senior high school department second mastery … · 2018. 9. 10. · research associate: murillo,...
TRANSCRIPT
GENERAL RULES
1. This assessment rubric will be used in evaluating your Second Mastery Examination in Practical Research 2.
2. The total score for Chapter 2: Review of Related Literature and Chapter 3: Research Methodology
will be your Second Mastery Examination composed of eight (8) areas.
3. Remember, ALL the areas in this chapter will be considered WRITTEN TASKS.
4. All researchers will have the same score ONLY in area 8.
5. Make sure to put the corrected versions of your output as this will be final and irrevocable except for
suggestions and recommendations by your research instructor.
6. Your research instructor will rate the output based on the rubrics below.
7. The lead researcher will rate his/her research associates based on the gravity of effort shared. The lead
researcher MUST see to it that there is a proper basis for the grade he/she will give. The grading will be
done in front of the research associates to avoid biases/personal gains.
8. NO EXTENSIONS will be given in the submission.
9. The lead researcher shall submit all the outputs to the instructor.
10. The output SHOULD be clean and presentable. Print all the documents in SHORT BOND ONLY.
11. The score given will be final and irrevocable.
12. Submit your output on or before August 20, 2018. The submission is until 6:00 pm ONLY. For every
hour of late submission, 5 points shall be deducted from the group’s overall score.
RC CODE SH-GAS-A12-C305-001
PEER ASSESSMENT/EVALUATION
Researchers Area 1
Area 2
Area 3
Area 4
Area 5
Area 6
Area 7
Area 8
Total Score
Lead Researcher: ZAMORA, LORJIELYN Asst. Lead Researcher: DAYON, BILLY SIMON Research Associate: DADULA, KIMBERLY Research Associate: NAYA, REMAELYN Research Associate: MURILLO, JIM JOSHUA Research Associate: Research Associate:
NONIEL JOHN VASQUEZ ERNO, LPT, MAED – ELLT (Candidate)
Research Lecturer
SECOND MASTERY EXAMINATION IN PRACTICAL RESEARCH 2 (QUANTITATIVE)
SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL DEPARTMENT
Excellent (30-27 points):
Excellent to superior work in all
areas as indicated in the
instructors’ written
expectations; exemplary
performance, participation,
creativity and writing; fully
addresses the criterion;
excellent grasp of facts,
analysis and application;
consistently clear statements
and explanations
Good: (26-23 points):
Good to fair work in most
aspects; minor deficiency in
relation to instructors’ written
expectations regarding content,
writing style or procedures;
adequate grasp of facts,
analysis, and practical
application; clear statements
and explanations are limited,
but above average quality
Average: (22-18 points):
Passing work, but in serious
need of improvement in many
areas, especially in regard to
form and content; minimal
grasp of facts, analysis and
application; very few clear
statements or explanations
Below Average (17 points
below):
Confusing, lacks explanation or
completion; little conforming to
instructors’ written
expectations regarding content,
writing style or procedures;
overall, below professional
quality standards; not quality
work
Areas of Assessment Points Earned
Review of Related Literature. (Area 1)
The review of related literature constitutes the introduction, body (using different
techniques), and conclusion with at least 20 studies and gives discussion on each variable
under study.
Research Design. (Area 2)
Research designs constitutes the approach, type, and method/s used by the researchers
following the content in each area.
Research Setting/Locale. (Area 3)
The setting/locale provides clear description of the research area in contextualized manner
and gives reason on why the setting is appropriate for the study.
Research Respondents/Participants. (Area 4)
The participants of the study are described with their demographics and explains why the
participants are fit to the study.
Research Instrument/s. Area 5)
This explains and describes the type of instruments used in the study.
Data Gathering Procedure. (Area 6)
Uses a systematic way of gathering data adhering to the scientific rules/guidelines in getting
necessary information needed in the study.
Statistical Treatment of Data. (Area 7)
The use of statistical measurement and tools in the study is appropriate and fit to the study
design and method; therefore, providing an accurate result of the study.
Grammar, Sentence Construction, and APA Style Format. (Area 8)
Grammar and sentence construction are properly observed in all components of research.
Uses APA format to properly cite the reference material used for research.
General Comments:
_______/240
RUBRICS FOR SECOND MASTERY EXAMINATION IN PRACTICAL RESEARCH 2 (QUANTITATIVE)
GENERAL RULES
1. This assessment rubric will be used in evaluating your Second Mastery Examination in Practical Research 2.
2. The total score for Chapter 2: Review of Related Literature and Chapter 3: Research Methodology
will be your Second Mastery Examination composed of eight (8) areas.
3. Remember, ALL the areas in this chapter will be considered WRITTEN TASKS.
4. All researchers will have the same score ONLY in area 8.
5. Make sure to put the corrected versions of your output as this will be final and irrevocable except for
suggestions and recommendations by your research instructor.
6. Your research instructor will rate the output based on the rubrics below.
7. The lead researcher will rate his/her research associates based on the gravity of effort shared. The lead
researcher MUST see to it that there is a proper basis for the grade he/she will give. The grading will be
done in front of the research associates to avoid biases/personal gains.
8. NO EXTENSIONS will be given in the submission.
9. The lead researcher shall submit all the outputs to the instructor.
10. The output SHOULD be clean and presentable. Print all the documents in SHORT BOND ONLY.
11. The score given will be final and irrevocable.
12. Submit your output on or before August 20, 2018. The submission is until 6:00 pm ONLY. For every
hour of late submission, 5 points shall be deducted from the group’s overall score.
RC CODE SH-GAS-A12-C305-002
PEER ASSESSMENT/EVALUATION
Researchers Area 1
Area 2
Area 3
Area 4
Area 5
Area 6
Area 7
Area 8
Total Score
Lead Researcher: ACAL, IVY MAE Asst. Lead Researcher: RUIZ, URSULA JOY Research Associate: DELA CRUZ, RAMILYN Research Associate: TEK-ING, BARBARA GAIL Research Associate: BATULAN, MELVIN Research Associate: Research Associate:
NONIEL JOHN VASQUEZ ERNO, LPT, MAED – ELLT (Candidate)
Research Lecturer
SECOND MASTERY EXAMINATION IN PRACTICAL RESEARCH 2 (QUANTITATIVE)
SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL DEPARTMENT
Excellent (30-27 points):
Excellent to superior work in all
areas as indicated in the
instructors’ written
expectations; exemplary
performance, participation,
creativity and writing; fully
addresses the criterion;
excellent grasp of facts,
analysis and application;
consistently clear statements
and explanations
Good: (26-23 points):
Good to fair work in most
aspects; minor deficiency in
relation to instructors’ written
expectations regarding content,
writing style or procedures;
adequate grasp of facts,
analysis, and practical
application; clear statements
and explanations are limited,
but above average quality
Average: (22-18 points):
Passing work, but in serious
need of improvement in many
areas, especially in regard to
form and content; minimal
grasp of facts, analysis and
application; very few clear
statements or explanations
Below Average (17 points
below):
Confusing, lacks explanation or
completion; little conforming to
instructors’ written
expectations regarding content,
writing style or procedures;
overall, below professional
quality standards; not quality
work
Areas of Assessment Points Earned
Review of Related Literature. (Area 1)
The review of related literature constitutes the introduction, body (using different
techniques), and conclusion with at least 20 studies and gives discussion on each variable
under study.
Research Design. (Area 2)
Research designs constitutes the approach, type, and method/s used by the researchers
following the content in each area.
Research Setting/Locale. (Area 3)
The setting/locale provides clear description of the research area in contextualized manner
and gives reason on why the setting is appropriate for the study.
Research Respondents/Participants. (Area 4)
The participants of the study are described with their demographics and explains why the
participants are fit to the study.
Research Instrument/s. Area 5)
This explains and describes the type of instruments used in the study.
Data Gathering Procedure. (Area 6)
Uses a systematic way of gathering data adhering to the scientific rules/guidelines in getting
necessary information needed in the study.
Statistical Treatment of Data. (Area 7)
The use of statistical measurement and tools in the study is appropriate and fit to the study
design and method; therefore, providing an accurate result of the study.
Grammar, Sentence Construction, and APA Style Format. (Area 8)
Grammar and sentence construction are properly observed in all components of research.
Uses APA format to properly cite the reference material used for research.
General Comments:
_______/240
RUBRICS FOR SECOND MASTERY EXAMINATION IN PRACTICAL RESEARCH 2 (QUANTITATIVE)
GENERAL RULES
1. This assessment rubric will be used in evaluating your Second Mastery Examination in Practical Research 2.
2. The total score for Chapter 2: Review of Related Literature and Chapter 3: Research Methodology
will be your Second Mastery Examination composed of eight (8) areas.
3. Remember, ALL the areas in this chapter will be considered WRITTEN TASKS.
4. All researchers will have the same score ONLY in area 8.
5. Make sure to put the corrected versions of your output as this will be final and irrevocable except for
suggestions and recommendations by your research instructor.
6. Your research instructor will rate the output based on the rubrics below.
7. The lead researcher will rate his/her research associates based on the gravity of effort shared. The lead
researcher MUST see to it that there is a proper basis for the grade he/she will give. The grading will be
done in front of the research associates to avoid biases/personal gains.
8. NO EXTENSIONS will be given in the submission.
9. The lead researcher shall submit all the outputs to the instructor.
10. The output SHOULD be clean and presentable. Print all the documents in SHORT BOND ONLY.
11. The score given will be final and irrevocable.
12. Submit your output on or before August 20, 2018. The submission is until 6:00 pm ONLY. For every
hour of late submission, 5 points shall be deducted from the group’s overall score.
RC CODE SH-GAS-A12-C305-003
PEER ASSESSMENT/EVALUATION
Researchers Area 1
Area 2
Area 3
Area 4
Area 5
Area 6
Area 7
Area 8
Total Score
Lead Researcher: RICAHUERTA, JORGINA Asst. Lead Researcher: ALLOSADA, JEFFERSON Research Associate: ENO, MILKYWAY Research Associate: VALIENTE, EURIKA Research Associate: NUÑEZA, MARC RHUDY Research Associate: Research Associate:
NONIEL JOHN VASQUEZ ERNO, LPT, MAED – ELLT (Candidate)
Research Lecturer
SECOND MASTERY EXAMINATION IN PRACTICAL RESEARCH 2 (QUANTITATIVE)
SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL DEPARTMENT
Excellent (30-27 points):
Excellent to superior work in all
areas as indicated in the
instructors’ written
expectations; exemplary
performance, participation,
creativity and writing; fully
addresses the criterion;
excellent grasp of facts,
analysis and application;
consistently clear statements
and explanations
Good: (26-23 points):
Good to fair work in most
aspects; minor deficiency in
relation to instructors’ written
expectations regarding content,
writing style or procedures;
adequate grasp of facts,
analysis, and practical
application; clear statements
and explanations are limited,
but above average quality
Average: (22-18 points):
Passing work, but in serious
need of improvement in many
areas, especially in regard to
form and content; minimal
grasp of facts, analysis and
application; very few clear
statements or explanations
Below Average (17 points
below):
Confusing, lacks explanation or
completion; little conforming to
instructors’ written
expectations regarding content,
writing style or procedures;
overall, below professional
quality standards; not quality
work
Areas of Assessment Points Earned
Review of Related Literature. (Area 1)
The review of related literature constitutes the introduction, body (using different
techniques), and conclusion with at least 20 studies and gives discussion on each variable
under study.
Research Design. (Area 2)
Research designs constitutes the approach, type, and method/s used by the researchers
following the content in each area.
Research Setting/Locale. (Area 3)
The setting/locale provides clear description of the research area in contextualized manner
and gives reason on why the setting is appropriate for the study.
Research Respondents/Participants. (Area 4)
The participants of the study are described with their demographics and explains why the
participants are fit to the study.
Research Instrument/s. Area 5)
This explains and describes the type of instruments used in the study.
Data Gathering Procedure. (Area 6)
Uses a systematic way of gathering data adhering to the scientific rules/guidelines in getting
necessary information needed in the study.
Statistical Treatment of Data. (Area 7)
The use of statistical measurement and tools in the study is appropriate and fit to the study
design and method; therefore, providing an accurate result of the study.
Grammar, Sentence Construction, and APA Style Format. (Area 8)
Grammar and sentence construction are properly observed in all components of research.
Uses APA format to properly cite the reference material used for research.
General Comments:
_______/240
RUBRICS FOR SECOND MASTERY EXAMINATION IN PRACTICAL RESEARCH 2 (QUANTITATIVE)
GENERAL RULES
1. This assessment rubric will be used in evaluating your Second Mastery Examination in Practical Research 2.
2. The total score for Chapter 2: Review of Related Literature and Chapter 3: Research Methodology
will be your Second Mastery Examination composed of eight (8) areas.
3. Remember, ALL the areas in this chapter will be considered WRITTEN TASKS.
4. All researchers will have the same score ONLY in area 8.
5. Make sure to put the corrected versions of your output as this will be final and irrevocable except for
suggestions and recommendations by your research instructor.
6. Your research instructor will rate the output based on the rubrics below.
7. The lead researcher will rate his/her research associates based on the gravity of effort shared. The lead
researcher MUST see to it that there is a proper basis for the grade he/she will give. The grading will be
done in front of the research associates to avoid biases/personal gains.
8. NO EXTENSIONS will be given in the submission.
9. The lead researcher shall submit all the outputs to the instructor.
10. The output SHOULD be clean and presentable. Print all the documents in SHORT BOND ONLY.
11. The score given will be final and irrevocable.
12. Submit your output on or before August 20, 2018. The submission is until 6:00 pm ONLY. For every
hour of late submission, 5 points shall be deducted from the group’s overall score.
RC CODE SH-GAS-A12-C305-004
PEER ASSESSMENT/EVALUATION
Researchers Area 1
Area 2
Area 3
Area 4
Area 5
Area 6
Area 7
Area 8
Total Score
Lead Researcher: TABAL, CARMELYN Asst. Lead Researcher: LAYAM, CHERRIE MAE Research Associate: MACASERO, MARIANNE Research Associate: URMENETA, ARGEL Research Associate: TILACAS, TRIXIE GAIL Research Associate: Research Associate:
NONIEL JOHN VASQUEZ ERNO, LPT, MAED – ELLT (Candidate)
Research Lecturer
SECOND MASTERY EXAMINATION IN PRACTICAL RESEARCH 2 (QUANTITATIVE)
SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL DEPARTMENT
Excellent (30-27 points):
Excellent to superior work in all
areas as indicated in the
instructors’ written
expectations; exemplary
performance, participation,
creativity and writing; fully
addresses the criterion;
excellent grasp of facts,
analysis and application;
consistently clear statements
and explanations
Good: (26-23 points):
Good to fair work in most
aspects; minor deficiency in
relation to instructors’ written
expectations regarding content,
writing style or procedures;
adequate grasp of facts,
analysis, and practical
application; clear statements
and explanations are limited,
but above average quality
Average: (22-18 points):
Passing work, but in serious
need of improvement in many
areas, especially in regard to
form and content; minimal
grasp of facts, analysis and
application; very few clear
statements or explanations
Below Average (17 points
below):
Confusing, lacks explanation or
completion; little conforming to
instructors’ written
expectations regarding content,
writing style or procedures;
overall, below professional
quality standards; not quality
work
Areas of Assessment Points Earned
Review of Related Literature. (Area 1)
The review of related literature constitutes the introduction, body (using different
techniques), and conclusion with at least 20 studies and gives discussion on each variable
under study.
Research Design. (Area 2)
Research designs constitutes the approach, type, and method/s used by the researchers
following the content in each area.
Research Setting/Locale. (Area 3)
The setting/locale provides clear description of the research area in contextualized manner
and gives reason on why the setting is appropriate for the study.
Research Respondents/Participants. (Area 4)
The participants of the study are described with their demographics and explains why the
participants are fit to the study.
Research Instrument/s. Area 5)
This explains and describes the type of instruments used in the study.
Data Gathering Procedure. (Area 6)
Uses a systematic way of gathering data adhering to the scientific rules/guidelines in getting
necessary information needed in the study.
Statistical Treatment of Data. (Area 7)
The use of statistical measurement and tools in the study is appropriate and fit to the study
design and method; therefore, providing an accurate result of the study.
Grammar, Sentence Construction, and APA Style Format. (Area 8)
Grammar and sentence construction are properly observed in all components of research.
Uses APA format to properly cite the reference material used for research.
General Comments:
_______/240
RUBRICS FOR SECOND MASTERY EXAMINATION IN PRACTICAL RESEARCH 2 (QUANTITATIVE)
GENERAL RULES
1. This assessment rubric will be used in evaluating your Second Mastery Examination in Practical Research 2.
2. The total score for Chapter 2: Review of Related Literature and Chapter 3: Research Methodology
will be your Second Mastery Examination composed of eight (8) areas.
3. Remember, ALL the areas in this chapter will be considered WRITTEN TASKS.
4. All researchers will have the same score ONLY in area 8.
5. Make sure to put the corrected versions of your output as this will be final and irrevocable except for
suggestions and recommendations by your research instructor.
6. Your research instructor will rate the output based on the rubrics below.
7. The lead researcher will rate his/her research associates based on the gravity of effort shared. The lead
researcher MUST see to it that there is a proper basis for the grade he/she will give. The grading will be
done in front of the research associates to avoid biases/personal gains.
8. NO EXTENSIONS will be given in the submission.
9. The lead researcher shall submit all the outputs to the instructor.
10. The output SHOULD be clean and presentable. Print all the documents in SHORT BOND ONLY.
11. The score given will be final and irrevocable.
12. Submit your output on or before August 20, 2018. The submission is until 6:00 pm ONLY. For every
hour of late submission, 5 points shall be deducted from the group’s overall score.
RC CODE SH-GAS-A12-C305-005
PEER ASSESSMENT/EVALUATION
Researchers Area 1
Area 2
Area 3
Area 4
Area 5
Area 6
Area 7
Area 8
Total Score
Lead Researcher: ARGOMIDO, SHARMAINE Asst. Lead Researcher: BONGHANOY, JOSEPH Research Associate: LAGNAYO, ROA MAE Research Associate: FLORES, ROMECEL Research Associate: MARAASIN, HRISTINE FAITH Research Associate: Research Associate:
NONIEL JOHN VASQUEZ ERNO, LPT, MAED – ELLT (Candidate)
Research Lecturer
SECOND MASTERY EXAMINATION IN PRACTICAL RESEARCH 2 (QUANTITATIVE)
SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL DEPARTMENT
Excellent (30-27 points):
Excellent to superior work in all
areas as indicated in the
instructors’ written
expectations; exemplary
performance, participation,
creativity and writing; fully
addresses the criterion;
excellent grasp of facts,
analysis and application;
consistently clear statements
and explanations
Good: (26-23 points):
Good to fair work in most
aspects; minor deficiency in
relation to instructors’ written
expectations regarding content,
writing style or procedures;
adequate grasp of facts,
analysis, and practical
application; clear statements
and explanations are limited,
but above average quality
Average: (22-18 points):
Passing work, but in serious
need of improvement in many
areas, especially in regard to
form and content; minimal
grasp of facts, analysis and
application; very few clear
statements or explanations
Below Average (17 points
below):
Confusing, lacks explanation or
completion; little conforming to
instructors’ written
expectations regarding content,
writing style or procedures;
overall, below professional
quality standards; not quality
work
Areas of Assessment Points Earned
Review of Related Literature. (Area 1)
The review of related literature constitutes the introduction, body (using different
techniques), and conclusion with at least 20 studies and gives discussion on each variable
under study.
Research Design. (Area 2)
Research designs constitutes the approach, type, and method/s used by the researchers
following the content in each area.
Research Setting/Locale. (Area 3)
The setting/locale provides clear description of the research area in contextualized manner
and gives reason on why the setting is appropriate for the study.
Research Respondents/Participants. (Area 4)
The participants of the study are described with their demographics and explains why the
participants are fit to the study.
Research Instrument/s. Area 5)
This explains and describes the type of instruments used in the study.
Data Gathering Procedure. (Area 6)
Uses a systematic way of gathering data adhering to the scientific rules/guidelines in getting
necessary information needed in the study.
Statistical Treatment of Data. (Area 7)
The use of statistical measurement and tools in the study is appropriate and fit to the study
design and method; therefore, providing an accurate result of the study.
Grammar, Sentence Construction, and APA Style Format. (Area 8)
Grammar and sentence construction are properly observed in all components of research.
Uses APA format to properly cite the reference material used for research.
General Comments:
_______/240
RUBRICS FOR SECOND MASTERY EXAMINATION IN PRACTICAL RESEARCH 2 (QUANTITATIVE)
GENERAL RULES
1. This assessment rubric will be used in evaluating your Second Mastery Examination in Practical Research 2.
2. The total score for Chapter 2: Review of Related Literature and Chapter 3: Research Methodology
will be your Second Mastery Examination composed of eight (8) areas.
3. Remember, ALL the areas in this chapter will be considered WRITTEN TASKS.
4. All researchers will have the same score ONLY in area 8.
5. Make sure to put the corrected versions of your output as this will be final and irrevocable except for
suggestions and recommendations by your research instructor.
6. Your research instructor will rate the output based on the rubrics below.
7. The lead researcher will rate his/her research associates based on the gravity of effort shared. The lead
researcher MUST see to it that there is a proper basis for the grade he/she will give. The grading will be
done in front of the research associates to avoid biases/personal gains.
8. NO EXTENSIONS will be given in the submission.
9. The lead researcher shall submit all the outputs to the instructor.
10. The output SHOULD be clean and presentable. Print all the documents in SHORT BOND ONLY.
11. The score given will be final and irrevocable.
12. Submit your output on or before August 20, 2018. The submission is until 6:00 pm ONLY. For every
hour of late submission, 5 points shall be deducted from the group’s overall score.
RC CODE SH-GAS-A12-C305-006
PEER ASSESSMENT/EVALUATION
Researchers Area 1
Area 2
Area 3
Area 4
Area 5
Area 6
Area 7
Area 8
Total Score
Lead Researcher: WONG, DYNAH ROBBIE Asst. Lead Researcher: CAÑETE, KAYE MARGARETTE Research Associate: PADAYOGDOG, NEIL JHON Research Associate: SOCO, DEXIM JOHN Research Associate: Research Associate: Research Associate:
NONIEL JOHN VASQUEZ ERNO, LPT, MAED – ELLT (Candidate)
Research Lecturer
SECOND MASTERY EXAMINATION IN PRACTICAL RESEARCH 2 (QUANTITATIVE)
SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL DEPARTMENT
Excellent (30-27 points):
Excellent to superior work in all
areas as indicated in the
instructors’ written
expectations; exemplary
performance, participation,
creativity and writing; fully
addresses the criterion;
excellent grasp of facts,
analysis and application;
consistently clear statements
and explanations
Good: (26-23 points):
Good to fair work in most
aspects; minor deficiency in
relation to instructors’ written
expectations regarding content,
writing style or procedures;
adequate grasp of facts,
analysis, and practical
application; clear statements
and explanations are limited,
but above average quality
Average: (22-18 points):
Passing work, but in serious
need of improvement in many
areas, especially in regard to
form and content; minimal
grasp of facts, analysis and
application; very few clear
statements or explanations
Below Average (17 points
below):
Confusing, lacks explanation or
completion; little conforming to
instructors’ written
expectations regarding content,
writing style or procedures;
overall, below professional
quality standards; not quality
work
Areas of Assessment Points Earned
Review of Related Literature. (Area 1)
The review of related literature constitutes the introduction, body (using different
techniques), and conclusion with at least 20 studies and gives discussion on each variable
under study.
Research Design. (Area 2)
Research designs constitutes the approach, type, and method/s used by the researchers
following the content in each area.
Research Setting/Locale. (Area 3)
The setting/locale provides clear description of the research area in contextualized manner
and gives reason on why the setting is appropriate for the study.
Research Respondents/Participants. (Area 4)
The participants of the study are described with their demographics and explains why the
participants are fit to the study.
Research Instrument/s. Area 5)
This explains and describes the type of instruments used in the study.
Data Gathering Procedure. (Area 6)
Uses a systematic way of gathering data adhering to the scientific rules/guidelines in getting
necessary information needed in the study.
Statistical Treatment of Data. (Area 7)
The use of statistical measurement and tools in the study is appropriate and fit to the study
design and method; therefore, providing an accurate result of the study.
Grammar, Sentence Construction, and APA Style Format. (Area 8)
Grammar and sentence construction are properly observed in all components of research.
Uses APA format to properly cite the reference material used for research.
General Comments:
_______/240
RUBRICS FOR SECOND MASTERY EXAMINATION IN PRACTICAL RESEARCH 2 (QUANTITATIVE)
GENERAL RULES
1. This assessment rubric will be used in evaluating your Second Mastery Examination in Practical Research 2.
2. The total score for Chapter 2: Review of Related Literature and Chapter 3: Research Methodology
will be your Second Mastery Examination composed of eight (8) areas.
3. Remember, ALL the areas in this chapter will be considered WRITTEN TASKS.
4. All researchers will have the same score ONLY in area 8.
5. Make sure to put the corrected versions of your output as this will be final and irrevocable except for
suggestions and recommendations by your research instructor.
6. Your research instructor will rate the output based on the rubrics below.
7. The lead researcher will rate his/her research associates based on the gravity of effort shared. The lead
researcher MUST see to it that there is a proper basis for the grade he/she will give. The grading will be
done in front of the research associates to avoid biases/personal gains.
8. NO EXTENSIONS will be given in the submission.
9. The lead researcher shall submit all the outputs to the instructor.
10. The output SHOULD be clean and presentable. Print all the documents in SHORT BOND ONLY.
11. The score given will be final and irrevocable.
12. Submit your output on or before August 20, 2018. The submission is until 6:00 pm ONLY. For every
hour of late submission, 5 points shall be deducted from the group’s overall score.
RC CODE SH-GAS-A12-C305-007
PEER ASSESSMENT/EVALUATION
Researchers Area 1
Area 2
Area 3
Area 4
Area 5
Area 6
Area 7
Area 8
Total Score
Lead Researcher: JAPOS, MYRNA DEE Asst. Lead Researcher: MERONIO, BRYAN Research Associate: FIGARUM, MELODY Research Associate: GALANO, JENNIE ROSE Research Associate: CARPINA, NELGIE Research Associate: Research Associate:
NONIEL JOHN VASQUEZ ERNO, LPT, MAED – ELLT (Candidate)
Research Lecturer
SECOND MASTERY EXAMINATION IN PRACTICAL RESEARCH 2 (QUANTITATIVE)
SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL DEPARTMENT
Excellent (30-27 points):
Excellent to superior work in all
areas as indicated in the
instructors’ written
expectations; exemplary
performance, participation,
creativity and writing; fully
addresses the criterion;
excellent grasp of facts,
analysis and application;
consistently clear statements
and explanations
Good: (26-23 points):
Good to fair work in most
aspects; minor deficiency in
relation to instructors’ written
expectations regarding content,
writing style or procedures;
adequate grasp of facts,
analysis, and practical
application; clear statements
and explanations are limited,
but above average quality
Average: (22-18 points):
Passing work, but in serious
need of improvement in many
areas, especially in regard to
form and content; minimal
grasp of facts, analysis and
application; very few clear
statements or explanations
Below Average (17 points
below):
Confusing, lacks explanation or
completion; little conforming to
instructors’ written
expectations regarding content,
writing style or procedures;
overall, below professional
quality standards; not quality
work
Areas of Assessment Points Earned
Review of Related Literature. (Area 1)
The review of related literature constitutes the introduction, body (using different
techniques), and conclusion with at least 20 studies and gives discussion on each variable
under study.
Research Design. (Area 2)
Research designs constitutes the approach, type, and method/s used by the researchers
following the content in each area.
Research Setting/Locale. (Area 3)
The setting/locale provides clear description of the research area in contextualized manner
and gives reason on why the setting is appropriate for the study.
Research Respondents/Participants. (Area 4)
The participants of the study are described with their demographics and explains why the
participants are fit to the study.
Research Instrument/s. Area 5)
This explains and describes the type of instruments used in the study.
Data Gathering Procedure. (Area 6)
Uses a systematic way of gathering data adhering to the scientific rules/guidelines in getting
necessary information needed in the study.
Statistical Treatment of Data. (Area 7)
The use of statistical measurement and tools in the study is appropriate and fit to the study
design and method; therefore, providing an accurate result of the study.
Grammar, Sentence Construction, and APA Style Format. (Area 8)
Grammar and sentence construction are properly observed in all components of research.
Uses APA format to properly cite the reference material used for research.
General Comments:
_______/240
RUBRICS FOR SECOND MASTERY EXAMINATION IN PRACTICAL RESEARCH 2 (QUANTITATIVE)
GENERAL RULES
1. This assessment rubric will be used in evaluating your Second Mastery Examination in Practical Research 2.
2. The total score for Chapter 2: Review of Related Literature and Chapter 3: Research Methodology
will be your Second Mastery Examination composed of eight (8) areas.
3. Remember, ALL the areas in this chapter will be considered WRITTEN TASKS.
4. All researchers will have the same score ONLY in area 8.
5. Make sure to put the corrected versions of your output as this will be final and irrevocable except for
suggestions and recommendations by your research instructor.
6. Your research instructor will rate the output based on the rubrics below.
7. The lead researcher will rate his/her research associates based on the gravity of effort shared. The lead
researcher MUST see to it that there is a proper basis for the grade he/she will give. The grading will be
done in front of the research associates to avoid biases/personal gains.
8. NO EXTENSIONS will be given in the submission.
9. The lead researcher shall submit all the outputs to the instructor.
10. The output SHOULD be clean and presentable. Print all the documents in SHORT BOND ONLY.
11. The score given will be final and irrevocable.
12. Submit your output on or before August 20, 2018. The submission is until 6:00 pm ONLY. For every
hour of late submission, 5 points shall be deducted from the group’s overall score.
RC CODE SH-GAS-A12-C305-008
PEER ASSESSMENT/EVALUATION
Researchers Area 1
Area 2
Area 3
Area 4
Area 5
Area 6
Area 7
Area 8
Total Score
Lead Researcher: GEMINA, VINESS ROSE Asst. Lead Researcher: LISONDRA, LAWRENCE Research Associate: MONCEDA, ROCHARLYN Research Associate: ANDAM, JAY Research Associate: PITOGO, JERAME Research Associate: Research Associate:
NONIEL JOHN VASQUEZ ERNO, LPT, MAED – ELLT (Candidate)
Research Lecturer
SECOND MASTERY EXAMINATION IN PRACTICAL RESEARCH 2 (QUANTITATIVE)
SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL DEPARTMENT
Excellent (30-27 points):
Excellent to superior work in all
areas as indicated in the
instructors’ written
expectations; exemplary
performance, participation,
creativity and writing; fully
addresses the criterion;
excellent grasp of facts,
analysis and application;
consistently clear statements
and explanations
Good: (26-23 points):
Good to fair work in most
aspects; minor deficiency in
relation to instructors’ written
expectations regarding content,
writing style or procedures;
adequate grasp of facts,
analysis, and practical
application; clear statements
and explanations are limited,
but above average quality
Average: (22-18 points):
Passing work, but in serious
need of improvement in many
areas, especially in regard to
form and content; minimal
grasp of facts, analysis and
application; very few clear
statements or explanations
Below Average (17 points
below):
Confusing, lacks explanation or
completion; little conforming to
instructors’ written
expectations regarding content,
writing style or procedures;
overall, below professional
quality standards; not quality
work
Areas of Assessment Points Earned
Review of Related Literature. (Area 1)
The review of related literature constitutes the introduction, body (using different
techniques), and conclusion with at least 20 studies and gives discussion on each variable
under study.
Research Design. (Area 2)
Research designs constitutes the approach, type, and method/s used by the researchers
following the content in each area.
Research Setting/Locale. (Area 3)
The setting/locale provides clear description of the research area in contextualized manner
and gives reason on why the setting is appropriate for the study.
Research Respondents/Participants. (Area 4)
The participants of the study are described with their demographics and explains why the
participants are fit to the study.
Research Instrument/s. Area 5)
This explains and describes the type of instruments used in the study.
Data Gathering Procedure. (Area 6)
Uses a systematic way of gathering data adhering to the scientific rules/guidelines in getting
necessary information needed in the study.
Statistical Treatment of Data. (Area 7)
The use of statistical measurement and tools in the study is appropriate and fit to the study
design and method; therefore, providing an accurate result of the study.
Grammar, Sentence Construction, and APA Style Format. (Area 8)
Grammar and sentence construction are properly observed in all components of research.
Uses APA format to properly cite the reference material used for research.
General Comments:
_______/240
RUBRICS FOR SECOND MASTERY EXAMINATION IN PRACTICAL RESEARCH 2 (QUANTITATIVE)
GENERAL RULES
1. This assessment rubric will be used in evaluating your Second Mastery Examination in Practical Research 2.
2. The total score for Chapter 2: Review of Related Literature and Chapter 3: Research Methodology
will be your Second Mastery Examination composed of eight (8) areas.
3. Remember, ALL the areas in this chapter will be considered WRITTEN TASKS.
4. All researchers will have the same score ONLY in area 8.
5. Make sure to put the corrected versions of your output as this will be final and irrevocable except for
suggestions and recommendations by your research instructor.
6. Your research instructor will rate the output based on the rubrics below.
7. The lead researcher will rate his/her research associates based on the gravity of effort shared. The lead
researcher MUST see to it that there is a proper basis for the grade he/she will give. The grading will be
done in front of the research associates to avoid biases/personal gains.
8. NO EXTENSIONS will be given in the submission.
9. The lead researcher shall submit all the outputs to the instructor.
10. The output SHOULD be clean and presentable. Print all the documents in SHORT BOND ONLY.
11. The score given will be final and irrevocable.
12. Submit your output on or before August 20, 2018. The submission is until 6:00 pm ONLY. For every
hour of late submission, 5 points shall be deducted from the group’s overall score.
RC CODE SH-GAS-A12-C305-009
PEER ASSESSMENT/EVALUATION
Researchers Area 1
Area 2
Area 3
Area 4
Area 5
Area 6
Area 7
Area 8
Total Score
Lead Researcher: DUTALLAS, ABIGAIL Asst. Lead Researcher: MIER, JHINVOH Research Associate: TRAZONA, JAYCOMER Research Associate: CULANAG, CATHERINE JEAN Research Associate: VILLARMEA, GYCIL FAITH Research Associate: Research Associate:
NONIEL JOHN VASQUEZ ERNO, LPT, MAED – ELLT (Candidate)
Research Lecturer
SECOND MASTERY EXAMINATION IN PRACTICAL RESEARCH 2 (QUANTITATIVE)
SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL DEPARTMENT
Excellent (30-27 points):
Excellent to superior work in all
areas as indicated in the
instructors’ written
expectations; exemplary
performance, participation,
creativity and writing; fully
addresses the criterion;
excellent grasp of facts,
analysis and application;
consistently clear statements
and explanations
Good: (26-23 points):
Good to fair work in most
aspects; minor deficiency in
relation to instructors’ written
expectations regarding content,
writing style or procedures;
adequate grasp of facts,
analysis, and practical
application; clear statements
and explanations are limited,
but above average quality
Average: (22-18 points):
Passing work, but in serious
need of improvement in many
areas, especially in regard to
form and content; minimal
grasp of facts, analysis and
application; very few clear
statements or explanations
Below Average (17 points
below):
Confusing, lacks explanation or
completion; little conforming to
instructors’ written
expectations regarding content,
writing style or procedures;
overall, below professional
quality standards; not quality
work
Areas of Assessment Points Earned
Review of Related Literature. (Area 1)
The review of related literature constitutes the introduction, body (using different
techniques), and conclusion with at least 20 studies and gives discussion on each variable
under study.
Research Design. (Area 2)
Research designs constitutes the approach, type, and method/s used by the researchers
following the content in each area.
Research Setting/Locale. (Area 3)
The setting/locale provides clear description of the research area in contextualized manner
and gives reason on why the setting is appropriate for the study.
Research Respondents/Participants. (Area 4)
The participants of the study are described with their demographics and explains why the
participants are fit to the study.
Research Instrument/s. Area 5)
This explains and describes the type of instruments used in the study.
Data Gathering Procedure. (Area 6)
Uses a systematic way of gathering data adhering to the scientific rules/guidelines in getting
necessary information needed in the study.
Statistical Treatment of Data. (Area 7)
The use of statistical measurement and tools in the study is appropriate and fit to the study
design and method; therefore, providing an accurate result of the study.
Grammar, Sentence Construction, and APA Style Format. (Area 8)
Grammar and sentence construction are properly observed in all components of research.
Uses APA format to properly cite the reference material used for research.
General Comments:
_______/240
RUBRICS FOR SECOND MASTERY EXAMINATION IN PRACTICAL RESEARCH 2 (QUANTITATIVE)