school performance framework preliminary ratings colorado department of education
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: School Performance Framework Preliminary Ratings Colorado Department of Education](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081519/56649c6d5503460f9491ec11/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
School Performance FrameworkPreliminary Ratings
Colorado Department of Education
![Page 2: School Performance Framework Preliminary Ratings Colorado Department of Education](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081519/56649c6d5503460f9491ec11/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
School Performance Framework Purposes
• Establishes a common framework for accountability
• Provides transparent performance information to drive statewide conversation about change
• Modernizes reporting of state, district and school performance information
• Establishes new system of support and intervention, including for turnaround schools and districts
![Page 3: School Performance Framework Preliminary Ratings Colorado Department of Education](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081519/56649c6d5503460f9491ec11/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Focused Attention on Four Key Performance Indicators
• Academic Achievement
• Academic Growth
• Academic Growth Gaps
• Postsecondary and Workforce Readiness
Growth and Postsecondary and Workforce Readiness weighted more heavily in school and district frameworks
![Page 4: School Performance Framework Preliminary Ratings Colorado Department of Education](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081519/56649c6d5503460f9491ec11/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Moving from Performance Indicators to Plan Rating
• Schools receive a rating for each of the performance indicators:– Exceeds, Meets, Approaching, Does Not Meet
• The ratings roll up to an overall evaluation of the school’s performance, which determines the school’s plan type assignment
![Page 5: School Performance Framework Preliminary Ratings Colorado Department of Education](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081519/56649c6d5503460f9491ec11/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
School Plan Assignments
• Performance Plan
• Improvement Plan
• Priority Improvement Plan*
• Turnaround Plan*
*Requires increased levels of state oversight
![Page 6: School Performance Framework Preliminary Ratings Colorado Department of Education](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081519/56649c6d5503460f9491ec11/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Sample SPF
![Page 7: School Performance Framework Preliminary Ratings Colorado Department of Education](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081519/56649c6d5503460f9491ec11/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Preliminary Ratings: All Schools
![Page 8: School Performance Framework Preliminary Ratings Colorado Department of Education](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081519/56649c6d5503460f9491ec11/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Requests for Reconsideration
• Majority of districts accepted initial CDE school performance plan assignments for their schools
• October 15 - Districts submitted accreditation category for schools and any additional evidence as applicable
• CDE currently reviewing all requests for reconsideration
![Page 9: School Performance Framework Preliminary Ratings Colorado Department of Education](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081519/56649c6d5503460f9491ec11/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Approval Process• Commissioner recommends plan type assignments to
State Board for approval
– Follows opportunity for districts to submit additional evidence for consideration between August and October
• Commissioner determines final accreditation categories for districts
– Districts may appeal final accreditation categories to the State Board
![Page 10: School Performance Framework Preliminary Ratings Colorado Department of Education](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081519/56649c6d5503460f9491ec11/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Next Steps with SPF Reports
• Use this data to focus improvement planning efforts
• Use plan type assignments to target support for schools – with focused attention on schools rated as Turnaround and Priority Improvement
![Page 11: School Performance Framework Preliminary Ratings Colorado Department of Education](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081519/56649c6d5503460f9491ec11/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Timeline• Expect all school plan assignments and district accreditation
categories to be final in advance of State Board Meeting on December 6th
• November and December 2010 – CDE finalizes district accreditation and State Board approves all school plan types
• January 2011 – Districts submit district and school Priority Improvement and Turnaround Plans, and any other plans required by federal law, for Department review and feedback
• March 2011 – Districts submit revised Turnaround Plans to Department for approval
• April 15, 2011 – Districts submit district and school Improvement and Performance Plans for publication
![Page 12: School Performance Framework Preliminary Ratings Colorado Department of Education](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081519/56649c6d5503460f9491ec11/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Resources• SPF Tutorial:
http://www.cde.state.co.us/media/training/SPF_Online_Tutorial/player.html
• SPF and DPF templates: http://www.schoolview.org/documents/SPFTemplate(EM).pdf
http://www.schoolview.org/documents/SPFTemplate(H).pdf
http://www.schoolview.org/documents/DPFTemplate.pdf
• Accountability Tutorial: http://www.cde.state.co.us/media/training/AccountabilitySystemOverviewplayer.html
• Accountability Handbook: http://www.schoolview.org/documents/DistrictAccountabilityHandbook.pdf
• General Resource:
http://www.schoolview.org/learningcenter.asp
![Page 13: School Performance Framework Preliminary Ratings Colorado Department of Education](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081519/56649c6d5503460f9491ec11/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
ContactsOffice of Performance and Policy
– Bill Bonk, Longitudinal Growth Consultant, [email protected]– John Condie, Performance Support Manager,
[email protected]– Kady Dodds, Senior Policy Associate, [email protected]– Marie Huchton, Senior Statistical Consultant,
[email protected]– Dianne Lefly, Director of Research and Evaluation,
[email protected]– Jhon Penn, Performance Support Director, [email protected]– DeLinda Rose, Executive Assistant, [email protected]– Somoh Supharukchinda, Performance Support Manager,
[email protected]– Richard Wenning, Associate Commissioner,