scaler curvature equation - nim.nankai.edu.cn ji.pdfn = 2: morser, hong, ... at every critical point...
TRANSCRIPT
Scaler Curvature Equation
on Sn
Min Ji
Academy of Mathematics and System Sciences
Chinese Academy of Sciences
December 2008
1. Introduction
Let Sn = x ∈ Rn+1 : |x| = 1, n ≥ 3,
g0 = dx21 + dx2
2 + · · · + dx2n+1.
• Scalar Curvature Equation:
−cn u + R0u = R un+2n−2
u > 0,on Sn (1)
where
cn =4(n − 1)
(n − 2), R0 = n(n − 1),
R : Sn → R1 is a given positive, smooth function.
• Kazdan-Warner Problem: Given R : Sn → R1, find metric g
s.t.
– R = scalar curvature of g;
– g is pointwise conformal to g0.
• Equivalent Problem: Write
g = u4
n−2 g0, u > 0.
Then geometric problem ⇐⇒ solvability of (1).
• Remarks:
a) When n = 2, it is called the Nirenberg Problem which involves a
different equation.
b) Difficulties in two aspects
1) analysis: not compact, no minimun if R 6=constant;
2) topology: Kazdan-Warner necessary condition
c) Many works: Morser, Hong, Chen-Ding, Chang-Yang, Han,
Chen-Li, Chang-Liu, Ma, Xu-Yang, Escobar-Schoen, Hebey, Chen,
Zhang, Chang-Gursky-Yang, Y.Y. Li, Ambrosetti-Malchiodi,
Chen-Lin, Lin, Cao ...
• Minimizers in symmetric cases
Let H be a subgroup of the orthogonal transformations on Rn+1.
Let R be H-symmetric.
Consider
XH = u ∈ H1 : u(x) = u(hx), ∀h ∈ H.
Minimize the functional in XH
n = 2: Morser, Hong, Chen-Ding, · · ·
n ≥ 3: Escobar-Schoen, Hebey, Chen, · · ·
under some additional conditions
• Bahri-Coron Theorem (1991): Let n = 3.
Assumptions:
a) R is a Morse function;
b) |∇R| + |R| 6= 0 on Sn;
c) Index condition:
∑
∇R(x)=0,R(x)<0
(−1)ind(x) 6= (−1)n,
where ind(x)= Morse index.
Conclusion: Solution of (1) exists.
• Remark:
When n = 2, same result was given by Chang-Yang (1987).
Methods: Variational method + Minimax procedure.
• Generalized Bahri-Coron Theorem (Li, 1995):
Assumptions:
a) At every critical point p, under a geodesic normal coordinate
system centered at p,
R(y) = R(0) +n
∑
j=1
bj |yj |α + R(y), |y| ≪ 1,
where α ∈ (n − 2, n), bj 6= 0(∀j),∑n
j=1 bj 6= 0, and, R(y) = o(|y|α).
b) Index condition:∑
∇R(p)=0,Pn
j=1 bj<0
(−1)i(p) 6= (−1)n,
where i(p) = ♯bj : bj < 0.
Conclusion: Solutions of (1) exist.
• Remark: Allow α ∈ (1, n) if R ≈ R0.
Topological degree approach:
— Two steps:
1) Perturbation problem: R ≈ R0.
2) Deformation problem:
Rµ = µR + (1 − µ)R0, ∀ ǫ ≤ µ ≤ 1, (ǫ << 1).
Assume the a prior estimate
0 < C(R, n, ǫ)−1 ≤ uµ ≤ C(R, n, ǫ)
=⇒The Leray-Schauder degree associated with R1 = R and
Rǫ ≈ R0 are the same.
Perturbation Result:
— Chang-Yang (1991, 1993), Chang-Gursky-Yang(1993), Li (1995)
Assumptions:
1) ‖R − R0‖ ≤ ǫn;
2) Li’s uniform condition on R.
Conclusion: If deg(Gt, B, 0) 6= 0 as t ≫ 1, then solution of (1)
exists. Here
B = x ∈ Rn+1 : |x|2 = 1
the family of maps
Gt : Sn → Rn+1 (t ≥ 1) −−− Chang-Yang Map
Leray-Schauder degree = (−1)n deg(Gt, B, 0)
• Chang-Yang Map:
— the family of maps Gt : Sn → Rn+1, t ≥ 1
Gt(P ) =
∫
Sn
(
R φP,t
)
(x)x dx, ∀P ∈ Sn, t ≥ 1,
where φP,t : Sn → Sn is the conformal transformation, generated
by y 7→ ty (y : Sn \ P → Rn, the stereographic projection
when P is viewed as the north pole of Sn)
• Li’s uniform condition:
∃t0 > 0 and ω(t) with limt→∞ ω(t) = 0, s.t.
ω(t)|Gt(P )| ≥ ‖R φP,t − R(P )‖L2 ‖R φP,t − R(P )‖L2n/(n+2)
∀ t ≥ t0 and P ∈ Sn.
• Remarks:
a) Li’s uniform condition is verified for those special forms of R.
Especially, all critical points need to be non-degenerate;
b) Index condition ⇐⇒ deg(Gt, B, 0) 6= 0;
c) flatness condition: α ∈ (n − 2, n) =⇒ a priori estimate;
d) R is not allowed to be Cα+1 when α is odd.
• Questions:
Q1) How to verify Li’s uniform condition when R admits some
degenerate, or infinitely many, critical points?
Q2) How to verify the degree condition deg(Gt, B, 0) 6= 0 when R is
neither a Morse function nor of a special form?
Ji, Scaler Curvature Equation on Sn, Part I, · · ·
• Main Idea:
a) Establish asymptotic formulas for both Gt as t ≫ 1, and
‖R φP,t − R(P )‖L2 , ∀P ∈ Sn, as t ≫ 1.
(use to control both sides of Li’s condition)
b) Construct simple maps, G(β)t , having the same degree as Gt.
• Consequences:
1) Using these two asymptotic formulas, we can easily verify Li’s
uniform condition, by posing explicit conditions on R, without
assuming isolation and non-degeneracy of its critical points.
2) Leading to existence results using degree condition
deg(G(β)t , B, 0) 6= 0.
(the degree of G(β)t is easier to compute due to its simplicity)
The maps G(β)t :
• Definition: Let 2 ≤ β ≤ 2[n2 ] , an integer. Define, ∀x ∈ Sn,
G(β)t (x) : =
∇Re · ∇x − (Re)x when β is even,
∇Ro · ∇x − (Re)x when β is odd,
Re : =
R when β ≤ 3,
R + 1t2R + · · · + 1
t2(k−1)k−1R when β ≥ 4,
Ro : = Re +1
t2kkR, k = [
β
2].
• Special Cases:
— β = 2: G(2)t = ∇R · ∇x − (R)x := G independent of t;
— β = 3: G(3)t = G + 1
t2∇R · ∇x;
— β = 4: G(4)t = G + 1
t2(∇R · ∇x − (2R) x).
2. Analytical Characterizations
Ji, Scaler Curvature Equation on Sn, Part II, · · ·
Discuss
deg(G(β)t , B, 0) 6= 0 for an integer β
Let R be H-symmetric.
1) Existence of H-symmetric solutions:
deg(G(β)t , BH , 0) 6= 0
where
BH = x ∈ Rn+1 : |x|2 = 1, hx = x, ∀h ∈ H.
2) Existence of sub-H-symmetric solutions:
• It is possible that (1) do admit solutions, but does not admit
H-symmetric solutions(Chen-Li’s example). Necessarily
deg(G(β)t , BH , 0)= 0.
• If deg(G(β)t , BH , 0)= 0, find a subgroup Q ⊂ H, s.t.
deg(G(β)t , BQ, 0) 6= 0 (as t ≫ 1) ⇒ ∃Q-symmetric solution .
• General maps
F : Sm → Rm+1, defined by
F (x) = ∇f1(x) · ∇x + f2(x)x, x ∈ Sm,
where 0 ≤ m ≤ n, f1 ∈ C1(Sm), f2 ∈ C0(Sm), satisfying
|∇f1| + |f2| 6= 0, on Sm.
Taking m = dim(SH), SH = ∂BH ,
f1 =k
∑
i=0
1
t2iiR
∣
∣
∣
SH
, f2 = −l
∑
i=1
1
t2i−2iR
∣
∣
∣
SH
, t ≥ t0,
where 0 = 1, k = [β−12 ], l = [β
2 ].
3) Extension to cases where R is H-symmetric-like provided that
deg(G(β)t , B, 0) 6= 0 in H-symmetric cases.
• H-symmetric-like property:
∇f1(x) · h−1∇f1(hx) + f2(x)f2(hx) ≥ 0 x ∈ Sn, h ∈ H.
Remarks:
When R is H-symmetric, then
• f1, f2 are H-symmetric
left terms = |∇f1(x)|2 + |f2(x)|2 > 0.
• G(β)t is equivariant w.r.t. H
⇒ the degree has ”dimension reduction” property:
deg(G(β)t , B, 0) ↔ deg(G
(β)t , BH , 0)
DEGREE FORMULAS for
F (x) = ∇f1(x) · ∇x + f2(x)x, x ∈ Sm
Let N = (0, · · · , 0, 1) be the north pole of Sm.
Identify Sm\N with Rm via the stereographic projection:
yi(x) =xi
1 − xm+1, 1 ≤ i ≤ m, x ∈ Sm.
Without loss of generality,
∇f1(N) = 0.
Let f∗i : Rm → R1 (i = 1, 2), induced by fi, i.e.,
f∗i (y) := fi(x(y)), y ∈ Rm,
Ω− = y : f∗2 (y) < 0, Ω+ = y : f∗
2 (y) > 0.
•Theorem 1.
a) If m = 0, then
deg(F, B1, 0) =
±1, as f2(N)f2(−N) > 0;
0, as f2(N)f2(−N) < 0.
b) If m ≥ 1, then
deg(F, Bm+1, 0)
=
1 − deg(∇f∗1 , Ω−, 0), as f2(N) > 0;
(−1)m+1(
1 − (−1)m deg(∇f∗1 , Ω+, 0)
)
, as f2(N) < 0.
where ∇ is the gradient on the Euclidean spaces.
3. Existence results:
Case 1 dim(SH) = 0;
Case 2 dim(SH) = m ≥ 1: Denote
Σ := x ∈ Sn : ∇R(x) = R(x) = 0, ΣH := Σ⋂
SH ,
K = x ∈ Sn : ∇R(x) = 0, KH := K⋂
SH .
• Corollary (β = 2). Let R ∈ C2,γ .
Assumptions:
ΣH = ∅, and
deg(∇R, R < 0 ∩ Rm, 0) 6= (−1)m as R(N) > 0
deg(∇R, R > 0 ∩ Rm, 0) 6= 1 as R(N) < 0,
Conclusion: H-symmetric solution of (1) exists.
• Remark: R(N) 6= 0 (N ∈ KH).
• Cases where ΣH 6= ∅ are allowed
Di =
∇m, if i = 2m + 1 (m ≥ 0),
m, if i = 2m (m ≥ 1).
L(p) = mini : DiR(p) 6= 0, ∀p ∈ KH
Condition O(L)
—involves mainly conditions on DiR near p for odd i ≤ L.
—Example:
The condition O(3) at p : for some ǫ > 0
∇R · ∇R ≥ −(1 − ǫ)|∇R||∇R|, near p.
Theorem 2. Let R ∈ Cβ,γ .
Assumptions:
a) the condition O(L) at any p ∈ ΣH , w.r.t. H, with L = L(p) ≤ β;
b) E+ (resp. E−) is empty, or is a finite set consisting of isolated
critical points of R|SH and
∑
p∈E+
Indp ∇(R|SH ) 6= 1 ( resp.∑
p∈E−
Indp ∇(R|SH ) 6= (−1)m).
where
E− = p ∈ KH : L = L(p) is even, DLR(p) < 0,
E+ = p ∈ KH : L = L(p) is even, DLR(p) > 0.
Conclusion: H-symmetric solution of (1) exists.
• Remarks:
a) Critical points p of odd L(p) make no contribution to the index
counting formula.
b) Isolation of critical points are only assumed either in E+ or E−.
c) E+ and E− are open sets. So isolation of critical points does not
imply the finiteness of these sets in general.
(in fact this is true if Indp ∇R 6= 0 is further assumed ∀p ∈ E+
(resp. ∀p ∈ E−)).
d) If p is a non-degenerate critical point of R|SH in the sense of
Morse, then Indp ∇R|SH = (−1)ind(p), ind(p) =Morse index of
R|SH at p .
Corollary(β = 2, 3). Let n ≥ 4.
Assumptions:
a) When ΣH 6= ∅, assume ∇R 6= 0 on ΣH , and for pj ⊂ SH ,
pj → p ∈ ΣH , ∃ǫ > 0 s.t.
∇R · ∇R ≥ −(1 − ǫ)|∇R||∇R| at pj .
b) One of the following holds:
(1) R ≥ 0 on SH ;
(2) R ≤ 0 on SH ;
(3) Critical points of R|SH in R < 0 ∩ SH are non-degenerate
∑
x∈KH ,R(x)<0
(−1)Ind(x) 6= (−1)m;
(4) Critical points of R|SH in R > 0 ∩ SH are non-degenerate
and∑
x∈KH ,R(x)>0
(−1)Ind(x) 6= 1.
Conclusion: H-symmetric solution of (1) exists.
• Remarks.
a) This extends Bahri-Coron Theorem (which assumes n = 3,
H = I, Σ = ∅; and R is a Morse function).
b) This extends result of Ambrosetti-Malchiodi (2001), which
assumes ΣH = ∅; and R|SH is a Morse function
• Special form:
(H = I)At each critical point p, under the stereographic
coordinates centered at p,
R(y) = R(0) +n
∑
i=1
biyαii + o(
∑
i
|biyi|αi), |y| ≪ 1.
• Remark:
Comparing with that considered by Li, this is more general by
— allowing some of the bi’s to vanish;
— allowing the power αi’s to be different;
— allowing R to be smooth (it involves powers of yi rather than
those of |yi| )
• Corollary. Let R ∈ C2[ n2 ],γ and denote
α = minαi : bi 6= 0,
± = p ∈ K : α is even, ±∑
αi=α bi > 0,
E = p ∈ K : all αi are even.
Assumptions:
a) For each p ∈ K, α ≤ 2[n2 ] is either odd, or even with
∑
αi=α bi 6= 0.
b) + (resp. − ) is finite, and∑
p∈E∩+
(−1)i(p) 6= 1 (resp.∑
p∈E∩−
(−1)i(p) 6= (−1)n).
Conclusion: Solution of (1) exists.
• Remark: Critical points p with some odd αi(p) make no
contribution to the index counting formula.
Existence of sub-H-symmetric solutions
Typical case: axisymmetric case
R(x) = ζ(xn+1) for some ζ : [−1, 1] → R1
— symmetric w.r.t. H = O(n)
— Xu-Yang (n=2, 1993), Chen-Li(n ≥ 3, 2001):
Under a non-degenerate condition,
not monotone ⇔ existence (no any symmetry)
— Observation
deg(G, B, 0) 6= 0 ⇔
R(N)R(−N) > 0, if n is even.
R is not monotone, if n is odd.
Our Conclusion:
not monotone ⇐⇒ deg(G(β)t , BQ, 0) 6= 0 with Q = O(n − 1).
• Remarks:
a) The non-monotonicity is necessary for solvability.
b) Possibly deg(G(β)t , BH , 0) = 0 for H = O(n).
—This shows that the most suitable symmetry group to use is
O(n − 1) rather than O(n).
In other words, an axisymmetric R should be regarded as a
functions of 2-variables rather than a 1-variable function.
Use the latitude as the variable:
R = R(θ) = ζ(sin θ) −π
2≤ θ ≤
π
2.
• Theorem. Let R ∈ C2[ n2 ],γ be axisymmetric.
Assumption:
|R′(θ)| + |R′′(θ)| + · · · + |R(2[ n2 ])(θ)| 6= 0, ∀θ ∈ [−π/2, π/2].
Conclusion:
R is not monotone iff (1) has O(n − 1)-symmetric solutions.
Remarks:
• The Theorem improves the result of Xu-Yang (n=2), Chen-Li
(n ≥ 3, flatness conditions, and R only admits local extrema type
of critical points, but allows R < 0 somewhere)
Near every positive critical point r0:
R = R(r) = R(r0) + a|r − r0|α + h(|r − r0|),
with a 6= 0, n − 2 < α < n, h′ = o(sα−1).
• Our result for the sub-symmetric solution is given for the general
functions of (m + 1) variables (m < n):
R(x) = ζ(u), ∀x = (x1, · · · , xn−m, u), |x|2 = 1
where ζ is a smooth function on the closed ball Bm+1 ⊂ Rm+1.
— R is Hl-symmetric ∀l ∈ [m, n],
Hl := O(n − l), with the action: ∀h ∈ Hl,
hx = (hx′, xn−l+1, · · · ), ∀x = (x′, xn−l+1, · · · ) ∈ Rn+1.
— m = 0 corresponds to the axisymmetric R.