seafarer's access to shore leave
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/14/2019 Seafarer's Access to Shore Leave
1/3
Seafarer's Access to Shore Leave
Thursday, October 23, 2008
One of the more sensitive issues that NMSAC (National Maritime
Security Advisory Committee) has been working on is the issue of
allowing Seafarer's access to shore leave while in port. As a formerMerchant Officer, I can tell you that getting off the boat for a few
hours is a huge deal to most sailors. Even if it's to go to Wal Mart toget a new tooth brush, getting a change of scenery does much for
crew morale.
The shore leave issue for foreign seafarers is extremely sensitive and
has long been receiving attention from seafarer representativeorganizations, foreign flagged steamship companies and their industry
representative organizations (BIMCO, for example). Some facilityowners/operators have established security measures that essentially
bar access to any persons not vetted by them, including seafarersseeking access to shore leave. Others have established a system of
escort and transportation through the facility with the cost of thisservice being billed directly to the individual seafarer.
NMSAC was tasked to develop a working group to examine and
quantify the extent to which the issue of seafarers access to shore
leave is a problem and develop a set of reasonable solutions andrecommendations that the Department can use in addressing the
issue. At their September 18 meeting, the NMSAC reviewed anddiscussed the results of the Seafarers Access Working group:
Findings of the Working Group:
The Working Group identified two main elements of the issue:
1. Physical access through facilities, and,
2. Seafarers documentation.
Physical Access: Physical access issues arise through inconsistentinterpretation of regulations and weak support from the Coast Guard
for the intent of the human element provisions of the ISPS Code
specifically, paragraphs 10 and 11 of the Preamble and Part A, Section16.3.15. The Working Group found that physical access issues must be
resolved through the Coast Guard and terminal operators.
http://uscg-nmsac.blogspot.com/2008/10/seafarers-access-to-shore-leave.htmlhttp://homeport.uscg.mil/mycg/portal/ep/contentView.do?channelId=-26462&contentId=135391&programId=71296&programPage=%2Fep%2Fprogram%2Feditorial.jsp&pageTypeId=13489&contentType=EDITORIAL&BV_SessionID=@@@@1558310180.1229454984@@@@&BV_EngineID=cccdadeflmlmdlhcfjgcfgfdffhdghk.0http://uscg-nmsac.blogspot.com/2008/10/seafarers-access-to-shore-leave.htmlhttp://homeport.uscg.mil/mycg/portal/ep/contentView.do?channelId=-26462&contentId=135391&programId=71296&programPage=%2Fep%2Fprogram%2Feditorial.jsp&pageTypeId=13489&contentType=EDITORIAL&BV_SessionID=@@@@1558310180.1229454984@@@@&BV_EngineID=cccdadeflmlmdlhcfjgcfgfdffhdghk.0 -
8/14/2019 Seafarer's Access to Shore Leave
2/3
Seafarers Documentation: Seafarers documentation issues arisethrough the immigration policies of the federal government. For
example, the arrivals and departures of air crews in the United Statesare governed by the same laws that apply to seafarers. However, air
crew members may receive a waiver of the visa requirements for short
stays. This is generally not done for seafarers.
Seafarers documentation issues must be resolved through action by
Customs and Border Protection and the Department of State.
The Working Group made 10 specific recommendations, specificallygeared to address 3 fundamental Goals:
1. Clarify the relevant statutes and regulations to reemphasize the
human element and the protection of seafarers rights as animportant principle of port facility security. In addition, clarify
which government agency has the authority to make policies andto enforce regulations that ensure seafarers access to shore
leave and visitors.
2. Resolve issues relating to seafarers physical access to shoreleave and visitors.
3. Resolve issues relating to seafarers documentation.
NMSAC Deliberations: The Committee recognized that many of therecommendations, especially those addressing clarification of the
relevant statutes/regulations and resolving the issues relating to
seafarers documentation are not solely a Coast Guard issue toresolve. As such they recommended that these recommendations be
forwarded to the CG/CBP Senior Guidance Team (SGT) for action.
In regards to the recommendations relating to seafarers physical
access to shore leave visitors, the NMSAC agreed overall with thefindings of the working group and officially made the recommendation
to the Coast Guard that:
NMSAC recommends the CG implement and enforce the obligation ofport facilities under the International Ship and Port Facility Security
Code, the Maritime Transportation Security Act, and the relevant
provision Title 33 Code of Federal Regulations regarding seafarers'access to shore leave, visitors, representatives of seafarers welfare
and labor organizations.
NMSAC further recommends that the CG require each facility provideunencumbered access for seafarers by requiring that every port facility
-
8/14/2019 Seafarer's Access to Shore Leave
3/3
security plan facilitate shore leave, crew changes, and access forvisitors. Any costs for facilitating such access are a matter for the port
facility.
So, what's next? NMSAC staff will be working with the Merchant Marine
Personnel Advisory Committee (MERPAC) staff to coordinate a jointmeeting with the USCG/CBP Senior Guidance Team to further explorethe issue and consider the recommendations identified in the report
including a look at legal authority to force facilities to provide access to
shore leave.
Additionally, in support of the Subchapter H rewrite, NMSAC will be
asked to assist in drafting standardized language for facility securityplans to address the Seafarers access.
Posted by Ryan Owens
http://www.uscg.mil/hq/cg5/cg522/cg5221/merpac.asphttp://www.uscg.mil/hq/cg5/cg522/cg5221/merpac.asp