sec state collaborative be inspired, engaged, informed project planning and leader training san...
TRANSCRIPT
SEC State Collaborative Be Inspired, Engaged, Informed
Project Planning and Leader TrainingSan Diego February 2008
Surveys of Enacted Curriculum
Tools for Aligning Instruction, Standards, Tools for Aligning Instruction, Standards,
& Assessments& Assessments
Orientation for Educators
Surveys of Enacted Curriculum
New members: Session topicsNew members: Session topics
What is SEC? Why? How? -- RB What Collaborative does; Tools --RB SEC online survey system/alignment –
Diana Nunnaley How to plan an SEC project – Lani
Seikaly How to use SEC data charts– Lisa
Palacios
RationaleRationale
AssessmentStandards
Curriculum
Key Question -- SEC ToolsKey Question -- SEC ToolsResearch into PracticeResearch into Practice
How can Educators obtain reliable, valid data to determine Alignment of instruction with required standards and assessments?
Surveys of Enacted Surveys of Enacted CurriculumCurriculum
A neutral content grid
with cognitive demand
The intended curriculum: State content standards—What students should learn
The enacted curriculum: What teachers teach
The learned curriculum: Student outcomes based on school learning
The assessed curriculum: State (and other) assessments—tested learning
Categories of Cognitive Demand
Topics Memorize Peform
Procedures Communicate Understanding
Sovle non-routine
problems
Conjecture/ Generalize/
Prove Multiple
Step Equations
Inequalities
Literal Equations
Lines / Slope and Intercept
Operations on
Polynomials
Quadratic Equations
Content MatrixContent Matrix
• School & Class Description• Instructional Activities
• General• Problem Solving Activities
• Pairs & Small Group Work• Use of Hands-on Materials• Use of Calculators/Computers & other Ed. Tech.
• Assessment Use• Instructional Influences
• Instructional Readiness• Teacher Opinions• Professional Development
• Types, Frequency• Content , Active,• Collegial, Coherence
• Instructional Content•Topic x Cog. Demand
Survey Sections/Uses
Steps in SEC DevelopmentSteps in SEC Development
R&D studies curriculum-- Early ‘90s Models:TIMSS, NAEP, Analyze assessment OTL interest of States, Porter/ Smithson research, CCSSO Science Assessment project State collaborative –Develop surveys-’98-’01 (NSF)
11-State field study, Reports, Alignment, USI Use of data experiment – DEC (NSF/ROLE:‘01-04) Evaluation: MSP RETA PD Study (‘02 – 05, NSF) English/ Language Arts survey (‘03 – 04) Current projects: 15 States, 4 Districts, 5 MSPs
Applications Applications
Alignment analysis --instruction, standards, assessments
Instructional improvement in schools Needs assessment/ Evaluation Indicators – monitoring change over time
Multi-State CollaborativeMulti-State Collaborative
Build Knowledge of leaders Share Strategies Produce joint products, tools
SEC Collaborative offersSEC Collaborative offers
Core Components of SEC tools/services1) Surveys with teachers – report instruction
2) Alignment analysis – content code standards and assessments
3) How to use Data – knowledge, skills
4) Leader development – 2-3 meetings/yr
4) In-state workshops: a) orientation
b) use of data
SEC Collaborative Members2007-08
•Delaware•Idaho•Illinois•Indiana•Iowa•Kansas•Maine•Michigan•Mississippi• Montana
• Ohio• Oklahoma• Oregon• Wisconsin
SEC ELL Project• Minnesota• Florida• Virginia• Utah• Plus 5
Social Studies SEC Development2005-2007
• Arizona• Delaware• Idaho• Maine•Ohio•Oregon•Vermont•Wisconsin• Minnesota• Nevada
•U of Wis-WCER• NCSS• Civics Education•National Geographic•GENIP•NCEE•CCSSO
SEC Collaborating OrganizationsSEC Collaborating Organizations
•Council of Chief State School Officers www.SECsurvey.org
•Wisconsin Center for Education Research www.SEConline.org
•Learning Point Associates/NCREL www.SECsupport.org
•TERC Regional Alliance DEC Project www.ra.terc.edu/DEC
SEC CollaborativeSEC Collaborative
States, Districts
CCSSO – SEC Collaborative Management Rolf Blank, Carlise Smith
WCER – Surveys, Reporting, Alignment analysis John Smithson, Alissa Minor, Eric Osthoff
Training & Technical AssistanceCarolyn Karatzas, Consultant, CCSSODiana Nunnaley, TERC Lisa Palacios,Gary Money, Learning Point Associates
Lani Seikaly, Hillstreet & MainJennifer Unger, The Groupworks
Deborah Fairington, Michael Erhlinghaus, Measured Progress
SEC Websites SEC Websites
CCSSO, SEC Collaborative
www.SECsurvey.org
WCER, SEC Online Survey and Reports
www.SEConline.org
SEC State Collaborative Be Inspired, Engaged, Informed
Project Planning and Leader TrainingSan Diego February 2008
Surveys of Enacted Curriculum
SEC by the Numbers: ’06-07SEC by the Numbers: ’06-07
10,393 SEC Surveys 06-07
4674 Math
1993 Science
3646 ELAR
80 Soc Stud
131 Standards/Assess. Content analysis
1000 est. schools--Data use
SEC by the Numbers (2)SEC by the Numbers (2)
• By Comparison
1996 207 Science Teachers (5 states)
1999 626 M/S Teachers (11 states)
2005 5,414 E, M, S teachers
2006 10,200 E, M, S teachers
2007 10,400 E, M, S, SSt (27 states)•
SEC CollaborativeSEC Collaborative
How SEC Collaborative works for members Training and Assistance to project leaders Project Planning w/ budget– meet local objectives Each state/district makes decisions on services &
project plan Multi-state benefits of collaborative
e.g., learning from experience, sharing ideas, training
AccomplishmentsAccomplishments06-0706-07
SEC CollaborativeSEC Collaborative In-state Leader workshops, Project Planning PPTs for Orientation, Survey Admin, Data
use Leader Development Standards document Website revisions, improvements
(SECsurvey.org; SEConline.org)E.g., State Projects, All Alignment results,
Report generator
More AccomplishmentsMore Accomplishments SEC CollaborativeSEC Collaborative
“Using Data to Improve Instruction” Education Leaders conference, St. Louis – 200 leaders, 32 sessions (30 states)
Social Studies Survey development – 10 states, 5 prof. orgs.,
NAEP Alignment analysis – 2007 Math items Research/evaluation:
MSP study of professional development– multi-site study Ohio case study of district/school implementation of SEC Follow-up data tool –to track school level data Validity study—longitudinal data for teachers and students
Ohio reading study
Initiatives SEC 07-08Initiatives SEC 07-08
College Board standards alignment analysis Iowa SEC ELL Consortium Webinar Training Regional Leader Training Planning—
Summer Meeting/ConferenceWork Group productsCoding with States
Goals SEC 07-08Goals SEC 07-08
State/local projects—From pilots to broad application, local leadership training
Integrate SEC tools/data with Improvement Initiatives, especially data-driven
Research/Evaluation --Broader use of Surveys, Alignment
Assist States in planning with Service delivery agencies; SEC team with CACs & Labs
Social Studies SEC complete & implement
View from CCSSO View from CCSSO State Opportunities w/ SECState Opportunities w/ SEC
Alignment –a) Standards-based consequential validity B) Improving standards in state
Evaluation – connecting with resch/eval in states Providing local leaders with basic information, then building on it
Montana model KS Webinar model
Data-driven instructional improvement –relate SEC to other models E.g. St. Louis conference
Implement through pilot district example – OH, OR From pilots to broad application, local leadership training
Link SEC to other funded initaitives, ELL, R!, Title I sch improve, MSP
Longitudinal Data Systems (LDS)—enter SEC into systems
Questions Addressed by SEC DataQuestions Addressed by SEC Data
How can in-depth data on content of instruction be collected and reported–not topic checklists, to analyze teaching content in relation to standards, assessments, achievement?
How can methods of teaching practices be compared across classrooms, schools, districts, and states?
How can enacted curriculum data be reported in a manner to encourage use by teachers to improve instruction?
MSP PD Study SitesMSP PD Study Sites
Brockport/Rochester – SUNYCleveland Municipal SDCorpus Christi – AIMS - TX A&MEl Paso – UTEP State MSPs: ID, IL, OR, OK, ME, MT
NSF MSPs: Boston NJ MSP -- 12 districts
NC MSP -- 17 districts SW PA MSP
SCALE – Los Angeles
Key Education Questions Key Education Questions (cont’d)(cont’d)
How can we measure the effects of standards-based initiatives on instructional practices and curriculum in classrooms?
How can we analyze effectiveness of professional development on changes in teachers’ instructional practices? (i.e. determine the quality of professional development)
What if…What if…
[for Intro of SEC to Educators]You could use data on instructional quality and content to guide professional development?
You could have consistency across grade levels?
You could know how well aligned your state standards were to the state assessment?
You could compare how you teach content compared to how others across the nation teach?
You could use anonymous teacher data to start a powerful school discussion about what the teacher needs are?
Uses a multi-dimensional language fordescribing instructional content
SEC Instructional Content
Topics
byCognitive Demand
(Expectations for Student Learning)
Categories of Cognitive Demand
Topics Memorize
facts, defintions
Conduct Invest/ Perf Procedures
Communicate Understanding of sci concepts
Analzye information
Apply concepts/ Connnect
Nature of Science
Meas/Calc. in Science
Life Science
Physical Science
Earth Science
Chem/Biol/ Physics
(HS)
Science content matrixScience content matrix
MemorizePerform
CommunicateConjecture
Connect0
0.020.040.060.08
0.1
Operations
Number Sense
Measurement
Geometric Concepts
Algebraic Concepts
Data Analysis
Instructional Technology
MemorizePerform
CommunicateConjecture
Connect
State J Grade 8Mathematics Instruction
Content Maps
The The EnactedEnacted Curriculum Curriculum