selective catalytic reduction (scr) by nh 3 in a fixed-bed reactor hee je seong the department of...
TRANSCRIPT
Selective Catalytic Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) by NHReduction (SCR) by NH33 in a in a
Fixed-Bed ReactorFixed-Bed Reactor
HEE JE SEONG
The Department of Energy and Geo-Environmental Engineering
The Pennsylvania State University
IntroductionIntroductionNOx emissions are a major pollutant from
engines, incinerators and power plants - unavoidable at conditions where air is
involved at high combusting temperatureSelective catalytic reduction with NH3 has
been successfully used to remove NOx 4NO + 4NH3 + O2 4N2 + 6H2OKinetic parameters depend much on a
catalyst - V2O5-WO3/TiO2, CuHM and etc
Governing EquationsGoverning EquationsMass equation - Convection and diffusion
where R : -rNO, -rNH3
Momentum equation - Navier-Stokes equation (Brinkman eqn. involved) Energy equation - Assumed as an isothermal state due to a
small amount of heat evolved
Boundary ConditionsBoundary Conditions
Inlet - Velocity : 1, 2, 4m/s - CNO = 8.16x10-3mol/m3
CNH3 = 8.16x10-3mol/m3
CNH3 = 6.94x10-3mol/m3
CNH3 = 9.38x10-3mol/m3
- Pin : 1.01325x105PaOutlet - P : Pin – ΔP (according to
Ergun eqn.)
Inlet
Wall/Insulation
Outlet
Wall/Insulation
0.1(m)
0.076(m)
FormulationFormulationMass conservation - Convection and diffusion - Chemical reaction
ENO : Enthalpy of NO reductionENH3 : Enthalpy of NH3 oxidationHNH3 : Heat of NH3 adsorptionkNO : Reaction rate constant of NO reductionkNH3 : Reaction rate constant of NH3 oxidationKNH3 : Adsorption equilibrium constant for NH3
FormulationFormulation Air is assumed as the
fluid flowing through the reactor
- small amounts of NO and NH3
- ρ and η are temperature-dependent
- pressure drop is calculated using Ergun eqn.
- Permeability is calculated using Darcy’s law
SolutionSolution
- Much portion of reactants is converted in the inlet of the reactor- NH3 slip should be considered when NH3 is injected
ValidationValidation
SV = 100,000 h-1 SV = 200,000 h-1
- Detailed information in Chae et al’s model is missing- This COMSOL model simulates similar trends of results to those of Chae et al.’s model for both conditions
Parametric StudyParametric Study
Temperature (oC)Porosity = 0.5 Porosity = 0.7
ΔP (Pa) K (m2) ΔP (Pa) K (m2)
200 29492 3.33x10-10 4390 2.23x10-9
250 33308 3.49x10-10 4861 2.40x10-9
300 37529 3.62x10-10 5353 2.54x10-9
350 42119 3.72x10-10 5921 2.65x10-9
400 47057 3.80x10-10 6539 2.73x10-9
450 52323 3.86x10-10 7205 2.80x10-9
500 57901 3.90x10-10 7915 2.86x10-9
Parametric StudyParametric Study
Kineticparamete
rDry Wet
Ea,NO
Ea,NH3
ΔHNH3
ko,NO
ko,NH3
Ko,NH3
11.542.821.5
2.79x106
6.38x105
59.6
12.157.622.2
3.04x106
9.98x108
69.1
- Conversion of NO is higher at a dry condition than at a wet condition due to the competition between H2O and NH3
-This COMSOL model also reflects a general phenomenon of SCR when water is involved in the reaction
ConclusionConclusionSCR model using COMSOL well
describes a general trend of NO removal performance
- Valid result compared to the reference- Water effect is predictableThe model also indicates that NH3/NO
should be controlled considering NH3 slip
and performance at operating temperatures