school apportionment hot topics

27
School Apportionment Hot Topics April 25, 2014 2014 Annual Conference

Upload: yon

Post on 23-Feb-2016

31 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

School Apportionment Hot Topics. April 25, 2014. Topics For Discussion. SHB 6552 – Funding Implications Other Funding Increases SHB 2207 – Federal Forest Revenues LAP Prior Year Poverty Percentage K-1 High Poverty Compliance Addendum to 2013-14 Accounting Manual - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: School Apportionment Hot Topics

2014 Annual Conference

School Apportionment Hot Topics

April 25, 2014

Page 2: School Apportionment Hot Topics

2014 Annual Conference

SHB 6552 – Funding Implications Other Funding Increases SHB 2207 – Federal Forest Revenues LAP Prior Year Poverty Percentage K-1 High Poverty Compliance Addendum to 2013-14 Accounting Manual Community Eligibility Status Academic Acceleration

Topics For Discussion

Page 3: School Apportionment Hot Topics

2014 Annual Conference

SAFS Session Recap

Page 4: School Apportionment Hot Topics

2014 Annual Conference

Increases funding in the 2014-15 school year as follows: Lab Science Class Size Enhancement, MSOC Enhancement for Grades 9-12, Increased Prototypical High School Guidance Counselor Allocation.

Alternative Learning Experience (ALE) students benefit from these funding increases through the running start rate.

SHB 6652 – Improving Student Success

Page 5: School Apportionment Hot Topics

2014 Annual Conference

Provides an enhanced class size of 19.98. Students generating additional teachers equals all

grades 9-12 enrollment, including Vocational and Skill Center enrollment.

Multiply the student enrollment by 0.08333. Enhancement calculation is as follows:

(Enrollment * ((1/19.98)-(1/28.74))*(1 + 0.2))

SHB 6552 – Lab Science Class Size

Page 6: School Apportionment Hot Topics

2014 Annual Conference

Students enrolled in grades 9-12 including CTE and Skill Center students generate an additional $164.25 in MSOC.

This additional funding is provided through the general education allocation, and does not increase Vocational minimum expenditures or Skill Center allocations.

SHB 6552 – MSOC Grades 9-12

Page 7: School Apportionment Hot Topics

2014 Annual Conference

Increases the allocation of guidance counselors per prototypical high school from 2.009 to 2.539.

Increases the other CIS per 1,000 funding ratio for Vocational programs from 2.02 to 2.72 and for Skill Centers from 2.36 to 3.06.

SHB 6552 – Guidance Counselors

Page 8: School Apportionment Hot Topics

2014 Annual Conference

SHB 6652 – Funding DetailsFunding Driver 2013-14 2014-15 Additional Funding

(In Millions)* Lab Science Class Size 28.74 19.98 $34.3

HS Guidance Counselors 2.009 2.539 $14.6

MSOC (9-12 Enhancement) $0.00 $164.25 $48.3*These values do not include the special education or ALE program funding impacts.

Page 9: School Apportionment Hot Topics

2014 Annual Conference

General Education MSOC Increase

Page 10: School Apportionment Hot Topics

2014 Annual Conference

Vocational and Skill Center MSOC Increase

Page 11: School Apportionment Hot Topics

2014 Annual Conference

Impact on Running Start Rates

ALE enrollment generates a per student allocation based on the regular running start rate, even if the ALE enrollment is in a vocational or skill center program.

Page 12: School Apportionment Hot Topics

2014 Annual Conference

Allows school districts with prior year CEDARS poverty percentage of 57% or more to keep their federal forest allocations up to a maximum of $70,000.

Under current law, all federal forest revenue is deducted from general apportionment payments.

On April 10, Washington State was notified as to the total amount of federal forest to be received.

SHB 2207 – Federal Forest Revenue

Page 13: School Apportionment Hot Topics

2014 Annual Conference

Section 513 of Supplemental Budget:

“Starting with the allocation for the 2014-15 school year, the prior year’s October headcount enrollment for free and reduced priced lunch shall be as reported in the comprehensive education data and research system.”

Poverty Data for LAP Funding

Page 14: School Apportionment Hot Topics

2014 Annual Conference

K-1 High Poverty Compliance

Page 15: School Apportionment Hot Topics

2014 Annual Conference

“For grades K through 1 the superintendent shall, at a minimum, allocate funding to high poverty schools for the 2014-15 school year based on an average class size of 24.10 full-time equivalent students per teacher. The superintendent shall provide funding for a class size reduction in grades K through 1 to the extent of, and proportionate to, the school’s demonstrated actual average class size up to a class size of 20.3 full-time equivalent students per teacher.”

K-1 High Poverty Class Size

Page 16: School Apportionment Hot Topics

2014 Annual Conference

Rules hearing was held on March 25 to consider the original proposed WAC language.

Changes were made prior to this initial rules hearing which eliminate planning time from the compliance calculation.

A CR-102 was submitted, thereby requesting a new rules hearing on the language without the planning time portion of the calculation.

New rules hearing date: May 7, 2014 at 10:00 a.m.

K-1 High Poverty Compliance

Page 17: School Apportionment Hot Topics

2014 Annual Conference

Measured at each individual school independent of other eligible schools within the district.

Performed three times throughout the school year: January, March, and June.

Districts will be funded based on their budgeted K-1 high poverty class size as represented in the F-203 from September to January.

The resulting weighted average funded class size from the most recent compliance calculation will be used for

funding January through August.

K-1 High Poverty Compliance

Page 18: School Apportionment Hot Topics

2014 Annual Conference

October 1 CEDARS enrollment inclusive of changes through January, March, and June.

All ALE students will be excluded for the enrollment calculation.

Students coded in CEDARS as First grade or K1 will be considered a 1.0 FTE.

K2 students in CEDARS will be considered a 0.5 FTE.

K-1 HP Compliance – Enrollment

Page 19: School Apportionment Hot Topics

2014 Annual Conference

S-275 data with changes made through January, March, and June will be considered.

Teachers coded to programs 01 and 79 in grade grouping K and 1 with following duty roots will be considered:◦Duty root 31: Elementary Teacher◦Duty root 33: Other Teacher◦Duty root 52: Substitute Teacher◦Duty root 63: Contractor Teacher

Because we are not reducing teacher units by planning time in the compliance calculations, only teachers are

considered. No specialists. Do not double count.

K-1 HP Compliance – Teachers

Page 20: School Apportionment Hot Topics

2014 Annual Conference

Program 21 teachers in the previously mentioned programs and duty roots will be multiplied by the districts annual percentage of students in special education used in the 3121 revenue calculations will be considered.

Program 02 teachers will not be considered.

K-1 HP Compliance – Teachers

Page 21: School Apportionment Hot Topics

2014 Annual Conference

A demonstrated class size will be calculated for each school by taking the calculated enrollment divided by the calculated teachers as defined previously.

The funded class size will equal the demonstrated class size with a maximum of 24.1 and a minimum of 20.3.

K-1 HP Class Size

Page 22: School Apportionment Hot Topics

2014 Annual Conference

For each individual school building, enrollment will be multiplied by the funded class size.

The result of that calculation for each individual school will be summed and divided by the total calculated enrollment at all K-1 high poverty eligible schools within the district.

The resulting weighted average funded class size will be that basis of K-1 high poverty calculations in the apportionment system.

K-1 HP Weighted Average Class Size

Page 23: School Apportionment Hot Topics

2014 Annual Conference

Other Topics

Page 24: School Apportionment Hot Topics

2014 Annual Conference

OSPI has issued an addendum to the 2013-14 Accounting Manual to address issues related to GASB Statement 63 – Fiduciary Fund Accounting and Deposit Arrangements with ESDs.

These changes and more will be discussed at School Financial Services Update.

Addendum to 2013-14 Accounting Manual

Page 25: School Apportionment Hot Topics

2014 Annual Conference

Allows school districts to determine free and reduced priced lunch percentages based on direct certifications, not individual applications and income verification.

This option starts for the 2014-15 school year. OSPI is working to determine the impact of the option for

community eligibility on various poverty based funding streams.

It is estimated that Community Eligibility Status would most benefit approximately 200 schools in the state.

Community Eligiblity Status

Page 26: School Apportionment Hot Topics

2014 Annual Conference

RCW 28A.320.196◦ Created the academic acceleration incentive program.

Funds are available to school districts through two avenues: ◦ Competitive Grants

iGrants package 661: Application window late spring 2014. Eligible districts must have an approved Academic Acceleration

board policy.◦ Incentive Awards

Districts receive an incentive award for each student who earned dual high school and college credit for

courses offered by the district’s high schools during the previous

school year. Running start does not count.

Academic Acceleration

Page 27: School Apportionment Hot Topics

2014 Annual Conference

Questions?

T.J. KellyDirector – SAFS360-725-6301

[email protected]