sdn and nfv - events.static.linuxfound.org · nfv phase 1 virtualize the technology journey:...

16
SDN and NFV Stepping Stones to the Telco Cloud Prodip Sen CTO, NFV March 16, 2016

Upload: nguyendieu

Post on 15-Sep-2018

228 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

SDN and NFV Stepping Stones to the Telco CloudProdip Sen CTO, NFV

March 16, 2016

The Evolution of SDN and NFV

2

NFV phase 1 Virtualize

The technology journey: convergence of the SDN & NFV stages

3

NFV phase 0 Decouple

NFV & SDN phase 3

We are starting to cloudify in NFV

We are starting to interconnect in SDN

NFV & SDN phase 2

Need to accelerate the convergence

SDN phase 1 Interconnect

SDN phase 0 Decouple

Cloudify Decompose

Realizing the full business benefits of NFV using SDN

Proprietary hardware network function

Dumb physical pipes

+

VNF B1

VNF C1

Distributed solution based on flexible VNF deployments

+

Programmable Network Infrastructure

Smart virtual network infrastructure

Solutions based on virtualized network functions

+

Dumb virtual pipes

VNF A1

VNF A2VNF B2

VNF D1

SDN for NFV

Flexibility • Apps • Programma

bility of the network

Agility • SDN

Controller • Dynamicity

of connectivity

Manageability •

Analytics & Automation

• Loose coupling between the overlay and underlay

Scalability •

Controller federation

• Multi-domain

Fat vs. fit VNFs

Thick/fat VNFs Virtual implementations of physical functions

–Complex multiservice configurations – Integrated load balancing, high

availability, AAA IF –Scale in and out internal to VNF

Drawbacks –Complex to implement, integrate, and

test –Elasticity is difficult to implement –Slow rollouts, long time to revenue

Thin/fit VNFs (apps)

Single-service atomic network functions

– In-network load balancing, high availability –Single interface to AAA –Scaling by adding network function

instances

Advantages –Simple integration and testing –Elasticity by simple integration with

orchestration –Fast rollouts, short time to revenue

6

Move common functions to the infrastructure

The Business Value of SDN enabled NFV

7

SDN enabled vGi-LAN solution

8

Challenges – All functions sized for peak – Slow new service deployment – Separate load balancers

needed per function

Virtualized With SDN

Virtualized, but no SDN

Advantages – No need to send all traffic

through all devices – no overprovisioning

– Agility – add new services without affecting other services

PCRF

InternetOptimizer Content Filter FW NAT

P-GW

PCRF

Internet

ContexNet Controller

P-GW

ContexNet Switching Fabric

Optimizer Content Filter FW NAT

Service agility with HPE ContexNet

9

Service Evaluation Groups to assess idea

Resource Capacity Scaling (Policy Controller, Hardware)

BillingPolicy and Gi LAN Configuration

Catalog Creation

Service Creation

New Service Launch

About 1 month

About 1 month per service

About 15 days

About 15 days

About 20 days

About 45 days – could be complex and usually manual

Total: 139 days for a New Service Launch with PMO

About 1 day per service (fewer decision makers needed)

About 5 days

About 15 days

About 2 days

About 20 days

About 1 day

Total: 44 days for a New Service Launch with ContexNet

S1 = Service 1 S2 S3

Si

ContexNet

PMO

© Copyright Hewlett Packard Enterprise 2016 10

The need to be able to launch and try new services with minimal risks

The need to offer highly personalized services SDN enables policy integration

to create scalable per user/per application traffic flows

NFV implementation enables matching capacity expansion to revenue growthThe need to optimize Gi

LAN capacity utilizationSDN enables easy plug and play of new service functions into the Gi LAN and service path

What challenges does it address And how …

HPE Carrier SDN solutions to optimize NFV implementations

SDN-enabled virtualized Gi LAN

With SDN

IP NetworkS/P-GW-U S/P-GW-U

S1-U

S11MME

eNB

SDN Controller

HSS

S6a

S1-MME

Gx

SGi

PCRF

P-GW-CS-GW-C

PDNCentral Gi

Local Gi

SDN-enabled mobile packet coreWithout SDN Challenges

Traffic growth pattern putting pressure on the gateway

– Increasing active/idle signaling load – Increasing peak throughput load

Traffic composition changing – Video upload & download increasing – Emerging applications need lower latency and/or

local only connectivity – “Private LTE” networks, IoT apps

AdvantagesIndependent scaling of user and control planes Capability to break out traffic

S1-U

S11

eNB

HSS

S6a

S1-MME

Gx

SGi

PCRF

P-GW PDNCentral Gi

IP Network

S-GW

MME

© Copyright Hewlett Packard Enterprise 2016

User Plane

Backhaul

vEPC split solutions

Control Plane

3. Per-flow selection between central and distributed Gi-LAN

Control Plane

2. Distributed user plane APN-based local breakout

Control Plane

1. Simple split

Core

Backhaul

Edge

RAN• Specific APNs are broken locally to

Mobile Edge • Requires preconfiguration

Dynamic handling of same APN traffic based on application context

Gi-LAN

User Plane User Plane

User Plane

Gi-LAN Gi-LAN

Backhaul Backhaul

Gi-LAN Gi-LAN

User Plane

© Copyright Hewlett Packard Enterprise 2016 13

Latency-sensitive applications

Desire to develop two-sidedbusiness models

Exploding EPC capacity

Distributed mobility management, processing, and service continuity

Policy integration, SFC, and capability exposure

SGW/PGW control/user plane separation

Unpredicted quality of experience

Per-flow apportioning of user-plane instances

What challenges does it address And how …

HPE Carrier SDN solutions to optimize NFV implementations

SDN-enabled mobile packet core

The Evolution of SDN, NFV and Open Innovation

14

The evolution of SDN, NFV, & open innovation

15

Open innovation

Software-defined networking

Network functions virtualization

2013Open innovation Software-defined

networking

Network functions

virtualization

2015/6

NFV ISG

How important is SDN to NFV? Very important: 69% Somewhat important: 30% Not at all important:1%

(Customer Survey 2015)

NFV ISG

OSM, Open-O …….

Open source and ecosystems – pathways to the Telco Cloud

16

Testing, performance and SDN integration in the new OPNFV release

Partner Engagements

Customer Engagements

28PoCs Ongoing

17PoCs

Completed

NFV

SDN

11 3PoCs

CompletedPoCs Ongoing

70+Application

partners

10Technology

partners

Partners

NEPs

HPE OpenNFV Ecosystem

Alignment

Alignment

Installers

Scenarios

Testing

Functional

System

Performance

New Features

Fault Mgmt

IPv6

SFC

L3VPN

Reservation

Continuous Integration / Continuous Deployment

Documentation

OPNFV Release Brahmaputra Overview

Upstream Project Collaboration

Infrastructure

Pharos Community Labs

OPNFV Bare Metal Labs

Data Plane AccelerationDPDK ODP

Compute Storage Network

Orchestration and Management

Virtual Network Functions

Compute Virtualization Control

Storage Virtualization Control

Network Virtualization Control

OpenStack

KVM Ceph OpenDaylight

OpenContrail

ONOS

OVS