screening for breast cancer · 2020-03-05 · • 1970s-1990s-old studies • invitation not as...
TRANSCRIPT
Screening for Breast Cancer Information For Primary Care Providers in Michigan
Renee W. Pinsky, MD Assistant Professor
Department of Radiology University of Michigan Health System
Screening Mammography • Module 4: Agreement over screening
– Screening Mammography reduces breast cancer mortality • Module 5: Controversies in screening
– When to start? – When to end? – How often?
• Module 6: Negative consequences of screening
Module 4 Agreement over screening
• Intended Learning Outcomes – Be familiar with the extensive research demonstrating
mortality reduction resulting from screening mammography
– Counsel patients regarding the utility of mammography including evidence for mortality and morbidity reduction
Agreement over Screening
• Outline: – Screening mammography introduction – Breast Cancer (BC) mortality rates – Scientific support of screening mammography
• RCT • Observational studies • Computerized models
Screening Mammography in Average Risk Women
• Purpose: – To decrease mortality and morbidity from breast cancer
(BC) • To detect cancers at an earlier stage than when clinically
apparent • To allow more limited surgery and medical treatment
• Asymptomatic women
ACS 2014, SEER 2015
Declining USA Female Breast Ca Mortality Rate
ê2 % / year 1990-2011 = 35%
Screening and Treatment Greater decline if Mortality trend used
Randomized Controlled Trials (RCT) • 1970s-1990s-old studies • Invitation not as treated • Allowed screening in control arm (contamination) • Variable mammogram methodologies:
– Age range – Frequency of screening 12,18, 24 month intervals – Number of rounds of screening – Length of follow up
Smith RA. The randomized trials of breast cancer screening: What have we learned? Radiol Clinics of NA 2004
Marmot MG et al, The benefits and harms of breast cancer screening: an independent review. British Journal of Cancer (2013) 108, 2205–2240
RCT: RR= 0.80 (0.73-0.89) UK Review
RCT Long Term Follow Up Studies Swedish Two County Trial
• 29 years • RR of BC death 0.69= 31% mortality reduction • Most prevented deaths occurred after 10 years of follow up
Tabár, L et al, Swedish Two-County Trial: Impact of Mammographic Screening on Breast Cancer Mortality during 3 Decades Radiology 2011 260:3, 658-663
Invited
Not invited
Canadian National Trial – Original study:
• Mammography did NOT reduce BC mortality • Ages 40-59 • Outlier from other RCTs
– 25 year follow up • Mammography did NOT reduce BC mortality
Miller AB et al Twenty five year follow up for breast cancer incidence and mortality of the Canadian National Breast Screening Study: randomized screening trial. Br. Med. Journal 2014 Feb 11:348
10 observational studies: Meta-analysis 49% Mortality Reduction
Nickson C et al. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2012 ;21:1479-1488 ©2012 by American Association for Cancer Research
• 40% MORTALITY REDUCTION – ~2.8 million screening studies – Age 40-79 – All age decades similar (40s-70s)
Coldman A et al Pan-Canadian Study of Mammography Screening and Mortality Image from Breast Cancer JNCI (2014)106 (11)
Biennial 50-74 (USPSTF) vs Annual 40-84 (ACS, NCCN)
(mean 6 CISNET models)
LYG/1000
Mortality Reduction (%)
B 50-74
110
23
A 40-84
189
40
Difference(%) 79 (72% ) 16.3 (71% ) Hendrick and Helvie, AJR 2011 Derived from: Mandelblatt J S et al. Ann Intern Med 2009;151:738-747
Screening vs. treatment effect
46% mortality reduction attributed to
mammography
Low screening compliance (< 50%)
Berry DA, Effect of screening and adjuvant therapy on mortality from breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2005;353(17) 1784-92
Screen impact at 100% relative to SCR +TX Model S 74% due to annual screen (39.0% of 52.5%) Model E 69% due to annual screen (35.6% of 51.8%)
Munoz D et al, Effects of Screening and Systemic Adjuvant Therapy on ER-specific US Breast Cancer Mortality JNCI Vol. 106, Nov 2014
Morbidity: Age 40-79, British Columbia
46% less Chemotherapy among screened 47% higher use of BCT among screened
Coldman AJ,et al. A retrospective study of the effect of participation in screening mammography on the use of chemotherapy and breast conserving therapy, Int J Cancer: 120, 2185-2190 (2007)
Decreased Morbidity Screen vs Palpable Detection
Age 40-49
Screened Symptoms Mastectomy 25% 47%
Chemotherapy 45% 81%
Malmgren J A et al. Impact of mammography detection on the course of breast cancer in women aged 40-49 years. Radiology 2012 ;262:797-806