screen tech - shaker screen case study
TRANSCRIPT
PtarmiganServices.com 303-‐281-‐9670 [email protected]
Date 5/3/15 -‐ 5/26/15 Shaker Type Derrick 500 Series API # Tested Ptarmigan 170's (4)/ Against 140's (4)
Field Denver-‐Julesburg Basin Screen Type Derrick 500 Series Fluid Type Water Based Mud 9.7ppg
Ptarmigan 170's (4) Ptarmigan 170's (4) / 140's (4) Current Vendor 140's (4) Current Vendor 140's (4)
Total Shaker Hours 264Total Gallons Screened 72600
Ptarmigan None Ptarmigan
(3) 170's replaced @ 4500ft W/ 3 140's. Last 170 (1) was replaced @ 14,500ft W/ (1) 140
Current Vendor All 4 140's pulled of at end of well Current Vendor New 140's (4) before drilling well
Total Shaker Hours 360Total Gallons Screened 99000
Total Feet Drilled 15456 Total Feet Drilled 15500
GPM Over Shakers 550 GPM Over Shakers 550
GPM Distribution Competitor-‐ 50% / Ptarmigan-‐ 50% GPM Distribution Competitor-‐ 50% / Ptarmigan-‐ 50%WBM Weight 9.7 WBM Weight 9.8Mud Viscosity 36 Mud Viscosity 43 Notes:Sweep Viscosity (Vis/ Wt) N/A Sweep Viscosity (Vis/ Wt) N/AShaker Hours 264 Shaker Hours 240
Not only were we able to outlast the competitors screens 36%, one of our 170's lasted 75% longer (almost twice the life of the competitors).
Our Higer API 170's were able to outlast the competitors API 140's on shaker hours and gallons screend
Case Study
Screen Test Overview
Screens Replaced Screens Replaced
RESULTS
Competitor's First 4-‐ 140's
Well # 1 Info Well # 2 Info
Ptarmigan's First 3-‐ API 170's
LONGER LIFE
Ptarmigan 36%
WELL #1 Well # 2