scaling arguments — the fourier number turkey cooking
TRANSCRIPT
Scaling Arguments — The Fourier Number
Turkey Cooking
Woman's Home Companion Cook Book
Weight n weight Tune/Unit Weight in time/weight
6-10 (8) 2.1 20-25 3.110-16 (13) 2.6 18-20 2.9518-25 (21) 3.0 15-18 2.8
Suppose the whole family is getting together, and we needed to cook a 30-pound turkey. How long should we cook it?
says 1 3 nt nM
1 3t M
Why should a 30-pounder takes in 30 = 3.4 ~ 14 min/lb?
9-1
Turkey Cooking
Why do bigger turkeys take less time to cook per pound?
Turkeys are spheres? — 1st approximation
We know that 2
0
, s
s
T T re f
T T R
, everything here just depends on
dimensionless or "scaled" radius and time. Basically, to cook a turkey, we need to make sure that the interior temperature reaches a
certain value for a certain time; hence:
Since in each case, 0,a , we should have the same dimensionless time, 0
02
t
R
20R
Now this gives us the real time, which depends on R2 of the turkey, assuming all turkeys have the same α:
The mass of turkey (sphere) is: 1 3
3 or M
M R R
21 3
2 3
2 3
M M
so the actual time it takes for a turkey to cook
goes like 2 3M .
If, as in the cookbook, we want to determine the time/mass, we have to: 2 3
1 32 3
1 3 per pound
MM
M M
or M
1/ 3 .nt nM Hence, the theoretical justification of our graph, without any tough PDE's to solve. Often in engineering analysis, the dimensionless Fourier number, τ, is sufficient to scale the problem.
9-2
ChE 120B
Important Numbers on Heat Transfer
2
p
kt
C L - Fourier number — dimensionless time
ratio of convective heat transferBiot number
conductive heat transfer
hL
k
When to do a complete analysis — when not to. First, always do the simplest scaling relationship.
Transient problem – ID,
[ 0
2_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
2 , ,C T
y=0 y=L
0
p
x bT T
xt x
in dimensionless form 0
T T
T T
When to use tabulated data/scaling:
Note that for transient problems in dimensionless form, the solutions are functions of
20
, char. dim.
surface
surface
T Tt
T T
Char. Dim x/L, 0/r r , etc.
And Biot# =.dim.
h
k char
So, all problems are similar and can be used to scale up when needed. What is important in the system geometry, the Fourier number and the Biot number.
9-3
ChE 120B Hamburger Cooking Scaling
For Biot# >> 1, τ = αt/L2 governs the time it takes for a given dimensionless temperature change.
Imagine – McDonalds is planning a 1/2-pounder to replace the 1/4-pounder. To use the same buns, the diameter of the burger is the same but the patty is thicker, however, the centerline temperature of patty must be at the sample temperature as before to prevent intestinal problems due to raw meat. Using the same cooking surface, how much longer will the 1/2-pounder take to cook?
Eng. Analysis:
important dimension
2
b
2
2
2
2
V R b
M V R b
for 1/4-pounders
1
1 2
1
t
b
22 2
2
t
b
but we want 0
0
x surf
surf
T Tsame
T T
so 1 2 – dimensionless time, temperature same
1 22 2
1 2
= t
b b
________ should be same so
1 22 2
1 2
t t
b b
2 12b b to account for extra meat, as R stays the same
1 2
221 1
2
t t
b b
solving we see that
1 24t t
or a 1/2 pounder will take 4 times as long to cook as a 1/4 pounder. This is likely why McDonald's puts two 1/4 pound patties to make their 1/2 pound burger.
9–4
ChE 120B
Superposition
Suppose we are faced with the following problem:
3
1
4 2
t t
t
t
At first glance, a separation of variables solution seems impossible. However, we can break the problem in to simpler sub-problems due to the linearity of the differential equation:
2 2
2 2
x
T T
y
-- Assume we have 4 solutions to the simple problems below:
We can solve each of these by separation of variables.
1 ,T x y =
1
0
0 0
t
2 ,T x y 2
0
0
0
t
3 ,T x y
3
0
0 0
t
4 ,T x y 4
0
0
0
t
9–5
ChE 120B
We know that T1 + T2 + T3 + T4 is also a solution of the differential equation that has boundary conditions
1 2 3 4 10, 0, 0, 0,T y x T y x T y x T y x T
2 2 3 4 2, , , ,T y b x T y b x T y b x T y b x T
and so on…..
Since each sub-solution also satisfies 2 2
2 20
T T
x y
, the sum must also.
9—6
ChE 120B
Melting a Fuse Wire (More Superposition)
Fuse design — how much current do you need before one melts — important question.
Fuses blow because the wire melts due to too much current. How to model this system?
23 3
energy1
time e
WS Ke
cm cm 2current density amps/I cm
1 13 conductivity ohm K cm
1 resistanceek
Model — Ke, K, ρ, Cp, physical parameters constant
Input — Output + Generation = Accumulation
area area vol. elvol. el
2 q - 2 q 2 S 2 e p
TrL r rL r dr r dr L r dr L C
t
lim
0 e p
rq r rq r dr TrS r C
dr dr t
gives r e p
Trq rS r C
r t
e p
k T Tr S C
r r r t
Rearranging, we get
e
p
S
ST Tr
r r t C t
1T Tr S
t r r r
What we wind up with is a non-homogeneous P.D.E. How do we solve? — first, need B.C.'s, I.C.
0 0 @ t =0 -TT T is ambient
9-7
ChE 120B Symmetry:
0 @ 0, or is finite @ 0T
r T rr
Surface: f
Tk h T T
r
Newton's law @ surface
We also need to non-dimensionalize problem.
0
f
f
T T
T T
a little different format than usual, but it is handy for the 2nd B.C.
2 standard
r t
R R
0 0
2
f fT T T TR S
R R RR
0 0
2 2
f fT T T T dS
R R
2 2
00
1
ff
p
SR SRkT T T TC
2
0
e
pp
S Rk
C TC
2
0
eS R
kT
Dimensionless rate of generation
G
9-8
ChE 120B
Dimensionless Problem Statement:
1
2G
I.C. 0, 1
B.C. ,0 = finite
B.C. 2
0
0
f
f
T TK h T T
R
B.C. 2 1 1 1
d hRBi
k
Now we need to solve our set of equations
How to think about this problem:
1. We would know how to solve if G = 0
A) Massage B.C.'s to get separable solutions. (Actually, they are already OK)
B) Use e-functions to get answer.
2. How do we go about getting the equations in this form?
A) Transient problem can't always have easy superposition solutions.
B) We can often determine the steady-state distribution — What does this tell us
about the transient problems?
Steady-state Problem
1 0@ steady stateG
G
9-9
ChE 120B
2
12
GC
11 0 because 0 at Imposing some B.C.'s
2
CGC
Then, one more integration gives:
2
24
GC
B.C#2
1 Bi
2
1 2 1 2 4 n
G GBi C
2 4 2
G GC
Bi
2
4 4 2
G G G
Bi
2 21
4
G
Bi
2 24
G Bi
Bi
Now we know what happens when t and we get steady state!
22
4
G Bi
Bi
New superposition tack for transient problems.
Let or 0
is the solution to our original problem.
9-10
ChE 120B
is the steady state solution to our original problem. Is the solution for easier than .
I hope so.
Original equation
1
G
Plug in
0*
2*1 1
2G
Now the trick is becoming clear.
We made sure that
1=G and =0
= 0 so this reduces the equation for to:
1
0
B.C.'s on
I.C. 0, 1 0, 0
1 0,
1 0,
,0 ,0 finitefinite
1 1Bi
1 1 1 1Bi
9-11
ChE 120B
1 1Bi
because
1 1Bi
Hence, for , we have a separable solution
1
0
0, 1
,0 finite
1,1Bi
Solution for is straight forward:
Let Y N to get
21/
YN
22
10 Y
Y C e Y
22 0 3 0
10
NN C J C Y N
and
2
1 2 0 3 0C e C J C Y
The easiest B.C. to apply is that is always finite @ 0.
0 0 , soY
9-12
ChE 120B 3 1 21 0, Let BC C C C C
Now to apply the second B.C.: 1,1iB
2
0Ce J
0 1J J
and
2 2
0 1 Bi Ce J C e J
This defines 0 1 Bi Jn J
1
0
n
n
JBi
J
Similar to tan n = n
Bi
for rectangular case we dealt with before.
Applying the I.C. gives:
2
01
nn n
n
C e J
and 1 0, so
01
1 n nn
C J
To determine the nC , we recognize that are orthogonal w.r.t. , hence Multiply
by 0 mJ d and integrate from 0 to 1
1 1
0 0 010 0
1 dm n m mn
J d C J J
1 1
2
0 0
0 0
1 C dm m mJ d J
9-13
ChE 120B
1
0
01
20
0
1 m
m
m
J d
C
J d
What can we say physically about this solution now?
Where do the physical properties of the material come into the solution?
characteristic times 21
Note that for Bi << 1 — case likely to be important here, we can look at first eigenvalue: Taylor series for the Bessel functions are:
2
0 1 21
2J
1 1 2J
and inserting into the equation for eigenvalues:
1
2
2
2
12
Bi
2
1
2Bi
212Bi
12 .Bi
0 1 2
21 1
2
BiJ
Hence, simple solution is:
9—14
ChE 120B
Superposition
Consider only variations along Z direction because 1BiN r . Current passes through the
wire producing heat at a uniform volumetric rate of 3eS W cm per unit volume. Wire loses
heat from surface by Newton's Law of cooling.
Energy Balance:
Input — Output + Source = Accumulation
2 2 2 202 z z z Z Z z e pR q R q R zh T T R zS R z C T
T
reduces to: 0
2, with Fourier's Law; ,z
e p zz
q h T dtT T S C q k
R t dz
we get: 2
02
2 peCST h T
T Tz Rk k k t
02
0
let 0 ,p
T T z ktz
T L C L
then we get the dimensionless form:
222 2
2
2 peC LS LhL T
z Rk k k t
2
22
m Gz t
22
2 2, eS LhL
m GRk k
9–16
Boundary Conditions: 0, 0 1, ,0z
How to solve? — Well, let's look at steady-state — we know how to solve that.
Let z be the steady state temperature distribution. Then 0t
and
2
22
0m Gz
with 0 1 0
1 2 2sinh mz cosh mz
GC C
m
2 22 20
G GC C
m m
1 21 0 sinh m cosh mz 1
GC
m
2
1
cosh m 1
sinh m
GmC
2
1 cosh mcosh mz 1 sinh mz
sinh m
G
m
So what — let's look at a new problem:
and use our superposition principle
2
22
m Gz
2 2
2 22 2
0m m Gz z
0 by construction and
9-17
ChE 120B
2
22
mz
0, 0 0, 0 0
1, 0 1, 0 0 ,0 0 ,0z z z z
So we now have a homogeneous P.D.E. whose B.C. are of the Drichlet form — solve by
separation of variables:
Let Z z Y
2
22
Z YY m YZ Z
z
2
2 2 22
0, 0Z Y
Z M Yz
Solution is 2 2
1 2 3, sin cosm
z C e C z C z
30, 0 0C
1, 0 sin 0 1, 2,...n n
2 2
1
, e sinn m
n
z Cn n z
1
,0 sinn
z z Cn n z
1 1 2
0 0sin sin mz m z dz C m z dz
1
0 2 sin mC z m z dz
9—18