selected acquisition report (sar) · 31, 2015; and the tcto was completed on all fielded aircraft...

Selected Acquisition Report (SAR)

RCS: DD-A&T(Q&A)823-327

C-5 Reliability Enhancement and Re-engining Program (C-5 RERP)As of FY 2017 President's Budget

Defense Acquisition ManagementInformation Retrieval

(DAMIR)

March 23, 2016 16:10:28

UNCLASSIFIED

C-5 RERP December 2015 SAR

March 23, 2016 16:10:28

UNCLASSIFIED 2

Table of Contents Common Acronyms and Abbreviations for MDAP Programs 3

Program Information 5

Responsible Office 5

References 5

Mission and Description 6

Executive Summary 7

Threshold Breaches 8

Schedule 9

Performance 11

Track to Budget 13

Cost and Funding 14

Low Rate Initial Production 23

Foreign Military Sales 24

Nuclear Costs 24

Unit Cost 25

Cost Variance 28

Contracts 31

Deliveries and Expenditures 34

Operating and Support Cost 35

Common Acronyms and Abbreviations for MDAP Programs

Acq O&M - Acquisition-Related Operations and MaintenanceACAT - Acquisition CategoryADM - Acquisition Decision MemorandumAPB - Acquisition Program BaselineAPPN - AppropriationAPUC - Average Procurement Unit Cost$B - Billions of DollarsBA - Budget Authority/Budget ActivityBlk - BlockBY - Base YearCAPE - Cost Assessment and Program EvaluationCARD - Cost Analysis Requirements DescriptionCDD - Capability Development DocumentCLIN - Contract Line Item NumberCPD - Capability Production DocumentCY - Calendar YearDAB - Defense Acquisition BoardDAE - Defense Acquisition ExecutiveDAMIR - Defense Acquisition Management Information RetrievalDoD - Department of DefenseDSN - Defense Switched NetworkEMD - Engineering and Manufacturing DevelopmentEVM - Earned Value ManagementFOC - Full Operational CapabilityFMS - Foreign Military SalesFRP - Full Rate ProductionFY - Fiscal YearFYDP - Future Years Defense ProgramICE - Independent Cost EstimateIOC - Initial Operational CapabilityInc - IncrementJROC - Joint Requirements Oversight Council$K - Thousands of DollarsKPP - Key Performance ParameterLRIP - Low Rate Initial Production$M - Millions of DollarsMDA - Milestone Decision AuthorityMDAP - Major Defense Acquisition ProgramMILCON - Military ConstructionN/A - Not ApplicableO&M - Operations and MaintenanceORD - Operational Requirements DocumentOSD - Office of the Secretary of DefenseO&S - Operating and SupportPAUC - Program Acquisition Unit Cost


March 23, 2016 16:10:28

UNCLASSIFIED 3

PB - President’s BudgetPE - Program ElementPEO - Program Executive OfficerPM - Program ManagerPOE - Program Office EstimateRDT&E - Research, Development, Test, and EvaluationSAR - Selected Acquisition ReportSCP - Service Cost PositionTBD - To Be DeterminedTY - Then YearUCR - Unit Cost ReportingU.S. - United StatesUSD(AT&L) - Under Secretary of Defense (Acquisition, Technology and Logistics)


March 23, 2016 16:10:28

UNCLASSIFIED 4

Mr. Brian TownsendC-5 DivisionMobility Directorate2275 D Street, Bldg 16, Room 127Wright Patterson Air Force Base, OH 45433-7222

[email protected]

Phone: 937-656-9568

Fax: 937-656-7026

DSN Phone: 986-9568

DSN Fax: 986-7026

Date Assigned: October 2, 2012

Program Information

Program Name

C-5 Reliability Enhancement and Re-engining Program (C-5 RERP)

DoD Component

Air Force

Responsible Office

References

SAR Baseline (Production Estimate)

Defense Acquisition Executive (DAE) Approved Acquisition Program Baseline (APB) dated June 24, 2008

Approved APB

Defense Acquisition Executive (DAE) Approved Acquisition Program Baseline (APB) dated October 7, 2010


March 23, 2016 16:10:28

UNCLASSIFIED 5

Mission and Description

The C-5 Reliability Enhancement and Re-engining Program (C-5 RERP) is the second phase of a two-phase modernization program for the C-5. The Avionics Modernization Program was Phase I and is the baseline for C-5 RERP. Following completion of Phase II, C-5 RERP, the aircraft is designated a C-5M. C-5 RERP is a comprehensive modernization effort that will improve aircraft reliability, maintainability, and availability. C-5 RERP will enable the C-5M to achieve wartime mission requirements by increasing fleet availability (mission capable rates and departure reliability), reducing total ownership costs, and improving aircraft performance. This effort centers on replacing the current TF39 engine with a more reliable, commercial off-the-shelf General Electric (GE) CF6-80C2 (F138-GE-100 military designation) turbofan engine with increased takeoff thrust, stage-3 noise compliance, and Federal Aviation Regulation pollution compliance. In addition to new engines/pylons, C-5 RERP will provide upgrades to wing attachment fittings; new thrust reversers and auxiliary power units; upgrades to the electrical, hydraulic, fuel, fire suppression, landing gear, and pressurization/air conditioning systems; and airframe structural modifications. These aircraft improvements increase payload capability and access to communication, navigation, surveillance/air traffic management airspace. C-5 RERP also decreases aircraft time-to-climb, increases engine-out climb gradient for takeoff, improves transportation system throughput, and decreases engine removals.

The procurement tempo to deliver a C-5 RERP aircraft is a three-year process. The first year is advance procurement of material with longer than 12 months duration to buy and deliver, the second year involves material procurement and fabrication, while the third and final year is installation on the aircraft.


March 23, 2016 16:10:28

UNCLASSIFIED 6

Executive Summary

Lockheed Martin Aeronautics (LMA) delivered nine C-5M aircraft to the Air Force in 2015. The total complement of aircraft for Dover Air Force Base (AFB) was completed in 2014. Travis AFB received 9 aircraft, bringing their complement of aircraft to 14 as of December 31, 2015. The 9 deliveries in CY 2015 brought the total number of C-5Ms delivered to 32 aircraft. In addition, LMA delivered 2 aircraft in CY 2016 bringing the total C-5M fleet to 34 aircraft as of February 22, 2016.

Aircraft 68-0213, the first C-5C model to undergo the RERP modification, was delivered on April 24, 2015 and was ferried to Stewart Air National Guard Base (ANGB) for refurbishment before final delivery to Travis AFB.

A “handshake” agreement was reached during negotiations for the FY 2015 Lot 7 Production (Install) contract on the first day of “face-to-face” negotiations on July 6, 2015. The contract was awarded on August 13, 2015 and is the final lot buy for RERP.

Since the introduction of a government advisory team and an onsight representative in CY 2013, an improved LMA production feedback process and streamlined LMA/Defense Contract Management Agency flight operations process have stablized the RERP modification line. Significant savings have been achieved in several modification phases: aircraft induction timelines have been reduced 32 percent; aircraft modification timelines have been reduced 15 percent; quality assurance steps have been reduced 16 percent and functional testing has been reduced 8 percent. Together these reductions have reduced the delivery time from 678 calendar days in CY 2013 to 479 calendar days in CY 2015, a reduction of 199 calendar days (29 percent). LMA delivered nine of nine aircraft scheduled for delivery in CY 2015 and two of eight aircraft planned for delivery in CY 2016. Thirty-four of fifty-two aircraft have been modified to the C-5M configuration as of February 22, 2016.

A C-5 Safety Investigation Board (SIB) convened January 5, 2015 in response to multiple gear strikes causing a Class B mishap during acceptance testing at LMA. The number one main landing gear malfunctioned twice on two separate acceptance test flights while conducting hydraulic pressure tests during landing gear retraction. The SIB completed its investigation January 29, 2015 and the formal outbrief to the Air Force Life Cycle Management Center commander was held February 20, 2015. All recommendations were implemented. The aircraft completed acceptance testing March 31, 2015 and was delivered on April 6, 2015. The aircraft was ferried to Stewart ANGB for refurbishment on April 8, 2015 prior to delivery to Travis AFB.

At Air Mobility Command's request, the C-5 team successfully expedited delivery and fielding of updated C-5 software (Operational Flight Program version 3.5.2) and associated logistics support to include training, technical orders and the Time Compliance Technical Order (TCTO). The new software fixed a number of nuisance errors and also eliminated a safety risk during takeoff and landing. The contract was awarded January 29, 2015; aircrew training was completed March 31, 2015; and the TCTO was completed on all fielded aircraft (total of 30) in November 2015. The first Lot 6 production aircraft to be delivered with the new software occurred October 21, 2015.

On April 2, 2015, C-5M 85-0010, from Travis AFB, set 46 world records in the time to climb category with a 264,000 pound payload. Gross takeoff weight was 735,222 pounds. The records have been validated and certified by the National Aeronautics Association and the Federation Aeronautique Internationale. The C-5M Super Galaxy is now the top aviation record holder with a total of 89 world records; beating the AN-225 (73 records) and the B-1B (83 records).

The C-5 RERP CPD requires the C-5M to achieve a wartime Mission Capability Rate (MCR) of 75 percent. Since the start of production in October 2010, the C-5M has demonstrated that capability during several events. The latest event was three C-5Ms supporting real-world movement of helicopters and other equipment from Rota Air Base Portugal to Afganistan from December 6, 2015 to January 2, 2016. During this period, the aircraft flew 41 sorties and achieved an impressive 90.5 percent MCR.

There are no significant software-related issues with this program at this time.


March 23, 2016 16:10:28

UNCLASSIFIED 7

APB Breaches

Schedule Performance Cost RDT&E

Procurement MILCON Acq O&M

O&S CostUnit Cost PAUC

APUC

Nunn-McCurdy Breaches

Current UCR Baseline PAUC NoneAPUC None

Original UCR Baseline PAUC NoneAPUC None

Threshold Breaches


March 23, 2016 16:10:28

UNCLASSIFIED 8

Schedule

Schedule Events

EventsSAR Baseline

ProductionEstimate

Current APBProduction

Objective/Threshold

CurrentEstimate

Program Initiation Feb 2000 Feb 2000 Feb 2000 Feb 2000

Milestone B Nov 2001 Nov 2001 Nov 2001 Nov 2001

Contract Award Dec 2001 Dec 2001 Dec 2001 Dec 2001

Hardware/Software CDR Apr 2004 Apr 2004 Apr 2004 Apr 2004

First Flight Jun 2006 Jun 2006 Jun 2006 Jun 2006

Start Combined QT&E/QOT&E Jun 2006 Jun 2006 Jun 2006 Jun 2006

Milestone C Mar 2008 Mar 2008 Sep 2008 Mar 2008

Complete Dedicated QOT&E (AFOTEC Report complete)

Apr 2010 Apr 2010 Oct 2010 Mar 2010

FRP For B Models Dec 2010 Dec 2010 Dec 2011 Oct 2010

IOC Jun 2013 Jun 2013 Jun 2014 Feb 2014

Change Explanations

None


March 23, 2016 16:10:28

UNCLASSIFIED 9

Acronyms and Abbreviations

AFOTEC - Air Force Operational Test and Evaluation CenterCDR - Critical Design ReviewQOT&E - Qualification Operational Test and EvaluationQT&E - Qualification Test and Evaluation


March 23, 2016 16:10:28

UNCLASSIFIED 10

Performance

Performance Characteristics

SAR BaselineProductionEstimate


Objective/Threshold

DemonstratedPerformance

CurrentEstimate

Time To Climb/Initial Level Off

837,000 lbs take-off gross weight; RCR 23; climb condition: 77 deg F; SL to 31,000 ft in less than 25 min




Will meet or exceed Current APB Threshold. 769,000 lbs take-off gross weight; RCR 23; climb condition: 77 deg F; SL to 31,000 ft in less than 25 min

Aircraft Take-off Climb Gradient

One engine out climb gradient >=3.3% beginning at departure end of runway / 837,000 lbs take-off weight / hot day (103 deg F) / 10,000 ft runway / SL / RCR 23



One engine out climb gradient >= 3.3% beginning at departure end of runway/ 837,000 lbs takeoff weight; hot day (103 deg F)/ 10,000 ft runway/ SL/ RCR 23

Will meet or exceed Current APB Threshold. One engine out climb gradient >=2.5% beginning at departure end of runway / 837,000 lbs take-off weight / hot day (103 deg F) / 10,000 ft runway / SL / RCR 23

Mission Capable Rate (MCR)

Wartime >= 82% and Peacetime >= 75%

Wartime >= 82% and Peacetime >= 75%

Wartime >= 75% SDD (81.6%)/ QOT&E (66% & 76%)/ CONOPS I Surge (78%) & CONOPS II Surge (89%)/ AMC/ AFTRANS Surge (90%); Wartime >= 75% & Peace time >= 82%

Will meet or exceed Current APB Threshold. Wartime >= 75%

Noise Compliance

Certifiable under FAR Part 36 Stage 4 noise standards


Certifiable under FAR part 36 Stage 3 noise standards


Will meet or exceed Current APB Threshold. Certifiable under FAR part 36 Stage 3 noise standards

Emission Compliance

Certifiable under FAR Part 34 emission



Certifiable under FAR Part 34 emission requirements

Will meet or exceed Current APB Threshold. Certifiable


March 23, 2016 16:10:28

UNCLASSIFIED 11

requirements requirements requirements under FAR Part 34 emission requirements

Requirements Reference

Capability Production Document (CPD) Change 1 dated December 1, 2009

Change Explanations

None

Notes

Demonstrated performance reflects the outcome of Flight Test completed during SDD on August 18, 2008; QOT&E completed on March 8, 2010; and Post-QOT&E Real-World Surge Exercises.

Acronyms and Abbreviations

AFTRANS - Air Forces TransportationAMC - Air Mobility CommandCONOPS - Concept of Operationsdeg - degreesF - FahrenheitFAR - Federal Aviation Regulationft - feetlbs - poundsmin - minutesQOT&E - Qualification Operational Test and EvaluationRCR - Runway Condition ReadingSDD - System Design and DevelopmentSL - Sea Level


March 23, 2016 16:10:28

UNCLASSIFIED 12

Track to Budget

RDT&E

Appn BA PE

Air Force 3600 07 0401119F Project Name

674835 C-5 Airlift Squadrons/C-5 Reliability Enhancement & Reengining Program (RERP)

(Sunk)

Procurement

Appn BA PE

Air Force 3010 07 0401119F Line Item Name

000075 C-5 Reliability Enhancement and Reengining Program (RERP)

(Shared) (Sunk)

Air Force 3010 06 0401119F Line Item Name

000999 Initial spares and repair parts (Shared) (Sunk) Air Force 3010 05 0401119F

Line Item Name

C00500 C-5 Reliability Enhancement and Reengining Program (RERP)

(Sunk)

C005M0 C-5M (Sunk) MILCON

Appn BA PE

Air Force 3300 01 0401896F Project Name

103003 C-5 Reliability Enhancement and Reengining Program (RERP)

(Sunk)

Notes: Training facility at Dover Air Force Base


March 23, 2016 16:10:28

UNCLASSIFIED 13

Cost and Funding

Cost Summary

Total Acquisition Cost

Appropriation

BY 2008 $M BY 2008 $M TY $M



Objective/Threshold

CurrentEstimate


Current APBProductionObjective

CurrentEstimate

RDT&E 1722.9 1734.3 1907.7 1691.4 1643.5 1645.0 1601.2Procurement 5415.9 5396.3 5935.9 5001.6 6042.1 5860.4 5460.1

Flyaway -- -- -- 4170.6 -- -- 4560.3Recurring -- -- -- 4170.6 -- -- 4560.3Non Recurring -- -- -- 0.0 -- -- 0.0

Support -- -- -- 831.0 -- -- 899.8Other Support -- -- -- 291.1 -- -- 316.4Initial Spares -- -- -- 539.9 -- -- 583.4

MILCON 7.8 5.1 5.6 5.0 8.5 5.3 5.3Acq O&M 0.0 0.0 -- 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Total 7146.6 7135.7 N/A 6698.0 7694.1 7510.7 7066.6

Confidence Level

Confidence Level of cost estimate for current APB: 50%

Confidence Level for current Acquisition Program Baseline (APB) cost is 50%. The Independent Cost Estimate (ICE) to support C-5 RERP Full Rate Production decision, like all life-cycle cost estimates previously performed by the Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation (CAPE), is built upon a product-oriented work breakdown structure, based on historical actual cost information to the maximum extent possible, and, most importantly, based on conservative assumptions that are consistent with actual demonstrated contractor and government performance for a series of acquisition programs in which the Department has been successful.

It is difficult to calculate mathematically the precise confidence levels associated with life-cycle cost estimates prepared for Major Defense Acquisition Program (MDAPs) programs. Based on the rigor in methods used in building estimates, the strong adherence to the collection and use of historical cost information, and the review of applied assumptions, we project that it is about equally likely that the estimate will prove too low or too high for execution of the program described.

Total Quantity

QuantitySAR Baseline

ProductionEstimate


Current Estimate

RDT&E 3 3 3Procurement 49 49 49

Total 52 52 52


March 23, 2016 16:10:28

UNCLASSIFIED 14

Cost and Funding

Funding Summary

Appropriation Summary

FY 2017 President's Budget / December 2015 SAR (TY$ M)

Appropriation Prior FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021To

CompleteTotal

RDT&E 1601.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1601.2Procurement 5460.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5460.1MILCON 5.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.3Acq O&M 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

PB 2017 Total 7066.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 7066.6PB 2016 Total 7090.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 7090.6

Delta -24.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -24.0

Quantity Summary

FY 2017 President's Budget / December 2015 SAR (TY$ M)

Quantity Undistributed PriorFY

2016FY

2017FY

2018FY

2019FY

2020FY

2021To

CompleteTotal

Development 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3Production 0 49 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 49

PB 2017 Total 3 49 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 52PB 2016 Total 3 49 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 52

Delta 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0


March 23, 2016 16:10:28

UNCLASSIFIED 15

Cost and Funding

Annual Funding By Appropriation

Annual Funding3600 | RDT&E | Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation, Air Force

FiscalYear

Quantity

TY $M

End ItemRecurring

Flyaway

Non EndItem

RecurringFlyaway

NonRecurring

Flyaway

TotalFlyaway

TotalSupport

TotalProgram

2000 -- -- -- -- -- -- 16.32001 -- -- -- -- -- -- 39.62002 -- -- -- -- -- -- 83.72003 -- -- -- -- -- -- 191.42004 -- -- -- -- -- -- 260.22005 -- -- -- -- -- -- 278.22006 -- -- -- -- -- -- 222.92007 -- -- -- -- -- -- 137.62008 -- -- -- -- -- -- 161.62009 -- -- -- -- -- -- 80.92010 -- -- -- -- -- -- 62.42011 -- -- -- -- -- -- 54.42012 -- -- -- -- -- -- 12.0

Subtotal 3 -- -- -- -- -- 1601.2


March 23, 2016 16:10:28

UNCLASSIFIED 16

Annual Funding3600 | RDT&E | Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation, Air Force

FiscalYear

Quantity

BY 2008 $M

End ItemRecurring

Flyaway

Non EndItem

RecurringFlyaway

NonRecurring

Flyaway

TotalFlyaway

TotalSupport

TotalProgram

2000 -- -- -- -- -- -- 19.02001 -- -- -- -- -- -- 45.62002 -- -- -- -- -- -- 95.42003 -- -- -- -- -- -- 215.42004 -- -- -- -- -- -- 285.52005 -- -- -- -- -- -- 297.32006 -- -- -- -- -- -- 231.42007 -- -- -- -- -- -- 139.22008 -- -- -- -- -- -- 160.32009 -- -- -- -- -- -- 79.22010 -- -- -- -- -- -- 60.32011 -- -- -- -- -- -- 51.62012 -- -- -- -- -- -- 11.2

Subtotal 3 -- -- -- -- -- 1691.4


March 23, 2016 16:10:28

UNCLASSIFIED 17

Annual Funding3010 | Procurement | Aircraft Procurement, Air Force

FiscalYear

Quantity

TY $M

End ItemRecurring

Flyaway

Non EndItem

RecurringFlyaway

NonRecurring

Flyaway

TotalFlyaway

TotalSupport

TotalProgram

2007 -- 52.5 -- -- 52.5 9.0 61.52008 1 132.6 -- -- 132.6 61.3 193.92009 3 289.9 -- -- 289.9 46.7 336.62010 5 482.9 -- -- 482.9 72.3 555.22011 7 636.5 -- -- 636.5 187.1 823.62012 11 823.3 -- -- 823.3 329.1 1152.42013 11 1002.7 -- -- 1002.7 120.1 1122.82014 11 853.2 -- -- 853.2 43.5 896.72015 -- 286.7 -- -- 286.7 30.7 317.4

Subtotal 49 4560.3 -- -- 4560.3 899.8 5460.1


March 23, 2016 16:10:28

UNCLASSIFIED 18

Annual Funding3010 | Procurement | Aircraft Procurement, Air Force

FiscalYear

Quantity

BY 2008 $M

End ItemRecurring

Flyaway

Non EndItem

RecurringFlyaway

NonRecurring

Flyaway

TotalFlyaway

TotalSupport

TotalProgram

2007 -- 52.2 -- -- 52.2 9.0 61.22008 1 129.9 -- -- 129.9 60.0 189.92009 3 279.3 -- -- 279.3 45.0 324.32010 5 456.3 -- -- 456.3 68.3 524.62011 7 592.1 -- -- 592.1 174.1 766.22012 11 754.4 -- -- 754.4 301.5 1055.92013 11 900.1 -- -- 900.1 107.8 1007.92014 11 755.7 -- -- 755.7 38.5 794.22015 -- 250.6 -- -- 250.6 26.8 277.4

Subtotal 49 4170.6 -- -- 4170.6 831.0 5001.6


March 23, 2016 16:10:28

UNCLASSIFIED 19

Cost Quantity Information3010 | Procurement | Aircraft Procurement, Air Force

FiscalYear

Quantity

End ItemRecurring

Flyaway(Aligned With

Quantity)BY 2008 $M

2007 -- --2008 1 176.22009 3 294.52010 5 468.72011 7 639.42012 11 914.82013 11 808.12014 11 868.92015 -- --

Subtotal 49 4170.6


March 23, 2016 16:10:28

UNCLASSIFIED 20

Annual Funding3300 | MILCON | Military Construction, Air Force

FiscalYear

TY $M

TotalProgram

2010 5.3Subtotal 5.3


March 23, 2016 16:10:28

UNCLASSIFIED 21

Annual Funding3300 | MILCON | Military Construction, Air Force

FiscalYear

BY 2008 $M

TotalProgram

2010 5.0Subtotal 5.0


March 23, 2016 16:10:28

UNCLASSIFIED 22

Low Rate Initial Production

Item Initial LRIP Decision Current Total LRIP

Approval Date 11/5/2001 3/25/2008

Approved Quantity 12 16

Reference Milestone B ADM Milestone C ADM

Start Year 2006 2007

End Year 2010 2012

The Current Total LRIP Quantity is more than 10% of the total production quantity due to the C-5 RERP Milestone C ADM approving an LRIP quantity of 16 systems as being necessary to maintain a steady ramp to FRP. The start year changed from the Initial LRIP Decision to the Current Total LRIP during the Nunn-McCurdy restructure.

The procurement tempo to deliver a C-5 RERP aircraft is a three-year process. The first year is advance procurement of material with longer than 12 months duration to buy and deliver. The second year involves material procurement and fabrication, while the third and final year is installation on the aircraft.


March 23, 2016 16:10:28

UNCLASSIFIED 23

Foreign Military Sales

None

Nuclear Costs

None


March 23, 2016 16:10:28

UNCLASSIFIED 24

Unit Cost

Unit Cost Report

Item

BY 2008 $M BY 2008 $M

% ChangeCurrent UCRBaseline

(Oct 2010 APB)

Current Estimate(Dec 2015 SAR)

Program Acquisition Unit CostCost 7135.7 6698.0 Quantity 52 52 Unit Cost 137.225 128.808 -6.13

Average Procurement Unit CostCost 5396.3 5001.6 Quantity 49 49 Unit Cost 110.129 102.073 -7.32

Item

BY 2008 $M BY 2008 $M

% ChangeRevised

Original UCRBaseline

(Jun 2008 APB)

Current Estimate(Dec 2015 SAR)

Program Acquisition Unit Cost Cost 7146.6 6698.0 Quantity 52 52 Unit Cost 137.435 128.808 -6.28

Average Procurement Unit CostCost 5415.9 5001.6 Quantity 49 49 Unit Cost 110.529 102.073 -7.65


March 23, 2016 16:10:28

UNCLASSIFIED 25

Unit Cost History

Item DateBY 2008 $M TY $M

PAUC APUC PAUC APUC

Original APB Nov 2001 81.955 71.010 88.047 78.293APB as of January 2006 Feb 2005 92.829 81.564 98.252 88.355Revised Original APB Jun 2008 137.435 110.529 147.963 123.308Prior APB Jun 2008 137.435 110.529 147.963 123.308Current APB Oct 2010 137.225 110.129 144.437 119.600Prior Annual SAR Dec 2014 128.998 102.280 136.358 111.920Current Estimate Dec 2015 128.808 102.073 135.896 111.431

SAR Unit Cost History

Initial SAR Baseline to Current SAR Baseline (TY $M)

Initial PAUCDevelopment

Estimate

Changes PAUCProduction

Estimate Econ Qty Sch Eng Est Oth Spt Total

88.047 0.635 55.435 10.863 -1.056 -6.673 0.000 0.712 59.916 147.963

Current SAR Baseline to Current Estimate (TY $M)

PAUCProductionEstimate

Changes PAUCCurrentEstimateEcon Qty Sch Eng Est Oth Spt Total

147.963 -2.469 0.000 0.000 0.000 -6.554 0.000 -3.044 -12.067 135.896


March 23, 2016 16:10:28

UNCLASSIFIED 26

Initial SAR Baseline to Current SAR Baseline (TY $M)

Initial APUCDevelopment

Estimate

Changes APUCProduction

Estimate Econ Qty Sch Eng Est Oth Spt Total

78.293 0.640 32.062 7.029 0.000 -4.756 0.000 10.040 45.015 123.308

Current SAR Baseline to Current Estimate (TY $M)

APUCProductionEstimate

Changes APUCCurrentEstimate Econ Qty Sch Eng Est Oth Spt Total

123.308 -2.420 0.000 0.000 0.000 -6.227 0.000 -3.231 -11.878 111.431

SAR Baseline History

ItemSAR

PlanningEstimate

SARDevelopment

Estimate

SARProduction

Estimate

CurrentEstimate

Milestone I N/A Feb 2000 Feb 2000 Feb 2000Milestone B N/A Nov 2001 Nov 2001 Nov 2001Milestone C N/A Dec 2006 Mar 2008 Mar 2008IOC N/A Mar 2010 Jun 2013 Feb 2014Total Cost (TY $M) N/A 11093.9 7694.1 7066.6Total Quantity N/A 126 52 52PAUC N/A 88.047 147.963 135.896


March 23, 2016 16:10:28

UNCLASSIFIED 27

Cost Variance

Summary TY $M

Item RDT&E Procurement MILCON Total


1643.5 6042.1 8.5 7694.1

Previous ChangesEconomic -9.4 -105.7 -0.2 -115.3Quantity -- -- -- --Schedule -- -- -- --Engineering -- -- -- --Estimating -32.9 -316.1 -3.0 -352.0Other -- -- -- --Support -- -136.2 -- -136.2

Subtotal -42.3 -558.0 -3.2 -603.5Current Changes

Economic -0.2 -12.9 -- -13.1Quantity -- -- -- --Schedule -- -- -- --Engineering -- -- -- --Estimating +0.2 +11.0 -- +11.2Other -- -- -- --Support -- -22.1 -- -22.1

Subtotal -- -24.0 -- -24.0Total Changes -42.3 -582.0 -3.2 -627.5

CE - Cost Variance 1601.2 5460.1 5.3 7066.6CE - Cost & Funding 1601.2 5460.1 5.3 7066.6


March 23, 2016 16:10:28

UNCLASSIFIED 28

Summary BY 2008 $M

Item RDT&E Procurement MILCON Total


1722.9 5415.9 7.8 7146.6

Previous ChangesEconomic -- -- -- --Quantity -- -- -- --Schedule -- -- -- --Engineering -- -- -- --Estimating -31.7 -280.9 -2.8 -315.4Other -- -- -- --Support -- -123.3 -- -123.3

Subtotal -31.7 -404.2 -2.8 -438.7Current Changes

Economic -- -- -- --Quantity -- -- -- --Schedule -- -- -- --Engineering -- -- -- --Estimating +0.2 +9.8 -- +10.0Other -- -- -- --Support -- -19.9 -- -19.9

Subtotal +0.2 -10.1 -- -9.9Total Changes -31.5 -414.3 -2.8 -448.6

CE - Cost Variance 1691.4 5001.6 5.0 6698.0CE - Cost & Funding 1691.4 5001.6 5.0 6698.0

Previous Estimate: December 2014


March 23, 2016 16:10:28

UNCLASSIFIED 29

RDT&E $M

Current Change ExplanationsBase Year

Then Year

Revised escalation indices. (Economic) N/A -0.2Adjustment for current and prior escalation. (Estimating) +0.2 +0.2

RDT&E Subtotal +0.2 0.0

Procurement $M

Current Change ExplanationsBase Year

Then Year

Revised escalation indices. (Economic) N/A -12.9Revised estimate to reflect actuals. (Estimating) -0.5 -0.7Adjustment for current and prior escalation. (Estimating) +10.3 +11.7Adjustment for current and prior escalation. (Support) +1.2 +1.2Decrease in Other Support related to Depot Activation. (Support) -1.5 -1.6Decrease in Initial Spares to reflect actuals and refined estimating assumptions. (Support) -19.6 -21.7

Procurement Subtotal -10.1 -24.0


March 23, 2016 16:10:28

UNCLASSIFIED 30

Contracts

Contract Identification

Appropriation: Procurement

Contract Name: C-5 RERP FRP Lot 5

Contractor: Lockheed Martin

Contractor Location: 86 South Cobb DriveMarietta, GA 39963-0290

Contract Number: FA8625-07-C-6471/5

Contract Type: Fixed Price with Economic Price Adjustment (FPEPA)

Award Date: October 20, 2010

Definitization Date: October 20, 2010

Contract Price

Initial Contract Price ($M) Current Contract Price ($M) Estimated Price At Completion ($M)

Target Ceiling Qty Target Ceiling Qty Contractor Program Manager

162.9 N/A 11 1099.1 N/A 11 1099.1 1099.1

Target Price Change Explanation

The difference between the Initial Contract Price Target and the Current Contract Price Target is due to contract modification adding the following to Lot 5: Long lead, material/fabrication, installation, initial spares, readiness spares package, rapid repair and response, and support equipment.

Cost and Schedule Variance Explanations

Cost and Schedule Variance reporting is not required on this (FPEPA) contract.

General Contract Variance Explanation

Cost and schedule variances are not reported for this contract, because an EVM waiver was granted in an ADM, dated October 07, 2010, due to fixed price production contract.

Notes

This contract is more than 90% complete; therefore, this is the final report for this contract.


March 23, 2016 16:10:28

UNCLASSIFIED 31





Contractor Location: 86 South Cobb DriveMarietta, GA 39963-0290





Contract Price



160.0 N/A 11 1014.6 N/A 11 1014.6 1014.6


The difference between the Initial Contract Price Target and the Current Contract Price Target is due to contract modification adding the following to Lot 6: Long lead, material/fabrication, installation, initial spares, readiness spares package, rapid repair and response, and support equipment.




March 23, 2016 16:10:28

UNCLASSIFIED 32





Contractor Location: 86 Cobb DriveMarietta, GA 39963-0290





Contract Price



155.5 N/A 11 1088.0 N/A 11 1088.0 1088.0


The difference between the Initial Contract Price Target and the Current Contract Price Target is due to contract modification adding the following to Lot 7: Long lead, material/fabrication, installation, and rapid repair and response.




March 23, 2016 16:10:28

UNCLASSIFIED 33

7066.65450.4

77.13%16

Total Acquisition CostExpended to DatePercent ExpendedTotal Funding Years

16100.00%

7066.6100.00%

Years AppropriatedPercent Years AppropriatedAppropriated to DatePercent Appropriated

Deliveries and Expenditures

Deliveries

Delivered to Date Planned to Date Actual to Date Total QuantityPercent

Delivered

Development 3 3 3 100.00%Production 30 31 49 63.27%Total Program Quantity Delivered 33 34 52 65.38%

Expended and Appropriated (TY $M)

The above data is current as of February 09, 2016.

RERP 3010/3600 expenditures as of February 9, 2016.Scheduled deliveries are based on the award of the Production Contract Schedule Re-Baseline modification, dated November 6, 2012.


March 23, 2016 16:10:28

UNCLASSIFIED 34

Operating and Support Cost

Cost Estimate Details

Date of Estimate: Source of Estimate: Quantity to Sustain: Unit of Measure: Service Life per Unit: Fiscal Years in Service:

O&S costs are not tracked separately for C-5 RERP. O&S costs are included in the overall operational costs for the existing C-5 fleet managed by the program office at Robins Air Force Base.

Sustainment Strategy

.

Antecedent Information

No Antecedent

Annual O&S Costs BY2008 $M

Cost ElementC-5 RERP

N/AN/A (Antecedent)

N/A

Unit-Level Manpower 0.000 0.000Unit Operations 0.000 0.000Maintenance 0.000 0.000Sustaining Support 0.000 0.000Continuing System Improvements 0.000 0.000Indirect Support 0.000 0.000Other 0.000 0.000Total -- --

Item

Total O&S Cost $M

C-5 RERPN/A (Antecedent)Current Production APB

Objective/ThresholdCurrent Estimate

Base Year N/A N/A N/A N/A

Then Year N/A N/A N/A 0.0

O&S Cost Variance


March 23, 2016 16:10:28

UNCLASSIFIED 35

Category BY 2008

$MChange Explanations

Prior SAR Total O&S Estimates - Dec 2014 SAR

0.0

Programmatic/Planning Factors 0.0Cost Estimating Methodology 0.0Cost Data Update 0.0Labor Rate 0.0Energy Rate 0.0Technical Input 0.0Other 0.0Total Changes 0.0Current Estimate 0.0

Disposal Estimate Details

Date of Estimate: Source of Estimate: Disposal/Demilitarization Total Cost (BY 2008 $M):


March 23, 2016 16:10:28

UNCLASSIFIED 36

selected acquisition report (sar) · 31, 2015; and the tcto was completed on all fielded aircraft...

Documents