secondary school study · first public meeting – may 31, 2016 all saints css – 60 attendees •...
TRANSCRIPT
Whitby Secondary Schools Study
October 24, 2016
Aims of the Study • Review the optimal programs and service delivery models for Catholic
Secondary Schools in Whitby ; • Understand the existing enrolment and projections impacting the
utilization of both schools; • Determine the characteristics and develop a profile for Whitby
Schools; • Review potential programs to locate at one or both Catholic Secondary
Schools in Whitby; • Examine potential grade configurations for one or both Catholic
Secondary Schools in Whitby • Prepare recommendations to the Board of Trustees
2
Actions to Date • Board approved its Long Term Accommodation Plan – January 19, 2016 • Initial report to Board – April 25, 2016 • Working Committee formed – May 1, 2016 • Initial Working Committee Meeting – May 9, 2016 • Second Report to Board – May 24, 2016 • First Public Meeting – May 31, 2016 All Saints CSS – 60 attendees • Third Report to Board – June 10, 2016 • Second Working Committee Meeting – September 30, 2016 • Second Public Meeting – October 18, 2016 – 200 attendees
3
Background Data
4
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
Stud
ents
Year
All Saints CSS Projections 2015-2025
Regular Track French Immersion Capacity
Background Data
5
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
Stud
ents
Year
Father Leo J Austin CSS Projections 2015-2025
Regular Track French Immersion Whitby French Immersion Oshawa Capacity
Page6
Page7
Range of Options Available
Page8
Page9
Alternative Time Frame Term Impact on School Impact on Adjacent School(s)
Ministry Approval
Boundary Change <1 year Long Term Increases enrolment at the receiving school from one or more adjacent schools
Reduces enrolment at each affected school
No
Grade Change <1 Year Long Term Increases enrolment at the receiving school from all of the schools impacted by the grade change
Reduces enrolment at each affected school
No
Program Relocation <1 year Medium Term Increases enrolment from program affected
Reduces enrolment at each affected school
No
Facility Partnership <1 year Short to Medium Term
Removes 1/2 capacity of the area designated
None No
Community Hub >1 year Long Term May remove all capacity from the area based on uses
None Capital will require approval
Magnet Program >1 Year Long Term Increases enrolment at the receiving school from all of the schools impacted by the program offered
Reduces enrolment at each affected school, may attract open access students
No
Select Demolition >1 Year Long Term Removes all capacity associated with wing of school
None Yes
Declare Portion Surplus and Lease
>1 Year Long Term Removes all capacity associated with wing of school
None Depends
Closure and Disposition >1 Year Long Term Removes all capacity associated with wing of school
None Yes
Options Considered
Page10
Options Considered • Program relocation • Facility Partnership(s) • Community Hub(s) • Magnet Program • Select demolition • Declare portion surplus and Lease
11
Options to Consider Further
Page12
Options to Consider Further in Study • Boundary change(s) • Grade change(s) • Closure and Disposition
13
Future Meeting Dates
• November 1st – 3rd Working Meeting at Monsignor John Pereyma CSS • November 24th – 3rd Public Consultation at All Saints CSS • December 9th – 4th and Final Working Meeting at CEC • January/February 2017 – Final Report to Board
14