second temple period innovation or anachronistic interpretation?

39
Second Temple Period Innovation or Anachronistic Interpretation? The “’Otzar” in Ancient Ritual Baths Yonatan Adler Ariel University Center of Samaria

Upload: dulcea

Post on 25-Feb-2016

30 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

DESCRIPTION

The “’ Otzar” in Ancient Ritual Baths. Second Temple Period Innovation or Anachronistic Interpretation? . Yonatan Adler. Ariel University Center of Samaria. 1. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Second Temple Period Innovation or Anachronistic Interpretation?

Second Temple Period Innovation or Anachronistic Interpretation?

The “’Otzar” in Ancient Ritual Baths

Yonatan AdlerAriel University Center

of Samaria

Page 2: Second Temple Period Innovation or Anachronistic Interpretation?

The bath must contain a minimum volume of water which would allow for the full immersion of an adult, a volume measured in rabbinic metrological terms as forty se’ah, probably equivalent to about half of a cubic meter.

This minimum volume of water must derive from either rain or spring-water channeled directly into the mikveh, as drawn-water would render the bath unfit for ritual use.

1.

2.

Page 3: Second Temple Period Innovation or Anachronistic Interpretation?

Over 850 Ancient Mikva’ot

Throughout the Country

Page 4: Second Temple Period Innovation or Anachronistic Interpretation?

“’Otzar”Immersion

Pool Connecting Pipe

Method # 1

Page 5: Second Temple Period Innovation or Anachronistic Interpretation?

“’Otzar”Immersion

Pool Connecting Pipe

Method # 2

Page 6: Second Temple Period Innovation or Anachronistic Interpretation?
Page 7: Second Temple Period Innovation or Anachronistic Interpretation?
Page 8: Second Temple Period Innovation or Anachronistic Interpretation?
Page 9: Second Temple Period Innovation or Anachronistic Interpretation?
Page 10: Second Temple Period Innovation or Anachronistic Interpretation?

History of Research

Page 11: Second Temple Period Innovation or Anachronistic Interpretation?

“’Otzar” Connecting PipeImmersion

Pool

Page 12: Second Temple Period Innovation or Anachronistic Interpretation?

“’Otzar”

Immersion Pool

Connecting Pipe

Page 13: Second Temple Period Innovation or Anachronistic Interpretation?

Immersion Pool “Otzar”Connecting

Channel

Jericho, Hasmonean Period (Pools F176-F182)

Page 14: Second Temple Period Innovation or Anachronistic Interpretation?

“’Otzar”

Immersion Pool

Jericho, Herodian Period (Pools A[M]537-A[M]538)

Page 15: Second Temple Period Innovation or Anachronistic Interpretation?

Immersion Pool “Otzar”Connecting

Pipe

Herodium

Page 16: Second Temple Period Innovation or Anachronistic Interpretation?

Immersion Pool

“Otzar”

Connecting Pipe

JerusalemArea T-4 of the Jewish Quarter

Excavations

Page 17: Second Temple Period Innovation or Anachronistic Interpretation?

MIQWA’OT (JEWISH RITUAL IMMERSION BATHS)IN ERETZ-ISRAEL

IN THE SECOND TEMPLE AND THE MISHNAH AND TALMUD PERIODS

THESIS SUBMITTED FOR THE DEGREE ‘DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY’

TO THE SENATE OF THE HEBREW UNIVERSITY, JERUSALEMBY RONNY REICH

1990

Page 18: Second Temple Period Innovation or Anachronistic Interpretation?
Page 19: Second Temple Period Innovation or Anachronistic Interpretation?

Miqwa’ot without an ’Otzar (265)

Miqwa’ot with an ’Otzar (17)

Miqwa’ot With a Questionable ’Otzar (18)

Page 20: Second Temple Period Innovation or Anachronistic Interpretation?

The “’Otzar” in Textual Sources

Page 21: Second Temple Period Innovation or Anachronistic Interpretation?

They may purify mikva’ot, whether a higher [pool] from a lower [pool], or a distant [pool] from one which is nearby. How so? One brings a pipe of earthenware or of lead and places his hand beneath it until it is filled with water [from one pool], and he has drawn it along and brought [this water] into contact [with the water of the other pool]; even if it touches by a hair’s breadth – it suffices. (Mishnah, Mikva’ot 6:8)

Page 22: Second Temple Period Innovation or Anachronistic Interpretation?

If there were forty se’ah in the upper [pool] and nothing in the lower, one may draw water [in vessels, carry them] on the shoulder, and pour [the drawn-water] into the upper pool until forty se’ah [of water] flows down into the lower [pool].

(Mishnah, Mikva’ot 6:8)

Page 23: Second Temple Period Innovation or Anachronistic Interpretation?

Rabbi Moses Schreiber (Sofer) Pressburg-Bratislava

Responsum dated December 14, 1813

Page 24: Second Temple Period Innovation or Anachronistic Interpretation?

A Re-examination of the Archaeological

Data in Context

Page 25: Second Temple Period Innovation or Anachronistic Interpretation?

Immersion Pool

“Otzar”

Connecting Pipe

JerusalemArea T-4 of the Jewish Quarter

Excavations7 m3

Page 26: Second Temple Period Innovation or Anachronistic Interpretation?
Page 27: Second Temple Period Innovation or Anachronistic Interpretation?
Page 28: Second Temple Period Innovation or Anachronistic Interpretation?

Immersion Pool “Otzar”Connecting

Channel

Jericho, Hasmonean Period (Pools F176-F182)

22 m3

Page 29: Second Temple Period Innovation or Anachronistic Interpretation?

What was the Function of the So-Called

“’Otzar” Installations?

Page 30: Second Temple Period Innovation or Anachronistic Interpretation?

Immersion Pool

“Otzar”Connecting PipeImmersion

Pool

Page 31: Second Temple Period Innovation or Anachronistic Interpretation?

Immersion Pool

Connecting Pipe

“Otzar”Immersion

Pool

Page 32: Second Temple Period Innovation or Anachronistic Interpretation?

“Otzar”

Immersion Pool

Gamla Synagogue Complex

Page 33: Second Temple Period Innovation or Anachronistic Interpretation?

Immersion Pool

Gamla Synagogue Complex

“Otzar”Settling Tank

Page 34: Second Temple Period Innovation or Anachronistic Interpretation?

Immersion Pool

Connecting Channel

“Otzar”Water Reservoir

Page 35: Second Temple Period Innovation or Anachronistic Interpretation?

Concluding Remarks

Page 36: Second Temple Period Innovation or Anachronistic Interpretation?

Rabbi David Münzberg inspecting the mikveh in the southern casemate wall of Masada (February 11, 1964)

Page 37: Second Temple Period Innovation or Anachronistic Interpretation?
Page 38: Second Temple Period Innovation or Anachronistic Interpretation?
Page 39: Second Temple Period Innovation or Anachronistic Interpretation?