script to - uni-due.de5 5 atomic physics 146 5.1 experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a)...

213
Prof. Dr. H. Franke Script to "ISE Physics" Prof. Dr. H. Franke University Duisburg-Essen Campus Duisburg Department of physics / applied physics Lotharstr. 1, D - 47048 Duisburg Phone: ++49 (0)203 - 379 2865 Email: [email protected] Web: http://www.ofm.uni-due.de

Upload: others

Post on 19-Mar-2020

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

Prof. Dr. H. Franke

Script to

"ISE Physics" Prof. Dr. H. Franke University Duisburg-Essen Campus Duisburg Department of physics / applied physics Lotharstr. 1, D - 47048 Duisburg Phone: ++49 (0)203 - 379 2865 Email: [email protected] Web: http://www.ofm.uni-due.de

Page 2: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

2

CONTENTS 0 INTRODUCTION………………………………………………………...6 0.1 Foreword……………………………………………………………...6 0.2 Literature……………………………………………………………..7 0.3 What is physics?...................................................................................7 0.4 Physical quantities……………………………………………………8 0.4.1 basic units / SI system 0.4.2 derived units & physical constants 0.4.3 angular units 1 TRANSLATIONS……………………………………………………….11 1.1 Coordinates, position-vector…………………………………….....11 1.2 Tracks……………………………………………………………..…13 1.3 Position, velocity & acceleration…………………………………...14 1.3.1 1D motion 1.3.2 3D motion 1.4 Special translations………………………………………………….18 1.4.1 uniform motion 1.4.2 motion with constant acceleration 1.4.3 circular motion (a) general case (b) uniform circular motion (c) circular motion with constant angular acceleration 1.4.4 summary 1.5 Assembled motion / coordinate transformations…………….23 1.5.1 systems with constant velocity 1.5.2 systems with constant acceleration 1.6 Forces………………………………………………………………..24 1.6.1 Newton's laws 1.6.2 consequences from Newton's laws: conservation of momentum 1.6.3 consequences from Newton's laws: equation of motion for a particle (a) case 1: m = const (1) constant forces (2) position dependent forces: gravitational force (3) position dependent forces: spring force (b) case 2: m ≠ const, rocket equation

Page 3: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

3

1.7 Energy & work……………………………………………………....30 1.7.1 kinetic and potential energy, energy conservation 1.7.2 work and power 1.8 Collisions……………………………………………………………..34 1.8.1 1D collisions 1.8.2 3D collisions 2 OSCILLATIONS…………………………………………………......…40 2.1 Simple harmonic motion (oscillation): spring-pendulum………...42 2.1.1 spring pendulum (a) equilibrium (b) equation of motion (c) solution of the equ. of motion (d) discussion of the solution 2.1.2 simple pendulum 2.2 Overlapping oscillations…………………………………………….49 2.2.1 ω1 = ω2 2.2.2 ω1 ≠ ω2, ω1 ≈ ω2

2.3 Energy during harmonic oscillations……………………………....51 2.4 Free, damped oscillation…………………………………………....52 (a) equation of motion (b) solution of the equation of motion (c) case: small damping, γ < ω0 (d) case: large damping: γ > ω0 (e) case: critical damping (aperiodic): γ ≈ ω0 2.5 Enforced oscillations and resonance……………………………….58 (a) equation of motion (b) solution (c) stationary state

Page 4: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

4

3 WAVES AND ACCOUSTICS……………………………………….61 3.1 Harmonic waves……………………………………………………..63 3.2 Superposition of waves (interference)……………………………...66 3.3 Standing waves………………………………………………………67 3.3.1 Standing waves is different systems: resonance 3.4 Harmonic sound waves……………………………………………..71 3.5 Energy and intensity………………………………………………..74 3.5.1 Intensity and sound level at sound waves 3.6 Plane, circular and spherical waves………………………………..77 3.7 Doppler effect………………………………………………………..79 4 OPTICS………………………………………………………………..83 4.1 Introduction to electromagnetic waves…………………………….83 4.1.1 Maxwell's equations 4.1.2 electromagnetic wave-equation, speed of light 4.1.3 electromagnetic wave-functions 4.1.4 elm. waves in different media - phase velocity and refractive index 4.1.5 wavefronts and Huygen's principle 4.1.6 law of reflection and refraction 4.2 Geometrical optics…………………………………………………93 4.2.1 ray approximation 4.2.2 image formation by reflection: mirrors (a) plane mirror (b) spherical mirror

4.2.3 image formation by refraction at a spherical surface 4.2.4 image formation by thin lenses 4.2.5 optical instruments (a) human eye (b) simple magnifier (c) optical microscope (d) telescope 4.2.6 prism, dispersion, spectral analysis 4.3 Wave optics………………………………………………………...120 4.3.1 interference fringes from thin layers 4.3.2 diffraction slit 4.3.3 diffraction grating, spectral analysis 4.4 Quantum optics…………………………………………………….138 4.4.1 wave particle duality I 4.4.2 photons 4.4.3 photoelectric effect

Page 5: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

5

5 ATOMIC PHYSICS……………………………………………………146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models…………………………...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment (d) atomic gases in discharges - line spectra (e) Zeeman effect 5.2 Historic atomic models…………………………………………….151 (a) J.J.Thompson's "plum pudding" model (b) Rutherford's atomic model (c) Bohr's atomic model 5.3 Wave particle duality II: electrons, neutrons, αααα-particles, ... …160 5.4 Schrödinger's equation and quantum mechanics………………..163 5.4.1 Schrödinger's axiom 5.4.2 example: particle in a box 5.5 Atomic model in quantum mechanics…………………………….168 5.5.1 the hydrogen atom 5.5.2 atoms with more electrons 5.5.3 the periodic system 6 SPECIAL THEORY Of RELATIVITY………………………………180 6.1 Lorentz transformation……………………………………………181 6.2 Time dilatation……………………………………………………..182 6.3 Length contraction………………………………………………...184 6.4 Relativistic mass, momentum & energy………………………….184 7 NUCLEAR PHYSICS……………………………………………….…187 7.1 Properties of atoms………………………………………………...187 7.2 Properties of nuclei………………………………………………...191 7.3 Radioactivity……………………………………………………….195 7.4 Decay types…………………………………………………………199 7.5 Natural radioactivity………………………………………………204 7.6 Fusion & fission……………………………………………………206 Exemplary problems for the written test……….………………………..212

Page 6: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

6

Chapter 0. Introduction 0.1. Foreword

Page 7: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

7

0.2. Literature P.A.Tipler: "Physics for scientists and engineers" A.Beiser: “Modern Technical Physics”, Addison Wesley, 1988 F.Bueche: “Principles of physics”, Mc Graw Hill, 1977 G.A. Williams: “Elementary physics”, Mc Graw Hill, 1969 Van Neie,P.Riley: “OHANIAN´s physics”, W.W.Norton, 1989 more detailed: Keller, Gettys, Skove: “physics”, Mc Graw Hill, 1993

0.3. What is physics?

physics = natural science, which deals with the basic modules of our environment and with their interactions Goal: discovery legalities in diversity of natural phenomenons, explanation of observed phenomena with few physical laws How to do? →Experiment: o systematic question to nature o meaning: gain the possibility to predict physical processes

quantitately 0.4. physical quantities

• objective description of nature demands quantitative (=numerically)

ascertainable correlations: measurement – result

needs mesure unit to measure means: comparison of two physical quantities e.g.: How long is the distance between Essen and Duisburg? possible answers: 25 km, 5 hours walk, 250 x length of soccer fields,... • measuring units:

length: e.g. see above: “km”, “velocity of walking,”,

Page 8: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

8

“soccer field” • time: e.g. “pulse frequence”, “day of sun”,...

→ every physical quantity consists of a number and a unit! note: number can be a vector or scalar! e.g.:

i. time: How long does a soccer game take? → t = 90 min → physical quantity „time“ is a scalar

ii. position: Where does my neighbour sit? → from my point of view (reference point), she / he sits 1m on the left →physical quantity „position“ is a vector

iii. other scalar quantities: mass m , current I , electric charge Q , luminous intensity I ,...

iv. other vector quantites: force F, magnetic field B , momentum p , ...

physical laws: contain fundamental constants, the physical constants e.g.: interaction between two bodies with masses 1 2,m m with a distance r to each other is called gravitational force.

The norm is: 1 212 2F

m mr

γ= with 12F = gravitational force

from object 1 on object 2, γ = gravitational constant 0.4.1. basic units

• How many?

→ 3 basic quantites: length, time, mass → functional: 3 additional quantities: amount of substance, temperature, (electric) current

• Basic units in physics: SI-system (system internatonal d’unites)

[length] = m ("meter") [time] = s ("second") [mass] = kg ("kilogramm") [current] = A ("ampere") [termperature] = K ("kelvin") [amount of substance] = mol ("mole")

Page 9: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

9

• Definitions

1) 1 m is the distance light travels through space in the

time-interval 1

299792458 s.

2) 1 s is the time-interval a cesium-clock oscillates 9 192 631 770,0 times.

3) 1 kg is the mass of the platinum-iridium stab which is stored in Paris. It is used as the mass-standard.

4) 1 mol is the amount of substance of a system that contains as many particles as atoms in 0,012 kg 12C .

5) 1 K is the 273,15th part of the thermodynamic temperature of water at its triple-point (that means: 0 0C = 273,15 K, 0 K = -273,15 0C )

6) 1 A is the electric current traveling through 2 parallel conductors in the distance of 1m to each other in vacuum, if the force between the 2 conductors is

72 10−⋅ N/m. 0.4.2. derived units & physical constants

a) derived units every unit can be derived from the basic units:

[force] = N ("newton"), 1 N = 1 kg m / s2 [work] = J ("joule") 1 J = 1 N m (=[energy]) [power] = W ("watt") 1 W = 1 J / s [frequency] = Hz ("hertz") 1 Hz = 1 s-1 [pressure] = Pa ("pascal") 1 Pa = 1 N / m2 [charge] = C ("coulomb") 1 C = 1 As [voltage] = V ("volt") 1 V = 1 J / C [resistance] = Ω ("ohm") 1 Ω = 1 V / A [capacitance] = F ("farad") 1 F = 1 C / V [magnetic field] = T ("tesla") 1 T = 1 N / (A m) [magnetic flux] = Wb ("weber") 1 Wb = 1 T / m2 [inductance] = H ("henry") 1 H = 1 J / A2 ...to be continued...

Page 10: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

10

b) physical constants

Avogadro's number: NA = 6,022 × 1023 particles/mol Boltzmann's constant: Bk = 1,38 × 1023 J/K Gravitational constant: γ = 6,67 × 10-11 Nm2/kg2 Mass of electron: me = 9,109 × 10-31 kg proton: mp = 1,673 × 10-27 kg neutron: mn = 1,675 × 10-27 kg earth: mearth = 5,974 × 1024 kg Dielectric constant (vacuum): 0ε = 8,8542 × 10-12 As/(Vm) Permeability (vacuum): 0µ = 4π × 107 N/A2 Speed of light (vacuum): c = 3 × 108 m/s Unified mass unit: u = 1,66 × 10-27 kg Earth-acceleration: g = 9,81 m/s2 ... to be continued....

0.4.3. angular units - flat angles

FIG. 0-01. Degree and radian measure, α = + 90 ° = π/2 rad, β = 360 ° = 2 π rad = 2 π.

i. degree: full circle: 360 , [ ]β β= ° = °

ii. radian: L

radr

α = (rad = physical unit of angle, in equations

unitless), L : arc length, r : radius, unit: [ ] [ ] 1L m radα= → = =

e.g.: full circle: 2

2 2 2r

L rad r rad radrππ β π π= ⋅ → = = =

conversion between degree / radian: =2 360radα π = °

Page 11: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

11

Chapter 1. Translations – motion of a mass point model of a mass point: • motion of a body in force field • neglect of body’s dimension • body: dot-shaped with mass m concentrated in one single point

(mass point) 1.1. Coordinates, position-vector a) coordinates

i.cartesian coordinates (see FIG. 1-01a) 3D-space 3

1 2 3( ) : ( , , ) ( , , ) ...x y z x x x= = 2D ( 2 ,plane): 1 2( , ) ( , )x y x x= 1D ( ,plane): ( )x

ii.spherical coordinates (see FIG. 1-01b) 3D: ( , ,r ϑ ϕ )

cos coscos sinsin

x r

y r

z r

ϑ ϕϑ ϕϑ

===

2D: ( ,r ϕ ) – polar coordinates iii.cylindrical coordinates (see FIG. 1-01c)

3D: ( , ,h zϕ )

cossin

x h

y h

z z

ϕϕ

===

b) position vector contains the coordinates: r( ) ( ( ), ( ), ( )) ( ( ), ( ), ( )),...t x t y t z t r t t tϑ ϕ= = r( )t : track in space = path of mass-point Translation = motion of a mass point while traversing its pathway r( )t

Page 12: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

12

FIG. 1-01. (a) Cartesian coordinates [1.1], (b) spherical coordinates [1.2], (c) cylindrical coordinates [1.2].

Page 13: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

13

1.2 tracks

FIG. 1-02. 1D uniform motion of a mass point along the x-axis.

FIG. 1-03. 2D uniform circular motion. (a) x(t) = R cos(ωt) in m, R = 2 m, ω = 2π/4s, (b) y(t) = R sin(ωt) in m, (c) r(t) in m with position-vector r(t ≈ 0,67 s) and the time-dependent argument ϕ(t ≈ 0,67 s) ≈ 60 °.

Page 14: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

14

1.3. Position, velocity & acceleration 1.3.1. 1D motion 1D-motion = motion along one axis

FIG. 1-04. 1D motion. (a) displacement ∆x = x2 - x1. (b) Average velocity in the time interval [t1,t2], vav = ∆x/ ∆t.

Page 15: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

15

FIG. 1-05. 1D motion, instantaneous velocity v = dx / dt.

FIG. 1-06. To ex. 1-06: Average and instantaneous velocity in 1 dimension.

Page 16: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

16

description: time t = parameter

position and displacement: 2 1 2 1

r = r( ) ( )r(t) = r r

t x t

x x

=∆ − = −

average velocity: av 2 1

r 1v x x

t t∆= = −∆ ∆

(instantaneous) velocity: 0

r( )v lim : r( ) ( ) :

t

t t dxt x t

t dt∆ →

+ ∆= = = =∆

average acceleration (vector): av

va

xt t

∆ ∆= =∆ ∆

acceleration (vector): 2 2

0

va lim : v = r(t) ( ) /

tx t d x dt

t∆ →

∆= = ∆ = =∆

1.3.2. 3D motion 3D-motion = motion along three axis (=: vector, consists of amount and direction)

position and displacement: 2 1

2 1 2 1

2 1

r = r( ) ( ( ), ( ), ( ))

r(t) = r r

t x t y t z t

x x

y y

z z

=−

∆ − = − −

average velocity: 2 1

av 2 1

2 1

r 1v

x x

y yt t

z z

− ∆ = = − ∆ ∆ −

(instantaneous) velocity: 0

( ) /r( )

v lim : r( ) ( ) /( ) /

t

x t dx dtt t

t y t dy dtt

z t dz dt∆ →

+ ∆ = = = = ∆

average acceleration: av

va

t∆=∆

acceleration:

2 2

2 2

02 2

/v ( ) x ( )v

a lim : v = r(t)= v ( ) x ( ) /

/v ( ) x ( )

x x

y yt

z z

d x dtt t

t t d y dtt

d z dtt t∆ →

∆ = = ∆ = = ∆

Page 17: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

17

FIG. 1-07. Example for displacement, velocity and acceleration in 2 dimensions. (a) Position r and displacement ∆r. (b) Average velocity vav, its components vav,x, vav,y and its direction Θ.

Page 18: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

18

1.4. special translations 1.4.1. uniform motion motion with constant velocity = uniform motion with a(t) 0=

How to get velocity and position?

0

v va(t) a(t)dt= dt= v v(t)

v(t)= a(t)dt= 0 v const

d dd

dt dt

dt

= → =

→ ≡ =

analog:

0 0 0r( ) v( ) v v rt t dt dt t= = = +

note: 0 0v , r : velocity and position at 0t = , set by boundary conditions

FIG. 1-08. example for an uniform motion. 1.4.2. motion with constant acceleration

0

0 0

20 0 0

a(t) a const 0

v( ) a(t) = a v

r( ) v(t) = 1/2a v r

t dt t

t dt t t

= = ≠

→ = +

→ = + +

Page 19: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

19

FIG. 1-09. Example for a motion with constant acceleration. 1.4.3. circular motion motion with non – constant acceleration

FIG. 1-10. Circular motion. (a) ∆S = S2 - S1: circular arc, ϕ: angle, r: position-vector, R: radius, C: center = origin. (b) r: Position, v: track velocity, a: acceleration with tangential and centripetal parts ac and at.

Page 20: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

20

a) general case:

important quantities: see FIG. 1-10a

• radius: R = constant, [R]=m • angle: ( ), [ ] radtϕ ϕ ϕ= = or °

note: 0ϕ > mathematicly positive direction → counter clockwise

• (instantaneous) angular velocity: ( ) ( )d

t tdtϕω ϕ= =

units: [ ] rad / rpmsω = = (revolutions per minute)

• average angular velocity: ( )ttϕω ∆=

• (instantaneous) angular acceleration:

2

rad( ) ( ) ( ), [ ]

dt t t

dt sωα ω ϕ α= = = =

• average angular acceleration: ( )ttωα ∆=

• circular arc: S R ϕ∆ = ∆ • position-vector: see FIG. 1-10b

cos ( )

ˆr( ) r( )sin ( )

tt R R t

t

ϕϕ

= = ⋅

with r( )t = unit vector in r -direction

• velocity (track velocity):

( )

cos ( ) -sin ( ) ( ) -sin ( )ˆv( )=r( )=R v( )

cos ( ) ( ) cos ( )sin ( ) t

dt t t tdtt t R R R t

d t t tt

dtϕ ω

ϕ ϕ ϕ ϕω ω

ϕ ϕ ϕϕ =

⋅ = = = ⋅

direction:

cos ( ) sin ( )ˆ ˆr( ) v( )

sin ( ) cos ( )

cos ( )( 1)sin ( ) sin ( )cos ( ) 0ˆ ˆr( ) v( )

t tt t

t t

t t t t

t t

ϕ ϕϕ ϕ

ϕ ϕ ϕ ϕ

− ⋅ = ⋅

= − + =→ ⊥

Page 21: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

21

• acceleration:

2

ˆv r

aa

( )sin ( )va( )

( )cos ( )

( )sin ( ) ( )cos ( ) ( )( )cos ( ) ( )sin ( ) ( )

sin ( ) cos ( )( ) ( )

cos ( ) sin ( )

ct

t td dt R

t tdt dt

t t t t tR

t t t t t

t tR t R t

t t

ϕ ϕϕ ϕ

ϕ ϕ ϕ ϕ ϕϕ ϕ ϕ ϕ ϕ

ϕ ϕα ω

ϕ ϕ

− = =

− − = −

− = −

decomposition in two parts: a( ) = a ( ) + a ( )t ct t t

i. tangential acceleration (= track acceleration)

t

t

t

ˆa ( ) ( )v( )

ˆ ˆdirection : a ( ) v( ) (parallel to v( ))

norm: ( ) ( )

t R t t

t t t

a t R t

α

α

=

↑↑=

ii. centripetal acceleration:

2c

t

2 2c

v

ˆa ( ) r( )

ˆ ˆdirection : a ( ) r( ) (antiparallel to r( ))

points to the center of the circle

norm: ( ) v /R

t R t

t t t

a t R Rω

ω

ω=

= −

↓↑

= =

• note: formulars for uniform motion and motion with constant acceleration can be transferred: circular arc, track velocity and track acceleration

Page 22: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

22

b) uniform circular motion: (t)=0α

0

0

0 0

0

0 0 0 0

( ) ( ) 0

( ) ( )

( ) 0, ( )

( ) ( )

t

v

t t dt dt

t t dt t

a R t v R t R t

S t R t R t R v t s

ω α ω

ϕ ω ω ϕ

α ω ω

ϕ ω ϕ

→ = = =

= = +

→ = = = =

→ = = + = +

c) circular motion with constant angular acceleration:

0

20 0

20 0 0

( ) const

( ) ( )

( ) ( ) 1/ 2

, , 1/ 2t

t

t t dt t

t t dt t t

a R v R t R S R t R t R

α α

ω α α ω

ϕ ω α ω ϕ

α α ω α ω ϕ

= =

→ = = +

→ = = + +

→ = = + = + +

1.4.4. summary a lot of similarities in formulars of straight & circular translations: uniform motion uniform circular motion a( ) 0t = ( ) 0, a 0ttα = =

0v( ) v = constt = 0

0

( ) const

v( ) const

t

t R

ω ωω

= == =

0 0r( ) v rt t= + 0 0

0 0

( )

( )

t t

S t R t R

ϕ ω ϕω ϕ

= += +

motion with constant acceleration circular motion with constant

angular acceleration 0a( ) a constt = = 0( ) consttα α= =

0 0v( ) + vt a t= 0 0

0 0

( ) +

v( ) +

t t

t R t R

ω α ωα ω

==

200 0

ar( ) t +v r

2t t= + 20

0 0

200 0

(t)= t +2

( ) t +2

t

S t R R t R

αϕ ω ϕ

α ω ϕ

+

= +

Page 23: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

23

1.5. assembled motion / coordinate transformation 1.5.1. systems with constant velocity

FIG. 1-11. Assembled motion. System ' has velocity (acceleration) u (w0) relative to system . consider: 2 coordinate systems , 'Σ Σ , 'Σ has constant velocity u relative to Σ (see FIG. 1-11)

• position vector: r = r' + S → position-vectors combine! uniform motion: 0S = u St +

at 00 : ' : S 0 S = u t t= Σ = Σ = → • velocity:

r

v (r' + S) v' + ud ddt dt

= = = → velocity combines

• acceleration:

u = const

v v 'a (v ' + u) = =a '

d d ddt dt dt

= = → acceleration is equal

1.5.2. systems with constant acceleration

consider: 2 coordinate systems , 'Σ Σ , 'Σ has constant acceleration 0ω relative to Σ (see FIG. 1-11)

• position vector: r = r' + S → position-vectors combine!

motion with constant acceleration: 200 0S( ) = + u S

2t t t

ω +

Page 24: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

24

at 200 00 : ' : S 0 S( ) = + u

2t t t t

ω= Σ = Σ = →

• velocity:

r

v (r ' + S) v ' + ud ddt dt

= = = → velocity combines

0 0u = utω + • acceleration:

0

va (v ' + u)=a '+

d ddt dt

ω= = → acceleration is different!

→ forces different (see below) 1.6. forces Why does a body move? e.g.: Why does the earth circle around the sun? Answer: Newton (1643-1727): Origin for a body to change its stable of motion is an interaction between the body and its environment physical description:

• interaction = F force (between body and environment) • stable of motion: momentum p vm=

m : mass of body, v : velocity, unit :

[p]kg m

s=

1.6.1. Newton’s laws

1) An object stays at rest or in uniform motion unless acted on by an external force. note: object, which isn’t effected by an external force = free object →different phrasing of Newton 1: The momentum of a free object remains constant

2) definition of force:

Page 25: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

25

The origin of a change in the momentum of a body is an external

force acting on the body. The force is defined by p

Fddt

= ,

unit: 2

[F] (Newton)

kg mN

s= =

note: v

p= v F vd dm

m mdt dt

→ = +

o mass is a function of velocity or time o examples: bodies with velocity = speed of light (relativistic problems), rocket

most of cases: v

constant F ad

m m mdt

= → = =

• principle of superposition: forces don’t affect each other → if abody is acted on by n different forces iF , 1,..., ,i n= the net force netF is the

superposition: net i1

F Fn

i=

=

Newton 2: net i1

p=F F

n

i

ddt =

=

• equilibrium of forces

net i1

F F 0n

i=

= = → a free body is under equilibrium of forces

3) actio = reactio Forces always occur in equal and opposite pairs. If object A exerts a force ABF on object B, an equal but opposite force BAF is exerted by object B on object A: AB BAF F= − .

1.6.2. Consequences from Newton’s laws conservation of momentum consider: system of n particles with different momentum ip Newton 2 for every particle:

i i net1 1

p p = F F F

n ni i

i i

d ddt dt= =

→ = = (= net force on the system of n particles)

Newton 1: if the system is free, the net force on the system is zero: netF 0=

Page 26: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

26

Free system of n particles: 1

p0

ni

i

ddt=

=

1

1 1 1

p0 const

pdt = p p const p

ni

i

n n ni

i i neti i i

ddt dt

dt

dd

dt

=

= = =

→ = =

→ = = =

→ the net of a free system is constant! 1.6.3. equation of motion of a particle acted by a force

case 1: m = const (=constant forces): Newton2: net

vF

dm

dt=

net net

net 0

0

net 0 0

F Fx x=

1v( ) F v

r( ) v( ) r

1 [ F ] v r

d ddt dt

dt m dt m

t dtm

t t dt

dt dt tm

→ → =

→ = +

→ = +

= + +

(1) net 0F F= = constant forces Newton 2: 0F am=

20 0 00 0 0

F F F1a , v( ) v , r( ) v r

2t t t t t

m m m= = = + = + +

(2) position – dependent – forces: gravitational force 2 objects with masses 1m and 2m in the distance gravitate toward each other with the gravitational force (see FIG: 1-12)

1 22,1 1,2 1 22

ˆF (r) r gm m

mr

γ= =

(force from object 2 acting on object 1) γ : gravitational constant

1,2r : unit-vector pointing from object 1 to object 2 r : distance between objects

Page 27: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

27

FIG. 1-12. (a) Gravitational force F12 from object 1 acting on object 2. (b) Gravitational force F21 from object 2 acting on object 1. Correlation between the two forces given by Newton's 3. law: F12 = - F21.

(3) position dependent forces: spring force

FIG. 1-13. Force exerted by a spring to a mass connected to the spring. (a) Horizontal arrangement, rest position = point of equilibrium, where FS = 0. (b) Mass is elongated at ∆x.

system: mass connected to a spring (see FIG. 1-13) a) rest position: 0x : no force is exerted → mass is free b) mass is pulled, spring is streched at he distance 0x x x∆ = − → Hooke’s law: 0F (r - r )s k= − (here 0( ) ( )sF x k x x= − − )

o Fs points to rest position 0r o k spring-constant, depends on spring’s material,

geometry,... unit: [ ] /k N m=

Page 28: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

28

o x∆ is called elongation o Hooke’s law is important also to describe interaction

of atoms in crystal case 2: m ≠ const

net

p vF v

d d dmm

dt dt dt= = +

e.g. rocket equation: consider: rocket with mass m in free space. Rocket burns fuel with

constant burn-rate 0dm

Rdt

= < , mass of rocket: 0( )m t m Rt= +

conservation of momentum: time rocket

net: p =p ( )t t time rocket

net fuel: p =p ( ) + ut dt t dt m+ + fuel , u :m Rdt= − velocity of fuel conservation: rocket rocket

netp = const p ( ) - u - p ( ) 0t dt Rdt t→ + ⋅ =

rocket rocket

rocket

netNewton 2

p ( ) - p ( ) u

p vu = F v

t dt tR

dtd d dm

R mdt dt dt

+→ =

→ = = +

netF : 2 parts: netF changes the momentum: one part changes velocity

(= thrust, th

vF

dm

dx= ), other part changes mass (= v

dmdt

)

v

= u - v = (u - v)d dm dm

m Rdt dt dt

coordinate system:

Page 29: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

29

FIG. 1-14. Coordinate transformations and rocket equation. (a) Velocities in systems at rest and at motion. Σ : external system, rocket has velocity v , fuel has velocity u

'Σ : rocket-system: travels with v relative to Σ , rocket at rest, fuel has constant velocity u' (relative to rocket) velocities: v + u' = u u' = u - v→

th

vu' = F

dm R

dt→ = (rocket-equation in free space, th = thrust)

note: net th

vF u v F v

d dm dmR m

dt dt dt= = + = +

thv = u - F (u - u') :dm

R Rdt

→ = force for mass – change

note: in reality you must add an gravity term:

net

gravity-term

vF u + g v

d dmR m m

dt dt= = +

many difficult calculations later:

… 20

0 0

r( ) u' (1 + ) ln(1 + ) - u' 1/ 2gm R R

t t t t tR m m

→ = +

Page 30: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

30

1.7. Energy & work energy & work: important concepts, closely associated work in physics: a force does work when it acts on an object energy: when work is done from one system to another, energy is transferred between two systems forms of energy:

• kinetic energy: associated with motion of an object • potential energy: associated with configuration of a system • thermal energy: associated with random motion of molecules, closely connected to system’s temperature • chemical energy: associated with chemical composition of system • rotational enrgy: ... • ...

1.7.1. kinetic and potential energy, energy – conservation consider: system of body with constant mass m acted on by net force netF Newton 2: netF am=

netv F v am→ ⋅ = ⋅

FIG. 1-15. Potential and kinetic energy.

Page 31: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

31

system: see FIG. 1-15 0t : object (here: dangerous spider) at position 0r r( 0)t= = , acted on by

net force net 0F ( )t (reference time) t : object at position r r( )t= (here: directly above the poor golf-player), acted by force netF ( )t and has passed from 0r to r through (arbitrary) curve C( )t (time is arbitary)

0 0

t t

nett t

v F dt' v a dt '

I II

m→ ⋅ =

potential energy:

0 0 0

t t r

net net net 0substitution definitiont t r ,C

v F dt' = r F dt' = F r (r ) (r)pot potI d E E= ⋅ ⋅ ≡ −

substitution: 0 0

rv r r ' r, r( ) = r , r( ) r

ddt d t t

dt= = → = =

(r)potE : potential energy of an object acted on by a force only

determinable for a constant 0(r )potE (r)potE depends on netF acting on the body → depends on system’s configuration (body in “force -field” of the earth, charge in “Coulomb-field” of other charges, mass connected to a spring, mass in force-field of both, spring + earth, ...)

0(r )potE : reference-point, point of 0(r )potE =0, fit to the system, 0(r )potE sets potential energy (r)potE for all points r for examples see FIG. 1-16 kineticl energy:

0 0

t v2 2

0substitutiont v ,C

1 1v a dt' = v' v' v v

2 2II m m d m m= ⋅ = −

substitution: 0 0

va v v = a ', boundaries: v( ) = v , v( ) v

'd

d dt t tdt

= = → =

Page 32: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

32

kinetic energy:

22

p v

p1/2 v

2 kinm

m Em=

= =

associated with momentum of body (momentum = measure fort he motion)

FIG. 1-16. (a) Potential energy of a body somewhere close to the earth's surface. (b) Potential energy of a body far away from the earth's surface. conservation of energy:

2 2pot 0 pot 0

2 2pot 0 pot 0

(r ) (r) 1/ 2 v 1/ 2 v

1 1v (r) v (r ) constant

2 2

I II E E m m

m E m E E

= → − = −

→ + = + = =

energy of an enclosed system remains constant!

→ If you know the energy at he reference point (= 20 pot 0

1v (r )

2m E+ ), you

know the energy at all times! →calculations can be simplified using the conservation of energy →potential and kinetic energy can be converted into each other

Page 33: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

33

1.7.2. work and power

1) work: 2

1

r

net netr C

: F r = F rW d d=

mechanical work, done by net force netF on object along the path C( )t (displacement of object from 1r to 2r ) work and potential energy:

definition of (r)potE : 0r

0 netr

(r) (r ) F (r') r'pot potE E d− =

0 0

1 2

0 2 2

1 0 1

r r

1 2 net netr r

r r r

net net netr r r

(r ) (r ) F (r') r' - F (r') r'

= F (r') r'+ F (r') r' = F (r') r' = W

pot potE E d d

d d d

→ − =

→ work is a change in potential energy :

i. W > 0: 1 2(r ) (r ) :pot potE E> potential energy decreases, net force does work on object (usually: object gets faster)

ii. W < 0: 1 2(r ) (r ) :pot potE E< potential energy increases, object does work against the net force

unit: [W]=Nm=J (“Joule”)

2) power:

definition:

2 2

1 1

r

net net netsubstitutionr

F r F v r F vt

t

dW d dP d d

dt dt dt= = = ⋅ = ⋅

substitution : r

v=ddt

unit : [P] = J/s = W („Watt“) note: difference between power and work: consider: 2 motors lift a given load a given distance →same amount of work → the one that does it in the least time supplies more power

Page 34: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

34

1.8 Collisions phenomenon:

• 2 (or more) objects approach and interact strongly for a short time • during brief collision time: external forces are much smaller than

interaction forces → all external forces can be neglected • interaction forces: 12 21F = -F (Newton 3)

• total momentum:

2 112 21

2 11 2

p pF = -F

p p0 p p constant

d ddt dt

d ddt dt

⇔ = −

→ + = → + =

→ total momentum remains constant! • small collision time → neglection of displacement during collision • before and after collision: interaction of objects small → only external net force • Examples: cue ball hitting object ball (billiard), baseball being hit

by bat, dart colliding with dart board, comet swinging aroung sun,..

• elastic collision: total kinetic energy remains constant (remember: during collision netF =0 = constantpotE→ )

• inelastic collision: kinE constant≠ → no conservation of energy (but conservation of momentum!)

e.g. perfectly inelastic collision: 2 objects stick together after collision

1.8.1. Collisions in one dimension (1D-collision) consider: object 1: mass: 1m , initial velocity: 1v , final velocity 1,fv (directly after collision) (v < 0: object moves to the left) object 2 : 2 2 2 f, v ,vm conservation of momentum:

1 1, i 2 2, i 1 1, f 2 2, f

momentum directly momentum directlybefore collision after collision

v v v vm m m m+ = +

→ 1 equation with 2 unknown variables 1 f 2 fv , v → 2. relation necessary

Page 35: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

35

a) perfectly inelastic collision (see FIG. 1-17)

FIG. 1-17. Perfectly inelastic collision [1.3].

particles stick together after collision: 1 2 1 + 2, fp = ( )v m m+

conservation of momentum: 1 1i 2 2i 1 2 1 + 2, f v + v ( )vm m m m= +

1 1 i 2 2 i 1 + 2, f

1 2

v + vv

m m

m m→ =

+

conservation (loss) of energy: kinetic energy is being converted into thermal energy, energy of deformation,...

: converted (lost) energy: initial kinetic energy

: final kinetic energyi i f i f

f

E

E E E E E E E

E

∆ = + ∆ → ∆ = −

here: 2 2 21 1 2 2 1 2 1 2,1/ 2 v 1/ 2 v 1/ 2( )vi i fE m m m m +∆ = + − +

for example see FIG. 1-28:

FIG. 1-18. 1D perfectly inelastic collision [1.3].

Page 36: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

36

b) partly inelastic collision objects don’t stick together after collision. Kinetic energy of object 1 is transferred into kinetic energy of object 2 and thermal energy or energy of deformation. conservation of momentum:

1 1 i 2 2 i 1 1, f 2 2, fv + v v vm m m m= + energy-consideration (no conservation!):

2 2 2 2

1 1 i 2 2 i 1 1, f 2 2, f

1 1 1 1v + v v v2 2 2 2m m m m E= + +∆

for example see FIG. 1-21:

FIG. 1-19.. Ballistic pendulum [1.4].

c) elastic collision

conservation of energy:2 2 2 2

1 1 i 2 2 i 1 1, f 2 2, f

1 1 1 1v + v v v2 2 2 2m m m m= + (i)

conservation of momentum: 1 1 i 2 2 i 1 1, f 2 2, fv + v v v m m m m= + (ii)

2 2 2 2

1 1 i 1 f 2 2, f 2, i

1 1 i 1 f 1 i 1 f 2 2, f 2, i 2, f 2, i

( i ) (v + v ) (v - v )

(v - v )(v + v ) (v - v )(v + v ) (i ')

m m

m m

→ =

⇔ =

1 1 i 1 f 2 2, f 2, i( ii ) (v - v ) (v - v ) (ii ')m m→ =

Page 37: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

37

1 i 1 f 2 f 2 i

1 f 2 f 2 i 1 i

2 f 1 i 1 f 2 i

( i')v + v v + v(ii')

v v + v v (iii a)

v v + v v (iii b)

→ =

→ = −

→ = −

(iiia) in (ii’):

1 1 i 2, f 2 i 1 i 2 2 f 2 i

1 1 i 1 2, f 1 2 i 2 2 f 2 2i

1 1 i 2 1 2 i 2 f 1 2

[v - (v + v - v ) ] = (v - v )

2 v v v v - v

2 v ( )vv

m m

m m m m m

m m mm m

⇔ − − =

+ −→ = +

(iiib) in (ii’):

1 1 i 1 f 2 1 i 1 f 2 i 2 i

1 1 i 1 1 f 2 1 i 2 1 f 2 2 i

1 i 1 2 2 2 i 1 f 1 2

[v - v )] [( v + v - v ) - v ]

v v v v - 2 v

v ( ) 2 vv

m m

m m m m m

m m mm m

=

⇔ − = +

− +→ = +

Page 38: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

38

1.8.2. Collisions in three dimensions (3D-collisions)

a) perfectly inelastic collision (for example see FIG. 1-20)

FIG. 1-20. (a) 3D perfectly inelastic collision. note: same results as in one dimension, but the velocities and momentums are now vectors and no more scalars (here: directions are given by means of sign)!

b) Elastic collisions object 1: 1 1 1f, v , v ;m object 2: 2 2 2 f, v , v ;m conservation of momentum:

1 1 i 2 2 i 1 1 f 2 2 f

1 1 i 1 f 2 2 f 2 i

v + v = v + v

(v v ) (v v ) (i')

m m m m

m m⇔ − = −

conservation of energy:

2 2 2 21 1 i 2 2 i 1 1 f 2 2 f

1 1 i 1 f 1 i 1 f 2 2 f 2 i 2 f 2 i

1/ 2 v + 1/2 v = 1/2 v + 1/2 v

(v v )(v + v ) (v v )(v + v ) (ii')

m m m m

m m⇔ − = −

big problem: (ii’)/(i’) not allowd of vectors! → solution only for special case:

2 i 1 2v 0, m m m= = = (almost the case for billiard):

Page 39: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

39

momentum: 1 1 i 2 2 i 1 1 f 2 2 f

0

1 i 1 f 2 f

v + v = v + v

v v v (i'')

m m m m

→ = +

energy: 2 2 2 2

1 1 i 2 2 i 1 1 f 2 2 f

0

2 2 2 1 i 1 f 2 f

1/ 2 v + 1/2 v = 1/2 v + 1/2 v

v v v (ii'')

m m m m

→ = +

(i’’) → velocities from a triangle (ii’’) → Pythagoras: angle between 1 fv and 2 fv 90= °

FIG. 1-21. 3D elastic collision for the special case: 1 2m m m= = , 2 0iv = .

Page 40: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

40

Chapter 2. Oscillations (harmonic motions) What and when? →Oscillations occurs when a system is disturbed from a position of stable equilibrium What happens? →Restering force acts on system, tries to restore the position of equilibrium. E.g.

i. spring pendulum: mass connected to a spring FIG. 2-01. Spring pendulum: body with mass m connected to a spring. (a) System in position of static equilibrium x0. (b) Disturbed system, mass moved out of equilibrium position, spring force FS serves as restoring force. (c) Oscillating system, mass swing between xmas and - xmas.

a) position of stable equilibrium: 0x b) system is disturbed: mass is moved out of equilibrium

position →spring force Fs acts as restoring force pointing to

0x c) if mass is released, oscillation starts without damping:

oscillations lasts eternally, system is never at static equilibrium, mass swings between maximum values maxx and

maxx− (turning points) around positions of equilibrium.

Page 41: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

41

ii. simple pendulum: mass hanging vertically on a string in gravity-field of the earth (surface)

FIG. 2-02. Simple pendulum: body with mass m vertically connected to a string in gravity field of earth (close to surface). (a) System in position of static equilibrium (x0,z0). (b) Disturbed system, mass moved out of equilibrium position, force FR (part of gravity force FG) serves as restoring force. (c) Oscillating system, mass swing between (xmax,zmax) and (-xmax,zmax).

a) position of stable equilibrium ( 0 0,x z ) b) mass moved out of equilibrium → restoring force acts

(FR =part of gravity force FG ) c) mass is released, system swings between turning points

( max max,x z ); (- max max,x z ) around ( 0 0,x z ) iii. further examples:

→boat bobing up and down →clock pendulums swinging back and forth →strings of musical instruments vibrating →oscillations of air molecules are sound-waves →oscillations of electric currents are radios

Why is study of oscillations important?

• Understanding of electromagnetic oscillations (cell phones, remote control, data transfer, …)

• Understanding and elimination of undesired resonance-phenomena at engines, buildings, bridges, …

Page 42: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

42

2.1. Simple harmonic motion easiest oscillation, e.g. simple pendulum, spring-pendulum

FIG. 2-03. Spring pendulum - equilibrium. (a) Horizontal arrangement. (b) Vertical arrangement. 2.1.1. spring pendulum

a) equilibrium example: spring-pendulum (see FIG. 2-03)

position of equilibrium: net force on object netF 0= horizontal arrangement: spring at ist natural length l, spring exerts no force on object (see FIG. 2-03a) vertical arrangement: spring elongated by l∆ ,spring force and gravity force compensate each other, netF 0= (see FIG. 2-03b) (see example 1-15: determination of spring constant k out of l∆ )

b) equation of motion Newton 2: netF am=

spring: Hooke’s law: s 0F (r-r )k= − with 0r r− : elongation of spring

Page 43: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

43

FIG. 2-04. Spring pendulum - non-equilibrium. (a) Horizontal arrangement. (b) Vertical arrangement.

i. horizontal arrangement: (see FIG. 2-04a)

net 0 0

2

2

0

0

ˆF (r r ) ( )x a

ˆa x, =

ˆ ˆx+ / ( )x = 0

+ / ( ) = 0

k k x x m

d xa a x

dta k m x x

x k m x x

= − − = − − =

→ = =

⇔ −→ −

coordinate system: 0 0 / 0x x k mx≡ → + =

equation of motion for a harmonic motion (free oscillator)

ii. vertical arrangement: (see FIG. 2-04b) spring force:

s

0

ˆF =- (z-l)= - ( - ) z positive directionk k z l z<

gravity force: G ˆF = g=- z negative directionm mg z −

net force: net s G ˆ ˆF = F +F = - ( - )z - zk z l mg

equilibrium: net s G ˆ ˆF = 0 = F +F = - ( - )z - z

ˆ ˆ- ( - )z - z = 0

k z l mg

k z l mg→

→ determination of k ! (exercise) Here:

Page 44: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

44

net

0 0trick!

0

0 0

0!

2

0 2Newton 2

0

ˆ ˆF = - ( - )z - z

ˆ ˆ = - ( - )z - z

ˆ ˆ ˆ= - ( - )z - ( )z - z

ˆ ˆ= - ( - )z = a a = z , =

/ ( - ) 0

k z l mg

k z l z z mg

k z z k z l mg

d zk z z m a a z

dtz k m z z

=

+ −

→ =

→ + =

Coordinate system: 0 0 / 0z z k mz≡ → + =

→equation of motion the same for vertical and horizontal arrangement!

c) Solution of the equation of motion / 0x k mx+ = : homogenous differential equation 2.order

approach: 2

( ) , const

( ) , ( )

t

t t

x t e

dxx t e x t e

dt

λ

λ λ

λ

λ λ

= =

→ = = ⋅ = ⋅

2 2 2/ 0 / 0 /t te k me k m k mλ λλ λ λ→ + = ⇔ + = → = −

with i = imaginary unit, 2 1i = − (respectively (0,1)i = is the unit vector of the complex plane) / /

1,2 1 2/ ( ) , ( )i k m t i k m ti k m x t e x t eλ + ⋅ − ⋅→ = ± → = =

general solution is complex linear-combination: 1 2( ) , ,c c c cx t u x v x u v= + : complex numbers polar rotation: ,u vi i

c cu ue v ueζ ζ−≡ ≡

/ /

( / ) ( / )

( ) u v

u v

i ii k m t i k m t

i k m t i k m t

x t ue e ve e

ue ve

ζ ζ

ζ ζ

⋅ − ⋅

⋅ + ⋅ +

→ = +

= +

one single requirement: ( )x t has to be real!

( ) cos( / ) sin( / )

cos( / ) sin( / )u u

v v

x t u k m t iu k m t

v k m t iv k m t

ζ ζ

ζ ζ

= ⋅ + + ⋅ +

+ ⋅ + − ⋅ +

(we used the Euler-notation: cos sinie iϕ ϕ ϕ= + ) imaginary part has to vanish: sin( / ) sin( / ) 0u vu k m t v k m tζ ζ⋅ + − ⋅ + =

satisfied, if / 2, u vu v A ζ ζ ε= = = =

Page 45: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

45

( / ) ( / )( ) / 2 / 2

cos( / ) ( )

i k m t i k m tx t A e A e

A k m t x t

ε ε

ε

⋅ + − ⋅ += +

= ⋅ + =

general solution of the equation of motion for harmonic motion (we

used cos 1 / 2( )i i

e eϕ ϕ

ϕ−

= + )

d) Discussion of the general solution ( ) cos( / )x t A k m t ε= ⋅ +

Page 46: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

46

FIG. 2-05. Simple harmonic motion. (left) Period T and amplitude A. (right) Phase-shift ε and phase difference 2π between two points of same state of motion. ( 2 , 7,4 / , 3 , / 3 60A cm k N m m kg ϕ π= = = = = ° )

• amplitude: , [ ]A A m= , meaning: maximum elongation • phase: ( ) / , [ ( )] radt k m t tψ ε ψ= ⋅ + = • phase-shift (or phase constant): , [ ] radε ε = meaning: set by boundary-condition: position and velocity at 0t =

• period: , [ ]T T s= meaning: time interval after which oscillator reaches the same state of motion: ( ) ( ), v( ) v( )x t T x t t T t+ = + =

satisfied if phases differ by 2π :

( ) 2 ( )

/ 2 / ( )

2 /

2 2

/

t t T

k m t k m t T

k m T

mT

kk m

ψ π ψε π ε

ππ π

+ = +

⇔ ⋅ + + = + +

→ = ⋅

→ = =

• frequency: , [ ] 1/f f s Hz= = („Hertz“) meaning: number of oscillations per second

/

1/2k m

f Tπ

→ = = frequency of a free oscillator

e.g. 311 10 / 1000 /

1T ms f s s

ms= → = = =

→1000 oscillations per second

• angular frequency (angular velocity): rad

, [ ]s

ω ω =

meaning: phase change done in 1 second:

2 rad 2

2 rad 2f ft T T

ψ π πω π π∆= = = = =∆

here: 0

0

/2 2 /

2

/

k mf k m

k m

ω ω π ππ

ω

= = = =

→ =

angular frequency of a free oscillator

Page 47: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

47

→ in the following: 0( ) cos( )x t A tω ε= +

• velocity of the oscillator: 0 0v( ) ( ) sin( )t x t A tω ω ε= = − + • acceleration of the oscillator: 2

0 0( ) v( ) ( ) cos( )a t t x t A tω ω ε= = = − + 2.1.2. simple pendulum equation of motion: Newton 2: netr = Fm

FIG. 2-06. Simple pendulum.

sin

ˆr rcos

L Lϕ

ϕ = = −

, L = thread length

Page 48: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

48

2

net G R N

cos cos ˆv = r = tsin sin

-sin ˆ ˆ ˆr t + t - rcos

F =F =F +F

L L L

L L L L

ϕ ϕ ϕϕ ϕ

ϕ ϕ ϕϕ ϕ

ϕ ϕ ϕ ϕϕ ϕ

⋅ → = = ⋅

⋅ → = = ⋅

→ restoring force: RˆF sin tmg ϕ= −

→ normal force: N ˆF cos rmg ϕ=

→ 2ˆ ˆˆ ˆ t - r sin t + cos rmL mL mg mgϕ ϕ ϕ ϕ= −

centripetal force (= thread force LF ):

L

2

F

2

2

0

ˆ ˆr cos r (Newton 3)

ˆ ˆ 0 = cos r + rˆ ˆ ˆ ˆt = - sin t (+ cos r + r)

t : = - sin

mL mg

mg mL

mL mg mg mL

L g

ϕ ϕ

ϕ ϕϕ ϕ ϕ ϕ

ϕ ϕ

− =

→→

series expansion for 3 5 7

sin ...3! 5! 7!ϕ ϕ ϕϕ ϕ= − + − +

for 22,4 : sinϕ ϕ ϕ≤ °

mistake: 3 3 21% ( /3!=0,39 /3! 0,01 with 22,4 in rad)

360πϕ ϕ≤ = ° ⋅

°

0gL

ϕ ϕ→ + = equation of motion for simple pendulum

(only for small angles) solution: analogous to spring-pendulum: 0 0 0( ) cos( / ) cos( )t g L t tϕ ϕ ε ϕ ω ε= ⋅ + = +

period: 2 /T L gπ=

frequency: 0 00

1 1/ , 2 /

2f g L T L g

π= = =

angular frequency: 0 /g Lω =

Page 49: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

49

2.2. Overlapping oscillations nature: not simple harmonic oscillations but complex forms of periodic of simple harmonic motions, can be described at the superposition of simple harmonic oscillations with different amplitudes, frequencies, phase-constants (=overlapping oscillations) in general: direction of oscillations different →3D overlapped oscillatins in the following: 1D superposition: direction of oscillation the same superposition of 2 simple harmonic oscillations:

1 2

1 1 1 1

2 2 2 2

( ) ( ) ( )

( ) cos( )

( ) cos( )

x t x t x t

x t A t

x t A t

ω ϕω ϕ

= += += +

general case: complicated: see FIG. 2-07a: 1 1 1 2 2 22 , / 2 , / 6; 2,5 , 3 / 4 , / 4 A cm Hz A cm Hzω π ϕ π ω π ϕ π= = = = = =

FIG. 2-07. Overlapping oscillations. (a) General case. (b) ω1 = ω2 = ω0. (c) Constructive overlap. (d) Destructive overlap.

Page 50: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

50

2.2.1. overlapping oscillations with 1 2 0ω ω ω= =

See FIG. 2-07b:

1 2 0 1 22 , 1,5 , / 2 , / 6, /5 A cm A cm Hzω π ϕ π ϕ π= = = = = −

1 0 1 2 0 2

0

( ) cos( ) cos( )

... cos( )

x t A t A t

B t

ω ϕ ω ϕω ε

= + + += = +

2 2 21 2 1 2 1 2

1 1 2 2

1 1 2 2

2 cos( )

sin sintan

cos cos

B A A A A

A AA A

ϕ ϕϕ ϕεϕ ϕ

= + + −+=+

special cases: i. constructive overlap: see FIG. 2.07c

1 2 1 2

2 2

0

2 , / 6

4 2 4 , / 6( ) 2 cos( )

A A A cm

B A B A cm

x t A t

ϕ ϕ ϕ πε ϕ π

ω ϕ

= = = = = =

→ = → = = = =→ = +

ii. destructive overlap: see FIG. 2.07d

1 2 1 2 1

1 2

1 2

0 1 0 1

0 1 0 1cos( ) cos

2 , / 6, 7 / 6 : phase difference of

sin sin 02 4 , tan ?

cos cos 0

( ) cos( ) cos( )

cos( ) cos( ) 0

A A A cm

B A cm

x t A t A t

A t A tψ π ψ

ϕ π ϕ ϕ π π πϕ ϕεϕ ϕ

ω ϕ ω ϕ πω ϕ ω ϕ

+ =−

= = = = = + =− →→ = = =− →

→ = + + + += + − + =

2.2.2. overlapping oscillations with 1 2 1 2,ω ω ω ω≠ ≈ :beats

simplification: 1 2 1 22 , 0A A cm ϕ ϕ ϕ= = = = =

1 2 1 2

1 2 1 2

changes amplitude slowly but periodically

1 2

( ) cos( ) cos( ) [cos( ) cos( )]

... 2 cos( ) cos( )2 2

cos( )2

x t A t A t A t t

A t t

C t

ω ω ω ωω ω ω ω

ω ω

= + = +− +=

+=

x→ oscillates with mean (angular) frequency 1 2

2ω ωω +=

Page 51: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

51

→amplitude 1 22 cos( )2

C A tω ω−= oscillates slowly with beat

frequency 1 2

2b

ω ωω −=

FIG. 2-08. Beat. Amplitude oscillates with beat frequency (ω1 - ω2)/2. Oscillation has mean frequency (ω1 + ω2)/2. 2.3. Energy during harmonic oscillations kinetic energy:

0

2 2 20 0

( ) cos( )

1/ 2 ( ) 1/ 2 sin ( )kinx t A t

E mx t mA tω ϕ

ω ω ϕ= +

= = +

potential energy:

0 0

0 0

20

0 , 0

02 2 2

00 ( ) cos( )

2 2 20 0

/

2 2 20 0 0

( ) ( ) F ( )

1/ 2 1/ 2 cos ( )

1/ 2 cos ( )

( ) 0 ( ( )) 1/ 2 cos ( )

x x

pot pot s xx x

x x t A tx

k m

pot pot

E x E x dx k x x dx

k xdx kx kA t

m A t

E x E x t m A t

ω ϕ

ω

ω ϕ

ω ω ϕ

ω ω ϕ

≡ = +

=

− = = − −

= − = = +

= +

≡ → = +

energy conservation:

2 2 2 20 0 0

1

2 20

( ( )) ( ( )) 1/ 2 [sin ( ) cos ( )]

1/ 2 const (energy of the oscillator)

kin potE x t E x t mA t t

mA E

ω ω ϕ ω ϕ

ω

+ = + + +

= = =

Page 52: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

52

mean values over one period T :

2 2 20 0

0 0

2 220

00

1/ ( ) 1/ 1/ 2 sin ( )

sin ( )2

T T

kin kin

T

I

E T E t dt T mA t dt

mAt dt

T

ω ω ε

ω ω ε

= = +

= + =

Idea: 0 00 '

sin( )sin( ) ... / 2T

u v

I t t dt Tω ε ω ε= + + = =

You need two integration by parts, use 2 2cos 1 sinx x= − and add 2sin xdx on both sides. Then divide with 2 and simple calculations

gives T/2. 2 201/ 4kinE m Aω→ =

analogous calculation: 2 201/ 4pot kinE m A Eω= = !

2.4. free, damped oscillation

a) equation of motion general case: oscillation in surrounding medium (gas, fluid), not in space →additional force: friction Stoke’s law of friction:

rF v , const, [ ] /fr

db b b b kg s

dt= − = − = =

→Friction acts against the motion equation of motion (for spring pendulum):

net s 0F = F + F a= - (r-r ) - rfr m k b=

1D-problem: 0 0(r-r ) - , r , ax x x x→ → →

0 0 :

0

x kx bx mx

b kx x x

m m

≡ − − =

→ + + =

abbreviations: 20 / , 2 /k m b mω γ= =

Page 53: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

53

202 0x x xγ ω→ + + =

equation of motion for a free, damped oscillation

b) solution of the equations of motion

approach: 2

2 2 2 20 1,2 0

( ) ( ) ( )

2 0

t t tx t e x t e x t eλ λ λλ λ

λ γλ ω λ γ γ ω

= → = → =

→ + + = → = − ± −

general solution: 2 2 2 2

0 0( ) ( )( ) t tc cx t u e v eγ γ ω γ γ ω− + − − − −= +

, :c cu v complex numbers

c) case: small damping: 0γ ω<

2 2 2 21,2 0 0

0 0

( ) ( )( ) ( )i t i t t i t i tc c c c

i i

x t u e v e e u e v eγ ω γ ω γ ω ω

λ γ γ ω γ ω γ γ ω< >

− + − − − −

→ = − ± − = − ± − = − ±

→ = + = +

analogous to free oscillation: 2 2

0( ) cos( ) , tx t Ae tγ ω ε ω ω γ−= + = −

discussion:

FIG. 2-09. (a) Free, undamped oscillation. (b) Free, damped oscillation with γ = 5 % ω0.

• ε : phase shift • A: amplitude of undamped oscillation

• tAe γ− : amplitude of damped oscillation, decays with damping-constant ([ ] 1/ )sγ γ = to zero

• ω : reduced (angular) frequency of damped oscillation,

Page 54: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

54

• 02f f

ωπ

= < (frequency), 0 01/ 1/T f T f= > = (period)

• See FIG. 2-09: values: 22 , 0, 3 , 3 / 29,61 /A cm m kg k N m N mε π= = = =

(a) free, undamped oscillation: 20 0 0 00 0, / 2 / 4 , 0,25 , 1/ 4b k m Hz f Hz T f sγ ω π= → = = = = = =

(b) free, damped oscillation:

2 20 0 0 0 0

3 0,05 / 0,47 /

0,05 < = , , =

b kg s kg s

T T f f

π

γ ω ω ω ω γ

= ⋅

→ = → −

• decay time τ : time when amplitude is decreased to 1e

of

its initial value:

0 1

( ) / 1/ ln(1/ )

ln(1/ ) ln(1) ln( ) 1

x A e Ae e e e

e e

γτ γττ γτ

τ τγ γ γ

− −= = ⇔ = ⇔ = −

−⇔ = = = =− −

• half time HT : time, when amplitude is at its half initial

value: as above

ln(2)HT

γ→ =

d) case: large damping: 0γ ω>

FIG. 2-10. Free, damped oscillation, case: γ > ω0. Boundary conditions: (a):

0( 0) 0, ( 0)x t v t v= = = = . (b) 0( 0) , ( 0) 0x t x v t= = = = .

Page 55: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

55

2 2 2 21,2 0 0,

( ) ( )t t tc cx t e u e v eγ α α

λ γ γ ω γ α α γ ω− −

= − ± − = − ± = −

→ = +

→ general solution is complex! Real solution only for special cases analytically determinable:

i. case: 0( 0) 0, ( 0) vx t x t= = = = 0 0 0( 0) ( ) 0 ( 1)c c c cx t e u e v e u v iγ α α− ⋅ ⋅ − ⋅= = + = + =

0

0( 1)

( ) ( ) ( )

( 0) ( ) ( )

v( ) v ( 2)

t t t t t tc c c c

c c c c

c c c ci

x t e u e v e e u e v e

x t u v u v

u v u v i

γ α α γ α αγ α αγ α

αα

− ⋅ ⋅ − ⋅ − ⋅ ⋅ − ⋅= − + + −= = − + + −

= − = → = +

0 0

0 0 0

0 0

0

2sinh( )

2 20

v v( 2) in ( 1) : 0 ( 3)

22v v v

( 3) in ( 1) : ( 4)2 2 2

v v( ) ( )

2 2v

( ) sinh( )

, 2

x x

c c c

c

t t t

t

x e e

i i v v v i

i i u i

x t e e e

x t e t

bm

γ α α

γ

α α

α α α

α α

αα

α γ ω γ

− ⋅ ⋅ − ⋅

− ⋅

= −

+ + = → = −

= − =

→ = −

→ =

= − =

ii. case: 0( 0) , ( 0) 0x t x x t= = = = 0( 0) ( 1)c cx t u v x ii= = + =

00

( 1)

( 0) ( ) ( )

( ) 0 ( 2)

c c c c

c c c cii

x t u v u v

xx u v u v ii

γ αγγ αα

= = − + + −

= − + − = → = +

Page 56: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

56

00

0 0

00 0

( 2) in ( 1) :

2 (1 ) 1/ 2 (1 ) ( 3)

( 3) in ( 2) : 1/ 2 (1 ) =1/ 2 (1 )

c c

c c

c

xii ii v v x

v x v x ii

xii ii u x x

+ + =

⇔ = − ⇔ = −

= + − +

0 0

0 0

0 0

( ) 1/ 2 (1 ) 1/ 2 (1 )

1/ 2 ( ) 1/ 2 ( )

cosh( ) sinh( ) ( )

t t t t

t t t t t t

t t

x t e x e e x e

x e e e x e e e

x e t x e t x t

γ α γ α

γ α α γ α α

γ γα α

− − −

− − − −

− −

→ = + + −

= + + +

= + =

e) case: aperiodic special case: 0γ ω=

λ γ→ = −

→ general solution: ( ) tcx t u e γ−=

Problem: case: 0 0

0

0

( 0) ( )

( 0) 0, ( )

( 0) 0!

t

t

x t x x t x e

x t x t x e

x t x

γ

γγγ

= = → =

= = = −= = − ≠

solution: cu time-dependent: ( )c cu u t=

2

2

( ) ( )

( ) ( ) ( )

( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )

( ) 2 ( ) ( )

tc

t tc c

t t t tc c c c

t t tc c c

x t u t e

x t u t e u t e

x t u t e u t e u t e u t e

u t e u t e u t e

γ

γ γ

γ γ γ γ

γ γ γ

γγ γ γ

γ γ

− −

− − − −

− − −

→ =

= −

= − − +

= − +

set into equation of motion 202 0x x xγ ω+ + = :

2 20

2 20

here:

2

1 1 2

1 2 1,2

( ) 2 ( ) ( )

2 ( ) 2 ( ) 0

( ) 0 ( ) 0

( ) , ( )

( ) ( ) , ( ) real real

t t t tc c c c

t tc c

tc c

c c

t

u t e u t e u t e u e

u t e u t e

u t e u t

u t c u t c t c

x t c t c e x t c

γ γ γ γ

ω γ

γ γ

γ

γ

γ γ ω

γ γ

− − − −

=

− −

− + +

+ − =

⇔ = ⇔ =→ = = +

→ = + →

Page 57: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

57

(i) case: 0( 0) 0, ( 0) vx t x t= = = =

1 2

2 2

2 0 0

( 0) 0 ( ) ,

( ) ( )

( 0) v ( ) v

t

t t

t

x t c x t c te

x t c e c t e

x t c x t te

γ

γ γ

γ

γ

− −

= = = → =

= + −

= = = → =

(ii) case: 0( 0) , ( 0) 0x t x x t= = = =

2 0 1 0

1 1 0

1 0 1 0

0 0 0

( 0) ( ) ( ) ,

( ) ( )( )

( 0) 0

( ) ( ) (1 ) ( )

t

t t

t t

x t c x x t c t x e

x t c e c t x e

x t c x c x

x t x t x e x t e x t

γ

γ γ

γ γ

γγ γ

γ γ

− −

− −

= = = → = +

= + + −= = − = → =

→ = + = + =

FIG. 2-11. Free, damped oscillation, case: γ = ω0. Boundary conditions: (a):

0( 0) 0, ( 0)x t v t v= = = = . (b) 0( 0) , ( 0) 0x t x v t= = = = .

Page 58: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

58

2.5. enforced oscillations and resonance System: mass connected to a spring in surrounding medium, upper end of spring is moved periodically up and down by external force ext 0 ˆF =F cos( )xtω

FIG. 2-12. Enforced oscillation [2.1].

a) equation of motion analogous to chapter 2.1:

20

00

2 cos( )

F, / ,

2

x x x t

bk m

m m

γ ω κ ω

γ ω κ

+ + =

= = =

b) solution • inhomogenous differential equation • solution = general solution of homogenous equation + one solution of inhomogenous equation homogenous equation: 2

02 0x x xγ ω+ + =

→chapter 2.2: ( ) cos( )tf fx t A e tγ ω ε−= +

2 20fω ω γ= − (small damping)

inhomogenous equation: 2

02 cos( )x x x tγ ω κ ω+ + =

approach: real functions → complex functions 202 , i tz z z e z x iyωγ ω κ+ + = = +

with , i tc cz A e Aω= complex amplitude, follows

2, i t i tc cz i A e z A eω ωω ω= = −

Page 59: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

59

2 20

2 2 2 20

( 2 )... , real amplitude

( ) (2 )i t

c

iA Ae Aωκ ω ω γω

ω ω γω− −→ = =

− +

a ib= +

2 2

2 2 2 20

2 20

( ) (2 )

2tan

( ) cos( )

A a b

ba

x t A t

κω ω γω

γωϕω ω

ω ϕ

→ = + =− +

→ = = −−

→ = +

→general solution ( ) ( ) cos( )fx t x t A tω ϕ= + +

c) stationary state

0 : ( ) 0

( ) cos( )

tft x t e

x t A t

γ

ω ϕ

−>> ∝ →

→ = +

• oscillation with frequency of driving force! • phase shift ϕ between driving force and oscillation

2 20

2tan

γωϕω ω

= −−

o dependent of damping constant γ o dependent of frequency of free undamped oscillation 0ω

FIG. 2-13. Enforced oscillation. (a) Phase-shift ϕ for different damping constants γ. For ω → ω0 : ϕ = ± π/2. (b) Amplitude A(ω) for different damping constants γ. Resonance for γ << ω0, ω → ω0 .

Page 60: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

60

o dependent of driving force ω o see FIG. 2-13a: 0 / 2Hzω π= o for 0 : / 2 90ω ω ϕ π= = ± = ± °

(that means: 0F=F cos( ) ( ) sin( )t x t A tω ω→ = )

• amplitude: 2 2 2 20( ) (2 )

ω ω γω→ =

− +

o dependent on amplitude 0F / mκ = of driving force o dependent of frequencies 0,ω ω o dependent of damping constant γ o see FIG. 2-13b: 0 0F 0,1 , 3 , / 2N m kg Hzω π= = = o resonance for 0 :γ ω< maximum of ( ) : ( ) 0A Aω ω =

2 20 0 0 2 , Rω ω γ ω γ ω→ = −

o for 00, : A( ) γ ω ω ω= → → ∞ → disaster! (bridges collapse under marching soldiers, glasses crash at high voices,..)

Page 61: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

61

Chapter 3 Waves and acoustic

wave: transport of energy and momentum without transporting matter mechanical wave: transport via disturbance in a medium e.g. string: disturbance = charge in shape of string from its equilibrium shape sound wave: disturbance = local density changes out of equilibrium density electromagnetic wave: transport without medium, disturbance = oscillating electric & magnetic fields transverse waves: disturbance perpendicular to propagation e.g. string: segments of string move perpendicular to string, wave propagates down the string

FIG. 3-01. Transverse mechanical wave [3.1]. longitudinal waves: disturbance parallel to propagation e.g. soundwaves: molecules of gas, liquid, solid move back and forth along line of propagation

FIG. 3-02. Longitudinal mechanical wave [3.2].

Page 62: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

62

general wave function: consider: 2 coordinate systems , 'Σ Σ Σ : fixed system, at t = 0 wave has shape ( )y f x= ,

'Σ : system moves with wave’s velocity v, wave has shape ( ')f x for all times coordinate transformation: ' v ' vx x t x x t= + → = − →shape of wave for all times: ( v )f f x t= −

FIG. 3-03. General wave function. Disturbance can be described by function

( )f f x vt= − . discussion: → f depends on position x and time t (compare oscillation: ( )x t depends on time only) →string: ( ) ( , )f x vt y x t− = : elongation differs with position and time →v: phase velocity, depends on medium (see TABLE 3-01) →direction of propagation: v > 0: wave moves to right v < 0: wave moves to left medium vPh [m/s] aluminium 3040 plumb 1960 glass 5640

Page 63: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

63

water 1402 mercury 1450 air 331,5 hydrogen 1284 oxygen 316 helium 965

TABLE 3-01. Phase velocities in different solids, liquids, gases [3-03] wave equation:

( , ) ( ) ( )y x t f x vt f u= − =

chain rule

1

( v )y df u df x t dfx du x du x du

∂ ∂ ∂ −→ = ⋅ = ⋅ =∂ ∂ ∂

2 2 2

2 2 2chain rule

y d f u d fx du x d u

∂ ∂→ = ⋅ =∂ ∂

(i)

chain rule

v

vy df u dft du t du

∂ ∂→ = ⋅ = −∂ ∂

2 2 22

2 2 2

v

v vy d f u d f

t du t d u−

∂ ∂→ = − ⋅ =∂ ∂

(ii)

(i) = (ii) 2 2

2 2 2

1v

y yx t

∂ ∂→ =∂ ∂

wave equation

mechanical waves: v out of Newton’s laws (difficult!) electromagnetic waves: v out of Maxwell’s equations (later) solution: wave function ( , ) ( )y x t f x vt= − Chapter 3.1. Maxwell’s equations one solution of wave equation: plane harmonic wave

( , ) sin[ ( v ) ] ( v )y x t A k x t f x tδ= − + = − illustration: “photo” of the wave: t = const

Page 64: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

64

FIG. 3-04. "Photo" of a wave ( , )y x t . discussion: • A: amplitude, unit: sound-waves: [A] = [pressure] = N/m², string: [A] = [elongation] = m elctric field: [A] = N/C (later), ... • k : wave number • wave length λ : distance between two maxima:

after x λ= phase (argument of sin-function) is 2π higher: 0 0( v ) 2 ( v )

2

2

k x t k x t

k

k

δ π λ δπ λ

πλ

+ + + = + + +⇔ = +

⇔ =

• phase shift δ : set by boundary condition • oscillation: oscillators at different positions x fulfill oscillations with different phase – shift δ depending on position, same frequencies!

Page 65: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

65

FIG. 3-05. Oscillation for oscillators at different positions x0. (a) "Photo" of the wave at t = 0 (black) and t = 0,25 s (grey). (b) x0 = 0, (c) x0 = 3 m, (d) x0 = 4,5 m. oscillation at 0x x= :

0 0 0

0sin( ) sin( )

( , ) sin[ ( v ) ] sin[ v ]

sin[ v ] sin[ ]

y x t A k x t A kx k t

A kx k t A tα π α

δ δπ δ ω ε

= −

= − + = − += − + − = +

(simple harmonic oscillation) 0 0( )kx xε π δ ε→ = − − = : phase shift (position dependent, independent of wave length because we are in the same medium) vkω = : (angular) frequency equal for every oscillator, depends on wave number and phase velocity

e.g.

2 11 Hz 3,14 Hz

2

0,52

ms m

f s

πω π

ωπ

= =

→ = =

see FIG. 3-05:

Page 66: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

66

(a) “photo”: 0, 0t δ= = (wave) phase: kxψ = (b) 0 00 0 = ( 0, ) - sin( )x y x t A tψ ε π ω= → = → → = =

(c) 0

0

33 3 = - 2

( 3 , ) sin( )

x m m

y x m t A t

πψ π ε ππ

ω

= → = = →

→ = =

(d) 0

0

9/ 29 / 2 4,5 =-9/2 + -7 / 2

( 4,5 , ) sin( 7 / 2 ) sin( 1/ 2 )

x m m

y x m t A t A t

πψ π ε π π ππ

ω π ω π

= → = = → =

→ = = − = +

• usual equation: 2

( , ) sin( ) , , vy x t A kx t k kπω δ ωλ

= − + = =

• plane wave: for given 0 0 0: ( , , , )x x y x y z t= = const → same elongation for all oscillators in yz – plane • spherical wave: wave generated by point source, propagation in all direction (e.g. sound wave coming out of speakers)

0( ) ,

( , ) sin( )

AA A r x r

rA

y r t kr tr

ω δ

→ = →

→ = − +

→ y depends on distance oscillator – wave source →amplitude decreases with increasing distance from source (e.g. sound!) 3.2 Superposition of waves (interference) analogous to chapter 2.2: Overlapping oscillations

1 1 1 1 1

2 2 2 2 2

1 2

( , ) sin( )

( , ) sin( )

( , ) ( , ) ( , )

y x t A k r t

y x t A k r t

y x t y x t y x t

ω δω δ

= − += − +

= +

special cases:

i. destructive interference: 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2, ( ), ( ), (phase shift!)

( , ) 0

A A k k f f

y x t

λ λ ω ω δ δ= = → = = → = =→ =

ii. constructive interference:

Page 67: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

67

1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2, , , (waves are in phase)

( , ) 2 sin( )

A A k k

y x t A kx t

ω ω δ δω δ

= = = =→ = − +

iii. beats:

1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2

1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2

, , , =0

( , ) 2 cos( )sin( )2 2 2 2

A A k k

k k k ky x t A x t x t

ω ω δ δω ω ω ω

= = = =− − + +→ = − −

FIG. 3-06. Beat. (a,b) "Photo" of the wave at t = 0. (c,d) Oscillation at x0 = 0.

3.3 Standing waves special case of interference:

1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2, = , = , 0, 0 A A A k k k ω ω ω δ δ= = = = = ≠ 1 2v 0, v 0> < (wave 1 moves to right, 2 moves to left)

1 2

1 2 1 21 2

( , ) sin( ), ( , ) sin( )

( , ) ( , ) ( , ) 2 cos( )sin( )2 2

y x t A kx t y x t A kx t

y x t y x t y x t A

ω ω δψ ψ ψ ψ

→ = − = + +− +→ = + =

with phases 1 2,ψ ψ :

Page 68: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

68

1 2

1 2

1 2

cos( ) cos( )

1 2

( ) 2

( ) 2

2 cos( ) cos( ) cos( )

2 2 2

sin( ) sin( )2 2

( , ) 2 cos( )sin( )2 2

x x

kx t kx t t

kx t kx t kx

tt

kx

y x t A t kx

ψ ψ ω ω δ ω δψ ψ ω ω δ δ

ψ ψ ω δ δω

ψ ψ δ

δ δω

− =

− = − − + + = − −+ = − + + + = −

− −→ = − = +

+→ = +

→ = + +

,x t→ in different functions! • nodes: positions nx for which ( ) 0ny x = for all times!

sin( ) 0 , 2 2

2

n n

n

kx kx n n

nx

k

δ δ π

δπ

+ = ⇔ + = ∈

−→ =

• antinodes: positions anx for which amplitude of wave is at

maximum: ( , ) 2 cos( )2any x t A tδω= + for

sin( ) 1,

2(2 1)

(2 1)2 2 2

an

an an

kx n

nkx n x

k

δ

δ π π δ

+ = ± ∈

+ +→ + = + ⇔ =

3.3.1 Standing waves in different systems – resonance most cases: standing waves only possible for particular wavelengths and frequencies ,R Rfλ mode: standing wave with special ,R Rfλ , mode is resonance of the system with ,R Rfλ : resonance frequency/wavelength

Page 69: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

69

FIG. 3-08. Standing waves for different boundary conditions. (a) "Guitar string" as a system with two fixed ends [3-4]. (b) "Organ pipe" as a system with one loose and one fixed end [3-5]. A: position of antinodes, N: position of nodes.

a) “guitar - string”: standing waves between two fixed ends (see FIG. 3-08a) boundary – condition:

( 0, ) 0, ( , ) 0, length of string

( 0, ) 2 cos( )sin( 0 ) 02 2

sin( ) 0 2 ,2 2

y x t y x L t L

y x t A t k

n n n

δ δω

δ δ π δ π

= = = = =

→ = = + ⋅ + =

→ = → = ⇔ = ⋅ ∈

( , ) 2 cos( )sin( ) 0sin( ) 0 ,

( ) ,

2 22R

y x L t A t n k L n

k L n k L n m m

kL m n z z

k L z L z

ω π ππ π ππ π

λπ π πλ λ

→ = = + ⋅ + =→ ⋅ + = → ⋅ + = ∈→ = − = ∈

= → = → =

(z=0 senseless) →Fundamental, First harmonic: z = 1 2R Lλ→ =

→Second harmonic: z = 2 R Lλ→ =

.... higher harmonics: z = 1 11

2, 1: R R

LL z

z zλλ λ λ→ = ≠ = = =

Page 70: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

70

wavelength of higher harmonics are integer deviders of fundamental wavelength

frequencies: v / v

v2 2

R

R

ff L z z

fλ= → = =

1

1

1

v v1:

2 2

v v1: , 2,3,4,...

2 2R RR

z L ff L

zz L f z zf f z

f L

= = → =

≠ = → = = = =

→ frequencies of harmonics are integers of frequency of fundamental wave functions: 0 0n δ= → = fundamental: 1 1 1( , ) 2 cos( )sin( )y x t A t k xω= z harmonic: ( , ) 2 cos( )sin( )z z zy x t A t k xω=

b) “pipe of an organ”: standing waves between one fixed and one loose end (see FIG. 3-08b) boundary conditions:

1

2

( 0, ) 0 2 ,

( , ) 2 cos( ) maximum amplitude2

sin( + )= 1 (2 1) , 2 2

( ) (2 1) , 2 2 2

2 2(2 1) (2 1)

2 4

n

z

R

y x t n n

y x L t A t

kL kL n m m

kL m n m n z z

k L z L z

δ π

δ πδω

δ ππ

π π ππ π π

λπ π πλ λ

= ⋅

= = → = ⋅ ∈

= = + =

→ ± ⇔ + = + ∈

⇔ = + − = − + = + ∈

= → = + ⇔ = +

11 1

fundamental

0 : 4 , 42 1zz L L

zλλ λ λ= = → = =+

(2z +1): odd integer, z = 1,2,3,...

frequencies: vv f

fλ λ= ⇔ =

Page 71: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

71

1 1

fundamental

v v(2 1) (2 1)

4 4

v(2 1)

4

R

z

L z f zf L

f f z ff

→ = + ⇔ = +

→ = → = +

wave functions:

fundamental: 1 1 1

2 2 2

( , ) 2 cos( )sin( )

( , ) 2 cos( )sin( )

y x t A t k x

y x t A t k x

ωω

==

3.4 Harmonic sound waves Generation: Tuning fork or loudspeaker vibrating with simple harmonic motion What happens? • air molecules next to vibrating source oscillate with simple harmonic

motion around equilibrium position. • “Neighbour-molecules” of vibration source collide with their

neighbours causing them to oscillate • sound wave propagates

Page 72: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

72

FIG. 3-09. Harmonic sound wave. (a) Displacement of air molecules from equilibrium position. (b) Some representative air molecules before sound wave arrives. (c) Air molecules near points x1, x2, x3 after sound wave arrived. (d) Density of air molecules. (e) Pressure change (proportional to density) [3.6]. Displacement of air molecules:

0

0, before wave arrived, air-molecules at equilibrium position( , ) (see FIG. 3-09b)

sin( - ), after wave arrived (see FIG. 3-09a,c)s x t

s kx tω

=

Density and pressure: minima at 2 , kx t n nω π− = ⋅ ∈ maxima at (2 1) , kx t n nω π− = − ∈ compare displacement:

maxima at (2 1) , 2

kx t n nπω− = − ∈ and n uneven

Page 73: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

73

minima at (2 1) , 2

kx t n nπω− = − ∈ and n even

FIG. 3-10. Oscillators with masses m at position x and another oscillator with mass m' while wave passes. • pressure and density are -90° out of phase with displacement

(see FIG. 3-09d,e) 0

0

0

( , ) sin( ), / 2

sin( / 2)

cos( ) ( , )

p x t p kx t

p kx t

p kx t p x t

ω ε ε πω π

ω

= − + = −= − −

= − =

pressure of air after sound wave arrived • note: before sound wave arrived: ( , ) 0p x t = discussion: • displacement, density, pressure varies in propagation direction (x-

direction) → longitudinal wave • usually: source = point source, emits wave in all directions

→ sound wave = spherical wave with 0( , ) sin( )p

p r t kx tr

ω= −

(see chapter 3.6)

Page 74: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

74

3.5 Energy, energy density and intensity mechanical wave: • oscillators with mass m vibrate → oscillators have kinetic and

potential energy of oscillation (see chapter 2.3) • via coupling oscillation is transferred from one oscillator to the other

in wave-propagation direction, oscillator stays at its position → transfer of energy with phase velocity in direction of wave propagation

FIG. 3-11. Sound wave as spherical wave traversing through space. energy of oscillator at position r :

2 2 20

0 0

( , ) 1/ 2 cos ( )

( ( , ) sin( ) ( , ) cos( ))kinE r t m x kr t

y r t x kr t y r t y kr t

ω ωω ω ω

= −= − → = − −

0

0

0 0

0

2 2 2 20

harmonic motion with r 0 0

( , ) ( , ) ( ') '

' ' 1/ 2 1/ 2 sin ( )

r

pot potr

r

E r t E r t F r dr

D r dy Dr m x kx tω ω

=

− = −

= = = −

(in the last step we used 0( , ) sin( ), /r x t x kx t D mω ω= − = )

Page 75: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

75

→ 2 201/ 2tot kin potE E E m x Eω= + = =

problem: definition of the “unit-oscillator”: see FIG. 3-10: Energy E is different for oscillators with masses , 'm m ! solution: energy-density: mass can be expressed by density /m Vρ =

2 201/ 2E V xρ ω→ =

consider: infinitely small unit-oscillator: 0m → or 0V → : 2 2

00lim ( ) 1/ 2V

dEE V x

dVη ρω

→→ = = =

η is the energy-density of a wave, independent of single oscillators! intensity:

definition: power of wave

intensity = area through which wave is transmited

2, [ ]P W

I IA m

= =

power: , , vdE dE

p dV A dtdt dV

η= = = (see FIG. 3-11)

v/ v =

dE dV A dtI P A I

Adt Adt Adtη η η→ = = = = = ⋅

→ intensity = energy-density x phase velocity 3.5.1. Intensity and sound-level of sound waves intensity: intensity-intervall hearable for human ear: from 12 2

0 10 /I W m−= : hearing threshold to 2 12

01 / 10I W m I= = : pain threshold

Page 76: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

76

TABLE 3-2. Intensity and sound- or intensity-level of common sounds [3.7]. sound-level (or sound-intensity): psychological sensation of loudness varies approximately logarithmically with sound-intensity →sound-level β is measured in logarithmic dB – scale (dB = decibel):

0

10lg( ), [ ]I

dBI

β β= = (unitless “unit” - similar to rad-scale)

12 20 10 /I W m−= : hearing threshold

e.g. Niagara Falls: 3 210 /I W m−=

3 23 12 9

12 20

9

9

10 /10 10

10 /

10lg(10 ) 90

I W mI W m

dBβ

−− +

−→ = = =

→ = =

Page 77: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

77

3.6 Plane, circular and spherical wave wave-function: 0( , ) sin( )y r t y kr tω= −

intensity: vdE

IAdt

η= = ⋅ , v = phase - velocity

total energy that passes in the time t∆ through area A perpendicular to propagation-direction:

0 0

v v

' v ' ( ) v'

t t

dE dEA

Adt dtdE

dt A dt E t A tdt

η η

η η∆ ∆

= ⇔ =

→ = → ∆ = ∆

( , , vA η = constant)

2 2 2 20 01/ 2 ( ) 1/ 2 vx E t A x tη ρω ρω= → ∆ = ∆

energy-conservation: t∆ = const → E = const! a. plane waves

FIG. 3-12. Plane wave moving in x - direction.

ˆ ˆv v x xk k k kr kxω= = ⋅ → = ⋅ → =

x

: wave propagation in x-direction 0A A= = constant 2 2

0 01/ 2 vE A txρω→ = ∆ = const (if t = const)

0

0

const

( , )= sin( )

x

r x t x kx tω→ =→ −

Page 78: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

78

b. circular waves

FIG. 3-13. Circular wave traveling in radial direction away from a point source (e.g. stone dropped into water).

cos

ˆ ˆv v r, r (polar coordinates)sin

k r

k r kr

ϕω

ϕ = = ⋅ =

→ =

!

2 2 2 20 0

constant

0

2 , = constant

E=1/2 2 rz v z v constant

1x

A r z z

trx t rx

r

π

π ρω π ρω

= ⋅

→ ⋅ ∆ = ∆ ⋅ =

→ ∝

0( , )= sin( )x

r x t kx tr

ω→ −

Page 79: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

79

c. spherical waves (see FIG: 3-11)

cos cosˆ ˆv v r, r sin sin (spherical coordinates)

sink r

k r kr

ϕ ϑω ϕ ϑ

ϑ

= = ⋅ =

→ =

2

!2 2

0

0

4

E= constant

1x

A r

const r x

r

π=

→ ⋅ =

→ ∝

0( , )= sin( )x

r x t kx tr

ω→ −

3.7 Doppler-effect wave source and receiver move relative to each other →observed frequency and emetted frequency different! source and receiver toward each other → frequency higher source and receiver away from each other → frequency lower e.g. passing ambulance: pitch shifts o case: moving source, receiver at rest → wavelength changes

→ find new wavelength 'λ , then v

''

= (v=phase velocity)

Page 80: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

80

FIG. 3-14. Doppler effect. Wave-source moves with uS to the right. (a) Behind the source: wave expanded, λ' > λ0. (b) In front of source: wave compressed, λ' < λ0 [3.8].

• number of waves emitted in : t N f t∆ = ∆ • displacement of first emitted wavefront after : vwft s t∆ = ∆

• displacement of first emitted source after : s st s u t∆ = ∆ distance between source & first wavefront

new wavelength = number of emitted waves

0 0

0 0 0 0

s0

0

v v'

v= v/

v-u' (1 ) '

v/ v

wf s s s

s

s s t u t usN N f t f

f f

u

λ

λ λ

λ λ λλ

− ∆ − ∆ −∆= = = =∆

→ =

→ = = − =

Page 81: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

81

→ frequency: 0

0

vv ' ' ' v/ ' ... '

(v- ) / 1v

ss

ff f f

uu fλ λ= → = = = = =

FIG. 3-15. Doppler effect, moving source. The "new" wavelength λ' can be determined out of the distance ∆s between source and receiver. discussion: source towards receiver: 0su > 0(1 / v) 0 ' , 'su f f λ λ→ − > → > <

e.g. passing ambulance: pitch decreases directly after passing o case: moving receiver, source at rest → number of waves passing receiver changes

FIG. 3-16. Doppler effect, moving receiver. The number of wavefronts passing changes. → determine total number of wavefronts passing receiver in time t∆ → frequency ' '/f N t= ∆

• number of emitted wavefronts 0 0N f t= ∆ • number of additionally observed wavefronts:

00 0 0v / v

R R Ru t u t u tsN f

fλ λ∆ ∆ ∆∆= = = =

• total number: 0 0 0 0' / v= (1 / v)R RN N N f t f tu f t u= + = ∆ + ∆ ∆ +

Page 82: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

82

→ frequency: 0

'' (1 ) '

vRuN

f f ft

= = + =∆

→ wavelength:

0 0

0

v0

vv ' ' ' v/ ' '

(1 / v) 1vRfR

f f fuf u λ

λλ λ=

= → = = = =+ +

discussion: o receiver towards source: 0 0>0 (1+ /v)>1 ' , 'R Ru u f f λ λ→ → > < o receiver away from source: 0 0<0 ' , 'Ru f f λ λ→ < >

o general case: moving source: 0 0' /(1 / v), ' (1 / v)s sf f u uλ λ= − = − moving receiver: 0 0' (1 / v), ' /(1 / v)R Rf f u uλ λ= + = +

→ general case: 0

1 / v'

1 / vR

S

uf f

u+=−

, 0

1 / v'

1 / vs

R

uu

λ λ −=+

,s Ru u > 0: source and receiver moving towards each other in general: v ,s Ru u>>

Page 83: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

83

Chapter 4 Optics

Chapter 4.1. Introduction to electromagnetic waves

Chapter 4.1.1. Maxwell’s equtions

• laws of electricity and magnetism (classical electromagnetism)

• analogous: Newton's laws of mechanics

vacuum: / t∇ × = −∂ ∂E B , 0 0 / tµ ε∇ × = ∂ ∂B E , 0∇ ⋅ =E , 0∇ ⋅ =B E: electric field, / q= CE F , [ ] N / C=E

CF : Coulomb force from charge Q on charge q, 20/(4 )Qq rπε=CF r ,

[ ] N=CF , attractive for equal signs of Q, q, repulsive for different signs

FIG. 4-01. (a) Repulsive Coulomb force of charge Q on charge q with same sign (Q, q < 0 or Q, q > 0). (b) Attractive Coulomb force of charge Q on charge q with opposite sign (Q < 0, q > 0 or Q > 0, q > 0). q: electric charge, [ ] Cq = (“Coulomb”), charge is bound to mass,

negatively charged body: excess of electrons (e-), positively charged body: lack of e-, fundamental unit charge: 191,602 10 Ce −= × , e.g. electron: eq e= − ,

proton: pq e= charge quantization: , 0, 1, 2,...Q Ze z= = ± ± , (charges appear as multipliers of fundamental unit-charge) B: magnetic field, [B] = T ("Tesla")

Page 84: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

84

LF : Lorentz-force, ( )q= ×LF v B , v: velocity of body with charge q in magnetic field B, case: ⊥v B → FL: centripetal force (circular motion)

FIG. 4-02. Lorentz force FL on charge q moving with velocity v through constant magnetic field B. Lorentz force acts as centripetal force, q moves on circular track. 0µ : permeability (of free space), 7 2

0 4 10 N/Aµ π= × 0ε : dielectric constant (of free space), 12 2

0 8,8542 10 mA /kgε −= × ∇ : Nabla operator, ( / , / , / )x y z∇ = ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∇ × E = rot E (rotation) ∇ E = div E (divergence) grad ∇ Φ = Φ (gradient) – scalar field

Chapter 4.1.2. electromagnetic wave-equation

Maxwell

Maxwell Maxwell 0 0

( ) ( )

B( ) ( B) ( / )t

t t tµ ε

∇ × ∇ × = ∇ ∇ − ∆ = −∆∂ ∂ ∂= ∇ × − = − ∇ × = − ∂ ∂∂ ∂ ∂

E E E E

E

=> 2 20 0 / tµ ε∆ = ∂ ∂E E ,

analogous: 2 20 0 / tµ ε∆ = ∂ ∂B B ,

Page 85: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

85

2 2 2

2 2 2x y z∂ ∂ ∂∆ = + +∂ ∂ ∂

(Laplace-op.)

see chapter 3: wave-equation of mechanical waves:

2 2

2 2 2

( , ) 1 ( , )v

y x t y x tx t

∂ ∂=∂ ∂

solution: wave functions, mech. waves, travelling with phase-velocity v here: wave-equation of electromagnetic waves (in free space), phase-velocity v = speed of light c :

80 01/ 3 10 m/sc µ ε= = × (vacuum: speed of light)

wave-functions: ( , ) sin( )t tω δ= − +0E r E kr ( , ) sin( )t tω δ= − +0B r B kr Chapter 4.1.3. electromagnetic waves

FIG. 4-03. Electromagnetic wave, electric and magnetic fields swing in phase, E, B are perpendicular to each other and both to the propagation direction [3.9].

• consist of electric & magnetic field swinging in phase • directions: ⊥E B , , ⊥E B k (propagation-direction): elm. wave = transverse wave • electromagnetic spectrum: all wavelengths (frequencies) possible!

e.g. light: (400,700) nmλ ∈ (VIS), infrared (IR) (heat-radiation of bodies), ultraviolett (UV),

conversion between , fλ : c fλ=

Page 86: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

86

TABLE. 4-1. The electromagnetic spectrum [3.10].

• production of elm. waves: (i) acceleration of free charges (e.g. radio-waves, bremsstrahlung as part of x-rays, synchrotron-radiation) (ii) electrons bound to atoms make transitions to lower energy states (e.g. x-ray line spectrum, heat as blackbody radiation, light waves)

Page 87: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

87

Chapter 4.1.4. electromagnetic waves in different media

• electromagnetic wave forces electron sheath of atoms to oscillate,

or atomic core remains at its position

• accelerated charges send out radiation with lower phase velocity

v = c / n, n = refractive index, depend on material, wavelength, ...

e.g. vacuum n =1, air n =1,0003, glass n =1,515

• enforced oscillation; stationary case: frequency doesn’t change!

• v /

/nn

c n fn

c f

λλ λ

λ= = ⋅

== ⋅ ,

λ : wavelength in vacuum,

nλ : charged wavelength in medium with refractive index n

Chapter 4.1.5. Wavefronts and Huygen’s principle

Wavefront : All points with maximum amplitude

→wavefronts move with phase velocity v in propagation-

direction

FIG. 4-04. Wavefronts of a circular water wave generated by a point source moving up and down with simple harmonic motion [3.11].

Page 88: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

88

shapes: (i) plane wave: plane

(ii) circular waves: circle

(iii) spherical waves: sperical

(iv)

FIG. 4-05. Part of a wavefront of a spherical electromagnetic wave before and after propagation through an unplane piece of glass. Behind the "obstacle" the wavefront is deformed [3.12].

Huygen’s principle of wave propagation:

FIG. 4-06. Huygens's principle for the propagation of waves.

Page 89: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

89

FIG. 4-07. Huygens's principle of wave propagation for a (a) plane wave and (b) circular or spherical wave. The wavefront is the envelope of the wavelets outgoing from every point on the previous wavefront [3.13].

Chapter 4.1.6. Application of Huygen’s principle:

the law of reflection and refraction

Consider: plane wave hitting a plane surface

• part of wave is reflected, part is refracted

FIG. 4-08. Reflection and refraction. Plane wave hitting a plane surface at the incidence angle Θ1. The reflected wave is also a plane wave [3.13].

Page 90: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

90

• plane wavefront AA’ striking mirror at point A

• angle of incidence: angle between the perpendiculars on

wavefront and mirror

• position of wavefront afte time t : construction of wavelets of

radius r c t= ⋅ on every point of AA’

→ (i) wavelets that do not hit the mirror:

wavefront BB’

(ii) wavelets that hit the mirror:

wavefront BB’’

→ after t wavefront B’B’’ isn’t plane

• analoguos: construction of wavefront C’C’’

• reflection-angle:

FIG. 4-09. Derivation of the law of reflection using Huygens's principle [3.14].(enlargement of 4-08)

Page 91: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

91

o AP: part of wavefront AA’

o after time t : wavelet from P reached B,

wavelet from A reaches B’’

o reflection-angle: 1 'Θ

o 1 11 1

v vABP: sin ' ; AB''B: sin '

AB ABt t∆ Θ = ∆ Θ = ( 1v phase-velocity)

o → 1 1 'Θ = Θ law of reflection

• refraction-angle:

FIG. 4-10. Derivation of the Snell's law of refraction using Huygens's principle [3.14].

o AP: part of wavefront AA’

o After time t : wavelet from P reached B, wavelet from A

reached B’ → but: AB' PB<

(phase-velocity for wavelet in medium lower)

o Refraction-angle: 2Θ

o 1 21 2

v vABP : sin , ABB' : sin

AB ABt t∆ Θ = ∆ Θ =

→ 1 2 1 2

1 2 1 2

v v v vAB

sin sin sin sint t= = ⇔ =Θ Θ Θ Θ

with 1 21 2 1 1 2 2

v , v : sin sin

c c c cn n n n

= = =Θ Θ

Page 92: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

92

1 1 2 2sin sinn n⇔ Θ = Θ Snell’s law of refraction

• special case: total internal reflection:

for

crit1 2 2 1 1 2 2

1

; 90 : sin sin ,n n n n=

> Θ = ° Θ = Θ

crit1 1Θ = Θ (critical angle of total reflection)

crit 11

2

arcsin( )nn

Θ =

for angles crit1 1Θ > Θ : no refracted beam!

Page 93: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

93

Chapter 4.2. Geometrical optics

Chapter 4.2.1. ray approximation

Many applications: propagation-direction important,

diffraction (later) can be neglected

propagation-direction: perpendicular to wavefronts

→perpendiculars on wavefronts = (light) rays

FIG. 4-11. Rays as perpendiculars on the wavefront [3.11].

FIG. 4-12. Ray approximation. The wave hitting an object with refractive index n2 can be depicted by a ray directing in propagation direction.

Page 94: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

94

Chapter 4.2.2. Image formation by reflection mirrors

Goal of many optical set ups: generation of images of objects

object: each point P emits rays in all directions

optical instrument: bundles those rays in point P’

image: all points P’ together

(a) plane mirror

FIG. 4-13. (a) Optical image of a plane mirror. The image of the object "arrow" is virtual: it seems as if the rays come from the points Pi'. (b) Image construction.

(i) real & virtual images (see FIG 4-13a)

object: arrow

each point iP emits rays: red

rays are reflected at mirror

if human eye looks into mirror: seems as if rays come from 1P '

→ I is virtual image of O

real image: rays emerge from image (e.g. spherical mirror)

Page 95: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

95

(ii) mirror-equation: 2

2

sP AB : tan(90 )

ABs'

P 'AB : tan(90 )AB

∆ ° − Θ =

∆ ° − Θ =

→ 's s= mirror-equation for plane mirrors s: object-distance s’:image-distance (iii) lateral magnification

1 2 1 2

O I IP P O : tan ; P 'P 'A: tan =

s s' sI

1O

m

∆ Θ = ∆ Θ =

→ = =

(image and object have same size) image construction: 2 rays:

o perpendicular ray o non-perpendicular ray both cases: reflected beam is extended to “behind mirror” side (dashed) → intersection marks image-point

(b) spherical mirror (i) optical axes straight line through vertex P and center C of mirror (see FIG. 4-14a)

Page 96: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

96

FIG. 4-14. Spherical mirror. Derivation of the (a) focal length and (b) mirror equation.

(ii) focal point and focal length to optical axis focal point = focus of parallel incident rays (only for rays close to axes)

BF BF

CFB : tan ; ABF : tanCB BA

α α∆ = ∆ =

Page 97: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

97

1 1

CB=BA= CA ,2 2

r→ = r = radius of mirror

CB

CFB : cos CFCF 2cos

rαα

∆ = → =

1

f=FP CF (1 ) f2cos 2cos

rr r r

α α→ = − = − = − =

(focal length of spherical mirror) rays close to axes: α small → cos 1α

→ f2r= , f = focal length of spherical mirror

r = radius of spherical mirror

(iii) mirror equation (see FIG. 4-14b)

1

1

11

11

P CA: = +2

P 'CA: = +

ABABP : tan

P B

ABABC: tan

CBAB

ABP ': tanP 'B

δ γ αδ γ β

β δ α

γ

δ

β

∆ → = +∆

∆ =

∆ =

∆ =

approximation for rays close to optical axes: 1 1P B s; P 'B s'; CB ; tan( , , ) , ,r γ δ β γ δ β (small angles)

AB AB AB

2s s'r

→ = +

1 1 1f s s'

→ = + (we used here f = r /2)

mirror-equation for spherical mirrors (s: object-distance, s’: image-distance)

Page 98: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

98

(iv) image construction

FIG. 4-15. Image construction for spherical mirrors. Red: the parallel ray is reflected through the focal point F. Green: the "focal point ray" propagates parallel to the optical axes after reflection. Blue: the "center ray" is moves back the same way after reflection. The focusing point of the rays is the image point.

3 rays are helpful: red: “parallel” ray: reflected through focal point green: “focal point” ray: reflected parallel blue: “center” ray: reflected back through center 2 beams necessary, 3rd beam for to make sure → image iss maller, opposite directed, real image (rays emante from image point)

FIG. 4-16. Lateral magnification for a spherical mirror.

Page 99: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

99

FIG. 4-17. Concave spherical mirror. (a) Case s > 2 f → s' > 0, 0 > m > -1, real image. (b) Case 2 f > s > f → s' > 0, m < -1, real image. (c) Case f > s > 0 → s' < 0, m > 1, virtual image, dashed: virtual rays.

Page 100: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

100

FIG. 4-18. Convex spherical mirror (e.g. supermarket: observation mirrors). The formulas for spherical mirror can be applied with s > 0, f < 0 → s', m < 0, only virtual images.

(v) lateral magnification (see FIG. 4-16):

O -I

sin =s s'

Θ = (I < 0 !)

I s'=-

O sm = lateral magnification for sperical mirror

(vi) real and virtual images 3 different images, depending on object’s position regarding to center, focal point (see FIG. 4-17): (a): s > 2f → s’ > 0, [ 1,0]m∈ − , real image (b): 2f > s > f → s’ > 0, 1m < − , real image (c): 0 < s < f → s’ < 0, 1m > , virtual image (vii) convex spherical mirror (see FIG. 4-18): s > 0, f < 0 → s’ > 0, m < 0, always virtual images (e.g. supermarket: observation mirror) (viii) sign-convention

FIG. 4-19. Sign convention for concave and convex spherical mirrors [3.15].

Page 101: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

101

Chapter 4.2.3. Image formed by refraction at a spherical surface

compare: 4.2.2. Image formation by reflection mirrors

(i) focal length:

FIG. 4-20. Images formed by refraction at a spherical surface, derivation of the focal length f, C = center of curvature, F = focal point.

2 1ABC : 180°= + (180 )ε∆ Θ + ° − Θ

1 2ε→ = Θ − Θ

1ABC : ; ABF : f

l lr

ε∆ Θ = ∆ (f isn’t exactly the radius)

Snell’s law: 1 1 2 2sin sinn nΘ = Θ

→ 12 1

2

sin sinnn

Θ = Θ , small angles: 1,2 1,2sin Θ Θ

Page 102: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

102

1 12 1

2 2

1 2

2 2 1

f = r( )f

n n ln n r

n nl l lr n r n n

→ Θ = Θ =

→ = − →−

discussion:

1 2 2 1

1 2 2 1

: 0, f 0

: 0, f 0

n n n n

n n n n

< − > >> − < <

most cases: 1 21, f ( )1

nn n n r

n= = → =

(ii) imaging-equation:

FIG. 4-21. Images formed by refraction at a spherical surface, derivation of the imaging equation [3.16].

2

2

ACP' : 180 (180 )γ βγ β

∆ ° = + Θ + ° −→ = − Θ

, s '

l lr

β γ= (s’ isn’t radius regarding l )

Snellius: 1 1 2 2sin sinn nΘ = Θ

small angles: 12 1

2

sinnn

Θ Θ → Θ = Θ

Page 103: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

103

1

1

PAC : 180 (180 )α βα β

∆ ° = + + ° − Θ→ Θ = +

small 12

2

: ( )s s

nl l ln r

α α → Θ = +

1 1

2 2

1 2 2 1

1 1 1 1( ) ( )

s' s s ' s

s s'

n nl l l lr n r r n r

n n n nr

→ = − + → = − +

−→ + =

with 2 2 1 2

2 1

f ( )f

n n n nr

n n r−= ⇔ =

1 2 2

s s' fn n n

+ =

(iii) sign convention:

FIG. 4-22. Sign convention for the imaging by spherical surfaces. Attention: for virtual objects and virtual images the refractive indices have to be exchanged regarding the side of the object / image in the imaging equation, see also derivation of lens-maker's equation [3.16].

Page 104: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

104

Chapter 4.2.4. Image formation by thin lenses

effect: subsequent image formation by refraction at 2 spherical

surfaces

FIG. 4-23. Derivation of the lens-maker's formula. (a) Image formed by refraction at the first spherical surface. (b) Image formed by refraction at the second spherical surface. Object = image formed by first surface (virtual object). (c) Approximation: object and image distance are measured relative to the lens axis.

Page 105: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

105

Page 106: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

106

(i) lens maker’s formula and focal length

(1) Image by refraction at surface 1 (see FIG. 4-23a):

imaging-equation: 1 2 2 21 1

1 1 1 2 1

, fs s ' fn n n n

rn n

+ = =−

1 2 2 1

1 1 1s s 'n n n n

r−+ = (1)

(2) Image by refraction at surface 2 (see FIG. 4-23b): object: image made by surface 1 → virtual object on transmission side → exchange of 1 2,n n on left side of equation (1), 2s 0< radius: center of curvature on incident side → exchange of 1 2,n n on right side of equation (1)

1 2 2 1

2 2 2s s 'n n n n

r−+ = (2)

(3) Approximation: object and image distance measured relative to lens axis: 1 2 2 1s =s, s '=s', s =-s '

(1) + (2) 2 11 2

1 1 1 1+ =( - )( - )

s s'n n

r r→

(4) Focal length: for s → ∞ : incident rays parallel, s'=f:

2 11 2

0

1 1 1 1( )( )

s fn n

r r→

+ = − −

usually: incident medium: air with 1 21, n n n= =

1 2

1 1 1( 1)( )

fn

r r= − − lens maker’s formular

(ii) imaging equation

see above: 1 2

1 1 1 1 1( 1)( )

s s' fn

r r+ = − − =

1 1 1s s' f

→ + =

(iii) sign convention see FIG. 4-22

Page 107: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

107

(iv) image construction, real and virtual images converging lenses:

FIG. 4-24. Image construction for converging lenses. (a) s > f, inverse real image. (b) s < f, upright virtual image. 3 beams: red: parallel ray: through focal point blue: central ray: through vertex of lense green: focal ray: emerges parallel to optical axes Attention: ray goes through at lens axis mirrored focal point F’! real & virtual images possible, depending on object pos. regarding focal point diverging lenses (see FIG. 4-25): only virtual images converging & diverging lenses, focal length (see table 4-2)

Page 108: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

108

FIG. 4-25. Image construction for diverging lenses. (a,b) all cases: upright virtual image.

TABLE 4-2. Converging and diverging lens.

Page 109: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

109

FIG. 4-26. Object magnification by thin lenses.

(v) lateral magnification (see FIG. 4-26)

O -ytan = , I 0!

s s'I s'

= -O s

m m

α = <

→ = =

Page 110: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

110

Chapter 4.2.5: Optical instruments

(a) the eye

FIG. 4-27. The human eye [3.17]

how it works:

• pupil: entry for light

• iris: determines light intensity propagating through pupil,

darkness: iris widely opened

• Cornea / lens system: focuses incoming light onto retina

• Ciliary muscle: changes radii of lens, needed for

accommodation

• accommodation:

far objects: c.m. is released, lens system has maximum

focal length fmax, image is focused on retina

( max' 2,5 cms f= ≈ )

closer objects: c.m. increases curvature of lens, focal

length of lens system is decreased in order to place

the image again on retina (always: ' 2,5 cms ≈ )

Page 111: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

111

• retina: contains sensing structure, receives image

• optic nerve: transmits image to the brain

near point:

• closest point for which lens can focus image on retina

• varies with age (@ 10 years: ~ 7 cm ,

@ 60 years: ~200 cm )

• standard value: 25 cmnpx =

apparent object size / angle of vision:

• determined by image size on retina

• image appears larger if object is closer (see FIG. 4-28)

FIG. 4-28. Human eye, apparent object size. (a) The object is far away, the image appears small. (b) The closer the object the greater the image size on the retina. The object appears greater [3.18].

Page 112: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

112

• measure for apparent object size: angle of vision Θ

• determination of Θ (see FIG. 4-28a,b):

1 21 2

max max

' ',

y yf f

Θ = Θ = , 1 21 2

tan( ) , tan( )y ys s

Θ = Θ =

for small angles: tan( )Θ ≈ Θ

→ 1 21 2

, y ys s

Θ = Θ =

• standard angle of vision:

object at standard near point, 0np

yx

Θ =

0Θ = angle of vision for (average) largest apparent object

size that is possible (see FIG. 4-29a)

FIG. 4-29. The simple magnifier consisting of a single converging lens with short focal length [3.19]. (b) simple magnifier

goal: object magnification

compounds: converging lens

how it works: (see FIG. 4-29)

• object is placed close to focal point of converging lens:

, s f s f< ≈

• lens produces virtual image:

Page 113: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

113

's → −∞ , image size: I → ∞

• eye easily focuses virtual image as an infinitively far object on

retina

→ simple magnifier allows the object to be brought closer to the

eye

angular magnification or magnifying power M :

0

MΘ=Θ

Θ = angle of vision with simple magnifier

0Θ = standard value of angle of vision, maximum apparent

object size without simple magnifier

(see FIG. 4-29a:) 0 0tan( )np

yx

Θ ≈ Θ =

(see FIG. 4-29b:) tan( )yf

Θ ≈ Θ =

→ 0 npM x f= Θ Θ =

Page 114: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

114

(c) optical microscope (compound microscope)

FIG. 4-30. Optical or compound microscope [3.20].

goal: object magnification of very small objects at short distances

compounds: 2 converging lenses (objective + eyepiece)

how it works: (see FIG. 4-30)

• objective forms real, enlarged and inverted image

• eyepiece is used as simple magnifier, image formed by

objective serves as object

magnifying power: (see FIG. 4-30)

'

tan( )o

y yf L

β −= = , ' 0!y < , L = tube length, 0f = focal length of

objective

'

tan( )e

yf

−Θ = ≈ Θ−

, 0ef < (F' on incident side!)

see FIG: 4-29a:

Page 115: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

115

0 0tan( )np

yx

Θ ≈ Θ =

→ 0

'//

npe

np o e

L xy fM

y x f fΘ= = = −Θ

(d) telescope

FIG. 4-31. Astronomical telescope [3.21].

FIG. 4-32. Reflecting telescope [3.22].

goal: (1) view far & large objects, (see FIG. 4-31)

(2) brighten the image (view dark objects)

(see FIG. 4-32)

Page 116: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

116

goal (1):

compounds: 2 converging lenses (objective + eyepiece)

how it works:

• objective forms a real, downsized and inverted image at

focal point

• eyepiece is used as simple magnifier image of objective

serves as object

magnifying power:

' '

tan( )e ee e

y yf f

−Θ ≈ Θ = =−

0Θ = changed reference point:

before: object at near point

here: makes no sense (eye 25 cm in front of moon, sun,

Jupiter, ...)

→ 0Θ = angle of vision of object viewed directly

with unaided eye

0

'tan( )o

o

yf

−Θ ≈ Θ =

→ 0

'/'/

e e o

o e

y f fM

y f fΘ= = = −Θ −

goal (2):

• the larger the objective, the brighter the image

• problem: large lenses difficult to produce

Page 117: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

117

→ reflecting telescope: parabolic mirror used instead of lens as

objective

→ bodies appear that are not viewable with the unaided eye!

Chapter 4.2.6. prism, dispersion, spectral analysis

(i) prism

Page 118: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

118

FIG. 4-33. Optical prism. The deflection angle δ of light propagating through the prism depends on the incidence angle Θ1, the prism's refractive index n and the prism angle γ.

compounds: combination of 2 optical interfaces with angle γ in

between

how it works: light propagating through it gets deflected

determination of deflection angle δ: (see FIG. 4-33)

• goal: 1( , , )nδ δ γ= Θ

• ∆ ACE: 1 2 2 1180 ( ) ( ) (180 )α α δ° = Θ − Θ + − + ° −

→ 1 2 2 1δ α α= Θ − Θ + −

• ABCD: 360 90 90γ ε° = + ° + + °

→ 180ε γ= ° −

• ∆ ABC: 2 1 2 1180 (180 )ε α γ α° = Θ + + = Θ + ° − +

→ 2 1α γΘ + =

• intermediate result: 1 2δ γ α= Θ − +

• @ point C: Snell's law: 1 2sin( ) sin( )n α α= , (air) 1n =

→ 2 1arcsin[ sin( )]nα α=

• @ point A: Snell's law: 1 2sin( ) sin( )nΘ = Θ

→ 2 1arcsin[sin( ) / ]nΘ = Θ

1 2 2 1 1 2 1 2

11 2 1

1

( )

sinarcsin sin[arcsin( )]

( , , )

nn

n

δ α α α α

γ α γ

δ γ

= Θ − Θ + − = Θ − Θ + + =Θ= Θ − + = Θ − +

= Θ

Page 119: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

119

(exam: beam deflections through prisms...)

(ii) dispersion

dispersion: refractive index dependent on wavelength, ( )n n λ=

normal dispersion: usual case, n decreases with increasing

wavelength, / 0dn dλ <

anormal dispersion: / 0dn dλ >

(iii) spectral analysis

FIG. 4-34. Spectral analysis with a prism. Because of dispersion white light propagating through a glass prism can be separated into parts with different wavelengths [3.23].

( )nδ δ= , ( )n n λ= → ( )δ δ λ=

parallel white light can be separated into parts with different

wavelength (see FIG. 4-34)

Page 120: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

120

Chapter 4.3. Wave optics

interference + diffraction: wave phenomena

interference: combination of waves by superposition, 2 or more

waves meet at one point

diffraction: bending of waves around corners, occurs when portion

of wavefront is cut off by barrier

model: Huygens's principle, interference of N → ∞ waves with

phase difference ∆Ψ :

• wave 1: 1 0 1sin( )E E= Ψ

• wave 2: 2 0 2sin( )E E= Ψ

→ 2 1∆Ψ = Ψ − Ψ

constructive interference: 2m π∆Ψ = , 0, 1, 2,...m = ± ±

destructive interference: (2 1) m π∆Ψ = + , 0, 1, 2,...m = ± ±

origin of phase difference:

(1) waves propagate through different paths:

optical path difference ∆ :

• path: only absolute value important: 3D → 1D

• wave 1 at point P: 1 nk x tωΨ = −

wave 2 at point P: 2 ( )nk x x tωΨ = + ∆ −

Page 121: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

121

→ 2 1

2n

n

k x xπ

λ∆Ψ = Ψ − Ψ = ∆ = ∆

x∆ = path difference between waves 1 and 2

• optical path difference = corresponding path difference in

vacuum

• with :n nλλ =

2 2 2

n

x n xπ π π

λ λ λ∆Ψ = ∆ = ∆ = ∆ , n x∆ = ∆

• constructive interference: mλ∆ = , 0, 1, 2,...m = ± ±

→ 2

2m mπ λ πλ

∆Ψ = =

• destructive interference: (2 1)2

mλ∆ = + , 0, 1,...m = ± →

(2 1) m π∆Ψ = +

(2) phase change δ due to reflection at

(i) medium with lower refractive index: 0δ =

(ii) medium with higher refractive index: δ π=

Chapter 4.3.1. Interference fringes from thin layers

FIG. 4-35. Soap bubbles as interference fringes of interfering light reflected on top and bottom of the film. The varying film thickness results in coloration [3.24].

Page 122: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

122

FIG. 4-36. Interference fringes from thin layers of interfering light reflected on top and bottom of the film.

consider: wave I incident on thin layer (thickness t , refractive index

n ),

e.g. soap bubble (see FIG. 4-35)

what happens?

if film is observed with the eye under angle 1Θ , reflected light

on top and bottom of film ( 1 2&R R ) interferes on retina

(see FIG. 4-36)

determination of phase difference ∆Ψ :

• from point A,D to retina both rays have same paths

→ ∆Ψ is determined at points A,D

Page 123: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

123

(1) optical path difference

nAB nBC AD∆ = + −

2cos( ) /t ABΘ = → 2/ cos( )AB t= Θ

AB BC=

1sin( ) /AD ACΘ = → 1sin( )AD AC= Θ , 2AC EB= ,

2sin( ) /EB ABΘ = → 2 12 sin( )sin( )AD AB= Θ Θ

→ 2 1

2 1

2 12

2 2 sin( )sin( )

2 [ sin( )sin( )]

2 [ sin( )sin( )]cos( )

nAB AB

AB n

tn

∆ = − Θ Θ =

= − Θ Θ =

= − Θ ΘΘ

Snell's law @ point A: 1 2sin( ) sin( )nΘ = Θ

2 22 2

2 2

22 2

2

22

22 [ sin ( )] [1 sin ( )]

cos( ) cos( )

2cos ( ) 2 cos( )

cos( )

2 1 sin ( )

t ntn n

ntnt

nt

∆ = − Θ = − Θ =Θ Θ

= Θ = Θ =Θ

= − Θ

Snell's law @ point A: 1 2sin( ) sin( )nΘ = Θ

22 21

12

2 21

sin ( ) 12 1 2 sin ( )

2 sin ( )

nt nt nn n

t n

Θ∆ = − = − Θ =

= − Θ

(2) phase change δ :

(i) 1R : @ A: reflection at medium with higher refractive index:

1δ π=

(ii) 2R : @ B: 2 0δ =

→ 2 1δ δ δ π= − = −

Page 124: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

124

→ phase difference

2 21

2 4sin ( )

2 , constructive interference(2 1) , destructive interference

tn

m

m

π πδ πλ λ

ππ

∆∆Ψ = + = − Θ − =

= +

discussion:

FIG. 4-37. Interference fringes from thin layers. (a,b) One thin layer, the interference pattern starts with a dark spot in the center. (c,d) Layer system with refractive indices nsub > n. Due to an additional phase change at the bottom of the thin layer the interference pattern is inverted (bright spot in the center).

(i) case: variable incidence angle:

constλ = , t const= , 1 1[ , ]Θ∈ Θ − ∆Θ Θ + ∆Θ

interference fringes = rings with dark spot in center

(see FIG. 4-37a,b)

dark center: minimum 0. order

Page 125: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

125

1. bright circle: maximum 1st order

1. dark circle: minimum 1st order

2. bright circle: maximum 2nd order

etc.

(ii) case: consider thin film (refr. index n , thickness t ) deposited

on substrate with subn n> , ,t constλ = , variable incidence

angle (as above)

e.g. water film ( 1,33n = ) on glass substrate 1,515subn =

optical path difference: 2 212 sin ( )t n∆ = − Θ (as above)

phase change: 1δ π= (as above), but: 2δ π=

→ 0δ = !

2 21

2 4sin ( )

2 , constructive interference(2 1) , destructive interference

tn

m

m

π πδλ λ

ππ

∆∆Ψ = + = − Θ =

= +

intensity pattern is inverted! (see FIG. 3-37c,d)

bright center: maximum 0. order

1. dark circle: minimum 1. order

1. bright circle: maximum 1. order

etc.

(iii) case: variable wavelength & thickness:

1 constΘ = , [400,700] nmλ ∈ (white light), t increasing

(see FIG. 3-36)

2 21

4sin ( )

tn

π πλ

∆Ψ = − Θ −

@ top: 0t → , → π∆Ψ → − → dark area

Page 126: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

126

below top: thickness increases → ∆Ψ increases

→ 2 21

4sin ( )

tn

π πλ

− Θ → , for small λ first)

→ 0∆Ψ =

→ first rainbow arises (constructive interference for blue →

yellow → orange → red)

→ second rainbow for 2 21

4sin ( ) 3

tn

π πλ

− Θ → , 2π∆Ψ =

Page 127: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

127

Chapter 4.3.2. Diffraction at a single slit

FIG. 4-38. Diffraction pattern of a single slit with slit width a ≈ λ. Intensity pattern I(Φ)=I0 [sin(Φ)/Φ]2, Φ = π a sin(Θ). Most intensity is concentrated in the forward direction (central maximum). Points of zero intensity are determined by: a sin(Θ) = m λ, m = ±1 (minimum ±1. order), ±2 (minimum ±2. order), ... . Points of maximum intensity are determined by a sin(Θ) = n λ, n = 0 (maximum 0. order), ±1.4303 (maximum ±1. order), ±2.459 (maximum ±2. order),±3.4707 (maximum ±3. order), ... .

consider: straight propagating light hits a single slit with slit width

a λ≈ (see FIG. 4-38)

what happens?

• part of wave front is cut off

• propagation direction not straight → light bending (diffraction)

Page 128: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

128

determination of intensity pattern:

• approach: Huygens's principle, waves emerging from each

point of slit interfere

• derivation: complicated

• result: 20( ) [sin( ) / ]I I φ φΘ = , ( ) sin( ) /aφ π λΘ = Θ

Θ = viewing angle, a =slit width, λ = wavelength

(see FIG. 4-38)

maxima & minima of intensity pattern:

search for points with ( ) ( ) 0I I φΘ = =

necessary condition: / 0dI dφ =

→ 0 2

0 3

sin( ) cos( ) sin( )2

sin( )[ cos( ) sin( )]2 0

I

I

φ φ φ φφ φ

φ φ φ φφ

− =

−= =

case 1:

sin( ) 0φ = → , 2 , 3 ,...φ π π π= ± ± ± ( 0φ = not allowed)

→ 20( ) [sin( ) / ] 0I Iφ φ φ= = → minima

with sin( ) /aφ π λ= Θ :

→ minimum condition: sin( )a mλΘ = , 1, 2,...m = ± ±

1m = ± : minimum ±1. order

2m = ± : minimum ±2. order

etc.

case 2:

cos( ) sin( ) 0φ φ φ− = → tan( )φ φ=

only graphical solution possible:

Page 129: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

129

FIG. 4-39. Diffraction at a single slit, the solution of maxima of the intensity pattern is only possible graphically (numerically).

result: 1.4303 , 2.459 , 3.4707 ,...φ π π π= ± ± ±

for 0φ = : rule of de L'Hôpitale:

2

0 0

2 2

0

2sin( )cos( )lim[sin( ) / ] lim

2

cos ( ) sin ( )lim 1

1

φ φ

φ

φ φφ φφ

φ φ

→ →

=

−= =

→ 0( )I Iφ = (central maximum)

→ maximum condition:

sin( )a nλΘ = , 0, 1.4303, 2.459,3.4707,...n = ± ±

0n = : maximum 0. order

1.4303n = ± : maximum ±1. order

2.459n = ± : maximum ±2. order

etc.

Page 130: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

130

discussion:

(i) determination of positions of maxima / minima on screen:

FIG. 4-40. Diffraction of a single slit, determination of the width of the central maximum [3.25].

e.g. width w of central maximum

w = distance minimum ±1. order

position minimum +1.order:

1

1tan( )yL

++Θ = , L = distance slit / screen

1sin( )a λ+Θ = ( 1m = )

→ 1 tan[arcsin( / )]y L aλ+ =

intensity symmetric regarding 0Θ = → 12w y+=

Page 131: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

131

(ii) width of intensity pattern depends strongly on slit width a :

FIG. 4-41. Diffraction at a single slit. The intensity pattern strongly depends on the slit width. Border cases: a → 0: slit acts as point source, I = I0 = const, a → ∞: no diffraction, light propagates unimpeded through slit.

border cases:

(1) 0a → : 0I I const= = , slit acts as point source

(2) a → ∞ : ( 0) 0I Θ = ≠ , ( 0) 0I Θ ≠ = , light

propagates freely through slit

(iii) illumination with white light - spectral analysis

condition for maximum:

Page 132: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

132

FIG. 4-42. Wavelength separation by diffraction at a single slit. The higher order maxima are spread out.

maxsin( )na nλΘ = → max arcsin( / )n n aλΘ =

max max ( )n n λΘ = Θ → wavelength separation:

smaller angles for smaller wavelengths

stronger diffraction for longer wavelengths

Page 133: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

133

Chapter 4.3.3. Diffraction gratings

FIG. 4-43. Grating constant d and slit width a of a diffraction grating.

FIG. 4-44. Conventional fabrication of diffraction gratings: scratches on surfaces act as optical slits with M scratches per length L. Grating constant d = L/(M-1).

diffraction grating = combination of equally spaced slits

(see FIG. 4-43)

grating constant d = distance between center of slits (with slit width

a ) = period of the grating

conventional fabrication:

• equidistant scratches or coatings on flat surfaces with M

lines per length unit L (see FIG. 4-44)

• grating constant: ( 1)L M d= − → /( 1)d L M= −

• number N of slits illuminated with light ray of diameter D

(red circle in FIG. 4-44): /N D d=

Page 134: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

134

determination of light intensity pattern:

• approach: Huygens's principle, diffraction pattern of single

slits overlap

• derivation: even more complicated

• result:

2 20( ) [sin( ) / ] [sin( ) / sin( )]

sin( ) / , sin( ) / viewing angle, slit width, grating constant, wavelength

I I N

a d

a

d

φ φ α αφ π λ α π λ

λ

Θ == Θ = Θ

Θ = == =

FIG. 4-45. Diffraction grating. (a,b) Intensity pattern consists of two functions f1 & f2. (c) Function f2 with higher resolution. f2 consists of principal maxima with f2 = N 2 & subsidiary maxima. (d) The resulting intensity pattern I/I0 = f1 × f2. (e) I/I0 with higher resolution. The intensity pattern consists of principal & subsidiary maxima. The plot includes the envelope function N 2 × f1.

Page 135: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

135

discussion:

(i) plot 2 m, 8 m, 6, 632,8 nm (red light)a d N λ= = = =

(see FIG. 4-45)

(ii) different parts: 0 1 2/I I f f=

1f : intensity pattern of single slit, envelope function

(see FIG. 4-45a,e)

2f : intensity pattern of N slits acting as point

sources

consists of principal maxima (with 22f N= ) &

subsidiary maxima (see FIG. 4-45b,c)

0 1 2/I I f f= : resulting pattern, consists of principal &

subsidiary maxima (see FIG. 4-45d,e)

determination of position of principal maxima:

FIG. 4-47. Diffraction grating, determination of the position of principal maxima.

Page 136: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

136

@ principal maximum: 22f N=

→ sin( ) / sin( )N Nα α = → sin( ) sin( )N Nα α=

→ 0, , 2 ,...α π π= ± ± (because N is integer)

with sin( ) /dα π λ= Θ

→ condition of principal maxima:

sin( )d nλΘ = , 0, 1, 2,...n = ± ±

d = grating constant, Θ = viewing angle, λ = wavelength

0n = : maximum 0. order (central maximum)

1n = ± : maximum ±1. order

etc.

FIG. 4-46. Diffraction at a grating. The position of principal maxima is independent of the number of slits N (a) and the slit width a (b).

discussion:

(i) position of principal maxima independent of slit number N :

(see FIG. 4-46a)

→ with increasing N the width of principal maxima

decreases, subsidiary maxima vanish

Page 137: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

137

(ii) position of principal maxima independent of slit width a :

(see FIG. 4-46b)

→ with increasing slit width the intensity of higher order

maxima decreases

(iii) determination of maxima - positions on screen

(see FIG. 4-47)

tan( ) /n ny LΘ = , L = distance grating / screen

sin( )nd nλΘ =

→ tan[arcsin( / )]ny L n dλ=

(iv) wavelength dependency - spectral analysis

FIG. 4-48. Spectral analysis with a diffraction grating. Because of higher intensities and better resolution in higher order maxima a grating with high number of slits N is preferred compared to the single slit.

(v)

( )n ny y λ=

→ white light can be separated into different colors

→ analogous to single slit:

stronger diffraction for higher wavelengths

(e.g. exam: determination of the m. maximum...)

for N → ∞ : higher order maxima narrow, high intensity

→ great solution → grating preferable to single slit

Page 138: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

138

Chapter 4.4. Quantum optics

Chapter 4.4.1. wave-particle duality

wave phenomena:

• interference, diffraction

• radiation = electromagnetic waves, wavelength λ , phase

velocity Phv

particle phenomena:

• photoelectric effect, Compton effect, black body radiation, etc.

• radiation = beam of particles

• particles = photons

Chapter 4.4.2. photons:

momentum: p mv=

de Broglie: /p h λ= , combination of wave & particle properties

( 2 2/ / / /m E c hf c p mc hf c h λ= = → = = = )

Planck's constant: 346,626 10 Jsh −= ×

velocity of photon: photon = particle with light velocity, Phv v c= = ,

medium: /v c n=

rest mass of photon: 0 0m = (see chapter about relativistic effects

- later)

energy: Einstein: E hf=

energy-density η : → photon density n : /( )n hfη=

Chapter 4.4.3 photoelectric effect

Page 139: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

139

Heinrich Hertz (1897), Wilhelm Hallwachs (1895):

Exposure of a negatively charged metal plate with UV light

leads to charge reduction

→ during exposure electrons left the plate

FIG. 4-49. Experimental results of Heinrich Hertz (1897) and Wilhelm Hallwachs (1895). During UV exposure the negative charge of a metal plate decreases, electrons must have left the plate.

Lenard (1902): Quantitative examination of this phenomenon

experiment:

FIG. 4-50. Experimental set up to measure the photo current IPh as a function of the voltage U between two metal plates cathode and anode (Lenard, 1902).

• application of a voltage U between two metal plates

→ metal plates get charged oppositely

→ constant electric field /E U d= between plates,

Page 140: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

140

d = distance between plates

• UV exposure of cathode (= negatively charged plate)

→ release of electrons out of cathode (see above)

→ force on electrons: F qE eE= = − , electrons are

accelerated towards anode (positive plate)

→ kinetic energy of electrons at anode: cathkin kinE E eU= + ,

cathkinE = kinetic energy @ cathode

→ @ anode: electrons are absorbed, flow through outer

circuit again to cathode

• measurement of the photo current ( )Ph PhI I U=

FIG. 4-51. Photo current IPh as a function of applied voltage U. For U = 0, IPh ≠ 0, IPh decays at countervoltage U0 < 0! For U > 0 the photo current saturates to saturation value IPH,S.

Page 141: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

141

FIG. 4-52. Photoelectric effect. The saturation value of the photo current depends only on the UV intensity (a), the countervoltage depends only on the UV frequency (b).

FIG. 4-53. Photoelectric effect. Energy for inner and outer electrons in cathode material.

Page 142: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

142

results: (see FIG. 4-51)

• for 0U = , photo current 0PhI >

• for 0 0U U≤ < , photo current decays 0PhI =

0U = counter voltage, cathode is positive!

• for 0SU U≥ > , photo current saturates, ,Ph Ph SI I=

• variation of light intensity I : 0U const= , , , ( )Ph S Ph SI I I=

(see FIG. 4-52a)

• variation of light frequency f : 0 0 ( )U U f= , ,Ph SI const=

(see FIG. 4-52b)

• no time retardation between exposure and electron emission

explanation: Einstein (1905):

• UV light consists of photons (= light particles)

• in an absorption process inside cathode material each photon

transmits its entire energy E hf= onto electron, photon

disappears

• if fE E> , electrons can leave cathode

• fE : electrons have different energies in cathode material,

f AE E E= + ∆ , for outer electrons 0E∆ = , f AE E=

(see FIG. 4-53)

• AE = work function, minimum energy necessary to free

electrons out of material (see FIG. 4-53)

• energy relation @ cathode: cathkin AE E E= +

• kinetic energy of electrons @ cathode

Page 143: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

143

,maxcath cathkin kinE E E= − ∆ (see FIG.4-53)

,maxcathkinE = maximum kinetic energy of an electron =

kinetic energy of outer electrons

• ,maxcathkinE is determined by 0U ! (see FIG. 4-51)

case 0U > : all electrons with fE E< (released

electrons) are accelerated towards anode

and contribute to PhI

case SU U→ :

• for increasing U more & more electrons occupy outer

positions (cathode is higher charged, inner positions are

occupied)

• at SU there are so many electrons in outer positions

that every photon frees an electron

case SU U> : the number of released electrons can't

be increased because every photon

already frees one electron, PhI remains

at saturation value ,Ph SI

case 0U < :

• the number of electrons in high-energy

positions decreases (positive charge - lack

of electrons), PhI decreases

• field is opposite directed, electrons get broken on

the way towards anode, released electrons with velocities

Page 144: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

144

other than directly towards the anode cannot overcome

the counter field

case 0U U→ : only electrons with maximum kinetic

energy ,maxcathkinE and flight direction

towards the anode can get over the

counter field.

case 0U U= :

• highest energy electrons have velocity

0v = at anode.

• photo current decays.

• kinetic energy ,maxcathkinE equals kinetic energy for a

positron at cathode starting at anode with 0v = :

,max 0cathkinE eU= −

→ energy relation for outer electrons with initial velocity towards

anode:

,max 0cathkin A AE hf E E eU E= = + = − +

0 AeU hf E− = −

discussion:

(i) determination of work function AE and Planck's constant h

measurement of 0U for different frequencies f :

→ 0 / /AU hf e E e− = − (see FIG. 4-54)

AE : extrapolation to 0f = → 0 ( 0)AE eU f= − =

h : slope tan( ) /m h eα= =

Page 145: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

145

(ii) photoelectric effect not explainable with wave model:

• wave should need retardation time to put enough energy

onto electron to release it, retardation should depend on

wave's intensity, for all wavelengths it should be possible

to release electrons

• experimental results:

(1) no retardation time,

(2) for wavelengths with / AE hf hc Eλ= = <

no electrons can be released, minimum

frequency, maximum wavelength:

min max/ AE hf hc Eλ= = =

(determination of AE possible)

FIG. 4-54. Photoelectric effect. Determination of Planck's constant h and the work function EA of the cathode's material.

Page 146: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

146

Chapter 5. Atomic physics

Chapter 5.1. Experiments that led to atomic models

(a) photo-effect

• see chapter 4.4.3: electrons can be freed out of metals

• matter: usually electrically neutral → atoms must be electrically

neutral

result: atoms contain electrons with negative charge + particles

with equal amount of positive charge

(b) x-ray diffraction

• x-rays: 8 12[~ 10 ,10 ] mλ − −∈

• for diffraction you need grating with grating constant d λ≈ :

atomic crystals (solids with periodically located atoms)

FIG. 5-01. Atoms in crystal serve as a grating for x-ray diffraction (see also chapter 4.3.3) → atomic crystal serves as grating

(see also chapter 4.3.3)

Page 147: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

147

result: atoms have dimension atom 0,1 nmφ ≈

(c) atomic gases in discharges - line spectra

• experiment:

FIG. 5-02. Experimental set up to measure the line spectrum of different atoms in gases.

• free electrons are generated by applying an alternate voltage

to glowing cathode

• free electrons are accelerated towards anode

• on the way to anode electrons collide with gas atoms

• in collision process gas atoms are excited or ionized

Page 148: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

148

• excited atoms make transition to lower energy state, ionized

atoms recombine with free electrons

both cases: emission of electromagnetic radiation

• part of emitted wave front is blocked by slit

• different wavelengths are viewable on different positions on

screen behind slit → line spectrum (see chapter 4.3.2),

determination of emitted wavelengths

result: • each atom emits characteristic set of wavelengths called

its characteristic line spectrum

• line spectrum of hydrogen and mercury (only visible

wavelengths):

FIG. 5-03. Visible part of the line spectrum of hydrogen (a) and mercury (b) measured with an experimental set up according to FIG. 5-02 [5.01].

• general expression: Rydberg-Ritz formula

1 2

2 2, 1 2

1 1 1

n n

Rn nλ

= −

, 1,2n : integers, 2 1n n> ,

Page 149: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

149

R : Rydberg constant, varies slightly from element to

element, hydrogen: 71,097 10 1/mHR = × , expression

empirically found, no theoretical model at that time!

(d) Zeeman effect

FIG. 5-04. Applying of a magnetic field B to the gas chamber leads to splitting of single lines.

• applying of a constant magnetic field to gas chamber,

measurement of emitted wavelengths (see FIG. 5-04)

Page 150: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

150

FIG. 5-05. (a) The blue line in the line spectrum of hydrogen. (b) After application of a magnetic field the blue line is split into 5 different lines lying symmetrically around the previous line. Different colors are not detectable with the eye because the wavelength lie close together.

result: some single lines become split into different number of

lines with close wavelengths (see FIG. 5-05)

(e) Rutherford's scattering experiment

• scattering of α-particles from radioactive radium (later) by atoms

in gold-foil, measurement of scattering angle

result: nearly all mass and all positive charge is concentrated in

nucleus, dimension -6nucleus 1 fm = 10 nmφ ≈

Page 151: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

151

Chapter 5.2. Historic atomic models

Requirements for atomic models:

• explain different line spectra of atoms

(must hold Rydberg Ritz formula)

• explain change of line spectra in magnetic fields

• explain systematics of periodic table of elements

(a) J.J.Thomson's plum pudding mode

FIG. 5-06. "Plum pudding" model of J.J.Thomson [5.02].

• electrons embedded in fluid with dimension atom 0,1 nmφ ≈

• fluid contains most of mass and all positive charge

• explanation of experiments (a,b):

• explanation of experiments (c,d):

no appropriate particle arrangement found

• Rutherford's experiment (e): disprove of Thomson's model

Page 152: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

152

(b) Rutherford's atomic model

FIG. 5-07. Rutherford's atomic model. Atom consists of nucleus and electron shell. Nucleus has dimension φ ≈ 1 fm, contains most of the mass and all positive charge. Electron shell has dimension φ ≈ 100000 fm = 0,1 nm, contains almost no mass and all negative charge. The arrangement of the particles is still unknown. • Atom consistss of tiny nucleus and electron shell

• nucleus has dimension 1 fmφ ≈ , contains most of the mass and

positive charge

• electron shell contains almost no mass, all negative charge

• explanation of experiments (a,b,e):

• explanation of experiments (c,d):

problem: finding the electron arrangement in the electron shell

→ Bohr

(c) Bohr's atomic model (Nils Bohr, 1913) for hydrogen

• classical approach: Rutherford's atomic model, electron under

influence of Coulomb attraction to positive nucleus, Coulomb

force acts as centripetal force, electron moves on circular orbits

around nucleus

Page 153: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

153

FIG. 5-08. Bohr's atomic model. Attractive Coulomb force on an electron in the Coulomb field of the positively charged nucleus, k = 1 / (4πε0) = coulomb constant. The Coulomb force acts as centripetal force, the electron moves in circular orbits around nucleus.

(i) forces

Coulomb force = centripetal force: 2

2e nq q v

k mr r

= −r r ,

01/(4 )k πε= : Coulomb's constant, 0ε : dielectric constant (of

free space), ,e nq q : charge of electron shell / nucleus v :

velocity of electron, r : distance electron / nucleus, r : unit

vector pointing from nucleus to electron

with eq e= − , nq e= : 2 2

2

e vk m

r r− = −r r →

22e

k mvr

=

(ii) energy

Page 154: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

154

potential energy of electrons: ( ) ( ) pot potE E− = 0r

0 Cr

r r F dr

with 2

2

ek

r= −CF r , dr=dr r :

002

2 22 2

1 1( ) ( )

rr

pot potrr

eE E k dr ke dr ke

r r r − = − = − =

0r

0r

r r r r

reference point: 0r → ∞ , definition: ( ) 0potE ∞ =

2( ) ( ) /pot potE E r ke r= = −r

kinetic energy: 2 / 2kinE mv=

with 2

2ek mv

r= :

2

2kin

eE k

r=

total energy: 2 2 2

2 2pot kin

ke ke keE E E

r r r= + = − + = −

FIG. 5-09. Classical model, total energy of a classical electron circling around positive nucleus.

(iii) orbits:

2

2ke

Er

= − → 2

2ke

rE

= −

Page 155: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

155

(iv) orbit-problems:

• because of Coulomb force = centripetal force circular orbit

mechanically stable

• electron moving in circular orbit = accelerated charge!

• accelerated charge emits electromagnetic waves

• total energy decreases continuously

• FIG. 5-09 → decreasing energy leads to decreasing

distance electron / nucleus

→ atom collapses!

• solution: Bohr's postulates:

1. postulate:

The electron in the hydrogen atom can move only in

circular orbits called stationary states.

FIG. 5-10. Bohr's atomic model for hydrogen. When an electron makes a transition from a stationary state with high energy to one with a lower energy, a photon hf is emitted. The process is called photon emission. The contrary process is called photon absorption.

Page 156: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

156

2. postulate:

When electrons move from stationary states with higher

energies iE to those of lower energies fE , during the

transition a photon of frequency f is emitted which holds

the relation i fhf E E= − .

note: process is called photon emission, contrary process

is called photon absorption

3. postulate:

FIG. 5-11. Bohr's 3. postulate. The orbital angular momentum of the electron is quantized.

The orbital angular momentum L is quantized:

mvr n= × = =L r p z z → L mvr n= = (see FIG. 5-11)

Page 157: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

157

p = momentum of the electron, m = electron mass, v =

electron velocity, /(2 )h π= ,

1,2,3,...n = quantum number

• consequences from Bohr's postulates:

(i) orbits (see FIG. 5-10)

circular orbits: 2

2ek mv

r= →

22 ke

vmr

=

quantization: mvr n= → 2

2 nv

mr =

→ 2 2n ke

mr mr =

2 22

02n

nr a n

mke= =

• orbits are quantized

• 1n = : 21 0 /( ) 0,0529 nmr a mke= = = : first Bohr radius,

characteristic length in atomic physics

(ii) energy levels:

FIG. 5-12. Energy levels of hydrogen according to Bohr's atomic model.

Page 158: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

158

2

2ke

Er

= − → 2

022n

n

EkeE

r n= − = −

• energy quantized

• 2

00

113,6 eV

2ke

Ea

= = → 1 0 13,6 eVnE E= = − = −

• free electron: n → ∞ , 0nE →

(iii) stationary states:

• ground state: 1n = , lowest energy: 1 13,6 eVE = − , lowest

radius: 1 0 0,0529 nmr a= =

• excited states: 1n > , higher energies, larger radii

(iv) transitions between stationary states (see FIG. 5-10):

• transition of 1 electron → emission of 1 photon

• photon wavelength / line spectrum:

consider: electron on state with 2n moves to state

with 1 2n n<

photon energy: 2 1n nhf E E= −

with 20 /nE E n= − → ( )2 2

0 2 11/ 1/hf E n n= −

with c fλ= → ( )2 202 11/ 1/ 1/

En n

chλ = −

0 13,6 eVE = , 83 10 m/sc = × , 346,626 10 Jsh −= ×

→ ( )2 22 11/ 1/ 1/HR n nλ = − , 71,096 10 1/mHR = ×

agrees with Rydberg Ritz formula!

Page 159: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

159

→ line spectrum of hydrogen could be explained!

• ionization: atom in ground state, removal of outer electron,

necessary energy = ionization energy IE , for hydrogen:

13,6 eVIE = −

(see also work function for electrons in solids,

chapter 4.4.3)

• problems of Bohr's atomic model:

explanation of experiments (a,b,c,e):

explanation of experiment (d):

transfer of the model to other atoms or molecules:

(line spectra of other atoms can't be explained)

periodic systems can't be explained

→ Bohr's atomic model holds only for hydrogen!

• solution: Schrödinger's theory of quantum mechanics

Page 160: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

160

Chapter 5.3. Wave particle duality II: electrons, neutrons, αααα-

particles, ...

photon:

• see chapter 4.4: photon has wave and particle properties

• wave-properties: Maxwell's equations, wavelength, phase velocity

• particle properties: momentum p

• combination: Einstein, de Broglie: E hf= , /p h λ=

FIG. 5-13. Diffraction for different types of particles. (a) Diffraction pattern produced by x-rays of wavelength λ = 0,071 nm on an aluminium-foil target. (b) Diffraction pattern produced by Ekin = 600 eV electrons (de Broglie: λ = 0,05 nm) on an aluminium-foil target. (c) Diffraction pattern of Ekin = 0,0568 eV neutrons (λ = 0,12 nm) incident on a copper foil. (d) A two slit electron interference pattern [5.02].

electron, neutron, α-particle and other classical particles:

• experiments: electron, neutron, hydrogen, helium, ... diffraction at

atomic crystals – (see FIG. 5-13)

• classical particles have wave properties!

• particle properties: mass m, momentum p

• wave properties: energy E hf= , phase velocity c fλ=

• combination: de Broglie: /p h λ=

When can one "see" wave properties of particles?

Page 161: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

161

Obstacles like slits or gratings and wavelengths must have equal

dimensions

e.g.: • 600 eVkinE = electron: 2

212 2kin

pE mv

m= = , /p h λ=

→ 2

22kin

hE

mλ= →

2

... 0,05 nm2 kin

hmE

λ = = =

→ appropriate obstacle: atomic crystal

• baseball with mass 0,17 kgm = moving with

100 km/hv = : 2

34... 1,4 10 m2 kin

hmE

λ −= = = ×

→ appropriate obstacles don't exist on earth!

Wave functions for classical particles:

• string: displacement ( , )y x t

• sound: displacement ( , )s r t of air molecules or density ( , )r tρ or

pressure ( , )p r t

• light (photons): electric / magnetic field: ( , )tE r / ( , )tB r

• electrons, neutrons, ...: ( , )r tψ

Interpretation of the particles' wave function:

• energy density of light:

particle model: /dE dVη = , E Nhf= , N = number of photons →

dE dNhf= → / /dNhf dV dN dVη = ∝

wave model: 2η ∝

Page 162: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

162

→ 2/dN dV ∝ E : square of photons wave function

proportional to number of photons per

unit volume!

• consider: 1 single photon traveling:

2 1, photon is in unit volume0, otherwise

dNdV

∝ =

E

→ 2( )P r dV= E = probability of finding photon in unit volume

(proportional to size of volume dV also)!

• here: 2( , ) ( , )P r t r t dVψ= = probability to find classical particle at

time t in volume dV !!!

2 ( , )r tψ is called probability density

→ square of wave function can be interpreted, but the function

itself?

• photon: ( , )r tE = vector of electric field, makes charges moving

(Coulomb force acts)

• particle: ( , )r tψ : no idea, would be one of my questions to god...

Normalization:

• the particle at least must be somewhere:

2 1V

dVψ→∞

= (normalization condition)

Page 163: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

163

Chapter 5.4. Schrödinger's equation and quantum mechanics

5.4.1 Schrödinger's axiom (1928):

2 2

2

( , ) ( , )( , )

2x t x t

U x t im x t

ψ ψψ∂ ∂− + =∂ ∂

→ basic equation for theory of quantum mechanics (books: wave

mechanics, quantum theory)

solution: wave function, holds for particles with wave and particle

properties

( )0( , ) i kx tx t e ωψ ψ −=

normalization:

• boundary condition, leads to standing waves

• compare: standing waves on string (chapter 3.3):

quantization of frequencies, wavelengths, depending on

boundary condition

• here: boundary condition leads to quantization of frequency,

energy!

function U :

• potential energy in quantum mechanics

• depends which forces act on particle

5.4.2 example: particle in a box

• classical pendant: string, fixed at both ends

(see FIG. 5-14), wavelength results: 2

n

Ln

λ = , 1,2,3,...n =

Page 164: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

164

FIG. 5-14. Standing wave on a string fixed at both ends.

FIG. 5-15. Potential energy in quantum mechanics for a particle in a b

Page 165: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

165

• here: particle is free if he moves between walls, at and beyond

the walls infinitively high forces bring it back between the

walls (see FIG. 5-15).

potential energy:

(i) between the walls ( 0(0, )x x∈ ): 0F =

→ 0

( ) ( 0) ( ') ' 0pot pot refx

E x E x F x dx− = = =

with ( 0) 0pot refE x = = → ( ) ( ) 0potE x U x= =

(ii) left wall ( 0x ≤ ): F → ∞ → ( ) ( )potE x U x= → ∞

(iii) right wall ( 0x x≥ ): F → ∞ , ( ) ( )potE x U x= → ∞

• Schrödinger's equation:

(ii) left wall ( 0x ≤ ): ( )U x → ∞ → ( , ) 0x tψ =

(iii) right wall ( 0x x≥ ): ( )U x → ∞ → ( , ) 0x tψ =

(i) between the walls, 0(0, )x x∈ : ( ) 0U x =

2 2

2

( , ) ( , )2

x t x ti

m x tψ ψ∂ ∂− =∂ ∂

approach: ( )0( , ) i kx tx t e ωψ ψ −=

→ 2

2( ) ( , ) ( ) ( , )2

ik x t i i x tm

ψ ω ψ− = −

→ 2 2

2k

Em

ω= = → 2

2mEk = ±

→ solution: ( ) ( )0,1 0,2( , ) i k x t i k x tx t e eω ωψ ψ ψ

+ −− −= +

• boundary conditions: ( 0, ) 0x tψ = = , 0( , ) 0x x tψ = =

0,1 0,2(0, ) 0i t i tt e eω ωψ ψ ψ− −= + = → 0,1 0,2 0ψ ψ ψ= − =

Page 166: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

166

0 0( ) ( )0 0 0( , ) 0i k x t i k x tx t e eω ωψ ψ ψ

+ −− −= − =

with k k k+ −= = −

→ 0 00 0 0 0[2sin( )] 0ikx ikxe e kxψ ψ ψ−− = =

→ 0sin( ) 0kx = → 0nk x nπ= , 0, 1, 2,...n = ± ±

with 2 /n nk π λ= → 02 /n x nλ λ= = , 1,2,3,...n =

(values 0n ≤ don't make sense)

→ same result as for wave on a string fixed at both ends!!!

energy: 2 2

2n

n

kE E

m= =

→ boundary conditions lead to quantization of

energy!!!

• normalization condition:

0

2

0

1x

dxψ= , with 0( , ) 2 sin( )x t kx tψ ψ ω= −

→ 0 0

2 2 20

0 0

1 4 sin ( )x x

dx kx t dxψ ψ ω= = −

→ 0 02/ xψ =

• solution: 0( , ) 2 / sin( )nx t x k x tψ ω= − , 0/nk n xπ= ,

2 2

2n

n

kE

m= , 1,2,3,...n = (quantum number)

(see FIG. 5-16a)

• probability density:

Page 167: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

167

2 20( , ) 2 / sin ( )nx t x k x tψ ω= − - see FIG. 5-16b

FIG. 5-16. Wave function and probability density for a particle in a box.

Page 168: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

168

Chapter 5.5. Atomic model in quantum mechanics

5.5.1 The hydrogen atom

(a) The Schrödinger equation

• approach: 2 2

2

( , ) ( , )( , )

2x t x t

U x t im x t

ψ ψψ∂ ∂− + =∂ ∂

• potential energy U : electron in Coulomb field of positively

charged nucleus

classical potential energy: see chapter: 5.2c (Bohr's model): 2( ) / 1/potE r ke r r= − ∝

→ ( ) 1/U r r∝ `

• mathematical problems:

before: ( )U U x= → 1 dimensional problem

know: ( )U U r= → 3 dimensional problem, spherical

symmetry

→ calculation of , Eψ difficult

(but possible only for hydrogen!)

(b) solutions: wave functions

• boundary conditions in 3 dimensions → wave function depends

on 3 quantum numbers , ,n l m : , ,n l mψ ψ=

• n : determines range of , ,n l mψ

• ,l m : determine shape of , ,n l mψ , (see FIG. 5-17)

• @ Bohr's radii: maxima of 2, ,n l mψ → electron most probably at

Bohr's positions!

Page 169: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

169

FIG. 5-17. Probability density ψ2 for electrons in hydrogen atom [5.03a].

FIG. 5-18. Possible directions of orbital angular momentum L [5.03].

Page 170: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

170

(c) quantum numbers

• , , , sn l m m

• n : principal quantum number,

values: 1,2,3,...n =

associated with distance electron / nucleus, large

values: electron is probably far away from nucleus

• l : associated with orbital angular momentum of electron

values: 0,1,2,..., 1l n= −

orbital angular momentum in quantum mechanics:

( 1)l l= +L , unit: [ ] 2kg m /sL =

• m associated with orbital angular momentum of electron

values: , 1, 2,..., 1,0,1,..., 1,l l l l l− − + − + − −

( 0l = → 0m = , 1l = → 1,0,1m = − , ...)

orientation of L in magnetic field in (z-direction),

z-component quantized with quantum number m :

zL m= (see FIG. 5-18)

• sm associated with eigen angular momentum of electron

values: 1/ 2sm = ±

spin-up electron: electron rotating counter clockwise,

1/ 2sm =

spin-down electron: electron rotating clockwise, 1/ 2sm = −

(see FIG. 5-19)

pendant: earth moving around the sun while spinning

around its own axes

Page 171: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

171

eigen angular momentum: ( 1)s s= +S , 1/ 2s const= =

(same S ) for spin up/down electron

FIG. 5-19. Spin-up (ms = 1/2) and spin-down (ms = -1/2) electrons.

(d) energy levels

without magnetic field: 02n

EE E

n= = − , 0 13,6 eVE =

same as in Bohr's model!

independent of , , sl m m !

with magnetic field: ,n mE E= (m dependent!)

→ explanation of Zeeman effect!

(e) electron states:

all quantum numbers , , , sn l m m together define an electron state

ground state of hydrogen: 1, 0, 0, 1/ 2sn l m m= = = =

first excited state: 2, 0, 0, 1/ 2sn l m m= = = =

(f) transitions

transition from excited state 2 with higher energy to state 1 (can be

either excited or ground state) with lower energy: emission of

photon with energy 2 1hf E E= −

selection rules: only transitions are allowed for which holds:

0, 1m∆ = ± , 1l∆ = ± (see FIG. 5-20)

Page 172: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

172

FIG. 5-20. Selection rules for hydrogen. Not all possible transition between different states are allowed, ∆l = ±1 [5.04].

(g) comparison of Bohr's and Schrödinger's model:

Bohr Schrödinger

electron on orbits with electron most probably at

quantized radii nr Bohr's radii - maxima of

probability density

Page 173: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

173

energy is quantized energy is quantized

explanation of Zeeman explanation of Zeeman

effect: no effect: yes

holds for hydrogen only holds for all atoms and

molecules

5.5.2 Atoms with more electrons

general information:

• ~ 100 different elements in universe

• each element characterized by atoms with different number of

protons, electrons and neutrons

• atom contains same number Z of electrons/protons (atomic

number) and a number N of neutrons

• atomic mass: concentrated in nucleus, measured in units of

atomic mass unit: 271 1,66 10 kgu −= ×

• atomic mass number A: atomic mass in u ,

e.g. hydrogen: 1,008A = → 27(H) 1,008 1,66 10 kgm −= ∗ ×

• symbols: hydrogen: H, helium: He, lithium: Li, ...

• nucleus: charge nq Ze= , contains protons, neutrons, arrangement:

Schrödinger's equation

• electron shell: charge eq Ze= − , contains electrons, arrangement:

Schrödinger's equation

• ions: eq Ze< − (negative ion), eq Ze> − (positive ion)

Page 174: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

174

• chemical & physical properties: determined by number Z and

arrangement 2ψ of electrons in electron shell

(a) The Schrödinger equation

• approach: 2 2

2

( , ) ( , )( , )

2x t x t

U x t im x t

ψ ψψ∂ ∂− + =∂ ∂

• potential energy U : very complicated, electron in field of

nucleus and other electrons! → only numerical solutions

(b) solutions: wave functions

• only slightly different from the hydrogen ones

→ , ,n l mψ ψ= , (see FIG. 5-17)

(c) quantum numbers

same as for hydrogen!

(d) energy levels

,n lE E= (without magnetic field), , ,n l mE E= with magnetic

field

most cases: the lower the quantum numbers the lower the

energy! - see below!

, ,n l mE independent of sm ! → Spin-up and spin-down electrons

have same energies!

(e) electron states:

all quantum numbers , , , sn l m m together define electron state

Page 175: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

175

code: shell: 0n = : K, 1n = : L, 2n = : M, 3n = : O, 4n = : P, ...

subshell: 0l = : s, 1l = : p, 2l = : d, 3l = : f, 4l = : g, ...

(f) transitions

selection rules 0, 1m∆ = ± , 1l∆ = ± hold for all atoms!

5.5.3 The periodic system

3 laws are necessary to know the electronic configuration of any atom

in ground state:

1. Pauli's principle:

No two electrons can have the same set of values , , , sn l m m !

In other words: no two electrons can be in the same state!

2. Hund's law:

In the ground state the overall spin has its maximum value!

3. Energy minimization:

The distribution of electrons in states , , , sn l m m works so that the

total energy of all electrons is minimized for the ground state of the

atom.

successive occupation of states with electrons for atoms with low

number Z of electrons to those with larger numbers:

1Z = : hydrogen (H)

law 3: electron has to be in state: 1, 0, 0n l m= = =

Page 176: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

176

law 2: electron has to be a spin-up electron: 1/ 2sm =

electron configuration: 1s1 (means that hydrogen has

1 electron in the 1, 0n l= = state)

FIG. 5-21. Electron configuration for hydrogen.

2Z = : helium (He)

1. electron: see hydrogen: 1, 0, 0, 1/ 2sn l m m= = = =

2. electron: law 3: electron has to be in state:

1, 0, 0n l m= = =

law 1: electron must have 1/ 2sm = −

electron configuration: 1s2 (that means: helium has

two electrons in the 1, 0n l= = state)

FIG. 5-22. Electron configuration for helium.

3Z = : lithium (Li)

first two electrons: see helium

3. electron: law 1: electron can't be in state:

1, 0, 0n l m= = = (state fully

occupied)

Page 177: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

177

law 3: electron has to be in state

2, 0, 0n l m= = =

law 2: electron has 1/ 2sm =

electron configuration: 1s2 2s1

FIG. 5-23. Electron configuration for lithium. 6Z = : carbon

first 3 electrons: see lithium

4. electron: law 3: has to be in state: 2, 0, 0n l m= = =

law 1: must have 1/ 2sm = −

5. electron: law 1: can't be in state: 2, 0, 0n l m= = =

law 3: must be in state: 2, 1n l= = , no

magnetic field: 1,0,1m = −

possible

law 2: must have 1/ 2sm =

6. electron: law 3: must be in state: 2, 1n l= =

law 2: must have 1/ 2sm = → m must be

different to electron number 5!

electron configuration: 1s2 2s2 2p2

FIG. 5-24. Electron configuration for carbon.

Page 178: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

178

FIG. 5-25. Electron configuration for the elements. Sometimes energy minimization doesn't mean that quantum numbers have lowest values: After filling up atom of element Ar (3p orbital is full) 4s state is being filled (K,Ca) before the 3d orbital gets filled (Sc → Zn) [5.05].

Page 179: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

179

special cases:

sometimes law 3 doesn't mean that quantum numbers have

lowest values to minimize the energy: (see FIG. 5-25)

e.g. after filling up Ar (3p orbital is full, electron

configuration 1s2 2s2 2p6 3s2 3p6) the 4s state is being

filled (K,CA) before the 3d orbital gets filled (Sc → Zn).

see also: Kr → Rb → Sr → Y, ..., → Cd → In, ...

summary:

quantum theory can explain the electron configuration and

therefore the energy levels of all atoms and molecules

maximum numbers of electrons in shells, subshells, states:

shell

n

sub-shell

l

state

m

no. of sub-

shells

spin

ms

max. no. electrons

in subshell

max. no. electrons in shell

K (n = 1)

0 1s 0 1 ±1/2 2 2

0 2s 0 1 ±1/2 2 L (n = 2) 1 2p 0,±1 3 ±1/2 6

8

0 3s 0 1 ±1/2 2

1 3p 0,±1 3 ±1/2 6 M

(n = 3) 2 3d 0,±1,±2 5 ±1/2 10

18

0 4s 0 1 ±1/2 2

1 4p 0,±1 3 ±1/2 6

2 4d 0,±1,±2 5 ±1/2 10

N (n = 4)

3 4f 0,±1,±2,±3 7 ±1/2 14

32

X (n)

0 ...

n - 1

2n2

Page 180: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

180

Chapter 6. Special theory of relativity

physics: data of measurements (distance, velocity, ...) depend on

measuring frame (coordinate system)

FIG. 6-01. Galilei transformation, coordinate transformation in classical physics.

classical physics: Galilei transformation between two systems moving

with constant velocity relative to each other

(see chapter 1.5) (see FIG. 6-01)

results: • distances combine: ' t= +r r v

• velocities combine: '= +u u v

• accelerations identical: '=a a

problems: very accurate measurements of light velocity:

light velocity is always 83 10 m/sc const= × = , in every system!

contradiction: light emitted in system 'Σ has velocity c in 'Σ , should

have velocity c v+ but has velocity c when measured in Σ !

solution: Einstein's postulate: the speed of light is constant!

Page 181: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

181

Chapter 6.1 Lorentz transformation

classical Galilei transformation:

' t= +r r v , '= +u u v , '=a a

inverse Galilei transformation:

' t= −r r v , ' = −u u v , ' =a a

relativistic Lorentz transformation:

same as Galilei transformation except for factor γ and different time:

( ' ')tγ= +r r v

inverse Lorentz transformation: ' ( )tγ= −r r v

Lorentz transformation must make velocity of light being constant, no

matter in which system the light is generated and the measurement

is done!

determination of γ :

consider: v const= =v x , wave pulse starting at the origin of Σ at

0t = :

→ ( ' ')tγ= +r r v → ( ' ')x x vtγ= + , 'y y= , 'z z=

→ ' ( )tγ= −r r v → ' ( )x x vtγ= − , 'y y= , 'z z=

after t wave pulse went distance x ct= in Σ , ' 'x ct= in 'Σ

→ ( ' ') ( ) 'ct ct vt c v tγ γ= + = + , ' ( ) ( )ct ct vt c v tγ γ= − = −

Page 182: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

182

→ ( )

( )c v t

ct c vc

γγ −= + ↔ 22 2

2 2

11

c v vc cγ− = = −

→ 2 2

1

1 /v cγ =

note: 0 v c< < → 1γ ≥

time relations for transition between , 'Σ Σ :

( ' ')x x vtγ= + , ' ( )x x vtγ= −

→ 2[ ( ) '] ( ) 'x x vt vt x vt vtγ γ γ γ= − + = − +

2 2

2

2 2

( ) (1 / )'

x x vt x x vt x v c x vtt

v v v v v v

x xv x xvt t

v c v c

γ γ γγ γ

γ γ

− − − − = − = − = −

= − − + = −

inverse: 2

''

x vt t

cγ = +

Chapter 6.2 Time dilatation

consider: two events occur at a single point 0 'x at times 1 't , 2 't in frame

times 1t , 2t of these events in frame Σ :

01 1 2

''

x vt t

cγ = +

, 02 2 2

''

x vt t

cγ = +

note: in Σ events don't happen at the same point!

proper time pt∆ : time between events that happen at the same place in

reference frame: 2 1' 'pt t t∆ = −

Page 183: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

183

time interval in frame Σ : 2 1 2 1( ' ') pt t t t t tγ γ∆ = − = − = ∆

in Σ time interval between events is longer!!!

explanation for constant light velocity:

consider: flash of light generated at point 'A at time 1 't in 'Σ ,

reflected at mirror and returned to point 'A at time 2 't , beam

propagated distance 2D :

FIG. 6-02. Time dilatation as an explanation of the constant light velocity [6.01].

in Σ :

• flash of light and return happen at two different points

• beam propagates a greater distance 2s D> , but:

• time interval t∆ for the beam to return is longer because of

time dilatation

→ light velocity 8/ 2 / ' 3 10 m/sdc s t D t c const= ∆ = ∆ = = × = !!!

Page 184: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

184

Chapter 6.3 Length contraction

consider: stick in frame 'Σ , determination of both ends 1,2 'x at the same

time 0 't (that means: instantaneous length determination)

proper length: 2 1' 'pL x x= −

in Σ : length 2 1L x x= − , measured at the same time 2 1t t= :

• 2 2 2' ( )x x vtγ= − , 1 1 1' ( )x x vtγ= −

→ 2 1 2 1 2 1

0

' ' ( ) ( )pL x x x x v t t Lγ γ γ= − = − − − =

→ /pL L γ=

length appears always shorter as in reference frame!

Chapter 6.4 Relativistic mass and momentum & energy

problem of classical momentum in relativistic systems:

conservation of classical momentum m=p u doesn't hold!

solution: relativistic momentum: rm=rp u

relativistic mass: 0

2 21 /r

mm

v c=

−, 0m = rest mass

relativistic energy:

• rest energy: Einstein: 20 0E m c= , any body has rest energy!

Page 185: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

185

• total relativistic energy: 2r rE m c=

• kinetic relativistic energy: , 0r kin rE E E= +

→ 2, 0( )kin r rE m m c= −

example: acceleration of electrons

FIG. 6-03. Acceleration of charged particles between two metal plates C (cathode) and A (anode).

consider: electrons are accelerated on their way from cathode to

anode with voltage 430 kVaccU = in between

• classical calculation:

kinetic energy of electrons: 2 / 2kin accE eU mv= =

→ 2 /accv eU m=

with: 191,602 10 Ce −= × , 430 kVaccU = , 319,109 10 kgm −= × :

→ 1,3v c c≈ > !!!

• relativistic calculation:

Page 186: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

186

kinetic energy: 2, 0( )kin r r accE m m c eU= − =

relativistic mass: 2 20 / 1 /rm m v c= −

→ 00 22 21 /

accm eUm

cv c− =

↔ 2

02 22 2

0 0

11

1 /acc acceU eU m c

m c m cv c

+= + =−

↔ 2

2 2 02

0

1 /acc

m cv c

eU m c− =

+ ↔

222 2 0

20

/ 1acc

m cv c

eU m c

− = − +

↔ 22

2 2 02

0

1acc

m cv c

eU m c

= − +

with 191,602 10 Ce −= × , 430 kVaccU = , 310 9,109 10 kgm −= × ,

20 81,981 J 0,512 MeVm c = = , 430 kV 0,43 MeVacceU e= × = :

→ [ ]2 2 2 2 21 [0,512 /(0,43 0,512)] 1 0,295 0,705v c c c= − + = − =

→ 0,84v c c= < !!

Page 187: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

187

Chapter 7. Nuclear Physics

chemist: nucleus =

• positive point charge

• contains almost all mass

• lays negligible role in structure of atoms / molecules

physicist: close examinations:

• nucleus contains protons p & neutrons n

• interaction of p, n plays important roles, e.g.:

→ fusion of light nuclei (energy source of stars, power

source of future?)

→ fission of heavy nuclei (current major energy source)

Chapter 7.1 Properties of atoms

(a) atoms:

• contain nucleus, electron shell

• nucleus contains number Z of protons p (Z = atomic

number), number N of neutrons n , protons & neutrons =

nucleons

• electronic shell contains number Z of electrons

(= number of protons)

• atomic mass number A Z N= +

• relative atomic mass AM , given in periodic system,

meaning: atomic mass in units of atomic mass unit u ,

mass of an atom of element X : ( ) ( )Am X M X u= ,

Page 188: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

188

unit: [ ] 1AM = (unit less), in general:

• atomic mass unit: 1u = 1/12 of mass of carbon nuclide

12C (contains 6 protons, 6 neutrons, 6 electrons),

271 1,6605402 10 kgu −= ×

• mass M of 1 mol particles (atoms or molecules): 1 mol

contains 236,0221367 10AN = × particles, AN = Avogadro's

constant →

→ AM = atomic mass in g/mol (molar mass)

→ in general: AM A≈

• designation of element X in periodic system:

, AMAZ ZX X (more accurate), ...

• isotopes: atoms with same Z , different N

→ isotopes differ in atomic mass

→ chemical properties remain unchanged because of

unchanged electron shell

e.g.:

isotopes of Hydrogen:

- ordinary Hydrogen: 11 H , contains 1 ,1p e

(most stable)

- Deuterium: 21 H , contains 1 ,1 ,1p n e

- Tritium: 31 H , contains 1 ,2 ,1p n e

isotopes of Helium:

23 27

4

6,022 10 1,661 10 kg

10,0025 10 kg = g

A A A A

A

A A

M N M u M N u

M

M M

= × = ×

= × × ×

= ×

Page 189: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

189

- 32 He , contains 2 ,1 ,2p n e

- 42 He , contains 2 ,2 ,2p n e (most stable)

• periodic system: contains most stable isotope

FIG. 7-01. Periodic table of elements. The number above the element's symbol represents the atomic number Z, the number below the relative atomic mass MA [7.01].

• nuclide: nuclei of isotope

e.g. nuclides of hydrogen:

- ordinary hydrogen, contains 1p , deuterium, ...

Page 190: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

190

(b) nucleons:

• proton p : charge, 191,602 10 Ce −= × (elementary

charge), mass 271,6726231 10 kg 1,00727647pm u−= × =

• neutron n : charge 0nq = ,

mass 271,6749286 10 kg 1,008664904nm u−= × =

• compare: electron e− : charge pq e= − ,

mass 49,1093897 10 kg 5,48579903 10em u−= × = ×-31

Page 191: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

191

Chapter 7.2 Properties of nuclei

(a) forces: strong nuclear force / hadronic force

• fundamental force (like Coulomb or Lorentz force, gravity)

• strong attractive force of nucleons on their nearby

neighbors

• much stronger than repulsive Coulomb force between

protons

• much stronger than gravitational force → gravity always

neglected in nuclear physics

• roughly the same for all kinds of interactions ( p p↔ ,

p n↔ , n n↔ )

• decreases rapidly with distance (ranges ~ fm , only "next

neighbor" interaction)

(b) shape & size

• determined by scattering experiments of high energy

particles (e.g. Rutherford)

• spherical shape, radii 1/30R R A= , 0 1,5 fmR = , A = atomic

mass number

• volume: 1/3R A∝ → 3V R A∝ ∝

• mass: m A∝

• density: m A∝ , V A∝ → / / 1m V A Aρ = ∝ = → density of

nuclei constant for all kinds of nuclei!

Page 192: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

192

• liquid drop model: constant density in nucleus analogous

to constant density in a drop of fluid → nucleus behaves

like drop of charged fluid

(c) stability

• light nuclei: N Z=

• heavier nuclei: instability caused by electrostatic

repulsion between protons, minimized by increased

number of neutrons: N Z>

FIG. 7-02. Plot of number of neutrons N versus number of protons Z fro the stable nuclides. The dashed line is N = Z [7.02].

Page 193: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

193

• e.g.: AZ X N Z N Z∆ = −

168O 8 8 0

4020Ca 20 20 0

5626 Fe 30 26 4

20782 Pb 125 82 43

23892U 146 92 54

(d) mass & binding energy

• in general: mass (nucleus) < mass (its nucleons)

• e.g. Helium

- atomic mass ( ) ( ) 4,002603Am He M He u u= × =

- mass of nucleons and electrons:

( ) 2 2 2

2 1,007276 2 1,008665 2 0,0005494,03298

p n em p n e m m m

u u u

u

−+ + = + + =

= × + × + ×=

→ ( ) ( )

4,03298 4,002603 0,030377m m p m e m He

u u u

−∆ = + + − == − =

• m∆ = mass defect

• binding energy bE : Einstein: 2E mc= (equivalence of

mass & energy

→ 2bE m c= ∆ × , e.g. Helium:

Page 194: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

194

27 16 2 2

11

1119

8

0,030377 1,661 10 kg 9 10 m /s

0,4541 10 J1 e

0,4541 10 CV 1,602 10 C

0,28346 10 eV 28,346 MeV

bE −

−−

= × × × ×

= ×

= × ××

= × =

• energy production by nuclear fission or fusion:

plot: binding energy per nucleon /bE A versus A

FIG. 7-03. Binding energy per nucleon Eb/A versus the atomic mass number A. For nuclei with low atomic mass number the binding energy per nucleon increases with increasing A. This can be used to produce energy via nuclear fusion of light nuclei. For A > 50, Eb/A decreases with increasing A. This is used to produce energy via nuclear fission of heavy nuclei.

final product must have less value of /bE A

→ nuclear fission of heavy nuclei ( 50A > )

→ nuclear fusion of light nuclei ( 50A << ) - see later

Page 195: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

195

Chapter 7.3 Radioactivity

many nuclei: radioactive

meaning: heavy nuclei decay into lighter nuclei by emission of particles

(photons, electrons, neutrons, α particles)

designation:

• α - decay: emission of 42 He nuclei (Helium atom without electrons)

• β- - decay: emission of electrons e−

• β+ - decay: emission of positrons e+ ( em m= , q e= + )

• γ - decay: emission of γ - rays (high energy photons)

• K - capture: emission of characteristic X-rays

mass defect m∆ : during decay mass of initial nucleus is higher than

mass of final product (final product have less binding energy). Binding

energy difference 2E mc= ∆ appears as kinetic energy of radioactive

radiation, can be used to gain energy ( 2E mc= ∆ = decay energy).

(a) decay law

• radioactive decay is statistical process

(for all decay types!!)

• rate of decay decreases exponentially over the time

(not constant!)

• pressure and temperature effects have little or no effect

because nucleus is well shielded from others by atomic

electrons

• derivation of the decay law, consider

- N = number of radioactive nuclei at time t

Page 196: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

196

- M = number of decayed nuclei in time interval dt

- decay of a nucleus is a random event

→ number of decayed nuclei proportional to number of

radioactive nuclei: M N∝

→ number of decayed nuclei proportional to

time interval dt : M dt∝

→ M Ndtλ= , λ = decay constant, unit [ ] 1/sλ =

- number of nuclei at time t dt+ :

( ) ( ) ( )N t dt N t M N t dN+ = − ≡ + , dN = change of

radioactive nuclei after time interval dt ( 0dN < !)

→ dN M Ndtλ= − = −

- integration: dN Ndtλ= − → /( )dN Ndt λ= −

→ dN

dt dtNdt

λ= − → ln( )N t Cλ= − + ,

C = integration constant, → ln( )N t C C te e e eλ λ− + −= =

→ 0( ) tN t N e λ−=

Page 197: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

197

• discussion:

FIG. 7-04. Radioactive decay of 235U. The exponential decay is the result of that the radioactive decay is a statistical process. N0 = initial number of radioactive nuclei, τ = mean lifetime, t1/2 = half life time.

- 0CN e= = number of radioactive nuclei at 0t =

(initial value) (see FIG. 7-04a)

- mean lifetime τ : time at which N is decreased to

1/ e of its initial value: 0( ) /N N eτ = → 0 0 /N e N eλτ− =

↔ 1/e eλτ− = ↔ ln( ) ln(1/ )e eλτ− =

0 1

ln(1) ln( ) 1eλτ− = − = − ↔ 1/τ λ= (see FIG. 7-04a)

- half life time 1/ 2t : time at which N is decreased to

1/ 2 of its initial value: 1/ 2 0( ) / 2N t N= → ...

→ 1/ 2 ln(2) /t λ= (see FIG. 7-04b)

- e.g. radioactive decay of nuclide 23592U :

230 6,022 10N = × , 8

1/ 2 7,1 10 at = × !!! (see FIG. 7-04)

• decay rate R : rate at which radioactive nuclei decay:

0 0/ t tR dN dt N e R eλ λλ − −= = − = , 0 0R Nλ= − (initial rate)

unit: [ ] 1 BqR = ("Becquerel"), 1 Bq = 1 decay/s

Page 198: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

198

e.g.: after how many half life times is the decay rate

decreased to 1 % of its initial value?

x = number of half life times

→ 1/ 21/ 2 0 0 0( ) 1% 0,01xtR xt R e R Rλ−= = =

→ 1/ 2 1/100xte λ− = ↔ 1/ 2 ln(1/100)xtλ− =

↔ 1/ 2 1/ 2

0

[ln(1) ln(100)]/( ) ln(100) /( )x t tλ λ= − − =

with 1/ 2 ln(2) /t λ= → 1/ 2ln(2) / tλ =

→ ln(100) / ln(2) 4,605/ 0,693 6,645x = = =

→ after 6,645x = half life times the decay rate is

at 1% of its initial value, for 23592U : 9

1/ 2 4,72 10 axt = × ,

more than 1 billion years!!!

Page 199: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

199

Chapter 7.4 Decay types

(a) β− decay

• occurs in nuclei that have too many neutrons for stability

• neutron inside nucleus decays to proton + free electron + free

anti-neutrino

(because of conservation of energy and momentum)

• equation of reaction: 1A AZ Z eX Y e

β

ν−

−+→ + +

FIG. 7-05. β- - decay with the emission of an electron and an anti - neutrino. • simplest example: decay of free neutron into proton,

electron and anti-neutrino:

- reaction: 1 10 1 en p e

β

ν−

−→ + +

- half life time: 1/ 2 10,8 mint ≈

- mass defect:

initial mass: 1,008665i nm m u= =

final mass: ... 1,007825f p em m m u= + = =

→ ... 0,00084i fm m m u∆ = − = =

Page 200: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

200

- decay energy: 2 ... 0,0781 MeVdE mc= ∆ = =

• anti-neutrino:

- measurements of kinetic energy K of emitted electrons:

FIG. 7-06. Decay of neutrons. In general kinetic energy K of emitted electrons is smaller than decay energy Ed, only Kmax = Ed. Energy conservation leads to existence of so called anti-neutrino with nearly no mass, gets remaining energy Eν = Ed - K [7.03].

→ electrons have different kinetic energies K with

maximum energy max dK E=

→ for maxK K< , energy conservation: there must be

another particle that carries remaining energy

dE E K= −

→ anti-neutrino eν : nearly no mass, no charge, but

kinetic energy

• popular example: decay of 146C

- radioactive carbon dating, dating of former living

organisms (dinosaurs, plants, human beings, ...)

Page 201: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

201

- reaction: 14 146 7 eC N e

β

ν−

−→ + + , 1/ 2 5730 at ≈

(b) β+ decay

• occurs in nuclei that have too few neutrons for stability

• proton inside nucleus changes into neutron + free

positron + free neutrino

(because of energy conservation)

• equation of reaction: 1A AZ Z eX Y e

β

ν+

+−→ + +

FIG. 7-07. β+ - decay with the emission of a positron and a neutrino.

• example: 52 5225 24 eMn Cr e

β

ν+

+→ + + , 1/ 2 5,7 dt ≈

(c) γ decay

• occurs when a nucleus in excited state decays to lower

energy state

• nuclear counterpart: spontaneous emission of radiation by

atoms or molecules - see chapter 5)

• radioactive nucleus remains the same after γ decay

• reaction equation: A AZ ZX X

γγ∗ → +

Page 202: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

202

FIG. 7-08. γ - decay of an excited nucleus to a lower energy state with emission of a γ - photon. • energy of γ - photon: E hf=

• order of magnitude: spacing of energy levels in nucleus:

~ 1 MeV → / / 1,24 pmc f ch Eλ = = ≈

(for atoms & molecules: spacing of atomic energy levels

~ 1 eV , → 1,24 mλ ≈ )

• half life time: mostly very short, 111/ 2 ~ 10 st −

(d) α decay

• all heavy nuclei ( 83Z > ) are theoretically unstable to α decay

because mass of final products lower than initial mass

• reaction equation: 42

A AZ ZX Y

αα−

−→ +

FIG. 7-09. α - decay with the emission of an α - particle.

• example: Thorium decay

- reaction: 232 228

90 88Th Raα

α→ +

Page 203: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

203

- mass defect:

initial mass: 232,038im u=

final mass: 228,031 4,0026 232,0336fm u u u= + =

→ ... 0,0044i fm m m u∆ = − = =

- decay energy: 2 ... 4,08 MeVdE mc= ∆ = =

almost all decay energy: kinetic energy of α - particle

(e) K - capture

• reaction not real radioactivity, but nuclear reaction

• occurs when an electron in K - shell (quantum

number 1n = , 0l = ) stays close to the nucleus

(remember: related probability density is low but not zero

in this orbit) and is captured by a proton

→ proton changes into neutron

→ electron shell is re- filled with electrons out of higher

shells or free electrons with accompanied photon

emission (characteristic spectrum)

• reaction equation: 1 1 2 ...A AZ Z

K capture

X Y hf hf−−

→ + + +

Page 204: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

204

FIG. 7-10. K-capture of an electron of a proton in nucleus. Due to successive re-filling of the electron shell characteristic radiation is emitted (photons).

Chapter 7.5 Natural radioactivity

natural radioactivity: decay series

• remember α - decay: all heavy nuclei ( 83Z > ) are

theoretically unstable to α - decay

• daughter of radioactive nucleus is often itself radioactive

(β - or α - decay)

• intensive investigation: all naturally radioactive nuclei can be

assigned to 4 natural decay series: FIG. 7-11

- Uranium Radium series: initial radioactive nucleus: 24294 Pu ,

stable nucleus (product): 20682 Pb

- Uranium Actinium series: initial radioactive nucleus: 23992U ,

stable nucleus (product): 20782 Pb

Page 205: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

205

- Thorium series: initial radioactive nucleus: 24092U ,

stable nucleus (product): 20882 Pb

- Neptunium series: initial radioactive nucleus: 24194 Pu ,

stable nucleus (product): 20983 Bi

- special case: nucleus has two different decay types

with different half life times, e.g. Thorium series:

20881

2122128384 e

Ti

BiPo e

α

β

α

ν−

→ + → + +

- Neptunium series can't be found on earth because of

low half life times: 61/ 2 2 10 at ≤ ×

(age of earth: 94,55 10 aT ≈ × )

• natural radioactivity: only α -, β- - decay!

Page 206: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

206

FIG. 7-11. The four natural radioactive decay series. The neptunium series has already disappeared because of the low half life times of its components [7.04].

Page 207: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

207

Chapter 7.6 Fusion & fission

(a) fusion, reaction inside sun

• temperature needed: 710 KT = , all atoms fully ionized!

→ no chemical processes to fabricate energy (no molecular

bonds, no chemical reactions!)

• reaction energy cannot be determined out of mass defect, depends

on reaction!

• example: energy fabrication in sun: p-p chain, 3 ways lead to a

change of 4 H-nuclei in one He nucleus:

FIG. 7-12. Energy fabrication of the sun. In 3 different ways the fission of 4

H nuclei to 1 He nucleus leads to a gain of energy, E(way I) ≥ 26,2 MeV (~

91 %), E(way II) ≥ 25,67 MeV

(~ 9 %), E(way III) ≥ 19,28 MeV (~ 0,1 %) [7.05].

Page 208: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

208

- way 1: 91 %

(i) 1. reaction, 2 possibilities:

- 1 1 21 1 1 eH H H e ν++ → + +

fusion energy: ,1 1,19 MeVfE =

- 1 1 21 1 1 eH H e H ν−+ + → +

fusion energy: ,2 1,44 MeVfE =

(ii) 2. reaction: 2 1 31 1 2H H He γ+ → +

fusion energy: ,2 5,49 MeVfE =

(iii) 3. reaction: 3 3 4 12 2 2 12He He He H+ → +

fusion energy: ,3 12,85 MeVfE =

(iv) whole fusion energy:

,1 ,2 ,32 2 26,2 MeVf f f fE E E E= × + × + ≥

Page 209: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

209

FIG. 7-13. Different steps in the fission of 236U [7.06].

Page 210: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

210

(b) fission, nuclear reactor

• bombardment of heavy atoms with low energy neutrons

(see FIG. 7-13a)

• neutron is captured by nucleus, leaving it in an excited state (see

FIG. 7-13b)

• 2 possibilities:

(i) excited nucleus deexcites by emission of γ - photon

(~ 15 %)

(ii) heavy nuclei (Uranium, Plutonium) begin to oscillate and

finally split into other nuclei and several neutrons

(fission, ~ 85 %) (see FIG. 7-13c)

• generated neutrons can be used to cause further fissions,

producing chain reaction

• example: fission of 23592U

(first discovered by Strassmann, Hahn, 1939)

reaction: 235 236 141 9292 92 56 36 3n U U Ba Kr n∗+ → → + +

mass defect:

initial mass: 1,008665 235,044 236,052665im u u u= + =

final mass: 140.914411 91.926156 3 1,007825

235,866562fm u u u

u

= + + ×

=

mass defect: ... 0,186103i fm m m u∆ = − = =

fission energy: 2 ... 173,7 MeVfE mc= ∆ = =

• problem: control of chain reaction, 23692U is radioactive (see Thorium

series), what to do with the nuclear waste?

Page 211: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

211

References: [0.1] W. Demtröder - Experimentalphysik 1, Springer, 2. ed. (2001), p. 27 [1.1] W. Demtröder - Experimentalphysik 1, Springer, 2. ed. (2001), p. 417 [1.2] W. Demtröder - Experimentalphysik 1, Springer, 2. ed. (2001), p. 418 [1.3] P.A. Tipler - Physics, 4. ed. (1999), p. 230 [1.4] P.A. Tipler - Physics, 4. ed. (1999), p. 232 [2.1] P.A. Tipler - Physics, 4. ed. (1999), p. 425 [3.1] P.A. Tipler - Physics, 4. ed. (1999), p. 442 [3.2] P.A. Tipler - Physics, 4. ed. (1999), p. 443 [3.3] W. Demtröder - Experimentalphysik 1, Springer, 2. ed. (2001), p. 362, 365 [3.4] P.A. Tipler - Physics, 4. ed. (1999), p. 488 [3.5] P.A. Tipler - Physics, 4. ed. (1999), p. 492 [3.6] P.A. Tipler - Physics, 4. ed. (1999), p. 453 [3.7] P.A. Tipler - Physics, 4. ed. (1999), p. 457 [3.8] P.A. Tipler - Physics, 4. ed. (1999), p. 464 [3.9] P.A. Tipler - Physics, 4. ed. (1999), p. 1009 [3.10] P.A. Tipler - Physics, 4. ed. (1999), p. 1004 [3.11] P.A. Tipler - Physics, 4. ed. (1999), p. 454 [3.12] P.A. Tipler - Physics, 4. ed. (1999), p. 1040 [3.13] P.A. Tipler - Physics, 4. ed. (1999), p. 1058 [3.14] P.A. Tipler - Physics, 4. ed. (1999), p. 1059 [3.15] P.A. Tipler - Physics, 4. ed. (1999), p. 1076 [3.16] P.A. Tipler - Physics, 4. ed. (1999), p. 1078 [3.17] P.A. Tipler - Physics, 4. ed. (1999), p. 1091 [3.18] P.A. Tipler - Physics, 4. ed. (1999), p. 1092 [3.19] P.A. Tipler - Physics, 4. ed. (1999), p. 1093 [3.20] P.A. Tipler - Physics, 4. ed. (1999), p. 1095 [3.21] P.A. Tipler - Physics, 4. ed. (1999), p. 1096 [3.22] P.A. Tipler - Physics, 4. ed. (1999), p. 1097 [3.23] P.A. Tipler - Physics, 4. ed. (1999), p. 1048 [3.24] P.A. Tipler - Physics, 4. ed. (1999), p. 1112 [3.25] P.A. Tipler - Physics, 4. ed. (1999), p. 1119 [5.01] P.A. Tipler - Physics, 4. ed. (1999), p. 1170 [5.02] P.A. Tipler - Physics, 4. ed. (1999), p. 1171 [5.03] P.A. Tipler - Physics, 4. ed. (1999), p. 1178 [5.03a] U.Leute [5.03] P.A. Tipler - Physics, 4. ed. (1999), p. 1179 [5.04] P.A. Tipler - Physics, 4. ed. (1999), p. 1193 [5.05] W. Demtröder - Experimentalphysik 3, Springer, 2. ed. (2001), p. 191 [6.01] P.A. Tipler - Physics, 4. ed. (1999), p. 1249 [7.01] P.A. Tipler - Physics, 4. ed. (1999), p. AP-6 [7.02] P.A. Tipler - Physics, 4. ed. (1999), p. 1286 [7.03] P.A. Tipler - Physics, 4. ed. (1999), p. 1291 [7.04] W. Demtröder - Experimentalphysik 4, Springer, 2. ed. (2001), p. 42 [7.05] W. Demtröder - Experimentalphysik 4, Springer, 2. ed. (2001), p. 301 [7.06] P.A. Tipler - Physics, 4. ed. (1999), p. 1299

Page 212: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

212

X EXEMPLARY PROBLEMS FOR THE WRITTEN TEST

X.1 units (2 points)

What is the pressure o a 10 cm high column of mercury (ρ = 13,6 g/cm3) in hPa?

X.2 motion (4 points) An aeroplane starts from airport A to airport B, which is 600km away. The course (N) over ground from A to B is 30°. The wind is blowing with vW = 40 km/h from NW. The relative velocity is 200 km/h. (a) Draw the vector diagram of velocities. (b) Which course will the pilot choose? (c) What is the velocity over ground? (d) How long will the flight take?

X.3 oscillations (3 points) A mathematical pendulum with the length l1 = 120 cm has a period of T1. What length l2 is needed to increase the period by 30 s?

X.4 waves (3 points) A plane wave is described with the formula y(x,t) = y0 sin (ωt – kx). What is the adequate expression using wavelength λ and period T?

X.5 accoustic(4 points) An acoustic intensity I0 is amplified by 6 dB to an intensity I1. What is the ratio of I1/I0?

Page 213: Script to - uni-due.de5 5 ATOMIC PHYSICS 146 5.1 Experiments that led to atomic models ...146 (a) photoelectric effect (b) x-ray diffraction (c) Rutherford's scattering experiment

213

X.6 geometric optics (4 points) Given is a parallel glass plate with a thickness of 30 mm and a refractive index n = 1.65. A light beam hits the surface under an angle of β = 45°. (a) What is the parallel shift of the light beam? (b) What changes when the experiment is performed in water (n = 1.33)?

X.7 physical optics (4 points) Given is a white light source from 400 nm to 700 nm and an optical grating with d = 4 µm. The first deflected order is detected on a screen which is placed 1 m behind the grating. What is the width of the first order from blue (400 nm) to red (700 nm) on the screen?

X.8 quantum physics (4 points) The external photoeffect is measured in 2 experiments using light with λ1 = 330 nm and λ2 = 240 nm. For an opposite voltage of -3,9 V and -5,05 V the photocurrent could be compensated. Determine the value of h from these data!

X.9 atomic physics (4 points) Please tell the quantum numbers and describe their physical meaning.

X.10 nuclear physics (5 points) During the Tschernobyl accident in 1986 the isotope 137Cs was released. The half life time is 30 years. When will the activity of 137Cs reach 10 % of its initial activity?