second quarter 2011 remediation progress report defense...

190
ES071311094723SCO/BS2918.DOCX/111950002 Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense Fuel Support Point Norwalk, California Prepared for Kinder Morgan Energy Partners, L.P. 1100 Town & Country Road Orange, California 92868 July 15, 2011 6 Hutton Centre Drive, Suite 700 Santa Ana, California 92707

Upload: others

Post on 26-Sep-2020

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary

ES071311094723SCO/BS2918.DOCX/111950002

Second Quarter 2011

Remediation Progress Report Defense Fuel Support Point

Norwalk, California

Prepared for

Kinder Morgan Energy Partners, L.P. 1100 Town & Country Road

Orange, California 92868

July 15, 2011

6 Hutton Centre Drive, Suite 700 Santa Ana, California 92707

Page 2: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary
Page 3: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary

ES071311094723SCO/BS2918.DOCX/111950002

Signature Page

The material and data presented in this report were prepared consistent with current and generally accepted consulting principles and practices. This work was supervised by the following CH2M HILL licensed professional.

July/15/2011

Matthew S. Mayry Date CH2M HILL California Professional Geologist, No. 8873

Page 4: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary
Page 5: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary

ES071311094723SCO/BS2918.DOCX/111950002 I

Contents

Section Page Acronyms and Abbreviations ........................................................................................................III 1.  Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 1-1 2.  Remediation Systems ........................................................................................................ 2-1 3.  Operations and Maintenance ........................................................................................... 3-1 4.  Summary of Remediation Progress ................................................................................ 4-1 5.  System Evaluation and Optimization ............................................................................ 5-1 6.  Planned Third Quarter 2011 Activities ........................................................................... 6-1 7.  References ............................................................................................................................ 7-1 

Appendix A Laboratory Analytical Reports

Tables 1 Remediation Well Construction and Status

2 Vapor Remediation System Operation Summary

3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary

4 Extracted Vapor Analytical Results

5 Extracted Groundwater Analytical Results

6 Remediation Well Vapor Concentrations

7 Groundwater and Product Measurements and Elevations for Total Fluids, Groundwater, and Soil Vapor Extraction Wells

Figures 1 Site Location Map

2 Remediation System Layout

Page 6: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary
Page 7: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary

ES071311094723SCO/BS2918.DOCX/111950002 III

Acronyms and Abbreviations

μg/L micrograms per liter

1,2-DCA 1,2-dichloroethane

ASTM American Society for Testing and Materials

ATL Advanced Technology Laboratories

DFSP Defense Fuel Support Point

DPE dual-phase extraction

EPA United States Environmental Protection Agency

FBBR fluidized bed bioreactor

GAC granular activated carbon

Geomatrix Geomatrix Consultants, Inc.

GWE groundwater extraction

KMEP Kinder Morgan Energy Partners, L.P.

LGAC liquid-phase granular activated carbon

MTBE methyl tertiary butyl ether

NPDES National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System

O&M operations and maintenance

PID photoionization detector

ppmv parts per million by volume

RBCA Risk-Based Corrective Action

RWQCB California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Los Angeles Region

SCAQMD South Coast Air Quality Management District

Second Addendum Second Addendum to the Remedial Action Plan, November 30, 2006

SFPP SFPP, L.P.

SVE soil vapor extraction

TBA tertiary butyl alcohol

TFE total fluids extraction

TPH-fp total petroleum hydrocarbons characterized as fuel products

TPH-g total petroleum hydrocarbons quantified as gasoline

Page 8: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary

ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

IV ES071311094723SCO/BS2918.DOCX/111950002

VOC volatile organic compound

WDR Waste Discharge Requirement

WSB West Side Barrier

Page 9: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary

ES071311094723SCO/BS2918.DOCX/111950002 1-1

1. Introduction

CH2M HILL has prepared this report on behalf of SFPP, L.P. (SFPP), an operating partnership of Kinder Morgan Energy Partners, L.P. (KMEP), to summarize remediation activities performed at the Defense Fuel Support Point (DFSP) located at 15306 Norwalk Boulevard, Norwalk, California (the site; Figure 1) during the second quarter 2011 reporting period.

This progress report is submitted pursuant to a request from the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Los Angeles Region (RWQCB) in its letter dated October 25, 2006 (RWQCB, 2006), and in accordance with the Second Addendum to the Remedial Action Plan (Second Addendum) dated November 30, 2006 (Geomatrix Consultants, Inc. [Geomatrix], 2006). Implementation of the Second Addendum was approved by the RWQCB on April 2, 2007. Additional background information can be found in the Second Addendum and in previously submitted semiannual groundwater monitoring reports for the site.

This report summarizes the remediation systems present at the site and describes implementation of the Second Addendum for the period of April through June 2011 with documentation of the following tasks:

• Operations and maintenance (O&M) of remediation systems performed by SFPP field personnel

• Remediation system evaluation

The remediation activities performed during April through June 2011 and the progress achieved through those activities are summarized in the following sections.

Page 10: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary
Page 11: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary

ES071311094723SCO/BS2918.DOCX/111950002 2-1

2. Remediation Systems

SFPP currently operates remediation systems consisting of soil vapor extraction (SVE), total fluids extraction (TFE; extraction of free product and/or groundwater using a top-loading pump), groundwater extraction (GWE; extraction of groundwater using a bottom-loading pump), and treatment of extracted soil vapors and groundwater to address two specific areas at and near the site: the south-central area and the southeastern area. Operation of the West Side Barrier (WSB) groundwater extraction system (WSB system) for remediation of the western offsite area was discontinued in August 2008. During the second quarter 2010, two WSB wells were temporarily operated to control the selenium concentration in extracted groundwater as discussed in the Selenium Management Evaluation Update submitted to the RWQCB on June 10, 2010 (AMEC, 2010a). Blending of extracted groundwater from the WSB system with groundwater from the south-central and southeastern areas was discontinued on June 22, 2010.

Remediation in the south-central and southeastern areas consists of SVE and TFE (GWE is also performed at two well locations in the south-central area). At several well locations, SVE is coupled with TFE (or GWE at two locations) in a process referred to as dual-phase extraction (DPE). SVE is performed using a blower to remove soil vapors from the south-central and southeastern areas. The extracted vapors are conveyed to a knock-out tank that separates entrained moisture from the soil vapors. Accumulated moisture in the knock-out tank is treated by the main groundwater treatment system described below. The soil vapors are then preheated in a heat exchanger and treated in a catalytic oxidizer where volatile organic compounds (VOCs) are converted to carbon dioxide and water prior to being discharged to the atmosphere. Operation of the SVE and treatment system is conducted in accordance with Permit to Operate No. F13759 issued by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD).

The main groundwater treatment system handles free product and groundwater recovered from the south-central and southeastern parts of the site. Free product and groundwater recovered by pneumatically operated top-loading total fluids pumps and bottom-loading groundwater pumps are piped to an oil-water separator. Free product, if any, from the oil-water separator is collected in a storage tank and recycled at an offsite location. Water from the oil-water separator is treated using liquid-phase granular activated carbon (LGAC). Treated water is routed through an onsite 8,000-gallon effluent storage tank prior to discharge in accordance with a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit (NPDES No. CA0063509, CI No. 7497). Two temporary fluidized bed bioreactors (FBBRs) have been installed downstream of the LGAC units to treat tertiary butyl alcohol (TBA), a new discharge parameter in the Waste Discharge Requirements (WDRs) issued by the RWQCB on June 8, 2011.

A summary of remediation wells in the south-central, southeastern, and WSB areas is presented in Table 1. Table 1 includes well identifications, well construction details, well use, and operational status at the end of the second quarter 2011. The remediation system layout is presented in Figure 2.

Page 12: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary
Page 13: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary

ES071311094723SCO/BS2918.DOCX/111950002 3-1

3. Operations and Maintenance

Tasks performed for O&M of the remediation systems during the reporting period included:

• Weekly maintenance and monitoring of the south-central and southeastern SVE, TFE/GWE, and soil vapor and groundwater treatment systems (collectively referred to as remediation systems)

• Removal, inspection, and repair of TFE/GWE pumps and associated discharge lines

• Measurements of individual well vapor concentrations

• Collection and analysis of system influent vapor and groundwater samples

• Gauging of selected remediation wells

• Extraction well redevelopment

• Troubleshooting of the SVE and TFE/GWE systems

• Installation of the temporary FBBRs

• Troubleshooting the process and dilution valves of the SVE unit

• Routine changeout of the carbon units

In addition, system effluent vapor and water samples were collected and analyzed for compliance with the SCAQMD and NPDES permits. The effluent water sampling results will be provided under separate cover in the NPDES effluent monitoring report for the second quarter 2011 period.

During this reporting period, remediation system inspections were performed on a weekly basis. For these inspections, vapor flow rate, vacuum, volumes of extracted groundwater, hours of operation, and other system parameters were recorded during system operation. Remediation system operation activities for the second quarter 2011 are summarized in Tables 2 and 3. The remediation systems operated during the second quarter 2011 with the following exceptions.

• The SVE and TFE/GWE systems were shut down from April 4 through April 15, 2011, to allow static water levels and groundwater samples to be collected for the April 2011 semiannual groundwater monitoring event.

• The SVE system was shut down on April 19, 2011, to drain water due to condensation from the SVE manifold, and to troubleshoot the dilution air valve. The air valve did not close or open automatically when needed.

• The TFE/GWE system was off on arrival on April 19, 2011, due to clogged bag filters. Water was drained from one of the two 8,000-gallon holding tanks. The water in the tank was full of particulates that clogged the filters. The bag filters were replaced and the system was restarted on the same day.

Page 14: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary

3. OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE

3-2 ES071311094723SCO/BS2918.DOCX/111950002

• The TFE/GWE system was shut down on April 20, 2011, for repairs to the manifold piping. The system was turned on the next day.

• The TFE/GWE system was shut down on April 22, 2011, to change the granular activated carbon (GAC) from the first carbon vessel. However, the piping in the first vessel broke during the changeout. The system stayed off until the piping was repaired. The TFE/GWE system was restarted on April 27, 2011.

• On May 3, 2011, the SVE system was shut down to drain water due to condensation from the manifold. The SVE system was restarted on the same day.

• The TFE/GWE system was shut down on May 10, 2011, for routine cleaning of the oil-water separator, the bag filter housing, and the transfer tank. The system was restarted on the same day.

• The SVE system was off upon arrival on May 17, 2011, due to a high temperature alarm. The system was restarted on the same day.

• The TFE/GWE system was shut down on May 20, 2011, to change the GAC from the first vessel. The systems were restarted on the same day.

• The SVE system was shut down from May 24 through May 27, 2011, for groundwater monitoring.

• The TFE/GWE system was off upon arrival on May 31, 2011, due to clogged filters. The filters were replaced and the system was restarted on the same day.

• From June 6 through June 8, 2011, the TFE/GWE system was shut off in order to redevelop the southeastern wells (GMW-36, GMW-O-15, and GMW-O-18) and MW-SF-11 in the south-central area to remove the fine particulates from the wells. The southeastern conveyance lines were also cleaned on June 14, 2011.

• On June 7, 2011, the TFE/GWE system was turned off to change the GAC from the first carbon vessel. The SVE was also shut down to drain water due to condensation from the SVE manifold. The systems were restarted on the same day.

• The TFE/GWE system was off upon arrival on June 10, 2011, due to clogged filters. The southeast wells were shut off due to fine particulates in the lines and the wells. The system was restarted on the same day.

• On June 21, 2011, the SVE system was off upon arrival. The reason for the shutdown was unknown. The SVE system was restarted on the same day.

• On June 27, 2011, the SVE system was shut down to add a digital chart recorder on the SVE and to repair the motor and actuator that controls the dilution and process valves. The system was repaired and back online on July 12, 2011.

Overall, during the second quarter 2011, the SVE system operated approximately 75 percent of the time, while the TFE/GWE system operated approximately 80 percent of the time.

Vapor samples from the SVE system influent and water samples from TFE/GWE system influent were collected during the second quarter 2011 when the systems were in operation. During the second quarter 2011, influent vapor samples were collected on April 26, May 17, and June 17, 2011, when the SVE system was operating. Influent water samples were

Page 15: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary

3. OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE

ES071311094723SCO/BS2918.DOCX/111950002 3-3

collected on April 26, May 17, and June 21, 2011, when the TFE/GWE system was operating. The vapor and water samples were delivered to Advanced Technology Laboratories (ATL) for analysis. ATL is a laboratory certified by the California Department of Public Health Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program.

ATL analyzed the vapor samples for the following:

• Fixed gases (methane, carbon dioxide, oxygen, and argon) using American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) D-1946

• Total petroleum hydrocarbons quantified as gasoline (TPH-g) using United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Method TO-3

• VOCs using EPA Method TO-15

ATL analyzed the water samples for the following:

• TPH-g and TPH characterized as fuel product (TPH-fp) using EPA Method 8015(M)

• VOCs using EPA Method 8260B

Analytical results for the influent vapor and water samples are summarized in Tables 4 and 5, respectively. The laboratory analytical reports and chain-of-custody documents for these samples are included in Appendix A.

VOC concentrations in vapors extracted from individual SVE wells were measured in the field using a photoionization detector (PID) calibrated using 50 parts per million by volume (ppmv) of hexane. The individual well vapor readings are summarized in Table 6. VOC concentrations in vapors extracted from individual SVE wells were not measured in June, because the system was off most of the month. Depths to product and groundwater were measured to the nearest 0.01 foot from the top of the well casing using an interface probe in selected wells. The gauging results are summarized in Table 7.

Page 16: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary
Page 17: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary

ES071311094723SCO/BS2918.DOCX/111950002 4-1

4. Summary of Remediation Progress

Based on weekly monitoring of the influent vapor concentration, vapor extraction flow rate, and hours of operation, the total mass of VOCs removed by SVE was approximately 1,153 pounds during the second quarter 2011, for a cumulative mass removal of approximately 28,222 pounds since implementing the Second Addendum system upgrades, and over 3 million pounds since the SVE system began operation in 1995 (Table 2). The cumulative mass removed by SVE does not include the mass removed by biodegradation.

Approximately 2,906,477 gallons of groundwater was extracted during the second quarter 2011. This total includes approximately 2,084,092 gallons of water from the south-central area and 822,385 gallons of water from the southeastern area (Table 3). No water was extracted from the WSB area.

Groundwater extraction was discontinued in the WSB region during the third quarter 2008 based on the reduced lateral extent and low concentrations of methyl tertiary butyl ether (MTBE) and 1,2-dichloroethane (1,2-DCA) west of the site. Detected concentrations of MTBE and 1,2-DCA in wells west of the site have been below the conservative, site-specific, Risk-Based Corrective Action (RBCA) goals (Geomatrix, 1999) since August 2005. The lower (more conservative) RBCA goals for MTBE and 1,2-DCA are 40 micrograms per liter (μg/L) and 70 μg/L, respectively. 1,2-DCA, MTBE, and TBA concentrations in the western area continue to be monitored; other wells in the WSB system will be restarted if necessary.

Removal of free product using TFE continued during the second quarter 2011. Because the amount of free product removed by TFE was significantly less than the volume of groundwater extracted, free product was emulsified in the relatively larger volume of groundwater extracted and was not observed to accumulate in the product holding tank of the groundwater treatment system. Therefore, the amount of free product removed by TFE was not estimated.

Based on the TPH-g results for influent water samples and total groundwater extracted, the mass of TPH-g removed by TFE and GWE in the south-central and southeastern areas was approximately 63 pounds during the second quarter 2011, for a cumulative mass removed from these areas of approximately 1,407 pounds since implementing the system upgrades described in the Second Addendum (Table 3). TPH-fp also was detected in the influent water samples; however, TPH-fp results were not used to calculate mass removal for dissolved petroleum hydrocarbons because the ranges of hydrocarbons for TPH-g and TPH-fp overlap. Because the nonoverlapping portion of the TPH-fp range was not used in the mass removal calculation, and the amount of free product removed by TFE was not estimated, the total mass of petroleum hydrocarbons removed by TFE may be underestimated.

Page 18: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary
Page 19: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary

ES071311094723SCO/BS2918.DOCX/111950002 5-1

5. System Evaluation and Optimization

For the SVE treatment system, during the second quarter 2011, vapor-phase VOC concentrations were measured in individual wells using a PID on April 26 and May 20, 2011, as shown in Table 6. The operation status of the SVE wells at the end of the second quarter 2011 is also shown in Table 6. PID readings recorded on April 26 and May 20, 2011, indicate VOC concentrations are close to or higher than 100 ppmv in several SVE wells; therefore, the SVE system will be operated until influent VOC concentrations reach low asymptotic levels. VOC concentrations in vapors extracted from individual SVE wells were not measured in June, because the system was off most of the month.

Groundwater monitoring in the WSB region during the second quarter 2011 supports the continued shutdown of GWE in the region. 1,2-DCA, MTBE, and TBA concentrations in the western area will continue to be monitored. The WSB system will be restarted if necessary.

As shown in Table 7, groundwater elevations and product thicknesses in the south-central area have generally decreased since implementing the Second Addendum. During the second quarter 2011, free product was detected in five remediation wells (GMW-36, GMW-O-15, MW-SF-10, MW-SF-13, and MW-SF-15). TFE will continue to be performed in areas with remaining free product. Selected remediation wells will continue to be monitored quarterly to assess remediation performance; remediation pump settings will be adjusted accordingly to optimize free product recovery and enhance hydraulic control of dissolved plumes.

The systems currently consist of 20 wells operated for product recovery and hydraulic control in the south-central part of the site (including 18 wells operated for TFE and 2 wells operated for GWE), and 3 wells equipped with TFE pumps operated for product recovery and hydraulic control in the southeastern part of the site (Table 1). At the end of the second quarter 2011, there was one TFE/GWE well online from the south-central area (MW-SF-11) and three wells from the southeastern area (GMW-O-15, GMW-O-18, and GMW-36). During the second quarter 2011, the GAC was changed out three times. Frequent changeouts of the carbon may be a result of higher flow to the system and fouling of the lead carbon vessel. The temporary FBBR, in addition to removing TBA from the process water, will also be able to remove other fuel oxygenates (e.g., MTBE) from the process water. Therefore, changeouts due to breakthrough of MTBE and petroleum hydrocarbons from the carbon vessels will be less frequent. Additional extraction wells will be brought online during the third quarter 2011, as needed.

The second temporary FBBR is anticipated to be installed by the third quarter 2011 to increase groundwater treatment capacity.

Page 20: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary
Page 21: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary

ES071311094723SCO/BS2918.DOCX/111950002 6-1

6. Planned Third Quarter 2011 Activities

During the third quarter 2011, SFPP plans to continue to focus remedial efforts on the south-central and southeastern areas. Installation of the second FBBR unit is anticipated to be completed. Concentrations of 1,2-DCA, MTBE, and TBA in the western area will continue to be monitored; the WSB system will be restarted if necessary. The TFE, GWE, and SVE systems for the south-central and southeastern areas will continue to operate. Operation of the TFE system in the southeastern area will be monitored closely, and adjustments will be made to improve fluid recovery. System inspections will continue on a weekly basis; system evaluation parameters will be collected as needed. The remediation activities and progress for the third quarter 2011 will be described in the third quarter 2011 remediation progress report to be submitted by October 15, 2011.

Page 22: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary
Page 23: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary

ES071311094723SCO/BS2918.DOCX/111950002 7-1

7. References

AMEC. 2010a. Letter to Mr. Paul Cho, California Regional Water Quality Control Board. Selenium Management Evaluation Update, Defense Fuel Support Point Norwalk. June 10.

AMEC. 2010b. Remediation Progress Report, First Quarter 2010, Defense Fuel Support Point Norwalk. April 15.

AMEC. 2010c. Remediation Progress Report, Second Quarter 2010, Defense Fuel Support Point Norwalk. July 15.

California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Los Angeles Region (RWQCB). 2006. Letter to Mr. Kola Olowu, Defense Energy Support Center, Los Angeles, and Mr. Michael Pitta, Kinder Morgan Energy Partners; Conditional Approval of Revised Remedial Action Plan and Second Addendum to Remedial Action Plan for the Defense Fuel Support Point Norwalk, 15306 Norwalk Boulevard, Norwalk (SLIC No. 0286A, DOD No. 16638). October 25.

CH2M HILL. 2010. Third Quarter 2010 Remediation Progress Report, Defense Fuel Support Point Norwalk, California. October 15.

CH2M HILL. 2011a. Fourth Quarter 2010 Remediation Progress Report and Annual 2010 Summary, Defense Fuel Support Point Norwalk, California. January 14.

CH2M HILL. 2011b. Remediation System Operational Status, January 2011, Defense Fuel Support Point (DFSP), Norwalk. February 15.

CH2M HILL. 2011c. Remediation System Operational Status, February 2011, Defense Fuel Support Point (DFSP), Norwalk. March 15.

CH2M HILL. 2011d. Remediation System Operational Status, March 2011, Defense Fuel Support Point (DFSP), Norwalk. April 12.

CH2M HILL. 2011e. Remediation System Operational Status, April 2011, Defense Fuel Support Point (DFSP), Norwalk. May 13.

CH2M HILL. 2011f. Remediation System Operational Status, May 2011, Defense Fuel Support Point (DFSP), Norwalk. June 15.

CH2M HILL. 2011g. Remediation System Operational Status, June 2011, Defense Fuel Support Point (DFSP), Norwalk. July 15.

CH2M HILL. 2011h. Draft First Semiannual 2011 Groundwater Monitoring Report, Defense Fuel Support Point, Norwalk, California. July 7.

Geomatrix Consultants, Inc. (Geomatrix). 1999. Risk-Based Corrective Action, Western 1,2-DCA and MTBE Plumes. February.

Geomatrix Consultants, Inc. (Geomatrix). 2006. Second Addendum to Remedial Action Plan, Defense Fuel Support Point Norwalk, Norwalk, California. November 30.

Page 24: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary

7. REFERENCES

7-2 ES071311094723SCO/BS2918.DOCX/111950002

Kinder Morgan Energy Partners, LP (KMEP). 2010. Letter to Mr. Paul Cho, California Regional Water Quality Control Board. Transmittal of Selenium Management Summary Report for the SFPP, L.P. Norwalk Station, 15306 Norwalk Boulevard, Norwalk, California. April 1.

Page 25: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary

ES071311094723SCO/BS2918.DOCX/111950002

Tables

Page 26: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary
Page 27: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary

(ft msl) SVE TFE/GWESouth-Central MW-SF-1 6/18/1990 78.93 25 - 40 SVE OFF NA

MW-SF-2 6/18/1990 78.53 25 - 40 SVE; TFE OFF OFFMW-SF-3 6/18/1990 78.12 25 - 40 SVE; TFE ON OFFMW-SF-4 6/19/1990 79.38 25 - 40 SVE OFF NAMW-SF-5 9/19/1990 79.74 23 - 38 SVE OFF NAMW-SF-6 9/19/1990 76.80 25 - 40 SVE; TFE OFF OFFMW-SF-9 6/15/1995 74.10 SVE OFF NAMW-SF-10 9/23/2003 76.53 10 - 30 SVE OFF NAMW-SF-11 6/19/2007 78.56 20 - 40 SVE; TFE OFF ONMW-SF-12 6/18/2007 78.07 20 - 40 SVE; TFE ON OFFMW-SF-13 6/19/2007 73.40 20 - 40 SVE; TFE OFF OFFMW-SF-14 6/21/2007 78.16 20 - 40 SVE; TFE OFF OFFMW-SF-15 6/21/2007 78.27 20 - 40 SVE; TFE OFF OFFMW-SF-16 6/20/2007 78.21 20 - 40 SVE; TFE ON OFFGMW-9 7/8/1991 74.44 20 - 50 SVE; TFE OFF OFFGMW-10 7/8/1991 74.67 25 - 50 SVE ON NAGMW-22 8/2/1991 74.17 25 - 60 SVE; TFE OFF OFFGMW-24 8/5/1991 74.04 25 - 60 SVE; TFE OFF OFFGMW-25 1/10/1992 74.29 20 - 50 SVE; GWE OFF OFFGWR-3 1/10/1992 74.93 20 - 50 SVE; GWE ON OFFVEW-1 -- -- SVE OFF NAVEW-2 -- -- SVE OFF NAMW-O-1 1/22/1991 75.48 25 - 40 SVE; TFE ON OFFMW-O-2 1/23/1991 71.90 25 - 40 SVE; TFE ON OFFGMW-O-11 5/20/1992 74.17 20 - 50 SVE; TFE ON OFFGMW-O-12 5/21/1992 73.49 20 - 50 SVE ON NAGMW-O-20 6/15/1995 73.32 SVE; TFE ON OFFGMW-O-21 10/1/1997 71.43 26 - 46 TFE NA OFFGMW-O-23 6/25/2007 73.63 20 - 40 SVE; TFE ON OFFMW-18 (MID) 6/10/1991 75.67 50 - 60 SVE OFF NAHW-2 -- -- SVE OFF NAGMW-O-15 4/19/1994 74.23 20 - 50 SVE; TFE ON ONGMW-O-18 7/25/1994 74.36 21 - 40 SVE; TFE ON ONGMW-36 4/11/1994 74.53 20 - 50 TFE NA ONGMW-SF-9 4/1/2003 73.00 37 - 46 GWE NA OFFGMW-SF-10 4/2/2003 75.77 37 - 46 GWE NA OFFBW-2 5/20/1996 73.57 27 - 47 GWE NA OFFBW-3 5/17/1996 74.16 31 - 50 GWE NA OFFBW-4 5/20/1996 74.61 28 - 47 GWE NA OFFBW-5 5/23/1996 73.59 27 - 46 GWE NA OFFBW-6 5/22/1996 73.48 28 - 47 GWE NA OFFBW-7 5/22/1996 74.65 27 - 46 GWE NA OFFBW-8 5/21/1996 75.08 27 - 46 GWE NA OFFBW-9 5/21/1996 76.19 27 - 46 GWE NA OFF

Notes1. Based on information provided by SFPP, L.P.

AbbreviationsNA = Not Applicable-- = information not availableft msl = feet above mean sea level based on the National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929.ft bgs = feet below ground surfaceGWE = groundwater extractionSVE = soil vapor extractionTFE = total fluids extraction

--

----

--

--

West Side Barrier

Top of Well Casing

ElevationRemediation

Area

Southeastern

Remediation Well ID

Installation Date

TABLE 1

Well Screen Interval Remediation

Well Function(ft bgs)

Norwalk, CaliforniaDefense Fuel Support Point Norwalk

Remediation Well Construction and StatusSFPP, L.P.

Well Operation Status at End of Second Quarter 20111

ES071311094723SCO/BS674.xlsx/111950003 (T1 Well Const & Status) Page 1 of 1

Page 28: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary
Page 29: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary

System Inspection Date

Cumulative Hours of

Operation (hours)

Incremental Hours of

Operation (hours)

Influent TPH-g Concentration

(ppmv)1

Influent FID or PID Reading

(ppmv as hexane)

System Flow (scfm)

Header Vacuum ("H2O)

Mass Removed (pounds)2

2007 Totals3 58,319 2,058 -- -- -- -- 3,7422008 Totals 64,233 5,915 -- -- -- -- 5,8782009 Totals 68,858 4,625 -- -- -- -- 9,3872010 Totals 72,369 3,511 -- -- -- -- 1,501

First Quarter 2011 Totals 73,734 1,293 6,56104/19/11 73,899.5 165 -- 8 1,949 50 5804/26/11 74,061.2 162 1.9 0 1,976 60 005/03/11 74,224.9 164 -- 6 2,047 50 3105/13/11 74,461.4 236 -- 38 2,048 50 27805/17/11 74,532.8 71 90 29 1,847 50 5705/24/11 74,695.1 162 -- 46 1,827 50 20306/01/11 74,814.5 119 62 1,831 55 20406/03/11 74,860.4 46 -- 1961 50 845

06/07/11 74,951.8 91 -- 1955 50 1675

06/08/11 74,974.4 23 31 1781 56 1906/09/11 74,997.3 23 -- 1782 50 195

06/10/11 75,018.5 21 -- 1785 50 175

06/14/11 75,114.1 96 1 1811 50 306/17/11 75,180.6 67 -- 1808 50 206/21/11 75,207.3 27 3 1807 50 206/23/11 75,256.0 49 -- 1818 52 306/27/11 75,346.4 90 -- -- -- 66

Second Quarter 2011 Totals 1,612 -- -- -- -- 1,15328,222

Notes1. The TPH-g concentration reflects analytical results for vapor samples collected from the influent of the vapor remediation system. Refer to Table 4 for a summary of analytical results for influent vapor samples.2. The total mass removed is based on influent FID or PID readings, hours of operation, and flow rate. 3. The 2007 total includes only operation after upgrades were made to the south-central system.4. Upgrades to the south-central system are described in the Second Addendum to Remedial Action Plan (Geomatrix, 2006).5. Used previous PID reading to obtain mass removed.6. System was turned off prior to obtaining data. Used previous PID reading and flow to obtain mass removed.

Data reported based on information provided by SFPP, L.P.

AbbreviationsTPH-g = total petroleum hydrocarbons as gasoline (C4-C12)ppmv = parts per million by volumeFID = flame ionization detectorPID = photoionization detectorscfm = standard cubic feet per minuteH20 = inches of water-- = not applicable or not available

Cumulative Mass Removed Since Implementation of RAP Upgrades4

Norwalk, California

TABLE 2

SFPP, L.P.Defense Fuel Support Point Norwalk

Vapor Remediation System Operation Summary

ES071311094723SCO/BS674.xlsx/111950003 (T2 Vapor Extraction) Page 1 of 1

Page 30: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary
Page 31: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary

System Inspection Date

Groundwater Removed from the South-Central Area

(gallons)

Groundwater Removed from the Southeastern Area

(gallons)

Groundwater Removed from the West Side Barrier

Area(gallons)

Influent TPH-g Concentration

(µg/L)1

TPH-g Removed from the South-Central,

Southeastern, and West Side Barrier Areas

(pounds)2

2007 Totals3 2,080,762 529,411 630,877 -- 3952008 Totals 5,391,860 700,882 405,9544 -- 3112009 Totals 8,044,836 770,869 0 -- 1612010 Totals 3,699,058 2,025,777 2,244 -- 334

First Quarter 2011 Totals 2,820,685 314,343 0 -- 14204/01/11 270,950 83,116 0 3,100 9.1304/04/11 103,498 37,770 0 3,100 3.6404/15/11 883 341 0 3,100 0.0304/19/11 137,387 46,227 0 3,100 4.7304/21/11 16,184 10,296 0 3,100 0.6804/22/11 23,532 15,142 0 3,100 1.0004/26/11 1,849 195 0 1,400 0.0204/29/11 116,777 29,461 0 1,400 1.7005/03/11 85,770 22,706 0 1,400 1.2605/06/11 53,108 13,209 0 1,400 0.7705/09/11 108,881 42,291 0 1,400 1.7605/10/11 34,995 12,710 0 1,400 0.5605/13/11 101,393 36,837 0 1,400 1.6105/17/11 127,475 48,919 0 3,300 4.8405/20/11 101,369 39,513 0 3,300 3.8705/24/11 122,181 56,258 0 3,300 4.9005/27/11 86,311 40,194 0 3,300 3.4705/31/11 105,425 52,818 0 3,300 4.3406/01/11 31,828 14,592 0 3,300 1.2706/03/11 65,224 25,737 0 3,300 2.5006/07/11 68,730 24,110 0 3,300 2.5506/08/11 1,523 235 0 3,300 0.0506/09/11 28,821 12,900 0 3,300 1.1406/10/11 33,814 12,524 0 3,300 1.2706/14/11 91,425 2,355 0 3,300 2.5706/17/11 21,828 0 0 3,300 0.6006/21/11 62,701 15,259 0 1,200 0.7806/23/11 19,548 25,417 0 1,200 0.4506/27/11 33,625 47,698 0 1,200 0.8106/28/11 8,457 15,386 0 1,200 0.2407/01/11 18,600 38,169 0 1,200 0.57

Second Quarter 2011 Totals 2,084,092 822,385 0 -- 631,407

Notes1. The TPH-g concentration reflects analytical results for samples collected from the influent of the total fluids extraction (TFE) system that extracts groundwater from the south-central, southeastern, and West Side Barrier areas. Refer to Table 5 for a summary of analytical results for the groundwater samples. For a given period, the most recent analytical result available is used to calculate TPH-g removed.2. Mass of TPH-g removed (pounds) is based on concentrations of dissolved TPH-g in the most recent TFE system influent samples and the volume of groundwater extracted by TFE. Total petroleum hydrocarbons characterized as fuel products (TPH-fp) also were detected in the TFE system influent samples (see Table 5) but were not used in estimating the mass of petroleum hydrocarbons removed from groundwater.3. The 2007 total includes only operation after upgrades were made to the south-central system.4. Groundwater removal in the West Side Barrier area was discontinued in August 2008. Groundwater extraction from West Side Barrier area wells BW-3 and BW-6 was resumed on May 14, 2010, to evaluate the efficacy of blending water with lower selenium concentrations from these wells with groundwater extracted from the south-central and southeastern areas. Groundwater removal from the West Side Barrier area was discontinued again on June 22, 2010. 5. Upgrades to the south-central remediation system are described in the Second Addendum to Remedial Action Plan (Geomatrix, 2006).

Data reported based on information provided by SFPP, L.P.

AbbreviationsTPH-g = total petroleum hydrocarbons as gasoline (C4-C12)µg/L = micrograms per liter

Cumulative TPH-g Removed Since Implementation of RAP Upgrades5

Norwalk, CaliforniaDefense Fuel Support Point Norwalk

TABLE 3Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary

SFPP, L.P.

ES071311094723SCO/BS674.xlsx/111950003 (T3 Water Extraction) Page 1 of 1

Page 32: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary
Page 33: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary

MethaneCarbon Dioxide

Oxygen & Argon TPH-g Benzene Ethylbenzene Toluene Xylenes MTBE

(%v) (%v) (%v) (ppmv) (ppbv) (ppbv) (ppbv) (ppbv) (ppbv)8/3/2007 ON <0.5 <0.5 22.0 63 650 220 1,100 1,420 559/5/2007 OFF <0.5 <0.5 22.0 9 32 48 140 320 1810/2/2007 ON <0.5 <0.5 21.9 27 250 75 430 610 2011/2/2007 ON <0.5 <0.5 22.1 5 40 10 74 95 72/1/2008 ON <0.5 <0.5 21.8 100 830 260 2,200 1,850 <503/4/2008 ON <0.5 <0.5 21.7 50 380 98 570 1,250 364/8/2008 OFF <0.5 <0.5 22.2 69 290 110 480 1,040 415/23/2008 OFF <0.5 <0.5 21.8 14 180 24 190 280 236/3/2008 OFF <0.5 <0.5 21.7 30 380 42 400 330 707/2/2008 ON <0.5 <0.5 21.4 49 32 6 34 45 108/19/2008 ON <0.5 1.7 20.8 50 390 63 230 450 409/5/2008 ON <0.5 2.0 21.2 22 130 39 130 340 4210/7/2008 ON <0.5 1.43 21.4 10 41 15 54 181 6.811/4/2008 ON <0.5 2.08 21.1 7.5 31 47 190 242 <2.03/6/2009 ON <0.5 <0.5 22.0 83 1,900 180 990 770 2404/17/2009 ON <0.5 <0.5 22.2 3.1 140 8 37 68 265/29/2009 ON <0.5 1.08 21.0 130 1,700 640 3,700 3,100 1008/18/2009 ON <0.5 0.78 21.7 28 380 37 290 310 338/25/2009 ON <0.5 0.87 20.6 37 500 44 320 293 209/18/2009 ON <0.5 0.37 21.6 11 75 11 39 107 3

10/29/2009 ON <0.5 1.80 18.2 77 350 45 250 440 411/25/2009 ON <0.5 <0.5 21.1 14 110 12 110 164 1112/15/2009 OFF <0.5 <0.5 21.7 7 28 3 20 47 <3.22/26/2010 ON <0.5 0.4 21.2 20 300 18 220 260 213/26/2010 ON <0.5 1.0 20.2 18 380 20 110 90 55/4/2010 ON <0.5 0.4 21.4 13 100 42 170 222 36/29/2010 ON <0.5 0.4 21.3 9 74 13 66 82 <5.08/3/2010 ON <0.5 0.6 20.4 29 210 13 64 85 98/31/2010 ON 0.0039 3 <0.5 21.4 11 72 12 66 87 89/14/2010 ON <0.5 <0.5 21.6 6 63 15 57 84 <3.211/2/2010 ON -- -- -- 11 140 <10 31 28 <10

11/17/2010 ON 0.00075 0.4 22.0 -- -- -- -- -- --12/28/2010 ON 0.0052 0.27 22.0 16 160 37 230 324 4.51/14/2011 ON 0.016 0.20 22.0 68 340 34 89 183 <102/8/2011 ON 0.026 0.24 21.0 210 3,000 1,700 11,000 7,400 1103/29/2011 ON 0.013 0.13 20.0 5 170 15 18 41.5 <2.54/26/2011 ON 0.0011 0.079 20.0 1.9 16 2.4 8.8 7.7 <1.25/17/2011 ON 0.021 0.65 22.0 90 2,600 140 2,200 1,100 2206/17/2011 ON 0.001 0.20 22.0 3 59 8.1 31 56 <0.25

Notes1. Influent vapor samples were collected from the manifold conveying soil vapors extracted from the south-central and southeastern areas.2. Other detected VOCs are included in the laboratory analytical reports in Appendix A.3. Method used is South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) 25.1M.Abbreviations ASTM = American Society for Testing and Materials EPA = United States Environmental Protection Agency VOC = volatile organic compound

%v = percent by volumeTPH-g = total petroleum hydrocarbons as gasoline (C4-C12)ppmv = parts per million by volumeppbv = parts per billion by volumeMTBE = methyl tertiary butyl ether<0.5 = not detected at or above the laboratory reporting lim

TABLE 4

EPA TO-15 (VOCs)2

SFPP, L.P.

Norwalk, California

EPA TO-3Total Fluids Extraction

System Status

ASTM D-1946

Defense Fuel Support Point Norwalk

Extracted Vapor Analytical Results1

DateSampled

ES071311094723SCO/BS674.xlsx/111950003 (T4 Vapor Lab Results) Page 1 of 1

Page 34: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary
Page 35: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary

DateSampled TPH-g TPH-fp Benzene Ethylbenzene Toluene Xylenes MTBE

(µg/L) (µg/L) (µg/L) (µg/L) (µg/L) (µg/L) (µg/L)7/11/2007 -- -- 4,800 130 890 1,040 6908/7/2007 14,000 11,000 5,400 140 1,100 770 5409/25/2007 12,000 30,000 3,400 310 1,600 2,390 54010/16/2007 8,900 8,400 3,400 94 520 660 39011/2/2007 44,000 6,500 3,200 130 860 1,160 57011/30/2007 6,000 5,200 1,800 48 170 490 45012/21/2007 7,200 4,200 2,100 41 170 430 7501/4/2008 4,300 7,200 3,300 49 300 540 6201/18/2008 11,000 2,200 3,600 140 650 850 6202/1/2008 8,700 5,700 3,600 100 440 930 5603/4/2008 7,200 4,900 3,900 120 510 770 6204/8/2008 8,100 10,000 2,800 96 280 580 6405/6/2008 5,300 2,800 2,900 76 190 328 4306/3/2008 8,400 6,800 3,700 110 450 480 3207/2/2008 9,200 4,300 3 4,500 75 620 650 4008/19/2008 4,000 6,600 2,600 57 76 215 4509/5/2008 160 <500 <12 <25 <25 <25 <2510/7/2008 <100 <500 0.36 J <1.0 <1.0 1.59 1.711/4/2008 12,000 660,000 2,500 140 220 760 16012/4/2008 1,300 1,500 600 8.2 28 73 1301/6/2009 1,500 980 560 23 41 110 3203/6/2009 2,500 1,500 1,100 33 51 114 654/7/2009 3,100 6,900 1,100 36 230 207 2105/13/2009 690 1,500 120 3.2 14 60 246/12/2009 150 <500 <0.50 <1.0 <1.0 0.71 J 447/10/2009 4,500 560 1,500 41 68 175 1508/4/2009 2,000 1,000 1,200 16 18 64 1009/1/2009 4,800 3,500 380 45 25 328 5.4 J10/6/2009 3,900 4,600 3,200 21 15 35 8210/27/2009 1,000 <500 520 4 15 10 18011/3/2009 120 <500 2 0.55 J 0.61 J 3 4011/25/2009 5,700 4,000 3,100 26 13 48 882/16/2010 8,000 5,900 4,700 110 1,300 800 1,8003/9/2010 7,000 5,900 6,600 110 460 550 4104/20/2010 10,000 11,000 6,000 44 230 174 1305/14/2010 8,500 2,100 3,600 67 380 400 2106/25/2010 4,600 2,600 2,200 61 540 380 1707/20/2010 21,000 21,000 3,400 370 3,000 2,550 2,3008/3/2010 3,400 1,500 1,400 17 140 161 3908/10/2010 5,800 3,400 2,600 40 190 169 1409/14/2010 9,400 10,000 4,900 170 1,100 1,340 38010/12/2010 5,700 1,000 2,200 43 140 138 12011/16/2010 1,100 1,600 290 4 15 78 8412/14/2010 7,100 3,200 2,600 76 200 315 3401/14/2011 7,400 3,500 3,700 56 110 220 2802/8/2011 5,600 3,500 2,400 43 110 190 4203/25/2011 3,100 1,200 1,300 51 92 200 3004/26/2011 1,400 1,200 610 5.8 5.7 20 1305/17/2011 3,300 1,700 3,600 82 180 300 2406/21/2011 1,200 720 860 9.6 31 82 190

Notes1. Influent samples were collected from the manifold conveying groundwater extracted from the south-central, southeastern, and West Side Barrier areas.2. Other detected VOCs are included in the laboratory analytical reports in Appendix A.3. TPH-fp result from influent extracted groundwater sample collected on July 10, 2008.Abbreviations TPH-g = total petroleum hydrocarbons as gasoline (C4-C12) TPH-fp = total petroleum hydrocarbons as fuel products (C7-C28) MTBE = methyl tertiary butyl ether µg/L = micrograms per liter -- = not analyzed <500 = Not detected at or above the laboratory reporting limit (RL) shown J = Analyte was detected above the laboratory method detection limit and below the laboratory RL

TABLE 5

EPA 8260B Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)2

SFPP, L.P.

Norwalk, California

EPA 8015M

Defense Fuel Support Point Norwalk

Extracted Groundwater Analytical Results1

ES071311094723SCO/BS674.xlsx/111950003 (T5 Water Lab Results) Page 1 of 1

Page 36: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary
Page 37: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary

TABLE 6Remediation Well Vapor Concentrations

SFPP, L.P.Defense Fuel Support Point Norwalk

Norwalk, California

MW-SF-1 SVE OFF 0.0 42.2MW-SF-2 SVE; TFE OFF; OFF 0.0 0.0MW-SF-3 SVE; TFE ON; OFF 102.2 55.5MW-SF-4 SVE OFF 31.6 1.2MW-SF-5 SVE OFF 0.0 10.8MW-SF-6 SVE; TFE OFF; OFF 10.8 7.2MW-SF-9 SVE OFF 0.0 0.0MW-SF-10 SVE OFF 0.0 6.5MW-SF-11 SVE; TFE OFF; ON 0.0 22.0MW-SF-12 SVE; TFE ON; OFF 148.3 130.9MW-SF-13 SVE; TFE OFF; OFF 9.8 8.0MW-SF-14 SVE; TFE OFF; OFF -- 11.9MW-SF-15 SVE; TFE OFF; OFF 21.5 2.8MW-SF-16 SVE; TFE ON; OFF 68.1 843.5GMW-9 SVE; TFE OFF; OFF 0.0 23.8GMW-10 SVE ON 89.2 219.5GMW-22 SVE; TFE OFF; OFF 0.0 23.8GMW-24 SVE; TFE OFF; OFF 0.0 0.0GMW-25 SVE; GWE OFF; OFF 0.0 0.0GWR-3 SVE; GWE ON; OFF 0.9 258.6VEW-1 SVE OFF 0.0 9.2VEW-2 SVE OFF 13.2 28.7MW-O-1 SVE; TFE ON; OFF 13.1 30.8MW-O-2 SVE; TFE ON; OFF 6.9 39.5GMW-O-11 SVE; TFE ON; OFF 2.5 3.8GMW-O-12 SVE ON 106.6 9.2GMW-O-20 SVE; TFE ON; OFF 24.2 2738GMW-O-23 SVE; TFE ON; OFF -- 4.9MW-18 (MID) SVE OFF 0.0 4.6HW-2 SVE OFF 18 27.7GMW-O-15 SVE; TFE ON; ON 3.5 1530GMW-O-18 SVE; TFE ON; ON 3.5 1530

Notes1. The well operations listed correspond to the well functions indicated in the previous column. 2. Vapor readings measured in the field with a photoionization detector (PID) calibrated using 50 ppmv of hexane. -- = Vapor readings could not be measured due to water from the sample port.Data reported based on information provided by SFPP, L.P.Abbreviations

SVE = soil vapor extractionTFE = total fluids extractionGWE = groundwater extractionppmv = parts per million by volumeNM = not measured

5/20/2011(ppmv as Hexane)2

4/26/2011(ppmv as Hexane)2

Southeastern

South-Central

Remediation Area

Remediation Well ID

Remediation Well Function1

Well OperationStatus at End ofSecond Quarter

20111

ES071311094723SCO/BS674.xlsx/111950003 (T6 FID) Page 1 of 1

Page 38: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary
Page 39: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary

(ft msl) (ft btoc) (ft btoc) (feet) (ft msl)GMW-9 8/8/2008 74.44 28.01 27.96 0.05 --- Envent

10/16/2008 74.44 28.36 28.35 0.01 --- Envent12/17/2008 74.44 27.61 --- --- 46.83 Envent1/15/2009 74.44 28.91 --- --- 45.53 Envent3/27/2009 74.44 29.04 --- --- 45.40 Envent4/21/2009 74.44 28.16 --- --- 46.28 Envent7/21/2009 74.44 28.31 --- --- 46.13 Envent5/24/2010 74.44 30.47 --- --- 43.97 Blaine Tech5/28/2010 74.44 30.35 --- --- 44.09 Blaine Tech10/4/2010 74.44 30.30 --- --- 44.14 Blaine Tech1/10/2011 74.44 32.02 --- --- 42.42 Blaine Tech4/11/2011 74.44 25.41 -- -- 49.03 Blaine Tech

GMW-10 04/30/2007 74.67 --- 25.9 --- 48.77 Secor11/12/2007 74.67 25.02 25.82 0.83 --- Secor04/14/2008 74.67 25.38 25.44 0.06 --- Secor10/13/2008 74.67 24.16 --- --- 50.51 Stantec4/20/2009 74.67 24.46 --- --- 50.21 Blaine Tech

10/19/2009 74.67 27.2 --- --- 47.47 Blaine Tech5/24/2010 74.67 26.72 --- --- 47.95 Blaine Tech5/28/2010 74.67 26.7 --- --- 47.97 Blaine Tech10/4/2010 74.67 27.15 --- --- 47.52 Blaine Tech4/11/2011 74.67 25.21 --- --- 49.46 Blaine Tech

GMW-22 11/12/2007 74.17 26.45 25.91 0.54 --- Stantec8/12/2008 74.17 26.70 --- --- 47.47 Envent

10/31/2008 74.17 28.25 27.04 1.21 --- Envent11/4/2008 74.17 26.97 --- --- 47.20 Envent

12/17/2008 74.17 26.65 --- --- 47.52 Envent1/15/2009 74.17 27.18 --- --- 46.99 Envent3/27/2009 74.17 27.86 --- --- 46.31 Envent4/21/2009 74.17 27.30 27.20 0.10 --- Envent7/21/2009 74.17 27.70 --- --- 46.47 Envent11/6/2009 74.17 28.12 --- --- 46.05 Kinder Morgan9/3/2010 74.17 28.36 25.10 3.26 --- Kinder Morgan

10/4/2010 74.17 27.65 --- --- 46.52 Blaine Tech4/11/2011 74.17 26.45 --- --- 47.72 Blaine Tech

GMW-24 11/12/2007 74.04 27.50 27.46 0.04 --- Stantec8/19/2008 74.04 29.34 28.24 1.10 --- Envent10/17/2008 74.04 30.88 29.90 0.98 --- Envent10/21/2008 74.04 29.64 28.30 1.34 --- Envent12/18/2008 74.04 29.04 --- --- 45.00 Envent1/15/2009 74.04 30.56 29.80 0.76 --- Envent3/20/2009 74.04 31.28 --- --- 42.76 Envent3/27/2009 74.04 30.45 --- --- 43.59 Envent4/21/2009 74.04 29.91 --- --- 44.13 Envent7/21/2009 74.04 32.78 --- --- 41.26 Envent2/4/2010 74.04 29.67 29.40 0.27 --- Kinder Morgan

6/22/2010 74.04 29.47 --- --- 44.57 Blaine Tech9/3/2010 74.04 29.90 --- --- 44.14 Kinder Morgan

10/4/2010 74.04 29.50 --- --- 44.54 Blaine Tech4/11/2011 74.04 28.21 --- --- 45.83 Blaine Tech

Groundwater Elevation Gauged ByWell ID Date

Gauged

Top of Well Casing Elevation

Measured Depth to Groundwater

Measured Depth to Product

Apparent Product

Thickness

Norwalk, California

TABLE 7Groundwater and Product Measurements and Elevations for Total Fluids, Groundwater, and Soil Vapor Extraction Wells

SFPP, L.P.Defense Fuel Support Point Norwalk

ES071311094723SCO/BS674.xlsx/111950003 (T7 DTW & DTP) Page 1 of 9

Page 40: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary

(ft msl) (ft btoc) (ft btoc) (feet) (ft msl)

Groundwater Elevation Gauged ByWell ID Date

Gauged

Top of Well Casing Elevation

Measured Depth to Groundwater

Measured Depth to Product

Apparent Product

Thickness

Norwalk, California

TABLE 7Groundwater and Product Measurements and Elevations for Total Fluids, Groundwater, and Soil Vapor Extraction Wells

SFPP, L.P.Defense Fuel Support Point Norwalk

GMW-25 11/12/2007 74.29 27.30 27.25 0.05 --- Stantec8/12/2008 74.29 27.81 --- --- 46.48 Envent

10/17/2008 74.29 28.26 --- --- 46.03 Envent12/18/2008 74.29 29.01 --- --- 45.28 Envent1/15/2009 74.29 28.62 --- --- 45.67 Envent3/24/2009 74.29 28.79 --- --- 45.50 Envent4/21/2009 74.29 28.35 --- --- 45.94 Envent7/21/2009 74.29 29.80 --- --- 44.49 Envent10/19/2009 74.29 30.28 --- --- 44.01 Blaine Tech6/22/2010 74.29 31.64 --- --- 42.65 Blaine Tech10/4/2010 74.29 29.25 --- --- 45.04 Blaine Tech4/11/2011 74.29 26.21 --- --- 48.08 Blaine Tech

GMW-36 8/28/2007 74.53 24.31 --- --- 50.22 Stantec11/12/2007 74.53 24.86 24.85 0.01 --- Stantec2/19/2008 74.53 25.50 --- --- 49.27 Stantec4/14/2008 74.53 24.61 --- --- 50.16 Stantec8/8/2008 74.53 26.20 26.14 0.06 --- Envent

10/16/2008 74.53 26.11 26.09 0.02 --- Envent12/18/2008 74.53 28.70 28.65 0.05 --- Envent1/15/2009 74.53 27.73 27.45 0.28 --- Envent2/20/2009 74.53 26.39 26.35 0.04 --- Envent2/23/2009 74.53 26.13 25.80 0.33 --- Blaine Tech3/24/2009 74.53 29.83 --- --- 44.70 Envent4/20/2009 74.53 25.63 25.59 0.04 --- Blaine Tech7/17/2009 74.53 27.40 --- --- 47.13 Envent7/21/2009 74.53 26.03 --- --- 48.50 Envent7/22/2009 74.53 25.90 --- --- 48.63 Blaine Tech10/19/2009 74.53 26.56 26.45 0.11 --- Blaine Tech2/4/2010 74.53 26.93 26.80 0.13 --- Kinder Morgan

3/15/2010 74.53 26.80 --- --- 47.73 Blaine Tech4/16/2010 74.53 26.90 --- --- 47.63 Blaine Tech5/24/2010 74.53 25.96 25.90 0.06 --- Blaine Tech5/28/2010 74.53 25.94 25.88 0.06 --- Blaine Tech6/22/2010 74.53 25.94 25.91 0.03 --- Blaine Tech10/24/2010 74.53 26.90 --- --- 47.63 Blaine Tech11/23/2010 74.53 27.35 27.10 0.25 --- Blaine Tech12/22/2010 74.53 28.35 26.84 1.51 --- Blaine Tech1/10/2011 74.53 29.10 27.70 1.40 -- Blaine Tech4/12/2011 74.53 26.98 25.05 1.93 -- Blaine Tech

GMW-O-11 11/12/2007 74.17 24.40 --- --- 49.77 Stantec8/15/2008 74.17 29.30 --- --- 44.87 Envent

10/17/2008 74.17 24.45 --- --- 49.72 Envent12/19/2008 74.17 24.85 --- --- 49.32 Envent1/15/2009 74.17 26.87 24.38 2.49 --- Envent2/24/2009 74.17 24.31 24.21 0.10 --- Envent3/27/2009 74.17 31.08 --- --- 43.09 Envent4/21/2009 74.17 25.36 25.34 0.02 --- Envent7/21/2009 74.17 26.18 --- --- 47.99 Envent11/6/2009 74.17 26.33 26.18 0.15 --- Kinder Morgan10/4/2010 74.17 30.00 --- --- 44.17 Blaine Tech4/13/2011 74.17 24.19 --- --- 49.98 Blaine Tech

ES071311094723SCO/BS674.xlsx/111950003 (T7 DTW & DTP) Page 2 of 9

Page 41: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary

(ft msl) (ft btoc) (ft btoc) (feet) (ft msl)

Groundwater Elevation Gauged ByWell ID Date

Gauged

Top of Well Casing Elevation

Measured Depth to Groundwater

Measured Depth to Product

Apparent Product

Thickness

Norwalk, California

TABLE 7Groundwater and Product Measurements and Elevations for Total Fluids, Groundwater, and Soil Vapor Extraction Wells

SFPP, L.P.Defense Fuel Support Point Norwalk

GMW-O-12 11/12/2007 73.49 23.13 --- --- 50.36 Stantec4/14/2008 73.49 23.36 --- --- 50.13 Stantec

10/13/2008 73.49 24.20 --- --- 49.29 Stantec4/20/2009 73.49 24.21 --- --- 49.28 Blaine Tech

10/19/2009 73.49 25.08 --- --- 48.41 Blaine Tech5/24/2010 73.49 24.80 --- --- 48.69 Blaine Tech5/28/2010 73.49 24.74 --- --- 48.75 Blaine Tech10/4/2010 73.49 25.31 25.20 0.11 --- Blaine Tech1/10/2011 73.49 26.42 26.32 0.10 --- Blaine Tech4/11/2011 73.49 24.04 --- --- 49.45 Blaine Tech

GMW-O-15 11/12/2007 74.23 23.95 23.85 0.10 --- Stantec4/14/2008 74.23 23.64 --- --- 50.59 Stantec8/8/2008 74.23 24.60 --- --- 50.59 Envent8/11/2008 74.23 24.40 24.34 0.06 --- Stantec

10/16/2008 74.23 24.53 --- --- 49.70 Envent12/18/2008 74.23 24.86 --- --- 49.37 Envent1/2/2009 74.23 24.82 --- --- 49.41 Envent1/15/2009 74.23 26.01 --- --- 48.22 Envent2/20/2009 74.23 24.80 --- --- 49.43 Envent2/23/2009 74.23 24.76 24.74 0.02 --- Blaine Tech3/24/2009 74.23 25.55 --- --- 48.68 Envent4/20/2009 74.23 24.66 24.61 0.05 --- Blaine Tech7/17/2009 74.23 25.01 --- --- 49.22 Envent7/22/2009 74.23 24.99 24.94 0.05 --- Blaine Tech10/19/2009 74.23 25.55 25.43 0.12 --- Blaine Tech2/4/2010 74.23 25.50 25.48 0.02 --- Kinder Morgan

4/16/2010 74.23 23.10 --- --- 51.13 Blaine Tech5/24/2010 74.23 25.67 --- --- 48.56 Blaine Tech5/28/2010 74.23 25.35 --- --- 48.88 Blaine Tech6/22/2010 74.23 25.81 --- --- 48.42 Blaine Tech10/4/2010 74.23 25.85 25.80 0.05 --- Blaine Tech11/23/2010 74.23 53.17 --- --- 21.06 Blaine Tech12/22/2010 74.23 26.31 --- --- 47.92 Blaine Tech1/10/2011 74.23 25.97 --- --- 48.26 Blaine Tech4/12/2011 74.23 22.55 22.53 0.02 --- Blaine Tech

GMW-O-18 04/30/2007 74.36 24.21 --- --- 50.15 Secor11/12/2007 74.36 22.46 --- --- 51.90 Secor04/14/2008 74.36 24.5 --- --- 49.86 Secor10/13/2008 74.36 25.46 --- --- 48.90 Stantec4/20/2009 74.36 25.59 --- --- 48.77 Blaine Tech

10/19/2009 74.36 26.31 --- --- 48.05 Blaine Tech3/15/2010 74.36 26.54 --- --- 47.82 Blaine Tech4/16/2010 74.36 24.25 --- --- 50.11 Blaine Tech5/24/2010 74.36 26.26 --- --- 48.10 Blaine Tech5/28/2010 74.36 26.03 --- --- 48.33 Blaine Tech10/4/2010 74.36 29.95 --- --- 44.41 Blaine Tech4/12/2011 74.36 22.88 --- --- 51.48 Blaine Tech

ES071311094723SCO/BS674.xlsx/111950003 (T7 DTW & DTP) Page 3 of 9

Page 42: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary

(ft msl) (ft btoc) (ft btoc) (feet) (ft msl)

Groundwater Elevation Gauged ByWell ID Date

Gauged

Top of Well Casing Elevation

Measured Depth to Groundwater

Measured Depth to Product

Apparent Product

Thickness

Norwalk, California

TABLE 7Groundwater and Product Measurements and Elevations for Total Fluids, Groundwater, and Soil Vapor Extraction Wells

SFPP, L.P.Defense Fuel Support Point Norwalk

GMW-O-20 8/15/2008 73.32 25.90 --- --- 47.42 Envent10/17/2008 73.32 25.82 --- --- 47.50 Envent12/19/2008 73.32 27.15 --- --- 46.17 Envent1/15/2009 73.32 26.53 26.09 0.44 --- Envent2/24/2009 73.32 27.85 --- --- 45.47 Envent3/20/2009 73.32 28.81 --- --- 44.51 Envent3/27/2009 73.32 27.84 --- --- 45.48 Envent4/21/2009 73.32 28.70 --- --- 44.62 Envent7/21/2009 73.32 24.10 --- --- 49.22 Envent11/9/2009 73.32 25.60 25.40 0.20 --- Kinder Morgan6/22/2010 73.32 24.76 24.66 0.10 --- Blaine Tech10/4/2010 73.32 31.20 31.10 0.10 --- Blaine Tech1/10/2011 73.32 26.62 26.48 0.14 --- Blaine Tech4/11/2011 73.32 23.82 --- --- 49.50 Blaine Tech

GMW-O-21 12/28/2007 71.43 27.67 --- --- 43.76 Geomatrix10/17/2008 71.43 26.00 --- --- 45.43 Envent12/19/2008 71.43 24.82 --- --- 46.61 Envent3/27/2009 71.43 26.41 --- --- 45.02 Envent7/21/2009 71.43 24.88 --- --- 46.55 Envent11/9/2009 71.43 25.02 --- --- 46.41 Kinder Morgan10/4/2010 71.43 25.40 --- --- 46.03 Blaine Tech4/13/2011 71.43 23.72 --- --- 47.71 Blaine Tech

GMW-O-23 8/14/2007 73.63 23.33 --- --- 50.30 Geomatrix8/21/2007 73.63 23.31 --- --- 50.32 Geomatrix8/28/2007 73.63 23.00 --- --- 50.63 Stantec9/11/2007 73.63 23.42 --- --- 50.21 Geomatrix10/5/2007 73.63 27.79 --- --- 45.84 Geomatrix11/2/2007 73.63 25.15 --- --- 48.48 Geomatrix11/13/2007 73.63 23.90 --- --- 49.73 Stantec12/28/2007 73.63 24.91 --- --- 48.72 Geomatrix8/15/2008 73.63 26.28 --- --- 47.35 Envent10/17/2008 73.63 27.16 --- --- 46.47 Envent12/19/2008 73.63 27.60 --- --- 46.03 Envent1/15/2009 73.63 27.54 --- --- 46.09 Envent2/24/2009 73.63 26.19 --- --- 47.44 Envent3/27/2009 73.63 23.74 --- --- 49.89 Envent4/21/2009 73.63 27.30 --- --- 46.33 Envent11/9/2009 73.63 27.50 --- --- 46.13 Kinder Morgan6/22/2010 73.63 32.10 --- --- 41.53 Blaine Tech10/4/2010 73.63 25.92 --- --- 47.71 Blaine Tech1/10/2011 73.63 27.45 --- --- 46.18 Blaine Tech4/11/2011 73.63 25.03 --- --- 48.60 Blaine Tech

GMW-SF-9 4/21/2009 73.00 24.19 --- --- 48.81 Envent5/24/2010 73.00 28.31 --- --- 44.69 Blaine Tech5/28/2010 73.00 28.37 --- --- 44.63 Blaine Tech10/4/2010 73.00 25.28 --- --- 47.72 Blaine Tech4/11/2011 73.00 23.90 --- --- 49.10 Blaine Tech

GMW-SF-10 4/21/2009 75.77 27.1 --- --- 48.67 Envent10/4/2010 75.77 28.03 --- --- 47.74 Blaine Tech4/11/2011 75.77 26.80 --- --- 48.97 Blaine Tech

GWR-3 11/12/2007 74.93 27.90 --- --- 47.03 Stantec10/17/2008 74.93 29.88 --- --- 45.05 Envent12/17/2008 74.93 19.71 --- --- 55.22 Envent1/15/2009 74.93 29.27 29.26 0.26 --- Envent3/27/2009 74.93 27.18 --- --- 47.75 Envent4/21/2009 74.93 29.97 --- --- 44.96 Envent7/21/2009 74.93 28.77 --- --- 46.16 Envent10/4/2010 74.93 30.67 --- --- 44.26 Blaine Tech4/11/2011 74.93 29.94 --- --- 44.99 Blaine Tech

ES071311094723SCO/BS674.xlsx/111950003 (T7 DTW & DTP) Page 4 of 9

Page 43: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary

(ft msl) (ft btoc) (ft btoc) (feet) (ft msl)

Groundwater Elevation Gauged ByWell ID Date

Gauged

Top of Well Casing Elevation

Measured Depth to Groundwater

Measured Depth to Product

Apparent Product

Thickness

Norwalk, California

TABLE 7Groundwater and Product Measurements and Elevations for Total Fluids, Groundwater, and Soil Vapor Extraction Wells

SFPP, L.P.Defense Fuel Support Point Norwalk

MW-18 (MID) 04/30/2007 75.67 29.77 --- --- 45.9 Secor11/12/2007 75.67 30.23 --- --- 45.44 Secor04/14/2008 75.67 30.45 --- --- 45.22 Secor10/13/2008 75.67 31.15 --- --- 44.52 Stantec4/20/2009 75.67 31.49 --- --- 44.18 Blaine Tech

10/19/2009 75.67 32.62 --- --- 43.05 Blaine Tech5/24/2010 75.67 32.26 --- --- 43.41 Blaine Tech5/28/2010 75.67 32.17 --- --- 43.50 Blaine Tech10/4/2010 75.67 32.30 --- --- 43.37 Blaine Tech4/11/2011 75.67 31.28 --- --- 44.39 Blaine Tech

MW-O-1 8/14/2007 75.48 25.31 23.78 1.53 --- Geomatrix8/21/2007 75.48 23.84 23.58 0.26 --- Geomatrix8/28/2007 75.48 23.07 23.06 0.01 --- Stantec9/11/2007 75.48 23.86 23.48 0.38 --- Geomatrix10/5/2007 75.48 24.67 --- --- 50.81 Geomatrix11/2/2007 75.48 24.25 --- --- 51.23 Geomatrix11/12/2007 75.48 24.27 24.25 0.02 --- Stantec12/28/2007 75.48 25.54 25.51 0.03 --- Geomatrix8/19/2008 75.48 25.18 25.13 0.05 --- Envent10/17/2008 75.48 25.30 --- --- 50.18 Envent12/19/2008 75.48 26.31 --- --- 49.17 Envent1/15/2009 75.48 25.84 --- --- 49.64 Envent4/21/2009 75.48 25.41 --- --- 50.07 Envent10/19/2009 75.48 26.30 --- --- 49.18 Blaine Tech10/4/2010 75.48 26.90 --- --- 48.58 Blaine Tech4/11/2011 75.48 25.59 --- --- 49.89 Blaine Tech

MW-O-2 11/12/2007 71.90 23.10 --- --- 48.80 Stantec10/17/2008 71.90 24.85 --- --- 47.05 Envent12/19/2008 71.90 25.51 --- --- 46.39 Envent3/27/2009 71.90 25.22 --- --- 46.68 Envent7/21/2009 71.90 23.63 --- --- 48.27 Envent11/9/2009 71.90 25.39 --- --- 46.51 Kinder Morgan10/4/2010 71.90 26.05 --- --- 45.85 Blaine Tech4/13/2011 71.90 23.31 --- --- 48.59 Blaine Tech

MW-SF-1 8/28/2007 78.93 27.94 --- --- 50.99 Stantec11/12/2007 78.93 28.76 --- --- 50.17 Stantec2/19/2008 78.93 29.50 --- --- 49.43 Stantec4/14/2008 78.93 29.16 --- --- 49.77 Stantec8/11/2008 78.93 29.75 --- --- 49.18 Stantec

10/13/2008 78.93 29.86 --- --- 49.07 Stantec2/23/2009 78.93 30.00 --- --- 48.93 Blaine Tech4/20/2009 78.93 29.97 --- --- 48.96 Blaine Tech7/22/2009 78.93 30.98 --- --- 47.95 Blaine Tech

10/19/2009 78.93 31.11 --- --- 47.82 Blaine Tech3/15/2010 78.93 31.74 --- --- 47.19 Blaine Tech5/24/2010 78.93 30.79 --- --- 48.14 Blaine Tech5/28/2010 78.93 30.57 --- --- 48.36 Blaine Tech6/22/2010 78.93 30.84 --- --- 48.09 Blaine Tech7/12/2010 78.93 30.51 --- --- 48.42 Blaine Tech10/4/2010 78.93 30.88 --- --- 48.05 Blaine Tech1/10/2011 78.93 32.51 --- --- 46.42 Blaine Tech4/11/2011 78.93 29.87 --- --- 49.06 Blaine Tech

ES071311094723SCO/BS674.xlsx/111950003 (T7 DTW & DTP) Page 5 of 9

Page 44: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary

(ft msl) (ft btoc) (ft btoc) (feet) (ft msl)

Groundwater Elevation Gauged ByWell ID Date

Gauged

Top of Well Casing Elevation

Measured Depth to Groundwater

Measured Depth to Product

Apparent Product

Thickness

Norwalk, California

TABLE 7Groundwater and Product Measurements and Elevations for Total Fluids, Groundwater, and Soil Vapor Extraction Wells

SFPP, L.P.Defense Fuel Support Point Norwalk

MW-SF-2 11/12/2007 78.53 29.18 28.71 0.47 --- Stantec8/12/2008 78.53 31.11 --- --- 47.42 Envent

10/17/2008 78.53 31.55 31.50 0.05 --- Envent12/18/2008 78.53 32.75 32.55 0.20 --- Envent1/15/2009 78.53 30.84 30.57 0.27 --- Envent3/24/2009 78.53 28.85 --- --- 49.68 Envent4/21/2009 78.53 29.98 --- --- 48.55 Envent7/21/2009 78.53 29.85 --- --- 48.68 Envent12/9/2009 78.53 31.45 --- --- 47.08 Kinder Morgan10/4/2010 78.53 30.96 30.75 0.21 --- Blaine Tech1/10/2011 78.53 32.62 32.50 0.12 --- Blaine Tech4/11/2011 78.53 29.83 --- --- 48.70 Blaine Tech

MW-SF-3 11/12/2007 78.12 29.34 28.28 1.06 --- Stantec8/12/2008 78.12 30.30 29.05 1.25 --- Envent

10/17/2008 78.12 29.45 --- --- 48.67 Envent12/18/2008 78.12 31.08 30.82 0.26 --- Envent1/15/2009 78.12 29.96 29.94 0.02 --- Envent3/20/2009 78.12 31.10 --- --- 47.02 Envent3/24/2009 78.12 27.82 --- --- 50.30 Envent4/21/2009 78.12 29.51 29.50 0.01 --- Envent7/21/2009 78.12 30.07 --- --- 48.05 Envent11/6/2009 78.12 30.37 30.35 0.02 --- Kinder Morgan12/9/2009 78.12 30.53 --- --- 48.05 Kinder Morgan9/3/2010 78.12 30.97 30.42 0.55 --- Kinder Morgan

10/4/2010 78.12 30.88 30.30 0.58 --- Blaine Tech4/12/2011 78.12 29.44 --- --- 48.68 Blaine Tech

MW-SF-4 8/14/2007 79.38 30.34 28.38 1.96 --- Geomatrix8/28/2007 79.38 29.95 28.30 1.65 --- Stantec9/11/2007 79.38 29.98 28.43 1.55 --- Geomatrix10/5/2007 79.38 30.68 28.85 1.83 --- Geomatrix10/12/2007 79.38 30.27 29.96 0.31 --- Geomatrix10/19/2007 79.38 30.28 --- --- 49.10 Geomatrix10/26/2007 79.38 30.52 --- --- 48.86 Geomatrix11/2/2007 79.38 30.68 --- --- 48.70 Geomatrix11/12/2007 79.38 29.70 29.69 0.01 --- Stantec12/21/2007 79.38 30.69 --- --- 48.69 Geomatrix2/19/2008 79.38 30.22 --- --- 49.16 Stantec3/21/2008 79.38 30.07 --- --- 49.31 Envent4/14/2008 79.38 29.95 --- --- 49.43 Stantec8/8/2008 79.38 30.51 --- --- 48.87 Envent

8/11/2008 79.38 30.57 --- --- 48.81 Stantec10/16/2008 79.38 30.77 --- --- 48.61 Envent1/15/2009 79.38 31.14 --- --- 48.24 Envent2/20/2009 79.38 30.84 --- --- 48.54 Envent2/23/2009 79.38 30.96 --- --- 48.42 Blaine Tech4/20/2009 79.38 30.02 29.94 0.08 --- Blaine Tech4/28/2009 79.38 30.78 --- --- 48.60 Envent7/17/2009 79.38 31.85 --- --- 47.53 Envent7/22/2009 79.38 31.65 31.61 0.04 --- Blaine Tech10/19/2009 79.38 31.93 31.90 0.03 --- Blaine Tech3/15/2010 79.38 31.95 31.91 0.04 --- Blaine Tech5/24/2010 79.38 31.60 --- --- 47.78 Blaine Tech5/28/2010 79.38 26.40 --- --- 52.98 Blaine Tech6/22/2010 79.38 31.63 --- --- 47.75 Blaine Tech7/12/2010 79.38 31.37 --- --- 48.01 Blaine Tech10/4/2010 79.38 31.81 --- --- 47.57 Blaine Tech1/10/2011 79.38 32.99 --- --- 46.39 Blaine Tech4/11/2011 79.38 30.85 --- --- 48.53 Blaine Tech

ES071311094723SCO/BS674.xlsx/111950003 (T7 DTW & DTP) Page 6 of 9

Page 45: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary

(ft msl) (ft btoc) (ft btoc) (feet) (ft msl)

Groundwater Elevation Gauged ByWell ID Date

Gauged

Top of Well Casing Elevation

Measured Depth to Groundwater

Measured Depth to Product

Apparent Product

Thickness

Norwalk, California

TABLE 7Groundwater and Product Measurements and Elevations for Total Fluids, Groundwater, and Soil Vapor Extraction Wells

SFPP, L.P.Defense Fuel Support Point Norwalk

MW-SF-5 8/21/2007 79.74 28.36 --- --- 51.38 Geomatrix8/28/2007 79.74 28.84 --- --- 50.90 Stantec10/5/2007 79.74 29.50 --- --- 50.24 Geomatrix11/2/2007 79.74 31.50 --- --- 48.24 Geomatrix11/12/2007 79.74 29.93 --- --- 49.81 Stantec12/21/2007 79.74 31.00 --- --- 48.74 Geomatrix4/14/2008 79.74 30.20 --- --- 49.54 Stantec8/11/2008 79.74 30.85 --- --- 48.89 Stantec10/13/2008 79.74 30.93 --- --- 48.81 Stantec4/20/2009 79.74 30.99 --- --- 48.75 Blaine Tech5/24/2010 79.74 31.55 --- --- 48.19 Blaine Tech5/28/2010 79.74 31.44 --- --- 48.30 Blaine Tech6/22/2010 79.74 31.57 --- --- 48.17 Blaine Tech10/4/2010 79.74 31.39 --- --- 48.35 Blaine Tech1/10/2011 79.74 33.80 --- --- 45.94 Blaine Tech4/11/2011 79.74 31.03 --- --- 48.71 Blaine Tech

MW-SF-6 11/12/2007 76.80 27.14 --- --- 49.66 Stantec8/12/2008 76.80 29.82 --- --- 46.98 Envent

10/17/2008 76.80 29.75 --- --- 47.05 Envent12/18/2008 76.80 30.73 --- --- 46.07 Envent1/15/2009 76.80 31.35 --- --- 45.45 Envent3/24/2009 76.80 30.50 --- --- 46.30 Envent4/21/2009 76.80 28.45 --- --- 48.35 Envent7/21/2009 76.80 27.22 --- --- 49.58 Envent11/6/2009 76.80 29.10 --- --- 47.70 Kinder Morgan12/9/2009 76.80 31.35 --- --- 45.45 Kinder Morgan10/4/2010 76.80 29.09 --- --- 47.71 Blaine Tech1/10/2011 76.80 30.87 --- --- 45.93 Blaine Tech4/11/2011 76.80 28.16 --- --- 48.64 Blaine Tech

MW-SF-9 8/14/2007 74.10 28.73 28.61 0.12 --- Geomatrix8/28/2007 74.10 20.55 --- --- 53.55 Stantec8/21/2007 74.10 26.55 --- --- 47.55 Geomatrix9/11/2007 74.10 19.40 --- --- 54.70 Geomatrix10/5/2007 74.10 26.84 --- --- 47.26 Geomatrix11/2/2007 74.10 22.76 --- --- 51.34 Geomatrix11/12/2007 74.10 22.96 --- --- 51.14 Stantec12/21/2007 74.10 24.05 --- --- 50.05 Geomatrix4/14/2008 74.10 24.23 --- --- 49.87 Stantec10/13/2008 74.10 24.83 --- --- 49.27 Stantec4/20/2009 74.10 25.27 --- --- 48.83 Blaine Tech10/19/2009 74.10 26.45 --- --- 47.65 Blaine Tech5/24/2010 74.10 25.80 --- --- 48.30 Blaine Tech5/28/2010 74.10 25.66 --- --- 48.44 Blaine Tech6/22/2010 74.10 25.84 --- --- 48.26 Blaine Tech10/4/2010 74.10 26.10 --- --- 48.00 Blaine Tech1/10/2011 74.10 27.41 --- --- 46.69 Blaine Tech4/11/2011 74.10 24.16 --- --- 49.94 Blaine Tech

MW-SF-10 10/17/2008 76.53 27.49 --- --- 49.04 Envent10/19/2009 76.53 28.61 --- --- 47.92 Blaine Tech10/4/2010 76.53 28.5 28.36 0.14 --- Blaine Tech4/11/2011 76.53 27.41 27.37 0.04 --- Blaine Tech

ES071311094723SCO/BS674.xlsx/111950003 (T7 DTW & DTP) Page 7 of 9

Page 46: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary

(ft msl) (ft btoc) (ft btoc) (feet) (ft msl)

Groundwater Elevation Gauged ByWell ID Date

Gauged

Top of Well Casing Elevation

Measured Depth to Groundwater

Measured Depth to Product

Apparent Product

Thickness

Norwalk, California

TABLE 7Groundwater and Product Measurements and Elevations for Total Fluids, Groundwater, and Soil Vapor Extraction Wells

SFPP, L.P.Defense Fuel Support Point Norwalk

MW-SF-11 8/14/2007 78.56 28.58 28.30 0.28 --- Geomatrix8/21/2007 78.56 28.76 28.63 0.13 --- Geomatrix8/28/2007 78.56 28.22 --- --- 50.34 Stantec9/11/2007 78.56 26.90 --- --- 51.66 Geomatrix10/5/2007 78.56 28.43 --- --- 50.13 Geomatrix11/2/2007 78.56 29.48 29.38 0.10 --- Geomatrix11/12/2007 78.56 29.03 --- --- 49.53 Stantec8/15/2008 78.56 30.13 --- --- 48.43 Envent10/17/2008 78.56 30.50 --- --- 48.06 Envent12/18/2008 78.56 29.92 --- --- 48.64 Envent1/15/2009 78.56 30.32 --- --- 48.24 Envent3/24/2009 78.56 31.05 --- --- 47.51 Envent4/21/2009 78.56 30.03 --- --- 48.53 Envent7/21/2009 78.56 30.89 --- --- 47.67 Envent11/9/2009 78.56 31.00 --- --- 47.56 Kinder Morgan9/3/2010 78.56 31.22 --- --- 47.34 Kinder Morgan

10/4/2010 78.56 30.94 --- --- 47.62 Blaine Tech4/12/2011 78.56 30.82 --- --- 47.74 Blaine Tech

MW-SF-12 8/14/2007 78.07 27.76 --- --- 50.31 Geomatrix8/21/2007 78.07 27.43 --- --- 50.64 Geomatrix8/28/2007 78.07 27.58 --- --- 50.49 Stantec9/11/2007 78.07 27.73 --- --- 50.34 Geomatrix10/5/2007 78.07 28.06 --- --- 50.01 Geomatrix11/2/2007 78.07 29.59 --- --- 48.48 Geomatrix11/12/2007 78.07 28.33 --- --- 49.74 Stantec8/12/2008 78.07 30.02 --- --- 48.05 Envent

10/17/2008 78.07 30.42 --- --- 47.65 Envent12/18/2008 78.07 31.55 --- --- 46.52 Envent1/15/2009 78.07 30.11 --- --- 47.96 Envent3/24/2009 78.07 29.41 --- --- 48.66 Envent4/21/2009 78.07 29.52 --- --- 48.55 Envent7/21/2009 78.07 28.58 --- --- 49.49 Envent11/4/2009 78.07 30.36 --- --- 47.71 Kinder Morgan2/4/2010 78.07 29.20 --- --- 48.87 Kinder Morgan

10/4/2010 78.07 30.70 --- --- 47.37 Blaine Tech4/11/2011 78.07 29.47 --- --- 48.60 Blaine Tech

MW-SF-13 8/14/2007 73.40 22.98 --- --- 50.42 Geomatrix8/21/2007 73.40 23.11 --- --- 50.29 Geomatrix8/28/2007 73.40 22.85 --- --- 50.55 Stantec9/11/2007 73.40 23.10 --- --- 50.30 Geomatrix10/5/2007 73.40 28.11 --- --- 45.29 Geomatrix11/2/2007 73.40 25.43 25.41 0.02 --- Geomatrix11/12/2007 73.40 23.70 --- --- 49.70 Stantec12/21/2007 73.40 24.45 24.42 0.03 --- Geomatrix8/15/2008 73.40 27.38 24.11 3.27 --- Envent10/17/2008 73.40 27.28 24.33 2.95 --- Envent10/21/2008 73.40 27.14 24.26 2.88 --- Envent9/3/2010 73.40 27.40 25.71 1.69 --- Kinder Morgan

12/17/2008 73.40 26.21 24.70 1.51 --- Envent1/15/2009 73.40 26.90 24.80 2.10 --- Envent3/27/2009 73.40 26.46 25.49 0.97 --- Envent4/21/2009 73.40 24.86 24.78 0.08 --- Envent7/21/2009 73.40 25.72 25.48 0.24 --- Envent11/6/2009 73.40 25.72 --- --- 47.68 Kinder Morgan2/4/2010 73.40 25.43 25.30 0.13 --- Kinder Morgan

10/4/2010 73.40 26.95 25.92 1.03 --- Blaine Tech4/12/2011 73.40 24.79 24.78 0.01 --- Blaine Tech

ES071311094723SCO/BS674.xlsx/111950003 (T7 DTW & DTP) Page 8 of 9

Page 47: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary

(ft msl) (ft btoc) (ft btoc) (feet) (ft msl)

Groundwater Elevation Gauged ByWell ID Date

Gauged

Top of Well Casing Elevation

Measured Depth to Groundwater

Measured Depth to Product

Apparent Product

Thickness

Norwalk, California

TABLE 7Groundwater and Product Measurements and Elevations for Total Fluids, Groundwater, and Soil Vapor Extraction Wells

SFPP, L.P.Defense Fuel Support Point Norwalk

MW-SF-14 8/14/2007 78.16 27.68 --- --- 50.48 Geomatrix8/21/2007 78.16 27.60 --- --- 50.56 Geomatrix8/28/2007 78.16 27.53 --- --- 50.63 Stantec9/11/2007 78.16 27.66 --- --- 50.50 Geomatrix10/5/2007 78.16 27.75 --- --- 50.41 Geomatrix11/2/2007 78.16 29.83 --- --- 48.33 Geomatrix8/15/2008 78.16 29.77 29.24 0.53 --- Envent10/17/2008 78.16 29.52 29.50 0.02 --- Envent12/18/2008 78.16 30.62 --- --- 47.54 Envent1/15/2009 78.16 30.08 --- --- 48.08 Envent3/24/2009 78.16 29.73 --- --- 48.43 Envent4/21/2009 78.16 29.61 --- --- 48.55 Envent7/21/2009 78.16 29.20 --- --- 48.96 Envent11/6/2009 78.16 30.48 --- --- 47.68 Kinder Morgan12/9/2009 78.16 30.68 --- --- 47.48 Kinder Morgan6/22/2010 78.16 26.17 --- --- 51.99 Blaine Tech10/4/2010 78.16 30.54 --- --- 47.62 Blaine Tech4/12/2011 78.16 29.55 --- --- 48.61 Blaine Tech

MW-SF-15 8/14/2007 78.27 27.78 27.75 0.03 --- Geomatrix8/21/2007 78.27 27.69 27.65 0.04 --- Geomatrix8/28/2007 78.27 27.65 27.61 0.04 Stantec9/11/2007 78.27 27.62 --- --- 50.65 Geomatrix10/5/2007 78.27 28.15 --- --- 50.12 Geomatrix11/2/2007 78.27 30.45 30.20 0.25 --- Geomatrix11/12/2007 78.27 28.75 --- --- 49.52 Stantec8/15/2008 78.27 30.12 29.35 0.77 --- Envent10/17/2008 78.27 30.80 29.44 1.36 --- Envent10/21/2008 78.27 30.80 29.31 1.49 --- Envent12/18/2008 78.27 32.11 30.56 1.55 --- Envent1/15/2009 78.27 31.75 29.70 2.05 --- Envent3/24/2009 78.27 30.32 29.93 0.39 --- Envent4/21/2009 78.27 29.96 29.60 0.36 --- Envent7/21/2009 78.27 30.45 --- --- 47.82 Envent11/4/2009 78.27 31.10 30.45 0.36 --- Kinder Morgan12/9/2009 78.27 30.87 --- --- 47.40 Kinder Morgan10/4/2010 78.27 30.66 30.65 0.01 --- Blaine Tech4/12/2011 78.27 30.50 29.40 1.1 --- Blaine Tech

MW-SF-16 8/14/2007 78.21 27.68 --- --- 50.53 Geomatrix8/21/2007 78.21 27.33 --- --- 50.88 Geomatrix8/28/2007 78.21 27.51 --- --- 50.70 Stantec9/11/2007 78.21 27.59 --- --- 50.62 Geomatrix10/5/2007 78.21 28.10 --- --- 50.11 Geomatrix11/2/2007 78.21 29.81 --- --- 48.40 Geomatrix11/12/2007 78.21 28.40 --- --- 49.81 Stantec8/15/2008 78.21 29.36 --- --- 48.85 Envent10/17/2008 78.21 29.51 --- --- 48.70 Envent12/18/2008 78.21 30.94 --- --- 47.27 Envent1/15/2009 78.21 30.01 30.00 0.01 --- Envent3/24/2009 78.21 29.82 --- --- 48.39 Envent4/21/2009 78.21 29.60 --- --- 48.61 Envent7/21/2009 78.21 30.36 --- --- 47.85 Envent11/4/2009 78.21 30.58 --- --- 47.63 Kinder Morgan2/4/2010 78.21 30.36 --- --- 47.85 Kinder Morgan9/3/2010 78.21 30.25 --- --- 47.96 Kinder Morgan

10/4/2010 78.21 30.49 --- --- 47.72 Blaine Tech4/12/2011 78.21 29.52 --- --- 48.69 Blaine Tech

Abbreviationsft msl = feet above mean sea level based on the National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929ft btoc = feet below top of casing--- = not detected or not applicable

ES071311094723SCO/BS674.xlsx/111950003 (T7 DTW & DTP) Page 9 of 9

Page 48: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary
Page 49: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary

ES071311094723SCO/BS2918.DOCX/111950002

Figures

Page 50: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary
Page 51: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary

ES070610212914SCO407609.A1.03 DFSP_sitelocation.ai 7/10

Figure 1

Project No:Date:By:

SITE LOCATION MAP

DFSP NORWALKNorwalk, California

Andy Vollmar July 21, 2010 407609

Site

Page 52: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary

!A

!A

!A

!A

!A

!A

!A

!A

!A

!A

!A

!A

!A!A

!A !A!A

!A

!A

!A

!A !A

!A

!A!A

!A!A

!A

!A

!A

!A

!A

!A

!A

!A

!A

!A

!A

!A

!A

!A !A

!A

!A!A

!A!A

!A

!A

!A

!A

!A!A

!A

!A!A

!A

!A

!A

E E

E

EE

E

E

E

E

!A

!A

!A

!A

!A

!A

!A

!A

!A

E

E

EE

E

EE

E

E

E

E

EE

EE

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

EE

E E

!A

!A

!A

!A

!A

!A

!A!A

!A

!A

!A

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

E E

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

!A

!A!A!A

!A

!A!A

!A

!A

!A!A

!A

!A

!A !A

!A

!A

!A

!A

E E

E

E

E

!A

!A!A

E

!A!A

!A!A

!A

!A

!A

!A

!A

!A!A!A

!A

!A!A

!A!A

!A

E

EE

!A

E E

E

EE

E

E

!A

E

!A

!A

!A

!A

!A

!A

!A

E

!A

GW-7

GW-6GW-1

GMW-O-18

GMW-O-15GMW-36MW-SF-11

TF-16

TF-15

GMW-O-12

GMW-O-21

TF-26

TF-25TF-13

TF-14

TF-11

GW-16

TF-22

TF-21

TF-20

TF-19TF-18

TF-17TF-9

TF-8

TF-10

GMW-O-20

GMW-O-11

GMW-24GMW-9

GMW-22

GMW-25

GMW-10

MW-SF-9

MW-SF-10

MW-SF-4

MW-SF-1MW-SF-3

MW-SF-6

MW-SF-2VEW-1

VEW-2

GMW-SF-9

GMW-SF-10

HW-3 HW-5 HW-7

BW-8

BW-7

BW-9

BW-6

BW-5

BW-4

BW-3

BW-2

BW-1

MW-O-1 MW-O-2

GWR-3

TF-23

MW-SF-5

GW-13

GW-14GW-15

MW-SF-12

MW-SF-13MW-SF-14

MW-SF-15MW-SF-16

GMW-O-23

MW-18(MID)*

GMW-35PZ-3

PZ-4

PZ-5

PZ-8B

PZ-9APZ-9B

PZ-8A

PZ-10PZ-6

GMW-3

GMW-33GMW-55

GMW-54GMW-34

GMW-41GMW-40

GMW-8

PZ-1GWR-2 PZ-2

PW-1

PW-2

PW-3 HL-2

HL-4

GMW-57

HL-1

HL-3

GMW-O-10

MW-28 MW-29

GMW-62

GMW-37

GMW-65

GMW-SF-8

TF-24 (GMW-21)

PZ-7A

MW-6

MW-25

MW-14

MW-17

MW-9

MW-7

HL-5

MW-26

MW-11

MW-27

MW-16MW-12

GMW-O-5

GMW-O-14

GMW-O-17

GMW-O-16 GMW-O-19

GMW-28GMW-23

GMW-30GMW-29

GMW-26

GMW-O-1

GMW-O-9

GMW-2

GWR-1

GMW-11

GMW-20

GMW-44

GMW-43

GMW-42GMW-17

GMW-31GMW-18

GMW-7 GMW-19

GMW-15GMW-6 GMW-45

GMW-47

GMW-60

GMW-58

GMW-61

GMW-59

GMW-51GMW-50

GMW-48

GMW-53GMW-52

GMW-39

GMW-38

GMW-SF-7

GMW-32

GMW-12

PZ-7B

GMW-27

GMW-4

GMW-14

GMW-13

GMW-1

MW-15

MW-8EXP-3*

EXP-1*

MW-22(MID)*

MW-20(MID)*

MW-19(MID)*MW-21(MID)* SUMP

ADMINISTRATIONBUILDING

LABORATORYBUILDING OIL WATER

SEPERATOR

KMEPLEASEAREA

TRUCK FILL YARDS

MADR

ISS AV

E

CLAR

ETT A

VE

CAME

O AV

E

SEAF

ORTH

AVE

THOR

NLAK

E AVE

CHESIRE ST

CHESHIRE ST

120 0 12060Feet

¹

REMEDIATION SYSTEM LAYOUTDFSP NORWALKNorwalk, California

Figure 2

By: Michael Brown Date: 10/4/2010 Project No: 406972

Explanation

KMEP Remediation Piping Layout(above ground and below ground)Approximate Location of AirCompressor Shed

Existing Groundwater Monitoring WellExisting Remediation Well

GMW-5VE-1

!A

E

Page 53: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary

ES071311094723SCO/BS2918.DOCX/111950002

Appendix A Laboratory Analytical Reports

Page 54: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary
Page 55: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary

Laboratories, Inc. Advanced Technology

3151 W. Post Road, Las Vegas, NV 89118 Tel: 702-307-2659 Fax: 702-307-2691

May 04, 2011

CH2M HILL

Daniel Jablonski

Attention: Daniel Jablonski

RE: SFPP - Norwalk Site

Workorder No.: N005706FAX: (510) 622-9129

TEL: (213)228-8271

155 Grand Avenue, Suite 1000

Oakland, CA 94612

CA-ELAP No.:2676

NV Cert. No.:NV-009222007A

Thank you for the opportunity to service the needs of your company.

Please feel free to call me at (702) 307-2659 if I can be of further assistance to your company.

Sincerely,

Jose Tenorio Jr.

Laboratory Director

Enclosed are the results for sample(s) received on April 27, 2011 by Advanced Technology

Laboratories, Inc. . The sample(s) are tested for the parameters as indicated in the enclosed chain of

custody in accordance with the applicable laboratory certifications.

The cover letter is an integral part of this analytical report. This Laboratory Report cannot be reproduced in part or

in its entirety without written permission from the client and Advanced Technology Laboratories - Las Vegas.

1 of 18

Page 56: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary

Laboratories, Inc. Advanced Technology

3151 W. Post Road, Las Vegas, NV 89118 Tel: 702-307-2659 Fax: 702-307-2691

04-May-11Date:Advanced Technology Laboratories, Inc.

Project: SFPP - Norwalk Site

CLIENT: CH2M HILL

Lab Order: N005706CASE NARRATIVE

SAMPLE RECEIVING/GENERAL COMMENTS:

Samples were received intact with proper chain of custody documentation.

Cooler temperature and sample preservation were verified upon receipt of samples if applicable.

Information on sample receipt conditions including discrepancies can be found in attached Sample

Receipt Checklist Form.

Samples were analyzed within method holding time.

Analytical Comments for EPA 8260B:

Matrix Spike (MS) and Matrix Spike Duplicate (MSD) are outside recovery criteria possibly due to

matrix interference. The associated Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) recovery was acceptable.

Page 1 of 1

2 of 18

Page 57: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary

Laboratories, Inc. Advanced Technology

3151 W. Post Road, Las Vegas, NV 89118 Tel: 702-307-2659 Fax: 702-307-2691

04-May-11Date:Advanced Technology Laboratories, Inc.

Project: SFPP - Norwalk Site

CLIENT: CH2M HILL

Lab Order: N005706

Work Order Sample Summary

Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Collection DateMatrix Date Received

Contract No:

Date Reported

N005706-001A INF-04-26 4/26/2011 11:45:00 AM 4/27/2011Wastewater

N005706-001B INF-04-26 4/26/2011 11:45:00 AM 4/27/2011Wastewater

N005706-001C INF-04-26 4/26/2011 11:45:00 AM 4/27/2011Wastewater

Page 1 of 1

3 of 18

Page 58: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary

Laboratories, Inc. Advanced Technology

3151 W. Post Road, Las Vegas, NV 89118 Tel: 702-307-2659 Fax: 702-307-2691

Project: SFPP - Norwalk Site

Client Sample ID: INF-04-26

Collection Date: 4/26/2011 11:45:00 AM

Matrix: WASTEWATER

CLIENT: CH2M HILL

Lab Order: N005706

Lab ID: N005706-001

Advanced Technology Laboratories, Inc. Print Date: 04-May-11

Analyses Result Qual Units Date AnalyzedDFPQLMDL

ANALYTICAL RESULTS

TPH-FUEL PRODUCT BY GC/FID

EPA 8015B

Analyst: MDM

EPA 3510C

RunID: GC1_110503B 36794QC Batch: PrepDate: 5/2/2011

TPH-Fuel Product 50 ug/L 11200 13 5/3/2011 04:41 PM

Surr: Octacosane 26-152 %REC 159.0 0 5/3/2011 04:41 PM

Surr: p-Terphenyl 57-132 %REC 163.6 0 5/3/2011 04:41 PM

GASOLINE RANGE ORGANICS BY GC/FID

EPA 8015B

Analyst: QBMRunID: GC4_110429A E11VW019QC Batch: PrepDate:

TPH-Gasoline 100 μg/L 11400 6.0 4/29/2011

Surr: Chlorobenzene - d5 74-138 %REC 193.9 0 4/29/2011

VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS BY GC/MS

EPA 8260B

Analyst: QBMRunID: MS1_110428A D11VW056QC Batch: PrepDate:

1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 1.0 μg/L 1ND 0.061 4/28/2011 05:05 PM

1,1,1-Trichloroethane 1.0 μg/L 1ND 0.068 4/28/2011 05:05 PM

1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 1.0 μg/L 1ND 0.054 4/28/2011 05:05 PM

1,1,2-Trichloroethane 1.0 μg/L 1ND 0.083 4/28/2011 05:05 PM

1,1-Dichloroethane 0.50 μg/L 1ND 0.099 4/28/2011 05:05 PM

1,1-Dichloroethene 1.0 μg/L 1ND 0.094 4/28/2011 05:05 PM

1,1-Dichloropropene 1.0 μg/L 1ND 0.082 4/28/2011 05:05 PM

1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 1.0 μg/L 1ND 0.10 4/28/2011 05:05 PM

1,2,3-Trichloropropane 1.0 μg/L 1ND 0.12 4/28/2011 05:05 PM

1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 1.0 μg/L 1ND 0.12 4/28/2011 05:05 PM

1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 1.0 μg/L 18.8 0.095 4/28/2011 05:05 PM

1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 2.0 μg/L 1ND 0.15 4/28/2011 05:05 PM

1,2-Dibromoethane 1.0 μg/L 1ND 0.14 4/28/2011 05:05 PM

1,2-Dichlorobenzene 1.0 μg/L 1ND 0.070 4/28/2011 05:05 PM

1,2-Dichloroethane 0.50 μg/L 1ND 0.17 4/28/2011 05:05 PM

1,2-Dichloropropane 1.0 μg/L 1ND 0.085 4/28/2011 05:05 PM

1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 1.0 μg/L 12.7 0.087 4/28/2011 05:05 PM

1,3-Dichlorobenzene 1.0 μg/L 1ND 0.090 4/28/2011 05:05 PM

1,3-Dichloropropane 1.0 μg/L 1ND 0.074 4/28/2011 05:05 PM

1,4-Dichlorobenzene 1.0 μg/L 1ND 0.092 4/28/2011 05:05 PM

2,2-Dichloropropane 1.0 μg/L 1ND 0.061 4/28/2011 05:05 PM

2-Butanone 10 μg/L 1400 1.0 4/28/2011 05:05 PM

2-Chlorotoluene 1.0 μg/L 1ND 0.080 4/28/2011 05:05 PM

Qualifiers: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range

H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit

S Spike/Surrogate outside of limits due to matrix interference Results are wet unless otherwise specified

DO Surrogate Diluted Out

4 of 18

Page 59: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary

Laboratories, Inc. Advanced Technology

3151 W. Post Road, Las Vegas, NV 89118 Tel: 702-307-2659 Fax: 702-307-2691

Project: SFPP - Norwalk Site

Client Sample ID: INF-04-26

Collection Date: 4/26/2011 11:45:00 AM

Matrix: WASTEWATER

CLIENT: CH2M HILL

Lab Order: N005706

Lab ID: N005706-001

Advanced Technology Laboratories, Inc. Print Date: 04-May-11

Analyses Result Qual Units Date AnalyzedDFPQLMDL

ANALYTICAL RESULTS

VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS BY GC/MS

EPA 8260B

Analyst: QBMRunID: MS1_110428A D11VW056QC Batch: PrepDate:

4-Chlorotoluene 1.0 μg/L 1ND 0.10 4/28/2011 05:05 PM

4-Isopropyltoluene 1.0 μg/L 1ND 0.080 4/28/2011 05:05 PM

4-Methyl-2-pentanone 10 μg/L 1ND 0.76 4/28/2011 05:05 PM

Acetone 10 μg/L 1150 1.6 4/28/2011 05:05 PM

Acrolein 20 μg/L 1ND 4.3 4/28/2011 05:05 PM

Acrylonitrile 20 μg/L 1ND 0.61 4/28/2011 05:05 PM

Benzene 10 μg/L 10610 0.75 4/28/2011 04:43 PM

Bromobenzene 1.0 μg/L 1ND 0.082 4/28/2011 05:05 PM

Bromochloromethane 1.0 μg/L 1ND 0.15 4/28/2011 05:05 PM

Bromodichloromethane 1.0 μg/L 1ND 0.063 4/28/2011 05:05 PM

Bromoform 1.0 μg/L 1ND 0.086 4/28/2011 05:05 PM

Bromomethane 1.0 μg/L 1ND 0.13 4/28/2011 05:05 PM

Carbon disulfide 1.0 μg/L 1ND 0.054 4/28/2011 05:05 PM

Carbon tetrachloride 1.0 μg/L 1ND 0.10 4/28/2011 05:05 PM

Chlorobenzene 1.0 μg/L 1ND 0.092 4/28/2011 05:05 PM

Chloroethane 1.0 μg/L 1ND 0.14 4/28/2011 05:05 PM

Chloroform 1.0 μg/L 1ND 0.058 4/28/2011 05:05 PM

Chloromethane 1.0 μg/L 1ND 0.054 4/28/2011 05:05 PM

cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 1.0 μg/L 1ND 0.11 4/28/2011 05:05 PM

cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 1.0 μg/L 1ND 0.10 4/28/2011 05:05 PM

Dibromochloromethane 1.0 μg/L 1ND 0.061 4/28/2011 05:05 PM

Dibromomethane 1.0 μg/L 1ND 0.15 4/28/2011 05:05 PM

Dichlorodifluoromethane 1.0 μg/L 1ND 0.12 4/28/2011 05:05 PM

Ethylbenzene 1.0 μg/L 15.8 0.051 4/28/2011 05:05 PM

Freon-113 1.0 μg/L 1ND 0.080 4/28/2011 05:05 PM

Hexachlorobutadiene 1.0 μg/L 1ND 0.17 4/28/2011 05:05 PM

Isopropylbenzene 1.0 μg/L 1ND 0.057 4/28/2011 05:05 PM

m,p-Xylene 1.0 μg/L 111 0.17 4/28/2011 05:05 PM

Methylene chloride 5.0 μg/L 1ND 0.10 4/28/2011 05:05 PM

MTBE 1.0 μg/L 1130 0.089 4/28/2011 05:05 PM

n-Butylbenzene 1.0 μg/L 1ND 0.082 4/28/2011 05:05 PM

n-Propylbenzene 1.0 μg/L 11.5 0.087 4/28/2011 05:05 PM

Naphthalene 1.0 μg/L 14.8 0.056 4/28/2011 05:05 PM

o-Xylene 1.0 μg/L 19.4 0.077 4/28/2011 05:05 PM

sec-Butylbenzene 1.0 μg/L 1ND 0.098 4/28/2011 05:05 PM

Styrene 1.0 μg/L 1ND 0.072 4/28/2011 05:05 PM

Qualifiers: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range

H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit

S Spike/Surrogate outside of limits due to matrix interference Results are wet unless otherwise specified

DO Surrogate Diluted Out

5 of 18

Page 60: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary

Laboratories, Inc. Advanced Technology

3151 W. Post Road, Las Vegas, NV 89118 Tel: 702-307-2659 Fax: 702-307-2691

Project: SFPP - Norwalk Site

Client Sample ID: INF-04-26

Collection Date: 4/26/2011 11:45:00 AM

Matrix: WASTEWATER

CLIENT: CH2M HILL

Lab Order: N005706

Lab ID: N005706-001

Advanced Technology Laboratories, Inc. Print Date: 04-May-11

Analyses Result Qual Units Date AnalyzedDFPQLMDL

ANALYTICAL RESULTS

VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS BY GC/MS

EPA 8260B

Analyst: QBMRunID: MS1_110428A D11VW056QC Batch: PrepDate:

tert-Butylbenzene 1.0 μg/L 1ND 0.062 4/28/2011 05:05 PM

Tetrachloroethene 1.0 μg/L 1ND 0.13 4/28/2011 05:05 PM

Toluene 2.5 μg/L 15.7 0.12 4/28/2011 05:05 PM

trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 1.0 μg/L 1ND 0.094 4/28/2011 05:05 PM

trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 1.0 μg/L 1ND 0.10 4/28/2011 05:05 PM

Trichloroethene 1.0 μg/L 1ND 0.060 4/28/2011 05:05 PM

Trichlorofluoromethane 1.0 μg/L 1ND 0.097 4/28/2011 05:05 PM

Vinyl chloride 1.0 μg/L 1ND 0.12 4/28/2011 05:05 PM

Xylenes, Total 2.0 μg/L 120 1.5 4/28/2011 05:05 PM

Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 72-119 %REC 190.0 0 4/28/2011 05:05 PM

Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 72-119 %REC 1086.6 0 4/28/2011 04:43 PM

Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 76-119 %REC 1107 0 4/28/2011 05:05 PM

Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 76-119 %REC 10105 0 4/28/2011 04:43 PM

Surr: Dibromofluoromethane 85-115 %REC 198.4 0 4/28/2011 05:05 PM

Surr: Dibromofluoromethane 85-115 %REC 1092.9 0 4/28/2011 04:43 PM

Surr: Toluene-d8 81-120 %REC 10108 0 4/28/2011 04:43 PM

Surr: Toluene-d8 81-120 %REC 1108 0 4/28/2011 05:05 PM

Qualifiers: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range

H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit

S Spike/Surrogate outside of limits due to matrix interference Results are wet unless otherwise specified

DO Surrogate Diluted Out

6 of 18

Page 61: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary

Labora

tori

es,

Inc.

A

dva

nce

d T

echnolo

gy

3151 W

. P

ost

Road,

Las

Veg

as,

NV

89118

Tel

: 702-3

07-2

65

9

Fa

x: 7

02-3

07-2

69

1

04

-Ma

y-1

1D

ate

:A

dv

ance

d T

ech

no

log

y L

abo

rato

ries

, In

c.

Pro

ject:

SF

PP

- N

orw

alk

Sit

e

CL

IEN

T:

CH

2M

HIL

L

Wo

rk

Ord

er:

N0

05

70

6A

NA

LY

TIC

AL

QC

SU

MM

AR

Y R

EP

OR

T

Tes

tCo

de:

80

15

_W

_F

P_S

FP

P

Sa

mp

le I

D:

MB

-36794

Batc

h I

D:

36

79

4T

estN

o:

EP

A 8

01

5B

An

aly

sis

Da

te:

5/3

/20

11

Pre

p D

ate

:5

/2/2

01

1

An

aly

teR

esu

ltS

PK

va

lue

SP

K R

ef

Va

l%

RE

CR

PD

Re

f V

al

%R

PD

Lo

wLim

itH

igh

Lim

itR

PD

Lim

itQ

ua

l

Un

its:

ug

/L

PQ

L

Clie

nt

ID:

PB

W

Ru

nN

o:

79

90

0

Se

qN

o:

12

62

96

5

MB

LK

Sa

mp

Typ

e:

Te

stC

od

e:

80

15

_W

_F

P_

EP

A 3

51

0C

TP

H-F

ue

l P

rod

uct

50

20

.88

5

S

urr

: O

cta

co

sa

ne

80

.00

78

.72

61

52

62

.99

6

S

urr

: p-T

erp

hen

yl

80.0

096.7

57

132

77

.39

2

Qu

ali

fier

s:

BA

nal

yte

det

ecte

d i

n t

he

asso

ciat

ed M

eth

od

Bla

nk

EV

alu

e ab

ov

e q

uan

tita

tio

n r

ange

HH

old

ing

tim

es f

or

pre

par

atio

n o

r an

alysi

s ex

ceed

ed

ND

No

t D

etec

ted

at

the

Rep

ort

ing

Lim

itR

RP

D o

uts

ide

acce

pte

d r

eco

ver

y l

imit

sS

Sp

ike/

Su

rro

gat

e o

uts

ide

of

lim

its

du

e to

mat

rix

in

terf

eren

ce

DO

Su

rro

gat

e D

ilu

ted

Out

Cal

cula

tio

ns

are

bas

ed o

n r

aw v

alues

7 o

f 18

Page 62: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary

Labora

tori

es,

Inc.

A

dva

nce

d T

echnolo

gy

3151 W

. P

ost

Road,

Las

Veg

as,

NV

89118

Tel

: 702-3

07-2

65

9

Fa

x: 7

02-3

07-2

69

1

Pro

ject:

SF

PP

- N

orw

alk

Sit

e

CL

IEN

T:

CH

2M

HIL

L

Wo

rk

Ord

er:

N0

05

70

6A

NA

LY

TIC

AL

QC

SU

MM

AR

Y R

EP

OR

T

Tes

tCo

de:

8015

_W

_G

SF

PP

Sa

mp

le I

D:

E1

10

42

9L

CS

Batc

h I

D:

E1

1V

W0

19

Te

stN

o:

EP

A 8

01

5B

An

aly

sis

Da

te:

4/2

9/2

01

1

Pre

p D

ate

:

An

aly

teR

esu

ltS

PK

va

lue

SP

K R

ef

Va

l%

RE

CR

PD

Re

f V

al

%R

PD

Lo

wLim

itH

igh

Lim

itR

PD

Lim

itQ

ua

l

Un

its:

μg

/L

PQ

L

Clie

nt

ID:

LC

SW

Ru

nN

o:

79

85

1

Se

qN

o:

12

61

55

1

LC

SS

am

pT

yp

e:

Te

stC

od

e:

80

15

_W

_G

SF

TP

H-G

aso

line

10

00

85

.76

71

36

10

00

85

7.0

00

S

urr

: C

hlo

rob

enze

ne

- d

55

0.0

09

5.0

74

13

84

7.4

78

Sa

mp

le I

D:

N005706

-001B

MS

Batc

h I

D:

E1

1V

W0

19

Te

stN

o:

EP

A 8

01

5B

An

aly

sis

Da

te:

4/2

9/2

01

1

Pre

p D

ate

:

An

aly

teR

esu

ltS

PK

va

lue

SP

K R

ef

Va

l%

RE

CR

PD

Re

f V

al

%R

PD

Lo

wLim

itH

igh

Lim

itR

PD

Lim

itQ

ua

l

Un

its:

μg

/L

PQ

L

Clie

nt

ID:

ZZ

ZZ

ZZ

Ru

nN

o:

79

85

1

Se

qN

o:

12

61

55

2

MS

Sa

mp

Typ

e:

Te

stC

od

e:

80

15

_W

_G

SF

TP

H-G

aso

line

10

00

12

66

71

36

10

01

38

62

646

.00

0

S

urr

: C

hlo

rob

enze

ne

- d

55

0.0

01

00

74

13

85

0.2

22

Sa

mp

le I

D:

N005706

-001B

MS

D

Batc

h I

D:

E1

1V

W0

19

Te

stN

o:

EP

A 8

01

5B

An

aly

sis

Da

te:

4/2

9/2

01

1

Pre

p D

ate

:

An

aly

teR

esu

ltS

PK

va

lue

SP

K R

ef

Va

l%

RE

CR

PD

Re

f V

al

%R

PD

Lo

wLim

itH

igh

Lim

itR

PD

Lim

itQ

ua

l

Un

its:

μg

/L

PQ

L

Clie

nt

ID:

ZZ

ZZ

ZZ

Ru

nN

o:

79

85

1

Se

qN

o:

12

61

55

3

MS

DS

am

pT

yp

e:

Te

stC

od

e:

80

15

_W

_G

SF

TP

H-G

aso

line

10

00

12

76

71

36

30

10

01

38

62

646

0.4

52

26

58

.00

0

S

urr

: C

hlo

rob

enze

ne

- d

55

0.0

01

01

74

13

80

05

0.4

81

Sa

mp

le I

D:

E1

10

42

9M

B1

Batc

h I

D:

E1

1V

W0

19

Te

stN

o:

EP

A 8

01

5B

An

aly

sis

Da

te:

4/2

9/2

01

1

Pre

p D

ate

:

An

aly

teR

esu

ltS

PK

va

lue

SP

K R

ef

Va

l%

RE

CR

PD

Re

f V

al

%R

PD

Lo

wLim

itH

igh

Lim

itR

PD

Lim

itQ

ua

l

Un

its:

μg

/L

PQ

L

Clie

nt

ID:

PB

W

Ru

nN

o:

79

85

1

Se

qN

o:

12

61

55

4

MB

LK

Sa

mp

Typ

e:

Te

stC

od

e:

80

15

_W

_G

SF

TP

H-G

aso

line

100

ND

S

urr

: C

hlo

rob

enze

ne

- d

55

0.0

01

03

74

13

85

1.4

16

Qu

ali

fier

s:

BA

nal

yte

det

ecte

d i

n t

he

asso

ciat

ed M

eth

od

Bla

nk

EV

alu

e ab

ov

e q

uan

tita

tio

n r

ange

HH

old

ing

tim

es f

or

pre

par

atio

n o

r an

alysi

s ex

ceed

ed

ND

No

t D

etec

ted

at

the

Rep

ort

ing

Lim

itR

RP

D o

uts

ide

acce

pte

d r

eco

ver

y l

imit

sS

Sp

ike/

Su

rro

gat

e o

uts

ide

of

lim

its

du

e to

mat

rix

in

terf

eren

ce

DO

Su

rro

gat

e D

ilu

ted

Out

Cal

cula

tio

ns

are

bas

ed o

n r

aw v

alues

8 o

f 18

Page 63: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary

Labora

tori

es,

Inc.

A

dva

nce

d T

echnolo

gy

3151 W

. P

ost

Road,

Las

Veg

as,

NV

89118

Tel

: 702-3

07-2

65

9

Fa

x: 7

02-3

07-2

69

1

Pro

ject:

SF

PP

- N

orw

alk

Sit

e

CL

IEN

T:

CH

2M

HIL

L

Wo

rk

Ord

er:

N0

05

70

6A

NA

LY

TIC

AL

QC

SU

MM

AR

Y R

EP

OR

T

Tes

tCo

de:

8260

_W

P_S

FP

P

Sa

mp

le I

D:

D1

10

42

8L

CS

Batc

h I

D:

D1

1V

W0

56

Te

stN

o:

EP

A 8

26

0B

An

aly

sis

Da

te:

4/2

8/2

01

1

Pre

p D

ate

:

An

aly

teR

esu

ltS

PK

va

lue

SP

K R

ef

Va

l%

RE

CR

PD

Re

f V

al

%R

PD

Lo

wLim

itH

igh

Lim

itR

PD

Lim

itQ

ua

l

Un

its:

μg

/L

PQ

L

Clie

nt

ID:

LC

SW

Ru

nN

o:

79

85

6

Se

qN

o:

12

61

64

2

LC

SS

am

pT

yp

e:

Te

stC

od

e:

82

60

_W

P_

SF

1,1

,1,2

-Te

tra

ch

loro

eth

ane

25

.00

10

68

11

29

1.0

02

6.5

80

1,1

,1-T

richlo

roeth

ane

25.0

078.6

67

132

1.0

01

9.6

60

1,1

,2,2

-Te

tra

ch

loro

eth

ane

25

.00

99

.86

31

28

1.0

02

4.9

40

1,1

,2-T

richlo

roeth

ane

25.0

0100

75

125

1.0

02

5.0

00

1,1

-Dic

hlo

roeth

an

e2

5.0

09

9.7

69

13

30

.50

02

4.9

30

1,1

-Dic

hlo

roeth

en

e2

5.0

01

01

68

13

01

.00

25

.19

0

1,1

-Dic

hlo

ropro

pe

ne

25

.00

94

.67

31

32

1.0

02

3.6

60

1,2

,3-T

richlo

robenzene

25.0

0110

67

137

1.0

02

7.4

20

1,2

,3-T

richlo

ropro

pane

25.0

095.5

73

124

1.0

02

3.8

80

1,2

,4-T

richlo

robenzene

25.0

0112

66

134

1.0

02

7.9

10

1,2

,4-T

rim

eth

ylb

en

ze

ne

25

.00

11

57

41

32

1.0

02

8.8

10

1,2

-Dib

rom

o-3

-chlo

ropro

pane

25.0

082.7

50

132

2.0

02

0.6

70

1,2

-Dib

rom

oe

tha

ne

25

.00

10

08

01

21

1.0

02

5.0

60

1,2

-Dic

hlo

robe

nze

ne

25

.00

10

57

11

22

1.0

02

6.3

20

1,2

-Dic

hlo

roeth

an

e2

5.0

01

03

69

13

20

.50

02

5.8

00

1,2

-Dic

hlo

ropro

pa

ne

25

.00

95

.87

51

25

1.0

02

3.9

50

1,3

,5-T

rim

eth

ylb

en

ze

ne

25

.00

11

17

41

31

1.0

02

7.7

90

1,3

-Dic

hlo

robe

nze

ne

25

.00

10

87

51

24

1.0

02

6.8

90

1,3

-Dic

hlo

ropro

pa

ne

25

.00

10

57

31

26

1.0

02

6.1

80

1,4

-Dic

hlo

robe

nze

ne

25

.00

10

67

41

23

1.0

02

6.4

70

2,2

-Dic

hlo

ropro

pa

ne

25

.00

70

.36

91

37

1.0

01

7.5

80

2-B

uta

no

ne

25

0.0

10

94

91

36

10

02

72.2

10

2-C

hlo

roto

lue

ne

25

.00

10

97

31

26

1.0

02

7.1

70

4-C

hlo

roto

lue

ne

25

.00

10

47

41

28

1.0

02

6.1

10

4-I

sopro

pylto

luene

25.0

0113

73

130

1.0

02

8.3

20

4-M

eth

yl-2-p

enta

none

250.0

105

58

134

10

02

62.4

60

Ace

ton

e2

50.0

13

14

01

35

10

03

27.7

10

Acro

lein

25

0.0

77

.37

51

25

20

01

93.3

60

Acry

lon

itri

le2

50.0

11

87

51

25

20

02

96.0

10

Be

nze

ne

25

.00

99

.08

11

22

1.0

02

4.7

50

Qu

ali

fier

s:

BA

nal

yte

det

ecte

d i

n t

he

asso

ciat

ed M

eth

od

Bla

nk

EV

alu

e ab

ov

e q

uan

tita

tio

n r

ange

HH

old

ing

tim

es f

or

pre

par

atio

n o

r an

alysi

s ex

ceed

ed

ND

No

t D

etec

ted

at

the

Rep

ort

ing

Lim

itR

RP

D o

uts

ide

acce

pte

d r

eco

ver

y l

imit

sS

Sp

ike/

Su

rro

gat

e o

uts

ide

of

lim

its

du

e to

mat

rix

in

terf

eren

ce

DO

Su

rro

gat

e D

ilu

ted

Out

Cal

cula

tio

ns

are

bas

ed o

n r

aw v

alues

9 o

f 18

Page 64: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary

Labora

tori

es,

Inc.

A

dva

nce

d T

echnolo

gy

3151 W

. P

ost

Road,

Las

Veg

as,

NV

89118

Tel

: 702-3

07-2

65

9

Fa

x: 7

02-3

07-2

69

1

Pro

ject:

SF

PP

- N

orw

alk

Sit

e

CL

IEN

T:

CH

2M

HIL

L

Wo

rk

Ord

er:

N0

05

70

6A

NA

LY

TIC

AL

QC

SU

MM

AR

Y R

EP

OR

T

Tes

tCo

de:

8260

_W

P_S

FP

P

Sa

mp

le I

D:

D1

10

42

8L

CS

Batc

h I

D:

D1

1V

W0

56

Te

stN

o:

EP

A 8

26

0B

An

aly

sis

Da

te:

4/2

8/2

01

1

Pre

p D

ate

:

An

aly

teR

esu

ltS

PK

va

lue

SP

K R

ef

Va

l%

RE

CR

PD

Re

f V

al

%R

PD

Lo

wLim

itH

igh

Lim

itR

PD

Lim

itQ

ua

l

Un

its:

μg

/L

PQ

L

Clie

nt

ID:

LC

SW

Ru

nN

o:

79

85

6

Se

qN

o:

12

61

64

2

LC

SS

am

pT

yp

e:

Te

stC

od

e:

82

60

_W

P_

SF

Bro

mob

en

ze

ne

25

.00

10

77

61

24

1.0

02

6.7

00

Bro

moch

loro

me

tha

ne

25

.00

10

66

51

29

1.0

02

6.4

40

Bro

mod

ichlo

rom

eth

an

e2

5.0

08

7.2

76

12

11

.00

21

.81

0

Bro

mofo

rm2

5.0

09

5.4

69

12

81

.00

23

.84

0

Bro

mom

eth

an

e2

5.0

01

26

53

14

11

.00

31

.40

0

Ca

rbon

dis

ulfid

e2

5.0

08

8.0

75

12

51

.00

22

.00

0

Ca

rbon

te

tra

ch

loride

25

.00

76

.26

61

38

1.0

01

9.0

60

Chlo

robe

nzene

25.0

0105

81

122

1.0

02

6.1

50

Ch

loro

eth

an

e2

5.0

01

12

58

13

31

.00

28

.00

0

Ch

loro

form

25

.00

10

56

91

28

1.0

02

6.2

70

Ch

loro

meth

an

e2

5.0

09

2.6

56

13

11

.00

23

.15

0

cis

-1,2

-Dic

hlo

roe

the

ne

25

.00

10

67

21

26

1.0

02

6.5

00

cis

-1,3

-Dic

hlo

rop

rope

ne

25

.00

91

.86

91

31

1.0

02

2.9

60

Dib

rom

och

loro

meth

ane

25.0

0101

66

133

1.0

02

5.3

20

Dib

rom

om

eth

an

e2

5.0

01

03

76

12

51

.00

25

.77

0

Dic

hlo

rod

iflu

oro

me

tha

ne

25

.00

94

.95

31

53

1.0

02

3.7

20

Eth

ylb

enze

ne

25

.00

10

47

31

27

1.0

02

5.9

80

Fre

on-1

13

25.0

087.5

75

125

1.0

02

1.8

70

He

xa

ch

loro

bu

tad

ien

e2

5.0

01

08

67

13

11

.00

27

.09

0

Iso

pro

pylb

en

ze

ne

25

.00

10

87

51

27

1.0

02

7.1

10

m,p

-Xyle

ne

50

.00

10

57

61

28

1.0

05

2.6

60

Me

thyle

ne

ch

lori

de

25

.00

94

.46

31

37

5.0

02

3.5

90

MT

BE

25

.00

92

.76

51

23

1.0

02

3.1

80

n-B

uty

lbe

nze

ne

25

.00

11

86

91

37

1.0

02

9.5

10

n-P

rop

ylb

en

ze

ne

25

.00

10

77

21

29

1.0

02

6.7

00

Na

ph

tha

len

e2

5.0

01

06

54

13

81

.00

26

.57

0

o-X

yle

ne

25

.00

10

28

01

21

1.0

02

5.4

10

se

c-B

uty

lbe

nze

ne

25

.00

10

97

21

27

1.0

02

7.3

70

Sty

ren

e2

5.0

01

05

65

13

41

.00

26

.13

0

tert

-Buty

lben

zene

25.0

0107

70

129

1.0

02

6.7

30

Qu

ali

fier

s:

BA

nal

yte

det

ecte

d i

n t

he

asso

ciat

ed M

eth

od

Bla

nk

EV

alu

e ab

ov

e q

uan

tita

tio

n r

ange

HH

old

ing

tim

es f

or

pre

par

atio

n o

r an

alysi

s ex

ceed

ed

ND

No

t D

etec

ted

at

the

Rep

ort

ing

Lim

itR

RP

D o

uts

ide

acce

pte

d r

eco

ver

y l

imit

sS

Sp

ike/

Su

rro

gat

e o

uts

ide

of

lim

its

du

e to

mat

rix

in

terf

eren

ce

DO

Su

rro

gat

e D

ilu

ted

Out

Cal

cula

tio

ns

are

bas

ed o

n r

aw v

alues

10 o

f 18

Page 65: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary

Labora

tori

es,

Inc.

A

dva

nce

d T

echnolo

gy

3151 W

. P

ost

Road,

Las

Veg

as,

NV

89118

Tel

: 702-3

07-2

65

9

Fa

x: 7

02-3

07-2

69

1

Pro

ject:

SF

PP

- N

orw

alk

Sit

e

CL

IEN

T:

CH

2M

HIL

L

Wo

rk

Ord

er:

N0

05

70

6A

NA

LY

TIC

AL

QC

SU

MM

AR

Y R

EP

OR

T

Tes

tCo

de:

8260

_W

P_S

FP

P

Sa

mp

le I

D:

D1

10

42

8L

CS

Batc

h I

D:

D1

1V

W0

56

Te

stN

o:

EP

A 8

26

0B

An

aly

sis

Da

te:

4/2

8/2

01

1

Pre

p D

ate

:

An

aly

teR

esu

ltS

PK

va

lue

SP

K R

ef

Va

l%

RE

CR

PD

Re

f V

al

%R

PD

Lo

wLim

itH

igh

Lim

itR

PD

Lim

itQ

ua

l

Un

its:

μg

/L

PQ

L

Clie

nt

ID:

LC

SW

Ru

nN

o:

79

85

6

Se

qN

o:

12

61

64

2

LC

SS

am

pT

yp

e:

Te

stC

od

e:

82

60

_W

P_

SF

Tetr

achlo

roeth

ene

25.0

0108

66

128

1.0

02

7.0

90

To

lue

ne

25

.00

94

.87

71

22

2.5

02

3.7

10

tra

ns-1

,2-D

ich

loro

eth

en

e2

5.0

01

05

63

13

71

.00

26

.24

0

tra

ns-1

,3-D

ich

loro

pro

pe

ne

25

.00

90

.35

91

35

1.0

02

2.5

70

Trich

loro

eth

en

e2

5.0

09

6.2

70

12

71

.00

24

.05

0

Trich

loro

flu

oro

me

tha

ne

25

.00

11

05

71

29

1.0

02

7.5

20

Vin

yl ch

lori

de

25

.00

10

15

01

34

1.0

02

5.2

80

Xyle

ne

s, T

ota

l7

5.0

01

04

75

12

52

.00

78

.07

0

S

urr

: 1,2

-Dic

hlo

roe

tha

ne

-d4

25

.00

99

.07

21

19

24

.76

0

S

urr

: 4-B

rom

oflu

oro

be

nze

ne

25

.00

98

.67

61

19

24

.65

0

S

urr

: D

ibro

mo

fluo

rom

eth

an

e2

5.0

01

06

85

11

52

6.4

00

S

urr

: T

olu

en

e-d

82

5.0

09

8.8

81

12

02

4.7

00

Sa

mp

le I

D:

N005701

-001B

MS

Batc

h I

D:

D1

1V

W0

56

Te

stN

o:

EP

A 8

26

0B

An

aly

sis

Da

te:

4/2

8/2

01

1

Pre

p D

ate

:

An

aly

teR

esu

ltS

PK

va

lue

SP

K R

ef

Va

l%

RE

CR

PD

Re

f V

al

%R

PD

Lo

wLim

itH

igh

Lim

itR

PD

Lim

itQ

ua

l

Un

its:

μg

/L

PQ

L

Clie

nt

ID:

ZZ

ZZ

ZZ

Ru

nN

o:

79

85

6

Se

qN

o:

12

61

64

3

MS

Sa

mp

Typ

e:

Te

stC

od

e:

82

60

_W

P_

SF

1,1

,1,2

-Te

tra

ch

loro

eth

ane

25

.00

10

88

11

29

1.0

02

6.8

90

1,1

,1-T

richlo

roeth

ane

25.0

076.2

67

132

1.0

01

9.0

50

1,1

,2,2

-Te

tra

ch

loro

eth

ane

25

.00

87

.66

31

28

1.0

02

1.9

10

1,1

,2-T

richlo

roeth

ane

25.0

095.4

75

125

1.0

02

3.8

50

1,1

-Dic

hlo

roeth

an

e2

5.0

09

6.6

69

13

30

.50

02

4.1

40

1,1

-Dic

hlo

roeth

en

e2

5.0

09

6.6

68

13

01

.00

24

.15

0

1,1

-Dic

hlo

ropro

pe

ne

25

.00

96

.27

31

32

1.0

02

4.0

50

1,2

,3-T

richlo

robenzene

25.0

0106

67

137

1.0

02

6.4

00

1,2

,3-T

richlo

ropro

pane

25.0

082.3

73

124

1.0

02

0.5

80

1,2

,4-T

richlo

robenzene

25.0

0114

66

134

1.0

02

8.6

20

1,2

,4-T

rim

eth

ylb

en

ze

ne

25

.00

12

27

41

32

1.0

03

0.5

80

1,2

-Dib

rom

o-3

-chlo

ropro

pane

25.0

071.9

50

132

2.0

01

7.9

70

1,2

-Dib

rom

oe

tha

ne

25

.00

86

.28

01

21

1.0

02

1.5

40

Qu

ali

fier

s:

BA

nal

yte

det

ecte

d i

n t

he

asso

ciat

ed M

eth

od

Bla

nk

EV

alu

e ab

ov

e q

uan

tita

tio

n r

ange

HH

old

ing

tim

es f

or

pre

par

atio

n o

r an

alysi

s ex

ceed

ed

ND

No

t D

etec

ted

at

the

Rep

ort

ing

Lim

itR

RP

D o

uts

ide

acce

pte

d r

eco

ver

y l

imit

sS

Sp

ike/

Su

rro

gat

e o

uts

ide

of

lim

its

du

e to

mat

rix

in

terf

eren

ce

DO

Su

rro

gat

e D

ilu

ted

Out

Cal

cula

tio

ns

are

bas

ed o

n r

aw v

alues

11 o

f 18

Page 66: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary

Labora

tori

es,

Inc.

A

dva

nce

d T

echnolo

gy

3151 W

. P

ost

Road,

Las

Veg

as,

NV

89118

Tel

: 702-3

07-2

65

9

Fa

x: 7

02-3

07-2

69

1

Pro

ject:

SF

PP

- N

orw

alk

Sit

e

CL

IEN

T:

CH

2M

HIL

L

Wo

rk

Ord

er:

N0

05

70

6A

NA

LY

TIC

AL

QC

SU

MM

AR

Y R

EP

OR

T

Tes

tCo

de:

8260

_W

P_S

FP

P

Sa

mp

le I

D:

N005701

-001B

MS

Batc

h I

D:

D1

1V

W0

56

Te

stN

o:

EP

A 8

26

0B

An

aly

sis

Da

te:

4/2

8/2

01

1

Pre

p D

ate

:

An

aly

teR

esu

ltS

PK

va

lue

SP

K R

ef

Va

l%

RE

CR

PD

Re

f V

al

%R

PD

Lo

wLim

itH

igh

Lim

itR

PD

Lim

itQ

ua

l

Un

its:

μg

/L

PQ

L

Clie

nt

ID:

ZZ

ZZ

ZZ

Ru

nN

o:

79

85

6

Se

qN

o:

12

61

64

3

MS

Sa

mp

Typ

e:

Te

stC

od

e:

82

60

_W

P_

SF

1,2

-Dic

hlo

robe

nze

ne

25

.00

10

77

11

22

1.0

02

6.6

50

1,2

-Dic

hlo

roeth

an

e2

5.0

08

9.4

69

13

20

.50

02

2.3

50

1,2

-Dic

hlo

ropro

pa

ne

25

.00

94

.37

51

25

1.0

02

3.5

80

1,3

,5-T

rim

eth

ylb

en

ze

ne

25

.00

11

87

41

31

1.0

0.3

40

02

9.7

20

1,3

-Dic

hlo

robe

nze

ne

25

.00

11

27

51

24

1.0

02

8.0

40

1,3

-Dic

hlo

ropro

pa

ne

25

.00

93

.47

31

26

1.0

02

3.3

40

1,4

-Dic

hlo

robe

nze

ne

25

.00

11

07

41

23

1.0

02

7.4

60

2,2

-Dic

hlo

ropro

pa

ne

25

.00

67

.76

91

37

S1

.00

16

.92

0

2-B

uta

no

ne

25

0.0

35

.84

91

36

S1

00

89

.55

0

2-C

hlo

roto

lue

ne

25

.00

11

67

31

26

1.0

02

8.9

40

4-C

hlo

roto

lue

ne

25

.00

11

17

41

28

1.0

02

7.6

80

4-I

sopro

pylto

luene

25.0

0123

73

130

1.0

0.6

30

03

1.2

90

4-M

eth

yl-2-p

enta

none

250.0

71.6

58

134

10

01

79.1

20

Ace

ton

e2

50.0

27

.84

01

35

S1

00

69

.51

0

Acro

lein

25

0.0

19

.47

51

25

S2

00

48

.49

0

Acry

lon

itri

le2

50.0

89

.67

51

25

20

02

23.8

80

Be

nze

ne

25

.00

10

88

11

22

1.0

12

.73

39

.64

0

Bro

mob

en

ze

ne

25

.00

10

87

61

24

1.0

02

6.9

60

Bro

moch

loro

me

tha

ne

25

.00

93

.86

51

29

1.0

02

3.4

50

Bro

mod

ichlo

rom

eth

an

e2

5.0

08

2.6

76

12

11

.00

20

.65

0

Bro

mofo

rm2

5.0

08

3.8

69

12

81

.00

20

.95

0

Bro

mom

eth

an

e2

5.0

01

19

53

14

11

.00

29

.77

0

Ca

rbon

dis

ulfid

e2

5.0

08

6.3

75

12

51

.00

21

.58

0

Ca

rbon

te

tra

ch

loride

25

.00

75

.96

61

38

1.0

01

8.9

70

Chlo

robe

nzene

25.0

0106

81

122

1.0

02

6.4

40

Ch

loro

eth

an

e2

5.0

01

11

58

13

31

.00

27

.67

0

Ch

loro

form

25

.00

96

.46

91

28

1.0

02

4.1

10

Ch

loro

meth

an

e2

5.0

09

3.5

56

13

11

.00

23

.38

0

cis

-1,2

-Dic

hlo

roe

the

ne

25

.00

10

07

21

26

1.0

02

5.0

50

cis

-1,3

-Dic

hlo

rop

rope

ne

25

.00

88

.86

91

31

1.0

02

2.1

90

Qu

ali

fier

s:

BA

nal

yte

det

ecte

d i

n t

he

asso

ciat

ed M

eth

od

Bla

nk

EV

alu

e ab

ov

e q

uan

tita

tio

n r

ange

HH

old

ing

tim

es f

or

pre

par

atio

n o

r an

alysi

s ex

ceed

ed

ND

No

t D

etec

ted

at

the

Rep

ort

ing

Lim

itR

RP

D o

uts

ide

acce

pte

d r

eco

ver

y l

imit

sS

Sp

ike/

Su

rro

gat

e o

uts

ide

of

lim

its

du

e to

mat

rix

in

terf

eren

ce

DO

Su

rro

gat

e D

ilu

ted

Out

Cal

cula

tio

ns

are

bas

ed o

n r

aw v

alues

12 o

f 18

Page 67: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary

Labora

tori

es,

Inc.

A

dva

nce

d T

echnolo

gy

3151 W

. P

ost

Road,

Las

Veg

as,

NV

89118

Tel

: 702-3

07-2

65

9

Fa

x: 7

02-3

07-2

69

1

Pro

ject:

SF

PP

- N

orw

alk

Sit

e

CL

IEN

T:

CH

2M

HIL

L

Wo

rk

Ord

er:

N0

05

70

6A

NA

LY

TIC

AL

QC

SU

MM

AR

Y R

EP

OR

T

Tes

tCo

de:

8260

_W

P_S

FP

P

Sa

mp

le I

D:

N005701

-001B

MS

Batc

h I

D:

D1

1V

W0

56

Te

stN

o:

EP

A 8

26

0B

An

aly

sis

Da

te:

4/2

8/2

01

1

Pre

p D

ate

:

An

aly

teR

esu

ltS

PK

va

lue

SP

K R

ef

Va

l%

RE

CR

PD

Re

f V

al

%R

PD

Lo

wLim

itH

igh

Lim

itR

PD

Lim

itQ

ua

l

Un

its:

μg

/L

PQ

L

Clie

nt

ID:

ZZ

ZZ

ZZ

Ru

nN

o:

79

85

6

Se

qN

o:

12

61

64

3

MS

Sa

mp

Typ

e:

Te

stC

od

e:

82

60

_W

P_

SF

Dib

rom

och

loro

meth

ane

25.0

093.2

66

133

1.0

02

3.2

90

Dib

rom

om

eth

an

e2

5.0

09

1.1

76

12

51

.00

22

.77

0

Dic

hlo

rod

iflu

oro

me

tha

ne

25

.00

94

.35

31

53

1.0

02

3.5

80

Eth

ylb

enze

ne

25

.00

12

37

31

27

1.0

20

.46

51

.23

0

Fre

on-1

13

25.0

083.8

75

125

1.0

02

0.9

60

He

xa

ch

loro

bu

tad

ien

e2

5.0

01

16

67

13

11

.00

29

.02

0

Iso

pro

pylb

en

ze

ne

25

.00

15

97

51

27

S1

.04

7.8

08

7.4

70

m,p

-Xyle

ne

50

.00

11

17

61

28

1.0

5.2

40

60

.82

0

Me

thyle

ne

ch

lori

de

25

.00

86

.86

31

37

5.0

02

1.6

90

MT

BE

25

.00

77

.86

51

23

1.0

01

9.4

60

n-B

uty

lbe

nze

ne

25

.00

13

56

91

37

1.0

6.3

70

40

.15

0

n-P

rop

ylb

en

ze

ne

25

.00

19

17

21

29

S1

.01

12.8

16

0.5

90

Na

ph

tha

len

e2

5.0

07

2.2

54

13

81

.05

8.4

67

6.5

10

o-X

yle

ne

25

.00

10

58

01

21

1.0

0.5

60

02

6.8

60

se

c-B

uty

lbe

nze

ne

25

.00

13

17

21

27

S1

.01

3.7

84

6.5

00

Sty

ren

e2

5.0

01

03

65

13

41

.00

25

.74

0

tert

-Buty

lben

zene

25.0

0115

70

129

1.0

1.2

20

30

.05

0

Tetr

achlo

roeth

ene

25.0

0113

66

128

1.0

02

8.3

20

To

lue

ne

25

.00

96

.37

71

22

2.5

0.7

00

02

4.7

80

tra

ns-1

,2-D

ich

loro

eth

en

e2

5.0

09

8.8

63

13

71

.00

24

.71

0

tra

ns-1

,3-D

ich

loro

pro

pe

ne

25

.00

81

.85

91

35

1.0

02

0.4

60

Trich

loro

eth

en

e2

5.0

09

7.5

70

12

71

.00

24

.38

0

Trich

loro

flu

oro

me

tha

ne

25

.00

10

75

71

29

1.0

02

6.7

40

Vin

yl ch

lori

de

25

.00

10

15

01

34

1.0

02

5.2

20

Xyle

ne

s, T

ota

l7

5.0

01

09

75

12

52

.05

.80

08

7.6

80

S

urr

: 1,2

-Dic

hlo

roe

tha

ne

-d4

25

.00

85

.07

21

19

21

.25

0

S

urr

: 4-B

rom

oflu

oro

be

nze

ne

25

.00

99

.77

61

19

24

.92

0

S

urr

: D

ibro

mo

fluo

rom

eth

an

e2

5.0

09

6.9

85

11

52

4.2

30

S

urr

: T

olu

en

e-d

82

5.0

09

9.8

81

12

02

4.9

40

Qu

ali

fier

s:

BA

nal

yte

det

ecte

d i

n t

he

asso

ciat

ed M

eth

od

Bla

nk

EV

alu

e ab

ov

e q

uan

tita

tio

n r

ange

HH

old

ing

tim

es f

or

pre

par

atio

n o

r an

alysi

s ex

ceed

ed

ND

No

t D

etec

ted

at

the

Rep

ort

ing

Lim

itR

RP

D o

uts

ide

acce

pte

d r

eco

ver

y l

imit

sS

Sp

ike/

Su

rro

gat

e o

uts

ide

of

lim

its

du

e to

mat

rix

in

terf

eren

ce

DO

Su

rro

gat

e D

ilu

ted

Out

Cal

cula

tio

ns

are

bas

ed o

n r

aw v

alues

13 o

f 18

Page 68: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary

Labora

tori

es,

Inc.

A

dva

nce

d T

echnolo

gy

3151 W

. P

ost

Road,

Las

Veg

as,

NV

89118

Tel

: 702-3

07-2

65

9

Fa

x: 7

02-3

07-2

69

1

Pro

ject:

SF

PP

- N

orw

alk

Sit

e

CL

IEN

T:

CH

2M

HIL

L

Wo

rk

Ord

er:

N0

05

70

6A

NA

LY

TIC

AL

QC

SU

MM

AR

Y R

EP

OR

T

Tes

tCo

de:

8260

_W

P_S

FP

P

Sa

mp

le I

D:

N005701

-001B

MS

D

Batc

h I

D:

D1

1V

W0

56

Te

stN

o:

EP

A 8

26

0B

An

aly

sis

Da

te:

4/2

8/2

01

1

Pre

p D

ate

:

An

aly

teR

esu

ltS

PK

va

lue

SP

K R

ef

Va

l%

RE

CR

PD

Re

f V

al

%R

PD

Lo

wLim

itH

igh

Lim

itR

PD

Lim

itQ

ua

l

Un

its:

μg

/L

PQ

L

Clie

nt

ID:

ZZ

ZZ

ZZ

Ru

nN

o:

79

85

6

Se

qN

o:

12

61

64

4

MS

DS

am

pT

yp

e:

Te

stC

od

e:

82

60

_W

P_

SF

1,1

,1,2

-Te

tra

ch

loro

eth

ane

25

.00

10

48

11

29

20

1.0

02

6.8

93

.44

25

.98

0

1,1

,1-T

richlo

roeth

ane

25.0

074.8

67

132

20

1.0

01

9.0

51

.85

18

.70

0

1,1

,2,2

-Te

tra

ch

loro

eth

ane

25

.00

89

.46

31

28

20

1.0

02

1.9

11

.99

22

.35

0

1,1

,2-T

richlo

roeth

ane

25.0

092.4

75

125

20

1.0

02

3.8

53

.19

23

.10

0

1,1

-Dic

hlo

roeth

an

e2

5.0

09

2.7

69

13

32

00

.50

02

4.1

44

.10

23

.17

0

1,1

-Dic

hlo

roeth

en

e2

5.0

09

7.3

68

13

02

01

.00

24

.15

0.7

43

24

.33

0

1,1

-Dic

hlo

ropro

pe

ne

25

.00

94

.67

31

32

20

1.0

02

4.0

51

.68

23

.65

0

1,2

,3-T

richlo

robenzene

25.0

0102

67

137

20

1.0

02

6.4

03

.94

25

.38

0

1,2

,3-T

richlo

ropro

pane

25.0

085.1

73

124

20

1.0

02

0.5

83

.30

21

.27

0

1,2

,4-T

richlo

robenzene

25.0

0110

66

134

20

1.0

02

8.6

23

.81

27

.55

0

1,2

,4-T

rim

eth

ylb

en

ze

ne

25

.00

11

97

41

32

20

1.0

03

0.5

82

.55

29

.81

0

1,2

-Dib

rom

o-3

-chlo

ropro

pane

25.0

073.0

50

132

20

2.0

01

7.9

71

.49

18

.24

0

1,2

-Dib

rom

oe

tha

ne

25

.00

84

.68

01

21

20

1.0

02

1.5

41

.83

21

.15

0

1,2

-Dic

hlo

robe

nze

ne

25

.00

10

57

11

22

20

1.0

02

6.6

51

.97

26

.13

0

1,2

-Dic

hlo

roeth

an

e2

5.0

08

2.8

69

13

22

00

.50

02

2.3

57

.62

20

.71

0

1,2

-Dic

hlo

ropro

pa

ne

25

.00

89

.97

51

25

20

1.0

02

3.5

84

.78

22

.48

0

1,3

,5-T

rim

eth

ylb

en

ze

ne

25

.00

11

57

41

31

20

1.0

0.3

40

02

9.7

22

.28

29

.05

0

1,3

-Dic

hlo

robe

nze

ne

25

.00

11

07

51

24

20

1.0

02

8.0

41

.80

27

.54

0

1,3

-Dic

hlo

ropro

pa

ne

25

.00

87

.07

31

26

20

1.0

02

3.3

47

.05

21

.75

0

1,4

-Dic

hlo

robe

nze

ne

25

.00

10

67

41

23

20

1.0

02

7.4

63

.14

26

.61

0

2,2

-Dic

hlo

ropro

pa

ne

25

.00

64

.76

91

37

20

S1

.00

16

.92

4.5

31

6.1

70

2-B

uta

no

ne

25

0.0

32

.74

91

36

20

S1

00

89

.55

9.0

78

1.7

80

2-C

hlo

roto

lue

ne

25

.00

11

37

31

26

20

1.0

02

8.9

42

.13

28

.33

0

4-C

hlo

roto

lue

ne

25

.00

10

97

41

28

20

1.0

02

7.6

81

.16

27

.36

0

4-I

sopro

pylto

luene

25.0

0119

73

130

20

1.0

0.6

30

03

1.2

92

.79

30

.43

0

4-M

eth

yl-2-p

enta

none

250.0

67.0

58

134

20

10

01

79.1

6.6

51

67.5

90

Ace

ton

e2

50.0

22

.64

01

35

20

SR

10

06

9.5

12

0.8

56

.40

0

Acro

lein

25

0.0

16

.87

51

25

20

S2

00

48

.49

14

.64

1.8

80

Acry

lon

itri

le2

50.0

67

.87

51

25

20

SR

20

02

23.9

27

.61

69.5

70

Be

nze

ne

25

.00

10

28

11

22

20

1.0

12

.73

39

.64

3.6

03

8.2

40

Qu

ali

fier

s:

BA

nal

yte

det

ecte

d i

n t

he

asso

ciat

ed M

eth

od

Bla

nk

EV

alu

e ab

ov

e q

uan

tita

tio

n r

ange

HH

old

ing

tim

es f

or

pre

par

atio

n o

r an

alysi

s ex

ceed

ed

ND

No

t D

etec

ted

at

the

Rep

ort

ing

Lim

itR

RP

D o

uts

ide

acce

pte

d r

eco

ver

y l

imit

sS

Sp

ike/

Su

rro

gat

e o

uts

ide

of

lim

its

du

e to

mat

rix

in

terf

eren

ce

DO

Su

rro

gat

e D

ilu

ted

Out

Cal

cula

tio

ns

are

bas

ed o

n r

aw v

alues

14 o

f 18

Page 69: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary

Labora

tori

es,

Inc.

A

dva

nce

d T

echnolo

gy

3151 W

. P

ost

Road,

Las

Veg

as,

NV

89118

Tel

: 702-3

07-2

65

9

Fa

x: 7

02-3

07-2

69

1

Pro

ject:

SF

PP

- N

orw

alk

Sit

e

CL

IEN

T:

CH

2M

HIL

L

Wo

rk

Ord

er:

N0

05

70

6A

NA

LY

TIC

AL

QC

SU

MM

AR

Y R

EP

OR

T

Tes

tCo

de:

8260

_W

P_S

FP

P

Sa

mp

le I

D:

N005701

-001B

MS

D

Batc

h I

D:

D1

1V

W0

56

Te

stN

o:

EP

A 8

26

0B

An

aly

sis

Da

te:

4/2

8/2

01

1

Pre

p D

ate

:

An

aly

teR

esu

ltS

PK

va

lue

SP

K R

ef

Va

l%

RE

CR

PD

Re

f V

al

%R

PD

Lo

wLim

itH

igh

Lim

itR

PD

Lim

itQ

ua

l

Un

its:

μg

/L

PQ

L

Clie

nt

ID:

ZZ

ZZ

ZZ

Ru

nN

o:

79

85

6

Se

qN

o:

12

61

64

4

MS

DS

am

pT

yp

e:

Te

stC

od

e:

82

60

_W

P_

SF

Bro

mob

en

ze

ne

25

.00

10

77

61

24

20

1.0

02

6.9

60

.63

32

6.7

90

Bro

moch

loro

me

tha

ne

25

.00

90

.06

51

29

20

1.0

02

3.4

54

.18

22

.49

0

Bro

mod

ichlo

rom

eth

an

e2

5.0

07

8.7

76

12

12

01

.00

20

.65

4.8

61

9.6

70

Bro

mofo

rm2

5.0

08

3.0

69

12

82

01

.00

20

.95

0.9

59

20

.75

0

Bro

mom

eth

an

e2

5.0

01

23

53

14

12

01

.00

29

.77

2.8

83

0.6

40

Ca

rbon

dis

ulfid

e2

5.0

08

7.2

75

12

52

01

.00

21

.58

1.0

12

1.8

00

Ca

rbon

te

tra

ch

loride

25

.00

75

.66

61

38

20

1.0

01

8.9

70

.31

71

8.9

10

Chlo

robe

nzene

25.0

0104

81

122

20

1.0

02

6.4

41

.49

26

.05

0

Ch

loro

eth

an

e2

5.0

01

12

58

13

32

01

.00

27

.67

1.4

02

8.0

60

Ch

loro

form

25

.00

96

.16

91

28

20

1.0

02

4.1

10

.37

42

4.0

20

Ch

loro

meth

an

e2

5.0

09

4.6

56

13

12

01

.00

23

.38

1.1

12

3.6

40

cis

-1,2

-Dic

hlo

roe

the

ne

25

.00

98

.07

21

26

20

1.0

02

5.0

52

.22

24

.50

0

cis

-1,3

-Dic

hlo

rop

rope

ne

25

.00

83

.66

91

31

20

1.0

02

2.1

95

.94

20

.91

0

Dib

rom

och

loro

meth

ane

25.0

087.3

66

133

20

1.0

02

3.2

96

.47

21

.83

0

Dib

rom

om

eth

an

e2

5.0

08

4.6

76

12

52

01

.00

22

.77

7.4

22

1.1

40

Dic

hlo

rod

iflu

oro

me

tha

ne

25

.00

94

.35

31

53

20

1.0

02

3.5

80

.04

24

23

.57

0

Eth

ylb

enze

ne

25

.00

11

47

31

27

20

1.0

20

.46

51

.23

4.4

54

9.0

00

Fre

on-1

13

25.0

081.7

75

125

20

1.0

02

0.9

62

.56

20

.43

0

He

xa

ch

loro

bu

tad

ien

e2

5.0

01

12

67

13

12

01

.00

29

.02

3.7

92

7.9

40

Iso

pro

pylb

en

ze

ne

25

.00

14

37

51

27

20

S1

.04

7.8

08

7.4

74

.45

83

.66

0

m,p

-Xyle

ne

50

.00

10

87

61

28

20

1.0

5.2

40

60

.82

2.8

75

9.1

00

Me

thyle

ne

ch

lori

de

25

.00

86

.26

31

37

20

5.0

02

1.6

90

.69

42

1.5

40

MT

BE

25

.00

71

.46

51

23

20

1.0

01

9.4

68

.69

17

.84

0

n-B

uty

lbe

nze

ne

25

.00

12

96

91

37

20

1.0

6.3

70

40

.15

4.2

03

8.5

00

n-P

rop

ylb

en

ze

ne

25

.00

16

37

21

29

20

S1

.01

12.8

16

0.6

4.4

41

53.6

20

Na

ph

tha

len

e2

5.0

07

5.2

54

13

82

01

.05

8.4

67

6.5

10

.98

87

7.2

70

o-X

yle

ne

25

.00

10

28

01

21

20

1.0

0.5

60

02

6.8

62

.68

26

.15

0

se

c-B

uty

lbe

nze

ne

25

.00

12

47

21

27

20

1.0

13

.78

46

.50

3.6

34

4.8

40

Sty

ren

e2

5.0

01

00

65

13

42

01

.00

25

.74

2.9

22

5.0

00

tert

-Buty

lben

zene

25.0

0114

70

129

20

1.0

1.2

20

30

.05

0.8

69

29

.79

0

Qu

ali

fier

s:

BA

nal

yte

det

ecte

d i

n t

he

asso

ciat

ed M

eth

od

Bla

nk

EV

alu

e ab

ov

e q

uan

tita

tio

n r

ange

HH

old

ing

tim

es f

or

pre

par

atio

n o

r an

alysi

s ex

ceed

ed

ND

No

t D

etec

ted

at

the

Rep

ort

ing

Lim

itR

RP

D o

uts

ide

acce

pte

d r

eco

ver

y l

imit

sS

Sp

ike/

Su

rro

gat

e o

uts

ide

of

lim

its

du

e to

mat

rix

in

terf

eren

ce

DO

Su

rro

gat

e D

ilu

ted

Out

Cal

cula

tio

ns

are

bas

ed o

n r

aw v

alues

15 o

f 18

Page 70: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary

Labora

tori

es,

Inc.

A

dva

nce

d T

echnolo

gy

3151 W

. P

ost

Road,

Las

Veg

as,

NV

89118

Tel

: 702-3

07-2

65

9

Fa

x: 7

02-3

07-2

69

1

Pro

ject:

SF

PP

- N

orw

alk

Sit

e

CL

IEN

T:

CH

2M

HIL

L

Wo

rk

Ord

er:

N0

05

70

6A

NA

LY

TIC

AL

QC

SU

MM

AR

Y R

EP

OR

T

Tes

tCo

de:

8260

_W

P_S

FP

P

Sa

mp

le I

D:

N005701

-001B

MS

D

Batc

h I

D:

D1

1V

W0

56

Te

stN

o:

EP

A 8

26

0B

An

aly

sis

Da

te:

4/2

8/2

01

1

Pre

p D

ate

:

An

aly

teR

esu

ltS

PK

va

lue

SP

K R

ef

Va

l%

RE

CR

PD

Re

f V

al

%R

PD

Lo

wLim

itH

igh

Lim

itR

PD

Lim

itQ

ua

l

Un

its:

μg

/L

PQ

L

Clie

nt

ID:

ZZ

ZZ

ZZ

Ru

nN

o:

79

85

6

Se

qN

o:

12

61

64

4

MS

DS

am

pT

yp

e:

Te

stC

od

e:

82

60

_W

P_

SF

Te

tra

ch

loro

eth

en

e2

5.0

01

11

66

12

82

01

.00

28

.32

1.8

52

7.8

00

To

lue

ne

25

.00

97

.27

71

22

20

2.5

0.7

00

02

4.7

80

.84

42

4.9

90

tra

ns-1

,2-D

ich

loro

eth

en

e2

5.0

09

9.3

63

13

72

01

.00

24

.71

0.4

44

24

.82

0

tra

ns-1

,3-D

ich

loro

pro

pe

ne

25

.00

78

.25

91

35

20

1.0

02

0.4

64

.50

19

.56

0

Trich

loro

eth

en

e2

5.0

09

6.6

70

12

72

01

.00

24

.38

0.9

48

24

.15

0

Trich

loro

flu

oro

me

tha

ne

25

.00

10

45

71

29

20

1.0

02

6.7

42

.88

25

.98

0

Vin

yl ch

lori

de

25

.00

10

15

01

34

20

1.0

02

5.2

20

.31

72

5.3

00

Xyle

ne

s, T

ota

l7

5.0

01

06

75

12

52

02

.05

.80

08

7.6

82

.81

85

.25

0

S

urr

: 1,2

-Dic

hlo

roe

tha

ne

-d4

25

.00

83

.27

21

19

02

0.7

90

S

urr

: 4-B

rom

oflu

oro

be

nze

ne

25

.00

10

17

61

19

02

5.2

90

S

urr

: D

ibro

mo

fluo

rom

eth

an

e2

5.0

09

7.9

85

11

50

24

.48

0

S

urr

: T

olu

en

e-d

82

5.0

01

04

81

12

00

25

.90

0

Sa

mp

le I

D:

D1

10

42

8M

B3

Batc

h I

D:

D1

1V

W0

56

Te

stN

o:

EP

A 8

26

0B

An

aly

sis

Da

te:

4/2

8/2

01

1

Pre

p D

ate

:

An

aly

teR

esu

ltS

PK

va

lue

SP

K R

ef

Va

l%

RE

CR

PD

Re

f V

al

%R

PD

Lo

wLim

itH

igh

Lim

itR

PD

Lim

itQ

ua

l

Un

its:

μg

/L

PQ

L

Clie

nt

ID:

PB

W

Ru

nN

o:

79

85

6

Se

qN

o:

12

61

64

5

MB

LK

Sa

mp

Typ

e:

Te

stC

od

e:

82

60

_W

P_

SF

1,1

,1,2

-Te

tra

ch

loro

eth

ane

1.0

ND

1,1

,1-T

richlo

roeth

ane

1.0

ND

1,1

,2,2

-Te

tra

ch

loro

eth

ane

1.0

ND

1,1

,2-T

richlo

roeth

ane

1.0

ND

1,1

-Dic

hlo

roeth

an

e0

.50

ND

1,1

-Dic

hlo

roeth

en

e1

.0N

D

1,1

-Dic

hlo

ropro

pe

ne

1.0

ND

1,2

,3-T

richlo

robenzene

1.0

ND

1,2

,3-T

richlo

ropro

pane

1.0

ND

1,2

,4-T

richlo

robenzene

1.0

ND

1,2

,4-T

rim

eth

ylb

en

ze

ne

1.0

ND

1,2

-Dib

rom

o-3

-chlo

ropro

pane

2.0

ND

1,2

-Dib

rom

oe

tha

ne

1.0

ND

Qu

ali

fier

s:

BA

nal

yte

det

ecte

d i

n t

he

asso

ciat

ed M

eth

od

Bla

nk

EV

alu

e ab

ov

e q

uan

tita

tio

n r

ange

HH

old

ing

tim

es f

or

pre

par

atio

n o

r an

alysi

s ex

ceed

ed

ND

No

t D

etec

ted

at

the

Rep

ort

ing

Lim

itR

RP

D o

uts

ide

acce

pte

d r

eco

ver

y l

imit

sS

Sp

ike/

Su

rro

gat

e o

uts

ide

of

lim

its

du

e to

mat

rix

in

terf

eren

ce

DO

Su

rro

gat

e D

ilu

ted

Out

Cal

cula

tio

ns

are

bas

ed o

n r

aw v

alues

16 o

f 18

Page 71: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary

Labora

tori

es,

Inc.

A

dva

nce

d T

echnolo

gy

3151 W

. P

ost

Road,

Las

Veg

as,

NV

89118

Tel

: 702-3

07-2

65

9

Fa

x: 7

02-3

07-2

69

1

Pro

ject:

SF

PP

- N

orw

alk

Sit

e

CL

IEN

T:

CH

2M

HIL

L

Wo

rk

Ord

er:

N0

05

70

6A

NA

LY

TIC

AL

QC

SU

MM

AR

Y R

EP

OR

T

Tes

tCo

de:

8260

_W

P_S

FP

P

Sa

mp

le I

D:

D1

10

42

8M

B3

Batc

h I

D:

D1

1V

W0

56

Te

stN

o:

EP

A 8

26

0B

An

aly

sis

Da

te:

4/2

8/2

01

1

Pre

p D

ate

:

An

aly

teR

esu

ltS

PK

va

lue

SP

K R

ef

Va

l%

RE

CR

PD

Re

f V

al

%R

PD

Lo

wLim

itH

igh

Lim

itR

PD

Lim

itQ

ua

l

Un

its:

μg

/L

PQ

L

Clie

nt

ID:

PB

W

Ru

nN

o:

79

85

6

Se

qN

o:

12

61

64

5

MB

LK

Sa

mp

Typ

e:

Te

stC

od

e:

82

60

_W

P_

SF

1,2

-Dic

hlo

robe

nze

ne

1.0

ND

1,2

-Dic

hlo

roeth

an

e0

.50

ND

1,2

-Dic

hlo

ropro

pa

ne

1.0

ND

1,3

,5-T

rim

eth

ylb

en

ze

ne

1.0

ND

1,3

-Dic

hlo

robe

nze

ne

1.0

ND

1,3

-Dic

hlo

ropro

pa

ne

1.0

ND

1,4

-Dic

hlo

robe

nze

ne

1.0

ND

2,2

-Dic

hlo

ropro

pa

ne

1.0

ND

2-B

uta

no

ne

10

ND

2-C

hlo

roto

lue

ne

1.0

ND

4-C

hlo

roto

lue

ne

1.0

ND

4-I

sopro

pylto

luene

1.0

ND

4-M

eth

yl-2-p

enta

none

10

ND

Ace

ton

e1

0N

D

Acro

lein

20

ND

Acry

lon

itri

le2

0N

D

Be

nze

ne

1.0

ND

Bro

mobe

nzene

1.0

ND

Bro

moch

loro

me

tha

ne

1.0

ND

Bro

mod

ichlo

rom

eth

an

e1

.0N

D

Bro

mofo

rm1

.0N

D

Bro

mom

eth

an

e1

.0N

D

Ca

rbon

dis

ulfid

e1

.0N

D

Ca

rbon

te

tra

ch

loride

1.0

ND

Chlo

robe

nzene

1.0

ND

Chlo

roeth

ane

1.0

ND

Chlo

rofo

rm1.0

ND

Chlo

rom

eth

an

e1

.0N

D

cis

-1,2

-Dic

hlo

roe

the

ne

1.0

ND

cis

-1,3

-Dic

hlo

rop

rope

ne

1.0

ND

Qu

ali

fier

s:

BA

nal

yte

det

ecte

d i

n t

he

asso

ciat

ed M

eth

od

Bla

nk

EV

alu

e ab

ov

e q

uan

tita

tio

n r

ange

HH

old

ing

tim

es f

or

pre

par

atio

n o

r an

alysi

s ex

ceed

ed

ND

No

t D

etec

ted

at

the

Rep

ort

ing

Lim

itR

RP

D o

uts

ide

acce

pte

d r

eco

ver

y l

imit

sS

Sp

ike/

Su

rro

gat

e o

uts

ide

of

lim

its

du

e to

mat

rix

in

terf

eren

ce

DO

Su

rro

gat

e D

ilu

ted

Out

Cal

cula

tio

ns

are

bas

ed o

n r

aw v

alues

17 o

f 18

Page 72: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary

Labora

tori

es,

Inc.

A

dva

nce

d T

echnolo

gy

3151 W

. P

ost

Road,

Las

Veg

as,

NV

89118

Tel

: 702-3

07-2

65

9

Fa

x: 7

02-3

07-2

69

1

Pro

ject:

SF

PP

- N

orw

alk

Sit

e

CL

IEN

T:

CH

2M

HIL

L

Wo

rk

Ord

er:

N0

05

70

6A

NA

LY

TIC

AL

QC

SU

MM

AR

Y R

EP

OR

T

Tes

tCo

de:

8260

_W

P_S

FP

P

Sa

mp

le I

D:

D1

10

42

8M

B3

Batc

h I

D:

D1

1V

W0

56

Te

stN

o:

EP

A 8

26

0B

An

aly

sis

Da

te:

4/2

8/2

01

1

Pre

p D

ate

:

An

aly

teR

esu

ltS

PK

va

lue

SP

K R

ef

Va

l%

RE

CR

PD

Re

f V

al

%R

PD

Lo

wLim

itH

igh

Lim

itR

PD

Lim

itQ

ua

l

Un

its:

μg

/L

PQ

L

Clie

nt

ID:

PB

W

Ru

nN

o:

79

85

6

Se

qN

o:

12

61

64

5

MB

LK

Sa

mp

Typ

e:

Te

stC

od

e:

82

60

_W

P_

SF

Dib

rom

och

loro

meth

ane

1.0

ND

Dib

rom

om

eth

an

e1

.0N

D

Dic

hlo

rod

iflu

oro

me

tha

ne

1.0

ND

Eth

ylb

enze

ne

1.0

ND

Fre

on-1

13

1.0

ND

He

xa

ch

loro

bu

tad

ien

e1

.0N

D

Iso

pro

pylb

en

ze

ne

1.0

ND

m,p

-Xyle

ne

1.0

ND

Me

thyle

ne

ch

lori

de

5.0

ND

MT

BE

1.0

ND

n-B

uty

lbe

nze

ne

1.0

ND

n-P

rop

ylb

en

ze

ne

1.0

ND

Na

ph

tha

len

e1

.00

.35

0

o-X

yle

ne

1.0

ND

se

c-B

uty

lbe

nze

ne

1.0

ND

Sty

ren

e1

.0N

D

tert

-Buty

lben

zene

1.0

ND

Tetr

achlo

roeth

ene

1.0

ND

To

lue

ne

2.5

ND

tra

ns-1

,2-D

ich

loro

eth

en

e1

.0N

D

tra

ns-1

,3-D

ich

loro

pro

pe

ne

1.0

ND

Trich

loro

eth

en

e1

.0N

D

Tri

ch

loro

flu

oro

me

tha

ne

1.0

ND

Vin

yl ch

lori

de

1.0

ND

Xyle

ne

s, T

ota

l2

.0N

D

S

urr

: 1,2

-Dic

hlo

roe

tha

ne

-d4

25

.00

99

.47

21

19

24

.86

0

S

urr

: 4-B

rom

oflu

oro

be

nze

ne

25

.00

10

47

61

19

26

.02

0

S

urr

: D

ibro

mo

fluo

rom

eth

an

e2

5.0

09

5.7

85

11

52

3.9

20

S

urr

: T

olu

en

e-d

82

5.0

01

06

81

12

02

6.3

80

Qu

ali

fier

s:

BA

nal

yte

det

ecte

d i

n t

he

asso

ciat

ed M

eth

od

Bla

nk

EV

alu

e ab

ov

e q

uan

tita

tio

n r

ange

HH

old

ing

tim

es f

or

pre

par

atio

n o

r an

alysi

s ex

ceed

ed

ND

No

t D

etec

ted

at

the

Rep

ort

ing

Lim

itR

RP

D o

uts

ide

acce

pte

d r

eco

ver

y l

imit

sS

Sp

ike/

Su

rro

gat

e o

uts

ide

of

lim

its

du

e to

mat

rix

in

terf

eren

ce

DO

Su

rro

gat

e D

ilu

ted

Out

Cal

cula

tio

ns

are

bas

ed o

n r

aw v

alues

18 o

f 18

Page 73: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary
Page 74: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary
Page 75: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary

Laboratories, Inc. Advanced Technology

3151 W. Post Road, Las Vegas, NV 89118 Tel: 702-307-2659 Fax: 702-307-2691

May 04, 2011

CH2M HILL

Daniel Jablonski

Attention: Daniel Jablonski

RE: SFPP - Norwalk Site

Workorder No.: N005698FAX: (510) 622-9129

TEL: (213)228-8271

155 Grand Avenue, Suite 1000

Oakland, CA 94612

CA-ELAP No.:2676

NV Cert. No.:NV-009222007A

Thank you for the opportunity to service the needs of your company.

Please feel free to call me at (702) 307-2659 if I can be of further assistance to your company.

Sincerely,

Jose Tenorio Jr.

Laboratory Director

Enclosed are the results for sample(s) received on April 26, 2011 by Advanced Technology

Laboratories, Inc. . The sample(s) are tested for the parameters as indicated in the enclosed chain of

custody in accordance with the applicable laboratory certifications.

The cover letter is an integral part of this analytical report. This Laboratory Report cannot be reproduced in part or

in its entirety without written permission from the client and Advanced Technology Laboratories - Las Vegas.

1 of 2

Page 76: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary

Laboratories, Inc. Advanced Technology

3151 W. Post Road, Las Vegas, NV 89118 Tel: 702-307-2659 Fax: 702-307-2691

04-May-11Date:Advanced Technology Laboratories, Inc.

Project: SFPP - Norwalk Site

CLIENT: CH2M HILL

Lab Order: N005698CASE NARRATIVE

SAMPLE RECEIVING/GENERAL COMMENTS:

Samples were received intact with proper chain of custody documentation.

Cooler temperature and sample preservation were verified upon receipt of samples if applicable.

Information on sample receipt conditions including discrepancies can be found in attached Sample

Receipt Checklist Form.

Subcontracted Analyses:

EPA TO15 and EPA TO3 were subcontracted to Advanced Technology Laboratories-Signal Hill, CA .

ASTM D1946 was subcontracted to Air Technology Laboratories-City of Industry, CA .

Page 1 of 1

2 of 2

Page 77: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary
Page 78: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary
Page 79: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary
Page 80: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary
Page 81: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary

3275 Walnut Avenue, Signal Hill, CA 90755 Tel: 562. 989.4045 Fax: 562.989.4040

Project:

Client Sample ID: N005698-001A / VINF-04-26

Collection Date: 4/26/2011 10:18:00 AM

Matrix: AIR

Analyses Result Qual Units Date Analyzed

CLIENT: Advanced Technology Laboratory-Las Vega

Lab Order: 117535

Lab ID: 117535-001A

DF

Advanced Technology Laboratories Print Date: 29-Apr-11

PQL

ANALYTICAL RESULTS

VOCS IN AIR BY GCMS

EPA TO15

Analyst: BBRunID: MS14_110427A W11A046QC Batch: PrepDate:

1,1,1-Trichloroethane 4/27/2011 03:32 PM1.2 ppbv 5ND

1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 4/27/2011 03:32 PM1.2 ppbv 5ND

1,1,2-Trichloroethane 4/27/2011 03:32 PM1.2 ppbv 5ND

1,1-Dichloroethane 4/27/2011 03:32 PM1.2 ppbv 5ND

1,1-Dichloroethene 4/27/2011 03:32 PM1.2 ppbv 5ND

1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 4/27/2011 03:32 PM1.2 ppbv 5ND

1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 4/27/2011 03:32 PM1.2 ppbv 5ND

1,2-Dibromoethane 4/27/2011 03:32 PM1.2 ppbv 5ND

1,2-Dichlorobenzene 4/27/2011 03:32 PM1.2 ppbv 5ND

1,2-Dichloroethane 4/27/2011 03:32 PM1.2 ppbv 5ND

1,2-Dichloropropane 4/27/2011 03:32 PM1.2 ppbv 5ND

1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 4/27/2011 03:32 PM1.2 ppbv 5ND

1,3-Dichlorobenzene 4/27/2011 03:32 PM1.2 ppbv 5ND

1,4-Dichlorobenzene 4/27/2011 03:32 PM1.2 ppbv 5ND

2-Butanone 4/27/2011 03:32 PM1.2 ppbv 53.8

2-Hexanone 4/27/2011 03:32 PM1.2 ppbv 5ND

4-Ethyl Toluene 4/27/2011 03:32 PM1.2 ppbv 5ND

4-Methyl-2-pentanone 4/27/2011 03:32 PM1.2 ppbv 5ND

Acetone 4/27/2011 03:32 PM1.2 ppbv 5ND

Benzene 4/27/2011 03:32 PM1.2 ppbv 516

Benzyl chloride 4/27/2011 03:32 PM1.2 ppbv 5ND

Bromodichloromethane 4/27/2011 03:32 PM1.2 ppbv 5ND

Bromoform 4/27/2011 03:32 PM1.2 ppbv 5ND

Bromomethane 4/27/2011 03:32 PM1.2 ppbv 5ND

Carbon disulfide 4/27/2011 03:32 PM1.2 ppbv 5ND

Carbon tetrachloride 4/27/2011 03:32 PM1.2 ppbv 5ND

Chlorobenzene 4/27/2011 03:32 PM1.2 ppbv 5ND

Chloroethane 4/27/2011 03:32 PM1.2 ppbv 5ND

Chloroform 4/27/2011 03:32 PM1.2 ppbv 5ND

Chloromethane 4/27/2011 03:32 PM1.2 ppbv 5ND

cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 4/27/2011 03:32 PM1.2 ppbv 5ND

cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 4/27/2011 03:32 PM1.2 ppbv 5ND

Dibromochloromethane 4/27/2011 03:32 PM1.2 ppbv 5ND

Dichlorodifluoromethane 4/27/2011 03:32 PM1.2 ppbv 5ND

Dichlorotetrafluoroethane 4/27/2011 03:32 PM1.2 ppbv 5ND

Qualifiers: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range

H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit

S Spike/Surrogate outside of limits due to matrix interference Results are wet unless otherwise specified

DO Surrogate Diluted Out

2 of 10

Page 82: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary

3275 Walnut Avenue, Signal Hill, CA 90755 Tel: 562. 989.4045 Fax: 562.989.4040

Project:

Client Sample ID: N005698-001A / VINF-04-26

Collection Date: 4/26/2011 10:18:00 AM

Matrix: AIR

Analyses Result Qual Units Date Analyzed

CLIENT: Advanced Technology Laboratory-Las Vega

Lab Order: 117535

Lab ID: 117535-001A

DF

Advanced Technology Laboratories Print Date: 29-Apr-11

PQL

ANALYTICAL RESULTS

VOCS IN AIR BY GCMS

EPA TO15

Analyst: BBRunID: MS14_110427A W11A046QC Batch: PrepDate:

Ethylbenzene 4/27/2011 03:32 PM1.2 ppbv 52.4

Freon-113 4/27/2011 03:32 PM1.2 ppbv 5ND

Hexachlorobutadiene 4/27/2011 03:32 PM1.2 ppbv 5ND

m,p-Xylene 4/27/2011 03:32 PM1.2 ppbv 56.2

MTBE 4/27/2011 03:32 PM1.2 ppbv 5ND

Methylene chloride 4/27/2011 03:32 PM1.2 ppbv 5ND

o-Xylene 4/27/2011 03:32 PM1.2 ppbv 51.5

Styrene 4/27/2011 03:32 PM1.2 ppbv 5ND

Tetrachloroethene 4/27/2011 03:32 PM1.2 ppbv 5ND

Toluene 4/27/2011 03:32 PM1.2 ppbv 58.8

trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 4/27/2011 03:32 PM1.2 ppbv 5ND

trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 4/27/2011 03:32 PM1.2 ppbv 5ND

Trichloroethene 4/27/2011 03:32 PM1.2 ppbv 5ND

Trichlorofluoromethane 4/27/2011 03:32 PM1.2 ppbv 5ND

Vinyl acetate 4/27/2011 03:32 PM1.2 ppbv 5ND

Vinyl chloride 4/27/2011 03:32 PM1.2 ppbv 5ND

Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 4/27/2011 03:32 PM70-130 %REC 593.2

GASOLINE RANGE ORGANICS BY GC-MS

EPA TO3

Analyst: BBRunID: MS14_110426A W11A045QC Batch: PrepDate:

Gasoline 4/26/2011 04:32 PM0.20 ppmv 101.9

Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 4/26/2011 04:32 PM70-130 %REC 10100

Qualifiers: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range

H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit

S Spike/Surrogate outside of limits due to matrix interference Results are wet unless otherwise specified

DO Surrogate Diluted Out

3 of 10

Page 83: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary

3275

Wal

nut A

venu

e, S

igna

l Hill

, CA

907

55

Te

l: 56

2. 9

89.4

045

F

ax: 5

62.9

89.4

040

29

-Ap

r-1

1D

ate

:A

dv

ance

d T

ech

no

log

y L

abo

rato

ries

Pro

ject

:

CL

IEN

T:

Ad

van

ced

Tec

hn

olo

gy

Lab

ora

tory

-Las

Vegas

Wo

rk O

rder

:1

17

53

5A

NA

LY

TIC

AL

QC

SU

MM

AR

Y R

EP

OR

T

Test

Co

de:

TO

15

_C

H2

Sam

ple

ID

:L

CS

-W11A

045

Ba

tch

ID

:W

11A

045

TestN

o:

EP

A T

O1

5A

naly

sis

Date

:4/2

6/2

01

1

Pre

p D

ate

:

An

aly

teR

esult

SP

K v

alu

eS

PK

Ref

Val

%R

EC

RP

D R

ef

Val

%R

PD

Lo

wLim

itH

ighLim

itR

PD

Lim

itQ

ual

Units:

pp

bv

PQ

L

Clie

nt

ID:

ZZ

ZZ

ZZ

Ru

nN

o:

132

373

Se

qN

o:

215

64

88

LC

SS

am

pT

ype:

TestC

od

e:

TO

15_

CH

2

1,1

-Dic

hlo

roe

than

e2.0

00

90

.07

01

30

0.2

50

1.8

00

Be

nzen

e2.0

00

110

70

130

0.2

50

2.2

10

Ch

loro

form

2.0

00

90

.57

01

30

0.2

50

1.8

10

m,p

-Xyle

ne

4.0

00

117

70

130

0.2

50

4.6

90

o-X

yle

ne

2.0

00

122

70

130

0.2

50

2.4

40

Te

tra

chlo

roeth

en

e2.0

00

104

70

130

0.2

50

2.0

90

Tolu

ene

2.0

00

104

70

130

0.2

50

2.0

70

Tri

chlo

roeth

en

e2.0

00

102

70

130

0.2

50

2.0

40

Vin

yl chlo

ride

2.0

00

90

.57

01

30

0.2

50

1.8

10

S

urr

: 4-B

rom

ofluoro

benzene

2.5

00

100

70

130

2.5

00

Sam

ple

ID

:L

CS

D-W

11A

045

Ba

tch

ID

:W

11A

045

TestN

o:

EP

A T

O1

5A

naly

sis

Date

:4/2

6/2

01

1

Pre

p D

ate

:

An

aly

teR

esult

SP

K v

alu

eS

PK

Ref

Val

%R

EC

RP

D R

ef

Val

%R

PD

Lo

wLim

itH

ighLim

itR

PD

Lim

itQ

ual

Units:

pp

bv

PQ

L

Clie

nt

ID:

ZZ

ZZ

ZZ

Ru

nN

o:

132

373

Se

qN

o:

215

64

89

LC

SD

Sam

pT

ype:

TestC

od

e:

TO

15_

CH

2

1,1

-Dic

hlo

roe

than

e2.0

00

90

.57

01

30

20

0.2

50

1.8

00

0.5

54

1.8

10

Be

nzen

e2.0

00

110

70

130

20

0.2

50

2.2

10

0.4

54

2.2

00

Ch

loro

form

2.0

00

90

.07

01

30

20

0.2

50

1.8

10

0.5

54

1.8

00

m,p

-Xyle

ne

4.0

00

112

70

130

20

0.2

50

4.6

90

4.1

34.5

00

o-X

yle

ne

2.0

00

115

70

130

20

0.2

50

2.4

40

5.9

12.3

00

Te

tra

chlo

roeth

en

e2.0

00

98

.57

01

30

20

0.2

50

2.0

90

5.9

11.9

70

Tolu

ene

2.0

00

101

70

130

20

0.2

50

2.0

70

2.4

42.0

20

Tri

chlo

roeth

en

e2.0

00

101

70

130

20

0.2

50

2.0

40

1.4

82.0

10

Vin

yl chlo

ride

2.0

00

87

.57

01

30

20

0.2

50

1.8

10

3.3

71.7

50

S

urr

: 4-B

rom

ofluoro

benzene

2.5

00

99

.67

01

30

00

2.4

90

Qu

ali

fiers:

BA

nal

yte

det

ecte

d i

n t

he

asso

ciat

ed M

eth

od

Bla

nk

EV

alu

e ab

ove

qu

anti

tati

on

ran

ge

HH

old

ing

tim

es f

or

pre

par

atio

n o

r an

alysi

s ex

ceed

ed

ND

Not

Det

ecte

d a

t th

e R

eport

ing L

imit

RR

PD

ou

tsid

e ac

cep

ted

rec

over

y l

imit

sS

Sp

ike/

Su

rrogat

e ou

tsid

e of

lim

its

du

e to

mat

rix

in

terf

eren

ce

DO

Su

rro

gat

e D

ilu

ted

Ou

tC

alcu

lati

on

s ar

e b

ased

on

raw

val

ues

4 o

f 10

Page 84: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary

3275

Wal

nut A

venu

e, S

igna

l Hill

, CA

907

55

Te

l: 56

2. 9

89.4

045

F

ax: 5

62.9

89.4

040

Pro

ject

:

CL

IEN

T:

Ad

van

ced

Tec

hn

olo

gy

Lab

ora

tory

-Las

Vegas

Wo

rk O

rder

:1

17

53

5A

NA

LY

TIC

AL

QC

SU

MM

AR

Y R

EP

OR

T

Test

Co

de:

TO

15

_C

H2

Sam

ple

ID

:M

B-W

11A

045

Ba

tch

ID

:W

11A

045

TestN

o:

EP

A T

O1

5A

naly

sis

Date

:4/2

6/2

01

1

Pre

p D

ate

:

An

aly

teR

esult

SP

K v

alu

eS

PK

Ref

Val

%R

EC

RP

D R

ef

Val

%R

PD

Lo

wLim

itH

ighLim

itR

PD

Lim

itQ

ual

Units:

pp

bv

PQ

L

Clie

nt

ID:

ZZ

ZZ

ZZ

Ru

nN

o:

132

373

Se

qN

o:

215

64

90

MB

LK

Sam

pT

ype:

TestC

od

e:

TO

15_

CH

2

1,1

,1-T

richlo

roeth

an

e0.2

5N

D

1,1

,2,2

-Tetr

ach

loro

eth

an

e0.2

5N

D

1,1

,2-T

richlo

roeth

an

e0.2

5N

D

1,1

-Dic

hlo

roe

than

e0.2

5N

D

1,1

-Dic

hlo

roe

then

e0.2

5N

D

1,2

,4-T

richlo

rob

en

zen

e0.2

5N

D

1,2

,4-T

rim

eth

ylb

en

zen

e0.2

5N

D

1,2

-Dib

rom

oeth

an

e0.2

5N

D

1,2

-Dic

hlo

robe

nzen

e0.2

5N

D

1,2

-Dic

hlo

roe

than

e0.2

5N

D

1,2

-Dic

hlo

ropro

pan

e0.2

5N

D

1,3

,5-T

rim

eth

ylb

en

zen

e0.2

5N

D

1,3

-Dic

hlo

robe

nzen

e0.2

5N

D

1,4

-Dic

hlo

robe

nzen

e0.2

5N

D

2-B

uta

non

e0.2

5N

D

2-H

exan

on

e0.2

5N

D

4-E

thyl T

olu

ene

0.2

5N

D

4-M

eth

yl-

2-p

enta

non

e0.2

5N

D

Aceto

ne

0.2

5N

D

Be

nzen

e0.2

5N

D

Benzyl chlo

ride

0.2

5N

D

Bro

mod

ich

loro

meth

an

e0.2

5N

D

Bro

mofo

rm0.2

5N

D

Bro

mom

eth

ane

0.2

5N

D

Carb

on d

isulfid

e0.2

5N

D

Carb

on t

etr

achlo

ride

0.2

5N

D

Ch

loro

be

nzen

e0.2

5N

D

Ch

loro

eth

ane

0.2

5N

D

Ch

loro

form

0.2

5N

D

Ch

loro

me

tha

ne

0.2

5N

D

Qu

ali

fiers:

BA

nal

yte

det

ecte

d i

n t

he

asso

ciat

ed M

eth

od

Bla

nk

EV

alu

e ab

ove

qu

anti

tati

on

ran

ge

HH

old

ing

tim

es f

or

pre

par

atio

n o

r an

alysi

s ex

ceed

ed

ND

Not

Det

ecte

d a

t th

e R

eport

ing L

imit

RR

PD

ou

tsid

e ac

cep

ted

rec

over

y l

imit

sS

Sp

ike/

Su

rrogat

e ou

tsid

e of

lim

its

du

e to

mat

rix

in

terf

eren

ce

DO

Su

rro

gat

e D

ilu

ted

Ou

tC

alcu

lati

on

s ar

e b

ased

on

raw

val

ues

5 o

f 10

Page 85: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary

3275

Wal

nut A

venu

e, S

igna

l Hill

, CA

907

55

Te

l: 56

2. 9

89.4

045

F

ax: 5

62.9

89.4

040

Pro

ject

:

CL

IEN

T:

Ad

van

ced

Tec

hn

olo

gy

Lab

ora

tory

-Las

Vegas

Wo

rk O

rder

:1

17

53

5A

NA

LY

TIC

AL

QC

SU

MM

AR

Y R

EP

OR

T

Test

Co

de:

TO

15

_C

H2

Sam

ple

ID

:M

B-W

11A

045

Ba

tch

ID

:W

11A

045

TestN

o:

EP

A T

O1

5A

naly

sis

Date

:4/2

6/2

01

1

Pre

p D

ate

:

An

aly

teR

esult

SP

K v

alu

eS

PK

Ref

Val

%R

EC

RP

D R

ef

Val

%R

PD

Lo

wLim

itH

ighLim

itR

PD

Lim

itQ

ual

Units:

pp

bv

PQ

L

Clie

nt

ID:

ZZ

ZZ

ZZ

Ru

nN

o:

132

373

Se

qN

o:

215

64

90

MB

LK

Sam

pT

ype:

TestC

od

e:

TO

15_

CH

2

cis

-1,2

-Dic

hlo

roeth

en

e0.2

5N

D

cis

-1,3

-Dic

hlo

ropro

pen

e0.2

5N

D

Dib

rom

och

loro

meth

an

e0.2

5N

D

Dic

hlo

rod

iflu

oro

me

than

e0.2

5N

D

Dic

hlo

rote

trafluo

roeth

an

e0.2

5N

D

Eth

ylb

en

zen

e0.2

5N

D

Fre

on-1

13

0.2

5N

D

He

xa

ch

loro

buta

die

ne

0.2

5N

D

m,p

-Xyle

ne

0.2

5N

D

MT

BE

0.2

5N

D

Meth

yle

ne c

hlo

ride

0.2

5N

D

o-X

yle

ne

0.2

5N

D

Sty

ren

e0.2

5N

D

Te

tra

chlo

roeth

en

e0.2

5N

D

Tolu

ene

0.2

5N

D

trans-1

,2-D

ich

loro

eth

en

e0.2

5N

D

trans-1

,3-D

ichlo

ropro

pen

e0.2

5N

D

Tri

chlo

roeth

en

e0.2

5N

D

Tri

ch

loro

fluo

rom

eth

an

e0.2

5N

D

Vin

yl aceta

te0.2

5N

D

Vin

yl chlo

ride

0.2

5N

D

S

urr

: 4-B

rom

ofluoro

benzene

2.5

00

98

.87

01

30

2.4

70

Qu

ali

fiers:

BA

nal

yte

det

ecte

d i

n t

he

asso

ciat

ed M

eth

od

Bla

nk

EV

alu

e ab

ove

qu

anti

tati

on

ran

ge

HH

old

ing

tim

es f

or

pre

par

atio

n o

r an

alysi

s ex

ceed

ed

ND

Not

Det

ecte

d a

t th

e R

eport

ing L

imit

RR

PD

ou

tsid

e ac

cep

ted

rec

over

y l

imit

sS

Sp

ike/

Su

rrogat

e ou

tsid

e of

lim

its

du

e to

mat

rix

in

terf

eren

ce

DO

Su

rro

gat

e D

ilu

ted

Ou

tC

alcu

lati

on

s ar

e b

ased

on

raw

val

ues

6 o

f 10

Page 86: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary

3275

Wal

nut A

venu

e, S

igna

l Hill

, CA

907

55

Te

l: 56

2. 9

89.4

045

F

ax: 5

62.9

89.4

040

Pro

ject

:

CL

IEN

T:

Ad

van

ced

Tec

hn

olo

gy

Lab

ora

tory

-Las

Vegas

Wo

rk O

rder

:1

17

53

5A

NA

LY

TIC

AL

QC

SU

MM

AR

Y R

EP

OR

T

Test

Co

de:

TO

15

_C

H2

Sam

ple

ID

:L

CS

-W11A

046

Ba

tch

ID

:W

11A

046

TestN

o:

EP

A T

O1

5A

naly

sis

Date

:4/2

7/2

01

1

Pre

p D

ate

:

An

aly

teR

esult

SP

K v

alu

eS

PK

Ref

Val

%R

EC

RP

D R

ef

Val

%R

PD

Lo

wLim

itH

ighLim

itR

PD

Lim

itQ

ual

Units:

pp

bv

PQ

L

Clie

nt

ID:

ZZ

ZZ

ZZ

Ru

nN

o:

132

386

Se

qN

o:

215

66

30

LC

SS

am

pT

ype:

TestC

od

e:

TO

15_

CH

2

1,1

-Dic

hlo

roe

than

e2.0

00

91

.57

01

30

0.2

50

1.8

30

Be

nzen

e2.0

00

107

70

130

0.2

50

2.1

40

Ch

loro

form

2.0

00

94

.07

01

30

0.2

50

1.8

80

m,p

-Xyle

ne

4.0

00

112

70

130

0.2

50

4.4

80

o-X

yle

ne

2.0

00

116

70

130

0.2

50

2.3

30

Te

tra

chlo

roeth

en

e2.0

00

97

.57

01

30

0.2

50

1.9

50

Tolu

ene

2.0

00

101

70

130

0.2

50

2.0

10

Tri

chlo

roeth

en

e2.0

00

99

.07

01

30

0.2

50

1.9

80

Vin

yl chlo

ride

2.0

00

91

.07

01

30

0.2

50

1.8

20

S

urr

: 4-B

rom

ofluoro

benzene

2.5

00

98

.87

01

30

2.4

70

Sam

ple

ID

:L

CS

D-W

11A

046

Ba

tch

ID

:W

11A

046

TestN

o:

EP

A T

O1

5A

naly

sis

Date

:4/2

7/2

01

1

Pre

p D

ate

:

An

aly

teR

esult

SP

K v

alu

eS

PK

Ref

Val

%R

EC

RP

D R

ef

Val

%R

PD

Lo

wLim

itH

ighLim

itR

PD

Lim

itQ

ual

Units:

pp

bv

PQ

L

Clie

nt

ID:

ZZ

ZZ

ZZ

Ru

nN

o:

132

386

Se

qN

o:

215

66

31

LC

SD

Sam

pT

ype:

TestC

od

e:

TO

15_

CH

2

1,1

-Dic

hlo

roe

than

e2.0

00

91

.07

01

30

20

0.2

50

1.8

30

0.5

48

1.8

20

Be

nzen

e2.0

00

109

70

130

20

0.2

50

2.1

40

1.8

52.1

80

Ch

loro

form

2.0

00

92

.57

01

30

20

0.2

50

1.8

80

1.6

11.8

50

m,p

-Xyle

ne

4.0

00

113

70

130

20

0.2

50

4.4

80

0.8

89

4.5

20

o-X

yle

ne

2.0

00

118

70

130

20

0.2

50

2.3

30

1.2

82.3

60

Te

tra

chlo

roeth

en

e2.0

00

102

70

130

20

0.2

50

1.9

50

4.0

22.0

30

Tolu

ene

2.0

00

101

70

130

20

0.2

50

2.0

10

0.4

96

2.0

20

Tri

chlo

roeth

en

e2.0

00

102

70

130

20

0.2

50

1.9

80

2.4

92.0

30

Vin

yl chlo

ride

2.0

00

90

.07

01

30

20

0.2

50

1.8

20

1.1

01.8

00

S

urr

: 4-B

rom

ofluoro

benzene

2.5

00

101

70

130

00

2.5

30

Sam

ple

ID

:M

B-W

11A

046

Ba

tch

ID

:W

11A

046

TestN

o:

EP

A T

O1

5A

naly

sis

Date

:4/2

7/2

01

1

Pre

p D

ate

:

An

aly

teR

esult

SP

K v

alu

eS

PK

Ref

Val

%R

EC

RP

D R

ef

Val

%R

PD

Lo

wLim

itH

ighLim

itR

PD

Lim

itQ

ual

Units:

pp

bv

PQ

L

Clie

nt

ID:

ZZ

ZZ

ZZ

Ru

nN

o:

132

386

Se

qN

o:

215

66

32

MB

LK

Sam

pT

ype:

TestC

od

e:

TO

15_

CH

2

Qu

ali

fiers:

BA

nal

yte

det

ecte

d i

n t

he

asso

ciat

ed M

eth

od

Bla

nk

EV

alu

e ab

ove

qu

anti

tati

on

ran

ge

HH

old

ing

tim

es f

or

pre

par

atio

n o

r an

alysi

s ex

ceed

ed

ND

Not

Det

ecte

d a

t th

e R

eport

ing L

imit

RR

PD

ou

tsid

e ac

cep

ted

rec

over

y l

imit

sS

Sp

ike/

Su

rrogat

e ou

tsid

e of

lim

its

du

e to

mat

rix

in

terf

eren

ce

DO

Su

rro

gat

e D

ilu

ted

Ou

tC

alcu

lati

on

s ar

e b

ased

on

raw

val

ues

7 o

f 10

Page 87: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary

3275

Wal

nut A

venu

e, S

igna

l Hill

, CA

907

55

Te

l: 56

2. 9

89.4

045

F

ax: 5

62.9

89.4

040

Pro

ject

:

CL

IEN

T:

Ad

van

ced

Tec

hn

olo

gy

Lab

ora

tory

-Las

Vegas

Wo

rk O

rder

:1

17

53

5A

NA

LY

TIC

AL

QC

SU

MM

AR

Y R

EP

OR

T

Test

Co

de:

TO

15

_C

H2

Sam

ple

ID

:M

B-W

11A

046

Ba

tch

ID

:W

11A

046

TestN

o:

EP

A T

O1

5A

naly

sis

Date

:4/2

7/2

01

1

Pre

p D

ate

:

An

aly

teR

esult

SP

K v

alu

eS

PK

Ref

Val

%R

EC

RP

D R

ef

Val

%R

PD

Lo

wLim

itH

ighLim

itR

PD

Lim

itQ

ual

Units:

pp

bv

PQ

L

Clie

nt

ID:

ZZ

ZZ

ZZ

Ru

nN

o:

132

386

Se

qN

o:

215

66

32

MB

LK

Sam

pT

ype:

TestC

od

e:

TO

15_

CH

2

1,1

,1-T

richlo

roeth

an

e0.2

5N

D

1,1

,2,2

-Tetr

ach

loro

eth

an

e0.2

5N

D

1,1

,2-T

richlo

roeth

an

e0.2

5N

D

1,1

-Dic

hlo

roe

than

e0.2

5N

D

1,1

-Dic

hlo

roe

then

e0.2

5N

D

1,2

,4-T

richlo

rob

en

zen

e0.2

5N

D

1,2

,4-T

rim

eth

ylb

en

zen

e0.2

5N

D

1,2

-Dib

rom

oeth

an

e0.2

5N

D

1,2

-Dic

hlo

robe

nzen

e0.2

5N

D

1,2

-Dic

hlo

roe

than

e0.2

5N

D

1,2

-Dic

hlo

ropro

pan

e0.2

5N

D

1,3

,5-T

rim

eth

ylb

en

zen

e0.2

5N

D

1,3

-Dic

hlo

robe

nzen

e0.2

5N

D

1,4

-Dic

hlo

robe

nzen

e0.2

5N

D

2-B

uta

non

e0.2

5N

D

2-H

exan

on

e0.2

5N

D

4-E

thyl T

olu

ene

0.2

5N

D

4-M

eth

yl-

2-p

enta

non

e0.2

5N

D

Aceto

ne

0.2

5N

D

Be

nzen

e0.2

5N

D

Benzyl chlo

ride

0.2

5N

D

Bro

mod

ich

loro

meth

an

e0.2

5N

D

Bro

mofo

rm0.2

5N

D

Bro

mom

eth

ane

0.2

5N

D

Carb

on d

isulfid

e0.2

5N

D

Carb

on t

etr

achlo

ride

0.2

5N

D

Ch

loro

be

nzen

e0.2

5N

D

Ch

loro

eth

ane

0.2

5N

D

Ch

loro

form

0.2

5N

D

Ch

loro

me

tha

ne

0.2

5N

D

Qu

ali

fiers:

BA

nal

yte

det

ecte

d i

n t

he

asso

ciat

ed M

eth

od

Bla

nk

EV

alu

e ab

ove

qu

anti

tati

on

ran

ge

HH

old

ing

tim

es f

or

pre

par

atio

n o

r an

alysi

s ex

ceed

ed

ND

Not

Det

ecte

d a

t th

e R

eport

ing L

imit

RR

PD

ou

tsid

e ac

cep

ted

rec

over

y l

imit

sS

Sp

ike/

Su

rrogat

e ou

tsid

e of

lim

its

du

e to

mat

rix

in

terf

eren

ce

DO

Su

rro

gat

e D

ilu

ted

Ou

tC

alcu

lati

on

s ar

e b

ased

on

raw

val

ues

8 o

f 10

Page 88: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary

3275

Wal

nut A

venu

e, S

igna

l Hill

, CA

907

55

Te

l: 56

2. 9

89.4

045

F

ax: 5

62.9

89.4

040

Pro

ject

:

CL

IEN

T:

Ad

van

ced

Tec

hn

olo

gy

Lab

ora

tory

-Las

Vegas

Wo

rk O

rder

:1

17

53

5A

NA

LY

TIC

AL

QC

SU

MM

AR

Y R

EP

OR

T

Test

Co

de:

TO

15

_C

H2

Sam

ple

ID

:M

B-W

11A

046

Ba

tch

ID

:W

11A

046

TestN

o:

EP

A T

O1

5A

naly

sis

Date

:4/2

7/2

01

1

Pre

p D

ate

:

An

aly

teR

esult

SP

K v

alu

eS

PK

Ref

Val

%R

EC

RP

D R

ef

Val

%R

PD

Lo

wLim

itH

ighLim

itR

PD

Lim

itQ

ual

Units:

pp

bv

PQ

L

Clie

nt

ID:

ZZ

ZZ

ZZ

Ru

nN

o:

132

386

Se

qN

o:

215

66

32

MB

LK

Sam

pT

ype:

TestC

od

e:

TO

15_

CH

2

cis

-1,2

-Dic

hlo

roeth

en

e0.2

5N

D

cis

-1,3

-Dic

hlo

ropro

pen

e0.2

5N

D

Dib

rom

och

loro

meth

an

e0.2

5N

D

Dic

hlo

rod

iflu

oro

me

than

e0.2

5N

D

Dic

hlo

rote

trafluo

roeth

an

e0.2

5N

D

Eth

ylb

en

zen

e0.2

5N

D

Fre

on-1

13

0.2

5N

D

He

xa

ch

loro

buta

die

ne

0.2

5N

D

m,p

-Xyle

ne

0.2

5N

D

MT

BE

0.2

5N

D

Meth

yle

ne c

hlo

ride

0.2

5N

D

o-X

yle

ne

0.2

5N

D

Sty

ren

e0.2

5N

D

Te

tra

chlo

roeth

en

e0.2

5N

D

Tolu

ene

0.2

5N

D

trans-1

,2-D

ich

loro

eth

en

e0.2

5N

D

trans-1

,3-D

ichlo

ropro

pen

e0.2

5N

D

Tri

chlo

roeth

en

e0.2

5N

D

Tri

ch

loro

fluo

rom

eth

an

e0.2

5N

D

Vin

yl aceta

te0.2

5N

D

Vin

yl chlo

ride

0.2

5N

D

S

urr

: 4-B

rom

ofluoro

benzene

2.5

00

93

.67

01

30

2.3

40

Qu

ali

fiers:

BA

nal

yte

det

ecte

d i

n t

he

asso

ciat

ed M

eth

od

Bla

nk

EV

alu

e ab

ove

qu

anti

tati

on

ran

ge

HH

old

ing

tim

es f

or

pre

par

atio

n o

r an

alysi

s ex

ceed

ed

ND

Not

Det

ecte

d a

t th

e R

eport

ing L

imit

RR

PD

ou

tsid

e ac

cep

ted

rec

over

y l

imit

sS

Sp

ike/

Su

rrogat

e ou

tsid

e of

lim

its

du

e to

mat

rix

in

terf

eren

ce

DO

Su

rro

gat

e D

ilu

ted

Ou

tC

alcu

lati

on

s ar

e b

ased

on

raw

val

ues

9 o

f 10

Page 89: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary

3275

Wal

nut A

venu

e, S

igna

l Hill

, CA

907

55

Te

l: 56

2. 9

89.4

045

F

ax: 5

62.9

89.4

040

Pro

ject

:

CL

IEN

T:

Ad

van

ced

Tec

hn

olo

gy

Lab

ora

tory

-Las

Vegas

Wo

rk O

rder

:1

17

53

5A

NA

LY

TIC

AL

QC

SU

MM

AR

Y R

EP

OR

T

Test

Co

de:

TO

3_

GA

S_

CH

2

Sam

ple

ID

:M

B-W

11A

045

Ba

tch

ID

:W

11A

045

TestN

o:

EP

A T

O3

Analy

sis

Date

:4/2

6/2

01

1

Pre

p D

ate

:

An

aly

teR

esult

SP

K v

alu

eS

PK

Ref

Val

%R

EC

RP

D R

ef

Val

%R

PD

Lo

wLim

itH

ighLim

itR

PD

Lim

itQ

ual

Units:

pp

mv

PQ

L

Clie

nt

ID:

ZZ

ZZ

ZZ

Ru

nN

o:

132

373

Se

qN

o:

215

65

04

MB

LK

Sam

pT

ype:

TestC

od

e:

TO

3_G

AS

_C

Ga

so

line

0.0

20

ND

S

urr

: 4-B

rom

ofluoro

benzene

0.0

025

00

88

.47

01

30

0.0

02

Sam

ple

ID

:L

CS

-W11A

045

Ba

tch

ID

:W

11A

045

TestN

o:

EP

A T

O3

Analy

sis

Date

:4/2

6/2

01

1

Pre

p D

ate

:

An

aly

teR

esult

SP

K v

alu

eS

PK

Ref

Val

%R

EC

RP

D R

ef

Val

%R

PD

Lo

wLim

itH

ighLim

itR

PD

Lim

itQ

ual

Units:

pp

mv

PQ

L

Clie

nt

ID:

ZZ

ZZ

ZZ

Ru

nN

o:

132

373

Se

qN

o:

215

65

05

LC

SS

am

pT

ype:

TestC

od

e:

TO

3_G

AS

_C

Ga

so

line

0.2

00

089

.47

01

30

0.0

20

00.1

79

S

urr

: 4-B

rom

ofluoro

benzene

0.0

025

00

107

70

130

0.0

03

Sam

ple

ID

:L

CS

D-W

11A

045

Ba

tch

ID

:W

11A

045

TestN

o:

EP

A T

O3

Analy

sis

Date

:4/2

6/2

01

1

Pre

p D

ate

:

An

aly

teR

esult

SP

K v

alu

eS

PK

Ref

Val

%R

EC

RP

D R

ef

Val

%R

PD

Lo

wLim

itH

ighLim

itR

PD

Lim

itQ

ual

Units:

pp

mv

PQ

L

Clie

nt

ID:

ZZ

ZZ

ZZ

Ru

nN

o:

132

373

Se

qN

o:

215

65

06

LC

SD

Sam

pT

ype:

TestC

od

e:

TO

3_G

AS

_C

Ga

so

line

0.2

00

089

.37

01

30

20

0.0

20

00.1

78

80.1

40

0.1

79

S

urr

: 4-B

rom

ofluoro

benzene

0.0

025

00

103

70

130

00

0.0

03

Qu

ali

fiers:

BA

nal

yte

det

ecte

d i

n t

he

asso

ciat

ed M

eth

od

Bla

nk

EV

alu

e ab

ove

qu

anti

tati

on

ran

ge

HH

old

ing

tim

es f

or

pre

par

atio

n o

r an

alysi

s ex

ceed

ed

ND

Not

Det

ecte

d a

t th

e R

eport

ing L

imit

RR

PD

ou

tsid

e ac

cep

ted

rec

over

y l

imit

sS

Sp

ike/

Su

rrogat

e ou

tsid

e of

lim

its

du

e to

mat

rix

in

terf

eren

ce

DO

Su

rro

gat

e D

ilu

ted

Ou

tC

alcu

lati

on

s ar

e b

ased

on

raw

val

ues

10 o

f 10

Page 90: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary
Page 91: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary
Page 92: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary
Page 93: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary
Page 94: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary
Page 95: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary
Page 96: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary
Page 97: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary
Page 98: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary
Page 99: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary

Laboratories, Inc. Advanced Technology

3151 W. Post Road, Las Vegas, NV 89118 Tel: 702-307-2659 Fax: 702-307-2691

May 24, 2011

CH2M HILL

Daniel Jablonski

Attention: Daniel Jablonski

RE: SFPP - Norwalk Site

Workorder No.: N005822FAX: (510) 622-9129

TEL: (213)228-8271

155 Grand Avenue, Suite 1000

Oakland, CA 94612

CA-ELAP No.:2676

NV Cert. No.:NV-009222007A

Thank you for the opportunity to service the needs of your company.

Please feel free to call me at (702) 307-2659 if I can be of further assistance to your company.

Sincerely,

Jose Tenorio Jr.

Laboratory Director

Enclosed are the results for sample(s) received on May 17, 2011 by Advanced Technology

Laboratories, Inc. . The sample(s) are tested for the parameters as indicated in the enclosed chain of

custody in accordance with the applicable laboratory certifications.

The cover letter is an integral part of this analytical report. This Laboratory Report cannot be reproduced in part or

in its entirety without written permission from the client and Advanced Technology Laboratories - Las Vegas.

1 of 18

Page 100: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary

Laboratories, Inc. Advanced Technology

3151 W. Post Road, Las Vegas, NV 89118 Tel: 702-307-2659 Fax: 702-307-2691

24-May-11Date:Advanced Technology Laboratories, Inc.

Project: SFPP - Norwalk Site

CLIENT: CH2M HILL

Lab Order: N005822CASE NARRATIVE

SAMPLE RECEIVING/GENERAL COMMENTS:

Sample was received intact with proper chain of custody documentation.

Cooler temperature and sample preservation were verified upon receipt of samples if applicable.

Information on sample receipt conditions including discrepancies can be found in attached Sample

Receipt Checklist Form.

Sample was analyzed within method holding time.

Results were J-Flag. "J" is used to flag those results that are between the PQL (Practical Quantitation

Limit) and the calculated MDL (Method Detection Limit). Results that are "J" Flagged are estimated

values since it becomes difficult to accurately quantitate the analyte near the MDL.

Page 2 of 17

2 of 18

Page 101: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary

Laboratories, Inc. Advanced Technology

3151 W. Post Road, Las Vegas, NV 89118 Tel: 702-307-2659 Fax: 702-307-2691

24-May-11Date:Advanced Technology Laboratories, Inc.

Project: SFPP - Norwalk Site

CLIENT: CH2M HILL

Lab Order: N005822

Work Order Sample Summary

Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Collection DateMatrix Date Received

Contract No:

Date Reported

N005822-001A INF-05-17 5/17/2011 1:20:00 PM 5/17/2011Wastewater

N005822-001B INF-05-17 5/17/2011 1:20:00 PM 5/17/2011Wastewater

N005822-001C INF-05-17 5/17/2011 1:20:00 PM 5/17/2011Wastewater

Page 1 of 1

3 of 18

Page 102: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary

Laboratories, Inc. Advanced Technology

3151 W. Post Road, Las Vegas, NV 89118 Tel: 702-307-2659 Fax: 702-307-2691

Project: SFPP - Norwalk Site

Client Sample ID: INF-05-17

Collection Date: 5/17/2011 1:20:00 PM

Matrix: WASTEWATER

CLIENT: CH2M HILL

Lab Order: N005822

Lab ID: N005822-001

Advanced Technology Laboratories, Inc. Print Date: 24-May-11

Analyses Result Qual Units Date AnalyzedDFPQLMDL

ANALYTICAL RESULTS

TPH-FUEL PRODUCT BY GC/FID

EPA 8015B

Analyst: admin

EPA 3510C

RunID: GC1_110523A 36940QC Batch: PrepDate: 5/20/2011

TPH-Fuel Product 50 ug/L 11700 13 5/23/2011 03:58 PM

Surr: Octacosane 26-152 %REC 197.5 0 5/23/2011 03:58 PM

Surr: p-Terphenyl 57-132 %REC 197.7 0 5/23/2011 03:58 PM

GASOLINE RANGE ORGANICS BY GC/FID

EPA 8015B

Analyst: QBMRunID: GC4_110519B E11VW023QC Batch: PrepDate:

TPH-Gasoline 100 μg/L 13300 6.0 5/19/2011

Surr: Chlorobenzene - d5 74-138 %REC 196.8 0 5/19/2011

VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS BY GC/MS

EPA 8260B

Analyst: QBMRunID: MS1_110519A D11VW063QC Batch: PrepDate:

1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 1.0 μg/L 1ND 0.061 5/19/2011 12:53 PM

1,1,1-Trichloroethane 1.0 μg/L 1ND 0.068 5/19/2011 12:53 PM

1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 1.0 μg/L 1ND 0.054 5/19/2011 12:53 PM

1,1,2-Trichloroethane 1.0 μg/L 1ND 0.083 5/19/2011 12:53 PM

1,1-Dichloroethane 0.50 μg/L 1ND 0.099 5/19/2011 12:53 PM

1,1-Dichloroethene 1.0 μg/L 1ND 0.094 5/19/2011 12:53 PM

1,1-Dichloropropene 1.0 μg/L 1ND 0.082 5/19/2011 12:53 PM

1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 1.0 μg/L 1ND 0.10 5/19/2011 12:53 PM

1,2,3-Trichloropropane 1.0 μg/L 1ND 0.12 5/19/2011 12:53 PM

1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 1.0 μg/L 1ND 0.12 5/19/2011 12:53 PM

1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 1.0 μg/L 173 0.095 5/19/2011 12:53 PM

1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 2.0 μg/L 1ND 0.15 5/19/2011 12:53 PM

1,2-Dibromoethane 1.0 μg/L 1ND 0.14 5/19/2011 12:53 PM

1,2-Dichlorobenzene 1.0 μg/L 1ND 0.070 5/19/2011 12:53 PM

1,2-Dichloroethane 0.50 μg/L 1ND 0.17 5/19/2011 12:53 PM

1,2-Dichloropropane 1.0 μg/L 1ND 0.085 5/19/2011 12:53 PM

1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 1.0 μg/L 122 0.087 5/19/2011 12:53 PM

1,3-Dichlorobenzene 1.0 μg/L 1ND 0.090 5/19/2011 12:53 PM

1,3-Dichloropropane 1.0 μg/L 1ND 0.074 5/19/2011 12:53 PM

1,4-Dichlorobenzene 1.0 μg/L 1ND 0.092 5/19/2011 12:53 PM

2,2-Dichloropropane 1.0 μg/L 1ND 0.061 5/19/2011 12:53 PM

2-Butanone 10 μg/L 1ND 1.0 5/19/2011 12:53 PM

2-Chlorotoluene 1.0 μg/L 1ND 0.080 5/19/2011 12:53 PM

Qualifiers: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range

H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded J Analyte detected below quantitation limits

ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit S Spike/Surrogate outside of limits due to matrix interferenc

Results are wet unless otherwise specified DO Surrogate Diluted Out

4 of 18

Page 103: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary

Laboratories, Inc. Advanced Technology

3151 W. Post Road, Las Vegas, NV 89118 Tel: 702-307-2659 Fax: 702-307-2691

Project: SFPP - Norwalk Site

Client Sample ID: INF-05-17

Collection Date: 5/17/2011 1:20:00 PM

Matrix: WASTEWATER

CLIENT: CH2M HILL

Lab Order: N005822

Lab ID: N005822-001

Advanced Technology Laboratories, Inc. Print Date: 24-May-11

Analyses Result Qual Units Date AnalyzedDFPQLMDL

ANALYTICAL RESULTS

VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS BY GC/MS

EPA 8260B

Analyst: QBMRunID: MS1_110519A D11VW063QC Batch: PrepDate:

4-Chlorotoluene 1.0 μg/L 1ND 0.10 5/19/2011 12:53 PM

4-Isopropyltoluene 1.0 μg/L 11.5 0.080 5/19/2011 12:53 PM

4-Methyl-2-pentanone 10 μg/L 1ND 0.76 5/19/2011 12:53 PM

Acetone J10 μg/L 14.2 1.6 5/19/2011 12:53 PM

Acrolein 20 μg/L 1ND 4.3 5/19/2011 12:53 PM

Acrylonitrile 20 μg/L 1ND 0.61 5/19/2011 12:53 PM

Benzene 100 μg/L 1003600 7.5 5/19/2011 12:08 PM

Bromobenzene 1.0 μg/L 1ND 0.082 5/19/2011 12:53 PM

Bromochloromethane 1.0 μg/L 1ND 0.15 5/19/2011 12:53 PM

Bromodichloromethane 1.0 μg/L 1ND 0.063 5/19/2011 12:53 PM

Bromoform 1.0 μg/L 1ND 0.086 5/19/2011 12:53 PM

Bromomethane 1.0 μg/L 1ND 0.13 5/19/2011 12:53 PM

Carbon disulfide J1.0 μg/L 10.46 0.054 5/19/2011 12:53 PM

Carbon tetrachloride 1.0 μg/L 1ND 0.10 5/19/2011 12:53 PM

Chlorobenzene 1.0 μg/L 1ND 0.092 5/19/2011 12:53 PM

Chloroethane 1.0 μg/L 1ND 0.14 5/19/2011 12:53 PM

Chloroform 1.0 μg/L 1ND 0.058 5/19/2011 12:53 PM

Chloromethane 1.0 μg/L 1ND 0.054 5/19/2011 12:53 PM

cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 1.0 μg/L 1ND 0.11 5/19/2011 12:53 PM

cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 1.0 μg/L 1ND 0.10 5/19/2011 12:53 PM

Dibromochloromethane 1.0 μg/L 1ND 0.061 5/19/2011 12:53 PM

Dibromomethane 1.0 μg/L 1ND 0.15 5/19/2011 12:53 PM

Dichlorodifluoromethane 1.0 μg/L 1ND 0.12 5/19/2011 12:53 PM

Ethylbenzene 1.0 μg/L 182 0.051 5/19/2011 12:53 PM

Freon-113 1.0 μg/L 1ND 0.080 5/19/2011 12:53 PM

Hexachlorobutadiene 1.0 μg/L 1ND 0.17 5/19/2011 12:53 PM

Isopropylbenzene 1.0 μg/L 114 0.057 5/19/2011 12:53 PM

m,p-Xylene 1.0 μg/L 1220 0.17 5/19/2011 12:53 PM

Methylene chloride 5.0 μg/L 1ND 0.10 5/19/2011 12:53 PM

MTBE 10 μg/L 10240 0.89 5/19/2011 12:30 PM

n-Butylbenzene 1.0 μg/L 12.3 0.082 5/19/2011 12:53 PM

n-Propylbenzene 1.0 μg/L 130 0.087 5/19/2011 12:53 PM

Naphthalene 1.0 μg/L 176 0.056 5/19/2011 12:53 PM

o-Xylene 1.0 μg/L 178 0.077 5/19/2011 12:53 PM

sec-Butylbenzene 1.0 μg/L 12.3 0.098 5/19/2011 12:53 PM

Styrene 1.0 μg/L 1ND 0.072 5/19/2011 12:53 PM

Qualifiers: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range

H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded J Analyte detected below quantitation limits

ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit S Spike/Surrogate outside of limits due to matrix interferenc

Results are wet unless otherwise specified DO Surrogate Diluted Out

5 of 18

Page 104: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary

Laboratories, Inc. Advanced Technology

3151 W. Post Road, Las Vegas, NV 89118 Tel: 702-307-2659 Fax: 702-307-2691

Project: SFPP - Norwalk Site

Client Sample ID: INF-05-17

Collection Date: 5/17/2011 1:20:00 PM

Matrix: WASTEWATER

CLIENT: CH2M HILL

Lab Order: N005822

Lab ID: N005822-001

Advanced Technology Laboratories, Inc. Print Date: 24-May-11

Analyses Result Qual Units Date AnalyzedDFPQLMDL

ANALYTICAL RESULTS

VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS BY GC/MS

EPA 8260B

Analyst: QBMRunID: MS1_110519A D11VW063QC Batch: PrepDate:

tert-Butylbenzene 1.0 μg/L 1ND 0.062 5/19/2011 12:53 PM

Tetrachloroethene 1.0 μg/L 1ND 0.13 5/19/2011 12:53 PM

Toluene 2.5 μg/L 1180 0.12 5/19/2011 12:53 PM

trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 1.0 μg/L 1ND 0.094 5/19/2011 12:53 PM

trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 1.0 μg/L 1ND 0.10 5/19/2011 12:53 PM

Trichloroethene 1.0 μg/L 1ND 0.060 5/19/2011 12:53 PM

Trichlorofluoromethane 1.0 μg/L 1ND 0.097 5/19/2011 12:53 PM

Vinyl chloride 1.0 μg/L 1ND 0.12 5/19/2011 12:53 PM

Xylenes, Total 2.0 μg/L 1300 1.5 5/19/2011 12:53 PM

Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 72-119 %REC 197.8 0 5/19/2011 12:53 PM

Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 72-119 %REC 1093.5 0 5/19/2011 12:30 PM

Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 72-119 %REC 10091.3 0 5/19/2011 12:08 PM

Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 76-119 %REC 1105 0 5/19/2011 12:53 PM

Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 76-119 %REC 10108 0 5/19/2011 12:30 PM

Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 76-119 %REC 100105 0 5/19/2011 12:08 PM

Surr: Dibromofluoromethane 85-115 %REC 195.0 0 5/19/2011 12:53 PM

Surr: Dibromofluoromethane 85-115 %REC 1098.8 0 5/19/2011 12:30 PM

Surr: Dibromofluoromethane 85-115 %REC 10095.4 0 5/19/2011 12:08 PM

Surr: Toluene-d8 81-120 %REC 1104 0 5/19/2011 12:53 PM

Surr: Toluene-d8 81-120 %REC 10108 0 5/19/2011 12:30 PM

Surr: Toluene-d8 81-120 %REC 100108 0 5/19/2011 12:08 PM

Qualifiers: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range

H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded J Analyte detected below quantitation limits

ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit S Spike/Surrogate outside of limits due to matrix interferenc

Results are wet unless otherwise specified DO Surrogate Diluted Out

6 of 18

Page 105: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary

Labora

tori

es,

Inc.

A

dva

nce

d T

echnolo

gy

3151 W

. P

ost

Road,

Las

Veg

as,

NV

89118

Tel

: 702-3

07-2

65

9

Fa

x: 7

02-3

07-2

69

1

24

-Ma

y-1

1D

ate

:A

dv

ance

d T

ech

no

log

y L

abo

rato

ries

, In

c.

Pro

ject:

SF

PP

- N

orw

alk

Sit

e

CL

IEN

T:

CH

2M

HIL

L

Wo

rk

Ord

er:

N0

05

82

2A

NA

LY

TIC

AL

QC

SU

MM

AR

Y R

EP

OR

T

Tes

tCo

de:

80

15

_W

_F

P_S

FP

P

Sa

mp

le I

D:

LC

S-3

6940_D

RO

Batc

h I

D:

36

94

0T

estN

o:

EP

A 8

01

5B

An

aly

sis

Da

te:

5/2

3/2

01

1

Pre

p D

ate

:5

/20

/20

11

An

aly

teR

esu

ltS

PK

va

lue

SP

K R

ef

Va

l%

RE

CR

PD

Re

f V

al

%R

PD

Lo

wLim

itH

igh

Lim

itR

PD

Lim

itQ

ua

l

Un

its:

ug

/L

PQ

L

Clie

nt

ID:

LC

SW

Ru

nN

o:

80

13

5

Se

qN

o:

12

70

36

0

LC

SS

am

pT

yp

e:

Te

stC

od

e:

80

15

_W

_F

P_

EP

A 3

51

0C

TP

H-F

ue

l P

rod

uct

10

00

75

.56

11

43

50

07

54.6

96

S

urr

: O

cta

co

sa

ne

80

.00

86

.22

61

52

68

.95

4

S

urr

: p-T

erp

hen

yl

80.0

087.0

57

132

69

.57

0

Sa

mp

le I

D:

LC

SD

-36

940

_D

RO

Batc

h I

D:

36

94

0T

estN

o:

EP

A 8

01

5B

An

aly

sis

Da

te:

5/2

3/2

01

1

Pre

p D

ate

:5

/20

/20

11

An

aly

teR

esu

ltS

PK

va

lue

SP

K R

ef

Va

l%

RE

CR

PD

Re

f V

al

%R

PD

Lo

wLim

itH

igh

Lim

itR

PD

Lim

itQ

ua

l

Un

its:

ug

/L

PQ

L

Clie

nt

ID:

LC

SS

02

Ru

nN

o:

80

13

5

Se

qN

o:

12

70

36

1

LC

SD

Sa

mp

Typ

e:

Te

stC

od

e:

80

15

_W

_F

P_

EP

A 3

51

0C

TP

H-F

ue

l P

rod

uct

10

00

83

.06

11

43

30

50

07

54.7

9.5

68

30.4

35

S

urr

: O

cta

co

sa

ne

80

.00

95

.22

61

52

07

6.1

74

S

urr

: p-T

erp

hen

yl

80.0

096.5

57

132

07

7.1

80

Sa

mp

le I

D:

MB

-36940

Batc

h I

D:

36

94

0T

estN

o:

EP

A 8

01

5B

An

aly

sis

Da

te:

5/2

3/2

01

1

Pre

p D

ate

:5

/20

/20

11

An

aly

teR

esu

ltS

PK

va

lue

SP

K R

ef

Va

l%

RE

CR

PD

Re

f V

al

%R

PD

Lo

wLim

itH

igh

Lim

itR

PD

Lim

itQ

ua

l

Un

its:

ug

/L

PQ

L

Clie

nt

ID:

PB

W

Ru

nN

o:

80

13

5

Se

qN

o:

12

70

36

2

MB

LK

Sa

mp

Typ

e:

Te

stC

od

e:

80

15

_W

_F

P_

EP

A 3

51

0C

TP

H-F

ue

l P

rod

uct

J5

02

0.3

41

S

urr

: O

cta

co

sa

ne

80

.00

11

92

61

52

94

.86

1

S

urr

: p-T

erp

hen

yl

80.0

0113

57

132

90

.69

0

Qu

ali

fier

s:

BA

nal

yte

det

ecte

d i

n t

he

asso

ciat

ed M

eth

od

Bla

nk

EV

alu

e ab

ov

e q

uan

tita

tio

n r

ange

HH

old

ing

tim

es f

or

pre

par

atio

n o

r an

alysi

s ex

ceed

ed

JA

nal

yte

det

ecte

d b

elow

qu

anti

tati

on

lim

its

ND

No

t D

etec

ted

at

the

Rep

ort

ing

Lim

itR

RP

D o

uts

ide

acce

pte

d r

eco

ver

y l

imit

s

SS

pik

e/S

urr

og

ate

ou

tsid

e o

f li

mit

s d

ue

to m

atri

x i

nte

rfer

ence

DO

Su

rro

gat

e D

ilu

ted

Ou

tC

alcu

lati

on

s ar

e b

ased

on r

aw v

alu

es

7 o

f 18

Page 106: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary

Labora

tori

es,

Inc.

A

dva

nce

d T

echnolo

gy

3151 W

. P

ost

Road,

Las

Veg

as,

NV

89118

Tel

: 702-3

07-2

65

9

Fa

x: 7

02-3

07-2

69

1

Pro

ject:

SF

PP

- N

orw

alk

Sit

e

CL

IEN

T:

CH

2M

HIL

L

Wo

rk

Ord

er:

N0

05

82

2A

NA

LY

TIC

AL

QC

SU

MM

AR

Y R

EP

OR

T

Tes

tCo

de:

8015

_W

_G

SF

PP

Sa

mp

le I

D:

E1

10

51

9L

CS

Batc

h I

D:

E1

1V

W0

23

Te

stN

o:

EP

A 8

01

5B

An

aly

sis

Da

te:

5/1

9/2

01

1

Pre

p D

ate

:

An

aly

teR

esu

ltS

PK

va

lue

SP

K R

ef

Va

l%

RE

CR

PD

Re

f V

al

%R

PD

Lo

wLim

itH

igh

Lim

itR

PD

Lim

itQ

ua

l

Un

its:

μg

/L

PQ

L

Clie

nt

ID:

LC

SW

Ru

nN

o:

80

11

0

Se

qN

o:

12

69

52

5

LC

SS

am

pT

yp

e:

Te

stC

od

e:

80

15

_W

_G

SF

TP

H-G

aso

line

10

00

92

.36

71

36

10

00

92

3.0

00

S

urr

: C

hlo

rob

enze

ne

- d

55

0.0

09

8.8

74

13

84

9.4

04

Sa

mp

le I

D:

E1

10

51

9M

B1

Batc

h I

D:

E1

1V

W0

23

Te

stN

o:

EP

A 8

01

5B

An

aly

sis

Da

te:

5/1

9/2

01

1

Pre

p D

ate

:

An

aly

teR

esu

ltS

PK

va

lue

SP

K R

ef

Va

l%

RE

CR

PD

Re

f V

al

%R

PD

Lo

wLim

itH

igh

Lim

itR

PD

Lim

itQ

ua

l

Un

its:

μg

/L

PQ

L

Clie

nt

ID:

PB

W

Ru

nN

o:

80

11

0

Se

qN

o:

12

69

52

6

MB

LK

Sa

mp

Typ

e:

Te

stC

od

e:

80

15

_W

_G

SF

TP

H-G

aso

line

100

ND

S

urr

: C

hlo

rob

enze

ne

- d

55

0.0

09

7.5

74

13

84

8.7

33

Sa

mp

le I

D:

N005822

-001B

MS

Batc

h I

D:

E1

1V

W0

23

Te

stN

o:

EP

A 8

01

5B

An

aly

sis

Da

te:

5/1

9/2

01

1

Pre

p D

ate

:

An

aly

teR

esu

ltS

PK

va

lue

SP

K R

ef

Va

l%

RE

CR

PD

Re

f V

al

%R

PD

Lo

wLim

itH

igh

Lim

itR

PD

Lim

itQ

ua

l

Un

its:

μg

/L

PQ

L

Clie

nt

ID:

ZZ

ZZ

ZZ

Ru

nN

o:

80

11

0

Se

qN

o:

12

69

52

7

MS

Sa

mp

Typ

e:

Te

stC

od

e:

80

15

_W

_G

SF

TP

H-G

aso

line

10

00

10

46

71

36

10

03

30

44

342

.00

0

S

urr

: C

hlo

rob

enze

ne

- d

55

0.0

01

11

74

13

85

5.4

37

Sa

mp

le I

D:

N005822

-001B

MS

D

Batc

h I

D:

E1

1V

W0

23

Te

stN

o:

EP

A 8

01

5B

An

aly

sis

Da

te:

5/1

9/2

01

1

Pre

p D

ate

:

An

aly

teR

esu

ltS

PK

va

lue

SP

K R

ef

Va

l%

RE

CR

PD

Re

f V

al

%R

PD

Lo

wLim

itH

igh

Lim

itR

PD

Lim

itQ

ua

l

Un

its:

μg

/L

PQ

L

Clie

nt

ID:

ZZ

ZZ

ZZ

Ru

nN

o:

80

11

0

Se

qN

o:

12

69

52

8

MS

DS

am

pT

yp

e:

Te

stC

od

e:

80

15

_W

_G

SF

TP

H-G

aso

line

10

00

91

.26

71

36

30

10

03

30

44

342

2.9

44

216

.00

0

S

urr

: C

hlo

rob

enze

ne

- d

55

0.0

01

13

74

13

80

05

6.6

05

Qu

ali

fier

s:

BA

nal

yte

det

ecte

d i

n t

he

asso

ciat

ed M

eth

od

Bla

nk

EV

alu

e ab

ov

e q

uan

tita

tio

n r

ange

HH

old

ing

tim

es f

or

pre

par

atio

n o

r an

alysi

s ex

ceed

ed

JA

nal

yte

det

ecte

d b

elow

qu

anti

tati

on

lim

its

ND

No

t D

etec

ted

at

the

Rep

ort

ing

Lim

itR

RP

D o

uts

ide

acce

pte

d r

eco

ver

y l

imit

s

SS

pik

e/S

urr

og

ate

ou

tsid

e o

f li

mit

s d

ue

to m

atri

x i

nte

rfer

ence

DO

Su

rro

gat

e D

ilu

ted

Ou

tC

alcu

lati

on

s ar

e b

ased

on r

aw v

alu

es

8 o

f 18

Page 107: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary

Labora

tori

es,

Inc.

A

dva

nce

d T

echnolo

gy

3151 W

. P

ost

Road,

Las

Veg

as,

NV

89118

Tel

: 702-3

07-2

65

9

Fa

x: 7

02-3

07-2

69

1

Pro

ject:

SF

PP

- N

orw

alk

Sit

e

CL

IEN

T:

CH

2M

HIL

L

Wo

rk

Ord

er:

N0

05

82

2A

NA

LY

TIC

AL

QC

SU

MM

AR

Y R

EP

OR

T

Tes

tCo

de:

8260

_W

P_S

FP

P

Sa

mp

le I

D:

D1

10

51

9L

CS

Batc

h I

D:

D1

1V

W0

63

Te

stN

o:

EP

A 8

26

0B

An

aly

sis

Da

te:

5/1

9/2

01

1

Pre

p D

ate

:

An

aly

teR

esu

ltS

PK

va

lue

SP

K R

ef

Va

l%

RE

CR

PD

Re

f V

al

%R

PD

Lo

wLim

itH

igh

Lim

itR

PD

Lim

itQ

ua

l

Un

its:

μg

/L

PQ

L

Clie

nt

ID:

LC

SW

Ru

nN

o:

80

10

8

Se

qN

o:

12

69

69

6

LC

SS

am

pT

yp

e:

Te

stC

od

e:

82

60

_W

P_

SF

1,1

,1,2

-Te

tra

ch

loro

eth

ane

25

.00

10

78

11

29

1.0

02

6.6

80

1,1

,1-T

richlo

roeth

ane

25.0

093.1

67

132

1.0

02

3.2

80

1,1

,2,2

-Te

tra

ch

loro

eth

ane

25

.00

10

36

31

28

1.0

02

5.7

70

1,1

,2-T

richlo

roeth

ane

25.0

096.4

75

125

1.0

02

4.0

90

1,1

-Dic

hlo

roeth

an

e2

5.0

09

7.4

69

13

30

.50

02

4.3

60

1,1

-Dic

hlo

roeth

en

e2

5.0

01

00

68

13

01

.00

25

.10

0

1,1

-Dic

hlo

ropro

pe

ne

25

.00

95

.87

31

32

1.0

02

3.9

60

1,2

,3-T

richlo

robenzene

25.0

099.6

67

137

1.0

02

4.9

10

1,2

,3-T

richlo

ropro

pane

25.0

0102

73

124

1.0

02

5.4

10

1,2

,4-T

richlo

robenzene

25.0

0103

66

134

1.0

02

5.8

60

1,2

,4-T

rim

eth

ylb

en

ze

ne

25

.00

10

47

41

32

1.0

02

6.1

20

1,2

-Dib

rom

o-3

-chlo

ropro

pane

25.0

094.6

50

132

2.0

02

3.6

60

1,2

-Dib

rom

oe

tha

ne

25

.00

98

.38

01

21

1.0

02

4.5

70

1,2

-Dic

hlo

robe

nze

ne

25

.00

10

17

11

22

1.0

02

5.1

50

1,2

-Dic

hlo

roeth

an

e2

5.0

09

3.9

69

13

20

.50

02

3.4

70

1,2

-Dic

hlo

ropro

pa

ne

25

.00

92

.67

51

25

1.0

02

3.1

50

1,3

,5-T

rim

eth

ylb

en

ze

ne

25

.00

10

57

41

31

1.0

02

6.3

30

1,3

-Dic

hlo

robe

nze

ne

25

.00

10

27

51

24

1.0

02

5.5

90

1,3

-Dic

hlo

ropro

pa

ne

25

.00

98

.57

31

26

1.0

02

4.6

20

1,4

-Dic

hlo

robe

nze

ne

25

.00

10

27

41

23

1.0

02

5.5

20

2,2

-Dic

hlo

ropro

pa

ne

25

.00

93

.76

91

37

1.0

02

3.4

20

2-B

uta

no

ne

25

0.0

88

.84

91

36

10

02

21.9

40

2-C

hlo

roto

lue

ne

25

.00

10

67

31

26

1.0

02

6.4

30

4-C

hlo

roto

lue

ne

25

.00

10

47

41

28

1.0

02

6.0

00

4-I

sopro

pylto

luene

25.0

0106

73

130

1.0

02

6.5

50

4-M

eth

yl-2-p

enta

none

250.0

96.3

58

134

10

02

40.8

70

Ace

ton

e2

50.0

88

.24

01

35

10

02

20.5

10

Acro

lein

25

0.0

81

.27

51

25

20

02

02.9

60

Acry

lon

itri

le2

50.0

82

.07

51

25

20

02

04.9

00

Be

nze

ne

25

.00

98

.58

11

22

1.0

02

4.6

20

Qu

ali

fier

s:

BA

nal

yte

det

ecte

d i

n t

he

asso

ciat

ed M

eth

od

Bla

nk

EV

alu

e ab

ov

e q

uan

tita

tio

n r

ange

HH

old

ing

tim

es f

or

pre

par

atio

n o

r an

alysi

s ex

ceed

ed

JA

nal

yte

det

ecte

d b

elow

qu

anti

tati

on

lim

its

ND

No

t D

etec

ted

at

the

Rep

ort

ing

Lim

itR

RP

D o

uts

ide

acce

pte

d r

eco

ver

y l

imit

s

SS

pik

e/S

urr

og

ate

ou

tsid

e o

f li

mit

s d

ue

to m

atri

x i

nte

rfer

ence

DO

Su

rro

gat

e D

ilu

ted

Ou

tC

alcu

lati

on

s ar

e b

ased

on r

aw v

alu

es

9 o

f 18

Page 108: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary

Labora

tori

es,

Inc.

A

dva

nce

d T

echnolo

gy

3151 W

. P

ost

Road,

Las

Veg

as,

NV

89118

Tel

: 702-3

07-2

65

9

Fa

x: 7

02-3

07-2

69

1

Pro

ject:

SF

PP

- N

orw

alk

Sit

e

CL

IEN

T:

CH

2M

HIL

L

Wo

rk

Ord

er:

N0

05

82

2A

NA

LY

TIC

AL

QC

SU

MM

AR

Y R

EP

OR

T

Tes

tCo

de:

8260

_W

P_S

FP

P

Sa

mp

le I

D:

D1

10

51

9L

CS

Batc

h I

D:

D1

1V

W0

63

Te

stN

o:

EP

A 8

26

0B

An

aly

sis

Da

te:

5/1

9/2

01

1

Pre

p D

ate

:

An

aly

teR

esu

ltS

PK

va

lue

SP

K R

ef

Va

l%

RE

CR

PD

Re

f V

al

%R

PD

Lo

wLim

itH

igh

Lim

itR

PD

Lim

itQ

ua

l

Un

its:

μg

/L

PQ

L

Clie

nt

ID:

LC

SW

Ru

nN

o:

80

10

8

Se

qN

o:

12

69

69

6

LC

SS

am

pT

yp

e:

Te

stC

od

e:

82

60

_W

P_

SF

Bro

mob

en

ze

ne

25

.00

10

17

61

24

1.0

02

5.2

40

Bro

moch

loro

me

tha

ne

25

.00

98

.26

51

29

1.0

02

4.5

50

Bro

mod

ichlo

rom

eth

an

e2

5.0

01

00

76

12

11

.00

25

.06

0

Bro

mofo

rm2

5.0

08

5.9

69

12

81

.00

21

.48

0

Bro

mom

eth

an

e2

5.0

01

01

53

14

11

.00

25

.17

0

Ca

rbon

dis

ulfid

e2

5.0

09

4.1

75

12

51

.00

23

.53

0

Ca

rbon

te

tra

ch

loride

25

.00

80

.56

61

38

1.0

02

0.1

30

Chlo

robe

nzene

25.0

0100

81

122

1.0

02

5.0

40

Ch

loro

eth

an

e2

5.0

01

05

58

13

31

.00

26

.31

0

Ch

loro

form

25

.00

96

.66

91

28

1.0

02

4.1

40

Ch

loro

meth

an

e2

5.0

09

1.1

56

13

11

.00

22

.78

0

cis

-1,2

-Dic

hlo

roe

the

ne

25

.00

96

.57

21

26

1.0

02

4.1

20

cis

-1,3

-Dic

hlo

rop

rope

ne

25

.00

95

.86

91

31

1.0

02

3.9

60

Dib

rom

och

loro

meth

ane

25.0

091.4

66

133

1.0

02

2.8

60

Dib

rom

om

eth

an

e2

5.0

09

7.8

76

12

51

.00

24

.46

0

Dic

hlo

rod

iflu

oro

me

tha

ne

25

.00

96

.05

31

53

1.0

02

4.0

00

Eth

ylb

enze

ne

25

.00

10

27

31

27

1.0

02

5.5

00

Fre

on-1

13

25.0

091.5

75

125

1.0

02

2.8

80

He

xa

ch

loro

bu

tad

ien

e2

5.0

01

03

67

13

11

.00

25

.85

0

Iso

pro

pylb

en

ze

ne

25

.00

10

67

51

27

1.0

02

6.4

90

m,p

-Xyle

ne

50

.00

10

67

61

28

1.0

05

2.9

90

Me

thyle

ne

ch

lori

de

25

.00

90

.06

31

37

5.0

02

2.4

90

MT

BE

25

.00

86

.76

51

23

1.0

02

1.6

80

n-B

uty

lbe

nze

ne

25

.00

10

76

91

37

1.0

02

6.8

40

n-P

rop

ylb

en

ze

ne

25

.00

10

77

21

29

1.0

02

6.6

80

Na

ph

tha

len

e2

5.0

09

7.0

54

13

81

.00

24

.25

0

o-X

yle

ne

25

.00

10

28

01

21

1.0

02

5.4

20

se

c-B

uty

lbe

nze

ne

25

.00

10

57

21

27

1.0

02

6.1

80

Sty

ren

e2

5.0

01

02

65

13

41

.00

25

.39

0

tert

-Buty

lben

zene

25.0

0103

70

129

1.0

02

5.8

30

Qu

ali

fier

s:

BA

nal

yte

det

ecte

d i

n t

he

asso

ciat

ed M

eth

od

Bla

nk

EV

alu

e ab

ov

e q

uan

tita

tio

n r

ange

HH

old

ing

tim

es f

or

pre

par

atio

n o

r an

alysi

s ex

ceed

ed

JA

nal

yte

det

ecte

d b

elow

qu

anti

tati

on

lim

its

ND

No

t D

etec

ted

at

the

Rep

ort

ing

Lim

itR

RP

D o

uts

ide

acce

pte

d r

eco

ver

y l

imit

s

SS

pik

e/S

urr

og

ate

ou

tsid

e o

f li

mit

s d

ue

to m

atri

x i

nte

rfer

ence

DO

Su

rro

gat

e D

ilu

ted

Ou

tC

alcu

lati

on

s ar

e b

ased

on r

aw v

alu

es

10 o

f 18

Page 109: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary

Labora

tori

es,

Inc.

A

dva

nce

d T

echnolo

gy

3151 W

. P

ost

Road,

Las

Veg

as,

NV

89118

Tel

: 702-3

07-2

65

9

Fa

x: 7

02-3

07-2

69

1

Pro

ject:

SF

PP

- N

orw

alk

Sit

e

CL

IEN

T:

CH

2M

HIL

L

Wo

rk

Ord

er:

N0

05

82

2A

NA

LY

TIC

AL

QC

SU

MM

AR

Y R

EP

OR

T

Tes

tCo

de:

8260

_W

P_S

FP

P

Sa

mp

le I

D:

D1

10

51

9L

CS

Batc

h I

D:

D1

1V

W0

63

Te

stN

o:

EP

A 8

26

0B

An

aly

sis

Da

te:

5/1

9/2

01

1

Pre

p D

ate

:

An

aly

teR

esu

ltS

PK

va

lue

SP

K R

ef

Va

l%

RE

CR

PD

Re

f V

al

%R

PD

Lo

wLim

itH

igh

Lim

itR

PD

Lim

itQ

ua

l

Un

its:

μg

/L

PQ

L

Clie

nt

ID:

LC

SW

Ru

nN

o:

80

10

8

Se

qN

o:

12

69

69

6

LC

SS

am

pT

yp

e:

Te

stC

od

e:

82

60

_W

P_

SF

Tetr

achlo

roeth

ene

25.0

0106

66

128

1.0

02

6.5

30

To

lue

ne

25

.00

99

.27

71

22

2.5

02

4.8

10

tra

ns-1

,2-D

ich

loro

eth

en

e2

5.0

09

5.9

63

13

71

.00

23

.98

0

tra

ns-1

,3-D

ich

loro

pro

pe

ne

25

.00

99

.25

91

35

1.0

02

4.7

90

Trich

loro

eth

en

e2

5.0

09

5.8

70

12

71

.00

23

.96

0

Trich

loro

flu

oro

me

tha

ne

25

.00

11

55

71

29

1.0

02

8.8

50

Vin

yl ch

lori

de

25

.00

96

.75

01

34

1.0

02

4.1

80

Xyle

ne

s, T

ota

l7

5.0

01

05

75

12

52

.00

78

.41

0

S

urr

: 1,2

-Dic

hlo

roe

tha

ne

-d4

25

.00

93

.07

21

19

23

.25

0

S

urr

: 4-B

rom

oflu

oro

be

nze

ne

25

.00

97

.47

61

19

24

.36

0

S

urr

: D

ibro

mo

fluo

rom

eth

an

e2

5.0

09

7.3

85

11

52

4.3

20

S

urr

: T

olu

en

e-d

82

5.0

09

8.8

81

12

02

4.7

00

Sa

mp

le I

D:

N0

05

80

7-0

05

AM

S

Batc

h I

D:

D1

1V

W0

63

Te

stN

o:

EP

A 8

26

0B

An

aly

sis

Da

te:

5/1

9/2

01

1

Pre

p D

ate

:

An

aly

teR

esu

ltS

PK

va

lue

SP

K R

ef

Va

l%

RE

CR

PD

Re

f V

al

%R

PD

Lo

wLim

itH

igh

Lim

itR

PD

Lim

itQ

ua

l

Un

its:

μg

/L

PQ

L

Clie

nt

ID:

ZZ

ZZ

ZZ

Ru

nN

o:

80

10

8

Se

qN

o:

12

69

69

7

MS

Sa

mp

Typ

e:

Te

stC

od

e:

82

60

_W

P_

SF

1,1

,1,2

-Te

tra

ch

loro

eth

ane

25

.00

11

18

11

29

1.0

02

7.7

80

1,1

,1-T

richlo

roeth

ane

25.0

093.4

67

132

1.0

02

3.3

40

1,1

,2,2

-Te

tra

ch

loro

eth

ane

25

.00

86

.46

31

28

1.0

02

1.6

10

1,1

,2-T

richlo

roeth

ane

25.0

087.8

75

125

1.0

02

1.9

50

1,1

-Dic

hlo

roeth

an

e2

5.0

09

3.4

69

13

30

.50

02

3.3

60

1,1

-Dic

hlo

roeth

en

e2

5.0

09

6.9

68

13

01

.00

24

.23

0

1,1

-Dic

hlo

ropro

pe

ne

25

.00

94

.07

31

32

1.0

02

3.5

00

1,2

,3-T

richlo

robenzene

25.0

098.3

67

137

1.0

02

4.5

80

1,2

,3-T

richlo

ropro

pane

25.0

084.7

73

124

1.0

02

1.1

80

1,2

,4-T

richlo

robenzene

25.0

0107

66

134

1.0

02

6.7

10

1,2

,4-T

rim

eth

ylb

en

ze

ne

25

.00

10

97

41

32

1.0

0.5

50

02

7.8

20

1,2

-Dib

rom

o-3

-chlo

ropro

pane

25.0

079.9

50

132

2.0

01

9.9

80

1,2

-Dib

rom

oe

tha

ne

25

.00

79

.18

01

21

S1

.00

19

.77

0

Qu

ali

fier

s:

BA

nal

yte

det

ecte

d i

n t

he

asso

ciat

ed M

eth

od

Bla

nk

EV

alu

e ab

ov

e q

uan

tita

tio

n r

ange

HH

old

ing

tim

es f

or

pre

par

atio

n o

r an

alysi

s ex

ceed

ed

JA

nal

yte

det

ecte

d b

elow

qu

anti

tati

on

lim

its

ND

No

t D

etec

ted

at

the

Rep

ort

ing

Lim

itR

RP

D o

uts

ide

acce

pte

d r

eco

ver

y l

imit

s

SS

pik

e/S

urr

og

ate

ou

tsid

e o

f li

mit

s d

ue

to m

atri

x i

nte

rfer

ence

DO

Su

rro

gat

e D

ilu

ted

Ou

tC

alcu

lati

on

s ar

e b

ased

on r

aw v

alu

es

11 o

f 18

Page 110: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary

Labora

tori

es,

Inc.

A

dva

nce

d T

echnolo

gy

3151 W

. P

ost

Road,

Las

Veg

as,

NV

89118

Tel

: 702-3

07-2

65

9

Fa

x: 7

02-3

07-2

69

1

Pro

ject:

SF

PP

- N

orw

alk

Sit

e

CL

IEN

T:

CH

2M

HIL

L

Wo

rk

Ord

er:

N0

05

82

2A

NA

LY

TIC

AL

QC

SU

MM

AR

Y R

EP

OR

T

Tes

tCo

de:

8260

_W

P_S

FP

P

Sa

mp

le I

D:

N0

05

80

7-0

05

AM

S

Batc

h I

D:

D1

1V

W0

63

Te

stN

o:

EP

A 8

26

0B

An

aly

sis

Da

te:

5/1

9/2

01

1

Pre

p D

ate

:

An

aly

teR

esu

ltS

PK

va

lue

SP

K R

ef

Va

l%

RE

CR

PD

Re

f V

al

%R

PD

Lo

wLim

itH

igh

Lim

itR

PD

Lim

itQ

ua

l

Un

its:

μg

/L

PQ

L

Clie

nt

ID:

ZZ

ZZ

ZZ

Ru

nN

o:

80

10

8

Se

qN

o:

12

69

69

7

MS

Sa

mp

Typ

e:

Te

stC

od

e:

82

60

_W

P_

SF

1,2

-Dic

hlo

robe

nze

ne

25

.00

99

.27

11

22

1.0

02

4.8

10

1,2

-Dic

hlo

roeth

an

e2

5.0

07

8.9

69

13

20

.50

01

9.7

30

1,2

-Dic

hlo

ropro

pa

ne

25

.00

88

.47

51

25

1.0

02

2.1

10

1,3

,5-T

rim

eth

ylb

en

ze

ne

25

.00

11

27

41

31

1.0

02

7.9

80

1,3

-Dic

hlo

robe

nze

ne

25

.00

10

57

51

24

1.0

02

6.3

50

1,3

-Dic

hlo

ropro

pa

ne

25

.00

88

.07

31

26

1.0

02

2.0

00

1,4

-Dic

hlo

robe

nze

ne

25

.00

10

47

41

23

1.0

02

5.9

40

2,2

-Dic

hlo

ropro

pa

ne

25

.00

93

.56

91

37

1.0

02

3.3

70

2-B

uta

no

ne

25

0.0

40

.14

91

36

S1

00

10

0.2

20

2-C

hlo

roto

lue

ne

25

.00

11

07

31

26

1.0

02

7.6

00

4-C

hlo

roto

lue

ne

25

.00

10

87

41

28

1.0

02

6.9

80

4-I

sopro

pylto

luene

25.0

0113

73

130

1.0

02

8.2

80

4-M

eth

yl-2-p

enta

none

250.0

61.2

58

134

10

01

53.0

30

Ace

ton

e2

50.0

19

.34

01

35

S1

00

48

.22

0

Acro

lein

25

0.0

70

.87

51

25

S2

00

17

7.0

90

Acry

lon

itri

le2

50.0

62

.07

51

25

S2

00

15

4.9

70

Be

nze

ne

25

.00

98

.68

11

22

1.0

7.6

90

32

.33

0

Bro

mob

en

ze

ne

25

.00

10

17

61

24

1.0

02

5.1

70

Bro

moch

loro

me

tha

ne

25

.00

84

.96

51

29

1.0

02

1.2

30

Bro

mod

ichlo

rom

eth

an

e2

5.0

09

7.7

76

12

11

.00

24

.42

0

Bro

mofo

rm2

5.0

07

9.6

69

12

81

.00

19

.91

0

Bro

mom

eth

an

e2

5.0

09

5.2

53

14

11

.00

23

.80

0

Ca

rbon

dis

ulfid

e2

5.0

09

3.0

75

12

51

.00

.44

00

23

.68

0

Ca

rbon

te

tra

ch

loride

25

.00

85

.86

61

38

1.0

02

1.4

40

Chlo

robe

nzene

25.0

0102

81

122

1.0

02

5.4

70

Ch

loro

eth

an

e2

5.0

01

34

58

13

3S

1.0

03

3.6

20

Ch

loro

form

25

.00

93

.06

91

28

1.0

02

3.2

50

Ch

loro

meth

an

e2

5.0

01

13

56

13

11

.00

28

.16

0

cis

-1,2

-Dic

hlo

roe

the

ne

25

.00

91

.87

21

26

1.0

02

2.9

60

cis

-1,3

-Dic

hlo

rop

rope

ne

25

.00

87

.16

91

31

1.0

02

1.7

70

Qu

ali

fier

s:

BA

nal

yte

det

ecte

d i

n t

he

asso

ciat

ed M

eth

od

Bla

nk

EV

alu

e ab

ov

e q

uan

tita

tio

n r

ange

HH

old

ing

tim

es f

or

pre

par

atio

n o

r an

alysi

s ex

ceed

ed

JA

nal

yte

det

ecte

d b

elow

qu

anti

tati

on

lim

its

ND

No

t D

etec

ted

at

the

Rep

ort

ing

Lim

itR

RP

D o

uts

ide

acce

pte

d r

eco

ver

y l

imit

s

SS

pik

e/S

urr

og

ate

ou

tsid

e o

f li

mit

s d

ue

to m

atri

x i

nte

rfer

ence

DO

Su

rro

gat

e D

ilu

ted

Ou

tC

alcu

lati

on

s ar

e b

ased

on r

aw v

alu

es

12 o

f 18

Page 111: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary

Labora

tori

es,

Inc.

A

dva

nce

d T

echnolo

gy

3151 W

. P

ost

Road,

Las

Veg

as,

NV

89118

Tel

: 702-3

07-2

65

9

Fa

x: 7

02-3

07-2

69

1

Pro

ject:

SF

PP

- N

orw

alk

Sit

e

CL

IEN

T:

CH

2M

HIL

L

Wo

rk

Ord

er:

N0

05

82

2A

NA

LY

TIC

AL

QC

SU

MM

AR

Y R

EP

OR

T

Tes

tCo

de:

8260

_W

P_S

FP

P

Sa

mp

le I

D:

N0

05

80

7-0

05

AM

S

Batc

h I

D:

D1

1V

W0

63

Te

stN

o:

EP

A 8

26

0B

An

aly

sis

Da

te:

5/1

9/2

01

1

Pre

p D

ate

:

An

aly

teR

esu

ltS

PK

va

lue

SP

K R

ef

Va

l%

RE

CR

PD

Re

f V

al

%R

PD

Lo

wLim

itH

igh

Lim

itR

PD

Lim

itQ

ua

l

Un

its:

μg

/L

PQ

L

Clie

nt

ID:

ZZ

ZZ

ZZ

Ru

nN

o:

80

10

8

Se

qN

o:

12

69

69

7

MS

Sa

mp

Typ

e:

Te

stC

od

e:

82

60

_W

P_

SF

Dib

rom

och

loro

meth

ane

25.0

088.8

66

133

1.0

02

2.1

90

Dib

rom

om

eth

an

e2

5.0

08

0.0

76

12

51

.00

20

.00

0

Dic

hlo

rod

iflu

oro

me

tha

ne

25

.00

92

.55

31

53

1.0

02

3.1

30

Eth

ylb

enze

ne

25

.00

10

67

31

27

1.0

1.4

50

28

.02

0

Fre

on-1

13

25.0

089.7

75

125

1.0

02

2.4

20

He

xa

ch

loro

bu

tad

ien

e2

5.0

01

16

67

13

11

.00

28

.91

0

Iso

pro

pylb

en

ze

ne

25

.00

11

27

51

27

1.0

1.9

20

29

.99

0

m,p

-Xyle

ne

50

.00

10

97

61

28

1.0

1.5

70

56

.30

0

Me

thyle

ne

ch

lori

de

25

.00

80

.86

31

37

5.0

02

0.2

10

MT

BE

25

.00

71

.86

51

23

1.0

01

7.9

50

n-B

uty

lbe

nze

ne

25

.00

11

66

91

37

1.0

0.5

20

02

9.5

40

n-P

rop

ylb

en

ze

ne

25

.00

11

57

21

29

1.0

2.8

80

31

.64

0

Na

ph

tha

len

e2

5.0

08

4.7

54

13

81

.01

.11

02

2.2

90

o-X

yle

ne

25

.00

10

38

01

21

1.0

0.3

70

02

6.0

80

se

c-B

uty

lbe

nze

ne

25

.00

11

47

21

27

1.0

2.0

00

30

.38

0

Sty

ren

e2

5.0

01

01

65

13

41

.00

25

.20

0

tert

-Buty

lben

zene

25.0

0111

70

129

1.0

02

7.8

00

Tetr

achlo

roeth

ene

25.0

0112

66

128

1.0

02

8.0

50

To

lue

ne

25

.00

95

.27

71

22

2.5

0.3

80

02

4.1

90

tra

ns-1

,2-D

ich

loro

eth

en

e2

5.0

09

2.1

63

13

71

.00

23

.03

0

tra

ns-1

,3-D

ich

loro

pro

pe

ne

25

.00

86

.05

91

35

1.0

02

1.5

10

Trich

loro

eth

en

e2

5.0

09

3.8

70

12

71

.00

23

.45

0

Trich

loro

flu

oro

me

tha

ne

25

.00

11

25

71

29

1.0

02

7.9

40

Vin

yl ch

lori

de

25

.00

93

.45

01

34

1.0

02

3.3

60

Xyle

ne

s, T

ota

l7

5.0

01

07

75

12

52

.01

.94

08

2.3

80

S

urr

: 1,2

-Dic

hlo

roe

tha

ne

-d4

25

.00

77

.47

21

19

19

.36

0

S

urr

: 4-B

rom

oflu

oro

be

nze

ne

25

.00

95

.37

61

19

23

.82

0

S

urr

: D

ibro

mo

fluo

rom

eth

an

e2

5.0

08

9.2

85

11

52

2.3

00

S

urr

: T

olu

en

e-d

82

5.0

09

4.4

81

12

02

3.6

10

Qu

ali

fier

s:

BA

nal

yte

det

ecte

d i

n t

he

asso

ciat

ed M

eth

od

Bla

nk

EV

alu

e ab

ov

e q

uan

tita

tio

n r

ange

HH

old

ing

tim

es f

or

pre

par

atio

n o

r an

alysi

s ex

ceed

ed

JA

nal

yte

det

ecte

d b

elow

qu

anti

tati

on

lim

its

ND

No

t D

etec

ted

at

the

Rep

ort

ing

Lim

itR

RP

D o

uts

ide

acce

pte

d r

eco

ver

y l

imit

s

SS

pik

e/S

urr

og

ate

ou

tsid

e o

f li

mit

s d

ue

to m

atri

x i

nte

rfer

ence

DO

Su

rro

gat

e D

ilu

ted

Ou

tC

alcu

lati

on

s ar

e b

ased

on r

aw v

alu

es

13 o

f 18

Page 112: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary

Labora

tori

es,

Inc.

A

dva

nce

d T

echnolo

gy

3151 W

. P

ost

Road,

Las

Veg

as,

NV

89118

Tel

: 702-3

07-2

65

9

Fa

x: 7

02-3

07-2

69

1

Pro

ject:

SF

PP

- N

orw

alk

Sit

e

CL

IEN

T:

CH

2M

HIL

L

Wo

rk

Ord

er:

N0

05

82

2A

NA

LY

TIC

AL

QC

SU

MM

AR

Y R

EP

OR

T

Tes

tCo

de:

8260

_W

P_S

FP

P

Sa

mp

le I

D:

N0

05

80

7-0

05

AM

SD

Batc

h I

D:

D1

1V

W0

63

Te

stN

o:

EP

A 8

26

0B

An

aly

sis

Da

te:

5/1

9/2

01

1

Pre

p D

ate

:

An

aly

teR

esu

ltS

PK

va

lue

SP

K R

ef

Va

l%

RE

CR

PD

Re

f V

al

%R

PD

Lo

wLim

itH

igh

Lim

itR

PD

Lim

itQ

ua

l

Un

its:

μg

/L

PQ

L

Clie

nt

ID:

ZZ

ZZ

ZZ

Ru

nN

o:

80

10

8

Se

qN

o:

12

69

69

8

MS

DS

am

pT

yp

e:

Te

stC

od

e:

82

60

_W

P_

SF

1,1

,1,2

-Te

tra

ch

loro

eth

ane

25

.00

11

88

11

29

20

1.0

02

7.7

86

.28

29

.58

0

1,1

,1-T

richlo

roeth

ane

25.0

096.6

67

132

20

1.0

02

3.3

43

.41

24

.15

0

1,1

,2,2

-Te

tra

ch

loro

eth

ane

25

.00

92

.36

31

28

20

1.0

02

1.6

16

.54

23

.07

0

1,1

,2-T

richlo

roeth

ane

25.0

094.4

75

125

20

1.0

02

1.9

57

.20

23

.59

0

1,1

-Dic

hlo

roeth

an

e2

5.0

09

7.6

69

13

32

00

.50

02

3.3

64

.36

24

.40

0

1,1

-Dic

hlo

roeth

en

e2

5.0

01

02

68

13

02

01

.00

24

.23

4.7

52

5.4

10

1,1

-Dic

hlo

ropro

pe

ne

25

.00

97

.27

31

32

20

1.0

02

3.5

03

.39

24

.31

0

1,2

,3-T

richlo

robenzene

25.0

097.4

67

137

20

1.0

02

4.5

80

.94

02

4.3

50

1,2

,3-T

richlo

ropro

pane

25.0

088.1

73

124

20

1.0

02

1.1

83

.89

22

.02

0

1,2

,4-T

richlo

robenzene

25.0

0104

66

134

20

1.0

02

6.7

12

.54

26

.04

0

1,2

,4-T

rim

eth

ylb

en

ze

ne

25

.00

11

17

41

32

20

1.0

0.5

50

02

7.8

21

.92

28

.36

0

1,2

-Dib

rom

o-3

-chlo

ropro

pane

25.0

084.8

50

132

20

2.0

01

9.9

85

.88

21

.19

0

1,2

-Dib

rom

oe

tha

ne

25

.00

84

.38

01

21

20

1.0

01

9.7

76

.37

21

.07

0

1,2

-Dic

hlo

robe

nze

ne

25

.00

10

37

11

22

20

1.0

02

4.8

13

.87

25

.79

0

1,2

-Dic

hlo

roeth

an

e2

5.0

08

3.4

69

13

22

00

.50

01

9.7

35

.47

20

.84

0

1,2

-Dic

hlo

ropro

pa

ne

25

.00

92

.77

51

25

20

1.0

02

2.1

14

.68

23

.17

0

1,3

,5-T

rim

eth

ylb

en

ze

ne

25

.00

11

47

41

31

20

1.0

02

7.9

82

.16

28

.59

0

1,3

-Dic

hlo

robe

nze

ne

25

.00

10

97

51

24

20

1.0

02

6.3

53

.28

27

.23

0

1,3

-Dic

hlo

ropro

pa

ne

25

.00

92

.27

31

26

20

1.0

02

2.0

04

.70

23

.06

0

1,4

-Dic

hlo

robe

nze

ne

25

.00

10

77

41

23

20

1.0

02

5.9

43

.22

26

.79

0

2,2

-Dic

hlo

ropro

pa

ne

25

.00

97

.86

91

37

20

1.0

02

3.3

74

.56

24

.46

0

2-B

uta

no

ne

25

0.0

40

.74

91

36

20

S1

00

10

0.2

1.5

81

01.8

20

2-C

hlo

roto

lue

ne

25

.00

11

47

31

26

20

1.0

02

7.6

03

.14

28

.48

0

4-C

hlo

roto

lue

ne

25

.00

11

17

41

28

20

1.0

02

6.9

82

.42

27

.64

0

4-I

sopro

pylto

luene

25.0

0115

73

130

20

1.0

02

8.2

81

.65

28

.75

0

4-M

eth

yl-2-p

enta

none

250.0

65.0

58

134

20

10

01

53.0

6.0

51

62.5

80

Ace

ton

e2

50.0

20

.54

01

35

20

S1

00

48

.22

6.3

35

1.3

70

Acro

lein

25

0.0

73

.47

51

25

20

S2

00

17

7.1

3.5

41

83.4

80

Acry

lon

itri

le2

50.0

63

.27

51

25

20

S2

00

15

5.0

1.8

91

57.9

30

Be

nze

ne

25

.00

10

28

11

22

20

1.0

7.6

90

32

.33

2.4

73

3.1

40

Qu

ali

fier

s:

BA

nal

yte

det

ecte

d i

n t

he

asso

ciat

ed M

eth

od

Bla

nk

EV

alu

e ab

ov

e q

uan

tita

tio

n r

ange

HH

old

ing

tim

es f

or

pre

par

atio

n o

r an

alysi

s ex

ceed

ed

JA

nal

yte

det

ecte

d b

elow

qu

anti

tati

on

lim

its

ND

No

t D

etec

ted

at

the

Rep

ort

ing

Lim

itR

RP

D o

uts

ide

acce

pte

d r

eco

ver

y l

imit

s

SS

pik

e/S

urr

og

ate

ou

tsid

e o

f li

mit

s d

ue

to m

atri

x i

nte

rfer

ence

DO

Su

rro

gat

e D

ilu

ted

Ou

tC

alcu

lati

on

s ar

e b

ased

on r

aw v

alu

es

14 o

f 18

Page 113: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary

Labora

tori

es,

Inc.

A

dva

nce

d T

echnolo

gy

3151 W

. P

ost

Road,

Las

Veg

as,

NV

89118

Tel

: 702-3

07-2

65

9

Fa

x: 7

02-3

07-2

69

1

Pro

ject:

SF

PP

- N

orw

alk

Sit

e

CL

IEN

T:

CH

2M

HIL

L

Wo

rk

Ord

er:

N0

05

82

2A

NA

LY

TIC

AL

QC

SU

MM

AR

Y R

EP

OR

T

Tes

tCo

de:

8260

_W

P_S

FP

P

Sa

mp

le I

D:

N0

05

80

7-0

05

AM

SD

Batc

h I

D:

D1

1V

W0

63

Te

stN

o:

EP

A 8

26

0B

An

aly

sis

Da

te:

5/1

9/2

01

1

Pre

p D

ate

:

An

aly

teR

esu

ltS

PK

va

lue

SP

K R

ef

Va

l%

RE

CR

PD

Re

f V

al

%R

PD

Lo

wLim

itH

igh

Lim

itR

PD

Lim

itQ

ua

l

Un

its:

μg

/L

PQ

L

Clie

nt

ID:

ZZ

ZZ

ZZ

Ru

nN

o:

80

10

8

Se

qN

o:

12

69

69

8

MS

DS

am

pT

yp

e:

Te

stC

od

e:

82

60

_W

P_

SF

Bro

mob

en

ze

ne

25

.00

10

57

61

24

20

1.0

02

5.1

74

.28

26

.27

0

Bro

moch

loro

me

tha

ne

25

.00

90

.46

51

29

20

1.0

02

1.2

36

.25

22

.60

0

Bro

mod

ichlo

rom

eth

an

e2

5.0

09

6.0

76

12

12

01

.00

24

.42

1.6

92

4.0

10

Bro

mofo

rm2

5.0

08

6.2

69

12

82

01

.00

19

.91

7.9

12

1.5

50

Bro

mom

eth

an

e2

5.0

08

9.0

53

14

12

01

.00

23

.80

6.6

92

2.2

60

Ca

rbon

dis

ulfid

e2

5.0

09

5.6

75

12

52

01

.00

.44

00

23

.68

2.7

52

4.3

40

Ca

rbon

te

tra

ch

loride

25

.00

88

.86

61

38

20

1.0

02

1.4

43

.44

22

.19

0

Chlo

robe

nzene

25.0

0104

81

122

20

1.0

02

5.4

72

.25

26

.05

0

Ch

loro

eth

an

e2

5.0

01

35

58

13

32

0S

1.0

03

3.6

20

.35

63

3.7

40

Ch

loro

form

25

.00

96

.96

91

28

20

1.0

02

3.2

54

.09

24

.22

0

Ch

loro

meth

an

e2

5.0

09

3.4

56

13

12

01

.00

28

.16

18

.62

3.3

60

cis

-1,2

-Dic

hlo

roe

the

ne

25

.00

95

.37

21

26

20

1.0

02

2.9

63

.68

23

.82

0

cis

-1,3

-Dic

hlo

rop

rope

ne

25

.00

91

.96

91

31

20

1.0

02

1.7

75

.41

22

.98

0

Dib

rom

och

loro

meth

ane

25.0

095.4

66

133

20

1.0

02

2.1

97

.21

23

.85

0

Dib

rom

om

eth

an

e2

5.0

08

4.8

76

12

52

01

.00

20

.00

5.8

72

1.2

10

Dic

hlo

rod

iflu

oro

me

tha

ne

25

.00

92

.05

31

53

20

1.0

02

3.1

30

.56

42

3.0

00

Eth

ylb

enze

ne

25

.00

10

77

31

27

20

1.0

1.4

50

28

.02

0.8

17

28

.25

0

Fre

on-1

13

25.0

092.5

75

125

20

1.0

02

2.4

23

.07

23

.12

0

He

xa

ch

loro

bu

tad

ien

e2

5.0

01

11

67

13

12

01

.00

28

.91

4.0

22

7.7

70

Iso

pro

pylb

en

ze

ne

25

.00

11

77

51

27

20

1.0

1.9

20

29

.99

4.0

23

1.2

20

m,p

-Xyle

ne

50

.00

11

17

61

28

20

1.0

1.5

70

56

.30

1.4

35

7.1

10

Me

thyle

ne

ch

lori

de

25

.00

83

.76

31

37

20

5.0

02

0.2

13

.50

20

.93

0

MT

BE

25

.00

76

.86

51

23

20

1.0

01

7.9

56

.68

19

.19

0

n-B

uty

lbe

nze

ne

25

.00

11

76

91

37

20

1.0

0.5

20

02

9.5

40

.91

02

9.8

10

n-P

rop

ylb

en

ze

ne

25

.00

11

77

21

29

20

1.0

2.8

80

31

.64

1.8

83

2.2

40

Na

ph

tha

len

e2

5.0

08

4.5

54

13

82

01

.01

.11

02

2.2

90

.27

02

2.2

30

o-X

yle

ne

25

.00

10

68

01

21

20

1.0

0.3

70

02

6.0

82

.54

26

.75

0

se

c-B

uty

lbe

nze

ne

25

.00

11

77

21

27

20

1.0

2.0

00

30

.38

2.5

73

1.1

70

Sty

ren

e2

5.0

01

03

65

13

42

01

.00

25

.20

2.3

52

5.8

00

tert

-Buty

lben

zene

25.0

0114

70

129

20

1.0

02

7.8

02

.35

28

.46

0

Qu

ali

fier

s:

BA

nal

yte

det

ecte

d i

n t

he

asso

ciat

ed M

eth

od

Bla

nk

EV

alu

e ab

ov

e q

uan

tita

tio

n r

ange

HH

old

ing

tim

es f

or

pre

par

atio

n o

r an

alysi

s ex

ceed

ed

JA

nal

yte

det

ecte

d b

elow

qu

anti

tati

on

lim

its

ND

No

t D

etec

ted

at

the

Rep

ort

ing

Lim

itR

RP

D o

uts

ide

acce

pte

d r

eco

ver

y l

imit

s

SS

pik

e/S

urr

og

ate

ou

tsid

e o

f li

mit

s d

ue

to m

atri

x i

nte

rfer

ence

DO

Su

rro

gat

e D

ilu

ted

Ou

tC

alcu

lati

on

s ar

e b

ased

on r

aw v

alu

es

15 o

f 18

Page 114: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary

Labora

tori

es,

Inc.

A

dva

nce

d T

echnolo

gy

3151 W

. P

ost

Road,

Las

Veg

as,

NV

89118

Tel

: 702-3

07-2

65

9

Fa

x: 7

02-3

07-2

69

1

Pro

ject:

SF

PP

- N

orw

alk

Sit

e

CL

IEN

T:

CH

2M

HIL

L

Wo

rk

Ord

er:

N0

05

82

2A

NA

LY

TIC

AL

QC

SU

MM

AR

Y R

EP

OR

T

Tes

tCo

de:

8260

_W

P_S

FP

P

Sa

mp

le I

D:

N0

05

80

7-0

05

AM

SD

Batc

h I

D:

D1

1V

W0

63

Te

stN

o:

EP

A 8

26

0B

An

aly

sis

Da

te:

5/1

9/2

01

1

Pre

p D

ate

:

An

aly

teR

esu

ltS

PK

va

lue

SP

K R

ef

Va

l%

RE

CR

PD

Re

f V

al

%R

PD

Lo

wLim

itH

igh

Lim

itR

PD

Lim

itQ

ua

l

Un

its:

μg

/L

PQ

L

Clie

nt

ID:

ZZ

ZZ

ZZ

Ru

nN

o:

80

10

8

Se

qN

o:

12

69

69

8

MS

DS

am

pT

yp

e:

Te

stC

od

e:

82

60

_W

P_

SF

Te

tra

ch

loro

eth

en

e2

5.0

01

13

66

12

82

01

.00

28

.05

0.9

58

28

.32

0

To

lue

ne

25

.00

97

.67

71

22

20

2.5

0.3

80

02

4.1

92

.41

24

.78

0

tra

ns-1

,2-D

ich

loro

eth

en

e2

5.0

09

6.5

63

13

72

01

.00

23

.03

4.6

22

4.1

20

tra

ns-1

,3-D

ich

loro

pro

pe

ne

25

.00

91

.05

91

35

20

1.0

02

1.5

15

.60

22

.75

0

Trich

loro

eth

en

e2

5.0

09

7.8

70

12

72

01

.00

23

.45

4.1

32

4.4

40

Trich

loro

flu

oro

me

tha

ne

25

.00

11

45

71

29

20

1.0

02

7.9

41

.77

28

.44

0

Vin

yl ch

lori

de

25

.00

94

.75

01

34

20

1.0

02

3.3

61

.32

23

.67

0

Xyle

ne

s, T

ota

l7

5.0

01

09

75

12

52

02

.01

.94

08

2.3

81

.78

83

.86

0

S

urr

: 1,2

-Dic

hlo

roe

tha

ne

-d4

25

.00

82

.07

21

19

02

0.5

00

S

urr

: 4-B

rom

oflu

oro

be

nze

ne

25

.00

98

.07

61

19

02

4.5

10

S

urr

: D

ibro

mo

fluo

rom

eth

an

e2

5.0

09

5.0

85

11

50

23

.74

0

S

urr

: T

olu

en

e-d

82

5.0

09

7.6

81

12

00

24

.40

0

Sa

mp

le I

D:

D1

10

51

9M

B2

Batc

h I

D:

D1

1V

W0

63

Te

stN

o:

EP

A 8

26

0B

An

aly

sis

Da

te:

5/1

9/2

01

1

Pre

p D

ate

:

An

aly

teR

esu

ltS

PK

va

lue

SP

K R

ef

Va

l%

RE

CR

PD

Re

f V

al

%R

PD

Lo

wLim

itH

igh

Lim

itR

PD

Lim

itQ

ua

l

Un

its:

μg

/L

PQ

L

Clie

nt

ID:

PB

W

Ru

nN

o:

80

10

8

Se

qN

o:

12

69

69

9

MB

LK

Sa

mp

Typ

e:

Te

stC

od

e:

82

60

_W

P_

SF

1,1

,1,2

-Te

tra

ch

loro

eth

ane

1.0

ND

1,1

,1-T

richlo

roeth

ane

1.0

ND

1,1

,2,2

-Te

tra

ch

loro

eth

ane

1.0

ND

1,1

,2-T

richlo

roeth

ane

1.0

ND

1,1

-Dic

hlo

roeth

an

e0

.50

ND

1,1

-Dic

hlo

roeth

en

e1

.0N

D

1,1

-Dic

hlo

ropro

pe

ne

1.0

ND

1,2

,3-T

richlo

robenzene

1.0

ND

1,2

,3-T

richlo

ropro

pane

1.0

ND

1,2

,4-T

richlo

robenzene

1.0

ND

1,2

,4-T

rim

eth

ylb

en

ze

ne

1.0

ND

1,2

-Dib

rom

o-3

-chlo

ropro

pane

2.0

ND

1,2

-Dib

rom

oe

tha

ne

1.0

ND

Qu

ali

fier

s:

BA

nal

yte

det

ecte

d i

n t

he

asso

ciat

ed M

eth

od

Bla

nk

EV

alu

e ab

ov

e q

uan

tita

tio

n r

ange

HH

old

ing

tim

es f

or

pre

par

atio

n o

r an

alysi

s ex

ceed

ed

JA

nal

yte

det

ecte

d b

elow

qu

anti

tati

on

lim

its

ND

No

t D

etec

ted

at

the

Rep

ort

ing

Lim

itR

RP

D o

uts

ide

acce

pte

d r

eco

ver

y l

imit

s

SS

pik

e/S

urr

og

ate

ou

tsid

e o

f li

mit

s d

ue

to m

atri

x i

nte

rfer

ence

DO

Su

rro

gat

e D

ilu

ted

Ou

tC

alcu

lati

on

s ar

e b

ased

on r

aw v

alu

es

16 o

f 18

Page 115: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary

Labora

tori

es,

Inc.

A

dva

nce

d T

echnolo

gy

3151 W

. P

ost

Road,

Las

Veg

as,

NV

89118

Tel

: 702-3

07-2

65

9

Fa

x: 7

02-3

07-2

69

1

Pro

ject:

SF

PP

- N

orw

alk

Sit

e

CL

IEN

T:

CH

2M

HIL

L

Wo

rk

Ord

er:

N0

05

82

2A

NA

LY

TIC

AL

QC

SU

MM

AR

Y R

EP

OR

T

Tes

tCo

de:

8260

_W

P_S

FP

P

Sa

mp

le I

D:

D1

10

51

9M

B2

Batc

h I

D:

D1

1V

W0

63

Te

stN

o:

EP

A 8

26

0B

An

aly

sis

Da

te:

5/1

9/2

01

1

Pre

p D

ate

:

An

aly

teR

esu

ltS

PK

va

lue

SP

K R

ef

Va

l%

RE

CR

PD

Re

f V

al

%R

PD

Lo

wLim

itH

igh

Lim

itR

PD

Lim

itQ

ua

l

Un

its:

μg

/L

PQ

L

Clie

nt

ID:

PB

W

Ru

nN

o:

80

10

8

Se

qN

o:

12

69

69

9

MB

LK

Sa

mp

Typ

e:

Te

stC

od

e:

82

60

_W

P_

SF

1,2

-Dic

hlo

robe

nze

ne

1.0

ND

1,2

-Dic

hlo

roeth

an

e0

.50

ND

1,2

-Dic

hlo

ropro

pa

ne

1.0

ND

1,3

,5-T

rim

eth

ylb

en

ze

ne

1.0

ND

1,3

-Dic

hlo

robe

nze

ne

1.0

ND

1,3

-Dic

hlo

ropro

pa

ne

1.0

ND

1,4

-Dic

hlo

robe

nze

ne

1.0

ND

2,2

-Dic

hlo

ropro

pa

ne

1.0

ND

2-B

uta

no

ne

10

ND

2-C

hlo

roto

lue

ne

1.0

ND

4-C

hlo

roto

lue

ne

1.0

ND

4-I

sopro

pylto

luene

1.0

ND

4-M

eth

yl-2-p

enta

none

10

ND

Ace

ton

e1

0N

D

Acro

lein

20

ND

Acry

lon

itri

le2

0N

D

Be

nze

ne

1.0

ND

Bro

mobe

nzene

1.0

ND

Bro

moch

loro

me

tha

ne

1.0

ND

Bro

mod

ichlo

rom

eth

an

e1

.0N

D

Bro

mofo

rm1

.0N

D

Bro

mom

eth

an

e1

.0N

D

Ca

rbon

dis

ulfid

e1

.0N

D

Ca

rbon

te

tra

ch

loride

1.0

ND

Chlo

robe

nzene

1.0

ND

Chlo

roeth

ane

1.0

ND

Chlo

rofo

rm1.0

ND

Chlo

rom

eth

an

e1

.0N

D

cis

-1,2

-Dic

hlo

roe

the

ne

1.0

ND

cis

-1,3

-Dic

hlo

rop

rope

ne

1.0

ND

Qu

ali

fier

s:

BA

nal

yte

det

ecte

d i

n t

he

asso

ciat

ed M

eth

od

Bla

nk

EV

alu

e ab

ov

e q

uan

tita

tio

n r

ange

HH

old

ing

tim

es f

or

pre

par

atio

n o

r an

alysi

s ex

ceed

ed

JA

nal

yte

det

ecte

d b

elow

qu

anti

tati

on

lim

its

ND

No

t D

etec

ted

at

the

Rep

ort

ing

Lim

itR

RP

D o

uts

ide

acce

pte

d r

eco

ver

y l

imit

s

SS

pik

e/S

urr

og

ate

ou

tsid

e o

f li

mit

s d

ue

to m

atri

x i

nte

rfer

ence

DO

Su

rro

gat

e D

ilu

ted

Ou

tC

alcu

lati

on

s ar

e b

ased

on r

aw v

alu

es

17 o

f 18

Page 116: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary

Labora

tori

es,

Inc.

A

dva

nce

d T

echnolo

gy

3151 W

. P

ost

Road,

Las

Veg

as,

NV

89118

Tel

: 702-3

07-2

65

9

Fa

x: 7

02-3

07-2

69

1

Pro

ject:

SF

PP

- N

orw

alk

Sit

e

CL

IEN

T:

CH

2M

HIL

L

Wo

rk

Ord

er:

N0

05

82

2A

NA

LY

TIC

AL

QC

SU

MM

AR

Y R

EP

OR

T

Tes

tCo

de:

8260

_W

P_S

FP

P

Sa

mp

le I

D:

D1

10

51

9M

B2

Batc

h I

D:

D1

1V

W0

63

Te

stN

o:

EP

A 8

26

0B

An

aly

sis

Da

te:

5/1

9/2

01

1

Pre

p D

ate

:

An

aly

teR

esu

ltS

PK

va

lue

SP

K R

ef

Va

l%

RE

CR

PD

Re

f V

al

%R

PD

Lo

wLim

itH

igh

Lim

itR

PD

Lim

itQ

ua

l

Un

its:

μg

/L

PQ

L

Clie

nt

ID:

PB

W

Ru

nN

o:

80

10

8

Se

qN

o:

12

69

69

9

MB

LK

Sa

mp

Typ

e:

Te

stC

od

e:

82

60

_W

P_

SF

Dib

rom

och

loro

meth

ane

1.0

ND

Dib

rom

om

eth

an

e1

.0N

D

Dic

hlo

rod

iflu

oro

me

tha

ne

1.0

ND

Eth

ylb

enze

ne

1.0

ND

Fre

on-1

13

1.0

ND

He

xa

ch

loro

bu

tad

ien

e1

.0N

D

Iso

pro

pylb

en

ze

ne

1.0

ND

m,p

-Xyle

ne

1.0

ND

Me

thyle

ne

ch

lori

de

5.0

ND

MT

BE

1.0

ND

n-B

uty

lbe

nze

ne

1.0

ND

n-P

rop

ylb

en

ze

ne

1.0

ND

Na

ph

tha

len

e1

.0N

D

o-X

yle

ne

1.0

ND

se

c-B

uty

lbe

nze

ne

1.0

ND

Sty

ren

e1

.0N

D

tert

-Buty

lben

zene

1.0

ND

Tetr

achlo

roeth

ene

1.0

ND

To

lue

ne

2.5

ND

tra

ns-1

,2-D

ich

loro

eth

en

e1

.0N

D

tra

ns-1

,3-D

ich

loro

pro

pe

ne

1.0

ND

Trich

loro

eth

en

e1

.0N

D

Tri

ch

loro

flu

oro

me

tha

ne

1.0

ND

Vin

yl ch

lori

de

1.0

ND

Xyle

ne

s, T

ota

l2

.0N

D

S

urr

: 1,2

-Dic

hlo

roe

tha

ne

-d4

25

.00

92

.07

21

19

22

.99

0

S

urr

: 4-B

rom

oflu

oro

be

nze

ne

25

.00

10

37

61

19

25

.80

0

S

urr

: D

ibro

mo

fluo

rom

eth

an

e2

5.0

09

3.0

85

11

52

3.2

50

S

urr

: T

olu

en

e-d

82

5.0

01

09

81

12

02

7.2

70

Qu

ali

fier

s:

BA

nal

yte

det

ecte

d i

n t

he

asso

ciat

ed M

eth

od

Bla

nk

EV

alu

e ab

ov

e q

uan

tita

tio

n r

ange

HH

old

ing

tim

es f

or

pre

par

atio

n o

r an

alysi

s ex

ceed

ed

JA

nal

yte

det

ecte

d b

elow

qu

anti

tati

on

lim

its

ND

No

t D

etec

ted

at

the

Rep

ort

ing

Lim

itR

RP

D o

uts

ide

acce

pte

d r

eco

ver

y l

imit

s

SS

pik

e/S

urr

og

ate

ou

tsid

e o

f li

mit

s d

ue

to m

atri

x i

nte

rfer

ence

DO

Su

rro

gat

e D

ilu

ted

Ou

tC

alcu

lati

on

s ar

e b

ased

on r

aw v

alu

es

18 o

f 18

Page 117: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary
Page 118: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary
Page 119: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary
Page 120: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary
Page 121: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary

Laboratories, Inc. Advanced Technology

3151 W. Post Road, Las Vegas, NV 89118 Tel: 702-307-2659 Fax: 702-307-2691

May 25, 2011

CH2M HILL

Daniel Jablonski

Attention: Daniel Jablonski

RE: SFPP - Norwalk Site

Workorder No.: N005821FAX: (510) 622-9129

TEL: (213)228-8271

155 Grand Avenue, Suite 1000

Oakland, CA 94612

CA-ELAP No.: 2676

NV Cert. No.: NV-009222007A

The attached report is the final hard copy pertaining to the subcontracted tests for the above project.

Thank you for the opportunity to service the needs of your company.

Please feel free to call me at (702) 307-2659 if I can be of further assistance to your company.

Sincerely,

Jose Tenorio Jr.

Laboratory Director

Enclosed are the results for sample(s) received on May 17, 2011 by Advanced Technology

Laboratories, Inc. . The sample(s) are tested for the parameters as indicated in the enclosed chain of

custody in accordance with the applicable laboratory certifications.

This cover letter is an integral part of this analytical report.

1 of 2

Page 122: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary

Laboratories, Inc. Advanced Technology

3151 W. Post Road, Las Vegas, NV 89118 Tel: 702-307-2659 Fax: 702-307-2691

25-May-11Date:Advanced Technology Laboratories, Inc.

Project: SFPP - Norwalk Site

CLIENT: CH2M HILL

Lab Order: N005821CASE NARRATIVE

SAMPLE RECEIVING/GENERAL COMMENTS:

Samples were received intact with proper chain of custody documentation.

Cooler temperature and sample preservation were verified upon receipt of samples if applicable.

Information on sample receipt conditions including discrepancies can be found in attached Sample

Receipt Checklist Form.

Subcontracted Analyses:

EPA TO15 and EPA TO3 were subcontracted to Advanced Technology Laboratories-Signal Hill, CA .

ASTM D1946 was subcontracted to ATL Air Labs-City of Industry, CA .

Page 1 of 1

2 of 2

Page 123: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary
Page 124: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary
Page 125: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary
Page 126: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary
Page 127: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary
Page 128: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary
Page 129: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary
Page 130: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary
Page 131: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary
Page 132: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary
Page 133: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary
Page 134: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary
Page 135: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary
Page 136: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary
Page 137: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary
Page 138: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary
Page 139: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary
Page 140: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary
Page 141: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary
Page 142: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary

3275 Walnut Avenue, Signal Hill, CA 90755 Tel: 562. 989.4045 Fax: 562.989.4040

Project:

Client Sample ID: N005821-001A / VINF-05-17

Collection Date: 5/17/2011 1:50:00 PM

Matrix: AIR

Analyses Result Qual Units Date Analyzed

CLIENT: Advanced Technology Laboratory-Las Vega

Lab Order: 117873

Lab ID: 117873-001A

DF

Advanced Technology Laboratories Print Date: 27-May-11

PQL

ANALYTICAL RESULTS

VOCS IN AIR BY GCMS

EPA TO15

Analyst: DMPRunID: MS14_110518B W11A057QC Batch: PrepDate:

1,1,1-Trichloroethane 5/18/2011 03:50 PM5.0 ppbv 20ND

1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 5/18/2011 03:50 PM5.0 ppbv 20ND

1,1,2-Trichloroethane 5/18/2011 03:50 PM5.0 ppbv 20ND

1,1-Dichloroethane 5/18/2011 03:50 PM5.0 ppbv 20ND

1,1-Dichloroethene 5/18/2011 03:50 PM5.0 ppbv 20ND

1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 5/18/2011 03:50 PM5.0 ppbv 20ND

1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 5/18/2011 03:50 PM5.0 ppbv 2089

1,2-Dibromoethane 5/18/2011 03:50 PM5.0 ppbv 20ND

1,2-Dichlorobenzene 5/18/2011 03:50 PM5.0 ppbv 20ND

1,2-Dichloroethane 5/18/2011 03:50 PM5.0 ppbv 20ND

1,2-Dichloropropane 5/18/2011 03:50 PM5.0 ppbv 20ND

1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 5/18/2011 03:50 PM5.0 ppbv 2055

1,3-Dichlorobenzene 5/18/2011 03:50 PM5.0 ppbv 20ND

1,4-Dichlorobenzene 5/18/2011 03:50 PM5.0 ppbv 20ND

2-Butanone 5/18/2011 03:50 PM5.0 ppbv 2024

2-Hexanone 5/18/2011 03:50 PM5.0 ppbv 20120

4-Ethyl Toluene 5/18/2011 03:50 PM5.0 ppbv 2034

4-Methyl-2-pentanone 5/18/2011 03:50 PM5.0 ppbv 20ND

Acetone 5/18/2011 03:50 PM5.0 ppbv 20ND

Benzene 5/18/2011 07:00 PM120 ppbv 5002600

Benzyl chloride 5/18/2011 03:50 PM5.0 ppbv 20ND

Bromodichloromethane 5/18/2011 03:50 PM5.0 ppbv 20ND

Bromoform 5/18/2011 03:50 PM5.0 ppbv 20ND

Bromomethane 5/18/2011 03:50 PM5.0 ppbv 20ND

Carbon disulfide 5/18/2011 03:50 PM5.0 ppbv 20ND

Carbon tetrachloride 5/18/2011 03:50 PM5.0 ppbv 20ND

Chlorobenzene 5/18/2011 03:50 PM5.0 ppbv 20ND

Chloroethane 5/18/2011 03:50 PM5.0 ppbv 20ND

Chloroform 5/18/2011 03:50 PM5.0 ppbv 20ND

Chloromethane 5/18/2011 03:50 PM5.0 ppbv 20ND

cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 5/18/2011 03:50 PM5.0 ppbv 20ND

cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 5/18/2011 03:50 PM5.0 ppbv 20ND

Dibromochloromethane 5/18/2011 03:50 PM5.0 ppbv 20ND

Dichlorodifluoromethane 5/18/2011 03:50 PM5.0 ppbv 20ND

Dichlorotetrafluoroethane 5/18/2011 03:50 PM5.0 ppbv 20ND

Qualifiers: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range

H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit

S Spike/Surrogate outside of limits due to matrix interference Results are wet unless otherwise specified

DO Surrogate Diluted Out

2 of 8

Page 143: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary

3275 Walnut Avenue, Signal Hill, CA 90755 Tel: 562. 989.4045 Fax: 562.989.4040

Project:

Client Sample ID: N005821-001A / VINF-05-17

Collection Date: 5/17/2011 1:50:00 PM

Matrix: AIR

Analyses Result Qual Units Date Analyzed

CLIENT: Advanced Technology Laboratory-Las Vega

Lab Order: 117873

Lab ID: 117873-001A

DF

Advanced Technology Laboratories Print Date: 27-May-11

PQL

ANALYTICAL RESULTS

VOCS IN AIR BY GCMS

EPA TO15

Analyst: DMPRunID: MS14_110518B W11A057QC Batch: PrepDate:

Ethylbenzene 5/18/2011 03:50 PM5.0 ppbv 20140

Freon-113 5/18/2011 03:50 PM5.0 ppbv 20ND

Hexachlorobutadiene 5/18/2011 03:50 PM5.0 ppbv 20ND

m,p-Xylene 5/18/2011 03:50 PM5.0 ppbv 20800

MTBE 5/18/2011 03:50 PM5.0 ppbv 20220

Methylene chloride 5/18/2011 03:50 PM5.0 ppbv 20ND

o-Xylene 5/18/2011 03:50 PM5.0 ppbv 20300

Styrene 5/18/2011 03:50 PM5.0 ppbv 20ND

Tetrachloroethene 5/18/2011 03:50 PM5.0 ppbv 20ND

Toluene 5/18/2011 07:00 PM120 ppbv 5002200

trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 5/18/2011 03:50 PM5.0 ppbv 20ND

trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 5/18/2011 03:50 PM5.0 ppbv 20ND

Trichloroethene 5/18/2011 03:50 PM5.0 ppbv 20ND

Trichlorofluoromethane 5/18/2011 03:50 PM5.0 ppbv 20ND

Vinyl acetate 5/18/2011 03:50 PM5.0 ppbv 20ND

Vinyl chloride 5/18/2011 03:50 PM5.0 ppbv 20ND

Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 5/18/2011 03:50 PM70-130 %REC 20114

Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 5/18/2011 07:00 PM70-130 %REC 500110

GASOLINE RANGE ORGANICS BY GC-MS

EPA TO3

Analyst: DMPRunID: MS14_110518B W11A057QC Batch: PrepDate:

Gasoline 5/18/2011 05:48 PM4.0 ppmv 20090

Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 5/18/2011 05:48 PM70-130 %REC 200102

Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 5/18/2011 05:48 PM70-130 %REC 200102

Qualifiers: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range

H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit

S Spike/Surrogate outside of limits due to matrix interference Results are wet unless otherwise specified

DO Surrogate Diluted Out

3 of 8

Page 144: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary

3275

Wal

nut A

venu

e, S

igna

l Hill

, CA

907

55

Te

l: 56

2. 9

89.4

045

F

ax: 5

62.9

89.4

040

27

-Ma

y-1

1D

ate

:A

dv

ance

d T

ech

no

log

y L

abo

rato

ries

Pro

ject

:

CL

IEN

T:

Ad

van

ced

Tec

hn

olo

gy

Lab

ora

tory

-Las

Vegas

Wo

rk O

rder

:1

17

87

3A

NA

LY

TIC

AL

QC

SU

MM

AR

Y R

EP

OR

T

Test

Co

de:

TO

15

_C

H2

Sam

ple

ID

:L

CS

-W11A

057

Ba

tch

ID

:W

11A

057

TestN

o:

EP

A T

O1

5A

naly

sis

Date

:5/1

8/2

01

1

Pre

p D

ate

:

An

aly

teR

esult

SP

K v

alu

eS

PK

Ref

Val

%R

EC

RP

D R

ef

Val

%R

PD

Lo

wLim

itH

ighLim

itR

PD

Lim

itQ

ual

Units:

pp

bv

PQ

L

Clie

nt

ID:

ZZ

ZZ

ZZ

Ru

nN

o:

133

092

Se

qN

o:

217

10

78

LC

SS

am

pT

ype:

TestC

od

e:

TO

15_

CH

2

1,1

-Dic

hlo

roe

than

e2.0

00

104

70

130

0.2

50

2.0

80

Be

nzen

e2.0

00

100

70

130

0.2

50

2.0

00

Ch

loro

form

2.0

00

102

70

130

0.2

50

2.0

30

m,p

-Xyle

ne

4.0

00

108

70

130

0.2

50

4.3

40

o-X

yle

ne

2.0

00

112

70

130

0.2

50

2.2

30

Te

tra

chlo

roeth

en

e2.0

00

107

70

130

0.2

50

2.1

40

Tolu

ene

2.0

00

103

70

130

0.2

50

2.0

50

Tri

chlo

roeth

en

e2.0

00

97

.57

01

30

0.2

50

1.9

50

Vin

yl chlo

ride

2.0

00

105

70

130

0.2

50

2.1

00

S

urr

: 4-B

rom

ofluoro

benzene

2.5

00

109

70

130

2.7

20

Sam

ple

ID

:L

CS

D-W

11A

057

Ba

tch

ID

:W

11A

057

TestN

o:

EP

A T

O1

5A

naly

sis

Date

:5/1

8/2

01

1

Pre

p D

ate

:

An

aly

teR

esult

SP

K v

alu

eS

PK

Ref

Val

%R

EC

RP

D R

ef

Val

%R

PD

Lo

wLim

itH

ighLim

itR

PD

Lim

itQ

ual

Units:

pp

bv

PQ

L

Clie

nt

ID:

ZZ

ZZ

ZZ

Ru

nN

o:

133

092

Se

qN

o:

217

10

79

LC

SD

Sam

pT

ype:

TestC

od

e:

TO

15_

CH

2

1,1

-Dic

hlo

roe

than

e2.0

00

104

70

130

20

0.2

50

2.0

80

0.4

80

2.0

90

Be

nzen

e2.0

00

99

.07

01

30

20

0.2

50

2.0

00

1.0

11.9

80

Ch

loro

form

2.0

00

101

70

130

20

0.2

50

2.0

30

0.4

94

2.0

20

m,p

-Xyle

ne

4.0

00

106

70

130

20

0.2

50

4.3

40

2.1

04.2

50

o-X

yle

ne

2.0

00

111

70

130

20

0.2

50

2.2

30

0.4

49

2.2

20

Te

tra

chlo

roeth

en

e2.0

00

107

70

130

20

0.2

50

2.1

40

02.1

40

Tolu

ene

2.0

00

101

70

130

20

0.2

50

2.0

50

1.9

72.0

10

Tri

chlo

roeth

en

e2.0

00

95

.57

01

30

20

0.2

50

1.9

50

2.0

71.9

10

Vin

yl chlo

ride

2.0

00

106

70

130

20

0.2

50

2.1

00

1.4

22.1

30

S

urr

: 4-B

rom

ofluoro

benzene

2.5

00

107

70

130

00

2.6

80

Qu

ali

fiers:

BA

nal

yte

det

ecte

d i

n t

he

asso

ciat

ed M

eth

od

Bla

nk

EV

alu

e ab

ove

qu

anti

tati

on

ran

ge

HH

old

ing

tim

es f

or

pre

par

atio

n o

r an

alysi

s ex

ceed

ed

ND

Not

Det

ecte

d a

t th

e R

eport

ing L

imit

RR

PD

ou

tsid

e ac

cep

ted

rec

over

y l

imit

sS

Sp

ike/

Su

rrogat

e ou

tsid

e of

lim

its

du

e to

mat

rix

in

terf

eren

ce

DO

Su

rro

gat

e D

ilu

ted

Ou

tC

alcu

lati

on

s ar

e b

ased

on

raw

val

ues

4 o

f 8

Page 145: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary

3275

Wal

nut A

venu

e, S

igna

l Hill

, CA

907

55

Te

l: 56

2. 9

89.4

045

F

ax: 5

62.9

89.4

040

Pro

ject

:

CL

IEN

T:

Ad

van

ced

Tec

hn

olo

gy

Lab

ora

tory

-Las

Vegas

Wo

rk O

rder

:1

17

87

3A

NA

LY

TIC

AL

QC

SU

MM

AR

Y R

EP

OR

T

Test

Co

de:

TO

15

_C

H2

Sam

ple

ID

:M

B-W

11A

057

Ba

tch

ID

:W

11A

057

TestN

o:

EP

A T

O1

5A

naly

sis

Date

:5/1

8/2

01

1

Pre

p D

ate

:

An

aly

teR

esult

SP

K v

alu

eS

PK

Ref

Val

%R

EC

RP

D R

ef

Val

%R

PD

Lo

wLim

itH

ighLim

itR

PD

Lim

itQ

ual

Units:

pp

bv

PQ

L

Clie

nt

ID:

ZZ

ZZ

ZZ

Ru

nN

o:

133

092

Se

qN

o:

217

10

80

MB

LK

Sam

pT

ype:

TestC

od

e:

TO

15_

CH

2

1,1

,1-T

richlo

roeth

an

e0.2

5N

D

1,1

,2,2

-Tetr

ach

loro

eth

an

e0.2

5N

D

1,1

,2-T

richlo

roeth

an

e0.2

5N

D

1,1

-Dic

hlo

roe

than

e0.2

5N

D

1,1

-Dic

hlo

roe

then

e0.2

5N

D

1,2

,4-T

richlo

rob

en

zen

e0.2

5N

D

1,2

,4-T

rim

eth

ylb

en

zen

e0.2

5N

D

1,2

-Dib

rom

oeth

an

e0.2

5N

D

1,2

-Dic

hlo

robe

nzen

e0.2

5N

D

1,2

-Dic

hlo

roe

than

e0.2

5N

D

1,2

-Dic

hlo

ropro

pan

e0.2

5N

D

1,3

,5-T

rim

eth

ylb

en

zen

e0.2

5N

D

1,3

-Dic

hlo

robe

nzen

e0.2

5N

D

1,4

-Dic

hlo

robe

nzen

e0.2

5N

D

2-B

uta

non

e0.2

5N

D

2-H

exan

on

e0.2

5N

D

4-E

thyl T

olu

ene

0.2

5N

D

4-M

eth

yl-

2-p

enta

non

e0.2

5N

D

Aceto

ne

0.2

5N

D

Be

nzen

e0.2

5N

D

Benzyl chlo

ride

0.2

5N

D

Bro

mod

ich

loro

meth

an

e0.2

5N

D

Bro

mofo

rm0.2

5N

D

Bro

mom

eth

ane

0.2

5N

D

Carb

on d

isulfid

e0.2

5N

D

Carb

on t

etr

achlo

ride

0.2

5N

D

Ch

loro

be

nzen

e0.2

5N

D

Ch

loro

eth

ane

0.2

5N

D

Ch

loro

form

0.2

5N

D

Ch

loro

me

tha

ne

0.2

5N

D

Qu

ali

fiers:

BA

nal

yte

det

ecte

d i

n t

he

asso

ciat

ed M

eth

od

Bla

nk

EV

alu

e ab

ove

qu

anti

tati

on

ran

ge

HH

old

ing

tim

es f

or

pre

par

atio

n o

r an

alysi

s ex

ceed

ed

ND

Not

Det

ecte

d a

t th

e R

eport

ing L

imit

RR

PD

ou

tsid

e ac

cep

ted

rec

over

y l

imit

sS

Sp

ike/

Su

rrogat

e ou

tsid

e of

lim

its

du

e to

mat

rix

in

terf

eren

ce

DO

Su

rro

gat

e D

ilu

ted

Ou

tC

alcu

lati

on

s ar

e b

ased

on

raw

val

ues

5 o

f 8

Page 146: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary

3275

Wal

nut A

venu

e, S

igna

l Hill

, CA

907

55

Te

l: 56

2. 9

89.4

045

F

ax: 5

62.9

89.4

040

Pro

ject

:

CL

IEN

T:

Ad

van

ced

Tec

hn

olo

gy

Lab

ora

tory

-Las

Vegas

Wo

rk O

rder

:1

17

87

3A

NA

LY

TIC

AL

QC

SU

MM

AR

Y R

EP

OR

T

Test

Co

de:

TO

15

_C

H2

Sam

ple

ID

:M

B-W

11A

057

Ba

tch

ID

:W

11A

057

TestN

o:

EP

A T

O1

5A

naly

sis

Date

:5/1

8/2

01

1

Pre

p D

ate

:

An

aly

teR

esult

SP

K v

alu

eS

PK

Ref

Val

%R

EC

RP

D R

ef

Val

%R

PD

Lo

wLim

itH

ighLim

itR

PD

Lim

itQ

ual

Units:

pp

bv

PQ

L

Clie

nt

ID:

ZZ

ZZ

ZZ

Ru

nN

o:

133

092

Se

qN

o:

217

10

80

MB

LK

Sam

pT

ype:

TestC

od

e:

TO

15_

CH

2

cis

-1,2

-Dic

hlo

roeth

en

e0.2

5N

D

cis

-1,3

-Dic

hlo

ropro

pen

e0.2

5N

D

Dib

rom

och

loro

meth

an

e0.2

5N

D

Dic

hlo

rod

iflu

oro

me

than

e0.2

5N

D

Dic

hlo

rote

trafluo

roeth

an

e0.2

5N

D

Eth

ylb

en

zen

e0.2

5N

D

Fre

on-1

13

0.2

5N

D

He

xa

ch

loro

buta

die

ne

0.2

5N

D

m,p

-Xyle

ne

0.2

5N

D

MT

BE

0.2

5N

D

Meth

yle

ne c

hlo

ride

0.2

5N

D

o-X

yle

ne

0.2

5N

D

Sty

ren

e0.2

5N

D

Te

tra

chlo

roeth

en

e0.2

5N

D

Tolu

ene

0.2

5N

D

trans-1

,2-D

ich

loro

eth

en

e0.2

5N

D

trans-1

,3-D

ichlo

ropro

pen

e0.2

5N

D

Tri

chlo

roeth

en

e0.2

5N

D

Tri

ch

loro

fluo

rom

eth

an

e0.2

5N

D

Vin

yl aceta

te0.2

5N

D

Vin

yl chlo

ride

0.2

5N

D

S

urr

: 4-B

rom

ofluoro

benzene

2.5

00

109

70

130

2.7

30

Qu

ali

fiers:

BA

nal

yte

det

ecte

d i

n t

he

asso

ciat

ed M

eth

od

Bla

nk

EV

alu

e ab

ove

qu

anti

tati

on

ran

ge

HH

old

ing

tim

es f

or

pre

par

atio

n o

r an

alysi

s ex

ceed

ed

ND

Not

Det

ecte

d a

t th

e R

eport

ing L

imit

RR

PD

ou

tsid

e ac

cep

ted

rec

over

y l

imit

sS

Sp

ike/

Su

rrogat

e ou

tsid

e of

lim

its

du

e to

mat

rix

in

terf

eren

ce

DO

Su

rro

gat

e D

ilu

ted

Ou

tC

alcu

lati

on

s ar

e b

ased

on

raw

val

ues

6 o

f 8

Page 147: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary

3275

Wal

nut A

venu

e, S

igna

l Hill

, CA

907

55

Te

l: 56

2. 9

89.4

045

F

ax: 5

62.9

89.4

040

Pro

ject

:

CL

IEN

T:

Ad

van

ced

Tec

hn

olo

gy

Lab

ora

tory

-Las

Vegas

Wo

rk O

rder

:1

17

87

3A

NA

LY

TIC

AL

QC

SU

MM

AR

Y R

EP

OR

T

Test

Co

de:

TO

3_

GA

S_

CH

2

Sam

ple

ID

:M

B-W

11A

057

Ba

tch

ID

:W

11A

057

TestN

o:

EP

A T

O3

Analy

sis

Date

:5/1

8/2

01

1

Pre

p D

ate

:

An

aly

teR

esult

SP

K v

alu

eS

PK

Ref

Val

%R

EC

RP

D R

ef

Val

%R

PD

Lo

wLim

itH

ighLim

itR

PD

Lim

itQ

ual

Units:

pp

mv

PQ

L

Clie

nt

ID:

ZZ

ZZ

ZZ

Ru

nN

o:

133

092

Se

qN

o:

217

10

84

MB

LK

Sam

pT

ype:

TestC

od

e:

TO

3_G

AS

_C

S

urr

: 4-B

rom

ofluoro

benzene

2.5

00

94

.87

01

30

2.3

70

Sam

ple

ID

:L

CS

-W11A

057

Ba

tch

ID

:W

11A

057

TestN

o:

EP

A T

O3

Analy

sis

Date

:5/1

8/2

01

1

Pre

p D

ate

:

An

aly

teR

esult

SP

K v

alu

eS

PK

Ref

Val

%R

EC

RP

D R

ef

Val

%R

PD

Lo

wLim

itH

ighLim

itR

PD

Lim

itQ

ual

Units:

pp

mv

PQ

L

Clie

nt

ID:

ZZ

ZZ

ZZ

Ru

nN

o:

133

092

Se

qN

o:

217

10

85

LC

SS

am

pT

ype:

TestC

od

e:

TO

3_G

AS

_C

S

urr

: 4-B

rom

ofluoro

benzene

2.5

00

98

.87

01

30

2.4

70

Sam

ple

ID

:L

CS

D-W

11A

057

Ba

tch

ID

:W

11A

057

TestN

o:

EP

A T

O3

Analy

sis

Date

:5/1

8/2

01

1

Pre

p D

ate

:

An

aly

teR

esult

SP

K v

alu

eS

PK

Ref

Val

%R

EC

RP

D R

ef

Val

%R

PD

Lo

wLim

itH

ighLim

itR

PD

Lim

itQ

ual

Units:

pp

mv

PQ

L

Clie

nt

ID:

ZZ

ZZ

ZZ

Ru

nN

o:

133

092

Se

qN

o:

217

10

87

LC

SD

Sam

pT

ype:

TestC

od

e:

TO

3_G

AS

_C

S

urr

: 4-B

rom

ofluoro

benzene

2.5

00

101

70

130

00

2.5

20

Sam

ple

ID

:M

B-W

11A

057

Ba

tch

ID

:W

11A

057

TestN

o:

EP

A T

O3

Analy

sis

Date

:5/1

8/2

01

1

Pre

p D

ate

:

An

aly

teR

esult

SP

K v

alu

eS

PK

Ref

Val

%R

EC

RP

D R

ef

Val

%R

PD

Lo

wLim

itH

ighLim

itR

PD

Lim

itQ

ual

Units:

pp

mv

PQ

L

Clie

nt

ID:

ZZ

ZZ

ZZ

Ru

nN

o:

133

092

Se

qN

o:

217

61

77

MB

LK

Sam

pT

ype:

TestC

od

e:

TO

3_G

AS

_C

Ga

so

line

0.0

20

ND

S

urr

: 4-B

rom

ofluoro

benzene

0.0

025

00

94

.87

01

30

0.0

02

Sam

ple

ID

:L

CS

-W11A

057

Ba

tch

ID

:W

11A

057

TestN

o:

EP

A T

O3

Analy

sis

Date

:5/1

8/2

01

1

Pre

p D

ate

:

An

aly

teR

esult

SP

K v

alu

eS

PK

Ref

Val

%R

EC

RP

D R

ef

Val

%R

PD

Lo

wLim

itH

ighLim

itR

PD

Lim

itQ

ual

Units:

pp

mv

PQ

L

Clie

nt

ID:

ZZ

ZZ

ZZ

Ru

nN

o:

133

092

Se

qN

o:

217

61

78

LC

SS

am

pT

ype:

TestC

od

e:

TO

3_G

AS

_C

Ga

so

line

0.2

00

01

22

70

130

0.0

20

00.2

45

S

urr

: 4-B

rom

ofluoro

benzene

0.0

025

00

98

.87

01

30

0.0

02

Qu

ali

fiers:

BA

nal

yte

det

ecte

d i

n t

he

asso

ciat

ed M

eth

od

Bla

nk

EV

alu

e ab

ove

qu

anti

tati

on

ran

ge

HH

old

ing

tim

es f

or

pre

par

atio

n o

r an

alysi

s ex

ceed

ed

ND

Not

Det

ecte

d a

t th

e R

eport

ing L

imit

RR

PD

ou

tsid

e ac

cep

ted

rec

over

y l

imit

sS

Sp

ike/

Su

rrogat

e ou

tsid

e of

lim

its

du

e to

mat

rix

in

terf

eren

ce

DO

Su

rro

gat

e D

ilu

ted

Ou

tC

alcu

lati

on

s ar

e b

ased

on

raw

val

ues

7 o

f 8

Page 148: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary

3275

Wal

nut A

venu

e, S

igna

l Hill

, CA

907

55

Te

l: 56

2. 9

89.4

045

F

ax: 5

62.9

89.4

040

Pro

ject

:

CL

IEN

T:

Ad

van

ced

Tec

hn

olo

gy

Lab

ora

tory

-Las

Vegas

Wo

rk O

rder

:1

17

87

3A

NA

LY

TIC

AL

QC

SU

MM

AR

Y R

EP

OR

T

Test

Co

de:

TO

3_

GA

S_

CH

2

Sam

ple

ID

:L

CS

D-W

11A

057

Ba

tch

ID

:W

11A

057

TestN

o:

EP

A T

O3

Analy

sis

Date

:5/1

8/2

01

1

Pre

p D

ate

:

An

aly

teR

esult

SP

K v

alu

eS

PK

Ref

Val

%R

EC

RP

D R

ef

Val

%R

PD

Lo

wLim

itH

ighLim

itR

PD

Lim

itQ

ual

Units:

pp

mv

PQ

L

Clie

nt

ID:

ZZ

ZZ

ZZ

Ru

nN

o:

133

092

Se

qN

o:

217

61

80

LC

SD

Sam

pT

ype:

TestC

od

e:

TO

3_G

AS

_C

Ga

so

line

0.2

00

01

16

70

130

20

0.0

20

00.2

44

85.3

90.2

32

S

urr

: 4-B

rom

ofluoro

benzene

0.0

025

00

101

70

130

00

0.0

03

Qu

ali

fiers:

BA

nal

yte

det

ecte

d i

n t

he

asso

ciat

ed M

eth

od

Bla

nk

EV

alu

e ab

ove

qu

anti

tati

on

ran

ge

HH

old

ing

tim

es f

or

pre

par

atio

n o

r an

alysi

s ex

ceed

ed

ND

Not

Det

ecte

d a

t th

e R

eport

ing L

imit

RR

PD

ou

tsid

e ac

cep

ted

rec

over

y l

imit

sS

Sp

ike/

Su

rrogat

e ou

tsid

e of

lim

its

du

e to

mat

rix

in

terf

eren

ce

DO

Su

rro

gat

e D

ilu

ted

Ou

tC

alcu

lati

on

s ar

e b

ased

on

raw

val

ues

8 o

f 8

Page 149: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary
Page 150: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary
Page 151: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary

���� ������� ����������������� ���� ������������ �� � ������������

�����������

� ��� ���

����������������

���������������������������

��� �� �!�"�#$��������

%�#��#&�#�"�'� "()*���+� ,(�-�.��!)��)

/��� ,��0-��*!*�1�

�((�2#��&���3������������

4�����&�����)�.��

��!��� �"�'��.1.

"5���#�'�"�'�"5!)���1�

/6����7���8�#��6���99�#�����7������#3�:���6�����&���8�7��#�:�;9��7'

������8����8#������:����;�����,1�-�01!�.()��8���:�������8�8�#�6�#���������:�����7��#�:�;9��7'

���:�#��7

�����/���#����#'

����#���#7���#�:��#

��:����&��#���6��#�������8�#���;9��,�-�#�:��3�&����������1������7��&3��:�&�/�:6����<7 ����#���#������:'�'�/6����;9��,�-��#�������&�8�#��6��9�#�;���#�������&�:���&�����6����:����&�:6�����8 :����&7�����::�#&��:��$��6��6���99��:���������#���#7�:�#��8�:������'

/6��:�3�#������#�����������<#���9�#���8��6�������7��:���#�9�#�'�/6�������#���#7���9�#��:���������#�9#�&�:�&����9�#���# �����������#��7�$��6����$#������9�#;�������8#�;��6��:��������&��&3��:�&�/�:6����<7�����#���#����!�����5�<��'

1 of 2

Page 152: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary

���� ������� ����������������� ���� ������������ �� � ������������

�!�"#$��������������� ��������������������������

�������� �� �!�"�#$��������

����� � � ��� ���

���� ����� "()*���!����""� �#�

��� ��������5�"2=2�"������4���"/��

��;9����$�#��#�:��3�&�����:��$��6�9#�9�#�:6�����8�:����&7�&�:�;��������'

�����#���;9�#���#����&���;9���9#���#3������$�#��3�#�8��&��9���#�:��9���8���;9�����8��99��:����'

��8�#;�����������;9���#�:��9��:��&���������:��&��<�&��:#�9��:����:������8���&��������:6�&���;9�� ��:��9���6�:��������#;'

���:���#�:��&�����7����

� ��/4�(���&�� ��/40��$�#�����:���#�:��&�����&3��:�&�/�:6����<7�����#���#���!��<���� �������'

��/����)�.��$������:���#�:��&������#�/�:6����<7�����#���#���!���7��8���&���#7����'

�<�����8��

2 of 2

Page 153: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary
Page 154: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary
Page 155: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary

3275 Walnut Avenue, Signal Hill, CA 90755 Tel: 562. 989.4045 Fax: 562.989.4040

24-Jun-11Date:Advanced Technology Laboratories

Project:

CLIENT: Advanced Technology Laboratory-Las Vega

Lab Order: 118503CASE NARRATIVE

Analytical Comments for EPA TO15

Sample 118503-001A, surrogate recovery biased high possibly due to matrix interferences.

Page 1 of 7

2 of 8

Page 156: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary

3275 Walnut Avenue, Signal Hill, CA 90755 Tel: 562. 989.4045 Fax: 562.989.4040

Project:

Client Sample ID: N005984-001A / VINF-06-17

Collection Date: 6/17/2011 8:40:00 AM

Matrix: AIR

Analyses Result Qual Units Date Analyzed

CLIENT: Advanced Technology Laboratory-Las Vega

Lab Order: 118503

Lab ID: 118503-001A

DF

Advanced Technology Laboratories Print Date: 24-Jun-11

PQL

ANALYTICAL RESULTS

VOCS IN AIR BY GCMS

EPA TO15

Analyst: DMPRunID: MS14_110617A W11A071QC Batch: PrepDate:

1,1,1-Trichloroethane 6/17/2011 08:57 PM0.25 ppbv 1ND

1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 6/17/2011 08:57 PM0.25 ppbv 1ND

1,1,2-Trichloroethane 6/17/2011 08:57 PM0.25 ppbv 1ND

1,1-Dichloroethane 6/17/2011 08:57 PM0.25 ppbv 1ND

1,1-Dichloroethene 6/17/2011 08:57 PM0.25 ppbv 1ND

1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 6/17/2011 08:57 PM0.25 ppbv 1ND

1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 6/17/2011 08:21 PM2.5 ppbv 1020

1,2-Dibromoethane 6/17/2011 08:57 PM0.25 ppbv 1ND

1,2-Dichlorobenzene 6/17/2011 08:57 PM0.25 ppbv 1ND

1,2-Dichloroethane 6/17/2011 08:57 PM0.25 ppbv 1ND

1,2-Dichloropropane 6/17/2011 08:57 PM0.25 ppbv 1ND

1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 6/17/2011 08:57 PM0.25 ppbv 110

1,3-Dichlorobenzene 6/17/2011 08:57 PM0.25 ppbv 1ND

1,4-Dichlorobenzene 6/17/2011 08:57 PM0.25 ppbv 1ND

2-Butanone 6/17/2011 08:57 PM0.25 ppbv 110

2-Hexanone 6/17/2011 08:57 PM0.25 ppbv 1ND

4-Ethyl Toluene 6/17/2011 08:57 PM0.25 ppbv 15.1

4-Methyl-2-pentanone 6/17/2011 08:57 PM0.25 ppbv 1ND

Acetone 6/17/2011 08:21 PM2.5 ppbv 1083

Benzene 6/17/2011 08:21 PM2.5 ppbv 1059

Benzyl chloride 6/17/2011 08:57 PM0.25 ppbv 1ND

Bromodichloromethane 6/17/2011 08:57 PM0.25 ppbv 1ND

Bromoform 6/17/2011 08:57 PM0.25 ppbv 1ND

Bromomethane 6/17/2011 08:57 PM0.25 ppbv 1ND

Carbon disulfide 6/17/2011 08:57 PM0.25 ppbv 10.63

Carbon tetrachloride 6/17/2011 08:57 PM0.25 ppbv 1ND

Chlorobenzene 6/17/2011 08:57 PM0.25 ppbv 1ND

Chloroethane 6/17/2011 08:57 PM0.25 ppbv 10.50

Chloroform 6/17/2011 08:57 PM0.25 ppbv 1ND

Chloromethane 6/17/2011 08:57 PM0.25 ppbv 11.1

cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 6/17/2011 08:57 PM0.25 ppbv 1ND

cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 6/17/2011 08:57 PM0.25 ppbv 1ND

Dibromochloromethane 6/17/2011 08:57 PM0.25 ppbv 1ND

Dichlorodifluoromethane 6/17/2011 08:57 PM0.25 ppbv 10.62

Dichlorotetrafluoroethane 6/17/2011 08:57 PM0.25 ppbv 1ND

Qualifiers: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range

H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit

S Spike/Surrogate outside of limits due to matrix interference Results are wet unless otherwise specified

DO Surrogate Diluted Out

3 of 8

Page 157: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary

3275 Walnut Avenue, Signal Hill, CA 90755 Tel: 562. 989.4045 Fax: 562.989.4040

Project:

Client Sample ID: N005984-001A / VINF-06-17

Collection Date: 6/17/2011 8:40:00 AM

Matrix: AIR

Analyses Result Qual Units Date Analyzed

CLIENT: Advanced Technology Laboratory-Las Vega

Lab Order: 118503

Lab ID: 118503-001A

DF

Advanced Technology Laboratories Print Date: 24-Jun-11

PQL

ANALYTICAL RESULTS

VOCS IN AIR BY GCMS

EPA TO15

Analyst: DMPRunID: MS14_110617A W11A071QC Batch: PrepDate:

Ethylbenzene 6/17/2011 08:57 PM0.25 ppbv 18.1

Freon-113 6/17/2011 08:57 PM0.25 ppbv 1ND

Hexachlorobutadiene 6/17/2011 08:57 PM0.25 ppbv 1ND

m,p-Xylene 6/17/2011 08:21 PM2.5 ppbv 1037

MTBE 6/17/2011 08:57 PM0.25 ppbv 1ND

Methylene chloride 6/17/2011 08:57 PM0.25 ppbv 12.4

o-Xylene 6/17/2011 08:57 PM0.25 ppbv 119

Styrene 6/17/2011 08:57 PM0.25 ppbv 10.80

Tetrachloroethene 6/17/2011 08:57 PM0.25 ppbv 1ND

Toluene 6/17/2011 08:21 PM2.5 ppbv 1031

trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 6/17/2011 08:57 PM0.25 ppbv 1ND

trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 6/17/2011 08:57 PM0.25 ppbv 1ND

Trichloroethene 6/17/2011 08:57 PM0.25 ppbv 1ND

Trichlorofluoromethane 6/17/2011 08:57 PM0.25 ppbv 10.30

Vinyl acetate 6/17/2011 08:57 PM0.25 ppbv 1ND

Vinyl chloride 6/17/2011 08:57 PM0.25 ppbv 1ND

Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene S 6/17/2011 08:57 PM70-130 %REC 1132

Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 6/17/2011 08:21 PM70-130 %REC 10114

GASOLINE RANGE ORGANICS BY GC-MS

EPA TO3

Analyst: DMPRunID: MS14_110617B W11A071QC Batch: PrepDate:

Gasoline 6/17/2011 08:21 PM0.20 ppmv 103.0

Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 6/17/2011 08:21 PM70-130 %REC 10111

Qualifiers: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range

H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit

S Spike/Surrogate outside of limits due to matrix interference Results are wet unless otherwise specified

DO Surrogate Diluted Out

4 of 8

Page 158: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary

3275

Wal

nut A

venu

e, S

igna

l Hill

, CA

907

55

Te

l: 56

2. 9

89.4

045

F

ax: 5

62.9

89.4

040

24

-Jun

-11

Da

te:

Ad

van

ced

Tec

hn

olo

gy

Lab

ora

tori

es

Pro

ject

:

CL

IEN

T:

Ad

van

ced

Tec

hn

olo

gy

Lab

ora

tory

-Las

Vegas

Wo

rk O

rder

:1

18

50

3A

NA

LY

TIC

AL

QC

SU

MM

AR

Y R

EP

OR

T

Test

Co

de:

TO

15

_C

H2

Sam

ple

ID

:L

CS

-W11A

071

Ba

tch

ID

:W

11A

071

TestN

o:

EP

A T

O1

5A

naly

sis

Date

:6/1

7/2

01

1

Pre

p D

ate

:

An

aly

teR

esult

SP

K v

alu

eS

PK

Ref

Val

%R

EC

RP

D R

ef

Val

%R

PD

Lo

wLim

itH

ighLim

itR

PD

Lim

itQ

ual

Units:

pp

bv

PQ

L

Clie

nt

ID:

ZZ

ZZ

ZZ

Ru

nN

o:

134

374

Se

qN

o:

219

64

74

LC

SS

am

pT

ype:

TestC

od

e:

TO

15_

CH

2

1,1

-Dic

hlo

roe

than

e2.0

00

110

70

130

0.2

50

2.2

00

Be

nzen

e2.0

00

92

.57

01

30

0.2

50

1.8

50

Ch

loro

form

2.0

00

119

70

130

0.2

50

2.3

80

m,p

-Xyle

ne

4.0

00

106

70

130

0.2

50

4.2

30

o-X

yle

ne

2.0

00

108

70

130

0.2

50

2.1

70

Te

tra

chlo

roeth

en

e2.0

00

99

.57

01

30

0.2

50

1.9

90

Tolu

ene

2.0

00

92

.07

01

30

0.2

50

1.8

40

Tri

chlo

roeth

en

e2.0

00

96

.57

01

30

0.2

50

1.9

30

Vin

yl chlo

ride

2.0

00

106

70

130

0.2

50

2.1

20

S

urr

: 4-B

rom

ofluoro

benzene

2.5

00

108

70

130

2.6

90

Sam

ple

ID

:L

CS

D-W

11A

071

Ba

tch

ID

:W

11A

071

TestN

o:

EP

A T

O1

5A

naly

sis

Date

:6/1

7/2

01

1

Pre

p D

ate

:

An

aly

teR

esult

SP

K v

alu

eS

PK

Ref

Val

%R

EC

RP

D R

ef

Val

%R

PD

Lo

wLim

itH

ighLim

itR

PD

Lim

itQ

ual

Units:

pp

bv

PQ

L

Clie

nt

ID:

ZZ

ZZ

ZZ

Ru

nN

o:

134

374

Se

qN

o:

219

64

75

LC

SD

Sam

pT

ype:

TestC

od

e:

TO

15_

CH

2

1,1

-Dic

hlo

roe

than

e2.0

00

110

70

130

20

0.2

50

2.2

00

0.4

54

2.2

10

Be

nzen

e2.0

00

92

.07

01

30

20

0.2

50

1.8

50

0.5

42

1.8

40

Ch

loro

form

2.0

00

118

70

130

20

0.2

50

2.3

80

0.8

44

2.3

60

m,p

-Xyle

ne

4.0

00

108

70

130

20

0.2

50

4.2

30

1.6

44.3

00

o-X

yle

ne

2.0

00

112

70

130

20

0.2

50

2.1

70

2.7

32.2

30

Te

tra

chlo

roeth

en

e2.0

00

98

.57

01

30

20

0.2

50

1.9

90

1.0

11.9

70

Tolu

ene

2.0

00

93

.57

01

30

20

0.2

50

1.8

40

1.6

21.8

70

Tri

chlo

roeth

en

e2.0

00

97

.57

01

30

20

0.2

50

1.9

30

1.0

31.9

50

Vin

yl chlo

ride

2.0

00

120

70

130

20

0.2

50

2.1

20

12

.02.3

90

S

urr

: 4-B

rom

ofluoro

benzene

2.5

00

109

70

130

00

2.7

20

Qu

ali

fiers:

BA

nal

yte

det

ecte

d i

n t

he

asso

ciat

ed M

eth

od

Bla

nk

EV

alu

e ab

ove

qu

anti

tati

on

ran

ge

HH

old

ing

tim

es f

or

pre

par

atio

n o

r an

alysi

s ex

ceed

ed

ND

Not

Det

ecte

d a

t th

e R

eport

ing L

imit

RR

PD

ou

tsid

e ac

cep

ted

rec

over

y l

imit

sS

Sp

ike/

Su

rrogat

e ou

tsid

e of

lim

its

du

e to

mat

rix

in

terf

eren

ce

DO

Su

rro

gat

e D

ilu

ted

Ou

tC

alcu

lati

on

s ar

e b

ased

on

raw

val

ues

5 o

f 8

Page 159: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary

3275

Wal

nut A

venu

e, S

igna

l Hill

, CA

907

55

Te

l: 56

2. 9

89.4

045

F

ax: 5

62.9

89.4

040

Pro

ject

:

CL

IEN

T:

Ad

van

ced

Tec

hn

olo

gy

Lab

ora

tory

-Las

Vegas

Wo

rk O

rder

:1

18

50

3A

NA

LY

TIC

AL

QC

SU

MM

AR

Y R

EP

OR

T

Test

Co

de:

TO

15

_C

H2

Sam

ple

ID

:M

B-W

11A

071

Ba

tch

ID

:W

11A

071

TestN

o:

EP

A T

O1

5A

naly

sis

Date

:6/1

7/2

01

1

Pre

p D

ate

:

An

aly

teR

esult

SP

K v

alu

eS

PK

Ref

Val

%R

EC

RP

D R

ef

Val

%R

PD

Lo

wLim

itH

ighLim

itR

PD

Lim

itQ

ual

Units:

pp

bv

PQ

L

Clie

nt

ID:

ZZ

ZZ

ZZ

Ru

nN

o:

134

374

Se

qN

o:

219

64

76

MB

LK

Sam

pT

ype:

TestC

od

e:

TO

15_

CH

2

1,1

,1-T

richlo

roeth

an

e0.2

5N

D

1,1

,2,2

-Tetr

ach

loro

eth

an

e0.2

5N

D

1,1

,2-T

richlo

roeth

an

e0.2

5N

D

1,1

-Dic

hlo

roe

than

e0.2

5N

D

1,1

-Dic

hlo

roe

then

e0.2

5N

D

1,2

,4-T

richlo

rob

en

zen

e0.2

5N

D

1,2

,4-T

rim

eth

ylb

en

zen

e0.2

5N

D

1,2

-Dib

rom

oeth

an

e0.2

5N

D

1,2

-Dic

hlo

robe

nzen

e0.2

5N

D

1,2

-Dic

hlo

roe

than

e0.2

5N

D

1,2

-Dic

hlo

ropro

pan

e0.2

5N

D

1,3

,5-T

rim

eth

ylb

en

zen

e0.2

5N

D

1,3

-Dic

hlo

robe

nzen

e0.2

5N

D

1,4

-Dic

hlo

robe

nzen

e0.2

5N

D

2-B

uta

non

e0.2

5N

D

2-H

exan

on

e0.2

5N

D

4-E

thyl T

olu

ene

0.2

5N

D

4-M

eth

yl-

2-p

enta

non

e0.2

5N

D

Aceto

ne

0.2

5N

D

Be

nzen

e0.2

5N

D

Benzyl chlo

ride

0.2

5N

D

Bro

mod

ich

loro

meth

an

e0.2

5N

D

Bro

mofo

rm0.2

5N

D

Bro

mom

eth

ane

0.2

5N

D

Carb

on d

isulfid

e0.2

5N

D

Carb

on t

etr

achlo

ride

0.2

5N

D

Ch

loro

be

nzen

e0.2

5N

D

Ch

loro

eth

ane

0.2

5N

D

Ch

loro

form

0.2

5N

D

Ch

loro

me

tha

ne

0.2

5N

D

Qu

ali

fiers:

BA

nal

yte

det

ecte

d i

n t

he

asso

ciat

ed M

eth

od

Bla

nk

EV

alu

e ab

ove

qu

anti

tati

on

ran

ge

HH

old

ing

tim

es f

or

pre

par

atio

n o

r an

alysi

s ex

ceed

ed

ND

Not

Det

ecte

d a

t th

e R

eport

ing L

imit

RR

PD

ou

tsid

e ac

cep

ted

rec

over

y l

imit

sS

Sp

ike/

Su

rrogat

e ou

tsid

e of

lim

its

du

e to

mat

rix

in

terf

eren

ce

DO

Su

rro

gat

e D

ilu

ted

Ou

tC

alcu

lati

on

s ar

e b

ased

on

raw

val

ues

6 o

f 8

Page 160: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary

3275

Wal

nut A

venu

e, S

igna

l Hill

, CA

907

55

Te

l: 56

2. 9

89.4

045

F

ax: 5

62.9

89.4

040

Pro

ject

:

CL

IEN

T:

Ad

van

ced

Tec

hn

olo

gy

Lab

ora

tory

-Las

Vegas

Wo

rk O

rder

:1

18

50

3A

NA

LY

TIC

AL

QC

SU

MM

AR

Y R

EP

OR

T

Test

Co

de:

TO

15

_C

H2

Sam

ple

ID

:M

B-W

11A

071

Ba

tch

ID

:W

11A

071

TestN

o:

EP

A T

O1

5A

naly

sis

Date

:6/1

7/2

01

1

Pre

p D

ate

:

An

aly

teR

esult

SP

K v

alu

eS

PK

Ref

Val

%R

EC

RP

D R

ef

Val

%R

PD

Lo

wLim

itH

ighLim

itR

PD

Lim

itQ

ual

Units:

pp

bv

PQ

L

Clie

nt

ID:

ZZ

ZZ

ZZ

Ru

nN

o:

134

374

Se

qN

o:

219

64

76

MB

LK

Sam

pT

ype:

TestC

od

e:

TO

15_

CH

2

cis

-1,2

-Dic

hlo

roeth

en

e0.2

5N

D

cis

-1,3

-Dic

hlo

ropro

pen

e0.2

5N

D

Dib

rom

och

loro

meth

an

e0.2

5N

D

Dic

hlo

rod

iflu

oro

me

than

e0.2

5N

D

Dic

hlo

rote

trafluo

roeth

an

e0.2

5N

D

Eth

ylb

en

zen

e0.2

5N

D

Fre

on-1

13

0.2

5N

D

He

xa

ch

loro

buta

die

ne

0.2

5N

D

m,p

-Xyle

ne

0.2

5N

D

MT

BE

0.2

5N

D

Meth

yle

ne c

hlo

ride

0.2

5N

D

o-X

yle

ne

0.2

5N

D

Sty

ren

e0.2

5N

D

Te

tra

chlo

roeth

en

e0.2

5N

D

Tolu

ene

0.2

5N

D

trans-1

,2-D

ich

loro

eth

en

e0.2

5N

D

trans-1

,3-D

ichlo

ropro

pen

e0.2

5N

D

Tri

chlo

roeth

en

e0.2

5N

D

Tri

ch

loro

fluo

rom

eth

an

e0.2

5N

D

Vin

yl aceta

te0.2

5N

D

Vin

yl chlo

ride

0.2

5N

D

S

urr

: 4-B

rom

ofluoro

benzene

2.5

00

105

70

130

2.6

30

Qu

ali

fiers:

BA

nal

yte

det

ecte

d i

n t

he

asso

ciat

ed M

eth

od

Bla

nk

EV

alu

e ab

ove

qu

anti

tati

on

ran

ge

HH

old

ing

tim

es f

or

pre

par

atio

n o

r an

alysi

s ex

ceed

ed

ND

Not

Det

ecte

d a

t th

e R

eport

ing L

imit

RR

PD

ou

tsid

e ac

cep

ted

rec

over

y l

imit

sS

Sp

ike/

Su

rrogat

e ou

tsid

e of

lim

its

du

e to

mat

rix

in

terf

eren

ce

DO

Su

rro

gat

e D

ilu

ted

Ou

tC

alcu

lati

on

s ar

e b

ased

on

raw

val

ues

7 o

f 8

Page 161: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary

3275

Wal

nut A

venu

e, S

igna

l Hill

, CA

907

55

Te

l: 56

2. 9

89.4

045

F

ax: 5

62.9

89.4

040

Pro

ject

:

CL

IEN

T:

Ad

van

ced

Tec

hn

olo

gy

Lab

ora

tory

-Las

Vegas

Wo

rk O

rder

:1

18

50

3A

NA

LY

TIC

AL

QC

SU

MM

AR

Y R

EP

OR

T

Test

Co

de:

TO

3_

GA

S_

CH

2

Sam

ple

ID

:M

B-W

11A

071

Ba

tch

ID

:W

11A

071

TestN

o:

EP

A T

O3

Analy

sis

Date

:6/1

7/2

01

1

Pre

p D

ate

:

An

aly

teR

esult

SP

K v

alu

eS

PK

Ref

Val

%R

EC

RP

D R

ef

Val

%R

PD

Lo

wLim

itH

ighLim

itR

PD

Lim

itQ

ual

Units:

pp

mv

PQ

L

Clie

nt

ID:

ZZ

ZZ

ZZ

Ru

nN

o:

134

375

Se

qN

o:

219

64

80

MB

LK

Sam

pT

ype:

TestC

od

e:

TO

3_G

AS

_C

Ga

so

line

0.0

20

0.0

07

S

urr

: 4-B

rom

ofluoro

benzene

0.0

025

00

93

.27

01

30

0.0

02

Sam

ple

ID

:L

CS

-W11A

071

Ba

tch

ID

:W

11A

071

TestN

o:

EP

A T

O3

Analy

sis

Date

:6/1

7/2

01

1

Pre

p D

ate

:

An

aly

teR

esult

SP

K v

alu

eS

PK

Ref

Val

%R

EC

RP

D R

ef

Val

%R

PD

Lo

wLim

itH

ighLim

itR

PD

Lim

itQ

ual

Units:

pp

mv

PQ

L

Clie

nt

ID:

ZZ

ZZ

ZZ

Ru

nN

o:

134

375

Se

qN

o:

219

64

81

LC

SS

am

pT

ype:

TestC

od

e:

TO

3_G

AS

_C

Ga

so

line

0.2

00

01

10

70

130

0.0

20

0.0

074

40

0.2

27

S

urr

: 4-B

rom

ofluoro

benzene

0.0

025

00

112

70

130

0.0

03

Sam

ple

ID

:L

CS

D-W

11A

071

Ba

tch

ID

:W

11A

071

TestN

o:

EP

A T

O3

Analy

sis

Date

:6/1

7/2

01

1

Pre

p D

ate

:

An

aly

teR

esult

SP

K v

alu

eS

PK

Ref

Val

%R

EC

RP

D R

ef

Val

%R

PD

Lo

wLim

itH

ighLim

itR

PD

Lim

itQ

ual

Units:

pp

mv

PQ

L

Clie

nt

ID:

ZZ

ZZ

ZZ

Ru

nN

o:

134

375

Se

qN

o:

219

64

83

LC

SD

Sam

pT

ype:

TestC

od

e:

TO

3_G

AS

_C

Ga

so

line

0.2

00

01

13

70

130

20

0.0

20

0.0

074

40

0.2

26

92.7

90.2

33

S

urr

: 4-B

rom

ofluoro

benzene

0.0

025

00

106

70

130

00

0.0

03

Qu

ali

fiers:

BA

nal

yte

det

ecte

d i

n t

he

asso

ciat

ed M

eth

od

Bla

nk

EV

alu

e ab

ove

qu

anti

tati

on

ran

ge

HH

old

ing

tim

es f

or

pre

par

atio

n o

r an

alysi

s ex

ceed

ed

ND

Not

Det

ecte

d a

t th

e R

eport

ing L

imit

RR

PD

ou

tsid

e ac

cep

ted

rec

over

y l

imit

sS

Sp

ike/

Su

rrogat

e ou

tsid

e of

lim

its

du

e to

mat

rix

in

terf

eren

ce

DO

Su

rro

gat

e D

ilu

ted

Ou

tC

alcu

lati

on

s ar

e b

ased

on

raw

val

ues

8 o

f 8

Page 162: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary
Page 163: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary
Page 164: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary
Page 165: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary
Page 166: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary
Page 167: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary
Page 168: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary
Page 169: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary

���� ������� ����������������� ���� ������������ �� � ������������

������*����

� ��� ���

����������������

���������������������������

��� �� �!�"�#$��������

%�#��#&�#�"�'� "())1��+� ,(�-�.��!)��)

/��� ,��0-��*!*�1�

�((�2#��&���3������������

4�����&�����)�.��

��!��� �"�'��.1.

"5���#�'�"�'�"5!)���1�

/6����7���8�#��6���99�#�����7������#3�:���6�����&���8�7��#�:�;9��7'

������8����8#������:����;�����,1�-�01!�.()��8���:�������8�8�#�6�#���������:�����7��#�:�;9��7'

���:�#��7

�����/���#����#'

����#���#7���#�:��#

��:����&��#���6��#�������8�#���;9��,�-�#�:��3�&�����������������7��&3��:�&�/�:6����<7 ����#���#������:'�'�/6����;9��,�-��#�������&�8�#��6��9�#�;���#�������&�:���&�����6����:����&�:6�����8 :����&7�����::�#&��:��$��6��6���99��:���������#���#7�:�#��8�:������'

/6��:�3�#������#�����������<#���9�#���8��6�������7��:���#�9�#�'�/6�������#���#7���9�#��:���������#�9#�&�:�&����9�#���# �����������#��7�$��6����$#������9�#;�������8#�;��6��:��������&��&3��:�&�/�:6����<7�����#���#����!�����5�<��'

1 of 19

Page 170: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary

���� ������� ����������������� ���� ������������ �� � ������������

���"#$��������������� ��������������������������

�������� �� �!�"�#$��������

����� � � ��� ���

���� ����� "())1��!����""� �#�

��� ��������5�"2=2�"������4���"/��

��;9����$�#��#�:��3�&�����:��$��6�9#�9�#�:6�����8�:����&7�&�:�;��������'

�����#���;9�#���#����&���;9���9#���#3������$�#��3�#�8��&��9���#�:��9���8���;9�����8��99��:����'

��8�#;�����������;9���#�:��9��:��&���������:��&��<�&��:#�9��:����:������8���&��������:6�&���;9�� ��:��9���6�:��������#;'

��;9����$�#������7>�&�$��6���;��6�&�6��&��<���;�'

����7��:�����;;�����8�#�� ��*�.?�

/#�:6��#�8���#�;��6������&��:#7�����#����#�:�3�#7������&�6�<6��������#���#7�����#�����;9���,���-' ��;9���#�������$�#�����!&���:��,"�-�8�#��6���������7�����6�#�8�#��#�����7�����8��6����;9���$������ ��:����#7'

���#�@��9����,��-���&����#�@��9������9��:����,���-��#�������&��#�:�3�#7�:#���#���9������7�&����� ;��#�@�����#8�#��:�'�/6������:����&�����#���#7�����#�����;9���,���-�#�:�3�#7�$����::�9�����'

�<�����8��

2 of 19

Page 171: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary

���� ������� ����������������� ���� ������������ �� � ������������

���"#$��������������� ��������������������������

�������� �� �!�"�#$��������

����� � � ��� ���

���� ����� "())1

$��%� �����!�&'���!(&&���

����!�&'����� ������!�&'����� ��������������)����* �����"������

�����������

�����"�'�����

"())1!�� �"�!.!�� .=��=������������ .=��=���%�����%���#

"())1!�? �"�!.!�� .=��=������������ .=��=���%�����%���#

"())1!�� �"�!.!�� .=��=������������ .=��=���%�����%���#

�<�����8��

3 of 19

Page 172: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary

���� ������� ����������������� ���� ������������ �� � ������������

�������� �� �!�"�#$��������

������!�&'������ �"�!.!��

��������������� .=��=������������

)����*� %��/��%�/��

����� � � ��� ���

���� ����� "())1

������� "())1!�

������� �������������������������� ���������� ���"#$���

������� "��(�� +(�� ,��� ���������-���.�+�)��

����/ �����"�!,� !

���������� ����������

��������

������� � �

��������

��� ����������� ������������� ���� ��� ���������

���������������� �� � !" #$%� #& '!%$!%�##��%�$��(

)����*��������� %'�#�% +,� #'#-. � '!%$!%�##��%�$��(

)��������������� �$�#&% +,� #'%-& � '!%$!%�##��%�$��(

����� ��� ������ ����������

��������

������� !����� ��"�������� ���#$����������� ���� ���

����/����0�� #�� 1 !" ##%�� '-� '!%&!%�##

)����������2��3�������� $4�#&5 +,� #.%-5 � '!%&!%�##

#��������� �������� ��������

��������

������� !����� ����������� ��#$��"�������� ���� ���

#6#6#6%������������������ #-� 1 !" #7 �-�'# '!%%!%�##�##45��(

#6#6#���0������������ #-� 1 !" #7 �-�'5 '!%%!%�##�##45��(

#6#6%6%������������������ #-� 1 !" #7 �-��4 '!%%!%�##�##45��(

#6#6%���0������������ #-� 1 !" #7 �-�5& '!%%!%�##�##45��(

#6#� 0������������ �-�� 1 !" #7 �-�.. '!%%!%�##�##45��(

#6#� 0������������ #-� 1 !" #7 �-�.4 '!%%!%�##�##45��(

#6#� 0������������� #-� 1 !" #7 �-�5% '!%%!%�##�##45��(

#6%6&���0������2��3��� #-� 1 !" #7 �-#� '!%%!%�##�##45��(

#6%6&���0������������� #-� 1 !" #7 �-#% '!%%!%�##�##45��(

#6%64���0������2��3��� #-� 1 !" #7 �-#% '!%%!%�##�##45��(

#6%64���08�����2��3��� #-� 1 !" ### �-�.� '!%%!%�##�##45��(

#6%� 02��8��&�������������� %-� 1 !" #7 �-#� '!%%!%�##�##45��(

#6%� 02��8������� #-� 1 !" #7 �-#4 '!%%!%�##�##45��(

#6%� 0������2��3��� #-� 1 !" #7 �-�$� '!%%!%�##�##45��(

#6%� 0������������ �-�� 1 !" #7 �-#$ '!%%!%�##�##45��(

#6%� 0������������� #-� 1 !" #7 �-�5� '!%%!%�##�##45��(

#6&6����08�����2��3��� #-� 1 !" #4-$ �-�5$ '!%%!%�##�##45��(

#6&� 0������2��3��� #-� 1 !" #7 �-�.� '!%%!%�##�##45��(

#6&� 0������������� #-� 1 !" #7 �-�$4 '!%%!%�##�##45��(

#64� 0������2��3��� #-� 1 !" #7 �-�.% '!%%!%�##�##45��(

%6%� 0������������� #-� 1 !" #7 �-�'# '!%%!%�##�##45��(

%��������� #� 1 !" #7 #-� '!%%!%�##�##45��(

%�������������� #-� 1 !" #7 �-�5� '!%%!%�##�##45��(

+(���0����� ? ����7���&���:��&�����6������:����&����6�&�?���� � 5��������3��A������������#��<�

��&��<���;���8�#�9#�9�#�������#�����7�����@:��&�& "� "�������:��&�����6����9�#���<���;��

� �9���=��##�<���������&���8���;����&������;��#�@�����#8�#��:� ���������#��$������������6�#$�����9�:�8��&

�4 ��##�<����������&�4��

4 of 19

Page 173: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary

���� ������� ����������������� ���� ������������ �� � ������������

�������� �� �!�"�#$��������

������!�&'������ �"�!.!��

��������������� .=��=������������

)����*� %��/��%�/��

����� � � ��� ���

���� ����� "())1

������� "())1!�

������� �������������������������� ���������� ���"#$���

������� "��(�� +(�� ,��� ���������-���.�+�)��

����/ �����"�!,� !

#��������� �������� ��������

��������

������� !����� ����������� ��#$��"�������� ���� ���

4�������������� #-� 1 !" #7 �-#� '!%%!%�##�##45��(

4����������������� #-� 1 !" #7 �-�5� '!%%!%�##�##45��(

4�(������%���������� #� 1 !" #7 �-$' '!%%!%�##�##45��(

������� #� 1 !" #7 #-' '!%%!%�##�##45��(

������0� %� 1 !" #7 4-& '!%%!%�##�##45��(

�������0��0�� %� 1 !" #7 �-'# '!%%!%�##�##45��(

���3��� #� 1 !" #�5'� �-$� '!%%!%�##�##�&��(

���8�2��3��� #-� 1 !" #7 �-�5% '!%%!%�##�##45��(

���8�������8������ #-� 1 !" #7 �-#� '!%%!%�##�##45��(

���8��0������8������ #-� 1 !" #7 �-�'& '!%%!%�##�##45��(

���8�9��8 #-� 1 !" #7 �-�5' '!%%!%�##�##45��(

���8�8������ #-� 1 !" #7 �-#& '!%%!%�##�##45��(

���2����0���90�� #-� 1 !" #7 �-��4 '!%%!%�##�##45��(

���2�������������0�� #-� 1 !" #7 �-#� '!%%!%�##�##45��(

������2��3��� #-� 1 !" #7 �-�.% '!%%!%�##�##45��(

������������ #-� 1 !" #7 �-#4 '!%%!%�##�##45��(

������9��8 #-� 1 !" #7 �-��5 '!%%!%�##�##45��(

������8������ #-� 1 !" #7 �-��4 '!%%!%�##�##45��(

�0��#6%� 0������������ #-� 1 !" #7 �-## '!%%!%�##�##45��(

�0��#6&� 0������������� #-� 1 !" #7 �-#� '!%%!%�##�##45��(

0�0�������������� #-� 1 !" #'-' �-�$% '!%%!%�##�##45��(

02��8�������8������ #-� 1 !" #7 �-�'# '!%%!%�##�##45��(

02��8�8������ #-� 1 !" #7 �-#� '!%%!%�##�##45��(

0�������09�����8������ #-� 1 !" #7 �-#% '!%%!%�##�##45��(

,����������2���������� #-� 1 !" #7 �-�$� '!%%!%�##�##45��(

,����2��3��� #-� 1 !" #.-' �-��# '!%%!%�##�##45��(

������##& #-� 1 !" #7 �-�5� '!%%!%�##�##45��(

��:�������2����0��� #-� 1 !" #7 �-#$ '!%%!%�##�##45��(

���������2��3��� #-� 1 !" ##-4 �-��$ '!%%!%�##�##45��(

86��;����� #-� 1 !" #�. �-#$ '!%%!%�##�##45��(

(��������������0�� %-� 1 !" #7 �-#� '!%%!%�##�##45��(

(��, #-� 1 !" ##.� �-�5. '!%%!%�##�##45��(

�������2��3��� #-� 1 !" #7 �-�5% '!%%!%�##�##45��(

��������2��3��� #-� 1 !" #%-� �-�5$ '!%%!%�##�##45��(

7���������� #-� 1 !" #%. �-��' '!%%!%�##�##45��(

��;����� #-� 1 !" #%& �-�$$ '!%%!%�##�##45��(

+(���0����� ? ����7���&���:��&�����6������:����&����6�&�?���� � 5��������3��A������������#��<�

��&��<���;���8�#�9#�9�#�������#�����7�����@:��&�& "� "�������:��&�����6����9�#���<���;��

� �9���=��##�<���������&���8���;����&������;��#�@�����#8�#��:� ���������#��$������������6�#$�����9�:�8��&

�4 ��##�<����������&�4��

5 of 19

Page 174: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary

���� ������� ����������������� ���� ������������ �� � ������������

�������� �� �!�"�#$��������

������!�&'������ �"�!.!��

��������������� .=��=������������

)����*� %��/��%�/��

����� � � ��� ���

���� ����� "())1

������� "())1!�

������� �������������������������� ���������� ���"#$���

������� "��(�� +(�� ,��� ���������-���.�+�)��

����/ �����"�!,� !

#��������� �������� ��������

��������

������� !����� ����������� ��#$��"�������� ���� ���

���������2��3��� #-� 1 !" #7 �-�.5 '!%%!%�##�##45��(

)������ #-� 1 !" #7 �-�$% '!%%!%�##�##45��(

������8���8����������� #-� 1 !" #7 �-#� '!%%!%�##�##45��(

������������ �� 1 !" #�%%�� #% '!%%!%�##�##�&��(

����������2��3��� #-� 1 !" #7 �-�'% '!%%!%�##�##45��(

����������������� #-� 1 !" #7 �-#& '!%%!%�##�##45��(

������� %-� 1 !" #&# �-#% '!%%!%�##�##45��(

������#6%� 0������������ #-� 1 !" #7 �-�.4 '!%%!%�##�##45��(

������#6&� 0������������� #-� 1 !" #7 �-#� '!%%!%�##�##45��(

��0������������ #-� 1 !" #7 �-�'� '!%%!%�##�##45��(

��0������9�����8������ #-� 1 !" #7 �-�.$ '!%%!%�##�##45��(

<0���������0�� #-� 1 !" #7 �-#% '!%%!%�##�##45��(

;������6������ %-� 1 !" #5% #-� '!%%!%�##�##45��(

)����#6%� 0��������������4 $%�##. +,� #.4-' � '!%%!%�##�##45��(

)����#6%� 0��������������4 $%�##. +,� #�#�� � '!%%!%�##�##�&��(

)����4����8�9�����2��3��� $'�##. +,� ##�� � '!%%!%�##�##45��(

)����4����8�9�����2��3��� $'�##. +,� #�#�. � '!%%!%�##�##�&��(

)���� 02��8�9�����8������ 5��##� +,� #.%-� � '!%%!%�##�##45��(

)���� 02��8�9�����8������ 5��##� +,� #�#�� � '!%%!%�##�##�&��(

)�������������5 5#�#%� +,� ##�4 � '!%%!%�##�##45��(

)�������������5 5#�#%� +,� #�##� � '!%%!%�##�##�&��(

+(���0����� ? ����7���&���:��&�����6������:����&����6�&�?���� � 5��������3��A������������#��<�

��&��<���;���8�#�9#�9�#�������#�����7�����@:��&�& "� "�������:��&�����6����9�#���<���;��

� �9���=��##�<���������&���8���;����&������;��#�@�����#8�#��:� ���������#��$������������6�#$�����9�:�8��&

�4 ��##�<����������&�4��

6 of 19

Page 175: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary

����

�������

������

����

�������

���� ������������

� � ������������

����"#$���

�����

�&3��:�&�/�:6����<7�����#���#������:'

��������

�� �!�"�#$��������

����� �

� ��� ���

$��%� �����

"())1

����/ �����+��!,))�"/�"�� "

��������12345$5.�5!.��

)�8����� ��������

������� �����

����7���������

������0�� ������������

����� ������������

�������

�����

)�=�>����

)�=��9�<��

+,�

� ��9�<��

+�

"�?"080�

�0 �"080�

� "080�

����

@�0��%&�

��"

��0�����

��$

��7������

)�A7������"�

��'

)�8�����

�������������$����

��������

����������������

��

4'-5$&

)����*���������

5�-��

.5-5

%'

#�%

$.-��%

)���������������

5�-��

#�#

�$

#&%

5�-'%$

+(���0�����

?����7���&���:��&�����6������:����&��

��6�&�?����

�5��������3��A������������#��<�

��&��<���;���8�#�9#�9�#�������#�����7�����@:��&�&

"�

"�������:��&�����6����9�#���<���;��

�� �������&���::�9��&�#�:�3�#7���;���

��9���=��##�<���������&���8���;����&������;��#�@�����#8�#��:�

�4

��##�<����������&�4��

���:����������#������&����#�$

�3�����

7 o

f 19

Page 176: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary

����

�������

������

����

�������

���� ������������

� � ������������

��������

�� �!�"�#$��������

����� �

� ��� ���

$��%� �����

"())1

����/ �����+��!,))�"/�"�� "

��������12345$56!.��

)�8����� ���������

������� ���#$���

����7���������

������0�� ������������

����� ���

�������

�����

)�=�>����

)�=��9�<��

+,�

� ��9�<��

+�

"�?"080�

�0 �"080�

� "080�

����

@�0��(&�

��"

��0�����

��$

��7������

)�A7����)���

��

)�8�����

�������������$����

����/

����0��

#���

5&-4

'$

#&'

#��

�5&4-���

)����������2��3��������

��-��

.�-�

$4

#&5

4�-%&#

)�8����� ����������

������� ���#$���

����7���������

������0�� ������������

����� ���

�������

�����

)�=�>����

)�=��9�<��

+,�

� ��9�<��

+�

"�?"080�

�0 �"080�

� "080�

����

@�0��(&�

��"

��0�����

��$

��7������

)�A7����)���

��'

)�8�����

�������������$����

����/

����0��

#��

7

)����������2��3��������

��-��

..-.

$4

#&5

4.-.4$

)�8����� ���))��������

������� ���#$���

����7���������

������0�� ������������

����� ���

�������

�����

)�=�>����

)�=��9�<��

+,�

� ��9�<��

+�

"�?"080�

�0 �"080�

� "080�

����

@�0��(&�

��"

��0�����

******

��7������

)�A7����)���

��

)�8�����

�������������$����

����/

����0��

#���

#&%

'$

#&'

#��

#%�%

%�%'-���

)����������2��3��������

��-��

#��

$4

#&5

��-#�%

)�8����� ���))��������

������� ���#$���

����7���������

������0�� ������������

����� ���

�������

�����

)�=�>����

)�=��9�<��

+,�

� ��9�<��

+�

"�?"080�

�0 �"080�

� "080�

����

@�0��(&�

��"

��0�����

******

��7������

)�A7����)���

��

)�8�����

�������������$����

����/

����0��

#���

##&

'$

#&'

&�

#��

#%�%

%�%'

5-#'

%&%5-���

)����������2��3��������

��-��

.4-5

$4

#&5

��

4$-4#$

+(���0�����

?����7���&���:��&�����6������:����&��

��6�&�?����

�5��������3��A������������#��<�

��&��<���;���8�#�9#�9�#�������#�����7�����@:��&�&

"�

"�������:��&�����6����9�#���<���;��

�� �������&���::�9��&�#�:�3�#7���;���

��9���=��##�<���������&���8���;����&������;��#�@�����#8�#��:�

�4

��##�<����������&�4��

���:����������#������&����#�$

�3�����

8 o

f 19

Page 177: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary

����

�������

������

����

�������

���� ������������

� � ������������

��������

�� �!�"�#$��������

����� �

� ��� ���

$��%� �����

"())1

����/ �����+��!,))�"/�"�� "

��������17825$�5!.��

)�8����� ���������

������� ��#$��"

����7���������

������0�� ������������

����� ���

�������

�����

)�=�>����

)�=��9�<��

+,�

� ��9�<��

+�

"�?"080�

�0 �"080�

� "080�

����

@�0��(&�

��"

��0�����

��$

��7���")�

)�A7����)���

��

)�8�����

�������������$����

#6#6#6%������������������

%�-��

#�&

5#

#%.

#-�

�%�-$5�

#6#6#���0������������

%�-��

.4-4

'$

#&%

#-�

�%&-�.�

#6#6%6%������������������

%�-��

#�4

'&

#%5

#-�

�%'-�$�

#6#6%���0������������

%�-��

#�%

$�

#%�

#-�

�%�-4#�

#6#� 0������������

%�-��

.5-$

'.

#&&

�-��

�%4-'5�

#6#� 0������������

%�-��

#�#

'5

#&�

#-�

�%�-%%�

#6#� 0�������������

%�-��

.�-4

$&

#&%

#-�

�%&-5'�

#6%6&���0������2��3���

%�-��

#��

'$

#&$

#-�

�%'-#$�

#6%6&���0�������������

%�-��

#��

$&

#%4

#-�

�%�-���

#6%64���0������2��3���

%�-��

#�4

''

#&4

#-�

�%'-���

#6%64���08�����2��3���

%�-��

#�#

$4

#&%

#-�

�%�-#4�

#6%� 02��8��&��������������

%�-��

.#-%

��

#&%

%-�

�%%-5#�

#6%� 02��8�������

%�-��

#�%

5�

#%#

#-�

�%�-4��

#6%� 0������2��3���

%�-��

#�#

$#

#%%

#-�

�%�-&4�

#6%� 0������������

%�-��

##%

'.

#&%

�-��

�%$-.&�

#6%� 0�������������

%�-��

.#-.

$�

#%�

#-�

�%%-.5�

#6&6����08�����2��3���

%�-��

#��

$4

#&#

#-�

�%�-�#�

#6&� 0������2��3���

%�-��

#�%

$�

#%4

#-�

�%�-�%�

#6&� 0�������������

%�-��

#��

$&

#%'

#-�

�%�-�5�

#64� 0������2��3���

%�-��

#�&

$4

#%&

#-�

�%�-$%�

%6%� 0�������������

%�-��

$5-'

'.

#&$

#-�

�#.-'4�

%���������

%��-�

#%#

4.

#&'

#�

�&�&-4&�

%��������������

%�-��

#�%

$&

#%'

#-�

�%�-���

4��������������

%�-��

#�#

$4

#%5

#-�

�%�-&&�

4�����������������

%�-��

#�%

$&

#&�

#-�

�%�-4%�

4�(

������%����������

%��-�

#%#

�5

#&4

#�

�&�#-&4�

�������

%��-�

#&4

4�

#&�

#�

�&&�-5��

������0�

%��-�

55-$

$�

#%�

%�

�%%#-$��

�������0��0��

%��-�

#'�

$�

#%�

)%�

�4��-&��

���3���

%�-��

.'-�

5#

#%%

#-�

�%4-�#�

+(���0�����

?����7���&���:��&�����6������:����&��

��6�&�?����

�5��������3��A������������#��<�

��&��<���;���8�#�9#�9�#�������#�����7�����@:��&�&

"�

"�������:��&�����6����9�#���<���;��

�� �������&���::�9��&�#�:�3�#7���;���

��9���=��##�<���������&���8���;����&������;��#�@�����#8�#��:�

�4

��##�<����������&�4��

���:����������#������&����#�$

�3�����

9 o

f 19

Page 178: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary

����

�������

������

����

�������

���� ������������

� � ������������

��������

�� �!�"�#$��������

����� �

� ��� ���

$��%� �����

"())1

����/ �����+��!,))�"/�"�� "

��������17825$�5!.��

)�8����� ���������

������� ��#$��"

����7���������

������0�� ������������

����� ���

�������

�����

)�=�>����

)�=��9�<��

+,�

� ��9�<��

+�

"�?"080�

�0 �"080�

� "080�

����

@�0��(&�

��"

��0�����

��$

��7���")�

)�A7����)���

��

)�8�����

�������������$����

���8�2��3���

%�-��

#��

$'

#%4

#-�

�%�-##�

���8�������8������

%�-��

#��

'�

#%.

#-�

�%'-&$�

���8��0������8������

%�-��

#�$

$'

#%#

#-�

�%'-'&�

���8�9��8

%�-��

#�#

'.

#%5

#-�

�%�-#4�

���8�8������

%�-��

#��

�&

#4#

#-�

�%'-%��

���2����0���90��

%�-��

.%-5

$�

#%�

#-�

�%&-#.�

���2�������������0��

%�-��

54-�

''

#&5

#-�

�%#-#&�

������2��3���

%�-��

#�%

5#

#%%

#-�

�%�-&5�

������������

%�-��

##.

�5

#&&

#-�

�%.-$4�

������9��8

%�-��

#�&

'.

#%5

#-�

�%�-54�

������8������

%�-��

5#-$

�'

#&#

#-�

�%�-4%�

�0��#6%� 0������������

%�-��

..-5

$%

#%'

#-�

�%4-.4�

�0��#6&� 0�������������

%�-��

5�-5

'.

#&#

#-�

�%#-4'�

0�0��������������

%�-��

.%-%

$�

#&�

#-�

�%&-�4�

02��8�������8������

%�-��

.$-�

''

#&&

#-�

�%4-%4�

02��8�8������

%�-��

#�.

$'

#%�

#-�

�%$-&��

0�������09�����8������

%�-��

.#-'

�&

#�&

#-�

�%%-5.�

,����������2����������

%�-��

5�-.

$�

#&�

#-�

�%#-45�

,����2��3���

%�-��

#�&

$&

#%$

#-�

�%�-$#�

������##&

%�-��

.5-5

$�

#%�

#-�

�%4-$��

��:�������2����0���

%�-��

#��

'$

#&#

#-�

�%'-%.�

���������2��3���

%�-��

#�#

$�

#%$

#-�

�%�-#5�

86��;�����

��-��

#�5

$'

#%5

#-�

��4-�'�

(��������������0��

%�-��

.&-5

'&

#&$

%-�

�%&-4'�

(��,

%�-��

5'-5

'�

#%&

#-�

�%#-$#�

�������2��3���

%�-��

#�4

'.

#&$

#-�

�%�-.5�

��������2��3���

%�-��

#�%

$%

#%.

#-�

�%�-�#�

7����������

%�-��

.5-5

�4

#&5

#-�

�%4-'.�

��;�����

%�-��

#�&

5�

#%#

#-�

�%�-$#�

���������2��3���

%�-��

#�%

$%

#%$

#-�

�%�-�.�

+(���0�����

?����7���&���:��&�����6������:����&��

��6�&�?����

�5��������3��A������������#��<�

��&��<���;���8�#�9#�9�#�������#�����7�����@:��&�&

"�

"�������:��&�����6����9�#���<���;��

�� �������&���::�9��&�#�:�3�#7���;���

��9���=��##�<���������&���8���;����&������;��#�@�����#8�#��:�

�4

��##�<����������&�4��

���:����������#������&����#�$

�3�����

10 o

f 19

Page 179: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary

����

�������

������

����

�������

���� ������������

� � ������������

��������

�� �!�"�#$��������

����� �

� ��� ���

$��%� �����

"())1

����/ �����+��!,))�"/�"�� "

��������17825$�5!.��

)�8����� ���������

������� ��#$��"

����7���������

������0�� ������������

����� ���

�������

�����

)�=�>����

)�=��9�<��

+,�

� ��9�<��

+�

"�?"080�

�0 �"080�

� "080�

����

@�0��(&�

��"

��0�����

��$

��7���")�

)�A7����)���

��

)�8�����

�������������$����

)������

%�-��

#�4

'�

#&4

#-�

�%�-.��

������8���8�����������

%�-��

5&-%

$�

#&�

#-�

�%�-$.�

������������

#%�-�

55-�

$�

#&�

�-�

�#�.-.$�

����������2��3���

%�-��

..-&

$�

#%.

#-�

�%4-5&�

�����������������

%�-��

#�$

''

#%5

#-�

�%'-$5�

�������

%�-��

.5-'

$$

#%%

%-�

�%4-'4�

������#6%� 0������������

%�-��

..-#

'&

#&$

#-�

�%4-$5�

������#6&� 0�������������

%�-��

55-5

�.

#&�

#-�

�%%-#.�

��0������������

%�-��

.�-%

$�

#%$

#-�

�%&-5#�

��0������9�����8������

%�-��

#&&

�$

#%.

)#-�

�&&-%4�

<0���������0��

%�-��

.5-�

��

#&4

#-�

�%4-���

;������6������

$�-��

#�'

$�

#%�

%-�

�$.-$$�

)����#6%� 0��������������4

%�-��

#�$

$%

##.

%'-'5�

)����4����8�9�����2��3���

%�-��

#�%

$'

##.

%�-�%�

)���� 02��8�9�����8������

%�-��

#�.

5�

##�

%$-#4�

)�������������5

%�-��

#�#

5#

#%�

%�-%��

)�8����� ���)���������

������� ��#$��"

����7���������

������0�� ������������

����� ���

�������

�����

)�=�>����

)�=��9�<��

+,�

� ��9�<��

+�

"�?"080�

�0 �"080�

� "080�

����

@�0��(&�

��"

��0�����

******

��7���")�

)�A7����)��)

��

)�8�����

�������������$����

#6#6#6%������������������

%�-��

.$-4

5#

#%.

#-�

�%4-&4�

#6#6#���0������������

%�-��

.�-4

'$

#&%

#-�

�%%-�.�

#6#6%6%������������������

%�-��

5�-%

'&

#%5

#-�

�%#-&#�

#6#6%���0������������

%�-��

5.-�

$�

#%�

#-�

�%%-%��

#6#� 0������������

%�-��

.&-5

'.

#&&

�-��

�%&-4��

#6#� 0������������

%�-��

..-�

'5

#&�

#-�

�%4-55�

#6#� 0�������������

%�-��

.&-5

$&

#&%

#-�

�%&-4��

#6%6&���0������2��3���

%�-��

.5-'

'$

#&$

#-�

�%4-'��

#6%6&���0�������������

%�-��

5%-'

$&

#%4

#-�

�%�-'4�

+(���0�����

?����7���&���:��&�����6������:����&��

��6�&�?����

�5��������3��A������������#��<�

��&��<���;���8�#�9#�9�#�������#�����7�����@:��&�&

"�

"�������:��&�����6����9�#���<���;��

�� �������&���::�9��&�#�:�3�#7���;���

��9���=��##�<���������&���8���;����&������;��#�@�����#8�#��:�

�4

��##�<����������&�4��

���:����������#������&����#�$

�3�����

11 o

f 19

Page 180: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary

����

�������

������

����

�������

���� ������������

� � ������������

��������

�� �!�"�#$��������

����� �

� ��� ���

$��%� �����

"())1

����/ �����+��!,))�"/�"�� "

��������17825$�5!.��

)�8����� ���)���������

������� ��#$��"

����7���������

������0�� ������������

����� ���

�������

�����

)�=�>����

)�=��9�<��

+,�

� ��9�<��

+�

"�?"080�

�0 �"080�

� "080�

����

@�0��(&�

��"

��0�����

******

��7���")�

)�A7����)��)

��

)�8�����

�������������$����

#6%64���0������2��3���

%�-��

#�4

''

#&4

#-�

�%�-..�

#6%64���08�����2��3���

%�-��

#��

$4

#&%

#-�

�%�-�.�

#6%� 02��8��&��������������

%�-��

$4-�

��

#&%

%-�

�#5-4.�

#6%� 02��8�������

%�-��

5.-�

5�

#%#

#-�

�%%-&$�

#6%� 0������2��3���

%�-��

.5-'

$#

#%%

#-�

�%4-'��

#6%� 0������������

%�-��

#��

'.

#&%

�-��

�%�-�5�

#6%� 0�������������

%�-��

5'-4

$�

#%�

#-�

�%#-�.�

#6&6����08�����2��3���

%�-��

#�%

$4

#&#

#-�

�%�-���

#6&� 0������2��3���

%�-��

#�4

$�

#%4

#-�

�%�-5.�

#6&� 0�������������

%�-��

5.-4

$&

#%'

#-�

�%%-&4�

#64� 0������2��3���

%�-��

#�%

$4

#%&

#-�

�%�-�.�

%6%� 0�������������

%�-��

$&-5

'.

#&$

#-�

�#5-44�

%���������

%��-�

&5-4

4.

#&'

)#�

�.'-�'�

%��������������

%�-��

#�&

$&

#%'

#-�

�%�-5&�

4��������������

%�-��

#�%

$4

#%5

#-�

�%�-45�

4�����������������

%�-��

#��

$&

#&�

#-�

�%'-&'�

4�(

������%����������

%��-�

5�-$

�5

#&4

#�

�%�#-5��

�������

%��-�

&#-%

4�

#&�

)#�

�$$-.$�

������0�

%��-�

$%-$

$�

#%�

)%�

�#5#-$&�

�������0��0��

%��-�

#%5

$�

#%�

)%�

�&#.-&4�

���3���

%�-��

.4-#

5#

#%%

#-�

�%&-�&�

���8�2��3���

%�-��

.'-'

$'

#%4

#-�

�%4-#'�

���8�������8������

%�-��

.&-'

'�

#%.

#-�

�%&-&.�

���8��0������8������

%�-��

#�#

$'

#%#

#-�

�%�-#&�

���8�9��8

%�-��

5�-#

'.

#%5

#-�

�%#-%5�

���8�8������

%�-��

#�$

�&

#4#

#-�

�%'-'4�

���2����0���90��

%�-��

5.-�

$�

#%�

#-�

�%%-%��

���2�������������0��

%�-��

5%-'

''

#&5

#-�

�%�-'��

������2��3���

%�-��

#�#

5#

#%%

#-�

�%�-#4�

������������

%�-��

#%�

�5

#&&

#-�

�&�-#��

+(���0�����

?����7���&���:��&�����6������:����&��

��6�&�?����

�5��������3��A������������#��<�

��&��<���;���8�#�9#�9�#�������#�����7�����@:��&�&

"�

"�������:��&�����6����9�#���<���;��

�� �������&���::�9��&�#�:�3�#7���;���

��9���=��##�<���������&���8���;����&������;��#�@�����#8�#��:�

�4

��##�<����������&�4��

���:����������#������&����#�$

�3�����

12 o

f 19

Page 181: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary

����

�������

������

����

�������

���� ������������

� � ������������

��������

�� �!�"�#$��������

����� �

� ��� ���

$��%� �����

"())1

����/ �����+��!,))�"/�"�� "

��������17825$�5!.��

)�8����� ���)���������

������� ��#$��"

����7���������

������0�� ������������

����� ���

�������

�����

)�=�>����

)�=��9�<��

+,�

� ��9�<��

+�

"�?"080�

�0 �"080�

� "080�

����

@�0��(&�

��"

��0�����

******

��7���")�

)�A7����)��)

��

)�8�����

�������������$����

������9��8

%�-��

..-5

'.

#%5

#-�

&-�#�

%$-.$�

������8������

%�-��

5�-4

�'

#&#

#-�

�%#-&��

�0��#6%� 0������������

%�-��

.�-�

$%

#%'

#-�

�%&-$'�

�0��#6&� 0�������������

%�-��

5%-&

'.

#&#

#-�

�%�-�5�

0�0��������������

%�-��

5�-5

$�

#&�

#-�

�%#-4��

02��8�������8������

%�-��

55-�

''

#&&

#-�

�%%-#%�

02��8�8������

%�-��

.4-$

$'

#%�

#-�

�%&-'5�

0�������09�����8������

%�-��

.'-�

�&

#�&

#-�

�%4-�#�

,����������2����������

%�-��

$.-.

$�

#&�

#-�

�#.-.5�

,����2��3���

%�-��

#�4

$&

#%$

#-�

�%'-�&�

������##&

%�-��

.&-&

$�

#%�

#-�

�%&-&&�

��:�������2����0���

%�-��

##�

'$

#&#

#-�

�%$-'%�

���������2��3���

%�-��

#�%

$�

#%$

#-�

�-4$��

%'-�$�

86��;�����

��-��

#�.

$'

#%5

#-�

��4-'��

(��������������0��

%�-��

55-&

'&

#&$

%-�

�-&$��

%%-44�

(��,

%�-��

$5-4

'�

#%&

#-�

�#.-'��

�������2��3���

%�-��

##�

'.

#&$

#-�

�%$-�#�

��������2��3���

%�-��

#��

$%

#%.

#-�

�%'-%.�

7����������

%�-��

5&-�

�4

#&5

#-�

�%�-$4�

��;�����

%�-��

#�4

5�

#%#

#-�

�%�-.��

���������2��3���

%�-��

#�$

$%

#%$

#-�

�%'-'4�

)������

%�-��

..-&

'�

#&4

#-�

�%4-5&�

������8���8�����������

%�-��

$'-�

$�

#&�

#-�

�#5-..�

������������

#%�-�

$#-�

$�

#&�

�-�

�55-$'�

����������2��3���

%�-��

#�&

$�

#%.

#-�

�%�-5#�

�����������������

%�-��

#�5

''

#%5

#-�

%-$��

%.-$$�

�������

%�-��

.5-5

$$

#%%

%-�

�%4-$#�

������#6%� 0������������

%�-��

.&-5

'&

#&$

#-�

�%&-44�

������#6&� 0�������������

%�-��

5�-�

�.

#&�

#-�

�%�-#&�

��0������������

%�-��

.&-�

$�

#%$

#-�

�%&-%'�

+(���0�����

?����7���&���:��&�����6������:����&��

��6�&�?����

�5��������3��A������������#��<�

��&��<���;���8�#�9#�9�#�������#�����7�����@:��&�&

"�

"�������:��&�����6����9�#���<���;��

�� �������&���::�9��&�#�:�3�#7���;���

��9���=��##�<���������&���8���;����&������;��#�@�����#8�#��:�

�4

��##�<����������&�4��

���:����������#������&����#�$

�3�����

13 o

f 19

Page 182: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary

����

�������

������

����

�������

���� ������������

� � ������������

��������

�� �!�"�#$��������

����� �

� ��� ���

$��%� �����

"())1

����/ �����+��!,))�"/�"�� "

��������17825$�5!.��

)�8����� ���)���������

������� ��#$��"

����7���������

������0�� ������������

����� ���

�������

�����

)�=�>����

)�=��9�<��

+,�

� ��9�<��

+�

"�?"080�

�0 �"080�

� "080�

����

@�0��(&�

��"

��0�����

******

��7���")�

)�A7����)��)

��

)�8�����

�������������$����

��0������9�����8������

%�-��

#%.

�$

#%.

)#-�

�&%-&#�

<0���������0��

%�-��

#�#

��

#&4

#-�

�%�-#.�

;������6������

$�-��

#�$

$�

#%�

%-�

�5�-'��

)����#6%� 0��������������4

%�-��

.�-&

$%

##.

%&-5%�

)����4����8�9�����2��3���

%�-��

#�%

$'

##.

%�-4��

)���� 02��8�9�����8������

%�-��

#�%

5�

##�

%�-45�

)�������������5

%�-��

#�#

5#

#%�

%�-&%�

)�8����� ���)���������

������� ��#$��"

����7���������

������0�� ������������

����� ���

�������

�����

)�=�>����

)�=��9�<��

+,�

� ��9�<��

+�

"�?"080�

�0 �"080�

� "080�

����

@�0��(&�

��"

��0�����

******

��7���")�

)�A7����)���

��

)�8�����

�������������$����

#6#6#6%������������������

%�-��

.$-�

5#

#%.

%�

#-�

�%4-&4

�-&$�

%4-%��

#6#6#���0������������

%�-��

.�-�

'$

#&%

%�

#-�

�%%-�.

�-444

%%-4.�

#6#6%6%������������������

%�-��

55-5

'&

#%5

%�

#-�

�%#-&#

4-��

%%-#.�

#6#6%���0������������

%�-��

.%-4

$�

#%�

%�

#-�

�%%-%�

&-$#

%&-�.�

#6#� 0������������

%�-��

.�-�

'.

#&&

%�

�-��

�%&-4�

#-5%

%&-55�

#6#� 0������������

%�-��

..-.

'5

#&�

%�

#-�

�%4-55

�-4�#

%4-.5�

#6#� 0�������������

%�-��

.4-%

$&

#&%

%�

#-�

�%&-4�

�-4%'

%&-���

#6%6&���0������2��3���

%�-��

..-4

'$

#&$

%�

#-�

�%4-'�

�-545

%4-5'�

#6%6&���0�������������

%�-��

5'-5

$&

#%4

%�

#-�

�%�-'4

�-��

%#-$#�

#6%64���0������2��3���

%�-��

#�4

''

#&4

%�

#-�

�%�-..

�-#�4

%'-�&�

#6%64���08�����2��3���

%�-��

..-.

$4

#&%

%�

#-�

�%�-�.

�-4&.

%4-.5�

#6%� 02��8��&��������������

%�-��

$4-5

��

#&%

%�

%-�

�#5-4.

#-#5

#5-$#�

#6%� 02��8�������

%�-��

.�-$

5�

#%#

%�

#-�

�%%-&$

#-&5

%%-'5�

#6%� 0������2��3���

%�-��

.$-$

$#

#%%

%�

#-�

�%4-'�

�-5.'

%4-4&�

#6%� 0������������

%�-��

#�#

'.

#&%

%�

�-��

�%�-�5

�-4&5

%�-#.�

#6%� 0�������������

%�-��

5.-5

$�

#%�

%�

#-�

�%#-�.

&-.�

%%-4'�

#6&6����08�����2��3���

%�-��

#�#

$4

#&#

%�

#-�

�%�-��

#-4'

%�-#5�

#6&� 0������2��3���

%�-��

#�&

$�

#%4

%�

#-�

�%�-5.

�-�5#

%�-$4�

+(���0�����

?����7���&���:��&�����6������:����&��

��6�&�?����

�5��������3��A������������#��<�

��&��<���;���8�#�9#�9�#�������#�����7�����@:��&�&

"�

"�������:��&�����6����9�#���<���;��

�� �������&���::�9��&�#�:�3�#7���;���

��9���=��##�<���������&���8���;����&������;��#�@�����#8�#��:�

�4

��##�<����������&�4��

���:����������#������&����#�$

�3�����

14 o

f 19

Page 183: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary

����

�������

������

����

�������

���� ������������

� � ������������

��������

�� �!�"�#$��������

����� �

� ��� ���

$��%� �����

"())1

����/ �����+��!,))�"/�"�� "

��������17825$�5!.��

)�8����� ���)���������

������� ��#$��"

����7���������

������0�� ������������

����� ���

�������

�����

)�=�>����

)�=��9�<��

+,�

� ��9�<��

+�

"�?"080�

�0 �"080�

� "080�

����

@�0��(&�

��"

��0�����

******

��7���")�

)�A7����)���

��

)�8�����

�������������$����

#6&� 0�������������

%�-��

.�-'

$&

#%'

%�

#-�

�%%-&4

#-&5

%%-'��

#64� 0������2��3���

%�-��

#�%

$4

#%&

%�

#-�

�%�-�.

�-#.'

%�-�4�

%6%� 0�������������

%�-��

$4-'

'.

#&$

%�

#-�

�#5-44

#-#&

#5-'��

%���������

%��-�

4%-5

4.

#&'

%�

)#�

�.'-�'

#�-$

#�'-.'�

%��������������

%�-��

#�&

$&

#%'

%�

#-�

�%�-5&

�-4''

%�-$#�

4��������������

%�-��

#�#

$4

#%5

%�

#-�

�%�-45

�-4$%

%�-&'�

4�����������������

%�-��

#�'

$&

#&�

%�

#-�

�%'-&'

�-##4

%'-&.�

4�(

������%����������

%��-�

5$-�

�5

#&4

%�

#�

�%�#-5

$-4'

%#$-44�

�������

%��-�

&&-5

4�

#&�

%�

)#�

�$$-.$

$-.5

54-4��

������0�

%��-�

$4-�

$�

#%�

%�

)%�

�#5#-$

#-$$

#54-.$�

�������0��0��

%��-�

#&$

$�

#%�

%�

)%�

�&#.-&

$-%�

&4&-#5�

���3���

%�-��

.�-$

5#

#%%

%�

#-�

�%&-�&

#-'.

%&-.&�

���8�2��3���

%�-��

.'-$

$'

#%4

%�

#-�

�%4-#'

�-�5%$

%4-#5�

���8�������8������

%�-��

.5-5

'�

#%.

%�

#-�

�%&-&.

�-4#

%4-'.�

���8��0������8������

%�-��

#�%

$'

#%#

%�

#-�

�%�-#&

#-%$

%�-4��

���8�9��8

%�-��

55-%

'.

#%5

%�

#-�

�%#-%5

&-��

%%-���

���8�8������

%�-��

#�.

�&

#4#

%�

#-�

�%'-'4

#-.$

%$-#$�

���2����0���90��

%�-��

5.-'

$�

#%�

%�

#-�

�%%-%�

�-$#$

%%-4#�

���2�������������0��

%�-��

5&-4

''

#&5

%�

#-�

�%�-'�

#-�#

%�-5'�

������2��3���

%�-��

#��

5#

#%%

%�

#-�

�%�-#4

�-&..

%�-�4�

������������

%�-��

#%�

�5

#&&

%�

#-�

�&�-#�

�-%&&

&�-�&�

������9��8

%�-��

.5-'

'.

#%5

%�

#-�

&-�#�

%$-.$

#-�5

%$-'$�

������8������

%�-��

55-4

�'

#&#

%�

#-�

�%#-&�

&-4�

%%-#��

�0��#6%� 0������������

%�-��

.'-.

$%

#%'

%�

#-�

�%&-$'

#-.%

%4-%%�

�0��#6&� 0�������������

%�-��

54-�

'.

#&#

%�

#-�

�%�-�5

%-�$

%#-�#�

0�0��������������

%�-��

5$-%

$�

#&�

%�

#-�

�%#-4�

#-'%

%#-5��

02��8�������8������

%�-��

5.-�

''

#&&

%�

#-�

�%%-#%

�-'&#

%%-%'�

02��8�8������

%�-��

..-'

$'

#%�

%�

#-�

�%&-'5

�-�'

%4-.#�

0�������09�����8������

%�-��

.$-'

�&

#�&

%�

#-�

�%4-�#

#-'#

%4-4��

,����������2����������

%�-��

5�-$

$�

#&�

%�

#-�

�#.-.5

�-.4'

%�-#$�

+(���0�����

?����7���&���:��&�����6������:����&��

��6�&�?����

�5��������3��A������������#��<�

��&��<���;���8�#�9#�9�#�������#�����7�����@:��&�&

"�

"�������:��&�����6����9�#���<���;��

�� �������&���::�9��&�#�:�3�#7���;���

��9���=��##�<���������&���8���;����&������;��#�@�����#8�#��:�

�4

��##�<����������&�4��

���:����������#������&����#�$

�3�����

15 o

f 19

Page 184: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary

����

�������

������

����

�������

���� ������������

� � ������������

��������

�� �!�"�#$��������

����� �

� ��� ���

$��%� �����

"())1

����/ �����+��!,))�"/�"�� "

��������17825$�5!.��

)�8����� ���)���������

������� ��#$��"

����7���������

������0�� ������������

����� ���

�������

�����

)�=�>����

)�=��9�<��

+,�

� ��9�<��

+�

"�?"080�

�0 �"080�

� "080�

����

@�0��(&�

��"

��0�����

******

��7���")�

)�A7����)���

��

)�8�����

�������������$����

,����2��3���

%�-��

#�4

$&

#%$

%�

#-�

�%'-�&

�-&�5

%�-.��

������##&

%�-��

.&-#

$�

#%�

%�

#-�

�%&-&&

�-%�5

%&-%$�

��:�������2����0���

%�-��

##�

'$

#&#

%�

#-�

�%$-'%

�-&..

%$-�#�

���������2��3���

%�-��

#�#

$�

#%$

%�

#-�

�-4$��

%'-�$

#-&.

%�-$#�

86��;�����

��-��

#�.

$'

#%5

%�

#-�

��4-'�

�-4$$

�4-&.�

(��������������0��

%�-��

5.-'

'&

#&$

%�

%-�

�-&$��

%%-44

#-4%

%%-$'�

(��,

%�-��

$.-5

'�

#%&

%�

#-�

�#.-'�

#-$$

#.-.��

�������2��3���

%�-��

#�.

'.

#&$

%�

#-�

�%$-�#

�-.#&

%$-%'�

��������2��3���

%�-��

#�4

$%

#%.

%�

#-�

�%'-%.

#-�&

%�-5.�

7����������

%�-��

5�-%

�4

#&5

%�

#-�

�%�-$4

%-''

%#-&��

��;�����

%�-��

#�&

5�

#%#

%�

#-�

�%�-.�

#-��

%�-'5�

���������2��3���

%�-��

#�'

$%

#%$

%�

#-�

�%'-'4

�-.4&

%'-&.�

)������

%�-��

..-#

'�

#&4

%�

#-�

�%4-5&

�-%�%

%4-$5�

������8���8�����������

%�-��

$$-5

$�

#&�

%�

#-�

�#5-..

%-44

#.-4'�

������������

#%�-�

$�-'

$�

#&�

%�

�-�

�55-$'

'-%.

.4-�%�

����������2��3���

%�-��

#�%

$�

#%.

%�

#-�

�%�-5#

#-%#

%�-���

�����������������

%�-��

#��

''

#%5

%�

#-�

%-$��

%.-$$

%-.&

%5-.#�

�������

%�-��

..-&

$$

#%%

%�

%-�

�%4-$#

�-454

%4-5&�

������#6%� 0������������

%�-��

.�-#

'&

#&$

%�

#-�

�%&-44

#-44

%&-$5�

������#6&� 0�������������

%�-��

5�-5

�.

#&�

%�

#-�

�%�-#&

�-&.$

%�-%#�

��0������������

%�-��

.%-�

$�

#%$

%�

#-�

�%&-%'

�-'�4

%&-#%�

��0������9�����8������

%�-��

#%.

�$

#%.

%�

#-�

�&%-&#

�-%#$

&%-%4�

<0���������0��

%�-��

#�%

��

#&4

%�

#-�

�%�-#.

#-��

%�-�$�

;������6������

$�-��

#�$

$�

#%�

%�

%-�

�5�-'�

�-''�

5�-�$�

)����#6%� 0��������������4

%�-��

.$-%

$%

##.

�%4-%.�

)����4����8�9�����2��3���

%�-��

#�&

$'

##.

�%�-'��

)���� 02��8�9�����8������

%�-��

#�4

5�

##�

�%�-55�

)�������������5

%�-��

#�%

5#

#%�

�%�-�'�

+(���0�����

?����7���&���:��&�����6������:����&��

��6�&�?����

�5��������3��A������������#��<�

��&��<���;���8�#�9#�9�#�������#�����7�����@:��&�&

"�

"�������:��&�����6����9�#���<���;��

�� �������&���::�9��&�#�:�3�#7���;���

��9���=��##�<���������&���8���;����&������;��#�@�����#8�#��:�

�4

��##�<����������&�4��

���:����������#������&����#�$

�3�����

16 o

f 19

Page 185: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary

����

�������

������

����

�������

���� ������������

� � ������������

��������

�� �!�"�#$��������

����� �

� ��� ���

$��%� �����

"())1

����/ �����+��!,))�"/�"�� "

��������17825$�5!.��

)�8����� ��������"

������� ��#$��"

����7���������

������0�� ������������

����� ���

�������

�����

)�=�>����

)�=��9�<��

+,�

� ��9�<��

+�

"�?"080�

�0 �"080�

� "080�

����

@�0��(&�

��"

��0�����

��$

��7���")�

)�A7����)���

��'

)�8�����

�������������$����

#6#6#6%������������������

#-�

7

#6#6#���0������������

#-�

7

#6#6%6%������������������

#-�

7

#6#6%���0������������

#-�

7

#6#� 0������������

�-��

7

#6#� 0������������

#-�

7

#6#� 0�������������

#-�

7

#6%6&���0������2��3���

#-�

7

#6%6&���0�������������

#-�

7

#6%64���0������2��3���

#-�

7

#6%64���08�����2��3���

#-�

7

#6%� 02��8��&��������������

%-�

7

#6%� 02��8�������

#-�

7

#6%� 0������2��3���

#-�

7

#6%� 0������������

�-��

7

#6%� 0�������������

#-�

7

#6&6����08�����2��3���

#-�

7

#6&� 0������2��3���

#-�

7

#6&� 0�������������

#-�

7

#64� 0������2��3���

#-�

7

%6%� 0�������������

#-�

7

%���������

#�

7

%��������������

#-�

7

4��������������

#-�

7

4�����������������

#-�

7

4�(

������%����������

#�

7

�������

#�

7

������0�

%�

7

�������0��0��

%�

7

���3���

#-�

7

+(���0�����

?����7���&���:��&�����6������:����&��

��6�&�?����

�5��������3��A������������#��<�

��&��<���;���8�#�9#�9�#�������#�����7�����@:��&�&

"�

"�������:��&�����6����9�#���<���;��

�� �������&���::�9��&�#�:�3�#7���;���

��9���=��##�<���������&���8���;����&������;��#�@�����#8�#��:�

�4

��##�<����������&�4��

���:����������#������&����#�$

�3�����

17 o

f 19

Page 186: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary

����

�������

������

����

�������

���� ������������

� � ������������

��������

�� �!�"�#$��������

����� �

� ��� ���

$��%� �����

"())1

����/ �����+��!,))�"/�"�� "

��������17825$�5!.��

)�8����� ��������"

������� ��#$��"

����7���������

������0�� ������������

����� ���

�������

�����

)�=�>����

)�=��9�<��

+,�

� ��9�<��

+�

"�?"080�

�0 �"080�

� "080�

����

@�0��(&�

��"

��0�����

��$

��7���")�

)�A7����)���

��'

)�8�����

�������������$����

���8�2��3���

#-�

7

���8�������8������

#-�

7

���8��0������8������

#-�

7

���8�9��8

#-�

7

���8�8������

#-�

7

���2����0���90��

#-�

7

���2�������������0��

#-�

7

������2��3���

#-�

7

������������

#-�

7

������9��8

#-�

7

������8������

#-�

7

�0��#6%� 0������������

#-�

7

�0��#6&� 0�������������

#-�

7

0�0��������������

#-�

7

02��8�������8������

#-�

7

02��8�8������

#-�

7

0�������09�����8������

#-�

7

,����������2����������

#-�

7

,����2��3���

#-�

7

������##&

#-�

7

��:�������2����0���

#-�

7

���������2��3���

#-�

7

86��;�����

#-�

7

(��������������0��

%-�

�-4%�

(��,

#-�

7

�������2��3���

#-�

7

��������2��3���

#-�

7

7����������

#-�

7

��;�����

#-�

7

���������2��3���

#-�

7

+(���0�����

?����7���&���:��&�����6������:����&��

��6�&�?����

�5��������3��A������������#��<�

��&��<���;���8�#�9#�9�#�������#�����7�����@:��&�&

"�

"�������:��&�����6����9�#���<���;��

�� �������&���::�9��&�#�:�3�#7���;���

��9���=��##�<���������&���8���;����&������;��#�@�����#8�#��:�

�4

��##�<����������&�4��

���:����������#������&����#�$

�3�����

18 o

f 19

Page 187: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary

����

�������

������

����

�������

���� ������������

� � ������������

��������

�� �!�"�#$��������

����� �

� ��� ���

$��%� �����

"())1

����/ �����+��!,))�"/�"�� "

��������17825$�5!.��

)�8����� ��������"

������� ��#$��"

����7���������

������0�� ������������

����� ���

�������

�����

)�=�>����

)�=��9�<��

+,�

� ��9�<��

+�

"�?"080�

�0 �"080�

� "080�

����

@�0��(&�

��"

��0�����

��$

��7���")�

)�A7����)���

��'

)�8�����

�������������$����

)������

#-�

7

������8���8�����������

#-�

7

������������

�-�

7

����������2��3���

#-�

7

�����������������

#-�

7

�������

%-�

7

������#6%� 0������������

#-�

7

������#6&� 0�������������

#-�

7

��0������������

#-�

7

��0������9�����8������

#-�

7

<0���������0��

#-�

7

;������6������

%-�

7

)����#6%� 0��������������4

%�-��

##'

$%

##.

%5-.'�

)����4����8�9�����2��3���

%�-��

###

$'

##.

%$-'.�

)���� 02��8�9�����8������

%�-��

#�$

5�

##�

%'-5%�

)�������������5

%�-��

##4

5#

#%�

%5-4#�

+(���0�����

?����7���&���:��&�����6������:����&��

��6�&�?����

�5��������3��A������������#��<�

��&��<���;���8�#�9#�9�#�������#�����7�����@:��&�&

"�

"�������:��&�����6����9�#���<���;��

�� �������&���::�9��&�#�:�3�#7���;���

��9���=��##�<���������&���8���;����&������;��#�@�����#8�#��:�

�4

��##�<����������&�4��

���:����������#������&����#�$

�3�����

19 o

f 19

Page 188: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary
Page 189: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary
Page 190: Second Quarter 2011 Remediation Progress Report Defense ...norwalkrab.com/wp-content/files/Environmental... · 7/11/2011  · 3 Groundwater Remediation System Operation Summary