scientific forest management: a project tour report
TRANSCRIPT
Welcome & NamasteScientific Forest Management in Community Forests of Low Land Terai.
(A Case Study from Piparichapa Women Community Forest)
• Introduction• Objective• Methodology
-Study Site
-Sampling Technique
-Biophysical Measurement
• Data Analysis• Findings• Recommendations• Limitations of the study
Outline of Presentation
Introduction Why Scientific Forest Management?
CF in Nepal- Initiated in 1978s.
-Only basic & minimal need of rural people.
-Increasing gap between demand & Supply.
-To regulate sustained yield- concept of
scientific FM got emerged.
Paradigm Shift in Nepalese Forest Management
- Privatization - Nationalization - Populism
Objective of The Study
General Objective
• To Manage the Community Forest Scientifically to produce sustained Yield.
Specific Objectives
• To delineate the forest boundary.
• To calculate AAC.• Stem mapping of Sub block.
Methodology
Study Site: Piparichapa Women Community Forest
Address: Rudrapur-2, Piparichapa, Rupandehi
Major floral Species:- Sal, Saj, Karma, Banjhi
Major Faunal Species:- Wild Cat, Wolf, Leopard, Hare, Monkey, Nil gai etc.
Major Birds:- Dhukur, Jureli, Kag, Fistey, sarau etc.
Boundary Map
4 Boundaries:- East:- Lumbini Road
West:- Kothi Khola
North:- Bitalu ko Pratikshyalaya
South:- Residential Areas of Piparichapa
Periodic Block Establishment
Basis of PB Establishment Artificial Human Development WorksEg. Gravel Road. Natural Features eg. Ghola Interest of Local People.
Biophysical Measurement• Navigation:- e-trex 10, Garmin GPS
• Abneys Level & L-tape for Height estimation.• D- tape for DBH measurement.• Based on Angle and distance (between tree and
observer using Abneys Level), tree height was calculated using different trigonometric equations.
• Seedlings & Sapling were counted only.
Result
• Summary of SamplingNumber of plot Sampled 27
Total Seedlings Counted 132
Total Sapling Counted 16
Total Pole 1
Total Tree 110
Spp Sal Asna Banjh Mauwa Jamun Kadam Karma Other
No. of Trees 88 13 2 1 3 1 2
Pole 1
Sapling 3 0 9 4
Seedlings 93 9 2 28
Stand Table for Overall SamplingS.N. DBH Class No. of trees Sal Asna Other
1 30-40 14 9 4 1
2 40-50 30 24 3 3
3 50-60 24 18 3 3
4 60-70 24 22 0 2
5 70-80 9 9 0 0
6 80-90 3 2 1 0
7 90-100 3 1 2 0
8 100-110 3 3 0 0
Total 110 88 13 9
Stand table for Each Periodic BlockPeriodic Block Stem/ha
1 46.67
2 73.34
4 70
5 73.33
6 75
7 113.34
9 95
10 92
Stand table based on diameter Class
Diameter Class
No. of Trees in different Periodic Number/ha
1 2 4 5 6 7 9 10
30-40 0 0 30 13.33 5 26.67 0 12
40-50 0 13.33 10 40 35 33.33 15 24
50-60 13.33 26.67 10 6.67 15 26.67 25 20
60-70 20 20 0 13.33 5 26.67 35 16
70-80 0 6.67 10 0 5 0 20 12
80-90 6.67 6.67 10 0 0 0 0 0
90-100 6.67 0 0 0 0 0 0 4
100-110 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 4
Stand Table Based on Grade
Periodic Block
No. of trees/ha
1st class 2nd Class 3rd Class
120 13.33 6.67
233.33 20 20
430 30 10
513.33 13.33 46.67
625 35 10
726.67 46.67 26.67
970 20 5
1028 52 12
Forest Condition Table Based on Regeneration
Periodic Block Seedlings/ha Forest Condition Saplings/ha Forest Condition
1 11,333GOOD 267Worst
2 18,667GOOD 133Worst
4 0Worst 0Worst
5 5667GOOD 0Worst
6 6000GOOD 0Worst
7 0Worst 0Worst
9 0Worst 0Worst
10 2,333Satisfactory 1,733Satisfactory
Timber and Fuel wood Estimation Periodic Block
Total timber Volume (cft)
Total timber Volume (cft)/ha
Total fuelwood Volume (Chatta)
Chatta/ha
1 654.29 4361.93 0.97 6.46
2 822.26 5481.73 1.5 10
4 523.84 5238.4 0.8 8
5 279.32 1862.13 0.97 6.46
6 991.16 4955.8 1.67 8.35
7 683.13 4554.2 1.54 10.26
9 2003.33 10016.65 3.19 15.95
10 1906.37 7625.48 3.14 12.56
Total timber volume/ha= 44096.32 cftAnnual Increment/ha= 440.96 cftAnnual Allowable Cut= 176.38 cft of timber
Recommendations• Further detailed study.• Technical empowerment of officers.• Empowerment of Local people.• Proper coordination with local.
Limitations
• Limited time duration.• Extreme climatic condition.• Lack of adequate technical understanding.