semiology and the photographic image

Upload: dia-cora

Post on 03-Apr-2018

223 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/28/2019 Semiology and the Photographic Image

    1/21

    Semiology

    and the photographic image

    Roland Barthes: semiology as culturalcriticism

    From the study of verbal language to that ofcultural phenomena: films, photographs,fashion, advertising, etc.

    Developing a common vocabulary and arigorous or scientific method for the critical

    analysis of mass culture. Understanding the complexity and

    meaningfulness of all cultural artefacts despitetheir apparent "obviousness. The reality-effect (Roland Barthes)

    The impression of reality (Christian Metz)

  • 7/28/2019 Semiology and the Photographic Image

    2/21

    The photographic message:

    the reality-effect The reality-effect:

    So-called realism of the image makes it appear to be

    "natural" rather than socially and historically constructed.

    A product or production of the image--its structure

    of signification as a message.

    The appeal to a belief:

    I know very well that this is only a photograph, yet I

    choose to believe in its reality. Arguing that the photography functions as a sign

    is to discredit it as an innocent or neutral

    representation.

  • 7/28/2019 Semiology and the Photographic Image

    3/21

  • 7/28/2019 Semiology and the Photographic Image

    4/21

    What is a sign?

    There is an arbitrary relation between a

    sign and its meaning.

    Referent: what the signifier purports torepresent

    Signifier: representational aspect

    Signified: concept or meaning

    If the relation between signifier andsignified is only defined by convention,

    then meaning or signification is socially

    and historically constructed.

  • 7/28/2019 Semiology and the Photographic Image

    5/21

    Ferdinand de Saussure

  • 7/28/2019 Semiology and the Photographic Image

    6/21

    The two traditions:

    semiology and semiotics Semiology: the study of signs based on

    linguistics

    Ferdinand de Saussure (1857-1913). Courseon General Linguistics.

    Roland Barthes

    Christian Metz

    Semiotics: the study of signs based onlogic Charles Sanders Peirce (1839-1914)

    Umberto Eco

    Gilles Deleuze

  • 7/28/2019 Semiology and the Photographic Image

    7/21

    Defining the sign:

    representation

    The perceptible aspect of the sign:

    how we recognize the sign as

    standing for something

    Saussure: the signifier

    Peirce: the representer or

    representamen Souriau: the first degree of film form

  • 7/28/2019 Semiology and the Photographic Image

    8/21

    Defining the sign:

    representation Peirce: icon, index, and symbol

    An icon signifies in virtue of its resemblance, or

    its analogical relation to what it wishes torepresent.

    A symboldoes not resemble what it refers to; itsignifies through the force of convention.

    An indexmay but does not necessarily

    resemble its referent. It signifies in virtue of arelationship of contiguity with its referent. Acausal or existential link is presumed.

    The representational character of signs can be,and often is, mixed or heterogeneous.

  • 7/28/2019 Semiology and the Photographic Image

    9/21

  • 7/28/2019 Semiology and the Photographic Image

    10/21

    Defining the sign: signification How signs become meaningful to

    individuals and societies.

    Saussure: the signified Peirce: the interpretant

    Souriau: the second degree of film form

    Signification is always defined by

    convention. The distinction between speech (parole)

    and language (langue).

  • 7/28/2019 Semiology and the Photographic Image

    11/21

    Defining the sign: signification

    The distinction between speech

    (parole) and language (langue).

    Speech: the everyday use of language. A

    potentially infinite number of statements.

    Language: the limited number of rules we

    use in speaking. The distinction between message and

    code.

  • 7/28/2019 Semiology and the Photographic Image

    12/21

    Defining the sign: signification The message is

    actual

    concrete

    singular

    heterogeneous

    A code is

    ideal

    abstract

    general

    homogenous

  • 7/28/2019 Semiology and the Photographic Image

    13/21

    Defining the sign: signification A message is a singular, meaningful unit of

    discourse.

    A code is an abstraction created by theanalyst--a logic reconstructed from thematerials provided by the message.

    A code is a principle of intelligibility

    formulated by the film theorist through theanalysis of specific "messages." Its unity or homogeneity is not of a sensory or

    material order; rather, it is an order of logicalcoherence, valued for its explanatory power.

  • 7/28/2019 Semiology and the Photographic Image

    14/21

  • 7/28/2019 Semiology and the Photographic Image

    15/21

    Roland Barthes on

    photography The photographic message

    a sign can be a very complex structure that mixes

    forms and materials of representation; a sign is meaningful only in context.

    Denotation and connotation

    The photographic paradox

    The photograph is a message without a

    code.

  • 7/28/2019 Semiology and the Photographic Image

    16/21

    The photograph is

    a message without a code

    MESSAGE CODE

    signifer (representation) signified (meaning)denotation connotationphotograph captionobvious or informational symbolictraumatic ideologicalnatural noncode cultural coderecords transforms

    studium punctumsignifiance

  • 7/28/2019 Semiology and the Photographic Image

    17/21

    Roland Barthes on photography

    The denotation of the photograph

    "Certainly the image is not the reality but at least it is its

    perfect analogon and it is exactly this analogical perfection

    which, to common sense, defines the photograph (17).

    The photograph as a "mechanical analogon" whose

    message is "the scene itself, literal reality."

    The photographic paradox

    The spectators fascination with "the here-now, for the

    photograph is never experienced as an illusion ..., its reality

    [is] that of the having been there, for in every photograph

    there is always the stupefying evidence of this is how it

    was, giving us, by a precious miracle, a reality from which

    we are sheltered" (44).

  • 7/28/2019 Semiology and the Photographic Image

    18/21

    Roland Barthes on photography

    The code gravitates toward connotational

    meaning.

    The imposition of a second meaning through editorial

    choice, laboratory manipulations, cropping, layout, etc.

    The informational or "obvious" meaning of the

    photograph.

    Connotation is to denotation as a caption or

    written text is to the photograph. If the message is "informational" then the code

    structures the "symbolic" level of meaning, that is,

    the range of meanings accruing to the image in

    virtue of conventional or cultural associations.

  • 7/28/2019 Semiology and the Photographic Image

    19/21

  • 7/28/2019 Semiology and the Photographic Image

    20/21

    Roland Barthes on photography

    Ideology and the image:

    How the image structures social belief and

    meaning The ideological function of connotation, as regulated

    by given codes, is to reassure individuals and to

    integrate them into the society overall.

    How the image is naturalized by the code. The traumatic quality of the photograph as a

    suspension of language

  • 7/28/2019 Semiology and the Photographic Image

    21/21