selecting the best analyst - appendix d

Upload: policefoundation

Post on 04-Apr-2018

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/30/2019 Selecting the Best Analyst - Appendix D

    1/7

    SELECTING THEBEST ANALYST

    FOR THE JOBA Model Crime Analyst AssessmentProcess for Law Enforcement Agencie

    APPENDIX D

    C A AP C

  • 7/30/2019 Selecting the Best Analyst - Appendix D

    2/7

    D-1

    Crime Analyst Assessment Process Comonents Apendix D

    Appendix D: Crime Analyst Assessment Process Components

    D.1 Rsum Evaluation Key

    The following is a rating scale anchored by typical characteristics associated with candidate backgrounds. If you

    assign a score that does not match the anchor, provide an explanation below. Circle one number in each category.

    Education 1 2 3 4 5

    No degree Related A.A. or

    unrelated B.A./B.S

    Relevant

    B.A./B.S

    Related Masters

    or unrelated Ph.D.

    Relevant Ph.D.

    Comments: ___________________________________________________________________________________________

    _____________________________________________________________________________________________________

    _____________________________________________________________________________________________________

    Years of Prof. Experience 1 2 3 4 5

    None < 1 year 1 3 years 3 5 years 5 or more years

    Comments: ___________________________________________________________________________________________

    _____________________________________________________________________________________________________

    _____________________________________________________________________________________________________

    Law Enforcement Experience 1 2 3 4 5

    None < 1 year 1 3 years 3 5 years 5 or more years

    Comments: ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

    _____________________________________________________________________________________________________

    Analyst Experience 1 2 3 4 5

    None < 1 year 1 3 years 3 5 years 5 or more years

    Comments: ___________________________________________________________________________________________

    _____________________________________________________________________________________________________

    _____________________________________________________________________________________________________

    Research Experience 1 2 3 4 5

    None < 1 year 1 3 years 3 5 years 5 or more years

    Comments: ___________________________________________________________________________________________

    _____________________________________________________________________________________________________

    _____________________________________________________________________________________________________

  • 7/30/2019 Selecting the Best Analyst - Appendix D

    3/7

    D-2

    Crime Analyst Assessment Process Comonents Apendix D

    Demonstrated Job Commitment 1 2 3 4 5

    None (Job hopper) Very limited Some Changes jobs only

    for promotion/

    greater relevance

    Extremely

    Comments: ___________________________________________________________________________________________

    _____________________________________________________________________________________________________

    _____________________________________________________________________________________________________

    Problem-Solving Orientation 1 2 3 4 5

    None Very limited Has handled some

    problems

    Focuses on

    problem solving

    Extensive problem

    solving focus

    Comments: ___________________________________________________________________________________________

    _____________________________________________________________________________________________________

    _____________________________________________________________________________________________________

    Rsum Presentation Quality 1 2 3 4 5

    Poor Below average Average Above average Exceptional

    Comments: ___________________________________________________________________________________________

    _____________________________________________________________________________________________________

    _____________________________________________________________________________________________________

    Software/Database Skills 1 2 3 4 5

    None Very limited Average Above average Extensive

    Other Skills or Experience 1 2 3 4 5

    None Very limited Average Very good Excellent

    PLEASE Describe: ______________________________________________________________________________________

    _____________________________________________________________________________________________________

    Multiply total score by 3 = _______/150

    By: __________ (initial here)

    *FOR SUPERVISORS ONLY: If you use the CAAP for supervisory positions, you will need to adapt the scoring key and total score accordingly.

  • 7/30/2019 Selecting the Best Analyst - Appendix D

    4/7

    D-3

    Crime Analyst Assessment Process Comonents Apendix D

    Management and/orSupervisory Skills/Experience

    1 2 3 4 5

    None Very limited Some knowledge

    or experience

    2 3 years More than 3 years

    Comments: ___________________________________________________________________________________________

    _____________________________________________________________________________________________________

    _____________________________________________________________________________________________________

    PLEASE Describe: ______________________________________________________________________________________

    _____________________________________________________________________________________________________

  • 7/30/2019 Selecting the Best Analyst - Appendix D

    5/7

    D-4

    Crime Analyst Assessment Process Comonents Apendix D

    D.2 Scoring Key for Writing Sample/Analysis Product

    The following is a rating scale anchored by typical characteristics associated with written expression relevant to

    this position. In some cases, a sample product (e.g., map, etc.) may take the place of a writing sample. In that case,the product will still be rated on the same general categories. If you assign a score that does not match the anchor,

    please provide an explanation below.

    Circle one number in each category.

    Clarity/Organization

    1 2 3 4 5

    Highly disorganized,

    unclear, and hard to

    understand.

    Somewhat disorganized

    or unclear, and somewhat

    hard to understand.

    Somewhat clear,

    organized, and somewhat

    easy to understand

    Mostly clear, well

    organized, and easy to

    understand.

    Very clear, well organized,

    and very easy to

    understand.

    Comments: ___________________________________________________________________________________________

    _____________________________________________________________________________________________________

    Quality of Research or Analysis Product

    1 2 3 4 5

    Very unprofessional;

    content inaccurate; lacks

    meaning.

    Lacks professionalism;

    content weak; meaning

    unclear.

    Somewhat professional;

    acceptable content and

    meaning.

    Professional; strong

    content; very meaningful.

    Highly professional;

    exceptional content;

    highly meaningful.

    Comments: ___________________________________________________________________________________________

    _____________________________________________________________________________________________________

    Presentation Style

    1 2 3 4 5

    Extensive errors; very

    poorly written.

    Quite a few errors; writing

    is acceptable.

    Some errors; writing is

    acceptable.

    Limited errors; writing is

    very good.

    Flawless; writing is

    exceptional.

    Comments: ___________________________________________________________________________________________

    _____________________________________________________________________________________________________

    Overall Impression

    1 2 3 4 5

    Poor Below average Average Good Excellent

    Comments: ___________________________________________________________________________________________

    _____________________________________________________________________________________________________

    Multiply total score by 5 = _______/100

    By: __________ (initial here)

  • 7/30/2019 Selecting the Best Analyst - Appendix D

    6/7

    D-5

    Crime Analyst Assessment Process Comonents Apendix D

    D.3 Candidate Materials

    D.3.a Selection Letter and Information Packet

    Crime Mapping, Crime Analysis, and Problem Analysis

    Training Exercise

    ID # _____

    DATE:

    TO: Candidate Name

    FROM:

    RE: Crime Analyst Position

    Congratulations on being selected to participate in the Crime Analyst Selection Process. For this process, you have

    been assigned an ID # (shown above) to use during the assessment. We have scheduled you to participate in our

    assessment process on ___________(date). The assessment process will consist of the following: 1) problem

    analysis exercise, 2) training presentation, 3) structured panel interview, and 4) a GIS mapping exercise. For items

    3 and 4, instructions will be given on the day of the assessment. For item 2, training presentation, you will need to

    prepare in advance as follows.

    Enclosed in this packet is a CD with actual training slides from a recent Advanced Problem Analysis, Crime Analysis,

    & Crime Mapping Training conducted by the Police Foundations Crime Mapping & Problem Analysis Laboratory.Only two of the original sections are included on this CD: (1) Intro to Crime Analysis, Problem Solving, and Problem

    Analysis, and (2) Descriptive Spatial Analysis.

    Your objective is to prepare to present a 30-minute training session during your assessment process here at the

    ________________ on _____________ (date/time). Use only the slides that you feel should be included. In

    addition, you will be given 10 minutes preparation time before your 30-minute training segment. We will provide

    a laptop and PowerPoint projector for you. Your audience for this particular training session is introductory level

    participants who have little, if any, knowledge about crime analysis, crime mapping, and problem solving. There will

    be _________(insert number) employees who may offer questions after your presentation. Again, feel free to leave

    out any slides so that your presentation runs close to the 30-minutes allotted for this exercise. You may save your

    training presentation on either a ash drive or preferably a CD to bring in on the day you present.

    If you have any questions about this training exercise, please contact ________________ at

    ________________ (phone).

  • 7/30/2019 Selecting the Best Analyst - Appendix D

    7/7

    D-6

    Crime Analyst Assessment Process Comonents Apendix D

    D.3.b Sample Candidate Assessment Schedule

    Candidate Name

    INSERT ASSESSMENT DATE

    INSERT ASSESSMENT TIME (from/to)

    Time Exercise Length Description

    8:30 Problem Analysis/Solving 90 minutes Review details and data regarding a problem ina ctitious city. Write a 23 page summary of

    the problem and potential solutions.

    10:00 Break 10 minutes

    10:10 Training Presentation 40 minutes (10 allotted forsetup)

    Using the slides sent to you, present a 30-

    minute training session on the material based

    on the audience description.

    10:50 Structured Panel Interview 3040 minutes Respond to questions from a 35 memberinterview panel.

    11:30 GIS Mapping Exercise* 40 minutes Complete a mapping exercise using ArcViewGIS 9.x.

    12:10 Debrieng 1020 minutes Meet with Assessment Coordinator to discussnext steps and get exercise feedback.

    * Assistance will be available for those not fully familiar with ArcView.