sechelt community projects inc. (the “corporation”) · (the “corporation”) minutes of...
TRANSCRIPT
Page 1 of 3
SECHELT COMMUNITY PROJECTS INC. (the “Corporation”)
MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS HELD ON MONDAY,
MARCH 26, 2018 AT 09:00 A.M. AT THE SUNSHINE COAST COMMUNITY FOREST
CONFERENCE ROOM, SECHELT, B.C.
PRESENT: Anderson, Tim Bonderud, Glen Craig, Geoff
(Directors) D'Arcy, Bob Fournier, Brian
Tony Greenfield Moonen, Peter
ALSO PRESENT: Harris, Linda - Administrator Lasser, Dave - Operations Manager
Richard Wilson, TCG
REGRETS: Fogarty, Fidel Pinfold, Tom
Call to Order
The meeting was called to order at 9:05 a.m.
Agenda
The agenda was reviewed and adopted.
1.0 Minutes
MOTION:
UPON MOTION DULY MADE AND SECONDED IT WAS RESOLVED that the minutes of the
meeting of January 29, 2018 be received and approved without change. Motion carried.
2.0 Finance
2.1 2017 Audited Financial Statement
Richard Wilson verbally reviewed the final report from the Auditors related to the Consolidated
Financial Statement for the year ended December 31, 2017, the recommended adjusting journal
entries and the Audit Committee acceptance document. Tim (Chair of Audit Committee) reported
that he had reviewed the Auditor’s report and had spoken with lead auditor. Tim is satisfied with
the audit process and the results.
MOTION:
UPON MOTION DULY MADE AND SECONDED IT WAS RESOLVED that the final
report from the Auditors related to the Consolidated Financial Statement for the year ended
December 31, 2017, the recommended adjusting journal entries and the Audit Committee
acceptance document be received and accepted. Motion carried.
MOTION:
UPON MOTION DULY MADE AND SECONDED IT WAS RESOLVED that the Audited
Consolidated Financial Statement for the year ended December 31. 2017 be received and
accepted. Motion carried.
Page 2 of 3
Pursuant to Sections 90(2)(b) "consideration of information received and held in confidence ... " of the Community Charter, it has been determined that the meeting will move in-camera at 9:15 am.
The regular meeting resumed at 9:50 a.m.
MOTION:
UPON MOTION DULY MADE AND SECONDED IT WAS RESOLVED that a dividend of
$25,890 be paid to the shareholder for return on investment. Motion carried.
MOTION:
UPON MOTION DULY MADE AND SECONDED IT WAS RESOLVED that an
extraordinary dividend of $750,000 be paid to the Shareholder with the recommendation that it
be deposited into the SCCF Legacy Fund in its entirety. Motion carried.
The recommendation was put forth to name Crowe Mackay as SCPI's Auditor for the 2018 fiscal year.
This recommendation is to be presented to the shareholder for their approval at the upcoming annual
general meeting.
3.0 Operations Manager's Report
The Operations Manager's Report was received and discussed. Further information was provided for
the following:
- Six cedar logs from Block EW23 have been donated to the shíshálh Nation for future carving.
- Dave clarified the practice of protecting established trails during harvest activity. He has
committed to protecting Locomotive Trail in Halfmoon Bay due to its historical significance.
Other trails are assessed for value individually and possible relocation commitments can be made
if deemed appropriate.
MOTION:
UPON MOTION DULY MADE AND SECONDED IT WAS RESOLVED that the Operations
Manager's Report be received and approved. Motion carried.
4.0 Business Arising
4.1 As per discussions during the October 23, 2017 meeting, Tony has obtained quotes for printing
biodiversity brochures detailing information about the local butterfly population.
MOTION:
UPON MOTION DULY MADE AND SECONDED IT WAS RESOLVED that $2,000 be
committed to cover the cost of printing 1000 biodiversity brochures - butterfly theme, as produced
by Tony Greenfield. Motion carried.
4.2 Installation of the ancient log display at the Watermark is being delayed by DOS Planning
Department processes.
4.3 A report entitled Roosevelt Elk Habitat Assessment by Sally Leigh Spencer was received and
discussed. It has already been posted on our website.
Page 3 of 3
5.0 Committees
5.1 Nominations
Brian reported that two candidates for directorship have been interviewed, are acceptable to
the Nominations Committee and are willing to stand for election to the Board. Their names
will be put forward to the shareholder for acceptance at the Annual General Meeting. They
will both be recommended for one-year terms to enable continuance of our staggered term
policy.
5.2 Legacy Fund
Bob reported that he will be stepping down from the Community Forest board and therefore
the Legacy Fund Assessment Committee. This leaves a short-term vacancy on the
committee. Tim has agreed to step in for the one upcoming meeting to assist with the review
of received applications.
6.0 Other Business
6.1 Glen and Tom attended a Carbon/Life Cycle analysis workshop organized by Peter Moonen,
National Sustainability Manager, Canadian Wood Council recently. Glen reported that it was a
very successful and informative workshop. The presentation by Werner Kurz was especially
powerful.
6.2 The SCCF AGM will be held on May 7 @ 7pm at the Sunshine Coast Botanical Gardens.
6.3 It was confirmed that SCCF directors receive no remuneration for their service on the board,
however, a precedent has been set to provide nominal gifts upon their retirement or departure.
MOTION:
UPON MOTION DULY MADE AND SECONDED IT WAS RESOLVED that upon
retirement from the Board of Directors, SCPI will make a cash donation to the charity of choice
of a retiring director. The donation will have a value of $100 per year of service and will be given
in the name of the retiring director. Motion carried.
7.0 Next Meeting
The next regular meeting of the Board of Directors will be held on Monday May 14, 2018 at 9:00 am.
Termination
There being no further business, the meeting terminated at 11:35 am.
Ecologic Consulting
S u n s h i n e C o a s t C o m m u n i t y F o r e s t
R o o s e v e l t E l k H a b i t a t
A s s e s s m e n t
Submitted by: Sally Leigh-Spencer, R.P. Bio. Ecologic Consulting 5632 Menzies Rd. Duncan, B.C. V9L 6G7
Submitted to: Dave Lasser, RPF Operations Manager Sunshine Coast Community Forest
December 2017
Table of Contents List of Figures ................................................................................................................................. 2
List of Tables .................................................................................................................................. 2
List of Appendices .......................................................................................................................... 2
1.0 Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 1
2.0 Methodology ............................................................................................................................ 2
3.0 Background .............................................................................................................................. 3
3.1 Sunshine Coast Community Forest ....................................................................................... 3
3.2 Roosevelt Elk Status ............................................................................................................. 5
3.3 Roosevelt Elk Habitat ........................................................................................................... 5
3.4 Roosevelt Elk Translocations ................................................................................................ 7
4.0 Discussion ................................................................................................................................ 8
5.0 Literature Cited ...................................................................................................................... 13
List of Figures Figure 1: Sunshine Coast Community Forest tenure boundary .......................................................... 1 Figure 2: Forest age classes within Block 1 of the Sunshine Coast Community Forest ...................... 2 Figure 3: Biogeoclimatic Variants represented within the Sunshine Coast Community Forest ......... 3 Figure 4: Lower Wilson Creek portion of SCCF showing block reserves and OGMAs ....................... 10 Figure 5: Block EW28 ....................................................................................................................... 11 Figure 6: Block EW16 ....................................................................................................................... 11 Figure 7: The older forests of 130+ years comprised of Douglas fir, western hemlock and western redcedar within the reserves, riparian zones and OGMAs provide connectivity, forage, thermal and snow interception cover. ................................................................................................................. 12
List of Tables Table 1: Snowpack zones (Rain/Snow Zones) and associated elevations represented by the BEC Zones within the SCCF ........................................................................................................................ 5
List of Appendices APPENDIX 1: Important forage plants for Roosevelt Elk (Nyberg and Janz 1990) ............................ 14
Ecologic Consulting December 2017
Sunshine Coast Community Forest Roosevelt Elk Habitat Assessment
1.0 Introduction The Sunshine Coast is home to a large population of Roosevelt Elk that were relocated from various locations on Vancouver Island in 1987 and again in 1993 (LMRERP 2011). The success of establishment of the herd and the growth of the population has provided many animals for other relocations along the mainland coast. The herds on the Sunshine Coast have thrived on the lower to mid-elevation south and west aspect sites that have ample year-round forage and relatively snow free winters. There is an abundance of suitable closed canopy forests that provide both summer and winter thermal cover. Upon request of the Sunshine Coast Community Forest (SCCF) in late November 2017, Sally Leigh-Spencer (R.P. Bio.) of Ecologic Consulting conducted a field assessment to look at the suitability and connectivity of Roosevelt Elk seasonal habitats within the SCCF tenure (Block 1) of the Wilson Creek Watershed (Figure 1). Figure 1: Sunshine Coast Community Forest tenure boundary
Block 1
2 Ecologic Consulting December 2017
2.0 Methodology A field reconnaissance was conducted on December 1st, 2017 to assess the forest habitat suitability and connectivity of habitats on both the west and east sides of Wilson Creek. A variety of forested stands were walked through to assess the available elk forage, thermal and snow interception cover and connectivity between stands. The areas included the forested stands around Block EW28, including the wildlife tree retention areas (WTRA), Block EW16 and the adjacent juvenile spaced stands on the west side of Wilson Creek. The spaced and pruned stands along the east side of Husdon were also assessed. We then walked into several stands on the east side of Wilson Creek, including the older stands along the riparian zone and the old growth management areas (OGMAs). These age class 8 forests (141 to 250 years) comprised of Douglas fir, western hemlock and western redcedar provide significant connectivity, forage, thermal and snow interception cover within the Wilson Creek drainage (Figure 2). A literature review was completed on the translocation history of Roosevelt Elk on the Sunshine Coast.
Figure 2: Forest age classes within Block 1 of the Sunshine Coast Community Forest
3 Ecologic Consulting December 2017
3.0 Background
3.1 Sunshine Coast Community Forest The Wilson Creek Watershed is comprised of Wilson Creek, East Wilson Creek and Husdon Creek and is approximately 2,207 ha in size (Horel 2012). The Wilson Creek portion of the SCCF (Block 1) is situated within the lower to mid-portion of the overall watershed and is comprised of 822.7 ha (Figure 2). There are 5 Biogeoclimatic (BEC) Variants represented within the Sunshine Coast Community Forest (Figure 3):
→ CWHxm1 (Coastal Western Hemlock Eastern Very Dry Maritime) → CWHdm (Coastal Western Hemlock Dry Maritime) → CWHvm1 (Coastal Western Hemlock Submontane Very Wet Maritime) → CWHvm2 (Coastal Western Hemlock Montane Very Wet Maritime) → MHmm1 (Mountain Hemlock Windward Moist Maritime)
Figure 3: Biogeoclimatic Variants represented within the Sunshine Coast Community Forest
4 Ecologic Consulting December 2017
Within the Wilson Creek watershed, Block 1 of the SCCF, two BEC Variants are represented, the CWHxm1 and the CWHdm. The CWHxm1 occurs at low elevations from sea level to 700m and has dry, hot summers and moist, mild winters with relatively little snowfall. Growing seasons are long with a water deficit. The zonal forests are characterized by Douglas fir (Fd) dominating sites with lesser amounts of western hemlock (Hw) and minor cover of western redcedar (Cw). The understory is dominated with salal, dull Oregon-grape, red huckleberry and the mosses Hylocomium splendens and Kindbergia oregana. Depending on the richness and soil moisture of the site other species include vanilla-leaf, sword fern, twinflower and bracken fern (Green and Klinka 1994). The CWHxm1 is considered to fall within the shallow snowpack zone or rain zone (below 300m) with usually shallow snowpack averaging <30cm Critical snowpacks occur less than once in every 15 years (Table 1). Above 300m in elevation the zone changes to the rain-on-snow zone; however on warm aspect sites the elevation of the rain zone will increase significantly. Some younger stands can provide winter thermal cover given appropriate height, cover and canopy (Nyberg and Janz 1990). During average years snow depths do not restrict access to food so winter, spring and summer ranges often overlap. Snow interception and thermal cover is required during tears where there are critical snow depths (Nyberg and Janz 1990). The CWHdm has warm, relatively dry summers and moist, mild winters with little snowfall. Zonal forests are dominated by Fd, Hw and Cw with salal and red huckleberry dominating the understory with minor amounts of dull Oregon-grape, vine maple, bracken fern and sword fern (Green and Klinka 1994). The CWHdm falls within the shallow to moderate snowpack zone (rain-on-snow transition zone). The lower elevations the snowpack does not exceed 30 cm and is considered ephemeral while the higher elevations the snowpack can persist longer. On warmer aspect slopes such as the slopes of Wilson Creek, the snowpack will be less significant and will melt more frequently. Some young stands can provide cover given appropriate height, cover and canopy closure. During average years snow does not restrict access to food so winter, spring and summer ranges often overlap (Nyberg and Janz 1990). The snowpack zones (rain/snow zones (Horel 2014)) and associated elevations represented by the BEC Zones within the SCCF are listed in Table 1.
5 Ecologic Consulting December 2017
Table 1: Snowpack zones (Rain/Snow Zones) and associated elevations represented by the BEC Zones within the SCCF
3.2 Roosevelt Elk Status Roosevelt Elk (Cervus elaphus roosevelti) are native to Vancouver Island, the south coast of British Columbia, including the Sunshine Coast and coastal areas of Washington, Oregon and northern California. The range of Roosevelt Elk has been reduced and fragmented in coastal areas and hence is blue-listed (species of special concern) by the Conservation Data Centre (BC.CDC 2017). Although there are local declines, the population is currently stable to increasing overall. The provincial ranking as of March 2017 is S3/S4 (3 = special concern, vulnerable to extirpation or extinction, 4 = apparently secure). The greatest rate of increase has occurred on the mainland coast around the site of re-introduction (Sunshine Coast) where there is an approximate increase of range and population of 20% per year ((D. Reynolds, pers. comm., 2010) from BC CDC 2017)). Both the Vancouver Island and the Sechelt populations have continued to expand in recent decades (D. Reynolds, pers. comm. 2017). The planning process for ungulates was established by the Minister of Water Land and Air Protection in 2004. An Order under the Government Action Regulation (GAR) declared which ungulate species would be included under the category of Ungulate Winter Range (UWR) for the entire province. In the Sunshine Coast Forest District, only Mountain Goat (one out of three of the ungulate species) were declared as urgent. Roosevelt Elk and Black-tailed Deer were considered non-urgent thereby not part of the UWR regulated planning process. Therefore, there are no designated UWRs for deer and elk.
3.3 Roosevelt Elk Habitat Roosevelt Elk habitat requirements are driven by their need for abundant, high quality forage. As a result, they are typically found in any habitat dominated by dense shrub cover, including open coniferous or deciduous forest stands, wetlands, riparian areas, vegetated slides in the summer
6 Ecologic Consulting December 2017
and around the edges of rock outcrops with warm aspects in the winter and spring (Nyberg and Janz 1990). Winter is the most critical season for Roosevelt elk. Winter ranges for elk on Vancouver Island and the Sunshine Coast are generally found in low elevation river valleys and the lower part of watersheds. Warm aspects, specifically south and southwest south facing slopes provide suitable thermal attributes where forested stands are interspersed with rock outcrops and open hill slopes. During mild winters or in the shallow snowpack zone (rain zone), elk forage extensively in openings (natural openings and recent clear-cuts) and open forests, especially those on rich, moist sites. When snow conditions preclude feeding in more open areas (snow depth >30 cm or snow crusted), elk will shift to densely canopied mature or old-growth forests on floodplains or moderately steep southerly slopes where snowpacks are lower (Brunt 1990). Second growth stands can satisfy winter range requirements in the shallow to moderate snowpack zone (rain and rain-on-snow zone) while older forests with suitable snow interception are required to satisfy critical winter habitat requirements in the moderate to deep snowpack zones depending on the aspect and hillside shading (Nyberg and Janz 1990). Both migratory and non-migratory (resident) elk occur on Vancouver Island and the Sunshine Coast. Migratory elk occupy distinct seasonal ranges during the winter, summer/fall and, sometimes, spring seasons. Migratory elk benefit from shallower snow depths on low-elevation winter ranges and abundant, diverse forage on higher elevation summer/fall ranges. There are two different movement patterns associated with migratory elk. There are those herds that are obligate migrators that move annually to their traditional winter ranges and those herds that are facultative, moving only when snow depths cause the animals to move to lower elevations with less snow. Migratory elk populations generally move into high elevation sub-alpine and alpine areas in summer. The location of spring ranges is variable; they are often located between winter and summer ranges. Important sites include riparian areas, warm aspect vegetated slides and rock outcrops that are snow-free early in the season and provide an abundance of forage. There are some non-migratory elk populations that must meet all their life history requirements within relatively small, low-elevation ranges that may or may not be captured by existing UWRs, riparian zones and OGMAs. Seasonal ranges of migratory elk are usually within the watershed of a single river, but can be separated by as much as 40 km. Individual seasonal ranges may be up to 30 km2 in size. Non-migratory or resident elk also occur in favourable low-elevation habitats on Vancouver Island and the Sunshine Coast. Resident elk occupy single annual home ranges of about 5-10 km2 at lower elevations that sometimes overlap the winter ranges of migratory elk herds (Brunt 1990). Roosevelt elk require snow interception cover in winter when snow depths exceed 30 cm (BC Ministry of Water, Land and Air Protection 2004). Older stands are preferred as they provide
7 Ecologic Consulting December 2017
suitable snow interception characteristics and access to forage. In other seasons elk are usually associated with cover for predator-avoidance reasons and thermal cover, often bedding down just inside a forested edge (Shackleton 1999). Important landscape level considerations affecting the relative value of an area as elk winter range include the following (Brunt 1990):
→ position in the watershed (low, mod, or high snowfall area – Elk Winter Range (EWR) more critical in areas of higher snowfall);
→ distance to other winter ranges (greater distances between winter ranges increases their individual importance);
→ adjacency to high quality spring and summer range;
→ the capability of adjacent areas to satisfy elk habitat requirements; and factors affecting local climatic conditions such as exposure to dominant winds or marine influences,
→ warm aspect sites (south and southwest) provide thermal radiation during colder winter periods.
Roosevelt Elk range in herds and can occupy habitat features for days at a time (Nyberg and Janz 1990). As a result, they are susceptible to harassment by human-related activities that can displace them from otherwise suitable habitat.
3.4 Roosevelt Elk Translocations → 24 Roosevelt Elk were relocated from Vancouver Island to the Sunshine Coast from
1987 to 1993.
→ The need to control nuisance animals and the goal to continue re-establishing elk populations in other areas resulted in the development of the Lower Mainland Roosevelt Elk Recovery Project (LMRERP) in 2000.
→ From 2001 to 2015, 405 Roosevelt Elk have been translocated from the original Sechelt herd.
→ As of 2015, the population is estimated to be 200 and considered stable. The carrying
capacity is estimated at 333 animals with a target population of 200. The Sechelt herd is considered a source population for translocations (MFLNRO 2015).
8 Ecologic Consulting December 2017
4.0 Discussion → Roosevelt Elk within the SCCF are either resident herds and/or facultative migrators that
move to lower elevations when snow depths exceed around 30cm. Therefore, mid to older second growth forests provide suitable thermal and snow interception cover.
→ The openings created by the spaced stands provide suitable forage opportunities of conifers, woody shrubs and ferns. The pruned/spaced stands provide ease of movement for elk.
→ The open fields within the lower elevations of the Wilson Creek watershed provide suitable year-round grazing and adjacent protective/thermal cover.
→ There is an abundance of suitable year-round forage and both summer and winter thermal cover for elk herds within the Wilson Creek watershed.
→ The older forests of 130+ years comprised of Douglas fir, western hemlock and western redcedar within the reserves, riparian zones and OGMAs provide connectivity, forage, thermal and snow interception cover to the east side of Wilson Creek (Figures 2, 4 and 7).
→ Many of the 40 to 60 year old stands, especially those that have been spaced provide
suitable winter forage. Sword fern and Vaccinium ssp. were abundant in the different age stands assessed. Important elk forage species are listed in Appendix1 (Nyberg and Janz 1990).
→ The lower Wilson Creek watershed at 154m receives 5% of precipitation falling as snow
water equivalent and at 550m receives 11% (Horel 2012). The elevation below 500m would be considered the shallow snowpack zone and therefore younger to moderate age stands provide suitable winter cover and forage.
→ The Sunshine Coast Roosevelt Elk herd is considered stable and has reached the target
population goal (FLNRO 2015). The herd is one of the primary source of animals for translocations on the coast. The lack of designated UWRs on the Sunshine Coast has not impacted the continual population growth of the herds.
→ Block EW28 in East Wilson is slated for harvest in 2018. The block is 25ha of which 8ha are in reserve (Figure 4). It is comprised of age class 7 (121 to 140 years) forest of Douglas fir, western hemlock and western redcedar with sword fern dominating the understory along with red huckleberry and salal (Figure 2, Figure 5). The block has a southwest (warm) aspect and ranges between 210m and 290m in elevation and is within the CWHdm BEC variant. The block is considered to be within the shallow snowpack zone (rain zone) (Table 1).
9 Ecologic Consulting December 2017
→ Block EW16 is an age class 4 (61 to 80 years) stand of primarily Douglas fir and western hemlock. The canopy cover is approximately 80% and there are no shrubs or herbaceous growth in the understory. The site could provide thermal cover however there are no forage opportunities (Figure 6).
10 Ecologic Consulting December 2017
Figure 4: Lower Wilson Creek portion of SCCF showing block reserves and OGMAs
11 Ecologic Consulting December 2017
Figure 5: Block EW28
Figure 6: Block EW16
12 Ecologic Consulting December 2017
Figure 7: The older forests comprised of Douglas fir, western hemlock and western redcedar within the reserves, riparian zones and OGMAs provide connectivity, forage, thermal and snow interception cover.
13 Ecologic Consulting December 2017
5.0 Literature Cited B.C. Conservation Data Centre. 2017. Species Summary: Cervus elaphus roosevelti. B.C. Minist. of
Environment. Available: http://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/eswp/ (accessed Dec 6, 2017). Brunt, K. 1990. Ecology of Roosevelt Elk. Pg. 65-98. In: J.B. Nyberg and D.W. Janz, eds. Deer and
Elk Habitats in Coastal Forests of Southern British Columbia. Special Report Series 5, B.C. Ministry of Forests, Victoria, B.C.
Horel, G. 2012. Wilson Creek Watershed Assessment Power Point Presentation for SCCF. Horel, G. 2014. Watershed Assessment Chapman and Gray Creek Community Watersheds. LMRERP (Lower Mainland Roosevelt Elk Recovery Project). Project Summary 2010-2011. Ministry of Forests, Lands and Natural Resource Operations (FLNRO). 2015. A Management Plan
for Roosevelt Elk in British Columbia. Nyberg, J. B., and D. W. Janz. 1990. Deer and elk habitats in coastal forests of southern British
Columbia. BC Ministry of Forests Special Report Series 5 and BC Ministry of Environment Technical Monograph #2, Victoria.
Reynolds, D. 2006. History of Roosevelt Elk Recovery in the Lower Mainland Region 2006. Wildlife
Biologist. British Columbia Ministry of Environment.
14 Ecologic Consulting December 2017
APPENDIX 1: Important forage plants for Roosevelt Elk (Nyberg and Janz 1990)