school facilities master plan and reconfiguration ......3,126 3,126 3,126 3,126 –“ 735 30 school...
TRANSCRIPT
1
SCHOOL FACILITIES M AS T E R P L AN & R E C O N F I G UR AT I O N S T UD Y
B O A R D O F E D U C A T I O N U P D A T E
02.25.2020
2
AGENDA 1. Summary of current options
2. Feedback from the
neighborhood meetings
3. Survey results
4. Moving forward ~ schedule of
upcoming meetings
2
Important Considerations
1. Costs are based upon mid range of historical averages
2. Costs are escalated to mid point of 2022, or the potential
mid-point of construction for Step 1 of the plan options
3. Adjustments shall be made once a preferred option is
selected
4. Does not include impact for operational costs or premium
for site logistics for multi-phase renovations
5. Reimbursement rate utilized is last published 2018:
Renovate as New ~ 34.64%
New Construction ~ 24.64% ARCHITECTS
INTRODUCTIONS / A C O L L A B O R A T I V E A P P R O A C H
CONSULTANT TEAM
TECTON ARCHITECTS Architecture & Programming
Jeff Wyszynski, AIA
Ed Widofsky, AIA
Stephen Melingonis, AIA
Alison Fredericks, Assoc. AIA
MILONE & MACBROOM SZEWCZAK ASSOCIATES Demographic Projections Structural Engineering Patrick Gallagher, AICP Peter Celella, PE
CES FUSS & O’NEILL – CIVIL ENGINEERING
MEP Engineering Site, Civil, Landscape, Planning
Derek Bride, PE Ron Bomengen, PE, LEED AP, Associate
Lauren Mello, PE
3
Important Considerations
1. Costs are based upon mid range of historical averages
2. Costs are escalated to mid point of 2022, or the potential
mid-point of construction for Step 1 of the plan options
3. Adjustments shall be made once a preferred option is
selected
4. Does not include impact for operational costs or premium
for site logistics for multi-phase renovations
5. Reimbursement rate utilized is last published 2018:
Renovate as New ~ 34.64%
New Construction ~ 24.64%
,,_\1-SBu,p
i■, ~ So: 'Ji, P~ LS ... ., .. ,7'10~ ---·· ... ·
Tecton ARCHITECTS
GOALS OF THE PROJECT/ M A S T E R P L A N F O R T H E F U T U R E
• Analysis of existing conditions & educational needs
• Identify capital Improvements & maintenance items
• 10 year prioritized plan
• Sustainable approach to address facility &
educational needs
• Review demographics / projections
• Develop alternative configurations & options
• Engage community & explore responsive solutions
• Long Range Master Plan for community 4
Important Considerations
1. Costs are based upon mid range of historical averages
2. Costs are escalated to mid point of 2022, or the potential
mid-point of construction for Step 1 of the plan options
3. Adjustments shall be made once a preferred option is
selected
4. Does not include impact for operational costs or premium
for site logistics for multi-phase renovations
5. Reimbursement rate utilized is last published 2018:
Renovate as New ~ 34.64%
New Construction ~ 24.64%
School Projections (K-6): 2019-20 to 2029-30 800
700
600 L------------~ ~
500
400
300
"7----------------------------------- [ 255 1 1247 1 200
2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30
--Centra l --Latimer --Squadron Li ne --Tariffvi ll e --Tootin ' H ills
Medium projections model
■ Fastest growth projected at Latimer (23.6%), Squadron Line (17.1 %) and Central (16.5%), the three districts with the greatest housing permit activity.
■ Modest growth projected at Tootin' Hills (13.6%), with most of that growth occurring over the next five years.
■ Tariffville projected to stay generally stable over the next decade, growing by just 3.2%.
Tecton ARCHITECTS
ELEMENTARY PROJECTIONS / B A S E D O N M E D I U M
5
Important Considerations
1. Costs are based upon mid range of historical averages
2. Costs are escalated to mid point of 2022, or the potential
mid-point of construction for Step 1 of the plan options
3. Adjustments shall be made once a preferred option is
selected
4. Does not include impact for operational costs or premium
for site logistics for multi-phase renovations
5. Reimbursement rate utilized is last published 2018:
Renovate as New ~ 34.64%
New Construction ~ 24.64%6
CONSIDERATION OF
OPTIONS
6
Important Considerations
1. Costs are based upon mid range of historical averages
2. Costs are escalated to mid point of 2022, or the potential
mid-point of construction for Step 1 of the plan options
3. Adjustments shall be made once a preferred option is
selected
4. Does not include impact for operational costs or premium
for site logistics for multi-phase renovations
5. Reimbursement rate utilized is last published 2018:
Renovate as New ~ 34.64%
New Construction ~ 24.64%7
(New 5-6)
Updated Option
1
Revised enrollment numbers based upon October 2019 demographic projections
utilizing highest enrollment per school through the 2029-30 school year.
7
Imp
orta
nt C
on
side
ratio
ns
1.
Co
sts are
ba
sed
up
on
mid
ran
ge
of h
istoric
ala
ve
rag
es
2.
Co
sts are
esc
ala
ted
to m
id p
oin
t of 2
02
2, o
r the
po
ten
tial
mid
-po
int o
f co
nstru
ctio
n fo
r Ste
p 1
of th
e p
lan
op
tion
s
3.
Ad
justm
en
tssh
allb
e m
ad
e o
nc
e a
pre
ferre
d o
ptio
n is
sele
cte
d
4.
Do
es n
ot
inc
lud
e im
pa
ct
for o
pe
ratio
na
lco
sts or
pre
miu
m
for site
log
istics fo
r mu
lti-ph
ase
ren
ov
atio
ns
5.
Re
imb
urse
me
nt ra
te u
tilized
is last
pu
blish
ed
2018:
Re
no
va
te a
s Ne
w ~
34
.64
%
Ne
w C
on
struc
tion
~ 2
4.6
4% - -
-
-
- -
-
-
- -
-
-
-–
“
3 iof s=Re
8
OP
TION
1A
thru
1C
(Ne
w 5
-6)
(PK
-4, 5
-6, 7
-8, 9
-12)
Bu
ildin
g N
am
e
Current
Grade
Configuration
Current
Enrollment
Prop. Grade
Configuration
Projected
Enrollment
A New 5 6, 3 PK 4
Elem. Schools, 7
8, 9 12, redistrict
B New 5 6, 4 PK 4
Elem. Schools, 7
8, 9 12, redistrict
C New 5 6, 5 PK 4
Elem. Schools, 7
8, 9 12, no
redistrict
Proposed
Project Type
HEN
RY
JA
MES
MID
DLE
SC
HL.
7-8
6
33
7-8
735
(27-2
8)
735
735
735
Existin
g to
rem
ain
NEW
SC
HO
OL @
H
EN
RY
JA
MES
5-6
-
5-6
-
756
756
756
NEW
LATIM
ER
LAN
E
K-6
4
45
PK
-4
(+R
SG
) 5
54
(25-2
6)
545 o
r 0
408 o
r 0
371
NEW
or R
AN
SQ
UA
DR
ON
LINE
PK
-6
(+R
SG
) 6
01
(+1
01
PK
) PK
-4
720
(25-2
6)
545 o
r 0
409 o
r 0
499
NEW
or R
AN
CEN
TRA
L SC
HO
OL
K-6
3
76
PK
-4
438
(29-3
0)
545 o
r 0
409 o
r 0
299
NEW
or R
AN
TOO
TIN H
ILLS
K-6
(+
RSG
) 3
69
PK
-4
(+R
SG
) 424
(24-2
5)
545 o
r 0
409 o
r 0
288
NEW
or R
AN
TAR
IFFV
ILLE
K-6
2
47
PK
-4
(+R
SG
) 255
(29-3
0)
545
or 0
409 o
r 0
178
NEW
or R
AN
SU
BTO
TAL
2,6
71
3,1
26
3,1
26
3,1
26
3,1
26
3 of 5 Remain
4 of 5 Remain
5 of 5 Remain
No
te: R
ev
ised
en
rollm
en
t nu
mb
ers b
ase
d u
po
n O
cto
be
r 201
9 d
em
og
rap
hic
pro
jec
tion
s utilizin
g h
igh
est e
nro
llme
nt p
er sc
ho
ol th
rou
gh
the
2029 3
0 sc
ho
ol y
ea
r. *u
pd
ate
d 2
/7/2
02
0 fo
r o
r 0”
8
Important Considerations
1. Costs are based upon mid range of historical averages
2. Costs are escalated to mid point of 2022, or the potential
mid-point of construction for Step 1 of the plan options
3. Adjustments shall be made once a preferred option is
selected
4. Does not include impact for operational costs or premium
for site logistics for multi-phase renovations
5. Reimbursement rate utilized is last published 2018:
Renovate as New ~ 34.64%
New Construction ~ 24.64%9
OPTION 1 / N E W ( 5 - 6 ) @ H E N R Y J A M E S
What it might look like…
Important Considerations
1. Costs are based upon mid range of historical averages
2. Costs are escalated to mid point of 2022, or the potential
mid-point of construction for Step 1 of the plan options
3. Adjustments shall be made once a preferred option is
selected
4. Does not include impact for operational costs or premium
for site logistics for multi-phase renovations
5. Reimbursement rate utilized is last published 2018:
Renovate as New ~ 34.64%
New Construction ~ 24.64%10
(6th Grade Addition)
Updated Option 2
Revised enrollment numbers based upon October 2019 demographic projections
utilizing highest enrollment per school through the 2029-30 school year.
10
Important Considerations
1. Costs are based upon mid range of historical averages
2. Costs are escalated to mid point of 2022, or the potential
mid-point of construction for Step 1 of the plan options
3. Adjustments shall be made once a preferred option is
selected
4. Does not include impact for operational costs or premium
for site logistics for multi-phase renovations
5. Reimbursement rate utilized is last published 2018:
Renovate as New ~ 34.64%
New Construction ~ 24.64%
--
--
--
--
-– “
11
OPTION 2A & 2B (6th Grade Addition)
Building Name
Cu
rre
nt
Gra
de
Co
nfig
ura
tio
n
Cu
rre
nt
En
rollm
en
t
Pro
p.
Gra
de
Co
nfig
ura
tio
n
Pro
jec
ted
En
rollm
en
t
4
PK
5 E
lem
.
Sc
ho
ols
, 6 8
, 9 1
2,
red
istr
ict
Pro
p.
Gra
de
Co
nfig
ura
tio
n
Pro
jec
ted
En
rollm
en
t
5
PK
5 E
lem
.
Sc
ho
ols
, 6 8
, 9 1
2,
red
istr
ict
Pro
po
sed
Pro
jec
t Ty
pe
HENRY JAMES MIDDLE SCHL.
7-8 633 6-8 735 (27-28)
1,128 (735 + 393)
6-8 735 (27-28)
1,128 (735 + 393)
Addition
LATIMER LANE K-6 445 PK-5 (+RSG)
554 (25-26)
499 or 0 PK-5
(+RSG) 554
(25-26) 399 NEW or RAN
SQUADRON LINE PK-6 (+RSG)
601 (+101 PK)
PK-5 720 (25-26)
499 or 0 PK-5 720 (25-26)
399 NEW or RAN
CENTRAL SCHOOL
K-6 376 PK-5 438 (29-30)
500 or 0 PK-5 438 (29-30)
399 NEW or RAN
TOOTIN HILLS K-6 (+RSG)
369 PK-5 (+RSG)
424 (24-25)
500 or 0 PK-5
(+RSG) 424 (24-25)
400 NEW or RAN
TARIFFVILLE K-6 247 PK-5 (+RSG)
255 (29-30)
500 or 0 PK-5
(+RSG) 255 (29-30)
400 NEW or RAN
SUBTOTAL 2,671 3,126 3,126 3,126 3,126
2A (4 Elem.) 2B (5 Elem.)
Note: Revised enrollment numbers based upon October 2019 demographic projections utilizing highest enrollment per school through the 2029 30 school year. *updated 2/7/2020 for or 0”
11
Important Considerations
1. Costs are based upon mid range of historical averages
2. Costs are escalated to mid point of 2022, or the potential
mid-point of construction for Step 1 of the plan options
3. Adjustments shall be made once a preferred option is
selected
4. Does not include impact for operational costs or premium
for site logistics for multi-phase renovations
5. Reimbursement rate utilized is last published 2018:
Renovate as New ~ 34.64%
New Construction ~ 24.64%12
OPTION 2 / 6 T H G R A D E A D D I T I O N @ H E N R Y J A M E S
What it might look like…
Important Considerations
1. Costs are based upon mid range of historical averages
2. Costs are escalated to mid point of 2022, or the potential
mid-point of construction for Step 1 of the plan options
3. Adjustments shall be made once a preferred option is
selected
4. Does not include impact for operational costs or premium
for site logistics for multi-phase renovations
5. Reimbursement rate utilized is last published 2018:
Renovate as New ~ 34.64%
New Construction ~ 24.64%
ADDITION
■ RENOVAT ION
POTENT~~'·• ..
SCTV ··· •.•.•.. _ •..
SCIENCE ALTERATIONS
FORMER MEDIA CENTER
CONVERSION TO CLASSROOMS &
SUPPORT
SCIENCE WORLD ALTERATIONS LANGUAGE
LAB
MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN
UPPER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN
Tecton ARCHITECTS
6 T HOPTION 2 / G R A D E A D D I T I O N T O H E N R Y J A M E S
ADDITION FOR 6TH GRADE
13
Important Considerations
1. Costs are based upon mid range of historical averages
2. Costs are escalated to mid point of 2022, or the potential
mid-point of construction for Step 1 of the plan options
3. Adjustments shall be made once a preferred option is
selected
4. Does not include impact for operational costs or premium
for site logistics for multi-phase renovations
5. Reimbursement rate utilized is last published 2018:
Renovate as New ~ 34.64%
New Construction ~ 24.64%14
Updated Option Revised enrollment numbers based upon October 2019 demographic projections
utilizing highest enrollment per school through the 2029-30 school year.
3
Elementary Renewal
14
Important Considerations
1. Costs are based upon mid range of historical averages
2. Costs are escalated to mid point of 2022, or the potential
mid-point of construction for Step 1 of the plan options
3. Adjustments shall be made once a preferred option is
selected
4. Does not include impact for operational costs or premium
for site logistics for multi-phase renovations
5. Reimbursement rate utilized is last published 2018:
Renovate as New ~ 34.64%
New Construction ~ 24.64% -15
OPTION 3A & 3B (Maintain Elem.)
Building
Name
Cu
rre
nt
Gra
de
Co
nfig
ura
tio
n
Cu
rre
nt
En
rollm
en
t
Pro
p.
Gra
de
Co
nfig
ura
tio
n
Pro
jec
ted
En
rollm
en
t
Pro
jec
ted
En
rollm
en
t
Pro
po
sed
Pro
jec
t Ty
pe
HENRY JAMES MIDDLE SCHL.
7-8 633 7-8 735 (27-28)
735 Existing to
remain
LATIMER LANE K-6 445 PK-6 (+RSG)
554 (25-26)
479 RAN or NEW
SQUADRON LINE PK-6
(+RSG) 601
(+101 PK) PK-6 720
(25-26) 478 RAN or NEW
CENTRAL SCHOOL
K-6 376 PK-6 438 (29-30)
478 RAN or NEW
TOOTIN HILLS K-6 369 PK-6 (+RSG)
424 (24-25)
478 RAN or NEW
TARIFFVILLE K-6 247 PK-6 (+RSG)
255 (29-30)
478 RAN or NEW
SUBTOTAL 2,671 3,126 3,126
3A (no redistrict) 3B (redistrict/equal)
Note: Revised enrollment numbers based upon October 2019 demographic projections utilizing highest enrollment per school through the 2029 30 school year. 15
Important Considerations
1. Costs are based upon mid range of historical averages
2. Costs are escalated to mid point of 2022, or the potential
mid-point of construction for Step 1 of the plan options
3. Adjustments shall be made once a preferred option is
selected
4. Does not include impact for operational costs or premium
for site logistics for multi-phase renovations
5. Reimbursement rate utilized is last published 2018:
Renovate as New ~ 34.64%
New Construction ~ 24.64%16
Status quo Phased/Targeted Renovations to each School
4
16
Important Considerations
1. Costs are based upon mid range of historical averages
2. Costs are escalated to mid point of 2022, or the potential
mid-point of construction for Step 1 of the plan options
3. Adjustments shall be made once a preferred option is
selected
4. Does not include impact for operational costs or premium
for site logistics for multi-phase renovations
5. Reimbursement rate utilized is last published 2018:
Renovate as New ~ 34.64%
New Construction ~ 24.64%17
OPTION 4 Phased/Targeted Renovations to each School
Step 1 – Add Modular classrooms to Latimer, re-district
Squadron/Tariffville
Step 2 – Targeted/Phased renovations to each school
• Envelope - Roofs, windows, doors, insulation
• Interior – Finishes, accessibility, toilet cores
• Building Systems – HVAC, Fire Protection, Electrical, Lighting,
Fire Alarms
• Site – Parking, lighting, amenities, drainage
• Security – Site access control, access control, window
filming, compartmentalization
• Educational Improvements – Modest alterations to interior to
better support curriculum 17
M AS T E R P L AN
COMPARISON OF OPTIONS S I M S B U R Y S C H O O L S
1 $65,517,488
$52,322,266New 5-6New 5-6, (3) PK-4 Elem.
3 $45,466,801
$31,763,107RAN Latimer
ETR 7-8, (5) PK-6
no redistrict
$66,070,773
$49,318,149
6th Grade
A ddit io n &
R A N Latimer
6th Grade Addition @ HJ
(5) PK-5 Elem.
STE
P 1
ON
LY
Overall Project Costs
Cost to Simsbury after reimbursement
2
Important Considerations
1. Costs are based upon mid range of historical averages
2. Costs are escalated to mid point of 2022, or the potential
mid-point of construction for Step 1 of the plan options
3. Adjustments shall be made once a preferred option is
selected
4. Does not include impact for operational costs or premium
for site logistics for multi-phase renovations
5. Reimbursement rate utilized is last published 2018:
Renovate as New ~ 34.64%
New Construction ~ 24.64%
-
19
CONSTRUCTION PHASE
BID CONSTRUCTION 18 MOS. +/ C.O.
Community Input, Public Forums (Fall 2019 – Spring 2020)
Selection of Preferred Option (Spring 2020)
Communicate the Plan & Scope of Phase I
(Fall 2020 / Winter 2021)
Referendum Meeting (Spring 2021)
MILESTONE SCHEDULE – STEP 1
2019+1 2021 2022 2023 20242018
Submit Grant Application (June 2021)
State Approval & Funding (Spring 2022)
Priority List (Dec.2021)
Proposed Occupancy
Phase I (Fall 2024) Selection of Architect (Dec.2018)
PLANNING PROCESS DEVELOPMENT OF THE
MASTER PLAN
REF. SUPPORT COMMUNICATE
THE NEED
PRECONSTRUCTION PHASE DESIGN PHASE &
DUE DILIGENCE
19
Important Considerations
1. Costs are based upon mid range of historical averages
2. Costs are escalated to mid point of 2022, or the potential
mid-point of construction for Step 1 of the plan options
3. Adjustments shall be made once a preferred option is
selected
4. Does not include impact for operational costs or premium
for site logistics for multi-phase renovations
5. Reimbursement rate utilized is last published 2018:
Renovate as New ~ 34.64%
New Construction ~ 24.64%20
MILESTONE SCHEDULE – OVERALL TIMELINE 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037 2038 2039
1
Project
STATE APPROVAL & FUNDING
4 ½ - 5 Years Total
DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION
Proposed
Occupancy Fall 2029
2
Project
3
Project
4
Project
STATE APPROVAL & FUNDING
4 ½ - 5 Years Total
DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION
Proposed
Occupancy Fall 2023/24
STATE APPROVAL & FUNDING
4 ½ - 5 Years Total
DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION
Proposed
Occupancy Fall 2034
STATE APPROVAL & FUNDING
4 ½ - 5 Years Total
DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION
Proposed
Occupancy Fall 2039
20
Important Considerations
1. Costs are based upon mid range of historical averages
2. Costs are escalated to mid point of 2022, or the potential
mid-point of construction for Step 1 of the plan options
3. Adjustments shall be made once a preferred option is
selected
4. Does not include impact for operational costs or premium
for site logistics for multi-phase renovations
5. Reimbursement rate utilized is last published 2018:
Renovate as New ~ 34.64%
New Construction ~ 24.64%21
Feedback from Neighborhood
Meetings so far… • Understand and appreciate the building analysis but would like to
learn/hear more about the benefits educationally (research/data)
of 5/6 school or 6th in middle school
• Please summarize the educational reasons for new models
• What are other communities doing for grade structure
configuration?
• Latimer --we have to do something now to address the elementary
schools and need to determine best first step with built in flexibility
for the long run
• Concerned about now, but it will take 4 years until we see relief
21 • Don’t want to support anything that will result in a school closing
Important Considerations
1. Costs are based upon mid range of historical averages
2. Costs are escalated to mid point of 2022, or the potential
mid-point of construction for Step 1 of the plan options
3. Adjustments shall be made once a preferred option is
selected
4. Does not include impact for operational costs or premium
for site logistics for multi-phase renovations
5. Reimbursement rate utilized is last published 2018:
Renovate as New ~ 34.64%
New Construction ~ 24.64%22
Feedback from Neighborhood
Meetings so far… • What happens to a vacant building if we consolidate?
• You can’t separate conditions and demographics
• Would like more information about logistics of 5-6 or 6th to HJMS
model (details on start times, who is riding the bus together, etc.)
• Some concerns about 5th and/or 6th graders being with older kids
and those influences
• Didn’t we look at a 5-6 before?
• Some people said they moved to town because of K-6 structure
• Models with same sized schools -- why would you equalize
populations? Can’t you shift some now by redistricting? 22
Important Considerations
1. Costs are based upon mid range of historical averages
2. Costs are escalated to mid point of 2022, or the potential
mid-point of construction for Step 1 of the plan options
3. Adjustments shall be made once a preferred option is
selected
4. Does not include impact for operational costs or premium
for site logistics for multi-phase renovations
5. Reimbursement rate utilized is last published 2018:
Renovate as New ~ 34.64%
New Construction ~ 24.64%23
Feedback from Neighborhood
Meetings… • Have the teachers been involved? You should have the same
town hall session with them
• Need to emphasize with people that “doing nothing” still has significant costs in terms of on-going maintenance to old buildings
• Concerns about the capacity of the core spaces for special events
– crammed spaces and no parking
• Concerns about more multiunit housing being built
• Like the idea of preschool in more buildings -- not just Squadron
23
24
SCHOOL FACILITIES M AS T E R P L AN & R E C O N F I G UR AT I O N S T UD Y
B O A R D O F E D U C A T I O N U P D A T E
02.25.2020
Would you su pport a ,6th ,grade addition to Henry J am,es M ,e1modal School?
244 responses
• Yes • Nlo
Staff Survey
. Would you suppor t a n ew 5-6 intermediate sch ooll on t h e He n ry Jlaim1es M lemor ia l School
s ite?'
245 r e·s pon s,es
• Yes • Nlo
4
Staff Survey
The current master planning effort contempllates grade reconfiguration. Please rank from 1
(m1ost desirabl-e) to 3 (least desirable) the potential grade structures below:
100
50
0
- Rank 1 - Rank2 - Rank3
Existing structure - PK-6 E lementary, 7-8 M iddle School, 9-12 High School
Option 1 - A new 5-6 school, PK-4 E lementary Schools , 7-8 M iddle School,.
9-12 Hig h School
Option 2 -A 6th g rade addition to Henry James, PK-5 E lementary Schools , 9-12
H igh School
Staff Survey
Where do you believe the most effective location is for Grade 6?
243 responses
• E lementary school
• M iddle school
e Part of a new interm ed iate school ( Grnde 5-6}
Staff Survey
In p llanning for improvements to the physic a l condition of the schools. what would you
rather see?
247 respons,es
e Additions and m novations
e Nlew Schooll on the same s1ite,(s)
e Does not m atte r as llong as needs a re addressed
Staff Survey
Woulld you su pport a ,6th ,grade additio n to Henry Jlam,es Me1morial School?
1 , 1158 liesponses
e ves • Nlo
Community Survey
Would you support a new 5-6 intermediate schooll on the Henry Jaimes IMlemorial School
site?
1 , 1 62 responses
• Yes • No
Community Survey
The current master planning effort contemplates grade reconfiguration. Please rank from 1
(most desirabl,e) to 3 (least desirable) the potential grade structures below:
600
400
200
0
- Rani< 1 - 1Rank3
Ex isting structure - PK -6 E lementary, 7-8 M iddle School, 9 -12 High School
Option 1 - A new 5-6 school , PK-4 E lementary Schools , 7-8 Middle School,.
9-12 High School
Option 2 - A 6th grade add ition to Henry James, PK-5 Elementary Schools , 9-12
H igh School
Community Survey
Where do you believe the most effective location is for Grade 6 ?'
1 , 11 62 respon ses
• E lementary school
• Miiddlle school
e Part of a new intermediate sc llool ( Girade 5-6)
Community Survey
1. Would you support a long range capital! improvement program to address the physical and
educational needs of the e lementary sch ools if it meant an increase to your taxes?
1, 1 71 responses
e Yes, the need is clear
e Yes, but needs to be a phased approach to mitigate the tax impact
e No, taxes are too high now
1
Community Survey