scientific content infographic - veeva systems · scientific content must be relevant, consumable,...
TRANSCRIPT
Expand access and visibility of your scientific content
*Source: internal audit by top 10 pharma company**Source: based on internal data collected by top pharma companies
MSLs only use a fraction of scientific decks created by home office medical teams
average cost to create a scientific slide*
average cost to create and maintain a scientific deck**
600+ 10-100K
28,000+scientific peer-reviewed
publications in circulation
73 daysRate at which medical data doubles
(35x faster than in 1980)
Key industry challenges todelivering scientific content
have full visibility into the usage of scientific
content
10%
Proven best practices
Centralize content in a single source of
truth
Connect to your CRM to track interactions &
channel preference
Respond to HCPs in their preferred
channels
Analyze data to get content usage metrics
and other insights
Learn more on how Bristol-Myers Squibb maximized content usage in this on-demand webinar
Physicians need a more efficient way to consume medical knowledgeScientific content must be relevant, consumable,
& available in the channel of preference
use a central hub for scientific content
33%lack a comprehensive
strategy for repurposing or localizing scientific content
64%
Bristol-Myers Squibb found that centralizing scientific content helps optimize content
usage and interactions
So how can life sciences organizations speed the creation, approval, dissemination, and reuse of scientific content?
1 2 3 4
The growing complexity of medicines is driving the evolution of scientific content
We create our content, we send it off into the world and we hope it does its job, but we have little
visibility as to what's actually happening to it.- Medical affairs leader
top 10 pharmaceutical company
“”