scaling up the nutrition response in the philippines key challenges & lessons learnt
DESCRIPTION
Scaling Up the Nutrition Response in The Philippines Key Challenges & Lessons Learnt. Needs Assessment and Analysis. Needs A ssessment and Analysis (1/2). Primary Needs analysis showed high GAM-SRP Targets Government-led needs analysis had limited nutrition focus - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
1
Scaling Up the Nutrition Response
in The Philippines
Key Challenges & Lessons Learnt
2
Needs Assessment and Analysis
Needs Assessment and Analysis (1/2)
• Primary Needs analysis showed high GAM-SRP Targets• Government-led needs analysis had limited nutrition
focus • Limited capacity of AWG to adapt existing methods for
L3 level disaster-Coordination Team taking over AWG (during initial months)
• MIRA-1 (limited nutrition focus) & MIRA-2 was not linked to planning (timing and methodology)
• SMART survey (3 months post Haiyan) showed GAM prevalence 2x lower than expected-SRP Targets overestimated?- Revised Targets
5
Needs Assessment and Analysis (2/2)
• Limited Technical capacity in nutrition surveys and analysis (Trained FNRI team busy with NNS)
• Coordinated assessments were OCHA driven• High number of meetings and clearance protocols-
bottleneck to cluster needs analysis• Time difference, tight deadlines affected HQ remote
support on needs analysis• Disconnect between sub-national and national
discussions• Limited use of response monitoring data to complement
needs assessment
6
Strategic Response Planning
Strategic Response Planning (1/2)
• SRP and prioritization centrally-prepared; minimal regional consultation
• Limited number of partners and low capacity in CMAM• Overstretched HR capacity of government (ongoing 3
emergencies)• OCHA-driven process with tight deadlines and no
flexibility, in-depth assessment and strategic discussion• Project Proposal development – less consultative
(UNICEF/WFP and Partner centric)- limited government involvement
Strategic Response Planning (2/2)
• Scale up delayed heavily due to paperwork/approvals (PCA/FLA)
• Lack of clear arrangements for shifting government capacities to affected areas from other regions-limited number of government staff for response
10
Resource mobilisation
Resources…
1.Finance
2.Supply
3.People
12
Resource Mobilisation: FUNDING
14
Funding challenges
• 7 of 8 partners were funded through UNICEF and WFP, which delayed nutrition cluster capacity to scale up due to administrative procedures of delayed fund release
• Government Funding was not tapped for nutrition Haiyan SRP planning and implementation ($10 M SRP funding covered through UNICEF, WFP and ACF)
15
Resource Mobilisation: SUPPLY
Photo Courtesy: WFP Philippines
17
Supplies challenges
• Prepositioned supplies stocks stretched - 3 ongoing emergencies
• Partners brought CMAM supplies, limited consultation -led to duplication and excess
• Limited CMAM capacity- limited ability to distribute excess supplies
• Supplies for MNPs and RUSF only planned for 6 months in SRP- negatively impacted service delivery of MAM and MNP programmes after May 2014
Resource Mobilisation: HUMAN RESOURCE CAPACITY
20
Human Resources-Challenges
• Limited DOH technical staff/capacity to respond- high staff retirement
• Local government personnel were morally destabilized due to losing relatives and infrastructure damage
• Still a need to develop and cost a capacity development plan as part of preparedness efforts
21
Implementation and Monitoring
23
Cluster SRP achievements
IYCF counselling (pregnant and children 0-23 months)
MNP beneficiaries (6-59 months)
BSFP beneficiaries *(6-59 months)
-
20,000
40,000
60,000
80,000
100,000
120,000
140,000
160,000
180,000
200,000
102%
49%
MAM admissions (6-59 months)
SAM admissions (6-59 months)
- 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000 7,000
Achieved Target
42%
80%
137%
As of end August 2014
24
Implementation and Monitoring-Challenges (1/2)
• Delayed programme implementation due to administrative delays (PCA/FLA)
• Gap in supplies for MAM/MNPs due to pull out of WFP
• IYCF counseling challenging due to limited partner and government capacity
• WGs focused on technical discussions rather than operational support at beginning
• No approved national CMAM guidelines, lack of CMAM capacity
25
Implementation and Monitoring-Challenges (2/2)
• Some SRP indicators (IFA and Vit A) linked to routine reporting system- incomplete/under reporting
• IYCF counseling indicator not reported by govt (only NGOs)
• Community nutrition volunteers are overworked