semi-automatic central-chest lymph-node definition from 3d mdct images kongkuo lu and william e....
TRANSCRIPT
Semi-Automatic Central-Chest Semi-Automatic Central-Chest Lymph-Node Definition from Lymph-Node Definition from
3D MDCT Images3D MDCT ImagesKongkuo Lu and William E. Higgins
Penn State University
University Park and Hershey, PA, USA
SPIE Medical Imaging 2010: Computer-Aided Diagnosis, San Diego, CA, Feb. 17, 2010
Drawing by Terese Winslow, “Bronchoscopy,” Drawing by Terese Winslow, “Bronchoscopy,” NCI Visuals OnlineNCI Visuals Online, National , National Cancer InstituteCancer Institute
MotivationMotivation Lung cancer is the Lung cancer is the
leading cause of cancer leading cause of cancer deathdeath
Early lung cancer Early lung cancer detection could increase detection could increase survival ratesurvival rate
Diagnosis procedures:Diagnosis procedures: 3D MDCT chest 3D MDCT chest
image assessmentimage assessment Follow-on diagnostic Follow-on diagnostic
bronchoscopybronchoscopy
512 x 512 x ~700 voxels512 x 512 x ~700 voxels-1000 HU to 1000 HU -1000 HU to 1000 HU
(grayscale)(grayscale)
MotivationMotivation
Armato Armato et al.et al., , RadiologyRadiology 2004 2004 Subaortic and subcarinal lymph node (p2h012b)Subaortic and subcarinal lymph node (p2h012b)
Lower para-tracheal lymph node (Lower para-tracheal lymph node (IRB20349.3.3IRB20349.3.3))
ROIs involve complex ROIs involve complex phenomenaphenomena
Manual slice tracing – not feasibleManual slice tracing – not feasible Automatic methods Automatic methods
– – application dependentapplication dependent Semi-automatic methods Semi-automatic methods
– – more practicalmore practicalLive WireLive Wire
Prior WorkPrior Work
Mortensen and Barrett (Mortensen and Barrett (Graphical Models and Medical Imaging Graphical Models and Medical Imaging 19981998))
FalcFalcão ão et al. et al. ((Graphical Models and Medical Imaging 1998Graphical Models and Medical Imaging 1998)) Lu and HigginsLu and Higgins ((Int. J. CARS 2007)Int. J. CARS 2007)
2D Live Wire:2D Live Wire:
Falcão and Udupa (Medical Image Analysis 2000) Hamarneh et al. (SPIE Medical Imaging 2005) König and Hesser (SPIE Medical Imaging 2005) Souza et al. (SPIE Medical Imaging 2006) Lu and HigginsLu and Higgins ((Int. J. CARS 2007)Int. J. CARS 2007) Poon et al. (SPIE Medical Imaging 2007 and CMIG 2008)
3D Live Wire:3D Live Wire:
Prior WorkPrior Work
),(),()()(),( qpfwqpfwqfwqfwqpl DfDfDDGGzz Cost Function:Cost Function:
292924242222181815151414448810101919
404028282020141413131111551100551111
3333222219192020131388448833991616
3030242427273636292924241414121277771515
3434292937376262393933331919131310101414
44442929161613132020
29291919171719192929
25252323252529294747
3333303035354141
Dynamic Graphic Search:Dynamic Graphic Search:
Mortenson Mortenson GMMIGMMI 1998; K. Lu and W.E. Higgins, 1998; K. Lu and W.E. Higgins, SPIESPIE 2006 and 2006 and IJCARIJCAR 2007 2007
Prior WorkPrior Work
K. Lu and W.E. Higgins, K. Lu and W.E. Higgins, SPIESPIE 2006 and 2006 and IJCARIJCAR 2007 2007
Segment ROI using 2D Live WireSegment ROI using 2D Live WireSegment ROI using 3D Live WireSegment ROI using 3D Live Wire
Central-Chest Lymph Nodes in 3D MDCT Image
Typical lower paratracheal (M4) Typical lower paratracheal (M4) lymph nodeslymph nodes
M4-3M4-3
M4-1M4-1
M4-1M4-1
M4-2M4-2
CoroCoro
TransTrans
Complete segmentation of Complete segmentation of
central-chest lymph nodescentral-chest lymph nodes
Case IRB20349.3.3Case IRB20349.3.3
Single-Section Live Wire
Single-Section Live WireAdjust working area adaptivelyAdjust working area adaptively
Refine seed set iterativelyRefine seed set iteratively
Terminate iterations whenTerminate iterations when
Terminate 3D process whenTerminate 3D process when
Section limits reachedSection limits reached
Boundary costs vary greatlyBoundary costs vary greatly
Boundary is too smallBoundary is too small
Segmented region is too Segmented region is too
smallsmall
Intensity distribution varies Intensity distribution varies
greatlygreatlyK. Lu, PhD Dissertation 2010K. Lu, PhD Dissertation 2010
Single-Section Live Wire
Single-Section Live Wire
Single-Click Live Wire
Single-Click Live Wire
Single-Section and Single-Click LW
Single-SectionSingle-Section Single-ClickSingle-Click
Lu, PhD Dissertation 2010 and K. Lu and W.E. Higgins Lu, PhD Dissertation 2010 and K. Lu and W.E. Higgins Computer in Biology and Medicine Computer in Biology and Medicine (in submission)(in submission)
Performance EvaluationPerformance Evaluation
Computer - Dell Precision 650 workstation:Computer - Dell Precision 650 workstation:
MDCT Data:MDCT Data:
• Dual Intel Xeon 3.2GHz, 3GB RAM, Windows XPDual Intel Xeon 3.2GHz, 3GB RAM, Windows XP
ResultsResults
Segmented Nodes: Short-Axis Length: 5.8±1.5 mm±1.5 mm Long-Axis Length:Long-Axis Length: 11±4.0 mm 11±4.0 mm Volume: 256±210 mm±210 mm33
Number of Voxels: 1089±861±861
Method Single-Section Single-Click
Number of Nodes 50
Success Rate 90 % (45/50) 80% (40/50)
Accuracy 81±7% 79±8%
Inter-Trial Reproducibility 88±7% 86±9%
Processing Time 16±4s 20±5s
Comparison of Two ObserversComparison of Two Observers
Operator IndependentOperator Independent
20349.3.15 21405.67
O1 O2 O1 O2
Accuracy 83% 80% 78% 79%
Reproducibility 87% 88% 89% 85%
Processing Time 16s 20s 19s 22s
Example Lymph Node SegmentationsExample Lymph Node Segmentations
21405.6421405.64 20349.3.320349.3.3
* Segmentable nodes: both observers and both methods * Segmentable nodes: both observers and both methods
SummarySummary
Single-Section and Single-Click Live Wire
Reduce human interaction
Efficient and reliable
Operator independent
Can handle typical lymph nodes and other ROIs
• 90% Single-Section
• 80% Single-Click
AcknowledgmentsAcknowledgments
• NIH NCI grant #R01-CA074325NIH NCI grant #R01-CA074325• Pinyo Taeprasartsit - experiment participantPinyo Taeprasartsit - experiment participant
The Multidimensional Imaging Processing Lab at The Multidimensional Imaging Processing Lab at Penn StatePenn State
Single-Section and Single-Click Single-Section and Single-Click LW EvaluationLW EvaluationLymph node #: 50Succ. Seg. : M1-45 (90%) M2-40 (80%)Accuracy: >80%Inter-trial Reprod.: >85%
MM11, M, M22:Single-section and single-click LW; :Single-section and single-click LW; εε11, , εε22: Trials; a(: Trials; a(MMii, , εεjj): accuracy; r(): accuracy; r(MMii, , εεjj, , εεkk): reproducibility): reproducibility
Single-Section and Single-Click Single-Section and Single-Click LW EvaluationLW Evaluation
MM11, M, M22:Single-section and single-click LW; :Single-section and single-click LW; εε11, , εε22: Trials; a(: Trials; a(MMii, , εεjj): accuracy; r(): accuracy; r(MMii, , εεjj, , εεkk): reproducibility): reproducibility