science communication & social media (part 2)
DESCRIPTION
Science Communication & Social Media (part 2). Karen Lips @kwren88. Slides posted here:http://figshare.com/authors/Karen%20Lips/278233. Social media for research . What’s the best thing about Social Media?. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Science Communication & Social Media (part 2)
Karen Lips@kwren88
Slides posted here:http://figshare.com/authors/Karen%20Lips/278233
"Social Media has provided us with the opportunity to have our own National Geographic or Discovery Channels to reach the general public”
“It gives you exposure to a much bigger part of the world. Kids can interact with scientists and form a more accurate and broader picture of what science is and what scientists do.”
Social media is like the conversations in the hallways at meetings. It is the Campfire around which we can gather and converse. It is the Virtual Water Cooler where we trade stories
Why Use Social Media?• Boost your professional profile• Act as a public voice for science• Online outreach can help you get funding• Establish contact with reporters, media outlets• Increase impact of your papers• Open science & Collaboration• #icanhazpdf• Personalized news feed• Ask questions of experts• Live tweeting meetings
(From Paige Brown, Russ Mounce)
What are your goals?
• What do you want out of your social media experience?– Increased citations for your papers?– Increased visibility of your research?– Outlet for opinions?– Collaboration?– Open data and sharing?– Translation of science for broad audience?
(From titus brown, paige brown)
Suggestions
• Create & curate your Google Scholar page.• Make sure you have a Web page somewhere.• Create a Twitter account and follow people that
work in your area• When you publish,– Post data to figshare;– Write a guest blog post about paper– Add your Twitter handle to posts, talks, etc
(From Titus Brown)
What is the problem?“Science is produced at research centers within a few select
regions. This distribution contributes to “brain drain”—the cultural and geographical separation of researchers from their communities of origin…
This precludes achieving a critical mass of scientific expertise and the development of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM)…
Displaced scientists become disconnected from home communities and colleagues, challenges in maintaining research collaborations...
Dispersion presents challenges to scientists who see themselves as underrepresented in the larger culture of science…”
Goals of CienciaPR
(1) promoting scholarly interaction among self-identified members of an otherwise dispersed community;
(2) providing visibility to diverse scientific role models; and
(3) supporting research and science education through initiatives that culturally resonate with our community of origin.
More PR-specific Resources
• http://www.cienciapr.org• http://biodiversidadpr.com• http://caribbeanpaleobiology.blogspot.com• http://biologiaboricua.com/• https://www.facebook.com/
salvemosloscoquies • http://www.coquiguajon.org
A Proposal to Evaluate a Scientist’s Impact on Society
“If the ultimate goal is to evaluate a person’s true overall role as a scientist, I think we should be considering how they communicate with all people not just other scientists.” ~ Prosanta Chakrabarty (@LSU_Fish)
http://lsuichthyology.blogspot.com/2014/02/a-proposal-for-new-altmetric-influence.html
Influence Score = (H-Index X 100) + (Press index/100) + (Social Media-
Index/100)
H-index = citations of scientific publications
• H-index*100• The H-index can be easily calculated in
Google Scholar. Google Scholar counts books and other non-traditional peer-reviewed publications, and it is free!
Press Index = visibility with the press
• PI= #articles/100• Using Google News, one simple puts the
person’s name in the search box and counts the number of articles that are found, which Google also does for you
Social Media Index or SM-index
• SMI= #followers/100
• For someone on Twitter you get 1pt for every follower. For someone not on Twitter but that has either a Facebook “Fan” Page or Facebook “followers,” you get 1pt per fan or follower.
Quantifying your full Impact
• Altmetrics – a way of quantifying downloads, clicks, shares, likes of a particular scientific product (paper, posters, talks)
• ImpactStory – all the various kinds of impacts of your products
What reach do your papers have beyond citations in other scientific papers?
ImpactstoryBlogs, shares, clicks, press coverage, etc
For example:http://impactstory.org/user51076
What reach does any paper have?
Altmetrics:Add this bookmarklet to your toolbar so you can
measure the reach of any paper:http://www.altmetric.com/bookmarklet.php
What are your goals for using twitter?
• What do you want out of your social media experience?– Increased citations for your papers?– Increased visibility of your research?– Outlet for opinions?– Collaboration?– Open data and sharing?– Translation of science for broad audience?
(From titus brown, paige brown)
Tweeting increases the reach of your science
“Highly tweeted articles were 11 times more likely to be highly cited than less tweeted articles…
Top-cited articles can be predicted from top-tweeted articles with 93% specificity an 73% sensitivity”
Eysenback, 2011J Med Internet Res; 13(4): e123
SOCIAL MEDIA FOR TEACHING
"Social Media can serve as a great tool to inspire younger generations to follow careers in science"
SOCIAL MEDIA FOR OUTREACH(TO THE MEDIA,
POLICYMAKERS, THE PUBLIC)
"Social Media helps scientists connect with the public in a neutral, non-
intimidating setting"
Other Useful Apps
Academic networking:• Mendeley• Academia.com• LinkedIn
Sharing talks, posters, code• Figshare• Slideshare• Github
Organizing• Dropbox• Evernote• Pocket• Feedly
General Social Media Resources• It’s Time for Scientists to Tweet:
http://theconversation.com/its-time-for-scientists-to-tweet-14658• Social Networking for Scientists: The Wiki
http://socialnetworkingforscientists.wikispaces.com/General• How to Build an Enduring Online Research Presence Using Social Networking
and Open Science, SlideShare, Titus Brown http://www.slideshare.net/c.titus.brown/2013-beaconcongresssocialmedia
• Darling et al. (2013).The role of Twitter in the life cycle of a scientific publication. https://peerj.com/preprints/16v1/
• Bik, H. M., & Goldstein, M. C. (2013). An Introduction to Social Media for Scientists. PLoS biology, 11(4), e1001535.
• Liz Neeley. 2014. A fresh look at social media for scicomm. Slideshare http://www.slideshare.net/LizNeeley/fresh-look-at-social-media-for-science-communication-decodesci
From Paige Brown: Social Media for Scientists, with additions