securities and investment institute market misconduct: recent developments & case studies dorian...

24
Securities and Investment Institute Market misconduct: recent developments & case studies Dorian Drew 18 September 2007

Upload: david-bishop

Post on 13-Jan-2016

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Securities and Investment Institute Market misconduct: recent developments & case studies Dorian Drew 18 September 2007

Securities and Investment Institute Market misconduct: recent developments & case studiesDorian Drew18 September 2007

Page 2: Securities and Investment Institute Market misconduct: recent developments & case studies Dorian Drew 18 September 2007

Agenda

• The past

• The present

• The future

Page 3: Securities and Investment Institute Market misconduct: recent developments & case studies Dorian Drew 18 September 2007

Enforcement action to date

The FSA’s approach will be “…to prioritise rigorously, investigating only those cases which are material and significant.”

Howard Davies, March 2002

Page 4: Securities and Investment Institute Market misconduct: recent developments & case studies Dorian Drew 18 September 2007

Enforcement action to date

• Developing body of precedent:– c.20 final notices– 6 Tribunal decisions– 1 criminal prosecution

• All actions under pre-MAD types of behaviour

Page 5: Securities and Investment Institute Market misconduct: recent developments & case studies Dorian Drew 18 September 2007

Enforcement action to date

Misuse of information cases• Bracken, Middlemiss, Hutchings, Smith, Isaacs, Malins,

Jabre and GLG, Davies, Parker, Mohammed• Isaacs and Smith involved improper dissemination of

information• Baldwin: FSA failed to establish telephone conversation

took place• “Pre-existing trading strategy”: Parker and Jabre

Page 6: Securities and Investment Institute Market misconduct: recent developments & case studies Dorian Drew 18 September 2007

Enforcement action to date

False or misleading impression cases• Shell, Indigo Capital and Bonnier

Market distortion case• EBG and Potts

Page 7: Securities and Investment Institute Market misconduct: recent developments & case studies Dorian Drew 18 September 2007

Market misconduct under the Principles

• ABN AMRO• Hoodless Brennan• Deutsche• Citigroup• Jabre/GLG• Pignatelli and Casoni• Investments outside the scope of the market

abuse regime

Page 8: Securities and Investment Institute Market misconduct: recent developments & case studies Dorian Drew 18 September 2007

Penalties

• Range from £1,000 to £17m• Tribunal’s comments in Parker• Davidson and Tatham• Aggravating/mitigating factors

Page 9: Securities and Investment Institute Market misconduct: recent developments & case studies Dorian Drew 18 September 2007

Sean Pignatelli

• Statements of principle 2 & 3 - £20,000 penalty • “Outsider trading” – passed on, and embellished,

information received in an email from an analyst• Did not believe information to be inside• Prin 2 – failed to address his mind to warning

signs and discuss with manager or compliance• Prin 3 – relayed information in a way that gave

impression it was inside information• Credit Suisse had appropriate procedures

Page 10: Securities and Investment Institute Market misconduct: recent developments & case studies Dorian Drew 18 September 2007

Roberto Casoni

• Statement of principle 3 - £52,500 penalty (stage 1)• Research analyst - disclosed views and proposed

valuation method to certain clients prior to publication

• Citigroup had appropriate procedures• Star analyst - market abuse?

Page 11: Securities and Investment Institute Market misconduct: recent developments & case studies Dorian Drew 18 September 2007

Current problem

• Market cleanliness

– FTSE 350 trading statements: “marked improvement”

– Public takeover announcements: “only the slightest improvement”

– “More and tougher fines are required”

• “Sadly we can do sweet FSA about insider dealing”

Page 12: Securities and Investment Institute Market misconduct: recent developments & case studies Dorian Drew 18 September 2007

Current solutions

• NAO recently reinforced the importance of enforcement powers

• FSA has signalled push on enforcement, particularly in relation to market misconduct and TCF

• Enforcement staff overhaul• Budget increase• Greater international focus

Page 13: Securities and Investment Institute Market misconduct: recent developments & case studies Dorian Drew 18 September 2007

Current solutions

• Market Watch 18 – STR Review 2006: 400 STRs from 100 firms– Most of “high quality”– Most from small/medium firms– Most relate to equities markets– Insider dealing (not manipulation)

• SABRE update: £17m spend - real time monitoring

Page 14: Securities and Investment Institute Market misconduct: recent developments & case studies Dorian Drew 18 September 2007

Current solutions

• “In partnership” – Sally Dewar– Dialogue to agree priority areas– Strengthening procedures and learning good

practices– Reporting wrongdoing - STRs/self-reporting– Each taking tough action when abuse

identified

Page 15: Securities and Investment Institute Market misconduct: recent developments & case studies Dorian Drew 18 September 2007

Current solutions

• Plea bargaining/immunity agreements• Smoother process - greater involvement of senior

management• Search and seizure/freezing injunctions• Criminal prosecutions – four on the go• Gold plating – Margaret Cole reassures…

Page 16: Securities and Investment Institute Market misconduct: recent developments & case studies Dorian Drew 18 September 2007

Future focus – on the up

• Information flows: (Market Watch 21: inside information controls, Market Cleanliness Report)

• “Non-traditional” markets: Debt/credit/commodity derivatives markets

• Large financial institutions• Hedge funds/private equity: misuse of information

Page 17: Securities and Investment Institute Market misconduct: recent developments & case studies Dorian Drew 18 September 2007

Future focus – on the up

• MTFs/systematic internalisers• Increased use of Principles• Senior management?• Financial crime (not just market abuse)

Page 18: Securities and Investment Institute Market misconduct: recent developments & case studies Dorian Drew 18 September 2007

Future focus – On their way down

• Smaller market abuse cases• Misuse of information• Criminal investigations – “niche and easy”

Page 19: Securities and Investment Institute Market misconduct: recent developments & case studies Dorian Drew 18 September 2007

Risk mitigation

• Appropriate procedures– Ensure clear recording of product features,

external landscape and risks presented to firm– Implement clear rules/guidance– Undertake effective monitoring– Ensure there is evidence for pre-existing

trading strategies

Page 20: Securities and Investment Institute Market misconduct: recent developments & case studies Dorian Drew 18 September 2007

Risk mitigation

• Focus on FSA priority areas• Training: gaps often identified• Be proactive in identifying/reporting misconduct• Interact with FSA and contemporaries• Undertake robust disciplinary action

Page 21: Securities and Investment Institute Market misconduct: recent developments & case studies Dorian Drew 18 September 2007

Case study

• You are the compliance officer for Brookwyn Bank which makes a market in Tajikismurf, a mining company listed on AIM.

• During an analysts’ conference call, the CFO of the company lets slip that the main geologist’s report used to support the IPO of the company contained significant errors.

• Whilst still on the call, your analyst calls you to ask whether he can notify the market maker with a view to shorting the stock.

What further information would you want? Would you let him do it? If so, what would you do to mitigate the risks?

Page 22: Securities and Investment Institute Market misconduct: recent developments & case studies Dorian Drew 18 September 2007

Our international practice

AsiaBangkok BeijingHong KongJakartaShanghaiSingapore

Middle EastBahrainDubai

RussiaMoscow

Europe AmsterdamAthensBrusselsFrankfurtLondonMilanMunichParisPiraeusPragueRomeWarsaw

Page 23: Securities and Investment Institute Market misconduct: recent developments & case studies Dorian Drew 18 September 2007

Disclaimers

1 No individual who is a member, partner, shareholder, employee or consultant of, in or to any constituent part of Norton Rose Group (whether or not such individual is described as a “partner”) accepts or assumes responsibility, or has any liability, to any person in respect of this publication.

2 Any reference to a partner means a member of Norton Rose LLP or a consultant or employee of Norton Rose LLP or one of its affiliates with equivalent standing and qualifications.

3 This presentation contains information confidential to Norton Rose Group. Copyright in the materials is owned by Norton Rose Group and the materials should not be copied or disclosed to any other person without the express authorisation of Norton Rose.

4 This presentation is not intended to give legal advice and, accordingly, they should not be relied upon. They should not be regarded as a comprehensive statement of the law and practice in this area. Readers must take specific legal advice on any particular matter which concerns them. If you require any advice or information, please speak to your usual contact at Norton Rose Group.

Page 24: Securities and Investment Institute Market misconduct: recent developments & case studies Dorian Drew 18 September 2007