sce presentation
TRANSCRIPT
Stability Analysis of Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator via Tryptic Digestion
Chris Holmes, Biophysical Society John Riordan (PI) & Timothy Jensen (Mentor) , CF Center
Symptoms of Cystic Fibrosis (CF)
http://smithbiologyp3.wikispaces.com/Cystic+Fibrosishttp://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/4/4e/ClubbingCF.JPG
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-VoDtcyKhUew/T0IT9WdRpvI/AAAAAAAAAE4/utY1XRNhuFE/s640/Caylee's+1st+Vest+Treatment+010edit2.jpg
Background Methods Results Conclusions
Cystic Fibrosis: The Resultant from the Disruption of the Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane
Conductance Regulator (CFTR)
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-NypSdLKYx_0/T38RrbomnwI/AAAAAAAAABw/wZpOLyNcXz0/s1600/cf-1.jpg
Background Methods Results Conclusions
Acquiring a Complete CFTR Crystal Structure is Presently Unsuccessful
Molinski, S.; Eckford, P. D. W.; Pasyk, S.; Ahmadi, S.; Chin, S.; Bear, C. E. Functional rescue of F508del-CFTR using small molecule correctors. Frontiers in Pharmacology 2012, 3.
Background Methods Results Conclusions
X
Limited Tryptic Digestion and Sonication of CFTR
Western Blot of Digested CFTR
Repeat with Mutant CFTR and Correctors
Procedure for Indirectly Determining the Structural Stability of CFTR
Background Methods Results Conclusions
Expectations and Objective from the Tryptic Digestion of CFTR
Investigate the structural stability of CFTR
Wild-type CFTR (natural) and ΔF508 CFTR (mutated) Adenosine triphosphate (ATP) and a non-hydrolysable ATP-
analogue (AMP-PNP)
VX-809 (Lumacaftor) was used because of its success with CF
Currently in phase three of clinical trials
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/d3/Lumacaftor_skeletal.svghttp://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/
commons/0/07/ATP_structure.svghttp://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/WO2003076333A2/imgf000010_0002.png
Background Methods Results Conclusions
Using Tryptic Digestion: Cleavage Locations at Lysine Residues
Background Methods Results Conclusions
Henderson, M. J.; Singh, O. V.; Zeitlin, P. L. Applications of proteomic technologies for understanding the premature proteolysis of CFTR. Expert Rev Proteomics 2010, 7, 473–486.
Trypsin cleaves the protein on the carboxyl side of lysine or arginine residues
The more digestion that occurs, the more exposed those lysine and arginine residues are.
0μL
1μL
3μL
9μL
Using Sonication to Permit the Passage of Treatments and Trypsin into the CFTR Cells
Background Methods Results Conclusions
= CFTR Membrane
= Treatment (VX-809, ATP, AMP-PNP)
= Trypsin
Using Western Blot Band Strength as an Indicator of Structural Stability
Background Methods Results Conclusions
The More Intense the Band
The More Intact the CFTR
The Higher the Stability
IR Detection Using Primary and Secondary Antibodies
Membrane
Antigen
1° Antibody
2° Antibody
Fluorophore
Background Methods Results Conclusions
1° Antibodies = 660 & 7692° Antibodies = IgG1 & IgG2b
Limited Tryptic Digestion as an Indicator of CFTR Stability
Cui, L.; Aleksandrov, L.; Chang, X.; Hou, Y.; He, L.; Hegedus, T.; Gentzsch, M.; Aleksandrov, A.; Balch, W. E.; Riordan, J. R. Domain Interdependence in the Biosynthetic Assembly of CFTR. J. Mol. Biol. 2007, 365, 981-994
Background Methods Results Conclusions
NBD 2
Western Blotting of Wild-Type CFTR after Tryptic DigestionNBD 1
AMP-PNP Wild-Type ATP VX-809
0µL 1µL 3µL 9µL
Background Methods Results Conclusions
~170 kDa
Data Quantification of Wild-Type CFTR Membranes is Significant
Background Methods Results Conclusions
0 1 3 90
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
NBD 1AMP-PNP
VX-809
WT
ATP
Trypsin Concentration (µL)
Norm
aliz
ed
Valu
e o
f In
itia
l Ban
d
(%)
0 1 3 90
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
110NBD 2
AMP-PNP
VX-809
WT
ATP
Trypsin Concentration (µL)
Norm
alize
d V
alu
e o
f In
itia
l B
and
(%)
*
*
*
*
NBD 2
Western Blotting of ΔF508 CFTR after Tryptic Digestion
NBD 1
AMP-PNP ΔF508 ATP VX-809
0µL1µL3µL9µL
Background Methods Results Conclusions
Data Quantification of ΔF508 CFTR Membranes is NOT Significant
Background Methods Results Conclusions
0 1 3 90
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8NBD 1
AMP-PNP
VX-809
ΔF
ATP
Trypsin Concentration (µL)
Norm
aliz
ed
Valu
e o
f In
itia
l Ban
d
(%)
0 1 3 90
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8NBD 2
AMP-PNP
VX-809
ΔF
ATP
Trypsin Concentration (µL)
Norm
alize
d V
alu
e o
f In
itia
l B
and
(%)
At least not yet!<1%
100100
Adjusting the Quantified Band from the Full-Length CFTR to Approximately Half-Length
CFTR for a More Definitive Reading
170 kDa
Background Methods Results Conclusions
AMP-PNP ΔF508 ATP VX-809
0µL 1µL 3µL 9µLMWM 0µL1µL 3µL 9µLMWM 0µL1µL 3µL 9µLMWM 0µL1µL 3µL 9µLMWM
~72 kDa
The Difference Between 170 kDa and 72 kDa in CFTR Membranes
Cui, L.; Aleksandrov, L.; Chang, X.; Hou, Y.; He, L.; Hegedus, T.; Gentzsch, M.; Aleksandrov, A.; Balch, W. E.; Riordan, J. R. Domain Interdependence in the Biosynthetic Assembly of CFTR. J. Mol. Biol. 2007, 365, 981-994
Background Methods Results Conclusions
0 1 3 90
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
NBD 1AMP-PNP
VX-809
ΔF
ATP
Trypsin Concentration (µL)
Norm
aliz
ed
Valu
e o
f In
itia
l Ban
d
(%)
Data Quantification of ΔF508 CFTR Membranes IS Significant
Background Methods Results Conclusions
>1%
0 1 3 90
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
NBD 2AMP-PNP
VX-809
ΔF
ATP
Trypsin Concentration (µL)
Norm
aliz
ed
Valu
e o
f In
itia
l Ban
d
(%)
* *
*
100 100
Implications of the Stabilizing Effects of ATP and AMP-PNP
Background Methods Results Conclusions
Bound ATP and AMP-PNP
Favorable Interactions and Conformational Adjustments
Lower Susceptibility to Proteolysis (Tryptic Digestion) & Increased Stability
Future Directions for the Stability Analysis of CFTR
Background Methods Results Conclusions
Since VX-809 was not particularly effective Investigate the effects of VX-661 and/or VX-770
Since AMP-PNP and ATP were effective Investigate other ATP analogues or treatments that would
extort the stabilizing effects of the ATP binding pocket
Since the ΔF508 mutation only represents one class of CFTR mutations Investigate the stabilities of other mutations(e.g. G551D)
Since the experiment was small scale and did not account for other mechanisms Investigate the treatments in vivo
Acknowledgments
Special thanks to the University of Mount Union, the Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, UNC, the Biophysical Society, and the
Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics for providing me with this opportunity
University of North Carolina
In the Laboratory:
Dr. John Riordan
Dr. Tim Jensen
Dr. Luba Aleksandrov
Mr. Mohamed Dumbuya
In the Summer Program:
Dr. Mike Jarstfer
Dr. Barry Lentz
Lisa Phillippie
Ellen Mackall
Dr. Jaime Campbell-Fox
Patrick McCarter
Lior Vered
University of Mount Union
Mentoring:
Dr. Robert Woodward
Dr. Keith Miller
Student Assistants:
Amanda Dragan