san franciscosan francisco--oakland bay bridge … · 2009 – bata authorizes preparation of a...

29
San Francisco San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge West Oakland Bay Bridge West Span Bicycle/Pedestrian/Maintenance Path an Bicycle/Pedestrian/Maintenance Path Span Bicycle/Pedestrian/Maintenance Path an Bicycle/Pedestrian/Maintenance Path Prepared for Prepared by December 13, 2011 1

Upload: duongdung

Post on 28-Sep-2018

212 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

San FranciscoSan Francisco--Oakland Bay Bridge West Oakland Bay Bridge West SSppan Bicycle/Pedestrian/Maintenance Pathan Bicycle/Pedestrian/Maintenance PathSSppan Bicycle/Pedestrian/Maintenance Pathan Bicycle/Pedestrian/Maintenance Path

Prepared for Prepared by

December 13, 201111

Project overview

Presentation OverviewPresentation Overview Project overview Background Project goals San Francisco downtown connections Path on West Span YBI/TI connections YBI/TI connections Project schedule, cost & phasing Next step

22

Project OverviewProject Overview

33

1936 – Bay Bridge Opened

BackgroundBackground 1936 – Bay Bridge Opened 1950’s – Rail Removed from Lower Deck

1989 Loma Prieta Earthquake Damage 1989 – Loma Prieta Earthquake Damage 2001 – West Span Bike/Ped/Maint. Pathway

Feasibility Study CompletedFeasibility Study Completed 2004 – West Span Seismic Retrofit Completed

200 S O C 2006 – West Span Deck Overlay Completed 2009 – BATA authorizes preparation of a Project

St d R t t id tif lt ti d d t Study Report to identify alternatives and update costs for future funding decisions on a West Span Bike/Ped/Maint PathwayBike/Ped/Maint. Pathway

44

Project GoalsProject Goals

San Francisco downtown bicycle &

pedestrian link to East Bay & Treasure Islandpedestrian link to East Bay & Treasure Island

Caltrans maintenance access to reduce

daily maintenance closure

55

San Francisco Design ConsiderationsSan Francisco Design Considerations ADA requirements ADA requirements Bicycle design requirements Lack of right of way Planned developmentp Connectivity Safety Safety Costs Environmental impact

66

Downtown Downtown SFSF Planned DevelopmentPlanned Development

77

SF Bike Plan & ConnectivitySF Bike Plan & Connectivity

88

San FranciscoSan Francisco--Alt SFN Alt SFN –– 1A1A

99

Alternative SFN Alternative SFN –– 1CX31CX3

1010

Alternative SFN Alternative SFN –– 1F1F

1111

Pier W1 Elevator & Stairs TowerPier W1 Elevator & Stairs Tower

1212

Alternative SFAlternative SFSS –– 2 and 2B2 and 2B

1313

Alternatives Considered & DeferredAlternatives Considered & Deferred

1414

Main Span Design ConsiderationsMain Span Design Considerations

Seismic

Wind Wind

ConstructabilityConstructability

Maintenance considerations

Shipping channel clearance

1515

Shipping Channel Clearance Shipping Channel Clearance

Suspender cable shortening

Deck replacement Deck replacement

•Savings For BPM Path Project

•Minimize traffic disruption

1616

Main Span Cross SectionMain Span Cross Section

1717

Main Main (West) (West) SpanSpan

1818

YBI Design ConsiderationsYBI Design Considerations ADA requirements ADA requirements Steep terrain Planned development Lack of right of wayg y Maintenance of USCG operations Safety Safety Cost Environmental impact

1919

Treasure Island Circulation PlanTreasure Island Circulation Plan

2020

AlternativeAlternative YBI YBI –– N1N1

2121

AlternativeAlternative YBI YBI –– 2A2A

2222

Alternatives Considered & DeferredAlternatives Considered & Deferred

2323

Alternatives Considered & DeferredAlternatives Considered & Deferred

2424

Project ScheduleProject Schedule

IdentificationOf ProjectFunding

Funding Commitment Made

Preliminary DesignEnvironmental

Final DesignAcquire Right of Way

Project Environmental Approval

Construction

0 2 4 6 8 10

2525

Project CostProject CostHi h j t t i h ll High project cost is a challenge

Estimate being developed Estimate being developed

2001 Study Estimate $300 to $350 million y

(2011 Dollars)

Additional escalation of $200 million if

j t d t dproject proceeds today

Cost escalation for future start undetermined Cost escalation for future start undetermined2626

Project PhasingProject Phasing

Minimum Cost Initial Segment

Phased/Initial phased segment approach Phased/Initial phased segment approach

•North side- public access

•South side- maintenance only

•Does not preclude further south side access

Cost red ction /Deck replacement Cost reduction w/Deck replacement

Potential savings $70 million range (2011$) Potential savings $70 million range (2011$)2727

Next StepNext Step

Public meeting: December 13, 2011

PID completion : Summer 2012

Allows for programming of funds to develop

project

2828

Information Request/Comments/IdeasInformation Request/Comments/IdeasBATABATABATABATA Peter LeeBATABATABATABATA Peter Lee

[email protected]

CaltransCaltrans(510) 817-5716Robert BlancoCaltransCaltrans Robert [email protected](510) 286 8676

Project TeamProject Team(510) 286-8676Francis Lo [email protected] (510) 457-3038

2929

(510) 457 3038