APPLICATION OF COOPERATIVE LEARNING MODEL TYPE STAD (STUDENTS TEAMS ACHIEVEMENT DIVISION) TO INCREASE

LEARNING MATH PROGRESS IN STUDENTSCLASS VIIB SMPN 1 NAPAL PUTIH

By:Feronika Artiningsih

A1C009018

CHAPTER 1

INTRODUCTION

BACKGROUND

Research Question

How to improve student’s cognitive learning outcomes by implementing a model of cooperative learning type STAD in the class VIIB SMPN 1 Napal Putih?

How to improve student’s affective learning outcomes by implementing a model of cooperative learning type STAD in the class VIIB SMPN 1 Napal Putih?

PURPOSE

To find out how to improve student’s cognitive learning outcomes in the class VIIB SMPN 1 Napal Putih through the application of cooperative learning model type STAD

To find out how to improve student’s affective learning outcomes in the class VIIB SMPN 1 Napal Putih through the application of cooperative learning model type STAD

Advantages of Research

Theoretical Advantages,it is hoped this research can contribute to increase

interest and learning outcomes in mathematics

Practical Advantages,> For Researcher, as the development of knowledge and gain experience of research in learning mathematics.> For Teachers, Expected to provide an overview of cooperative learning model type STAD in order to increase the activity and student achievement.> For Students, Given this research, students are expected to be more motivated to learn mathematics so as to increase the activity and student learning outcomes.

TERM LIMITS•Learning or teaching is an attempt to train students. In this sense it is learning there implicit activities to choose, establish, and develop methods to achieve the desired learning outcomes (Degeng as cited in Uno, 2008, p. 134).

•Cooperative learning model type STAD is a model of cooperative learning using small groups are heterogeneous (Trianto, 2011, p. 52).

•Student activity is any activity of students in like attention, asked questions and discussion to following the learning process.

•The results of studying mathematics is the abilities students after receiving their learning experience. Learning outcomes in this study includes two aspects:Cognitive learning outcomes relating to intellectual property. Cognitive assessment is seen from the tests performed. Affective learning is student’s attitudes regarding the assessed from charging student questionnaires and observation sheets.

Research Study Limitation

This research is only done on class VIIB SMPN 1 Napal Putih academic

year 2011/2012 using a model cooperative learning type STAD to

improve student learning outcomes in the cognitive and affective.

CHAPTER 2

STUDY LIBRARY

Definition of Learning

Learning is a process of interaction between the stimulus (which may be thought, feeling, or movement) and

response (which also can include thoughts, feeling, or movement)

(Thorndike as cited in Uno, 2008, p. 7)Learning or teaching is an attempt to train students. In this sense there is implicit in the learning activities of

selecting, establishing, and developing methods to achieve the desired learning

outcomes (Degeng as cited in Uno, 2008, p. 134)

Cooperative Learning

Cooperative learning structured in an effort to increase participation of students, facilitating students with leadership experience and attitude to make decisions in

groups, as well as providing the opportunity for students to

interact and learn together other students

Trianto, 2011, p.41

Cooperative Learning Type STAD

Cooperative learning type STAD is one type of cooperative learning model using small

groups with a number of members of each group of 4-5 students are heterogeneous.

Cooperative learning type STAD "begins with the delivery of learning objectives,

presentation, group activities, quizzes, and awards groups" (Trianto, 2011, p.52)

Students Results

Cognitive Learning Outcomes,relating to intellectual property consisting of six aspects of the

knowledge or memory, comprehension, application, analysis, synthesis and

evaluationAffective Learning Outcomes

domain of attitudes regarding which consists of five aspects, namely,

acceptance, participation, evaluation and determination of attitudes, organization

and establishment of lifestyle

Framework of Research

MaterialMaterial

cooperative learning model of type STAD

cooperative learning model of type STAD

Device cooperative learning with type STAD

Device cooperative learning with type STAD

Students class VIIB SMPN 1 Napal PutihStudents class VIIB

SMPN 1 Napal Putih

Improved student learning activitiesImproved student learning activities

Improved student learning outcomesImproved student learning outcomes

STAD Stage:1. Conveying the purpose and motivation of

students2. Present / communicate information3. Organize the students into groups to learn4. Guide the group work and learning5. Evaluation6. Reward

Alternative Hypotesis

With the application of cooperative learning models type STAD can improve student’s cognitive learning outcomes in class VIIB SMPN 1 Napal Putih

With the application of cooperative learning models type STAD can improve student’s affective learning outcomes in class VIIB SMPN 1 Napal Putih

Relevant Research

Research conducted Yofi Nurkaesal (2009) concluded that the learning method STAD in

teaching circle can improve student achievement, the results of observation and

inquiry that the application of the model STAD learning can make students more active in teaching and learning and can

enhance student's motivation.

CHAPTER 3

METHODS

Type of Research

This is a Classroom Action Research is the research conducted in the field of education

is implemented in the classroom with the aim to repair and improve the quality of learning.

Research Procedures

CYCLE 2

Observations

Reflection Actions

?

Planning

ActionsReflection CYCLE 1

Observations

Planning

Data Collection Techniques

Observation Data,Obtained using observation sheets for students to know and recognize the activities of students in the learning

process

The Test Sheet,The test form a task or series of tasks to be done by the students who performed at the end of each cycle, the goal is to

determine the success of learning model STAD in mathematics.

Data Analysis Techniques

Observation Sheet

No Assessment Criteria Notation Score Value

1 Less K 1

2 Enough C 23 Good B 3

Observation of the student activity sheet totaled 10 points of observation, the highest score of each point of observation is 3 (three), then the highest score is: 3 x 10 = 30 and lowest scores are: 1 x 10 = 10.

Thus, the range of assessment scores for student observation sheet are:

No Assessment Criteria Score range

1 Less 10-16

2 Enough 17-24

3 Good 24-30

Test

1. The average value of learning outcomes

3. Completeness in the classical learning

Where as, = the average student = number of student score N = number of students

x x

2. Criteria students completed

Students said completed in study if they have value minimum is 70.

Indicator of Success

Indicators of Success Learning CognitiveClassical: if> 85% of students have completed

Indicators of Success Learning AffectiveAt least 85% of students have positive attitudes

towards learning mathematics with application of type STAD cooperative learning model.

Thank You…