41P12SE05M 2.6904 GROVES 010

SEAWAY BASE METALS LIMITED

(TROUTFLY RESOURCES INC.)

ASSESSMENT REPORT

GROVES TOWNSHIP

ONTARIO

BY

NEIL NOVAK B.Se.

JUNE 15, 1984

2 fi 1984

MINING

i

PROPERTY DESCRIPTION

These properties are located in Groves Township of the Porcupine Mining

Division of the District of Sudbury in the province of Ontario. They consist

of two separate groups of claims, the most northerly is comprised of six

claims while the southern group is comprised of four claijns totalling ten

in number.

Northern group consists of claims numbered:

P-683963 to P-683968 inclusive (6)

Southern group consist of claims numbered:

P-683891 to P-683894 inclusive (4)

These ten claims cover an area of approximately four hundred acres.

The property is currently in good standing with the provincial mining

recorder and is currently held by Troutfly Resources Inc. (a wholly owned

subsidiary of Seaway Base Metals Limited ,) with head office located at

1585-B Britannia Road East, Suites 11 5 12, Mississauga, Ontario, L4W 2M4.

LOCATION, ACCESS AND FACILITIES

These properties are located in west-central Groves Township at the

southeastern tip of Geoffrion Lake and the central portion of Shuller Lake

(see O.M.N.R. plan M.898.)

Access to the property is gained by float planes based at Gogama, Ontario

some 5.0 miles northwest of the property. Access may also be gained by canoe

by travelling from Gogama eastward along Minnisinakwa River to Duckbreast

Lake, then south to Groves Lake, two portages are required to get to Groves

Lake which, when reached is about a J mile east of the northern group,

requiring another portage. The float plane option is highly recommended

in this situation.

The crew involved in this survey established a small tent camp on the

north shore of Shuller Lake for the duration of the surveys. No facilities

were left after the completion of the survey.

HISTORY OF EXPLORATION

This general area was the focus of much exploration activity in the search

for gold and related base metals.

In 1933 exploration was carried out in the Pensyl Lake area by the

Tasmijopen Syndicate. They did a few short diamond drill holes, along with

surface trenching and stripping exposing a "rudely banded sugary or cherty

quartz vein." This vein, when sampled yielded 0.15 o.p.t. Au and 0.15 Ag 0-p-V-

drilled to a depth of 20 feet. About 500 feet east of this zone iron

formation was encountered which was heavily gossaned and yielded selected

samples of up to 0.5 o.p.t. Au plus silver. Another zone was encountered

100 feet north of this zone, which consisted of a l foot wide quartz vein

with grab samples of up to 0.5 o.p.t. Au.

In 1934 Flintoba Mines acquired a group of claims on Shuller Lake (south

group) which saw little exploration to save the opening of a few small test

pits on what they report as being "rusty shear zones in sediments."

In 1953 Falconbridge Nickel Mines entered the area and did a number

of short diamond drill holes and opened up several test pits in the

vicinity of Geoffrion Lake (currently the north group). They had interesting

results, but let the property drop due to the poor nickel-copper-gold

prices.

Groves Township saw little, if any exploration until the early 1980's

when a consortium of private and public companies pooled their resources

and flew an airborne geophysical survey over the entire southeast extension

of the Swayze Syncline. The "iron formation" of Pensyl Lake was picked up

in this EM portion of the survey and the magnetics indicate it to be

continuous from Pensyl Lake through to Shuller Lake.

SURVEY PERSONNEL

An EM 16 (VLF) and ground magnetic survey was carried out on these

properties in May 1984. Personnel involved in these surveys included John

Daley and William Dickinson, both of Thornloe, Ontario, under the auspices

of this author. All personnel were in the employ of Blue Falcon Mines

Limited of Mississauga, Ontario, on contract with Seaway Base Metals

Limited (Troutfly Resources Inc.)

SURVEY PROCEDURE

An east-west base line was established on both groups following the

centrally located claim line. This base line was cut out approximately fourf0~f

feet wide. Offsets were established every "*w hundred feet in the north

and south directions perpendicular to the base lines with stations every

one hundred feet each station being clearly flagged. Readings in the EM

survey were recorded at every station, being read in the northerly direction

in each instance. A magnetic reading was recorded at each station location,

with time variables, base station check-ins whenever possible. Total

number of feet surveyed in each survey was 44.300 feet.

ELECTROMAGNETIC CVLF) SURVEY

The very low frequency (VLF) electromagnetic survey is a passive

electromagnetic technique utilizing electromagnetic radio waves trans

mitted world wide for marine navigational purposes. The signal used in this

survey originated in Cutler, Maine, U.S.A., some 1240 kilometres to the east

at a azimuth of 104 0 , the station code is NAA, transmitted at a frequency of

17.8 khz, at a radiated power of 1000 kw.

The Geonics EM-16 hand held receiver used in this survey is capable of

measuring the variations in the tilt angle of the electromagnetic polar

ization ellipse resultant from the distortions from the normal caused by

irregular conductive bodies acted upon the transmitted signal. This unit

measures the in-phase component as a percentage of the horizontal normal

field (real component} as well as measuring the amplitude of the minor axis

of the polarization ellipse (quadrature response).

As the real component decreases and approaches zero percent, the

receiver is approaching a conductive target, and as the real component

becomes negative the receiver passes the conductor. The quadrature

response to the conductor is a semi-quantitative measurement of the inter

ference caused by overburden inconsistencies and other geologic related

quirks.

Measurements were taken along lines facing in the north (azimuth O 0)

in all instances. The values were recorded and plotted on the accompanying

geophysical plan. The results were then profiled at a scale of one inch

equals 501, and plot on the accompanying geophysical plan.

MAGNETIC SURVEY

Proton magnetometers accurately measure variations of the total intensity

of the earth's magnetic field over any given area. The resultant variations

and rate of variations of this field reflect changes in rock type, rock

constituents, as well as geologic structures and depth of magnetic bodies.

All measurements are quantitative in nature with the interpretation being

qualitative.

The Geometrics Model G-816 Portable Proton Magnetometer was used

during these surveys. This unit measures the total intensity of the

earth's magnetic field based upon an atomic constant (Proton Gyromagnetic

Ratio equal to (2.67513 0.00002) xlO4 radian l Gauss sec.). This measure

ment is independent of temperature, humidity and sensor orientation. The

unit is capable of providing one gamma accuracy, when the staff is used on the

sensor, but when the back pack mount is used accuracy is only 10 gammas

which is sufficient for surveys at the reconnaissance level.

A total of three readings were taken at each station, with the sensor

held at shoulder level. The readings were averaged, then entered into the

field book, with the time recorded at each station location.

A magnetic base station was established at line O base line station

on both the north and south properties. This station was checked into at

approximately one hour intervals during the course of the surveys.

Diurnal variations were therefore monitored within the survey periods

and corrections were made accordingly. This method, although not as

accurate as is possible, provides an acceptable observance of any micro-

pulsations during the survey period. All data was processed manually taking

into consideration all recorded drift measurements with respect to time and

reduced to a final quantitative measurement, which was plotted on the accomp

anying geophysical plans.

SURVEY RESULTS

Numerous short electromagnetic conductors were encountered during the

course of these two surveys. Nearly all conductors have a general

azimuthal direction of 090 0 20 0 . The magnetic pattern appears to follow

the overall trend of the conductive bodies with only a few minor exceptions,

where the magnetic pattern transects the electromagnetic pattern. This

occurs in the extreme southeast corner of the north group, and in the south-

west corner of the south group.

INTERPRETATION

"NORTH GROUP"

Several short electromagnetic conductors exist in this group of claims.

High magnetics are commonly associated with these short conductive zones. A

large east-west trending conductor exists, extending from the southern

extremity of Watershed Lake to the southeast corner near Shuller Creek.

About 1000' north two short conductors parallel this major conductor, which

show a very distinct magnetic high expression. Sulphides have been

located in this zone and were previously tested by diamond drilling in the

late 1950's with encouraging results with respect to Copper, Nickel and

Gold. The rocks in this area have been described as hybrid meta-tuffs of

intermediate affinities. The broken up appearance of the conductive zones

is thought to reflect isolated conductive bodies, syngenetic with the

volcanic accumulations, displaying an en-echelon concordant pattern. The

isolated magnetic highs reflect volcanics of more mafic compenents with

or without magnetic minerals.

"SOUTH GROUP"

An east-west electromagnetic pattern is also evident in this group.

Two parallel conductive bodies exist about 5000 apart in the northern half

of the group of claims. These two zones have little magnetic expression

and are thought to be reflecting a zone of felsic accumulations. Geologic

mapping and sampling of an area on strike to the west about three quarters

of a mile indicate that this zone is of volcanic-sedimentary origin with

economic to sub-economic accumulations of gold in a cherty iron formation

interbedded with felsic tuffs. It is therefore felt that this situation

exists within this claim group.

CONCLUSIONS

These EM and Mag surveys have suggested several areas of exciting

geologic and possibly economic situations. The area is typical of the

region in that several short en-echelon sulphide accumulations exist which

are syngenetic with the volcanic stratigraphy. The longer conductors in

the south group are attributable to an intra-formational cherty iron

formation within felsic tuffs, while the longer conductors in the south

group are attributable to sulphide accumulations within a mafic suite

of volcanics. Both series of conductors (north and south) contain economic

concentrations of metals. The northern series contains base metals Cu, Ni

as well as gold and platinum. The southern series contains primarily gold

with minor amounts of silver.

RECOMMENDATIONS

Detail geologic mapping and sampling is highly recommended to cover

both claim blocks. Several conductive bodies have been located and their

economic importance assessed by surface trenching and sampling. Diamond

drilling is recommended in both groups, to follow up the geologic mapping

and sampling whenever favourable results are obtained.

f his report is respectfully submitted by:

Neil Novak B.Se,

Geologist

June 15, 1984

CERTIFICATE

I, NEIL D. NOVAK, do hereby certify:

1) that I am an exploration geologist residing

at lot 7, Trillium Crt., Heidelberg, Ontario;^

2) that I am a graduate of the University of

Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, and hold a Bach

elor of Science degree as an Earth Scientist,

dated 1977;

3) that I have been engaged in the practice of

this profession since graduating;

4) that I have no interest, direct or indirect

in the properties or securities of SEAWAY BASE

METALS LIMITED.

NEIL D. NOVAK, B. Se.

Geologist

June 15, 1984

LJO O

UJo oCD

UJ O O c\J

MAGNETIC INTENSITY (fl) 1000 8 CONTOUR

ZOO # CONTOUR '

MAGNETIC DEPRESSION BASE STATION l

NOTE : All reading* artby "0" except where Indicated

IUJ O O tO

J cvJ

SEAWAY BASE METALS LTD. MAGNETOMETER SURVEY

GROVES TWP. ONTARIOSOUTH GROU

APPROVED

1000

) "

"**

-l-,

i

* 'r f

,i./i-\ f .x

* * ~i~

**sv^ V' 9 -' '

f \

\ N\

\ ,'\ ,\\ '

V

\i),

' \ -H -i . t.. .d. . * f

V1 \ ••i '

' ^ \ •.-i V

1 1• C J ' IK

-••: X,!^^^** .^tV

•* ^.

-1cf^4i^^i

1 ! X

v ' Nv,.N

\'t ""

N,

\ :,

J '•V 'i: \ ,

] \ .••,' !/ 4

l

V- 1 \l,\

u

\ \ X "i i ft*\ \ J-*- ' ^^i l j--\ v ^-; X .•;; f - 7•i' - a"f -*j; i (t

'J/ -Jii

^ -l;

•J '. ,,t

•n i ^

,, '.'\,,''v "' VJ*. '. ;•A ;' ^.... \ j ,,'

i i ) t... \j ,.

i\ /4V;

\ *\Ti-,, i

Uj \ *

'A; ! 'Vy \•i' \ i^"\ V-t A \^^,\ Vs'/ A. N. \

\^ v

^*. "^T* " """7

* J 4 -j/

;f -*' j , '/f;^

*- ' '

L•'Vv

i'-il '\ ^/,'M v ir

.1 .

-I-! i! i.-;* l^

j 1 ,.

J L

rx nix *^^'J ?n ". ^ !K/

- ?i ,'' Jiufo* * * ii '. V *l

" * ', l', b.-l M

fi J- * . tl 1 f ^^r, .v^'lA iM** i, 2i'!!I \?

gp— i*^*" ^ i , t.BASELtNE'^ *' -4 i 1 A., r ^\.'I \ 3iV* /"\i/.i ^

j *

;i J. '.

v i ; REAL COMPONENT (l*ft of lint)*

; QUAD. COMPONENT (right of line)•j'.' i

**' *' PROFILE (r*ol) — - — ' ——

j PROFILE (quod) r-~'--'--*

;v iv - ;'• * i•n i

J iii S ^

8 1 8 SBo * S 2: N M

SEAWAY BASE METALS LTD. AELECTROMAGNETIC (EMI6) V.L.F. SURVEY y ^

GROVES TWP. ONTARIO r

"SOUTH GR OUf" 1\i t\ i\ V t^ \ *oo* looo1H \\ Svi y \\ ir\ " ———— '

MEAL COMPONENT (Itft rf tin*)

QUAD. COMPONENT (r 1*4 rf It*.)

f1

•7

}f;7'; -J

^i-*VI

•It-w

1

\ \il "\ *\ j^l -

, t**i ""1 M

4 -*

k "

:Vx?"M \ ^* f V "•rt i ' -*

-i*i

•tt

*

4*

1

*'

1

••T "M**i '"' 'nit'

\••i "**

i•M '*y. j -U

.1* *| **

J-rt H "t

A * ^

S

u w

* Vit" ;vt

t '!*t "(J

| ,

I'll y*\

-fl 1 ^| '\ ;ji i A*! i -tt \ o^ \ -,. \ *

: r *** k*•l i ^

* ^7I ;'i*l !(,,, J.t /rt.

i J ifiJ '1 ! i-i: ^s * ; .^* .' nrrt f /"^ 1 Wf' y r

ri \ -Vu ! *

•*J

i * i j ~ * *™*j ?

f ' ^/t' i :;t i -i4 1 - 1

. i * i j -* !:l w^ T V

1 i"T "C*,, i 4J i-i r/*! y*n \ -rf \ T"

t *

l/:! r-, .l* ! l-*7 j i -*7 . i1**

i; i/ t t

' i/i

* • 'J

t v;^ r*

7 u'. l/.* A c\ J* !/^ ia. h1 1 - 7i\ s* f *-f* i }.f* i -.r* j i-/

, ,' i-:/ t;f ^V i -f

X u/\ ;

f ^ H7 1 ;' ,

J ^jjM'i 1 ' l

f , *tm i i fi

1 ' .n

9 j .' -ht 1 'w*t J ;.f* ! ;^* ' i -7r 1 ! Jl *, , -*

f '^ p1 \ .-41 j J .0

1,1

r(\:*/ /jJ ; /,*l '^

r\ \i* i i.*

i i/; / ;;•! \

PKOPILI

* ' f,* t!

UiV:* A'i (ii* \1 h1 v; |

I (***d) - --* - ---

^sjr**j,'ii1 ^r''S/

'A f 1'* .' J t -t7 J -*;W -*f! t.'t l -i:

7! ,i

i* i* \ -w* .' -wr 1 .^j. i *.y :,A -M

* ^

T *f/j

4 -w'f -tnii -')^ '*^|IHe5l) ;\ 4

iV,

1- . -3R ' * at

8 e 8

V

f .' .M

1 \ -'7; V:,-* X -/i^ y -*t C ;. .'-rfi f .n;m L 'JtJ" ^

k

V ^ i \\T;/

:ll?/v \tr\

r* M1

ir*

* ; IASELINE

-l ^ V. \

r* ^ '*.'' V

1 y **5 V f

* l/ ** 4^ \^^^nf^'t "^^**^

M^.jj'ta ,'''m*it ; w ajK, tt, 7fi

I.IUJ U W xvQ O OX

s? 8 ? o * S s*

^EAWAY BASE METALfl ^TPELECTROMAGNETIC (EMI6) V.L.F. SURVEY . c/

/)A7^ 'GROVES TWP. ONTARIO /^

"NORTH GROUP" t

—k! ^ 0^ J BOO* 1000'^Hkki-

MAGNETIC INTENSITY (l) ft#7 1000 l CONTOUR ————

200 f CONTOUR ——— MAGNETIC DEPRESSION vL BASE STATION m

Ootvi

3c 3t0 So o

uJ LJ U JfO O Oj:O O CJi

CO * O t CO ~^SEAWAY BASE METALS LTD.

NOTE- Alt rtodlnfi arc prifixtd

wh*r*

MAGNETOMETER GROVES TWP.

"NORTH

SURVEY ONTARIO

GROUP"

lOOO'

\PPROVED

Ministry o*NaturalResources

Ontario

Report of Work(Geophysical, Geological, Geochemical and Expenditures)

The Mi41P12SE0508 2.6904 GROVES 900

Type of Survey(s)

J, M CAddress

it - 12Survey Company

Miut? CTODate oi'Survev (from Si to) ,

Day l Mo. l Yr. Day | Mo. | Yr.

Total Mites of line Cut

Name and Address of Author (of Geo Technical report)

fat. H '12.Credits Requested per Each Claim in Columns at right Mining Claims Traversed (List in numerical sequence)Special Provisions

For first survey:Enter 40 days. (This includes line cutting)

For each additional survey: using the same grid:

Enter 20 days (for each)

Man Days

Complete reverse side and enter total (s) here

Airborne Credits

Note: Special provisions credits do not apply to Airborne Surveys.

Geophysical

- Electromagnet

- Magnetometer

- Radiometric

- Other

Geological

Geochemical

Geophysical

c

- Electromagnetic

- Magnetometer

- Radiometric

- Other

Geological

Geochemical

Electromagnetic

Magnetometer

Radiometric

Days perClaim

io(2.6

Days perClaim

Days perClaim

Expenditures (excludes power stripping)Type of Work Performed

Performed on Claim(s)

Gale ulation of Expenditure Days Credits

Total Expenditures

S -s-Instructions

Total Days Credits may be a t choice. Enter number of d y in columns at right.

Datl

V-W U/0Y F^Certification Verifying Ref o

15

CTotal

)ays Credits

jportionedet the claim holder's i credits pel claim selected

;o\Aed HvSW \ \ TK Ale 3t (Signature)

Mining ClaimPrefix

P

- *.."C.Vi.

- *- : -'

, .....,^..u .

R [

Rece

Number

(M4 (i\foZ&Mt,#3b?3j f; *? GL O(J

{pX lyblbt3 (iMbtl 3(05kf}9(?(*&X3967kfWbZ

E C 0 R D

JUN 1 1 W^*^^ A 1

!ft*.v)\sid 2r

Expend. Days Cr.

t) t?"

^y^?

^//^^

-pe-irt,/^L.

tev4#~^^^^xi\^T^*

•4*fr

- D

LcAlLf

4

M

^For Office Use Only/

Total Day Recordec

(oCC

t Cr. Date Recorded 7

A^A^vlLJ^iqSVl Date Appro/fed as Recorded

Mining ClaimPrefix

V, . -

:i'^

PDF

t,

A.M.7i8|0

*ut

Number

^* P f i j- JL.* Y K

^ SO to*'sQ'if'i r~^iil[)^ n^

:r:i)P|K|p MINING DtVISK

: (S E l v f'UN l 1 88410,11,12,1,2

Total number of mining claims covered by this report of work,

^~V s

Expend. Days Cr.

i

•••MMM B"

-&MT- -

10

MiniM^fTsatwO*' f/ St^m^^/BrarajJiffilrinjKRecorder f

rt of Work * "~ — "hereby certify that 1 have a persona

or witnessed same during and/or afterand intimate knowledge of the facts set forth in the Report of Work annexed hereto, having performed the work its completion and the annexed report is true.

Name and Postal Address of Person Certifying

?.Q.i \ ^c,v ir (U;MW* Cu^M-A NJ.ote t

Datk Certified J

\ kjL*4 K 1 S ^iCerlifiloNby.lSiina^ jrel

itVM.c -

Ontario

Ministry of Natural Resources

GEOPHYSICAL - GEOLOGICAL - GEOCHEMICAL TECHNICAL DATA STATEMENT

File.

TO BE ATTACHED AS AN APPENDIX TO TECHNICAL REPORTFACTS SHOWN HERE NEED NOT BE REPEATED IN REPORT

TECHNICAL REPORT MUST CONTAIN INTERPRETATION, CONCLUSIONS ETC.

Type of Sur

Township o

Claim Holdi

Survey Con-

Author of F

Address of j

Covering Dz

Total Miles

SPECIAL

vey/s) l ^GfJfr

r Area (rjtQtffl

ar(8) S*4HMV

(T/fouTftipany "jsLUT

teport AJPIL

\nthor **4t( / l

fpsnf Survey M .. . .-.^,, ~~... ,^ , -

'/C c LecT&QfltAlJrMG'riC (p{.-f.2

r TiVA M. d 9^

B/IS^ /tt^T/itr. v A esouacfs)FAUow MfA/rs trDD A^di/AVL.-/* /5^^ 0/.-/BMM ^ C Mtiitoy

4*/ /O /AC/ - .hitjf lK/8^(linecutting to office)

nfT-ineCut 9. 1 **;(ti

PROVISIONSCREDITS REQUESTED

ENTER 40 days (includes line cutting) for first survey.

ENTER 20 days for each additional survey using same grid.

AIRBORNE

Magnetome

1PATF-XJU

Res. Geol.

DAYS L . , per claimGeophysical F-k^rnmagnrtir ^ 0

3 n

Radiometric- ...

-Other

fl^nlogir^l , i iil ,,

npnrhpmirfll T

\ CREDITS (Special provision credits do not apply to airborne surveys)

ter FilrrtrnnpagnAtir 1 A RaHmriptrir t(enter days per claiV) \\ \ \ U f

/ n \\ ** M W \W v""\lAl. OOr, SIHMATTTPP. KV\LkXMWWP

1 Author of Report or AgerirS*. -

Oualifirations ^"^ x ' c^- cr- f

Previous SurveysFile No. Type Date Claim Holder

MINING CLAIMS TRAVERSED List numerically

P ^^V(prefix) ' (number)

P fc&Z&yi

f* 4630^,

P Wl&t

^ x a O ^7 ^" P p O f f v 2

f v fy 3 7w*

f 66 3.9+7 -.-f/ j n o fj f o

1 V O J f fev '

. (

RFCEIVEDJ^2G?^

^Wfi Uf;M ^rftv/,. .^tji/017

V i ' . .

I

1Fi

1

1a

IND

UC

ED

PO

LA

RIZ

AT

ION

R

ESI

STIV

ITY

GR

AV

ITY

Electrode

array

Electrode

spacing —

TVnp

nf

pWtrnHe

j i

t- i q i? O

C

1 2.

:

•5

5s

~ E

--

5'

r o

33

ar-

*- 3" •s

*- S c * r r k L

D C

5 :

r ^

t (?

2

5 2

Si

g" l

* o.

3

S 3

D^

tfL

i1

o*

O S 3' DW

*"*

1 ^3

g 3

3m

-Q

-0

^S

C

Cft

ff

tD

3

O

Ov-

v^ a o 5'

w rt" 1 5" p

n curacv.

Base

station g c" n

t* 3 O.

O* S 1-*- p- 3

Scale

consta

Corrections s

: g o. n

l

3 -*

EL

EC

TR

OM

AG

NE

TIC

MA

GN

ET

ICn

' TJ

f z

s? :

i j :

2 -

i s 1 t a. T V- "*, 0 r -

t IT

'S H o-

1k

—

^ -s f* i, V r i t l o*N L D f

Method:

Frpmipnrv 50 . W

D x' (T) O-

^ "

^

3.^

v

r^"

n •-i

*~ c

w•\

3" O

C5 O" n D 3

1 5" fs D i^ s? Si. ft3 5"

> o

o

t?^

2. 2.

|

1 i i

i3

25 as

S s

"S ~

t o

3 -s

. '

s Si .

^

o1

3 ? K \ r i?, tf ^ ^*? s •A 5 •iniiih

.

a~~-

r***

, T

)" r' x i- ^[t •v /x ^

CO

td

M

^-

tr1

DCD

&J

M

- X

l"

* *™

^

8 S

g g

5 g

s s?

i. S

l :.

OJ

JB

O

g

3

c*

rt

O

*^

fjj

rt-

Q-Q

-O

S

q

-

o

g

W

18

| B.

S -.

1- M

?w

fc

!j*

3

^*\

35

35

BS 3 3"

5- s

f f

S. 1

c" ^

p* 1 5 y if D O ^. r ™ ^j\ 0 ^

o2

-C

. w

P

'

X. S1 5 rt ••c t- O 0 l V |\ oq S:

^ff

'

0 i"t

V

2*

s o -x\

l? 0 ^ r •N "^ El i ^ y l* — 2

^

— D P* ^ ^ — - r 7 w 5 S—

? s' tt* , IA ^J ^ tO 01 s~-

4 -

\ ^ \^

^

~L ^ P

f

Q

V.JT

~"

^ ^ 1 W 0 ? 5* vi '

~ 0

o O Si S S *^ 5 r2,

* |

s1 1'

IT01

"

t2so

ivd

^

^

^rt

3 w

^

r*-

2.

sa

^ 5'

*"*

"1

n 0 ^ S/

"•^ ^ ^ 3' w

/i -fc ^v^

(Jo

1

z \ or*to

o

P3

M

0 ROUND

SURVE ^

en 1 (—1

o r* 3-

3

O S o

2

"TS

1 s ffi

* s

D.

"^•5

J p* TECHNICA

L y data

for

each ~ D

t

^

^

^

("

PO

o >

S o.

St

.|^

**"

•Si w -T

iK*

W < 1

SELF POTENTIAL

Instrument--————————————————-—-.^——--——.™———.-—— Range.Survey Method —————-———-———-———.^———————.--.—-.—.—-^.—.—.—.-.-—

Corrections made.

RADIOMETRIC

Instrument——

Values measured.Energy windows (levels) -——-———^———————^—-——-—.——.—.-—.—..—.—,.———Height of instrument——-————-—————.—————.-—-..-.—.-™Background Count.Size of detector——.—-—-..—-———-———-—————————..———.———--..-—...-..

Overburden —-———^—^-—.-^——-^————--——.—-———————.——.——.—.—.(type, depth - include outcrop map)

OTHERS (SEISMIC, DRILL WELL LOGGING ETC.)

Type of survey———-——^-^————————————— Instrument ——————————————————————————— Accuracy__________________________Parameters measured.

Additional information (for understanding results).

AIRBORNE SURVEYS

Type of survey(s) ———

Instrument(s) —————(specify for each type of lurvey)

Accuracy——————————————(specify for each type of survey)

Aircraft used———.——————.———.-—.————.——..—.——Sensor altitude.Navigation and flight path recovery method.

Aircraft altitude_______________________________Line Sparing Miles flown over total area-——————————-——.™————.—Over claims only..

GEOCHEMICAL SURVEY - PROCEDURE RECORD

Numbers of claims from which samples taken.

Total Number of Samples. Type of Sample.

(Nature of Material)Average Sample Weight—————— Method of Collection-^————^—

Soil Horizon Sampled. Horizon Development- Sample Depth————— Terrain————————

Drainage Development——————————— Estimated Range of Overburden Thickness.

ANALYTICAL METHODSValues expressed in: percent

p. p. m. p. p. b.

Da a

Cu, Pb, Zn, Ni, Co, Ag, Mo, As,-( circle)

Others - _______,————-—--————.™^—.Field Analysis (.

Extraction Method. Analytical Method- Reagents Used;——

Field Laboratory AnalysisNo. —————————,

SAMPLE PREPARATION(Includes drying, screening, crushing, ashing)

Mesh size of fraction used for analysis ————

Extraction Method. Analytical Method . Reagents Used——

Commercial Laboratory (- Name of Laboratory— Extraction Method—— Analytical Method —— Reagents Used————

.tests)

.tests)

.tests)

General. General.

/LL^v Ministry ot Technical Assess)I TT 1 Natural ii, i. /^ j-. VVy Resources Work CreditsOntario ^^

inent File2.6904

Date Mining Recorder's Report of1984 08 07 Work "a 235-84

Recorded Holder

TROUTFLY RESOURCES INCTownship or Area GR()VES ^^p

Type of survey and number of Assessment days credit per claim

Geophysical 40

20

RariinniPtrir days

Oth*r days

Section 77 (19) See "Mining Claims Assested" column

Geological days

Geochemiral days

Man days CH Airborne O

Special provision Q Ground Q

[~1 Credits have been reduced because of partial coverage of claims.

tZ] Credits have been reduced because of corrections to work dates and figures of applicant.

Mining Claims Assessed

P 683891-94

683963-64-65-67-68

Special credits under section 77 (16) for the following mining claims

30 DAYS ELECTROMAGNETIC 20 DAYS ELECTROMAGNETIC

15 DAYS MAGNETOMETER 10 DAYS MAGNETOMETER

P 683966 P 683892-93

No credits have been allowed for the following mining claims

LJ not sufficiently covered by the survey LJ Insufficient technical data filed

The Mining Recorder may reduce the above credits if necessary in order that the total number of approved assessment days recorded on each claim does not exceed the maximum allowed as follows: Geophysical — 80; Geological — 40; Geochemical — 40; Section 77(19)—60:828 (83/6)

1984 07 11 Your File: 235 Our File: 2.6904

Mr. Bruce HanleyMining RecorderMinistry of Natural Resources60 Wilson AvenueTimmins, OntarioP4N 2S7

Dear Sir:

We have received reports and maps for a Geophysical (Electromagnetic and Magnetometer) Survey submitted under Special Provisions (credit for Performance and Coverage) on Mining Claims P 683891 et al In the Township of Groves.

This material will be examined and assessed and a statement of assessment work credits will be Issued.

Yours sincerely,

S.E. YundtDirectorLand Management Branch

Whitney Block, Room 6643Queen's ParkToronto, OntarioM7A 1W3Phone: (416) 965-1380

A. Barr:sc

cc: Troutfly Resources Inc 1585 - B Britannia Rd E Suitee 11 S 12 M1ss1ssauga, Ontario L4W 2M4 Attn: Nell D. Novak

Ministry ofNaturalResources

UIO

1984 08 07 Your File: 235-84 Our F ile: 2 .6904

Bruce W. HanleyMining RecorderMinistry,of Natural Resources60 Wilson AvenueTimmins, OntarioP4N 2S7

Dear Sir:

Enclosed are two copies of a Notice of Intent with statements listing a reduced rate of assessment work credits to be allowed for a technical survey. Please forward one copy to the recorded holder of the claims and retain the other. In approximately fifteen days from the above date, a final letter of approval of these credits will be sent to you. On receipt of the approval letter, you may then change the work entries on the claim record sheets.For further information, if required, please contact

Mr. R.J. Pichette at 416/965-4888.

Yours sincerely,

S. E. YundtDirectorLand Management Branch

Whitney Block, Room 6643 Queen's Park Toronto, Ontario M7A 1W3

. Hurst:mc

Ends.

cc: Troutfly Resources Inc Suites 11 S 12 1505-B Britannia Road East Mississauga, Ontario L4W 2M4

cc: Mr. G. H. FergusonMining S Lands Commissioner Toronto, Ontario

645

Ministry of •Natural Resources

Ontario

Notice of Intent

for Technical Reports

1984 08 07

2.6904/235-84

An examination of your survey report indicates that the requirements of The Ontario Mining Act have not been fully met to warrant maximum assessment work credits. This notice is merely a warning that you will not be allowed the number of assessment work days credits that you expected and also that in approximately 15 days from the above date, the mining recorder will be authorized to change the entries on his record sheets to agree with the enclosed statement. Please note that until such time as the recorder actually changes the entry on the record sheet, the status of the claim remains unchanged.

If you are of the opinion that these changes by the mining recorder will jeopardize your claims, you may during the next fifteen days apply to the Mining and Lands Commissioner for an extension of time. Abstracts should be sent with your application.

If the reduced rate of credits does not jeopardize the status of the claims then you need not seek relief from the Mining and Lands Commissioner and this Notice of Intent may be disregarded.

If your survey was submitted and assessed under the "Special Provision-Performance and Coverage" method and you are of the opinion that a re-appraisal under the "Man-days" method would result in the approval of a greater number of days credit per claim, you may, within the said fifteen day period, submit assessment work breakdowns listing the employees names, addresses and the "dates and hours they worked. The new work breakdowns should be submitted direct to the Land Management Branch, Toronto. The report will be re-assessed and a new statement of credits based on actual days worked will be issued.

B46 (82/5)

Mining Lands Section

Control Sheet

File

TYPE OF SURVEY GEOPHYSICAL

GEOLOGICAL

GEOCHEMICAL

EXPENDITURE

MINING LANDS COMMENTS:

Signature of Aspegsor

Date

1984 08 31 Your File: 235-84 Our File: 2.6904

Bruce W. HanleyMining RecorderMinistry of Natural Resources60 Wilson AvenueTimmins, OntarioP4N 2S7

Dear Sir:

RE: Notice of Intent dated August 7, 1984 Geophysical (Electromagnetic and Mene tome ter) Survey on Mining Claims P 683891 et al In the Township of Groves

The assessment work credits, as listed with the above-mentioned Notice of Intent, have been approved as of the above date.

Please Inform the recorded holder of thesetrtlnlng claims and so Indicate on your records.

Youts sincerely,

S.E. YundtDirectorLand Management Branch

Whitney Block, Room 6643 Queen's Park Toronto, Ontario M7A 1W3 Phone:(416)965-4888

S. Hurst:me

cc: Troutfly Resources Inc Suites 11 ft 12 1505-B Britannia Road East Mlsslssauga, Ontario L4W 2M4

cc: Mr. G.H. FergusonMining a* Lands CommissionerToronto, Ontario

End.

cc: Resident Geologist Timmins, Ontario

Ms*

X*

x*X*

.

NORTH GROUP

SOUTH GROUP

683964*

GOGAMA

tfc-PROPERTY

LOCATION PLAN

t ~ 1 6 miles683967 P-6839

LEGEND

GRID LINES

CLAIM POST

CLAIM LINE

CLAIM NUMBER

located, presumed

Q A O E.M. 16 CONDUCTOR s trong, moderate, weak E.M. 16 C ONDUCTOR A XIS MAGNETIC ANOMALY i 60000 Y

SCALEl = 500'

683892

P-^8 838 94

1500

SEAWAY BASE METALS LTD.GEOPHYSICAL COMPILATION PLAN

GROVES TWP. ONTARIO

APPROVED

41P12SE0508 a.6904 GROVES 200