expenditures is presented for purposes of additional analysis as specified in
the Passenger Facility Charge Audit Guide for Public Agencies, issued by the Federal Aviation Administration, and is not
a required part of the basic financial statements. Such information is the responsibility of management and was derived
from and relates directly to the underlying accounting and other records used to prepare the basic financial statements.
The Schedule of Passenger Facility Charge Revenues and Expenditures has been subjected to the auditing procedures
applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and certain additional procedures, including comparing and
reconciling such information directly to the underlying accounting and other records used to prepare the basic
financial statements or to the basic financial statements themselves, and other additional procedures in accordance
with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. In our opinion, the Schedule of
Passenger Facility Charge Revenues and Expenditures is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the basic
financial statements as a whole.
Other Reporting Required by Government Auditing Standards
In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued our report dated October 25, 2013, on our
consideration of the Airport’s internal control over financial reporting and our report dated October 25, 2013 on our
tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts, and grant agreements and other matters.
The purpose of that report is to describe the scope of our testing of internal control over financial reporting and
compliance and the results of that testing, and not to provide an opinion on the internal control over financial
reporting or on compliance. That report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government
Auditing Standards in considering the Airport’s internal control over financial reporting and compliance.
San Francisco, California
October 25, 2013
To view the entire fiscal year 2012-2013 audited financial statements visit: www.flysfo.com/fy1213afs
2
The Management’s Discussion and Analysis on pages 3 through 31 is not a required part of the basic financial statements but is supplementary information required by U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. We have applied certain limited procedures, which consisted principally of inquiries of management regarding the methods of measurement and presentation of the required supplementary information. However, we did not audit the information and express no opinion on it.
Our audits were conducted for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic financial statements of the Airport Commission, City and County of San Francisco, San Francisco International Airport. The accompanying Schedule of Passenger Facility Charge Revenues and Expenditures is presented for purposes of additional analysis as specified in the Passenger Facility Charge Audit Guide for Public Agencies, issued by the Federal Aviation Administration, and is not a required part of the basic financial statements. Such information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audits of the basic financial statements and, in our opinion, is fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole.
As discussed in note 2(b) to the financial statements, the Airport adopted the recognition and disclosure requirements of Governmental Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 53, Accounting and Financial Reporting for Derivative Instruments, as of July 1, 2009. The financial statements for the year ended June 30, 2009 were restated to reflect the impact of adoption.
October 28, 2011
34 35
John L. Martin, Airport Director
Shauna Marie Rose, Executive Assistant to the Airport Director
Tryg McCoy, Chief Operating Officer
Julian Potter, Chief of Staff
Theresa Lee, Deputy Airport Director, Administration
Leo Fermin, Deputy Airport Director, Business & Finance
Kandace Bender, Deputy Airport Director, Communications & Marketing
Jeff Littlefield, Deputy Airport Director, Operations & Security
Ivar Satero, Deputy Airport Director, Design, Construction & Technology
Blake Summers, Director & Chief Curator, SFO Museum
Peter Acton, Director, Facilities Maintenance
John Bergener, Manager, Airport Planning
Jean Caramatti, Commission Secretary
Sheryl Bregman, Airport General Counsel
Larry Mazzola, President
Linda S. Crayton, Vice President
Eleanor Johns
Richard J. Guggenhime
Peter A. Stern
A ir port Commission
A ir port M a nagement
37Yukon Delta, Alaska
San Francisco International AirportP.O. Box 8097
San Francisco, CA 94128-8097(650) 821-5000