school funding 2010/11 and beyond consultation january 2010
Post on 21-Dec-2015
215 views
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: SCHOOL FUNDING 2010/11 AND BEYOND CONSULTATION JANUARY 2010](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062516/56649d545503460f94a309b7/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
SCHOOL FUNDING 2010/11 AND BEYOND
CONSULTATION
JANUARY 2010
![Page 2: SCHOOL FUNDING 2010/11 AND BEYOND CONSULTATION JANUARY 2010](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062516/56649d545503460f94a309b7/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Dedicated School Grant
Ea
rly Y
ea
rs 4
%
LA Services 9%
Schools Delegated Budgets
86%
School Related Contingencies 1%
Independent Special School Fees
Pupil Referral Service
SEN
Every Child = £3,881 of DSG for 09/10
No of Pupils x Guaranteed Funding Unit = Total DSG
MFGs are 81% of total DSG
![Page 3: SCHOOL FUNDING 2010/11 AND BEYOND CONSULTATION JANUARY 2010](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062516/56649d545503460f94a309b7/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Pupil Referral Service
SEN
Early Years
Children's Centres
Independent Special Schools/
RecoupmentThreshold payments
School Improvements
Advisory Teacher Service
Hospital & Home Education
Behaviour Support
Bus Mangt Contribution/
CYPD Support
School Contingencies
DSG Centrally Controlled Budget 2009/10
![Page 4: SCHOOL FUNDING 2010/11 AND BEYOND CONSULTATION JANUARY 2010](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062516/56649d545503460f94a309b7/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Budget 2010/11
Proposals:• Minimum Funding Guarantee + 2.1%• Personalisation/SEN + £2.1m• Suspend MFG for schools over 100% needs-led funding• Changes to SEN funding•Broadband•Post-16
![Page 5: SCHOOL FUNDING 2010/11 AND BEYOND CONSULTATION JANUARY 2010](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062516/56649d545503460f94a309b7/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Funding 2011/12 and 2012/13
Chancellor’s pre-budget statement:•1.6% p.a. increase in costs
To be met by:•0.7% p.a. increase in funding•0.9% p.a. efficiency saving
Position on specific grants and DSG generally not known
![Page 6: SCHOOL FUNDING 2010/11 AND BEYOND CONSULTATION JANUARY 2010](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062516/56649d545503460f94a309b7/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Medium Term Outlook
2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 400,000,000,000
450,000,000,000
500,000,000,000
550,000,000,000
600,000,000,000
650,000,000,000
700,000,000,000
Forecastof public spending and income
Receipts Expenditure
![Page 7: SCHOOL FUNDING 2010/11 AND BEYOND CONSULTATION JANUARY 2010](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062516/56649d545503460f94a309b7/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
The Gloucestershire Context•Low funding•Wide range in funding per pupil•Funding per pupil increases significantly for schools with intakes below 20 (primary) and 120 (secondary)•Funding exceptionally low for Key
Stage 4•Base allocation, SF and MFG all act as subsidies for small schools•Not clear about impact of NLF•SEN funding used to cover core costs•Attainment levels high at “headline” level but …
![Page 8: SCHOOL FUNDING 2010/11 AND BEYOND CONSULTATION JANUARY 2010](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062516/56649d545503460f94a309b7/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
DeconstructingThe Individual Schools Budget
![Page 9: SCHOOL FUNDING 2010/11 AND BEYOND CONSULTATION JANUARY 2010](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062516/56649d545503460f94a309b7/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
DECONSTRUCTINGTHE INDIVIDUAL SCHOOLS BUDGET
![Page 10: SCHOOL FUNDING 2010/11 AND BEYOND CONSULTATION JANUARY 2010](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062516/56649d545503460f94a309b7/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
The Individual Schools BudgetGLOUCESTERSHIRE LOCAL AUTHORITY
PRIMARY SCHOOL BUDGETS
-£200
£1,800
£3,800
£5,800
£7,800
£9,800
£11,800
TYPE OF SCHOOL
FUN
DIN
G P
ER P
UPIL
Age-weighted funding Social and Special Needs Total Site-specific factors Total School-specific factors
Budget adjustments Minimum funding guarantee Standards Grant/ Fund Threshold and Performance Pay
Infant Junior Primary
![Page 11: SCHOOL FUNDING 2010/11 AND BEYOND CONSULTATION JANUARY 2010](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062516/56649d545503460f94a309b7/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
The Impact Of Very Low AWPUs On Performance At the End On Key Stage 4
5 or more A*-C
Grades – inc En and
Ma
5 or more A*-C
Grades
5 or more A*-G
Grades
Average Points score
KS2 – KS4 Contextual
Value Added
Minimum 29.6 51.2 83.0 341.9 978.6 Median 47.7 64.2 92.9 390.9 1001.6 Maximum 67.2 79.1 97.7 454.9 1022.3 Gloucestershire 56.8 67.6 93.5 392.6 993.8 Gloucestershire Rank 17th 36th 52nd 66th 135th
![Page 12: SCHOOL FUNDING 2010/11 AND BEYOND CONSULTATION JANUARY 2010](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062516/56649d545503460f94a309b7/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
SEN – the problem
•Increasing reliance on statements:
- SA + nos. low
- rising cost of statements•Current funding model not sustainable•Rising nos. and costs of out-county placements•Focus on ASD and BESD
![Page 13: SCHOOL FUNDING 2010/11 AND BEYOND CONSULTATION JANUARY 2010](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062516/56649d545503460f94a309b7/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
SEN Funding Strategy
SEN delegation in 2003/4 produced only initial decline in statements 13
![Page 14: SCHOOL FUNDING 2010/11 AND BEYOND CONSULTATION JANUARY 2010](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062516/56649d545503460f94a309b7/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
The Vicious CircleLow funded mainstream
schools
Use of SEN funds for core
functions
Increase in statements/exclusions
Higher SEN/PRS
spend central
Higher SEN spend
schools
14
![Page 15: SCHOOL FUNDING 2010/11 AND BEYOND CONSULTATION JANUARY 2010](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062516/56649d545503460f94a309b7/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Strategic Priorities
1. Develop strategic planning and communications.
2. Optimise the impact of funding available for schools.
3. Advise Cabinet, schools and government on the impact of a reducing budget.
4. Reprofile SEN spending to improve outcomes.
5. Ensuring value for money.
![Page 16: SCHOOL FUNDING 2010/11 AND BEYOND CONSULTATION JANUARY 2010](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062516/56649d545503460f94a309b7/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Budget 2010/11
DSG proposals:•Avoid unaffordable commitments•Meet unavoidable SEN costs•Introduce “top up” funding for statements•Allocate reduction in statementing costs back to schools•Develop specialist ASD expertise in secondary schools•Suspend MFG for schools > 100% NLF
![Page 17: SCHOOL FUNDING 2010/11 AND BEYOND CONSULTATION JANUARY 2010](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062516/56649d545503460f94a309b7/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Impact on Individual Schools
• Key variables:
- pupil numbers
- specific grants• 2010/11 –roughly standstill• 2011/12 and 2012/13 – real terms
reductions• 2013/14 and beyond – further significant
reductions
![Page 18: SCHOOL FUNDING 2010/11 AND BEYOND CONSULTATION JANUARY 2010](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062516/56649d545503460f94a309b7/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Impact on DSG of Reducing Pupil Numbers
82,397 81,800 81,001
![Page 19: SCHOOL FUNDING 2010/11 AND BEYOND CONSULTATION JANUARY 2010](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062516/56649d545503460f94a309b7/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Consultation Questions
1. What are the particular concerns confronting your school over the next 3 to 5 years?
2. Do you agree with the strategic priorities identified by the Schools Forum?
3. Do you agree with the SEN proposals on:
- statementing
- ASD
- accountability for SEN spending
4. Comments on budget proposals for 2010/11 including the suspension of MFG.