sensitivity analysis of sst along nj coast with adroms
DESCRIPTION
Sensitivity Analysis of SST along NJ coast with ADROMS. Weifeng (Gordon) Zhang John Wilkin Julia Levin Hernan Arango Institute of Marine and Coastal Sciences, Rutgers University Oct. 2005. Background. Plenty of measurement in New Jersey shore area; - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Sensitivity Analysis of SST along NJ coast with ADROMS](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032805/56813298550346895d9931c0/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Sensitivity Analysis of SST along NJ coast with ADROMS
Weifeng (Gordon) ZhangJohn WilkinJulia Levin
Hernan Arango
Institute of Marine and Coastal Sciences, Rutgers University
Oct. 2005
![Page 2: Sensitivity Analysis of SST along NJ coast with ADROMS](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032805/56813298550346895d9931c0/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Background
Plenty of measurement in New Jersey shore area;
Ocean forecast and hind-cast with forward ROMS has been running;
To use data assimilation in these area to improve the forecast and measurement;
Adjoint sensitivity analysis with ADROMS is applied first to test the model based on our understanding of the physics in this area.
Adjoint sensitivity analysis: What causes the event?
![Page 3: Sensitivity Analysis of SST along NJ coast with ADROMS](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032805/56813298550346895d9931c0/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Forward Model – Background for Adjoint model
Three idealized cases (steady low river discharge, no tide, no surface exchange):
No wind Southwestward wind Northeastward wind
![Page 4: Sensitivity Analysis of SST along NJ coast with ADROMS](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032805/56813298550346895d9931c0/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Adjoint sensitivity set-up
For upwelling event:
Background state: 5 days bi-hourly forward model output.
Event time:
Adjoint forcing:
Adjoint variable:
FORWARD_MIXING: Adjoint model reads mixing coefficients from forward output
5.0 4.75t DendS DstrS days
21
2J SST dAdt
A t
SST dA dtscope
A t
, , , ,J J J J
temp salt zeta sustr
![Page 5: Sensitivity Analysis of SST along NJ coast with ADROMS](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032805/56813298550346895d9931c0/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
No wind case
J
SST
J
SSS
J
u
SST
![Page 6: Sensitivity Analysis of SST along NJ coast with ADROMS](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032805/56813298550346895d9931c0/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Nowind case (cont’d)
Adjoint variable Magnitude of adjoint variable
Standard deviation of variable
ad_SST (0, 0.02) 5 0.1ad_SSS (-0.002, 0.002) 5 0.01ad_u/ad_v (-0.05, 0.05) 0.5 0.025ad_Akv (-100, 100) 10-4 10-2
ad_Akt (0, 60) 10-5 10-4
ad_Aks (-3, 3) 10-5 10-5
xx
J J J J JJ T S u Akt
T S u Akt
JX
X
![Page 7: Sensitivity Analysis of SST along NJ coast with ADROMS](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032805/56813298550346895d9931c0/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Southward wind case
J
SST
J
sustr
J
SSS
J
SST
SST
![Page 8: Sensitivity Analysis of SST along NJ coast with ADROMS](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032805/56813298550346895d9931c0/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Southward wind case (cont’d)
Adjoint variable Magnitude of adjoint variable
Standard deviation of variable
ad_SST (0, 0.02) 5 0.1ad_SSS (-0.005, 0.005) 5 0.025ad_sustr/ad_svstr (-100, 100) 0.002 0.2ad_u/ad_v (-0.05, 0.05) 0.5 0.025ad_Akv (-150, 150) 10-4 0.015ad_Akt (0, 15) 10-5 10-4
ad_Aks (-10, 5) 10-5 10-4
JX
X
xx
J J J J JJ T S u Akt
T S u Akt
![Page 9: Sensitivity Analysis of SST along NJ coast with ADROMS](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032805/56813298550346895d9931c0/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Northward wind caseJ T T
![Page 10: Sensitivity Analysis of SST along NJ coast with ADROMS](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032805/56813298550346895d9931c0/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Northward wind case (cont’d)
J
SSS
J
svstr
![Page 11: Sensitivity Analysis of SST along NJ coast with ADROMS](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032805/56813298550346895d9931c0/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Summary
ADROMS gives physically reasonable results for sensitivity analysis on idealized application in NJ shore area
Users need to think about the definition of the measure of certain event, J
The validity of linearization to the nonlinear model has to be considered carefully and proved first
______________________________________________________
Great appreciation goes to
John Wilkin, Hernan Arango, Julia Levin, Andrew Moore and B-J Choi!