school improvement plan - revised 9-26-2011

Upload: allison-meeks-hood

Post on 05-Apr-2018

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/2/2019 School Improvement Plan - Revised 9-26-2011

    1/10

    School Improvement Plan

    School Name: Burke County High School System Name: Burke County

    Principal Name: Sam Adkins School Year: 2011 - 2012

    Title I Schoolwide Program: Yes Targeted Assistance: No

    Needs Improvement Status: NI NI-AYP 0 1 2 3 4 5

    6 7 8 9 10 11

    Sanctions Implementing (Select all that apply):

    X

    School Improvement Plan (The school improvement plan is submitted to the system per system guidelines. Needs Improvement schools will submit plans to the system forapproval in October of each year).

    X PublicSchool Choice

    X Supplemental Educational Services (SES)

    X

    Corrective Action Addendum (The corrective action addendum is completed by the system by the end of Januaryof each year.)

    X Corrective Action Tier

    State Directed Improvement Contract

    Principals Signature: Date:

    Title I Directors Signature: Date:

    Superintendents Signature: Date:

  • 8/2/2019 School Improvement Plan - Revised 9-26-2011

    2/10

    STUDENT ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT MEASURABLE GOALS:

    GHSGT MATHEMATICS GOALS:

    All students will increase achievement in Mathematics from _86.9_% meeting or exceeding standard at the end of SY2011 to _88.9_% meeting or exceeding standard at the end of SY2012 asmeasured by the mathematics GHSGT with 100% participation.

    Subgroup Goal:

    Black Students: Percentage meeting standard in math in 2010-2011: 80.1% Goal: percentage of students meeting math standard in 2011-2012> = 85.1%

    SWD: Percentagemeeting standard in math in 2010-2011: 62.5% Goal: percentage of students meeting math standard in 2011-2012> = 68.7%

    MATHEMATICS END OF COURSE TEST (EOCT) GOALS:

    All students will increase achievement on the Mathematics I EOCT from _48_% meeting or exceeding standard at the end of SY2011 to _53

    _% meeting or exceeding standard at the end of

    SY2012.

    All students will increase achievement on the Mathematics II EOCT from _67_% meeting or exceeding standard at the end of SY2011 to _72_% meeting or exceeding standard at the end ofSY2012.

    GHSGT ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS:

    All students will increase achievement in ELA from 91.2 % meeting or exceeding standard at the end of SY2011 to _93.9_% meeting or exceeding standard at the end of SY2012 as

    measured by the ELA GHSGT with 100% participation.

    Subgroup Goal:

    Black Students: Percentage meeting standard in ELA in 2010-2011: 88.2

    _% Goal: percentage of students meeting ELA standard in 2011-2012> = _93.9_%

    SWD: Percentagemeeting standard in ELA in 2010-2011: 41.2% Goal: percentage of students meeting ELA standard in 2011-2012> = 45.3%

    ENGLISH/LANGUEAGE ARTS END OF COURSE TEST (EOCT) GOALS:

    All students will increase achievement on the Ninth Grade Literature EOCT from _72_% meeting or exceeding standard at the end of SY2011 to _77

    _% meeting or exceeding standard at

    the end of SY2012.

    All students will increase achievement on the American Literature EOCT from _86_% meeting or exceeding standard at the end of SY2011 to _91

    _% meeting or exceeding standard at the

    end of SY2012.

    GRADUATION RATE:

    The graduation rate will increase from _71.1 % in 2011 receiving a regular education diploma to 78.2 % receiving a regular education diploma at the end of SY2012.

    Graduation Rate (Cohort 2012)

    Based on present data our graduation rate would be projected at 47% (if students were graduating August 2011). Graduation rate will increase from the projected 47% to meet or exceed the 2012 AMO

    to be determined by GADOE.

  • 8/2/2019 School Improvement Plan - Revised 9-26-2011

    3/10

    eys

    Strands

    *GAPSS

    Target

    Areas&

    SIG

    Correlation

    Actions, Strategies, and

    InterventionsTimeline

    Estimated

    Costs,Funding

    Sources, and

    Resources

    Person(s)

    Responsible

    Evaluation of I mplementation

    of Strategies and

    Impact on Student Learning

    Artifacts EvidenceCheckpoints/ Status

    Curriculum C

    - 1.3

    SIG~ A-7

    All faculty will follow GPSDOE Frameworks.

    August2011May 2012

    $0

    $2,000

    Administrators,All Faculty, &Instructional

    Coaches

    Artifacts will containGPS/SBI/DOE Frameworksimplementation data is

    collected. Artifacts to bemeasured include:-Unit Plans

    -Collaborative Planning

    Agendas and Minutes

    -Lesson Plan Template

    -Classroom ObservationResults-Class Keys Portfolio

    -Student WorkSamples

    (PerformanceLearning Tasks,

    PerformanceAssessments)

    School leaders andteachers can articulateand demonstrate a

    common definition ofrigor, relevance,standards-basedteaching and learning

    with fidelity. As aresult:

    * Higher order thinkingis reflected in assigned

    performance tasks.

    *Teachers askappropriate questionsto assess higher order

    thinking and problem

    solving ability.

    *Students can explainand support theiranswers as well asshow evidence thatvalidates theirreasoning.

    8/30 11/17 1/25 4/18

  • 8/2/2019 School Improvement Plan - Revised 9-26-2011

    4/10

    C2.1 The faculty will study theCommon Core Georgia

    Performance Standards(CCGPS) Training.

    A Short Term Action Plan(STAP) will be usedthroughout the year to ensureimplementation and monitorprogress of the use of theframeworks.

    Instructional Coaches facilitateJob-Embedded professionallearning and work withindividuals and groups toimprove instructional delivery.This includes work with newteachers.

    August2011January 12

    August2011May 2012

    August2011May 2012

    Administrators,All Faculty, &InstructionalCoaches

    STAP ActionTeam

    Administration

    InstructionalCoaches

    Professional Learning hasbeen scheduled with a roll-out plan. Artifacts willinclude:- PL CCGPS Calendar-PL Meeting Minutes

    Revised STAP

    STAP Action TeamMinutes & Agendas

    Job-Embedded PLdocumentation to include:-New Teacher MeetingAgendas- PL Calendar-Collaborative PlanningSchedule

    Teachers engage in aprocess of collaborativeplanning for curriculumimplementation toensure that they agreeon core content andrequired student

    performance.

    As a result of asystematic andconsistent approach tocollaborative planningand professionallearning provided bythe InstructionalCoaches, there is a highlevel of consensusconcerning whatlearners should know,

    do, and understand bythe end of each gradingperiod.

  • 8/2/2019 School Improvement Plan - Revised 9-26-2011

    5/10

    Instruction

    Standard 2

    I2.1I2.2I - 2.3I2.4I - 2.5

    SIGA4, A6

    I2.7SIG - A4

    All teachers will implementStandards Based Instruction toinclude: through an emphasison analyzing student work toinclude:- Higher Order Thinking Skills(HOTS)-Flex Grouping

    -Differentiated Instruction-Language of the Standards(LOTS)- Rigor and Relevance-Learning Focus Strategies(LFS)

    Conduct school-wide anddepartmental walkthroughs tomonitor the instructionalframework, standards-basedinstruction, and professional

    learning initiatives.

    Increase student and teacheruse of technology as aneffective instructional tool toincrease comprehension andhigher order thinking skills.

    E-Reader/E-Books/RelatedMaterials

    August2011May 2012

    August2011May 2012

    $ 6,000

    $60,000

    $18,000

    All Faculty &Administrators

    InstructionalCoaches

    All Faculty

    Reading SupportTeacher

    All Faculty

    To measure implementationand effectiveness, artifactswill include:-Units aligned to standards-Differentiation elementincluded in unit/lessonplans-SBI High Impact Rubric

    utilized in unit/lessonplanning-Student Work Samples-You Be George

    Classroom Data willinclude:-Evidence of smallgroups/pairs based on

    differentiated methodology-Focus Walk Data collectedby BCPS, RESA, andVisiting Observers-LFS Lesson Plan Templateutilization-Class Keys TeacherObservation Data-Student Achievement Data-Student Work Samples-Student use of rubrics- Benchmark data

    Teacher Artifacts toinclude:-Completed Flip Charts-Observed use inclassrooms

    Student Artifacts to include:

    Teachers can analyzestudent work accordingto the different focuses.

    Teachers and studentscan explain differentphases of the lesson(opening, work session,

    and closing).

    Teachers can explainhow an assessments,performance tasks, etc.emphasize higher-orderthinking skills.

    Teachers can showexamples of diagnosticand formativeassessments that havebeen used to determine

    flexible groups.

    Students can explain orinterpret new learningin differentapplications.Worksheets are notused as the primarysource of practice andassessment.

    Teachers candemonstrate use ofinstructionaltechnology throughclassroomobservations.

    8/30 11/17 1/25 4/18

  • 8/2/2019 School Improvement Plan - Revised 9-26-2011

    6/10

    I-2.1PL1.5

    SIGA-4

    Instructional Coaches facilitateJob-Embedded professionallearning and work withindividuals and groups toimprove instructional delivery.

    August2011April 2012

    All Faculty

    -Observed use inclassrooms-Student work samples

    Artifacts to include:-PL Calendar (based oncurrent initiatives andteacher interest)-Sign-In Sheets/Agendas

    -Student Work Samples-Walkthrough Data- Progress monitoring ofunit plans

    Students can articulatehow technologysupports their learning.

    A significant part ofeach work week is

    spent in job-embeddedPL (25% as noted byNSDC standards).

  • 8/2/2019 School Improvement Plan - Revised 9-26-2011

    7/10

    AssessmentA- 1.1A - 1.2A1.4A - 2.1A - 2.2A - 2.3A - 3.1

    I3.1

    SIG - A4

    A1.1

    SchoolCultureSC1.1

    SIG - A4, A6

    Data are used to driveinstruction.

    Review student performancedata to determine individualareas of strengths andweaknesses. Establish plans forsupport.

    Benchmark Data EOCT Data GHSGT Data GHSWT Data Standards Mastery

    An Assessment Action Teamwill be formed to develop,facilitate and/or monitor thebenchmark, common, andstandardized assessments.

    Based on student data,academic interventions/safetynets will be provided tostudents who need additionalassistance meeting thestandards

    Response toIntervention (RTI)

    Before/After School

    August2011May 2012

    August2011May 2012

    August2011May 2012

    $2,000 All faculty andAdministrators

    Select Personnel

    All FacultyAdministration

    -Common Assessments-Collaborative PlanningMeeting Agendas andMinutes-Balanced Assessments-Disaggregated Test Data-Utilization of the DataRoom

    -School Improvement Plan(SIP)-Progress Monitoring

    -RTI Meeting Minutes-21 Century Rosters-PLATO Rosters andStudent Assessment Data-GHSGT Express Rosters

    Teachers willdisaggregate formativeand summativeassessment data toidentify achievementgaps among subgroupsto monitor and adjustinstruction.

    Students know wherethey are in relation tothe identified goal andcan identify next stepsneeded to meet thestandards.

    Students who needadditional assistance inmeeting the standardsare enrolled inacademic intervention/safety nets. Academicintervention/safety netsinstruction iscontinuouslymonitored.

    A cohesive andcomprehensive systemfor assessing studentprogress is evidencedthrough student data.

    Teachers can explainhow students aremoved in and out ofintervention programsbased on data.

    8/30 11/17 1/25 4/18

  • 8/2/2019 School Improvement Plan - Revised 9-26-2011

    8/10

    SIGA4

    Tutoring

    Credit Recovery Lunch Intervention GHSGT Review

    Implement Teachers AsAdvisors (TAA) to monitorstudents academic progress

    throughout the school year.

    August2011May 2012

    CounselorsAll FacultyAdministration

    -TAA PL Meeting Agenda-Monthly TAA advisementlogs-Master Schedule-Student 4-Year Plan-GA College 411 Rosters

    Teachers can articulatethe advisement process.

    Students can explainhow their 4 year plan isbeing monitored.

    LeadershipL4.2L4.3

    A data-driven and consensus-oriented process is used forcontinuous improvement.

    August2011May 2012

    $0 Better SeekingTeam Members(BST)

    -BST minutes-Action team minutes-Individual students

    intervention plans (RTI)-Credit recovery rosters,test results-Before and after schooltutoring rosters, test results

    The BST is keenlyaware of barriers tostudent achievement

    and can articulate aclear action plan toaddress/eliminate thesebarriers to learning

    BST members canexplain how the schoolimprovement planimpacts the work of theschool. The goals ofthe improvement planbecome the focus of thework of the team.

    8/30 11/17 1/25 4/18

  • 8/2/2019 School Improvement Plan - Revised 9-26-2011

    9/10

    SIG - A4

    SIG - A4, A6

    Implement action teams toaddress a management processfor monitoring graduation rate,student attendance, teacherattendance, student discipline,and assessment.

    BST monitors theimplementation of the SchoolImprovement Plan while usingthe High-Impact PracticeImplementation Rubric:Leadership Team to evaluateand refine practices andprocesses.

    August2011May 2012

    August2011May 2012

    Action TeamMembers

    Action Team MeetingAgenda/Minutes

    Implementation of plannedstrategies/interventionsbased on data analysis fromeach Action Team.

    N/A- SIP is continuallyrevised and monitoredon a monthly basis andfulfills therequirements of STAP.

    Student,

    Family, &

    CommunitySFC - 1.1

    SIG- A9

    The school establishes anetwork between parents andthe community to supportstudent learning.

    August2011May 2012

    $6,000 All FacultyAdministration

    School & FamilyLiaison

    -parental portal accessreports-parent/teacher conferenceand contact logs- sign in sheets from parent

    engagement meetings.

    - parent surveys- system stuffers sent toparents-parent newletters-family liaison contact logs-teacher websites withcontact information

    Parents are aware ofthe standards that theirchildren are working onin the classroom.Parents can identifyhow their children are

    progressing towardmeeting the standards.

    8/30 11/17 1/25 4/18

    ProfessionalLearning

    PL - 2.1PL3.1PL3.2

    PL3.3

    SIGA2, A6

    Collect and collaborativelyanalyze data relevant to studentlearning, demographic,perception, and process (e.g.action research, analyzing

    student work, classroomobservations, awareness walks,and surveys) on a continuousbasis to identify student andadult learning needs and goalsand to monitor and reviseschool and classroominstructional strategies.

    August2011May 2012

    $0 All FacultyAdministrators

    School & FamilyLiaison

    InstructionalCoaches

    -Professional Growth Plans(PGP)-CLASS Keys Self-Assessment-Professional Learning logs

    and minutes- Survey data-Post-training observations- Collaborative planningagendas and minutes- Focus walkthrough data- Professional LearningCalendar-Peer observation recordsfocusing on high academicexpectations

    Leadership andteachers can articulatethe learning needs ofstudents as a whole andby various

    demographics as wellas other commonassessment data thatwill be collected overthe course of the schoolyear to demonstratestudents areprogressing towardmeeting performancetargets.

    Teachers can articulatea rationale for whyspecific instructional

    strategies are

    8/30 11/17 1/25 4/18

  • 8/2/2019 School Improvement Plan - Revised 9-26-2011

    10/10

    School

    Culture 2.2

    Ensure that all professionallearning promotes the sustaineddevelopment of teachers deep

    understanding of contentknowledge, research-basedinstructional strategies, andassessment strategies to includethe five step protocol.

    Ensure that faculty and staffreceive job-embeddedprofessional learning viaconferences and book studiesto ensure better delivery ofcontent material and jobefficiency.

    Monitor teachers progress inimplementing these research-based practices and providefeedback and coaching.

    Promote a learning communitythat consistently celebrates andacknowledges theachievements andaccomplishments of all

    members in the school. Toinclude:

    Rewards for PositiveBehavior

    Wall of Fame Faculty, Student, and

    Staff Rewards

    August2011- May2012

    $20,000

    $5,000

    $80,000

    All Faculty

    InstructionalCoaches

    Administration

    InstructionalCoaches

    Administration

    InstructionalCoaches

    All faculty,administrators,and InstructionalCoaches

    appropriate and howthey meet the differingneeds of students.

    School leaders andteachers can articulatehow collaboration ismonitored and howthey receive feedbackabout theircollaborative work.

    Teachers can re-delivermaterial gleaned from

    job-embedded PL.

    The school staff candescribe ways in whichthey model acceptanceand respect and howthey recognize and

    celebrate individualefforts andaccomplishments.

    Students can discussthe differentrecognitions andcelebrations that occurin the school. Studentsdescribe how thesecelebrations encouragetheir continuedprogress for academicachievement.

    Revised 9/26/11