selection 3 mana 4328 dr. george benson [email protected]

12
Selection 3 MANA 4328 Dr. George Benson [email protected]

Upload: esmond-reynolds

Post on 19-Jan-2016

223 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Selection 3 MANA 4328 Dr. George Benson benson@uta.edu

Selection 3

MANA 4328

Dr. George Benson

[email protected]

Page 2: Selection 3 MANA 4328 Dr. George Benson benson@uta.edu

Contingent Assessment

Background Checks References and education Criminal record and credit check Investigative agencies Reliability and Validity

Integrity / Honesty Tests

Drug Tests Current vs. previous drug use

Medical Exams Determine if a person can safely perform the job Significant and specific risk must exists “Preventing Injury” not the same as “Job Performance”

Page 3: Selection 3 MANA 4328 Dr. George Benson benson@uta.edu

Background Checks

Purposes (1) to verify information and (2) gain additional information relevant to the job

Types:1. Education / Employment verification

2. References

3. Criminal record

4. Credit – Fair Credit Reporting Act requires permission

What positions should require background checks and to what degree?

Page 4: Selection 3 MANA 4328 Dr. George Benson benson@uta.edu

U. of Texas Background Checks

It is the policy of The University of Texas at Arlington to obtain:

a.    Criminal history record information on an applicant who is the finalist for a position designated by System Administration or a component institution as security-sensitive position.

b.    Criminal conviction record information available to the public on an applicant who is the finalist for a position that is not so designated as security-sensitive.

As of 09-17-2002 this policy does not apply to current or prospective employees with faculty titles.

Page 5: Selection 3 MANA 4328 Dr. George Benson benson@uta.edu

Security Sensitive Positions

All senior level administrator positions including all executive officers and System administrative officials.

Positions that have responsibility for providing patient care or for providing child-care in a child-care facility, as that term is defined in Texas Human Resources Code § 42.002(3), as it may be amended from time to time.

Positions that have direct access to, or responsibility for, pharmaceuticals, select agents, or controlled substances.

Page 6: Selection 3 MANA 4328 Dr. George Benson benson@uta.edu

U. of Texas Background Checks

“Many are worried that these checks will hamper efforts to attract the most qualified employees.”

UTA Shorthorn 9/18/02

“What kind of statement are we making when we, at UT System, require these checks when other schools in the state don’t have the same policy,” University Provost George Wright.

Currently, the university pays a flat monthly rate of $450 to have the checks conducted.

Page 7: Selection 3 MANA 4328 Dr. George Benson benson@uta.edu

Decision Criteria

The hiring official will determine on a case-by-case basis whether the individual is qualified based on factors such as:

Specific duties of the position; Number of offenses; Nature of each offense; Length of time intervening between the offense and the employment

decision; Employment history; Efforts at rehabilitation; and Accuracy of the information that the individual provided on the

employment application

Page 8: Selection 3 MANA 4328 Dr. George Benson benson@uta.edu

Grand Prairie says it Goofed in Hiring Sex Offender

When Damon Otto Bryan filled out a job application for the Grand Prairie parks department, he acknowledged a conviction for aggravated assault. But he left out a key word: His conviction was for aggravated sexual assault.

State records show Bryan was convicted of sexually assaulting a 12-year-old girl in Ellis County when he was 18. His $12-an-hour city job, he explained, consisted of mowing, cleaning and picking up trash in the medians along Grand Prairie streets. "I never came in contact with people other than my co-workers.”

When they tried to conduct a background check, a computerized database never completed it, and nobody followed up. And when they interviewed Bryan, they didn't ask about his conviction. Both mistakes will never happen again, promised Fred Ginapp, the city's human resources adviser.

Star-Telegram 7.12.06

Page 9: Selection 3 MANA 4328 Dr. George Benson benson@uta.edu

Integrity / Honesty Tests

Two Types:1. In-direct testing: Personality-based tests

2. Overt testing: Questions on ethical situations or attitudes towards theft / unlawful activities.

Reliability and Validity depends on test Can predict bad behavior in certain cases Subject to manipulation

Polygraph testing?

Page 10: Selection 3 MANA 4328 Dr. George Benson benson@uta.edu

Drug Testing

Required for only certain jobs Federal employees DOT regulated jobs (trucking, airlines, etc)

Drug Free Workplace Act of 1988 Requires all employers with federal contracts of $25k

to engage in drug testing Current estimates

50% of companies test current employees 61% of companies test applicants 25 million people tested every year

Page 11: Selection 3 MANA 4328 Dr. George Benson benson@uta.edu

Drug Testing

Urinalysis most common means and least expensive ADA prohibits pre-employment screening for alcohol Policies applied carefully and consistently

Companies may not selectively test based on “appearance”

Have a written policy in place Written consent needed

Screening test vs. confirmation Costs

$15 to $100 per test Time away from work Administrative time

Page 12: Selection 3 MANA 4328 Dr. George Benson benson@uta.edu

Negligent Hiring

The person causing harm was an employee. The person was incompetent (rather than a

competent employee acting negligently). Employer knew or should have known about the

incompetence. Injury or harm was a foreseeable consequence of

hiring the incompetent employee. Hiring of the unfit employee was proximate cause of

the injury or harm.